Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Evaluation of Unfilled Grout in Tendons of Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges by Portable 950 keV/3.95 MeV X-ray Sources
Next Article in Special Issue
Visual Analysis of Spatiotemporal Data Predictions with Deep Learning Models
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Preparation of Biochar Ceramsite Based on Sewage Sludge and the Characterization of Its Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Threshold Effects of Infectious Disease Outbreaks on Livestock Prices: Cases of African Swine Fever and Avian Influenza in South Korea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/app11125523
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

s2p: Provenance Research for Stream Processing System

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5523; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125523
by Qian Ye 1,2 and Minyan Lu 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5523; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125523
Submission received: 21 May 2021 / Revised: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Big Data Analysis and Visualization â…¡)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presents a novel provenance solution for stream processing systems that combines offline and online parts. The article is well written and well organized. However, some issues should be addressed.

  • When the authors summarized the main contributions of the work, they should present how they filled the research gaps.  
  • The authors should present the meaning of the acronym DSP in the abstract. It helps readers of the journal who are searching for papers in this area. 
  • In the conclusion section, the authors should include a summarized quantitative analysis and compare their results with the literature.
  • Table 2 is exceeding the PDF margins. 
  • Table 4 caption is not left-aligned.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

 

It is a great effort and the case study is well presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the whole s2p solution. Please make the following changes in the paper. 

  1. Ref are not cited in an adequate manner. No sequence is followed. 

    2. Add more Summary of features in general-purpose data processing systems with provenance support (table 2)

    3. Limitations of this work are not highlighted.

    4. Validation of the algorithm 1 (Checkpoint Determination Among Object Source Data) and algorithm 2 : (Source Data Caching and Purging Algorithm) is missing.

5. Link number 511, you mentioned that  (We choose s2p-flink as the experimental object and choose three applications working under various workloads) which one, can  you be more specific please?


6. Challenges include but are not limited to an optimization solution for avoiding excessive runtime overhead.. what other optimization solutions are available, please make a comparison table and comment on their pros and cons. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have made all the suggested changes. References issue MUST be resolved before final publication. 

 

I am happy to accept this paper in its current form. 

Back to TopTop