Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Patient Experience with the Mawid App during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Extensor Digitorum Longus and Tibialis Anterior Taping on Balance and Gait Performance in Patients Post Stroke
Previous Article in Journal
Detailed Changes in Oxygenation following Awake Prone Positioning for Non-Intubated Patients with COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure—A Historical Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Appropriate Needle Length Determined by Ultrasonic Echography for Intramuscular Injection in Japanese Elderly over 50 Years
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Care Dependency of Hospitalized Stroke Patients Based on Family Caregivers’ and Nurses’ Assessments: A Comparative Study

Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061007
by Nursiswati Nursiswati 1,*, Ruud J. G. Halfens 2 and Christa Lohrmann 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061007
Submission received: 4 April 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Initially, I congratulate the authors for choosing the topic, current and relevant.

It is important to empower family caregivers to properly care for the dependent family person.

 The authors present and discuss the object of study, describe the methodology used, and the results are clearly described and discussed in the light of current and relevant references.

 I recommend a more detailed description of the method, for example, the total duration of the session, who made the session, etc

Materials and methods

Line 136 – more space

Line 139 -140- Clarify who made the session and for how long

 Line 142- clarify when the family caregivers fill out the CDS sheet

Line 145 the demographic information sheet only had age, gender, and relation?

 

Author Response

Thank you for the valuable suggestion.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank  you for this interesting study of the difference in care dependency ratings between nurses and family caregivers in Indonesia using the CDS. 

There were a couple of spots I would suggest edits.  Line 52 looks like an incomplete thought.  What do you mean by insufficient social support?  It's an important thought, so could you add a little more? 

Line 192 Table 1 has a problem.  It looks like Table 2 was accidently copied into Table 1?  There is no heading.

Line 200 has a typo, easy fix.  "caregivers"". 

In the results, you point to Table 1 for demographics. I see that you mention comorbidity, but you don't tell the reader what comorbidity is.  Perhaps you might like to explain comorbidity, because you bring it up again in the discussion in line 250. 

I appreciate that stroke patients and caregivers respond differently to care needs in the discussion, and the cultural  norms addressed.

Thank you

Author Response

Thank you for the valuable suggestion.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop