Next Article in Journal
The Effectiveness of Mindful Hypnotherapy on Psychological Inflexibility, Pain Acceptance, Headache Disability and Intensity in Females with Chronic Migraine Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
An Anatomically Preserved Cone-like Flower from the Lower Cretaceous of China
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Post-Treatment Leptin Concentration as a Prognostic Biomarker of the High Risk of Luminal Breast Cancer Relapse: A Six-Year Comprehensive Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/life13010130
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First-Trimester Maternal Serum Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth

by
Victoria E. de Knegt
1,2,
Paula L. Hedley
1,3,
Anna K. Eltvedt
1,
Sophie Placing
1,
Karen Wøjdemann
4,
Anne-Cathrine Shalmi
5,
Line Rode
6,
Jørgen K. Kanters
7,
Karin Sundberg
8,
Ann Tabor
8,9,
Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen
10 and
Michael Christiansen
1,7,*
1
Department for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Slagelse, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
3
Brazen Bio, Los Angeles, CA 90014, USA
4
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bornholm Hospital, 3700 Rønne, Denmark
5
Department of Obstetrics, Hillerød Hospital, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
6
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
7
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
8
Center of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
9
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
10
Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(1), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010130
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health and Leptin implications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The serum adiponectin/leptin ratio (A/L ratio) is a surrogate marker of insulin sensitivity. Pre-eclampsia (PE) is associated with maternal metabolic syndrome and occasionally impaired fetal growth. We assessed whether the A/L ratio in first-trimester maternal serum was associated with PE and/or birth weight. Adiponectin and leptin were quantitated in first-trimester blood samples (gestational week 10+3–13+6) from 126 women who later developed PE with proteinuria (98 mild PE; 21 severe PE; 7 HELLP syndrome), and 297 controls, recruited from the Copenhagen First-Trimester Screening Study. The A/L ratio was reduced in PE pregnancies, median 0.17 (IQR: 0.12–0.27) compared with controls, median 0.32 (IQR: 0.19–0.62) (p < 0.001). A multiple logistic regression showed that PE was negatively associated with log A/L ratio independent of maternal BMI (odds ratio = 0.315, 95% CI = 0.191 to 0.519). Adiponectin (AUC = 0.632) and PAPP-A (AUC = 0.605) were negatively associated with PE, and leptin (AUC = 0.712) was positively associated with PE. However, the A/L ratio was a better predictor of PE (AUC = 0.737), albeit not clinically relevant as a single marker. No significant association was found between A/L ratio and clinical severity of pre-eclampsia or preterm birth. PE was associated with a significantly lower relative birth weight (p < 0.001). A significant negative correlation was found between relative birth weight and A/L ratio in controls (β = −0.165, p < 0.05) but not in PE pregnancies), independent of maternal BMI. After correction for maternal BMI, leptin was significantly associated with relative birth weight (β = 2.98, p < 0.05), while adiponectin was not significantly associated. Our findings suggest that an impairment of the A/L ratio (as seen in metabolic syndrome) in the first trimester is characteristic of PE, while aberrant fetal growth in PE is not dependent on insulin sensitivity, but rather on leptin-associated pathways.

1. Introduction

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a serious pregnancy complication characterized by high blood pressure and proteinuria and/or impaired liver and kidney function, pulmonary edema, hematological complications, seizures, or uteroplacental dysfunction [1,2]. The prevalence of PE is 3–5% in the Western world and it is a major contributor to maternal and fetal/neonatal morbidity [1]. In places with limited access to healthcare, e.g., in large parts of Asia, Africa, and South America, between one-tenth and one-quarter of maternal deaths are associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [3]. PE predisposes both mothers and offspring to a plethora of deleterious health outcomes. Mothers have an increased risk of developing hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases [4], metabolic syndrome, and overweight and obesity years after pregnancy [5]. Infants too are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease [6], metabolic syndrome and overweight and obesity later in life [6,7,8]. The pathophysiological background of PE is elusive, but most likely heterogeneous, involving uterine–placental dysangiogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, immunological abnormalities, genetic factors, or metabolic disturbances [9].
Pregnancy requires major metabolic adaptations to ensure adequate nutrient supply for the fetus [10]. An important aspect of this is changes in maternal insulin sensitivity (IS) and insulin resistance (IR) that is mediated by a range of maternal, placental, and fetal hormones [11]. The first trimester is characterized by a relative increase in insulin sensitivity, needed to ensure uptake of nutrients in the mother; this changes as insulin resistance develops during the second trimester [12,13].
Pre-pregnancy IR is associated with the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [14], with an ensuing risk of fetal over-nutrition and macrosomia [15,16,17], as well as PE [18]. Early-onset PE is frequently associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) [19], while late-onset PE is more often associated with macrosomia [2]. Both fetal under- and overnutrition may lead to changes in body composition in the fetus that persist after birth [20,21]. These, in turn, may lead to permanent metabolic alterations, epigenetic changes, and fetal programming, that ultimately result in the development of metabolic syndrome and its associated diseases later in life [6,7,8,22].
The risk of developing PE increases with increasing body mass index (BMI) [23]. Furthermore, adiponectin, exhibiting decreased maternal serum levels in pregnancy [24], and leptin, where the maternal serum levels increase through pregnancy to normalize after birth [25], play a major role in the metabolic adaptations to pregnancy. There is a small placental contribution to maternal leptin levels [26,27], but not to the extent that it obviates the relation between maternal BMI and leptin. A number of hormonal factors regulate the insulin signaling pathway and control the balance between IS and IR in order to accommodate pregnancy [11] as well as compensate for the metabolic consequences of overweight and obesity [28]. Several hormones have been suggested to be involved in first-trimester fetal growth, and placental growth hormone appears to be of particular significance [29]. In pregnant women with BMI values on the extreme ends of the scale, insufficient homeostatic compensatory mechanisms may result in presentation of disease symptoms. This process may be reflected in adipocytokine levels, already in first-trimester [28].
Adiponectin and leptin are involved in a wide range of physiological processes and seem perturbed in GDM and PE [14,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Serum adiponectin/leptin ratio (A/L ratio) is a surrogate marker of IS that correlates well with signs of metabolic syndrome in childhood and adolescence [38,39]. It has been shown to correlate with insulin resistance in pregnancy [40]. However, it has not been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
In this study, we used A/L ratio as a marker of IS and hypothesize that the A/L ratio is perturbed in the first trimester of pregnancies that later develop PE. Furthermore, we assessed the significance of the A/L ratio for fetal growth, because maternal, placental, and fetal leptin have been reported to contribute to intrauterine growth [26]. Accordingly, this study examined the relationship between first-trimester A/L ratio and PE, as well as the relationship between adiponectin, leptin, and A/L ratio and birth weight.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This was a case–control sub-study of the 1997 to 2001 Copenhagen First-Trimester Screening Study focusing on screening for chromosomal disorders [41]. Several sub-studies on fetal growth [29], PE [27,42,43,44], and sources of Down syndrome serum marker variability [45,46], have been performed. The adipocytokine data used were collected from 2003 to 2010 and stored in an anonymized database. Only singleton pregnancies with first-trimester blood samples (gestational age (GA) 103–136) were included. GA was determined by crown rump length (CRL). Selection of cases and controls is described in Laigaard et al. [42]. Briefly, 126 pregnancies that developed PE were selected for the study and 297 controls were matched with respect to maternal age, parity, and GA at time of sampling [42]. Of the 126 women with PE, 98 had mild PE, 21 had severe PE, and seven had HELLP syndrome. Ten pregnancies ended in delivery before GA 34+0. Regarding ethnicity, 93% of the women were of North European descent. Demographic and clinical parameters are given in Table 1.

2.2. Data Collection

Detailed clinical information, as well as pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and beta-chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ) concentrations, were collected as part of the Copenhagen First-Trimester Screening Study, as previously described [41]. PE pregnancies were categorized into one of three severity groups: mild PE, severe PE, and HELLP syndrome as per criteria from The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) during the course of the First-Trimester Screening Study [47]. Briefly, PE was defined as persistent hypertension (either a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg), occurring after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman, in combination with proteinuria (≥0.3 g in a 24 h urine collection or dipstick urine analysis of ≥1+). Severe PE was defined by a diastolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg in combination with subjective symptoms and/or abnormal laboratory findings. HELLP syndrome was defined by the presence of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets. Early PE was defined as a PE pregnancy that resulted in delivery prior to GA 34+0.

2.3. Biochemical Measurements

All blood samples were collected in dry containers and kept at 4 °C for a maximum of 48 h until storage at −20 °C. Adiponectin and leptin concentrations were measured in singlo following appropriate sample dilution [27,28] using the Human Adiponectin Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) development kit, Duo Set (DY1065), and the Human Leptin ELISA development kit, Duo Set (DY398), R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA. The functional detection limits of the assays were 62.5 pg/mL (for adiponectin) and 31.25 pg/mL (for leptin).
Evaluation of pre-analytic variables demonstrated that both adiponectin and leptin were stable for at least 48 h at 23 °C and 10 freeze–thaw cycles. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <5% and <10% for adiponectin and leptin, respectively.

2.4. Data Analysis

Birth weights corrected for GA, relative birth weight, were calculated using intrauterine growth curves developed by Marsal et al. [48]. Weight classifications of small-for-gestational-age (SGA), appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) were calculated using ±24% as the upper and lower limits of relative birth weight [48]. The A/L ratio was calculated as ([adiponectin]/[leptin])/1000. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models following logarithmic transformation as appropriate. When necessary, non-parametric statistics were employed. A PAPP-A value corrected for GA at time of sampling was calculated using multiples of the median (MoM). MoM of logPAPP-A in both controls and PE pregnancies were calculated by performing a regression analysis in the control pregnancies of log10 PAPP-A on GA at time of sampling. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 28.0; Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.

2.5. Ethics

The Copenhagen First-Trimester Study was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg Counties (No. (KF) 01-288/97) and the Data Protection Agency approved the study protocol. All participants gave written informed consent.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of PE and Control Pregnancies

The A/L ratio was lower in PE pregnancies, 0.17 (IQR: 0.12–0.27) than in controls, 0.32 (IQR: 0.19–0.62) (p < 0.001) (Table 1). PAPP-A was significantly lower in PE pregnancies than controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Furthermore, a significant association was found between A/L ratio and PAPP-A (log-transformed and controlled for GA at time of testing) in PE (β = 1.432, 95% CI = 0.057 to 2.807). hCGβ concentrations were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 1). Offspring of women with PE had a lower GA at birth and lower relative birth weight compared with the control group (p < 0.001) (Table 1). A larger proportion of PE pregnancies delivered SGA infants, 14.3% in PE vs. 2.0% in controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Compared with control pregnancies, women with PE had a significantly higher BMI (p < 0.001) (Table 1). CRL and nuchal translucency measurements did not differ significantly between PE pregnancies and controls (Table 1). Of the PE deliveries, 74% were induced compared with 16% in controls (p < 0.001).
Multiple logistic regression showed that PE was negatively associated with log A/L ratio independent of maternal BMI (OR = 0.315, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.214). Adiponectin (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.632) and PAPP-A (AUC = 0.605) were negatively, and leptin (AUC = 0.712) was positively associated with PE. However, the A/L ratio was a better predictor of PE (AUC = 0.737) (Figure 1).

3.2. Comparison of Mild PE, Severe PE, and HELLP Syndrome

The demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of mild PE, severe PE, and HELLP pregnancies are presented in Table 2. There was no discernable difference between A/L ratios in the different severity groups (Figure 2). The proportion of early PE (<GA week 34) increased with increasing severity of PE (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in relative birth weight between severity groups. However, the proportion of SGA infants was greater in severe PE and HELLP (p = 0.006).

3.3. Comparison of Early and Late PE

Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of early and late PE are presented in Table 3. No significant difference in A/L ratio between early and late PE was found. More frequently, early PE pregnancies were classified as severe PE and HELLP syndrome compared with late PE pregnancies, 80.0% and 17.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Early PE infants had a significantly lower relative birth weight than late PE infants (p < 0.001). There was a difference in size for GA between early and late PE, where 80.0% were SGA in early PE and 8.6% were SGA in late PE (p < 0.001).

3.4. Relative Birth Weight and A/L Ratio

A significant negative correlation was found between relative birth weight and A/L ratio in controls, but not in PE pregnancies (β = −0.165, p < 0.05). This was independent of maternal BMI. The relationship was also valid when only considering AGA controls, again independent of maternal BMI. After correction for maternal BMI, leptin was significantly associated with relative birth weight (β = 2.98, 95% CI = 2.361 to 14.353), while adiponectin was not significantly associated. No association was found between A/L ratio and CRL in either PE or control pregnancies, independent of maternal BMI.

4. Discussion

In this study, we showed, for the first time, that the A/L ratio in the first trimester was significantly lower in pregnancies that developed PE compared with controls. Previous studies have either not examined first-trimester pregnancies [40,49,50,51], or examined the effect of the A/L ratio in first-trimester obese women who developed PE [28]. In the latter study, a decrease in A/L ratio, albeit insignificant, was found [28]. The A/L ratio was, however, associated with the development of GDM in the same cohort [51]. This is compatible with the inverse correlation between the A/L ratio and the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) in pregnancy [40]. The A/L ratio decreased with maternal BMI, a known risk factor of PE [28], but the A/L ratio outperformed maternal BMI as a predictor of PE. This is compatible with the A/L ratio being a diagnostic marker of PE in late pregnancy [52].
The leptin/adiponectin ratio (a marker of insulin resistance) is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in children [38,39]. Furthermore, in adults, a decreased A/L ratio has been shown to be associated with IR in various metabolic disorders, including diabetes mellitus [53,54], polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [55,56,57], metabolic syndrome [58], atherosclerosis [59], and obesity [60]. The reduction in A/L ratio thus likely reflects an increasing IR. This could also explain the association between PE and PCOS [61].
In first-trimester PE pregnancies, the change in A/L ratio is driven by both a decrease in adiponectin and an increase in leptin. Adiponectin is a protective factor against cardiometabolic diseases [62]; thus, the association between PE and later hypertension and diabetes type 2 could be explained by this relation. Adiponectin is not synthesized by the placenta; therefore, the changes in adiponectin concentrations are a result of physiological changes in the mother. Leptin is partially synthesized by the placenta and largely by adipose tissue in the mother [35]. However, the effect of leptin is modulated by the presence of soluble leptin receptor as well as the variable expression of leptin receptors in different tissues [63]. Pregnancy requires metabolic adaptations through gestation, mediated by several endocrine axes; therefore, the present study precludes a more precise analysis of the causation of changes in adiponectin and leptin.
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the A/L ratio was a better predictor of PE than leptin and adiponectin individually. However, the AUC of the A/L ratio is so small that it precludes using the A/L ratio as a first-trimester single marker of later PE. Likewise, PAPP-A is a marker for PE, but only used as a single marker in high risk pregnancies. However, it is possible that the A/L ratio might contribute to improving the efficiency and clinical utility of either PE screening algorithms based on clinical information [64] or algorithms including ultrasound and biochemical markers [65]. An advantage of a biochemical marker, which may be measured on dried filter paper blood spots, is that it can be used in populations with challenged access to prenatal care. This might be of particular importance in low- and middle-income countries.
There were no discernable differences between A/L ratios in the different severity groups of PE, or between early and late PE. Thus, the A/L ratio in the first trimester cannot be used to discern the severity or early delivery in PE pregnancies. This suggests that IR predisposes to PE, but other factors determine clinical presentation. A significantly larger cohort of PE cases will be needed to further investigate the performance of the A/L ratio in early- and late-onset PE, severe PE, and HELLP. Samples were few in number in the present study.
A significant positive association between PAPP-A—a known marker for PE, placental dysfunction, and FGR—and A/L ratio was found in PE pregnancies. This is interesting as the growth hormone—insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis, where PAPP-A is a placenta-derived insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2, -4, and -5 protease [66], plays a major role for both fetal and placental growth (possibly due to its importance for bioavailability of IGF) [67]. This specific finding needs to be confirmed through replication in other datasets.
A negative relationship between the A/L ratio and relative birth weight was only found in controls, suggesting that the homeostatic mechanisms involving adiponectin and leptin are perturbed in PE. This finding was independent of maternal BMI. One explanation could, however, be that 74% of PE pregnancies were induced, in contrast to 16% of controls. Thus, the timing of parturition is for the majority of PE cases determined by the obstetrician, and not by endocrine effector systems. The relationship between the A/L ratio and relative birth weight was also apparent when examining just AGA controls, indicating that it is not the extreme relative birth weights driving the overall association. Interestingly, the association between A/L ratio and relative birth weight in controls was driven by a positive association between leptin and relative birth weight. Adiponectin did not contribute to this association. Thus, relative birth weight does not seem to be dependent on IS, but rather on leptin-associated pathways [26].
Leptin contributed independently to the negative association between A/L ratio and relative birth weight in controls. Leptin has a permissive role in several reproductive functions [68], and in the current context, one might hypothesize that leptin reflects whether maternal energy stores are sufficient sustain normal fetal growth. We know that the relationship between leptin and maternal BMI is perturbed at high BMI levels [28], and increased IR originating from adipose tissue can be a contributing factor [69]. However, both leptin and adiponectin are involved in multiple physiological functions, e.g., immune- and metabolic regulation, so the precise definition of the mechanism behind the associations described here will have to be established through other types of studies [26].
PE is—in some cases—associated with reduced fetal size, and as expected, we found that women with PE had infants with significantly lower relative birth weight compared with controls. However, interestingly, there was a lack of association between birth weight and A/L ratio in PE pregnancies. These findings suggest that disturbances in metabolic homeostasis are already apparent long before the development of PE symptoms, by definition in week 20, and have negative consequences for fetal growth. Alternatively, the large abovementioned difference in induction rates between PE pregnancies and controls may over-ride the normal homeostatic mechanisms controlling the time of parturition. However, the period of relative IS and optimal nutrient access in the first trimester may be reduced in women who develop PE because they instead risk experiencing premature and/or increased IR. This possible shift between IS and IR in the first trimester may herald PE-associated impaired fetal growth.
Even though this study included a broad range of clinical parameters, some important variables, such as the gender of offspring and gestational weight gain during pregnancy, were not included. Another limitation of this study was that only total adiponectin levels were measured. Three forms of adiponectin, low-, medium-, and high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin, have been identified, where only HMW adiponectin has been shown to be associated with PE [70]. Finally, the A/L ratio was not compared with other known markers of insulin sensitivity/insulin resistance, such as HOMA-IR. Such a comparison might have helped substantiate the A/L ratio as a relevant marker of insulin sensitivity.

5. Conclusions

A reduced A/L ratio is a first-trimester characteristic of pregnancies that later develop PE. However, neither severity nor time of onset was associated with A/L ratio. The A/L ratio, reflecting IS, is a better discriminator between PE and controls than either leptin or adiponectin. Relative birth weight was associated with A/L ratio; however, this was driven by leptin alone. Changes in birth weight do not seem to be dependent on insulin sensitivity, as is the case for PE, but rather on leptin-associated pathways. These findings may lead to novel paradigms towards the prevention of PE and low birth weight.

Author Contributions

V.E.d.K., M.C., P.L.H. and U.L.-T. conceived and designed the sub-study; S.P., K.W., A.-C.S., L.R., K.S. and A.T. collected the data and performed clinical assessments; V.E.d.K., M.C. and P.L.H. did the data analysis; V.E.d.K., M.C., P.L.H., U.L.-T., A.K.E., L.R., A.T. and J.K.K. interpreted the results of the data; V.E.d.K., M.C., P.L.H. and U.L.-T. drafted the work; All authors revised the work critically for intellectual content; all authors approved the final version of the work to be published; All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was a sub-study of the Copenhagen First-Trimester Screening Study, which was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg Counties (No. (KF) 01-288/97).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to restrictions in handling personal data, and particularly because participants were recruited at a time when it was not standard practice to make samples/data publicly available but meta-data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Pia Lind and Pernilla Rasmussen. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support to the Copenhagen First-Trimester Study from the Danish Medical Research Council, Copenhagen University, The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, The Ivan Nielsen Foundation, The Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborg Foundation, The Dagmar Marshall Foundation, The Egmont Foundation, The Fetal Medicine Foundation, The Augustinus Foundation, The Gangsted Foundation, The A.P. Møller Foundation, The Mads Clausens Foundation, The Copenhagen Hospital Corporation, and SAFE Network of Excellence. This research has been conducted using the Danish National Biobank resource, funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AGAappropriate-for-gestational-age
A/L ratioserum adiponectin/leptin ratio
AUCarea under the curve
BMIbody mass index
CRLcrown rump length
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FGRfetal growth restriction
GAgestational age
GDMgestational diabetes mellitus
HCGβbeta-chorionic gonadotropin
HMWhigh molecular weight
HOMA-IRhomeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance
IGFinsulin-like growth factor
IGFBPinsulin-like growth factor binding protein
IRinsulin resistance
ISinsulin sensitivity
ISSHPThe International Society for the Study of Hypertension
LGAlarge-for-gestational-age
MoMmultiple of the median
ORodds ratio
PAPP-Apregnancy-associated plasma protein A
PCOSpolycystic ovary syndrome
PEpre-eclampsia
ROCreceiver operating characteristic
SGAsmall-for-gestational-age

References

  1. Mol, B.W.J.; Roberts, C.T.; Thangaratinam, S.; Magee, L.A.; de Groot, C.J.M.; Hofmeyr, G.J. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2016, 387, 999–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Magee, L.A.; Nicolaides, K.H.; von Dadelszen, P. Preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1817–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; (WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee). Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK140561/ (accessed on 3 June 2020).
  4. Hauspurg, A.; Countouris, M.E.; Catov, J.M. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Future Maternal Health: How Can the Evidence Guide Postpartum Management? Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2019, 21, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alonso-Ventura, V.; Li, Y.; Pasupuleti, V.; Roman, Y.M.; Hernandez, A.V.; Pérez-López, F.R. Effects of preeclampsia and eclampsia on maternal metabolic and biochemical outcomes in later life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 2019, 102, 154012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Karatza, A.A.; Dimitriou, G. Preeclampsia emerging as a novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the offspring. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2019, 16, 194–199. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffin, S.M.; Derraik, J.G.B.; Groom, K.M.; Cutfield, W.S. Maternal pre-eclampsia and long-term offspring health: Is there a shadow cast? Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018, 12, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pinheiro, T.V.; Brunetto, S.; Ramos, J.G.L.; Bernardi, J.R.; Goldani, M.Z. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and health outcomes in the offspring: A systematic review. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2016, 7, 391–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burton, G.J.; Redman, C.W.; Roberts, J.M.; Moffett, A. Pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ 2019, 366, l2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mouzon, S.H.; de Lassance, L. Endocrine and metabolic adaptations to pregnancy; impact of obesity. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2015, 24, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sonagra, A.D.; Biradar, S.M.; Dattatreya, K.; Murthy, D.S.J. Normal pregnancy- a state of insulin resistance. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, CC01–CC03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Catalano, P.M.; Roman-Drago, N.M.; Amini, S.B.; Sims, E.A. Longitudinal changes in body composition and energy balance in lean women with normal and abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 179, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. García-Patterson, A.; Gich, I.; Amini, S.B.; Catalano, P.M.; de Leiva, A.; Corcoy, R. Insulin requirements throughout pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Three changes of direction. Diabetologia 2010, 53, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Plows, J.F.; Stanley, J.L.; Baker, P.N.; Reynolds, C.M.; Vickers, M.H. The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Brunner, S.; Schmid, D.; Hüttinger, K.; Much, D.; Heimberg, E.; Sedlmeier, E.-M.; Brüderl, M.; Kratzsch, J.; Bader, B.L.; Amann-Gassner, U.; et al. Maternal insulin resistance, triglycerides and cord blood insulin in relation to post-natal weight trajectories and body composition in the offspring up to 2 years. Diabet. Med. 2013, 30, 1500–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crume, T.L.; Shapiro, A.L.; Brinton, J.T.; Glueck, D.H.; Martinez, M.; Kohn, M.; Harrod, C.; Friedman, J.E.; Dabelea, D. Maternal Fuels and Metabolic Measures During Pregnancy and Neonatal Body Composition: The Healthy Start Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 1672–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shapiro, A.L.B.; Schmiege, S.J.; Brinton, J.T.; Glueck, D.; Crume, T.L.; Friedman, J.E.; Dabelea, D. Testing the fuel-mediated hypothesis: Maternal insulin resistance and glucose mediate the association between maternal and neonatal adiposity, the Healthy Start study. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cho, G.J.; Park, J.H.; Shin, S.-A.; Oh, M.-J.; Seo, H.S. Metabolic syndrome in the non-pregnant state is associated with the development of preeclampsia. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 203, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Audette, M.C.; Kingdom, J.C. Screening for fetal growth restriction and placental insufficiency. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 23, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dessì, A.; Puddu, M.; Ottonello, G.; Fanos, V. Metabolomics and fetal-neonatal nutrition: Between “not enough” and “too much”. Molecules 2013, 18, 11724–11732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hales, C.N.; Barker, D.J. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br. Med. Bull. 2001, 60, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Maiorana, A.; Del Bianco, C.; Cianfarani, S. Adipose Tissue: A Metabolic Regulator. Potential Implications for the Metabolic Outcome of Subjects Born Small for Gestational Age (SGA). Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2007, 4, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Motedayen, M.; Rafiei, M.; Rezaei Tavirani, M.; Sayehmiri, K.; Dousti, M. The relationship between body mass index and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2019, 17, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Kanety, H.; Sivan, E. Adiponectin and human pregnancy. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2005, 5, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schubring, C.; Englaro, P.; Siebler, T.; Blum, W.; Demirakca, T.; Kratzsch, J.; Kiess, W. Longitudinal Analysis of Maternal Serum Leptin Levels during Pregnancy, at Birth and Up To Six Weeks after Birth: Relation to Body Mass Index, Skinfolds, Sex Steroids and Umbilical Cord Blood Leptin Levels. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 1998, 50, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. de Knegt, V.E.; Hedley, P.L.; Kanters, J.K.; Thagaard, I.N.; Krebs, L.; Christiansen, M.; Lausten-Thomsen, U. The Role of Leptin in Fetal Growth during Pre-Eclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hedley, P.L.; Placing, S.; Wøjdemann, K.; Carlsen, A.L.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Sundberg, K.; Tabor, A.; Christiansen, M. Free leptin index and PAPP-A: A first trimester maternal serum screening test for pre-eclampsia. Prenat. Diagn. 2009, 30, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Thagaard, I.N.; Hedley, P.L.; Holm, J.-C.; Lange, T.; Larsen, T.; Krebs, L.; Christiansen, M. Leptin and Adiponectin as markers for preeclampsia in obese pregnant women, a cohort study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018, 15, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pedersen, N.G.; Juul, A.; Christiansen, M.; Wøjdemann, K.R.; Tabor, A. Maternal serum placental growth hormone, but not human placental lactogen or insulin growth factor-1, is positively associated with fetal growth in the first half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 36, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Retnakaran, A.; Retnakaran, R. Adiponectin in pregnancy: Implications for health and disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5444–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herrid, M.; Palanisamy, S.K.A.; Ciller, U.A.; Fan, R.; Moens, P.; Smart, N.A.; McFarlane, J.R. An updated view of leptin on implantation and pregnancy: A review. Physiol. Res. 2014, 63, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miehle, K.; Stepan, H.; Fasshauer, M. Leptin, adiponectin and other adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia. Clin. Endocrinol. 2011, 76, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dos Santos, E.; Duval, F.; Vialard, F.; Dieudonné, M.N. The roles of leptin and adiponectin at the fetal-maternal interface in humans. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2015, 24, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hauguel-de Mouzon, S.; Lepercq, J.; Catalano, P. The known and unknown of leptin in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 194, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. D’Ippolito, S.; Tersigni, C.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Adipokines, an adipose tissue and placental product with biological functions during pregnancy. BioFactors 2012, 38, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pérez, A.P.; Toro, A.; Vilariño-García, T.; Maymó, J.; Guadix, P.; Dueñas-Díez, J.-L.; Fernández-Sánchez, M.; Varone, C.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Leptin action in normal and pathological pregnancies. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2017, 22, 716–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dalamaga, M.; Srinivas, S.K.; Elovitz, M.A.; Chamberland, J.; Mantzoros, C.S. Serum adiponectin and leptin in relation to risk for preeclampsia: Results from a large case-control study. Metabolism 2011, 60, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Frithioff-Bøjsøe, C.; Lund, M.A.V.; Lausten-Thomsen, U.; Hedley, P.L.; Pedersen, O.; Christiansen, M.; Baker, J.L.; Hansen, T.; Holm, J. Leptin, adiponectin, and their ratio as markers of insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk in childhood obesity. Pediatr. Diabetes 2019, 21, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lausten-Thomsen, U.; Lund, M.A.V.; Frithioff-Bøjsøe, C.; Hedley, P.L.; Pedersen, O.; Hansen, T.; Christiansen, M.; Holm, J.-C. Reference values for leptin/adiponectin ratio in healthy children and adolescents. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 493, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Skvarca, A.; Tomazic, M.; Blagus, R.; Krhin, B.; Janez, A. Adiponectin/leptin ratio and insulin resistance in pregnancy. J. Int. Med. Res. 2013, 41, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wøjdemann, K.R.; Shalmi, A.C.; Christiansen, M.; Larsen, S.O.; Sundberg, K.; Brocks, V.; Bang, J.; Nørgaard-Pedersen, B.; Tabor, A. Improved first-trimester Down syndrome screening performance by lowering the false-positive rate: A prospective study of 9941 low-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 25, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Laigaard, J.; Sørensen, T.; Placing, S.; Holck, P.; Fröhlich, C.; Wøjdemann, K.R.; Sundberg, K.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Tabor, A.; Nørgaard-Pedersen, B.; et al. Reduction of the Disintegrin and Metalloprotease ADAM12 in Preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 106, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Villiers, C.P.; Hedley, P.L.; Placing, S.; Wøjdemann, K.R.; Shalmi, A.C.; Carlsen, A.L.; Rode, L.; Sunberg, K.; Tabor, A.; Christiansen, M. Placental protein-13 (PP13) in combination with PAPP-A and free leptin index (fLI) in first trimester maternal serum screening for severe and early preeclampsia. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017, 56, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Christiansen, M.; Hedley, P.L.; Placing, S.; Wøjdemann, K.R.; Carlsen, A.L.; Jørgensen, J.M.; Gjerris, A.-C.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Rode, L.; Sundberg, K.; et al. Maternal Serum Resistin Is Reduced in First Trimester Preeclampsia Pregnancies and Is a Marker of Clinical Severity. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2015, 34, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Laigaard, J.; Larsen, S.O.; Pedersen, N.G.; Hedley, P.L.; Gjerris, A.C.; Wøjdemann, K.R.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Sundberg, K.; Tabor, A.; Christiansen, M. ADAM 12-S in first trimester: Fetal gender, smoking and maternal age influence the maternal serum concentration. Prenat. Diagn. 2009, 29, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Laigaard, J.; Pedersen, N.G.; Larsen, S.O.; Hedley, P.L.; Wøjdemann, K.; Gjerris, A.C.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Sundberg, K.; Tabor, A.; Christiansen, M. ADAM12 in first trimester maternal serum from pregnancies conceived by assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Prenat. Diagn. 2009, 29, 628–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Brown, M.A.; Lindheimer, M.D.; de Swiet, M.; Van Assche, A.; Moutquin, J.M. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2001, 20, IX–XIV. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Maršál, K.; Persson, P.-H.; Larsen, T.; Lilja, H.; Selbing, A.; Sultan, B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr. 1996, 85, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nakatsukasa, H.; Masuyama, H.; Takamoto, N.; Hiramatsu, Y. Circulating Leptin and Angiogenic Factors in Preeclampsia Patients. Endocr. J. 2008, 55, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ouyang, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, H. Reduced plasma adiponectin and elevated leptin in pre-eclampsia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2007, 98, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Thagaard, I.N.; Krebs, L.; Holm, J.-C.; Lange, T.; Larsen, T.; Christiansen, M. Adiponectin and leptin as first trimester markers for gestational diabetes mellitus: A cohort study. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017, 55, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rao, S.; Kumari, A.; Sharma, M.; Kabi, B.C. Predicting Maternal Serum Adiponectin and Leptin Level as Biomarkers of Pre-eclampsia: A Prospective Study. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India 2021, 71, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zaletel, J.; Barlovic, D.P.; Prezelj, J. Adiponectin-leptin ratio: A useful estimate of insulin resistance in patients with Type 2 diabetes. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2010, 33, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Inoue, M.; Maehata, E.; Yano, M.; Taniyama, M.; Suzuki, S. Correlation between the adiponectin-leptin ratio and parameters of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 2005, 54, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Obirikorang, C.; Owiredu, W.K.B.A.; Adu-Afram, S.; Acheampong, E.; Asamoah, E.A.; Antwi-Boasiakoh, E.K.; Owiredu, E.-W. Assessing the variability and predictability of adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, resistin and their ratios) in non-obese and obese women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sarray, S.; Madan, S.; Saleh, L.R.; Mahmoud, N.; Almawi, W.Y. Validity of adiponectin-to-leptin and adiponectin-to-resistin ratios as predictors of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Svendsen, P.F.; Christiansen, M.; Hedley, P.L.; Nilas, L.; Pedersen, S.B.; Madsbad, S. Adipose expression of adipocytokines in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mirza, S.; Qu, H.-Q.; Li, Q.; Martinez, P.J.; Rentfro, A.R.; McCormick, J.B.; Fisher-Hoch, S.P. Adiponectin/leptin ratio and Metabolic Syndrome in a Mexican American population. Clin. Investig. Med. 2011, 34, E290–E297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J. Adiponectin-leptin ratio: A promising index to estimate adipose tissue dysfunction. Relation with obesity-associated cardiometabolic risk. Adipocyte 2017, 7, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Ramírez, B.; Becerril, S.; Salvador, J.; Colina, I.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J. Adiponectin-leptin Ratio is a Functional Biomarker of Adipose Tissue Inflammation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Naver, K.V.; Grinsted, J.; Larsen, S.O.; Hedley, P.; Jørgensen, F.S.; Christiansen, M.; Nilas, L. Increased risk of preterm delivery and pre-eclampsia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenaemia. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 121, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Younus, S.; Rodgers, G. Biomarkers associated with cardiometabolic risk in obesity. Am. Heart Hosp. J. 2011, 9, E28–E32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fasshauer, M.; Blüher, M. Adipokines in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 36, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. ACOG. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 135, e237–e260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chaemsaithong, P.; Sahota, D.S.; Poon, L.C. First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 226, S1071–S1097.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Steffensen, L.B.; Conover, C.A.; Oxvig, C. PAPP-A and the IGF system in atherosclerosis: What’s up, what’s down? Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019, 317, H1039–H1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaur, H.; Muhlhausler, B.S.; Roberts, C.T.; Gatford, K.L. The growth hormone–insulin-like growth factor axis in pregnancy. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 251, R23–R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Childs, G.V.; Odle, A.K.; MacNicol, M.C.; MacNicol, A.M. The Importance of Leptin to Reproduction. Endocrinology 2020, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Spradley, F.T. Metabolic abnormalities and obesity’s impact on the risk for developing preeclampsia. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2017, 312, R5–R12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Takemura, Y.; Osuga, Y.; Koga, K.; Tajima, T.; Hirota, Y.; Hirata, T.; Morimoto, C.; Harada, M.; Yano, T.; Taketani, Y. Selective increase in high molecular weight adiponectin concentration in serum of women with preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2007, 73, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 13 00130 g001 550
Figure 1. ROC curves of adiponectin, leptin, PAPP-A, and A/L ratio. A/L ratio was a better predictor of PE compared with adiponectin, leptin, and PAPP-A.
Figure 1. ROC curves of adiponectin, leptin, PAPP-A, and A/L ratio. A/L ratio was a better predictor of PE compared with adiponectin, leptin, and PAPP-A.
Life 13 00130 g001
Life 13 00130 g002 550
Figure 2. Box-plot of A/L ratio in controls, mild PE, severe PE, and HELLP. There was no discernable difference between A/L ratios in the different severity groups.
Figure 2. Box-plot of A/L ratio in controls, mild PE, severe PE, and HELLP. There was no discernable difference between A/L ratios in the different severity groups.
Life 13 00130 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of PE and control pregnancies.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of PE and control pregnancies.
ParameterPE (n = 126)Controls (n = 297)p-Value
Maternal BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)24.0 (21.7–26.4)21.7 (20.1–24.0)<0.001
GA at birth (days), median (IQR)275.5 (263.8–283.0)284.0 (278.0–290.0)<0.001
GA below 34 + 0 weeks, n (%)10 (7.9)0 (0.0)<0.001
Crown rump length (mm), median (IQR)67.00 (61.0–72.0)67.0 (61.0–74.0)0.54
Relative birth weight (%), mean (±SD)91.39 (±14.98)98.42 (±11.89)<0.001
Weight classification, n (%) <0.001
-
SGA
18 (14.3)6 (2.0)
-
AGA
104 (82.5)284 (95.6)
-
LGA
4 (3.2)7 (2.4)
Nuchal translucency (mm), median (IQR)1.6 (1.3–1.9)1.5 (1.3–1.9)0.51
GA at time of sampling (days), median (IQR)90.5 (87.0–93.0)90.0 (87.5–94.0)0.63
A/L ratio, median (IQR)0.17 (0.12–0.27)0.32 (0.19–0.62)<0.001
PAPP-A (mIU/L), median (IQR)3064.0 (1941.3–4579.8)3874.0 (2582.5–5979.5)<0.001
HCGβ (IU/L), median (IQR)42.4 (28.1–59.2)41.8 (26.9–63.1)0.94
Abbreviations: AGA: appropriate-for-gestational-age; A/L ratio: serum adiponectin/leptin ratio; BMI: body mass index; GA: gestational age; HCGβ: beta-chorionic gonadotropin; LGA: large-for-gestational-age; MoM: multiple of the median; PAPP-A: pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; SGA: small-for-gestational-age.
Table
Table 2. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of mild PE, severe PE and HELLP pregnancies.
Table 2. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of mild PE, severe PE and HELLP pregnancies.
ParameterMild (n = 98)Severe (n = 21)HELLP (n = 7)p-Value
Maternal BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)24.0 (21.6–27.2)24.5 (22.4–26.1)23.1 (21.9–26.7)0.76
GA at birth (days), median (IQR)278.0 (269.0–284.0)264.0 (238.5–275.5)254.0 (216.0–276.0)<0.001
GA < 34 + 0, n (%)2 (2.0)5 (23.8)3 (42.9)<0.001
Crown rump length (mm), mean (±SD)66.0 (±8.96)68.9 (±8.67)67.9 (±4.60)0.37
Actual birth weight (g), median (IQR)3295.0 (2899.0–3700.0)2682.0 (1850.0–3255.0)1629.0 (1475.0–3400.0)0.002
Relative birth weight (%), mean (±SD)92.8 (±13.91)88.3 (±17.19)80.5 (±18.82)0.06
Weight classification, n (%) 0.02
-
SGA
9 (9.2)6 (28.6)3 (42.9)
-
AGA
86 (87.8)14 (66.7)4 (57.1)
-
LGA
3 (3.1)1 (4.8)0 (0.0)
Nuchal translucency (mm), mean (±SD)1.6 (±0.49)1.7 (±0.52)1.3 (±0.36)0.22
GA at time of sampling (days), median (IQR)90.0 (86.0–93.0)91.0 (88.5–94.0)91.0 (90.0–92.0)0.33
A/L ratio, median (IQR)0.16 (0.11–0.26)0.17 (0.13–0.24)0.25 (0.07–0.37)0.63
PAPP-A (mIU/L), median (IQR)3260.5 (2341.0–5077.8)2350.0 (1650.0–4427.5)2283.0 (1753.0–2607.0)0.08
HCGβ (IU/L), median (IQR)43.1 (30.4–63.3)31.2 (17.1–50.6)43.2 (26.4–84.4)0.17
Abbreviations: AGA: appropriate-for-gestational-age; A/L ratio: serum adiponectin/leptin ratio; BMI: body mass index; GA: gestational age; HCGβ: beta-chorionic gonadotropin; LGA: large-for-gestational-age; MoM: multiple of the median; PAPP-A: pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; SGA: small-for-gestational-age.
Table
Table 3. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of early and late PE.
Table 3. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of early and late PE.
ParameterEarly PE (n = 10)Late PE (n = 116)p-Value
Maternal BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)25.6 (23.0–28.8)24.0 (21.6–26.3)0.20
GA at birth (days), median (IQR)210.5 (201.0–229.8)276.0 (268.0–283.8)<0.001
PE severity, n (%) <0.001
-
Mild
2 (20.0)96 (82.8)
-
Severe
5 (50.0)16 (13.8)
-
HELLP
3 (30.0)4 (3.4)
Crown rump length (mm), median (IQR)69.5 (62.3–72.3)67.0 (60.3–72.0)0.41
Relative birth weight (%), mean (±SD)70.2 (±6.79)93.2 (±14.07)<0.001
Weight classification, n (%) <0.001
-
SGA
8 (80.0)10 (8.6)
-
AGA
2 (20.0)102 (87.9)
-
LGA
0 (0.0)4 (3.4)
Nuchal translucency (mm), median (IQR)1.7 (1.4–1.8)1.5 (1.3–1.9)0.98
GA at time of sampling (days), median (IQR)90.5 (87.5–93.0)90.5 (87.0–93.0)0.85
A/L ratio, median (IQR)0.13 (0.11–0.25)0.17 (0.12–0.27)0.45
PAPP-A (mlU/L), median (IQR)1761.0 (1470.0–2194.3)3239.5 (2291.5–5019.8)0.003
HCGβ (IU/L), median (IQR)42.4 (28.1–59.2)42.4 (29.6–61.9)0.21
Abbreviations: AGA: appropriate-for-gestational-age; A/L ratio: serum adiponectin/leptin ratio; BMI: body mass index; GA: gestational age; HCGβ: beta-chorionic gonadotropin; LGA: large-for-gestational-age; MoM: multiple of the median; PAPP-A: pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; PE: pre-eclampsia; SGA: small-for-gestational-age.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Knegt, V.E.; Hedley, P.L.; Eltvedt, A.K.; Placing, S.; Wøjdemann, K.; Shalmi, A.-C.; Rode, L.; Kanters, J.K.; Sundberg, K.; Tabor, A.; et al. First-Trimester Maternal Serum Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth. Life 2023, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010130

AMA Style

de Knegt VE, Hedley PL, Eltvedt AK, Placing S, Wøjdemann K, Shalmi A-C, Rode L, Kanters JK, Sundberg K, Tabor A, et al. First-Trimester Maternal Serum Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth. Life. 2023; 13(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010130

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Knegt, Victoria E., Paula L. Hedley, Anna K. Eltvedt, Sophie Placing, Karen Wøjdemann, Anne-Cathrine Shalmi, Line Rode, Jørgen K. Kanters, Karin Sundberg, Ann Tabor, and et al. 2023. "First-Trimester Maternal Serum Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio in Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth" Life 13, no. 1: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop