Next Article in Journal
Effect of Diet on Growth Performance of First Crab Stage Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896 (Brachyura: Portunidae): A Comparison of Three Different Regimens
Next Article in Special Issue
Review: Recent Applications of Gene Editing in Fish Species and Aquatic Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Crayfish Research: A Global Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Characterization of hox Genes in Senegalese Sole (Solea senegalensis, Kaup 1858): Clues to Evolutionary Path in Pleuronectiformes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Aeromonas Species in the Cutaneous Mucus of Barbour’s Seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) as Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing

by
Rose Chinly Mae H. Ortega
1,2,*,
Sharon Rose M. Tabugo
1,2,
Joey Genevieve T. Martinez
1,3,
Chinee S. Padasas
1,2 and
José L. Balcázar
4,5,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Mathematics, Mindanao State University—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines
2
Molecular Systematics and Oceanography Laboratory, Premier Research Institute of Science and Mathematics (PRISM), Mindanao State University—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines
3
Mathematical Biology and Nematology Research Cluster, Complex Systems Group, Premier Research Institute of Science and Mathematics (PRISM), Mindanao State University—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines
4
Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), 17003 Girona, Spain
5
University of Girona, 17004 Girona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(7), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071241
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 1 April 2023 / Published: 3 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Genomic Advances in Fisheries and Aquaculture)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, the bacterial community structure and composition in the skin ecosystem of Barbour’s seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) were assessed by the high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, with particular emphasis on members belonging to the Aeromonadaceae family due to its implications for the health of fish species. The results revealed that sequences affiliated with the Aeromonas genus were found in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses, with abundances being slightly similar between female and male specimens. Comparative analysis also demonstrated that the presence of Aeromonas species in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses was strongly influenced by the surrounding sediment. These findings could be used as a baseline for further studies about the role of Aeromonas species in the normal and disturbed microbiota associated with seahorses.

Abstract

Although several studies have described the bacterial community composition associated with marine fish, there is limited information related to seahorses. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that the skin microbiota is useful for determining health status and common disorders in the host. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the skin bacterial community composition in Barbour’s seahorse (Hippocampus barbouri) using high-throughput sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Water and sediment samples from the surrounding environment were also analyzed for comparative purposes. The results revealed that sequences affiliated with the Shewanellaceae family were dominant in the skin of female Barbour’s seahorses and sediment samples, whereas sequences affiliated with the Bacillaceae family were dominant in the skin of male Barbour’s seahorses. Interestingly, sequences affiliated with the Aeromonas genus were found in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses, whose abundance was slightly similar between the female and male specimens. Further comparative analysis showed that the presence of Aeromonas species in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses was strongly influenced by the surrounding sediment. Given that some Aeromonas species are known to be important pathogens in humans and fish, these results may be used for further research on the dependency of the skin microbial composition on the environment as well as determine whether the presence of Aeromonas and other detected species has implications on seahorse health.

1. Introduction

Although seahorses (Hippocampus) play important roles in the ecosystem, they are constantly at risk because of trade for medicinal and ornamental purposes [1]. Like other fish species, seahorses are intimately in contact with a complex and dynamic microbial world in which a large fraction of these microorganisms adhere to and colonize epithelial surfaces. However, in seahorses, the microorganisms are attached only to the mucous layer of a unique type of surface cell—the flame cone cells, which are found exclusively on seahorses [2]. Despite such unique features, seahorses are not exempted from diseases. In fact, some studies have reported skin diseases of diverse etiology in wild and farmed seahorses [3,4]. The fish skin microbiota possesses distinct physicochemical properties that have evolved to reside with the host and help regulate host–microbe interactions [5,6]. This regulation includes enhancement of the epithelial barrier, development of the immune system, and nutrient acquisition [7,8]. In fish species from large-scale production facilities, the mucosal microbiota is vital in protecting the host from pathogens by stimulating the immune system; however, the complex interactions of the mucosal microbiota with the pathogens and the fish skin immune system have remained unexplored [5]. In order to address these concerns, it is essential to explore the bacterial composition in the cutaneous mucus of seahorses. In a recent study carried out by our research team, we observed the presence of Aeromonas species in the cutaneous mucus of healthy Hippocampus barbourin [9]. It should be noted that Aeromonas species are ubiquitous bacteria primarily recovered from aquatic ecosystems [10], as they are commonly found in freshwater bodies, estuaries [11], and even in seawater [12]. Some Aeromonas species are typically known as opportunistic pathogens as they cause severe disease outbreaks in wild and pond-raised freshwater fish [13]. For instance, Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium that causes furunculosis in wild and captive salmonids (e.g., salmon and trout). This disease results in high morbidity and mortality rates and has become a major threat to the aquaculture industry [14]. Moreover, Aeromonas hydrophila, commonly found in the aquatic ecosystem, is considered as an important foodborne bacterial zoonotic pathogen in aquaculture. This infectious agent is a leading cause of mortality in economically important fish species from Southeast Asia such as the striped snakehead or snakehead murrel (Channa striata). Despite implications for fish health [15], there is limited information on the prevalence of these bacterial species in seahorses.
Until the last decade, our knowledge of microbial communities associated with fish has largely been based on the use of traditional culture-based methods. Although useful, these data are limited and biased toward cultivable members of the community [16]. However, the study of microbial ecology has dramatically changed due to the implementation of cutting-edge sequencing technologies (such as Illumina or Oxford Nanopore), which provide new ways to study microbial communities, thereby overcoming these limitations based on culture-dependent approaches [17]. These approaches have provided a more accurate picture of microbial communities in a particular habitat following the extraction of all genetic material, followed by sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. By providing a large amount of data with high accuracy and low cost, high-throughput sequencing technology has fundamentally altered the way that research has been conducted in the past and made it possible to understand microbial diversity at a much larger scale [18]. Consequently, high-throughput sequencing technology can make an in-depth analysis of the bacterial community structure and abundance efficiently [19], not only in fish but also in other organisms. Given this, a full picture of the bacterial community composition associated with seahorses can be obtained, thereby increasing our knowledge of the role of skin microbiota in the health and disease of seahorses. This technology has therefore taken a giant leap forward in evaluating microbial communities in seahorses. In this study, we used the Illumina sequencing technology method based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing to explore the bacterial community structure and composition in the skin ecosystem of Barbour’s seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri), with particular emphasis on members belonging to the Aeromonadaceae family due to its implications for the overall health of fish species.

2. Materials and Methods

A gratuitous permit from the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) was requested and granted under the project “Seahorses and Pipefishes with Pharmaceutical Potentials from selected areas in Mindanao, Philippines” with GP No. 0184-19. Eleven healthy Barbour’s seahorses weighing an average of 7.07 g and samples from the surrounding environment (water and sediment) were collected from coral reefs off the coast of Cantiasay Island, San Pedro, Surigao del Norte. The water had an average temperature of 23.6 °C during the sampling period. Each sample was separately and immediately transported to the Molecular Systematics and Oceanography Laboratory of the Premier Research Institute of Science and Mathematics (PRISM), Mindanao State University—Iligan Institute of Technology for further analysis. Seahorses were gently washed with sterile seawater twice to remove debris without compromising the microbial community on the skin [20]. Skin mucus samples were then collected by scraping the seahorse’s dorsal surface using a sterile swab [21], which were placed into a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube and stored at −65 °C until DNA extraction.
Genomic DNA was extracted from the skin microbial community of six female Barbour’s seahorses (HBFS) and five male Barbour’s seahorses (HBMS) as well as from water (WS) and sediment (SS) samples. Samples were pooled according to their origin and the HiPurA™ DNA Purification Kit (HIMEDIA; Mumbai, India) was used for DNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 mL of water lysis solution and samples were individually added to the Hi-Water bead tubes, which were horizontally vortexed at maximum speed for 5 min. These mixtures were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 1 min, and the supernatants were transferred to 2 mL collection tubes and approximately 600–650 μL of each supernatant was recovered. The mixture was then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature and the supernatant was transferred to a new 2 mL collection tube without disturbing the pellet. A volume of 200 μL of inhibitor removal solution was added to each supernatant, and the tubes were briefly vortexed and incubated at 4 °C for 5 min. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature, whose supernatants were transferred to 2 mL collection tubes without disturbing the pellet. A volume of 650 μL of binding solution was added to the pellet and mixed by vortexing briefly. Approximately 650 μL of this homogenate was loaded onto the HiElute Miniprep Spin Column, which was centrifuged for 1 min at 13,000 rpm. The flow-through was discarded. We repeated loading the remaining solution of 650 μL of binding solution and the pellet onto the HiElute Miniprep Spin Column and then centrifuged for 1 min at 13,000 rpm at room temperature. Then, 650 μL of diluted wash solution was added to the column and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. The flow-through was discarded, and then re-used the same 2.0 mL collection tube with the column. A volume of 650 μL of wash solution was added to the column and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. Again, the flow-through was discarded and centrifuged again at 13,000 rpm for 2 min to dry the column. The column was then placed in a new 2.0 mL collection tube and 100 μL of elution buffer was added. The solution was incubated for 5 min at room temperature, which was further centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. The eluted DNA was then transferred to a new tube for storage at −20 °C.
Extracted DNA samples were sent to Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) for amplification, purification, quality check, and high-throughput sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform based on universal primers targeting the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Raw data were processed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME 2) pipeline [22]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined at 99% sequence similarity of the 16S rRNA genes. This value was used to define a core set of representative sequences, which were used for phylogenetic analyses. The weighted UniFrac test was applied to determine whether two or more communities had the same structure [23]. A heatmap was also generated showing the relative abundance of OTUs assigned to the Aeromonadaceae family across the samples, which were classified using the EzBioCloud database [24]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed by using MEGA version 6.0 [25]. Distances (distance options according to the Kimura 2-parameter model) and clustering with the neighbor-joining method were determined by using bootstrap values for 1000 replications.

3. Results and Discussion

After normalizing to avoid any bias due to the difference in the total number of sequences, the bacterial community structure was analyzed using the weighted UniFrac test (sensitive to abundances of taxa), whose results demonstrated that the relative abundance of OTUs (defined at 99% similarity) was significantly different (p < 0.001) among groups. Overall taxonomic characterization of the bacterial community was then conducted at the family level (Figure 1A). Sequences affiliated with the Shewanellaceae family were dominant in the skin of female Barbour’s seahorses (HBFS) and sediment samples (SS) (41.6 and 37.8%, respectively), whereas sequences affiliated with the Bacillaceae family were dominant in the skin of male Barbour’s seahorses (HBMS) (59.1%). Moreover, water samples (WS) were dominated by sequences affiliated with the Flavobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae families (7.2 and 6.7%, respectively). Although sequences affiliated with the Aeromonadaceae family were found in all samples, their abundance was very low in the water samples (0.4%). Specifically, sequences affiliated with the Aeromonadaceae family had relative abundances of 7.6 and 5.5% in the skin of female and male Barbour’s seahorses, respectively. Interestingly, a relatively high abundance of sequences affiliated with the Aeromonadaceae family was found in the sediment samples (21.4%). Because members belonging to this family have important implications for the overall health of fish species [26], a phylogenetic analysis was carried out to establish their taxonomic affiliation. Representative nucleotide sequences of OTUs assigned to the Aeromonas genus are available in Supplementary Material File S1. A phylogenetic dendrogram of selected OTUs was then constructed using the neighbor-joining method (Figure 1B), which revealed that these OTUs grouped with known Aeromonas species. The closest described relative of OTU 6 and OTU 588 was A. taiwanensis LMG 24683, whereas OTU 91 was closely related to A. tecta CECT 7082, OTU 104 to A. sanarellii LMG 24682, OTU 462 to A. bivalvium CECT 7113, OTU 582 to A. jandaei CECT 4228, and OTU 708 to A. rivipollensis LMG 26313. Although Aeromonas species share high levels of similarity based on 16S rRNA gene analysis [27], our analyses provide valuable information on the diversity of Aeromonas species, thereby validating the reliability of our findings. The above-mentioned Aeromonas species have also been observed in fishes intended for human consumption such as largemouth bass [28], sushi [29], tilapia and salmonids [30], seafood [10], and bivalve mollusks [31], whereas other Aeromonas species have been reported to be present in environmental samples [32,33,34,35] and in clinical samples that can be isolated from fish, and has characteristics of virulence and antimicrobial resistance that are comparable to isolates from humans [36].
Although the abundance of sequences affiliated with the Aeromonas genus was slightly similar between the female and male Barbour’s seahorses, there were differences in terms of diversity. In fact, the detected OTUs in the skin of female Barbour’s seahorses were affiliated with A. bivalvium, A. jandaei, A. sanarellii, A. taiwanensis, and A. tecta, whereas the detected OTUs in the skin of male specimens were affiliated with A. taiwanensis and A. tecta. Surprisingly, sequences affiliated with A. taiwanensis were highly abundant in both cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that A. taiwanensis has been detected in seahorses. This is of special relevance because A. taiwanensis was originally described on the basis of one strain recovered from the wounds of hospitalized patients in Taiwan [33]. Moreover, A. taiwanensis has been isolated from wastewater in Portugal [37] and from the feces of a patient with diarrhea in Israel [38].
It should be noted that environmental factors and microbiota composition are intimately related and have a significant impact on host health. As the skin epithelial surface is in direct contact with the surrounding environment, a comparative analysis was carried out to establish the potential influence of sediment or water on the presence and abundance of Aeromonas species in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses (Figure 2). The results showed that the presence of Aeromonas species in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses was strongly influenced by the sediments. Previous studies have suggested that the structure and composition of the skin microbiota are likely to be impacted by several variables including abiotic factors linked to the geographic locality, mineral content, temperature, and season as well as biotic factors related to the presence of other microorganisms, nutrient potential, or antimicrobial components of fish mucus [39]. Given the interface influencing this skin microbiota, water and sediments were considered [40], and in this case, the sediments had a higher influence on the skin microbiota of Barbour’s seahorses. Therefore, it appears that seahorses possess an epidermal cell type that is particularly suited for the effective adhesion of microorganisms from their environment. This is because the surface coat of the seahorse epidermis comprises several types of mucopolysaccharides: the glycocalyx, the cap of the flame cone cells, which is a mucopolysaccharide–protein complex, and the mucus secreted by unmodified cells, which resembles that of goblet cells [2]. Our findings were also supported by recent studies suggesting that the sampling site is a factor because the areas where the sediments were collected had a great impact on the skin microbial communities [41], and that the skin microbiome assemblage of marine organisms is strongly associated with the surrounding sediments [42]. In some aquacultural setups, for instance, sediments are known to be one of the primary sources of microbiota in fish, with fish microbiota also settling on the sediments [43]. This claim, therefore, provides evidence for the relationship between the microbiota composition on H. barbouri skin and sediments. Generally, this implies that the microbiota of marine animals including seahorses may contain significant information about how animals and the environment interact as well as about the ocean ecosystem [44].
Some studies on the microbial composition and pathogens in seahorse species have been published such as phylogenetic characterization of bacterial communities in H. guttulatus [45] and H. barbourin [9], bacterial communities in the intestinal tract of H. kuda (Tanu et al., 2011) [46], assessment of pathogenic bacteria from H. erectus [47] and H. haema [48]; however, no studies have been conducted on the prevalence and diversity of Aeromonas species in H. barbouri. Our findings show that the presence of Aeromonas species in the skin of H. barbouri could indicate health and disease clues. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the dynamics and diversity of the Aeromonas species could provide us with reliable evidence on why they inhabit the skin mucus of H. barbouri. The genus Aeromonas is a member of the Aeromonadaceae family, which consists of facultatively anaerobic, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming bacilli or coccobacilli that are generally motile bacteria and commonly found in aquatic environments, some of which can cause disease in humans, fish, and other aquatic animals [49,50]. This genus comprises 36 species that are considered autochthonous of aquatic environments [51]. Numerous aquatic animals, mostly fish and corals, are involved in pathological interactions with various species of Aeromonas [10]. As inhabitants of marine environments, fish and other seafood are the most common sources for isolating these microorganisms [52], supporting their occurrence in seahorses. Moreover, some Aeromonas species are known to be opportunistic pathogens for fish. When handling fish, working in aquaculture, or keeping fish as pets, Aeromonas spp. can infect the skin and soft tissue, which may lead to injuries [53]. Under stressful conditions such as an increase in water temperature, poor water quality, excessive handling, etc., Aeromonas spp. can cause epidemic outbreaks [54]. Few known species are frequent etiological agents of fish disease such as the motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS), caused by virulent A. hydrophila, A. caviae, iA.veronii, which is responsible for ulcerative syndrome in catfish and A. salmonicida, which is responsible for furunculosis in salmonids [55]. However, the severity of disease cases depends on the concentration of these microorganisms [56]. Some changes in the skin microbiota based on its phylogenetic composition may affect its functions, thereby upsetting its homeostatic interactions with the host and eventually favoring disease development [40]. Considering that H. barbouri specimens in this study were directly collected from the wild with no trace of skin disease, they can be considered as apparently healthy. As a result, further research is needed to understand the differences in the composition of healthy and diseased H. barbouri.

4. Conclusions

High-throughput sequencing based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing technology revealed the presence of sequences affiliated with Aeromonas species in the skin of Barbour’s seahorses. Interestingly, Aeromonas species were also observed in the sediments, which seem to be the most probable source of these species. Although some Aeromonas species are known to be important pathogens, the presence of these species in this study may not have affected the health status of Barbour’s seahorses yet. Therefore, further studies are required to explore the implications of Aeromonas species and other detected species on seahorse health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13071241/s1. Supplementary Material File S1: Representative nucleotide sequences of OTUs assigned to the Aeromonas genus.

Author Contributions

R.C.M.H.O.: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—(both original draft and review and editing), funding acquisition. S.R.M.T.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing (review and editing), supervision, funding acquisition. J.G.T.M.: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision. C.S.P.: Conceptualization, methodology; J.L.B.: Methodology, investigation, formal analysis, visualization, supervision, writing—(review and editing). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) under DOST-ASTHRDP scholarship grant to RCMHO.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions from the Gratuitous Permit issued under the project “Seahorses and Pipefishes with Pharmaceutical Potentials from selected areas in Mindanao, Philippines” with GP No. 0184-19. This project is externally funded by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) and conducted in Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology and approved by the Institutional review board (IRB) of the University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the locals from Cantiasay Island, LGU of Surigao del Norte, Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, and the DOST-ASTHRDP.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Seahorses in the Philippines. Why Care about Seahorses? Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5734f2a086db43e3f6fb1bbc/t/5d97c107cfcd403eddf462c1/1570226441051/Why+care+about+seahorses_Philippines_Final+copy.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2021).
  2. Bereiter-Hahn, J.; Richards, K.S.; Elsner, L.; Voth, M. Composition and formation of flame cell caps: A substratum for the attachment of micro-organisms to sea horse epidermis. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. B Biol. Sci. 1980, 79, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balcázar, J.L.; Gallo-Bueno, A.; Planas, M.; Pintado, J. Isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio splendidus from captive-bred seahorses with disease symptoms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010, 97, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. LePage, V.; Young, J.; Dutton, C.J.; Crawshaw, G.; Paré, J.A.; Kummrow, M.; McLelland, D.J.; Huber, P.; Young, K.; Russell, S.; et al. Diseases of captive yellow seahorse Hippocampus kuda Bleeker, pot-bellied seahorse Hippocampus abdominalis Lesson and weedy seadragon Phyllopteryx taeniolatus (Lacépède). J. Fish Dis. 2015, 38, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kelly, C.; Salinas, I. Under pressure: Interactions between commensal microbiota and the teleost immune system. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pérez-Pascual, D.; Vendrell-Fernández, S.; Audrain, B.; Bernal-Bayard, J.; Patiño-Navarrete, R.; Petit, V.; Rigaudeau, D.; Ghigo, J.M. Gnotobiotic rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) model reveals endogenous bacteria that protect against Flavobacterium columnare infection. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hapfelmeier, S.; Lawson, M.A.; Slack, E.; Kirundi, J.K.; Stoel, M.; Heikenwalder, M.; Cahenzli, J.; Velykoredko, Y.; Balmer, M.L.; Endt, K.; et al. Reversible microbial colonization of germ-free mice reveals the dynamics of IgA immune responses. Science 2010, 328, 1705–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gomez de Agüero, M.; Ganal-Vonarburg, S.C.; Fuhrer, T.; Rupp, S.; Uchimura, Y.; Li, H.; Steinert, A.; Heikenwalder, M.; Hapfelmeier, S.; Sauer, U.; et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science 2016, 351, 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ortega, R.C.M.H.; Tabugo, S.R.M.; Martinez, J.G.T.; Padasas, C.S.; Balolong, M.P.; Balcázar, J.L. High-throughput sequencing-based analysis of bacterial communities associated with Barbour’s seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) from Surigao del Norte, Philippines. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 73, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Janda, J.M.; Abbott, S.L. The Genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, Pathogenicity, and Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 35–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chaix, G.; Roger, F.; Berthe, T.; Lamy, B.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Lafite, R.; Forget-Leray, J.; Petit, F. Distinct Aeromonas populations in water column and associated with copepods from estuarine environment (Seine, France). Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chenia, H.Y.; Duma, S. Characterization of virulence, cell surface characteristics and biofilm-forming ability of Aeromonas spp. isolates from fish and sea water. J. Fish Dis. 2017, 40, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cutuli, M.T.; Gibello, A.; Rodriguez-Bertos, A.; Blanco, M.M.; Villarroel, M.; Giraldo, A.; Guarro, J. Skin and subcutaneous mycoses in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) caused by Fusarium oxysporum in coinfection with Aeromonas hydrophila. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2015, 9, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Du, Y.; Yi, M.; Xiao, P.; Meng, L.; Li, X.; Sun, G.; Liu, Y. The impact of Aeromonas salmonicida infection on innate immune parameters of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 44, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vivekanandhan, G.; Hatha, A.A.M.; Lakshmanaperumalsamy, P. Prevalence of Aeromonas hydrophila in fish and prawns from the seafood market of Coimbatore, South India. Food Microbiol. 2005, 22, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Egerton, S.; Culloty, S.; Whooley, J.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. The gut microbiota of marine fish. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramírez, C.; Romero, J. Fine flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) microbiome showed important differences between wild and reared specimens. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wei, Y.J.; Wu, Y.; Yan, Y.Z.; Zou, W.; Xue, J.; Ma, W.R.; Wang, W.; Tian, G.; Wang, L.Y. High-throughput sequencing of microbial community diversity in soil, grapes, leaves, grape juice and wine of grapevine from China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leite, A.M.O.; Mayo, B.; Rachid, C.T.C.C.; Peixoto, R.S.; Silva, J.T.; Paschoalin, V.M.F.; Delgado, S. Assessment of the microbial diversity of Brazilian kefir grains by PCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing analysis. Food Microbiol. 2012, 31, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nurul, A.N.A.; Muhammad, D.D.; Okomoda, V.T.; Nur, A.A.B. 16S rRNA-Based metagenomic analysis of microbial communities associated with wild Labroides dimidiatus from Karah Island, Terengganu, Malaysia. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balcázar, J.L.; Gallo-Bueno, A.; Planas, M.; Pintado, J. Identification and characterization of bacteria with antibacterial activities isolated from seahorses (Hippocampus guttulatus). J. Antibiot. 2010, 63, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lozupone, C.; Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8228–8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Beaz-Hidalgo, R.; Figueras, M.J. Aeromonas spp. whole genomes and virulence factors implicated in fish disease. J. Fish Dis. 2013, 36, 371–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carnahan, A.; Joseph, S.W. Order XII. Aeromonadales ord. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Brenner, D.J., Krieg, N.R., Staley, J.T., Garrity, G.M., Eds.; Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005; pp. 556–578. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xue, M.; Xiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiang, N.; Liu, W.; Meng, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zeng, L.; Zhou, Y. Isolation, identification and characteristics of Aeromonas caviae from diseased largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Fishes 2022, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoel, S.; Vadstein, O.; Jakobsen, A.N. Species distribution and prevalence of putative virulence factors in mesophilic Aeromonas spp. isolated from fresh retail sushi. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Figueras, M.J.; Beaz-Hidalgo, R. Aeromonas: Introduction. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  31. Galbis, D.; Farfán, M.; Fusté, M.C.; Lorén, J.G. Aeromonas bivalvium sp. nov., isolated from bivalve molluscs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carnahan, A.; Fanning, G.R.; Joseph, S.W. Aeromonas jandaei (formerly genospecies DNA group 9 A. sobria), a new sucrose-negative species isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alperi, A.; Martínez-Murcia, A.J.; Ko, W.C.; Monera, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Figueras, M.J. Aeromonas taiwanensis sp. nov. and Aeromonas sanarellii sp. nov., clinical species from Taiwan. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 2048–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Demarta, A.; Küpfer, M.; Riegel, P.; Harf-Monteil, C.; Tonolla, M.; Peduzzi, R.; Monera, A.; José Saavedra, M.; Martínez-Murcia, A. Aeromonas tecta sp. nov., isolated from clinical and environmental sources. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 31, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Marti, E.; Balcázar, J.L. Aeromonas rivipollensis sp. nov., a novel species isolated from aquatic samples. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 55, 1435–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wu, C.J.; Ko, W.C.; Lee, N.Y.; Su, S.L.; Li, C.W.; Li, M.C.; Chen, Y.W.; Su, Y.C.; Shu, C.Y.; Lin, Y.T.; et al. Aeromonas isolates from fish and patients in Tainan City, Taiwan: Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01360-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Figueira, V.; Vaz-Moreira, I.; Silva, M.; Manaia, C.M. Diversity and antibiotic resistance of Aeromonas spp. in drinking and waste water treatment plants. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5599–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Senderovich, Y.; Ken-Dror, S.; Vainblat, I.; Blau, D.; Izhaki, I.; Halpern, M. A molecular study on the prevalence and virulence potential of Aeromonas spp. recovered from patients suffering from diarrhea in Israel. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Larsen, A.; Tao, Z.; Bullard, S.A.; Arias, C.R. Diversity of the skin microbiota of fishes: Evidence for host species specificity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chiarello, M.; Villéger, S.; Bouvier, C.; Bettarel, Y.; Bouvier, T. High diversity of skin-associated bacterial communities of marine fishes is promoted by their high variability among body parts, individuals and species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, fiv061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sylvain, F.-É.; Holland, A.; Bouslama, S.; Audet-Gilbert, É.; Lavoie, C.; Luis Val, A.; Derome, N. Fish skin and gut microbiomes show contrasting signatures of host species and habitat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kawamoto, Y.; Kato, H.; Nagata, Y.; Urabe, J. Microbial communities developing within bulk sediments under fish carcasses on a tidal flat. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Q.; Lai, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wang, C.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, E.; Mai, Y.; Yang, W.; Li, H. Connection between the gut microbiota of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and microbiota of the pond culture environment. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Callewaert, C.; RavardHelffer, K.; Lebaron, P. Skin microbiome and its interplay with the environment. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2020, 21 (Suppl. S1), 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Balcázar, J.L.; Lee, N.M.; Pintado, J.; Planas, M. Phylogenetic characterization and in situ detection of bacterial communities associated with seahorses (Hippocampus guttulatus) in captivity. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tanu; Deobagkar, D.; Khandeparker, R.; Sreepada, R.A.; Sanaye, S.V.; Pawar, H.B. A study on bacteria associated with the intestinal tract of farmed yellow seahorse, Hippocampus kuda (Bleeker, 1852): Characterization and extracellular enzymes. Aquacult. Res. 2011, 43, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, G.; Luo, W.; Lin, Q. A novel pathogenic bacteria (Vibrio fortis) causing enteritis in cultured seahorses, Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810. J. Fish Dis. 2016, 39, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, G.; Choi, K.M.; Joo, M.S.; Woo, W.S.; Park, C. A case report of secondary infection by Vibrio splendidus associated with gas bubble disease in syngnathid fishes (Syngnathus schlegeli and Hippocampus haema). Fish Aquat. Sci. 2022, 25, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abu-Elala, N.; Abdelsalam, M.; Marouf, S.; Setta, A. Comparative analysis of virulence genes, antibiotic resistance and gyrB-based phylogeny of motile Aeromonas species isolates from Nile tilapia and domestic fowl. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fernández-Bravo, A.; Figueras, M.J. An update on the genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Aeromonas. Global Water Pathogen Project. Available online: https://www.waterpathogens.org/book/aeromonas (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  52. Pessoa, R.B.; de Oliveira, W.F.; Marques, D.S.C.; dos Santos Correia, M.T.; de Carvalho, E.V.M.M.; Coelho, L.C.B.B. Thegenus Aeromonas: A general approach. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 130, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Borella, L.; Salogni, C.; Vitale, N.; Scali, F.; Moretti, V.; Pasquali, P.; Alborali, G.L. Motile aeromonads from farmed and wild freshwater fish in northern Italy: An evaluation of antimicrobial activity and multidrug resistance during 2013 and 2016. Acta Vet. Scand. 2020, 62, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beaz-Hidalgo, R.; Alperi, A.; Buján, N.; Romalde, J.L.; Figueras, M.J. Comparison of phenotypical and genetic identification of Aeromonas strains isolated from diseased fish. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; Kumar, G.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Aeromonas salmonicida: Updates on an old acquaintance. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2016, 120, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hu, M.; Wang, N.; Pan, Z.H.; Lu, C.P.; Liu, Y.J. Identity and virulence properties of Aeromonas isolates from diseased fish, healthy controls and water environment in China. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 55, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Relative abundance of dominant bacterial families found in the skin samples from Barbour’s seahorses as well as in water and sediment samples from the surrounding environment. (B) Phylogenetic dendrogram of selected OTUs with the most closely related Aeromonas species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (420 bp) and constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap percentages (>50%) based on 1000 replications are shown at branch nodes. Bar, 0.002 estimated substitutions per site.
Figure 1. (A) Relative abundance of dominant bacterial families found in the skin samples from Barbour’s seahorses as well as in water and sediment samples from the surrounding environment. (B) Phylogenetic dendrogram of selected OTUs with the most closely related Aeromonas species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (420 bp) and constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap percentages (>50%) based on 1000 replications are shown at branch nodes. Bar, 0.002 estimated substitutions per site.
Animals 13 01241 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap of OTUs assigned to the Aeromonadaceae family, which were compared with their abundances in each sample. The color intensity (log2 scale) in each panel shows the percentage of each OTU.
Figure 2. Heatmap of OTUs assigned to the Aeromonadaceae family, which were compared with their abundances in each sample. The color intensity (log2 scale) in each panel shows the percentage of each OTU.
Animals 13 01241 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortega, R.C.M.H.; Tabugo, S.R.M.; Martinez, J.G.T.; Padasas, C.S.; Balcázar, J.L. Occurrence of Aeromonas Species in the Cutaneous Mucus of Barbour’s Seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) as Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing. Animals 2023, 13, 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071241

AMA Style

Ortega RCMH, Tabugo SRM, Martinez JGT, Padasas CS, Balcázar JL. Occurrence of Aeromonas Species in the Cutaneous Mucus of Barbour’s Seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) as Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing. Animals. 2023; 13(7):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortega, Rose Chinly Mae H., Sharon Rose M. Tabugo, Joey Genevieve T. Martinez, Chinee S. Padasas, and José L. Balcázar. 2023. "Occurrence of Aeromonas Species in the Cutaneous Mucus of Barbour’s Seahorses (Hippocampus barbouri) as Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing" Animals 13, no. 7: 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop