# A Neural-Network Based MPAS—Shallow Water Model and Its 4D-Var Data Assimilation System

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Methodology

#### 2.1. MPAS-SW Dynamics

#### 2.2. NN Emulator of MPAS-SW

#### 2.3. The Tangent Linear and Adjoint Models

#### 2.4. A Continuous 4D-Var DA System

## 3. Experiment Design

#### 3.1. A Single Observation Experiment

#### 3.2. Full Vector Observation Experiment

#### 3.3. Discussion

## 4. Conclusions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Sample Availability

## References

- Bauer, P.; Thorpe, A.; Brunet, G. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature
**2015**, 525, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zhang, Z.; Moore, J.C. Mathematical and Physical Fundamentals of Climate Change; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Pathak, J.; Subramanian, S.; Harrington, P.; Raja, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Mardani, M.; Kurth, T.; Hall, D.; Li, Z.; Azizzadenesheli, K. Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators. arXiv
**2022**, arXiv:2202.11214. [Google Scholar] - Schultz, M.G.; Betancourt, C.; Gong, B.; Kleinert, F.; Langguth, M.; Leufen, L.H.; Mozaffari, A.; Stadtler, S. Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A
**2021**, 379, 20200097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Irrgang, C.; Boers, N.; Sonnewald, M.; Barnes, E.A.; Kadow, C.; Staneva, J.; Saynisch-Wagner, J. Towards neural Earth system modelling by integrating artificial intelligence in Earth system science. Nat. Mach. Intell.
**2021**, 3, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Scher, S.; Messori, G. Predicting weather forecast uncertainty with machine learning. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
**2018**, 144, 2830–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bildirici, M.; Ersin, O.O. Improving forecasts of GARCH family models with the artificial neural networks: An application to the daily returns in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Expert Syst. Appl.
**2009**, 36, 7355–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bildirici, M.; Ersin, O. Modeling Markov switching ARMA-GARCH neural networks models and an application to forecasting stock returns. Sci. World J.
**2014**, 2014, 497941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gagne, D.J.; McGovern, A.; Xue, M. Machine learning enhancement of storm-scale ensemble probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts. Weather Forecast.
**2014**, 29, 1024–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - McGovern, A.; Elmore, K.L.; Gagne, D.J.; Haupt, S.E.; Karstens, C.D.; Lagerquist, R.; Smith, T.; Williams, J.K. Using artificial intelligence to improve real-time decision-making for high-impact weather. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.
**2017**, 98, 2073–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rasp, S.; Lerch, S. Neural networks for postprocessing ensemble weather forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev.
**2018**, 146, 3885–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Agrawal, S.; Barrington, L.; Bromberg, C.; Burge, J.; Gazen, C.; Hickey, J. Machine learning for precipitation nowcasting from radar images. arXiv
**2019**, arXiv:1912.12132. [Google Scholar] - Grönquist, P.; Yao, C.; Ben-Nun, T.; Dryden, N.; Dueben, P.; Li, S.; Hoefler, T. Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A
**2021**, 379, 20200092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Lam, R.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Willson, M.; Wirnsberger, P.; Fortunato, M.; Pritzel, A.; Ravuri, S.; Ewalds, T.; Alet, F.; Eaton-Rosen, Z. GraphCast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting. arXiv
**2022**, arXiv:2212.12794. [Google Scholar] - Keisler, R. GraphCast: Forecasting Global Weather with Graph Neural Networks. arXiv
**2022**, arXiv:2202.07575. [Google Scholar] - Chevallier, F.; Chéruy, F.; Scott, N.A.; Chédin, A. A neural network approach for a fast and accurate computation of a longwave radiative budget. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol.
**1998**, 37, 1385–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Krasnopolsky, V.M.; Fox-Rabinovitz, M.S.; Chalikov, D.V. New approach to calculation of atmospheric model physics: Accurate and fast neural network emulation of longwave radiation in a climate model. Mon. Weather Rev.
**2005**, 133, 1370–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rasp, S.; Pritchard, M.S.; Gentine, P. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
**2018**, 115, 9684–9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Brenowitz, N.D.; Bretherton, C.S. Spatially extended tests of a neural network parametrization trained by coarse-graining. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.
**2019**, 11, 2728–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hatfield, S.; Chantry, M.; Dueben, P.; Lopez, P.; Geer, A.; Palmer, T. Building Tangent-Linear and Adjoint Models for Data Assimilation With Neural Networks. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.
**2021**, 13, e2021MS002521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nonnenmacher, M.; Greenberg, D.S. Deep emulators for differentiation, forecasting, and parametrization in Earth science simulators. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.
**2021**, 13, e2021MS002554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Scher, S.; Messori, G. Generalization properties of feed-forward neural networks trained on Lorenz systems. Nonlinear Process. Geophys.
**2019**, 26, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ringler, T.; Ju, L.; Gunzburger, M. A multiresolution method for climate system modeling: Application of spherical centroidal Voronoi tessellations. Ocean Dyn.
**2008**, 58, 475–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ringler, T.D.; Thuburn, J.; Klemp, J.B.; Skamarock, W.C. A unified approach to energy conservation and potential vorticity dynamics for arbitrarily-structured C-grids. J. Comput. Phys.
**2010**, 229, 3065–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hoffmann, L.; Günther, G.; Li, D.; Stein, O.; Wu, X.; Griessbach, S.; Heng, Y.; Konopka, P.; Müller, R.; Vogel, B. From ERA-Interim to ERA5: The considerable impact of ECMWF’s next-generation reanalysis on Lagrangian transport simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys.
**2019**, 19, 3097–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Clevert, D.A.; Unterthiner, T.; Hochreiter, S. Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs). arXiv
**2015**, arXiv:1511.07289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Srivastava, N.; Hinton, G.; Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res.
**2014**, 15, 1929–1958. [Google Scholar] - Tian, X. Evolutions of Errors in the Global Multiresolution Model for Prediction Across Scales - Shallow Water (MPAS-SW). Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc.
**2020**, 734, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tian, X.; Ide, K. Hurricane Predictability Analysis with Singular Vectors in the Multiresolution Global Shallow Water Model. J. Atmos. Sci.
**2021**, 78, 1259–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zou, X.; Kuo, Y.H.; Guo, Y.R. Assimilation of atmospheric radio refractivity using a nonhydrostatic adjoint model. Mon. Weather Rev.
**1995**, 123, 2229–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zou, X.; Vandenberghe, F.; Pondeca, M.; Kuo, Y.H. Introduction to Adjoint Techniques and the MM5 Adjoint Modeling System; NCAR Technical Note; NCAR: Boulder, CO, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, X.; Zou, X. Validation of a Prototype Global 4D-Var Data Assimilation System for the MPAS-Atmosphere Model. Mon. Weather Rev.
**2021**, 149, 2803–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**(

**a**) Spatial distribution of the Spherical Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (SCVT) mesh at 1000 km with 611 cells globally. (

**b**) The neural network diagram showing the structure of the NN-based MPAS-SW model. The actual number of the neurons for the input and output layers is N = 1833, and N = 3666 for the hidden layer.

**Figure 3.**(

**a**) The spatial distribution of the fields of height (shaded) and wind (vectors) at 00 UTC 1 January 2021. (

**b**,

**c**) The 12-h forecasts made by (

**b**) the NN-based SW model and (

**c**) MPAS-SW model.

**Figure 4.**The differences in height (shaded) and wind (vectors) between the 12-h forecasts by (

**a**) NN-based SW and (

**b**) MPAS-SW with respect to the initial conditions.

**Figure 5.**Variations in the gradient-check results $log\left(\right|\Phi \left(\alpha \right)-1\left|\right)$ as a function of the log of the scaling factor $\alpha $.

**Figure 6.**(

**a**) Variation of the cost function (solid curve) and the norm of the gradient (dashed curve) with respect to the number of iterations when assimilating a single point observation. (

**b**) The analysis increment in height (shaded) and wind (vectors) after assimilating only the height at the location marked with a white cross.

**Figure 7.**(

**a**) Variation of the cost function (solid curve) and the norm of the gradient (dashed curve) with respect to the number of iterations when assimilating the observations of the entire model state. (

**b**) The analysis increment in height (shaded) and wind (vectors).

**Figure 8.**The differences in root mean squared errors (RMSE) between the control and DA experiments with respect to the forecast lead time.

**Figure 9.**Differences in 2-day forecasts (

**a**) between the control experiment and referenced high resolution simulations and (

**b**) between the DA experiment and the referenced high-resolution simulations.

**Figure 10.**Differences in 5-day forecasts (

**a**) between the control experiment and referenced high resolution simulations and (

**b**) between the DA experiment and the referenced high-resolution simulations.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Tian, X.; Conibear, L.; Steward, J.
A Neural-Network Based MPAS—Shallow Water Model and Its 4D-Var Data Assimilation System. *Atmosphere* **2023**, *14*, 157.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010157

**AMA Style**

Tian X, Conibear L, Steward J.
A Neural-Network Based MPAS—Shallow Water Model and Its 4D-Var Data Assimilation System. *Atmosphere*. 2023; 14(1):157.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010157

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Tian, Xiaoxu, Luke Conibear, and Jeffrey Steward.
2023. "A Neural-Network Based MPAS—Shallow Water Model and Its 4D-Var Data Assimilation System" *Atmosphere* 14, no. 1: 157.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010157