Next Article in Journal
Electroencephalography-Based Depression Detection Using Multiple Machine Learning Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
The Fluoroless Future in Electrophysiology: A State-of-the-Art Review
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Serum Lactate as an Early Serum Biomarker for Cardiopulmonary Parameters within the First 24 Hours of Intensive Care Unit Treatment in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microembolizations in the Arterial Cerebral Circulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using the Cryoballoon Technique—Protocol and Methodology of a Prospective Observational Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Strain Imaging and Ventricular Arrhythmia

by
Caroline Løkke Bjerregaard
1,2,
Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup
1,2,
Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen
1,2,
Tor Biering-Sørensen
1,2 and
Flemming Javier Olsen
1,2,*
1
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital–Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
2
Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(10), 1778; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101778
Submission received: 8 April 2023 / Revised: 11 May 2023 / Accepted: 13 May 2023 / Published: 17 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias)

Abstract

:
Ventricular arrhythmia is one of the main causes of sudden cardiac death. Hence, identifying patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death is important but can be challenging. The indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator as a primary preventive strategy relies on the left ventricular ejection fraction as a measure of systolic function. However, ejection fraction is flawed by technical constraints and is an indirect measure of systolic function. There has, therefore, been an incentive to identify other markers to optimize the risk prediction of malignant arrhythmias to select proper candidates who could benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Speckle-tracking echocardiography allows for a detailed assessment of cardiac mechanics, and strain imaging has repeatedly been shown to be a sensitive technique to identify systolic dysfunction unrecognized by ejection fraction. Several strain measures, including global longitudinal strain, regional strain, and mechanical dispersion, have consequently been proposed as potential markers of ventricular arrhythmias. In this review, we will provide an overview of the potential use of different strain measures in the context of ventricular arrhythmias.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) pose a substantial risk for the development of sudden cardiac death (SCD) [1,2]. While VA may develop because of channelopathies, toxicity, or for idiopathic reasons, structural heart disease is a frequent cause of VA [3]. Cardiac imaging, including echocardiography, may help detect structural and functional heart disease to identify patients at risk of VA. In line with this, the estimation of systolic function by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is used to guide the indication for the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in heart failure (HF) [3,4]. However, LVEF is limited by its pure volume-based assessment of systolic function and by technical constraints, including poor reproducibility, geometric assumptions, and loading dependency [5,6]. Consequently, LVEF has shown to be limited in terms of predicting VAs, particularly in patients with LVEF >35%, and early prediction of the occurrence of VAs remains a challenge despite being the most common cause of SCD [1,2,3,5,7].
Given the constraints of LVEF and the varying pathophysiological mechanisms that may promote the development of VAs, several studies have evaluated the potential prognostic utility of other biomarkers in the context of VAs. These include electrocardiographic markers as well as findings from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, radionuclide imaging, and novel echocardiographic techniques [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Speckle tracking is one of the most promising echocardiographic techniques in this regard. As outlined in Table 1, speckle tracking offers several advantages for the assessment of myocardial function. Strain imaging parameters, in particular global longitudinal strain (GLS), have been shown to be more sensitive markers of cardiovascular risk than LVEF [22,23,24,25,26]. Accordingly, strain imaging could be of value in terms of predicting VAs and may potentially aid in the selection of candidates who would benefit from an ICD.
This review will provide an overview of the potential use of different strain imaging measures as predictors of VA. Although this has been investigated in various patient groups, it has most widely been studied in the settings of ischemic heart disease and HF. This review will therefore focus on the utility of strain measures in these conditions but also highlight other potential disease categories.

2. Concept of Myocardial Strain Imaging

Strain imaging was initially introduced as a derivative of tissue Doppler imaging but was made quantifiable through speckle tracking in 2004 by Lysyanski et al. [27,28]. The method of speckle tracking takes advantage of the presence of natural acoustical markers within the myocardium that can be tracked throughout the cardiac cycle [29]. Speckle tracking is therefore possible in multiple projections, typically measured in either apical or short-axis views, and allows for the quantification of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain, as well as twist and torsion [30]. Key practical points to consider include proper visualization of myocardial tissue, adequate temporal resolution (~60–90 fps), and careful consideration of ECG trigger points, but more details are available in published practical guidelines [31]. The longitudinal strain has been most widely assessed because of its higher feasibility and reproducibility [5,6] but also because longitudinal fibers located in the subendocardial layer are most susceptible to ischemia [32,33]. Accordingly, most available evidence relies on findings from longitudinal strain. The assessment of longitudinal strain can provide widespread insight into cardiac mechanics, including quantification of GLS, regional strain, mechanical dispersion (MD), and, most recently, myocardial work as potential markers of cardiovascular outcomes, including the risk of arrhythmias.

3. Global Longitudinal Strain

3.1. Value of GLS

As indicated by the name, GLS represents a global measure of LV myocardial tissue deformation acquired from the three main apical projections. Since the introduction of myocardial speckle tracking, several studies have emerged to suggest that GLS can detect LV systolic dysfunction at an earlier point than LVEF [34,35]. Several technical and pathophysiological aspects contribute to why that is. As mentioned above, GLS evaluates myocardial deformation and, thereby, contractile tissue function, whereas LVEF is a volume-based measurement and, thereby, an indirect surrogate of systolic function. In addition, GLS specifically evaluates longitudinal fiber function, which is more sensitive to ischemia since coronary perfusion extends from the subendocardium and outwards [36,37,38]. Finally, GLS has been shown to correlate closely with the neurohumoral response, infarct size, and myocardial fibrosis [39,40,41].
The primary impediment that has prevented GLS from earlier widespread clinical implementation has been its vendor dependency [42,43]. However, collaborations have already been created to mitigate this issue [44]. In addition, data from several studies proposing normal values for GLS are now available, further benchmarking GLS for clinical practice. A large-scale meta-analysis of ~2600 subjects reported that normal values varied from −15.9 to −22.1% with a mean value of −19.7% [45], and a rule of thumb has been that −16 to −18% is considered borderline abnormal, whereas a lower threshold of −16% was considered abnormal [46]. This lower threshold was recently validated in ~2000 healthy participants from a general population study (the Copenhagen City Heart study), which found −15.8% to be the lower limit of normality for GLS [47]. Finally, GLS has consistently shown excellent reproducibility, and by direct comparison, the reproducibility of GLS was substantially better than LVEF, regardless of the operator’s level of expertise [48]. These efforts have promoted the dissemination of GLS into various guidelines and recommendations [49,50].

3.2. GLS as a Marker of Ventricular Arrhythmia

As an extension to simply recognizing systolic dysfunction, several observational studies have also shown that GLS can predict cardiovascular outcomes even in patients with preserved LVEF [34,51,52]. Such findings also extend into the context of the prediction of VA. Figure 1 is a representative example of GLS measured in a patient at risk of VA. Table 2 provides an outline of studies examining GLS in relation to VAs across various cardiac disorders. Even though GLS has shown potential for predicting VAs, it should be noted that heterogeneity exists concerning endpoint definition, rhythm monitoring, and length of follow-up.
For the selection of candidates for ICD implantation as a primary preventive strategy, current guidelines rely heavily on an LVEF threshold of <35% [3], despite studies showing that VA and SCD risk stratification by LVEF may be suboptimal [53,54,55]. Ersbøll et al. reported on the value of GLS for predicting VA in the acute setting of myocardial infarction (MI) with echocardiograms performed within 48 h of admission (n = 988 with 34 events during 29.7 months of follow-up) in a prospective study. The authors found that GLS was significantly reduced among patients who developed VAs compared to those who did not (9.9% vs. 13.9%, p < 0.001) and that GLS was an independent predictor of VAs after adjusting for clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters. In addition, GLS improved risk prediction beyond LVEF and Killip class. Finally, GLS was found to be an independent predictor of VAs even in patients with LVEF above 35%, further emphasizing the potential added value of GLS [56]. However, landmark analysis from the study suggested that GLS, as opposed to MD, was significantly associated with VAs in the short term (within 90 days) and highlighted the fact that there could be a diminishing return on its predictive value with increasing length of time from the index infarction as compared to MD. Indeed, in a multicenter, prospective study of 569 patients (15 events during 30 months of follow-up), with echocardiograms performed >40 days after the MI, Haugaa et al. found both GLS and MD to be univariable predictors of VAs; however, when both parameters were included in the same regression model, only MD remained significantly associated with VAs [57]. Central limitations to both these studies, as well as others, have been the use of admission with VAs rather than systematic rhythm monitoring for endpoint ascertainment as well as the few numbers of events. It is also worth noting that in an antecedent study by Haugaa et al. on post-MI patients with ICDs (n: 85 with 38 events during 2.3 years of follow-up), only MD and not GLS was found to be an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy [58]. It should, however, be noted that even though this was a prospective study, the echocardiograms were performed at various time points from ICD implantation, and the median time from the MI to the study’s baseline was about 6 years. Accordingly, the lack of independent predictive value for GLS could be related to the long time that elapsed from MI to echocardiogram.
As can be appreciated above and from Table 2, some inconsistencies appear concerning GLS’ predictive value, particularly in ischemic heart disease. To that end, a meta-analysis based on undifferentiated populations reported that GLS was not associated with VA events (2076, events: 147) [59]. However, it should be noted that in another meta-analysis based on 984 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (231 events), GLS was found to be significantly associated with VAs [60]. It is also worthwhile to mention that in a MADIT-CRT substudy, representing the largest study that has examined GLS’ value with continuous rhythm monitoring and adjudicated VA events (n = 1064, events: 254), GLS was also found to be associated with VAs [61]. Compared to meta-analyses, which extrapolate results based on events that may differ markedly in terms of rhythm monitoring and definition of VA endpoints, large-scale studies such as MADIT-CRT provide findings from a more homogenous design.
In addition to the above-mentioned studies, several other studies have also reported on the potential of GLS for predicting VAs in MI patients [62,63,64]. A brief outline of these studies is provided in Table 2; however, the findings are less easily interpreted since the studies were either retrospective or included VAs in a composite outcome with HF or mortality.
Table 2. Global longitudinal strain and ventricular arrhythmia.
Table 2. Global longitudinal strain and ventricular arrhythmia.
StudyYear DesignSample SizeArrhythmia OutcomeArrhythmia MonitoringNo. of EventsFollow-Up Key Strain Findings
Myocardial infarction
Haugaa et al. [58]2010Prosp.85Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring382.3 (range: 0.6–5.5) yearsMD but not GLS was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy.
Haugaa et al. [57]2013Prosp.569 Composite:
Sustained VT
VF
SCD
Not specified1530 (IQR: 18) monthsGLS was a univariate predictor of VA but not an independent predictor of VA when adjusted for MD.
MD was an independent predictor of VA.
Ersbøll et al. [56]2013Prosp.988Composite:
VA
Appropriate ICD therapy
Definite/suspected SCD
Admission with documented VA
ICD monitoring in subgroup
SCD based on hospital and prehospital records.
3429.7 (IQR: 23.5–32.7) monthsGLS and MD were independent predictors of VA.
In patients with LVEF < 35%, both GLS and MD were independent predictors of VAs, but only GLS was an independent predictor of VAs in
patients with LVEF > 35%.
Sjøli et al. [62]2011Prosp.77Composite:
Cardiac death
Reinfarction
Hospitalization for HF
UAP
Life-threatening arrhythmia
Not specified173.29 ± 1.59 (range: 0–5.22) years GLS measured in both the acute phase and after 10 days was an independent predictor of the composite outcome.
Nguyen et al. [63]2015Not specified467VTDocumented on
24 h ambulatory ECG
monitoring during hospitalizationEP study
51Median: 25 (range: 6–43) months In multivariate analysis, MD was significantly associated with VT, and GLS was borderline significantly associated with VT.
Choi et al. [64]2022Retrosp.545Composite:
All-cause death
Rehospitalization for acute HF
VA
National database and electrical medical records55Median: 49.5 monthsReduced 3D and 2D GLS were both independently associated with the composite outcome.
Leong et al. [65]2015Retrosp. 206Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring75Median: 24 (IQR: 7.8–24) monthsGLS and MD were independently associated with VT.
Structural heart disease
Guerra et al. [66]2020Prosp.203Any VA detected by ICDICD monitoring74817 (IQR: 440–1105) daysGLS Ws an independent predictor of the first VA episode but not recurrent episodes. MD was not associated with VAs.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Nikoo et al. [67]2020Prosp.70Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring301.8 ± 0.6 (1–3) yearsReduced GLS was a predictor of VAs. Better diagnostic performance than LVEF.
MD was not reported.
Hasselberg et al. [68]2016Prosp. 170Composite:
VT
VF
SCA
Appropriate ATP
Appropriate defibrillator shock therapy
CRT-D monitoring181.9 ± 0.3 yearsGLS and MD at baseline were not independent predictors of the VA endpoint.
MD at 6 months was an independent predictor of the VA endpoint.
Mornoş et al. [69] 2017Prosp. 340Composite:
VT
VF
SCD
Hospital documentationDeath certificate4836 ± 9 monthsGLS, MD, and the ratio of GLS to MD (GLS/MD) were univariate predictors of VAs, but only GLS/MD was an independent predictor of VAs.
Matsuzoe et al. [70]2016Retrosp. 72Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring3417
(IQR: 0.2–72.5) months
GLS and MD were not independently associated with the VA endpoint. Only LV dyssynergy (SD of peak strain) was independently associated with the VA endpoint.
Biering-Sørensen et al. [61] 2017RCT substudy1064Appropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy ICD/CRT-D monitoring
Adjudicated events
2542.9 (IQR: 2.0–3.7) yearsGLS and all regional (anterior and inferior) strain were associated with VT/VF, whereas MD was not.
Bax et al. [71] 2017RCT substudy755Composite:
Appropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy
Arrhythmic death
Atrial tachyarrhythmias
ICD/CRT-D monitoring
Adjudicated events
7219.4 months GLS was not independently associated with the arrhythmic endpoint.
MD was not investigated.
Biering-Sørensen et al. [72]2016Retrosp.151Composite:
CVD
Appropriate ICD therapy
ICD monitoring
CVD from the national cause of death registry
402.3 (IQR: 1.5–3.1) yearsNeither MD nor GLS was associated with VAs.
Winsløw et al. [73]2023RCT substudy401Composite:
SCD
Appropriate ICD therapy
Admission with sustained ventricular arrhythmia
Resuscitated cardiac arrest
ICD monitoring
ECG
Hospital/source documentation
Adjudicated events
524.0 (IQR:2.8–5) yearsNeither GLS nor LVEF was associated with the VA endpoint. Only inferior strain was independently associated with the VA endpoint.
Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Haugaa et al. [74]2012Prosp. 94Composite:
Appropriate ICD therapy
Sustained VT
Cardiac arrest
Cardiac syncope
Not specified1222 (Range:1–46) monthsBoth GLS and MD were independent predictors of the VA endpoint.
Melichova et al. [75] 2021Prosp.290Composite:
SCD
Shock from ICD
Sustained VT
Medical records (ICD therapy, ECG, Holter, aborted cardiac arrest)
Cause of death registry
3222 ± 12 monthsBoth GLS and MD were independent predictors of the VA endpoint.
Negishi et al. [76] 2016Retrosp.124Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring363.8 (IQR: 2.2–6.0) years GLS, but not MD, was an independent predictor of VAs.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Haland et al. [77]2016Prosp.150 HCMComposite:
Sustained and non-sustained VT
Previous aborted cardiac arrest
24–48 h Holter monitoring
ICD monitoring
37Not specifiedGLS and MD were univariate predictors of the VA endpoint, but only MD was an independent predictor.
Candan et al. [78]2017Prosp.63Appropriate ICD therapy ICD monitoring173 years (21.5 ± 6.9 months)GLS and MD were independent predictors of VAs.
Debonnaire et al. [79]2014Retrosp.92Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring214.7 (2.2–8.2) years GLS was independently associated with VAs.
MD was not investigated.
Candan et al. [80]2019Prosp.59Non-sustained VT24–72 h Holter monitoring17N/ALV Twist and GLS were independent predictors for non-sustained VT.
MD was not investigated.
Popa-Fotea et al. [81]2020Prosp.47 Non-sustained VT24 h Holter monitoring16N/AGLS, RV and LV MD were univariate predictors of non-sustained VT, but only RV and LV MD were independent predictors of non-sustained VT.
Hiemstra et al. [82] 2017Prosp.427Composite:
Aborted SCD
Appropriate ICD therapy
Medical chart review
Contact with general practitioner
536.7 (IQR: 3.3–10.0) yearsGLS was independently associated with the VA endpoint.
MD was not investigated.
Jalanko et al. [83]2016Prosp.31Non-sustained VT24 h Holter monitoring11N/ABoth GLS and MD were associated with non-sustained VT in univariate analysis, but only MD was independently associated with non-sustained VT.
Chagas cardiomyopathy
Barros et al. [84]2016Retrosp., case-control study62Clinically indicated implantation of ICD.N/A28N/AMD and GLS were more abnormal in the group with ICD, and both were independent markers of previous events precipitating ICD.
Azevedo et al. [85]2021Prosp.77Composite:
VES
Non-sustained VT
24 h Holter Not specifiedN/ABoth GLS and MD were associated with non-sustained VT in univariate analysis, but only MD was independently associated with non-sustained VT, paired VES, and VES in bigeminy.
Long QT syndrome
Haugaa et al. [86]2010Prosp.101 LQTS
35 healthy individuals
History of either:
Documented arrhythmia
Syncope
Cardiac arrest
N/A48N/ALQTS patients with a history of arrhythmia had higher MD but similar GLS compared to those without arrhythmia.
Lamin A/C mutation
Haugaa et al. [87]2015Prosp.33Composite:
Non-sustained VT
VT
VF
Not specified11Not specifiedPatients with any ventricular arrhythmia had higher MD but similar GLS compared to those without ventricular arrhythmia.
Tetralogy of Fallot
Diller et al. [88]2012Retrosp.413Composite:
SCD
Sustained VTResuscitated SCD
Appropriate ICD discharge
ICD monitoring192.9 (IQR:1.4–4.4) yearsGLS was an independent predictor of the VA endpoint.
MD was not investigated.
Van Grootel et al. [89]2019Prosp. 151 ToF Composite:
Death
HF
Reintervention
Hospitalization for cardiac reasons
Symptomatic ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias
Regularly checked at an outpatient clinic6271.5
(IQR: 64–75.3) months
GLS, RV strain, and apical rotation were univariate predictors of the composite outcome. Only apical rotation was independently associated with the composite outcome.
MD was not investigated.
Cardiac amyloidosis
Hamon et al. [90]2016Prosp.45Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring1217 ± 13.7 monthsGLS was not associated with VAs.
MD was not investigated.
Brugada syndrome
Scheirlynck et al. [91]2020Case-control study175 BrSHistory of either:
VT
VF
Aborted cardiac arrest
Medical records19N/APatients with a history of VAs or aborted cardiac arrest had higher MD than, but similar GLS to, those who had not had VAs or aborted cardiac arrest.
Elite Athletes
Lie et al. [92]2021Cross-sectional study43 athletes with VT
and 30 healthy athletes
Composite of life-threatening VAs:
VF
Sustained VT
Aborted cardiac arrest
Appropriate ICD therapy
24 h Holter monitoring
ECG
Telemetry
ILR monitoring
Intracardiac device monitoring
23N/AMD was higher and GLS was lower in VA patients.
Only MD was independently associated with life-threatening VAs.
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
Lie et al. [93]2018Prosp.117VT
Cardiac arrest
Appropriate ICD shock
ECG
Holter monitoring
ICD monitoring
182.0 (IQR:0.5–3.5) yearsPatients with VAs had reduced LV and RV strain and higher LV and RV MD. RV strain and LV MD were independently associated with VAs.
Lie et al. [94] 2021LCS168Composite:
Aborted cardiac arrest
Sustained VT
Appropriate ICD shock
Not specified541.3 (IQR: 0.4–3.5) yearsLV GLS was independently associated with VAs.
MD was not reported.
Sarvari et al. [95] 2011Prosp. Case-control study42 symptomatic
27 asymptomatic
30 healthy
History of either:
VT
VF
N/A42N/APatients with a history of VAs had lower LV and RV strain and higher LV and RV MD. Only RV MD was independently associated with a history of VAs.
Kirkels et al. [96]2021Retrosp.160History of either:
Sustained VT
Appropriate ICD therapy
Aborted cardiac arrest
N/A47N/APatients with a history of VAs had reduced LV GLS and RV strain and higher RV MD than those without VA history. RV MD was independently associated with VAs.
Mitral valve prolapse
Ermakov et al. [97] 2019Retrosp.59 MVPHistory of:
Ventricular couplets
Ventricular bigeminy
Non-sustained VT
VT
ICD for aborted cardiac arrest
N/A 32N/AMD higher but similar GLS in patients with a history of VA compared to those without arrhythmia. MD was independently associated with a history of VA.
Unexplained syncope
Falsing et al. [98]2021Retrosp. 288VTILR monitoring362.9 (IQR:1.3–3.5) yearsGLS was independently associated with VT. MD was not associated with VT.
Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
Groeneveld et al. [99]2021Retrosp. Case-control study47 IVF
47 healthy individuals
VFN/AN/AN/AIVF patients had lower GLS, higher MD, and higher post-systolic index than matched controls. No adjusted analyses were performed.
Acute myocarditis
Pruitt et al. [100] 2021Retrosp.66Composite:
VT
VF
SVT
High-grade or complete heart block
Any arrhythmia requiring antiarrhythmic medication
Medical records23During hospitalizationGLS was independently associated with the composite arrhythmia outcome.
Abbreviations: Prosp., prospective; Retrosp., retrospective; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LQTS, long QT syndrome; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; Brs, Brugada syndrome; VT, ventricular tachycardia; IVF, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VF, ventricular fibrillation; SCA, sudden cardiac arrest; CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; VES; ventricular extrasystoles; HF, heart failure; VA, ventricular arrhythmia; ECG, electrocardiogram; GLS, global longitudinal strain; MD, mechanical dispersion; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle; RVMD, right ventricular mechanical dispersion; RV, right ventricle; MD, mechanical dispersion; LBBB, left bundle branch block.

4. Regional Strain

4.1. Is Regional Strain Worthwhile to Consider?

Since myocardial strain imaging can be performed from multiple projections, the assessment of tissue deformation within specific regions of the LV is feasible. Cardiac MRI studies have shown that radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strain deteriorate in a stepwise fashion from non-infarcted areas to peri-infarct regions and infarcted regions after a MI [101]. Since GLS reflects global LV function, regional LV strain could be of potential value to detect specific areas of systolic dysfunction. In fact, in a subset of participants in the VALIANT study, the authors showed that regional strain was impaired even in segments that were visually estimated to be normokinetic and that a higher number of regions with abnormal strain posed a higher risk of death [102]. It should be noted, though, that studies relating regional strain to outcome have been inconsistent. Conceptually, lower regional strain in infarcted areas was thought to pose an increased risk of outcomes such as HF and all-cause death. However, a study by Biering-Sørensen et al. found that reduced regional strain outside the culprit perfusion area was a more important aspect to consider, as this would indicate limited compensatory reserve after an MI [103]. In addition to the above-mentioned considerations, the regional strain has also been shown to be associated with other outcomes after MI, including LV thrombus formation [104].
It is, however, worthwhile to note that compared to GLS, regional strain is even more heterogenous across different vendor solutions and exhibits poorer reproducibility [105,106]. A representative example of regional strain in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy is shown in Figure 1.

4.2. Regional Strain and Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmia

Several underlying mechanisms could indicate a potential for regional strain as a marker of VA risk, one being the ability to identify regions within an infarct zone or in the peri-infarct zone that may contribute to arrhythmogenic potential. This relies on the fact that in patients with MI, areas of the infarcted zone commonly consist of fibrotic tissue and represent an anatomical and physiological substrate for malignant arrhythmias [107,108]. Meanwhile, the peri-infarct zone comprises heterogeneous areas with an intermediate degree of non-transmural fibrosis with potential for conduction delay, unidirectional conduction block, and electrical dispersion, thereby creating re-entry substrates that could result in VAs [109]. Indeed, several cardiac MRI studies have demonstrated an ability to anatomically identify myocardial scar tissue, characterize the peri-infarct zone, and quantify the function and extent of the dysfunctional myocardium to predict mortality and the occurrence of VAs [110,111,112,113].
In general, studies on echocardiographically assessed regional strain in the context of VAs are sparse compared to GLS and MD. Bertini et al. investigated 134 patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy scheduled for a clinically indicated electrophysiological (EP) study who had an echocardiogram performed within 24 h prior to the EP study. They found that peak longitudinal systolic strain at the peri-infarct zone was independently associated with inducible VT, whereas peak longitudinal systolic strain values in the infarct and remote zones were not associated with inducibility [114]. By extension, in a prospective study of 424 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and prophylactic ICD, Ng et al. investigated the potential of regional strain for predicting appropriate ICD therapy as a secondary outcome. During 24.2 months of follow-up, 95 patients received appropriate ICD therapy. The authors found that regional strain in the peri-infarct zone was independently associated with the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy [115]. In a related study, Hoogslag et al. investigated the utility of regional strain for predicting a composite outcome of appropriate ICD therapy or cardiac mortality in 79 patients with MI by performing echocardiography at baseline and after 3 months. Interestingly, no difference in regional strain was detected in the infarct, peri-infarct, or remote zone at baseline between patients who developed the outcome and those who did not. However, at the 3-month echocardiogram, it became evident that strain in the peri-infarct zone was reduced in those who developed the outcome, and reduced peri-infarct zone strain was independently associated with the outcome [116]. The findings were extended in a study of 467 patients. During 25 months of follow-up, 51 patients had documentation of VA either on 24 h ECG monitoring, monitoring during hospitalization, or through an EP study. Interestingly, both longitudinal and circumferential strain yielded high AUCs for recognizing VAs, but only abnormal circumferential per-infarct strain was independently associated with VAs along with MD [63]. This may be ascribed to the fact that more extensive MIs would not be limited to subendocardial ischemia and thereby impairment of solely longitudinal function but also reductions in circumferential strain. It is, however, important to keep in mind that none of the above-mentioned studies specifically ascertained where the infarct was located based on late gadolinium enhancement but rather defined the infarct zone based on either regional strain values or wall motion score index.
In the setting of HF, a substudy of the MADIT-CRT trial represents the largest study to report on the potential of regional strain for predicting VAs. Based on 1064 patients with 254 events, Biering-Sørensen et al. reported that longitudinal strain in the inferior and posterior segments of the LV wall was significantly associated with the development of VT/VF and that longitudinal strain obtained from the inferior wall provided prognostic information beyond clinical and echocardiographic parameters for VT/VF [61]. These findings have recently been replicated in a substudy of 401 patients from the DANISH trial with 52 events, also demonstrating an association between inferior wall strain and VAs [73]. The proposed underlying mechanisms for these findings included a differential distribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic innervation to the LV and differential wall stress owing to different radii of curvature across the LV [117,118,119,120,121].

5. Mechanical Dyssynchrony

Mechanical dyssynchrony is a term used to describe myocardial contraction inhomogeneity within the LV. Echocardiographic measures of mechanical dyssynchrony have been a point of focus for several decades as a means to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy and predict VA in specific patient groups [57,122,123,124]. The aspect of using dyssynchrony measures in cardiac resynchronization therapy lies beyond the scope of this review, which focuses on the prediction of VA. For that purpose, the most widely investigated dyssynchrony measure has been MD.

5.1. Mechanical Dispersion Fundamentals

MD is defined as the standard deviation of the time to peak of the longitudinal strain, typically in a 16-segment model, although this has varied across studies. As for GLS, MD has been reported to have excellent reproducibility with intra- and interobserver ICCs of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively [125]. Figure 2 depicts the heterogeneous contraction of the LV as identified by MD in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
The presence of LV fibrosis can result in a heterogeneous contraction pattern since fibrosis leads to electrical dispersion, influencing both activation time and refractoriness. This has been noted as the primary underlying mechanism for which MD may be a marker of elevated VA risk [125,126] since MD has been shown to correlate with fibrosis as assessed by LGE [127,128].
Even though MD has been extensively studied, primarily in the context of VA prediction, studies looking at normal reference values based on healthy individuals are sparse. A single study by Rodrígues-Zenella et al. sought to define reference values. Based on 334 healthy volunteers (Caucasian, median age 54 (range: 18–79) years, and 54% women), the authors found an overall normal value of 34 ± 10 ms with an upper limit of normality of 56 ms. Of note, they did not find that MD differed between men and women, but it did increase with age. In addition to proposing reference values, the authors evaluated clinical and echocardiographic correlates and found age, GLS, and E/e’ to be independently correlated with MD [125] in a larger, general population study not restricted to healthy individuals. Aagaard et al. similarly investigated which clinical and echocardiographic parameters correlated to MD, although this study population was not restricted to healthy individuals. Based on 2529 participants, they found coronary artery disease, hypertension, GLS, e’, and LVEF to be significantly associated with higher MD [129].

5.2. Mechanical Dispersion and Ventricular Arrhythmias

Similar to GLS, the association between MD and VA has been studied extensively, mostly within HF and coronary artery disease [58,68,69,70,130,131], but also in congenital heart disease [89], long QT syndrome [86,132], and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [93]. An outline of studies is provided in Table 3, and key studies in MI patients have been addressed in the previous section regarding GLS.
Two systematic reviews have assessed the potential of MD for predicting VAs. Recently, in a meta-analysis, Harapoz et al. reported on the potential of MD in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n: 346 with 107 events), by which no significant association between MD and VAs was found [60]. However, it should be noted that the authors highlighted that the analysis was limited by the few and relatively small studies, which also precluded an assessment of publication bias. However, it does raise the question as to whether MD is as suitable a predictor of VAs in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy as compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy, which differs in terms of the underlying pathophysiology and distribution of fibrosis. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Kawakami et al., which included 12 studies with 3198 patients and 387 arrhythmic events over 17 to 70 months of follow-up, found that MD was higher in patients with VAs, that MD was independently associated with VAs, and that MD was superior to LVEF and GLS for this purpose [59]. It should, however, be noted that the studies included in the meta-analysis were quite heterogenous (I2 of 84%), as both patient groups, endpoints, and monitoring differed across the studies. In addition, the timing of the echocardiogram was not considered, which seems to be important in patients with MI, as outlined previously, but also in the context of CRT. Interestingly, Kawakami et al. stated that MD cannot predict VAs in CRT patients since CRT impacts regional timing and the risk of arrhythmias [59]. Indeed, this has been substantiated in substudies from the MADIT-CRT trial [61,133]. As reported by Biering-Sørensen et al., in 1064 patients with continuous rhythm monitoring for a median of 2.9 years, the 254 patients who developed VAs had similar MD as those who remained free of VAs [61]. Before that, Kutyifa et al. reported that baseline MD was not predictive of VAs but noted that CRT patients with LBBB who had improvement in MD at 12 months had a lower risk of VAs [134]. Similar findings have also been noted in a large-scale retrospective study by Van der Bijl al. Based on 1185 patients with 403 events, they did not find that baseline MD was associated with VAs but rather that MD at 6 months was independently associated with VAs [131]. Accordingly, the timing of the echocardiogram seems to be of importance when considering the use of MD for predicting VAs.
Table 3. Mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmia.
Table 3. Mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmia.
StudyYear DesignSample SizeArrhythmia OutcomeArrhythmia MonitoringNo. of EventsFollow-Up Key Strain Findings
Myocardial infarction
Ersbøll et al. [56]2013Prosp.988Composite:
VA
Appropriate ICD therapy
Definite/suspected SCD
Admission with documented VA
ICD monitoring in subgroup
SCD based on hospital and prehospital records
3429.7 (IQR: 23.5–32.7) monthsGLS and MD were independent predictors of VA.
In patients with LVEF < 35%, both GLS and MD were independent predictors of VAs, but only GLS was an independent predictor of VAs in
patients with LVEF > 35%.
Haugaa et al. [57]2013Prosp.569 Composite:
Sustained VT
VF
SCD
Not specified1530 (IQR: 18) monthsGLS was a univariate predictor of VA but not an independent predictor of VA when adjusted for MD.
MD was an independent predictor of VA.
Nguyen et al. [63]2015Not specified467VTDocumented on
24 h ambulatory ECG
Monitoring during hospitalization
EP study
5125 (range: 6–43) months In multivariate analysis, MD was significantly associated with VT, and GLS was borderline significantly associated with VT.
Leong et al. [65]2015Retrosp. 206Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring7524 (IQR: 7.8–24) monthsGLS and MD were independently associated with VT.
Haugaa et al. [58]2010Prosp.85Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring382.3 (range: 0.6–5.5) yearsMD, but not GLS, was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy.
Structural heart disease
Guerra et al. [66]2020Prosp.203Any VA detected by ICDICD monitoring74817 (IQR: 440–1105) daysGLS was an independent predictor of the first VA episode but not recurrent episodes. MD was not associated with VAs.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Matsuzoe et al. [70]2016Retrosp. 72Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring3417
(IQR: 0.2–72.5) months
GLS and MD were not independently associated with the VA endpoint. Only LV dyssynergy (SD of peak strain) was independently associated with the VA endpoint.
Hasselberg et al. [68]2016Prosp. 170Composite:
VT
VF
SCA
Appropriate ATP Appropriate defibrillator shock therapy
CRT-D monitoring181.9 ± 0.3 yearsGLS and MD at baseline were not independent predictors of the VA endpoint.
MD at 6 months was an independent predictor of the VA endpoint.
Mornoş et al. [69] 2017Prosp. 340Composite:
VT
VF
SCD
Hospital documentationDeath certificate4836 ± 9 monthsGLS, MD, and the ratio of GLS to MD (GLS/MD) were univariate predictors of VAs, but only GLS/MD was an independent predictor of VAs.
Banasik et al. [130]2016Retrosp.47Appropriate CRT-D therapyCRT-D monitoring 294 yearsMD was greater in patients experiencing VAs. GLS was not reported. No multivariate analyses were performed.
Van der Bijl et al. [131]2018Retrosp.1185Appropriate CRT-D therapyCRT-D monitoring 40355 ± 36 monthsNo difference in VA events between high vs. low baseline MD but more frequent VA events in those with high MD at 6 months. MD at 6 months was independently associated with VAs.
GLS was not reported.
Biering-Sørensen et al. [61] 2017RCT substudy1064Appropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy ICD/CRT-D monitoring
Adjudicated events
2542.9 (IQR:2.0–3.7) yearsGLS and all regional (anterior and inferior) strains were associated with VT/VF, whereas MD was not.
Kutyifa et al. [133]. 2013RCT substudy1077VT/VFICD/CRT-D monitoring
Adjudicated events
- 205 (for baseline associations)
- 90 (for associations after 12 months)
2.3 ± 0.9 years Baseline MD was not associated with VAs.
Patients with LBBB who had >15% improvement in MD had a lower risk of VAs.
Biering-Sørensen et al. [72]2016Retrosp.151Composite:
CVD
Appropriate ICD therapy
ICD monitoring
CVD from the national cause of death registry
402.3 (IQR: 1.5–3.1) yearsNeither MD nor GLS was associated with VAs.
Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Haugaa et al. [74]2012Prosp. 94Composite:
Appropriate ICD therapy
Sustained VT
Cardiac arrest
Cardiac syncope
Not specified1222
(Range:1–46) months
Both GLS and MD were independent predictors of the VA endpoint.
Kosiuk et al. [134]2015Prosp.20Composite:
VT
VF
Holter, duration not specified
ICD monitoring
1170 ± 40 monthsGreater MD in patients with VAs and MD was independently associated with the VA endpoint.
Negishi et al. [76] 2016Retrosp.124Appropriate ICD therapyICD monitoring363.8 (IQR: 2.2–6.0) years GLS but not MD was an independent predictor of VAs.
Melichova et al. [75] 2021Prosp.290Composite:
SCD
Shock from ICD
Sustained VT
Medical records (ICD therapy, ECG, Holter, aborted cardiac arrest)
Cause of death registry
3222 ± 12 monthsBoth GLS and MD were independent predictors of VA endpoint.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Haland et al. [77]2016Prosp.150 HCMComposite:
Sustained and non-sustained VT
Previous aborted cardiac arrest
24–48 h Holter monitoring
ICD monitoring
37Not specifiedGLS and MD were univariate predictors of the VA endpoint, but only MD was an independent predictor.
Candan et al. [78]2017Prosp.63Appropriate ICD therapy ICD monitoring173 years (21.5 ± 6.9 months)GLS and MD were independent predictors of VAs.
Jalanko et al. [83]2016Prosp.31Non-sustained VT24 h Holter monitoring11N/ABoth GLS and MD were associated with non-sustained VT in univariate analysis, but only MD was independently associated with non-sustained VT.
Popa-Fotea et al. [81]2020Prosp.47 Non-sustained VT24 h Holter monitoring16N/AGLS, RV, and LV MD were univariate predictors of non-sustained VT, but only RV and LV MD were independent predictors of non-sustained VT.
Chagas cardiomyopathy
Barros et al. [84]2016Retrosp., case-control study62Clinically indicated implantation of ICD.N/A28N/AMD and GLS were more abnormal in the group with ICD, and both were independent markers of previous events precipitating ICD.
Azevedo et al. [85]2021Prosp.77Composite:
VES
Non-sustained VT
24 h Holter Not specifiedN/ABoth GLS and MD were associated with non-sustained VT in univariate analysis, but only MD was independently associated with non-sustained VT, paired VES, and VES in bigeminy.
Long QT syndrome
Haugaa et al. [132]2008Prosp.73 LQTS
20 healthy individuals
History of either:
Documented arrhythmia
Syncope
Cardiac arrest
N/A33Not specifiedLQTS patients with a history of arrhythmia had a higher MD than those without arrhythmia.
GLS not reported.
Haugaa et al. [86]2010Prosp.101 LQTS
35 healthy individuals
History of either:
Documented arrhythmia
Syncope
Cardiac arrest
N/A48N/ALQTS patients with a history of arrhythmia had a higher MD but similar GLS compared to those without arrhythmia.
Lamin A/C mutation
Haugaa et al. [87]2015Prosp.33Composite:
Non-sustained VT
VT
VF
Not specified11Not specifiedPatients with any ventricular arrhythmia had higher MD but similar GLS compared to those without ventricular arrhythmia.
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
Lie et al. [93]2018Prosp.117VT
Cardiac arrest
Appropriate ICD shock
ECG
Holter monitoring
ICD monitoring
182.0 (IQR:0.5–3.5) yearsPatients with VAs had reduced LV and RV strain and higher LV and RV MD. RV strain and LV MD were independently associated with VAs.
Kirkels et al. [96]2021Retrosp.160History of either:
Sustained VT
Appropriate ICD therapy
Aborted cardiac arrest
N/A47N/APatients with a history of VAs had reduced LV GLS and RV strain and higher RV MD than those without VA history. RV MD was independently associated with VAs.
Sarvari et al. [95] 2011Prosp. Case-control study42 symptomatic
27 asymptomatic
30 healthy
History of either:
VT
VF
N/A42N/APatients with a history of VAs had lower LV and RV strain and higher LV and RV MD. Only RV MD was independently associated with a history of VAs.
Mitral valve prolapse
Ermakov et al. [97] 2019Retrosp.59 MVPHistory of:
Ventricular couplets Ventricular bigeminy
Non-sustained VT
VT
ICD for aborted cardiac arrest
N/A 32N/AMD was higher but similar GLS was seen in patients with a history of VA compared to those without arrhythmia. MD was independently associated with a history of VA.
Brugada syndrome
Scheirlynck et al. [91]2020Prosp.175 BrSHistory of:
Sustained VT
VF
Aborted cardiac arrest
Medical records19Not specifiedPatients with a history of VAs had higher LV MD but similar LV GLS, RV strain, and RV MD compared to those without VA history. High LV MD was independently associated with VA history.
Elite Athletes
Lie et al. [92]2021Cross-sectional study43 athletes with VT
and 30 healthy athletes
Composite of life-threatening VAs:
VF
Sustained VT
Aborted cardiac arrest
Appropriate ICD therapy
24 h Holter monitoring
ECG
Telemetry
ILR monitoring
Intracardiac device monitoring
23N/AMD was higher and GLS was lower in VA patients.
Only MD was independently associated with life-threatening VAs.
Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
Groeneveld et al. [99]2021Retrosp. Case-control study47 IVF
47 healthy individuals
VFN/AN/AN/AIVF patients had lower GLS, higher MD, and higher post-systolic index than matched controls. No adjusted analyses were performed.
Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot
Van Grootel et al. [89]2019Prosp. 151 ToFComposite:
Death
HF
Reintervention
Hospitalization for cardiac reasons
Symptomatic ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.
Regularly checked at an outpatient clinic6271.5
(IQR: 64–75.3) months
GLS, RV strain, and apical rotation were univariate predictors of the composite outcome. Only apical rotation was independently associated with the composite outcome.
MD was not investigated.
Unexplained syncope
Falsing et al. [98]2021Retrosp. 288VTILR monitoring362.9 (IQR:1.3–3.5) yearsGLS was independently associated with VT. MD was not associated with VT.
Abbreviations: Prosp., prospective; Retrosp., retrospective; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LQTS, long QT syndrome; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; Brs, Brugada syndrome; VT, ventricular tachycardia; IVF, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VF, ventricular fibrillation; SCA, sudden cardiac arrest; CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; VES, ventricular extrasystoles; HF, heart failure; VA, ventricular arrhythmia; ECG, electrocardiogram; GLS, global longitudinal strain; MD, mechanical dispersion; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle; RVMD, right ventricular mechanical dispersion; RV, right ventricle; MD, mechanical dispersion; LBBB, left bundle branch block.

6. Future Directions

6.1. An Unexplored World of Strain Measures

Even though GLS, MD, and regional strain have been the most widely studied strain measures in terms of predicting VAs, other potential strain measures of myocardial mechanics could be of value. These include measures of paradoxical motion and myocardial work. To date, however, their associations with VAs have only been sparsely investigated.
In certain settings, the motion of myocardial tissue is altered such that segments of the LV may lengthen when they are supposed to shorten. Such a feature is termed paradoxical motion and is usually expressed as either early systolic lengthening or post-systolic shortening [135]. Figure 3 shows examples of paradoxical motion in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. These abnormal movements have been linked to ischemic heart disease; they often co-exist, and their presence has been thought to indicate ischemic segments with potential tissue viability [136,137]. However, they can also develop in other settings, including conduction abnormalities and mitral annular disjunction [138,139]. It should also be noted that, to some extent, they may appear under normal circumstances as part of normal physiology [140,141]. Given that these features of myocardial deformation seem to be closely linked to ischemia and the extent of myocardial affliction, they could represent markers of elevated VA risk. Indeed, in the previously mentioned multicenter study by Haugaa et al. (n: 569, VA events: 15), the authors found that patients who developed VAs had a higher degree of post-systolic shortening, expressed as the post-systolic strain index (PSSI), than patients who did not develop VAs. This was also evident in those with LVEF > 35%. By extension, PSSI was also a univariate predictor of VAs, yielding similar predictive performance by C-statistics as MD, but was not an independent predictor of VAs in multivariate adjustments with MD [57]. Similarly, Groeneveld et al. have also shown that patients with idiopathic VF exhibit more frequent and widespread post-systolic shortening when compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls [99].
The most recent advancement in strain imaging has been the development of a non-invasive method for estimating myocardial work through pressure–strain loop analysis. This method was introduced by Russell et al. in 2012 and allows for the estimation of myocardial work by combining information on the strain, cuff arterial blood pressure, and valvular event timing [142,143]. Figure 4 shows an example of myocardial work in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy with ICD and appropriate therapy for VA. Similar to other strain measures, the reproducibility has been reported to be excellent [142,144,145,146]. Since this technique incorporates blood pressure as a surrogate of afterload, it may provide a more valid assessment of systolic function. Expert statements have since been published to guide the practical approach to measuring myocardial work [147]. In addition, normal values and the impact of age and sex have been detailed in several studies, including a meta-analysis [144,148,149,150,151]. Aside from quantifying myocardial work, the method also allows for the quantification of wasted work, constructive work, and work efficiency [152], all of which are influenced by the presence of paradoxical motion. Accordingly, these metrics may be used as a means to quantify paradoxical motion and thereby indicate the risk of VAs. Myocardial work measures have shown potential value in a wide range of settings and potentially provide clinical information superior to GLS [145,153,154]. A case report by Jaworski et al. alluded to the potential application of regional work in a patient who developed VF [155]. Furthermore, in a study of 110 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Hiemstra et al. reported that constructive work was a viable predictor of a combined clinical endpoint, which included aborted sudden cardiac death and appropriate ICD therapy, which constituted 11 of the observed 24 events [146]. However, no separate details were reported about the association between myocardial work measures and VA endpoints. Accordingly, the potential use of myocardial work in the context of VAs remains to be fully elucidated.

6.2. Extending Current Findings into Clinical Practice

As outlined throughout this review, several studies have shown associations between strain measures and VAs across a broad range of cardiovascular disease groups, highlighting their potential clinical value. However, no study has yet to evaluate whether any of these strain measures may actually be used to guide clinical management, i.e., by randomizing patients to ICD based on a strain measure. While studies are still needed to explore whether measures of paradoxical motion or myocardial work relate to VAs, trials are needed to examine whether the observed associations between VAs and strain measures such as GLS or MD would translate into clinical benefit if they were to be applied for selecting ICD candidates.

7. Conclusions

Speckle-tracking echocardiography allows for a comprehensive quantification of the intricate myocardial mechanics that develop in various cardiac disorders. Abnormalities in several strain measures, including regional strain, GLS, and MD, have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of VAs, whereas strain measures of paradoxical motion and myocardial work still need to be explored further in this context. GLS and MD have been most widely investigated and may provide important information for assessing the risk of VAs in several settings, even in patients with LVEF > 35%. Consequently, they could be useful for identifying patients who could stand to benefit from an ICD for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, trials are needed to substantiate this further.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.B. and F.J.O.; methodology, C.L.B.; investigation, C.L.B. and F.J.O.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.B.; writing—review and editing, K.G.S., M.C.H.L., T.B.-S. and F.J.O.; supervision, K.G.S., M.C.H.L., T.B.-S. and F.J.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

CLB: none. KGS: advisory board for Sanofi Pasteur. MCHL: none. TB-S: steering committee member of the Amgen-financed “GALACTIC-HF” trial; steering committee member of the Boehringer-Ingelheim-financed “SHARP”3 trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi-Pasteur-financed “NUDGE-FLU” trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi-Pasteur-financed “DANFLU-1” trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi-Pasteur-financed “DANFLU-2” trial; steering committee member of the “LUX-Dx TRENDS Evaluates Diagnostics Sensors in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Boston Scientific’s Investigational ICM System” trial; advisory board for Sanofi Pasteur, Amgen, and GSK; speaker honorarium for Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and GSK. Research grants: GE Healthcare, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi Pasteur. FJO: none. The organizations had no role in any part of this review.

References

  1. Singh, S.N. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Elderly: Lessons From Clinical Trials. Am. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 1998, 7, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Lo, R.; Chia, K.K.M.; Hsia, H.H. Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 2017, 9, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zeppenfeld, K.; Tfelt-Hansen, J.; de Riva, M.; Winkel, B.G.; Behr, E.R.; Blom, N.A.; Charron, P.; Corrado, D.; Dagres, N.; de Chillou, C.; et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3997–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heidenreich, P.A.; Bozkurt, B.; Aguilar, D.; Allen, L.A.; Byun, J.J.; Colvin, M.M.; Deswal, A.; Drazner, M.H.; Dunlay, S.M.; Evers, L.R.; et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022, 145, e895–e1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malm, S.; Frigstad, S.; Sagberg, E.; Larsson, H.; Skjaerpe, T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 44, 1030–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thavendiranathan, P.; Popović, Z.B.; Flamm, S.D.; Dahiya, A.; Grimm, R.A.; Marwick, T.H. Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013, 26, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Larsen, L.; Markham, J.; Haffajee, C.I. Sudden death in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: Role of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 1993, 16 Pt 1, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonou, M.; Mavrogeni, S.; Kapelios, C.J.; Markousis-Mavrogenis, G.; Aggeli, C.; Cholongitas, E.; Protoerou, A.D.; Barbetseas, J. Cardiac Adiposity and Arrhythmias: The Role of Imaging. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kukavica, D.; Guglielmo, M.; Baggiano, A.; Muscogiuri, G.; Fusini, L.; Muratori, M.; Tamborini, G.; Mantegazza, V.; Trancuccio, A.; Arnò, C.; et al. Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Introducing an Era of Multimodality Imaging-Based Diagnosis and Risk Stratification. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pavon, A.G.; Monney, P.; Schwitter, J. Mitral Valve Prolapse, Arrhythmias, and Sudden Cardiac Death: The Role of Multimodality Imaging to Detect High-Risk Features. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nikolaidou, C.; Kotanidis, C.P.; Wijesurendra, R.; Leal-Palado, J.; Kouskouras, K.; Vassilikos, V.P.; Karvounis, H.; Ntusi, N.; Antoniades, C.; Neubauer, S.; et al. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect the Underlying Substrate in Patients with Frequent Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crescenzi, C.; Zorzi, A.; Vessella, T.; Martino, A.; Panattoni, G.; Cipriani, A.; De Lazzari, M.; Marra, M.P.; Fusco, A.; Sciarra, L.; et al. Predictors of Left Ventricular Scar Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Athletes with Apparently Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e018206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wacker-Gussmann, A.; Strasburger, J.F.; Wakai, R.T. Contribution of Fetal Magnetocardiography to Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and Treatment of Fetal Arrhythmia. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e025224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fesas, A.; Giannoula, E.; Vrachimis, A.; Doumas, A.; Wenning, C.; Didagelos, M.; Iakovou, I. Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System and Ventricular Arrhythmias: The Role of Radionuclide Molecular Imaging. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, S.; AbdelWahab, A.; Sapp, J.L.; Sung, E.; Aronis, K.N.; Warren, J.W.; MacInnis, P.J.; Shah, R.; Horácek, B.M.; Berger, R.; et al. Assessment of an ECG-Based System for Localizing Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Structural Heart Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saramet, E.E.; Negru, R.D.; Oancea, A.; Constantin, M.M.L.; Ancuta, C. 24 h Holter ECG Monitoring of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Potential Role for a Precise Evaluation of QT Interval Duration and Associated Arrhythmic Complications. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramírez, J.; Kiviniemi, A.; van Duijvenboden, S.; Tinker, A.; Lambiase, P.D.; Juntilla, J.; Perkiömäki, J.S.; Huikuri, H.V.; Orini, M.; Munroe, P.B. ECG T-Wave Morphologic Variations Predict Ventricular Arrhythmic Risk in Low- and Moderate-Risk Populations. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e025897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gehi, A.K. High-Resolution ECG for Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmia in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Another Tool in the Toolbox. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e028095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suszko, A.M.; Chakraborty, P.; Viswanathan, K.; Barichello, S.; Sapp, J.; Talajic, M.; Laksman, Z.; Yee, R.; Woo, A.; Spears, D.; et al. Automated Quantification of Abnormal QRS Peaks from High-Resolution ECGs Predicts Late Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A 5-Year Prospective Multicenter Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e026025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martini, C.; Di Maria, B.; Reverberi, C.; Tuttolomondo, D.; Gaibazzi, N. Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitor Repurposed for Automatic Arrhythmia Detection with Snapshot Electrocardiographic Capability: A Pilot Validation. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guarracini, F.; Testolina, M.; Giacopelli, D.; Martin, M.; Triglione, F.; Coser, A.; Quintarelli, S.; Bonmassari, R.; Marini, M. Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Biering-Sørensen, T.; Biering-Sørensen, S.R.; Olsen, F.J.; Sengeløv, M.; Jørgensen, P.G.; Mogelvang, R.; Shah, A.M.; Jensen, J.S. Global Longitudinal Strain by Echocardiography Predicts Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in a Low-Risk General Population: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e005521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shah, A.M.; Claggett, B.; Loehr, L.R.; Chang, P.P.; Matsushita, K.; Kitzman, D.; Konety, S.; Kucharska-Newton, A.; Sueta, C.A.; Mosley, T.H.; et al. Heart Failure Stages among Older Adults in the Community: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation 2017, 135, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cheng, S.; McCabe, E.L.; Larson, M.G.; Merz, A.A.; Osypiuk, E.; Lehman, B.T.; Stantchev, P.; Aragam, J.; Solomon, S.D.; Benjamin, E.J.; et al. Distinct Aspects of Left Ventricular Mechanical Function Are Differentially Associated with Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in the Community. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015, 4, e002071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Russo, C.; Jin, Z.; Elkind, M.S.V.; Rundek, T.; Homma, S.; Sacco, R.L.; Di Tullio, M.R. Prevalence and prognostic value of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction by global longitudinal strain in a community-based cohort. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2014, 16, 1301–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wong, C.Y.; O’Moore-Sullivan, T.; Leano, R.; Byrne, N.; Beller, E.; Marwick, T.H. Alterations of left ventricular myocardial characteristics associated with obesity. Circulation 2004, 110, 3081–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leitman, M.; Lysyansky, P.; Sidenko, S.; Shir, V.; Peleg, E.; Binenbaum, M.; Kaluski, E.; Krakover, R.; Vered, Z. Two-dimensional strain-a novel software for real-time quantitative echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2004, 17, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reisner, S.A.; Lysyansky, P.; Agmon, Y.; Mutlak, D.; Lessick, J.; Friedman, Z. Global longitudinal strain: A novel index of left ventricular systolic function. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2004, 17, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smiseth, O.A.; Torp, H.; Opdahl, A.; Haugaa, K.H.; Urheim, S. Myocardial strain imaging: How useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 1196–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stöhr, E.J.; Shave, R.E.; Baggish, A.L.; Weiner, R.B. Left ventricular twist mechanics in the context of normal physiology and cardiovascular disease: A review of studies using speckle tracking echocardiography. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016, 311, H633–H644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Negishi, K.; Negishi, T.; Kurosawa, K.; Hristova, K.; Popescu, B.A.; Vinereanu, D.; Yuda, S.; Marwick, T.H. Practical guidance in echocardiographic assessment of global longitudinal strain. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Reimer, K.A.; Lowe, J.E.; Rasmussen, M.M.; Jennings, R.B. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977, 56, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tan, Y.T.; Wenzelburger, F.; Lee, E.; Heatlie, G.; Leyva, F.; Patel, K.; Frenneaux, M.; Sanderson, J.E. The pathophysiology of heart failure with normal ejection fraction: Exercise echocardiography reveals complex abnormalities of both systolic and diastolic ventricular function involving torsion, untwist, and longitudinal motion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shah, A.M.; Claggett, B.; Sweitzer, N.K.; Shah, S.J.; Anand, I.S.; Liu, L.; Pitt, B.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Solomon, S.D. Prognostic Importance of Impaired Systolic Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and the Impact of Spironolactone. Circulation 2015, 132, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. DeVore, A.D.; McNulty, S.; Alenezi, F.; Ersboll, M.; Vader, J.M.; Oh, J.K.; Lin, G.; Redfield, M.M.; Lewis, G.; Semigran, M.J.; et al. Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the RELAX trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017, 19, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Geer, J.C.; Crago, C.A.; Little, W.C.; Gardner, L.L.; Bishop, S.P. Subendocardial ischemic myocardial lesions associated with severe coronary atherosclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 1980, 98, 663–680. [Google Scholar]
  37. Duncker, D.J.; Traverse, J.H.; Ishibashi, Y.; Bache, R.J. Effect of NO on transmural distribution of blood flow in hypertrophied left ventricle during exercise. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, H1305–H1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ono, S.; Waldman, L.K.; Yamashita, H.; Covell, J.W.; Ross, J. Effect of coronary artery reperfusion on transmural myocardial remodeling in dogs. Circulation 1995, 91, 1143–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Le, T.T.; Huang, W.; Singh, G.K.; Toh, D.-F.; Ewe, S.H.; Tang, H.C.; Loo, G.; Bryant, J.A.; Ang, B.; Tay, E.L.-W.; et al. Echocardiographic Global Longitudinal Strain Is Associated with Myocardial Fibrosis and Predicts Outcomes in Aortic Stenosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 750016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Munk, K.; Andersen, N.H.; Nielsen, S.S.; Bibby, B.M.; Bøtker, H.E.; Nielsen, T.T.; Poulsen, S.H. Global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking for infarct size estimation. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2011, 12, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ersbøll, M.; Valeur, N.; Mogensen, U.M.; Andersen, M.; Greibe, R.; Møller, J.E.; Hassager, C.; Søgaard, P.; Køber, L. Global left ventricular longitudinal strain is closely associated with increased neurohormonal activation after acute myocardial infarction in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A two-dimensional speckle tracking study. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2012, 14, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Risum, N.; Ali, S.; Olsen, N.T.; Jons, C.; Khouri, M.G.; Lauridsen, T.K.; Samad, Z.; Velazquez, E.J.; Søgaard, P.; Kisslo, J. Variability of global left ventricular deformation analysis using vendor dependent and independent two-dimensional speckle-tracking software in adults. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2012, 25, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farsalinos, K.E.; Daraban, A.M.; Ünlü, S.; Thomas, J.D.; Badano, L.P.; Voigt, J.U. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 1171–1181.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Voigt, J.U.; Pedrizzetti, G.; Lysyansky, P.; Marwick, T.H.; Houle, H.; Baumann, R.; Pedri, S.; Ito, Y.; Abe, Y.; Metz, S.; et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: Consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2015, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yingchoncharoen, T.; Agarwal, S.; Popović, Z.B.; Marwick, T.H. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: A meta-analysis. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013, 26, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, H.; Wright, L.; Negishi, T.; Negishi, K.; Liu, J.; Marwick, T.H. Research to Practice: Assessment of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain for Surveillance of Cancer Chemotherapeutic-Related Cardiac Dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, 1196–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Skaarup, K.G.; Lassen, M.C.H.; Johansen, N.D.; Olsen, F.J.; Lind, J.N.; Jørgensen, P.G.; Jensen, G.; Schnohr, P.; Prescott, E.; Søgaard, P.; et al. Age- and sex-based normal values of layer-specific longitudinal and circumferential strain by speckle tracking echocardiography: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 23, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karlsen, S.; Dahlslett, T.; Grenne, B.; Sjøli, B.; Smiseth, O.; Edvardsen, T.; Brunvand, H. Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 2019, 17, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lyon, A.R.; López-Fernández, T.; Couch, L.S.; Asteggiano, R.; Aznar, M.C.; Bergler-Klein, J.; Boriani, G.; Cardinale, D.; Cordoba, R.; Cosyns, B.; et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 4229–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nagueh, S.F.; Smiseth, O.A.; Appleton, C.P.; Byrd, B.F., 3rd; Dokainish, H.; Edvardsesn, T.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Gillebert, T.C.; Klein, A.L.; Lancellotti, P.; et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016, 29, 277–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olsen, F.J.; Lindberg, S.; Pedersen, S.; Iversen, A.; Davidovski, F.S.; Galatius, S.; Fritz-Hansen, T.; Gislason, G.H.; Søgaard, P.; Møgelvang, R.; et al. Global longitudinal strain predicts cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart 2021, 107, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ersbøll, M.; Valeur, N.; Mogensen, U.M.; Andersen, M.J.; Møller, J.E.; Velazquez, E.J.; Hassager, C.; Søgaard, P.; Køber, L. Prediction of all-cause mortality and heart failure admissions from global left ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2013, 61, 2365–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stecker, E.C.; Vickers, C.; Waltz, J.; Socoteanu, C.; John, B.T.; Mariani, R.; McAnulty, J.H.; Gunson, K.; Jui, J.; Chugh, S.S. Population-based analysis of sudden cardiac death with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Two-year findings from the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2006, 47, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Santangeli, P.; Dello Russo, A.; Casella, M.; Pelargonio, G.; Di Biase, L.; Natale, A. Left ventricular ejection fraction for the risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: Friend or foe? Intern. Med. J. 2011, 41, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Buxton, A.E.; Lee, K.L.; Hafley, G.E.; Pirex, L.A.; Fisher, J.D.; Gold, M.R.; Josephson, M.E.; Lehmann, M.H.; Prystowsky, E.N.; MUSTT Investigators. Limitations of ejection fraction for prediction of sudden death risk in patients with coronary artery disease: Lessons from the MUSTT study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ersbøll, M.; Valeur, N.; Andersen, M.J.; Mogensen, U.M.; Vinther, M.; Svendsen, J.H.; Møller, J.E.; Kisslo, J.; Velazquez, E.J.; Hassager, C.; et al. Early echocardiographic deformation analysis for the prediction of sudden cardiac death and life-threatening arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haugaa, K.H.; Grenne, B.L.; Eek, C.H.; Ersbøll, M.; Valeur, N.; Svendsen, J.H.; Florian, A.; Sjøli, B.; Brunvand, H.; Køber, L.; et al. Strain echocardiography improves risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Haugaa, K.H.; Smedsrud, M.K.; Steen, T.; Kongsgaard, E.; Loennechen, J.P.; Skjaerpe, T.; Voigt, J.-U.; Willems, R.; Smith, G.; Smiseth, O.A.; et al. Mechanical dispersion assessed by myocardial strain in patients after myocardial infarction for risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmia. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 3, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kawakami, H.; Nerlekar, N.; Haugaa, K.H.; Edvardsen, T.; Marwick, T.H. Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmias with Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 562–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Harapoz, M.; Zada, M.; Matthews, J.; Kumar, S.; Thomas, L. Echocardiographic predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart Vasc. 2022, 39, 100962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Biering-Sørensen, T.; Knappe, D.; Pouleur, A.C.; Claggett, B.; Wang, P.J.; Moss, A.J.; Solomon, S.D.; Kutyifa, V. Regional Longitudinal Deformation Improves Prediction of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A MADIT-CRT Substudy (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e005096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sjøli, B.; Grenne, B.; Smiseth, O.A.; Edvardsen, T.; Brunvand, H. The advantage of global strain compared to left ventricular ejection fraction to predict outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography 2011, 28, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nguyen, B.L.; Capotosto, L.; Persi, A.; Placanica, A.; Rafique, A.; Piccirillo, G.; Gaudio, C.; Gang, E.S.; Siegel, R.J.; Vitarelli, A. Global and regional left ventricular strain indices in post-myocardial infarction patients with ventricular arrhythmias and moderately abnormal ejection fraction. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015, 41, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Choi, W.; Kim, C.H.; Hwang, I.C.; Yoon, C.-H.; Choi, H.-M.; Yoon, Y.E.; Chae, I.-H.; Cho, G.-Y. Three-Dimensional Myocardial Strain for the Prediction of Clinical Events in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 30, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Leong, D.P.; Hoogslag, G.E.; Piers, S.R.D.; Höke, U.; Thijssen, J.; Marsan, N.A.; Schalij, M.J.; Zeppenfeld, K.; Bax, J.J.; Delgado, V. The relationship between time from myocardial infarction, left ventricular dyssynchrony, and the risk for ventricular arrhythmia: Speckle-tracking echocardiographic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guerra, F.; Malagoli, A.; Contadini, D.; Baiocco, E.; Menditto, A.; Bonelli, P.; Rossi, L.; Sticozzi, C.; Zanni, A.; Cai, J.; et al. Global Longitudinal Strain as a Predictor of First and Subsequent Arrhythmic Events in Remotely Monitored ICD Patients with Structural Heart Disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13 Pt 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nikoo, M.H.; Naeemi, R.; Moaref, A.; Attar, A. Global longitudinal strain for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2020, 7, 2956–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hasselberg, N.E.; Haugaa, K.H.; Bernard, A.; Ribe, M.P.; Kongsgaard, E.; Donal, E.; Edvardsen, T. Left ventricular markers of mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mornoş, C.; Muntean, D.; Mornoş, A.; Crişan, S.; Petrescu, L.; Ionac, A.; Sosdean, R.; Cozma, D. Risk stratification in patients with heart failure: The value of considering both global longitudinal left ventricular strain and mechanical dispersion. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 95, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Matsuzoe, H.; Tanaka, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Toki, H.; Shimoura, H.; Ooka, J.; Sano, H.; Sawa, T.; Motoji, Y.; Mochizuki, Y.; et al. Left ventricular dyssynergy and dispersion as determinant factors of fatal ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bax, J.J.; Delgado, V.; Sogaard, P.; Singh, J.P.; Abraham, W.T.; Borer, J.S.; Dickstein, K.; Gras, D.; Brugada, J.; Robertsen, M.; et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis of the randomized EchoCRT trial. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Biering-Sørensen, T.; Olsen, F.J.; Storm, K.; Fritz-Hansen, T.; Olsen, N.T.; Jøns, C.; Vinther, M.; Søgaard, P.; Risum, N. Prognostic value of tissue Doppler imaging for predicting ventricular arrhythmias and cardiovascular mortality in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Winsløw, U.; Elming, M.B.; Thune, J.J.; Haarbo, J.; Philbert, B.T.; Svendsen, J.H.; Pehrson, S.; Jøns, C.; Bundgaard, H.; Køber, L.; et al. Reduced inferior wall longitudinal strain is associated with malignant arrhythmias in non-ischemic heart failure. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2023. Epub Ahead of Print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Haugaa, K.H.; Goebel, B.; Dahlslett, T.; Meyer, K.; Jung, C.; Lauten, A.; Figulla, H.R.; Poerner, T.C.; Edvardsen, T. Risk assessment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy by strain echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2012, 25, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Melichova, D.; Nguyen, T.M.; Salte, I.M.; Klaeboe, L.G.; Sjøli, B.; Karlsen, S.; Dahlslett, T.; Leren, I.S.; Edvardsen, T.; Brunvand, H.; et al. Strain echocardiography improves prediction of arrhythmic events in ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 342, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Negishi, K.; Negishi, T.; Zardkoohi, O.; Ching, E.A.; Basu, N.; Wilkoff, B.L.; Popovic, Z.B.; Marwick, T.H. Left atrial booster pump function is an independent predictor of subsequent life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Haland, T.F.; Almaas, V.M.; Hasselberg, N.E.; Saberniak, J.; Leren, I.S.; Hopp, E.; Edvardsen, T.; Haugaa, K.H. Strain echocardiography is related to fibrosis and ventricular arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Candan, O.; Gecmen, C.; Bayam, E.; Guner, A.; Celik, M.; Doğan, C. Mechanical dispersion and global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography: Predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography 2017, 34, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Debonnaire, P.; Thijssen, J.; Leong, D.P.; Joyce, E.; Katsanos, S.; Hoogslag, G.E.; Schalij, M.J.; Atsma, D.E.; Bax, J.J.; Delgado, V.; et al. Global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume index improve prediction of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 30, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Candan, O.; Gecmen, C.; Kalaycı, A.; Bayam, E.; Guner, A.; Gunduz, S.; Cersit, S.; Ozkan, M. Left ventricular twist in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Predictor of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Herz 2019, 44, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Popa-Fotea, N.M.; Micheu, M.M.; Onciul, S.; Zamfir, D.; Dorobanţu, M. Combined right and left ventricular mechanical dispersion enhance the arrhythmic risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hiemstra, Y.L.; Debonnaire, P.; Bootsma, M.; van Zwet, E.W.; Delgado, V.; Schalij, M.J.; Atsma, D.E.; Bax, J.J.; Marsan, N.A. Global Longitudinal Strain and Left Atrial Volume Index Provide Incremental Prognostic Value in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e005706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jalanko, M.; Tarkiainen, M.; Sipola, P.; Jääskeläinen, P.; Lauerma, K.; Laine, M.; Nieminen, M.S.; Laakso, M.; Heliö, T.; Kuusisto, J. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion is associated with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ann. Med. 2016, 48, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Barros, M.V.L.; Leren, I.S.; Edvardsen, T.; Haugaa, K.H.; Carmo, A.A.L.; Lage, T.A.R.; Nunes, M.C.P.; Rocha, M.O.C.; Ribeiro, A.L. Mechanical Dispersion Assessed by Strain Echocardiography Is Associated with Malignant Arrhythmias in Chagas Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016, 29, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Azevedo, A.C.A.; Barros, M.V.L.; Klaboe, L.G.; Edvardsen, T.; Costa, H.S.; Paixao, G.M.M.; Santos Junior, O.R.; Nunes, M.C.P.; Rocha, M.O.C. Association between myocardial mechanical dispersion and ventricular arrhythmogenicity in chagas cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 37, 2727–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Haugaa, K.H.; Amlie, J.P.; Berge, K.E.; Leren, T.P.; Smiseth, O.A.; Edvardsen, T. Transmural differences in myocardial contraction in long-QT syndrome: Mechanical consequences of ion channel dysfunction. Circulation 2010, 122, 960377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Haugaa, K.H.; Hasselberg, N.E.; Edvardsen, T. Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography: A predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in subjects with lamin A/C mutations. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Diller, G.P.; Kempny, A.; Liodakis, E.; Alonso-Gonzalez, R.; Inuzuka, R.; Uebing, A.; Orwat, S.; Dimopoulos, K.; Swan, L.; Li, W.; et al. Left ventricular longitudinal function predicts life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia and death in adults with repaired tetralogy of fallot. Circulation 2012, 125, 2440–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Van Grootel, R.W.J.; van den Bosch, A.E.; Baggen, V.J.M.; Menting, M.E.; Baart, S.J.; Cuypers, J.A.A.E.; Witsenburg, M.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W. The Prognostic Value of Myocardial Deformation in Adult Patients with Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2019, 32, 866–875.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hamon, D.; Algalarrondo, V.; Gandjbakhch, E.; Extramiana, F.; Marijon, E.; Elbaz, N.; Selhane, D.; Dubois-Rande, J.-L.; Teiger, E.; Plante-Bordeneuve, V.; et al. Outcome and incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 222, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Scheirlynck, E.; Van Malderen, S.; Motoc, A.; Lie, Ø.H.; de Asmundis, C.; Sieira, J.; Chierchia, G.-B.; Brugada, P.; Cosyns, B.; Droogmans, S. Contraction alterations in Brugada syndrome; association with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 299, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lie, Ø.H.; Klaboe, L.G.; Dejgaard, L.A.; Skjølsvik, E.T.; Grimsmo, J.; Bosse, G.; Hopp, E.; Edvardsen, T.; Haugaa, K.H. Cardiac Phenotypes and Markers of Adverse Outcome in Elite Athletes with Ventricular Arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lie, Ø.H.; Rootwelt-Norberg, C.; Dejgaard, L.A.; Leren, I.S.; Stokke, M.K.; Edvardsen, T.; Haugaa, K.H. Prediction of Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: A Primary Prevention Cohort Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lie, Ø.H.; Chivulescu, M.; Rootwelt-Norberg, C.; Ribe, M.; Bogsrud, M.P.; Lyseggen, E.; Beitnes, J.O.; Almaas, V.; Haugaa, K.H. Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Association with Exercise Exposure, Genetic Basis, and Prognosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e018680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sarvari, S.I.; Haugaa, K.H.; Anfinsen, O.G.; Leren, T.P.; Smiseth, O.A.; Kongsgaard, E.; Amlie, J.P.; Edvardsen, T. Right ventricular mechanical dispersion is related to malignant arrhythmias: A study of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and subclinical right ventricular dysfunction. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kirkels, F.P.; Lie, Ø.H.; Cramer, M.J.; Chivulescu, M.; Rootwelt-Norberg, C.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Teske, A.J.; Haugaa, K.H. Right Ventricular Functional Abnormalities in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Association with Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ermakov, S.; Gulhar, R.; Lim, L.; Bibby, D.; Fang, Q.; Nah, G.; Abraham, T.P.; Schiller, N.B.; Delling, F.N. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion predicts arrhythmic risk in mitral valve prolapse. Heart 2019, 105, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Falsing, M.M.; Brainin, P.; Andersen, D.M.; Larroudé, C.E.; Lindhardt, T.B.; Modin, D.; Ravnkilde, K.; Karsum, E.H.; Gislason, G.; Biering-Sørensen, T. Usefulness of echocardiography for predicting ventricular tachycardia detected by implantable loop recorder in syncope patients. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 37, 3157–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Groeneveld, S.A.; van der Ree, M.H.; Taha, K.; de Bruin-Bon, R.H.A.; Cramer, M.J.; Teske, A.J.; Bouma, B.J.; Amin, A.S.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Postema, P.G.; et al. Echocardiographic deformation imaging unmasks global and regional mechanical dysfunction in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: A multicenter case-control study. Heart Rhythm. 2021, 18, 1666–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pruitt, C.R.; Menon, S.; Lal, A.K.; Eckhauser, A.W.; Ou, Z.; Presson, A.; Miller, T.; Niu, M. Usefulness of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation in Children Hospitalized for Acute Myocarditis who Develop Arrhythmias. Am. J. Cardiol. 2021, 152, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yu, S.; Zhou, J.; Yang, K.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, K.; Song, J.; Ji, K.; Zhou, P.; Yan, H.; et al. Correlation of Myocardial Strain and Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance after a First Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 705487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, N.; Hung, C.L.; Shin, S.H.; Claggett, B.; Skali, H.; Thune, J.J.; Køber, L.; Shah, A.M.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Pfeffer, M.A.; et al. Regional cardiac dysfunction and outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both after myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Biering-Sørensen, T.; Jensen, J.S.; Pedersen, S.H.; Galatius, S.; Fritz-Hansen, T.; Bech, J.; Olsen, F.J.; Mogelvang, R. Regional Longitudinal Myocardial Deformation Provides Incremental Prognostic Information in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Olsen, F.J.; Pedersen, S.; Galatius, S.; Fritz-Hansen, T.; Gislason, G.; Biering-Sørensen, T. Association between regional longitudinal strain and left ventricular thrombus formation following acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 36, 1271–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Amzulescu, M.S.; Langet, H.; Saloux, E.; Manrique, A.; Boileau, L.; Slimani, A.; Allain, P.; Roy, C.; de Meester, C.; Pasquet, A.; et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global and Regional Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Strain Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tagging in a Multicenter Validation Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e006530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mirea, O.; Pagourelias, E.D.; Duchenne, J.; Bogaert, J.; Thomas, J.D.; Badano, L.P.; Voigt, J.-U.; EACVI-ASE-Industry Standardization Task Force. Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Moss, A.J.; Wilber, D.J.; Brown, M.W. Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bardy, G.H.; Lee, K.L.; Mark, D.B.; Poole, J.E.; Packer, D.L.; Boineau, R.; Domanski, M.; Troutman, C.; Anderson, J.; Johnson, G.; et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Verma, A.; Marrouche, N.F.; Schweikert, R.A.; Saliba, W.; Wazni, O.; Cummings, J.; Abdul-Karim, A.; Bhargava, M.; Burkhardt, J.D.; Kilicaslan, F.; et al. Relationship between successful ablation sites and the scar border zone defined by substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia post-myocardial infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2005, 16, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fernandes, V.R.S.; Wu, K.C.; Rosen, B.D.; Schmidt, A.; Lardo, A.C.; Osman, N.; Halperin, H.R.; Tomaselli, G.; Berger, R.; Bluemke, D.A.; et al. Enhanced infarct border zone function and altered mechanical activation predict inducibility of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Radiology 2007, 245, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yan, A.T.; Shayne, A.J.; Brown, K.A.; Gupta, S.N.; Chan, C.W.; Luu, T.M.; Di Carli, M.F.; Reynolds, H.G.; Stevenson, W.G.; Kwong, R.Y. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality. Circulation 2006, 114, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Roes, S.D.; Borleffs, C.J.W.; van der Geest, R.J.; Westenberg, J.J.M.; Marsan, N.A.; Kaandorp, T.A.M.; Reiber, J.H.C.; Zeppenfeld, K.; Lamb, H.J.; de Roos, A.; et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2009, 2, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Schmidt, A.; Azevedo, C.F.; Cheng, A.; Gupta, S.N.; Bluemke, D.A.; Foo, T.K.; Gerstenblith, G.; Weiss, R.G.; Marbán, E.; Tomaselli, G.F.; et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2007, 115, 2006–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bertini, M.; Ng, A.C.T.; Borleffs, C.J.W.; Delgado, V.; Wijnmaalen, A.P.; Nucifora, G.; Ewe, S.H.; Shanks, M.; Thijssen, J.; Zeppenfeld, K.; et al. Longitudinal mechanics of the periinfarct zone and ventricular tachycardia inducibility in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am. Heart J. 2010, 160, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Ng, A.C.T.; Bertini, M.; Borleffs, C.J.W.; Delgado, V.; Boersma, E.; Piers, S.R.D.; Thijssen, J.; Nucifora, G.; Shanks, M.; Ewe, S.H.; et al. Predictors of death and occurrence of appropriate implantable defibrillator therapies in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 106, 1566–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hoogslag, G.E.; Thijssen, J.; Höke, U.; Boden, H.; Antoni, M.L.; Debonnaire, P.; Haeck, M.L.A.; Holman, E.R.; Bax, J.J.; Marsan, N.A.; et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular regional function heterogeneity assessed with two-dimensional speckle tracking in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Heart Vessel. 2014, 29, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mancini, G.B.; DeBoe, S.F.; Anselmo, E.; Simon, S.B.; LeFree, M.T.; Vogel, R.A. Quantitative regional curvature analysis: An application of shape determination for the assessment of segmental left ventricular function in man. Am. Heart J. 1987, 113 Pt 1, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Greenbaum, R.A.; Gibson, D.G. Regional non-uniformity of left ventricular wall movement in man. Br. Heart J. 1981, 45, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Inoue, H.; Zipes, D.P. Increased afferent vagal responses produced by epicardial application of nicotine on the canine posterior left ventricle. Am. Heart J. 1987, 114 Pt 1, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Boogers, M.J.; Borleffs, C.J.W.; Henneman, M.M.; van Bommel, R.J.; van Ramshorst, J.; Boersma, E.; Dibbets-Schneider, P.; Stokkel, M.P.; van der Wall, E.E.; Schalij, M.J.; et al. Cardiac sympathetic denervation assessed with 123-iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging predicts ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2769–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sasano, T.; Abraham, M.R.; Chang, K.C.; Ashikaga, H.C.; Mills, K.J.; Holt, D.P.; Hilton, J.; Nekolla, S.G.; Dong, J.; Lardo, A.C.; et al. Abnormal sympathetic innervation of viable myocardium and the substrate of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 2266–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tayal, B.; Gorcsan, J.; Delgado-Montero, A.; Marek, J.J.; Haugaa, K.H.; Ryo, K.; Goda, A.; Olsen, N.T.; Saba, S.; Risum, N.; et al. Mechanical Dyssynchrony by Tissue Doppler Cross-Correlation is Associated with Risk for Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Olsen, N.T.; Mogelvang, R.; Jons, C.; Fritz-Hansen, T.; Sogaard, P. Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with cross-correlation analysis of myocardial systolic acceleration: A new approach to echocardiographic dyssynchrony evaluation. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2009, 22, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Risum, N.; Tayal, B.; Hansen, T.F.; Bruun, N.E.; Jensen, M.T.; Lauridsen, T.K.; Saba, S.; Kisslo, J.; Gorcsan, J., 3rd; Sogaard, P. Identification of Typical Left Bundle Branch Block Contraction by Strain Echocardiography Is Additive to Electrocardiography in Prediction of Long-Term Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rodríguez-Zanella, H.; Haugaa, K.; Boccalini, F.; Secco, E.; Edvardsen, T.; Badano, L.P.; Muraru, D. Physiological Determinants of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dispersion: A 2-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Study in Healthy Volunteers. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, 650–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Nagueh, S.F. Mechanical dyssynchrony in congestive heart failure: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Han, J.; Moe, G.K. Nonuniform Recovery of Excitability in Ventricular Muscle. Circ. Res. 1964, 14, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vassallo, J.A.; Cassidy, D.M.; Kindwall, K.E.; Marchlinski, F.E.; Josephson, M.E. Nonuniform recovery of excitability in the left ventricle. Circulation 1988, 78, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Aagaard, E.N.; Kvisvik, B.; Pervez, M.O.; Lyngbakken, M.N.; Berge, T.; Enger, S.; Orstad, E.B.; Smith, P.; Omland, T.; Tveit, A.; et al. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion in a general population: Data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 study. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 21, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Banasik, G.; Segiet, O.; Elwart, M.; Szulik, M.; Lenarczyk, R.; Kalarus, Z.; Kukulski, T. LV mechanical dispersion as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with advanced systolic heart failure: A pilot study. Herz 2016, 41, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Van der Bijl, P.; Khidir, M.J.H.; Leung, M.; Yilmaz, D.; Mertens, B.; Marsan, N.A.; Delgado, V.; Bax, J.J. Reduced left ventricular mechanical dispersion at 6 months follow-up after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with superior long-term outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2018, 15, 1683–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Haugaa, K.H.; Edvardsen, T.; Leren, T.P.; Gran, J.M.; Smiseth, O.A.; Amlie, J.P. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion by tissue Doppler imaging: A novel approach for identifying high-risk individuals with long QT syndrome. Eur. Heart J. 2009, 30, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kutyifa, V.; Pouleur, A.C.; Knappe, D.; Al-Ahmad, A.; Gibinski, M.; Wang, P.J.; McNitt, S.; Merkely, B.; Goldenberg, I.; Solomon, S.D.; et al. Dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kosiuk, J.; Dinov, B.; Bollmann, A.; Koutalas, E.; Mussigbrodt, A.; Sommer, P.; Arya, A.; Richter, S.; Hindricks, G.; Breithardt, O.A. Association between ventricular arrhythmias and myocardial mechanical dispersion assessed by strain analysis in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2015, 104, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Brainin, P. Myocardial Postsystolic Shortening and Early Systolic Lengthening: Current Status and Future Directions. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Eek, C.; Grenne, B.; Brunvand, H.; Aakhus, S.; Endresen, K.; Smiseth, O.A.; Edvardsen, T.; Skulstad, H. Postsystolic shortening is a strong predictor of recovery of systolic function in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2011, 12, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kahyaoglu, M.; Gecmen, C.; Candan, O.; İzgi, I.A.; Kirma, C. The duration of early systolic lengthening may predict ischemia from scar tissue in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion lesions. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 35, 1823–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ring, M.; Persson, H.; Mejhert, M.; Edner, M. Post-systolic motion in patients with heart failure--a marker of left ventricular dyssynchrony? Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2007, 8, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lee, A.P.W.; Jin, C.N.; Fan, Y.; Wong, R.H.L.; Underwood, M.J.; Wan, S. Functional Implication of Mitral Annular Disjunction in Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Quantitative Dynamic 3D Echocardiographic Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, 1424–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Voigt, J.U.; Lindenmeier, G.; Exner, B.; Regenfus, M.; Werner, D.; Reulbach, U.; Nixdorff, U.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Daniel, W.G. Incidence and characteristics of segmental postsystolic longitudinal shortening in normal, acutely ischemic, and scarred myocardium. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2003, 16, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Brainin, P.; Biering-Sørensen, S.R.; Møgelvang, R.; de Knegt, M.C.; Olsen, F.J.; Galatius, S.; Gislason, G.H.; Jensen, J.S.; Biering-Sørensen, T. Post-systolic shortening: Normal values and association with validated echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac function. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 35, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Russell, K.; Eriksen, M.; Aaberge, L.; Wilhelmsen, N.; Skulstad, H.; Remme, E.W.; Haugaa, K.H.; Opdahl, A.; Fjeld, J.G.; Gjesdal, O.; et al. A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: A non-invasive index of myocardial work. Eur. Heart J. 2012, 33, 724–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Russell, K.; Eriksen, M.; Aaberge, L.; Wilhelmsen, N.; Skulstad, H.; Gjesdal, O.; Edvardsen, T.; Smiseth, O.A. Assessment of wasted myocardial work: A novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2013, 305, H996–H1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Galli, E.; John-Matthwes, B.; Rousseau, C.; Schnell, F.; Leclercq, C.; Donal, E. Echocardiographic reference ranges for myocardial work in healthy subjects: A preliminary study. Echocardiography 2019, 36, 1814–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Edwards, N.F.A.; Scalia, G.M.; Shiino, K.; Sabapathy, S.; Anderson, B.; Chamberlain, R.; Khandheria, B.K.; Chan, J. Global Myocardial Work Is Superior to Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function and Wall Motion. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2019, 32, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hiemstra, Y.L.; van der Bijl, P.; El Mahdiui, M.; Bax, J.J.; Delgado, V.; Marsan, N.A. Myocardial Work in Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Implications for Outcome. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2020, 33, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Smiseth, O.A.; Donal, E.; Penicka, M.; Sletten, O.J. How to measure left ventricular myocardial work by pressure-strain loops. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 22, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Manganaro, R.; Marchetta, S.; Dulgheru, R.; Ilardi, F.; Sugimoto, T.; Robinet, S.; Cimino, S.; Go, Y.Y.; Bernard, A.; Kacharava, G.; et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal non-invasive myocardial work indices: Results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 20, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Morbach, C.; Sahiti, F.; Tiffe, T.; Cejka, V.; Eichner, F.A.; Gelbrich, G.; Heuschmann, P.U.; Störk, S.; STAAB consortium. Myocardial work—Correlation patterns and reference values from the population-based STAAB cohort study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Olsen, F.J.; Skaarup, K.G.; Lassen, M.C.H.; Johansen, N.D.; Sengeløv, M.; Jensen, G.B.; Schnohr, P.; Marott, J.L.; Søgaard, P.; Gislason, G.; et al. Normal Values for Myocardial Work Indices Derived From Pressure-Strain Loop Analyses: From the CCHS. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 15, e013712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Truong, V.T.; Vo, H.Q.; Ngo, T.N.M.; Mazur, J.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Pham, T.T.M.; Le, T.K.; Phan, H.; Palmer, C.; Nagueh, S.F.; et al. Normal Ranges of Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices in Adults: A Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2022, 35, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Papadopoulos, K.; Özden Tok, Ö.; Mitrousi, K.; Ikonomidis, I. Myocardial Work: Methodology and Clinical Applications. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Roemer, S.; Jaglan, A.; Santos, D.; Umland, M.; Jain, R.; Tajik, A.J.; Khandheria, B.K. The Utility of Myocardial Work in Clinical Practice. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2021, 34, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Aalen, J.M.; Donal, E.; Larsen, C.K.; Duchenne, J.; Lederlin, M.; Cvijic, M.; Hubert, A.; Voros, G.; Leclercq, C.; Bogaert, J.; et al. Imaging predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Left ventricular work asymmetry by echocardiography and septal viability by cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 3813–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jaworski, K.; Firek, B.; Syska, P.; Lewandowski, M.; Śpiewak, M.; Dąbrowski, R. Malignant arrhythmia associated with mitral annular disjunction: Myocardial work as a potential tool in the search for a substrate. Kardiol. Pol. 2022, 80, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Global and regional strain. The figure shows an example of strain analysis in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left side, speckle tracking of the left ventricle in the apical 4–chamber view is shown. In the middle panel, strain profiles for each segment are shown (colored curves), and the global value for this projection is shown as the white dotted profile. On the right, a corresponding bulls–eye plot of regional strain values is shown, and the global strain value is denoted as ‘GS’ in the upper right-hand corner. Overall, this patient had markedly reduced global longitudinal strain and widespread regional abnormalities in longitudinal strain, most notable for the basal lateral wall segment, showing positive strain values indicating paradoxical motion.
Figure 1. Global and regional strain. The figure shows an example of strain analysis in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left side, speckle tracking of the left ventricle in the apical 4–chamber view is shown. In the middle panel, strain profiles for each segment are shown (colored curves), and the global value for this projection is shown as the white dotted profile. On the right, a corresponding bulls–eye plot of regional strain values is shown, and the global strain value is denoted as ‘GS’ in the upper right-hand corner. Overall, this patient had markedly reduced global longitudinal strain and widespread regional abnormalities in longitudinal strain, most notable for the basal lateral wall segment, showing positive strain values indicating paradoxical motion.
Diagnostics 13 01778 g001
Figure 2. Mechanical dispersion. The figure shows an example of strain analysis, for assessing mechanical dispersion, in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left, segmental strain profiles from the apical 4–chamber view are shown, with white arrows highlighting a heterogenous timing of peak strain values for the segments (each colored curve represents a single segment). On the right, a bulls–eye plot of time–to–peak strain is shown for all segments, and mechanical dispersion is provided as the peak systolic dispersion (PSD), calculated as the standard deviation of the time–to–peak of the segmental strain.
Figure 2. Mechanical dispersion. The figure shows an example of strain analysis, for assessing mechanical dispersion, in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left, segmental strain profiles from the apical 4–chamber view are shown, with white arrows highlighting a heterogenous timing of peak strain values for the segments (each colored curve represents a single segment). On the right, a bulls–eye plot of time–to–peak strain is shown for all segments, and mechanical dispersion is provided as the peak systolic dispersion (PSD), calculated as the standard deviation of the time–to–peak of the segmental strain.
Diagnostics 13 01778 g002
Figure 3. Paradoxical motion. The figure shows an example of strain analysis for quantifying paradoxical motion in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left side, segmental strain curves from the apical 4–chamber view are shown, with arrows illustrating early systolic lengthening and post-systolic shortening in the lateral wall segments (blue and red strain curves). On the right side, a bulls–eye plot of the post-systolic index in all segments is presented, also showing a high post-systolic index in the anterior, lateral, and anteroseptal segments.
Figure 3. Paradoxical motion. The figure shows an example of strain analysis for quantifying paradoxical motion in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. On the left side, segmental strain curves from the apical 4–chamber view are shown, with arrows illustrating early systolic lengthening and post-systolic shortening in the lateral wall segments (blue and red strain curves). On the right side, a bulls–eye plot of the post-systolic index in all segments is presented, also showing a high post-systolic index in the anterior, lateral, and anteroseptal segments.
Diagnostics 13 01778 g003
Figure 4. Pressure–strain loop analysis. The figure shows an example of pressure–strain loop analysis for quantifying myocardial work in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. The upper left–sided panel shows the pressure–strain loop, the area of which corresponds to the myocardial work index. The red profile shows the global myocardial work, showing normal clockwise looping but overall reduced myocardial work. The green profile depicts the mid–anteroseptal segment, showing a counterclockwise looping. The bottom left panel shows the relative extent of constructive work (green bars) and wasted work (blue bars), illustrating a fairly high amount of wasted work, particularly in the mid–anteroseptal segment (bars on the left). The top right panel is a bulls–eye plot showing all regional myocardial work estimates, and the global values for all work measures are shown in the bottom right panel, along with blood pressure and global longitudinal strain.
Figure 4. Pressure–strain loop analysis. The figure shows an example of pressure–strain loop analysis for quantifying myocardial work in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD who experienced appropriate therapy after implantation. The upper left–sided panel shows the pressure–strain loop, the area of which corresponds to the myocardial work index. The red profile shows the global myocardial work, showing normal clockwise looping but overall reduced myocardial work. The green profile depicts the mid–anteroseptal segment, showing a counterclockwise looping. The bottom left panel shows the relative extent of constructive work (green bars) and wasted work (blue bars), illustrating a fairly high amount of wasted work, particularly in the mid–anteroseptal segment (bars on the left). The top right panel is a bulls–eye plot showing all regional myocardial work estimates, and the global values for all work measures are shown in the bottom right panel, along with blood pressure and global longitudinal strain.
Diagnostics 13 01778 g004
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of strain.
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of strain.
Strengths
On the verge of guideline implementation
Direct tissue measure
Can investigate each fiber aspect
High reproducibility, automatic options
Angle independent (compared to Doppler)
Can provide regional details
Can provide measures of diastolic function and dyssynchrony
Changes typically precede changes in LVEF
Limitations
Vendor dependency
Loading dependency
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bjerregaard, C.L.; Skaarup, K.G.; Lassen, M.C.H.; Biering-Sørensen, T.; Olsen, F.J. Strain Imaging and Ventricular Arrhythmia. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101778

AMA Style

Bjerregaard CL, Skaarup KG, Lassen MCH, Biering-Sørensen T, Olsen FJ. Strain Imaging and Ventricular Arrhythmia. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(10):1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bjerregaard, Caroline Løkke, Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, and Flemming Javier Olsen. 2023. "Strain Imaging and Ventricular Arrhythmia" Diagnostics 13, no. 10: 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop