Next Article in Journal
Ecological and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in a Diverse Industrial Area of Al-Akrasha, Egypt
Next Article in Special Issue
The Plasma In Situ Detection on China’s Space Station Wentian Module: Instrument Description and First Results
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings on the Migrating Diurnal Tide in the Equatorial Middle Atmosphere Observed by Aura/Microwave Limb Sounder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma Analyzer for the Chinese FY-3E Satellite: In-Orbit Performance and Ground Calibration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalog of Geomagnetic Storms with Dst Index ≤ −50 nT and Their Solar and Interplanetary Origin (1996–2019)

1
Institute of Astronomy and National Astronomical Observatory (IANAO)—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Helwan, Cairo 11421, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(12), 1744; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14121744
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 19 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 27 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research and Space-Based Exploration on Space Plasma)

Abstract

:
We present a comprehensive catalog of geomagnetic storms (GSs) with a Dst index 50 nT detected during solar cycles (SCs) 23 and 24 (1996–2019). About 550 events were identified in the Kyoto database and used as a starting point for this study. The solar origin of the GSs, in terms of coronal mass ejections (CMEs), solar flares (SFs), and in situ-observed energetic particles, was identified where possible using temporal constraints and wide Earth-directed ejecta. In addition, any accompanied interplanetary (IP) sources, such as ICMEs and IP shock waves detected at 1 AU, are also considered. The resulting occurrence rates and correlation plots are presented and discussed in the space weather framework.

1. Introduction

The term geomagnetic storm (GS) is used to describe, in general, a significant disruption in Earth’s magnetosphere, driven by structures in the solar wind [1]. The concept was proposed for the first time by Alexander von Humboldt as magnetic storms, in order to describe and link between the rapid magnetic declination variations and the appearance of the Northern Lights phenomena [2]. This ground-based disturbance intensifies and prolongs when a prevalent southward-directed magnetic field ( B z ) is present [3].
The fundamental cause of these storms lies in the magnetic interaction between a planetary magnetosphere and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) [4]. A GS is a phenomenon of energy transfer between (ejecta in) the solar wind and the terrestrial magnetosphere based on the mechanism of magnetic reconnection [1]. The latter process is sufficiently effective when the IMF of the plasma structure is southward-directed [5]. During the reconnection, solar wind plasma is injected and transported to the night-side magnetosphere. However, the protons drift to the west, whereas the electrons to the east, thus forming a ‘ring current’ around the Earth. It is this current that eventually causes a sharp decrease in the magnetic field measured by ground-based stations [6].
The strongest GSs occur when coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are expelled in the Earth direction, arrive at 1 AU as soon as about 12–13 h (based on the fastest ejecta ever recorded) and up to 5–6 days later (based on typical slow solar wind speed). These are termed interplanetary (IP) CMEs or ICMEs, creating conditions for magnetic field-line reconnection [5,7,8,9,10,11]. The reliable identification of (I)CME geoeffectiveness is a topic of ongoing research [12].
There are other recognized sources of the geomagnetic disturbances predominantly driven by fast solar wind streams and occasionally repeating with the solar rotation (termed recurrent GSs). Such structures are the high-speed streams (HSSs), crossings of the heliospheric current sheet, and corotating interaction regions (CIRs) [12]. The resulting GSs are often of weaker intensity, but longer in duration.
The effects by ICMEs/IP shocks and HSSs/CIRs are also responsible for different effects on the terrestrial radiation belts [13], whereas fast variations of the magnetic field vector are currently linked to geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in ground-based conduction systems [14,15], which subsequently may cause transformer damages. On the other hand, the Starlink satellite failure in February 2022 happened during the course of a weak GS [16] with the exact reasons still being debatable, e.g., see [17] and the references therein. Novel techniques, such as machine learning algorithms for the classification of GSs, are also being tested [18].
In general, the GS progresses through three phases. It commences with a sudden compression of the magnetosphere due to an increase in the dynamic pressure of the solar wind. This phase, known as sudden storm commencement (SSC), is characterized by an abrupt positive variation of the disturbance storm time (Dst) index. The subsequent phase is referred to as the main phase. Here, the Dst index takes negative values during the injection of energized plasma in the equatorial ring current, ultimately reaching its minimum value. This is followed by the recovery phase, wherein particle transport into the ring current decelerates, enabling various loss processes to diminish ring current particle fluxes to their quiet-time level. This process is reflected by the Dst values, which start to rise until they return to pre-sudden commencement levels, signifying the restoration of the geomagnetic field to pre-storm levels [3,4,19].
Various indices are used to measure the GS intensity (see, e.g., https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/geomag/indices.html, accessed on 26 November 2023), and the commonly used ones are listed below:
  • Dst is a geomagnetic index that measures the magnitude of the GSs. It is calculated based on the average value of the horizontal component of the Earth’s magnetic field. The intensity is expressed in negative values and measured in nano-Teslas [20,21,22]. This index is directly related to the total kinetic energy of the ring current particles and the overall energetics of the GS. The Sym-H index is the 1 min resolution of Dst index.
  • The Kp (planetary) index quantifies the disturbance of the horizontal component of Earth’s magnetic field due to geomagnetic activity. It ranges from 0 to 9, with higher values indicating more-severe disturbances [23,24].
  • The Ap (planetary) index is another measure of geomagnetic activity, representing the planetary averaged amplitude of the magnetic field. It provides a daily average value [25].
  • The Auroral Electrojet (AE) index measures the level of geomagnetic activity in the auroral zone. It is also used as an indication of the strength of the GS [26].
  • The AA index is a global index of magnetic activity from the K indices of two nearly antipodal magnetic observatories in England and Australia. Its variation, the AA index, is the three-hourly equivalent amplitude antipodal index.
  • Other indices or variations of the above (https://isgi.unistra.fr/indices_asy.php, accessed on 26 November 2023).
There is no unique definition of the strength of the GSs concerning the Dst index, as the thresholds differ between different authors (the amplitude of the Dst index will preferably be used in the text): moderate ( 50 |Dst| < 100 nT), intense ( 100 |Dst| < 250 nT), and super-storms (|Dst| 250 nT) were introduced by [3]; intense |Dst| 100 nT and super-intense |Dst| 500 nT were proposed by [27]; many teams use the term ‘major’ for |Dst| 100 nT; whereas the strongest GSs on record (following the Carrington–Hodgson event on 1–2 September 1859) are named ‘extreme’ [28]. A combination between two indices was proposed by [3,24], where the GSs are categorized into weak (30 < |Dst| < 50 nT, with 0 ≤ Kp ≤ 5), moderate ( 50 < |Dst| < 100 nT, with 5 < Kp < 7), and intense (|Dst| > 100 nT, with 7 ≤ Kp ≤ 9).
Alternatively, NASA employs the NOAA Space Weather Scale (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation, accessed on 26 November 2023) to categorize the intensity of GSs. Known as the G-scale, it spans from G1, denoting minor storms, to G5, representing extreme events. A G1 storm, classified as minor, may result in slight fluctuations in power grids and minor disruptions to satellite operations. A G2 storm, categorized as moderate, can trigger voltage alarms in power systems, potential transformer damage, and increased drag on low Earth orbit satellites. G3 storms, characterized as strong, have the potential to induce voltage control issues, transformer damage, and satellite surface charging. Severe G4 storms can lead to widespread voltage control problems, transformer damage, and satellite surface charging. In the most-extreme cases, G5 storms can lead to a complete collapse of power systems, prolonged surface charging of satellites, and even damage to pipeline systems. The engineering aspects of this scale impressively demonstrate the importance of the GSs (and their precursors) to space weather research [29]. The term space weather is considered here in a broader framework of all direct and indirect influences of the solar activity phenomena on the terrestrial atmospheric layers, technology, and human safety [30]. A focused study on the space weather effects (including the strength and structure of GSs) on satellite operations was recently compiled [17].
A rich volume of research has been devoted to the GS phenomenon, e.g., see [27,31,32] for literature reviews, since a representative description goes beyond the scope of this report. For example, very early on, it was established that the Dst index varies with the conditions in the IP space [33], and the topic continued to be further explored with the availability of new satellite data, e.g., [7,34]. Recent studies over two solar cycles (SCs) confirm the stronger trends between the Dst and the IP parameters compared to solar eruptive phenomena. Namely, a recent study [35] explored the Pearson correlations between 111 GSs with |Dst| 100 nT and a variety of physical parameters in SC23 and 24, confirming strong relationships with total B-field, the product between solar wind speed and the B z -component and the ICME speed. Moderate correlations are reported with the solar wind speed and pressure and weak/no clear correlation with plasma density, solar flare (SF) class, CME speed and angular width (AW), and the fluxes and fluences of energetic particles. Over the same time period, another study [32] extended the list of GSs with |Dst| 50 nT to 179 in SC23 and 85 in SC24 or a reduction of 47% of the GS activity being present. They reported correlations between several GS indices (SymH, Kp, and AE) with solar wind speed, IMF B z , and their product and confirmed the high correlations in SC23, but not in SC24.
In order to explore the statistical relationship, a list of GSs needs to be compiled with carefully identified parent solar and/or accompanied IP activity. Lists of historical GSs can be found in [36,37]. Examples of major GSs (|Dst| > 100 nT) generated by CIRs were presented by [38], another study in SC24 was completed by [39], but no list was provided, whereas 12 cases in 1996–2016 were reported by [40]. Due to the lack of a comprehensive listing covering the period of interest for our study, we will not consider the effects of CIRs separately.
Previous catalogs of GSs considered SC23 or earlier time periods and have been reported in the past with a different focus: to search for solar and IP origin of major (|Dst| > 100 nT) GSs [41]; to study the 50 most intense in the Dst index GSs [42]; to explore extreme GSs [36]. An important aspect of any follow-up studies is the ability to compare the results. This is impeded to a degree when no catalog is provided, as in the case of the recently completed statistical analysis with the IP parameters covering SC23 and 24 by [32].
The aim of this study was to provide an open-access catalog of GSs with a Dst index 50 nT, together with their solar and IP sources in SC23 and 24 (1996–2019). We upgraded a previous study focused on SC24 [43] and propose a source identity based on an association study between the GS peaks and the timing and physical properties of the IP structures and CMEs. The here presented GSs can be additionally affected by HSSs/CIRs, which was not accounted for with the performed analyses. In contrast, a set of criteria was applied on the entire list of GSs, resulting in certain/uncertain associations. Our catalog aims to serve as a basis of a living document with additions and corrections being periodically implemented, e.g., filtering out a possible contamination by CIRs, especially for the weaker GSs. The online version of the list will be supported at https://catalogs.astro.bas.bg/ (accessed on 26 November 2023).

2. Methodology

2.1. Data

In order to characterize the strength of the GS storm, we used the Dst index provided by the World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto: https://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dstdir/index.html (accessed on 26 November 2023). The final values of the Dst index are currently available through the end of 2016, whereas for the period 2017–2019 of our list, we used the provisional ones; however, only minor changes in the Dst index were expected. Based on the visual inspection of the monthly Dst-curves and to the best of our abilities, we identified 546 GSs where the Dst value dropped below the adopted threshold for this study of 50 nT, as reported to the nearest hour. No identification of the onset and end times of each GS was attempted by us; instead, we focused on the amplitude of the Dst index. For the purposes of this statistical analysis, pre-event disturbances were also not considered. However, we noticed that the identity of 49 GSs seemed to be compromised due to a previous event or an extended turbulent period according to our assessment. These GSs are denoted as ‘uncertain’ in our list.
Apart from the Dst index, we collected the readily provided characteristics of ICMEs, IP shock waves, CMEs, and in situ-observed energetic particles, using data from various spacecraft positioned at the Lagrangian point L1 or at geostationary orbit for the SFs.
The speeds of the ICMEs observed close to Earth have been already identified and reported in several sources. A catalog of ICME timing and characteristics based on Wind satellite data is provided at: https://wind.nasa.gov/ICME_catalog/ICME_catalog_viewer.php (accessed on 26 November 2023). An alternative ICME catalog using data from the ACE satellite can be found here: https://izw1.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/DATA/level3/icmetable2.htm (accessed on 26 November 2023). We preferred the latter, as the catalog gives also the solar origin (i.e., the parent CMEs) for some of the ICMEs.
The timing and speeds of IP shocks using Wind observations are given in great detail by https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/shocks/ (accessed on 26 November 2023), where we used the median reported value for the shock speed. Alternative sources for IP shocks, both from the Wind and ACE spacecraft, can be found at http://www.ipshocks.fi/database (accessed on 26 November 2023); however, due to some temporary access interruptions, we could not use this database for our study.
The properties of the CMEs were collected from the well-known CDAW SOHO/LASCO database https://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME_list/ (accessed on 26 November 2023). The following parameters were adopted: timing (first occurrence above the occulting disk); linear speed, i.e., the on-sky projected speed, obtained by fitting a straight line to the height–time measurements of the fastest segment of the leading edge of the CME; AW, i.e., the sky-plane width of CMEs, which is typically measured in the field of view between 1.5 and 6 solar radii; and the measurement position angle (MPA), as measured from the north and advancing in the counterclockwise direction. Both AW and MPA are reported in degrees.
In order to quantify the geomagnetic effects due to phenomena (e.g., electromagnetic emissions or particles) originating at the same solar eruption, SFs and solar energetic particles are also considered. These are the ones physically related to the already identified CME eruption. The SF information was taken from a GOES-based list with the timing, soft X-ray (SXR) class, and helio-locations: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-flares/x-rays/goes/xrs/ (accessed on 26 November 2023). For the case of the in situ-observed particles, e.g., protons (SEPs) and electrons (SEEs), we compared their associated CMEs and SFs (identified previously) with the GS-associated CMEs and SFs in our list. The matching cases were selected, and only the peak particle fluxes were used here, as provided by the respective catalogs: Wind/EPACT SEP catalog http://www.stil.bas.bg/SEPcatalog/ (accessed on 26 November 2023) (19–28 MeV) and ACE/EPAM SEE catalog https://www.nriag.sci.eg/ace_electron_catalog/ (accessed on 26 November 2023) (103–175 keV), reported in [44] and [45], respectively.

2.2. Association Procedure

When associating the IP counterpart of a GS, we only employed timing constraints. The travel time of the disturbance first detected at L1 to the magnetosphere was estimated to be within one hour, depending on the speed. Since we did not quantitatively evaluate the onset time of the GSs, but used their peak times instead, we needed to allow for a wider time window between the hour of the minimum Dst and its driver at L1. Namely, we searched for an identified ICME and IP shock wave within a 1-day period prior to the GS peak time. Based on this guideline, we could identify 228 ICMEs (or about a 42% of occurrence rate) and 179 IP shock waves (close to 33%, respectively). In the majority of the cases, the IP phenomenon identified by us was a unique candidate.
The following criteria for the search of the solar driver of GSs were used: Starting from the hour of minimum value of the Dst measurement (depicting the GS peak), we isolated 3- and 5-day periods ahead of each GS. These periods cover the characteristic travel time of ejecta from the Sun to Earth. Longer periods are possible, though less probable to cause detectable geomagnetic response. Firstly, in a shorter time period, we looked for Earth-directed ejecta, namely a halo CME (with an AW of 360°), with the fastest candidate being selected. In the case of no candidates, we searched for a halo CME with a speed above 600 kms 1 in the wider time window. The imposed threshold for the speed was subjective to a degree; however, we kept the requirement as the ejecta should be faster than the typical speeds of the slow solar wind. Furthermore, we set an additional requirement for the AW to be above 90°. This set of criteria (or quality flagging) was applied to the entire GS event list. For the major GSs (|Dst| 100 nT), ∼100 cases, we adopted the associations from our previous work [35].
A main source of uncertainty on the solar origin identification followed from the non-fulfillment of the adopted association criteria. As a rule, all proposed associations within a 3-day period were considered as certain, whereas those within a 3- to 5-day period were denoted as uncertain. Any other cases that diverged to a small degree from the above-described criteria were also considered uncertain associations (e.g., the candidate was a non-halo CME with the specified 3-day period, slow CME, or other deviations from the rules, but reported as a GS origin by other online catalogs, as described above). From the entire GS list, we could identify in total 330 CMEs or the occurrence rate of 60%, split into 157 (≲29%) certain and 173 (≳31%) uncertain solar origin associations. The large amount of uncertain CME associations was due to the majority of weak GSs in our list.
Furthermore, we investigated the certain vs. uncertain CME association among the 49 uncertain GSs and obtained 4 vs. 17 cases, respectively (whereas the remaining 28 uncertain GSs had no CME association). Due to the low fraction of uncertain GS-related CMEs, the entire GS distribution will be considered as certain only.
The SF association with GSs was performed via the SF inter-connection to CMEs. The later procedure is relatively easy to complete and was based on the timing (within 1 h) and helio-location (the SF position to be within 90° of the reported MPA of the CME). Thus, concerning the SF as a solar origin, we obtained 227 GSs with an SF or 42%. Based on the certain/uncertain label of the CME, we obtained 118 (22%) certain SFs and 109 (20%) uncertain ones.
From the entire list, only 90 SEPs (16%) and 110 SEEs (20%) could be associated with GSs, based on the reported CMEs and SFs linked to these particles. Since the CMEs played the role of an intermediary here as well, the certain and uncertain labels of the particles were due to certain and uncertain types of CMEs.
For visualization purposes, we used the entire GS sample, or over SC23 and 24. For completeness, we calculated occurrence rates separately for SC23 and SC24. All three considered time periods are summarized in Table A1 in Appendix A.
The IP driver proposed by us and solar origin are not immune to misidentifications and should be regarded as a first approximation only. IP structures such as HSSs and/or CIRs can be the true cause of many of the weaker GSs. For example, a catalog of high-speed streams and GSs is available at http://www.geodin.ro/varsiti/ (accessed on 26 November 2023), but only during SC24. As already explained above, due to the lack of a consistent list of solar wind streams and their link to GSs over the last two SCs, we will not consider this aspect in our analyses.
Another important and very helpful online tool for inspecting plasma structures in the heliosphere is provided by http://helioweather.net/archive/ (accessed on 26 November 2023). Again, the coverage was only during SC24, and the information from these simulations could only be applied over a smaller fraction of our list. For the consistency of the association procedure over both SCs, we had to drop this source.

3. Results

3.1. Catalog of GSs

The total number of GSs in SC23+24 after our visual identification amounted to 546; see Table A2 in Appendix B; of these, 361 (or 66%) occurred in SC23 and 185 (34%) in SC24, plotted in the left side of Figure 1 using a stacked histogram. The dark-colored bars denote the number of certain events and the fraction of light-gray-colored bars the uncertain GSs. The SC24 was also weaker in terms of GSs with a 51% drop.
The distribution of GSs according to their Dst index is shown in Figure 1 (right) for the entire time period, SC23+24. The strongest GS in our list had a Dst index of 422 nT, whereas the majority of the GSs had |Dst| 100 nT. For better visualization, we used the log10-linear format. The power law distribution of the phenomena can be recognized, at least for the weak GSs: when the |Dst| is between 50 and 200 nT, the magnitude of the slope is ≲0.03, whereas above 200 nT we notice a flat distribution consisting of a few GSs. At the lower end of the Dst distribution cluster are the uncertain GSs: these GSs had, on average, lower mean and median |Dst| values (in the range of 57–74 nT) regardless of the time period of interest. The certain GSs, on the other hand, had the same values as for the entire sample (from 66 to 92 nT in absolute values), whereas, for the entire sample (denoted by ‘all’ in the plot), the values were 86/69. All mean and median values are summarized in Table 1 for each of the time periods of interest.

3.2. IP Origin

For SC23+24, we identified 42% (228/546) ICME events and 33% (179/546) IP shock waves with similar fractions for the ICMEs in each of the two SCs; see Table A1. For completeness, Table 1 gives the mean and median values for the speeds of the GS-associated ICMEs and IP shock waves for the certain, uncertain, and both categories. However, the number of uncertain (according to the GS identity) ICME and IP shocks was minimal. This is why, for the plots and correlations with the IP phenomena, we will not differentiate into two categories. The mean/median values of the entire sample (given in bold font in Table 1) were nearly identical to those of certain categories.
The scatter plots between the speeds and the Dst index are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 (left) in the same linear scale for comparison. On the right are shown the histograms for the speeds of the GS-associated phenomena, ICME or IP shock, respectively. A clustering at small values i.e., for the speed at around 500 kms 1 and for the |Dst| < 100 nT) was evident. The extent of IP shock wave speeds was slightly larger than the range in speeds covered by the ICMEs (after the exclusion of the outlier). The mean/median values of the speeds can be inspected from Table 1. The median values of the ICME and IP shock speeds were similar, 460–480 kms 1 , whereas the sample of the IP shock speeds had a larger mean value by about 40 kms 1 compared to the ICME sample (Table 1).
In both cases, there was a rough positive trend in the correlation between the speeds of IP phenomena and the GS strength, as shown in each plot, however not very strong due to the large spread. For quantitative comparison, we used Pearson correlation coefficients, whereas for the uncertainty, we used the bootstrapping method, as described in [44,45]. A slightly better correlation was obtained between the |Dst| and ICME speeds ( 0.45 ± 0.07 ), compared to the IP shock speeds ( 0.31 ± 0.06 ). The sample size is given in parentheses in the plots. In terms of the SC trends, the values for the speeds in SC23 tend to be slightly larger than those in SC24, especially for the IP shocks.

3.3. Solar Origin

The solar origin of GSs is given via the GS-associated CMEs, SFs, SEPs and SEEs with occurrence rates in SC23+24 as follows, 60%, 42%, 16% and 20%, respectively, with only slight variations (of the order of several percents) between the SCs; see Table A1 for the details. The focal point here is the association of the CMEs, and here, we will recognize certain and uncertain cases. Specifically, Figure 4 shows the scatter plot between the CME linear speed and Dst index (on the left) and the histogram of the CME speed (on the right). Empty circles and light gray color denote uncertain events, whereas filled circles and dark color denote certain events. The uncertain CME associations were concentrated for slower ejecta with mean/median values of 915/791 kms 1 ; see also Table 1. The mean/median values for the speeds of the certain-type CMEs were around 1000 kms 1 and were the same as the mean values of the entire CME sample (though the median value for the latter was lower, 874 kms 1 ).
Overall, no clear correlations could be identified between the GSs and CME speed properties; see Figure 4 (left) for neither of the categories: certain: 0.18 ± 0.08 ; uncertain: 0.11 ± 0.08 ; all: 0.17 ± 0.07 . The abrupt starting line is due to the threshold selection of 50 nT. Similarly, the relationship with the CME AW is shown in Figure 5 (left), and no correlation with the Dst index was obtained: certain: 0.07 ± 0.07 ; uncertain: 0.02 ± 0.07 ; all: 0.22 ± 0.03 . There was an over-representation of halo CMEs, and the majority of non-halo cases (<300 degrees) were uncertain.
The remaining phenomena (SF class and energetic particle flux) covered a range of several orders of magnitudes. This is why the scatter plots are given in log10–log10 form; see Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 (left). There was no correlation between the SF class or particle intensities with the Dst index, and the uncertainty was very large, due to the relatively small sample size. The Pearson correlations were calculated between the log10 values, and the results for the SFs are: certain: 0.17 ± 0.08 , uncertain: 0.09 ± 0.10 , all: 0.25 ± 0.06 . Similarly, for the SEPs, we obtained the following: certain: 0.15 ± 0.14 , uncertain: 0.16 ± 0.20 , all: 0.18 ± 0.12 , whereas for the SEEs we had: certain: 0.14 ± 0.12 , uncertain: 0.02 ± 0.17 , all: 0.22 ± 0.10 . The sample size is given in Table 1.
All histograms (on the right) are given in binned format, as denoted by the x-label. Overall, the certain sample tended to have the largest mean/median values, followed by the entire sample, and the smallest values were for the uncertain GS-associated SFs, SEPs, and SEEs. The exact mean/median values in SC23+24 are given in the plots.
In the histogram for the SFs, the bins for a given class, e.g., X, were significantly smaller than those of the C- and M-class, the latter two groups being also the most-abundant ones. Also, the number of events denoted by 6 ÷ 9 was always less than the sample denoted by 1 ÷ 5, independent of the SF class. The mean/median values of the SF class for the certain and all GS-associated SFs were in the lower M-class range, whereas for the uncertain ones, they decreased to the C-class values. Furthermore, we calculated the mean/median value for the helio-locations of the entire sample of GS-associated SFs (no plots are shown) and obtained S01/S06 for the helio-latitude and W04/W05 for the helio-longitude.
Concerning the particle distributions in Figure 7 and Figure 8, the peak of the distribution was shifted towards the middle, where there were also mean/median values for the certain and also for the entire sample. For completeness, the mean/median values were calculated in the three time periods (Table 1); however, they reflect the weight of the largest bins of the distributions.

4. Discussion

When comparing our results with previously published results of GSs over the same time periods by [32], we noted there were fewer reported events, namely 179 in SC23 and 85 in SC24 (no catalog supplied). Even after eliminating our uncertain GS identification (leading to 331 in SC23 and 166 in SC24), the differences were considerable. The cause of such discrepancies could be due to the different selection criteria applied in either case. According to the results by [32], there was a 47% drop in the geomagnetic activity in SC24 compared to the previous one, which is similar to the one obtained by us of 51% (for the entire GS sample and, similarly, for the certain GSs only). This is one of the studies that explored the relationship between GSs and IP parameters over the same two SCs. The obtained trends by [32] (see their Figures 7 and 8) between the GS indices with the product between solar wind speed and B z is reminiscent of the overall trends between the Dst index with ICME and IP shock speeds obtained in our work (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Another statistical work over SC23 and 24 [35] that presented the occurrence rates between the GSs and the different solar origin phenomena, however, focused on major GSs with Dst 100 nT. Apart from the occurrence rate for the IP shocks (33%, 179/546), which was not considered there, we could still compare the results on GS-associated phenomena. Below, we compare, from one side, the upper limits of the occurrence rates as obtained in our study (with a sample size of 546) and, on the other, the corresponding values in our previous work [35] (with a sample size of 111), namely:
  • GSs–ICMEs: 42% (228/546) vs. 85% (94/111);
  • GSs–CMEs: 60% (330/546) vs. 72% (80/111);
  • GSs–SFs: 42% (227/546) vs. 55% (61/111);
  • GSs–SEPs: 16% (90/546) vs. 34% (38/111);
  • GSs–SEEs: 20% (110/546) vs. 30% (33/111).
The values obtained in this study (based on a larger sample with numerous weaker GSs) were all smaller. This can be explained by the fact that larger eruptions manifest overall as stronger solar and IP phenomena. Furthermore, we investigated their correlation trends as depicted in the scatter plots and quantified them in terms of the Pearson correlation coefficients. We focused on the results only over SC23+24, and the results in this study were again predominantly lower (but, mostly, not statistically significant) compared to those reported previously by [35], namely:
  • Dst–ICME speed: 0.45 ± 0.07 (228) vs. 0.62 (94);
  • Dst–CME speed: 0.17 ± 0.07 (330) vs. 0.30 (80);
  • Dst–CME AW: 0.22 ± 0.03 (330) vs. 0.26 (80);
  • Dst–SF class: 0.25 ± 0.06 (227) vs. 0.19 (61);
  • Dst–SEP flux: 0.18 ± 0.12 (90) vs. 0.35 (38);
  • Dst–SEE flux: 0.22 ± 0.10 (110) vs. 0.27 (33).
When considering the mean/median values, both studies revealed only marginal differences for the CME speed, but overall, smaller values for the solar parameters. The latter was particularly pronounced in the case of SEE flux, which was two orders of magnitude lower, whereas the SF class and SEP flux were lower by one order of magnitude.
The applicability of statistical results reached an upper limit especially when the sample contained a large amount of scatter and a physical relationship can be easily lost. Moreover, the parameters used for the correlations are often subject to limitations or errors. A greater effort needs to be devoted to the association procedure itself in order to develop procedures for improving its accuracy. A reliable identification of GS precursors would be of use for the development of novel schemes and the improvement of existing forecasting schemes.
Our motivation for the inclusion of GS-related SFs was grounded in the improved understanding of the overall complexity and magnetic environment of the underlying active region that gives rise to the pair SF–CME. The structure and orientation of ICMEs based on the magnetic footprints of their CME counterparts and subsequent IP propagation/rotation/deflection are still subjects of ongoing research [46]. The electromagnetic emission is also the first signal to be observed after a solar activity event, and its GS precursor potential deserves further examination.
Chronologically, the second space weather phenomena to arrive are the fluxes of electrons, followed by the protons. They possess a latent space weather risk due to their radiation hazards for equipment and humans. Since the charged particles follow a magnetic path, they may well be deflected in the IP space due to magnetic irregularities (in plasma structures), and their forecasting potential is still uncertain. The simultaneous impact of SEP and SEE fluxes from follow-up events to an ongoing GS also awaits a large-scale investigation, although a few single-case studies have been attempted [35]. For example in our earlier analyses [47], low-energy protons tended to be over-represented at minor-to-moderate GSs with |Dst| 150 nT, compared to major GSs with |Dst| 150 nT, despite the larger scatter of the distribution. In summary, with this extended study, we confirmed previous studies on the correlations between GSs and the IP/solar origin of GSs [32,35].

5. Conclusions

This work offers a consistent list of 546 GSs with Dst index 50 nT in SC23 and 24. ICMEs and IP shock waves preceding the GSs were identified as their most-probable IP origin, whereas the solar origin was based on (fast, halo) CMEs, 3 to 5 days prior to the GSs. Despite the large fraction of uncertain CME (and their secondary) associations, our results were consistent with previous research on the correlations with IP phenomena and with the relationships between solar phenomena and larger GSs.
The focus in this study was set on selected IP and solar phenomena. The GS strength can be correlated with other available physical quantities related to ICMEs, such as plasma density, components of the measured speed, magnetic and electric fields, or a combination thereof, e.g., see [12,32,35,48] and the references therein. The weak correlation between the Dst index and ICME/IP shock speeds could well be due to the limitation to just one of the physical parameters measured in situ. A comprehensive investigation over a large GS sample and using the complete set of physical parameters of ICMEs is still lacking.
A few notable conclusions on the geoeffective IP and solar phenomena, based on the analysis performed here, are listed below:
  • Half of the GSs were linked to the arrival of an ICME with IP shocks also present;
  • Positive trends in the correlation between the Dst and the speeds of ICMEs and IP shocks were obtained, confirming previous results [32,35];
  • There were similar numbers of CMEs (halo and high speed, 330) and ICMEs (228);
  • CME to ICME deceleration during its propagation in the solar wind was from 1000/874 to 483/460 kms 1 in mean/median values;
  • No correlation was found between the Dst and the parameters of the solar events (CME speed, CME AW, SF class, or SEP/SEE flux);
  • The GS-related solar events originated close to the solar disk center.
The compiled catalog with the values and timings of the GSs and their associated phenomena will be released as open access via the platform https://catalogs.astro.bas.bg/ (assessed on 26 November 2023) and revised when necessary in the future.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bulgarian–Egyptian inter-academy project by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences IC-EG/08/2022-2024 and the Egyptian Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT)/NRIAG (ASRT/BAS/2022-2023/10116).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The complete version of the GS catalog will be released at https://catalogs.astro.bas.bg/.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the ground-based and space data providers for their free access policy: Kyoto World Data Center—Kyoto, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the European Space Agency.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; nor in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACE/EPAM      Satellite and instrument for particle detection
AUAstronomical unit
AWAngular width
CDAWCoordinated Data Analyses Workshop
CIRCo-rotating interaction region
CMECoronal mass ejection
DEFUDifferential electron flux units
DPFUDifferential proton flux units
GICGeomagnetically induced current
GSGeomagnetic storm
HSSHigh-speed solar wind stream
ICMEInterplanetary CME
IMFInterplanetary magnetic field
IPInterplanetary
MPAMeasurement position angle
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
SCSolar cycle
SEESolar energetic electron
SEPSolar energetic proton
SFSolar flare
SOHO/LASCOSatellite and instrument for CME detection
SSCSudden storm commencement
SXRSoft X-ray
Wind/EPACTSatellite and instrument for particle detection

Appendix A. Summary of Occurrence Rates

Table A1. Occurrence rates in % of the GS-associated IP and solar phenomena. In parenthesis are shown the fraction of the event type (from Table 1) to the same number of GSs in each of the time periods.
Table A1. Occurrence rates in % of the GS-associated IP and solar phenomena. In parenthesis are shown the fraction of the event type (from Table 1) to the same number of GSs in each of the time periods.
TypeSC23SC24SC23+24
ICMEs44% (159/361)37% (69/185)42% (228/546)
IP shocks35% (127/361)14% (52/185)33% (179/546)
CMEs61% (220/361)59% (110/185)60% (330/546)
- certain32% (114/361)23% (43/185)29% (157/546)
SFs43% (157/361)39% (70/185)42% (227/546)
- certain24% (86/361)17% (32/185)22% (118/546)
SEPs16% (57/361)19% (33/185)16% (90/546)
- certain12% (43/361)11% (20/185)12% (63/546)
SEEs19% (69/361)22% (41/185)20% (110/546)
- certain14% (51/361)12% (23/185)14% (74/546)

Appendix B. Catalog of GSs with Proposed IP and Solar Origin (1996–2019)

Table A2. A catalog of GSs with identified IP and solar origin. The timings of the latter will be given in the online version. The Dst index is in nT; speed in kms 1 ; AW in degrees; rounded SEP flux in DPFU; SEE flux in DEFU. The SF class and location are according to the GOES reports. Abbreviations: u—uncertain; dg—data gap; no—no event found.
Table A2. A catalog of GSs with identified IP and solar origin. The timings of the latter will be given in the online version. The Dst index is in nT; speed in kms 1 ; AW in degrees; rounded SEP flux in DPFU; SEE flux in DEFU. The SF class and location are according to the GOES reports. Abbreviations: u—uncertain; dg—data gap; no—no event found.
GSICMEIP ShockCMESFSEPSEE
yyyymmddhDstSpeedSpeedSpeedAWClassLocationFluxFlux
199611311−90nono499 u18nononono
19963114−60nonouunononono
199632024−54nono418 u59nononono
199632123−66nonouunononono
19963243−53nonouunononono
19963252−60nonouunononono
19964151−56nonouunononono
19964179−52nonouunononono
19969129−54nonouunononono
19969238−51nono41027nononono
19969271−50nonouunononono
1996101917−52nonouunononono
199610235−105nono470 u170B6.0nonono
199711010−78450434136360nononono
199721011−68450618490360nononono
199721110−60nonouunononono
19972179−54nonouunononono
199722724−86no543905 u209B7.2nonono
199732824−63nonouunononono
19974115−82460337878360C6.8S30E190.0118no
19974176−77no389dgdgnononono
19974221−107360nouunononono
1997521−64no361255 u360nononono
199751513−115450443464 u360C1.3no0.0202no
19975275−73340303296 u165M1.3N05W120.004no
1997694−84380nouunononono
19979323−98410368371360M1.4N30E17nono
19979186−56nonouunononono
199710116−98450no359360nononono
1997101020−65430471506103nononono
199710114−130400no1271167nono0.0108213
199710253−64nono523360C3.3N16E07no79
1997102723−60500no503360nononono
19971175−110400no785360X2.1S14W330.951819,795
199711103−54nono1556360X9.4S18W6318.13102,017
199711237−108510377611 u360C1.6nonono
1997121111−60350375397 u223nononono
1997123020−77370386197 u360nononono
1998175−77400406438360B6.4N24W42nono
199813012−55380no693360C1.1N21E25nono
19982181−100400nouunononono
199821820−51440451uunononono
19982201−50nonouunononono
199831021−116nono659 u79nononono
199832116−85nono636174nononono
199832517−56400nouunononono
199832920−54nono761104C5.3nonono
19984248−69no4021863243M1.4u37.6461,152
199842618−63nono1691360X1.2S17E102nono
19985218−855206311374360M6.8S18E200.01739955
1998546−205550474938360X1.1S15W151.42343,760
19986622−50nono818147nononono
199861411−553402731223 u177M1.4nonono
19986265−101470no278 u119nononou
199871617−58nonodgdgnononono
19988612−138360475dgdgnononono
1998876−108450nodgdgnononono
199882021−67320321dgdgnononono
199882710−155650708dgdgX1.0no3.60922,947
19989117−55nonodgdgnononono
199891814−51nonodgdgnononono
199892510−207640768dgdgM7.1N18E090.0167182
19981012−58nonodgdgnononono
199810222−56no660dgdgnononono
199810723−70nonodgdgnononono
1998101916−112390no262360nononono
19981020 u22−71nonouunononono
19981022 u19−53520nouunononono
19981169−61nono661 u169C4.4S25E44nono
1998117 u17−81450no523360C1.6N11W01nono
19981187−1494506451118360M8.4N22W18nou
199811918−142nonouunononono
1998111322−131390406325190nononono
1998121116−69nono806 u73nononono
1998122512−57nono752 u22nononono
1998122912−58400464uunononono
19991141−112420413uunononono
199912323−52570701dgdgnononono
199921810−123540700dgdgM3.2S23W140.0038180
1999311−94nonouunononono
19993424−52nonouunononono
19993711−57nonouunononono
19993109−81410501uunononono
199932915−56nonouunononono
19994178−91410456291 u261nononono
19997312−53480no462360M2.3S15E03nono
19998231−66460no736265C2.6N23E27nono
19999135−74no5311467 u125B7.0nonono
19999169−67no544898 u182C4.9N21E02nono
199992224−173530466604360C2.8nonono
199992719−64nono1150 u77nononono
19999304−61nonouunononono
1999101019−67nonouunononono
199910227−237480476144 u240C1.0nonono
1999102818−66nono1127 u114C1.5unono
199911716−67nonouunononono
199911815−73nonouunononono
199911117−55nono631 u87C5.0unono
199911139−69450nodgdgnononono
1999111323−106440466dgdgnononono
1999111617−79nono1104 u41C4.6S12E44nono
1999112410−50nonodgdgnononono
1999121310−85440553dgdgnononono
1999123124−50nonouunononono
200011122−81nono1813 u67C5.8N23W42nono
20001231−97380no739360M3.9S19E110.0201381
200021212−1335406381003360C7.3N31E04nono
200033112−60420no1177360uuuu
2000452−63nono532 u113nononono
2000471−2925606421188360C9.7N16W660.54419431
200041612−79nono409 u360M3.1S14W01nono
200042415−61500nouunononono
20005176−92550no666 u182C3.7S22E65nono
20005249−147530656629138nononono
200052921−54nonouunononono
20006820−90610no1119360X2.3N20E180.61622432
200062618−76520no847 u198M3.0N26W720.01721,306
20007161−301740no1674360X5.7N22W07174.3750,613
200072010−93530638788 u116C5.3N13E30nono
200072218−63no497dgdgnononono
200072323−68360nodgdgnononono
200072912−71440no1287 u271M8.0N06W08nono
20008117−10643038059740nononono
200081210−235580563702360C2.3N11W11nono
20008297−60nono518 u178M1.4S15E67nono
200091220−73nono761 u176nonouu
200091724−201600no1215360M5.9N14E07no3300
200091915−77nono1056 u100nononono
20009263−55nonouunononono
200093015−76no454587 u360M1.8N09W18no250
200010313−79no462820 u136C5.2N17W52no181
200010421−143400no703 u170M1.0S22E36nono
20001058−175no538525360C1.4S09E07no149
200010514−182450no569360C8.4nonou
200010136−71no526798 u175C6.7N01W140.0075no
2000101415−107400no506 u360uuno257
200010238−53nonouunononono
200010294−127380390770360C4.0N06W600.21152665
200011410−50no429801360C2.2S17E39nono
200011622−159510611291360C3.2N02W02no357
2000111013−96no9251738170M7.4N10W77173.2888,533
200011272−805405241245 u360X2.3N22W071.64329,353
2000112914−119540604671360X1.9N20W23no28,8203
200012235−62320314510360C7.0N15S01nono
200112419−614006151507360M7.7S07S460.0399793
200121322−50no651956 u360no?N37W03nono
2001353−73440no631 u237C1.2S09W27nono
200132014−149360441271281nononono
200132317−75no382389 u360noN20W0nono
200132816−87610552906 u360M1.7N15E22nou
20013319−387640498519360M4.3S10E30nono
200133122−284600565942360X1.7N20E190.626612,355
2001458−506508452505244X20no7.38987782
2001497−637406961270360X5.6S21E31nou
200141124−2716403102411360X2.3S23W092.4997716
200141316−77730no1103360M2.3S22W27no77,982
20014187−1144306021199167X14.4S20W8531.3153,434
200142216−1023503812465 u360C2.2S15W908.519,759
20015104−76430no1223 u205C3.9N25W350.35421356
20016189−61no3361701360nono0.67365220
200181722−105500519618360C2.3N24W190.0107no
20019138−57410449791 u360C3.2N13E35nou
200192319−73440no436 u360nononono
20019262−102no8512402360X2.6S16E231.883,551,563
200193021−66560483509 u182C3.8S20W27nono
20011019−148490no846360M3.3S18W36nono
200110213−104490no773 u109M1.2nonono
200110315−166500no509 u216M1.8N13E03nono
200110916−64no3821537360nononono
2001101213−71560579973360M1.4S28E08nono
2001101922−57nonouunononono
2001102122−187460636901360X1.6N15W290.12361739
2001102812−1573605891092360X1.3S16W21nono
200111111−106330395592 u200C3.4nonono
20011167−292600no1810360X1.0N06W18277.34,512,846
2001112417−2217208041443360M3.8S25W67196.74715
2001122123−67no5521025 u103nonono170
2001122411−55no306769 u108C2.4nonono
200112306−584006691446212M7.1N08W5424.47103,570
20021117−72nono1794360nononono
20022210−86nono1136360nono0.20951267
20022521−82nonouunononono
2002312−71390nouunononono
200232410−100450517603360nononono
20024188−127480517720360M1.2S15W01no267
2002419 u19−126no768uunononono
20024209−149500no1240360M2.6S14W340.102438,361
200242316−57no6442393360X1.5S14W8479.07127,221
200251120−110430483614360C4.2S12W07nono
200251421−63nono1154 u120C1.2S18W43nono
20025197−58no545600360C4.5S23E15nono
200252318−1095907371246186C9.7N17E36no1032
20025279−64nono1557 u360C5.0S30W341.517no
20028114−51nonouunononono
2002826−102460496562236nononono
2002802 u23−69nonouunononono
2002846−58nonouunononono
20028198−53no672uunononono
20028201−71no535uunononono
20028217−106460no1585 u360M5.2S14E200.03491082
2002946−109no340uunononono
2002981−1814708971748360C5.2N09E280.21181886
20029101−69nono909 u360nononono
200291123−90nonouunononono
200210121−176390331881 u104nononono
2002102 u5−158nonouunononono
20021049−146430nouunononono
200210516−102nono903 u190B9.2S18E20nono
20021078−115nono743 u230nononono
2002108 u5−108nonouunononono
2002101414−100nonouunononono
20021015 u19−70nono1009 u264M2.2S08E66nou
2002101621−63nono1694 u360nononono
2002102421−98nono640 u360nononono
20021025 u2−91nonouunononono
20021026 u20−62nono1052 u119C6.6S04W62nono
20021027 u16−65nono689 u286nononono
20021028 u5−63nono629 u360nononono
20021030 u19−52nono2115 u360nononono
20021134−74nonouunononono
2002111823−52380no1185360nononono
2002112021−87no3921008 u119C2.4nonono
2002112111−128nono938 u123nononono
200211277−64nono1077360nonono851
2002121921−72nonouunononono
20021220 u6−64nonouunononono
20021221 u4−75440nouunononono
2002122312−67nono1092 u360M2.7N15W090.10029777
200212275 17−68nonouunononono
20031301−66nono1053 u267C2.4S17W23nono
20032218−72510no620138nononono
20032410−74nonouunononono
200324 u24−54nonouunononono
200322722−66nonouunononono
2003341−67nonouunononono
200331622−60nono1021 u91C1.3S12E09dgno
200332020−64650no1601209X1.5S15W460.00823,895
200332718−56nono1505 u82C1.9S17E77nono
2003329 u7−63nonouunononono
2003329 u21−70nonouunononono
2003331 u16−78nono664 u111nononono
20034223−53nonouunononono
20034424−62nono885 u87nononono
200342523−53nono899 u148B7.2nonono
20034303−67nono991 u95nononono
20035109−84680nouunononono
20035223−73nono866 u101B8.3unono
20035301−1446009071366360X3.6S07W200.1636no
20035316−63680no1237360X1.2S06W37no7886
2003629−91nono1835360M9.3S07W650.554345,772
20036823−50nono1458 u239nononono
2003616 u17−59nonouunononono
200361623−68510nouunononono
20036179−81nono1215 u179nononono
200361810−1414804792053360X1.3S07E80no656
200362110−50nono1813 u360M6.8S08E580.263420,103
200362414−55nonouunononono
200371111−55nonouunononono
20037126−105nonouunononono
200371614−90nonouunononono
20037191−50nonouunononono
20037278−57nonouunononono
2003867−60440no699 u360nononono
20038722−61nonouunononono
200381816−148450no378360nononono
200382124−68nonouunononono
200391724−65nonouunononono
20039248−59nono646360nononono
2003101423−85nonouunononono
200310177−53nonouunononono
20031020 u22−57nono627 u360nononono
20031022 u7−61520nouunononono
200310275−52470no1406 u236M1.7S04E13uu
200310301−3531300no2459360X17.2S16E68353.2530,064
2003103023−383800no2029360M1.0S15W02nono
200311411−69no7592598360X8.3S14W5650.99116,852
2003111114−62nono2008 u360nononono
2003112021−4225806661660360M3.9N00E18uu
2003112223−87nono669360M9.6N01W080.06949787
20031265−55nono1393 u150C7.2S19W912.2251281
2003128 u22−54nono676 u95C2.2S17W38nono
20031210 u20−51nonouunononono
20041714−50nono1469 u166C2.5nonono
200411517−50nonouunononono
200412214−130560no965360nononono
2004125 u4−81490no762 u360C1.2S19E29nono
2004127 u2−62nonouunononono
200421118−93nonouunononono
20043924−72nonouunononono
200431124−63nonouunononono
2004441−117440no652 u113nononono
20044520−62nonouunononono
20047173−76nono747 u360M5.4N12W52no198
20047233−99560454710360M8.6N10E35nono
200472517−136560561899132C5.3N04E10nou
200472714−17087010861333360M1.1N08E331.24513,269
20048922−51nono1004360nononono
200483023−129390483uunononono
20041187−3746307421055293M5.4N08E18nono
2004111011−2636408131759360X2.0N09W17uno
200411258−53nono649 u102nononono
200411287−50nonouunononono
200412133−56400no611360C2.5N01W07nono
2005183−93460560735360B1.8S15E15nono
200511211−50nono870 u164M2.4S09E69nono
20051174−65520539455360C4.2S06E15nono
20051189−103nono2861360X2.6N14W0812.7159,664
2005119 u11−80800no2094 u360X2.2N13W19uu
20051226−97nono2020 u360X1.3N15W51nono
20052722−57nono711 u139nononono
20052183−80410no1135360C4.9S03W23no162
2005371−54nonouunononono
2005455−70no472uunononono
20054126−62nonouunononono
2005583−82no438uunononono
20055819−110no4761180360C7.8N04W67nono
20055159−2476308581689360M8.0N12E119.876879,497
20055209−83430no405 u140C1.2N15W27nou
200553014−113460u586360nononono
20056131−106480nouunononono
200562311−85nono614 u103B1.2S13W51nono
20057921−55nono772 u360C1.3S08E34nono
200571021−92430533683 u360M4.9N09E03no579
20057187−674203782115 u360X1.2N11W90no14,743
200582412−1846605362378360M5.6S13W650.179259,728
200583120−122nono1600360nono0.0328714
20059410−71pdno1384 u360nononono
2005910 u23−73no5441291 u126M1.4S12E88nono
200591111−13990011472257360X6.2S10E58nono
2005912 u22−8975010481893360X2.1S13E47nono
2005913 u13−86630no1922360M3.0S16E39nono
200591517−806806611866360X1.5S09E105.51518,409
20051088−50nonouunononono
2005103121−74360nouunononono
2005121119−55480no673 u360B5.5N15E14nono
20061264−51nonouunononono
2006372−52nonouunononono
20064516−79nonouunononono
2006498−82nonouunononono
200641410−98520nouunononono
20065622−53nono487 u360C1.0S17W02nono
20068202−79400460888360C3.6S14W13nono
200692410−55no402uunononono
20061016−51no356uunononono
2006101323−55nonouunononono
200610299−50nonouunononono
200611102−63no3601994 u360C8.8nonono
2006113014−74420nouunononono
200612613−55nonouunononono
200612158−16274010121774360X3.4S06W2320.17158,754
20073249−72nonouunononono
2007419−63nonouunononono
200752314−58nono958 u106nononou
2007102522−53no433uunononono
2007112021−59460442uunononono
20082288−52nonouunononono
2008396−86nonouunononono
200832722−56nono1103 u112M1.7S13E78nono
2008945−51nonouunononono
2008101112−54nonouunononono
20097227−83330337uunononono
201021524−59no336509 u360M8.3N26E11no744
20104615−81640no668360B7.4S25W00nono
20104122−67410465uunononono
20105219−71nonouunononono
201052913−80360no427360B1.1N13W31nono
2010642−53nonouunononono
2010842 20−74530537850360C3.2N20E36nono
2010101120−75nonouunononono
20112422−63430no437360nononono
20113115−88nonouunononono
20113116−83nono2125 u360M3.7N31W531.0129316
20114619−60nono2081 u109nononono
201152812−80510no657 u122nononono
2011751−59ndno511 u196nononono
2011864−115no5771315360M9.3N19W361.799625
20119105−75470no575 u360X2.1N14W180.1368622
201191716−72430506746 u199nononono
201192624−1185805561915360M7.1N10E56nono
20119287−68nono972 u360M3.0N12E42nono
201110252−147460no1005360M1.3N25W77no6239
201111116−66380334570360nononono
20121236−714504431120360M3.2N32E220.0173939
201212511−75no7362175360M8.7N28W21153.2170,580
201221517−67370no533 u360nononono
20122195−63nono538 u360nononono
201222720−57440no1039 u97B5.9nonono
2012322−54ndno466 u360nononono
2012342−50nono710 u206M3.3N16E83nono
20123710−88no4801306 u360M2.0N19E610.03841801
2012399−145550no2684360X5.4N17E2782.93370,966
201231217−64nono1296360M8.4N17W24nono
201231521−88680no1884360M7.9N17W6610.9170,886
20123285−68nono1390 u360nononono
2012458−64nonouunononono
20124135−60nono921 u360C3.9N20W65no111
20124245−120370425uunononono
20126122−67nonouunononono
201261714−86440483987360M1.9S17E060.0064212
20127913−78410no1828 u360X1.1S13W590.488519,052
201271517−139490746885360X1.4S15W011.68321,061
20129311−693104291442 u360C8.4S19E420.26179584
2012956−64500482538360C2.9N03W05nono
20121015−122370447947360C3.7N06W340.271612,151
2012108 u13−99no465uunononono
20121099−109390no612284nononono
201210138−90490465692 u122C2.0S26E86nono
201211121−65340390317360nononono
201211148−108380nouunononono
201311724−52390335798 u162nononono
201312623−51no354uunononono
20133111−55nono622 u138B8.3S19W05nono
201331721−1325207651063360X1.1N11E110.0091247
201332917−59no206663 u177B6.8nonono
20135119−72430447uunononono
20135185−61no4521366 u360X1.2N12E640.5234u
2013519 u15−51no4971345360M3.2N12E57nono
20135257−59no624146636050N14W8761.84no
2013525 u20−56no475uunononono
2013619−124nonouunononono
2013673−78430no709 u123nononono
20136297−102390nouunononono
20137619−87350no807 u267M1.5S11E82nono
201371022−56nonouunononono
201371423−81430no449 u360B7.6N19E14nono
2013853−50nonouunononono
201382722−59nonouunononono
20131028−724706541179360C1.2N10W433.208no
20131092−69480no567360C1.1S16W13nono
2013103024−54no337695360X1.0N04W660.070122,413
201311713−50nono1040 u360nonono259.94
20131199−804204281033 u360M1.8S11W970.05783644
201311118−68ndno497 u360nononono
20131289−66no329uunononono
20142199−119520621634360M1.1S11E01no305
201422013−95490no779360nono0.0071147
2014222 u2−64nno612 u360nono0.01991263
201422320−55nono1252360nonono156
201422724−97no4362147360X4.9S12E820.56610,469
2014319−52nonouunononono
201441210−87350no514 u360nononono
201443010−67310nouunononono
201482719−79nono551 u360M5.9S07E75nono
201491224−88600no1267360X1.6N14E020.580814,581
20141098−51nonouunononono
201410282−57nonouunononono
2014111018−65480no795 u293X1.6N15E33nono
201411168−59nono710 u115nononono
2014121217−53nono1086 u228C5.9S18W89nono
201412226−71380no587 u360M8.7S20E090.0107no
20141223 u23−57nono1195 u360M6.9S11E15no7979
20141224 u23−53nono830 u257X1.8S21W24nono
20141226 u2−57nono669 u360M1.0S14W25nono
20151422−78pdno902 u126nononono
20151712−107450nouunononono
2015227−55nonouunononono
20152181−69nonouunononono
20152248−58nono1120360nonono1046
2015319−56nonouunononono
2015329−64nono999 u360nononono
201531723−234560536719360C9.1S22W250.03251345
20154105−60no382uunononono
201541110−85380nouunononono
2015415 u21−62nonouunononono
2015416 u8−81no371uunononono
201541624−88noprev1198360nonono284
2015689−67no368uunononono
20156235−1986103681366 u360M2.0N12E160.0213019
201562517−815507481209 u360M6.5N12W08nono
2015626 u18−51490no1627 u360M7.9N09W420.27268319
2015756−74nono1435 u360nono0.045859
201571316−68490nouunononono
20157239−72nono782 u194C2.1S25W62uu
20158168−98500477647 u204B7.0nonono
20158197−64nono622 uX1.0unonono
20158239−57nono547 u360M1.2S15E13nono
2015826 u22−79nonouunononono
2015827 u6−92nonouunononono
201582721−103370nouunononono
2015828 u10−102nonouunononono
2015947−50nonouunononono
20159721−75nonouunononono
20159913−105460nouunononono
201591115−87nono556 u146nononono
201592016−81510716823131C2.6S21W10nono
201510410−63nono602 u128nononono
201510620−52nono914 u106C1.6S18W66nono
201510710−101nono714 u102nononono
201510723−124nono900 u145nononono
2015101810−56nono77079B6.4S06E76no90
2015113 u13−51nono751 u114C1.3N07E30nono
201511413−56640no867360nononono
20151177−87500no578360M3.7N09W040.0054425
2015119 u17−55nonouunononono
2015111014−56nono1041 u273M3.9S11E410.0675338
2015121420−55nono628 u84C1.4S15E52nono
2015122023−166400536579360C6.6S13W04no84
2016111−110440no1212360M1.8S23W110.0115572
201612017−101370no1730360nononono
2016219−53nono684 u71C3.3N09W50no689
2016233−57nono901 u118C2.0S20W63nono
201621620−65nono719 u360C8.9N09W08nono
20162181−62nonouunononono
20163622−99pdno644 u158nononono
20163158−50no398641 u79nononono
2016316 u24−56nonouunononono
20164224−59nonouunononono
20164722−61nonouunononono
20164132−56nonouunononono
201641421−61420no543 u136nononono
201641622−58ndnouunononono
2016588−95nonouunononono
20168316−52pdnouunononono
201682322−73nonouunononono
20169110−57nonouunononono
201692 u3−59nonouunononono
2016928 u18−51nonouunononono
2016929 u10−65nonouunononono
201610410−50nono818 u76nononono
2016101318−110390415179360nononono
2016102518−65nonouunononono
201610294−70nonouunononono
2016111018−60360344uunononono
20173122−61nonouunononono
201732715−70nonouunononono
20173317−51nonouunononono
201742217−51nono926360C5.5N14E77nono
20175288−125360373uunononono
201771616−72520no1200360M2.4S06W290.12841248
201783112−51no418uunononono
2017982−1222202451571360X9.3S08W330.604u
20179818−109nonouunononono
20179287−56nonouunononono
201710146−53nono741 u109nonono639
20171182−73nonouunononono
201831822−50nonouunononono
201842010−66no313uunononono
2018563−57no376uunononono
20188267−175410nouunononono
201891111−60nonouunononono
201810722−53nonouunononono
20181156−53nonouunononono
201951122−51350411745 uM9.6unonono
20195148−65470nouunononono
20198521−53nonouunononono
2019917−52nonouunononono

References

  1. Dungey, J.W. Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1961, 6, 47–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lakhina, G.; Tsurutani, B.; Gonzalez, W.; Alex, S. Humboldt, Alexander Von And Magnetic Storms. In Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism; Gubbins, D., Herrero-Bervera, E., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gonzalez, W.D.; Joselyn, J.A.; Kamide, Y.; Kroehl, H.W.; Rostoker, G.; Tsurutani, B.T.; Vasyliunas, V.M. What is a geomagnetic storm? J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 5771–5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lazzús, J.A.; Salfate, I.; Vega-Jorquera, P. Intense Geomagnetic Storms in The Maximum Phase of Solar Cycle 24 Observed From a Low-Latitude Ground Station. Geofis. Int. 2022, 61, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsurutani, B.T.; Gonzalez, W.D.; Tang, F.; Akasofu, S.I.; Smith, E.J. Origin of interplanetary southward magnetic fields responsible for major magnetic storms near solar maximum (1978–1979). J. Geophys. Res. 1988, 93, 8519–8531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akasofu, S.I.; Chapman, S. The Development of the Main Phase of Magnetic Storms. J. Geophys. Res. 1963, 68, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gosling, J.T.; McComas, D.J.; Phillips, J.L.; Bame, S.J. Geomagnetic activity associated with earth passage of interplanetary shock disturbances and coronal mass ejections. J. Geophys. Res. 1991, 96, 7831–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gopalswamy, N.; Yashiro, S.; Michalek, G.; Xie, H.; Lepping, R.P.; Howard, R.A. Solar source of the largest geomagnetic storm of cycle 23. Geophys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 32, L12S09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, P.F. Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 2011, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joshi, N.C.; Bankoti, N.S.; Pande, S.; Pande, B.; Pandey, K. Relationship between interplanetary field/plasma parameters with geomagnetic indices and their behavior during intense geomagnetic storms. New Astron. 2011, 16, 366–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Webb, D.F.; Howard, T.A. Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 2012, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Telloni, D.; Antonucci, E.; Bemporad, A.; Bianchi, T.; Bruno, R.; Fineschi, S.; Magli, E.; Nicolini, G.; Susino, R. Detection of Coronal Mass Ejections at L1 and Forecast of Their Geoeffectiveness. Astrophys. J. 2019, 885, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marchezi, J.P.; Dai, L.; Alves, L.R.; Da Silva, L.A.; Sibeck, D.G.; Lago, A.D.; Souza, V.M.; Jauer, P.R.; Veira, L.E.A.; Cardoso, F.R.; et al. Electron Flux Variability and Ultra-Low Frequency Wave Activity in the Outer Radiation Belt under the Influence of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections and High-Speed Solar Wind Streams: A Statistical Analysis From the Van Allen Probes Era. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2022, 127, e29887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schillings, A.; Palin, L.; Opgenoorth, H.J.; Hamrin, M.; Rosenqvist, L.; Gjerloev, J.W.; Juusola, L.; Barnes, R. Distribution and Occurrence Frequency of dB/dt Spikes During Magnetic Storms 1980–2020. Space Weather 2022, 20, e2021SW002953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Milan, S.E.; Imber, S.M.; Fleetham, A.L.; Gjerloev, J. Solar Cycle and Solar Wind Dependence of the Occurrence of Large dB/dt Events at High Latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2023, 128, e2022JA030953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hapgood, M.; Liu, H.; Lugaz, N. SpaceX—Sailing Close to the Space Weather? Space Weather 2022, 20, e2022SW003074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miteva, R.; Samwel, S.W.; Tkatchova, S. Space Weather Effects on Satellites. Astronomy 2023, 2, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McCuen, B.A.; Moldwin, M.B.; Steinmetz, E.S.; Engebretson, M.J. Automated High-Frequency Geomagnetic Disturbance Classifier: A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Noise while Retaining High-Frequency Components of the Geomagnetic Field. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2023, 128, e2022JA030842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Loewe, C.A.; Prölss, G.W. Classification and mean behavior of magnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 14209–14214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mayaud, P.N. Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 1980, 22, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banerjee, A.; Bej, A.; Chatterjee, T.N. On the existence of a long range correlation in the Geomagnetic Disturbance storm time (Dst) index. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2012, 337, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Borovsky, J.E.; Shprits, Y.Y. Is the Dst Index Sufficient to Define All Geospace Storms? J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2017, 122, 11543–11547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bartels, J.; Veldkamp, J. International data on magnetic disturbances, fourth quarter, 1953. J. Geophys. Res. 1954, 59, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Matzka, J.; Stolle, C.; Yamazaki, Y.; Bronkalla, O.; Morschhauser, A. The Geomagnetic Kp Index and Derived Indices of Geomagnetic Activity. Space Weather 2021, 19, e2020SW002641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McPherron, R.L. Determination of linear filters for predicting Ap during Jan. 1997. Geophys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 25, 3035–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kamide, Y.; Rostoker, G. What Is the Physical Meaning of the AE Index? EOS Trans. 2004, 85, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lakhina, G.S.; Tsurutani, B.T. Geomagnetic storms: Historical perspective to modern view. Geosci. Lett. 2016, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tsurutani, B.T.; Gonzalez, W.D.; Lakhina, G.S.; Alex, S. The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Physics) 2003, 108, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lockwood, M.; Owens, M.J.; Barnard, L.A.; Scott, C.J.; Watt, C.E.; Bentley, S. Space climate and space weather over the past 400 years: 2. Proxy indicators of geomagnetic storm and substorm occurrence. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 2018, 8, A12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Temmer, M. Space weather: The solar perspective. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 2021, 18, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akasofu, S.I. A Historical Review of the Geomagnetic Storm-Producing Plasma Flows from the Sun. Space Sci. Rev. 2011, 164, 85–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Manu, V.; Balan, N.; Zhang, Q.H.; Xing, Z.Y. Association of the Main Phase of the Geomagnetic Storms in Solar Cycles 23 and 24 with Corresponding Solar Wind-IMF Parameters. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2022, 127, e2022JA030747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Burton, R.K.; McPherron, R.L.; Russell, C.T. An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst. J. Geophys. Res. 1975, 80, 4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gopalswamy, N. Solar connections of geoeffective magnetic structures. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2008, 70, 2078–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Samwel, S.; Miteva, R. Correlations between space weather parameters during intense geomagnetic storms: Analytical study. Adv. Space Res. 2023, 72, 3440–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vennerstrom, S.; Lefevre, L.; Dumbović, M.; Crosby, N.; Malandraki, O.; Patsou, I.; Clette, F.; Veronig, A.; Vršnak, B.; Leer, K.; et al. Extreme Geomagnetic Storms—1868–2010. Sol. Phys. 2016, 291, 1447–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Balan, N.; Zhang, Q.H.; Xing, Z.; Skoug, R.; Shiokawa, K.; Lühr, H.; Tulasi Ram, S.; Otsuka, Y.; Zhao, L. Capability of Geomagnetic Storm Parameters to Identify Severe Space Weather. Astrophys. J. 2019, 887, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Richardson, I.G.; Webb, D.F.; Zhang, J.; Berdichevsky, D.B.; Biesecker, D.A.; Kasper, J.C.; Kataoka, R.; Steinberg, J.T.; Thompson, B.J.; Wu, C.C.; et al. Major geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) generated by corotating interaction regions. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2006, 111, A07S09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dumitrache, C.; Popescu, N.A. The solar cycle 24 geomagnetic storms triggered by ICMEs and CIRs. Rom. Astron. J. 2018, 28, 177–186. [Google Scholar]
  40. Choraghe, K.; Shaikh, Z.; Raghav, A.; Ghag, K.; Dhamane, O. Intense (SYMH ⩽ −100 nT) geomagnetic storms induced by planar magnetic structures in co-rotating interaction regions. Adv. Space Res. 2023, 72, 3220–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.; Richardson, I.G.; Webb, D.F.; Gopalswamy, N.; Huttunen, E.; Kasper, J.C.; Nitta, N.V.; Poomvises, W.; Thompson, B.J.; Wu, C.C.; et al. Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) during 1996–2005. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 2007, 112, A10102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Miteva, R. On extreme space weather events: Solar eruptions, energetic protons and geomagnetic storms. Adv. Space Res. 2020, 66, 1977–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miteva, R.; Samwel, S.W.; Nedal, M. Geomagnetic Storms and their Solar Origin in Solar Cycle 24 (2009–2019). In Proceedings of the XIII Bulgarian-Serbian Astronomical Conference, BSAC 2022, Velingrad, Bulgaria, 3–7 October 2022; Semkov, E., Dimitrijevic, M.S., Dechev, M., Simic, Z., Eds.; Astronomical Society “Rudjer Boskovic”: Belgrade, Serbia, 2023; pp. 125–135, ISBN ISBN 978-868903525-4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Miteva, R.; Samwel, S.W.; Costa-Duarte, M.V. The Wind/EPACT Proton Event Catalog (1996–2016). Sol. Phys. 2018, 293, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Samwel, S.W.; Miteva, R. Catalogue of in situ observed solar energetic electrons from ACE/EPAM instrument. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 505, 5212–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kilpua, E.; Lugaz, N.; Mays, M.L.; Temmer, M. Forecasting the Structure and Orientation of Earthbound Coronal Mass Ejections. Space Weather 2019, 17, 498–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miteva, R.; Samwel, S.W.; Zabunov, S. Multi-Energy Proton Events and Geomagnetic Storms in Solar Cycles 23 and 24. In Proceedings of the SES-2020 Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 4–6 November 2020; pp. 64–68. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mansilla, G.A. Solar wind and IMF parameters associated with geomagnetic storms with Dst < −50 nT. Phys. Scr. 2008, 78, 045902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Yearly distribution of the GSs on the left (bin width of 0.5 years) and Dst index distribution on the right (bin width 20 nT). Certain events are shown in dark and uncertain in light gray color.
Figure 1. Yearly distribution of the GSs on the left (bin width of 0.5 years) and Dst index distribution on the right (bin width 20 nT). Certain events are shown in dark and uncertain in light gray color.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g001
Figure 2. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the ICME speed (on the left) and its distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ) for the entire event sample.
Figure 2. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the ICME speed (on the left) and its distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ) for the entire event sample.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g002
Figure 3. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the IP shock speed (on the left) and its distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ) for the entire event sample.
Figure 3. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the IP shock speed (on the left) and its distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ) for the entire event sample.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g003
Figure 4. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the CME linear speed (on the left) and the CMEs’ speed distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ). Empty circles and light gray color denote uncertain events, whereas filled circles and dark color the certain events.
Figure 4. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the CME linear speed (on the left) and the CMEs’ speed distribution (on the right, bin width of 100 kms 1 ). Empty circles and light gray color denote uncertain events, whereas filled circles and dark color the certain events.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the CME AW (on the left) and the CME AW distribution (on the right, bin width of 20 degrees). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Figure 5. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the CME AW (on the left) and the CME AW distribution (on the right, bin width of 20 degrees). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g005
Figure 6. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SF class (on the left) and the SF class distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Figure 6. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SF class (on the left) and the SF class distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g006
Figure 7. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SEP flux (on the left) and the SEP flux distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Figure 7. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SEP flux (on the left) and the SEP flux distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g007
Figure 8. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SEE flux (on the left) and the SEE flux distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Figure 8. Scatter plots between the Dst index (nT) and the SEE flux (on the left) and the SEE flux distribution (on the right). Plotting style as in Figure 4.
Atmosphere 14 01744 g008
Table 1. Mean/median values for the entire sample (given in bold font) and separately for the certain and uncertain categories for each of the considered phenomena denoted by ‘type’. Units: absolute value of Dst in nT; speeds in kms 1 ; SEP flux in differential proton flux units (DPFU) or protons/(cm 2 sr s MeV) 1 ; SEE flux in differential electron flux units (DEFU) or electrons/(cm 2 sr s keV) 1 . The exact sample size is given in parentheses.
Table 1. Mean/median values for the entire sample (given in bold font) and separately for the certain and uncertain categories for each of the considered phenomena denoted by ‘type’. Units: absolute value of Dst in nT; speeds in kms 1 ; SEP flux in differential proton flux units (DPFU) or protons/(cm 2 sr s MeV) 1 ; SEE flux in differential electron flux units (DEFU) or electrons/(cm 2 sr s keV) 1 . The exact sample size is given in parentheses.
TypeSC23SC24SC23+24
GS |Dst|91/71 (361)75/66 (185)86/69 (546)
   - certain92/72 (331)77/67 (166)87/70 (497)
   - uncertain74/70 (30)65/57 (19)71/64 (49)
ICME speed499/460 (159)447/440 (69)483/460 (228)
   - certain495/460 (151)446/435 (68)480/450 (219)
   - uncertain575/520 (8)490 (1)566/520 (9)
IP shock speed543/517 (127)463/445 (52)520/479 (179)
   - certain537/500 (124)463/440 (48)517/478 (172)
   - uncertain787/768 (3)452/470 (4)595/497 (7)
CME speed1037/899 (220)943/803 (110)1006/874 (330)
   - certain1123/1004 (114)2684/987 (43)1007/1003 (157)
   - uncertain945/833 (106)866/745 (67)915/791 (173)
CME AW278/360 (220)286/360 (110)280/360 (330)
   - certain331/360 (114)353/360 (43)337/360 (157)
   - uncertain220/182 (106)243/257 (67)229/200 (173)
SF classM1.5/M1.2 (157)M1.5/M1.8 (70)M1.5/M1.4 (227)
   - certainM3.1/M3.9 (86)M2.1/M2.8 (32)M2.8/M3.5 (118)
   - uncertainC6.4/C5.2 (71)M1.1/M1.3 (38)C7.7/C6.7 (109)
SEP flux0.71/0.61 (57)0.21/0.14 (33)0.45/0.31 (90)
   - certain1.19/0.67 (43)0.35/0.39 (20)0.80/0.60 (63)
   - uncertain0.14/0.16 (14)0.10/0.07 (13)0.12/0.10 (27)
SEE flux ( × 10 3 ) 7.8/9.8 (69)2.1/1.3 (41)4.8/4.6 (110)
   - certain13.5/12.4 (51)2.9/1.3 (23)8.4/9.5 (74)
   - uncertain1.7/1.2 (18)1.4/1.0 (18)1.5/1.2 (36)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miteva, R.; Samwel, S.W. Catalog of Geomagnetic Storms with Dst Index ≤ −50 nT and Their Solar and Interplanetary Origin (1996–2019). Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14121744

AMA Style

Miteva R, Samwel SW. Catalog of Geomagnetic Storms with Dst Index ≤ −50 nT and Their Solar and Interplanetary Origin (1996–2019). Atmosphere. 2023; 14(12):1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14121744

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miteva, Rositsa, and Susan W. Samwel. 2023. "Catalog of Geomagnetic Storms with Dst Index ≤ −50 nT and Their Solar and Interplanetary Origin (1996–2019)" Atmosphere 14, no. 12: 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14121744

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop