Next Article in Journal
A Cost-Optimized Data Parallel Task Scheduling with Deadline Constraints in Cloud
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultra-Wideband Pentagonal Fractal Antenna with Stable Radiation Characteristics for Microwave Imaging Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Analysis of a Short Reference Orthogonal Double Bit Rate Differential Chaotic Shift Keying Communication Scheme
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel and Compact Slotted-Decahedral Antenna for 5G Devices
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Survey on CubeSat Missions and Their Antenna Designs

Electronics 2022, 11(13), 2021; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132021
by Sining Liu 1, Panagiotis Ioannis Theoharis 1, Raad Raad 1, Faisel Tubbal 1,2,*, Angelos Theoharis 1,3, Saeid Iranmanesh 1, Suhila Abulgasem 1, Muhammad Usman Ali Khan 1,4 and Ladislau Matekovits 5,6,7
Reviewer 1:
Electronics 2022, 11(13), 2021; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132021
Submission received: 1 June 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Designs for 5G/IoT and Space Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is a pity that the limited size of the manuscript did not allow authors to insert some design solutions, particularly concerning antenna design issues.   

Author Response

We agree with reviewer that including some designs' solutions for antenna designs issues can add a value to the paper and we thank the reviewer for his/her understanding that this will require extra work and will increase the survey paper size which is already big. The main aim of this survey paper is to provide a comprehensive survey about CubeSat missions and to present different antenna designs that were proposed for CubeSat Applications.

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his comments and feedback. The attached file shows our response to the comments. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The proposed review is well drafted and organized. The paper could be accepted in the present form. I recommend to accept the paper for publication.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his positive feedback 

Back to TopTop