Next Article in Journal
Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Genome Analysis of a Moderately Haloalkaliphilic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacterium Rhodovulum tesquicola
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Ticks and Molecular Survey of Anaplasma marginale, with Notes on Their Phylogeny
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Human Gut Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Radiation Enteropathy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms10081614
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection

by
Karim Ullah
1,
Muhammad Numan
1,
Abdulaziz Alouffi
2,
Mashal M. Almutairi
3,
Hafsa Zahid
1,
Majid Khan
1,
Zia Ul Islam
4,
Atif Kamil
4,
Sher Zaman Safi
5,
Haroon Ahmed
6,
Tetsuya Tanaka
7,* and
Abid Ali
1,*
1
Department of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
2
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 12354, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biotechnology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
5
Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Jenjarom 42610, Selangor, Malaysia
6
Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Park Road, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan
7
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1614; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081614
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 7 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Detection and Genotypic Analysis of Tick-Borne Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Theileria is the tick-borne disease-causing agent responsible for theileriosis in various animals. Like other tick-borne pathogens, the epidemiology, associated risk factors and genetic diversity of Theileria spp. have mostly remained unexplored in the region. The current study was designed to analyze the epidemiology, associated risk factors, and molecular characterization of Theileria spp. in the selected districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Among the chosen districts, the highest infection was found in Upper Dir, while the most prevalent species was Theileria annulata clustered with sequences for the same species reported from Pakistan, China, and Italy. The risk factors associated with Theileria infection included age, gender, breeds, feeding system, hygienic measure, farming system, stall system, and seasons. The microscopic examination, in combination with the molecular approach, will enhance the early diagnosis and accurate identification of Theileria spp. and facilitate effective control strategies against these parasites.

Abstract

Theileria annulata is a tick-associated parasite that causes tropical theileriosis in livestock and is responsible for huge economic losses. Studies have been neglected on the effect of Theileria spp. on cattle in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan. The present study was designed to determine the genetic diversity and assess the risk factors associated with Theileria infection in selected districts of KP. Information on the risk factors related to the Theileria infection was collected through a questionnaire. Blood samples were collected from symptomatic cattle from January 2019 to February 2020, identified morphologically through microscopic examination, and processed for molecular characterization using the 18S rRNA gene as a genetic marker. Of the 555 cattle examined (136, 24.5%) and (294, 53%) were found positive for Theileria spp. by microscopic examination and a PCR test, respectively. Based on the PCR test, the highest prevalence of infection was found in district Upper Dir (46/75, 61.3%), followed by Lower Dir (54/90, 60%); Malakand (51/88, 57.9%); Peshawar (40/80, 50%); and Charsadda (52/112, 46.4%), with the lowest in Bajaur (51/110, 46.34%). A BLAST analysis of the 18S rDNA sequences showed 99.5% identity with T. annulata. In a phylogenetic tree, the 18S rDNA sequence of T. annulata clustered with sequences from Pakistan, China, and Italy. A significant association was observed between the prevalence of infection and different host characteristics. The highest infection was found in adult cattle (216/360, 60%); females (218/377, 57.8%); and Holstein Friesian (120/180, 66.6%). Theileria infection was significantly associated with management practices. Higher infection rates were observed in free-grazing cattle (190/412, 42.2%); those kept in unhygienic conditions (246/405, 60.7%); cattle in combined farming systems (165/255, 64.8%); and those in congested stall systems (150/218, 68.8%). Seasonal patterns were found to be significantly associated with infection, and a higher infection rate was observed in summer (215/350, 61.4%) than in winter (79/205, 38.5%). Identified risk factors should be considered in designing practical control approaches to reduce the burden of Theileria infection. Large scale studies are required to explore the diversity of Theileria species in KP, Pakistan.

1. Introduction

Tick-borne pathogens cause diseases and affect millions of domesticated and wild animals in tropical and subtropical regions of the world [1,2]. Theileriosis is one of the most common tick-borne infection, and approximately 250 million animals are at risk annually [2]. Theileriosis occurs worldwide, affects nearly all ungulates, and causes either latent or lethal infections with high morbidity and mortality [2,3]. Among the different species of Theileria, Theileria annulata and Theileria parva are the most pathogenic for cattle, while other Theileria species are comparatively less pathogenic; however, all these species are well-known as life-threatening risks to various vertebrates [4]. Several species of Theileria are endemic in Pakistan, including T. annulata, Theileria orientalis, Theileria lestoquardi, and Theileria ovis [5,6,7].
Due to the morphological resemblances among Theileria spp., high technical expertise is required to differentiate these species by microscopic examination [1,8,9,10]. Several approaches such as the conventional methods of microscopic examination [1]; xenodiagnosis [11]; serological assays such as blood indirect fluorescent antibody (IFAT) [12] and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [13], as well as molecular assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [1,14]; loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP); reverse line blot (RLB) [15]; restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [16]; and DNA sequencing have been used for the accurate detection and differentiation of these pathogens. Among them, molecular approaches are well known for detecting and identifying various Theileria spp. and their genotypes [17]. The 18S rRNA gene has been utilized effectively to detect and identify various Theileria spp. [1,18]. Moreover, this gene has been sequenced and used in the evolutionary analysis of many Theileria species from various regions [19]. The currently available techniques are restricted in specificity and sensitivity, and accurate positive detection may be performed by multiple assays [1].
In Pakistan, rapid population growth has forced the government to import different cross-breed cattle with a high capacity for milk and meat production, but these cattle are susceptible to Theileria infection [2,20]. The cross-breeding of exotic animals with local animals has increased the susceptibility of these animals to several life-threatening diseases, including theileriosis [5,19]. Moreover, favorable agro-ecological conditions for tick vectors (Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus species) in Pakistan, such as humidity, temperature, long summer, and rainfall, play a major role in the propagation of these infectious agents [2,19,21,22,23]. The surveillance of these infectious agents is crucial for the timely control of outbreaks. Keeping in view the economic impact and importance of livestock in the country, livestock contributed approximately 61.9% of agricultural value added and 14.0% to the national GDP during 2021–2022 [Pakistan Economic Survey 2021–2022], The current study was intended to estimate the prevalence of Theileria infection and assess the associated risk factors and molecular characterization of Theileria species infecting cattle in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Advanced Studies Research Board (ASRB) members, AWKUM/2020/4871, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.

2.2. Sample Collection and Study Area

From January 2019 to February 2020 the blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of symptomatic cattle by a disposable 5 mL sterile syringe. The samples were randomly collected from various cattle herds in six districts, including: Peshawar (34°00′20.2″ N, 71°34′00.8″ E); Charsadda (34°10′02.0″ N, 71°45′21.2″ E); Malakand (34°33′07.4″ N, 71°53′37.1″ E); Lower Dir (34°54′05.8″ N, 71°48′51.2″ E); Upper Dir (35°19′00.1″ N, 72°03′57.2″ E); and Bajaur (34°45′43.2″ N, 71°32′18.0″ E) of KP, Pakistan. For further analyses, the collected blood samples were kept in 5.0 mL EDTA tubes at −30 °C. The geographic coordinates for the collection sites were obtained using “Google Earth pro”, and the map was designed by ArcGIS V. 10.3.1 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA) (Figure 1). While collecting the blood samples, relevant information such as age, gender, breeds, feeding system, hygienic measures, farming system, stall system, and collection seasons was collected using a questionnaire (Supplementary File S1).

2.3. Microscopic Examination and Clinical Signs

Blood samples collected from symptomatic cattle were examined microscopically using thin blood smears stained with Giemsa stain (8–10%) [24] and examined by using an oil immersion lens at 100× magnification using a microscope (BIOBASE, XS-208A, Jinan, China). The presence of any Theileria spp. was checked based on morphology [25]. The symptomatic cattle hosts were observed with clinical signs such as fever, loss of appetite, nasal and ocular discharge, oral lesions, diarrhea, anorexia, and reduced milk production.

2.4. DNA Extraction and PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from each collected blood (750 μL) sample using the standard phenol-chloroform protocol, and the DNA pellet was hydrated by adding 50 μL of “nuclease-free” water [26,27,28]. The extracted genomic DNA samples were quantified via Nano-Q (Optizen, Daejeon, Korea) and stored at −20 °C for further analysis. A pair of species-specific primers (forward: 5′-GGCGGCGTTTATTAGACC-3′ and reverse: 5′-TCAATTCCTTTAAGTTTCAGCC-3′) was used to amplify the 18S rRNA gene (1093 bp) in a conventional PCR for the detection of Theileria spp. [29]. The PCR was carried out in a Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) containing a reaction mixture of 25 μL comprised of 13 μL Dream Taq PCR MasterMix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA); 2 μL of primers (1 μL each forward and reverse); 2 μL (50 ng/μL) of extracted genomic DNA; and 8 μL “nuclease-free” water. The conditions for thermal cycling in the PCR were: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 60 s and 72 °C for 60 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min [29]. Each PCR experiment contained a negative control (PCR water instead of template DNA) and positive control (T. annulata DNA) [19]. The amplified PCR products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel, dyed with 2 μL of ethidium bromide, and observed by a gel documentation system (BioDoc-ItTM Imaging Systems UVP, LLC, Upland, CA, USA) (Figure S1).

2.5. DNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

The GeneClean II kit (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to purify the PCR products following the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 36 (two from each breed in each district) amplified PCR products were submitted for bidirectional sequencing (Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Korea). The obtained sequences were subjected to SeqMan V. 5 (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) for trimming to remove the contaminated nucleotide and primer regions. The trimmed sequences were submitted to BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) [30] at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information). Homologous sequences were downloaded from NCBI and aligned with the obtained sequences and an outgroup in BioEdit V. 7.0.5 (Raleigh, NC, USA) [31]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the maximum-likelihood model (1000 bootstrap replicons) in MEGA-X (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) [32].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed in the GraphPad Prism V. 5 (Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) [33]. The variables were classified into two or more categories to determine a significant difference and relative risk (RR) [34] between the occurrence of Theileria infection and the potential risk factors using a chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, respectively. The analysis was considered to be significant at a 95% confidence interval (CI) [35] and p-value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Collected Blood Samples

A total of 555 blood samples were collected from six districts, including Peshawar (80, 14.4%); Charsadda (112, 20.2%); Malakand (88, 15.8%); Lower Dir (90, 16.2%); Upper Dir (75, 13.5%); and Bajaur (110, 19.8%) of KP, Pakistan.

3.2. Microscopic Examination

The microscopic examination of the collected blood samples showed Theileria infection in the cattle hosts of the selected regions. The presence of a sting-ring, oval, rod, or comma-shaped parasite was considered as positive for Theileria spp. Among the collected 555 blood samples, 136 (24.5%) were microscopically found to be positive for Theileria spp. The highest infection was observed in blood samples collected from Lower Dir (28/90, 31.1%), followed by Charsadda (34/112, 30.35%); Upper Dir (28/75, 29.3%); Malakand (21/88 23.8%); Peshawar (15/80, 18.75%); and Bajaur (16/110, 14.5%) (Table 1).

3.3. Molecular Confirmation of Theileria Infection

Among the collected blood samples, 294 (53%) (including 136 microscopically positive) were confirmed to be positive for Theileria species by using a conventional PCR to amplify 18S rDNA sequences, using species-specific primers to identify the prevalent Theileria spp. from all selected districts.

3.4. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses

The obtained sequences with 100% identity were considered as a single sequence. The BLAST results of the obtained 18S rDNA sequences of 1000 bp revealed a 99.5% maximum identity with T. annulata. A total of 31 sequences of the 18S rDNA sequences for T. annulata were downloaded from GenBank in FASTA format based on maximum identity with query sequences. The 18S rDNA sequence for T. annulata was clustered in a phylogenetic tree with the sequences reported from Pakistan, China, and Italy (Figure 2). The 18S rDNA sequence of T. annulata was deposited to GenBank (MW487226).

3.5. Risk Factors Associated with Theileria Infection

Collected data about host (age, gender, breeds); management practices (feeding system, hygienic measures, farming system, and stall system); and seasonal patterns between summer (June, July, and August) and winter (December, January, and February) were analyzed, which assisted in identifying various risk factors associated with Theileria infection. Adult cattle of 2 to 6 years of age were found to be more highly infected (216/360, 60%) than young cattle of less than 2 years of age (78/195, 40%). The gendered prevalence was a significant risk factor in target sites, as female hosts were at more risk (218/377, 57.8%) than males (76/178, 42.6%). Breed-wise, the highest infection rate was observed in Holstein Friesian (120/180, 66.6%), followed by Jersey (106/176, 60.2%) and Sahiwal cattle (68/199, 34.2%). In the current study, different management practices such as the feeding system were observed as a significant risk factor, in which free-grazing cattle were found to be more highly infected (190/412, 42.2%) than stall feeding and tied cattle (104/143, 72.7%). Cattle in areas with effective hygienic measures were less affected by the infection (48/150, 32%) than those kept in unhygienic conditions (246/405, 60.7%). The cattle in the combined farming system were more highly infected (165/255, 64.5%) than in the isolated farming system (129/300, 43%). The infection rate was found to be higher in the summer (215/350, 61.4%) as compared to the winter (79/205, 38.5%) season (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Studies have shown the negative impact of T. annulata infection on livestock in some regions of Pakistan [36]. The majority of these studies were based on a microscopic-diagnosis of the infection, lacking sufficient molecular information about the genetic diversity of prevalent Theileria spp. [1,36]. The current study provides a detailed insight into the epidemiology, genetic diversity, and risk factors associated with these etiological agents for bovine theileriosis in KP, Pakistan. Blood samples collected from symptomatic cattle were investigated by microscopic examination and PCR for amplification of the 18S rDNA sequence that revealed a high prevalence of T. annulata in cattle. Prevalence of Theileria infection was significantly associated with various factors such as age, gender, breeds, feeding system, hygienic measures, farming system, stall system, and different seasons of the year.
Microscopic examination is a rapid and low-cost method for detecting and diagnosing several infectious agents, including Theileria spp. [37]. However, this method has often been less sensitive in diagnosing and accurately identifying various Theileria species [1,20]. During this study, more than half of the blood samples that detected negative for Theileria species through microscopic examination were found to be positive by a PCR test and sequencing. These results indicate that using the 18S rDNA sequence in a PCR test to detect Theileria spp. in blood samples has a higher accuracy than microscopy [38]. Based on the results, it is suggested that microscopic examination in combination with PCR and DNA sequencing should be adopted for the detection and accurate identification of Theileria spp.
In a phylogenetic tree, the 18S rDNA sequence of T. annulata clustered with the sequences from Pakistan, China, and Italy. The species-specific primers used to characterize the 18S rDNA sequences for T. annulata were able to identify this parasite accurately. The 18S rDNA sequences of T. annulata hold significance in describing genetic diversity due to the presence of hypervariable regions, which are crucial for determining evolutionary patterns [18].
Adult cattle (2 to 6 years old) were more highly infected than young cattle (≤2 years old). The high level of infection in adult cattle may be due to their regular exposure to questing ticks during free-grazing, and weak immune responses [39,40,41]. Early colostrum intake in calves has been suggested to enhance immunity against various pathogens, including Theileria spp. [42,43]. Gender-wise, female cattle were more highly infected than male cattle. The suppression of immunity during pregnancy and lactation in female cattle may be the possible reason for this difference in prevalence [44,45]. Breed-wise, the highest level of infection was observed in the Holstein Friesian, followed by Jersey and Sahiwal cattle. These findings suggest that importing exotic cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian) into Pakistan has enhanced the prevalence of Theileria infection [36,46].
Furthermore, the exposure of indigenous breeds to local ticks and tick-borne pathogens is common and might assist in developing protective immunity to fight against these infectious agents [14,47]. A higher level of infection was detected in free-grazing cattle than tied cattle. The contact of healthy cattle with infected cattle during free-grazing has been shown as a critical risk factor in enhancing the burden and spread of Theileria infection [13,39]. Congested stalls and unhygienic conditions were found to be potential risk factors responsible for high Theileria infection. This increased rate of infection may be due to the close contact of infected cattle with healthy cattle and the traumatic conditions cattle face in crowded stalls that suppress immunity to various infections [13,39,48]. A high prevalence of Theileria infection was recorded in the summer compared to the winter season. Warm and humid conditions favor ticks’ reproduction, growth, and dispersal, which may assist their quest and access to cattle hosts [3,49]. This region has recorded a high prevalence of various tick species, including vectors for Theileria species, during summer.

5. Conclusions

This study provides information about the prevalence and risk factors associated with theileriosis in different regions of Pakistan. In addition, some information was provided about the molecular characterization of Theileria spp. infecting cattle in selected districts of KP, Pakistan. PCR and sequencing are essential approaches for detecting and identifying Theileria spp. T. annulata was the dominant species detected in the investigated areas. Risk factors such as host age, gender, breeds, feeding system, hygienic measures, farming system, stall system, and different seasonal patterns were potential determinants that significantly enhanced the chances of Theileria infection. Using conventional microscopic examination in combination with molecular approaches will assist in adopting essential measures for the early detection and control of Theileria infection, in order to enhance livestock production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10081614/s1, File S1: Sample collection Performa; Figure S1: The PCR based amplified products containing fragment (1093 bp) DNA amplified through species-specific primers (Lane 1-6) for Theileria annulata. The positive control (Theileria annulata) is shown as PC and negative control as NC (PCR water instead of template DNA).

Author Contributions

A.A. (Abid Ali), K.U., A.A. (Abdulaziz Alouffi), M.M.A. and T.T. designed the experimental idea of the study. M.N., H.Z., M.K., Z.U.I., A.K., S.Z.S., H.A. and A.A. (Abid Ali) collected the blood samples. A.A. (Abid Ali), M.N., H.Z., T.T. and K.U. performed the experiments. M.N., H.Z. and A.A. (Abid Ali) performed the phylogenetic and statistical analyses. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number JP22H02522, and Heiwa Nakajima Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The research study was approved by the Advanced Studies Research Board (ASRB) committee members of Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (AWKUM/2020/4871).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Details regarding data supporting reported results can be found https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term= (accessed on 26 June 2022).

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out under the financial support given by the Higher Education Commission and Pakistan Science Foundation of Pakistan, and The researchers supporting project number (RSP2022R494), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Mans, B.J.; Pienaar, R.; Latif, A.A. A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ali, A.; Khan, M.A.; Zahid, H.; Yaseen, P.M.; Qayash Khan, M.; Nawab, J.; Ur Rehman, Z.; Ateeq, M.; Khan, S.; Ibrahim, M. Seasonal dynamics, record of ticks infesting humans, wild and domestic animals and molecular phylogeny of Rhipicephalus microplus in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kamran, K.; Ali, A.; Villagra, C.A.; Bazai, Z.A.; Iqbal, A.; Sajid, M.S. Hyalomma anatolicum resistance against ivermectin and fipronil is associated with indiscriminate use of acaricides in southwestern Balochistan, Pakistan. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yam, J.; Bogema, D.R.; Jenkins, C. Oriental theileriosis. Ticks Tick Borne Pathog. 2018, 1, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ghafar, A.; Koehler, A.V.; Hall, R.S.; Gauci, C.G.; Gasser, R.B.; Jabbar, A. Targeted next-generation sequencing and informatics as an effective tool to establish the composition of bovine piroplasm populations in endemic regions. Microorganisms 2020, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abid, K.; Bukhari, S.; Asif, M.; Sattar, A.; Arshad, M.; Aktas, M.; Ozubek, S.; Shaikh, R.S.; Iqbal, F. Molecular detection and prevalence of Theileria ovis and Anaplasma marginale in sheep blood samples collected from Layyah district in Punjab, Pakistan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hassan, M.A.; Liu, J.; Rashid, M.; Iqbal, N.; Guan, G.; Yin, H.; Luo, J. Molecular survey of piroplasm species from selected areas of China and Pakistan. Parasit Vectors 2018, 11, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mamatha, G.S.; Shruthi, R.; Chandranaik, B.M.; D’Souza, P.E.; Thimmareddy, P.M.; Shivashankar, B.P.; Puttalakshmamma, G.C. Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic characterisation of Theileria luwenshuni in India: A first report. Small Rumin. Res. 2017, 154, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Imam, E.; Ahmed, H.; Khalid, M.T. Malignant ovine theileriosis (Theileria lestoquardi): A review. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 147, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Criado-Fornelio, A. A review of nucleic acid-based diagnostic tests for Babesia and Theileria, with emphasis on bovine piroplasms. Parassitologia 2007, 49, S39–S44. [Google Scholar]
  11. Skilton, R.A.; Bishop, R.P.; Katende, J.M.; Mwaura, S.; Morzaria, S.P. The persistence of Theileria parva infection in cattle immunized using two stocks which differ in their ability to induce a carrier state: Analysis using a novel blood spot PCR assay. Parasitology 2002, 124, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bakheit, M.A.; Schnittger, L.; Salih, D.A.; Boguslawski, K.; Beyer, D.; Fadl, M.; Ahmed, J.S. Application of the recombinant Theileria annulata surface protein in an indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of tropical theileriosis. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 92, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Swai, E.S.; Karimuribo, E.D.; Kambarage, D.M.; Moshy, W.E.; Mbise, A.N. A comparison of seroprevalence and risk factors for Theileria parva and T. mutans in smallholder dairy cattle in the Tanga and Iringa regions of Tanzania. Vet. J. 2007, 174, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mans, B.J. The basis of molecular diagnostics for piroplasmids: Do the sequences lie? Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022, 13, 101907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gubbels, J.M.; De Vos, A.P.; Van der Weide, M.; Viseras, J.; Schouls, L.M.; De Vries, E.; Jongejan, F. Simultaneous detection of bovine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blot hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 1782–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zaeemi, M.; Haddadzadeh, H.; Khazraiinia, P.; Kazemi, B.; Bandehpour, M. Identification of different Theileria species (Theileria lestoquardi, Theileria ovis, and Theileria annulata) in naturally infected sheep using nested PCR–RFLP. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yokoyama, N.; Ueno, A.; Mizuno, D.; Kuboki, N.; Khukhuu, A.; Igarashi, I.; Miyahara, T.; Shiraishi, T.; Kudo, R.; Oshiro, M.; et al. Genotypic diversity of Theileria orientalis detected from cattle grazing in Kumamoto and Okinawa prefectures of Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 73, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sivakumar, T.; Hayashida, K.; Sugimoto, C.; Yokoyama, N. Evolution and genetic diversity of Theileria. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 27, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Karim, S.; Budachetri, K.; Mukherjee, N.; Williams, J.; Kausar, A.; Hassan, M.J.; Adamson, S.; Dowd, S.E.; Apanskevich, D.; Arijo, A.; et al. A study of ticks and tick-borne livestock pathogens in Pakistan. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gebrekidan, H.; Perera, P.K.; Ghafar, A.; Abbas, T.; Gasser, R.B.; Jabbar, A. An appraisal of oriental theileriosis and the Theileria orientalis complex, with an emphasis on diagnosis and genetic characterization. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, A.; Mulenga, A.; Vaz, I.S., Jr. Tick and tick-borne pathogens: Molecular and immune targets for control strategies. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ali, A.; Shehla, S.; Zahid, H.; Ullah, F.; Zeb, I.; Ahmed, H.; da Silva Vaz, I., Jr.; Tanaka, T. Molecular survey and spatial distribution of Rickettsia spp. in ticks infesting free-ranging wild animals in Pakistan (2017–2021). Pathogens 2022, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ali, A.; Zahid, H.; Zeb, I.; Tufail, M.; Khan, S.; Haroon, M.; Bilal, M.; Hussain, M.; Alouffi, A.S.; Muñoz-Leal, S.; et al. Risk factors associated with tick infestations on equids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, with notes on Rickettsia massiliae detection. Parasit. Vectors. 2021, 14, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Corrons, J.L.V.; Albarède, S.; Flandrin, G.; Heller, S.; Horvath, K.; Houwen, B.; Nordin, G.; Sarkani, E.; Skitek, M.; Van Blerk, M.; et al. Guidelines for blood smear preparation and staining procedure for setting up an external quality assessment scheme for blood smear interpretation. Part I: Control material. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2004, 42, 922–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gm, U.; Armour, J.; Duncan, J.L.; Dunn, A.M.; Fw, J. Veterinary Parasitology, 2nd ed.; Black well Science Co.: London, UK, 2003; pp. 254–255. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sangioni, L.A.; Horta, M.C.; Vianna, M.C.; Gennari, S.M.; Soares, R.M.; Galvão, M.A.; Schumaker, T.T.; Ferreira, F.; Vidotto, O.; Labruna, M.B. Rickettsial infection in animals and Brazilian spotted fever endemicity. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sibeko, K.P.; Oosthuizen, M.C.; Collins, N.E.; Geysen, D.; Rambritch, N.E.; Latif, A.A.; Groeneveld, H.T.; Potgieter, F.T.; Coetzer, J.A. Development and evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for the detection of Theileria parva infections in Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Habibi, G. A comparative phylogenetic analysis of Theileria spp. by using two “18S ribosomal RNA” and “Theileria annulata merozoite surface antigen” gene sequences. Arch. Razi Inst. 2013, 68, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.C.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hall, T.; Biosciences, I.; Arlsbad, C. BioEdit: An important software for molecular biology. GERF Bull. Biosci. 2011, 2, 60–61. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Motulsky, H.J. Prism 5 Statistics Guide; GraphPad Software Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gart, J.J. On the combination of relative risks. Biometrics 1962, 18, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Blyth, C.R.; Still, H.A. Binomial Confidence Intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983, 78, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jabbar, A.; Abbas, T.; Saddiqi, H.A.; Qamar, M.F.; Gasser, R.B. Tick-borne diseases of bovines in Pakistan: Major scope for future research and improved control. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mosqueda, J.; Olvera-Ramirez, A.; Aguilar-Tipacamu, G.; Canto, G.J. Current advances in detection and treatment of babesiosis. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 1504–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. El-Ashker, M.; Hotzel, H.; Gwida, M.; El-Beskawy, M.; Silaghi, C.; Tomaso, H. Molecular biological identification of Babesia, Theileria, and Anaplasma species in cattle in Egypt using PCR assays, gene sequence analysis and a novel DNA microarray. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Swai, E.S.; Mbise, A.N.; Kessy, V.; Kaaya, E.; Sanka, P.; Loomu, P.M. Farm constraints, cattle disease perception and tick management practices in pastoral Maasai community-Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 2005, 17, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vlasova, A.N.; Saif, L.J. Bovine immunology: Implications for dairy cattle. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 643206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khan, Z.; Shehla, S.; Alouffi, A.; Kashif Obaid, M.; Zeb Khan, A.; Almutairi, M.M.; Numan, M.; Aiman, O.; Alam, S.; Ullah, S.; et al. Molecular survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma marginale in ticks collected from livestock hosts in Pakistan. Animals 2022, 12, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rizk, M.A.; Salama, A.; El-Sayed, S.A.E.S.; Elsify, A.; El-Ashkar, M.; Ibrahim, H.; Youssef, M.; El-Khodery, S. Animal level risk factors associated with Babesia and Theileria infections in cattle in Egypt. Acta Parasitol. 2017, 62, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tabor, A.E.; Ali, A.; Rehman, G.; Rocha Garcia, G.; Zangirolamo, A.F.; Malardo, T.; Jonsson, N.N. Cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus-host interface: A review of resistant and susceptible host responses. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ponnudurai, R.; Sayavedra, L.; Kleiner, M.; Heiden, S.E.; Thürmer, A.; Felbeck, H.; Schlüter, R.; Sievert, S.M.; Daniel, R.; Schweder, T.; et al. Genome sequence of the sulfur oxidizing Bathymodiolus thermophilus gill endosymbiont. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2017, 12, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Nijhof, A.M.; Bodaan, C.; Postigo, M.; Nieuwenhuijs, H.; Opsteegh, M.; Franssen, L.; Jebbink, F.; Jongejan, F. Ticks and associated pathogens collected from domestic animals in the Netherlands. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007, 7, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gharbi, M.; Sassi, L.; Dorchies, P.; Darghouth, M.A. Infection of calves with Theileria annulata in Tunisia: Economic analysis and evaluation of the potential benefit of vaccination. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 137, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tuli, A.; Singla, L.D.; Sharma, A.; Bal, M.S.; Filia, G.; Kaur, P. Molecular epidemiology, risk factors and hematochemical alterations induced by Theileria annulata in bovines of Punjab (India). Acta Parasitol. 2015, 60, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carroll, J.A.; Forsberg, N.E. Influence of stress and nutrition on cattle immunity. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007, 23, 105–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ogden, N.H.; Lindsay, L.R. Effects of climate and climate change on vectors and vector-borne diseases: Ticks are different. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 10 01614 g001 550
Figure 1. Map showing the sites where blood samples were collected in the selected districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Figure 1. Map showing the sites where blood samples were collected in the selected districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Microorganisms 10 01614 g001
Microorganisms 10 01614 g002 550
Figure 2. The maximum likelihood model at 1000 bootstrap replicons was used to construct a phylogenetic tree for the 18S rDNA sequences of T. annulata. Theileria ornithorhynchid, and Theileria tachyglossi 18S rDNA sequences were utilized as an outgroup. A black circle has been used to label the obtained sequences in this study (MW487226).
Figure 2. The maximum likelihood model at 1000 bootstrap replicons was used to construct a phylogenetic tree for the 18S rDNA sequences of T. annulata. Theileria ornithorhynchid, and Theileria tachyglossi 18S rDNA sequences were utilized as an outgroup. A black circle has been used to label the obtained sequences in this study (MW487226).
Microorganisms 10 01614 g002
Table
Table 1. Comparison of microscopic examination and PCR for detecting Theileria annulata in collected blood samples.
Table 1. Comparison of microscopic examination and PCR for detecting Theileria annulata in collected blood samples.
DistrictsCattle BreedsBlood Sample (%)Microscopy +ve (%)95% CIp ValuePCR
+ve (%)		95% CIp Value
PeshawarHolstein Friesian21 (26.2)6 (7.5)−39.7–6.40.044911 (13.75)−2–20.05
Jersey24 (30)5 (6.25)12 (15)
Sahiwal35 (43.7)4 (5)17 (21.25)
Total80 (100)15 (18.75)40 (50)
CharsaddaHolstein Friesian38 (33.9)12 (10.7)−29–6.300.026018 (16.07)−2–170.31
Jersey41 (36.6)16 (14.2)15 (13.39)
Sahiwal33 (29.4)6 (5.3)19 (16.96)
Total112 (100)34 (30.35)52 (46.4)
MalakandHolstein Friesian26 (29.5)8 (9.09)−27.8–(−2.89)0.017021 (23.8)−2–30.24
Jersey30 (34.1)7 (7.9)13 (14.7)
Sahiwal32 (36.3)6 (6.8)17 (19.3)
Total88 (100)21 (23.8)51 (57.9)
Lower DirHolstein Friesian40 (44.4)12 (13.3)−27–4.60.04623 (25.5)−3–150.06
Jersey26 (28.8)6 (6.6)18 (20)
Sahiwal24 (26.6)10 (11.1)13 (14.4)
Total90 (100)28 (31.1)54 (60)
Upper DirHolstein Friesian15 (20)5 (6.6)−24–30.04112 (16)−2–30.25
Jersey28 (37.3)9 (12)22 (29.3)
Sahiwal32 (42.6)8 (10.6)12 (16)
Total75 (100)22 (29.3)46 (61.3)
BajaurHolstein Friesian48 (43.6)9 (8.1)−37–(−14)0.00527 (24.5)−2–180.31
Jersey27 (24.5)3 (2.7)12 (10.9)
Sahiwal35 (31.8)4 (3.6)12 (10.9)
Total110 (100)16 (14.5)51 (46.36)
Overall Total555 (100)136 (24.5) 294 (53)
Table
Table 2. Assessment of various risk factors associated with Theileria infection.
Table 2. Assessment of various risk factors associated with Theileria infection.
VariableTotal ExaminedPositive Sample (%)95% CIRRp Value
Age≤2 years19578/195 (40)1.26–1.771.5<0.0001
>2 years–6 years360216/360 (60)––
GenderFemale377218/377 (57.8)––0.0006
Male17876/178 (42.6)0.61–0.860.727
BreedsHolstein Friesian180120/180 (66.6)––0.0001
Jersey176106/176 (60.2)0.63–1.090.833
Sahiwal19968/199 (34.2)0.40–0.640.509
Feeding systemFree-grazing412190/412 (42.2)––<0.0001
Stall fed143104/143 (72.7)1.4 9–2.621.976
Hygienic measuresHygienic15048/150 (32)––<0.0001
Unhygienic405246/405 (60.7)1.48–2.061.754
Farming systemCombine255165/255 (64.8)––<0.0001
Isolated300129/300 (43)1.284–1.7641.505
Stall systemCongested218150/218 (68.8)––<0.001
Open337144/337 (42.7)1.3–1.81.6
SeasonsSummer350215/350 (61.4)––<0.0001
Winter20579/205 (38.5)0.52–0.740.628
Total samples555294/555 (53)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ullah, K.; Numan, M.; Alouffi, A.; Almutairi, M.M.; Zahid, H.; Khan, M.; Islam, Z.U.; Kamil, A.; Safi, S.Z.; Ahmed, H.; et al. Molecular Characterization and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081614

AMA Style

Ullah K, Numan M, Alouffi A, Almutairi MM, Zahid H, Khan M, Islam ZU, Kamil A, Safi SZ, Ahmed H, et al. Molecular Characterization and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ullah, Karim, Muhammad Numan, Abdulaziz Alouffi, Mashal M. Almutairi, Hafsa Zahid, Majid Khan, Zia Ul Islam, Atif Kamil, Sher Zaman Safi, Haroon Ahmed, and et al. 2022. "Molecular Characterization and Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop