Next Article in Journal
Interplay between Proline Metabolism and ROS in the Fine Tuning of Root-Meristem Size in Arabidopsis
Next Article in Special Issue
Endophytic Fungal and Bacterial Microbiota Shift in Rice and Barnyardgrass Grown under Co-Culture Condition
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Calmodulin/Calmodulin-like Protein (CAM/CML) Family in Ginkgo biloba, and the Influence of an Ectopically Expressed GbCML Gene (Gb_30819) on Seedling and Fruit Development of Transgenic Arabidopsis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of Vitis amurensis Rupr.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/plants11111511
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Diversity and Community Composition of Root Endophytic Fungi Associated with Aristolochia chilensis along an Aridity Gradient in the Atacama Desert

by
María José Guevara-Araya
1,
Víctor M. Escobedo
2,3,
Valeria Palma-Onetto
1 and
Marcia González-Teuber
1,*
1
Departamento de Química Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4090541, Chile
2
Centro de Ecología Integrativa, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile
3
Instituto de Investigación Interdisciplinaria, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1511; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111511
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 5 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interaction of Plants and Endophytic Microorganisms: Molecular Aspects, Biological Functions, Community Composition, and Practical Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite the widespread occurrence of fungal endophytes (FE) in plants inhabiting arid ecosystems, the environmental and soil factors that modulate changes in FE diversity and community composition along an aridity gradient have been little explored. We studied three locations along the coast of the Atacama Desert in Chile, in which the plant Aristolochia chilensis naturally grows, and that differ in their aridity gradient from hyper-arid to semi-arid. We evaluated if root-associated FE diversity (frequency, richness and diversity indexes) and community composition vary as a function of aridity. Additionally, we assessed whether edaphic factors co-varying with aridity (soil water potential, soil moisture, pH and nutrients) may structure FE communities. We expected that FE diversity would gradually increase towards the aridity gradient declines, and that those locations that had the most contrasting environments would show more dissimilar FE communities. We found that richness indexes were inversely related to aridity, although this pattern was only partially observed for FE frequency and diversity. FE community composition was dissimilar among contrasting locations, and soil water availability significantly influenced FE community composition across the gradient. The results indicate that FE diversity and community composition associated with A. chilensis relate to differences in the aridity level across the gradient. Overall, our findings reveal the importance of climate-related factors in shaping changes in diversity, structure and distribution of FE in desert ecosystems.

1. Introduction

All terrestrial plants in natural ecosystems are considered to harbor fungal endophytes (FE) in their tissues. In most plant species, except for some grasses, FE are horizontally transmitted through spores, having the capacity to colonize a wide range of hosts [1]. Horizontally transmitted FE are abundant and highly diverse in plants [2,3,4,5] and may benefit their hosts by improving growth and resistance to diverse biotic and abiotic factors [1]. FE diversity is strongly influenced by numerous host-related and environmental factors, such as host genotype, host structural and chemical traits, precipitation, temperature and soil chemistry [6,7,8].
FE abundance and diversity usually vary across the latitude and an annual rainfall gradient, decreasing from the tropics to boreal and arctic regions [9,10]. In the tropics and semi-arid regions, FE diversity is higher during the wet seasons in comparison to dry seasons [11,12,13]. Thus, annual precipitation appears to be a crucial factor for determining FE diversity and community composition in different ecosystems [6,14,15,16]. For example, for the tropical tree Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae) in Hawaii, rainfall was one of the key factors structuring foliar FE communities across the landscape [6]. Moreover, Giauque and Hawkes [17] reported that past and present precipitation levels were the most important predictor factors of FE communities in savanna grasslands across a steep precipitation gradient. Few studies have characterized FE diversity and communities in desert environments [18,19]; particularly, how they vary as a function of precipitation. Understanding variations in FE diversity and composition in desert environments is relevant to predicting shifts in the distribution range of FE in contrasting arid environments under climate change.
Deserts are characterized by extreme environmental conditions, where water deficit is one of the major limiting factors constraining species distribution and diversity [20]. Soil microbial diversity (bacteria and fungi), in general, declines towards the aridity gradient increases [21]. Some edaphic factors such as soil water availability, pH and nutrients may change in response to the long-term effects of the climate resulting from aridity gradients [22]. Importantly, they also seem to be relevant in influencing FE diversity in deserts [19]. For example, a study in the Sonora Desert on foliar FE diversity showed that endophytic fungi were isolated approximately 11- to 40-fold less frequently than that expected by the latitude of the study sites [19], suggesting that edaphic factors related to arid environments restrict endophyte distribution. Whereas edaphic factors appear to highly influence variations in soil microbial composition [23], the importance of these factors shaping FE communities at a large scale is not fully understood [24]. In contrast with the numerous studies on foliar FE communities in contrasting environmental and/or geographic sites, studies on the changes in diversity and community composition of root FE along an aridity gradient are still limited [25].
Here, we worked in three locations along the coast of the Atacama Desert in Chile, in which the perennial herb Aristolochia chilensis naturally grows, and that differ in their aridity gradient from hyper-arid to semi-arid (Figure 1). Using a culture-dependent method, we characterized the diversity and community composition of FE associated with the roots of A. chilensis, growing naturally across the aridity gradient. The aims of the study were to: (1) evaluate how root FE diversity varies along the aridity gradient; (2) determine the degree of structural similarity in root FE communities across locations; and (3) reveal if edaphic factors co-varying with aridity (soil moisture, soil water potential, pH and nutrients) drive the structure of root FE communities. Since FE distribution is restricted by precipitation, it is expected that root FE diversity is lower in the more arid location and that it gradually increases towards the aridity gradient declines. We also predicted that locations that have the most contrasting environments (hyper-arid vs. semi-arid) would show a more different root FE community composition. A manipulative field experiment was additionally performed to assess potential variation in root FE abundance as a function of water availability.

2. Results

2.1. Diversity and Community Composition of Root Endophytic Fungi

Molecular data revealed that the roots of A. chilensis coming from the three locations were colonized by numerous FE taxa. A total of 570 fungal isolates were purified into individual cultures, with a total species richness of 9 OTUs described for the location of Huasco, 29 OTUs for Totoralillo and 10 OTUs for Quilimarí (Table 1). Culture-based methods may underestimate the richness and misrepresent the taxonomic composition of endophyte communities relative to culture-independent approaches, such as PCR product pyrosequencing. Nevertheless, comparative studies suggest that many of the proportionally dominant microbial taxa identified by culture-independent approaches are accurately represented by culture-based techniques [28,29]. In general, the rarefaction curves for locations achieved saturation (Figure S1). For Huasco and Quilimarí, the rarefaction curves tended to be flat, indicating that most FE were covered in every sample of this study. For the location of Totoralillo, however, it was observed that the saturation curve was not completely flattened out, indicating that there were species not covered by the method. Root fungal endophyte communities were mainly dominated by the genera Fusarium, Penicillum, Clonostachys, and Trichoderma, which were found to dominate distinct locations in different ways (Figure 1). Both Fusarium and Trichoderma were similarly abundant among the locations (Fusarium: x2 = 3.20, p = 0.201, Kruskal–Wallis; Trichoderma: x2 = 3.36, p = 0.186, Kruskal–Wallis). For the Penicillium genus, its relative abundance was significantly higher in the more arid locations (Huasco and Totoralillo) than in the wettest location (Quilimarí) (x2 = 7.60, p = 0.022, Kruskal–Wallis), whereas the relative abundance of Clonostachys was dominant in the wettest location (Quilimarí) (x2 = 14.7, p = 0.000, Kruskal–Wallis) (Figure 2).
FE frequency (x2 = 13.31, p = 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis), as well as the indexes of Shannon (x2 = 6.57, p = 0.003, Kruskal–Wallis), Chao (x2 = 23.48, p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis) and Bootstrap (x2 = 23.48, p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis) were significantly different among locations (Table 2). In contrast, no significant differences in the Simpson index were observed among three locations (x2 = 2.57, p = 0.28, Kruskal–Wallis) (Table 2).
The PERMANOVA indicated that FE community composition significantly differed among locations (Table 3). The pairwise analyses revealed that whereas FE community was similar between Huasco (hyper-arid location) and Totoralillo (arid location), FE community from both Huasco and Totoralillo was significantly different from that from Quilimarí (semi-arid location) (Table 3). This was visualized with the NMDS that showed a grouping in FE communities among locations (Figure 3).

2.2. Edaphic Factors and Location Differences

The edaphic factors were significantly different among locations (Table S1). A distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) showed that FE communities were structured by soil water potential and soil moisture (Table 4). The structuring edaphic factors are explained in the first two axes in 65.67% and 34.33% of the model, and its total variance is 13.14, constricted 1.35, without restrictions 11.78.

2.3. Field Experiment

FE frequency (total fungal isolates) significantly differed between watered and non-watered plants (x2 = 3.86, p = 0.043, Kruskal–Wallis). It was observed that the FE frequency of watered plants (36.8 ± 5.9) was two times the frequency of non-watered plants of A. chilensis (15.6 ± 2.4).

3. Discussion

This study provides evidence that variations in root FE diversity and community composition associated with the endemic species A. chilensis relate to differences in the aridity level along the gradient. Our results showed that: (1) Both FE frequency and diversity were considerably lower in the more arid location (Huasco) than in the wettest locations (Totoralillo and Quilimarí); (2) FE richness indexes gradually increase towards the aridity gradient declines; and (3) FE communities were dissimilar across the aridity gradient, and soil water availability was a key factor in structuring FE community composition. Additionally, the abundance distribution of certain dominant FE taxa changed across the gradient, suggesting the importance of some fungal genera in structuring FE communities.
Our proposed pattern, that root FE diversity gradually decreases when the aridity index increases (H < T < Q) was partially reached. The richness indexes fulfilled the expected pattern; Chao and Bootstrap indexes were observed that significantly decreased as the aridity increased. Contrary, FE frequency and the Shannon diversity did not wholly follow this pattern. As expected, both were significantly lower in the hyper-arid location of Huasco; nevertheless, both showed their highest values in the arid location of Totoralillo. Interestingly, Totoralillo showed the highest soil water availability, even when it did not experience the highest level of precipitation and the lowest aridity index. The latter is likely associated with microclimate conditions, highlighting the importance of integrating both local and regional environmental factors in studying FE community composition. Our results concur with previous studies, which showed that marked aridity gradients or distinct aridity conditions modulate rhizosphere and endosphere fungal diversity and community composition [25,30,31]. For example, there is evidence that foliar FE richness in the annual plant Brachypodium sp. was greater in wetter sites (over 1000 mm of annual precipitation) than in the drier sites along an aridity gradient (less than 500 mm of annual precipitation) [25]. By contrast, for the cactus Opuntia ficus-indica, it was shown that alpha fungal diversity in the rhizosphere and endosphere did not change along a bioclimatic gradient from 1200 to 200 mm of annual precipitation [31]. However, the aridity gradient significantly contributed to differences in fungal species composition (beta diversity) [31].
We found that the locations of A. chilensis, which had the most contrasting environments, showed dissimilar root FE communities. Whereas the more arid locations along the gradient (Huasco and Totoralillo) showed similar FE communities, both showed dissimilar FE communities to the wettest location (Quilimarí). Thus, aridity appears to play a key role in driving FE species turnover. Consistently, our data revealed a significant variation in FE community composition as a function of soil water potential and soil moisture. These results agree with previous observations by Herrera, et al. [32], who showed that the abundance of root endophytic fungi associated with the grass Bouteloua gracilis considerably increased under irrigation. Soil moisture is likely one of the major factors determining soil microbial communities [33], suggesting that soil moisture pulse events stimulate the activity of soil microbes [34,35]. Moreover, the results of our field experiment (in the Northern location along the gradient) supports these findings, showing that a greater soil water availability was associated with a higher frequency of root FE. Even though pH and nutrients are likely associated with inter-site variation in soil archaeal and bacterial communities [36,37], here we found that neither pH nor nutrients shaped root FE communities.
Our study identified FE taxa that are specific for each location. Whereas Fusarium and Trichoderma seem to be generalist endophytes, i.e., with the ability to colonize locations with contrasting conditions of aridity, Penicillium and Clonostachys were observed to be habitat-specific FE taxa. Penicillium was dominant in the more arid locations (30 and 100 mm of annual precipitation, respectively), while the opposite pattern occurred for Clonostachys, which was almost absent in the more arid locations, but was dominant in the wettest location (over 250 mm of annual precipitation). Thus, our data suggest that extreme aridity selects for specific FE taxa, which likely contribute to variations in FE community composition across the gradient. Some of these taxa such as Fusarium, Penicillium and Trichoderma have previously been reported as common endophytes in plants inhabiting arid and semi-arid ecosystems [18,19,38]. The genus Penicillium, for example, has been found to be a dominant FE in below-ground tissues of other plant species native to the Atacama Desert in Chile, including Chenopodium quinoa and Prosopis chilensis [39,40]. FE isolated from the Atacama Desert seem to be a promising strategy to alleviate abiotic stress in host plants [39,40,41]. Therefore, this study contributes to the identification of new FE strains with potential benefits for plants to survive and tolerate stressful conditions in deserts. Understanding how arid-adapted FE taxa relate to the ability of A. chilensis to tolerate extreme arid conditions in the Atacama Desert is key to predicting the ecological significance of root FE in deserts. Further research in this context should consider testing potential differences in host stress tolerance depending on the symbiotic interaction with different aridity-adapted FE strains. Desert environments, despite the hostile conditions (low water availability and poor nutrient conditions), appear to harbor rich rhizosphere and endosphere fungal communities [30,42]. Our findings showed that environmental precipitation and soil water availability are relevant factors contributing to FE diversity and community composition in A. chilensis, revealing the importance of climate-related factors in shaping FE structure and distribution in desert ecosystems. Although this research covered only a few plant individuals in each location, our data supported our main prediction, that FE diversity and community composition vary as a function of aridity. Studies on changes in community composition of root FE along an aridity gradient are still limited [25]. Thus, our study provides new evidence in the topic and highlights the importance of considering environmental gradients as an appropriate approach to understand changes in the diversity, and the structure of FE communities. Large-scale studies across climate gradients, to investigate species adaptations to environmental pressures, are becoming common [43,44], and seem to be a promising alternative for climate change research. Understanding how FE community composition varies as a function of precipitation in deserts is critical to comprehending the whole ecosystem function in the face of climate change. The latter is particularly important for the Atacama Desert, the driest temperate desert on Earth [45], where the current decrease in precipitation and increase in temperature are the major threats of species distribution and overall diversity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Species and Study Sites

Aristolochia chilensis (Aristolochiaceae) is an endemic perennial plant species in Chile. It is a creeping herb with purple-brownish flowers and dark green leaves [46], and with a pivoting root fragmented into two or more parts, which are several inches long. Although A. chilensis has a wide environmental gradient distribution along Chile, its distribution is critically threatened by the effects of human activity, currently showing small and fragmented populations throughout its distribution range (González-Teuber, personal observations). It is found from the North of the Atacama Desert (~27°30′ S) to the Mediterranean regions (~33°29′ S) in central Chile [47]. In this study, roots of A. chilensis plants were collected in three natural populations along the Chilean coast, covering parts of the Atacama Desert. The locations selected for this study were Huasco (H), Totoralillo (T), and Quilimarí (Q), which considerably differ in their annual precipitations and aridity index [48,49]; and range from a hyper-arid environment to a semi-arid environment (Figure 1). A. chilensis is an appropriate plant system to work along an aridity gradient in Chile, since it is able to colonize hyper-arid sites in the North of Chile, and further spreads to semi-arid and Mediterranean sites more to the South [50].

4.2. Isolation of FE

Root material was collected in each population of A. chilensis (n = 10 plants per location). Three pivotal roots of ten healthy plants (without apparent damage from herbivores and pathogens) were collected in November/December 2015 in Huasco, Totoralillo and Quilimarí. The three pivotal roots were pooled in order to increase the number of fungal species isolated. After collection, root material was immediately transported to the lab for further endophyte isolation and molecular characterization. Roots were first washed under running water to remove dirt. Then, the root surface was disinfected in a sequence of washes with ethanol (70%), sodium hypochlorite (1%) and sterilized water (following the protocol described by Arnold, et al. [51,52]). The success of the surface sterilization method was confirmed by the absence of any microbial growth on PDA (potato-dextrose-agar) (Phyto Technology Laboratories, Lenexa, KS, USA) agar plates from the plating of the last root-washing water. Then, small fractions of sterilized root tissues (=0.5–1.0 cm2) were subsequently cultivated on PDA petri dish plates that contained a mixture of antibiotics (ampicillin and tetracycline 0.001% g mL−1 and kanamycin 0.005% g mL−1). FE were isolated from 90 root pieces (=30 root pieces from each pivotal root). This method of reducing the size and increasing the number of tissue fragments has been previously described as an appropriate method to estimate real values of FE diversity [53]. Plates were then incubated at room temperature for 2–3 weeks. After that time, emerging colonies were subcultured to obtain pure isolates. Pure isolates were grown on PDA plates (Phyto Technology Laboratories, Lenexa, KS, USA) at room temperature for one month for further DNA extraction.

4.3. DNA Extraction and Molecular Characterization of FE

All isolates used for DNA extraction were obtained from a monospore colony. Genomic DNA was extracted from the mycelial layer using a modification of the method described by Nicholson, et al. [54]. Fresh mycelium was ground on Mini-BeadBeater-16 (BioSpec, Bartlesbille, OK, USA). Then, the ground micelyum was suspended in an extraction buffer (10 mM Tris buffer pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, NaCl 250 mM). A solution of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and mixed slowly for 5 min. The phases were then separated by centrifugation at 13.000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. DNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase with 2.0 volumes of isopropanol. The DNA was recovered by centrifugation at 13.000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was then washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in molecular biology grade water (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., CA, USA). ITS1-F KYO1 (CTHGGTCATTTAGAGGAASTAA) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) primers were used for the identification of FE species. Partial amplification of the 18S rDNA gene (about 680 kpb) was performed with PCR reaction mixtures, each with 10–30 ng fungus genomic DNA, 10 pM of each primer, 1× SapphireAmp Fast PCR Master Mix (Takara, Otsu, Japan) and sterile water. PCRs were performed on a Techne TC-5000 thermocycler (Fisher Scientific, Burlington, NJ, USA) with the following program: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s and primer extension at 72 °C for 1 min, completed with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The amplified fragments were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products were then sent to Macrogen (South Korea) for purification and sequencing. The sequences were assembled using the SeqTrace software. The assembled sequences (forward and reverse) were aligned with the program Codoncode Aligner. Sequence clusters with similarity of 97% or above were defined as operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the CD-HIT program [55]. Consensus sequences were used for BLAST search at the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; accessed on 20 April 2022). FE frequency was expressed as the total number of fungal isolates corresponding to an Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU). Diversity indexes such as Shannon and Simpson were also calculated for each location. Complementarily, the Chao and Bootstrap indexes were used as a richness estimator through the function specpool in the ‘vegan’ package. The relative abundance (in percentage) of the most dominant FE genera in the communities was also determined.

4.4. Edaphic Factors

Soil samples were collected from each plant (n = 10) in each location. All soil samples were collected in polyethylene bags (using a hand shovel) from a depth interval of 15–20 cm of the exposed soil face. Samples were transported to the lab and stored at 4 °C for further analysis. The following parameters were measured from each soil sample: soil water potential, soil moisture, pH and nutrients, including nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and phosphorous (P). Soil water potential (MPa) was measured with a Dew Point Potentiometer (Model WP4-T, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA). Soil moisture content (%) was determined by the ratio between water mass and dry mass of the soil, measured after drying the soil samples at 100 °C in the oven (Model FED 53-720, Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany). Analyses of pH and nutrients were carried out at Activation Laboratories Ltd., (Coquimbo, Chile), by using the methods described by Sadzawka, et al. [56].

4.5. Field Experiment

In order to experimentally assess whether FE frequency (total fungal isolates) is affected by different water regimes, 20 healthy plants of A. chilensis were selected in the more arid location along the gradient (=Huasco). FE frequency was used here as a proxy of abundance [57]. Plants were randomly assigned to one of two watering regimes: (1) no watering (control, n = 10 plants) and (2) 85 mm3 of watering (n = 10 plants). 85 mm3 of watering imitates the average rainfall in the Southern population of Quilimarí for the year of sample collection (year 2015). Quilimarí is the contrasting location (in terms of rainfall) to the location of Huasco (Figure 1). Plants were irrigated on two occasions, with an interval of 20 days between each event. Thirty days after the last irrigation, root material of watered and non-watered plants was collected in the field, and immediately transported into the lab. Once in the lab, the roots were subjected to sterilization and cultivation, as previously described, for further determination of FE frequency.

4.6. Statistical Analyses

Differences in relative abundance (%) of the most prevalent FE genera, fungal frequency (number of fungal isolates), Chao index (richness estimator), Bootstrap index (richness estimator), as well as Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes among locations were assessed with the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, because data did not meet assumptions for parametrical tests. Differences in FE community composition among the three locations, and pair wise comparisons, were performed with a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (9999 permutations) based on Euclidean distances, using the adonis function in the ‘vegan’ package. To visualize differences in FE communities among the locations, and aid in the interpretation of PERMANOVA results, we performed a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), based on the Euclidean matrix of dissimilarity, using the function metaMDS in the ‘vegan’ package. A distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) was used to explore correlations between edaphic factors and FE communities. The dbrda function was performed with the selection criterion ordistep (‘vegan’ package) in order to obtain the most significant edaphic factors [58,59,60]. Differences in edaphic factors among the locations were determined with One-way ANOVAs. For the field experiment, differences in FE frequency between both watered and non-watered plants were assessed with a Kruskal–Wallis test. All statistical analyses were performed in R ver. 3.1.0 [61].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11111511/s1, Figure S1. Rarefaction curve for fungal endophytes isolated from roots of Aristolochia chilensis collected in three locations: Huasco, Totoralillo and Quilimarí; Table S1. Edaphic factors for three locations where Aristolochia chilensis was collected: Huasco (H), Totoralillo (T) and Quilimarí (Q).

Author Contributions

M.J.G.-A. and M.G.-T. designed the study. M.J.G.-A. performed all experiments. M.J.G.-A. and V.M.E. conducted statistical analyses. M.J.G.-A. and M.G.-T. wrote the manuscript. V.M.E. and V.P.-O. contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the ANID-Max Planck Society Grant, MPG190015 (MG-T); the FONDECYT Grant No. 3200434 (VME); and the FONDECYT Grant No. 3210334 (VP-O).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request. The raw reads of ITS sequences were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (BioProject accession No. PRJNA814878).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Andrea Morales and Natalia Morales for their valuable help in the lab.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodriguez, R.J.; White, J.F., Jr.; Arnold, A.; Redman, R.S. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 314–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lodge, D.J.; Fisher, P.J.; Sutton, B.C. Endophytic Fungi of Manilkara bidentata Leaves in Puerto Rico. Mycologia 1996, 88, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arnold, A.; Maynard, Z.; Gilbert, G.; Coley, P.; Kursar, T. Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol. Lett. 2000, 3, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Higgins, K.L.; Arnold, A.E.; Miadlikowska, J.; Sarvate, S.D.; Lutzoni, F. Phylogenetic relationships, host affinity, and geographic structure of boreal and arctic endophytes from three major plant lineages. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 42, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hoffman, M.T.; Arnold, A.E. Diverse bacteria inhabit living hyphae of phylogenetically diverse fungal endophytes. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4063–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Zimmerman, N.B.; Vitousek, P.M. Fungal endophyte communities reflect environmental structuring across a Hawaiian landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13022–13027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Vincent, J.B.; Weiblen, G.D.; May, G. Host associations and beta diversity of fungal endophyte communities in New Guinea rainforest trees. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 825–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González-Teuber, M.; Vilo, C.; Guevara-Araya, M.J.; Salgado-Luarte, C.; Gianoli, E. Leaf resistance traits influence endophytic fungi colonization and community composition in a South American temperate rainforest. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arnold, A.E.; Lutzoni, F. Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: Are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecology 2017, 88, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. U’Ren, J.M.; Lutzoni, F.; Miadlikowska, J.; Laetsch, A.D.; Arnold, A. Host and geographic structure of endophytic and endolichenic fungi at a continental scale. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 898–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Faeth, S.H.; Hammon, K.E. Fungal endophytes in oak trees: Long-term patterns of abundance and associations with leafminers. Ecology 1997, 78, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suwannarach, N.; Bussaban, B.; Nuangmek, W.; McKenzie, E.H.; Hyde, K.D.; Lumyong, S. Diversity of endophytic fungi associated with Cinnamomum bejolghota (Lauraceae) in Northern Thailand. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2012, 39, 389–398. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pieterse, Z.; Aveling, T.A.; Jacobs, A.; Cowan, D.A. Seasonal variability in fungal endophytes from Aizoaceae plants in the Succulent Karoo biodiversity hotspot, South Africa. J. Arid Environ. 2018, 156, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Kumaresan, V.; Johnson, J.A. Foliar fungal endophytes from two species of the mangrove Rhizophora. Can. J. Microbiol. 1998, 44, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Murali, T.S.; Venkatesan, G. Occurrence and distribution of fungal endophytes in tropical forests across a rainfall gradient. Can. J. Bot. 2002, 80, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oita, S.; Ibáñez, A.; Lutzoni, F.; Miadlikowska, J.; Geml, J.; Lewis, L.A.; Hom, L.A.; Carbone, I.; U’Ren, J.M.; Arnold, A.E. Climate and seasonality drive the richness and composition of tropical fungal endophytes at a landscape scale. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Giauque, H.; Hawkes, C.V. Climate affects symbiotic fungal endophyte diversity and performance. Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Porras-Alfaro, A.; Raghavan, S.; Garcia, M.; Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Natvig, D.O.; Lowrey, T.K. Endophytic fungal symbionts associated with gypsophilous plants. Botany 2014, 92, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Massimo, N.C.; Devan, M.N.; Arendt, K.R.; Wilch, M.H.; Riddle, J.M.; Furr, S.H.; Steen, C.; U’Ren, J.M.; Sandberg, D.C.; Arnold, A.E. Fungal endophytes in aboveground tissues of desert plants: Infrequent in culture, but highly diverse and distinctive symbionts. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noy-Meir, I. Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1973, 4, 25–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maestre, F.T.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Jeffries, T.C.; Eldridge, D.J.; Ochoa, V.; Gozalo, B.; Querod, J.; García-Gómez, M.; Gallardof, A.; Ulrichg, W.; et al. Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15684–15689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Jiao, S.; Liu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, W.; Wei, G. Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: Biogeography and co-occurrence patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 98, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kivlin, S.N.; Winston, G.C.; Goulden, M.L.; Treseder, K.K. Environmental filtering affects soil fungal community composition more than dispersal limitation at regional scales. Fungal Ecol. 2014, 12, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lau, M.K.; Arnold, A.E.; Johnson, N.C. Factors influencing communities of foliar fungal endophytes in riparian woody plants. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gargouri, M.; Karray, F.; Chebaane, A.; Mhiri, N.; Partida-Martínez, L.P.; Sayadi, S.; Mliki, A. Increasing aridity shapes beta diversity and the network dynamics of the belowground fungal microbiome associated with Opuntia ficus-indica. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 773, 145008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Información Oficial Hidrometeorológica y de Calidad de Aguas en Línea. Available online: http://snia.dga.cl/BNAConsultas/reportes (accessed on 10 December 2015).
  27. De Martonne, E. Aridité et indices d´aridité. Académie des Sciences. Comptes Rendus 1923, 182, 1935–1938. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jackson, C.R.; Randolph, K.C.; Osborn, S.L.; Tyler, H.L. Culture dependent and independent analysis of bacterial communities associated with commercial salad leaf vegetables. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bodenhausen, N.; Horton, M.W.; Bergelson, J. Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and roots of Arabidopis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bui, A.; Orr, D.; Lepori-Bui, M.; Konicek, K.; Young, H.S.; Moeller, H.V. Soil fungal community composition and functional similarity shift across distinct climatic conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Penner, S.; Sapir, Y. Foliar Endophytic Fungi Inhabiting an Annual Grass Along an Aridity Gradient. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 2080–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Herrera, J.; Poudel, R.; Nebel, K.A.; Collins, S.L. Precipitation increases the abundance of some groups of root-associated fungal endophytes in a semiarid grassland. Ecosphere 2011, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brockett, B.F.; Prescott, C.E.; Grayston, S.J. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 44, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaisermann, A.; Maron, P.A.; Beaumelle, L.; Lata, J.C. Fungal communities are more sensitive indicators to non-extreme soil moisture variations than bacterial communities. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 86, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schwinning, S.; Sala, O.E. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 2004, 141, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Andrew, D.R.; Fitak, R.R.; Munguia-Vega, A.; Racolta, A.; Martinson, V.G.; Dontsova, K. Abiotic factors shape microbial diversity in Sonoran Desert soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7527–7537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Loro, M.; Valero-Jiménez, C.A.; Nozawa, S.; Márquez, L.M. Diversity and composition of fungal endophytes in semiarid Northwest Venezuela. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 85, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. González-Teuber, M.; Vilo, C.; Bascuñán-Godoy, L. Molecular characterization of endophytic fungi associated with the roots of Chenopodium quinoa inhabiting the Atacama Desert, Chile. Genom. Data 2017, 11, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. González-Teuber, M.; Urzúa, A.; Plaza, P.; Bascuñán-Godoy, L. Effects of root endophytic fungi on response of Chenopodium quinoa to drought stress. Plant Ecol. 2018, 219, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. González-Teuber, M.; Contreras, R.A.; Zuñiga, G.E.; Barrera, D.; Bascunan-Godoy, L. Synergistic association with root endophytic fungi improves physiological and biochemical responses of Chenopodium quinoa to salt stress. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 9, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, T.; Yao, Y.F. Endophytic fungal communities associated with vascular plants in the high arctic zone are highly diverse and host-plant specific. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. De Frenne, P.; Graae, B.J.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, F.; Kolb, A.; Chabrerie, O.; Decocq, G.; De Kort, H.; De Schrijver, A.D.; Diekmann, M.; Eriksson, O.; et al. Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species’ responses to temperature. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Caddy-Retalic, S.; Andersen, A.N.; Aspinwall, M.J.; Breed, M.F.; Byrne, M.; Christmas, M.J.; Bradley, N.D.; Fordham, D.A.; Guerin, G.R.; Hoffmann, A.A.; et al. Bioclimatic transect networks: Powerful observatories of ecological change. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 4607–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bull, A.T.; Andrews, B.A.; Dorador, C.; Goodfellow, M. Introducing the Atacama Desert. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Valdivia, C.E.; Niemeyer, H.M. Noncorrelated evolution between herbivore and pollinator-linked features in Aristolochia chilensis (Aristolochiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 91, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hoffmann, A. El Árbol Urbano en Chile, 3rd ed.; Fundación Claudio Gay: Santiago, Chile, 1998; p. 79. [Google Scholar]
  48. Verbist, K.; Robertson, A.W.; Cornelis, W.M.; Gabriels, D. Seasonal predictability of daily rainfall characteristics in central northern Chile for dry-land management. JAMC 2010, 49, 1938–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dirección Meteorológica de Chile. Available online: http://www.meteochile.cl/PortalDMC-web/index.xhtml (accessed on 20 December 2016).
  50. Rodriguez, R.; Marticorena, C.; Alarcón, D.; Baeza, C.; Cavieres, L.; Finot, V.L.; Fuentes, N.; Kiessling, A.; Mihoc, M.; Pauchard, A.; et al. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Chile. Gayana Bot. 2018, 75, 1–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Arnold, A.E.; Maynard, Z.; Gilbert, G.S. Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical trees: Patterns of abundance and diversity. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1502–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Arnold, A.E.; Mejia, L.C.; Kyllo, D.; Rojas, E.I.; Maynard, Z.; Robbins, N.; Herre, E.A. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15649–15654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gamboa, M.A.; Laureano, S.; Bayman, P. Measuring diversity of endophytic fungi in leaf fragments: Does size matter? Mycopathologia 2002, 156, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nicholson, T.P.; Rudd, B.A.; Dawson, M.; Lazarus, C.M.; Simpson, T.J.; Cox, R.J. Design and utility of oligonucleotide gene probes for fungal polyketide synthases. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Fu, L.; Niu, B.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, S.; Li, W. CD-HIT: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3150–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sadzawka, A.; Carrasco, M.; Grez, R.; Mora, M.; Flores, H.; Neaman, A. Métodos de análisis recomendados para los suelos de Chile. In Serie Actas–Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigación La Platina: Santiago, Chile, 2006; p. 164. [Google Scholar]
  57. Arnold, A.E.; Henk, D.A.; Eells, R.L.; Lutzoni, F.; Vilgalys, R. Diversity and phylogenetic affinities of foliar fungal endophytes in loblolly pine inferred by culturing and environmental PCR. Mycologia 2007, 99, 185–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. McArdle, B.H.; Anderson, M.J. Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 2001, 82, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Warton, D.I.; Wright, S.T.; Wang, Y. Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Paliy, O.; Shankar, V. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 1032–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 October 2016).
Plants 11 01511 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographic positions, mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and aridity index of selected Aristolochia chilensis locations. Locations (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí) were chosen based on increasing aridity, ranging from hyper-arid to semi-arid. The annual averages of precipitations and temperature were calculated by taking into account the weather of a 15-year period (data extracted from [26]). The aridity index was calculated according to the De Martonne aridity index [27], where the lowest value represents the most arid place. A picture of a plant of A. chilensis growing naturally in the field is shown.
Figure 1. Geographic positions, mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and aridity index of selected Aristolochia chilensis locations. Locations (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí) were chosen based on increasing aridity, ranging from hyper-arid to semi-arid. The annual averages of precipitations and temperature were calculated by taking into account the weather of a 15-year period (data extracted from [26]). The aridity index was calculated according to the De Martonne aridity index [27], where the lowest value represents the most arid place. A picture of a plant of A. chilensis growing naturally in the field is shown.
Plants 11 01511 g001
Plants 11 01511 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance (average ± SE, n = 10 plants per location) of the four most abundant root FE genera found in the three locations of Aristolochia chilensis (Kruskal–Wallis). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns indicates non-significant differences.
Figure 2. Relative abundance (average ± SE, n = 10 plants per location) of the four most abundant root FE genera found in the three locations of Aristolochia chilensis (Kruskal–Wallis). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns indicates non-significant differences.
Plants 11 01511 g002
Plants 11 01511 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of fungal endophyte communities in three locations of Aristolochia chilensis: Huasco, Totoralillo and Quilimarí. A two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) is shown.
Figure 3. Comparison of fungal endophyte communities in three locations of Aristolochia chilensis: Huasco, Totoralillo and Quilimarí. A two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) is shown.
Plants 11 01511 g003
Table
Table 1. Best BLAST matches for OTUs of root endophytic fungi of Aristolochia chilensis plants from the three locations (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí).
Table 1. Best BLAST matches for OTUs of root endophytic fungi of Aristolochia chilensis plants from the three locations (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí).
LocationDescriptionIdentity (%)No. of IsolatesAccession Number
HuascoAspergillus ustus99.8%2HQ607918.1
Aspergillus versicolor100%1MT560203.1
Clonostachys sp.99.8%3MH864436.1
Fusarium oxysporum100%41MT560381.1
Fusarium sp.100%19MT447523.1
Hypocrea lixii99.5%1EF191308.1
Penicillium gladioli99.5%3DQ339568.1
Penicillium murcianum99.5%3KP016843.1
Penicillium polonicum100%6MT529240.1
TotoralilloCladosporium ramotenellum100%1MT441591.1
Clonostachys rosea100%14MT441592.1
Diaporthe columnaris100%2MT441604.1
Epicoccum nigrum100%1MT441593.1
Fungal sp.100%11MT441613.1
Fusarium decemcellulare100%3MT441594.1
Fusarium oxysporum 1100%3MT441590.1
Fusarium oxysporum 2100%39MT530243.1
Fusarium sp.100%115MT441596.1
Fusarium sambucinum100%8MT441588.1
Hypocrea viridescens100%2MT441598.1
Meyerozyma caribbica100%1MT441599.1
Meyerozyma guilliermondii100%14MN592978.1
Penicillium crustosum100%1MT441603.1
Penicillium glabrum100%5MT441616.1
Penicillium murcianum100%2MT441602.1
Penicillium sp.100%1MT441612.1
Phialemoniopsis cornearis100%9MT441611.1
Phomopsis sp.100%17MT441605.1
Preussia australis100%1MT441614.1
Sarocladium spinificis100%1MT441606.1
Talaromyces amestolkiae100%9MT441607.1
Talaromyces minioluteus100%1MT441589.1
Talaromyces minioluteus100%15MT441589.1
Trichoderma atroviride100%1MT441609.1
Trichoderma breve97%1MT441608.1
Trichoderma lixii100%1MT441597.1
Trichoderma sp.100%1MT441610.1
Trichoderma virilente99.8%8NR_138447.1
QuilimaríAspergillus flavipes99.81EU645664.1
Fusarium oxysporum 110073MT560381.1
Fusarium oxysporum 299.4117ON081646.1
Fusarium oxysporum 399.61MH454072.1
Fusarium sp.99.52HQ130713.1
Meyerozyma guilliermondii95.71MH545918.1
Meyerozyma guilliermondii97.82LC317638.1
Trichoderma sp.99.82KX459438.1
Uncultured Clonostachys96.52MK407059.1
Uncultured fungus clone99.72KF800414.1
Table
Table 2. Infection frequency and indexes of diversity of FE for the three locations where Aristolochia chilensis was collected (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí). Values indicate means ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among locations (non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests).
Table 2. Infection frequency and indexes of diversity of FE for the three locations where Aristolochia chilensis was collected (H: Huasco; T: Totoralillo; Q: Quilimarí). Values indicate means ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among locations (non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests).
IndexesHTQ
Chao32.62 ± 4.62 a54.43 ± 5.54 b76.38 ± 1.63 c
Bootstrap20.65 ± 3.02 a54.26 ± 10.45 b59.92 ± 1.16 c
FE frequency7.90 ± 1.79 a28.81 ± 6.03 b20.20 ± 4.64 b
Shannon0.88 ± 0.16 a1.47 ± 0.19 b0.91 ± 0.14 ab
Simpson0.47 ± 0.09 a0.58 ± 0.07 a0.45 ± 0.06 a
Table
Table 3. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) of fungal endophyte communities in the three locations where Aristolochia chilensis was collected: Huasco (H), Totoralillo (T) and Quilimarí (Q) (n = 10 replicates per location). Pairwise PERMANOVAs between locations are also indicated.
Table 3. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) of fungal endophyte communities in the three locations where Aristolochia chilensis was collected: Huasco (H), Totoralillo (T) and Quilimarí (Q) (n = 10 replicates per location). Pairwise PERMANOVAs between locations are also indicated.
dfSSMSPseudo-FR2p
Locations2934.7467.32.630.160.008
Residuals274790.1177.4 0.83
Total295724.8 1
H vs. T1100.5 0.740.030.740
H vs. Q1542.7 3.420.150.036
T vs. Q1758.9 3.170.150.004
Table
Table 4. Distance-based redundancy analysis assessing edaphic factors that contribute to explain variations in fungal endophyte communities associated with roots of Aristolochia chilensis (asterisk represents a significant contribution). * p < 0.05, ns indicates non-significant differences.
Table 4. Distance-based redundancy analysis assessing edaphic factors that contribute to explain variations in fungal endophyte communities associated with roots of Aristolochia chilensis (asterisk represents a significant contribution). * p < 0.05, ns indicates non-significant differences.
Edaphic FactorsAICFp
Soil water potential82.041.630.03 *
Soil moisture82.031.510.04 *
pH81.421.270.15 ns
N81.161.220.16 ns
P81.180.990.46 ns
K81.390.840.74 ns
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guevara-Araya, M.J.; Escobedo, V.M.; Palma-Onetto, V.; González-Teuber, M. Changes in Diversity and Community Composition of Root Endophytic Fungi Associated with Aristolochia chilensis along an Aridity Gradient in the Atacama Desert. Plants 2022, 11, 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111511

AMA Style

Guevara-Araya MJ, Escobedo VM, Palma-Onetto V, González-Teuber M. Changes in Diversity and Community Composition of Root Endophytic Fungi Associated with Aristolochia chilensis along an Aridity Gradient in the Atacama Desert. Plants. 2022; 11(11):1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guevara-Araya, María José, Víctor M. Escobedo, Valeria Palma-Onetto, and Marcia González-Teuber. 2022. "Changes in Diversity and Community Composition of Root Endophytic Fungi Associated with Aristolochia chilensis along an Aridity Gradient in the Atacama Desert" Plants 11, no. 11: 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop