Next Article in Journal
Internet Addiction
Next Article in Special Issue
cAMP Is a Promising Regulatory Molecule for Plant Adaptation to Heat Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Mechanisms of Cold Signaling in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/life12060860
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into the Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Abiotic Stress: Underlying Survival Strategies and Adaptation Mechanisms

by
Cuicui Miao
,
Yuting Zhang
,
Xuechun Bai
and
Tao Qin
*
College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(6), 860; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060860
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) is an important turfgrass and gramineous forage widely grown in temperate regions around the world. However, its perennial nature leads to the inevitable exposure of perennial ryegrass to various environmental stresses on a seasonal basis and from year to year. Like other plants, perennial ryegrass has evolved sophisticated mechanisms to make appropriate adjustments in growth and development in order to adapt to the stress environment at both the physiological and molecular levels. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms of perennial ryegrass response to abiotic stresses is crucial for obtaining superior stress-tolerant varieties through molecular breeding. Over the past decades, studies of perennial ryegrass at the molecular and genetic levels have revealed a lot of useful information to understand the mechanisms of perennial ryegrass adaptation to an adverse environment. Unfortunately, molecular mechanisms by which perennial ryegrass adapts to abiotic stresses have not been reviewed thus far. In this review, we summarize the recent works on the genetic and molecular mechanisms of perennial ryegrass response to the major abiotic stresses (i.e., drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures) and discuss new directions for future studies. Such knowledge will provide valuable information for molecular breeding in perennial ryegrass to improve stress resistance and promote the sustainability of agriculture and the environment.

1. Introduction

Drought, high salinity, and extreme temperatures are major adverse environmental stresses that plants often encounter, which is further complicated by the potential impact of climate change. Currently, agriculture uses more than 70% fresh water in the world [1]. The irrigation area and water consumption are expected to increase as the global climate becomes drier and warmer, which seriously threaten the sustainable development of global agriculture [1,2]. About 6% of cultivated land and one-fifth of irrigated land globally are salinized [3,4], which is expected to become worse by the severe salinization of more than 50% of arable land by 2050 [5,6]. In addition, climate models predict a higher incidence of extreme temperatures (i.e., extreme low temperature and extreme high temperature) in the future [7,8]. These abiotic stresses result in restricted plant cell division and growth, lower fertility, the promotion of senescence, and even cell death [9]. Both plant scientists and crop breeders are facing the great challenge of cultivating agricultural plant varieties that maintain high productivity under various environmental stresses [10]. Therefore, revealing the underlying mechanisms of plant response to abiotic stresses, which includes perceiving environmental challenges, transmitting the stress signals, and making appropriate adjustments in growth and development in order to survive and reproduce, is crucial for future agricultural development.
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), native to Europe, Asia, and Northern Africa, is a cool-season perennial grass cultivated around the world with a breeding history of more than 100 years [11,12]. Due to its outstanding forage quality, long growing season, high yield, grazing tolerance, and high palatability, perennial ryegrass is the most widely cultivated perennial gramineous forage in temperate regions [13,14,15]. Due to its prominent lawn quality, perennial ryegrass is also used as turf grass on golf courses, sports fields, and parks [16,17]. For example, it accounts for 50% of the total used land and 70% of agricultural land in the UK [18]. As a consequence of its wide distribution and perennial characteristics, perennial ryegrass is exposed to, and has to respond to, a variety of abiotic stresses. These abiotic stresses are sometimes seasonal, but increasingly unpredictable due to climate change [19]. Therefore, abiotic stresses such as drought, high salinity, and extreme temperatures are major restrictive factors in perennial ryegrass growth and management [12,17,20]. Breeding stress-resistance cultivars is considered as an important measure to mitigate the effects of abiotic stress on perennial ryegrass [17,19]. However, as perennial ryegrass is a self-incompatible species [21,22], and that plant tolerance to abiotic stresses is a complex quantitative trait involving multiple genes and complex mechanisms, breeding varieties in perennial ryegrass by conventional breeding strategies (e.g., hybrids, induced mutations, and somaclonal variation) is time-consuming and often yields unpredictable results [23,24,25]. The draft genome sequence of perennial ryegrass was reported in 2015 [26], and there is more genetic and genomic information available than other major perennial herb species [21,27]. Thus, it is widely accepted that genetic engineering is a perfect alternative for the improvement in stress resistance [25]. The knowledge of stress resistance genes and molecular mechanisms of perennial ryegrass is of great significance for cultivating new varieties with strong stress resistance.
A comprehensive review on the molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways of abiotic stress response predominantly focuses on a few annual model or crop plants [1,28,29]. However, the stress response mechanism of perennial ryegrass, which may differ to that of annual plants, has not been reported thus far. Here, we review the advances in perennial ryegrass in response to drought, salinity, and temperature stresses and focus on the understanding of the underlying survival strategies and adaptation mechanisms, especially the key stress-related genes and signal transduction systems. This review will contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of perennial ryegrass response to abiotic stresses and provide useful information for improving the stress resistance, which is critical to agricultural and environmental sustainability.

2. Drought Stress

Drought is a major constraint to the growth and development of perennial ryegrass with typical symptoms including leaf senescence and desiccation, slow shoot and root growth, and even death [25,30]. Knowledge about the adaptation mechanisms of perennial ryegrass to drought stress is important for sustainable agriculture. The ability of plants to maintain growth and survival when subjected to drought stress is broadly defined as drought resistance [31]. Drought resistance is a quantitative characteristic that is determined by many genes and biochemical processes [1,32]. The identification and characterization of genes associated with drought resistance are critical in clarifying the mechanisms of perennial ryegrass adaptation to drought stress. However, the research on drought stress-related genes of perennial ryegrass is very limited, and molecular mechanisms in response to the drought environment are mostly unknown. Some drought response genes of perennial ryegrass found in limited studies are as follows. Through transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, Foito et al. identified 38 and 15 genes with significantly increased expression under water stress in the leaves and roots, respectively. The transcripts homologous to known dehydration responsive element binding (DREB) transcription factors and aquaporins were identified [33]. The dehydration-responsive element (DRE), a 9-bp conserved sequence TACCGACAT, is essential for regulating the expression of dehydration response genes [34]. DREB transcription factors specifically combine with DRE cis-acting elements and have a vital function on conducting stress responses such as drought and salt. Transgenic ryegrass overexpressing Arabidopsis DREB1B shows stronger drought resistance [35]. These data suggest that DREB transcription factors may be key regulators of perennial ryegrass response to drought stress. By analyzing the transcriptome of perennial ryegrass leaves and roots under drought stress, Amiard et al. found that myoinositol inositol 1-phosphate synthase (INPS) and galactinol synthase (GOLS) regulate the content of loliose and raffinose under drought stress [36]. In addition to the transcriptional analysis, the results of the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the drought tolerance traits in 192 perennial ryegrass cultivars distributed in 43 countries suggested that Lolium perenne Late Embryogenesis Abundant3 (LpLEA3) and Superoxide Dismutase (LpFeSOD) are important for maintaining the leaf water content under drought stress [23].
Determining the role of drought-responsive genes in the adaptation of perennial ryegrass to drought stress by genetic transformation is very important in clarifying the drought resistance mechanism, as has been carried out in Arabidopsis and other crops [37]. It has been proven that Lolium perenne pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (LpP5CS) plays a vital role in the response to diverse stresses and is potentially a candidate gene for stress-related molecular breeding in perennial ryegrass [38]. LpP5CS includes all conserved functional sites and regions of P5CS [38,39]. The overexpression of LpP5CS in tobacco plants, especially the mutation form LpP5CSF128A without the feedback inhibition of proline, enhances the tolerance to drought stress [38]. The ubiquitin-like (Ubl) post-translational modifiers contain a subfamily designated ‘Homology to Ub1′ (HUB1), which is also known as Ubl5 [40]. Although HUB1 proteins are cognate with ubiquitins in structure, their amino acid resemblance to ubiquitins is only about 35% [40]. It is worth noting that transgenic perennial ryegrass overexpressing LpHUB1 exhibits an improved drought tolerance phenotype with a higher relative water content and growth rate under drought stress. As an ubiquitin-like modifier, LpHUB1 may regulate the protein interaction, activity, and cellular location of existing proteins in response to a stress environment [25].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are indispensable in the post-transcriptional regulation of target genes. Studying variations of miRNAs in ryegrass is crucial for comprehending the stress response mechanisms [41]. miRNA408 (miR408), a conserved miRNA, is known to take part in multiple kinds of stress responses and has a central function in plant survival under a stress environment [42,43]. The overexpression of miR408 in Arabidopsis results in an increased tolerance to salinity, low temperature, and oxidative stress, but decreased tolerance to drought and osmotic stress [44]. A recent study revealed that transgenic perennial ryegrass with heterologous expression of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) miR408 gene showed improved drought tolerance, which may be due to changes in the leaf morphology and increase in the antioxidant capacity [45]. These data demonstrate that miR408 may have different functions in Arabidopsis and in gramineous plants and is able to act as a potential target for genetic manipulation to improve the drought tolerance of perennial ryegrass.
Although more drought-responsive genes in perennial ryegrass should be identified, the current studies have shown that the drought stress signaling and mechanisms of perennial ryegrass are as follow: (1) Under drought conditions, DREB transcription factors regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes together with miRNAs such as miR408; (2) the expression of proline synthase LpP5CS and loliose- and raffinose-metabolism enzymes INPS and GOLS are differentially regulated under drought conditions, leading to changes in osmolyte metabolism and tolerance to drought stress; (3) the expression of LpSOD and other antioxidant enzymes such as POD, CAT, and APX maintains the homeostasis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (i.e., H2O2, OH•, 1O2, and O2−) under drought conditions, and results in the adaptation of perennial ryegrass to drought stress; (4) LpHUB1, an ubiquitin-like modifier, regulates the protein interaction, activity, and cellular location of existing proteins under stress environments and promotes the adaptation of perennial ryegrass to drought stress (Figure 1).

3. Salt Stress

Salt stress causes harm to perennial ryegrass through ionic stress, osmotic stress, and secondary stresses including the accumulation of toxic compounds and the disruption of nutrient balance. A reduction in the shoot and root dry weight is commonly observed in cool-season gramineous grass under salinity stress [46,47]. Although a complete understanding of the gene function of perennial ryegrass is yet to be achieved, identifying the genes that play central roles in salt response and tolerance will provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms. In this section, we illustrate the expression regulation of salt-induced genes, which is helpful to comprehend the molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in perennial ryegrass. According to previous studies, the salt-overly-sensitive (SOS) signal transduction pathway is a pivotal mechanism of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. In this pathway, the calcium-binding protein, SOS3, is activated by the elevated free Ca2+ in cytosolic when suffering under high salinity [48]. SOS3 interacts with a serine/threonine protein kinase, SOS2, to form a SOS2/SOS3 complex, which leads to the activation of SOS1 [49,50,51]. The results of the suppression of subtractive hybridization and RT-PCR analysis in perennial ryegrass showed that approximately 22% of salt-responsive genes were related to general metabolism, 16% to interrelated protein metabolism, 12% related to signaling/transcription, and 2–4% associated with detoxification and energy transfer [52]. By RT-PCR, Liu et al. demonstrated that the expression levels of LpSOS1 increased in the roots of perennial ryegrass but decreased in the stem under salt stress. Moreover, the expressions of NHX1, TIP1, and PIP were also associated with salinity tolerance in perennial ryegrass [53]. The salt tolerance of transgenic perennial ryegrass was significantly improved by the transformation of the rice vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter OsNHX1 [54]. Furthermore, Li et al. isolated two salt-induced P5CS genes (P5CS1 and P5CS2) from perennial ryegrass by using rapid-amplification of cDNA ends PCR (RACE-PCR). The accumulation of proline, which is significantly induced after salt treatment, is in line with the expression levels of those two P5CS genes under high salinity treatment [20], suggesting that both P5CS genes may be involved in the salt stress tolerance of perennial ryegrass.
A high salinity environment induces excessive ROS such as H2O2, OH•, and O2−, leading to organelle and tissue injury. In order to suppress the damage caused by ROS, plants usually produce more antioxidant enzymes to maintain ROS homeostasis [55]. Beyond that, Ca2+ and H2O2 are vital secondary messengers in plant signaling networks, triggering different physiological and molecular responses to various environmental stresses [56,57,58]. By treatments of perennial ryegrass with NaCl, exogenous Ca2+, and H2O2, and determination of the physiological indexes and the contents of Ca2+, H2O2, OH•, and O2−, Hu et al. proved that Ca2+ and H2O2 signaling were integrated to enhance the adaptation to stress conditions in perennial ryegrass. Ca2+ signaling maintains ROS homeostasis in stressed grasses by increasing the responses of antioxidant genes, proteins, and enzymes. H2O2 signaling also induces antioxidant genes but attenuates the signaling of Ca2+ in the root of perennial ryegrass [59]. Consistently, the results of RT-PCR suggest that the expressions of CAT, POD, APX, GPX, and GR are upregulated in perennial ryegrass under salt stress, suggesting that these antioxidant enzymes play an important role in eliminating ROS [55]. Collectively, the H2O2 and Ca2+ signaling of salinity response supplies a strategy for the adaptation of perennial ryegrass to salt stress. Additionally, other micromolecule metabolites are profoundly involved in salinity tolerance [60]. A study on the stress memory by the RT-PCR analysis of stress memory genes and GC–MS analysis of the metabolite profiles demonstrated that the metabolites in perennial ryegrass such as sugar and sugar alcohol regulated by trainable genes Brown Plant Hopper Susceptibility Protein (PBSP) and Sucrose Synthase (SUCS) played positive roles in the physiological changes induced by stress memory. Moreover, pre-exposure to multiple low NaCl concentrations improved the salinity response of perennial ryegrass to a subsequent worse salinity environment [61]. The application of exogenous cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) upregulates the gene expression of Lolium perenne High-affinity Potassium Transporter (LpHKT) and LpMYB and alleviates salt-induced cell damage and leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass [47]. Acetic acid is a natural endogenous substance to resist salt stress in perennial ryegrass. The results of transcriptome sequencing and acetic acid content determination under salt stress showed that the content of endogenous acetic acid gradually increased, along with the elevated expression of the key biosynthetic gene LpPDC1, under high salinity conditions [62].
For the purpose of improving the tolerance of perennial ryegrass to salt stress, it is of great significance in understanding the response strategies and signal transduction processes. Although it remains unknown how Na+ is sensed in cellular systems and what the complete salt stress signaling network in perennial ryegrass is, the current studies show that perennial ryegrass may adopt the following strategies to adapt to high salinity stress. (1) Under salt stress, SOS1 and NHX1 are activated and mediate the efflux of ion or antiport of Na+ into the vacuolar, leading to the adaptation of ryegrass to salt stress. (2) Salt stress activates the expression of P5CS genes or PBSP and SUCS. These genes alleviate the damage of osmotic stress by regulating the synthesis of osmolytes under salt stress. PBSP and SUCS also regulate the salt acclimation by mediating the metabolism of sugar and sugar alcohol. (3) Salt stress induces the increase in cytosolic Ca2+ and ROS concentrations, which triggers the downstream signaling networks to enhance the adaptation of perennial ryegrass to salt stress. It is worth noting that excessive ROS is harmful. Both Ca2+ and H2O2 increase the expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., CAT, POD, APX, GPX, and GR) to maintain ROS homeostasis in stressed grasses. (4) Some endogenous bioorganic micromolecules such as BAP and acetic acid also serve functions in the perennial ryegrass response to salt tolerance (Figure 2).

4. Cold Stress

Perennial ryegrass is a kind of perennial gramineous grass widely cultivated in temperate regions around the world. Hence, perennial ryegrass is inevitably affected by cold stress in winter and early spring every year. Improving the cold tolerance and the recovery ability of perennial ryegrass after cold stress is a key component in improving the grassland performance. The effects of cold stress on plant metabolism come from the direct inhibition of metabolic enzymes and the reprogramming of gene expression by low temperature [63]. Zhang et al. discovered by RT-PCR that Cold-Regulated (COR), Dehydration-responsive (DR), and Ice Recrystallization Inhibition (IRI) genes were upregulated after the cold treatment of perennial ryegrass [64]. Products of COR genes including low-temperature induced (LTI), responsive to desiccation (RD) and early dehydration-inducible (ERD), lower the cellular freezing point and allow plants to withstand extensive freeze-induced cellular desiccation [65,66,67]. IRI proteins protect membranes from physical damage by inhibiting ice crystal growth and recrystallization [64]. The overexpression of LpIRI-a and LpIRI-b in Arabidopsis enhances the cold tolerance with reduced ion leakage [68]. The C-repeat binding factor (CBF) transcriptional factors, also known as DREB, are critical for the plant response to cold stress [69]. Three linearly assembled CBF transcriptional factors, which are also known as DREB1B, DREB1C, and DREB1A, respectively, exist in Arabidopsis. These CBFs bind to cold- and dehydration-responsive DNA regulatory element (DRE) [70,71]. The constitutive expression of CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3 in Arabidopsis leads to changes in the biochemical components including proline, glucose, fructose, and raffinose and enhances frost resistance [72]. Transgenic Arabidopsis with the overexpression of CBF1/DREB1B or CBF3/DREB1A possesses the constitutive expression of downstream cold-inducible genes and improved low temperature resistance. CBF2/DREB1C ensures the transient expression of CBF1/DREB1B and CBF3/DREB1A by negatively regulating them to guarantee the appropriate induction of downstream genes [73]. By Southern and Northern analyses, Zhao et al. proved that similar to CBF genes in the great majority of plants, LpCBF3, a CBF homologous gene derived from a cold-resistant perennial ryegrass, contains the sequence for nuclear localization signal (NLS), the APETALA2 (AP2) DNA-binding domain, and the acidic activation motif [74]. After the identification of LpCBF3, five new CBF genes (LpCBFI, II, III, IV, and V) were identified in perennial ryegrass by using RACE-PCR [75]. LpCBF3 is rapidly upregulated in response to exposure to 4 °C [74]. Overexpression of LpCBF3 in Arabidopsis evokes the expression of COR15a and RD29A, which have been proven to be the target COR genes of DREB1A/CBF3 in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis transformed with LpCBF3 displayed a phenotype of stunting, later flowering, and increased freezing tolerance [74,76]. In addition, the transformation of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 gene in perennial ryegrass improved the freezing stress resistance due to the enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) [77]. These studies suggest that CBF genes may serve as useful candidates for the improvement in cold tolerance in perennial ryegrass.
On the other hand, protein metabolism undergoes dramatic changes to resist low temperature including selective up- or downregulation of protein synthesis. For instance, antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are induced and accumulated in the apoplast space of plant tissues under a cold environment. AFPs are the sort of proteins present in a series of over-wintering plants that play functions in a freezing-tolerant strategy [78]. AFP proteins possess the ability to adsorb to the surface of the ice crystals, protecting plant tissues from mechanical stress induced by the formation of ice crystals [79]. Lolium perenne has no ability to endure cold temperatures below the crystallization point. By analyzing the LpAFP expression profile and protein characterization, Lauersen et al. found that LpAFP plays a role in keeping perennial ryegrass away from the damage caused by a frosty environment [80]. Furthermore, a previous study on the transformation of LpAFP in tomato showed that the LpAFP gene endues cold resistance in transgenic tomato plants. Frosty stress gives rise to physiological damage in wild type tomato plants, while the transgenic plants maintain normality [81].
Based on the progress achieved in the research on perennial ryegrass response to cold stress, we can conclude that the strategies and signaling pathways of perennial ryegrass to adapt to low temperature stress are as follows. (1) LpCBF transcription factors activated by low temperature stress regulate the expression of downstream genes such as CORs and RD29A and facilitate the adaptation of ryegrass to cold stress. Furthermore, LpCBFs regulate ROS (mainly is H2O2 and OH•) homeostasis under cold stress by affecting the antioxidant enzymes. (2) LpIRI-a and LpIRI-b inhibit ice crystal growth and recrystallization in plant cells to alleviate the mechanical damage of membranes and improve the cold tolerance of perennial ryegrass. (3) The apoplast localized LpAFP adsorbs to the surface of the ice crystals to protect the tissues of perennial ryegrass from mechanical damage caused by ice formation (Figure 3).

5. Heat Stress

Perennial ryegrass is a heat-stress susceptible grass species. Its growth and development often suffer from extreme high temperature, which becomes more frequent with climate warming [12]. Identifying the genes regulating heat tolerance and clarifying the adaptive mechanism of perennial ryegrass will provide insights for the improvement in the heat tolerance of perennial ryegrass. The heat stress response is regulated by an integrated pathway comprising many transcription factors and signaling molecules in plants [41]. The homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-Zip) transcription factor family plays an important role in regulating plant development and in coping with abiotic stresses including heat stress. A total of 13 HD-Zip I genes were identified in the transcriptome of perennial ryegrass by using the tblastn program with HD-Zip proteins in rice as query sequences. The RT-PCR results suggest that the expression levels of LpHOX6, LpHOX8, and LpHOX24 (HD-Zip I transcription factor in Lolium perenne) are negatively correlated while LpHOX21 is positively correlated with the heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass [82]. Cytochrome P450 (P450) catalyzes a variety of monooxygenation and hydroxylation reactions in plant cell and take part in the plant response to abiotic stress [83,84]. By using sodium bisulfite sequencing and methylation analysis, Dai et al. revealed that the perennial ryegrass P450 gene LpCYP72A161 is epigenetically regulated under heat stress. The methylation of CpG islands in LpCYP72A161 exon 1 is significantly reduced when facing heat stress, resulting in a higher transcription. This research provides new insights into the epigenetic regulation of perennial ryegrass genes under temperature stress [85].
To resist heat stress, heat shock proteins (HSPs) are induced and act as molecular chaperones to prevent protein denaturation, which is a process controlled by the heat stress transcription factors (heat shock factor, HSF) [86]. Wang et al. analyzed the gene expression changes of perennial ryegrass under temperature stress by RNA-Seq, and found that the subfamilies of HSFA and HSFB were related to the acclimation of perennial ryegrass to heat tolerance [87]. Among the genes of the subfamily HSFC, the LpHSFC1b gene is significantly induced after heat treatment and acts as a core regulator. Heterologous expression of LpHSFC1b in Arabidopsis enhances the plants’ heat tolerance. The contents of electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in Arabidopsis transformed with LpHSFC1b decreased, and the expression of the heat stress-responsive genes increased significantly [11]. Furthermore, HSFA1b is also a positive regulator of heat stress and the overexpression of HSFA1b increased heat tolerance in Arabidopsis [88,89,90]. These data suggest that HSFs may play a positive regulatory roles in the heat stress response of perennial ryegrass.
When exposed to long-term heat stress, the leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content of perennial ryegrass greatly decreased, which led to the leaf senescence. Reduced Chl content is mainly due to the acceleration of Chl degradation rather than the inhibition of Chl biosynthesis under heat stress [91]. The determination of molecular markers related to the genetic variation of heat tolerance in different perennial ryegrass germplasm revealed that the expression levels of four Chl catabolism genes, LpNYC1, LpNOL, LpSGR, and LpPPH were associated with the tolerance to heat stress, and elevation of their expression levels enhanced the heat resistance of ryegrass [12]. Recently, Zhang et al. blocked the enzymatic catabolism of chlorophyll a (Chl a) by inhibiting the expression of LpSGR using RNAi, an essential Chl catabolic enzyme, leading to exacerbation of the degree of the heat-induced photosynthetic system II (PSII inhibition), ROS (such as H2O2 and OH•) homeostasis, and chloroplast breakdown [92]. These studies have demonstrated that the Chl catabolic proteins (i.e., LpNYC1, LpNOL, LpSGR, and LpPPH modulated Chl catabolism) are one of the mechanisms by which perennial ryegrass adapts to heat stress.
In addition to the up- or downregulation of heat tolerance genes, hormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinin (CK), and melatonin (MT) also undertake major functions in the heat tolerance of perennial ryegrass. The application of exogenous MT to perennial ryegrass could alleviate the growth inhibition and leaf senescence caused by heat stress, which is manifested as a significant increase in the tiller number, plant height, leaf Chl content, and the reduction in the transcript levels of the senescence-related genes LpSAG12.1 and Lph36 [93]. LpABI3 and LpABI5, which encode key transcription factors in the ABA signaling pathway, are also transcriptionally upregulated by heat stress but repressed by MT treatment, suggesting a crosstalk between these two signaling pathways to prevent the excessive inhibition of ABA on plant growth under heat stress. As transcription factors in the CK signaling pathway, the transcription of the B-type ARR genes LpARR1 and LpARR10 is repressed by heat stress, while MT treatment alleviates this inhibitory effect [93]. Taken together, MT, ABA, and CK cooperatively regulate the adaptability of perennial ryegrass to high temperature stress.
Therefore, some progress has been made by researchers on the heat stress response in perennial ryegrass. Based on this, we can conclude that the strategies and signaling pathways of perennial ryegrass to adapt to heat stress are as follows. (1) Under extremely high temperatures, the methylation of CpG islands in LpCYP72A161 is reduced, resulting in the change in its expression level and the tolerance of perennial ryegrass to heat stress. (2) The variations in the expression of negative related HD-Zip I transcription factors LpHOX6, LpHOX8, LpHOX24m and positive related transcription factor LpHOX21 affect the adaptability of perennial ryegrass to heat stress. (3) Under extremely high temperatures, LpNYC1, LpNOL, LpSGR, and LpPPH enhance the heat resistance of ryegrass by affecting the catabolism of Chl. (4) Heat stress induces the expression of HSFs such as LpHSFC1b. These HSFs activate the expression of HSPs to prevent protein denaturation and enhance the heat resistance of ryegrass. (5) The phytohormone MT positively regulates the adaptability of perennial ryegrass to high temperature stress by inhibiting the expression of LpSAG12.1 and Lph36, affecting the signaling pathways of ABA and CK under high temperature (Figure 4).

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

With global climate change, environmental problems such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures are becoming increasingly more severe. With the development of life science, great progress has been made in the stress resistance research of perennial ryegrass, and some key stress-related genes have been identified. This work revealed some of the molecular mechanisms and signal pathways of the perennial ryegrass response to abiotic stress. However, our understanding of the abiotic stress adaptation mechanisms of perennial ryegrass is still seriously deficient and fragmented, and a complete stress signaling network including stress perception, signal transduction, and the adjustment of gene expression and metabolism is yet to be achieved.
In order to comprehensively clarify the abiotic stress molecular mechanisms of perennial ryegrass and improve its stress resistance, future research should pay attention to the following items. (1) The identification and functional study of key components of abiotic stress signal transduction in perennial ryegrass such as stress sensors, kinases, and transcription factors remain important but challenging goals for further research. (2) Technologies such as genome editing, high-throughput phenotypic analysis, and the genetic transformation of perennial ryegrass need to be further developed. At present, genetic transformation of perennial ryegrass only works in a few varieties. The gene editing technology of perennial ryegrass is also in its infancy. The development of these technologies will contribute to the dissection of molecular mechanisms and the improvement in perennial ryegrass. (3) Because the stress resistance improvement of perennial ryegrass should not restrict its growth and development, it is important to understand the crosstalk between the stress signaling pathway and the growth and development signaling pathway. (4) Most of the knowledge about the response of perennial ryegrass to abiotic stress has been obtained in the laboratory. How to use them to cultivate high resistant varieties grown in the field is also a challenge.

Author Contributions

T.Q. produced the schematic models; C.M. wrote the manuscript; Y.Z., C.M., X.B. and T.Q. revised and edited the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Northwest A&F University for scientific research start-up (2452021101 to T.Q.) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2021JQ-139 to T.Q.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Chao, D.Y.; Li, J.; Wang, P.Y.; Qin, F.; et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oumarou, A.A.; Lu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Alhaj, H.Y.; Sheteiwy, M. The global trend of the net irrigation water requirement of maize from 1960 to 2050. Climate 2019, 7, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Morton, M.J.L.; Awlia, M.; Al-Tamimi, N.; Saade, S.; Pailles, Y.; Negrao, S.; Tester, M. Salt stress under the scalpel-dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019, 97, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, Y.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ashraf, M.; Wu, L. Breeding for Salinity Tolerance in Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 13, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pryor, S.C.; Barthelmie, R.J.; Schoof, J.T. High-resolution projections of climate-related risks for the Midwestern USA. Clim. Res. 2013, 56, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, B.; Yang, S.; Guo, Y.; Gong, Z. Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mickelbart, M.V.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Bailey-Serres, J. Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, T.X.; Shao, K.; Huang, Y.; Lei, Y.Y.; Tan, L.Y.; Chan, Z.L. Natural variation analysis of perennial ryegrass in response to abiotic stress highlights LpHSFC1b as a positive regulator of heat stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 179, 104192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, B.; Huang, B. Natural variation of physiological traits, molecular markers, and chlorophyll catabolic genes associated with heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass accessions. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fu, Z.; Song, J.; Zhao, J.; Jameson, P.E. Identification and expression of genes associated with the abscission layer controlling seed shattering in Lolium perenne. AoB Plants 2019, 11, ply076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xie, L.; Teng, K.; Tan, P.; Chao, Y.; Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Han, L. PacBio single-molecule long-read sequencing shed new light on the transcripts and splice isoforms of the perennial ryegrass. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2020, 295, 475–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, X.; Pijut, P.M.; Byrne, S.; Asp, T.; Bai, G.; Jiang, Y. Candidate gene association mapping for winter survival and spring regrowth in perennial ryegrass. Plant Sci. 2015, 235, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kemesyte, V.; Statkeviciute, G.; Brazauskas, G. Perennial ryegrass yield performance under abiotic stress. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 1935–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.; Jiang, Y. Identification of differentially expressed genes under drought stress in perennial ryegrass. Physiol. Plant 2010, 139, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. King, J.; Thorogood, D.; Edwards, K.J.; Armstead, I.P.; Roberts, L.; Skot, K.; Hanley, Z.; King, I.P. Development of a genomic microsatellite library in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and its use in trait mapping. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fradera-Sola, A.; Thomas, A.; Gasior, D.; Harper, J.; Hegarty, M.; Armstead, I.; Fernandez-Fuentes, N. Differential gene expression and gene ontologies associated with increasing water-stress in leaf and root transcriptomes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, H.; Guo, H.; Zhang, X.; Fu, J.; Rognli, O.A. Expression profiles of Pr5CS1 and Pr5CS2 genes and proline accumulation under salinity stress in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Breed. 2014, 133, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kubik, C.; Sawkins, M.; Meyer, W.A.; Gaut, B.S. Genetic diversity in seven perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars based on SSR markers. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xing, Y.; Frei, U.; Schejbel, B.; Asp, T.; Lubberstedt, T. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in 11 expressed resistance candidate genes in Lolium perenne. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yu, X.; Bai, G.; Liu, S.; Luo, N.; Wang, Y.; Richmond, D.S.; Pijut, P.M.; Jackson, S.A.; Yu, J.; Jiang, Y. Association of candidate genes with drought tolerance traits in diverse perennial ryegrass accessions. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sathish, P.; Withana, N.; Biswas, M.; Bryant, C.; Templeton, K.; Al-Wahb, M.; Smith-Espinoza, C.; Roche, J.R.; Elborough, K.M.; Phillips, J.R. Transcriptome analysis reveals season-specific rbcS gene expression profiles in diploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2007, 5, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patel, M.; Milla-Lewis, S.; Zhang, W.; Templeton, K.; Reynolds, W.C.; Richardson, K.; Biswas, M.; Zuleta, M.C.; Dewey, R.E.; Qu, R.; et al. Overexpression of ubiquitin-like LpHUB1 gene confers drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Byrne, S.L.; Nagy, I.; Pfeifer, M.; Armstead, I.; Swain, S.; Studer, B.; Mayer, K.; Campbell, J.D.; Czaban, A.; Hentrup, S.; et al. A synteny-based draft genome sequence of the forage grass Lolium perenne. Plant J. 2015, 84, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jensen, L.B.; Muylle, H.; Arens, P.; Andersen, C.H.; Holm, P.B.; Ghesquiere, M.; Julier, B.; Lubberstedt, T.; Nielsen, K.K.; De Riek, J.; et al. Development and mapping of a public reference set of SSR markers in Lolium perenne L. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, L.; Lu, X.; Wang, G.; Zhang, P.; Fu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wei, L.; Wang, T. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to drought stress and rewatering in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 1203–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raghuvanshi, R.; Srivastava, A.K.; Verulkar, S.; Suprasanna, P. Unlocking allelic diversity for sustainable development of salinity stress tolerance in rice. Curr. Genom. 2021, 22, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fry, J.; Huang, B. Applied Turfgrass Science and Physiology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; p. 130. [Google Scholar]
  31. Harb, A.; Krishnan, A.; Ambavaram, M.M.; Pereira, A. Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 1254–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fang, Y.; Xiong, L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Foito, A.; Byrne, S.L.; Shepherd, T.; Stewart, D.; Barth, S. Transcriptional and metabolic profiles of Lolium perenne L. genotypes in response to a PEG-induced water stress. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, Q.; Kasuga, M.; Sakuma, Y.; Abe, H.; Miura, S.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1391–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, F.; Liang, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Z. Perennial Ryegrass transformed with the adversity-resistant transcription factor DREB1B gene. Acta Bot. Boreal -Occident Sin. 2006, 26, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar]
  36. Amiard, V.; Morvan-Bertrand, A.; Billard, J.P.; Huault, C.; Keller, F.; Prud’homme, M.P. Fructans, but not the sucrosyl-galactosides, raffinose and loliose, are affected by drought stress in perennial ryegrass. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 2218–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Vadez, V.; Sharma, K.K. Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: Retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cao, L.; Han, L.; Zhang, H.L.; Xin, H.B.; Imtiaz, M.; Yi, M.F.; Sun, Z.Y.; Ju, G.S.; Qian, Y.Q.; Liu, J.X. Isolation and characterization of pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene from perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Szabados, L.; Savoure, A. Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Downes, B.; Vierstra, R.D. Post-translational regulation in plants employing a diverse set of polypeptide tags. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fan, J.B.; Zhang, W.H.; Amombo, E.; Hu, L.X.; Kjorven, J.O.; Chen, L. Mechanisms of environmental stress tolerance in turfgrass. Agronomy 2020, 10, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Pilon, M. MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15932–15945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sun, M.Z.; Yang, J.K.; Cai, X.X.; Shen, Y.; Cui, N.; Zhu, Y.M.; Jia, B.W.; Sun, X.L. The opposite roles of OsmiR408 in cold and drought stress responses in Oryza sativa. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garcia, M.E.; Lynch, T.; Peeters, J.; Snowden, C.; Finkelstein, R. A small plant-specific protein family of ABI five binding proteins (AFPs) regulates stress response in germinating Arabidopsis seeds and seedlings. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hang, N.; Shi, T.; Liu, Y.; Ye, W.; Taier, G.; Sun, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, W. Overexpression of OsmicroRNA408 enhances drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass. Physiol. Plant 2021, 172, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cen, H.; Ye, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, K.; Zhang, W. Overexpression of a chimeric gene, OsDST-SRDX, improved salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, B. Cytokinin-mitigation of salt-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass involving the activation of antioxidant systems and ionic balance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 125, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, J.; Zhu, J.K. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 1998, 280, 1943–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Halfter, U.; Ishitani, M.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis SOS2 protein kinase physically interacts with and is activated by the calcium-binding protein SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3735–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ishitani, M.; Liu, J.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Shi, W.; Zhu, J.K. SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium binding. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, H.; Hu, T.; Fu, J. Identification of genes associated with adaptation to NaCl toxicity in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 79, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, M.X.; Song, X.; Jiang, Y.W. Growth, ionic response, and gene expression of shoots and roots of perennial ryegrass under salinity stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2018, 40, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, Y.Y.; Chen, Q.J.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.C. Salt-tolerant transgenic perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) obtained by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, T.; Li, H.Y.; Zhang, X.Z.; Luo, H.J.; Fu, J.M. Toxic effect of NaCl on ion metabolism, antioxidative enzymes and gene expression of perennial ryegrass. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 2050–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ma, Y.; Dai, X.; Xu, Y.; Luo, W.; Zheng, X.; Zeng, D.; Pan, Y.; Lin, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, D.; et al. COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 2015, 160, 1209–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sun, J.; Wang, M.J.; Ding, M.Q.; Deng, S.R.; Liu, M.Q.; Lu, C.F.; Zhou, X.Y.; Shen, X.; Zheng, X.J.; Zhang, Z.K.; et al. H2O2 and cytosolic Ca2+ signals triggered by the PM H+-coupled transport system mediate K+/Na+ homeostasis in NaCl-stressed Populus euphratica cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 943–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, X.; Feng, Y.; Liang, G.; Liu, N.; Zhu, J.K. Aequorin-based luminescence imaging reveals stimulus- and tissue-specific Ca2+ dynamics in Arabidopsis plants. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hu, T.; Chen, K.; Hu, L.; Amombo, E.; Fu, J. H2O2 and Ca2+-based signaling and associated ion accumulation, antioxidant systems and secondary metabolism orchestrate the response to NaCl stress in perennial ryegrass. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hu, T.; Jin, Y.; Li, H.; Amombo, E.; Fu, J. Stress memory induced transcriptional and metabolic changes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in response to salt stress. Physiol. Plant 2016, 156, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xing, J.; Li, H.; Miao, J.; Xu, B. Acetic acid mitigated salt stress by alleviating ionic and oxidative damages and regulating hormone metabolism in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Grass Res. 2021, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chinnusamy, V.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, J.K. Gene regulation during cold acclimation in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, C.; Fei, S.Z.; Warnke, S.; Li, L.; Hannapel, D. Identification of genes associated with cold acclimation in perennial ryegrass. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1436–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Guy, C.; Kaplan, F.; Kopka, J.; Selbig, J.; Hincha, D.K. Metabolomics of temperature stress. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xin, Z.; Browse, J. Cold comfort farm: The acclimation of plants to freezing temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shi, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yang, S. Molecular regulation of CBF signaling in cold acclimation. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, C.; Fei, S.Z.; Arora, R.; Hannapel, D.J. Ice recrystallization inhibition proteins of perennial ryegrass enhance freezing tolerance. Planta 2010, 232, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shi, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yang, S. Cold signal transduction and its interplay with phytohormones during cold acclimation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gilmour, S.J.; Fowler, S.G.; Thomashow, M.F. Arabidopsis transcriptional activators CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 have matching functional activities. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gilmour, S.J.; Zarka, D.G.; Stockinger, E.J.; Salazar, M.P.; Houghton, J.M.; Thomashow, M.F. Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression. Plant J. 1998, 16, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gilmour, S.J.; Sebolt, A.M.; Salazar, M.P.; Everard, J.D.; Thomashow, M.F. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF3 transcriptional activator mimics multiple biochemical changes associated with cold acclimation. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1854–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Novillo, F.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Salinas, J. CBF2/DREB1C is a negative regulator of CBF1/DREB1B and CBF3/DREB1A expression and plays a central role in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3985–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhao, H.; Bughrara, S.S. Isolation and characterization of cold-regulated transcriptional activator LpCBF3 gene from perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 279, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tamura, K.; Yamada, T. A perennial ryegrass CBF gene cluster is located in a region predicted by conserved synteny between Poaceae species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Xiong, Y.; Fei, S.Z. Functional and phylogenetic analysis of a DREB/CBF-like gene in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Planta 2006, 224, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, X.; Cheng, X.; Liu, J.; Zeng, H.; Han, L.; Tang, W. Heterologous expression of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 gene enhances drought and freezing tolerance in transgenic Lolium perenne plants. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010, 5, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rajeev Kumar, S.; Kiruba, R.; Balamurugan, S.; Cardoso, H.G.; Birgit, A.-S.; Zakwan, A.; Sathishkumar, R. Carrot antifreeze protein enhances chilling tolerance in transgenic tomato. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 36, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Atıcı, Ö.; Nalbantoǧlu, B. Antifreeze proteins in higher plants. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lauersen, K.J.; Brown, A.; Middleton, A.; Davies, P.L.; Walker, V.K. Expression and characterization of an antifreeze protein from the perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne. Cryobiology 2011, 62, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Balamurugan, S.; Ann, J.S.; Varghese, I.P.; Murugan, S.B.; Harish, M.C.; Kumar, S.R.; Sathishkumar, R. Heterologous expression of Lolium perenne antifreeze protein confers chilling tolerance in tomato. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 17, 1128–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, J.; Zhuang, L.L.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.J.; Yang, Z.M.; Huang, B.R. Identification and characterization of novel homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-Zip) transcription factors associated with heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 160, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Takahashi, S.; Seki, M.; Ishida, J.; Satou, M.; Sakurai, T.; Narusaka, M.; Kamiya, A.; Nakajima, M.; Enju, A.; Akiyama, K.; et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of genes induced by hyperosmotic, high salinity, and oxidative stress and abscisic acid treatment in Arabidopsis cell culture using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 56, 29–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Seki, M.; Umezawa, T.; Urano, K.; Shinozaki, K. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dai, Y.; Mao, P.; Tao, X.; Wang, Y.; Wei, C.M.; Ma, X.R. Flexible shift on gene body methylation and transcription of LpCYP72A161 exposed to temperature stress in perennial ryegrass. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 143, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Scharf, K.D.; Berberich, T.; Ebersberger, I.; Nover, L. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: Structure, function and evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Tao, X.; Wang, J.Z.; Cheng, H.Y.; Yang, H.; Ma, X.R. Heat shock factor genes of tall fescue and perennial ryegrass in response to temperature stress by RNA-seq analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Liu, H.C.; Liao, H.T.; Charng, Y.Y. The role of class A1 heat shock factors (HSFA1s) in response to heat and other stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Prandl, R.; Hinderhofer, K.; Eggers-Schumacher, G.; Schoffl, F. HSF3, a new heat shock factor from Arabidopsis thaliana, derepresses the heat shock response and confers thermotolerance when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1998, 258, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yoshida, T.; Ohama, N.; Nakajima, J.; Kidokoro, S.; Mizoi, J.; Nakashima, K.; Maruyama, K.; Kim, J.M.; Seki, M.; Todaka, D.; et al. Arabidopsis HsfA1 transcription factors function as the main positive regulators in heat shock-responsive gene expression. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2011, 286, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jespersen, D.; Zhang, J.; Huang, B. Chlorophyll loss associated with heat-induced senescence in bentgrass. Plant Sci. 2016, 249, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Huang, X.; Xing, J.; Yao, J.; Yin, T.; Jiang, J.; Wang, P.; Xu, B. STAYGREEN-mediated chlorophyll a catabolism is critical for photosystem stability during heat-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 1412–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, X.Z.; Du, H.M.; Xu, B.; Huang, B.R. Melatonin suppression of heat-induced leaf senescence involves changes in abscisic acid and cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling pathways in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 138, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 00860 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to drought stress. Abbreviations: DREB, dehydration responsive element binding; miR408, miRNA408; P5CS, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase; INPS, myoinositol inositol 1-phosphate synthase; GOLS, galactinol synthase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; HUB1, homology to Ub1.
Figure 1. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to drought stress. Abbreviations: DREB, dehydration responsive element binding; miR408, miRNA408; P5CS, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase; INPS, myoinositol inositol 1-phosphate synthase; GOLS, galactinol synthase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; HUB1, homology to Ub1.
Life 12 00860 g001
Life 12 00860 g002 550
Figure 2. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to salt stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Abbreviations: SOS1, Salt Overly Sensitive 1; NHX1, Na+/H+ antiporter 1; P5CS, Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase; PBSP, Brown Plant Hopper Susceptibility Protein; SUCS, Sucrose Synthase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; BAP, 6-benzylaminopurine; HKT, High-affinity Potassium Transporter; MYB, MYB transcription factor.
Figure 2. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to salt stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Abbreviations: SOS1, Salt Overly Sensitive 1; NHX1, Na+/H+ antiporter 1; P5CS, Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase; PBSP, Brown Plant Hopper Susceptibility Protein; SUCS, Sucrose Synthase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; BAP, 6-benzylaminopurine; HKT, High-affinity Potassium Transporter; MYB, MYB transcription factor.
Life 12 00860 g002
Life 12 00860 g003 550
Figure 3. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to cold stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Snowflake graphic represents ice crystals. Abbreviations: CBF, C-repeat binding factor; COR, Cold-Regulated; IRI, Ice Recrystallization Inhibition; AFP, antifreeze proteins.
Figure 3. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to cold stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Snowflake graphic represents ice crystals. Abbreviations: CBF, C-repeat binding factor; COR, Cold-Regulated; IRI, Ice Recrystallization Inhibition; AFP, antifreeze proteins.
Life 12 00860 g003
Life 12 00860 g004 550
Figure 4. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to heat stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Abbreviations: Chl, chlorophyll; HSF, heat shock factor; HSP, heat shock protein; MT, melatonin.
Figure 4. A schematic model of the perennial ryegrass response to heat stress. The arrow represents positive regulation, whereas the line ending with a bar represents negative regulation. Abbreviations: Chl, chlorophyll; HSF, heat shock factor; HSP, heat shock protein; MT, melatonin.
Life 12 00860 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, X.; Qin, T. Insights into the Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Abiotic Stress: Underlying Survival Strategies and Adaptation Mechanisms. Life 2022, 12, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060860

AMA Style

Miao C, Zhang Y, Bai X, Qin T. Insights into the Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Abiotic Stress: Underlying Survival Strategies and Adaptation Mechanisms. Life. 2022; 12(6):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060860

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Cuicui, Yuting Zhang, Xuechun Bai, and Tao Qin. 2022. "Insights into the Response of Perennial Ryegrass to Abiotic Stress: Underlying Survival Strategies and Adaptation Mechanisms" Life 12, no. 6: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060860

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop