Next Article in Journal
Structure and Properties of TiNi Shape Memory Alloy after Quasi-Continuous Equal-Channel Angular Pressing in Various Aged States
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Dry-Sliding Wear Characterization of Open-Cell AlSn6Cu–Al2O3 Composites with LSTM-Based Coefficient of Friction Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
Liquid Metal Embrittlement Cracking in Uncoated Transformation-Induced Plasticity Steel during Consecutive Resistance Spot Welding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Synergy of NanoAl2O3/NanoAl Composites with High Thermomechanical Properties and Ductility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compactability Regularities Observed during Cold Uniaxial Pressing of Layered Powder Green Samples Based on Ti-Al-Nb-Mo-B and Ti-B

1
Merzhanov Institute of Structural Macrokinetics and Materials Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Akademika Osipyana 8, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
2
Department “Nanotechnology and Microsystem Technology,” RUDN University, Miklukho-Maklaya Str. 6, Moscow 117198, Russia
3
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Prospekt 31, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(11), 1827; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13111827
Submission received: 25 September 2023 / Revised: 24 October 2023 / Accepted: 29 October 2023 / Published: 30 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Metal Matrix Composites)

Abstract

:
We determined the compactability regularities observed during the cold uniaxial pressing of layered powder green samples, taking into account factors such as composition, height, and number of Ti–B (TiB) and Ti–Al–Nb–Mo–B (TNM) layers. The following composition was chosen for the TNM layer at %: 51.85Ti–43Al–4Nb–1Mo–0.15B, while for the Ti-B layer we selected the composition wt %: Ti-B-(20, 30, 40) Ti. Green samples were made containing both 100 vol % TiB and TNM, and those taken in the following proportions, vol %: 70TiB/30TNM, 50TiB/50TNM, 30TiB/70TNM; multilayer green samples were studied in the following proportions, vol %: 35TiB/30TNM/35TiB, 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM, 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM. Based on the obtained rheological data, we determined the rheological characteristics of the layered green samples, including compressibility modulus, compressibility coefficient, relaxation time, and limiting value of linear section deformation. These characteristics were found to vary depending on the composition, height, and number of layers. Our findings revealed that reducing the TNM content in the charge billet composition improves the compaction of powder materials under the given technological parameters of uniaxial cold pressing. Moreover, we observed that increasing the boron content and decreasing the amount of titanium in the Ti–B composition enhances the compactability of powder materials. We also established a relationship between the compaction pressure interval and the density of the layered powder green sample.

1. Introduction

Currently, third-generation TNM alloys based on the Ti–Al (Nb, Mo) system and β-stabilized γ-alloys are of significant scientific and practical interest. These alloys have a high melting point, low density, high elastic moduli, increasing yield strength with increasing temperature, resistance to oxidation and fire, high strength/density ratio, and heat resistance. These characteristics create favorable conditions for the use of these alloys for new generation aerospace engines [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
To enhance their physical and mechanical properties, these alloys are modified with a small amount of boron [8,9,10], which is a structure-modifying impurity in the intermetallic compound. For example, materials based on Ti–43Al–6Nb–1Mo–1Cr–(0, 0.6)B were manufactured [11], and it was observed that the addition of boron, along with a multi-stage forging process, improves the microstructure and significantly increases the ultimate tensile strength of alloys. The utilization of novel multicomponent alloys based on titanium aluminides represents a promising method for replacing turbine blades, traditionally made from heat-resistant nickel-based superalloys, with lighter alloys in more temperature-stressed areas of a gas turbine engine.
However, the demand for heat-resistant alloys continues to grow every year, and there are prospects for enhancing the heat-resistant properties of the alloys under development. Presently, a promising approach to increase heat resistance involves reinforcing intermetallic compounds based on titanium aluminides with various strengthening phases [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Among the strengthening phases employed, titanium monoboride stands out due to its closely matched coefficient of thermal expansion (7.2 × 10−6 K−1) and excellent chemical and thermal compatibility with the TiAl matrix [19,20,21]. This fact makes titanium monoboride the most suitable candidate for the development of layered composite materials (LCMs) based on TiB/TiAl(Nb,Mo)B. The deliberate design and formation of a layered composite have the potential to enhance its physical and mechanical properties [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
In the study of Hao et al. [30], LCMs based on (TiB/Ti)–TiAl were fabricated using the spark plasma sintering method. These composites were created by alternately stacking layers of TiB2/Ti powder with a thickness of 800 μm and layers of TiAl powder with a thickness of 400 μm. The starting materials consisted of (i) pre-alloyed powder Ti–47Al–2Cr–2Nb with spherical particles with an average diameter of 75 μm, (ii) powder Ti–6Al–4V with spherical particles with a diameter of 50−100 μm, and (iii) powder TiB2 with an average particle size of 3 μm. The authors of this study discovered that the resulting composites exhibited impressive fracture toughness and flexural strength, measuring up to 51.2 MPa m1/2 and 1456 MPa, respectively. These mechanical properties represent an increase of 293% and 108% compared to those of monolithic TiAl-based alloys. The authors attribute this enhancement in mechanical properties to the presence of TiB/Ti composite layers.
Powder metallurgy methods serve as the primary technologies for manufacturing composite materials. These methods encompass various techniques, including selective laser sintering [31,32,33,34,35], hot isostatic pressing [36,37,38], spark plasma sintering [39,40,41,42], self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) [43,44,45,46], and several other methods [47,48,49,50], wherein pressed powder green samples serve as precursors. The quality of the green sample, which encompasses factors like uniform density along its height and radius, relative density across the entire batch, and technological strength, significantly influences the physical, mechanical, and operational properties of the resulting products.
In most cases, the method of cold uniaxial pressing [51,52,53,54] is employed to create green samples. A critical aspect in both the theory and practice of cold uniaxial powder pressing is the determination of experimental relationships between the applied pressure and the density of the resulting green sample. These experimental dependencies are used to assess the compactability of selected powder materials, enabling the selection of the necessary compaction pressure to achieve a desired green sample density. To accomplish this, numerous experiments are conducted under static loading conditions using a constant compaction pressure mode.
To establish the relationship between green sample density and compaction pressure, a separate experiment was conducted for each pressure value. However, achieving identical density values for a large batch of powder green sample proves to be a challenging task. This significantly prolongs the time required to achieve the desired outcome and complicates and reduces the efficiency of the method for green sample production.
In practice, preliminary cold pressing of green samples is carried out using specialized press molds on hydraulic presses, enabling the application of a constant pressure. Nonetheless, this approach presents significant challenges because the compaction process is essentially non-stationary and the degree of compaction of the green sample continuously changes over time. In other words, when applying the same compaction pressure at different holding times under this pressure, variations in green sample densities will occur. Consequently, the density of the powder green samples, corresponding to a specific pressure, also relies on the duration of the compaction process at that pressure. Presently, researchers must take an empirical approach to address this issue and seek optimal pressing conditions tailored to each unique case.
To determine optimal conditions for pressing powder materials, we were pioneers in introducing a rheological approach [55]. This approach considers the compaction of powder materials as non-stationary deformation processes that are influenced by rheological factors. It enables us to understand the deformation mechanisms of powder materials and ascertain their rheological properties, among other things.
The essence of the approach lies in the construction and study of rheological stress–strain relationships. Experiments are carried out at a constant strain rate. This is the most distinguishing point from traditional methods, which apply constant compaction pressure. The resulting experimental relationships remain consistent regardless of the equipment or the form of the powder green sample. Furthermore, they are obtained continuously from a single experiment. In traditional methods, these dependencies are constructed discretely, i.e., for each point it is necessary to conduct a separate experiment.
The purpose of this work is to establish the influence of the compaction pressure of powder materials, taking into account the pressing time, on the pressing characteristics depending on the composition, height, and number of layers: Ti–B (Ti–B–(20, 30, 40 wt %) Ti) and Ti–Al–Nb–Mo–B (at %: 51.85Ti–43Al–4Nb–1Mo–0.15B).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Objects of Research

To obtain layered powder green samples, commercial powder Ti (45 µm, 99.1%), B (1 µm, 94.0%), Al (5–7 µm, 98.6%), Nb (40–63 µm, 99.9%), and Mo (5 µm, 99.1%) were used as starting reagents. These ratios were taken from the calculation of the formation in each layer during the combustion process in the mode of self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of the following compounds: in the cermet layer, TiB–(20–40) wt % Ti (hereinafter we will denote the layer as TiB, Table 1), and in the intermetallic layer, TiAl(Nb,Mo)B (hereinafter we will denote the layer as TNM). The TNM intermetallic layer was chosen with the following composition, at %: 51.85Ti–43Al–4Nb–1Mo–0.15B. Five types of powder green samples were studied; the layers were selected with the content of 100 vol % TiB and TNM, and in the following proportions, vol %: 70TiB/30TNM, 50TiB/50TNM, 30TiB/70TNM (Table 2, Figure 1). To study the characteristics of pressing multilayer powder green samples, the following ratios of each layer were taken, vol %: 35TiB/30TNM/35TiB, 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM, and 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM (Table 3). The composition TiB-20 was taken as a model cermet layer in multilayer powder green samples. Photos of powder green samples after pressing are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

2.2. Research Methods

The experiments were carried out using a REM-20A compression testing machine (Metrotest, Kazan, Russia) equipped with a press mold featuring a loading chamber diameter of 25 mm. The maximum pressing force was 20 kN, and a constant deformation rate of 20 mm/min was maintained throughout all load ranges. The powder mixture under study was placed into the assembled press mold, with each bulk layer having a predefined height. The total height of the bulk layer remained fixed at 45 mm, irrespective of the proportion of the TNM and TiB layers. Details of the parameters of the charge billets before and after testing are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
The initial parameters for the research included: h0, the initial height of the bulk layer; m, the mass of the green sample; ρb, the bulk density; ρc, the density of the compact obtained from a non-porous powder mixture; ρrel, the relative initial density of the powder mixture. The density of the compact green sample was determined using the following Formula (1):
1 ρ c = i = 1 n c i ρ i
where ci and ρi are the concentration and density of the i-th component in the mixture, respectively. Relative initial density ρrel of the powder mixture was determined by the following formula: ρrel = ρb/ρ0.
A press mold with a mixture of powders was installed under the plunger of the testing machine and loading was carried out at a constant speed of movement of the plunger to the maximum value of the pressing force (Figure 3). As a result of the experiments, “pressure–time” diagrams were constructed, which were subsequently rearranged into rheological “stress–strain” dependencies. The deformation of the powder mixture was calculated using the formula: ε = Δh(t)/h0, where Δh(t) is the change in the height of the bulk layer depending on the loading time. The compaction pressure was calculated as the ratio of the pressing force to the cross-sectional area of the press mold rod.
The constructed rheological dependencies have allowed us to determine the rheological characteristics of the studied powder green samples, identify the mechanisms of deformation of the powder green samples, and establish optimal compaction conditions. For the analyzed powder green samples, the following rheological characteristics were determined: the compressibility modulus (G), the limiting value of the deformation of the linear section of the rheological stress–strain relationship (ε*), the compressibility coefficient (kc), and the relaxation time. The limiting value of the deformation of the linear section (ε*) characterizes the beginning of the change from the stage of elastic deformation of powder materials to elastoplastic, and it is determined by tangent of a straight line drawn from the point where pressure was applied to the resulting rheological curve. The compressibility modulus (G) is numerically equal to the tangent of the slope of the linear section of the stress–strain diagram. The compressibility coefficient (kc) characterizes the reversible decrease in the height (volume) of a green sample under the influence of applied pressure on the “compaction pressure–change in height” diagram and is quantitatively determined by the Formula (2):
k c = 1 h 0 · h p
where Δh′ and Δp′ are the limit values for changes in height and compaction pressure in a linear section. In its physical meaning, the compressibility coefficient characterizes the ability of a material to compact at the initial (linear) stage, during which the intensity of compaction is maximum. Induction (relaxation) time is the time at which a sufficiently large pressure value is reached, the change of which has little effect on the change in the value of this parameter.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 presents the experimental results obtained during the investigation of compaction of both single-layer and two-layer green samples. It illustrates the relationship between the pressing force and the loading time, maintaining a constant speed of movement of the press plunger. Additionally, it displays the rheological curve, indicating the relationship between the deformation of powder green samples and stress. For the three compositions of the cermet layer based on Ti–B under study, the nature of the obtained dependences is similar. The intersection of the curves indicates that at the intersection points the studied green samples of different compositions have the same pressing characteristics.
Let us provide an explanation of the results obtained for a cermet layer made of TiB-30. The placement of the obtained dependences is observed from left to right (relative to the reader) based on the decrease in the TNM powder content in the sample and the increase in the content of Ti–B based powder. Specifically, let us examine the scenario when the deformation stress of the studied compositions is set at 15 MPa (highlighted with a red dotted line and arrows in Figure 5). Figure 5 illustrates that for a given stress level, the degree of deformation also increases from left to right corresponding to the decrease in the TNM powder content in the green sample and the increase in the content of Ti–B based powder: 0.25, 0.263, 0.275, 0.315, and 0.32. This indicates that the deformability of powders with increased TNM powder content is worse than that of Ti–B based powders. Specifically, for pure TNM the maximum degree of deformation did not exceed 0.325, whereas for pure Ti–B, it reached a maximum of 0.36. Therefore, depending on the content of each layer in a single-layer and two-layer green samples, the degree of deformation changes by a factor of 1.3.
The observed experimental dependencies can be elucidated by conditionally identifying three deformation sections on the rheological curves. To facilitate explanation, Figure 7 shows a scheme of the rheological curve, clearly delineating these three deformation stages.
The initial stage of deformation of powder materials is characterized by a linear stress increase as deformation progresses. During this stage, deformation primarily occurs due to the movement of powder particles into the pores. In coarse powder, the slope of the linear portion of the curve is more important due to the increased porosity in the green sample. When a more finely dispersed powder is deformed, the angle of inclination of the linear section of the first stage decreases, because porosity in green samples is less than when using a coarser powder. For the green sample studied, the dispersion of the powders is not high (less than 45 µm); therefore, the first section on the given scale does not look obvious. When the scale is increased, this section is clearly visible. If all the figures are marked with section numbers and enlarged scales, then the figures will not be readable, which will confuse the reader. Therefore, we have presented a generalized curve in Figure 7 for a visual explanation of the obtained dependencies.
Due to the fact that the process at the first stage occurs due to the filling of pores with powder particles, the pressing forces at this stage are low.
The second stage of deformation of powder materials exhibits a sharp, non-linear increase in stress values as deformation progresses. During this stage, the movement of particles within the studied powder occurs due to accommodation (adjustment) between them. Consequently, during this stage, the contact areas between particles increase, leading to the emergence of interatomic interaction forces in addition to their mechanical interaction. This increase in contact area and interatomic forces contributes to the overall strength of the powder green sample. This stage holds particular technological significance because it accumulates a certain amount of plastic deformation within powder green samples. However, it is essential to note that the entire powder green sample does not reach a plastic state, leading to challenges in selecting deformation conditions for porous materials.
During the third stage of deformation of powder green samples, there is a sharp increase in stress over a wide range, accompanied by only minor changes in deformation. To explain this case, we introduce a time characteristic known as the induction time (τi). The induction time represents the time to reach pressure, the change of which has little effect on the values of the induction period. This time can be conventionally taken when the material moves to the third stage of the rheological “stress–strain” relationship; for each powder material studied, this value is different.
Table 4 presents the induction times for the studied compositions, demonstrating an increase as the proportion of TNM in the powder green sample. During the third stage of deformation of powder materials, the compaction primarily occurs due to the expansion of the contact surface during deformation and the brittle fracture of the particles themselves. During this stage, green sample compaction practically ceases. If stress continues to increase, it will eventually surpass the strength of the green sample, leading to its failure. Consequently, for the studied compositions, an increased proportion of TNM results in an earlier stage of brittle deformation within the particles themselves, leading to a rapid increase in compaction pressure with minimal change in the degree of deformation.
Table 5 displays the obtained rheological characteristics of the studied two-layer powder green sample compositions. It is evident that as the TNM content in the powder green sample decreases, the values of the compressibility modulus decrease, resulting in an increase in the values of the compressibility coefficient. Notably, the limiting values of deformation of the linear section of the rheological stress–strain relationship for the TiB–20/TNM and TiB–30/TNM compositions are nearly identical. This observation is particularly pronounced when examining the powder green samples content ranging from 50 to 100% TNM. The most significant variation in the limiting deformation value was observed for the TiB–40/TNM composition, which contains the least amount of boron.
Based on the provided rheological patterns and calculated rheological characteristics, we can conclude that a reduction in TNM content in a two-layer powder material composition results in improved compaction under specific technological parameters of uniaxial pressing. Additionally, an increase in boron content and a decrease in titanium in the powder green sample for Ti–B compositions leads to an improvement in the compactability of powder materials. This is attributed to the smaller boron fraction, characterized by particle sizes less than 1 μm, which more completely fills the voids in the sample during deformation.
Figure 8 presents the experimental results obtained for multilayer powder green samples, depicting the relationship between the pressing force and loading time at a constant press plunger movement speed, as well as the rheological curve, specifically, the relationship between pressing stress and strain. The observed nature of these dependencies for the studied multilayer powder green samples closely resembles that of the two-layer powder green samples.
To evaluate the change in the degree of deformation for each composition, we focus on the obtained values at a compaction pressure of 15 MPa. Under this constant compaction pressure, the degrees of deformation of multilayer powder green sample are as follows: 0.267, 0.287, and 0.299. Consequently, we can conclude that powder green samples composed of alternating layers for the composition 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM exhibit the most favorable compaction ability. On the other hand, a green sample consisting of alternating layers of 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM exhibits the least favorable compaction properties. The maximum degree of deformation for multilayer green samples ranged from 0.322 to 0.347.
Drawing from the results obtained regarding the compactability of two-layer powder green samples, we can also deduce that a decrease in the TNM proportion in the powder material composition leads to improved compactability. When comparing the degree of deformation values of multilayer powder green samples with those of two-layer ones, it becomes evident that two-layer powder green samples exhibit superior compactability due to their higher content of TiB-based powder material.
Experimental dependences of the relative density of powder green samples on compaction pressure were obtained for the studied compositions (Figure 9). Since the samples consisted of layers with different densities, to calculate the average density of the green sample, the density values of each layer were taken depending on its share in the overall sample. Using the example of the TiB-40/TNM composition and the relative average density of the green sample equal to 0.45, we will provide an explanation of the obtained dependencies (Figure 9c). An increase in the proportion of TNM in the green sample leads to an increase in compaction pressure to obtain a given average density. Thus, for 100% TNM, it is necessary to apply a compaction pressure of 10 MPa, which is approximately three times higher than for pressing a green sample without TNM content. For multilayer green samples, it was found that compaction deteriorates as the amount of TNM increases (Figure 9d).
The obtained experimental relationships concerning powder green sample compaction allow us to establish the connection between compaction pressure and relative density when producing samples with specific density requirements. These findings are particularly valuable in technologies where it is necessary to achieve a predefined density for the initial green sample, as this parameter significantly influences the technological parameters of the process. For instance, in self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) technologies, combustion temperature and the propagation speed of the combustion front depend significantly on relative density, which in turn determines the time duration during which the material retains its plastic properties. In spark plasma sintering technology, relative density plays a critical role in influencing sintering temperature and time.

4. Conclusions

(1)
A simple and fast method has been proposed for studying the characteristics of cold uniaxial pressing for layered powder materials. This method makes it possible to determine in one experiment the effect of compaction pressure on the density of a sample, taking into account the time of its compaction. Reducing the TNM content in the charge billet composition improves the compaction of powder materials under the given technological parameters of uniaxial cold pressing. Increasing the boron content and decreasing the amount of titanium in the Ti–B composition enhances the compactability of powder materials.
(2)
An experimental method has been proposed to ascertain the relationship between the degree of deformation and the relative density of powder green samples in relation to compaction pressure and the duration of pressure application. This method applies to single-layer, double-layer, and multilayer materials based on Ti-B–(20, 30, 40) wt % Ti and TNM (at %: 51.85Ti–43Al–4Nb–1Mo–0.15B).
(3)
Rheological patterns were studied during cold uniaxial pressing of powder green samples depending on the composition of the initial components, height, and number of layers Ti-B–(20, 30, 40) wt % Ti and TNM (at %: 51.85Ti–43Al–4Nb–1Mo–0.15B). Layers were selected containing both 100 vol % TiB and TNM, and the following proportions: 70TiB/30TNM, 50TiB/50TNM, 30TiB/70TNM. In addition, multilayers were also studied in the following proportions: vol %: 35TiB/30TNM/35TiB, 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM, and 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM. Based on the obtained rheological patterns and calculated rheological characteristics, it was concluded that with a decrease in the TNM content in the composition of the powder green sample, the compaction of powder materials at given technological parameters of uniaxial pressing improves.
(4)
It was found that an increase in boron content and a decrease in titanium content in the composition of the Ti–B powder layer leads to an improvement in the compactability of powder materials. This improvement is attributed to the more effective filling of pore space in the powder green sample by finely dispersed boron powder, surpassing the performance of other components.
(5)
The obtained experimental relationships on powder green sample compaction facilitated the establishment of a correlation between compaction pressure and relative density, which is associated with pressing time.

Author Contributions

P.B.: Conceptualization, Methodology; Writing—Review & Editing; A.K.: Formal analysis; A.C.: Formal analysis, Visualization; M.A.: Investigation; P.S.: writing—original draft preparation; V.A.: Writing—Review & Editing; A.A.: Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 22-19-00040, https://rscf.ru/project/22-19-00040 (Russia, accessed on 24 October 2023).

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out using the equipment of the Distribution Center for Collective Use of the Merzhanov Institute (ISMAN).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Yingmei, T.; Ruirun, C.; Hongze, F.; Yangli, L.; Hongzhi, C.; Yanqing, S.; Jingjie, G.; Hengzhi, F. Enhanced strength and ductility in Ti46Al4Nb1Mo alloys via boron addition. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 102, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ruxin, C.; Xicong, Y.; Renci, L.; Xi, W.; Chao, Y.; Dong, L.; Yuyou, C.; Rui, Y. Influence of section thickness of casting on the microstructure characteristics and creep rupture properties of Ti-45Al-2Nb-2Mn-1B. Mater. Charact. 2023, 202, 113056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shaaban, A.; Hayashi, S.; Takeyama, M.A. Comparative study on the oxidation behaviours of a TNM alloy in argon and oxygen atmospheres at 650 degrees. Corros. Sci. 2021, 185, 109415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galetz, M.C.; Ulrich, A.S.; Oskay, C. Oxidation-induced microstructural changes of the TiAl TNM-B1 alloy after exposure at 900 °C in air. Intermetallics 2020, 123, 106830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nazarova, T.; Nazarov, K.; Sergeev, S.; Imayev, V.; Imayev, R. Microstructure and mechanical properties of intermetallic γ-TiAl alloy alloyed with dysprosium. Lett. Mater. 2017, 7, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siyu, C.; Yingmei, T.; Xuan, W.; Feng, C.; Liang, W.; Yanqing, S.; Jingjie, G. Individual and synergistic effects of Ta and Mn on optimizing the microstructures and mechanical properties of TiB reinforced high Nb–TiAl composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiuxuan, Y.; Zhang, B. Correlation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti2AlNb manufactured by SLM and heat treatment. Intermetallics 2021, 139, 107367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Malinina, E.A.; Myshletsov, I.I.; Buzanov, G.A.; Kubasov, A.S.; Kozerozhets, I.V.; Goeva, L.V.; Nikiforova, S.E.; Avdeeva, V.V.; Zhizhin, K.Y.; Kuznetsov, N.T. A New Approach to the Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Cobalt Boride in the Course of the Thermal Decomposition of Cobalt Complexes [Co(DMF)6]2+ with Boron Cluster Anions. Molecules 2023, 28, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sivaev, I.B. Decaborane: From Alfred Stock and Rocket Fuel Projects to Nowadays. Molecules 2023, 28, 6287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Avdeeva, V.V.; Nikiforova, S.E.; Malinina, E.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Composites and Materials Prepared from Boron Cluster Anions and Carboranes. Materials 2023, 16, 6099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiao, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, M. The improved properties and microstructure of β-solidify TiAl alloys by boron addition and multi steps forging process. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cui, S.; Cui, C.; Wang, X. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dual Scaled NbC/Ti2AlC Reinforced Titanium–Aluminum Composite. Materials 2023, 16, 4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fu, Z.; Mondal, K.; Koc, R. Sintering, mechanical, electrical and oxidation properties of ceramic intermetallic TiC–Ti3Al composites obtained from nano-TiC particles. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 9995–10005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Kong, L.; Li, T.; Xiong, T. A novel TiAl3/Al2O3 composite coating on γ-TiAl alloy and evaluating the oxidation performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 361, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, J.; Li, Q.; Cao, W.; Liu, Z.; Deng, X.; Ding, X.; Ran, S. Influences of B4C content and particle size on the mechanical properties of hot pressed TiB2–B4C composites. J. Asian. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 9, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Xie, X.; Gonzalez-Julian, J.; Malzbender, J.; Yang, R. Mechanical and oxidation behavior of textured Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 MAX phase materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 5258–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, C.; Radoslaw, C.; Zhang, J.; Yan, Q.; Wen, S.; Song, B.; Shi, Y. In-situ preparation and formation of TiB/Ti-6Al-4V nanocomposite via laser additive manufacturing: Microstructure evolution and tribological behavior. Powder Technol. 2019, 342, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Avdeeva, V.; Bazhina, A.; Antipov, M.; Stolin, A.; Bazhin, P. Relationship between Structure and Properties of Intermetallic Materials Based on γ-TiAl Hardened In Situ with Ti3Al. Metals 2023, 13, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Namini, A.S.; Azadbeh, M.; Asl, M.S. Effect of TiB2 content on the characteristics of spark plasma sintered Ti–TiBw composites. Adv. Powder Technol. 2017, 28, 1564–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hou, J.; Gao, L.; Cui, G.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Tian, W. Grain Refinement of Ti-15Mo-3Al-2.7Nb-0.2Si Alloy with the Rotation of TiB Whiskers by Powder Metallurgy and Canned Hot Extrusion. Metals 2020, 10, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bazhin, P.; Stolin, A.; Konstantinov, A.; Kostitsyna, E.; Ignatov, A. Ceramic Ti—B Composites Synthesized by Combustion Followed by High-Temperature Deformation. Materials 2016, 9, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bazhin, P.M.; Konstantinov, A.S.; Chizhikov, A.P.; Pazniak, A.I.; Kostitsyna, E.V.; Prokopets, A.D.; Stolin, A.M. Laminated cermet composite materials: The main production methods, structural features and properties (review). Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 1513–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Denisov, I.; Shakhray, D.; Malakhov, A.; Seropyan, S. Combustion Synthesis of Metal-Intermetallic-Ceramic Laminate AlMg6-NiAl-TiC Composite. Crystals. 2022, 12, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.; Li, P.; Huai, Y. Interface Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Post-treated Directed Energy Deposition Laminated Composites. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 7260–7274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prokopets, A.; Bazhin, P.; Konstantinov, A.; Chizhikov, A.; Antipov, M.; Avdeeva, V. Structural features of layered composite material TiB2/TiAl/Ti6Al4V obtained by unrestricted SHS-compression. Mater. Lett. 2021, 300, 130165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bazhina, A.; Konstantinov, A.; Chizhikov, A.; Bazhin, P.; Stolin, A.; Avdeeva, V. Structure and mechanical characteristics of a layered composite material based on TiB/TiAl/Ti. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14295–14300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bazhin, P.; Chizhikov, A.; Bazhina, A.; Konstantinov, A.; Avdeeva, V. Titanium-titanium boride matrix composites prepared in-situ under conditions combining combustion processes and high-temperature shear deformation. Mater. Sc. Eng. A 2023, 874, 145093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khvostunkov, K.; Bazhin, P.; Ni, Q.-Q.; Bazhina, A.; Chizhikov, A.; Konstantinov, A. Influence of Layer-Thickness Proportions and Their Strength and Elastic Properties on Stress Redistribution during Three-Point Bending of TiB/Ti-Based Two-Layer Ceramics Composites. Metals 2023, 13, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hao, D.; Xiping, C.; Naonao, G.; Yuan, S.; Yuanyuan, Z.; Lujun, H.; Lin, G. Fabrication of (TiB/Ti)-TiAl composites with a controlled laminated architecture and enhanced mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 62, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanqiang, X.; Bailu, L.; Zhengxing, L.; Xiaokang, Y. Microstructures and mechanical behaviors of reinforced aluminum matrix composites with modified nano-sized TiB2/SiC fabricated by selective laser melting. Compos. Commun. 2023, 37, 101439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, C.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wong, K.; Akbarzadeh, A.H. Effect of heat treatment on SLM-fabricated TiN/AlSi10Mg composites: Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 156722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zacharatos, F.; Karvounis, P.; Theodorakos, I.; Hatziapostolou, A.; Zergioti, I. Single Step Laser Transfer and Laser Curing of Ag NanoWires: A Digital Process for the Fabrication of Flexible and Transparent Microelectrodes. Materials 2018, 11, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, P.; Qi, H.; Zhu, Z.; Qin, H.; Li, H.; Chu, C.; Yan, M. Development of SiC/PVB Composite Powders for Selective Laser Sintering Additive Manufacturing of SiC. Materials 2018, 11, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Polozov, I.; Gracheva, A.; Popovich, A. Interface Characterization of Bimetallic Ti-6Al-4V/Ti2AlNb Structures Prepared by Selective Laser Melting. Materials 2022, 15, 8528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Becker, L.; Lentz, J.; Kramer, B.; Rottstegge, A.; Broeckmann, C.; Theisen, W.; Weber, S. Validation of the Powder Metallurgical Processing of Duplex Stainless Steels through Hot Isostatic Pressing with Integrated Heat Treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Soliman, H.A.; Pineault, J.; Elbestawi, M. Influence of Combined Heat Treatment and Hot Isostatic Pressure (HT-HIP) on Titanium Aluminide Processed by L-PBF. Materials 2023, 16, 5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaletsch, A.; Sondermann, M.; Mirz, M.; Radtke, F.; Broeckmann, C. Influence of PBF-LB Process Atmosphere on the Fatigue Strength of Hot Isostatically Post-Densified Duplex Steel Parts Produced via the Shell Core Approach. Materials 2023, 16, 4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, B.; Cai, G. Effect of Hot Isostatic Pressing Process Parameters on Properties and Fracture Behavior of Tungsten Alloy Powders and Sintered Bars. Materials 2022, 15, 8647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wimler, D.; Lindemann, J.; Clemens, H.; Mayer, S. Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of an Advanced γ-TiAl Based Alloy Processed by Spark Plasma Sintering. Materials 2019, 12, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Musi, M.; Deshayes, C.; Molénat, G.; Toualbi, L.; Galy, B.; Spoerk-Erdely, P.; Hantcherli, M.; Monchoux, J.-P.; Thomas, M.; Clemens, H. Microstructure, Plasticity and Ductility of a TNM+ Alloy Densified by Spark Plasma Sintering. Metals 2022, 12, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhichao, L.; Yanguo, L.; Qin, Z.; Wenqi, L.; Haotian, G.; Zhuang, L.; Yong’an, L. In-situ fabrication and characterization of TiC matrix composite reinforced by SiC and Ti3SiC2. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 20849–20859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhichao, L.; Yanguo, L.; Qin, Z.; Wenqi, L.; Haotian, G.; Zhuang, L.; Yong’an, L. Fabrication of the TiC matrix composite with the intragranular Al2O3 using carbon fibers as carbon source. Mater. Charact. 2023, 199, 112817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Loginov, P.A.; Kaplanskii, Y.Y.; Markov, G.M.; Patsera, E.I.; Vorotilo, K.V.; Korotitskiy, A.V.; Shvyndina, N.V.; Levashov, E.A. Structural and mechanical properties of Ti–Al–Nb–Mo–B alloy produced from the SHS powder subjected to high-energy ball milling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2021, 814, 141153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bin, Y.; Tiechui, Y.; Junjie, S.; Yuchao, Q.; Chenglong, J.; Xiaoping, W.; Daihong, X.; Ruidi, L.; Han, J.; Mingfeng, Y. Preparation of high-quality FeV50 alloy by an improved SHS-EAH multi-stage process. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 15114–15121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Evseev, N.S.; Matveev, A.E.; Nikitin, P.Y. Synthesis, Structure, and Phase Composition of High-Entropy Ceramics (HfTiCN)-TiB2. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 67, 1319–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bazhin, P.; Konstantinov, A.; Chizhikov, A.; Prokopets, A.; Bolotskaia, A. Structure, physical and mechanical properties of TiB-40 wt.% Ti composite materials obtained by unrestricted SHS compression. Mater. Today Com. 2020, 25, 101484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nasakina, E.O.; Sudarchikova, M.A.; Demin, K.Y.; Mikhailova, A.B.; Sergienko, K.V.; Konushkin, S.V.; Kaplan, M.A.; Baikin, A.S.; Sevostyanov, M.A.; Kolmakov, A.G. Study of Co-Deposition of Tantalum and Titanium during the Formation of Layered Composite Materials by Magnetron Sputtering. Coatings 2023, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kabaldin, Y.; Shatagin, D.; Ryabov, D.; Solovyov, A.; Kurkin, A. Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method. Metals 2023, 13, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Malyutina, Y.N.; Anisimov, A.G.; Popelyukh, A.I.; Lozhkin, V.S.; Bataev, A.A.; Bataev, I.A.; Lukyanov, Y.L.; Pai, V.V. Microstructure and Properties of Multilayer Niobium-Aluminum Composites Fabricated by Explosive Welding. Metals 2022, 12, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, J.; Chen, W.; Du, D.; Zhang, W.; Cui, G.; Yang, J. Temperature influenced microstructure evolution and strengthening of 4.5 vol% TiBw/TA15 composites with columnar-reinforced structure fabricated by pre-sintering and hot extrusion. Mater. Charact. 2022, 190, 112017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gómez-Rodríguez, C.; Fernández-González, D.; García-Quiñonez, L.V.; Castillo-Rodríguez, G.A.; Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Verdeja, L.F. MgO Refractory Doped with ZrO2 Nanoparticles: Influence of Cold Isostatic and Uniaxial Pressing and Sintering Temperature in the Physical and Chemical Properties. Metals 2019, 9, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Feijoo, I.; Cabeza, M.; Merino, P.; Pena, G.; Rey, P. Age Hardening of Extruded AA 6005A Aluminium Alloy Powders. Materials 2019, 12, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Peter Martin, L.; Andrea, M.; Geoffrey, H. Compaction behavior of uniaxially cold-pressed Bi–Ta composites. Scr. Mater. 2007, 57, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Muhammad, I.A.K.; Mohammad, S.M.; Noradila, A.L.; Ahmed, S.M. Microstructural Analysis and Mechanical Properties of Direct Recycling Aluminium Chips AA6061/Al Powder Fabricated by Uniaxial Cold Compaction Technique. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stolin, A.M.; Bazhin, P.M.; Pugachev, D.V. Cold uniaxial compaction of Ti-containing powders: Rheological aspects. SHS 2008, 17, 154–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme and photo of single-layer and two-layer powder green sample after pressing (composition TiB-20).
Figure 1. Scheme and photo of single-layer and two-layer powder green sample after pressing (composition TiB-20).
Metals 13 01827 g001
Figure 2. Scheme (above) and photo (below) of multilayer powder green samples: (a) 35TiB/30TNM/35TiB, (b) 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM, (c) 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM (composition TiB-20).
Figure 2. Scheme (above) and photo (below) of multilayer powder green samples: (a) 35TiB/30TNM/35TiB, (b) 25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM, (c) 35TNM/30TiB/35TNM (composition TiB-20).
Metals 13 01827 g002
Figure 3. Photo and scheme of the experiment for determination of the compactability of powder materials: (1) press mold, (2) green sample, (3) plunger of a compression machine.
Figure 3. Photo and scheme of the experiment for determination of the compactability of powder materials: (1) press mold, (2) green sample, (3) plunger of a compression machine.
Metals 13 01827 g003
Figure 4. Experimental dependences for TiB-20/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Figure 4. Experimental dependences for TiB-20/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Metals 13 01827 g004
Figure 5. Experimental dependences for TiB-30/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Figure 5. Experimental dependences for TiB-30/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Metals 13 01827 g005
Figure 6. Experimental dependences for TiB-40/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Figure 6. Experimental dependences for TiB-40/TNM compositions: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological curve.
Metals 13 01827 g006
Figure 7. Three main stages of deformation of powder green samples.
Figure 7. Three main stages of deformation of powder green samples.
Metals 13 01827 g007
Figure 8. Experimental dependences of compaction for multilayer powder green sample: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological “stress–strain” dependence.
Figure 8. Experimental dependences of compaction for multilayer powder green sample: (a) pressing force versus loading time; (b) rheological “stress–strain” dependence.
Metals 13 01827 g008
Figure 9. Dependence of relative density on compaction pressure for compositions: (a) TiB-20/TNM, (b) TiB-30/TNM, (c) TiB-40/TNM, (d) multilayer powder green sample.
Figure 9. Dependence of relative density on compaction pressure for compositions: (a) TiB-20/TNM, (b) TiB-30/TNM, (c) TiB-40/TNM, (d) multilayer powder green sample.
Metals 13 01827 g009
Table 1. Composition and parameters of layers in powder green samples.
Table 1. Composition and parameters of layers in powder green samples.
Composition DesignationContent of Free Titanium, wt %Contents of Components in Green Sample, wt %Bulk Density (ρb), g/cm3Compact Density (ρc), g/cm3 Relative Initial Density of the Mixture (ρrel)
TiB
TiB-202085151.3274.017820.330
TiB-303087131.2534.072230.308
TiB-404089111.2804.13130.310
TNM---1.3893.97910.349
Table 2. Parameters of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples before and after pressing.
Table 2. Parameters of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples before and after pressing.
CompositionGreen Sample Composition, vol %Green Sample Height, mmGreen Sample Weight, g
StartedFinal
TiB-20/TNM100% TNM454528.3328.3330.6630.66
0% TiB-20---
70% TNM4531.528.5421.7530.2621.46
30% TiB-2013.56.798.8
50% TNM4522.528.5616.0429.9815.33
50% TiB-2022.513.214.65
30% TNM4513.528.311.729.79.2
70% TiB-2031.516.620.5
0% TNM45-28.58-29.3-
100% TiB-204528.5829.3
TiB-30/TNM100% TNM454529.1929.1930.6630.66
0% TiB-30 ---
70% TNM4531.529.0121.6529.7621.46
30% TiB-30 13.57.368.3
50% TNM4522.528.8416.0429.1615.33
50% TiB-30 22.512.813.83
30% TNM4513.527.7611.728.569.2
70% TiB-30 31.516.0619.36
0% TNM45-27.11-27.66-
100% TiB-30 4527.1127.66
TiB-40/TNM100% TNM454529.1929.1930.6630.66
0% TiB-40 ---
70% TNM4531.52921.7329.9121.46
30% TiB-40 13.57.278.45
50% TNM4522.528.4416.829.4615.33
50% TiB-40 22.511.6414.13
30% TNM4513.528.412.928.989.2
70% TiB-40 31.515.519.78
0% TNM45-28.05-28.26-
100% TiB-40 4528.0528.26
Table 3. Parameters of multilayer powder green samples before and after pressing.
Table 3. Parameters of multilayer powder green samples before and after pressing.
CompositionGreen Sample Composition, vol %Green Sample Height, mmGreen Sample Weight, g
StartedFinal
35TiB/30TNM/35TiB35% TiB-204515.75287.8529.710.25
30% TNM13.5 7.259.2
35% TiB-2015.7528.312.910.25
25TiB/25TNM/25TiB/25TNM25% TiB-204511.2528.434.729.987.32
25% TNM11.257.137.67
25% TiB-2011.2528.428.37.32
25% TNM11.258.37.67
35TNM/30TiB/35TNM35% TNM4515.7528.8610.5330.2510.73
30% TiB-2013.5 78.79
35% TNM15.7529.111.3310.73
Table 4. Induction times of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples.
Table 4. Induction times of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples.
Composition100%TNM70%TNM50%TNM30%TNM0%TNM
TiB-2051.751.952.855.457.6
TiB-3051.752.854.258.358.5
TiB-4051.752.553.853.854.7
Table 5. Rheological characteristics of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples.
Table 5. Rheological characteristics of single-layer and double-layer powder green samples.
Composition100%TNM70%TNM50%TNM30%TNM0%TNM
Compressibility modulus (G), MPa
TiB-205.74.64.23.227
TiB-305.74.33.83.12.4
TiB-405.74.03.63.01.9
Compressibility coefficient (kc), MPa−1
TiB-200.180.20.230.310.37
TiB-300.180.230.260.320.42
TiB-400.180.250.280.330.53
Limiting value of the deformation of the linear section of the rheological stress–strain relationship (ε*)
TiB-200.180.190.220.230.24
TiB-300.180.190.220.250.26
TiB-400.170.180.210.220.24
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bazhin, P.; Konstantinov, A.; Chizhikov, A.; Antipov, M.; Stolin, P.; Avdeeva, V.; Antonenkova, A. Compactability Regularities Observed during Cold Uniaxial Pressing of Layered Powder Green Samples Based on Ti-Al-Nb-Mo-B and Ti-B. Metals 2023, 13, 1827. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13111827

AMA Style

Bazhin P, Konstantinov A, Chizhikov A, Antipov M, Stolin P, Avdeeva V, Antonenkova A. Compactability Regularities Observed during Cold Uniaxial Pressing of Layered Powder Green Samples Based on Ti-Al-Nb-Mo-B and Ti-B. Metals. 2023; 13(11):1827. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13111827

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bazhin, Pavel, Alexander Konstantinov, Andrey Chizhikov, Mikhail Antipov, Pavel Stolin, Varvara Avdeeva, and Anna Antonenkova. 2023. "Compactability Regularities Observed during Cold Uniaxial Pressing of Layered Powder Green Samples Based on Ti-Al-Nb-Mo-B and Ti-B" Metals 13, no. 11: 1827. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13111827

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop