Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Integration of Spectral and Chemical Cues Mediating Plant Responses to Competitors and Herbivores
Previous Article in Journal
Bio-Fabrication of Euryale ferox (Makhana) Leaf Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Agronomic Behavior of Mexican Roselle Cultivars Produced under Protected Agricultural Conditions

Plants 2022, 11(20), 2767; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202767
by Jeny Hinojosa-Gómez 1, César San Martín-Hernández 2, Tomás Osuna-Enciso 1, José B. Heredia 1, Josefina León-Félix 1 and María D. Muy-Rangel 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Plants 2022, 11(20), 2767; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202767
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 19 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural Science and Ornamental Plants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work of Hinojosa-Gómez et al. “Agronomic behaviour of mexican roselle cultivars produced under protected agricultural condition” presents an interesting analysis of the morpho-agronomic variability of cultivars under hydroponic condition. Mineral analysis of the leaves is also discussed. The paper is well organized and carefully written. The discussion of the data is based on recent bibliography. It presents relevant and worthy findings about this crop in commercial greenhouses. Moreover, the study is interesting and of practical value as there are very few studies about Mexican roselle cultivars.

 

As suggestions to improve the paper, I include the following commentaries:

Abstract should be improved: remove statistical analysis; abstract should include the main conclusions of the study, please include which minerals are the most important for each cultivar (not only the total minerals).

However, the paper is very descriptive and do not explain the physiological processes behind the morphological or mineral composition responses. This is an interesting paper but, in my opinion, out of the main scope of Plants and more related with the scope of Horticulturae or similar journals.

If the editor thinks it should be published in Plants, then the discussion should be partially rewritten to give it a slightly more physiological approach.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I accept the introduced amendments, additions and clarifications.
The article can be published.
 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has been revised accordingly. In my opinion, the paper can be accepted for publication.

Back to TopTop