Next Article in Journal
Design of an Adaptive Distributed Drive Control Strategy for a Wheel-Side Rear-Drive Electric Bus
Next Article in Special Issue
From Beginning to BEGANing: Role of Adversarial Learning in Reshaping Generative Models
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Beamforming for Multi-User Millimeter-Wave Heterogeneous Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Classification in Autonomous Driving Environment Using 3D LiDAR and Camera Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Substation Fire Early Warning Scheme Based on Multi-Information Fusion

1
State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
2
Hebei Chuangke Electronic Technology Company Limited, Handan 056000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2022, 11(24), 4222; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244222
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 18 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Applications)

Abstract

:
In view of the substation fire early warning using a single information sensor monitoring, it is easy to make mistakes and omissions. Taking the cable in substation as the research object, a multi-information fusion fire prediction model based on back propagation neural network (BPNN) and fuzzy set theory is proposed. Firstly, the BPNN model is trained by using the existing data. Secondly, the artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) is used to optimize the BPNN, which speeds up convergence speed of the model and improves the accuracy of prediction. The fuzzy set theory is applied to fuse the predicted fire probability to obtain the optimal fire prevention and control decision. Finally, the fire protection measures are taken according to the fire decision. The experimental show that the average absolute errors of no fire, smoldering and open fire decreased by 26.06%, 38.5% and 43.13% respectively. The model has higher prediction accuracy, can reasonably output different levels of fire alarm signals, establish substation fire warning and prevention and control system, and provide reference for future substation fire and other disasters warning and prevention and control.

1. Introduction

Substation which is important part of the power system is responsible for voltage transformation, power distribution, and voltage regulation through current control. The alternating current (AC) power supply system offers assure for the safety and stable operation of the substation, which is the premise for stable operation of the entire substation [1,2,3]. However, in actual situation, this part of the power supply system is prone to fire, which causes the substation to not operate normally [4]. Station AC power supply provides reliable power supply for station load. The cables that transmit energy are spread in substation cable ditches and cable shafts. If there is no effective means to monitor the operation status of the cables, the fire caused by the cable failure will cause serious accidents in the substation [5,6]. Thus, studying the fire warning technology of the cables in the substation to raise the safety of AC power supply system for the station become more and more significant.
At present, the main way of fire alarm for substation AC power system is monitored by smoke sensor or temperature sensor [7]. Monitoring with a single sensor may cause false alarm, or delay alarm, resulting in more serious fire. For the above problems, multi-information fusion technology has been applied to load forecasting, industrial safety monitoring system, and substation fire monitoring system [8,9]. The literature [10] uses a fusion of multiple information such as weather, holidays, and historical loads to forecast transit compliance. It has better prediction results compared to single information. Reference [11] applied multi-information fusion technology to chemical plant safety warning and improved the performance of the warning system by monitoring dust concentration, temperature, and flue gas concentration. In ref. [12], an early warning system based on multi-information fusion was developed for the fire protection of energy storage systems. The linkage with the fire protection system was realized. In this paper, the multi-information fusion technology is applied to the fire probability prediction of substations. For the early warning technology of fire, different information is selected to determine whether a fire will occur or not [13]. In ref. [14], an accurate prediction model was constructed by analyzing the factors affecting hydrogen pipeline leakage fires and selecting the main factors. Ref. [15] uses temperature, smoke, and carbon monoxide as input signals for electrical fire warning systems. Ref. [16] applied a combination of smoke and gas sensors for aircraft fire detection with shorter alarm times than smoke sensors operating alone. Ref. [17] uses the characteristic parameter residual current of power equipment as a characteristic signal for predicting electrical fires, which effectively reduces the false alarm rate. Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes to use residual current, operating voltage and operating current as input signals for predicting fires according to the working characteristics of substations, and combine them with temperature to further improve the accuracy rate.
With the development of artificial intelligence in various fields, the combination of multi-information fusion technology and artificial intelligence algorithms is gradually applied to fire early warning. [18,19,20,21]. Ref. [22] applied fuzzy logic to substation fire detection and combined it with multi-information fusion technology to improve the performance of substation fire detection. Ref. [23] selected temperature, smoke concentration, and CO concentration and applied BP neural network to predict the probability of fire. In ref. [24], gray-fuzzy neural networks were proposed to predict fires and determine the fire probability by predicting the smoke concentration and density. In ref. [25] uses dynamic Bayesian networks combined with fuzzy set theory for evaluating the reliability of fire alarm systems.
Therefore, based on the working characteristics of the substation, this paper selects residual current, working voltage, working current and the inherent characteristic temperature when the fire occurs as the input of the prediction model. Artificial fish swarm algorithm is used to optimize BP neural network to predict fire probability, and the prediction results are divided into open fire probability, smoldering probability and no fire probability. The three fire probabilities are output through the decision-making of fuzzy theory to judge whether a fire occurs. Finally, the fire protection system is linked to ensure the safety of the substation. The main innovations of this study are as follows:
  • Residual current, working voltage, working current and temperature are used as input signals to judge the probability of fire. It can predict whether a fire will occur in advance through the change of current before the fire.
  • BP neural network is used to predict open fire probability, smoldering probability and no fire probability, and artificial fish swarm algorithm is used to optimize BP neural network to improve prediction accuracy.
  • The three fire probabilities are combined with the fire duration for decision output, and the final fire output is divided into four levels: no fire, alert, alarm and serious alarm. Combined with fire fighting system to ensure substation safety.

2. Multi-Sensor Information Fusion Technology

The technology contains information layer, feature layer and decision layer [26,27]. The structure of the text shown in the Figure 1:
The decision-making layer makes judgment based on fire probability, and combines fire probability value with other decision-making factors. When fire probability is exactly 0.5, it is impossible to judge whether there is a fire. Therefore, the fuzzy theory is introduced and the duration of fire signal is added as decision-making factor to improve the decision-making level. The output of decision-making level is divided into four levels: no fire, warning, alarm and serious alarm. The step of fuzzy reasoning firstly fuzzifies the input signals and output signals, then establishes the fuzzy rules [28]. Equations (1) and (2) establish fuzzy implication relations. Rule i correspond to the fuzzy implication relationship Ri. Finally, the table of input and output rules is generated.
R i = Y 1 i   and   Y 2 i   and   T I
R x , y , z , u = U i = 1 n R i
Figure 2 shows the output surface of the established fuzzy inference system.
The occurrence of fire can be clearly judged from the output surface of fuzzy inference. The x axis is the probability of open fire, the y axis is the probability of smoldering fire, the z axis is the decision output value u, and the fluctuation of color represents the early warning situation. The dark blue situation is relatively light, and the yellow situation is serious. Specifically, when u < 0.25, it is normal, 0.25 ≤ u < 0.5, it is abnormal, 0.5 ≤ u < 0.75, it is critical alarm, and u ≥ 0.75, it is extremely urgent alarm.

3. Establishment of Substation Fire Warning Model

3.1. The Relationship between Input Signal and Output Signal

In the text, where i = 1,2,…, n is set to input signal. j = 1,2,…, m is set to output signal. The relationship between them is as follows:
S k = i = 1 n υ k i X i + υ k 0 , 1 k h
Z k = σ S k , 1 k h
Y j = k = 1 h ω j k Z k + ω j 0 , 1 j m
The hidden layer input is Sk, the hidden layer output is Zk, vki is the connection weight between input layer and hidden layer, vk0 is the hidden layer threshold, ω j k is connection weight from hidden layer to the output layer, ω j 0 is the output layer threshold [15].
The error is calculated by simulating the output of the training samples and is propagated backwards to continuously adjust the weights and thresholds to meet error requirements. The error function is:
E = 1 2 a = 1 t k = 1 m q k a p k a 2
where q k a is actual output, p k a is expected output.

3.2. Optimized Prediction Model of AFSA Based on BPNN

Owing to random selection of thresholds and weights of the BPNN, resulting in different convergence times, even the standard error cannot be reached within the specified number of times, this paper uses AFSA to optimize the BPNN [29,30,31].

3.2.1. Description of AFSA

An individual’s state in an artificial fish population in a D-dimensional space is X i = X i 1 , X i 2 , , X i D , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , N . Y represents the fitness of current position of artificial fish. The fitness of current position Xi, Yi is used to evaluate the fitness of the current position X. The distance between individuals is d i j = | | X i X j | | . The optimal solution is found by foraging, clustering and tailing behaviour.
  • Foraging Behavior
X v = X i + r a n d o m × v i s u a l
X i n e x t = X i + r a n d o m × s t e p × X v X i | | X v X i | |
X i n e x t = X i + r a n d o m × s t e p
If Y v > Y i , the food concentration at the location is high and the artificial fish moves to D in that direction. If it is not satisfied and the maximum number of attempts is reached, it moves randomly.
2.
Cluster Behavior
Set a time t, artificial fish state Xi, number of partners Nf within the field of view to form a set Si, if S i = , artificial fish perform foraging behavior, if there are other partners, partner population center location Xc, and Y c N f > δ Y i , artificial fish move to that location.
3.
Tailing Behavior
The optimal position with inartificial fish field of view is Xm, and the corresponding Ym is the maximum fitness value. If Y m N f > δ Y i indicates that the food concentration in this location is high and not crowded, it moves in this direction.

3.2.2. Optimization Process of AFSA

The variables to be optimized in this paper are vki, ωjk, bk, bj of the BPNN. Each artificial fish represents a set of weights and thresholds of the BPNN [32]. Use the reciprocal of E as the Y value to find the maximum of the fitness Y.
Y = 1 E = 1 / 1 2 a = 1 t k = 1 m q k a p k a 2
Figure 3 shows the optimization process.

3.3. Assessment Indicators

In the text, the accuracy of substation fire warning model is evaluated by means of two error indexes, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) y M A P E and root mean square error (RMSE). MAPE and RMSE determine the accuracy of the model. Equation (11) is MAPE, and Equation (12) is RMSE.
y M A P E = 1 n i = 1 n | y a ( i ) y p ( i ) y a ( i ) |
y R M S E = i = 1 n [ y a ( i ) y p ( i ) ] 2 n
ya(i) and yp(i) are the actual and predicted values of fire probability.
Figure 3 is the workflow diagram of the model based on the behaviour of the fish school. The specific steps are: (1) Build a BP network model, set the dimensions of the neural network weight threshold, and set the parameters to be optimized for the BP network structure to the initial position of the fish school individual; (2) Calculate the fitness value of the individual of the initial fish school, and determine the behaviour of the fish school according to the judgment conditions; (3) Judge whether the optimal solution is found or the maximum number of iterations is reached. If the conditions are met, the iteration is terminated, otherwise, the iterative optimization is continued; (4) Output the weights and thresholds assigned to the BP network by the optimal solution; (5) Calculate the output fire probability.

4. Forecast Results and Analysis

Select representative data samples from published papers and national standard fire test data. The model is trained and forecasted using the model. In the text, the parameters of BPNN are set to display the results once in 25 turns, the learning speed is 0.01, maximum training times are 5000, and mean square error is 0.0001.The size of artificial fish stocks is 20, is 0.6, step is 0.05. The number of iterations of the two algorithms is shown in Figure 4. The number of iterations of forecasting model optimized by the AFSA is significantly reduced.
The predicted values of BPNN optimized by AFSA and traditional BPNN for fire probability are shown in Figure 5.
The MAPE and RMSE of the predicted values optimized by BPNN and AFSA are shown in Figure 6.
From the graph analysis, the MAPE of no fire probability decreases by 26.06%, the RMSE decreases by 25.47%, the MAPE of smoldering probability decreases by 38.5%, the RMSE decreases by 11.18%, the MAPE of open fire probability decreases by 43.13%, the RMSE decreases by 16.23%, and the optimization of AFSA improve the accuracy of substation fire prediction model. After forecasting probability value of substation fire, output probability is judged by fuzzy strategy and different firefighting measures are taken by output decision signal. Table 1 is the decision-making judgment of fire probability value of forecast samples.
It can be seen from Table 1 that the decision and judgment on the fire probability values of ten prediction samples are correct, indicating the feasibility of this method.

5. Substation Fire Control Strategy

Based on the decision-making judgment of the predicted sample fire probability value, the fire alarm host interacts with the fire control equipment to take corresponding fire control measures. When the output decision is no fire, the substation operates safely; when the decision is warning, the fire extinguishing device is not started, and the substation personnel always observe the abnormal signal, and check the warning place if necessary; when the decision is to alarm, the fire alarm host receives the signal to start the automatic fire extinguishing device immediately; when the decision is serious alarm, the automatic fire extinguishing device is started immediately, the power supply is cut off, and the substation personnel go to the alarm to handle the accident. The fire control system is shown in Figure 7. The black arrow indicates the direction of information interaction.
For cable trench, cable sandwich, cable shafts and other electrical equipment in substation, install automatic fire extinguishing devices to achieve active fire extinguishing in the event of a fire. The aerosol fire extinguishing system can be used for fire extinguishing devices in substations. When triggered by the aerosol fire extinguishing device, chemical agents filled inside generate fire extinguishing gases, mainly metal oxide particles and inert gases, to achieve full submerged fire extinguishing.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, aiming at the substation fire prevention problem, taking the substation AC power system cables as the research object, the multi-information fusion technology is proposed for the substation fire warning research, and the characteristics and decision-making layers of the multi-information fusion technology are deeply studied. The BPNN prediction model is optimized by AFSA optimization, which improves convergence speed and reduces error, making the fire probability more accurate. Through fuzzy set theory and decision-making factors, the accuracy of fire prediction in substation is further improved. The substation control center takes different fire control measures according to the output of decision-making. The model proposed in the text can not only be used in the fire prediction of substation, but also can provide reference for dealing with other disasters in Substation in the future.

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, J.M.; review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, B.L.; methodology, software, writing—original draft preparation, X.D. and H.W.; validation, B.L. and X.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the State Grid Hebei Electric Power Co., Ltd. Science and Technology Project (kj2020-069).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, M.; Wu, J.B.; Li, C.H.; Luo, W.; Zhang, L.W. Transformer Fire Identification Method Based on Multi-Neural Network and Evidence Theory. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 9th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, 11–13 December 2020; pp. 1586–1590. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, S.B.; Li, L.; Zhao, X.J.; Xie, Y.Q.; Cai, L.H. Asymmetrical DC bias analysis of the no-load series transformer by using the TPFEM. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2017, 11, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Humayun, M.; Safdarian, A.; Ali, M.; Degefa, M.Z.; Lehtonen, M. Optimal capacity planning of substation transformers by demand response combined with network automation. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2016, 134, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pan, C.; Yi, S.Y.; Su, H.; Shi, W.X. Excitation–vibration harmonic response research of transformer in DC biasing operation. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2019, 13, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, H.M.; Zou, L.; Wang, X.L.; Song, Z.P.; Duan, Y.B.; Zhang, H. Analysis of Fire Spread in High Voltage Cable Trench under Different Cable Laying Modes. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Equipment and Reliable Operation (AEERO), Beijing, China, 15–17 October 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, X.S.; Hou, D.; Ji, J.; Zhu, H. Experiment and numerical simulation of cable trench fire detection. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 28, 101338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.Y.; Ren, J.C.; Yan, Y.J.; Sun, M.J.; Hu, F.Y.; Zhao, H.M. Multi-sourced sensing and support vector machine classification for effective detection of fire hazard in early stage. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2022, 101, 108046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iqbal, K.; Abbas, S.; Khan, M.A.; Ather, A.; Khan, M.S.; Fatima, A.; Ahmad, G. Autonomous parking-lots detection with multi-sensor data fusion using machine deep learning techniques. CMC Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 66, 1595–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tan, Q.L.; Wang, P.; Hu, J.; Zhou, P.J.; Bai, M.Z.; Hu, J.P. The application of multi-sensor target tracking and fusion technology to the comprehensive early warning information extraction of landslide multi-point monitoring data. Measurement 2020, 166, 108044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fan, S.X.; Liu, X.W.; Ma, W.W.; Zhang, W. Ultra-short-term Bus Load Forecasting Method Based on Multi-source Data and Hybrid Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 4th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), Wuhan, China, 30 October 2020; pp. 2976–2980. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhou, X.B.; Peng, T. Application of multi-sensor fuzzy information fusion algorithm in industrial safety monitoring system. Saf. Sci. 2020, 122, 104531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Li, T.; Chen, H.; Huang, B. Active safety warning system of energy storage system based on multi-sensor fusion. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 6th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China, 4–6 March 2022; pp. 929–933. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sowah, R.; Ofoli, A.R.; Krakani, S.; Fiawoo, S. Hardware module design of a real-time multi-sensor fire detection and notification system using fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Industry Application Society Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–9 October 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao, B.; Li, S.S.; Gao, D.K.; Xu, L.Z.; Zhang, Y.Y. Research on intelligent prediction of hydrogen pipeline leakage fire based on Finite Ridgelet neural network. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 23316–23323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, W. Electric fire early warning system of gymnasium building based on multi-sensor data fusion technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems Engineering (MLISE), Chongqing, China, 9–11 July 2021; pp. 339–343. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, S.J.; Hovde, D.C.; Peterson, K.A.; Marshall, A.W. Fire detection using smoke and gas sensors. Fire Saf. J. 2007, 42, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, X.W.; Zhang, K.; Chai, Y.; Li, Y. A Multi-sensor Characteristic Parameter Fusion Analysis Based Electrical Fire Detection Model. In Proceedings of the 2018 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, Wenzhou, China, 20–24 February 2018; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 397–410. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sun, B.; Xu, Z.D. A multi-neural network fusion algorithm for fire warning in tunnels. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022, 131, 109799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakip, M.; Güzelíş, C.; Yildiz, O. Recurrent trend predictive neural network for multi-sensor fire detection. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 84204–84216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qu, N.; Li, Z.Z.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, T.F. Multi-parameter fire detection method based on feature depth extraction and stacking ensemble learning model. Fire Saf. J. 2022, 128, 103541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H.; Yang, G.; Xin, J.; Wu, Y.; Xue, G. Corrosion Prediction for Naphtha and Gas System of Atmospheric Distillation Tower Based on Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2018, 6, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, D.E.; Lee, H.J.; Shon, J.G.; Park, J.D. Modified Expert Inference Method of Power Substation Monitoring System Based on Expansion of Multi-sensor Utilization for Fire Discrimination. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2019, 14, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liang, Y.H.; Tian, W.M. Multi-sensor Fusion Approach for Fire Alarm Using BP Neural Network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Networking & Collaborative Systems, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 7–9 September 2016; pp. 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, Y.; Yu, C.Y.; Tu, R.; Zhang, Y.M. Fire detection model in Tibet based on grey-fuzzy neural network algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 9580–9586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jafari, M.J.; Pouyakian, M.; Khanteymoori, A.; Hanifi, S.M. Reliability evaluation of fire alarm systems using dynamic Bayesian networks and fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2020, 67, 104229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.Y.; Yu, K.Y.; Xi, D.M. The research on the coordinated control system of PID neural network based on artificial fish swarm algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China, 28–30 May 2016; pp. 3065–3068. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, H.; Liao, W.L.; Li, C.; Shao, L.D.; Weng, K.Y. Discussion on multi-sensor information fusion in greenhouse detection system. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA), Changsha, China, 27–28 May 2017; pp. 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xia, W.; Zhao, D.A.; Guo, J.L.; Chen, B. Research on the abrasive water-jet cutting machine information fusion fault diagnosis system based on fuzzy neural network. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science, Wuhan, China, 23–25 April 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, Y.; Shahbazzade, S.; Jian, W. The integrated loading and unloading quay crane scheduling problem by AFSA-GA algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 16th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI* CC), Oxford, UK, 26–28 July 2017; pp. 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fei, O.Y. Research on Port Logistics Distribution Route Planning Based on Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. J. Coast. Res. 2020, 115, 78–80. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cao, L.; Cai, Y.; Yue, Y.G. Swarm intelligence-based performance optimization for mobile wireless sensor networks: Survey, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 161524–161553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, X.L.; Lian, L.K.; Zhu, F.K. Parameter fitting of variogram based on hybrid algorithm of particle swarm and artificial fish swarm. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2021, 116, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multi-information fusion structure.
Figure 1. Multi-information fusion structure.
Electronics 11 04222 g001
Figure 2. Fuzzy inference output surface.
Figure 2. Fuzzy inference output surface.
Electronics 11 04222 g002
Figure 3. AFSA for optimizing flow chart of BPNN.
Figure 3. AFSA for optimizing flow chart of BPNN.
Electronics 11 04222 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of BPNN and AFSA−BPNN algorithm iterations. (a) Iteration times of BPNN algorithm,(b) Iteration times of AFSA-BPNN algorithm.
Figure 4. Comparison of BPNN and AFSA−BPNN algorithm iterations. (a) Iteration times of BPNN algorithm,(b) Iteration times of AFSA-BPNN algorithm.
Electronics 11 04222 g004aElectronics 11 04222 g004b
Figure 5. Forecast of fire probability.
Figure 5. Forecast of fire probability.
Electronics 11 04222 g005
Figure 6. Error of BPNN and AFSA-BPNN algorithms in predicting fire probability.
Figure 6. Error of BPNN and AFSA-BPNN algorithms in predicting fire probability.
Electronics 11 04222 g006
Figure 7. Flowchart of substation fire warning and fire control.
Figure 7. Flowchart of substation fire warning and fire control.
Electronics 11 04222 g007
Table 1. Decision-making judgment of fire probability value of forecast samples.
Table 1. Decision-making judgment of fire probability value of forecast samples.
Smoldering ProbabilityOpen Fire ProbabilityDecision OutputDecision-making JudgmentIs the Decision Correct
10.52280.3360.659Alarmcorrect
20.05340.1920.381Warningcorrect
30.29060.54050.658Alarmcorrect
40.26040.50250.656Alarmcorrect
50.29570.53550.658Alarmcorrect
60.10210.0740.222No firecorrect
70.21760.53280.657Alarmcorrect
80.57880.31590.659Alarmcorrect
90.15480.05050.307Warningcorrect
100.4460.39660.651Alarmcorrect
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, J.; Li, B.; Du, X.; Wang, H. A Substation Fire Early Warning Scheme Based on Multi-Information Fusion. Electronics 2022, 11, 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244222

AMA Style

Miao J, Li B, Du X, Wang H. A Substation Fire Early Warning Scheme Based on Multi-Information Fusion. Electronics. 2022; 11(24):4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Junjie, Bingyu Li, Xuhao Du, and Haobin Wang. 2022. "A Substation Fire Early Warning Scheme Based on Multi-Information Fusion" Electronics 11, no. 24: 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop