Next Article in Journal
Potential Use of Deep-Sea Sediment Bacteria for Oil Spill Biodegradation: A Laboratory Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Evidence for Electron Transfer from the Bidirectional Hydrogenase to the Photosynthetic Complex I (NDH-1) in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chromatic Acclimation Processes and Their Relationships with Phycobiliprotein Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms10081615
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Genome Analysis of a Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola

by
Anastasia V. Komova
1,*,
Elizaveta D. Bakhmutova
1,
Anna O. Izotova
1,
Evelina S. Kochetova
1,
Stepan V. Toshchakov
1,
Zorigto B. Namsaraev
1,
Maxim V. Golichenkov
2,3 and
Aleksei A. Korzhenkov
1
1
Kurchatov Centre for Genome Research, NRC Kurchatov Institute, 123098 Moscow, Russia
2
Soil Biology Department, Soil Science Faculty, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Biology, Faculty of Pediatrics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081615
Submission received: 8 July 2022 / Revised: 23 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phototrophic Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genome of the moderately haloalkaliphilic diazotrophic anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola A-36sT isolated from an alkaline lake was analyzed and compared to the genomes of the closest species Rhodovulum steppense A-20sT and Rhodovulum strictum DSM 11289T. The genomic features of three organisms are quite similar, reflecting their ecological and physiological role of facultative photoheterotrophs. Nevertheless, the nitrogenase activity of the pure cultures of the studied bacteria differed significantly: the highest rate (4066 nmoles C2H2/mg of dry weight per hour) was demonstrated by Rhodovulum strictum while the rates in Rhodovulum tesquicola and Rhodovulum steppense were an order of magnitude lower (278 and 523 nmoles C2H2/mg of dry weight per hour, respectively). This difference can be attributed to the presence of an additional nitrogenase operon found exclusively in R. strictum and to the structural variation in nitrogenase operon in R. tesquicola.

1. Introduction

The genus Rhodovulum includes anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria that require sodium chloride for growth [1,2]. The members of the genus are widely distributed in marine and saline environments [3,4,5], and due to their metabolic capacities may be used in a variety of biotechnological applications [6,7,8]. Additionally, recent studies show a wider spread of photoferrotrophy and phototrophic extracellular electron uptake in Rhodovulum that previously thought [9]. Thus, the genome analysis of the representatives of the genus appears to provide new insights into the genetic and evolutionary basis of metabolic processes in halotolerant anoxygenic phototrophic Proteobacteria. To date, Rhodovulum comprises 20 validly described species, for eight of which no genome sequence has been published so far.
Bacteria of the genus Rhodovulum preferably grow photoheterotrophically and are able to fix nitrogen. Thus, they serve as an important mediator of the carbon and nitrogen cycles as it links the organic matter decomposition and nitrogen fixation. Saline and soda lakes are among the most productive ecosystems in the world [10,11]. The alkaline conditions favour the volatilization of ammonium from the lakes; therefore the regular supply of nitrogen is needed to provide the functioning of ecosystem [12].
The process of nitrogen fixation in saline and soda lakes was studied mostly for the natural ecosystems and mesocosms [13,14,15,16,17]. The nitrogen fixation in pure cultures of phototrophic Alphaproteobacteria was studied in details for the neutrophilic and some of the marine and true halophilic representatives [18,19,20]. Nevertheless, little is known about this process in pure cultures of halotolerant and alkaliphilic anoxygenic phototrophic Alphaproteobacteria that are widespread in the lakes with relatively low salinity and increased alkalinity [5,21].
Rhodovulum tesquicola A-36sT was isolated from an alkaline lake Sul’fatnoe (Buryat Republic, Siberia, Russia; pH 9.2, mineralization 7.7 g/L) [5] and later described as a type strain of a new species within Rhodovulum genus [22]. It is a typical anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium able to grow photoheterotrophically and chemoheterotrophically with a range of organic substrates, and to grow photolithoautotrophically with sulfur compounds as electron donors. However, its ability to fix nitrogen has not been studied before. Here we present the analysis of genome of R. tesquicola in comparison with the genomes of the closest species, R. steppense A-20sT and R. strictum DSM 11289T, and the data on the nitrogen fixation activity by the pure cultures of these organisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Cultivation

R. tesquicola A-36sT (=ATCC BAA-1573T), R. steppense A-20sT (=DSM 21153T) (both isolated previously by A.V.K. and kept at the laboratory collection) and R. strictum DSM 11289T obtained from the Leibniz-Institut DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany were grown photoheterotrophically at 30 °C on the previously described medium [22] (pH 8.5–9).

2.2. Nitrogenase Activity Measurement

Nitrogenase activity measurement was performed by the acetylene reduction assay [23]. 1 mL of acetylene (about 10% of gaseous headspace in the vial) was injected into the hermetically sealed 23 mL vials containing liquid photoheterotrophically grown cultures of the investigated bacteria with argon filled headspace. The vials were incubated at 25 °C for 20 h. After that, 1 mL of gaseous phase was sampled and the detection of ethylene was performed on Crystal-2000 chromatograph (LLC NPF Meta-Chrom, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia) with a heated flame ionization detector (HFID). Instrument characteristics: column length—1 m, diameter—3 mm, filler—Porapak N 80/100, column temperature—60 °C, detector temperature—160 °C, evaporator temperature—100 °C, carrier gas flow (N2)—50 mL/min, air—280 mL/min, hydrogen—28 mL/min.

2.3. Genome Sequencing and Assembly

Genomic DNA was isolated from cell culture of R. tesquicola A-36sT using the QIAamp® DNA Mini kit following the manufacturer’s recommendations (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany).
DNA was fragmented by ultrasound on a Covaris M220 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). A paired-end genomic library (average insertion size 300 bp) was made using the NEBNext® UltraTM II DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The DNA library was sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a 2 × 250 bp paired-end read.
Genome assembly was performed using ZGA software pipeline v0.1 [24]. Sequencing reads were processed using BBTools software toolkit v38.96 [25]. Reads with low quality bases and adapter sequences were trimmed from sequencing reads with BBduk v38.96 (ktrim = r qtrim = rl trimq = 21 k = 20 mL = 33 trimpolyg = 4 trimpolya = 4). Trimmed reads were corrected with Tadpole (mode = correct, cecc = t). Corrected reads were normalized with BBnorm v38.96 to 250× depth coverage. Normalized reads were assembled to scaffolds with SPAdes v3.14 [26] using default parameters. The resulting assembly was polished with Pilon v1.24 [27] using trimmed reads.
Primary annotation was performed using DFAST v1.2.15 [28], CDS were predicted with Prodigal. Additional annotation was performed with NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.1 [29], proteins were predicted using GeneMarkS-2+ [30] and best-placed reference protein set. KEGG orthologs (KO) annotation was performed using KofamKOALA [31]. Completeness for a given KEGG module [32] was calculated using the program anvi-estimate-metabolism from anvi’o toolkit v7.1 [33].
All available on the 1 July 2022 Rhodovulum genomes including the genomes of R. steppense A-20sT and R. strictum DSM 11289T were downloaded from NCBI Assembly database. Genome completeness was assessed with CheckM v1.2.0 [34] taxonomy workflow using Rhodobacteraceae marker set. Pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) was estimated using FastANI [35]. Pangenomic analysis was conducted using Proteinortho v6 [36] with BLASTP+ [37] algorithm. Nitrogen fixation genes in Rhodovulum genomes were searched using gene annotations in NCBI protein and Uniprot and BLASTP+ [37] search in NCBI nr and Swissprot databases. Phi29-like polymerase and viral single-stranded DNA-binding protein were searched using BLASTP+ [37] (e-value 0.001) with P03680 and Q38504 reference sequences, respectively.
Amino acid sequences of nifH gene homologs were found via BLASTP+ [37] search in NBCI nr database. The first 250 hits were downloaded and clustered using CD-HIT [38] with 95% identity threshold. Representative sequences of 16S rRNA and nifH genes were aligned using MAFFT v7.475 with the FFT-NS-i algorithm [39]. The resulting alignments were manually curated and phylogenetic trees were inferred using FastTree v2.1.10 [40] in auto mode. The trees were visualized using ITOL web-server [41].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Characteristics of Genome

The sequencing yielded in 6,272,843 pair-end reads with a length of 251 bp, totaling to 41.39 Gbp. The draft genome of R. tesquicola A-36sT consists of 80 sequences resulting in 3,521,822 bp with GC-content of 67.68% and N50 of 156,513 bp (Table 1). The most similar to R. tesquicola A-36sT genomes of cultivated Rhodovulum species were R. steppense—ANI value 94.86% and R. strictum—88.91% (Figure 1 and Figure 2). These values support the novelty of R. tesquicola.
The completeness of the KEGG modules was assessed for R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum genomes. The completeness differs only in 28 out of 204 modules. Only 18 differing modules are complete for at least 50% for at least one of the genomes and differ for at least 10% (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S1).
Pangenome analaysis of three Rhodovulum genomes (Figure 4) showed that R. tesquicola has the smallest genome and more common protein clusters comparing to R. steppense and R. strictum. R. tesquicola and R. steppense have more in common than any other pair of genomes that emphasize their proximity. The core genome of the three Rhodovulum genomes consists of 2646 protein clusters corresponding to 79% of R. tesquicola genome. Among genes lacking in R. tesquicola genome there are mobile elements, genes of prophage loci and hypothetical proteins without any functional annotation. Phi29-like DNA polymerase and phage single-stranded DNA-binding protein genes were not found in any of the three genomes.

3.2. Carbon Metabolism

Genes responsible for a complete TCA cycle, non-oxidative phase of pentose phosphate pathway, Entner-Doudoroff pathway, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis are present in all the genomes studied (Supplementary Table S1). The anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria can assimilate acetate as a sole organic substrate in a number of anaplerotic pathways to replenish the oxaloacetate pool [42,43]. Among them, the genes for the full ethylmalonyl pathway were found in the genome of R. tesquicola. The methylaspartate and glyoxylate pathways are incomplete. Although there is evidence for the isocitrate lyase presence in R. steppense [44], we have found no corresponding or homologous genes in any of the three genomes studied. Thus, the detection of the potential presence and functioning of glyoxylate cycle is a subject of further research. The absence of gene for acetyl-CoA synthetase in R. tesquicola shows that only the two-step mechanism of acetate assimilation via acetyl phosphate may function in R. tesquicola, while R. steppense and R. strictum have genes for both ways [45]. On the opposite, the gene for malonyl-CoA decarboxylase potentially involved in malonyl/methylmalonyl utilization [46,47] was detected only in R. tesquicola, thus expanding the variety of organic substrates for utilization.

3.3. Nitrogen Metabolism

During photoheterotrophic growth, the nitrogenase activity of R. strictum was significantly higher than that of R. steppense and R. tesquicola (Table 2 and Table 3).
The genomes of all three investigated bacteria contain the genes necessary for the biosynthesis of Mo-nitrogenase (nifHDK) and iron–molybdenum cofactor FeMoco (nifB, nifEN, nifV); no alternative nitrogenases were found.
All three genomes share a common nitrogenase operon (“slow” operon) (Figure 5). These genes (GH815_10410-GH815_10390 in case of R. strictum) have close homologues in several representatives of the genera Rhodobacter and Cereibacter, as well as in a small number of Alphaprotobacteria mainly from Hyphomicrobiales. Relatively close homologues are also found in the representatives of Firmicutes and Chloroflexi (Figure S1), suggesting a lateral gene transfer event in case of the “slow” operon. In addition, we have found the second nitrogenase operon in R. strictum genome (Figure 5). Only a limited number of Alphaproteobacteria including R. strictum and Rhodobacter capsulatus possesses second operon with putative higher nitrogen fixation activity (“fast” operon) (Figure 6).
The nif operon in R. tesquicola is broken into two parts. 16 genes from nifA (NHN26_05215) to fdxB (NHN26_05140) are separated from nifU (NHN26_05060), nifV (NHN26_05055) and nifW (NHN26_05050) by a cluster of 15 genes coding mainly for RnfABCDGE type electron transport complex. This break may lead to a decreased nitrogenase activity in comparison with R. steppense.
Nitrogen fixing phototrophic microorganisms play an important role in the nitrogen uptake by the phototrophic communities of the saline and soda lakes. It has been previously demonstrated that in soda lakes, nitrogen is fixed mainly at low salinities with the nitrogen fixation rates in the light much higher than those in the dark at the salinities of less than 100 g/L [17,48]. The investigated communities consisted mostly of the photoautotrophic heterocystous cyanobacteria with nifH-containing Ectothiorhodospira sp. present to a lesser extent. In the saline and soda lakes, Ectothiorhodospiraceae usually occur at the salinities up to the saturation, while Rhodobacteraceae reach high numbers at the mineralization below 100 g/L [21], and thus may be responsible for the nitrogen fixation activity at these conditions. However, in spite of wide distribution of nif-related genes among the phototrophic Alphaproteobacteria inhabiting saline and soda environments [49], the actual rates of nitrogen fixation in pure cultures as well as in situ may vary strongly (Table 3).
The product of the nifH gene is dinitrogenase reductase, also known as the Fe protein or component II. The Fe protein has an obligate redox role and is involved in the process of maturation of the P-clusters of the apo-MoFe protein to their catalytically active forms [50,51,52]. Probably the “fast” and “slow” operon function differs in the expression rate of nifH genes, leading to the different rates of nitrogen fixation. As R. strictum and Rba. capsulatus contain 2 operons with different nifH variants (Figure 5) while R. steppense and R. tesquicola have a single operon, we hypothesize that either the “fast” operon or both of them are responsible for high nitrogenase activity. Phylogenetically, the “fast” operon cluster (Figure S1) includes not only Rba. capsulatus and R. strictum performing high nitrogenase activity but also Rhodoblastus sphagnicola, Rhodomicrobium vannielii and Rhodopseudomonas palustris with moderate nitrogenase activity, so it is likely that both “fast” and “slow” operons may be required to achieve high activities.
The structure and organization of genes for molybdenum-only and alternative nitrogenases in Rba. capsulatus and other organisms are well studied [50,52,53,54,55]. The presence of multiple copies of nif genes in Rba. capsulatus was demonstrated [56], but little is known about the nitrogenase activity depending on the number and structure of nitrogenase operon. The phylogenetic studies of nitrogenase on the phyla level show that most probably nitrogenase first appeared in the methanogenic archaea and later nif genes entered bacteria via horizontal gene transfer [57,58]. Nevertheless, the taxa within phylum can have different nitrogenases that can function in a different way depending on the environmental conditions and physiological features [58]. For example, it was demonstrated that Anabaena variabilis possesses two types of nitrogenase that function under different environmental conditions and express in different types of cells [59]. In our study, we show that two types of nitrogenase operons are present in the Rhodovulum species that probably results in different nitrogen fixation rates, so it is necessary to further investigate this phenomenon.
Unlike R. tesquicola and R. steppense, both isolated from saline soda lakes, R. strictum was isolated from a coastal colored bloom [60]. In spite of the fact that purple nonsulfur bacteria do not predominate in the coastal colored blooms, the members of Rhodovulum may represent a significant proportion of the phototrophic bacterial population in such environments [3]. It is probably due to the high nitrogenase activity that gives them the competitive advantage in case of nitrogen removal during the bloom.

3.4. Vitamin Requirements

The vitamin requirements of the investigated bacteria according to the physiological tests are given in Table 2. Biotin requirement corresponds with the fact that biotin biosynthesis pathways are incomplete in the genome of all three bacteria. In contrast to R. steppense and R. strictum, R. tesquicola contains a gene for phosphomethylpyrimidine synthase which may allow it to start the biosynthesis of thiamine monophosphate. The physiological tests, however, demonstrate that R. tesquicola requires additional thiamine. Some of the genes involved into thyamine synthesis are probably not expressed for reasons yet to be discovered. The niacin requirement in R. steppense and R. tesquicola may be due to the absence of nadAB genes which in turn are present in R. strictum.

3.5. Osmotic Adaptation

R. tesquicola and R. steppense are more halotolerant than R. strictum (Table 2). Apart from the complete pathway of ectoin biosynthesis and a partial trehalose synthesis pathway in genomes of the former two bacteria (Figure 3), the ectoine/hydroxyectoine TRAP transporter genes TeaABC [61] and glycine betaine uptake system proVWX [62] were found. The distribution of the compatible solutes biosynthesis and uptake genes in the investigated moderately halophilic bacteria correlates with the previously described pattern [63].

4. Conclusions

The genomes of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum demonstrate significant similarity, except for some features including the vitamin synthesis pathways and the repertoire of the nitrogen fixation genes. The analysis of genome and nitrogen fixation rates shows that the studied Rhodovulum members are capable of fixing nitrogen with different rates, and thus may play an important role in nitrogen fixation in high-salt and alkaline conditions. Nevertheless, it becomes evident that the presence of representatives of this group does not necessarily indicate the effective nitrogen fixation in these ecosystems. Moreover, the presence of the “fast” operon does not predict high rates of nitrogen fixation in an organism. Literature data and our results show that the relationship between nitrogen fixation rate and the nitrogenase operon structure is still poorly studied, and thus further studies in this direction appear promising.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10081615/s1, Table S1: The completeness of KEGG modules for three Rhodovulum genomes; Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree of nifH gene across Bacteria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.K. and A.A.K.; software, A.A.K. and S.V.T.; methodology and investigation, A.V.K. (cultivation), E.D.B., E.S.K., A.O.I., S.V.T. (genomic DNA sequencing), M.V.G. (GC); validation, A.A.K.; resources, A.O.I., Z.B.N.; data curation, A.O.I.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.K., A.A.K.; writing—review and editing, A.V.K., E.D.B., A.O.I., S.V.T., M.V.G., Z.B.N., A.A.K.; visualization, A.A.K.; project administration, Z.B.N.; funding acquisition, Z.B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (Agreement No. 075-15-2019-1659 with Kurchatov Center of Genome Research) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant # 20-04-60190).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The Rhodovulum tesquicola A-36sT sequencing reads were deposited in the NCBI database under BioProject PRJNA853128, genome submission ID SUB11687731.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Anastasia P. Mitina and Anna V. Vlaskina for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Imhoff, J.F. Genus XIV Rhodovulum. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume 2: The Proteobacteria, Part C: The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria; Garrity, G., Brenner, D.J., Krieg, N.R., Staley, J.T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hiraishi, A.; Ueda, Y. Intrageneric structure of the genus Rhodobacter: Transfer of Rhodobacter sulfidophilus and related marine species to the genus Rhodovulum gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hiraishi, A.; Nagao, N.; Yonekawa, C.; Umekage, S.; Kikuchi, Y.; Eki, T.; Hirose, Y. Distribution of phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacteria in massive blooms in coastal and wastewater ditch environments. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Imhoff, J.F. True marine and halophilic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2001, 176, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kompantseva, E.I.; Komova, A.V.; Krauzova, V.I.; Kolganova, T.V.; Panteleeva, A.N. Purple nonsulfur bacteria in weakly and moderately mineralized soda lakes of the southern Transbaikal Region and northeastern Mongolia. Mikrobiologia 2009, 78, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fujimoto, H.; Wakabayashi, M.; Yamashiro, H.; Maeda, I.; Isoda, K.; Kondoh, M.; Kawase, M.; Miyasaka, H.; Yagi, K. Whole-cell arsenite biosensor using photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2006, 73, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cai, J.; Wang, G. Hydrogen production by a marine photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodovulum sulfidophilum P5, isolated from a shrimp pond. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy 2012, 37, 15070–15080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Higuchi-Takeuchi, M.; Morisaki, K.; Toyooka, K.; Numata, K. Synthesis of high-molecular-weight polyhydroxyalkanoates by marine photosynthetic purple bacteria. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Gupta, D.; Guzman, M.S.; Rengasamy, K.; Stoica, A.; Singh, R.; Ranaivoarisoa, T.O.; Davenport, E.J.; Bai, W.; McGinley, B.; Meacham, J.M.; et al. Photoferrotrophy and phototrophic extracellular electron uptake is common in the marine anoxygenic phototroph Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. ISME 2021, 15, 3384–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Melack, J.M.; Kilham, P. Photosynthetic rates of phytoplankton in East African alkaline, saline lakes 1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1974, 19, 743–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cloern, J.E.; Cole, B.E.; Oremland, R.S. Autotrophic processes in meromictic Big Soda Lake, Nevada. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1983, 28, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jellison, R.; Miller, L.G.; Melack, J.M.; Dana, G.L. Meromixis in hypersaline Mono Lake, California. 2. Nitrogen fluxes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1993, 38, 1020–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oremland, R.S. Nitrogen fixation dynamics of two diazotrophic communities in Mono Lake, California. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dubinin, A.V.; Gerasimenko, L.M.; Zavarzin, G.A. Nitrogen-fixation by cyanobacterium Microcoleus chthonoplastes from hypersaline lagoons od Lake Sivash. Mikrobiologia 1992, 61, 593–597. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pinckney, J.L.; Paerl, H.W. Anoxygenic photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation by a microbial mat community in a Bahamian hypersaline lagoon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Herbst, D.B. Potential salinity limitations on nitrogen fixation in sediments from Mono Lake, California. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 1998, 7, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Namsaraev, Z.; Samylina, O.; Sukhacheva, M.; Borisenko, G.; Sorokin, D.Y.; Tourova, T. Effect of salinity on diazotrophic activity and microbial composition of phototrophic communities from Bitter-1 soda lake (Kulunda Steppe, Russia). Extremophiles 2018, 22, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Munson, T.O.; Burris, R.H. Nitrogen fixation by Rhodospirillum rubrum grown in nitrogen-limited continuous culture. J. Bacteriol. 1969, 97, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Madigan, M.; Cox, S.S.; Stegeman, R.A. Nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase activities in members of the family Rhodospirillaceae. J. Bacteriol. 1984, 157, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Oda, Y.; Samanta, S.K.; Rey, F.E.; Wu, L.; Liu, X.; Yan, T.; Zhou, J.; Harwood, C.S. Functional genomic analysis of three nitrogenase isozymes in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 7784–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kompantseva, E.I.; Komova, A.V.; Sorokin, D.Y. Communities of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria in the saline soda lakes of the Kulunda Steppe (Altai Krai). Mikrobiologia 2010, 79, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kompantseva, E.I.; Komova, A.V.; Novikov, A.A.; Kostrikina, N.A. Rhodovulum tesquicola sp. nov., a haloalkaliphilic purple non-sulfur bacterium from brackish steppe soda lakes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 12, 2962–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hardy, R.W.; Holsten, R.D.; Jackson, E.K.; Burns, R. The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: Laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 1968, 43, 1185–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Korzhenkov, A. ZGA: A flexible pipeline for read processing, de novo assembly and annotation of prokaryotic genomes. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. BBMap—Bushnell B. Available online: Sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  26. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, A.K.; et al. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanizawa, Y.; Fujisawa, T.; Nakamura, Y. DFAST: A flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 1037–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lomsadze, A.; Gemayel, K.; Tang, S.; Borodovsky, M. Modeling leaderless transcription and atypical genes results in more accurate gene prediction in prokaryotes. Genome Res. 2018, 29, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2019, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Eren, A.M.; Kiefl, E.; Shaiber, A.; Veseli, I.; Miller, S.E.; Schechter, M.S.; Fink, I.; Pan, J.N.; Yousef, M.; Fogarty, E.C.; et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lechner, M.; Findeiß, S.; Steiner, L.; Marz, M.; Stadler, P.F.; Prohaska, S.J. Proteinortho: Detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fu, L.; Niu, B.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, S.; Li, W. CD-HIT: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3150–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tang, K.H.; Tang, Y.J.; Blankenship, R.E. Carbon metabolic pathways in phototrophic bacteria and their broader evolutionary implications. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Petushkova, E.; Mayorova, E.; Tsygankov, A. TCA Cycle Replenishing Pathways in Photosynthetic Purple Non-Sulfur Bacteria Growing with Acetate. Life 2021, 11, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eprintsev, A.T.; Falaleeva, M.I.; Lyashchenko, M.S.; Toropygin, I.Y.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Oligomeric forms of bacterial malate dehydrogenase: A study of the enzyme from the phototrophic non-sulfur bacterium Rhodovulum steppense A-20s. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018, 82, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Priefert, H.O.R.S.T.; Steinbüchel, A. Identification and molecular characterization of the acetyl coenzyme a synthetase gene (acoE) of Alcaligenes eutrophus. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 6590–6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Crosby, H.A.; Rank, K.C.; Rayment, I.; Escalante-Semerena, J.C. Structure-guided expansion of the substrate range of methylmalonyl coenzyme a synthetase (MatB) of Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 6619–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, Z.; Wen, Q.; Harwood, C.S.; Liang, B.; Yang, J. A disjointed pathway for malonate degradation by Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00631-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Samylina, O.S.; Namsaraev, Z.B.; Grouzdev, D.S.; Slobodova, N.V.; Zelenev, V.V.; Borisenko, G.V.; Sorokin, D.Y. The patterns of nitrogen fixation in haloalkaliphilic phototrophic communities of Kulunda Steppe soda lakes (Altai, Russia). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tourova, T.P.; Slobodova, N.V.; Bumazhkin, B.K.; Sukhacheva, M.V.; Sorokin, D.Y. Diversity of diazotrophs in the sediments of saline and soda lakes analyzed with the use of the nifH gene as a molecular marker. Mikrobiologia 2014, 83, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roberts, G.P.; MacNeil, T.; MacNeil, D.; Brill, W.J. Regulation and characterization of protein products coded by the nif (nitrogen fixation) genes of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 1978, 136, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rangaraj, P.; Ryle, M.J.; Lanzilotta, W.N.; Ludden, P.W.; Shah, V.K. In vitro biosynthesis of iron-molybdenum cofactor and maturation of the nif-encoded apodinitrogenase: Effect of substitution for NifH with site-specifically altered forms of NifH. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 19778–19784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ribbe, M.W.; Bursey, E.H.; Burgess, B.K. Identification of an Fe protein residue (Glu146) of Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase that is specifically involved in FeMo cofactor insertion. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 17631–17638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Avtges, P.; Kranz, R.G.; Haselkorn, R. Isolation and organization of genes for nitrogen fixation in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1985, 201, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schüddekopf, K.; Hennecke, S.; Liese, U.; Kutsche, M.; Klipp, W. Characterization of anf genes specific for the alternative nitrogenase and identification of nif genes required for both nitrogenases in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 8, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mus, F.; Alleman, A.B.; Pence, N.; Seefeldt, L.C.; Peters, J.W. Exploring the alternatives of biological nitrogen fixation. Metallomics 2018, 10, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scolnik, P.A.; Haselkorn, R. Activation of extra copies of genes coding for nitrogenase in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Nature 1984, 307, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Raymond, J.; Siefert, J.L.; Staples, C.R.; Blankenship, R.E. The natural history of nitrogen fixation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Koirala, A.; Brözel, V.S. Phylogeny of Nitrogenase Structural and Assembly Components Reveals New Insights into the Origin and Distribution of Nitrogen Fixation across Bacteria and Archaea. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Thiel, T.; Pratte, B.S. Regulation of three nitrogenase gene clusters in the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413. Life 2014, 4, 944–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Hiraishi, A.; Ueda, Y. Isolation and characterization of Rhodovulum strictum sp. nov. and some other purple nonsulfur bacteria from colored blooms in tidal and seawater pools. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1995, 45, 319–326. [Google Scholar]
  61. Grammann, K.; Volke, A.; Kunte, H.J. New type of osmoregulated solute transporter identified in halophilic members of the bacteria domain: TRAP transporter TeaABC mediates uptake of ectoine and hydroxyectoine in Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 3078–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Tsuzuki, M.; Moskvin, O.V.; Kuribayashi, M.; Sato, K.; Retamal, S.; Abo, M.; Zeilstra-Ryalls, J.; Gomelsky, M. Salt stress-induced changes in the transcriptome, compatible solutes, and membrane lipids in the facultatively phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7551–7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Imhoff, J.F.; Rahn, T.; Künzel, S.; Keller, A.; Neulinger, S.C. Osmotic adaptation and compatible solute biosynthesis of phototrophic bacteria as revealed from genome analyses. Microorganisms 2020, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 10 01615 g001 550
Figure 1. 16S rRNA gene phylogeny of the genus Rhodovulum. The tree is scaled by evolutionary distance (count of substitutions per site).
Figure 1. 16S rRNA gene phylogeny of the genus Rhodovulum. The tree is scaled by evolutionary distance (count of substitutions per site).
Microorganisms 10 01615 g001
Microorganisms 10 01615 g002 550
Figure 2. ANI dissimilarity dendrogram of high quality public Rhodovulum genomes. The dendrogram is rooted at the midpoint and scaled by genomic distance between strains.
Figure 2. ANI dissimilarity dendrogram of high quality public Rhodovulum genomes. The dendrogram is rooted at the midpoint and scaled by genomic distance between strains.
Microorganisms 10 01615 g002
Microorganisms 10 01615 g003 550
Figure 3. Completeness of the most different KEGG modules for three Rhodovulum genomes. Colors indicate the completeness of the module: red for the least complete, green for the most complete.
Figure 3. Completeness of the most different KEGG modules for three Rhodovulum genomes. Colors indicate the completeness of the module: red for the least complete, green for the most complete.
Microorganisms 10 01615 g003
Microorganisms 10 01615 g004 550
Figure 4. Venn diagram summarizing pangenome analysis of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum.
Figure 4. Venn diagram summarizing pangenome analysis of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum.
Microorganisms 10 01615 g004
Microorganisms 10 01615 g005 550
Figure 5. Nitrogen fixation operons. Top: common nitrogen fixation operon of three studied Rhodovulum species (“slow” operon): 1—4Fe-4S binding protein, 2—leucine rich repeat (LRR) protein, 3—nifZ, 4—nifT, 5—SIR2-like protein, 6—nifX, 7—nifX-associated nitrogen fixation protein, 8—hypothetical protein, 9—nif-specific ferredoxin III, 10—iron-sulfur cluster assembly accessory protein, 11—nifU, 12—nifW. Bottom: additional operon for nitrogen fixation present in R. strictum (“fast” operon): 1—oxidoreductase, 2—nitrogenase, 3—molybdopterin-dependent oxidoreductase (internal stop codon).
Figure 5. Nitrogen fixation operons. Top: common nitrogen fixation operon of three studied Rhodovulum species (“slow” operon): 1—4Fe-4S binding protein, 2—leucine rich repeat (LRR) protein, 3—nifZ, 4—nifT, 5—SIR2-like protein, 6—nifX, 7—nifX-associated nitrogen fixation protein, 8—hypothetical protein, 9—nif-specific ferredoxin III, 10—iron-sulfur cluster assembly accessory protein, 11—nifU, 12—nifW. Bottom: additional operon for nitrogen fixation present in R. strictum (“fast” operon): 1—oxidoreductase, 2—nitrogenase, 3—molybdopterin-dependent oxidoreductase (internal stop codon).
Microorganisms 10 01615 g005
Microorganisms 10 01615 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogeny of nifH gene across Rhodobacterales. The tree includes nifH homologues missing in R. steppense and R. tesquicola but found in R. strictum and Rhodobacter capsulatus strain SB1003 (blue background) and nifH homologues appearing in all three Rhodovulum strains (red background). Ultrafast bootstrap values are displayed as branch width. The tree is scaled by evolutionary distance (count of substitutions per site).
Figure 6. Phylogeny of nifH gene across Rhodobacterales. The tree includes nifH homologues missing in R. steppense and R. tesquicola but found in R. strictum and Rhodobacter capsulatus strain SB1003 (blue background) and nifH homologues appearing in all three Rhodovulum strains (red background). Ultrafast bootstrap values are displayed as branch width. The tree is scaled by evolutionary distance (count of substitutions per site).
Microorganisms 10 01615 g006
Table
Table 1. Genome features of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum, according to NCBI database.
Table 1. Genome features of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum, according to NCBI database.
Rhodovulum tesquicola A-36sTRhodovulum steppense A-20sT Rhodovulum strictum DSM 11289T
Genome size3,521,8223,665,9493,825,097
Total number of genes349036343756
Proteins337535823636
rRNA genes1, 1, 1 (5S, 16S, 23S)1, 1, 2 (5S, 16S, 23S partial)1, 1, 1 (5S, 16S, 23S)
tRNA genes455142
Genome completeness, %99.4199.1298.83
Genome contamination, %00.150.59
Table
Table 2. Physiological features of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum ([22], this study). b, Biotin; paba, p-aminobenzoate; t, thiamine; n, niacin; +, high nitrogenase activity rate; +−, moderate nitrogenase activity rate.
Table 2. Physiological features of R. tesquicola, R. steppense and R. strictum ([22], this study). b, Biotin; paba, p-aminobenzoate; t, thiamine; n, niacin; +, high nitrogenase activity rate; +−, moderate nitrogenase activity rate.
R. tesquicola A-36sTR. steppense A-20sTR. strictum DSM 11289T
pH range (optimum)7.5–10.0 (8.5–9.0) 7.5–10.0 (8.5)7.5–9.0 (8.0)
NaCl range (optimum) (%)0.3–10.0 (1–3) 0.5–10.0 (1–5)0.25–3.00 (0.8)
Vitamin requirementb, paba, t, nb, n, tb, paba, t
Nitrogenase activity +−+−+
Table
Table 3. Nitrogenase activity in the pure cultures of anoxygenic phototrophic Alphaproteobacteria (strain designation is indicated in case if only one strain was tested).
Table 3. Nitrogenase activity in the pure cultures of anoxygenic phototrophic Alphaproteobacteria (strain designation is indicated in case if only one strain was tested).
SpeciesNitrogenase Activity
(nmoles C2H2/mg Dry Weight per Hour)		Reference
Rhodobacter capsulatus1430–4900[19]
Rhodobacter capsulatus B103650[19]
Cereibacter sphaeroides1110–2755[19]
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum W4640[19]
Rhodothalassium salexigens DSM 2172630[19]
Rhodomicrobium vannielii660–1570[19]
Rhodopseudomonas palustris480–700[19]
Rhodoblastus acidophilus500–900[19]
Rhodovulum tesquicola A-36sT278This work
Rhodovulum steppense A-20sT523This work
Rhodovulum strictum DSM 11289T4066This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Komova, A.V.; Bakhmutova, E.D.; Izotova, A.O.; Kochetova, E.S.; Toshchakov, S.V.; Namsaraev, Z.B.; Golichenkov, M.V.; Korzhenkov, A.A. Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Genome Analysis of a Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081615

AMA Style

Komova AV, Bakhmutova ED, Izotova AO, Kochetova ES, Toshchakov SV, Namsaraev ZB, Golichenkov MV, Korzhenkov AA. Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Genome Analysis of a Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081615

Chicago/Turabian Style

Komova, Anastasia V., Elizaveta D. Bakhmutova, Anna O. Izotova, Evelina S. Kochetova, Stepan V. Toshchakov, Zorigto B. Namsaraev, Maxim V. Golichenkov, and Aleksei A. Korzhenkov. 2022. "Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Genome Analysis of a Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081615

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop