Next Article in Journal
Bond Performance of Hook-End Steel Fiber to the Mortars Cured for 360 Days
Next Article in Special Issue
Aerosol OT Quantity Impacts on Calcium Nitrate Self-Healing Microcapsule Properties Used for Sustainable Construction Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Parametric Stock Flow Modelling of Historical Building Typologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Barriers, Opportunities and Recommendations to Enhance the Adoption of Timber within Multi-Storey Buildings in Austria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Production

1
IMT Nord Europe, Institut Mines-Télécom, Centre for Materials and Processes, F-59000 Lille, France
2
Univ. Lille, Institut Mines-Télécom, Univ. Artois, Junia, ULR 4515—LGCgE—Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géoEnvironnement, F-59000 Lille, France
3
ANDRA—Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs, CEDEX, F-92298 Chatenay Malabry, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(9), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091421
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 10 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable and Green Construction Materials)

Abstract

:
Excavated soils and rocks are materials obtained in construction works that could represent an ecological issue if a durable and efficient reuse process is not set. The radioactive waste disposal planned by the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency will generate large quantities of excavated soil (mainly as Callovo-Oxfordian argillite). The re-use of excavated soils is a recent question. There is a lack in the literature concerning the recycling of such materials. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the possibility of using Callovo-Oxfordian argillite (COx argillite from the French URL) as a raw material for Portland cement clinker production. COx argillite was first characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) then a Portland cement clinker was synthesized at laboratory scale. The produced clinker was characterized to verify the chemical and mineralogical composition. After adding gypsum, the reactivity of the resulting cement was assessed by setting time and isothermal calorimetry measurements. The compressive strength was assessed on standard mortar prisms at 1, 14 and 28 days. The results show that a Portland cement clinker containing 64% C3S, 14% C2S, 10% C4AF, 7% C3A and 1% CaO can be produced when 22.24% of raw meal was substituted by the COx argillite. The setting time and isothermal calorimetry results show that the produced cement shows an equivalent reactivity to conventional ordinary Portland cement. The compressive strength at 28 days is 56 MPa, showing that the produced cement can be considered as CEM I 52.5 N Portland cement.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The management of excavated soils becomes one of the major issues that the environment and construction sector have to face. Excavated soils and rock are often obtained through activities of mining, tunneling or foundation works. When these materials are not beneficially reused, they are often stored or dumped and cause far-reaching environmental harm [1,2]. Recent studies pointed out the interest in using excavated soil as secondary building material, seeking therefore economic and environmental benefits [2,3,4].
Nowadays, the using of partial replacement of raw materials in the clinker raw meal by wastes or by-products is gaining a lot of attention [5,6]. This action allows, on one hand to preserve natural resources, which presents a challenge for the cement industry, and on another hand to recover wastes and industrial by-products. Decades ago, it was the case with blast furnace slag; today the use of by products is greater and comes not only from the industry [7]. Waste recovery makes it possible to participate to the circular economy and to meet the global requirements for reducing the carbon footprint as agreed in the COP22, Kyoto, and according to the IEA/WBCSD Roadmap [8,9,10,11,12]. Different types of wastes have been studied in the literature in order to produce cement, and mainly OPC cement. Aouad et al. used sediment from the north of France to produce OPC cement [13]. Their results showed that 39% of sediment can be added to the raw meal, and the compressive strength of sediment-based cement is equivalent to the reference cement (without sediment) and exceeds it by 20% in the long term. Sediments, coming from different French regions were also tested by Faure et al. [14] and their study showed that 10–15 wt% of the raw meal can be replaced by various types of sediment without significantly affecting the clinker characteristics. The recycled concrete aggregate and fine fractions were used by Diliberto et al. [15] in order to produce OPC cement. Tsakiridis et al. [16] added 10.5% of steel slag in the OPC clinker raw meal without affecting negatively the quality of the cement.
The French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency, Andra, is responsible for the long-term management of radioactive wastes produced in France. Cigeo (Industrial Centre for Geological Disposal) is one of Andra’s projects for the disposal of high-level (HLW) and intermediate level long-lived (IL-LLW) radioactive wastes. The Cigeo project concerns the radioactive waste disposal planned at 500 m below ground level in the geological layer formed by the Callovo-Oxfordian (COx) argillite [17,18].
The characterizations of this clay layer have shown that the argillite exhibits a homogeneity and a geological stability as well as physical properties (especially a low permeability) that allow this layer to host radioactive waste disposal [19,20]. This disposal will lead to the generation of millions of cubic meters of excavated COx argillite. The storage of such a volume during the operating period and the remaining volume after closure is a key issue. Therefore, the re-use of the excavated COx clay has become a goal in order to fix the in situ storage problem. Gharzouni et al. investigated the possibility of producing alkali-activated materials/geopolymers based on COx argillite [19]. Different thermal treatments were applied to COx argillite such as traditional calcination at different temperatures and flash calcination. Dupuy et al. [21], used also COx argillite to produce alkali-activated materials with a pH close to 11 and presenting a wide range of setting time up to 24 h.
The characterization of COx argillite realized in different studies shows the presence of three main components: clay, calcite and quartz [17,22,23,24,25]. These phases are essential to produce clinker in the cement industry [13,26,27]. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the possibility of using COx argillite as part of the meal blend to produce ordinary Portland cement. Therefore, COx argillite is incorporated to the raw meal. The produced clinker is characterized by X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence to verify its chemical and mineralogical composition. The compressive strength and reactivity of the cement made with COx argillite are investigated on mortar and cement paste, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The raw materials used in this study are pure CaCO3, Fe2O3 and SiO2, in addition to the Callovo-Oxfordian argillite. Prior to characterization and use, the COx argillite is dried, crushed and ground with a cross beater mill SK300, down to a fineness of less than 200 µm.
The reference cement used is the ordinary Portland cement CEM I 52.5 N produced at industrial scale by EQIOM. It is a cement specified in European standard NF EN 196-1 [28] for general construction use. The physical, mineralogical and chemical characteristics of this cement are presented in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

2.2. Clinker Synthesis at Laboratory Scale

The theoretical composition of the targeted clinker (COx clinker) is represented in Table 4.
In order to reach the targeted composition in Table 4, a theoretical oxide composition was calculated (see Table 5).
To reach such a composition, a backward calculation is performed to calculate the weight ratio of each raw material in the meal. The raw materials, CaCO3, Fe2O3, SiO2 and COx argillite are mixed together through a wet process to facilitate the homogenization of the raw meal. Then the raw meal is dried at 105 °C. Pellets are made and fired up to 1450 °C in a static furnace. After 15 min at the clinkering temperature, the clinker is cooled in the furnace to room temperature (Figure 1). The obtained clinker is ground using a vibratory disc mill RS 200 Retsch to a specific area of about 4300 cm2/g (in accordance to the Blaine air permeability method mentioned in the European standard NF EN 196-6 [29]).
To produce cement, gypsum is added with an SO3/Al2O3 ratio of 0.6 using the Equation (1) [30]:
Amount of gypsum used = Al2O3 content × [0.6/101.96] × [80.06/0.461]
where 101.96 = molar mass of Al2O3; 80.06 = molar mass of SO3; 0.461 = molar mass ratio of SO3/natural gypsum used (for pure gypsum 80.06/172.16 is 0.461).

2.3. Characterization Methods

The particle size distributions were determined using a COULTER laser granulometry type LS 13320.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTG) was performed using Netzsch STA 409. The thermal analysis was performed in a nitrogen gas atmosphere, within a temperature range from 40 °C to 1100 °C. The program was divided into 3 segments: a linear of 2 °C/min between 40 and 105 °C, an isothermal of 30 min at 105 °C and a linear of 3 °C/min between 105 and 1100 °C.
The chemical composition was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a S4-Pioneer equipped with 4 KW generator and Rh anode.
The mineralogical analysis of argillite and the produced clinker was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D2 apparatus with Cu Kα radiation. The X-ray patterns were acquired in the 2θ (10–80°) with a step size of 0.02° and 1 s per step. TOPAS software was used to conduct the Rietveld analysis in order to quantify the crystalline phases.
The reactivity of COx cement paste was followed by isothermal heat flow calorimetry measurements performed at 20 °C using a home-made calorimeter with flowmeters that allowed the calorimeter to equilibrate in less than 5 min [31]. A water/cement ratio of 0.5 was applied, and all the materials were kept at 20 °C before mixing in order to eliminate errors related to the temperature variation during testing.
The compressive strength tests were carried out at 1, 14 and 28 days on mortar prisms 40*40*160 mm, according to the European standard AFNOR NF EN 196-1 using a standard sand [28]. These tests were carried out using an Instron 5500R-4206-006 press with a loading capacity of 1500 KN. The strain rate applied was 144 KN/min, as required by the European standard AFNOR NF EN 196-1 [28].
The VICATRONIC I06 091 device was used to determine the initial setting time in conformity with the NF EN 196-3 standard.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. COx Argillite Characterization

Figure 2 represents the particle size distribution of the COx argillite after grinding. The results show that 90% of the particles have a diameter < 60 μm. Therefore, the particle size of COx is adapted to be used as raw material for cement production that should be less than 200 µm according to the literature [32].
The COx argillite XRD result (Figure 3) shows the presence mainly of calcite and quartz in addition to muscovite, kaolinite and pyrite as crystalline phases. These results are in accordance with older studies conducted on COx argillite in the literature [17,22,23,24,25]. This mineralogical composition confirms that COx argillite is a candidate raw material to produce Portland cement clinker equivalent to many other raw materials in use [5].
The TG/DTG analysis of the COx argillite represented in Figure 4 shows the formation of three main peaks at:
-
100 °C corresponding to free water evaporation,
-
300–500 °C corresponding to decomposition of the organic matter in addition to muscovite, kaolinite and pyrite,
-
750 °C corresponding to the decarbonation of calcite.
Table 6 presents the results of the chemical characterization conducted by XRF of COx argillite. These results show that the four main elements needed for Portland clinker manufacturing (Ca, Si, Al and Fe) are present in the COx argillite. Therefore, COx argillite could act as an alternative to limestone and clay in the manufacturing of Portland clinker.
The results also showed that argillite, unlike another secondary raw material such as sediment [33], does not contain trace elements. Otherwise, the presence of some trace elements, such as zinc, will disadvantage the synthesis of Portland cement and orient the use towards more specific cement [31].

3.2. Raw Meal Design and Characterization

To calculate the appropriate amount of COx argillite that could be incorporated in the meal to substitute the raw materials and to reach the mineralogical composition presented in Table 4, the solver option in Excel is used [15]. The calculation reveals that a maximum of 22.24% of COx argillite can be incorporated in the raw meal. If less than this maximum amount is used, an additional amount of Al2O3 must be used, in the aim of reaching the raw meal composition.
The theoretical raw meal composition for the COx clinker is represented in Table 7.
Before sintering, the particle size distribution (Figure 5) was verified. As shown in Figure 5 the maximal particle size is 69 μm, indicating that the raw meal fineness is in the appropriate range (<200 µm) [32].
In addition, the three moduli used in the cement industry which corresponds to the ratio between the main oxides are calculated. These moduli correspond to the lime saturation factor (LSF), silica modulus (SM) and alumina modulus (AM). The three moduli are given in the equations (Equations (2)–(4)) below:
LSF = % CaO 2.8   ×   % SiO 2 + 1.20   ×   % Al 2 O 3 + 0.65   ×   % Fe 2 O 3  
SM = % SiO 2 % Al 2 O 3 + % Fe 2 O 3  
AM = % Al 2 O 3   % Fe 2 O 3  
The value of LSF is usually between 92 and 102, 2 and 3 for SM and 1 and 4 for AM [34].
Table 8 shows that the experimental and theoretical moduli for COx clinker are equivalent.

3.3. Clinker Characterization

After burning, the mineralogical analysis of the produced clinker was verified by XRD analysis (Figure 6). The results show that the main phases of Portland clinker—C3S, C2S, C4AF and C3A—are obtained in addition to free lime CaO. No secondary phases are detected, indicating that the raw meal composition as well as the clinkering process are adapted.
In order to quantify the crystalline phases in the COx clinker, Rietveld analysis was conducted using TOPAS software (Table 9). Regarding the mineralogical composition, the Rietveld results show that COx clinker could be used to produce a sulfate resisting Portland cement (C3A content less than 3 wt%.) [35].

3.4. Isothermal Heat-Flow Calorimetry of COx Cement Paste

The hydration of the cement paste is an exothermic process, thus the heat release during hydration can be correlated with hydration kinetics. Figure 7 shows the calorimetric curve for COx cement paste. The shape of the curve is similar for an ordinary Portland cement presented in previous studies [13,36,37,38]. A first peak in phase I is formed after water addition and the anhydrous grain dissolution. In phase II, an induction period of 2 h with low thermal activity is observed. Then acceleration in the calcium silicates and aluminates hydration occurs in phase III and a second exothermic peak is formed after 8 h 45 min. In phase IV, the sulfate is depleted and a slow in the hydration kinetics of calcium silicates and aluminates is observed. In phase IV, a shoulder appears corresponding to the gypsum depletion (at 11 h 30 min). Figure 7 also includes the total heat release in J/g. COx cement paste shows a total heat release of 186 J/g after 24 h of hydration, which correspond to a low heat release cement (<270 J/g) according to the European standard NF EN 197-1 [35], that could be used for massive structures.

3.5. Setting Time of the COx Cement Mortar

The aim of setting time measurements was to determine the theoretical time needed for the hydration and mechanical properties development. The principle consists in monitoring the depth vs. time to sink the needle into the mixture to a depth of 34 ± 1 mm. The results are presented in Figure 8. The formulations include reference mortar with the commercial OPC (CEM I 52.5) and COx cement.
The initial setting time is 96 min for the COx cement and 216 min for the reference CEM I 52.5. This difference is mainly due to the difference in the crystallinity of the cement phases produced in a static kiln (for COx cement) compared to that produced in an industrial rotary kiln (commercial cement CEM I 52.5 N), in addition to the difference in the cooling rate applied [39] and/or the cement fineness.
The same result was obtained by Faure et al. [14] when comparing CEM I 52.5 N cement and a laboratory produced clinker containing 11.4% sediment from the Alps.
It is worth noting that, even though the initial setting time of COx cement is lower than the reference cement CEM I 52.5 N, it is still satisfying the condition of a 52.5 strength class according to the standard NF EN 197-1 (>45 min) [35].

3.6. Compressive Strength of the COx Cement Mortar

The compressive strengths of the produced clinker were tested by measuring the compressive strength on COx cement mortar prisms at 1, 14 and 28 days (Figure 9) according to the AFNOR NF EN 196-1 standard. The compressive strength measured on COx cement mortars were compared to the one made with commercial Portland cement CEM I 52.5 N.
The compressive strength of COx cement mortar is equal to 20.2, 43.3 and 56.4 MPa at 1, 7 and 28 days, respectively. These values are almost the same as those of commercial cement that has a compressive strength of (21.8, 52.0 and 56.1 MPa at 1, 7 and 28 days, respectively). Only a difference can be noticed at 7 days between the two mortars however the trends of the compressive strength curves are similar. The same result was obtained by Her et al. [39] when comparing the reference cement paste to cement pastes made from clinkers containing recycled pulverized oyster and scallop shell. The authors found that at 3 days, the strength values were lower than reference OPC cement paste but the trends of the compressive strength curves were similar.
The results show that adding 22.4% of argillite in the raw meal could be accomplished without affecting the compressive strength long term. The same results were obtained by Tsakiridis et al. [16] showing that at 28 days, steel slagbased cement had the same compressive strength as the reference cement.

4. Conclusions

Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite provided by Andra was used in this study to be used in a raw meal for the production of an Ordinary Portland Cement clinker. Therefore, after COx argillite characterization, Portland clinker was produced at laboratory scale with the maximum substitution of raw materials by COx argillite. Then, the mineralogy, hydration and mechanical performance of the produced clinker were studied. The main conclusions of this work can be summarized as follow:
  • COx argillite contains the main oxides required for a Portland clinker production: SiO2, Al2O3, CaO and Fe2O3.
  • Up to 22.4% of COx argillite could be used in clinker raw meal, without any other addition to adjust, especially, the Al content.
  • The COx argillite-based clinker produced contains the main phases of an ordinary Portland cement without having any secondary phase: C2S, C3S, C3A, C4AF.
  • The hydration of COx cement presents a heat evolution comparable to that of Portland cement, even if the setting seems faster.
  • The compressive strength of COx cement mortar at 28 days is equivalent to the one of CEM I 52.5 N commercial cement, with a compressive strength measured on normalized mortar samples, close to 56 MPa after 28 days.
Finally, it can be concluded that Callovo-Oxfordian argillite can be used as a raw material in the process of clinker production without affecting the cement properties. Moreover, this recycling reduces the use of natural resources and contributes to the circular economy and provides environmental benefits. Further studies should focus on the durability of the COx argillite-based cement and on the sintering process to get closer to the real industrial manufacturing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.B.; funding acquisition, G.A., X.B. and M.B.; investigation, J.K. and M.A.; methodology, J.K., M.A., G.A., X.B. and M.B.; project administration, N.-E.A.; resources, N.-E.A.; supervision, G.A. and M.B.; validation, G.A., X.B., M.B. and N.-E.A.; visualization, J.K. and M.A.; writing—original draft, J.K.; writing—review & editing, M.A., G.A., X.B., M.B. and N.-E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency (Andra) in collaboration with IMT Nord Europe laboratories.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forsman, J.; Kreft-Burman, K.; Lindroos, N.; Hämäläinen, H.; Niutanen, V.; Lehtonen, K. Experiences of utilising mass stabilised low-qualit soils for infrastructure construction in the capital region of Finland-case absoils project. In Proceedings of the 28th International Baltic Road Conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, 26–28 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Haas, M.; Mongeard, L.; Ulrici, L.; D’Aloïa, L.; Cherrey, A.; Galler, R.; Benedikt, M. Applicability of excavated rock material: A European technical review implying opportunities for future tunnelling projects. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Magnusson, S.; Lundberg, K.; Svedberg, B.; Knutsson, S. Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas–A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 93, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, W.; Liu, S.; Hu, Y.; Hu, D.; Kow, K.-W.; Pang, C.; Li, B. Sustainable reuse of excavated soil and recycled concrete aggregate in manufacturing concrete blocks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 342, 127917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Costa, F.N.; Ribeiro, D.V. Reduction in CO2 emissions during production of cement, with partial replacement of traditional raw materials with civil construction waste (CCW). J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, G.B.; Subramaniam, K.V. Production and characterization of low-energy Portland composite cement from post-industrial waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Özbay, E.; Erdemir, M.; Durmuş, H.I. Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties-A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghezloun, A.; Saidane, A.; Merabet, H. The COP 22 New commitments in support of the Paris Agreement. Energy Procedia 2017, 119, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry; United Nations Environment Program: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed, H.U.; Mohammed, A.A.; Rafiq, S.; Mohammed, A.S.; Mosavi, A.; Sor, N.H.; Qaidi, S.M.A. Compressive Strength of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Composites: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chajec, A. Granite powder vs. Fly ash for the sustainable production of air-cured cementitious mortars. Materials 2021, 14, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gartner, E.; Hirao, H. A review of alternative approaches to the reduction of CO2 emissions associated with the manufacture of the binder phase in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aouad, G.; Laboudigue, A.; Gineys, N.; Abriak, N. Dredged sediments used as novel supply of raw material to produce Portland cement clinker. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faure, A.; Coudray, C.; Anger, B.; Moulin, I.; Colina, H.; Izoret, L.; Théry, F.; Smith, A. Beneficial reuse of dam fine sediments as clinker raw material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 218, 365–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. DiLiberto, C.; LeComte, A.; Mechling, J.-M.; Izoret, L.; Smith, A. Valorisation of recycled concrete sands in cement raw meal for cement production. Mater. Struct. 2017, 50, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsakiridis, P.; Papadimitriou, G.; Tsivilis, S.; Koroneos, C. Utilization of steel slag for Portland cement clinker production. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yven, B.; Sammartino, S.; Géraud, Y.; Homand, F.; Villiéras, F. Mineralogy, texture and porosity of Callovo-Oxfordian argillites of the Meuse/Haute-Marne region (eastern Paris Basin). Bull. la Soc. Geol. Fr. 2007, 178, 73–90. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lebon, P.; Mouroux, B. Knowledge of the three French underground laboratory sites. Eng. Geol. 1999, 52, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gharzouni, A.; Dupuy, C.; Sobrados, I.; Joussein, E.; Texier-Mandoki, N.; Bourbon, X.; Rossignol, S. The effect of furnace and flash heating on COx argillite for the synthesis of alkali-activated binders. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 156, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, C.; Tang, A.; Cui, Y.; Delage, P.; Schroeder, C.; De Laure, E. Investigating the swelling pressure of compacted crushed-Callovo-Oxfordian claystone. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2011, 36, 1857–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dupuy, C.; Gharzouni, A.; Sobrados, I.; Tessier-Doyen, N.; Texier-Mandoki, N.; Bourbon, X.; Rossignol, S. Formulation of an alkali-activated grout based on Callovo-Oxfordian argillite for an application in geological radioactive waste disposal. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 232, 117170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, W.; Kondo, D.; Dormieux, L.; Shao, J. A closed-form three scale model for ductile rocks with a plastically compressible porous matrix. Mech. Mater. 2013, 59, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Andra, Dossier 2005 Argile–Synthèse: Evaluation de la faisabilité du stockage géologique en formation argileuse, Meuse/Haute Marne site. 2005. Available online: https://www.andra.fr/sites/default/files/2017-12/266.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  24. Gaucher, E.; Robelin, C.; Matray, J.; Négrel, G.; Gros, Y.; Heitz, J.; Vinsot, A.; Rebours, H.; Cassagnabère, A.; Bouchet, A. Aandra underground research laboratory: Interpretation of the mineralogical and geochemical data acquired in the Callovian–Oxfordian formation by investigative drilling. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2004, 29, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Descostes, M.; Blin, V.; Bazer-Bachi, F.; Meier, P.; Grenut, B.; Radwan, J.; Schlegel, M.; Buschaert, S.; Coelho, D.; Tevissen, E. Diffusion of anionic species in Callovo-Oxfordian argillites and Oxfordian limestones (Meuse/Haute–Marne, France). Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 655–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schneider, M.; Romer, M.; Tschudin, M.; Bolio, H. Sustainable cement production-present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Navia, R.; Rivela, B.; Lorber, K.; Méndez, R. Recycling contaminated soil as alternative raw material in cement facilities: Life cycle assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 48, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. AFNOR NF EN 196-1; Méthode d’essais des ciments-Partie 1: Détermination des résistances mécaniques. Afnor: Saint-Denis, France, 2006.
  29. N. E. 196-6; Méthode d’essais des ciments-Détermination de la finesse-Partie 6: Détermination de la finesse. Afnor: Saint-Denis, France, 2018.
  30. Bhatty, J.I. Effect of Minor Elements on Clinker and Cement Performance; Portland Cement Association: Skokie, IL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kleib, J.; Aouad, G.; Khalil, N.; Zakhour, M. Incorporation of zinc in calcium sulfoaluminate cement clinker. Adv. Cem. Res. 2021, 33, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chatterjee, A.K. Chemistry and engineering of the clinkerization process—Incremental advances and lack of breakthroughs. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 624–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amar, M.; Benzerzour, M.; Kleib, J.; Abriak, N.E. From dredged sediment to supplementary cementitious material: Characterization, treatment, and reuse. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2021, 36, 92–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Taylor, H.F.W. Cement Chemsitry, 2nd ed.; Thomas Telford Publishing: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  35. NF EN 197-1; Ciment Partie 1: Composition, spécifications et critères de conformité des ciments courants. Afnor: Saint-Denis, France, 2012.
  36. Juilland, P. Early Hydration of Cementitious Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Écublens, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhan, B.J.; Xuan, D.X.; Poon, C.S. The effect of nanoalumina on early hydration and mechanical properties of cement pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 202, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jansen, D.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; Stabler, C.; Neubauer, J. A remastered external standard method applied to the quantification of early OPC hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Her, S.; Park, T.; Zalnezhad, E.; Bae, S. Synthesis and characterization of cement clinker using recycled pulverized oyster and scallop shell as limestone substitutes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Clinker preparation procedure.
Figure 1. Clinker preparation procedure.
Buildings 12 01421 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of COx argillite.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of COx argillite.
Buildings 12 01421 g002
Figure 3. X-ray pattern of COx argillite.
Figure 3. X-ray pattern of COx argillite.
Buildings 12 01421 g003
Figure 4. TG/DTG analysis of COx argillite.
Figure 4. TG/DTG analysis of COx argillite.
Buildings 12 01421 g004
Figure 5. Particle size distribution of COx raw meal.
Figure 5. Particle size distribution of COx raw meal.
Buildings 12 01421 g005
Figure 6. XRD analysis for the COx clinker.
Figure 6. XRD analysis for the COx clinker.
Buildings 12 01421 g006
Figure 7. Heat flow release for COx cement paste.
Figure 7. Heat flow release for COx cement paste.
Buildings 12 01421 g007
Figure 8. Setting time of the COx cement mortar.
Figure 8. Setting time of the COx cement mortar.
Buildings 12 01421 g008
Figure 9. Compressive strength of COx cement mortar.
Figure 9. Compressive strength of COx cement mortar.
Buildings 12 01421 g009
Table 1. Physical properties of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
Table 1. Physical properties of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
MaterialDensity (g/cm3)Blaine Specific Surface (cm2/g)BET Specific Surface (cm2/g)LOI 950 °C (wt%)D10 (µm)
OPC3.15372098001.911.31
Table 2. Mineral phases of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
Table 2. Mineral phases of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
MethodClinkerC3S (wt%)C2S (wt%)C3A (wt%)C4AF (wt%)CaO Free (wt%)
Schlafer–Bukolowki method—Bogue formulaOPC 61.6315.769.149.181.60
Rietveld methodOPC 64.8712.478.839.041.19
Table 3. Chemical composition of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
Table 3. Chemical composition of CEM I 52.5 N cement.
Composition
(%)
CaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3SO3Na2OK2OMgOZnOP2O5LOI (950 °C)Total
OPC 63.7519.955.312.983.030.550.930.86--1.999.99
Table 4. Theoretical mineralogical composition for the COx clinker.
Table 4. Theoretical mineralogical composition for the COx clinker.
PhasesC3SC2SC4AFC3ACaO
Percentages64181071
Table 5. Theoretical oxide composition for the COx clinker.
Table 5. Theoretical oxide composition for the COx clinker.
OxideCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3
Percentages68.8623.124.743.29
Table 6. Chemical composition of COx argillite.
Table 6. Chemical composition of COx argillite.
OxideLOI 950 °CCaOAl2O3Fe2O3SiO2MgOP2O5SO3K2OTiO2
Percentage16.212.012.94.746.82.30.20.23.40.7
Table 7. Theoretical composition for the raw meal.
Table 7. Theoretical composition for the raw meal.
ComponentCaCO3SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3COx Argillite
COx Clinker72.973.790.001.0022.24
Table 8. Experimental and theoretical cementitious modulus for COx clinker.
Table 8. Experimental and theoretical cementitious modulus for COx clinker.
LSFSMAM
Experimental values0.972.951.44
Theoretical values0.952.881.44
Table 9. Rietveld quantification for COx clinker.
Table 9. Rietveld quantification for COx clinker.
Crystalline PhasesC3SC2SC4AFC3AC
COx clinker61.521.210.92.92.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kleib, J.; Amar, M.; Aouad, G.; Bourbon, X.; Benzerzour, M.; Abriak, N.-E. The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Production. Buildings 2022, 12, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091421

AMA Style

Kleib J, Amar M, Aouad G, Bourbon X, Benzerzour M, Abriak N-E. The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Production. Buildings. 2022; 12(9):1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kleib, Joelle, Mouhamadou Amar, Georges Aouad, Xavier Bourbon, Mahfoud Benzerzour, and Nor-Edine Abriak. 2022. "The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Production" Buildings 12, no. 9: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop