Next Article in Journal
Streptomyces rugosispiralis sp. nov., a Novel Actinobacterium Isolated from Peat Swamp Forest Soil That Produces Ansamycin Derivatives and Nocardamines
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Analysis of Carbapenem and Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Strains: A Challenge for Tertiary Care Hospitals
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation, Identification, and Antibacterial Properties of Prodigiosin, a Bioactive Product Produced by a New Serratia marcescens JSSCPM1 Strain: Exploring the Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of Serratia Species for Biological Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Poor Sensitivity of the MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module for Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) in Klebsiella Species

1
Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
2
Hackensack Meridian Health Center for Discovery and Innovation, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
3
Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá 110121, Colombia
5
The Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
6
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
7
Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(9), 1465; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091465
Submission received: 26 August 2023 / Revised: 13 September 2023 / Accepted: 14 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:
Rapid detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) in the Klebsiella species is desirable. The MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module (Bruker Daltonics) uses an algorithm that detects a peak at ~11,109 m/z corresponding to a protein encoded by the p019 gene to detect KPC simultaneously with organism identification by a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS). Here, the subtyping module was evaluated using 795 clinical Klebsiella isolates, with whole genome sequences used to assess for blaKPC and p019. For the isolates identified as KPC positive by sequencing, the overall sensitivity of the MALDI-ToF MS subtyping module was 239/574 (42%) with 100% specificity. For the isolates harboring p019, the subtyping module showed a sensitivity of 97% (239/246) and a specificity of 100%. The subtyping module had poor sensitivity for the detection of blaKPC-positive Klebsiella isolates, albeit exhibiting excellent specificity. The poor sensitivity was a result of p019 being present in only 43% of the blaKPC-positive Klebsiella isolates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasingly pressing challenge. A comprehensive study performed by the Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators estimated that globally in 2019, 4.95 and 1.27 million deaths were associated with or directly attributable to AMR, respectively [1]. As the leading AMR-types, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are classified as urgent threats by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with Klebsiella pneumoniae being a common carbapenem-resistant species [2].
Carbapenems have broad antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [3]. Carbapenem-resistant strains may be associated with multidrug resistance, severe infections, and poor treatment outcomes [4]. Although Enterobacterales may acquire carbapenem resistance by different mechanisms, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) is a common enzyme conferring resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacterales and can confer resistance in non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa [5,6]. According to Ambler’s scheme, KPCs belong to the class A β-lactamase family of enzymes, containing a serine residue at their active site that allows for hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of aztreonam, carbapenems, cephalosporins, and penicillins [7,8]. Variants of the blaKPC gene occur and can be found on plasmids, often in close association with mobile elements [9,10], or on the chromosome. The former accounts for the effectiveness of KPCs in spreading between strains, species, and genera, posing a major challenge, particularly in hospital settings. Accordingly, there is a need for methods that rapidly detect KPC-harboring bacteria suitable for use in the clinical microbiology laboratory to quickly inform treatment options.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) has been incorporated into most clinical microbiology laboratories in many countries for the rapid and reliable identification of bacteria grown in culture [11,12]. MALDI-ToF MS is a soft ionization method where matrix-embedded whole-cell-associated microbial analytes are desorbed by a laser [11,13]. The ionized microbial analytes are then accelerated based on their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio through a vacuum in a time-of-flight (ToF) analysis, with analytes of low mass traveling faster and arriving at a detector ahead of the larger ones [11,13]. This process generates a readout of a mass spectrum unique to most individual bacterial species, allowing for the identification of species by comparison to a database of spectra with a fast turnaround time and reasonable cost [11]. Thus, MALDI-ToF MS has become a powerful tool for the quick, specific, and relatively inexpensive identification of bacteria (and fungi) in clinical laboratories [12]. MALDI-ToF MS is not, however, commonly used to characterize antimicrobial susceptibility. This has resulted in species identification being available well ahead of results for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in most instances. The delay in availability for antimicrobial susceptibility testing results leaves some patients “over” treated and others “under” treated, depending on the empirically selected antibiotic regimen and the susceptibility of the bacterium with which individual patients are infected.
In 2014, a study by Lau and collaborators reported a ~11,109 m/z peak in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates, associated with a blaKPC-bearing pKpQIL plasmid; it was suggested that the detection of this peak might be used to identify the KPC-harboring Klebsiella species [14]. The peak corresponds to a cleavage product of P019, a hypothetical protein encoded by the p019 gene on the pKpQIL plasmid [14,15]. Prior studies have assessed the sensitivity and specificity of interrogating the ~11,109 m/z peak using automated detection algorithms coupled with MALDI-ToF MS to characterize KPC positivity with varying results. Cordovana and colleagues reported a KPC detection sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 100%, respectively, in 6209 K. pneumoniae isolates from Italy and Germany (including 2390 KPC producers), using the commercial MALDI Biotyper RUO and Flex Analysis 3.4 software (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) [16]. Gaibani and colleagues tested the MALDI Biotyper RTC subtyping module (Bruker Daltonics) using 59 K. pneumoniae isolates (including 34 KPC producers), reporting a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 99% [17]. Youn and colleagues evaluated 140 Enterobacterales (60 KPC producers, 26 with the p019 sequence) and reported a sensitivity and specificity of 96 and 99%, respectively, for p019-harboring isolates using the Bruker BioTyper and Flex Analysis software version 3.4 (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) [18]. Gato and colleagues performed a visual analysis of the mass spectral peaks obtained with the Bruker Daltonics subtyping module (Flex Control software 3.4 and Compass software 4.1.100) using 435 K. pneumoniae isolates (65 KPC producers), reporting a sensitivity of 49% and specificity of 100% [19].
The MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module (Bruker Daltonics) characterizes Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter kobei, Enterobacter ludwigii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, and Serratia marcescens as “KPC positive” if the mass spectral analysis produces a peak at ~11,109 m/z [20]. To expand on the previous work and further define the sensitivity and specificity of automated KPC detection by a commercially available software tool, we tested the performance of KPC detection by the MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module using 795 clinical Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) Klebsiella isolates from the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales (CRACKLE-2) study [21,22]. The mass spectrometry results were compared to those of whole genome sequencing (WGS) to further interpret the proteomics results in the genetic context of the isolates analyzed.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of Isolates by WGS

In total, 795 clinical ARLG Klebsiella isolates from CRACKLE-2 were tested, 792 (99.6%) of which were K. pneumoniae, with the remaining 3 (0.4%) being K. variicola. The species identification by MALDI-ToF MS matched the results for identification by WGS for all isolates. Geographically, the isolates were from four regions: (i) United States of America (USA), (ii) Central/Northern South America (Colombia and Nicaragua), (iii) Southern South America (Argentina and Chile), and (iv) Asia–Pacific (Lebanon and Singapore), although most isolates (739/795, 93%) were from the USA. All K. variicola isolates were from the USA, and 1/3 (33%) harbored the blaKPC3 gene (Figure 1a).
Among the K. pneumoniae isolates, the blaKPC2 gene was identified in isolates from the USA (320/736, 44%) and Central/Northern South America (1/6, 17%). Furthermore, 34% (248/736) of K. pneumoniae isolates from the USA harbored blaKPC3, while 0.5% (4/736) harbored other KPC genes. The isolates from Southern South America and Asia–Pacific were all K. pneumoniae, and none harbored blaKPC (Figure 1a,b).

2.2. KPC Detection by WGS and MALDI-ToF MS

The analysis of the results obtained by WGS showed that of 795 isolates tested, 574 (72%) were KPC-positive. Among the KPC-positive isolates, 321/574 (56%) harbored blaKPC2, 249/574 (43%) blaKPC3, and 4/574 (1%) other KPC subtypes (blaKPC8, blaKPC28, blaKPC31, or blaKPC34). The Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module identified 239/795 (30%) as KPC-positive (Table 1). Considering the number of isolates identified as KPC-positive by WGS, the overall sensitivity of the MALDI-ToF MS subtyping module was 239/574 (42%); the specificity was 100%.
Since the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module relies on the detection of a ~11,109 m/z peak associated with the P019 protein for KPC identification, the presence of the p019 sequence was assessed. The WGS data revealed that 246/795 isolates (31%) harbored the p019 sequence. Moreover, of the 574 isolates identified as blaKPC positive, 222/574 (39%) harbored blaKPC2 and p019, and 24/574 (4%) blaKPC3 and p019 (Table 2). As shown in Table 2, the presence of blaKPC2 and blaKPC3 was not always associated with p019; none of the isolates harboring other KPC subtypes carried the p019 gene.
The sensitivity of the subtyping module among isolates harboring p019 was also assessed. Of the 246 isolates containing p019, the MALDI-ToF subtyping module typed 239 as KPC-positive, for a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100% (Table 3).
During the proteomics study, the isolates were tested in duplicate. Notably, 22 MALDI-ToF MS plate spots showed discrepancies in KPC detection; upon reshooting, 11/22 (50%) were resolved. Similarly, 14 spots were reshot due to initially yielding an identification score <2.0; upon reshooting, 5/14 (36%) spots were resolved (identification score ≥ 2.0). All isolates yielded at least one identification spot score ≥ 2.0.

3. Discussion

In this study, the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module correctly identified 239/574 KPC-positive Klebsiella isolates, for an overall sensitivity of 42% compared to WGS, with excellent specificity. This poor sensitivity makes KPC detection via MALDI-ToF MS using the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module unreliable for use in clinical laboratories. Dual spotting was performed, and any isolate with at least one spot positive according to MADLI-ToF MS was reported as KPC-positive. Although dual spotting may have increased the sensitivity of KPC detection, it adds work in routine clinical practice. It should be noted that the module assessed is not cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration [20]. The results of this study show that although the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module exhibits excellent specificity, the sensitivity is low, and further testing of the isolates is necessary to confirm KPC absence.
KPC identification by the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module is based on the detection of an ~11,109 m/z mass spectral peak, provided that a successful identification score (log score ID ≥ 2.0) is obtained [20]. This peak corresponds to an abundant hypothetical protein termed P019, encoded by the p019 gene in the pKpQIL plasmid that also harbors blaKPC. Thus, the detection of P019 by mass spectrometry is used as a proxy for KPC. In this study, the identification of KPC in isolates that did not harbor the p019 sequence failed even with successful species identification. Unsurprisingly, there was a higher detection sensitivity for the subtyping module for isolates harboring the p019 sequence (97%). Collectively, these results show that the poor sensitivity of the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module was a result of the low representation of the p019 sequence (n = 246/574, 43%) among the blaKPC-positive Klebsiella isolates studied. Although the ~11,109 m/z peak correlates with the presence of KPC, the absence of this peak does not imply the absence of KPC. Previous observations show that blaKPC is not always associated with pKpQIL or p019, therefore blaKPC and p019 may be found independently [15,19].
In addition to assessing automated detection, the mass spectra were visually inspected. The assessors were blinded to the results of automated detection. Qualitatively, a high degree of variability among mass spectra was apparent. Typically, the isolates identified as KPC-positive using the software showed a clear peak at ~11,109 m/z, but sometimes the peak was surrounded by noise. It was unclear to what extent noise around the peak hindered KPC detection or above what threshold intensity value the ~11,109 m/z peak was successfully detected by the software. Moreover, discrepancies between spots of the same isolate were observed, even when both spots yielded successful identification scores (≥2.0). In these cases, reshooting the KPC-undetected spot resolved detection in 11/22 (50%) isolates. However, as discussed above, dual spotting would increase the workload in clinical settings, and in settings where dual spotting is not performed, there is a higher risk of KPC underdetection.
A limitation of this study is the geographical and species distribution of the isolates tested, as well as the large number of K. pneumoniae compared to K. variicola isolates. Although a large number of clinical isolates was examined, a majority were K. pneumoniae and were from the USA. Future studies could assess performance of the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module in other KPC-positive species from a wider range of geographical locations.
The escalating AMR represents a threat for human, animal, and environmental health, with profound socio-economic impacts associated with mortality and disability [2,4,23]. The rapid spread of resistance heightens the need for fast, accurate, and reliable detection methods that can guide treatment and reduce hospital-associated costs. Due to its simplicity and the possibility of obtaining accurate results in a fast and relatively inexpensive manner, MALDI-ToF MS is a gold-standard method for the identification of bacteria and fungi [11,12,24]. However, the automated detection of resistance mechanisms, such as KPC, by means of MALDI-ToF MS remains a challenge. The results of this study support the findings of Gato and colleagues [19], showing low sensitivity of the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module in KPC isolates that do not harbor the p019 sequence. The correlation between the P019 cleavage product detected by MALDI-ToF MS and the presence of blaKPC is imperfect, making the use of this surrogate biomarker a poor way of detecting KPC [15,25]. While the automated detection of AMR mechanisms by MALDI-ToF MS would revolutionize workflow in the clinical microbiology laboratory and provide crucial information for ideal treatment, the indirect detection of KPC by the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module is unreliable, failing for isolates that do not carry the p019 sequence but harbor blaKPC. Local epidemiology and patterns of resistance-associated plasmid transmission should be considered when interpreting KPC detection by MALDI-ToF MS.
The use of MALDI-ToF MS for the automated detection of AMR mechanisms has enormous potential but requires further development. A possible improvement could be the identification of other high intensity peaks in mass spectra that may constitute potential biomarkers for resistance, such as the 4521 m/z peak identified in blaKPC2-bearing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates from China by Huang and colleagues [26]. However, the identification of novel biomarkers needs a thorough understanding of their genetic context to verify their linkage to resistance genes. Another interesting approach was recently published by Gato and colleagues, who proposed the use of the full spectrum of the bacterial proteome coupled with machine learning to predict OXA-48 and KPC carriage [27]. While the results of this study need external confirmation and evaluation using a more epidemiologically diverse set of isolates, the possibility presents an exciting avenue for the application of MALDI-ToF MS for the rapid and reliable clinical detection of AMR.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Subculturing Isolates and Control Bacterial Strains

The bacterial isolates were selected based on the availability of Klebsiella isolates and associated sequencing data at the time of the study. They constitute a subset of CRACKLE-2 isolates from previous studies [21,22]. First, 795 ARLG Klebsiella isolates (including K. pneumoniae and K. variicola) were subcultured on 5% sheep blood agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C. BAA 1705 (K. pneumoniae, blaKPC-positive isolate) and BAA 1706 (K. pneumoniae, blaKPC-negative isolate) were used as the positive and negative controls, respectively, and subcultured daily from frozen vials on 5% sheep blood agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C. ATCC 25923 (Staphylococcus aureus) was used as a control for species identification and was provided by the Clinical Bacteriology laboratory at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

4.2. MALDI-ToF MS Plate Preparation

Spots on the MALDI-ToF MS plates were inoculated with 1 μL of 70% formic acid. Since the intensity of the KPC-related peak can be low [16], the subcultured colonies were tested in duplicate; colonies were transferred into the formic acid and allowed to air-dry. Single colonies were generally picked, with rare exceptions where colonies were small and more than one needed to be picked. Then, 2 μL of matrix solution (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid HCCA) was overlaid onto each spot and allowed to air dry. The first and the last spot were reserved for calibration and loaded with bacterial test standard (BTS, Bruker Daltonics). Additionally, all of the plates included one spot inoculated with ATCC 25923 (positive control for species identification), one spot inoculated with BAA 1705 (blaKPC-positive control), one spot inoculated with BAA 1706 (blaKPC-negative control), and one spot with only 1 μL of 70% formic acid and 2 μL of the matrix solution (negative loading control). Since reusable stainless-steel plates were used, the negative loading control was spotted in a different location on the MALDI-ToF MS plate each day (to assess plate cleaning).

4.3. Obtaining MALDI-ToF MS Readouts

The MALDI-ToF MS plates were placed into the MALDI Biotyper® Sirius system and calibration was performed on the BTS spot. The mass spectral readouts were obtained using Compass 4.1.100 and FlexControl 3.4.206 software.
As per the manufacturer’s suggestions [20], subtyping relied on successful species identification (log score identification ≥ 2.0). Thus, the individual spots were reshot when: (a) the identification score was <2.0; (b) duplicate spots yielded discrepant results regarding KPC detection; or (c) no peaks were found. Supplementary Figure S1 shows the criteria used for reshooting isolates and how the results were recorded. Entire plates were re-loaded when either a positive or negative control failed twice. Cordovana and colleagues observed no difference in KPC-detection between isolates cultured for 24, 48, or 76 h [16]. Thus, for this study, isolates that needed to be reloaded on a MALDI-ToF MS plate due to the failed identification of controls, were reloaded after a maximum of 48 h.
The mass spectral readouts were visually examined for the presence of the ~11,109 m/z peak. The evaluators were blinded to the automated detection results generated by the subtyping module.

4.4. Statistical Analysis and Preparation of Figures

The isolates were recorded as KPC-positive by MALDI-ToF MS if at least one spot was classified as positive by the Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module. During proteomic studies, the personnel were blinded to the WGS data (previous data [21,22]). Only after all isolates were processed by mass spectrometry and the results were analyzed were findings compared to those of WGS. Sensitivity was calculated as the percentage of the isolates detected as KPC-positive by MALDI-ToF MS among those positive by WGS. Specificity was calculated as the inverse of KPC-negative isolates by WGS that were detected as KPC positive by MALDI-ToF MS. The figures were created using Excel, Power Point, and MapChart. The graphical abstract and Supplementary Figure S1 were created with BioRender (https://www.biorender.com/, accessed on 25 August 2023).

4.5. Whole Genome Sequencing

The WGS data used for comparison to the MALDI-ToF MS results in this study were previously generated [21,22] at the following locations: Molecular Resource Facility, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ, USA (Illumina NextSeq 500; Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA); UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA (Illumina MiSeq; Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA (Illumina HiSeq X; Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA); and Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia (MiSeq, HiSeq 4000, and NextSeq 2000; Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The presence of the p019 gene was assessed using BLASTN against the Klebsiella genomes from CRACKLE-2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics12091465/s1. Geographical information, species identification, WGS, and MALDI-ToF MS results for the isolates included in this study can be found in Table S1: Results of WGS and MALDI-ToF detection in 795 Klebsiella isolates. Information about how the discrepant isolates were processed can be found in Figure S1: Poor sensitivity of the MALDI Biotyper MBT Subtyping Module.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P., K.E.G.-Q. and A.N.S.; methodology, R.P., K.E.G.-Q. and L.C. (Luz Cuello); formal analysis, L.C. (Luz Cuello), L.C. (Liang Chen), B.H., L.K. and L.G.; investigation, L.C. (Luz Cuello) and J.A.O.; resources, J.R., B.H., Z.D.L. and G.G.G.; data curation, L.C. (Luz Cuello), J.A.O., Z.D.L. and G.G.G.; visualization: L.C. (Luz Cuello); writing—original draft preparation, L.C. (Luz Cuello); writing—review and editing, J.A.O., K.E.G.-Q., R.P., B.H., L.C. (Liang Chen), J.R., L.K., L.G., Z.D.L., G.G.G. and A.N.S.; supervision, R.P., K.E.G.-Q., Z.D.L. and G.G.G.; project administration, R.P. and K.E.G.-Q.; funding acquisition, R.P. and K.E.G.-Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1AI104681. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The WGS data used for this study were previously generated [21,22] and can be found under https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30755-8 and https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00399-6.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Clinical Bacteriology Laboratory staff at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, for providing the training, facilities, and instruments needed for MALDI-ToF MS. The WGS data previously generated are available under https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30755-8 and https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00399-6.

Conflicts of Interest

R.P. reports grants from ContraFect, TenNor Therapeutics Limited, and BIOFIRE. R.P. is a consultant to PhAST, Torus Biosystems, Day Zero Diagnostics, Mammoth Biosciences, and HealthTrackRx; monies are paid to the Mayo Clinic. The Mayo Clinic and R.P. have a relationship with Pathogenomix. R.P. has research supported by Adaptive Phage Therapeutics. The Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics. R.P. is also a consultant to Abbott Laboratories, Trellis Bioscience, Inc., Oxford Nanopore Technologies, and CARB-X. In addition, R.P. has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to the Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued. R.P. receives honoraria from the NBME, Up-to-Date, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course. A.N.S. is a consultant to Merck&Co. The results from this study were presented in part at ASM Microbe 2023 in Houston, Texas.

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Centers for Disease Control. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
  3. Armstrong, T.; Fenn, S.J.; Hardie, K.R. JMM Profile: Carbapenems: A broad-spectrum antibiotic. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. World Health Organization. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report 2022; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  5. Nordmann, P.; Naas, T.; Poirel, L. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Reyes, J.; Komarow, L.; Chen, L.; Ge, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Cober, E.; Herc, E.; Alenazi, T.; Kaye, K.S.; Garcia-Diaz, J.; et al. Global epidemiology and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and associated carbapenemases (POP): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e159–e170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sawa, T.; Kooguchi, K.; Moriyama, K. Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance. J. Intensive Care 2020, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leavitt, A.; Chmelnitsky, I.; Carmeli, Y.; Navon-Venezia, S. Complete nucleotide sequence of KPC-3-encoding plasmid pKpQIL in the epidemic Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4493–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammoudi Halat, D.; Ayoub Moubareck, C. The current burden of carbapenemases: Review of significant properties and dissemination among Gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patel, R. MALDI-ToF MS for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Clin. Chem. 2015, 61, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rychert, J. Benefits and limitations of MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry for the identification of microorganisms. J. Infect. 2019, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leopold, J.; Popkova, Y.; Engel, K.M.; Schiller, J. Recent developments of useful MALDI matrices for the mass spectrometric characterization of lipids. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lau, A.F.; Wang, H.; Weingarten, R.A.; Drake, S.K.; Suffredini, A.F.; Garfield, M.K.; Chen, Y.; Gucek, M.; Youn, J.H.; Stock, F.; et al. A rapid matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based method for single-plasmid tracking in an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2804–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Partridge, S.R. Tn4401 carrying blaKPC is inserted within another insertion in pKpQIL and related plasmids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 4448–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cordovana, M.; Kostrzewa, M.; Glandorf, J.; Bienia, M.; Ambretti, S.; Pranada, A.B. A full MALDI-based approach to detect plasmid-encoded KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaibani, P.; Galea, A.; Fagioni, M.; Ambretti, S.; Sambri, V.; Landini, M.P. Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 2609–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Youn, J.H.; Drake, S.K.; Weingarten, R.A.; Frank, K.M.; Dekker, J.P.; Lau, A.F. Clinical performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry method for detection of certain blaKPC-containing plasmids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gato, E.; Constanso, I.P.; Rodino-Janeiro, B.K.; Guijarro-Sanchez, P.; Alioto, T.; Arroyo, M.J.; Mendez, G.; Mancera, L.; Gut, M.; Gut, I.; et al. Occurrence of the p019 gene in the blaKPC-harboring plasmids: Adverse clinical impact for direct tracking of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e0023821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bruker Daltonics GmbH. MALDI Biotyper Subtyping Module; Bruker Daltonics GmbH: Bremen, Germany, 2019; Volume 4, p. 5. [Google Scholar]
  21. van Duin, D.; Arias, C.A.; Komarow, L.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Weston, G.; Cober, E.; Garner, O.B.; Jacob, J.T.; Satlin, M.J.; et al. Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, M.; Earley, M.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Salcedo, S.; Cober, E.; Li, L.; Kanj, S.S.; et al. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): A prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tacconelli, E.; Sifakis, F.; Harbarth, S.; Schrijver, R.; van Mourik, M.; Voss, A.; Sharland, M.; Rajendran, N.B.; Rodriguez-Bano, J.; Group, E.P.-N.C.-M. Surveillance for control of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, e99–e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Angeletti, S.; Ciccozzi, M. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in clinical microbiology: An updating review. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 76, 104063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lau, A.F.; Wang, H.; Weingarten, R.A.; Drake, S.K.; Suffredini, A.F.; Chen, Y.; Gucek, M.; Youn, J.H.; Stock, F.; Tso, H.; et al. Reply to “Tn4401 carrying blaKPC is inserted within another insertion in pKpQIL and related plasmids”. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Tang, K.; Li, C. Rapid detection of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in China based on MALDI-ToF MS. J. Microbiol. Methods 2022, 192, 106385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gato, E.; Arroyo, M.J.; Mendez, G.; Candela, A.; Rodino-Janeiro, B.K.; Fernandez, J.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, B.; Mancera, L.; Arca-Suarez, J.; Beceiro, A.; et al. Direct detection of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae by MALDI-ToF analysis of full spectra applying machine learning. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2023, 61, e0175122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) The geographical distribution of blaKPC genes in Klebsiella isolates in the USA, Central/Northern South America, and Southern South America regions. (b) The geographical distribution of blaKPC genes in Klebsiella isolates in the Asia–Pacific region.
Figure 1. (a) The geographical distribution of blaKPC genes in Klebsiella isolates in the USA, Central/Northern South America, and Southern South America regions. (b) The geographical distribution of blaKPC genes in Klebsiella isolates in the Asia–Pacific region.
Antibiotics 12 01465 g001aAntibiotics 12 01465 g001b
Table 1. Comparison of KPC status, as determined by WGS or MALDI-ToF MS.
Table 1. Comparison of KPC status, as determined by WGS or MALDI-ToF MS.
WGS MALDI-ToF MS
Number Number
blaKPC positive 574KPC-positive239
blaKPC2321
blaKPC3249
Other blaKPC4
blaKPC negative221KPC negative556
Of the 239 identified as KPC-positive by the MALDI-ToF MS subtyping module, 219 harbored blaKPC2 and 20 harbored blaKPC3.
Table 2. Distribution of the p019 sequence in the 574 KPC-positive isolates, as determined by WGS.
Table 2. Distribution of the p019 sequence in the 574 KPC-positive isolates, as determined by WGS.
p019-Positivep019-Negative
NumberPercentNumberPercent
blaKPC2222399917
blaKPC324422539
Other blaKPC 0040.7
Total2464332857
Table 3. MALDI-ToF MS KPC status according to presence or absence of the p019 sequence, as determined by WGS.
Table 3. MALDI-ToF MS KPC status according to presence or absence of the p019 sequence, as determined by WGS.
WGS
p019-Positive p019-Negative
Number Percent Number Percent
MALDI-ToF MS KPC-positive 239 30 0 0
KPC-negative 7 1549 69
Total 246 31 549 69
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuello, L.; Alvarez Otero, J.; Greenwood-Quaintance, K.E.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.; Reyes, J.; Komarow, L.; Ge, L.; Lancaster, Z.D.; Gordy, G.G.; et al. Poor Sensitivity of the MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module for Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) in Klebsiella Species. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091465

AMA Style

Cuello L, Alvarez Otero J, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Chen L, Hanson B, Reyes J, Komarow L, Ge L, Lancaster ZD, Gordy GG, et al. Poor Sensitivity of the MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module for Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) in Klebsiella Species. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(9):1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cuello, Luz, Judith Alvarez Otero, Kerryl E. Greenwood-Quaintance, Liang Chen, Blake Hanson, Jinnethe Reyes, Lauren Komarow, Lizhao Ge, Zane D. Lancaster, Garrett G. Gordy, and et al. 2023. "Poor Sensitivity of the MALDI Biotyper® MBT Subtyping Module for Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) in Klebsiella Species" Antibiotics 12, no. 9: 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop