Next Article in Journal
Hydrometallurgical Synthesis of Nickel Nano-Sulfides from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of Cell-Based Flotation Circuits under Uncertainty: A Techno-Economic Stochastic Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Re–Os and Sr Isotopic Study of Permian–Triassic Sedimentary Rocks from the Himalaya: Shale Chronology and Carbonate Diagenesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Optimization Method for Calibration and Maintenance of Power-Based Belt Scale
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Empirical Study on Reduction Behavior and Metallurgical Properties of Vanadia–Titania Magnetite in Blast Furnace

1
The State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(4), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040418
Submission received: 26 March 2021 / Revised: 10 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Process Optimization in Mineral Processing)

Abstract

:
The loss of permeability affects the reduction of the ferrous burden in the cohesive zone of a blast furnace (BF). Vanadia–titania magnetite (VTM) burden of various chemical compositions have different metallurgical properties. The reduction and softening-melting-dripping properties of different kinds of VTM were investigated. The results showed that the core of sinter or pellet is indirectly reduced to wustite and (Fe,Ti)Ox, and the periphery contains interlinked metallic iron and CaSiO3 in the cohesive zone. Wustite and (Fe,Ti)Ox are directly reduced in the melting-dripping zone. The aggregate (Fe, V, Cr) present in the non-dripping causes a loss of valuable components. With the increase in TiO2 content, the substrate phase of molten slag changes from melilite to titanaugite, and the mass of dripping decreases gradually. In addition, the permeability index S increased and the melting zone widened, which indicates that the increase in TiO2 content negatively affected the melting-dripping performance. The mass of the dripping is directly proportional to the pellet ratio. Considering the adverse effect of TiO2 on softening-melting-dripping properties, it is recommended that high TiO2 VTM is smelted while mixed with ordinary ores or with an increased pellet ratio in the burden structure.

1. Introduction

Vanadia–titania magnetite (VTM) contains various kinds of valuable elements (Fe, V, Ti, and Cr) and has a high comprehensive utilization value [1,2]. In recent years, the price of vanadium products has remained high, and the smelting of VTM brings huge profits for steel companies. A blast furnace (BF) is the most common method for smelting VTM worldwide [3]. The shape and position of the cohesive zone of the BF, as well as its efficiency, are determined by the melt-down of ores [3,4]. In general, when the thickness of the cohesive zone decreases, the efficiency of the blast furnace increases. The softening and melting temperatures of the burden determine the thickness of the cohesive zone, so the smallest possible difference between them is desired. A reduction degree of a ferrous burden is typically above 50% in the cohesive zone of the BF [4], but the reduction degree of VTM burden is typically lower than this [5]. This leads to the aggravation of the reduction task in the melting-dripping zone. The smelting of VTM is difficult because of the role of titanium in the blast furnace. Thus, the reduction behavior and metallurgical properties of various VTM burden differ from each other markedly.
Titanium is one of the most important influencing factors in the smelting process, which has been studied by domestic and foreign researchers [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. It not only affects the quality and yield of sinter, but also affects the smelting process in the BF. Cheng [13] studied the effect of TiO2 on the crushing strength and smelting mechanism of high-chromium VTM pellets. It was found that the crushing strength is closely related to the mineral phase and microstructure, and that the crushing strength decreases when increasing the TiO2 content. Tang and Zhou [5,14] studied the effect of TiO2 on the sintering behavior of VTM, which confirmed that the optimum quicklime dosage, mixture moisture, wetting time, and granulation time are 5 wt%, 7.5 wt%, 10 min, and 5–8 min, respectively. Yue [15,16,17] studied the rheological evolution of Ti-bearing slag with different volume fractions of TiN. It was found that increasing the TiN volume increased the viscosity and the shear stress substantially. Ledzki [18] investigated the potential for the formation of high melting titanium compounds in the metal-slag system by TiO2 reduction from slag phase by solid carbon and carbon dissolved in iron. Furthermore, the abovementioned studies have focused on the agglomeration or metallurgical properties of the specific VTM under laboratory conditions.
In this work, the reduction behavior of VTM was explained by analyzing the phase composition and microstructure of slag, non-dripping, and dripping at various stages. The empirical studies on the reduction behavior and metallurgical properties of varieties of VTM provide a theoretical basis and technical support for BF smelting VTM.

2. Experimental

2.1. Raw Materials

V–Ti sinter and V–Ti pellet were used in this research as ferrous materials, which were obtained from multiple iron and steel companies in China. The chemical compositions of the ferrous materials and mixed burden (pellet ratio: HJ-45%, CJ-29%, PJ-12.6%) are listed in Table 1. The V-bearing phase is Fe2VO4, and the Ti-bearing phase is Fe2TiO4, FeTiO3, and Fe2TiO5 in sinter and pellet. The chemical compositions of coke are listed in Table 2. The sizes of the V–Ti sinter, V–Ti pellet, and coke were all 10–12.5 mm. All samples were dried at 110 °C.

2.2. Experiment Methods

Softening-melting-dripping experiments were carried out on the samples to measure their high-temperature properties. The schematic experimental apparatus is shown in Figure 1a. The device comprises a heating system, a gas control system, a temperature control system, and a data recording system. MoSi2 heating elements were used as the core components in the heating system to heat and melt the burden. An R-type thermocouple was placed at the bottom of the compression bar to control the experimental temperature. The crucible and compression bar were both made of graphite. The dimensions of the crucible are shown in Figure 1b.
In order to simulate the blast furnace burden conditions, 500 g of mixed burden was put in the crucible and layers of coke with a depth of 35 mm and 17 mm were placed below and above the samples, respectively. The displacement sensor measured the displacement changes and contraction of the burden when the experiment started. Experimental conditions are shown in Table 3. The heating rates were 10 °C/min below 900 °C, 2 °C/min from 900 °C to 1100 °C, and 5 °C from 1100 °C to the end. To better understand the reduction behavior and softening-melting characteristics of the mixed burden, an interrupted test was also carried out at 1300 °C. The gas was stopped, and N2 was introduced immediately to prevent the reaction from continuing after the test. When the temperature drops to room temperature, the soft slag, molten slag, non-dripping, and dripping products were collected. The chemical composition and microstructure of collected samples were analyzed by chemical analysis and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Reduction Behavior of Cohesive Zone

The experiment is terminated when the Burden is heated to 1300 °C, at which point the soft slag in the crucible is taken out. Figure 2a shows the macroscopic morphology of the soft slag. Under the action of external pressure, the upper coke moves downward, and a small amount of molten slag with good fluidity fills the upper coke void, so that the soft slag has been melted into a whole. The outermost edge of the soft slag is a ring of metal shell. When the soft slag is broken, it can be seen from a cross section that the interior is compact, and that the original shape of sinter and pellet are faintly visible with a metal layer between them. Therefore, the outer edge of sinter and pellet is the first to be reduced.
Figure 2b–d shows the SEM images of HJ, CJ, and PJ soft slag. The HJ soft slag is compact and consists mostly of wustite, CaTiO3, metallic iron, and CaSiO3. Some small phases of (Fe,Ti)Ox are found in the wustite. The metallic iron particles diffuse in the slag and are connected to each other, forming a relatively long strip structure. The CJ soft slag is mainly composed of wustite, metallic iron, CaFeSiO4, and (Fe,Ti)Ox. The wustite particles are connected to each other, forming a relatively uniform structure. The (Fe,Ti)Ox phase surrounds the wustite. The small phase of metallic iron is embedded in the slag. In the SEM image of PJ slag, the area to the left of the dotted line consists mostly of wustite, (Fe,Ti)Ox, and CaFeSiO4, while the area to the right includes wustite, CaTiO3, CaSiO3, and (Fe,Ti)Ox.
By comparing the SEM images, there are only a few grains of metallic iron in the CJ soft slag and the left part of the PJ soft slag, suggesting that this portion of the sample is inside the sinter or pellet, which does not make contact with the coke so that it is only being indirectly reduced. The indirect reduction reaction equations are shown in Equations (1)–(3). In the HJ soft slag and the right part of the PJ soft slag, the long strips of metallic iron divide (Fe,Ti)Ox into irregular shapes. The silicates surrounding the metallic iron are mainly CaSiO3. The chemical reaction equations are shown in Equations (4)–(5). It can be found that iron oxide is indirectly reduced by CO to form (Fe,Ti)Ox and Fe. (Fe,Ti)Ox and CaFeSiO4 are directly reduced by C to form Fe and CaSiO3, respectively.
3 Fe 2 O 3   + CO = 2 Fe 3 O 4 + CO 2
Fe 3 O 4 + CO = 3 FeO + CO 2
FeO + CO = Fe + CO 2
FeO + C = Fe + CO
CaO · FeO · SiO 2 + C = CaO · SiO 2 + Fe + CO

3.2. Reduction Behavior of Melting-Dripping Zone

When the Burden reaches the drop temperature, it begins to drop. After 30 min, the experiment ends and the samples in the graphite crucible and bowl are taken out. Figure 3 shows the macroscopic morphology for the molten slag, non-dripping, and dripping. Under the action of external pressure, the molten slag overflows from the small holes and sits on top of the tableting after cooling. The surface of the molten slag is relatively smooth and dense, as shown in Figure 3a. The mobility of the non-dripping is so poor that it cannot drip and stay at the bottom of the crucible. Figure 3b shows that the non-dripping is a dense metal block with coke embedded in it. The dripping drips from the crucible into the graphite bowl. Due to the action of gravity, the dripping is scattered by sputtering, and the surface is in the form of small particles, as shown in Figure 3c.
The SEM-EDS images of the HJ, CJ, and PJ molten slag are shown in Figure 4. The HJ molten slag has a simple structure and its base phase is melilite, which mainly consists of Mg, Al, Si, Ca and O. The small metallic iron and CaTiO3 is embedded in the melilite. In Figure 4b, the CJ molten slag mainly consist of melilite, titanaugite, and CaTiO3. The CaTiO3 is embedded in the melilite in the form of granules and leaves. In the PJ molten slag, it can be seen that CaTiO3 particles are connected to each other and that their particle sizes are large. The basal phase titanaugite consist of O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, and Ti. The metallic iron is embedded in the titanaugite. The TiC phase surrounds the metallic iron particles.
The SEM image of the non-dripping is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen that the blocky (Fe, V, Cr) and banded C are embedded in the metallic iron. The presence of C causes the metallic iron to become less fluid, so that it cannot drip from the crucible. Fe, V, and Cr aggregates are present in the non-dripping, resulting in a decrease in the recovery rate of valuable components.
The Richardson oxide free energy diagram of related elements is drawn using FactSage 7.0 software (ThermFact LTD, Montreal, QC, Canada), as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that V2O3 and Cr2O3 cannot be directly (with C) reduced at temperatures below 1250 °C. Thus, they are present in wustite and (Fe,Ti)Ox. With the increase in temperature, the direct reduction of oxides is further carried out in the melting-dripping zone. The reaction equations are shown in Equations (4), (6) and (7). Vanadium and Chromium are contained in dripping and non-dripping. However, the reduction temperature of titanium oxide is so high that it cannot be reduced, and it reacts to form CaTiO3 and titanaugite in the molten slag, as shown in Equations (8)–(9).
V 2 O 3 + 3 C = 2 V + 3 CO
Cr 2 O 3 + 3 C = 2 Cr + 3 CO
TiO 2   + CaO = CaTiO 3
( Mg , Al ) O x · TiO 2 + Silicate = Titanaugite

3.3. Softening-Melting-Dripping Performance

The softening-melting-dripping performance of the burden has a dramatic effect on the reduction process, and the permeability and distribution of gas there is also affected. In this work, softening start temperature (T4), softening end temperature (T40), melting start temperature (Ts), dripping temperature (Td), and pressure drop (ΔPm) are measured to evaluate the softening-melting-dripping properties. T4 and T40 are the temperatures at which the shrinkage degree of the burden reaches 4% and 40%, respectively. Ts is the temperature when the gas pressure drop begins to increase rapidly. When the temperature reaches Td, the molten iron drips from the crucible. The softening (ΔT1 = T40T4) and melting (ΔT2 = TdTs) zones need to be noted. Permeability index (S) is also an important characteristic value. S can be calculated by Equation (10).
S = T s T d ( P m Δ P s )
where Pm is pressure difference at any time, Pa, and ΔPs is the starting melting pressure difference, Pa.
The softening-melting-dripping characteristics of the burden are shown in Table 4. T4 of the burden mainly depends on the melting point of the low melting point slag phase in the reduction process. T4 and T40 are affected by so many factors, such as CaO, SiO2, TiO2, and burden structure, that no obvious pattern has been found. The high T4 and narrow ΔT1 are favorable for blast furnace smelting. It can be found that the PJ burden has the highest softening start temperature (T4) and the narrowest softening zone (ΔT1) of the three kinds of burden. Therefore, the softening property of the PJ burden is the best.
In Table 4, it can be found that Ts is closely related to the content of TiO2 in the burden as seen in Figure 7. With the increase of TiO2 content, Ts decreases gradually. When the content of TiO2 in the burden begins to increase, although more high-melting-point CaTiO3 and titangarnet will be generated, the low-melting-point titanaugite also increases. Titanaugite increases permeability resistance at lower temperatures, leading to a decrease in Ts to a certain extent. PJ burden has the highest Td and the widest ΔT2. This is because TiO2 increases the viscosity of slag and affects the drop of molten iron. When the appropriate fluidity is reached by increasing the temperature, the molten iron drips smoothly. A lower Ts and a wider ΔT2 are disadvantageous in blast furnace smelting.
The results of the permeability index (S) are shown in Table 4. The smaller the S, the better the droplet performance. It can be seen that the S of the PJ burden is much larger than the others, and that its permeability is the worst.
Figure 8 shows the dripping mass of the HJ, CJ, and PJ burden. It can be found that the dripping mass is inversely proportional to the content of TiO2 in the burden. When the content of TiO2 is high, the metallic iron is wrapped by the surrounding Ti(C,N), resulting in the loss of dripping. In addition, reducibility is also an important factor affecting the drop of molten iron. The poor reduction of the burden increases the reduction process and difficulty. The pellet ratio of PJ burden with good reducibility is the lowest, so its dripping mass is the lowest.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the soft slag, molten slag, non-dripping and dripping were analyzed by SEM-EDS. The reduction behavior and softening-melting-dripping performance of the burden was investigated in a cohesive and a melting-dripping zone. The conclusions are as follows:
(1) Iron oxides are reduced in the cohesive zone. Wustite and coated (Fe,Ti)Ox are formed in the core of pellet and sinter, while iron oxides and CaFeSiO4 at the periphery is reduced to formed metallic iron and CaSiO3.
(2) With the different content of TiO2 in the burden, the substrate phase of the molten slag is different. The aggregate (Fe, V, Cr) exists in the non-dripping, and metallic iron wrapped by TiC exists in the molten slag, which causes the loss of valuable components.
(3) The mass of the dripping is directly proportional to the pellet ratio and is inversely proportional to the TiO2 content.
(4) PJ burden with high TiO2 content has a high Td and a wide ΔT2, which is not conducive to blast furnace smelting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.X., K.C. and Z.H.; methodology, Z.H., J.L. and G.C.; validation, X.X., X.H. and Z.H.; formal analysis, Z.H. and M.L.; investigation, Z.H.; data curation, Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H.; supervision, X.X.; project administration, X.X. and X.H.; funding acquisition, X.X. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1908226, No. 51674084, and No. 21908020).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, S.T.; Zhou, M.; Tang, W.D.; Jiang, T.; Xue, X.X.; Zhang, W.J. Influence of coke ratio on the sintering behavior of high-chromium vanadium–titanium magnetite. Minerals 2017, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cheng, G.J.; Gao, Z.X.; Yang, H.; Xue, X.X. Effect of calcium oxide on the crushing strength, reduction, and smelting performance of high-chromium vanadium-titanium magnetite pellets. Metals 2017, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. He, Z.W.; Yue, H.R.; Xue, X.X. Study of the high temperature metallurgical properties of on-site samples with vanadium-titanium magnetite. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2018, 71, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kemppainen, A.; Ohno, K.; Iljana, M.; Mattila, O.; Paananen, T.; Heikkinen, E.; Maeda, T.; Kunitomo, K.; Fabritius, T. Softening behaviors of acid and olivine fluxed iron ore pellets in the cohesive zone of a blast furnace. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 2039–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tang, W.D.; Yang, S.T.; Cheng, G.J.; Gao, Z.X.; Yang, H.; Xue, X.X. Effect of TiO2 on the sintering behavior of chromium-bearing vanadium-titanium magnetite. Minerals 2018, 8, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Park, E.; Ostrovski, O. Effects of preoxidation of titania-ferrous ore on the ore structure and reduction behavior. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, S.T.; Tang, W.D.; Zhou, M.; Jiang, T.; Xue, X.X.; Zhang, W.J. Effects of dolomite on mineral compositions and metallurgical properties of chromium-bearing vanadium–titanium magnetite sinter. Minerals 2017, 7, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhou, L.H.; Zeng, F.H. Reduction mechanisms of vanadium-titanomagnetite-non-coking coal mixed pellet. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2011, 38, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhen, Y.L.; Zhang, G.H.; Chou, K.C.; Mills, K. Influence of TiN on viscosity of CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-(TiN) suspension system. Metall. Trans. B 2015, 54, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, L.H.; Yang, S.T.; Tang, W.D.; Xue, X.X. Investigations of MgO on sintering performance and metallurgical property of high-chromium vanadium-titanium magnetite. Minerals 2019, 9, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Frohlichova, M.; Findorak, R.; Legemza, J. Structural analysis of sinter with titanium addition. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013, 58, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fu, W.G.; Xie, H.E. Progress in technologies of vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite smelting in PanGang. Steel Res. Int. 2011, 82, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, G.J.; Xue, X.X.; Jiang, T.; Duan, P.N. Effect of TiO2 on the Crushing Strength and Smelting Mechanism of High-Chromium Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite Pellets. Metall. Trans. B 2016, 47, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, M.; Jiang, T.; Yang, S.T.; Xue, X.X. Sintering behaviors and consolidation mechanism of high-chromium vanadium and titanium magnetite fines. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2015, 22, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yue, H.R.; He, Z.W.; Jiang, T.; Duan, P.N.; Xue, X.X. Rheological evolution of Ti-bearing slag with different volume fractions of TiN. Metall. Trans. B 2018, 49, 2118–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yue, H.R.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Duan, P.N.; Xue, X.X. Electrorheological effect of Ti-bearing blast furnace slag with different TiC contents at 1500A degrees C. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2017, 24, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, W.; Yue, H.R.; Xue, X.X. Diffusion coefficient of Ti(4+)in calcium ferrite/calcium titanate diffusion couple. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 2020, 27, 1216–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ledzki, A.; Migas, P.; Stachura, R.; Klimczyk, A.; Bernasowski, M. Chemical and phase characteristics of titanium compounds produced in iron blast furnace dripping zone. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2009, 54, 129–135. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental apparatus. (a) Apparatus constitute (b) Crucible dimensions and charging method.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental apparatus. (a) Apparatus constitute (b) Crucible dimensions and charging method.
Minerals 11 00418 g001
Figure 2. The macroscopic morphology and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of soft slag: (a) Macroscopic morphology; (b) SEM image of HJ soft slag; (c) CJ soft slag; (d) PJ soft slag.
Figure 2. The macroscopic morphology and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of soft slag: (a) Macroscopic morphology; (b) SEM image of HJ soft slag; (c) CJ soft slag; (d) PJ soft slag.
Minerals 11 00418 g002aMinerals 11 00418 g002b
Figure 3. The macroscopic morphology of samples: (a) molten slag; (b) non-dripping; (c) dripping.
Figure 3. The macroscopic morphology of samples: (a) molten slag; (b) non-dripping; (c) dripping.
Minerals 11 00418 g003aMinerals 11 00418 g003b
Figure 4. The SEM-EDS images of molten slag: (a) HJ molten slag; (b) CJ molten slag; (c) PJ molten slag; (d) EDS of CaTiO3; (e) EDS of melilite; (f) EDS of titanaugite.
Figure 4. The SEM-EDS images of molten slag: (a) HJ molten slag; (b) CJ molten slag; (c) PJ molten slag; (d) EDS of CaTiO3; (e) EDS of melilite; (f) EDS of titanaugite.
Minerals 11 00418 g004
Figure 5. The SEM image of non-dripping.
Figure 5. The SEM image of non-dripping.
Minerals 11 00418 g005
Figure 6. The Richardson oxide free energy diagram of related elements.
Figure 6. The Richardson oxide free energy diagram of related elements.
Minerals 11 00418 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between Ts, Td, and TiO2 content of burden.
Figure 7. Relationship between Ts, Td, and TiO2 content of burden.
Minerals 11 00418 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between dripping mass, TiO2 content, and pellet ratio of burden.
Figure 8. Relationship between dripping mass, TiO2 content, and pellet ratio of burden.
Minerals 11 00418 g008
Table 1. Chemical compositions of ferrous materials and mixed burden.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of ferrous materials and mixed burden.
ItemsTFe/wt%V2O5/wt%TiO2/wt%Cr2O3/wt%CaO/wt%SiO2/wt%Al2O3/wt%MgO/wt%CaO/SiO2
HJ Sinter46.980.361.630.2516.285.401.913.043.01
CJ Sinter56.580.371.920.2211.035.621.533.701.96
PJ Sinter50.200.377.880.119.995.713.172.571.75
HJ Pellet60.830.642.680.640.586.372.482.060.09
CJ Pellet59.710.524.910.321.935.011.711.570.39
PJ Pellet53.410.529.900.221.916.113.552.500.31
HJ Burden53.210.492.100.439.225.842.172.601.58
CJ Burden57.490.412.790.258.395.441.583.081.54
PJ Burden50.600.398.130.128.975.763.222.561.56
Table 2. Chemical composition of coke.
Table 2. Chemical composition of coke.
Fixed Carbon /wt%Volatile/wt%SiO2/wt%CaO/wt%MgO/wt%Al2O3/wt%S/wt%Others/wt%
84.580.507.500.480.152.720.4923.578
Table 3. Temperature profile and reduction atmosphere of experiment.
Table 3. Temperature profile and reduction atmosphere of experiment.
Temperature (°C)0–500500–900900–11001100–End
Heating rate (°C/min)101025
Heating time (min)5040100100
Gas composition
and flow rate (L·min–1)
100% N2, 570% N2, 3.5; 30% CO, 1.5
Table 4. Performance data of softening-melting-dripping of burden.
Table 4. Performance data of softening-melting-dripping of burden.
ContentT4/°CT40/°C(T40T4)/°CTs/°CTd/°C(TdTs)/°CΔPm/PaS/(kPa·°C)
HJ Burden1082122514312721480208327662056.5
CJ Burden1121125513412691471202222882042.1
PJ Burden113012118112261490264226852532.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Hu, X.; Lan, M.; Liu, J.; Cheng, G.; Xue, X.; Chou, K. Empirical Study on Reduction Behavior and Metallurgical Properties of Vanadia–Titania Magnetite in Blast Furnace. Minerals 2021, 11, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040418

AMA Style

He Z, Hu X, Lan M, Liu J, Cheng G, Xue X, Chou K. Empirical Study on Reduction Behavior and Metallurgical Properties of Vanadia–Titania Magnetite in Blast Furnace. Minerals. 2021; 11(4):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040418

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zhanwei, Xiaojun Hu, Mo Lan, Jianxing Liu, Gongjin Cheng, Xiangxin Xue, and Kouchih Chou. 2021. "Empirical Study on Reduction Behavior and Metallurgical Properties of Vanadia–Titania Magnetite in Blast Furnace" Minerals 11, no. 4: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop