Next Article in Journal
Potential Effect of DIMBOA (2,4-Dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one) on Alleviating the Autotoxic Coumarin Stress in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Seedlings
Next Article in Special Issue
A Compact Imaging Platform for Conducting C. elegans Phenotypic Assays on Earth and in Spaceflight
Previous Article in Journal
Convolvulus arvensis: Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Properties of Chemically Profiled Essential Oils: An Approach against Nosocomial Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondria-Targeted Human Catalase in the Mouse Longevity MCAT Model Mitigates Head-Tilt Bedrest-Induced Neuro-Inflammation in the Hippocampus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Are Skeletal Muscle Changes during Prolonged Space Flights Similar to Those Experienced by Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults?

by
Alessandro Cannavo
1,
Angelica Carandina
2,
Graziamaria Corbi
3,
Eleonora Tobaldini
2,4,
Nicola Montano
2,4 and
Beatrice Arosio
2,*
1
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(12), 2139; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122139
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Space Biology)

Abstract

:
Microgravity exposure causes several physiological and psychosocial alterations that challenge astronauts’ health during space flight. Notably, many of these changes are mostly related to physical inactivity influencing different functional systems and organ biology, in particular the musculoskeletal system, dramatically resulting in aging-like phenotypes, such as those occurring in older persons on Earth. In this sense, sarcopenia, a syndrome characterized by the loss in muscle mass and strength due to skeletal muscle unloading, is undoubtedly one of the most critical aging-like adverse effects of microgravity and a prevalent problem in the geriatric population, still awaiting effective countermeasures. Therefore, there is an urgent demand to identify clinically relevant biological markers and to underline molecular mechanisms behind these effects that are still poorly understood. From this perspective, a lesson from Geroscience may help tailor interventions to counteract the adverse effects of microgravity. For instance, decades of studies in the field have demonstrated that in the older people, the clinical picture of sarcopenia remarkably overlaps (from a clinical and biological point of view) with that of frailty, primarily when referred to the physical function domain. Based on this premise, here we provide a deeper understanding of the biological mechanisms of sarcopenia and frailty, which in aging are often considered together, and how these converge with those observed in astronauts after space flight.

1. Introduction

After long-term space flight, astronauts present with health problems with multisystemic dysfunction [1,2,3]. In addition to microgravity, prolonged space missions involve several environmental and operational stressors (e.g., decompression, dietary restrictions, psychological factors related to high workload under pressure, operational and interpersonal distress, isolation, and confinement) that lead to an impairment in the physiological reserve. Among the systems involved, the musculoskeletal system is one of the most affected as the disuse and unloading of muscles in microgravity lead to significant atrophy [4]. Importantly, this form of microgravity-induced muscle atrophy is problematic for its fast development and severity, with muscle mass diminished by up to 20% after a 2-week space flight or up to 30% after longer missions (3–6 months) [5]. In addition, similar to the effects observed in the older people, this skeletal muscle atrophy may induce adverse effects systemically impacting the cardiovascular and nervous systems [6,7]. For instance, a common problem of orthostatic intolerance has been observed in both astronauts and hospitalized aged patients [8,9,10,11]. Together, these problems can hamper or preclude astronauts’ mission tasks, thus demanding more investigations aiming to identify the molecular mechanisms responsible for these microgravity-dependent effects along with clinically relevant biological markers that will allow the design of tailored countermeasures. Of note, the current knowledge around the aging process can be exploited better to understand most of the mechanisms behind space flight-induced physiological modifications, as Nandu Gowsmani [8] stated in the exciting review: “Geriatrics meets Spaceflight!”. In this regard, studies around sarcopenia, a syndrome characterized by a loss of muscle mass and function in older individuals, have been proposed as an analog of the muscle loss observed after space travel. It is worth noting that sarcopenia is considered the biological substrate of frailty, a condition of the increased vulnerability to stressors that typically leads to adverse outcomes [8,12,13]. Hence, this review article will provide an update on the most recent clinical and experimental data on frailty and sarcopenia in older adults. Further, we will debate how the clinical and biological characteristics of this age-related syndrome are comparable to the physiological changes observed in astronauts after space flight [14].

2. Frailty and Sarcopenia during Aging

In the last century, the amount of people reaching old age has grown exponentially, with the number of people aged over 60 years old reaching almost 22% in 2050 [15]. Of course, prolonged life expectancy is accompanied by an increased risk of chronic degenerative diseases, frequently observed in older populations, with national healthcare systems encountering this evolution with huge costs [16,17]. For many years, it has been postulated that aging “per se” is the critical condition for the onset of many age-related diseases. However, the relationship between aging and age-related diseases is likely much more complex, since aging is the major risk factor for these diseases, and common biological mechanisms are shared among them [18]. It is believed that the deviation from healthy aging to the disease’s onset depends on the rate of cellular and molecular processes implying that aging and age-related diseases are two different trajectories of the same process [18]. This determines that the courses of aging are different among individuals and that chronological aging is very different from the biological one. Furthermore, the interactions between genetic profile, environment, and lifestyle affect the individual’s ability to adapt to the various changes occurring over time [19,20]. Overall, the physiological changes that portray old people are the results of each individual’s adaptive strategies from a biological point of view [21], balancing the physiological decline that occurs during aging. In this context, critical events can immediately precipitate the response-ability, intended as the physiological reserve of the individual, thus modifying the aging trajectory [22]. This higher clinical complexity is well represented by the concept of frailty, a condition characterized by the increased vulnerability to stressors and reduced homeostatic reserves [23]. From a biological point of view, frailty is driven by the gradual, lifelong accumulation of molecular and cellular defects that involve different organs and systems (e.g., skeletal muscle, brain, respiratory, cardiovascular, and endocrine systems) [23]. Indeed, frailty is highly prevalent in the general population (~15%) [24]. Under these perspectives, frailty is indicated as a promising way of capturing the physiological decline, as well as the biological aging of the individuals [25]. Although there is a general agreement on the theoretical definition of frailty, the clinical identification is difficult due to pathophysiological complexity and clinical manifestations that lead each person to experience different degrees of “fragilization” [26,27,28,29]. Moreover, frailty is an operational definition used to describe a clinical condition measured with different constructs, and for this reason, incorrect interpretations are created [30]. There are multiple definitions to quantify frailty [30], and many operational approaches have been proposed over time [31], generating a relevant problem and reducing the ability to predict adverse outcomes if we consider that the subtle fluctuations of frailty are very difficult to detect [32]. Predominantly, the operational tools are based on two models: the frailty index (FI) [33] and the frailty phenotype (FP) [34]. The FI mirrors the biological age of the organism presenting the ratio of health deficits manifested by the individual at the end of a comprehensive geriatric assessment [25,35], demonstrating its applicability, even among long-lived people [36,37]. Furthermore, the FI is able to well capture the so-called “gender-paradox” [38], in which women have experienced greater longevity than men [39], albeit this survival advantage is linked to higher rates of disability and poor health during women’s lives [38].
In fact, physical decline is considered the cardinal sign of frailty [34,40], which motivates the fact that most frailty assessment tools are built on the FP [34]. Indeed, aging is typically characterized by muscle wasting that progressively causes disability, loss of muscle function and of self-sufficiency in older subjects. Muscle mass reaches its peak between 30 and 40 years of age and starts declining after that [41], up to a reduction of 25–30% in the cross-sectional area of the skeletal muscle and 40% in muscle strength [42]. This phenomenon is called “sarcopenia”, a term coined by Rosenberg at the end of the 1980s [43,44] to describe the age-related loss of muscle mass and later revised to include reduced muscle strength and/or function (i.e., dynapenia) [45,46,47,48,49]. At present, muscle weakness is the critical factor in diagnosing people with sarcopenia and in clinical decision-making [49]. As a result, sarcopenia recently received a specific International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) [50], making it a formally recognized disease [51]. The etiology of sarcopenia is multifactorial, involving many biological mechanisms [52,53], such as the neuromuscular junction dysfunction, reduced satellite cell number/function, intramuscular adipose tissue infiltration [54], as well as chronic inflammation [55].
Indeed, the involvement of neurological factors in the etiology of sarcopenia has been previously reported [56]. It is noteworthy that the PF model shows substantial overlaps with sarcopenia, since both cause a physically inactive lifestyle and fatigue [57]. Under this perspective, it has been proposed that sarcopenia may be the biological substrate for the development of physical frailty [57,58]. However, the causal relationship between the two manifestations remains largely unknown. For this reason, recently it has been coined the term ”physical frailty and sarcopenia” to merge the two conditions into a single entity [59] in which sarcopenia is intended as the biological substratum of physical frailty [57]. This concept is particularly applicable in older people whose ability to regulate the musculoskeletal system and cope with stress lose much of their efficiency [60], causing multisystem dysregulations.
To further complicate the picture, skeletal muscle can function as both an endocrine and a paracrine organ through the secretion of mediators, such as myokines, that bidirectionally link muscle to skeletal tissue [61,62].

3. Biological Mechanisms Underlying Sarcopenia and Frailty

The pathogenesis of frailty and sarcopenia in older people is suggested to encompass multiple biological systems [23,63,64,65]. In this regard, these two syndromes share several common risk factors, such as immune and inflammatory responses, hormonal dysregulation, and oxidative stress [66]. In this complex scenario, the mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal myocytes is recognized as a major driver of sarcopenia. Moreover, the contribution of the systemic processes (e.g., inflammation, hormones) to the muscle mitochondrial dysfunction remains to be fully elucidated.
Given this, frailty and sarcopenia are considered highly interrelated [66,67]. This section provides a brief overview of the current understanding of the key pathophysiologic processes of each of these conditions.

3.1. Immune Activation and Inflammation

A persistent immune system activation and a heightened inflammatory state are undoubtedly the most prominent and documented typical hallmarks of advanced age and a major contributor to several age-related pathologies, including frailty and sarcopenia [68,69]. This inflammatory process, identified with the term of “inflammaging” is often facilitated by physiologic and pathophysiologic alterations of the immune system occurring with aging, such as “immunosenescence”, an impairment of the functionality of immune cells that contributes to an increased incidence and severity of infections in older subjects [70,71].
In this context, a critical role is played by IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, whose age-related increased levels are well-known predictors of several pathophysiologic processes, including sarcopenia, physical disability, and motor performance decline even in well-functioning older adults (both men and women) [72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80].
In addition, a report from Leng et al. [81] provided the first evidence of a link between frailty and inflammation, demonstrating that community-dwelling older frail subjects presented with higher serum IL-6 levels than their non-frail-counterparts. To date, several studies have corroborated that this cytokine is directly related to frailty in community-dwelling older adults and in hospitalized people [82,83,84,85,86,87] and its secretion appears to be driven by an altered functionality of the immune cells (i.e., immunosenescence) in response to a chronic infection. Indeed, as demonstrated by Leng and colleagues [88], the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from older frail adults, after continuous exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), proliferate less and augment the release of this cytokine. In line with these reports, Qu and coworkers [89] proved that stimulation with LPS of monocytes isolated from frail older individuals resulted in a more robust expression of genes encoding for chemokines and cytokines than their non-frail counterparts. Interestingly, in another report, Schmaltz et al. [90] demonstrated that a chronic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was significantly associated with physical frailty and that IL-6 enhances the magnitude of such association. Finally, in a recent report from Kawamura et al. [91], it has been demonstrated that the chronic exposure of mice to porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) LPS (LPS-Pg), one of the major pathogenic factors for periodontitis [92,93], increases muscle atrophy participating to the development of sarcopenia. Of note, periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder triggered by Pg and other periodontal pathogens, that colonize the periodontium and, thanks to its virulence factors (including LPS-Pg), stimulates the production of inflammatory mediators and cytokines. Periodontal pathogens can destroy the epithelium of the periodontal pocket, thus allowing the entry of noxious endotoxins and exotoxins into the bloodstream, a process that leads to bacterial dissemination and systemic infection, with a consequent rise in the inflammatory response.
Importantly, as suggested by several studies, the fate of muscles in older subjects depends mostly by the severity and chronicity of inflammation [94,95]. In support of this proposal, Greiwe et al. provided data in humans suggesting that systemic inflammation (e.g., via the augmented circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α] levels) contributes to age-associated muscle wasting. These data were corroborated by Crossland and colleagues [96], who demonstrated that the LPS infusion in rats induced a significant systemic inflammatory response, accompanied with an increased expression of IL-6 and TNF-α in skeletal muscle, causing the loss of muscle mass and strength. In a human perspective, a recent report by Kamper and colleagues [97], using data from the Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study [98], observed that, during aging, the systemic levels of TNF-α and the C-reactive protein (CRP) increase especially in more physically frail older subjects, thus supporting the association between systemic inflammation and poor physical function. Of note, TNF-α plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia and frailty, since it directly upregulates the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of the activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway, including the ubiquitin-proteasome system, thus leading to to the loss of skeletal muscle proteins and myofibrils degradation [99,100] and myogenesis inhibition [101].

3.2. Role of Myokines

Skeletal muscles secrete many cytokines and factors called “myokines” with specific autocrine regulatory activities, including effects on the muscle metabolism, growth, and functionality, with effects also on inflammation and myogenesis [102,103,104]. Interestingly, such myokines may also systemically elicit paracrine functions on distant organs and tissues [97]. To date, several myokines have been identified, and some (described in this section) are relevant for their role in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia and frailty.

3.2.1. Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)

IGF-1 has a robust stimulatory effect on protein synthesis in muscle cells. Therefore, this factor is a well-recognized regulator of the regenerative capacity of muscle fibers. Indeed, IGF-1 stimulates growth and proliferation and controls the cell differentiation in muscles, bone, and cartilage tissue. Lower serum levels of this myokine have been proposed as an index of frailty and sarcopenia in older adults [105,106]. For instance, lower serum IGF-1 levels are related to the diminished physical performance and handgrip strength [107,108], high risk of disability [109,110], and are independently related to the reduction of skeletal muscle mass [106] in older adults.

3.2.2. Myostatin

Myostatin, also known as the growth differentiation factor 8 (GDF8), is a muscle-derived protein and member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily. As IGF-1, myostatin is a myokine regulating skeletal muscle metabolism and muscle mass [111]. However, in contrast to IGF-1, myostatin negatively impacts skeletal muscle mass, enhancing proteolysis and inhibiting the protein synthesis [111]. In addition, myostatin has been demonstrated to partake in the process of skeletal muscle wasting, typical of aging. For these reasons, myostatin has been investigated for its potential involvement in sarcopenia and frailty [22,112,113]. In this regard, several studies (both clinical and experimental) have reported an association between high myostatin levels and low muscle mass [114,115]. However, the relationship of myostatin with these conditions remains highly debated and inconclusive [116]. Indeed, opposite findings [116,117,118] or a lack of association [119] between circulating myostatin and frailty/sarcopenia conditions have been reported. In addition, the activities and levels of myostatin appear to be differently modulated in older women and men. For instance, Bergen 3rd et al. [120], demonstrated that myostatin contributes to the higher prevalence of sarcopenia only in women. Conversely, Chew and colleagues [121], despite confirming the presence of such sex differences, showed that myostatin in men is a potential biomarker for coexistent sarcopenia and frailty in community-dwelling older adults. Moreover, myostatin changes are also dependent on age and comorbidities [118,122], thus claiming for further studies that define better the specific association between the levels of myostatin and frailty/sarcopenia-parameters.

3.2.3. Irisin

Irisin, a peptide of 112-amino acids, is proteolytically cleaved and secreted from the fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5 (FNDC5) [123]. Irisin is considered a vital myokine, primarily synthesized and secreted by the skeletal muscle following mild physical activity, and its levels appear to be associated with increased muscle mass and strength [124,125]. Indeed, at molecular levels, irisin is a positive regulator of the IGF-1 and mTOR pathways, enhancing the muscle protein synthesis [125,126]. Moreover, studies demonstrated that the irisin administration to human skeletal muscle cells increased IGF-1 and decreased the myostatin mRNA levels [125,127]. Importantly, irisin exerts anti-inflammatory effects and positively impacts the myotube glucose homeostasis [102,103]. Accordingly, irisin is considered a promising biomarker of sarcopenia and frailty [128,129] since its levels are markedly reduced during aging, and as demonstrated by Chang et al. [128], low circulating irisin levels are a sensitive marker for muscle weakness and atrophy.

3.2.4. Follistatin

Follistatin is an endogenous inhibitor of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily ligands, including myostatin, and thereby promotes the skeletal muscle hypertrophy [130,131,132]. Therefore, follistatin has been proposed as a potential therapeutic against muscle atrophy [133,134,135]. Further, despite the controversy, an association with frailty and sarcopenia has been provided in older adults for follistatin [119,136,137].

3.3. Vitamin D

Nutritional factors play a significant role in the pathogenesis of frailty and sarcopenia [138]. Among these factors, Vitamin D and its deficiency have been demonstrated to affect the musculoskeletal function significantly [139]. Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin primarily synthesized in the skin upon sunlight exposure (ultraviolet B rays [UVB]), and about only 10% is supplied by dietary intake [138]. Importantly, Bischoff-Ferrari et al. [140] demonstrated that aging was associated with the decreased intracellular vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in human skeletal muscle tissue, and this was paired with a higher prevalence of a vitamin D deficiency. In addition, several observational studies provided an association between low vitamin D and sarcopenia and physical performance, in older adults [141,142], suggesting the involvement of the vitamin D/VDR system in muscle aging. Of note, the results from a study by Yu and colleagues [143], supported this thesis, demonstrating that a vitamin D deficiency can increase the incidence of age-related sarcopenia, by inducing oxidative stress, skeletal muscle senescence, and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Moreover, in a recent study [144], Parsanathan and colleagues showed that the co-supplementation of vitamin D and the antioxidant amino acid L-cysteine, in vitamin D-deficient mice, exerted beneficial effects on the skeletal muscle, improving the expression of the myogenic biomarkers and reducing the expression of the markers for musculoskeletal disorders, such as muscular dystrophy. Therefore, several randomized controlled trials have investigated the critical physiological role of this system within the muscle, demonstrating the beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation on muscle function [145,146,147,148].

3.4. Oxidative Stress

It is widely accepted that a direct relationship between oxidative stress and aging exists [149,150]. Accordingly, in 1956 Denham Harman proposed, for the first time, the free radical theory of aging, where oxidatively changed cellular components progressively accumulate in the cells during the organisms’ lifespan, leading to a decline of the cellular functions [151]. This thesis has been corroborated by decades of studies in both animals and humans, and, importantly, among the tissues negatively affected by oxidative stress, the skeletal muscle is one of the most important, especially in older persons. Indeed, as age progresses, muscles exhibit increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) that, in turn, causes the oxidative damage of the biomolecules (e.g., oxidation of lipids, protein, and DNA; protein carbonylation; inhibition of the muscle cell differentiation; breakdown of the myogenic proteins, and damaged autophagy process) [152,153,154,155]. In addition, the accumulation of ROS with aging induces apoptotic signaling cascades [150,156,157], leading to age-related muscle loss [158,159]. Mitochondria are a primary source of ROS in skeletal muscle, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is especially sensitive to oxidative DNA damage [160,161]. Of note, mtDNA damage (i.e., deletion, mutation frequency, copy number) increases in human skeletal muscle with age and is associated with impaired physical performance and skeletal muscle atrophy [161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168]. Importantly, it was demonstrated how antioxidants, ROS, and antioxidant enzymes control, in a positive or negative manner, inflammation and macrophage polarization [169,170,171,172] a process that, in skeletal muscle, is particularly relevant since it regulates both tissue regeneration (after injury) and infection resolution [173]. Together, these mechanisms seemingly underlie the pathogenesis of sarcopenia and frailty [149,150,174,175,176,177,178]. Indeed, in 2007, Howard and colleagues [179] provided one of the first proofs of the importance of oxidative protein damage measurement in predicting muscle weakening in the elderly. In line with these data, in a cross-sectional study performed on older women, these authors found that protein carbonylation was independently associated with low grip strength in frail women, compared to their non-frail counterparts. Subsequently, Serviddio and coworkers [180] provided data about a direct association between oxidative imbalance and frailty. In detail, these authors found raised levels of oxidized glutathione (GSSG), malondialdehyde (MDA), and 4-hydroxy-2,3-nonenal-(4-HNE) protein adducts in the plasma of frail elderly patients (aged 65 and older), compared to non-frail patients. Analogously, Bellanti et al. [181] demonstrated that significantly greater blood GSSG and plasma MDA/HNE protein adducts were observed in sarcopenic, rather than in non-sarcopenic, elderly patients. For their part, Bernabeu-Wittel and colleagues [182] evaluated the association between oxidative stress marker levels (total antioxidant capacity to the reactive oxygen species [TAC-ROS] and superoxide dismutase [SOD]) with sarcopenia and/or frailty, discovering that these markers were enhanced in both the conditions and when these coexisted.
Despite several biological mechanisms that have been highlighted, further studies are needed to better define their causal relationship with frailty and the sarcopenia parameters and to identify new possible therapeutic targets.

4. Impact of Space Flight on Astronauts’ Skeletal Muscle Health

Microgravity associated with space flight, especially following prolonged missions, results in the substantial deconditioning of the musculoskeletal system [183,184,185,186,187,188] that can be exacerbated due to a negative energy balance [185,189,190,191] and by the mission duration [187,188]. Consequently, a substantial muscle mass reduction (atrophy) and an impairment of muscle strength and endurance capacity represent a serious medical problem for astronauts upon their return to Earth or during a long-duration space flight. In this sense there are many parallels between the effects of aging and space flight on the skeletal muscle function and structure that can be drawn.

4.1. Clinical Manifestation of Sarcopenia/Frailty-like Phenotype in Astronauts

The term sarcopenia (from Greek: “sarx” for flesh and “penia” for loss) was defined in 1989 by Irwin Rosenberg to generally describe an age-related loss of muscle mass and function [44]. However, it is clinically essential to specify that sarcopenia also alters the physical performance and function. Indeed, this condition is associated with frailty, a condition characterized by the reduced functional ability and increased postural instability, disability, and mortality [192]. For this reason, sarcopenia is considered a clinical analog for microgravity-induced muscle deconditioning observed in astronauts during short and long-term missions [193,194]. Importantly, due to disuse in microgravity and limited movement range, astronauts undergo well-characterized and described effects related to muscle tissue (wasting and/or atrophy) and the skeletal system (accelerated bone resorption) [179]. Atrophy is the main skeletal muscle feature associated with microgravity and is manifested as both losses of muscle size/ volume and reduction in the myofiber size [180].
Indeed, in astronauts, the antigravity muscles (e.g., soleus, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, and muscles of the back), that are typically used on Earth, are no longer utilized in the absence of gravity, thereby they remain in a typical state of unloading and disuse [195,196,197,198,199,200]. These changes induce alterations in the size of the muscle fibers, resting and active force, contractile velocity, and function of the neuromuscular junctions, causing substantial physical deficits, such as fatigue and decreased speed [8,201,202]. Indeed, the clinical and biological manifestations that astronauts manifest during and after space flight seem to resemble the clinical and biological characteristics of physical frailty experienced by older people [60,203,204].
It is well known that aging alters the skeletal muscle homeostasis, contributing to an imbalance between the muscle protein anabolic and catabolic pathways and leads to an overall loss of skeletal muscle [205]. For instance, muscle mass reaches its peak between 30 and 40 years of age and starts declining thereafter [41], with up to 50% of the mass being lost by the 8th decade of life [206]. This decline can rapidly progress in people less physically active and in acute or chronic conditions [207]. From a biological point of view, the muscle loss experienced by sarcopenic older patients is driven by the decline in the number of neuromuscular junctions, leading to a loss of size and number of muscle fibers (predominately type II) [208].
In addition, the instability of the neuromuscular junctions, together with the altered production of calcium during the excitation-contraction coupling of the muscle, appear to be key factors in the decline of muscle strength [209] and force production [210]. Moreover, muscle capillarization is critical in reducing the exercise capacity and sarcopenia onset [211], and in regulating the skeletal muscle maintenance [212,213]. Similarly, the interplay between the nervous system and skeletal muscles is a key factor in the pathogenesis of muscular atrophy, induced by prolonged space flight [202,214,215,216]. Indeed, much evidence indicates that the presynaptic modulation of motoneurons, from the spinal cord to the neuromuscular junction, may contribute to muscle atrophy associated with space flight [201].
Since muscle mass accounts for up to 60 percent of the body mass, pathological alterations in this tissue could have enormous consequences for astronauts. It has been shown that muscle fibers rapidly adapt to the space environment in terms of size, strength, metabolic properties, and vascularization [217]. The level of adaptation and recovery to the microgravity environment depends on the mission duration and on inter-individual differences. Pre-flight markers may be used to identify crewmembers at the most significant risk of an altered response to microgravity and unloading, and therefore to indicate the need for preventative measures [218].
Furthermore, sex/gender differences may impact the ability to recover and the adequacy of the metabolic response after a space flight. For instance, previous studies showed that female astronauts take longer to restore their metabolic balance during recovery [219].
Significantly, this effect may depend on the alteration in sex hormones (i.e., estrogen) which, concerning women, are grossly understudied in both space missions and simulated microgravity [220]. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that during the menopausal and post-menopausal periods, women present with an increased progressive muscle degeneration (i.e., decrease in the quality and muscle function) than their male counterparts, and this effect has been partly related to the reduction in estrogen levels [221]. In this regard, studies in rats that underwent space flight (7–14 days) demonstrated a decrease in oxytocin levels [222]. This hormone attenuates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axes, dampens the stress responses in women, and indirectly correlates with the estrogens levels, since this sex hormone may increase the expression of oxytocin [223]. In addition, it should be kept in mind that other factors, such as impaired nutrition, hormonal dysregulations, and psychological stress, can trigger bone and muscle loss in older people and astronauts [180], accounting for the fact that there are very different aging phenotypes and different outcomes after the space flight [218,224].
Astronauts are subject to environmental stressors, such as isolation, a heavy workload, high noise and vibrations, exposure to radiation and toxins, limited nutrition, and the use of recycled air and water. These stressors could reduce their physiological reserve by altering their homeostasis and impacting the skeletal muscle function [201,202,225], as well as they can alter the biological mechanisms underlying aging [226,227]. There is growing evidence that the risk of frailty in older adults is strongly associated with an inadequate intake of food [228]. Indeed, a low dietary intake is one of the most critical factors of malnutrition responsible for the functional decline, physical frailty, sarcopenia, disability, and loss of independence [229,230]. In this regard, an inadequate caloric intake and altered protein content are also described in long-duration space flights affecting the astronauts’ metabolism and positive attitude [231].
Since some causal factors of sarcopenia, in the elderly population, are superimposable to the conditions to which the astronauts are exposed (e.g., food restriction, inactivity, social isolation), the assessment of pathophysiological mechanisms leading to muscle atrophy during space flight, could bring new insight on sarcopenia and frailty development.

4.2. Pathophysiological Mechanisms Activated in the Muscle by Prolonged Space Missions

As discussed above, there is a keen interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for the muscle atrophy observed in astronauts during and after space missions (Figure 1). Notably, previous studies on rodents have demonstrated that most of the effects on the muscle structure and function, induced by space, are qualitatively similar to those found in humans, especially with aging [217,232,233,234,235,236]. The results of both short- and long-term missions showed that muscle undergoes a considerable mass reduction (about 20% in humans and 30–40% in rodents), compared to the ground controls. These effects are associated with an extensive gene expression rearrangement at molecular levels. For instance, Allen et al. [237] analyzed the expression of key genes involved in numerous cellular processes, including the cytoskeletal and mitochondrial functions, metabolism, cell cycle, and apoptosis, in the gastrocnemius of mice (space flight group) that were kept flowing on the mid-deck of the space shuttle Endeavour (STS-108/UF-1) for 11 days and 19 h. The authors’ analysis demonstrated that the mRNA levels of most of the genes analyzed were significantly altered by the space flight, compared to the controls (normal gravity). Importantly, these authors found a significant alteration in the PhosphatidylInositol 3-Kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR pathway, which, as discussed above, represents critical regulator pathways of protein synthesis. In detail, an upregulation of the expressed genes involved in inhibiting this pathway, including the gene encoding for the PI3-kinase regulatory subunit p85α, which negatively impacts PI3-kinase signaling, has been observed. In addition, a robust increase in myostatin mRNA levels was found, which, along with the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, supports the idea that space flight causes a molecular shift towards mechanisms that enhance protein degradation. In line with these findings, the authors observed a decrease in the mRNA levels of the myostatin binding/inhibiting protein gene follistatin-like 3 (FSTL3), underling a negative impact on the skeletal muscle mass. Finally, a significantly altered expression of mRNAs encoding for the TNF-α-induced protein 2 and Nfatc3 was observed. In line with these data, Lalani and colleagues [238] demonstrated that muscle atrophy in rats undergoing a 17-day space flight (NASA STS-90 NeuroLab) was associated with the upregulation of myostatin and the decreased IGF-II levels. Interestingly, these alterations were normalized upon restoration of normal gravity and caging conditions. Sandonà et al. [183] performed a long-term (91-days) experiment on mice (mice drawer system [MDS] program, sponsored by the Italian Space Agency onboard the International Space Station) demonstrating that this long-term exposure to microgravity is responsible for an impaired muscle mass associated with a reduced IGF-1 expression.
Along with myokines, many reports have demonstrated that a dysregulation in the immune system function occurs in rodents and humans immediately following short- and long-duration space flights with a shift toward inflammaging, which, as seen in the previous paragraph, is one of the main factors promoting frailty and sarcopenia [239]. Notably, such an alteration is mediated both by microgravity or by ionizing radiations [240] and mainly consists in changes in the leukocyte distribution, in the impaired function of immune cells, and in altered cytokine and inflammatory mediators’ production and release [239,241,242]. Moreover, studies in rodents have clearly demonstrated that this immune system dysregulation is responsible for an impaired ability of the host to respond to infections [243]. Indeed, astronauts face an increased risk for microbial infections because of the altered microbiome (dysbiosis) [244]. For instance, studies have reported that astronauts exhibit increased gingival inflammation and periodontitis [245]. Further, the latent viral reactivation has been commonly reported during space flight and represent a manifestation of the immune system dysregulation [246,247].
Finally, oxidative stress and the consequent damage related to the excessive production of ROS and RNS by the skeletal muscle, have been found in astronauts during space flight, that are responsible for the altered structural and functional integrities of this tissue [248].
Following space flight, a substantial deconditioning of the musculoskeletal system with consequent muscle atrophy is observed in astronauts. This effect is dependent on multiple factors, and among these, a reduction (GREEN arrow) or an increase (RED arrow) of the crucial factors involved in protein synthesis, degradation, and oxidative and nitrosative stress damage, have been described. In detail, it has been demonstrated that a reduction in the insulin growth factor (IGF-I or IGF-II)/mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) system resulted in a reduction of the protein synthesis. Similarly, a decrease in follistatin-like 3 (FSTL3) with a consequent increase in myostatin levels, leads to the augmented protein degradation via the activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and to a parallel inhibition of the protein synthesis. Similarly, an increased concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), also stimulated by the microbial infections, resulted in the increased protein degradation. In addition to these mechanisms, a vitamin D deficiency is responsible for an increased mitochondrial dysfunction with a consequent increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide anion (O2·−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (·HO). In addition, O2·− can interact with nitric oxide radical (NO·), leading to the generation of the reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (e.g., peroxynitrite [ONOO]). ROS and RNS cause oxidative damage to biomolecules (e.g., protein and DNA) with harmful effects on the skeletal muscle cells.

5. Potential Countermeasures

Based on current observations, aging-like physical frailty and sarcopenia conditions are observed in astronauts during and after space flight. Therefore, adequate countermeasures aiming at counteracting the adverse effects of space flight on astronauts can take into account the current strategies used to fight sarcopenia and frailty in older people. In this regard, physical activity and/or nutritional interventions are undoubtedly considered the forefront strategies to counteract muscle atrophy and bone mineral density in both older adults and astronauts [249]. In general, exercise training is mainly associated with systemically beneficial effects, positively affecting the skeletal muscles and other tissues/organs [250,251,252,253,254]. Among the effects reported on muscles, exercise has been shown to attenuate the imbalance between the muscle protein degradation and synthesis, reduce the oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction, decrease inflammation, and stabilize the autophagy processes [252,253]. Interestingly, it has been described that a multicomponent intervention, based on physical activity with technological support and nutritional counselling, is associated with a reduction in the incidence of physical frailty and sarcopenia in older subjects [255].
In this context, exercise remains the primary countermeasure to mitigate the impairment in the physical performance that astronauts experience [256,257,258]. Indeed, recent studies have demonstrated that astronauts, using modern on-board resistive exercise devices, appear to be less susceptible to muscle changes [224,259]. However, despite the beneficial effects elicited by exercise training in astronauts, considerable muscle loss is still observed, thus demanding a period of rehabilitation upon their return to Earth [260,261]. In older adults, the effects of exercise are highly variable and mostly depend on the response to exercise (which is low in most subjects) and on the patients’ mobility in general [262]. For example, after resistance-type exercise training, the size increment of type II muscle fibers was mainly driven by individuals who had a higher muscle fiber capillarization at the baseline [263].
Therefore, other therapeutic approaches have been tested and implemented to counteract the effects of aging or space flight on skeletal muscle. In this regard, nutritional supplement to prevent a low vitamin D status, seemingly associated with muscle loss and impaired performance, has been adopted as an additional intervention and has been tested both in the geriatric population and in space flight studies. However, whether vitamin D supplementation in astronauts or old sarcopenic patients is beneficial or not in counteracting muscle atrophy, remains still controversial. Indeed, specific unresolved issues, including the complicated mechanisms underlying vitamin D activities on muscle tissue [264], the duration and dose of vitamin D supplementation need to be further investigated [148,265]. Finally, new drug candidates may find an ideal positioning, particularly among people that are non-responsive to lifestyle modifications because of the biological, clinical, and/or social factors [266,267]. Among these, myostatin antagonists (i.e., antibodies) have been extensively investigated under various clinical conditions associated with muscle loss and functional impairment. For instance, the anti-myostatin antibody (ATA 842) administration in elderly mice has been proven to increase muscle mass and strength [268]. In addition, in a multicenter study conducted in older people, it has been shown that myostatin antibody (LY2495655) improved the functional muscle power [269]. Of note, several myostatin pathway inhibitors are investigated in clinical trials for their potential impact on muscle atrophy [249], raising the possibility of using this therapeutic intervention also in astronauts and cosmonauts, to counteract long-term space flight-induced muscle alteration. In this sense, a study by Smith and coworkers [249] represents the first step towards implementing these drugs in astronauts, as they provide data in mice showing that the anti-myostatin antibody YN41 prevents space flight-induced atrophy. From these perspectives, it seems evident that combining pharmacological interventions with physical activity and nutritional support could be the gold standard to counter these adverse conditions both in space and on Earth.

6. Perspectives and Conclusions

This review article summarized the current knowledge regarding how space flight affects the physical function of astronauts by altering skeletal muscle cells and function. The picture coming out from this analysis is that part of the harmful mechanisms activated in the muscles and systemically in astronauts are parallel to those observed in older people (see Paragraph 3 and Figure 2). Of course, further investigations on space flight induced effects and the recovery phase of astronauts are needed to clarify the main determinants and causes of the development of these aging-like pathological conditions with applicative consequences also in the geriatric field. In light of this premise, it is worth stressing that the convergence of Geroscience and gravitational/space research can significantly advance our understanding of human physiology and the biological mechanisms involved in adapting to stress.
Increased inflammation, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/R reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and the altered myokines expression have been found in astronauts and older people and are responsible for the altered structural and functional integrity of the skeletal muscle. Adequate countermeasures aiming at counteracting these adverse effects include exercise training, vitamin D, and multi-nutrient supplementation, have been shown to reduce oxidative damage and inflammation and stabilize the myokine expression.

Author Contributions

A.C. (Alessandro Cannavo) wrote and revised the manuscript; A.C. (Angelica Carandina), G.C., E.T. revised the manuscript. N.M. revised and edited the manuscript. B.A. wrote, revised, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Partially funded by Italian Minister of Health: R.C. 2022-193.01. Partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health: RCR-2022-23682286 (Ricerca Corrente Reti 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Strollo, F. Chapter 4 Hormonal Changes in Humans During Spaceflight. In Advances in Space Biology and Medicine; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 7, pp. 99–129. ISBN 978-0-7623-0393-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Strollo, F.; Gentile, S.; Strollo, G.; Mambro, A.; Vernikos, J. Recent Progress in Space Physiology and Aging. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Vernikos, J.; Schneider, V.S. Space, Gravity and the Physiology of Aging: Parallel or Convergent Disciplines? A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2010, 56, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vandenburgh, H.; Chromiak, J.; Shansky, J.; Del Tatto, M.; Lemaire, J. Space travel directly induces skeletal muscle atrophy. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Williams, D.; Kuipers, A.; Mukai, C.; Thirsk, R. Acclimation during space flight: Effects on human physiology. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2009, 180, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Janssen, I. Influence of Sarcopenia on the Development of Physical Disability: The Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2006, 54, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zizola, C.; Schulze, P.C. Metabolic and structural impairment of skeletal muscle in heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2013, 18, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Goswami, N. Falls and Fall-Prevention in Older Persons: Geriatrics Meets Spaceflight! Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Furukawa, S.; Chatani, M.; Higashitani, A.; Higashibata, A.; Kawano, F.; Nikawa, T.; Numaga-Tomita, T.; Ogura, T.; Sato, F.; Sehara-Fujisawa, A.; et al. Findings from recent studies by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency examining musculoskeletal atrophy in space and on Earth. NPJ Microgravity 2021, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goswami, N.; Blaber, A.P.; Hinghofer-Szalkay, H.; Montani, J.-P. Orthostatic Intolerance in Older Persons: Etiology and Countermeasures. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Keskin, K. Orthostatic hypotension and age-related sarcopenia. Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabilit. 2021, 67, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Larsson, L.; Degens, H.; Li, M.; Salviati, L.; Lee, Y.I.; Thompson, W.; Kirkland, J.L.; Sandri, M. Sarcopenia: Aging-Related Loss of Muscle Mass and Function. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 427–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Umegaki, H. Sarcopenia and frailty in older patients with diabetes mellitus: Sarcopenia and frailty in DM. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2016, 16, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cesari, M.; Landi, F.; Vellas, B.; Bernabei, R.; Marzetti, E. Sarcopenia and Physical Frailty: Two Sides of the Same Coin. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rahimi Foroushani, A.; Estebsari, F.; Mostafaei, D.; Eftekhar Ardebili, H.; Shojaeizadeh, D.; Dastoorpour, M.; Jamshidi, E.; Taghdisi, M.H. The effect of health promoting intervention on healthy lifestyle and social support in elders: A clinical trial study. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2014, 16, e18399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Brown, G.C. Living too long: The current focus of medical research on increasing the quantity, rather than the quality, of life is damaging our health and harming the economy. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dominguez, L.J.; Veronese, N.; Baiamonte, E.; Guarrera, M.; Parisi, A.; Ruffolo, C.; Tagliaferri, F.; Barbagallo, M. Healthy Aging and Dietary Patterns. Nutrients 2022, 14, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Morsiani, C.; Conte, M.; Santoro, A.; Grignolio, A.; Monti, D.; Capri, M.; Salvioli, S. The Continuum of Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Common Mechanisms but Different Rates. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Capri, M.; Salvioli, S.; Sevini, F.; Valensin, S.; Celani, L.; Monti, D.; Pawelec, G.; De Benedictis, G.; Gonos, E.S.; Franceschi, C. The genetics of human longevity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1067, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salvioli, S.; Olivieri, F.; Marchegiani, F.; Cardelli, M.; Santoro, A.; Bellavista, E.; Mishto, M.; Invidia, L.; Capri, M.; Valensin, S.; et al. Genes, ageing and longevity in humans: Problems, advantages and perspectives. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 1303–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Franceschi, C.; Valensin, S.; Bonafè, M.; Paolisso, G.; Yashin, A.I.; Monti, D.; De Benedictis, G. The network and the remodeling theories of aging: Historical background and new perspectives. Exp. Gerontol. 2000, 35, 879–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Calvani, R.; Marini, F.; Cesari, M.; Tosato, M.; Anker, S.D.; von Haehling, S.; Miller, R.R.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Marzetti, E.; et al. Biomarkers for physical frailty and sarcopenia: State of the science and future developments. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015, 6, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Clegg, A.; Young, J.; Iliffe, S.; Rikkert, M.O.; Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013, 381, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Collard, R.M.; Boter, H.; Schoevers, R.A.; Oude Voshaar, R.C. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: A systematic review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012, 60, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mitnitski, A.B.; Mogilner, A.J.; Rockwood, K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci. World J. 2001, 1, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cesari, M.; Calvani, R.; Marzetti, E. Frailty in Older Persons. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2017, 33, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, X.; Mao, G.; Leng, S.X. Frailty syndrome: An overview. Clin. Interv. Aging 2014, 9, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Looman, W.M.; Fabbricotti, I.N.; Blom, J.W.; Jansen, A.P.D.; Lutomski, J.E.; Metzelthin, S.F.; Huijsman, R.; TOPICS-MDS Research Consortium. The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stolz, E.; Mayerl, H.; Freidl, W. Fluctuations in frailty among older adults. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cesari, M.; Marzetti, E.; Calvani, R.; Vellas, B.; Bernabei, R.; Bordes, P.; Roubenoff, R.; Landi, F.; Cherubini, A.; SPRINTT consortium. The need of operational paradigms for frailty in older persons: The SPRINTT project. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morley, J.E.; Vellas, B.; van Kan, G.A.; Anker, S.D.; Bauer, J.M.; Bernabei, R.; Cesari, M.; Chumlea, W.C.; Doehner, W.; Evans, J.; et al. Frailty consensus: A call to action. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013, 14, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coelho-Júnior, H.J.; Calvani, R.; Picca, A.; Gonçalves, I.O.; Landi, F.; Bernabei, R.; Cesari, M.; Uchida, M.C.; Marzetti, E. Protein-Related Dietary Parameters and Frailty Status in Older Community-Dwellers across Different Frailty Instruments. Nutrients 2020, 12, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lucas, M.; Goblet, C.; Keller, A.; Lamandé, N.; Gros, F.; Whalen, R.G.; Lazar, M. Modulation of embryonic and muscle-specific enolase gene products in the developing mouse hindlimb. Differentiation 1992, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rockwood, K.; Mitnitski, A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007, 62, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Arosio, B.; Ferri, E.; Casati, M.; Mari, D.; Vitale, G.; Cesari, M. The Frailty Index in centenarians and their offspring. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 31, 1685–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arosio, B.; Geraci, A.; Ferri, E.; Mari, D.; Cesari, M. Biological Frailty Index in centenarians. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022, 34, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oksuzyan, A.; Juel, K.; Vaupel, J.W.; Christensen, K. Men: Good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 20, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Thorslund, M.; Wastesson, J.W.; Agahi, N.; Lagergren, M.; Parker, M.G. The rise and fall of women’s advantage: A comparison of national trends in life expectancy at age 65 years. Eur. J. Ageing 2013, 10, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hoogendijk, E.O.; Afilalo, J.; Ensrud, K.E.; Kowal, P.; Onder, G.; Fried, L.P. Frailty: Implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet 2019, 394, 1365–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Siparsky, P.N.; Kirkendall, D.T.; Garrett, W.E. Muscle changes in aging: Understanding sarcopenia. Sports Health 2014, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vandervoot, A.A.; Symons, T.B. Functional and metabolic consequences of sarcopenia. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 26, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Clark, B.C. Neuromuscular Changes with Aging and Sarcopenia. J. Frailty Aging 2019, 8, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rosenberg, I.H. Sarcopenia: Origins and clinical relevance. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 990S–991S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Baker, B.A. Efficacy of Age-Specific High-Intensity Stretch-Shortening Contractions in Reversing Dynapenia, Sarcopenia, and Loss of Skeletal Muscle Quality. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2018, 3, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Clark, B.C.; Manini, T.M. Sarcopenia =/= dynapenia. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2008, 63, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Clark, B.C.; Manini, T.M. What is dynapenia? Nutrition 2012, 28, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Morley, J.E.; Abbatecola, A.M.; Argiles, J.M.; Baracos, V.; Bauer, J.; Bhasin, S.; Cederholm, T.; Coats, A.J.S.; Cummings, S.R.; Evans, W.J.; et al. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: An international consensus. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2011, 12, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Anker, S.D.; Morley, J.E.; von Haehling, S. Welcome to the ICD-10 code for sarcopenia. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016, 7, 512–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vellas, B.; Fielding, R.A.; Bens, C.; Bernabei, R.; Cawthon, P.M.; Cederholm, T.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Del Signore, S.; Donahue, S.; Morley, J.; et al. Implications of ICD-10 for Sarcopenia Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials: Report by the International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Task Force. J. Frailty Aging 2018, 7, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Malafarina, V.; Uriz-Otano, F.; Iniesta, R.; Gil-Guerrero, L. Sarcopenia in the elderly: Diagnosis, physiopathology and treatment. Maturitas 2012, 71, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pedersen, L.; Hojman, P. Muscle-to-organ cross talk mediated by myokines. Adipocyte 2012, 1, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Pagano, A.F.; Brioche, T.; Arc-Chagnaud, C.; Demangel, R.; Chopard, A.; Py, G. Short-term disuse promotes fatty acid infiltration into skeletal muscle. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fulop, T.; Larbi, A.; Dupuis, G.; Le Page, A.; Frost, E.H.; Cohen, A.A.; Witkowski, J.M.; Franceschi, C. Immunosenescence and Inflamm-Aging As Two Sides of the Same Coin: Friends or Foes? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sui, S.X.; Williams, L.J.; Holloway-Kew, K.L.; Hyde, N.K.; Pasco, J.A. Skeletal Muscle Health and Cognitive Function: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Landi, F.; Calvani, R.; Cesari, M.; Tosato, M.; Martone, A.M.; Bernabei, R.; Onder, G.; Marzetti, E. Sarcopenia as the Biological Substrate of Physical Frailty. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2015, 31, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Landi, F.; Calvani, R.; Cesari, M.; Tosato, M.; Martone, A.M.; Ortolani, E.; Savera, G.; Salini, S.; Sisto, A.; Picca, A.; et al. Sarcopenia: An Overview on Current Definitions, Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2018, 19, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marzetti, E.; Calvani, R.; Cesari, M.; Tosato, M.; Cherubini, A.; Di Bari, M.; Pahor, M.; Savera, G.; Collamati, A.; D’Angelo, E.; et al. Operationalization of the physical frailty & sarcopenia syndrome: Rationale and clinical implementation. Transl. Med. UniSa 2015, 13, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Guerville, F.; De Souto Barreto, P.; Ader, I.; Andrieu, S.; Casteilla, L.; Dray, C.; Fazilleau, N.; Guyonnet, S.; Langin, D.; Liblau, R.; et al. Revisiting the Hallmarks of Aging to Identify Markers of Biological Age. J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 2020, 7, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tagliaferri, C.; Wittrant, Y.; Davicco, M.-J.; Walrand, S.; Coxam, V. Muscle and bone, two interconnected tissues. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015, 21, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Florin, A.; Lambert, C.; Sanchez, C.; Zappia, J.; Durieux, N.; Tieppo, A.M.; Mobasheri, A.; Henrotin, Y. The secretome of skeletal muscle cells: A systematic review. Osteoarthr. Cartil. Open 2020, 2, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fried, L.P.; Xue, Q.-L.; Cappola, A.R.; Ferrucci, L.; Chaves, P.; Varadhan, R.; Guralnik, J.M.; Leng, S.X.; Semba, R.D.; Walston, J.D.; et al. Nonlinear multisystem physiological dysregulation associated with frailty in older women: Implications for etiology and treatment. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2009, 64, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, G.C.; Walston, J. CMV Infection and Frailty: Immunologic Consequences and Disease Pathogenesis. In Handbook on Immunosenescence: Basic Understanding and Clinical Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 9781402090639, pp. 1305–1326. ISBN 978-1-4020-9062-2. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yu, Z.; Ruan, Q.; D’Onofrio, G.; Greco, A. From Sarcopenia to Frailty: The Pathophysiological Basis and Potential Target Molecules of Intervention. Frailty Sarcopenia-Onset Dev. Clin. Chall 2017, 3, 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fulop, T.; Larbi, A.; Witkowski, J.M.; McElhaney, J.; Loeb, M.; Mitnitski, A.; Pawelec, G. Aging, frailty and age-related diseases. Biogerontology 2010, 11, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ruan, Q.; D’Onofrio, G.; Sancarlo, D.; Greco, A.; Lozupone, M.; Seripa, D.; Panza, F.; Yu, Z. Emerging biomarkers and screening for cognitive frailty. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Borras, C.; Ingles, M.; Mas-Bargues, C.; Dromant, M.; Sanz-Ros, J.; Román-Domínguez, A.; Gimeno-Mallench, L.; Gambini, J.; Viña, J. Centenarians: An excellent example of resilience for successful ageing. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2020, 186, 111199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yao, X.; Li, H.; Leng, S.X. Inflammation and immune system alterations in frailty. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2011, 27, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wertheimer, A.M.; Bennett, M.S.; Park, B.; Uhrlaub, J.L.; Martinez, C.; Pulko, V.; Currier, N.L.; Nikolich-Žugich, D.; Kaye, J.; Nikolich-Žugich, J. Aging and cytomegalovirus infection differentially and jointly affect distinct circulating T cell subsets in humans. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 2143–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Pawelec, G.; Derhovanessian, E. Role of CMV in immune senescence. Virus Res. 2011, 157, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ying, L.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, Y.-M.; Zhou, J.-Y. A Combination of Serum Biomarkers in Elderly Patients with Sarcopenia: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2022, 2022, 4026940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rong, Y.-D.; Bian, A.-L.; Hu, H.-Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, X.-Z. Study on relationship between elderly sarcopenia and inflammatory cytokine IL-6, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bian, A.-L.; Hu, H.-Y.; Rong, Y.-D.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.-X.; Zhou, X.-Z. A study on relationship between elderly sarcopenia and inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2017, 22, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Reuben, D.B.; Cheh, A.I.; Harris, T.B.; Ferrucci, L.; Rowe, J.W.; Tracy, R.P.; Seeman, T.E. Peripheral blood markers of inflammation predict mortality and functional decline in high-functioning community-dwelling older persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Visser, M.; Pahor, M.; Taaffe, D.R.; Goodpaster, B.H.; Simonsick, E.M.; Newman, A.B.; Nevitt, M.; Harris, T.B. Relationship of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha with muscle mass and muscle strength in elderly men and women: The Health ABC Study. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002, 57, M326–M332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ershler, W.B. Interleukin-6: A cytokine for gerontologists. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1993, 41, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Maggio, M.; Guralnik, J.M.; Longo, D.L.; Ferrucci, L. Interleukin-6 in aging and chronic disease: A magnificent pathway. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2006, 61, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Harris, T.B.; Ferrucci, L.; Tracy, R.P.; Corti, M.C.; Wacholder, S.; Ettinger, W.H.; Heimovitz, H.; Cohen, H.J.; Wallace, R. Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am. J. Med. 1999, 106, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ferrucci, L.; Penninx, B.W.J.H.; Volpato, S.; Harris, T.B.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Balfour, J.; Leveille, S.G.; Fried, L.P.; Md, J.M.G. Change in muscle strength explains accelerated decline of physical function in older women with high interleukin-6 serum levels. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 1947–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Leng, S.; Chaves, P.; Koenig, K.; Walston, J. Serum interleukin-6 and hemoglobin as physiological correlates in the geriatric syndrome of frailty: A pilot study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 1268–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heinze-Milne, S.D.; Banga, S.; Howlett, S.E. Frailty and cytokines in preclinical models: Comparisons with humans. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2022, 206, 111706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tembo, M.C.; Holloway-Kew, K.L.; Bortolasci, C.C.; Brennan-Olsen, S.L.; Williams, L.J.; Kotowicz, M.A.; Pasco, J.A. Association between serum interleukin-6 and frailty in older men: Cross-sectional data. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 12, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Semmarath, W.; Seesen, M.; Yodkeeree, S.; Sapbamrer, R.; Ayood, P.; Malasao, R.; Siviroj, P.; Limtrakul Dejkriengkraikul, P. The Association between Frailty Indicators and Blood-Based Biomarkers in Early-Old Community Dwellers of Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Gilmore, N.; Kadambi, S.; Lei, L.; Loh, K.P.; Mohamed, M.; Magnuson, A.; Cole, S.; Esparaz, B.T.; Giguere, J.K.; Mohile, S.; et al. Associations of inflammation with frailty in patients with breast cancer aged 50 and over receiving chemotherapy. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 2020, 11, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Boxer, R.S.; Dauser, D.A.; Walsh, S.J.; Hager, W.D.; Kenny, A.M. The association between vitamin D and inflammation with the 6-minute walk and frailty in patients with heart failure. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008, 56, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Samson, L.D.; Buisman, A.-M.; Ferreira, J.A.; Picavet, H.S.J.; Verschuren, W.M.M.; Boots, A.M.; Engelfriet, P. Inflammatory marker trajectories associated with frailty and ageing in a 20-year longitudinal study. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2022, 11, e1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Leng, S.X.; Yang, H.; Walston, J.D. Decreased cell proliferation and altered cytokine production in frail older adults. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2004, 16, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Qu, T.; Walston, J.D.; Yang, H.; Fedarko, N.S.; Xue, Q.-L.; Beamer, B.A.; Ferrucci, L.; Rose, N.R.; Leng, S.X. Upregulated ex vivo expression of stress-responsive inflammatory pathway genes by LPS-challenged CD14(+) monocytes in frail older adults. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2009, 130, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Schmaltz, H.N.; Fried, L.P.; Xue, Q.-L.; Walston, J.; Leng, S.X.; Semba, R.D. Chronic cytomegalovirus infection and inflammation are associated with prevalent frailty in community-dwelling older women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kawamura, N.; Ohnuki, Y.; Matsuo, I.; Suita, K.; Ishikawa, M.; Mototani, Y.; Shiozawa, K.; Ito, A.; Yagisawa, Y.; Hayakawa, Y.; et al. Effects of chronic Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide infusion on skeletal muscles in mice. J. Physiol. Sci. 2019, 69, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Liccardo, D.; Cannavo, A.; Spagnuolo, G.; Ferrara, N.; Cittadini, A.; Rengo, C.; Rengo, G. Periodontal Disease: A Risk Factor for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Del Giudice, C.; Vaia, E.; Liccardo, D.; Marzano, F.; Valletta, A.; Spagnuolo, G.; Ferrara, N.; Rengo, C.; Cannavo, A.; Rengo, G. Infective Endocarditis: A Focus on Oral Microbiota. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wilson, D.; Jackson, T.; Sapey, E.; Lord, J.M. Frailty and sarcopenia: The potential role of an aged immune system. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 36, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Murton, A.J.; Maddocks, M.; Stephens, F.B.; Marimuthu, K.; England, R.; Wilcock, A. Consequences of Late-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cachexia on Muscle Metabolic Processes. Clin. Lung Cancer 2017, 18, e1–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Crossland, H.; Constantin-Teodosiu, D.; Gardiner, S.M.; Constantin, D.; Greenhaff, P.L. A potential role for Akt/FOXO signalling in both protein loss and the impairment of muscle carbohydrate oxidation during sepsis in rodent skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 5589–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kamper, R.S.; Alcazar, J.; Andersen, L.L.; Haddock, B.; Jørgensen, N.R.; Hovind, P.; Suetta, C. Associations between inflammatory markers, body composition, and physical function: The Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021, 12, 1641–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Suetta, C.; Haddock, B.; Alcazar, J.; Noerst, T.; Hansen, O.M.; Ludvig, H.; Kamper, R.S.; Schnohr, P.; Prescott, E.; Andersen, L.L.; et al. The Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study: Lean mass, strength, power, and physical function in a Danish cohort aged 20–93 years. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019, 10, 1316–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Pijet, B.; Pijet, M.; Litwiniuk, A.; Gajewska, M.; Pająk, B.; Orzechowski, A. TNF- α and IFN-s-dependent muscle decay is linked to NF-κB- and STAT-1α-stimulated Atrogin1 and MuRF1 genes in C2C12 myotubes. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 171437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Ladner, K.J.; Caligiuri, M.A.; Guttridge, D.C. Tumor necrosis factor-regulated biphasic activation of NF-kappa B is required for cytokine-induced loss of skeletal muscle gene products. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 2294–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Li, H.; Malhotra, S.; Kumar, A. Nuclear factor-kappa B signaling in skeletal muscle atrophy. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 86, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Parsanathan, R.; Jain, S.K. Hydrogen Sulfide Regulates Irisin and Glucose Metabolism in Myotubes and Muscle of HFD-Fed Diabetic Mice. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhu, W.; Sahar, N.E.; Javaid, H.M.A.; Pak, E.S.; Liang, G.; Wang, Y.; Ha, H.; Huh, J.Y. Exercise-Induced Irisin Decreases Inflammation and Improves NAFLD by Competitive Binding with MD2. Cells 2021, 10, 3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Gonzalez-Gil, A.M.; Elizondo-Montemayor, L. The Role of Exercise in the Interplay between Myokines, Hepatokines, Osteokines, Adipokines, and Modulation of Inflammation for Energy Substrate Redistribution and Fat Mass Loss: A Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Doi, T.; Makizako, H.; Tsutsumimoto, K.; Hotta, R.; Nakakubo, S.; Makino, K.; Suzuki, T.; Shimada, H. Association between Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and Frailty among Older Adults. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2018, 22, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bian, A.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Association between sarcopenia and levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in the elderly. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Mohamad, M.I.; Khater, M.S. Evaluation of insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level and its impact on muscle and bone mineral density in frail elderly male. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 60, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. van Nieuwpoort, I.C.; Vlot, M.C.; Schaap, L.A.; Lips, P.; Drent, M.L. The relationship between serum IGF-1, handgrip strength, physical performance and falls in elderly men and women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 179, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Cappola, A.R.; Xue, Q.-L.; Ferrucci, L.; Guralnik, J.M.; Volpato, S.; Fried, L.P. Insulin-like growth factor I and interleukin-6 contribute synergistically to disability and mortality in older women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Doi, T.; Shimada, H.; Makizako, H.; Tsutsumimoto, K.; Hotta, R.; Nakakubo, S.; Suzuki, T. Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Related to Disability Among Older Adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016, 71, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Carnac, G.; Vernus, B.; Bonnieu, A. Myostatin in the pathophysiology of skeletal muscle. Curr. Genom. 2007, 8, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Scharf, G.; Heineke, J. Finding good biomarkers for sarcopenia. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2012, 3, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. White, T.A.; LeBrasseur, N.K. Myostatin and sarcopenia: Opportunities and challenges—A mini-review. Gerontology 2014, 60, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Léger, B.; Derave, W.; De Bock, K.; Hespel, P.; Russell, A.P. Human sarcopenia reveals an increase in SOCS-3 and myostatin and a reduced efficiency of Akt phosphorylation. Rejuvenation Res. 2008, 11, 163–175B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Yarasheski, K.E.; Bhasin, S.; Sinha-Hikim, I.; Pak-Loduca, J.; Gonzalez-Cadavid, N.F. Serum myostatin-immunoreactive protein is increased in 60-92 year old women and men with muscle wasting. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2002, 6, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Arrieta, H.; Hervás, G.; Rezola-Pardo, C.; Ruiz-Litago, F.; Iturburu, M.; Yanguas, J.J.; Gil, S.M.; Rodriguez-Larrad, A.; Irazusta, J. Serum Myostatin Levels Are Higher in Fitter, More Active, and Non-Frail Long-Term Nursing Home Residents and Increase after a Physical Exercise Intervention. Gerontology 2019, 65, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Peng, L.-N.; Lee, W.-J.; Liu, L.-K.; Lin, M.-H.; Chen, L.-K. Healthy community-living older men differ from women in associations between myostatin levels and skeletal muscle mass. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fife, E.; Kostka, J.; Kroc, Ł.; Guligowska, A.; Pigłowska, M.; Sołtysik, B.; Kaufman-Szymczyk, A.; Fabianowska-Majewska, K.; Kostka, T. Relationship of muscle function to circulating myostatin, follistatin and GDF11 in older women and men. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ratkevicius, A.; Joyson, A.; Selmer, I.; Dhanani, T.; Grierson, C.; Tommasi, A.M.; DeVries, A.; Rauchhaus, P.; Crowther, D.; Alesci, S.; et al. Serum concentrations of myostatin and myostatin-interacting proteins do not differ between young and sarcopenic elderly men. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2011, 66, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bergen, H.R.; Farr, J.N.; Vanderboom, P.M.; Atkinson, E.J.; White, T.A.; Singh, R.J.; Khosla, S.; LeBrasseur, N.K. Myostatin as a mediator of sarcopenia versus homeostatic regulator of muscle mass: Insights using a new mass spectrometry-based assay. Skelet. Muscle 2015, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Chew, J.; Tay, L.; Lim, J.P.; Leung, B.P.; Yeo, A.; Yew, S.; Ding, Y.Y.; Lim, W.S. Serum Myostatin and IGF-1 as Gender-Specific Biomarkers of Frailty and Low Muscle Mass in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2019, 23, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Furihata, T.; Kinugawa, S.; Fukushima, A.; Takada, S.; Homma, T.; Masaki, Y.; Abe, T.; Yokota, T.; Oba, K.; Okita, K.; et al. Serum myostatin levels are independently associated with skeletal muscle wasting in patients with heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 220, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Huh, J.Y.; Panagiotou, G.; Mougios, V.; Brinkoetter, M.; Vamvini, M.T.; Schneider, B.E.; Mantzoros, C.S. FNDC5 and irisin in humans: I. Predictors of circulating concentrations in serum and plasma and II. mRNA expression and circulating concentrations in response to weight loss and exercise. Metabolism 2012, 61, 1725–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kurdiova, T.; Balaz, M.; Vician, M.; Maderova, D.; Vlcek, M.; Valkovic, L.; Srbecky, M.; Imrich, R.; Kyselovicova, O.; Belan, V.; et al. Effects of obesity, diabetes and exercise on Fndc5 gene expression and irisin release in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: In vivo and in vitro studies. J. Physiol. 2014, 592, 1091–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Paris, M.T.; Bell, K.E.; Mourtzakis, M. Myokines and adipokines in sarcopenia: Understanding cross-talk between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue and the role of exercise. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2020, 52, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Reza, M.M.; Subramaniyam, N.; Sim, C.M.; Ge, X.; Sathiakumar, D.; McFarlane, C.; Sharma, M.; Kambadur, R. Irisin is a pro-myogenic factor that induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy and rescues denervation-induced atrophy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Huh, J.Y.; Dincer, F.; Mesfum, E.; Mantzoros, C.S. Irisin stimulates muscle growth-related genes and regulates adipocyte differentiation and metabolism in humans. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chang, J.S.; Kim, T.H.; Nguyen, T.T.; Park, K.-S.; Kim, N.; Kong, I.D. Circulating irisin levels as a predictive biomarker for sarcopenia: A cross-sectional community-based study. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2017, 17, 2266–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Fossati, C.; Papalia, R.; Torre, G.; Vadalà, G.; Borrione, P.; Grazioli, E.; Mazzola, C.; Parisi, A.; Pigozzi, F.; Denaro, V. Frailty of the elderly in orthopaedic surgery and body composition changes: The musculoskeletal crosstalk through irisin. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 327–335. [Google Scholar]
  130. Nakatani, M.; Takehara, Y.; Sugino, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Hashimoto, O.; Hasegawa, Y.; Murakami, T.; Uezumi, A.; Takeda, S.; Noji, S.; et al. Transgenic expression of a myostatin inhibitor derived from follistatin increases skeletal muscle mass and ameliorates dystrophic pathology in mdx mice. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kota, J.; Handy, C.R.; Haidet, A.M.; Montgomery, C.L.; Eagle, A.; Rodino-Klapac, L.R.; Tucker, D.; Shilling, C.J.; Therlfall, W.R.; Walker, C.M.; et al. Follistatin gene delivery enhances muscle growth and strength in nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 2009, 1, 6ra15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Amthor, H.; Nicholas, G.; McKinnell, I.; Kemp, C.F.; Sharma, M.; Kambadur, R.; Patel, K. Follistatin complexes Myostatin and antagonises Myostatin-mediated inhibition of myogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2004, 270, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yaden, B.C.; Croy, J.E.; Wang, Y.; Wilson, J.M.; Datta-Mannan, A.; Shetler, P.; Milner, A.; Bryant, H.U.; Andrews, J.; Dai, G.; et al. Follistatin: A novel therapeutic for the improvement of muscle regeneration. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 349, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Sepulveda, P.V.; Lamon, S.; Hagg, A.; Thomson, R.E.; Winbanks, C.E.; Qian, H.; Bruce, C.R.; Russell, A.P.; Gregorevic, P. Evaluation of follistatin as a therapeutic in models of skeletal muscle atrophy associated with denervation and tenotomy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Mendell, J.R.; Sahenk, Z.; Al-Zaidy, S.; Rodino-Klapac, L.R.; Lowes, L.P.; Alfano, L.N.; Berry, K.; Miller, N.; Yalvac, M.; Dvorchik, I.; et al. Follistatin Gene Therapy for Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis Improves Functional Outcomes. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 870–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Negaresh, R.; Ranjbar, R.; Baker, J.S.; Habibi, A.; Mokhtarzade, M.; Gharibvand, M.M.; Fokin, A. Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy, Insulin-like Growth Factor 1, Myostatin and Follistatin in Healthy and Sarcopenic Elderly Men: The Effect of Whole-body Resistance Training. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2019, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Echeverria, I.; Besga, A.; Sanz, B.; Amasene, M.; Hervás, G.; Barroso, J.; Rodriguez-Larrad, A.; Irazusta, J. Identification of frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Bollen, S.E.; Bass, J.J.; Fujita, S.; Wilkinson, D.; Hewison, M.; Atherton, P.J. The Vitamin D/Vitamin D receptor (VDR) axis in muscle atrophy and sarcopenia. Cell Signal 2022, 96, 110355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Köller, M. Sarcopenia-a geriatric pandemic: A narrative review. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Borchers, M.; Gudat, F.; Dürmüller, U.; Stähelin, H.B.; Dick, W. Vitamin D receptor expression in human muscle tissue decreases with age. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bollen, S.E.; Atherton, P.J. Myogenic, genomic and non-genomic influences of the vitamin D axis in skeletal muscle. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2021, 39, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wicherts, I.S.; van Schoor, N.M.; Boeke, A.J.P.; Visser, M.; Deeg, D.J.H.; Smit, J.; Knol, D.L.; Lips, P. Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 2058–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yu, S.; Ren, B.; Chen, H.; Goltzman, D.; Yan, J.; Miao, D. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D deficiency induces sarcopenia by inducing skeletal muscle cell senescence. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 12638–12649. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Parsanathan, R.; Achari, A.E.; Manna, P.; Jain, S.K. l-Cysteine and Vitamin D Co-Supplementation Alleviates Markers of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Vitamin D-Deficient High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Glendenning, P.; Zhu, K.; Inderjeeth, C.; Howat, P.; Lewis, J.R.; Prince, R.L. Effects of three-monthly oral 150,000 IU cholecalciferol supplementation on falls, mobility, and muscle strength in older postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012, 27, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhu, K.; Austin, N.; Devine, A.; Bruce, D.; Prince, R.L. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of vitamin D on muscle strength and mobility in older women with vitamin D insufficiency. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2010, 58, 2063–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gao, L.; Zhu, W.; Liu, Y.; Gu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, O.; Xing, X.; Xu, L. Physical performance and life quality in postmenopausal women supplemented with vitamin D: A two-year prospective study. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015, 36, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Gkekas, N.K.; Anagnostis, P.; Paraschou, V.; Stamiris, D.; Dellis, S.; Kenanidis, E.; Potoupnis, M.; Tsiridis, E.; Goulis, D.G. The effect of vitamin D plus protein supplementation on sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Maturitas 2021, 145, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Angulo, J.; El Assar, M.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L. Frailty and sarcopenia as the basis for the phenotypic manifestation of chronic diseases in older adults. Mol. Asp. Med. 2016, 50, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Meng, S.-J.; Yu, L.-J. Oxidative stress, molecular inflammation and sarcopenia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1509–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Harman, D. Aging: A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol. 1956, 11, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Mecocci, P.; Fanó, G.; Fulle, S.; MacGarvey, U.; Shinobu, L.; Polidori, M.C.; Cherubini, A.; Vecchiet, J.; Senin, U.; Beal, M.F. Age-dependent increases in oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins in human skeletal muscle. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Scherz-Shouval, R.; Shvets, E.; Fass, E.; Shorer, H.; Gil, L.; Elazar, Z. Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 1749–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Sandiford, S.D.E.; Kennedy, K.A.M.; Xie, X.; Pickering, J.G.; Li, S.S.C. Dual oxidase maturation factor 1 (DUOXA1) overexpression increases reactive oxygen species production and inhibits murine muscle satellite cell differentiation. Cell Commun. Signal 2014, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sakellariou, G.K.; Pearson, T.; Lightfoot, A.P.; Nye, G.A.; Wells, N.; Giakoumaki, I.I.; Vasilaki, A.; Griffiths, R.D.; Jackson, M.J.; McArdle, A. Mitochondrial ROS regulate oxidative damage and mitophagy but not age-related muscle fiber atrophy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Cannavo, A.; Liccardo, D.; Eguchi, A.; Elliott, K.J.; Traynham, C.J.; Ibetti, J.; Eguchi, S.; Leosco, D.; Ferrara, N.; Rengo, G.; et al. Myocardial pathology induced by aldosterone is dependent on non-canonical activities of G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Barbieri, E.; Sestili, P. Reactive oxygen species in skeletal muscle signaling. J. Signal Transduct. 2012, 2012, 982794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Braga, M.; Sinha Hikim, A.P.; Datta, S.; Ferrini, M.G.; Brown, D.; Kovacheva, E.L.; Gonzalez-Cadavid, N.F.; Sinha-Hikim, I. Involvement of oxidative stress and caspase 2-mediated intrinsic pathway signaling in age-related increase in muscle cell apoptosis in mice. Apoptosis 2008, 13, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Marzetti, E.; Wohlgemuth, S.E.; Lees, H.A.; Chung, H.-Y.; Giovannini, S.; Leeuwenburgh, C. Age-related activation of mitochondrial caspase-independent apoptotic signaling in rat gastrocnemius muscle. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2008, 129, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Yakes, F.M.; Van Houten, B. Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Melov, S.; Shoffner, J.M.; Kaufman, A.; Wallace, D.C. Marked increase in the number and variety of mitochondrial DNA rearrangements in aging human skeletal muscle. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 4122–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Kovalenko, S.A.; Kopsidas, G.; Kelso, J.M.; Linnane, A.W. Deltoid human muscle mtDNA is extensively rearranged in old age subjects. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 232, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhang, C.; Liu, V.W.; Addessi, C.L.; Sheffield, D.A.; Linnane, A.W.; Nagley, P. Differential occurrence of mutations in mitochondrial DNA of human skeletal muscle during aging. Hum. Mutat. 1998, 11, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wanagat, J.; Cao, Z.; Pathare, P.; Aiken, J.M. Mitochondrial DNA deletion mutations colocalize with segmental electron transport system abnormalities, muscle fiber atrophy, fiber splitting, and oxidative damage in sarcopenia. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Fayet, G.; Jansson, M.; Sternberg, D.; Moslemi, A.R.; Blondy, P.; Lombès, A.; Fardeau, M.; Oldfors, A. Ageing muscle: Clonal expansions of mitochondrial DNA point mutations and deletions cause focal impairment of mitochondrial function. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2002, 12, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Yarovaya, N.O.; Kramarova, L.; Borg, J.; Kovalenko, S.A.; Caragounis, A.; Linnane, A.W. Age-related atrophy of rat soleus muscle is accompanied by changes in fibre type composition, bioenergy decline and mtDNA rearrangements. Biogerontology 2002, 3, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Bua, E.A.; McKiernan, S.H.; Wanagat, J.; McKenzie, D.; Aiken, J.M. Mitochondrial abnormalities are more frequent in muscles undergoing sarcopenia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 2617–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Herbst, A.; Prior, S.J.; Lee, C.C.; Aiken, J.M.; McKenzie, D.; Hoang, A.; Liu, N.; Chen, X.; Xun, P.; Allison, D.B.; et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial DNA copy number and mitochondrial DNA deletion mutation frequency as predictors of physical performance in older men and women. Geroscience 2021, 43, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Parsanathan, R.; Jain, S.K. G6PD deficiency shifts polarization of monocytes/macrophages towards a proinflammatory and profibrotic phenotype. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 770–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Tan, H.-Y.; Wang, N.; Li, S.; Hong, M.; Wang, X.; Feng, Y. The Reactive Oxygen Species in Macrophage Polarization: Reflecting Its Dual Role in Progression and Treatment of Human Diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 2795090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Kwon, D.H.; Lee, H.; Park, C.; Hong, S.-H.; Hong, S.H.; Kim, G.-Y.; Cha, H.-J.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.-S.; Hwang, H.-J.; et al. Glutathione Induced Immune-Stimulatory Activity by Promoting M1-Like Macrophages Polarization via Potential ROS Scavenging Capacity. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Pérez, S.; Rius-Pérez, S. Macrophage Polarization and Reprogramming in Acute Inflammation: A Redox Perspective. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Arnold, L.; Henry, A.; Poron, F.; Baba-Amer, Y.; van Rooijen, N.; Plonquet, A.; Gherardi, R.K.; Chazaud, B. Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Moylan, J.S.; Reid, M.B. Oxidative stress, chronic disease, and muscle wasting. Muscle Nerve 2007, 35, 411–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Siu, P.M.; Pistilli, E.E.; Alway, S.E. Age-dependent increase in oxidative stress in gastrocnemius muscle with unloading. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 105, 1695–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Inglés, M.; Gambini, J.; Carnicero, J.A.; García-García, F.J.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L.; Olaso-González, G.; Dromant, M.; Borrás, C.; Viña, J. Oxidative stress is related to frailty, not to age or sex, in a geriatric population: Lipid and protein oxidation as biomarkers of frailty. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 1324–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. El Assar, M.; Angulo, J.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L. Frailty as a phenotypic manifestation of underlying oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 149, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Saum, K.-U.; Dieffenbach, A.K.; Jansen, E.H.J.M.; Schöttker, B.; Holleczek, B.; Hauer, K.; Brenner, H. Association between Oxidative Stress and Frailty in an Elderly German Population: Results from the ESTHER Cohort Study. Gerontology 2015, 61, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Howard, C.; Ferrucci, L.; Sun, K.; Fried, L.P.; Walston, J.; Varadhan, R.; Guralnik, J.M.; Semba, R.D. Oxidative protein damage is associated with poor grip strength among older women living in the community. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 103, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Serviddio, G.; Romano, A.D.; Greco, A.; Rollo, T.; Bellanti, F.; Altomare, E.; Vendemiale, G. Frailty syndrome is associated with altered circulating redox balance and increased markers of oxidative stress. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2009, 22, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Bellanti, F.; Romano, A.D.; Lo Buglio, A.; Castriotta, V.; Guglielmi, G.; Greco, A.; Serviddio, G.; Vendemiale, G. Oxidative stress is increased in sarcopenia and associated with cardiovascular disease risk in sarcopenic obesity. Maturitas 2018, 109, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bernabeu-Wittel, M.; Gómez-Díaz, R.; González-Molina, Á.; Vidal-Serrano, S.; Díez-Manglano, J.; Salgado, F.; Soto-Martín, M.; Ollero-Baturone, M.; On Behalf Of The Proteo Researchers. Oxidative Stress, Telomere Shortening, and Apoptosis Associated to Sarcopenia and Frailty in Patients with Multimorbidity. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sandonà, D.; Desaphy, J.-F.; Camerino, G.M.; Bianchini, E.; Ciciliot, S.; Danieli-Betto, D.; Dobrowolny, G.; Furlan, S.; Germinario, E.; Goto, K.; et al. Adaptation of mouse skeletal muscle to long-term microgravity in the MDS mission. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Comfort, P.; McMahon, J.J.; Jones, P.A.; Cuthbert, M.; Kendall, K.; Lake, J.P.; Haff, G.G. Effects of Spaceflight on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Considerations for Interplanetary Travel. Sports Med. 2021, 51, 2097–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Stein, T.P.; Gaprindashvili, T. Spaceflight and protein metabolism, with special reference to humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 60, 806S–819S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Tanaka, K.; Nishimura, N.; Kawai, Y. Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures. J. Physiol. Sci. 2017, 67, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. LeBlanc, A.D.; Spector, E.R.; Evans, H.J.; Sibonga, J.D. Skeletal responses to space flight and the bed rest analog: A review. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2007, 7, 33–47. [Google Scholar]
  188. Narici, M.V.; de Boer, M.D. Disuse of the musculo-skeletal system in space and on earth. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 403–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Laurens, C.; Simon, C.; Vernikos, J.; Gauquelin-Koch, G.; Blanc, S.; Bergouignan, A. Revisiting the Role of Exercise Countermeasure on the Regulation of Energy Balance During Space Flight. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Stein, T.P. The relationship between dietary intake, exercise, energy balance and the space craft environment. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2000, 441, R21–R31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Stein, T.P.; Leskiw, M.J.; Schluter, M.D.; Hoyt, R.W.; Lane, H.W.; Gretebeck, R.E.; LeBlanc, A.D. Energy expenditure and balance during spaceflight on the space shuttle. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, R1739–R1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Xia, Z.; Cholewa, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shang, H.-Y.; Yang, Y.-Q.; Araújo Pessôa, K.; Su, Q.-S.; Lima-Soares, F.; Zanchi, N.E. Targeting Inflammation and Downstream Protein Metabolism in Sarcopenia: A Brief Up-Dated Description of Concurrent Exercise and Leucine-Based Multimodal Intervention. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Hargens, A.R.; Vico, L. Long-duration bed rest as an analog to microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 120, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Rundfeldt, L.C.; Gunga, H.C.; Steinach, M. Anabolic signaling and response in sarcopenia as a model for microgravity induced muscle deconditioning: A systematic review. REACH 2019, 13, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. LeBlanc, A.; Lin, C.; Shackelford, L.; Sinitsyn, V.; Evans, H.; Belichenko, O.; Schenkman, B.; Kozlovskaya, I.; Oganov, V.; Bakulin, A.; et al. Muscle volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 89, 2158–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Fitts, R.H.; Trappe, S.W.; Costill, D.L.; Gallagher, P.M.; Creer, A.C.; Colloton, P.A.; Peters, J.R.; Romatowski, J.G.; Bain, J.L.; Riley, D.A. Prolonged space flight-induced alterations in the structure and function of human skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 2010, 588, 3567–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Kozlovskaya, I.B.; Kreidich, Y.V.; Oganov, V.S.; Koserenko, O.P. Pathophysiology of motor functions in prolonged manned space flights. Acta Astronaut. 1981, 8, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Koryak, Y.U. Electrically evoked and voluntary properties of the human triceps surae muscle: Effects of long-term spaceflights. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Bulg. 2001, 26, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  199. Akima, H.; Kawakami, Y.; Kubo, K.; Sekiguchi, C.; Ohshima, H.; Miyamoto, A.; Fukunaga, T. Effect of short-duration spaceflight on thigh and leg muscle volume. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 1743–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Tesch, P.A.; Berg, H.E.; Bring, D.; Evans, H.J.; LeBlanc, A.D. Effects of 17-day spaceflight on knee extensor muscle function and size. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 93, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Lee, P.H.U.; Chung, M.; Ren, Z.; Mair, D.B.; Kim, D.-H. Factors mediating spaceflight-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2022, 322, C567–C580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Gao, Y.; Arfat, Y.; Wang, H.; Goswami, N. Muscle Atrophy Induced by Mechanical Unloading: Mechanisms and Potential Countermeasures. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Campbell, M.J.; McComas, A.J.; Petito, F. Physiological changes in ageing muscles. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1973, 36, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Scicchitano, B.M.; Rizzuto, E.; Musarò, A. Counteracting muscle wasting in aging and neuromuscular diseases: The critical role of IGF-1. Aging 2009, 1, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Robbins, H.A.; Callister, M.; Sasieni, P.; Quaife, S.L.; Cheung, L.C.; Brennan, P.; Katki, H.A.; Berg, C.D.; Baldwin, D.; Johansson, M. Benefits and harms in the National Lung Screening Trial: Eexpected outcomes with a modern management protocol. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 655–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Metter, E.J.; Conwit, R.; Tobin, J.; Fozard, J.L. Age-associated loss of power and strength in the upper extremities in women and men. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 1997, 52, B267–B276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Denison, H.J.; Cooper, C.; Sayer, A.A.; Robinson, S.M. Prevention and optimal management of sarcopenia: A review of combined exercise and nutrition interventions to improve muscle outcomes in older people. Clin. Interv. Aging 2015, 10, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Nilwik, R.; Snijders, T.; Leenders, M.; Groen, B.B.L.; van Kranenburg, J.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C. The decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size. Exp. Gerontol. 2013, 48, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Monti, E.; Reggiani, C.; Franchi, M.V.; Toniolo, L.; Sandri, M.; Armani, A.; Zampieri, S.; Giacomello, E.; Sarto, F.; Sirago, G.; et al. Neuromuscular junction instability and altered intracellular calcium handling as early determinants of force loss during unloading in humans. J. Physiol. 2021, 599, 3037–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Inns, T.B.; Bass, J.J.; Hardy, E.J.O.; Wilkinson, D.J.; Stashuk, D.W.; Atherton, P.J.; Phillips, B.E.; Piasecki, M. Motor unit dysregulation following 15 days of unilateral lower limb immobilisation. J. Physiol. 2022, 600, 4753–4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Prior, S.J.; Ryan, A.S.; Blumenthal, J.B.; Watson, J.M.; Katzel, L.I.; Goldberg, A.P. Sarcopenia Is Associated With Lower Skeletal Muscle Capillarization and Exercise Capacity in Older Adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016, 71, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Betz, M.W.; Aussieker, T.; Kruger, C.Q.; Gorissen, S.H.M.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Snijders, T. Muscle fiber capillarization is associated with various indices of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men. Exp. Gerontol. 2021, 143, 111161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Barnouin, Y.; McPhee, J.S.; Butler-Browne, G.; Bosutti, A.; De Vito, G.; Jones, D.A.; Narici, M.; Behin, A.; Hogrel, J.-Y.; Degens, H. Coupling between skeletal muscle fiber size and capillarization is maintained during healthy aging. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017, 8, 647–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Buoite Stella, A.; Ajčević, M.; Furlanis, G.; Manganotti, P. Neurophysiological Adaptations to Space-flight and Simulated Microgravity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2021, 132, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Manganotti, P.; Buoite Stella, A.; Ajcevic, M.; di Girolamo, F.G.; Biolo, G.; Franchi, M.V.; Monti, E.; Sirago, G.; Marusic, U.; Simunic, B.; et al. Peripheral Nerve Adaptations to 10 Days of Horizontal Bed Rest in Healthy Young Adult Males. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2021, 321, R495–R503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Takamatsu, Y.; Koike, W.; Takenouchi, T.; Sugama, S.; Wei, J.; Waragai, M.; Sekiyama, K.; Hashimoto, M. Protection against Neurodegenerative Disease on Earth and in Space. NPJ Microgravity 2016, 2, 16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Edgerton, V.R.; Zhou, M.Y.; Ohira, Y.; Klitgaard, H.; Jiang, B.; Bell, G.; Harris, B.; Saltin, B.; Gollnick, P.D.; Roy, R.R. Human Fiber Size and Enzymatic Properties after 5 and 11 Days of Spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995, 78, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Gabel, L.; Liphardt, A.-M.; Hulme, P.A.; Heer, M.; Zwart, S.R.; Sibonga, J.D.; Smith, S.M.; Boyd, S.K. Pre-Flight Exercise and Bone Metabolism Predict Unloading-Induced Bone Loss Due to Spaceflight. Br. J. Sports Med. 2022, 56, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Stroud, J.E.; Gale, M.S.; Zwart, S.R.; Heer, M.; Smith, S.M.; Montina, T.; Metz, G.A.S. Longitudinal metabolomic profiles reveal sex-specific adjustments to long-duration spaceflight and return to Earth. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Ronca, A.E.; Baker, E.S.; Bavendam, T.G.; Beck, K.D.; Miller, V.M.; Tash, J.S.; Jenkins, M. Effects of sex and gender on adaptations to space: Reproductive health. J. Womens Health 2014, 23, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Geraci, A.; Calvani, R.; Ferri, E.; Marzetti, E.; Arosio, B.; Cesari, M. Sarcopenia and Menopause: The Role of Estradiol. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 682012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Wade, C.E.; Keil, L.C. Reduction of pituitary AVP and OT contents in rats following spaceflight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1998, 69, A53–A57. [Google Scholar]
  223. Berio, E.; Divari, S.; Starvaggi Cucuzza, L.; Biolatti, B.; Cannizzo, F.T. 17β-estradiol upregulates oxytocin and the oxytocin receptor in C2C12 myotubes. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Greene, K.A.; Tooze, J.A.; Lenchik, L.; Weaver, A.A. Change in Lumbar Muscle Size and Composition on MRI with Long-Duration Spaceflight. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 50, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Qaisar, R.; Karim, A.; Elmoselhi, A.B. Muscle unloading: A comparison between spaceflight and ground-based models. Acta Physiol. 2020, 228, e13431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Kennedy, B.K.; Berger, S.L.; Brunet, A.; Campisi, J.; Cuervo, A.M.; Epel, E.S.; Franceschi, C.; Lithgow, G.J.; Morimoto, R.I.; Pessin, J.E.; et al. Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell 2014, 159, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Martone, A.M.; Onder, G.; Vetrano, D.L.; Ortolani, E.; Tosato, M.; Marzetti, E.; Landi, F. Anorexia of aging: A modifiable risk factor for frailty. Nutrients 2013, 5, 4126–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Azzolino, D.; Arosio, B.; Marzetti, E.; Calvani, R.; Cesari, M. Nutritional Status as a Mediator of Fatigue and Its Underlying Mechanisms in Older People. Nutrients 2020, 12, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Jyväkorpi, S.K.; Ramel, A.; Strandberg, T.E.; Piotrowicz, K.; Błaszczyk-Bębenek, E.; Urtamo, A.; Rempe, H.M.; Geirsdóttir, Ó.; Vágnerová, T.; Billot, M.; et al. The sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people: Multi-component treatment strategies (SPRINTT) project: Description and feasibility of a nutrition intervention in community-dwelling older Europeans. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 12, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Lane, H.W.; Bourland, C.; Barrett, A.; Heer, M.; Smith, S.M. The role of nutritional research in the success of human space flight. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 521–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  232. Ohira, Y.; Jiang, B.; Roy, R.R.; Oganov, V.; Ilyina-Kakueva, E.; Marini, J.F.; Edgerton, V.R. Rat soleus muscle fiber responses to 14 days of spaceflight and hindlimb suspension. J. Appl. Physiol. 1992, 73, S51–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Desplanches, D.; Mayet, M.H.; Ilyina-Kakueva, E.I.; Sempore, B.; Flandrois, R. Skeletal muscle adaptation in rats flown on Cosmos 1667. J. Appl. Physiol. 1990, 68, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Harrison, B.C.; Allen, D.L.; Girten, B.; Stodieck, L.S.; Kostenuik, P.J.; Bateman, T.A.; Morony, S.; Lacey, D.; Leinwand, L.A. Skeletal muscle adaptations to microgravity exposure in the mouse. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 2462–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  235. Yamashita-Goto, K.; Okuyama, R.; Honda, M.; Kawasaki, K.; Fujita, K.; Yamada, T.; Nonaka, I.; Ohira, Y.; Yoshioka, T. Maximal and submaximal forces of slow fibers in human soleus after bed rest. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Morey-Holton, E.R.; Hill, E.L.; Souza, K.A. Animals and spaceflight: From survival to understanding. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2007, 7, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  237. Allen, D.L.; Bandstra, E.R.; Harrison, B.C.; Thorng, S.; Stodieck, L.S.; Kostenuik, P.J.; Morony, S.; Lacey, D.L.; Hammond, T.G.; Leinwand, L.L.; et al. Effects of spaceflight on murine skeletal muscle gene expression. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Lalani, R.; Bhasin, S.; Byhower, F.; Tarnuzzer, R.; Grant, M.; Shen, R.; Asa, S.; Ezzat, S.; Gonzalez-Cadavid, N.F. Myostatin and insulin-like growth factor-I and -II expression in the muscle of rats exposed to the microgravity environment of the NeuroLab space shuttle flight. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 167, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Buchheim, J.-I.; Matzel, S.; Rykova, M.; Vassilieva, G.; Ponomarev, S.; Nichiporuk, I.; Hörl, M.; Moser, D.; Biere, K.; Feuerecker, M.; et al. Stress Related Shift Toward Inflammaging in Cosmonauts After Long-Duration Space Flight. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Nogami, M.; Huang, J.T.; James, S.J.; Lubinski, J.M.; Nakamura, L.T.; Makinodan, T. Mice chronically exposed to low dose ionizing radiation possess splenocytes with elevated levels of HSP70 mRNA, HSC70 and HSP72 and with an increased capacity to proliferate. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1993, 63, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Guéguinou, N.; Huin-Schohn, C.; Bascove, M.; Bueb, J.-L.; Tschirhart, E.; Legrand-Frossi, C.; Frippiat, J.-P. Could spaceflight-associated immune system weakening preclude the expansion of human presence beyond Earth’s orbit? J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86, 1027–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Felix, K.; Wise, K.; Manna, S.; Yamauchi, K.; Wilson, B.L.; Thomas, R.L.; Kulkarni, A.; Pellis, N.R.; Ramesh, G.T. Altered cytokine expression in tissues of mice subjected to simulated microgravity. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 266, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Belay, T.; Aviles, H.; Vance, M.; Fountain, K.; Sonnenfeld, G. Effects of the hindlimb-unloading model of spaceflight conditions on resistance of mice to infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2002, 110, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Cervantes, J.L.; Hong, B.-Y. Dysbiosis and Immune Dysregulation in Outer Space. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 35, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Orsini, S.S.; Lewis, A.M.; Rice, K.C. Investigation of simulated microgravity effects on Streptococcus mutans physiology and global gene expression. NPJ Microgravity 2017, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  246. Agha, N.H.; Mehta, S.K.; Rooney, B.V.; Laughlin, M.S.; Markofski, M.M.; Pierson, D.L.; Katsanis, E.; Crucian, B.E.; Simpson, R.J. Exercise as a countermeasure for latent viral reactivation during long duration space flight. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 2869–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Mehta, S.K.; Laudenslager, M.L.; Stowe, R.P.; Crucian, B.E.; Sams, C.F.; Pierson, D.L. Multiple latent viruses reactivate in astronauts during Space Shuttle missions. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014, 41, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Tahimic, C.G.T.; Globus, R.K. Redox Signaling and Its Impact on Skeletal and Vascular Responses to Spaceflight. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Smith, R.C.; Cramer, M.S.; Mitchell, P.J.; Lucchesi, J.; Ortega, A.M.; Livingston, E.W.; Ballard, D.; Zhang, L.; Hanson, J.; Barton, K.; et al. Inhibition of myostatin prevents microgravity-induced loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Petersen, N.; Jaekel, P.; Rosenberger, A.; Weber, T.; Scott, J.; Castrucci, F.; Lambrecht, G.; Ploutz-Snyder, L.; Damann, V.; Kozlovskaya, I.; et al. Exercise in space: The European Space Agency approach to in-flight exercise countermeasures for long-duration missions on ISS. Extrem Physiol. Med. 2016, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Corbi, G.; Conti, V.; Filippelli, A.; Di Costanzo, A.; Ferrara, N. The Role of Physical Activity on the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment. Transl. Med. UniSa 2015, 13, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  252. Mancinelli, R.; Checcaglini, F.; Coscia, F.; Gigliotti, P.; Fulle, S.; Fanò-Illic, G. Biological Aspects of Selected Myokines in Skeletal Muscle: Focus on Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Kwon, J.H.; Moon, K.M.; Min, K.-W. Exercise-Induced Myokines can Explain the Importance of Physical Activity in the Elderly: An Overview. Healthcare 2020, 8, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Hackney, K.J.; Scott, J.M.; Hanson, A.M.; English, K.L.; Downs, M.E.; Ploutz-Snyder, L.L. The Astronaut-Athlete: Optimizing Human Performance in Space. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 3531–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  255. Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Calvani, R.; Cesari, M.; Del Signore, S.; Anker, S.D.; Bejuit, R.; Bordes, P.; Cherubini, A.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; et al. Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: Randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project). BMJ 2022, 377, e068788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Clément, G. International roadmap for artificial gravity research. NPJ Microgravity 2017, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  257. Richter, C.; Braunstein, B.; Winnard, A.; Nasser, M.; Weber, T. Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity—A Systematic Review. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  258. Diaz-Artiles, A.; Heldt, T.; Young, L.R. Computational model of cardiovascular response to centrifugation and lower body cycling exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 127, 1453–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Sibonga, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Jones, J.; Shapiro, J.; Lang, T.; Shackelford, L.; Smith, S.M.; Young, M.; Keyak, J.; Kohri, K.; et al. Resistive exercise in astronauts on prolonged spaceflights provides partial protection against spaceflight-induced bone loss. Bone 2019, 128, 112037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Lambrecht, G.; Petersen, N.; Weerts, G.; Pruett, C.; Evetts, S.; Stokes, M.; Hides, J. The role of physiotherapy in the European Space Agency strategy for preparation and reconditioning of astronauts before and after long duration space flight. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2017, 27, S15–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  261. Petersen, N.; Lambrecht, G.; Scott, J.; Hirsch, N.; Stokes, M.; Mester, J. Postflight reconditioning for European Astronauts—A case report of recovery after six months in space. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2017, 27, S23–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Lo, J.H.-T.; U, K.P.; Yiu, T.; Ong, M.T.-Y.; Lee, W.Y.-W. Sarcopenia: Current treatments and new regenerative therapeutic approaches. J. Orthop. Transl. 2020, 23, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Snijders, T.; Nederveen, J.P.; Joanisse, S.; Leenders, M.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Parise, G. Muscle fibre capillarization is a critical factor in muscle fibre hypertrophy during resistance exercise training in older men. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017, 8, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  264. Uchitomi, R.; Oyabu, M.; Kamei, Y. Vitamin D and Sarcopenia: Potential of Vitamin D Supplementation in Sarcopenia Prevention and Treatment. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Khoshvaghti, A. Vitamin D in Space. In Fads and Facts about Vitamin D; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  266. Cesari, M.; Bernabei, R.; Vellas, B.; Fielding, R.A.; Rooks, D.; Azzolino, D.; Mariani, J.; Oliva, A.A.; Bhasin, S.; Rolland, Y. Challenges in the Development of Drugs for Sarcopenia and Frailty—Report from the International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) Task Force. J. Frailty Aging 2022, 11, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Gomes, M.J.; Martinez, P.F.; Pagan, L.U.; Damatto, R.L.; Cezar, M.D.M.; Lima, A.R.R.; Okoshi, K.; Okoshi, M.P. Skeletal muscle aging: Influence of oxidative stress and physical exercise. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20428–20440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Camporez, J.-P.G.; Petersen, M.C.; Abudukadier, A.; Moreira, G.V.; Jurczak, M.J.; Friedman, G.; Haqq, C.M.; Petersen, K.F.; Shulman, G.I. Anti-myostatin antibody increases muscle mass and strength and improves insulin sensitivity in old mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2212–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Becker, C.; Lord, S.R.; Studenski, S.A.; Warden, S.J.; Fielding, R.A.; Recknor, C.P.; Hochberg, M.C.; Ferrari, S.L.; Blain, H.; Binder, E.F.; et al. Myostatin antibody (LY2495655) in older weak fallers: A proof-of-concept, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 948–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the mechanisms leading to muscle atrophy in astronauts.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the mechanisms leading to muscle atrophy in astronauts.
Life 12 02139 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mechanisms leading to muscle atrophy and physical frailty in astronauts and older people and the potential countermeasures to fight these adverse conditions.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the mechanisms leading to muscle atrophy and physical frailty in astronauts and older people and the potential countermeasures to fight these adverse conditions.
Life 12 02139 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cannavo, A.; Carandina, A.; Corbi, G.; Tobaldini, E.; Montano, N.; Arosio, B. Are Skeletal Muscle Changes during Prolonged Space Flights Similar to Those Experienced by Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults? Life 2022, 12, 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122139

AMA Style

Cannavo A, Carandina A, Corbi G, Tobaldini E, Montano N, Arosio B. Are Skeletal Muscle Changes during Prolonged Space Flights Similar to Those Experienced by Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults? Life. 2022; 12(12):2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cannavo, Alessandro, Angelica Carandina, Graziamaria Corbi, Eleonora Tobaldini, Nicola Montano, and Beatrice Arosio. 2022. "Are Skeletal Muscle Changes during Prolonged Space Flights Similar to Those Experienced by Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults?" Life 12, no. 12: 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop