Next Article in Journal
Belgian Anopheles plumbeus Mosquitoes Are Competent for Japanese Encephalitis Virus and Readily Feed on Pigs, Suggesting a High Vectorial Capacity
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Low Doses of Dexamethasone on Experimental Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Previous Article in Journal
Current Insights in Fungal Importance—A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Performance of Different Laboratory Methods for the Detection of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Antigen-Induced IL-1RA Production Discriminates Active and Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1385; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061385
by Cesar Sanchez 1,2, Luis Jaramillo-Valverde 1,3,*, Silvia Capristano 1, Gilmer Solis 1, Alonso Soto 4, Julio Valdivia-Silva 5,6, Julio A. Poterico 5,7 and Heinner Guio 1,8,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1385; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061385
Submission received: 18 March 2023 / Revised: 22 April 2023 / Accepted: 29 April 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention, Treatment and Diagnosis of Tuberculosis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is in a similar vein to other recent papers identifying immune correlates that are predictive of disease outcome for tuberculosis.

Overall while it has reasonable readability, there are many areas, some listed below, that need to be addressed together with proof reading by someone with good English skills, as there are numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

1>        Pg 3, line 90 –We evaluated the levels of cytokines/chemokines in supernatants PBMC stimulated in vitro with antigen peptides We used PBMCs from 54 patients with ATBD? This is two different sentences, please check the reading.

2>        Pg 3, line 93  body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m2 before the disease. Can you explain why excluded patients BMI<18 kg/m?

3>        Pg 5, the data in table 1 are conflict with study design in Pg 3, line 90, the study used PBMCs from 54 patients with ATBD, 51 with LTBI, 32 undetermined and 39 healthy controls. But in table 1,  there were 119 active TB and 47 Latent TB.

4>        Pg 6, control missing in the figure 2 to figure 5. Samples from 15 healthy controls, 15 LTBI and 15 ATBD participants were test, why there were only data for LTBI and ATBD participants, the healthy controls should be compared together.

5>        Pg 8- Pg 9, The table is not complete and difficult to understand. Please adjust the layout of the table and further analysis of tabular data.

6>        The article can be improved by further discussing the limitation of the study, and the constraints for the implementation of the new method in current clinical practice.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The general writing style needs improvement. For instance, Mycobacterium tuberculosis needs to be in italics. Check the consistency of tuberculosis throughout the manuscript.

Check abbreviations LTBI in the abstract and in the figure legends.

 

The figure legends need expanding, such as the number of samples and statistical test used.

Can the authors provide a reference work in addition to the reason for their choice of antigens/peptides tested? 

Can the authors include a discussion on the peptides Rv0849, Rv2031c,  Rv2031 and Rv2693 they found to be relevant for IL-1RA stimulation in active TB vs latent TB. What are the physiological role of these genes/peptides in Mtb and how they may interact with the human host?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop