Next Article in Journal
Plants from Arid and Semi-Arid Zones of Mexico Used to Treat Respiratory Diseases: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Rhizosphere Ventilation Effects on Root Development and Bacterial Diversity of Peanut in Compacted Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
24-Epibrassinolide Reduces Drought-Induced Oxidative Stress by Modulating the Antioxidant System and Respiration in Wheat Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Appraisal of the Role of Gaseous Signaling Molecules in Thermo-Tolerance Mechanisms in Plants

by
Harsha Gautam
1,
Sheen Khan
1,
Nidhi
1,
Adriano Sofo
2,* and
Nafees A. Khan
1,*
1
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
2
Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment, Cultural Heritage (DiCEM), University of Basilicata, 75100 Matera, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(6), 791; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060791
Submission received: 11 January 2024 / Revised: 19 February 2024 / Accepted: 9 March 2024 / Published: 11 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Signaling Molecules in Plant Stress Tolerance)

Abstract

:
A significant threat to the ongoing rise in temperature caused by global warming. Plants have many stress-resistance mechanisms, which is responsible for maintaining plant homeostasis. Abiotic stresses largely increase gaseous molecules’ synthesis in plants. The study of gaseous signaling molecules has gained attention in recent years. The role of gaseous molecules, such as nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), and ethylene, in plants under temperature high-temperature stress are discussed in the current review. Recent studies revealed the critical function that gaseous molecules play in controlling plant growth and development and their ability to respond to various abiotic stresses. Here, we provide a thorough overview of current advancements that prevent heat stress-related plant damage via gaseous molecules. We also explored and discussed the interaction of gaseous molecules. In addition, we provided an overview of the role played by gaseous molecules in high-temperature stress responses, along with a discussion of the knowledge gaps and how this may affect the development of high-temperature-resistant plant species.

1. Introduction

Planet’s average temperature change is increasing the global average temperature, resulting in higher temperatures and more intense rain. Moreover, temperature is one of the most important environmental factors influencing crop development and distribution [1]. specific. Plants respond to changes in their environment by changing the expression of specific genes, which can affect physiological and metabolic processes [2]. Between 1951 and 2012, the Earth’s average surface temperature increased by approximately 0.72 °C due to the rise in greenhouse gas emissions caused by human industrial development. If this situation remains unchanged, it is predicted that the average global surface temperature will increase by 3.7 ± 1.1 °C by the end of the twenty-first century [3]. Therefore, adverse, environmental conditions significantly hinder the growth and development of plants, preventing them from reaching their full genetic potential and reducing yield. The majority of crop losses worldwide and a more than 50% decline in the average yield of most crops are attributed to abiotic stresses [4]. Heat stress has emerged as one of the most serious and widespread abiotic stresses that can impede agricultural production due to its impact on crop plants growth, development, and yield. The frequency of heat stress, on the other hand, varies significantly among climatic zones and is dependent on the duration and probability of high temperatures as well as the timing of diurnal plants during high temperatures. Global warming, caused by the rapid and increased emission of greenhouse gases like NO2 and CO2 from various industries and automobile sources, is responsible for the daily rise in average global temperature. Additionally, there are variations in how different plant species and developmental stages respond to high temperatures [5,6,7]. Researchers are gaining interest in identifying compounds that have the potential to protect plants against the negative effects of heat stress. [8,9,10]. Research publications on heat stress in plants showed a notable increase from 2013 to 2023.
Gaseous molecules are currently regarded as significant signaling mediators [11,12,13,14]. Plants under high temperatures have benefited from exogenous application of gaseous molecules, osmoprotectants and phytohormones primarily because of their growth-promoting and antioxidant properties [9,15,16]. According to the most recent research, gaseous molecules have a significant amplifying ability to enhance plant adaptive responses that is still largely unexplored in crop production [13,14,17]. Small gaseous molecules produced by living organisms and serving as signaling agents are referred to as “gasotransmitters”. These molecules can cross cellular membranes; they don’t require a particular receptor to function and can be produced by enzymes. Additionally, they interact closely with other signaling mediators and react with specific cellular target components [17]. The main gasotransmitters in plants are nitric oxide (NO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and carbon monoxide (CO) [14]. Currently, gasotransmitters are also being considered for methane (CH4) and the gaseous phytohormone ethylene (C2H4). The characteristics of ethylene action are not entirely consistent with the concepts of gasotransmitters, and methane’s physiological uses and the mechanisms underlying their synthesis in plants have not yet been thoroughly investigated [14,18,19]. Methane’s inclusion is still unclear despite the fact that few reports highlight its potential value as a signaling molecule [17]. However, Yao et al. [14] recently reported that in addition to NO, CO, and H2S, CH4 is a gasotransmitter involved in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Additionally, gaseous molecules are particularly crucial in helping plants adapt to unfavorable environmental conditions [13,14].
The plants’ ability to generate gaseous molecules in response to abiotic stresses has been shown [13,14,20]. In contrast to other abiotic stresses, all of the gaseous molecules mentioned above control the response to high-temperature stress [21,22,23,24,25]. Exogenous application of gaseous molecule donors mediates a range of plant responses to high-temperature stress, including photosynthesis, oxidative defense, osmolyte accumulation, gene expression, and protein modifications [17,23,26,27,28,29]. High-temperature stress alters the expression of genes involved in direct heat stress protection, such as those for osmoprotectants, detoxifying enzymes, transporters, and regulatory proteins [30,31]. There have been several review articles on the biology of abiotic stress connected to high-temperature stress in plants, but in-depth studies of the relationship between gaseous molecules and high-temperature stress in plants are lacking. Here, we give a thorough overview of the mechanisms governing the regulation of thermo-tolerance by gaseous molecules and highlight their unique features.

2. Gaseous Molecules

Gaseous molecules are small molecules which are produced by living organisms and are used for carrying biological signals. Research on gaseous molecules is advancing quickly, and we are learning more about their potential applications in the fields of science and medicine [32]. Particular biological processes are regulated by gaseous molecules, which include ethylene, NO, H2S, CO2, CO, and CH4. The extensive study and analysis of endogenous gaseous molecules emissions in plants has recently aided our understanding of new signaling pathways. According to earlier studies, plants typically produce these molecules in response to abiotic stress [20,29,33]. Furthermore, growing evidence shows that gaseous molecules can play an essential role in increasing plant tolerance [34,35,36]. Table 1 summarizes a few studies that examine how plants respond when exposed to high temperatures and exogenous gaseous molecules.

2.1. Ethylene

Ethylene is the most basic unsaturated hydrocarbon. It affects of various plant growth and developmental processes, including germination, leaf and flower senescence and abscission, cell elongation, fruit ripening, nodulation, and stress response [53]. Internal signals control ethylene production during development and in response to external stimuli like biotic and abiotic stresses [54,55,56]. Two specific enzymatic processes contribute to the synthesis of the ethylene pathway, which is relatively simple. The enzyme ACC synthase (ACS) transforms the substrate S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) into ACC and 5′-methylthioadenosine (MTA) in the first step [57,58]. The enzyme ACC oxidase (ACO) converts ACC into ethylene, CO2, and cyanide in the second step [59,60]. By converting to β-cyanoalanine, a set of β-cyanoalanine synthases quickly reduces the toxicity of the cyanide by-product [61,62].
Ethylene stress, despite being essential for plant survival and adaptation in the face of environmental challenges, ethylene ultimately causes plant mortality. Depending on whether ACS activity has been induced or suppressed, heat stress can either stimulate or reduce ethylene production. Heat stress generates a substantial buildup of ROS, resulting in oxidative stress. When ROS levels reach a certain threshold, it signals the start of ethylene production. Together with ethylene, oxidative stress, particularly caused by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), causes leaf senescence and chlorosis under heat stress. At the same time, ethylene-induced H2O2 buildup increases ethylene synthesis. Through numerous levels of regulation, ethylene of impacts a plant’s ability to cope with various environmental stresses [63]. In creeping bentgrass, ethylene preserves cells’ structural integrity and stability and plays a crucial role in thermotolerance [64]. Heat shock proteins enhance ERF1 overexpression in Arabidopsis and improve heat tolerance in transgenic lines over wild type by up-regulating the expression of heat tolerance genes [65]. The conferring of thermotolerance by ethylene-mediated signaling also assists in of heat shock factors in rice seedlings [37]. Furthermore, by lowering oxidative stress or engaging genes associated with ethylene signaling in plants, ethylene signaling promotes heat resistance and preserves chlorophyll content [37]. The ethylene response factor (ERF021) has a significant 78.7-fold initiation during heat stress [66], indicating ethylene’s role in soybean tolerance to heat stress. Heat stress activates numerous ethylene-responsive genes (ER5, ER21, LeJERF1, and ER24) in developing pollen grains of Solanum lycopersicum [67]. The regulation of stress-specific genes by ERF1 could enhance way plants tolerate heat, drought, and salt stress [65]. The increased CO2-induced heat stress response in tomato plants could be attributed to the up-regulation of genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis and signaling and the subsequent induction of HSPs [68]. ACC (ethylene precursor) pretreatment increased the survival rate of Arabidopsis at 40 °C, reduced oxidative damage, and induced basal thermotolerance [69]. Additionally, previous work has shown that the Arabidopsis ein2 and etr1 ethylene-signaling mutants are defective in basal thermotolerance [70]. After exposure to ethephon, defensive mechanisms against oxidative stress were enhanced (including increased levels of glutathione-disulfide reductase, glutaredoxin, and protein disulfide isomerase) in tomato [24]. When rice seedlings were exposed to heat stress, ethylene-mediated signaling helped to reduce oxidative damage, maintain chlorophyll levels, and improve thermotolerance [37]. Contrarily, AVG, an ethylene inhibitor, was applied exogenously to creeping bent-grass leaves, which may have prevented leaf senescence by up-regulating antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing ethylene production [71].
Under both favorable and adverse conditions, studies have revealed that ethylene may play a role in synthesizing secondary metabolites, osmolytes, and antioxidant metabolism to modulate environmental stress tolerance [72]. According to in vitro studies, Glycine betaine shields the D1/D2/Cytb559 complex of photosystem II from heat stress (35 °C) [73]. Furthermore, proline accumulation under heat stress partially blocks ethylene production; as a result, low levels of ethylene may be a factor that increases sensitivity to heat caused by proline [74]. According to a recent study by Ma W. et al. [75], melatonin predominantly affects secondary metabolite biosynthesis and plant hormone signal transduction pathways through ethylene. This indicated that ethylene has a role in plants’ ability to produce secondary metabolites. According to Watkins et al. [76], ethylene controlled the accumulation of flavonol in guard cells, indicating that flavonol, in its capacity as an antioxidant, adversely regulates stomatal closure by scavenging ROS under stressful circumstances. Heat stress, on the other hand, can disrupt carbohydrate metabolism, which can impede plant growth and development, sterilize pollen, prevent fertilization, and reduce grain output in various crops. The impact of ethylene on sugar metabolism is well understood, particularly in the context of senescence or fruit ripening, although it has received less attention when heat stress is involved [77,78]. Soluble sugars function as signal molecules to control several photosynthesis-related gene expressions and either act as direct antagonistic signals or alter cellular signaling pathways to trigger stress response signals and boost plant stress resistance [79,80].
According to Wang et al. [81], ethylene considerably raises the fructose and glucose levels in ripe jackfruit but does not affect sucrose and total soluble sugar contents [82]. In cotton plants exposed to heat stress, 1-MCP treatment reduced the amount of soluble sugar content [83]. After AVG application to bentgrass plants, monosaccharides like glucose or fructose levels dropped in response to heat stress [64]. According to Paraankusam et al. [10] and Ali et al. [84], the buildup of ROS and RNS is a significant factor in regulating plant responses to heat stress. When plants are exposed to heat stress, ROS and RNS production often increase quickly, although this depends on the extent and duration of the heat exposure [85,86]. Ethylene could modulate the activity of antioxidant enzymes, which regulates ROS metabolism [87]. When creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) shoots were exposed to heat stress (35 °C), foliar treatment of ACC (100 µM) did not alter the tendency for CAT and APX activity to decline; however, it did increase the activity of SOD and POD [88]. Under heat-stress conditions, ethylene plays a significant role in ROS metabolism. Figure 1 depicts a schematic representation of the impacts of heat stress on photosynthesis and plant growth, as well as ethylene-mediated heat stress tolerance in plants.

2.2. Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) is currently recognized as a crucial signaling molecule in plants, where it controls a wide range of cellular processes involved in growth, development, and environmental interactions. NO is a small, diatomic gas that has no charge is colorless and can diffuse quickly across membranes [89,90]. NO is involved in seed germination, root development, stomatal closure, pathogen challenge, plant reproduction, and stress responses [91,92,93,94,95]. In plants, NO synthesis occurs through two fundamental processes: the oxidative or arginine-dependent system, and NO synthesis occurs through two key processes: the oxidative or arginine-dependent system and the reductive or nitrite-dependent pathway. The two oxidative mechanisms that produce NO and have received the most focus are the oxidation of L-arginine and polyamines. The enzymatic activity of nitric oxide synthases (NOSs) mediates the L-arginine-dependent pathway. L-arginine first combines with molecular oxygen to form N-hydroxy-L-arginine, which is then transformed into citrulline with the production of gaseous NO. The nitrogen atom of the resulting NO molecule derives from the guanidine group of arginine, while the oxygen atom originates from an oxygen molecule involved in the reaction [96,97]. The nitrate/nitrite reduction processes that occur with the involvement of enzymes capable of catalyzing the one-electron reduction of nitrite to NO are related to the reductive routes of NO production. In the apoplast of the barley aleurone layer, non-enzymatic nitrite-dependent NO production was found to occur at low pH and high nitrate concentrations [98,99,100]. The mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC) participates in the enzymatic reductive NO generation in the cytoplasm, chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and mitochondria of plant cells [101,102].
Plants can be protected from heat stress by NO acting either directly as an antioxidant and scavenging ROS or as a signal molecule to induce thermotolerance by up-regulating the expression of heat-responsive genes. In plants, NO has emerged as a critical signaling molecule that activates ROS-scavenging enzymes in response to abiotic stresses such as heavy metal, drought, heat, and salinity stress [103,104,105]. In previous studies, heat stress has been found to increase NO content in wheat, and exogenous NO application improves thermo-tolerance in Lablab purpureus and wheat [106,107,108]. Similarly, rapid NO generation was observed during heat stress in tobacco [109]. High temperatures (38 °C) reduce S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) activity in plants, leading to decreased nitric oxide (NO) levels and increased oxidative damage due to intensified tyrosine nitration [10]. The significance of the GSNOR gene has been well-documented through null mutations (gsnor1-3 and hot5-2), which result in truncated GSNOR protein expression in Arabidopsis, leading to NO hyper-accumulation and heightened heat sensitivity. This underscores the crucial role of maintaining an optimal NO level for plants to develop thermotolerance. In response to thermal stimuli, the activation of the S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR1) encoding allele, hot temperature 5 (HOT5), leads to elevated levels of S-nitrosothiols and nitrate, which undergo conversion to NO due to the transcriptional induction of chloroplast phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator/arginine amidohydrolase-1 genes which causes S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues in NPR1 genes. This process results in the S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues within NPR1 genes, which is crucial for detecting and mediating heat stress responses in plants [10]. The activated NPR genes interact with ROS-dependent systemic signaling, leading to the induction of RBOHD protein, which generates free radicals [107]. This process triggers NO-mediated S-nitrosylation of proteins involved in ribosome assembly and translation in the chloroplast, pathways related to enhancing cytokinins and ABA initiating downstream defense signaling for heat stress adaptation, and various transcription factors like WRKY and MYB, ultimately inducing the expression of molecular chaperones to mitigate protein denaturation and maintain cellular homeostasis during heat stress [107].
Studies on NO-mediated thermo-tolerance show significant variation, and the relationship between NO production and stress resistance is not well-established. Abscisic acid (ABA) has been found to cause H2O2-dependent NO formation, whereas ABA and H2O2 mediated increase in MAPK and antioxidant gene expression depends on endogenous NO generation [110,111]. NO-mediated thermo-tolerance requires ABA.
Inducing antioxidant enzymes, as well as lowering ion leakage, ROS levels and peroxidation of membrane lipids, is how exogenous NO causes heat tolerance in a variety of plant species. In Oryza sativa, tobacco, Arabidopsis, Festuca arundinacea, and wheat, NO was found to have a protective effect against damaging effects caused by high temperatures [106,109,112,113,114]. It has been demonstrated that NO stimulates the expression of HSP-encoding genes. Under heat stress, NO protects chloroplasts from oxidative damage by increasing gene expression, producing small HSP26 [112]. NO, along with ROS, has been shown to play a role in the regulation of HSP70 synthesis and accumulation under heat stress [115]. Xuan et al. [116] discovered evidence for the role of NO in thermotolerance, and they found that NO, via boosting the DNA-binding activity of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) and the accumulation of HSP18.2, positively contributed to thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. The role of NO in stress tolerance has been investigated using pharmacological experiments in which NO levels were altered using donors and scavengers, by employing mutants, or developing transgenic plants [117,118]. Exogenous or endogenous NO has been demonstrated in prior research to significantly enhance plant thermotolerance. NO was shown to significantly increase the thermotolerance of Vicia faba plants. The application of a NO scavenger, 2-4-carboxyphenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO), could significantly reduce NO production, demonstrating that NO is endogenously produced in plants during heat stress [119]. The application of NO donors, dramatically reduced the formation of oxidative stress indicators, such as increased H2O2 levels in wheat under heat stress [41]. Heat-induced damage was minimized in rice seedlings, and the survival rate of wheat leaves and maize seedlings was raised by NO pre-treatment [112,120]. Recent studies have also revealed an interaction between the activation of ROS-scavenging enzymes and, the regulation of heat-responsive genes and the alleviation of heat stress by exogenous NO [107,119]. According to Hossain et al. [121], NO may play a role in the decline of NPQ when exposed to heat stress. Increasing NO levels in plants has been shown to increase heat stress tolerance, which makes it a potential target for developing strategies to reduce the adverse effects of heat stress on plant growth and productivity. Overall, NO plays rolesa critical role in regulating plant responses to heat stress. (Figure 2a) depicts the numerous functions that NO plays in modulating plant heat stress responses.

2.3. Hydrogen Sulfide

With its distinctive smell of rotten eggs, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a small colorless gas, has long been regarded as an environmental hazard [122]. H2S is uncharged, small, and highly diffusible, making it plausible that it could pass through the plasma membrane and those of organelles without the assistance of proteins like aquaporins [123]. Regardless of its intrinsic toxicity, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial component of the group of small diffusible substances used by organisms in cell signaling [124,125,126]. As a key player in the regulating multiple processes regulating plant growth, development, and responses to environmental factors, H2S has emerged as a key signaling molecule. It’s significant to note that the biological effects of H2S in plants involve interactions and cross-talk with signaling pathways of other plant gasotransmitters as well as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [127,128]. The multiple functions of H2S in interactions with phytohormones also influence the biological roles of H2S in plant growth, development, and responses to abiotic stressors. Phytohormones control endogenous H2S levels, but H2S also affects the synthesis, distribution, and signaling of a variety of plant hormones during physiological reactions [129]. Chloroplast, cytosol, and mitochondria are three subcellular spaces in plant cells where H2S is present and can be produced by enzymes involved in the metabolism of cysteine and sulfur. L/D-cysteine desulfhydrase, sulfite reductase, cyanoalanine synthase, cysteine synthase, and O-acetylserine(thol)lyase isoforms are some of the enzymes involved in H2S metabolism [130]. Chloroplast is a crucial component of endogenous H2S production in plants. Sulfite reductase found in chloroplasts, catalyzes the conversion of sulfite to sulfide during the sulfate reduction pathway [131]. H2S is metabolically produced in the cytosol from cysteine. Cysteine biosynthesis produces H2S as a byproduct, which is catalyzed by O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase (OASTL) enzymes [132,133]. There are two steps in the biosynthesis of cysteine: Serine acetyltransferase (SAT) first converts acetyl-CoA and serine into an intermediary product called O-acetyl-Ser (OAS), and OASTL then catalyzes the incorporation of sulfide into OAS to generate cysteine [132]. L-cysteine desulfhydrase (L-CDES) enzyme (specific for L-cysteine) and D-cysteine desulfhydrase (D-CDES) enzyme (specific for D-cysteine) release H2S from cysteine, which results in the production of pyruvate and ammonia [131,133].
Several studies have suggested that H2S plays a role in the tolerance to both high and low temperatures. H2S can influence plant’s ability to to respond to a variety of environmental stimuli under stress conditions by reducing stress-related damage and activating defensive systems [130,134,135] H2S accumulation under heat stress has been reported, and this’ may be connected to plants’ development of stress tolerance [25,136]. On the basis of hydrogen sulfide’s priming effect on plant redox signaling, antioxidant ability, and certain components of cellular defense, plants’ tolerance to abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, heavy metal, and high-temperature stress can be increased [137]. H2S applied exogenously causes plants to cross-adapt to several abiotic stressors [138]. The ability of L-cysteine desulfhydrase (DES1) to function in response to abiotic stress carried on by the synthesis of H2S has been associated with increased tolerance to osmotic stress, heat stress, and drought [23,139,140]. H2S-mediated activation of carbonic anhydrase and OAS-TL activity provided evidence for the role of H2S in plant tolerance to dehydration stress, whereas both dehydration stress and an exogenous application of NaHS stimulated DES1 activity, which increased plant H2S levels derived from accumulated Cys [141]. It is known that H2S regulates the expression of genes essential for synthesizing phytohormones, which could change the relative amounts of hormone levels regulating various processes during plant growth and stress responses [129]. Proline levels are altered by H2S, and proline is crucial for maintaining redox balance and preventing oxidative stress [142,143]. H2S can raise glutathione levels, which is one of its beneficial effects [144]. When subjected to heat stress, NaHS-treated seedlings retained higher antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant levels (such as total glutathione and ascorbate) than controls. This suggested that pretreatment with NaHS could improve heat tolerance in maize seedlings [26]. Reduced glutathione concentrations may decrease under oxidative stress, when ROS formation increases, and thus, by boosting intracellular glutathione, H2S can significantly impact cell function, especially during periods of stress [135]. It showed that H2S in the form of NaHS improved maize seed germination under heat stress, as well as increased tissue viability and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation caused by the application of heat [25]. NaHS acting as an H2S donor, subsequently improved salicyclic acid-induced heat tolerance in maize [145], an effect that was countered by the use of an H2S biosynthesis inhibitor or H2S scavenger. According to Li et al. [46], the H2S donor NaHS was applied to tobacco to improve cell culture viability during heat stress. Here, it was proposed that the effects were caused by extracellular calcium ions across plasma membrane, and that the effects inside cells were dependent on the activity of calmodulin, a common calcium-binding protein. In a different study, strawberry roots were subjected to an acute heat shock in both the presence and absence of NaHS. In H2S-treated tissues, MDA, H2O2, and NO were all reduced [146]. Ascorbate and glutathione metabolism, as well as the activation of the genes for catalase, superoxide dismutase, and the heat shock proteins (HSP70, HSP80, and HSP90), have all been implicated in the prevention of heat-induced tissue damage [146]. Wheat seedlings treated with foliar NaHS exhibited improved heat tolerance. Antioxidant levels increased, indicators of oxidative stress, such as MDA, decreased, and it was suggested that foliar application of H2S donors would be advantageous [45]. Under heat stress, hydrogen sulfide was found to increase glucose utilization and decrease heat-induced photosynthesis reduction in wheat [41]. Understanding how H2S impacts different tissues under different conditions, such as heat stress, is crucial. An overview of the various mechanisms involving H2S in regulating plant responses to heat stress as shown in Figure 2b.

2.4. Carbon Dioxide

The primary cause of global warming is the exponential increase in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. The temperature has risen by 0.85 °C since pre-industrial times, along with a 129 ppm CO2 increase. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that atmospheric CO2 levels will rise from their current level of 412 ppm to 936 ppm along with warmer weather, with temperature increases of up to 2.6 to 4.8 °C in extreme scenarios [3,147]. Regardless of any effects on the climate, rising CO2 concentrations have significant direct effects on plant growth, physiology, and chemistry [148]. The key function of CO2 in plant metabolism accounts for these effects. Agriculture producers worldwide use additional CO2 in their greenhouses to increase agricultural yields while enhancing the quality of their crops, which also experience heat stress [149]. When temperatures are high, plants frequently close their stomata, reducing CO2 flux and photosynthesis [150]. Additionally, under those circumstances, gas solubility rises, affecting the proximity of O2/CO2 to Rubisco active sites, affecting the availability of those gases and influencing photorespiration and respiration, changing the energetic metabolism of plants [151].
Numerous investigations with various plant species found that, in high-temperature environments, increased CO2 positively impacted photosynthesis and biomass yield [152,153,154,155,156]. In tall fescue, elevated CO2 increased both the rate of photosynthetic activity and resistance to heat stress [157]. According to a study conducted by Li X. et al. [48] elevated CO2 reduced heat stress in tomato plants by effectively regulating the cellular redox-balance in an ABA-independent manner. Through increased photosynthesis and water use efficiency, and reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration, elevated CO2 enhances plant growth and biomass [158,159]. Increasing CO2 reduces the impact of stressful conditions including heat and water stress [160,161]. According to Bauweraerts et al. [162], elevated CO2 lessens the detrimental effects of heat and water stresses on the photosynthetic parameters of Quercus rubra and Pinus taeda.
Considering the likely future environmental conditions brought on by global climate change, researchers have been particularly interested in examining the interactions between high temperature, and elevated CO2 on the performance of crop plants (Figure 3). According to research, plants exposed to high CO2 concentrations can reduce the impact of heat stress [163,164]. The impact of CO2 on abiotic stress has been shown to vary significantly, and the underlying mechanisms are still undetermined. It is obvious that increased CO2 causes stomatal closure in addition to providing more carbon. Xu Z. et al. [165] stated that increased CO2 reduced stomatal conductance and controlled gene expression to counteract the negative effects of drought. Elevated CO2 helps plants tolerate high-temperature and scarce water situations by reducing oxidative stress and increasing water status of Arabidopsis. This reduction effect was constant across plant parameters [166]. The performance of plants, however, was not enhanced by elevated CO2 when temperatures were high. In comparison to plants under heat stress and ambient CO2, Yu et al. [163] found that Festuca arundinacea plants exposed to elevated CO2 and heat stress accumulated more metabolites like organic acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates. This led to improved growth, photosynthesis, and respiration. When compared to plants grown at ambient CO2, the combination of elevated CO2 and high temperature (from 25 °C to 42 °C) improved photochemical efficiency, energy use, and biochemical functioning in Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora, especially in the warmer condition [156,167]. According to Abebe et al. [168], increased grain yield, harvest index, cob length, crude protein content, and leaf area were some indicators of the beneficial effects of increased CO2 on temperature-stressed maize plants. Studies on coffee plants under heat stress have revealed increased antioxidant enzyme activity, which controls the excessive accumulation of ROS. Other genes, such as chaperonins and HSP70, were also up-regulated, helping to lessen heat stress and protect PS-II function [167]. Ramalho et al. [169] investigated the effect of heat and elevated CO2 on the quality of Coffea arabica beans. It was found that higher temperatures reduce bean quality, but this effect was mitigated by the interaction with increased CO2, which maintained bean properties nearer to or even better than those obtained under control conditions. Woody plants may benefit from increased by improving their photosynthetic apparatus, cell wall composition, and specialized metabolites that may be involved in stress signaling and defense [170]. Furthermore, Madan et al. [155] noticed that high CO2 exposure did not lessen the effects of heat stress on rice cultivars’ capacity to set seeds or produce grains.

2.5. Carbon Monoxide

Carbon monoxide (CO), which has one carbon and one oxygen atom, is tasteless, colorless, and odorless gas with low molecular weight of 28.01 g/mol. CO has emerged as a signaling molecule in plants due to its capacity to stimulate physiological processes such as seed germination, root development, and stomatal closure [171,172,173]. Wilks [174] was the first to discover CO biosynthesis in plants. Smaller plants at the soil’s surface and the soil-air interface are a significant source of light-independent CO gas [175]. CO is also produced by photosynthesis in living plants [176,177]. Additionally, it has been shown that heme methylene bonds can be disrupted and CO released when hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or ascorbic acid is used [178]. Biochemical findings confirmed Heme oxygenase as a significant enzymatic source of endogenous CO production [179].
CO is rapidly induced in plants by abiotic stresses and modulates plant responses to such stresses. CO has a significant impact on intracellular signaling mechanisms such as ensuring the maintenance of ROS equilibrium in the presence of oxidative stress. CO is crucial for intracellular redox signaling and the activation of antioxidant defense systems [180,181]. According to Cao et al. [172], CO is also required for the reduction of oxidative damage brought on by abiotic stress. Figure 4A illustrates a model of carbon monoxide-mediated signaling in plant responses to abiotic stress such as heat stress. Exogenous CO is toxic to plants and animals at high concentrations, but it plays an important role as a signaling mediator in many physiological processes at low concentrations [182]. The reduction of oxidative damage was caused by the induction of CAT and SOD activity by CO in aqueous solution [183]. There are currently limited studies on the role of CO in plant resilience to high-temperature stress. Hematin (CO donors) significantly improved the ability of cells to recover from heat stress and grow again, as well as reducing malondialdehyde accumulation and a decline in cell vitality. Hematin treatments also increased the activity of L-cysteine desulfhydrase, a crucial enzyme in the biosynthesis of H2S, which in turn caused tobacco cells to accumulate endogenous H2S. Therefore, it suggests that CO pretreatment could increase the heat tolerance of tobacco suspension-cultured cells [23]. In the case of other abiotic stresses, the administration of CO solution increased Indian mustard’s tolerance to mercury (Hg) and prevented the lipid peroxidation and root growth inhibition that was caused by Hg [184,185]. CO, together with other signaling molecules like as phytohormones, NO, and ROS, has a favorable effect on salt or heavy metal stresses [186]. Wheat seedling leaves may benefit from the exogenous application of low concentrations of CO donor hematin to protect them from salt-induced oxidative damage [187]. Wheat seedling roots experience a biphasic burst of CO production in response to NaCl, suggesting CO may be a crucial factor in the tolerance to salinity. CO may increase antioxidant system parameters and maintain ion homeostasis, both of which were partially mediated by NO signaling, thereby conferring increased tolerance to salinity stress in roots of wheat seedlings [188]. CO can increase a plant’s ability to withstand abiotic stress, but its precise biological functions signaling pathway in plants are largely unknown. Although there have been preliminary advances in our understanding of how CO regulates plant growth and development and the ability of plants to withstand environmental stresses, the field of CO research in heat stress tolerance is still in its infancy. Figure 4B demonstrates the role of CH4 in a stressful environment.

2.6. Methane

The second most prevalent greenhouse gas on the earth is methane (CH4). It has no colour, no smell, is safe, volatile, and is slightly soluble in water [19,189]. Methane is a tetrahedral molecule, which is present in both plants and animals, have been found to function as signaling molecule. CH4, a unique gaseous signal molecule, can regulate plant physiological processes such as seed germination, seedling growth, lateral rooting, adventitious root development, and post-harvest freshness [33,171,190,191,192]. CH4 has significant roles in the growth and environmental adaptation of plants. In addition, CH4 plays a crucial role as a key regulator in plants that are experiencing abiotic stress [190,193,194]. CH4 could improve plant abiotic stress resistance in general by strengthening the antioxidant defense system. According to several studies, plants can produce CH4 when the environment is aerobic [195]. The exact mechanism for CH4 production is not yet completely understood. It has been suggested that plants can produce CH4 through four different mechanisms. (1) By impeding the electron transport chain in the inner membrane of plant mitochondria, sodium azide causes the production of CH4. (2) Hydrogen peroxide oxidizes methionine to produce methionine sulfoxide. Methionine sulfoxide can demethylate its own to form methyl radicals by homogenizing the split-cleavage bond that releases CH4. (3) Under blue light, amino acids combine to form amino acid methyl. In canola, amino acid methyl is combined with ROS to produce CH4. (4) Under ultraviolet light, tryptophan produces singlet oxygen. Singlet oxygen can be converted to reactive hydroxyl radical in the presence of a biological reducing agent such as phenol. The hydroxyl radical and the methyl ester groups in pectin combine to form CH4 [196].
Higher plants under normal or stressful conditions could produce and release endogenous CH4 [193,197,198]. Various abiotic stresses, such as ultraviolet radiation [199,200], high temperatures [201], and heavy metal stress [197], are thought to cause plants to produce more CH4. According to a recent study, ROS could increase the production of endogenous CH4 [198]. It has been demonstrated that CH4 protects against ROS, functions as a signaling molecule, and controls numerous genes in plants to influence their growth and development [196]. According to biochemical and molecular research, CH4 can reduce the toxicity of heavy metals like cadmium and copper to plants [194], improve the salt tolerance of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [190], and support maize’s capacity to resist osmotic stress [193]. The protective effects of CH4 on different abiotic stresses in plants have been confirmed by research. CH4 reduced the toxicity of heavy metals and osmotic stress primarily by boosting the activity of key antioxidant enzymes and by restoring redox equilibrium [33,202]. Through partially raising heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression, boosting the antioxidant response, and changing K+/Na+ ion balance, CH4 may help plants tolerate salt stress [190]. Overall, it has been discovered that exposure to CH4 is associated with an increase in the gene expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes, which restores redox equilibrium. However, the mechanisms by which CH4 serves when exposed to high temperatures are not yet understood. high-temperature stress, further studies must be conducted further studies must be conducted in order to better understand the mechanisms that support CH4 under high-temperature stress. Figure 4B presents a simple model to illustrate the function of CH4 in a heat-stressed condition.

3. Crosstalk of Gaseous Molecules

According to findings from earlier studies, crosstalk between NO and H2S exists in the acquisition of abiotic tolerance, like heat stress. Exogenous NO pretreatment improved maize seedling survival rates under heat stress, and NO raised H2S content by boosting L-DES activity. H2S may act downstream of the NO signal in NO-induced heat tolerance, as shown by the fact that H2S synthesis inhibitors and an H2S scavenger completely reversed NO-induced heat tolerance [203]. Similar to this, Li Z.G. et al. [204] found that H2O2 pretreatment increased L-DES activity, which in turn increased the amount of endogenous H2S and improved maize seedling heat tolerance. This effect was further enhanced by the addition of SNP and NaHS. The ROS-scavenging system may have played a significant part in the NO and H2S crosstalk-evoked thermo-tolerance in maize seedlings as NO and H2S crosstalk increased the activity of the ROS-scavenging system in plants [205]. Additionally, ethylene applied as a foliar spray improved rice seedlings thermo-tolerance by modulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, osmolytes, and photosynthetic metabolism through cross-talk with NO and H2S [39]. Wheat seedling thermo-tolerance is improved by NO and H2S crosstalk which reduces glucose sensitivity and oxidative stress via the AsA-GSH cycle [41]. Chinese cabbage and Poplar (Populus trichocarpa) plants exhibit crosstalk between NO and H2S in the development of heat tolerance caused by H2S and NO [206,207]. Despite numerous lines of evidence linking NO to heat tolerance, the interaction between NO and ethylene under heat stress has not been thoroughly studied [10]. However, Medicago sativa plantlets exposed for two hours at 37 °C produced more NO and released less ethylene in alfalfa [208]. There is a possibility of a functional interaction between ethylene, H2S, and S in relation to the ability to withstand heat stress because the biosynthesis of ethylene and H2S is linked to the S-assimilation pathway. In Brassica, ethylene was shown to boost ATP-S activity and S absorption, and it was also discovered to cause H2S production in Arabidopsis leaves by increasing L-/D-cysteine desulfhydrase activity [209,210]. Findings of Pan et al. [68] provide strong evidence that increased CO2-induced heat stress response in tomato plants depends on ethylene production and signaling. Furthermore, elevated CO2-induced ethylene and ERF1 may promote HSFA2 to activate the transcription of HSPs genes, increasing tomato plants’ resistance to heat stress [68]. The induction of several ethylene signaling and synthesis genes by increased CO2 was consistent with earlier research [211].
CO shows crosstalk with other gas signaling molecules like NO, H2S, H2, and CH4 as well as phytohormones like IAA, ABA, and GA [12]. The ability of wheat seedling roots to produce NO after daily exogenous CO treatment suggests that NO may be a component of the CO action’s downstream signal molecule [11]. There are not numerous studies on interactions between CO and H2S. The formation of adventitious roots may be specifically influenced by H2S, which may also encourage the generation of CO, which in turn increases the growth of lateral roots [212]. CO increases cellular heat resistance in tobacco plants, but NaHS increases CO-induced heat resistance. However, both effects can be reduced by PAG, a particular inhibitor of H2S biosynthesis, or by HT, a scavenger of H2S [23]. CH4-induced Cd tolerance in alfalfa seedlings requires DES-dependent H2S signaling via the reduction of cadmium ion inflow and accumulation and the formation of glutathione homeostasis and antioxidant defense [213]. In cucumber, both NO and CO signaling pathways were engaged in CH4-induced adventitious root development [171,214]. NO could play a function in high CO2-induced flavonoid production by connecting the SA pathway [215]. Evidence suggests that NO-dependent abiotic stress tolerance generated by CH4 may involve NR and NOS-like proteins [202].

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The majority of study on a variety of gaseous molecules has been focused on ethylene, nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and to a lesser extent on carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). These molecules can quickly diffuse and modify cellular compartments due to their gaseous nature. Gaseous molecules can interact with one another, plant hormones, nutrients, ions, and polyamines, therefore efficiently reducing plant stress by influencing various defense mechanisms in plants. The main function of gaseous molecules largely depends on their concentration, signaling, and crosstalk with other molecules. The reports that are currently available indicate that these gaseous molecules are released in plants under various adverse circumstances. Importantly, these gaseous molecules increase the ability of plants to withstand a range of environmental stimuli. They do this primarily by controlling the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reducing oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, maintaining ion homeostasis, and restoring glutathione homeostasis. Future research on the biosynthesis of these gaseous molecules should concentrate on the molecular specifics of their production routes in plants under abiotic stress, such as high temperature stress. In animals, carbon monoxide has been extensively studied as a gaseous signaling molecule, but research on CO in plants is still in its initial stages. In connection to the interaction with other signaling molecules, CO can increase plant abiotic stress tolerance, although its precise biological functions in plants and its precise signaling pathway remain largely unclear. Exogenous application of relatively low concentrations of H2S donors via spraying or fumigation consistently shows the positive impact of H2S on plant growth performance under different environmental stresses. H2S may have a significant additional value for the use and advancement in modern agriculture, particularly considering the low cost of these compounds and the ease of their application. Focusing on discovering ethylene’s opposing and beneficial interactions with other signaling indications in the future will help us learn more about how ethylene interacts with various gaseous molecules and environmental factors. Significant work has been done in understanding the mechanism and signaling pathways that govern the achievement of thermo-tolerance in plants. It is still necessary to clarify the role of ethylene and other gaseous molecules in regulating biochemical and molecular processes for plant protection against heat stress. Additionally, the information that is currently accessible may help to strengthen the mechanism for minimizing heat stress damage, particularly in plants with agronomic significance.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, B.; Gao, K.; Ren, H.; Tang, W. Molecular mechanisms governing plant responses to high temperatures. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 757–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Balfagón, D.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Mittler, R.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. High temperatures modify plant responses to abiotic stress conditions. Physiol. Plant 2020, 170, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; Allen, S.K. (Eds.) IPCC Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray, E.A.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Weretilnyk, E. Responses to abiotic stresses. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants; Gruissem, W., Buchannan, B.B., Jones, R.L., Eds.; American Society of Plant Physiologists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 1158–1203. [Google Scholar]
  5. Azhar, M.T.; Wani, S.; Chaudhary, M.; Jameel, T.; Kaur, P.; Du, X. Heat Tolerance in Cotton: Morphological, Physiological, and Genetic Perspectives; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9643–9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Savvides, A.; Ali, S.; Tester, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: Mission possible? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.M.; Fujita, M. Exogenous glutathione confers high temperature stress tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) by modulating antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification system. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 112, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parankusam, S.; Adimulam, S.S.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Sharma, K.K. Nitric oxide (NO) in plant heat stress tolerance: Current knowledge and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, H.; He, L. The role of carbon monoxide signaling in the responses of plants to abiotic stresses. Nitric Oxide 2014, 42, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, M.; Liao, W. Carbon monoxide as a signaling molecule in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kolupaev, Y.E.; Karpets, Y.V.; Beschasniy, S.P.; Dmitriev, A.P. Gasotransmitters and their role in adaptive reactions of plant cells. Cytol. Genet. 2019, 53, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, C.; Huang, D.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Liao, W. Research progress on the functions of gasotransmitters in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Plants 2019, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chan, Z.; Shi, H. Improved abiotic stress tolerance of bermudagrass by exogenous small molecules. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e991577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sagor, G.H.M.; Berberich, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Niitsu, M.; Kusano, T. The polyamine spermine protects Arabidopsis from heat stress-induced damage by increasing expression of heat shock-related genes. Transgenic Res. 2013, 22, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karle, S.B.; Guru, A.; Dwivedi, P.; Kumar, K. Insights into the role of gasotransmitters mediating salt stress responses in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 2259–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kolupaev, Y.E.; Karpets, Y.V.; Shkliarevskyi, M.A.; Yastreb, T.O.; Plohovska, S.H.; Yemets, А.I.; Blume, Y.B. Gasotransmitters in Plants: Mechanisms of Participation in Adaptive Responses. Open Agric. 2022, 16, e187433152207050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Wei, S.; Shen, W. The role of methane in plant physiology: A review. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, D.; Liesche, J.; Shi, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Ethylene-induced hydrogen sulfide negatively regulates ethylene biosynthesis by persulfidation of ACO in tomato under osmotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Song, L.; Zhao, H.; Hou, M. Involvement of nitric oxide in acquired thermotolerance of rice seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 60, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pan, C.; Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Shi, K. Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis under high temperature by attenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes, electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Z.G.; Gu, S.P. Hydrogen sulfide as a signal molecule in hematin-induced heat tolerance of tobacco cell suspension. Biol. Plant 2016, 60, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jegadeesan, S.; Chaturvedi, P.; Ghatak, A.; Pressman, E.; Meir, S.; Faigenboim, A.; Firon, N. Proteomics of heat-stress and ethylene-mediated thermotolerance mechanisms in tomato pollen grains. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.G.; Ding, X.J.; Du, P.F. Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-improved heat tolerance in maize and involvement of proline. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.G.; Yi, X.Y.; Li, Y.T. Effect of pretreatment with hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide on heat tolerance in relation to antioxidant system in maize (Zea mays) seedlings. Biologia 2014, 69, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shokat, S.; Novák, O.; Široká, J.; Singh, S.; Gill, K.S.; Roitsch, T.; Liu, F. Elevated CO2 modulates the effect of heat stress responses in Triticum aestivum by differential expression of an isoflavone reductase-like gene. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 7594–7609. [Google Scholar]
  28. Poór, P.; Nawaz, K.; Gupta, R.; Ashfaque, F.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene involvement in the regulation of heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 41, 675–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdulmajeed, A.M.; Derby, S.R.; Strickland, S.K.; Qaderi, M.M. Interactive effects of temperature and UVB radiation on methane emissions from different organs of pea plants grown in hydroponic system. J. Photochem. 2017, 166, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Semenov, M.A.; Halford, N.G. Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2791–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, R. Overview of gasotransmitters and the related signaling network. In Gasotransmitters; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cui, W.; Cao, H.; Yao, P.; Pan, J.; Gu, Q.; Xu, S.; Shen, W. Methane enhances aluminum resistance in alfalfa seedlings by reducing aluminum accumulation and reestablishing redox homeostasis. Biometals J. 2017, 30, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jin, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Q.; Sun, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Pei, Y. Hydrogen sulfide mediates ion fluxes inducing stomatal closure in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil. 2017, 419, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maryan, K.E.; Lahiji, H.S.; Farrokhi, N.; Komeleh, H.H. Analysis of Brassica napus dehydrins and their Co-Expression regulatory networks in relation to cold stress. Gene Expr. Patterns 2019, 31, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, D.; Cao, H.; Fang, W.; Pan, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Shen, W. Linking hydrogen-enhanced rice aluminum tolerance with the reestablishment of GA/ABA balance and miRNA-modulated gene expression: A case study on germination. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, Y.S.; Yang, C.Y. Ethylene-mediated signaling confers thermotolerance and regulates transcript levels of heat shock factors in rice seedlings under heat stress. Bot. Stud. 2019, 60, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sehar, Z.; Gautam, H.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene-and proline-dependent regulation of antioxidant enzymes to mitigate heat stress and boost photosynthetic efficacy in wheat plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 42, 2683–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gautam, H.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Mir, I.R.; Khan, N.A. Hydrogen sulfide, ethylene, and nitric oxide regulate redox homeostasis and protect photosynthetic metabolism under high temperature stress in rice plants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sharma, N.; Shree, B.; Khurana, P. Myo-inositol phosphate synthase improves heat stress tolerance by ethylene-mediated modulation of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency. Protoplasma 2023, 206, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iqbal, N.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide coordinately reduce glucose sensitivity and decrease oxidative stress via ascorbate-glutathione cycle in heat-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Manafi, H.; Baninasab, B.; Gholami, M.; Talebi, M. Nitric oxide induced thermotolerance in strawberry plants by activation of antioxidant systems and transcriptional regulation of heat shock proteins. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 783–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, J.D.; Yun, J.Y.; Zhang, T.H.; Zhao, H.L. Presoaking with nitric oxide donor SNP alleviates heat shock damages in mung bean leaf discs. Bot. Stud. 2006, 47, 129–136. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sita, K.; Sehgal, A.; Bhardwaj, A.; Bhandari, K.; Kumar, S.; Prasad, P.V.; Nayyar, H. Nitric oxide secures reproductive efficiency in heat-stressed lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) plants by enhancing the photosynthetic ability to improve yield traits. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 2549–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Min, Y.A.N.G.; Qin, B.P.; Ping, W.A.N.G.; Li, M.L.; Chen, L.L.; Chen, L.T.; Yin, Y.P. Foliar application of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), a hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor, can protect seedlings against heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2745–2758. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, Z.G.; Gong, M.; Xie, H.; Yang, L.; Li, J. Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-induced heat tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) suspension cultured cells and involvement of Ca2+ and calmodulin. Plant Sci. 2012, 185, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.G.; Zhu, L.P. Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-induced accumulation of betaine is involved in the acquisition of heat tolerance in maize seedlings. Braz. J. Bot. 2015, 38, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, X.; Ahammed, G.J.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, G.Q.; Sun, Z.H.; Zhou, J.; Shi, K. Carbon dioxide enrichment alleviates heat stress by improving cellular redox homeostasis through an ABA-independent process in tomato plants. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ulfat, A.; Mehmood, A.; Ahmad, K.S.; Ul-Allah, S. Elevated carbon dioxide offers promise for wheat adaptation to heat stress by adjusting carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 2345–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ahmed, F.E.; Hall, A.E.; Madore, M.A. Interactive effects of high temperature and elevated carbon dioxide concentration on cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Plant Cell Environ. 1993, 16, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, J.; Li, R.; Fan, N.; Yang, Z.; Huang, B. Metabolic pathways involved in carbon dioxide enhanced heat tolerance in Bermudagrass. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shkliarevskyi, M.A.; Kolupaev, Y.E.; Karpets, Y.V.; Lugovaya, A.A.; Bessonova, V.P. Involvement of nitrate reductase and nitric oxide (NO) in implementation of the stress-protective action of a carbon monoxide (CO) donor on wheat seedlings under hyperthermy. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 68, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Argueso, C.T.; Hansen, M.; Kieber, J.J. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 26, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pattyn, J.; Vaughan-Hirsch, J.; Van de Poel, B. The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis: A complex multilevel control circuitry. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 770–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bürstenbinder, K.; Sauter, M. Early Events in the Ethylene Biosynthetic Pathway–Regulation of the Pools of Methionine and S-Adenosylmethionine. Annu. Plant Rev. Vol. 44 Plant Horm. Ethyl. 2012, 44, 19–52. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, K.L.C.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S131–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Adams, D.O.; Yang, S. Ethylene biosynthesis: Identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Boller, T.; Herner, R.C.; Kende, H. Assay for and enzymatic formation of an ethylene precursor, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Planta 1979, 145, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hamilton, A.J.; Bouzayen, M.; Grierson, D. Identification of a tomato gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme by expression in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 7434–7437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ververidis, P.; John, P. Complete recovery in vitro of ethylene-forming enzyme activity. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 725–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yip, W.K.; Yang, S.F. Cyanide metabolism in relation to ethylene production in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hatzfeld, Y.; Maruyama, A.; Schmidt, A.; Noji, M.; Ishizawa, K.; Saito, K. β-Cyanoalanine synthase is a mitochondrial cysteine synthase-like protein in spinach and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Husain, T.; Fatima, A.; Suhel, M.; Singh, S.; Sharma, A.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, V.P. A brief appraisal of ethylene signaling under abiotic stress in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1782051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jespersen, D.; Yu, J.; Huang, B. Metabolite responses to exogenous application of nitrogen, cytokinin, and ethylene inhibitors in relation to heat-induced senescence in creeping bentgrass. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xu, C.; Xia, Z.; Huang, Z.; Xia, C.; Huang, J.; Zha, M.; Zhang, C. Understanding the physiological and transcriptional mechanism of reproductive stage soybean in response to heat stress. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 2019, 2, e200004. [Google Scholar]
  67. Frank, G.; Pressman, E.; Ophir, R.; Althan, L.; Shaked, R.; Freedman, M.; Firon, N. Transcriptional profiling of maturing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) microspores reveals the involvement of heat shock proteins, ROS scavengers, hormones, and sugars in the heat stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3891–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Pan, C.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Q.; Fan, F.; Fu, R.; Ahammed, G.J.; Shi, K. Role of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in elevated CO2-induced heat stress response in tomato. Planta 2019, 250, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Larkindale, J.; Knight, M.R. Protection against heat stress-induced oxidative damage in Arabidopsis involves calcium, abscisic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Larkindale, J.; Hall, J.D.; Knight, M.R.; Vierling, E. Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 882–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, Y.; Huang, B. Effects of foliar-applied ethylene inhibitor and synthetic cytokinin on creeping bentgrass to enhance heat tolerance. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 1876–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Kumar, R.; Kohli, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Kapoor, D.; Bali, A.S.; Shahzad, B.; Khanna, K.; et al. Abiotic stress management in plants: Role of ethylene. In Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology; Roychoudhury, A., Tripathi, D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 185–208. [Google Scholar]
  73. Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Hayashi, H.; Nishiyama, Y.; Ivanov, A.G.; Aliev, J.A.; Klimov, V.V.; Carpentier, R. Glycinebetaine protects the D1/D2/Cytb559 complex of photosystem II against photo-induced and heat-induced inactivation. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 160, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lv, W.T.; Lin, B.; Zhang, M.; Hua, X.J. Proline accumulation is inhibitory to Arabidopsis seedlings during heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1921–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, W.; Xu, L.; Gao, S.; Lyu, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, Y. Melatonin alters the secondary metabolite profile of grape berry skin by promoting VvMYB14-mediated ethylene biosynthesis. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Watkins, J.M.; Hechler, P.J.; Muday, G.K. Ethylene-induced flavonol accumulation in guard cells suppresses reactive oxygen species and moderates stomatal aperture. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1707–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, Y.; Grimplet, J.; David, K.; Castellarin, S.D.; Terol, J.; Wong, D.C.; Chervin, C. Ethylene receptors and related proteins in climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Durán-Soria, S.; Pott, D.M.; Osorio, S.; Vallarino, J.G. Sugar signaling during fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 564917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Khan, N.; Ali, S.; Zandi, P.; Mehmood, A.; Ullah, S.; Ikram, M.; Ismail, M.A.S.; Babar, M.A. Role of sugars, amino acids and organic acids in improving plant abiotic stress tolerance. Pak. J. Bot. 2020, 52, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Rosa, M.; Prado, C.; Podazza, G.; Interdonato, R.; González, J.A.; Hilal, M.; Prado, F.E. Soluble sugars: Metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: A complex network in the life of plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Feng, F.; Yang, Z.; Ye, C. Effects of ethylene on carbohydrate metabolism and enzyme activities in postharvest ripening jackfruit. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2017, 39, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kępczyńska, E.; Zielińska, S. The role of endogenous ethylene in carbohydrate metabolism of Medicago sativa L. somatic embryos in relation to their regenerative ability. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yuan, C.; Cothren, J.T.; Chen, D.; Ibrahim, A.M.H.; Lombardini, L. Ethylene-inhibiting compound 1-MCP delays leaf senescence in cotton plants under abiotic stress conditions. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Arif, M.S.; Ahmad, R.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Ali, B.; Hussain, A. Approaches in enhancing thermotolerance in plants: An updated review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 456–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Locato, V.; Gadaleta, C.; De Gara, L.; De Pinto, M.C. Production of reactive species and modulation of antioxidant network in response to heat shock: A critical balance for cell fate. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 1606–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pucciariello, C.; Banti, V.; Perata, P. ROS signaling as common element in low oxygen and heat stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 59, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Takács, Z.; Poór, P.; Borbély, P.; Czékus, Z.; Szalai, G.; Tari, I. H2O2 homeostasis in wild-type and ethylene-insensitive Never ripe tomato in response to salicylic acid treatment in normal photoperiod and in prolonged darkness. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Larkindale, J.; Huang, B. Thermotolerance and antioxidant systems in Agrostis stolonifera: Involvement of salicylic acid, abscisic acid, calcium, hydrogen peroxide, and ethylene. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Beligni, M.V.; Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and de-etiolation, and inhibits hypocotyl elongation, three light-inducible responses in plants. Planta 2000, 210, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yamasaki, H.; Sakihama, Y.; Takahashi, S. An alternative pathway for nitric oxide production in plants: New features of an old enzyme. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4, 128–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Arc, E.; Galland, M.; Godin, B.; Cueff, G.; Rajjou, L. Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gayatri, G.; Agurla, S.; Raghavendra, A.S. Nitric oxide in guard cells as an important secondary messenger during stomatal closure. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mur, L.A.; Carver, T.L.; Prats, E. NO way to live; the various roles of nitric oxide in plant–pathogen interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hiscock, S.; Bright, J.; McInnis, S.M.; Desikan, R.; Hancock, J.T. Signaling on the stigma: Potential new roles for ROS and NO in plant cell signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hu, J.; Yang, H.; Mu, J.; Lu, T.; Peng, J.; Deng, X.; Zuo, J. Nitric oxide regulates protein methylation during stress responses in plants. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kolbert, Z.S.; Barroso, J.B.; Brouquisse, R.; Corpas, F.J.; Gupta, K.J.; Lindermayr, C.; Hancock, J.T. A forty year journey: The generation and roles of NO in plants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 93, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Del Castello, F.; Nejamkin, A.; Cassia, R.; Correa-Aragunde, N.; Fernández, B.; Foresi, N.; Lamattina, L. The era of nitric oxide in plant biology: Twenty years tying up loose ends. Nitric Oxide 2019, 85, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Astier, J.; Gross, I.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide production in plants: An update. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3401–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yamasaki, H. Nitrite–dependent nitric oxide production pathway: Implications for involvement of active nitrogen species in photoinhibition in vivo. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 355, 1477–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bethke, P.C.; Badger, M.R.; Jones, R.L. Apoplastic synthesis of nitric oxide by plant tissues. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Corpas, F.J.; Del Río, L.A.; Palma, J.M. Impact of nitric oxide (NO) on the ROS metabolism of peroxisomes. Plants 2019, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gupta, K.J.; Kumari, A.; Florez-Sarasa, I.; Fernie, A.R.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Interaction of nitric oxide with the components of the plant mitochondrial electron transport chain. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3413–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ismail, G.S.M. Protective role of nitric oxide against arsenic-induced damages in germinating mung bean seeds. Acta Physiol. Plant 2012, 34, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gautam, H.; Sehar, Z.; Rehman, M.T.; Hussain, A.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Khan, N.A. Nitric oxide enhances photosynthetic nitrogen and sulfur-use efficiency and activity of ascorbate-glutathione cycle to reduce high temperature stress-induced oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shams, M.; Ekinci, M.; Ors, S.; Turan, M.; Agar, G.; Kul, R.; Yildirim, E. Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress effects of pepper seedlings by altering nutrient uptake, enzyme activity and osmolyte accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 25, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Karpets, Y.V.; Kolupaev, Y.E.; Vayner, A.A. Functional interaction between nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide during formation of wheat seedling induced heat resistance. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rai, K.K.; Rai, N.; Aamir, M.; Tripathi, D.; Rai, S.P. Interactive role of salicylic acid and nitric oxide on transcriptional reprogramming for high temperature tolerance in Lablab purpureus L.: Structural and functional insights using computational approaches. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 309, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kumar, R.R.; Tasleem, M.; Jain, M.; Ahuja, S.; Goswami, S.; Bakshi, S.; Praveen, S. Nitric oxide triggered defense network in wheat: Augmenting tolerance and grain-quality related traits under heat-induced oxidative damage. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 158, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gould, K.S.; Lamotte, O.; Klinguer, A.; Pugin, A.; Wendehenne, D. Nitric oxide production in tobacco leaf cells: A generalized stress response? Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 1851–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Song, L.; Ding, W.; Shen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, L. Nitric oxide mediates abscisic acid induced thermotolerance in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed under heat stress. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Neill, S.; Barros, R.; Bright, J.; Desikan, R.; Hancock, J.; Harrison, J.; Wilson, I. Nitric oxide, stomatal closure, and abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Uchida, A.; Jagendorf, A.T.; Hibino, T.; Takabe, T.; Takabe, T. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Jia, L.; Chu, H.; Zhou, S.; Chen, K.; Zhao, L. Hydrogen peroxide acts upstream of nitric oxide in the heat shock pathway in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 2184–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chen, K.; Chen, L.; Fan, J.; Fu, J. Alleviation of heat damage to photosystem II by nitric oxide in tall fescue. Photosyn. Res. 2013, 116, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Piterková, J.; Luhová, L.; Mieslerová, B.; Lebeda, A.; Petřivalský, M. Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species regulate the accumulation of heat shock proteins in tomato leaves in response to heat shock and pathogen infection. Plant Sci. 2013, 207, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xuan, Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, L. Nitric oxide functions as a signal and acts upstream of AtCaM3 in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1895–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chun, H.J.; Park, H.C.; Koo, S.C.; Lee, J.H.; Park, C.Y.; Choi, M.S.; Kim, M.C. Constitutive expression of mammalian nitric oxide synthase in tobacco plants triggers disease resistance to pathogens. Mol. Cells 2012, 34, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Simontacchi, M.; Galatro, A.; Ramos-Artuso, F.; Santa-María, G.E. Plant survival in a changing environment: The role of nitric oxide in plant responses to abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Alamri, S.A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Khaishany, M.Y.; Khan, M.N.; Ali, H.M.; Alakeel, K.A. Nitric oxide-mediated cross-talk of proline and heat shock proteins induce thermotolerance in Vicia faba L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sehar, Z.; Mir, I.R.; Khan, S.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric oxide and proline modulate redox homeostasis and photosynthetic metabolism in wheat plants under high temperature stress acclimation. Plants 2023, 12, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hossain, K.K.; Nakamura, T.; Yamasaki, H. Effect of nitric oxide on leaf non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence under heat-stress conditions. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 58, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lefer, D. Redox pioneer: Professor hideo kimura. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 1699–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mathai, J.C.; Missner, A.; Kügler, P.; Saparov, S.M.; Zeidel, M.L.; Lee, J.K.; Pohl, P. No facilitator required for membrane transport of hydrogen sulfide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16633–16638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Jiang, J.; Chan, A.; Ali, S.; Saha, A.; Haushalter, K.J.; Lam, W.L.M.; Boss, G.R. Hydrogen sulfide—Mechanisms of toxicity and development of an antidote. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Hancock, J.T. Harnessing evolutionary toxins for signaling: Reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide in plant cell regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Filipovic, M.R.; Jovanović, V.M. More than just an intermediate: Hydrogen sulfide signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4733–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Scuffi, D.; Lamattina, L.; García-Mata, C. Gasotransmitters and stomatal closure: Is there redundancy, concerted action, or both? Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Hancock, J.T.; Whiteman, M. Hydrogen sulfide signaling: Interactions with nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1365, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. He, H.; Garcia-Mata, C.; He, L.F. Interaction between hydrogen sulfide and hormones in plant physiological responses. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 87, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Corpas, F.J. Hydrogen sulfide: A new warrior against abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, T.; Tian, M.; Han, Y. Hydrogen sulfide: A multi-tasking signal molecule in the regulation of oxidative stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2862–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, D.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C.; Xie, Y. Hydrogen sulfide, a signaling molecule in plant stress responses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gotor, C.; García, I.; Aroca, Á.; Laureano-Marín, A.M.; Arenas-Alfonseca, L.; Jurado-Flores, A.; Romero, L.C. Signaling by hydrogen sulfide and cyanide through post-translational modification. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4251–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Guo, H.; Xiao, T.; Zhou, H.; Xie, Y.; Shen, W. Hydrogen sulfide: A versatile regulator of environmental stress in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hancock, J.T. Hydrogen sulfide and environmental stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Chen, J.; Shang, Y.T.; Wang, W.H.; Chen, X.Y.; He, E.M.; Zheng, H.L.; Shangguan, Z. Hydrogen sulfide-mediated polyamines and sugar changes are involved in hydrogen sulfide-induced drought tolerance in Spinacia oleracea seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Fotopoulos, V.; Christou, A.; Manganaris, G.A. Hydrogen sulfide as a potent regulator of plant responses to abiotic stress factors. In Molecular Approaches in Plant Abiotic Stress; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 353–373. [Google Scholar]
  138. Li, Z.G.; Min, X.; Zhou, Z.H. Hydrogen sulfide: A signal molecule in plant cross-adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Khan, M.N.; Mobin, M.; Abbas, Z.K.; Siddiqui, M.H. Nitric oxide-induced synthesis of hydrogen sulfide alleviates osmotic stress in wheat seedlings through sustaining antioxidant enzymes, osmolyte accumulation and cysteine homeostasis. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jin, Z.; Xue, S.; Luo, Y.; Tian, B.; Fang, H.; Li, H.; Pei, Y. Hydrogen sulfide interacting with abscisic acid in stomatal regulation responses to drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 62, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Khan, M.N.; AlZuaibr, F.M.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; MAli, H.; Al-Muwayhi, M.A.; Al-Haque, H.N. Hydrogen sulfide-mediated activation of O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase and L/D-cysteine desulfhydrase enhance dehydration tolerance in Eruca sativa Mill. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. He, H.; He, L.F. Regulation of gaseous signaling molecules on proline metabolism in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Kavikishor, P.B.; Sreenivasulu, N.E.S.E. Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. De Kok, L.J.; Bosma, W.; Maas, F.M.; Kuiper, P.J.C. The effect of short-term H2S fumigation on water-soluble sulphydryl and glutathione levels in spinach. Plant Cell Environ. 1985, 8, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Li, Z.G. Synergistic effect of antioxidant system and osmolyte in hydrogen sulfide and salicylic acid crosstalk-induced heat tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e1051278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Christou, A.; Filippou, P.; Manganaris, G.A.; Fotopoulos, V. Sodium hydrosulfide induces systemic thermotolerance to strawberry plants through transcriptional regulation of heat shock proteins and aquaporin. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. IPCC Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  148. Ziska, L.H. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide and plant biology: The overlooked paradigm. DNA Cell Biol. 2008, 27, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Sun, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, Y.; Yu, J. Stimulated leaf dark respiration in tomato in an elevated carbon dioxide atmosphere. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. DaMatta, F.M.; Grandis, A.; Arenque, B.C.; Buckeridge, M.S. Impacts of climate changes on crop physiology and food quality. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1814–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Taub, D.R.; Seemann, J.R.; Coleman, J.S. Growth in elevated CO2 protects photosynthesis against high-temperature damage. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ghannoum, O.; Phillips, N.G.; Conroy, J.P.; Smith, R.A.; Attard, R.D.; Woodfield, R.; Tissue, D.T. Exposure to preindustrial, current and future atmospheric CO2 and temperature differentially affects growth and photosynthesis in Eucalyptus. Glob. Change Biol. 2010, 16, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Vu, J.C.; Allen Jr, L.H. Stem juice production of the C4 sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) is enhanced by growth at double-ambient CO2 and high temperature. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Madan, P.; Jagadish, S.V.K.; Craufurd, P.Q.; Fitzgerald, M.; Lafarge, T.; Wheeler, T.R. Effect of elevated CO2 and high temperature on seed-set and grain quality of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3843–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Rodrigues, W.P.; Martins, M.Q.; Fortunato, A.S.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Semedo, J.N.; Simões-Costa, M.C.; Ramalho, J.C. Long-term elevated air [CO2] strengthens photosynthetic functioning and mitigates the impact of supra-optimal temperatures in tropical Coffea arabica and C. canephora species. Glob. Change Biol. 2016, 22, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yu, J.; Yang, Z.; Jespersen, D.; Huang, B. Photosynthesis and protein metabolism associated with elevated CO2-mitigation of heat stress damages in tall fescue. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Qaderi, M.M.; Kurepin, L.V.; Reid, D.M. Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to three components of global climate change: Temperature, carbon dioxide and drought. Physiol. Plant 2006, 128, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jones, T.B.; Nenadic, N.G. Electromechanics and MEMS; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  160. Naudts, K.V.; Van den Berge, J.; Janssens, I.A.; Nijs, I.; Ceulemans, R. Combined effects of warming and elevated CO2 on the impact of drought in grassland species. Plant Soil 2013, 369, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zinta, G.; AbdElgawad, H.; Domagalska, M.A.; Vergauwen, L.; Knapen, D.; Nijs, I.; Asard, H. Physiological, biochemical, and genome-wide transcriptional analysis reveals that elevated CO2 mitigates the impact of combined heat wave and drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana at multiple organizational levels. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 20, 3670–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bauweraerts, I.; Wertin, T.M.; Ameye, M.; McGuire, M.A.; Teskey, R.O.; Steppe, K. The effect of heat waves, elevated [CO2] and low soil water availability on northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings. Glob. Change Biol. 2013, 19, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Yu, J.; Du, H.; Xu, M.; Huang, B. Metabolic responses to heat stress under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in a cool-season grass species. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 137, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. May, P.; Liao, W.; Wu, Y.; Shuai, B.; Richard McCombie, W.; Zhang, M.Q.; Liu, Q.A. The effects of carbon dioxide and temperature on microRNA expression in Arabidopsis development. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Xu, Z.; Shimizu, H.; Yagasaki, Y.; Ito, S.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, G. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, drought, and warming on plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 692–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Abo Gamar, M.I.; Kisiala, A.; Emery, R.N.; Yeung, E.C.; Stone, S.L.; Qaderi, M.M. Elevated carbon dioxide decreases the adverse effects of higher temperature and drought stress by mitigating oxidative stress and improving water status in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2019, 250, 1191–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Martins, M.Q.; Rodrigues, W.P.; Fortunato, A.S.; Leitao, A.E.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Pais, I.P.; Ramalho, J.C. Protective response mechanisms to heat stress in interaction with high [CO2] conditions in Coffea spp. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Abebe, A.; Pathak, H.; Singh, S.D.; Bhatia, A.; Harit, R.C.; Kumar, V. Growth, yield and quality of maize with elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature in north–west India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 218, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ramalho, J.C.; Pais, I.P.; Leitão, A.E.; Guerra, M.; Reboredo, F.H.; Máguas, C.M.; DaMatta, F.M. Can elevated air [CO2] conditions mitigate the predicted warming impact on the quality of coffee bean? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Lobo, A.K.M.; Catarino, I.C.; Silva, E.A.; Centeno, D.C.; Domingues, D.S. Physiological and molecular responses of woody plants exposed to future atmospheric CO2 levels under abiotic stresses. Plants 2022, 11, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cui, W.; Qi, F.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Shen, W. Methane-rich water induces cucumber adventitious rooting through heme oxygenase1/carbon monoxide and Ca2+ pathways. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Cao, Z.; Huang, B.; Wang, Q.; Xuan, W.; Ling, T.; Zhang, B.; Shen, W. Involvement of carbon monoxide produced by heme oxygenase in ABA-induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba and its proposed signal transduction pathway. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2007, 52, 2365–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Dekker, J.; Hargrove, M. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. V. Effects of gaseous environment on giant foxtail (Setaria faberii)(Poaceae) seed germination. Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Wilks, S.S. Carbon monoxide in green plants. Science 1959, 129, 964–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Siegel, S.M.; Siegel, B.Z. Biogenesis of carbon monoxide: Production by fungi and seed plants in the dark. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 3117–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lüttge, U.; Fischer, K. Light-dependent net CO-evolution by C3 and C4 plants. Planta 1980, 149, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Tarr, M.A.; Miller, W.L.; Zepp, R.G. Direct carbon monoxide photoproduction from plant matter. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1995, 100, 11403–11413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Dulak, J.; Józkowicz, A. Carbon monoxide—A” new” gaseous modulator of gene expression. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2003, 50, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Xuan, W.; Zhu, F.Y.; Xu, S.; Huang, B.K.; Ling, T.F.; Qi, J.Y.; Shen, W.B. The heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system is involved in the auxin-induced cucumber adventitious rooting process. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Boczkowski, J.; Poderoso, J.J.; Motterlini, R. CO–metal interaction: Vital signaling from a lethal gas. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Piantadosi, C.A. Carbon monoxide, reactive oxygen signaling, and oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Boehning, D.; Moon, C.; Sharma, S.; Hurt, K.J.; Hester, L.D.; Ronnett, G.V.; Snyder, S.H. Carbon monoxide neurotransmission activated by CK2 phosphorylation of heme oxygenase-2. Neuron 2003, 40, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Liu, K.; Xu, S.; Xuan, W.; Ling, T.; Cao, Z.; Huang, B.; Shen, W. Carbon monoxide counteracts the inhibition of seed germination and alleviates oxidative damage caused by salt stress in Oryza sativa. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Han, Y.; Xuan, W.; Yu, T.; Fang, W.B.; Lou, T.L.; Gao, Y.; Shen, W.B. Exogenous hematin alleviates mercury-induced oxidative damage in the roots of medicago sativa. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Chen, J.; Yang, Z.M. Enhancement of tolerance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) to mercury by carbon monoxide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1823–1829. [Google Scholar]
  186. Jeandroz, S.; Lamotte, O. Plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses: Lessons from cell signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Huang, B.K.; Xu, S.; Xuan, W.; Li, M.; Cao, Z.Y.; Liu, K.L.; Shen, W.B. Carbon monoxide alleviates salt-induced oxidative damage in wheat seedling leaves. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2006, 48, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Xie, Y.; Ling, T.; Han, Y.I.; Liu, K.; Zheng, Q.; Huang, L.; Shen, W. Carbon monoxide enhances salt tolerance by nitric oxide-mediated maintenance of ion homeostasis and up-regulation of antioxidant defence in wheat seedling roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 1864–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Keppler, F.; Boros, M.; Frankenberg, C.; Lelieveld, J.; McLeod, A.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Schnitzler, J.P. Methane formation in aerobic environments. Environ. Chem. 2009, 6, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhu, K.; Cui, W.; Dai, C.; Wu, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, W. Methane-rich water alleviates NaCl toxicity during alfalfa seed germination. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 129, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Wang, R.; Huang, L.; Shen, W. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in methane-induced tomato lateral root formation. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hu, H.; Liu, D.; Li, P. Methane delays the senescence and browning in daylily buds by re-established redox homeostasis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 1977–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Han, B.; Duan, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Shen, W. Methane protects against polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress in maize by improving sugar and ascorbic acid metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Samma, M.K.; Zhou, H.; Cui, W.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, J.; Shen, W. Methane alleviates copper-induced seed germination inhibition and oxidative stress in Medicago sativa. Biometals 2017, 30, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Keppler, F.; Hamilton, J.T.; Braß, M.; Röckmann, T. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 2006, 439, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Wang, N.; Huang, D.; Li, C.; Deng, Y.; Li, W.; Yao, Y.; Liao, W. Regulatory roles of methane in plants. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gu, Q.; Chen, Z.; Cui, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Yu, X.; Shen, W. Methane alleviates alfalfa cadmium toxicity via decreasing cadmium accumulation and reestablishing glutathione homeostasis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 147, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Covey, K.R.; Megonigal, J.P. Methane production and emissions in trees and forests. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. McLeod, A.R.; Fry, S.C.; Loake, G.J.; Messenger, D.J.; Reay, D.S.; Smith, K.A.; Yun, B.W. Ultraviolet radiation drives methane emissions from terrestrial plant pectins. New Phytol. 2008, 180, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Vigano, I.; Van Weelden, H.; Holzinger, R.; Keppler, F.; McLeod, A.; Röckmann, T. Effect of UV radiation and temperature on the emission of methane from plant biomass and structural components. Biogeosciences 2008, 5, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Yang, Y.; Yi, L.; Xie, J.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Xu, C.; Yang, Y. Effects of temperature on CH4 emission from subtropical common tree species leaves. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 2013, 24, 1545. [Google Scholar]
  202. Zhang, Y.; Su, J.; Cheng, D.; Wang, R.; Mei, Y.; Hu, H.; Zhang, Y. Nitric oxide contributes to methane-induced osmotic stress tolerance in mung bean. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Li, Z.G.; Yang, S.Z.; Long, W.B.; Yang, G.X.; Shen, Z.Z. Hydrogen sulphide may be a novel downstream signal molecule in nitric oxide-induced heat tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1564–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Li, Z.G.; Luo, L.J.; Sun, Y.F. Signal crosstalk between nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide may be involved in hydrogen peroxide-induced thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Sun, Y.Y.; Wang, J.Q.; Xiang, R.H.; Li, Z.G. Key role of reactive oxygen species-scavenging system in nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide crosstalk-evoked thermotolerance in maize seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Xie, M.; He, F.; Zhang, L.; Jin, Z.; Liu, D.; Pei, Y. Effects of H2S and NO on resistance to high temperature stress in Chinese cabbage. J. Agro-Environ. 2018, 37, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar]
  207. Cheng, T.; Shi, J.; Dong, Y.; Ma, Y.; Peng, Y.; Hu, X.; Chen, J. Hydrogen sulfide enhances poplar tolerance to high-temperature stress by increasing S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) activity and reducing reactive oxygen/nitrogen damage. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 84, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Guo, Z.; Tan, J.; Zhuo, C.; Wang, C.; Xiang, B.; Wang, Z. Abscisic acid, H2O2 and nitric oxide interactions mediated cold-induced S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Medicago sativa subsp. falcata that confers cold tolerance through up-regulating polyamine oxidation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Jahan, B.; Iqbal, N.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Masood, A.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene supplementation combined with split application of nitrogen and sulfur protects salt-inhibited photosynthesis through optimization of proline metabolism and antioxidant system in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Hou, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Hou, L.; Liu, X. Hydrogen sulfide regulates ethylene-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Wang, Y.; Du, S.T.; Li, L.L.; Huang, L.D.; Fang, P.; Lin, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.S.; Wang, H.L. Effect of CO2 elevation on root growth and its relationship with indole acetic acid and ethylene in tomato seedlings. Pedosphere 2009, 19, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Lin, Y.T.; Li, M.Y.; Cui, W.T.; Lu, W.; Shen, W.B. Haem oxygenase-1 is involved in hydrogen sulfide-induced cucumber adventitious root formation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 31, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Yang, X.; Kong, L.; Wang, Y.; Su, J.; Shen, W. Methane control of cadmium tolerance in alfalfa roots requires hydrogen sulfide. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 117123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Qi, F.; Xiang, Z.; Kou, N.; Cui, W.; Xu, D.; Wang, R.; Shen, W. Nitric oxide is involved in methane-induced adventitious root formation in cucumber. Physiol. Plant 2017, 159, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Ahammed, G.J.; Li, Y.T.; Wei, J.P.; Yan, P.; Han, W.Y. Salicylic acid acts upstream of nitric oxide in elevated carbon dioxide-induced flavonoid biosynthesis in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Heat stress can directly disrupt or harm the functioning of proteins, membranes, and DNA in plants or by generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS). This disruption negatively impacts photosynthesis and plant growth. Ethylene, acting through EIN3 (signaling component), triggers the activation of ERF95, ERF97, ERF1, ERF74, and ERF75 by binding to their respective promoter regions. ERF95 and ERF97 can form both heterodimers and homodimers, and they play a role in regulating the expression of HSFA2 by directly binding to its promoter. ERF1, on the other hand, controls the expression of HSFA3. All of these, in turn, regulate the expression of various genes responsible for producing heat shock proteins (HSPs), antioxidants, and osmolytes, thus helping plants in heat stress tolerance. Red solid arrow: Direct heat-mediated effect; Red faded arrow: Heat-induced ROS/RNS mediated effect; Green arrow: Ethylene mediated responses (solid arrow: direct pathway; dotted arrow: multistep pathway; head flat arrow: Inhibition).
Figure 1. Heat stress can directly disrupt or harm the functioning of proteins, membranes, and DNA in plants or by generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS). This disruption negatively impacts photosynthesis and plant growth. Ethylene, acting through EIN3 (signaling component), triggers the activation of ERF95, ERF97, ERF1, ERF74, and ERF75 by binding to their respective promoter regions. ERF95 and ERF97 can form both heterodimers and homodimers, and they play a role in regulating the expression of HSFA2 by directly binding to its promoter. ERF1, on the other hand, controls the expression of HSFA3. All of these, in turn, regulate the expression of various genes responsible for producing heat shock proteins (HSPs), antioxidants, and osmolytes, thus helping plants in heat stress tolerance. Red solid arrow: Direct heat-mediated effect; Red faded arrow: Heat-induced ROS/RNS mediated effect; Green arrow: Ethylene mediated responses (solid arrow: direct pathway; dotted arrow: multistep pathway; head flat arrow: Inhibition).
Plants 13 00791 g001
Figure 2. (a) Heat stress triggers nitric oxide (NO) production and increases calcium levels. Increased calcium concentration through its sensor proteins activates genes GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) and HOT5 (hot temperature 5), thus fine-tuning NO levels. NO leads to S-nitrosylation of cysteine in NPR1 (non-expresser of pathogenesis-related), mediating heat stress responses. ROS-driven systemic signaling converges with NPR genes, activating RBOHD (respiratory burst oxidase homolog D) via related to apetala 2 (RAP2). This triggers NOA1 (NO-associated) genes, initiating heat stress responses (HSR), including oxidative defenses, osmolyte accumulation, and heat shock proteins (HSPs). (b) The heat stress signal is detected at the plasma membrane by a sensor. This signal is then relayed through calcium (Ca2+) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) signaling pathways, resulting in the activation of L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD), D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD), cysteine synthase (CS) for hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production. H2S interacts with transcription factors, driving the transcription of antioxidants, osmolytes, and heat shock proteins (HSPs), thereby enhancing cell thermotolerance.
Figure 2. (a) Heat stress triggers nitric oxide (NO) production and increases calcium levels. Increased calcium concentration through its sensor proteins activates genes GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) and HOT5 (hot temperature 5), thus fine-tuning NO levels. NO leads to S-nitrosylation of cysteine in NPR1 (non-expresser of pathogenesis-related), mediating heat stress responses. ROS-driven systemic signaling converges with NPR genes, activating RBOHD (respiratory burst oxidase homolog D) via related to apetala 2 (RAP2). This triggers NOA1 (NO-associated) genes, initiating heat stress responses (HSR), including oxidative defenses, osmolyte accumulation, and heat shock proteins (HSPs). (b) The heat stress signal is detected at the plasma membrane by a sensor. This signal is then relayed through calcium (Ca2+) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) signaling pathways, resulting in the activation of L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD), D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD), cysteine synthase (CS) for hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production. H2S interacts with transcription factors, driving the transcription of antioxidants, osmolytes, and heat shock proteins (HSPs), thereby enhancing cell thermotolerance.
Plants 13 00791 g002
Figure 3. Under conditions of heat stress, the presence of calcium ions can trigger the activation of the PEPC (Phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase) enzyme, which in turn increases the production of CO2. This elevated CO2 is then transported by the aquaporin PIP2;1 and converted into HCO3 through the action of the β-CA (β-carbonic anhydrase) enzyme. One potential effect of CO2 is the activation of protein kinases 4&12 (MPK4&12) and RCH1 (Resistance to high CO2), which leads to the inhibition of HT1 (high leaf temperature 1). The suppression of HT1 activity subsequently deactivates 1OST1 (1open stomata 1). Furthermore, the elevated CO2 interacts with ABA, and ABA enters the guard cells to facilitate the closure of stomata by activating the RCAR/PYR1 (Regulatory components of ABA receptors/Pyrabactin resistance 1) receptors. This activation inhibits the PP2Cs protein phosphatases. In both cases of elevated CO2 and ABA, the SLAC1 (slow ion channel associated 1) ion channel is activated through the inhibition of OST1 and the action of SnRK2 (Ca+2 independent protein kinase) and CPK (calcium-dependent protein kinase). This activation results in the efflux of malate from ALMT12/QUAC1 (aluminum-activated malate transporter 12/quickly activating anion channel 1) and ultimately leads to the closure of stomata. Elevated CO2 also overcomes the effect of oxidative stress by stimulating the production of antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants.
Figure 3. Under conditions of heat stress, the presence of calcium ions can trigger the activation of the PEPC (Phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase) enzyme, which in turn increases the production of CO2. This elevated CO2 is then transported by the aquaporin PIP2;1 and converted into HCO3 through the action of the β-CA (β-carbonic anhydrase) enzyme. One potential effect of CO2 is the activation of protein kinases 4&12 (MPK4&12) and RCH1 (Resistance to high CO2), which leads to the inhibition of HT1 (high leaf temperature 1). The suppression of HT1 activity subsequently deactivates 1OST1 (1open stomata 1). Furthermore, the elevated CO2 interacts with ABA, and ABA enters the guard cells to facilitate the closure of stomata by activating the RCAR/PYR1 (Regulatory components of ABA receptors/Pyrabactin resistance 1) receptors. This activation inhibits the PP2Cs protein phosphatases. In both cases of elevated CO2 and ABA, the SLAC1 (slow ion channel associated 1) ion channel is activated through the inhibition of OST1 and the action of SnRK2 (Ca+2 independent protein kinase) and CPK (calcium-dependent protein kinase). This activation results in the efflux of malate from ALMT12/QUAC1 (aluminum-activated malate transporter 12/quickly activating anion channel 1) and ultimately leads to the closure of stomata. Elevated CO2 also overcomes the effect of oxidative stress by stimulating the production of antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants.
Plants 13 00791 g003
Figure 4. (A) Heat stress often leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide radicals (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In order to counteract the detrimental effects of ROS, plants activate heme oxygenase (HO), an enzyme responsible for converting heme to carbon monoxide (CO) as a byproduct. CO can then activate guanylate cyclase (GC), which triggers the production of cGMP. cGMP acts as a secondary messenger in various signaling pathways, including the stomatal signaling pathway. It activates the PKG (Protein Kinase-G) in guard cells, which are involved in phosphorylating different target proteins, including ion transporters and channels. Additionally, CO regulates the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which play a crucial role in safeguarding proteins from denaturation and aggregation during stressful conditions. Furthermore, CO induces the production of both enzymatic (SOD/CAT) and non-enzymatic antioxidants to scavenge ROS production, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress. (B) A straightforward model is presented in this illustration to demonstrate the role of CH4 in a stressful environment. Methane penetrates the plant cell through stomata and is transformed into methanol by the enzymatic activity of MMO (Methane monooxygenase). Methanol is a toxic substance, but it also acts as a signaling molecule that can stimulate the production of HSPs. Methanol binds to a receptor protein on the surface of the (ER) and triggers a signaling cascade that results in the increased production of HSPs and the activation of antioxidant and oxidative enzymes. These enzymes are then transported to various parts of the cell, where they help to safeguard the cell from ROS damage.
Figure 4. (A) Heat stress often leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide radicals (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In order to counteract the detrimental effects of ROS, plants activate heme oxygenase (HO), an enzyme responsible for converting heme to carbon monoxide (CO) as a byproduct. CO can then activate guanylate cyclase (GC), which triggers the production of cGMP. cGMP acts as a secondary messenger in various signaling pathways, including the stomatal signaling pathway. It activates the PKG (Protein Kinase-G) in guard cells, which are involved in phosphorylating different target proteins, including ion transporters and channels. Additionally, CO regulates the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which play a crucial role in safeguarding proteins from denaturation and aggregation during stressful conditions. Furthermore, CO induces the production of both enzymatic (SOD/CAT) and non-enzymatic antioxidants to scavenge ROS production, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress. (B) A straightforward model is presented in this illustration to demonstrate the role of CH4 in a stressful environment. Methane penetrates the plant cell through stomata and is transformed into methanol by the enzymatic activity of MMO (Methane monooxygenase). Methanol is a toxic substance, but it also acts as a signaling molecule that can stimulate the production of HSPs. Methanol binds to a receptor protein on the surface of the (ER) and triggers a signaling cascade that results in the increased production of HSPs and the activation of antioxidant and oxidative enzymes. These enzymes are then transported to various parts of the cell, where they help to safeguard the cell from ROS damage.
Plants 13 00791 g004
Table 1. Reports on various plant species under high-temperature stress and the effects of applying exogenous gaseous molecules.
Table 1. Reports on various plant species under high-temperature stress and the effects of applying exogenous gaseous molecules.
Plant SpeciesSource of Signaling MoleculeTissue ExposedHigh-Temperature StressObserved EffectsReferences
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Ethylene; 10 μM ACC for 1 h12 days seedlings45 °C for 4 daysEnhanced HSFs (HSFA1a, HSFA2a, c, d, e, and f) and ethylene gene expression ACC oxidase 1 and ACC oxidase 3, EIN 2, EIN-like 1, and EIN-like 2.[37]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Ethylene; 200 µL L−1 ethephonSeedlings40 °C for 15 daysEnhanced proline accumulation and activity of antioxidant enzymes, SOD, APX and GR.[38]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Ethylene; 1.6 mM ethephon15 days seedlings40 °C for 15 daysIncreased photosynthesis by up-regulating the photosystem II psbA and psbB genes.[39]
Arabidopsis thalianaEthylene; 10 µM ACC10 days seedlings42 °C for 4 hWith the the ethylene signaling pathway, myo inositol phosphate synthase regulates photosynthetic efficiency and chlorophyll content.[40]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)NO; 100 μM SNPSeedlings40 °C for 6 hIncreased net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, intercellular CO2 concentration, Rubisco activity, and stomatal conductance.[41]
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)NO; 0, 50, 100 μM SNP Seedlings40 °C for 2, 5 and 10 hIncreased the expression of FaTHSFA2a and FaTHSFB1a, as well as the expression of HSP70 and HSP90.[42]
Mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus)NO; 150 μM SNPLeaf discs 45 °C for 90 minReduced lipid peroxidation, increased Fv/Fm, increased MnSOD, CuSOD, and FeSOD activity.[43]
Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)NO; 1 mM SNPSeedlings32 °C for 12 hPollen grain germination and viability, stigma receptivity, and ovular viability increased significantly.[44]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)H2S; 0–1.5 mmol L–1 NaHSSeedlings38 °C for 24 hIncreased soluble sugar content, SOD, and APX activities.[45]
Maize (Zea mays L.)H2S; 0.5 mM NaHSSeeds48 °C for 18 hSignificantly increased survival percentage of seeds and survival percentage of seedlings.[25]
Tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L.)H2S; 50 μM NaHSCalli (young stem)43 °C for 1, 3, 5 or 7 hIncreased survival percentage of tobacco suspension cells and reduced MDA accumulation.[46]
Maize (Zea mays L.)H2S; 0.5 mM NaHSSeeds47 °C for 15 hImproved the activity of BADH and endogenous betaine accumulation,[47]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)800 μmol·mol−1 CO2Seedlings42 °C for 24 hLowered electrolyte leakage and MDA levels, increased Fv/Fm value, and increased antioxidant enzyme activity[48]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)780 mmol L−1 CO2Seedlings42 °C for 3 daysIncreased concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose and increased photosynthetic rate and grain yield[49]
Cowpea (Vigna unguicuiata L.)700 μmol mol−1 CO2Whole plant30 °C Increased carbohydrate content (starch in leaves, stems, and peduncles)[50]
Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon Pers.)800 μmol·mol−1 CO2Stolons45 °CIncreased Pn, Chl and Fv/Fm. Improved metabolic pathways involved in the, fructose light reaction (ATP synthase subunit and PS I reaction center subunit), carbon fixation of photosynthesis (GAPDH, FBA, PGK, SBPase, and sugars), and glycolysis (GAPDH, glucose, fructose, and galactose).[51]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)CO; 5 µM heminSeedlings45 °C for 10 minNO levels in root seedlings have increased. Hemin-induced antioxidant enzyme activation (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and guaiacol peroxidase)[52]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gautam, H.; Khan, S.; Nidhi; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Appraisal of the Role of Gaseous Signaling Molecules in Thermo-Tolerance Mechanisms in Plants. Plants 2024, 13, 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060791

AMA Style

Gautam H, Khan S, Nidhi, Sofo A, Khan NA. Appraisal of the Role of Gaseous Signaling Molecules in Thermo-Tolerance Mechanisms in Plants. Plants. 2024; 13(6):791. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gautam, Harsha, Sheen Khan, Nidhi, Adriano Sofo, and Nafees A. Khan. 2024. "Appraisal of the Role of Gaseous Signaling Molecules in Thermo-Tolerance Mechanisms in Plants" Plants 13, no. 6: 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop