Next Article in Journal
Effects of Mixed Cropping of Garden Plants with Brassica parachinensis on Remediation of Cr-Polluted Soil in Community Garden
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Two Severe Shamal Dust Storms and the Highest Dust Frequencies in the South and Southwest of Iran
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050

1
Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University, C504 Energy Science Building, Beijing 100084, China
2
Energy Internet Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Shuangqing Building No. 2, Beijing 100085, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(12), 1989; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989
Submission received: 26 September 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Air Quality)

Abstract

:
Methane (CH4) is an important greenhouse gas. There is increasing attention to CH4 abatement strategies because of its contribution to short-term warming and strong benefits of decreasing CH4 emissions. China greenhouse gas inventory methods are used to predict CH4 emissions from the energy industry and to assess the potentials of CH4 abatement policies and techniques by 2050. The NDC scenario results show using oil and gas as transitional clean energy sources instead of coal will increase CH4 emissions from oil and gas industries at least 70%, but CH4 emissions from the coal industry will decrease 45%, meaning total CH4 emissions from the energy industry will continually decrease at least 30% in 2030 compared with 2020. Energy-related CH4 emissions might peak around 2025, ahead of CO2 emission peaking. CH4 emissions will then decrease slightly and decrease markedly after 2030. Emissions in 2050 are expected to be 32% lower than emissions in 2020. In an extreme scenario, emissions may be 90% lower in 2050 than in 2020. It is suggested that the verification system for the energy industry’s CH4 emission accounting at the national level be improved and CH4 control targets in line with national emission targets and the “14th Five-Year Plan” development stage be formulated.

1. Introduction

Positive global responses to climate change have been made since the Paris Agreement was signed, and low-carbon development has become a goal for all countries. The Emissions Gap Report 2020 indicated that the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic caused global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to decrease. It has been estimated that total CO2 emissions decreased by 7% in 2020 [1]. However, this decrease would only cause a 0.01 °C decrease in global warming by 2050. This falls very short of the Paris Agreement target. Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) agreed by all countries under the Paris Agreement are still seriously inadequate. Even if all unconditional NDCs are fully achieved, emissions predicted for 2030 indicate that 3.2 °C of warming would occur by the end of this century [1]. The global average surface temperature has so far increased by >1 °C, and more than the global average warming has occurred in China. If the temperature continues to increase at the current rate, 1.5 °C of global warming may have occurred between 2030 and 2052 [2]. Attention is increasingly being paid to decreasing methane (CH4) emissions as part of the global response to climate change. CH4 is the second-most important greenhouse gas (GHG), after CO2. CH4 makes large contributions to short-term warming, which will respond well to decreasing CH4 emissions, so decreasing CH4 emissions is attracting increasing attention from the international community. China and the US have issued a joint declaration at COP 26, in which it stressed the significant impact of methane emissions on global warming and agreed that more actions to control methane emissions are necessary in the 2020s and also pointed out specific work directions and plans. The cooperation on methane control is seen as moving from a scientific consensus to a political one.
The Fifth Assessment Report published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicated that the contribution of non-CO2 GHGs to total GHG emissions has remained stable at 25% [3]. It has been predicted by many international agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), that non-CO2 GHG emissions will continue to increase in the future [4]. The global warming potentials of various non-CO2 GHGs were updated and increased in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report and Fifth Assessment Report [5]. This has increased the contributions of non-CO2 GHG emissions to global climate change relative to the contributions found in earlier studies. It has been stated in numerous studies [6,7] that non-CO2 GHG emissions will continue to grow if no controls are implemented and that this will offset the effects of efforts to decrease CO2 emissions. The International Energy Agency has found that 570 million tons of CH4 are emitted around the world each year [8], 40% from natural sources and the remaining 60% through human activities. The dominant sources of anthropogenic CH4 are, in decreasing order, agriculture (24% of total emissions); the energy sector, which includes emissions from coal, oil, natural gas and biofuels (20%); waste disposal (11%); and biomass fuel production and combustion (6%).
International studies of CH4 emissions have mainly been in several fields. Many studies have been focused on CH4 emission patterns and the advantages of decreasing emissions. In most studies, decreasing CH4 emissions has been found to be important to allow many countries to identify flexible solutions to achieving GHG emission targets [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Recently, some studies emphasize the importance of reducing short-lived climate pollutants (including non-CO2 GHGs such as methane and some F-gases). They have also identified a significant potential for reducing non-CO2 GHGs in China, but there are large uncertainties [17,18,19,20,21]. These uncertainties about non-CO2 GHG emissions are due to the fact that the sources are contingent on the available production technologies and mitigation measures. Wang et al. [22] found that the uncertainties in China’s inventories of non-CO2 GHG range from a low of ±15% to a high of ±55%, with the greatest uncertainty related to N2O and CH4 emissions. In other studies, the costs and benefits of decreasing CH4 emissions have been evaluated and analyzed. In most such studies, it was found that the costs of decreasing GHG emissions can be decreased to a remarkable degree by decreasing CH4 emissions. Combining techniques for decreasing CO2 and CH4 emissions costs 20%–60% less than only using techniques for decreasing CO2 emissions [23,24,25]. Decreasing CH4 emissions will also markedly improve air quality [26,27,28,29,30], improve health [31,32], and prevent some negative effects of air pollution on crop yields. This will therefore improve national food supply security, decrease tropospheric ozone concentrations, and increase the carbon capture capacities of the biosphere at the regional level [33]. Some studies have been focused on evaluating and analyzing the effects of policies on decreases in CH4 emissions. Voluntary partnerships were dominant in the early stages [34,35], but formal multilaterally supported projects to decrease CH4 emissions have become dominant [36,37]. Various targets for decreasing CH4 emissions have been established, indicating that efforts to control CH4 emissions have accelerated [38,39,40].
In response to the growing global concern about the importance of methane emissions reduction, a series of studies have recently been carried out on methane emission accounting methods for Chinese coal mining [41,42]. These studies have provided a series of bottom-up perspectives on the methane emission factors and reduction potential of Chinese coal mines, providing a database to continuously reduce uncertainty in methane accounting. At the same time, as the global response to climate change progresses, the future trends of non-CO2 GHG in China are attracting widespread attention. Research institutions have successively carried out quantitative analyses of energy-related methane emission pathways, i.e., including an assessment of the trends and potential of non-CO2 GHG emissions in the medium and long term [17,43], as well as a comprehensive assessment of the contribution of non-CO2 emissions reductions until 2030 [20].
CH4 emission inventories and future scenario analyses are essential to establishing targets for decreasing CH4 emissions and analyzing methods for decreasing CH4 emissions. Energy-related CH4 emissions present great challenges in terms of developing methods to decrease emissions and the availabilities of emission factors. CH4 emission data are much more uncertain than CO2 emission data in national information bulletins and biennial updates. Anthropogenic CH4 emissions in China in 2014 were 55 million tons [44], of which 25 million tons were caused by energy production. Energy-related CH4 emissions in China are mainly related to coal-mining activities (>95% of total emissions), and the remainder are caused by leaks from oil and gas systems (5%). Since the “11th Five-Year Plan”, numerous policies have been implemented in China with the aim of encouraging exploration and exploitation of coal-bed methane (CBM), increasing the utilization rates for CBM and coal-mine methane (CMM) and decreasing CH4 emissions and leaks. In this study, we used national GHG emission inventories for China to investigate CH4 emissions and possible ways of decreasing CH4 emissions related to energy production activities by 2050, taking into account policies and techniques for decreasing CH4 emissions. The aim of the study was to provide technical support and policy recommendations for developing mid- and long-term low-carbon development strategies for China.

2. Research Methods

2.1. Accounting for CH4 Emissions in China

CH4 emissions related to energy production activities in China occur mainly through CH4 venting and fugitive emissions during production-related processes in the coal industry and the oil and gas industry. According to the IPCC inventory guideline, there are also biomass combustion methane emissions, which are not included in this paper because of data limitations.

2.1.1. Coal Industry

Coal industry CH4 emissions occur in four main ways.
(1)
CH4 emissions during underground mining. CBM is continuously released into coal mine tunnels and caverns during underground coal mining and then emitted to the atmosphere through the ventilation and air extraction systems.
(2)
CH4 emissions during open-pit mining. CH4 is released from coal mined in open pits and from adjacent exposed coal seams.
(3)
CH4 emissions during post-mining activities. Before coal is combusted, CH4 is generated during activities such as coal cleaning, storage, transportation, and crushing.
(4)
CH4 emissions from abandoned mines. CMM will be slowly released into a mine and to the atmosphere for a certain period after the mine has been abandoned.
According to national emission inventories for China [45], CH4 emissions during underground mining and post-mining activities contribute 97% of coal-related CH4 emissions. Methane emissions from abandoned mines in 2020 account for 11.76% of coal methane emissions in the US greenhouse gas emissions inventory [45]. It has also been on an upward trend from 1990 until now. Methane emissions from abandoned mines in China coal methane emissions still accounted for about 1%, but the share of emissions is expected to grow with the increase in abandoned mines, following the US experience. Limited data are available; we estimated CH4 emissions during underground mining and post-mining activities (the first two types of CH4 emissions related to coal production activities). Therefore, results for coal mines methane emissions will be underestimated. In the 2012 inventory, CH4 emissions during coal industry activities were estimated using mean CH4 emission factors at tier 2. This is called the national or coalfield average method and is based on the amount of coal mined. The equations and methods used are shown in Table 1. The emission factors were taken from the 2012 national emission inventory for China [46].

2.1.2. Oil and Gas Industry

Exploitation of oil and gas reserves causes GHGs (particularly CH4) to be emitted during prospecting, drilling, well completion, oil/gas production, workover, gathering and transportation, purification, metering, storage, transportation, and oil refining and at the end-use site.
Gas venting and fugitive emissions release CH4 and other GHGs during oil and gas exploitation. Venting means the necessary release of gases (including CH4) during oil and gas exploitation. Venting occurs during storage tank breathing, pigging, oil and gas testing, workover, and other technical processes. Emissions through venting are also called process emissions. Different production processes and equipment can give very different venting emissions. Fugitive emissions of GHGs occur because of interfaces between equipment being poorly sealed or because of damage to equipment (e.g., aging of valves and piston seals, packing wear, pipeline corrosion, and sand hole perforation). The age, service life, maintenance, and operating conditions of equipment strongly affect fugitive emissions.
CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry were mainly accounted for using the compilation method, combining method 1 (the mean emission factor method based on outputs) and method 3 (the factor method based on specific emission sources) defined in the IPCC Inventory Guidelines. The IPCC default emission factors or oil and gas industry emission factors for other countries were used (see Table 1). Oil and gas reserves are exploited over long periods using complex production processes. There are many points at which venting and leaks occur because many types of equipment are constructed and used, including pipelines and interfaces, that have different venting emission patterns. Calculations using emission factors for specific emission sources can give fine-scale emission data, but the applicability of emission factors and availabilities of activity-level data mean the calculations may have relatively large errors.

2.2. Study Methods

The study of CH4 emissions during energy production activities in China by 2050 was combined into two parts. The first part is related to a multiscenario study of future development. The second part is the estimation of CH4 emissions during energy production activities. Future economic development and energy activities under different scenarios were compared in the multiscenario study. CH4 emissions during energy production activities were estimated using the method for estimating CH4 emissions in China mentioned above. These data and predicted energy activities under various scenarios were combined to estimate future CH4 emissions. The whole research framework is shown in Figure 1.
Three scenarios were compared and analyzed. These were a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, an NDC scenario, and an extreme scenario. For the coal mining and production, in all three scenarios, coal production will peak by 2020 and then decrease until 2050, but the production peaking values show small differences, and the decrease rates show different trends. The latter scenario is decreasing faster than the former scenario. The detailed descriptions are shown in Table 2.
The BAU scenario was based on current development trends in the energy sector, with emission factors that were assumed to remain constant. The NDC scenario took NDC actions taken by China [47] and decreased CH4 emissions into consideration as coal consumption decreased, in particular recovery and use of coal-mine gas and oil and local gas production. The carbon peaking target in the NDC scenarios requires control of the growth of coal consumption in the 14th five-year plan period and gradual reduction of it in the 15th five-year plan period. It was assumed that large amounts of oil and natural gas will be imported into China in the future and that China will become increasingly dependent on imports compared with BAU. It was assumed that oil and gas use in China will peak about 2030 at 1.5 billion tce and then slowly decrease. It was assumed that coal production and consumption will be increasingly controlled and decreased but that natural gas will be used as an alternative energy source and therefore be consumed in increasing amounts. The decline in coal production and the recovery and utilization of coal- mine methane is expected to reduce coal methane emissions directly but increase oil and gas methane due to oil and gas production and imports. In the NDC scenario, natural gas use increased initially, then remained slightly increased, but the contribution of natural gas to total energy consumption increased. Various technical measures and low-carbon economic transformation were taken into account in the extreme scenario. These changes and the latest Chinese carbon-neutral target were expected to force the energy system to develop and transform increasingly quickly. In this scenario, it was assumed that coal will cease to be used by 2050 and that oil and gas use will peak between 2025 and 2030 at 1.4 billion tce per year and then slowly decrease. Oil demand was expected to decrease sharply after reaching a peak in 2030, but natural gas use was expected to increase rapidly in the initial period and then steadily decrease (shown in Table 2 and Table 3).
The main emission factors adopted are shown in Table 3. For the emission-factor consideration for coal mining, BAU will adopt the frozen scenario, which means there is no more CH4 recovery and utilization. The NDC and extreme scenarios will expand and encourage the recovery and utilization of low concentration methane. For the oil and gas industry, predictions were made for the three energy scenario models for the relevant types of energy but not taking the amounts of equipment used and the activities of the energy industry into consideration. A lack of basic activity and equipment data for China meant it was not possible to estimate future CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry using the Chinese national emission inventory method. Because the US EPA has published the detailed emission factors for the main production process, this paper first calibrated the base year emissions based on China national GHG inventory and the main production process in US. That means based on China’s emissions, according to the production process of the US, the emissions factor is converted on the base year. Moreover, the emission factors for the future will utilize the change trend in the US. In particular, as for the emission factor of natural gas, based on the analysis comparing the change trend of the EAP emission factor, it can be found that the natural gas production, distribution, and logistics factor change is not large, mainly because most of these facilities select emission reduction technology and related management systems, and the exploration and processing factors present a downward trend. It is mainly related to the continuous optimization of mining technology facilities. Therefore, the BAU scenario in this paper is set as the technology freeze scenario; that is, the factors of future years and base years remain unchanged, whereas the NDC scenario assumes that the change rate of exploration and treatment factors in China lags behind that of the US for five years, while other factors remain basically unchanged. The extreme scenario assumes that the rate of change lags three years behind that of the US.

3. Research Results

3.1. Overall CH4 Emissions

In the BAU scenario, energy-related CH4 emissions could peak in 2030. CH4 emissions will then then decrease slightly by 2030 and then decrease markedly after 2035. It was estimated that emissions will be 25% lower in 2050 than 2020, equivalent to a mean annual decrease of around 1% (Figure 2). The main contributor to the decrease in CH4 emissions was found to be the coal industry, emissions from which were predicted to be 35% lower in 2050 than 2020 (a mean annual decrease of 1.4%). This was mainly attributed to implementing national coal control policies. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry were predicted to increase each year and be 48% higher in 2050 than 2020 (equivalent to a mean annual increase of 1.3%).
Some of the decrease in coal production and consumption was predicted to be replaced with oil and gas consumption, meaning production and consumption of oil and gas in China would increase. The overall structure of CH4 emissions by the energy industry were predicted to change. The results indicated that the contribution of the coal industry to total CH4 emissions would decrease from 90% in 2020 to 76% in 2050, but the contribution of the oil and gas industry would increase from 10% in 2020 to 23% in 2050. Using oil and gas as transitional clean energies to replace coal would increase CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry, but total CH4 emissions by the energy industry would continue to decrease because of considerable decreases in CH4 emissions by the coal industry.
Although estimation in this paper represents a bottom-up method for CH4 emission in China, there are still various uncertainties and barriers to this trend. For example, as mentioned in the method introduction, potential technology progress, especially in the oil and gas industry, is not considered completely, because methane control is still at the starting stage in China and there are not many more cases and unique criteria. In addition, reduction cost overtime is not considered.
This paper compared with current studies future methane emissions for China from the energy industry (Figure 3). Based on the different assumptions from various studies, there are still big gaps; for example, by 2030, most studies still predicted increased CH4 emissions from energy industries because there are no more methane control policies and measures assumptions. This paper estimated that the methane emissions from energy industries can peak about 2025.

3.2. CH4 Emissions by the Coal Industry

Policies aimed at controlling coal production and consumption will lead directly to a rapid decrease in CH4 emissions by the coal industry. In the NDC scenario, keeping coal output at about 1.5 billion tons in 2050 will require a mean annual decrease in coal production capacity of >10%. Keeping CMM emissions at 6 billion m3 will cause CH4 emissions by the coal industry to be >60% lower in 2050 than 2020.
For the extreme scenario, it was expected that coal use would completely stop by 2050. Keeping CMM emissions at 4 billion m3 would estimate CH4 emissions by the coal industry at 1.3 million tons in 2050, which is effectively close to zero emissions (Figure 4) and a good foundation for achieving the target of being carbon neutral by 2060. After the rapid phasing-out of coal, if the annual decrease rate will remain 20%, CH4 emissions from coal production will dramatically decrease, while CH4 emissions from the post-mining activities will account for a large share. This indicates that decreasing CH4 emissions by the coal industry will both require coal production to decrease and emissions caused by post-mining activities to be managed.

3.3. CH4 Emissions by the Oil and Gas Industry

CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry currently make relatively small contributions to CH4 emissions by the energy industry in China. However, the total amount of CH4 emitted and the contribution of the oil and gas industry to total CH4 emissions will increase as coal production and consumption decrease because oil and gas production capacity will increase to compensate. Annual oil output in China was estimated to remain at 200 million tons. In the BAU scenario, total oil demand was predicted to peak in 2030 at 800 million tons. CH4 emissions caused by oil production were therefore expected to peak before 2030, start to slowly fall from 2035, and to return to the 2020 emission value in 2050.
For the BAU scenario, it was estimated that CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry in China will be 48.5% higher in 2050 than 2020, equivalent to a mean annual increase of 1.3% (Figure 5). The natural gas production capacity is expected to increase, causing CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry to peak in 2040 and remain stable until 2050. CH4 emissions caused by natural gas production and use were predicted to contribute >80% of CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry, so CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry will need to be controlled mainly by decreasing natural gas venting and fugitive emissions.

3.4. Comparison of the Different Scenarios

Predicted CH4 emissions by the energy industry for the different scenarios are shown in Figure 6. CH4 emissions by the coal industry could be effectively controlled by 2050 by decreasing coal consumption and increasing the amount of CH4 recycled. For example, CH4 emissions would be decreased by 90% in the extreme scenario. CH4 emissions were found to be decreased more for the coal industry than the oil and gas industry for all three scenarios. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry for the different scenarios were not very different, but the contributions of the oil and gas industry to total emissions were markedly different for the different scenarios. The contribution of the oil and gas industry to CH4 emissions is currently not very high. However, implementing coal control policies will cause CH4 emissions by the coal industry to decrease. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry (which will change little in terms of the actual amount of CH4 emitted) will contribute more to total emissions. The contributions of the coal industry were higher than the contributions of the oil and gas industry in most of the scenarios. Actual CH4 emissions will be decreased more by controlling coal industry emissions than by controlling oil and gas industry emissions. Controlling the coal industry is therefore key to decreasing CH4 emissions by the energy industry. In the extreme scenario, CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry were predicted to contribute up to around 70% of energy-related CH4 emissions in 2050. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry will therefore need to be decreased to achieve the target of carbon-neutral energy production.

4. Conclusions

4.1. Methane Emissions from China’s Energy Sector Are Likely to Have Stabilised and Can Be Peaking with CO2 Emissions

The results in this paper show that even with the current policy scenario, energy-related methane emissions are expected to peak by 2030, with emission levels remaining at approximately 26 Mt. Due to the relatively high share of coal methane emissions, energy methane emissions are expected to decline by around 3–10% overall in 2035 compared to 2030 as coal consumption and production are effectively controlled. Although methane emissions from the oil and gas sector currently account for a relatively small proportion of energy sector methane emissions, their methane emission trends will increase as gas production and consumption increases but will largely not cause a significant increase in energy methane emissions. Methane emissions from the energy sector can be effectively curbed in the near term by controlling coal production, but in the long term its emissions will need to be controlled through technical means, such as recycling and enhanced detection.

4.2. Methane Emissions from Energy Sector will Be Reduced in the near Term by Controlling the Level of Production Activity, but in the Long Term it Will Still Require the Deployment of Abatement Technologies to Achieve Deeper Reductions

In addition to controlling energy production, the expansion of energy methane recycling technologies can effectively reduce emission factors and is expected to play an important role in accelerating the reduction of energy methane emissions beyond 2030, especially as increased natural gas consumption will inevitably lead to increased methane emissions once coal production is effectively controlled, and improved monitoring and recycling will offset some of this growth and will inevitably help to achieve a carbon-neutral reliance on negative emission technologies in the longer term.

4.3. Emissions Accounting System for Energy Methane Emissions Still Needs to Be Improved

It is very difficult to estimate CH4 emissions by the energy industry because of difficulties involved in determining emission factors. Problems related to the data or the applicability of the emission factors were addressed by adjusting the emission factors for the coal industry and the oil and gas industry to minimize uncertainty. It has been suggested that during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period, China should improve the verification system for estimating CH4 emissions by the energy industry at the national level, examine and improve the data acquired, develop more scientifically justified and reasonable emission factors, and formulate guidelines for the method used to compile CH4 emission inventories for a wide range of companies. Companies should also be trained to manage CH4 emissions using the experiences of companies in developed countries.

5. Discussion

In 2020, the European Commission issued the “EU Methane Strategy”, which introduced 24 actions to decrease CH4 emissions in the European Union and internationally and required CH4 emissions by the energy, agriculture, and waste treatment sectors to be decreased. In the strategy, it was stated that energy production is the key sector for decreasing CH4 emissions quickly and cheaply. The US has adopted a range of policies to decrease CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry, combining laws and regulations with voluntary activities to decrease emissions. The US federal government has developed national environmental air quality standards and national emission standards. Other countries such as Canada and Mexico have also implemented their NDC actions to control CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry. Numerous voluntary initiatives for decreasing CH4 emissions have also been proposed by the global energy industry. These include the Global Methane Initiative, the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (developed by the Climate and Clean Air Alliance and the United Nations Environment Programme), and the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative. All of these initiatives include a commitment to track and decrease CH4 emissions by key sectors and to promote research and other efforts to decrease CH4 emissions.
Efforts to decrease energy-related CH4 emissions in China started later than efforts to decrease energy-related CO2 emissions. Nonetheless, there is great potential for decreasing CH4 emissions, and decreasing CH4 emissions should be one of the priorities for decreasing GHG emissions in the future. In the “12th Five-Year Plan”, the Chinese government proposed an overall plan for encouraging improvements in CMM use and surface CBM exploitation to decrease CH4 emissions from coal mines. The Chinese government published Accounting Methods and Report Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Production Enterprises in China to provide guidance to help oil and gas companies compile GHG inventories. In the Work Plan for Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions, part of the “13th Five-Year Plan” period, the Chinese government proposed to improve recycling of vented natural gas and gas associated with oilfields.
One way of decreasing CH4 emissions from underground coal mines is to reorganize and integrate the industry to decrease CH4 emissions from small, scattered coal mines. Other ways are to extract as much CH4 as possible before mining or collect CH4 released during mining. In 2018, 18.4 × 109 m3 of CBM were extracted in China and 10.2 × 109 m3 of CBM were used. In the Action Plan for Coalbed Methane Exploration and Exploitation it was proposed that 20 × 109 m3 of CBM would be extracted each year by 2020 and 60% would be used. The volume of CMM extracted and the amount of CBM exploited have recently increased each year. However, the large annual CMM output means there is still great potential for recycling CMM.
Clear targets and requirements for controlling energy-related CH4 emissions have not yet been set in China. Current policies for controlling CH4 emissions by the energy industry are dominated by mandatory policies aimed at ensuring safe energy production and suggestive policies to encourage and provide guidance for CBM exploitation and utilization. These policies do not effectively persuade companies to recycle CH4. Oil and gas production in China is mainly performed by a few large state-owned companies. Some companies have spontaneously participated in initiatives or alliances to control CH4 emissions. However, strong decreases in CH4 emissions will be difficult to achieve in the absence of a target for controlling CH4 emissions set by the Chinese government, even though loose voluntary actions and initiatives can improve awareness and the ability to control CH4 emissions. The value of recycling CH4 can offset some of the costs of decreasing emissions. The International Energy Agency has estimated that 50% of CH4 emitted by the oil and gas industry can be avoided at no cost, indicating the huge potential for decreasing CH4 emissions.
The low initial costs of decreasing CH4 emissions and the economic benefits of recycling CH4 have led the Chinese government to consider formulating targets for controlling CH4 emissions in line with national targets for decreasing GHG emissions and in accordance with the stages of development of the techniques required to control and recycle CH4. It has been suggested that clear targets for decreasing CH4 emissions and guidance for control standards should be formulated during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period. Efforts to decrease coal production and consumption in China are being strengthened, and it has been suggested that targets for absolute amounts of CH4 that may be emitted by the coal industry should be set. Recommendations for CH4 recycling and utilization rates and CH4 leakage rates (emission intensities) for the oil and gas industry should also be made. A complete and sound CH4 emission inventory should be established to allow the recommended CH4 emission limits to be set. Leak rate indices to allow international benchmarking should be set, particularly for new and modified oil and gas wells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and S.X.; methodology, A.G. and S.X.; formal analysis, A.G., S.X. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G. and S.X.; writing—review and editing, S.Z. and Q.T.; visualization, A.G. and S.X.; supervision, Q.T.; project administration, A.G.; funding acquisition, A.G. and Q.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Environmental synergy in the context of carbon neutrality (72140003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (72140003) and Energy Foundation. We also thank reviewers helpful comments to and thank Gareth Thomas for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Emissions Gap Report 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.unep.org/interactive/emissions-gap-report/2020/ (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  2. IPCC Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. 2018. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  3. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  4. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2030. 2012. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/epa_global_nonco2_projections_dec2012.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  5. Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.K.; Tignor, M.M.; Allen, S.K.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P.M. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Alley, R.B.; Berntsen, T.; Bindoff, N.L.; Chen, Z.; Chidthaisong, A.; Gregory, J.M.; Hegerl, G.C.; et al. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2007, The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Weyant, J.P. EMF-EMF 22, Climate Change Control Scenarios. In Energy Modeling Forum; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. IEA. Methane Tracker 2021, IEA, 2021, Paris. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2021 (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  9. Hyman, R.C.; Reilly, J.M.; Babiker, M.H.; De Masin, A.; Jacoby, H.D. Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement. Environ. Model. Assess. 2002, 8, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manne, A.S.; Richels, R.G. An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gasses. Nature 2001, 5, 675–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. What Are the Gains from a Multigas Strategy? Available online: https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=350017064003086122074097109082100119065014088087016004031105065000091024062039106127044022037031009085124106064103004047030065085027079098020017068009126007081021018025075116120068118114090026121118084078076069069086092097002029109075089118110&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  12. Greenblatt, J.; Long, J. California’s Energy Future: Portraits of Energy Systems for Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets; California Council on Science and Technology: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenblatt, J.B. Estimating Policy-Driven Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trajectories in California: The California Greenhouse Gas Inventory Spreadsheet (GHGIS) Model; Report Number LBNL-6451E; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA.
  14. Yang, C.; Yeh, S.; Ramea, K.; Zakerinia, S.; McCollum, D.; Bunch, D.; Ogden, J. Modeling Optimal Transition Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy in California: California TIMES (CA-TIMES) Model; Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-14-04; Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, M.; Nelson, J.H.; Ting, M.; Yang, C.; Kammen, D.; Jones, C.; Mileva, A.; Johnston, J.; Bharvirkar, R. California’s Carbon Challenge (CCC): Scenarios for Achieving 80% Emissions Reduction in 2050; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, M.; Nelson, J.H.; Greenblatt, J.B.; Mileva, A.; Johnston, J.; Ting, M.; Yang, C.; Jones, C.; McMahon, J.E.; Kammen, D.M. Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 014038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. World Resource Institute. Opportunities of Enhance Non-Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in China. 2016. Available online: https://www.wri.org.cn/Opportunities-To-Enhance-Non-Carbon-Dioxide-Greenhouse-Gas-Mitigation-in-China (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  18. Yao, B.; Ross, K.; Zhu, J.; Igusky, K.; Song, R.; Damassa, T. Opportunities to Enhance Non-carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in China. World Resources Institute. 2016. Available online: https://www.wri.org/publication/greenhouse-gas-mitigation-in-china (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  19. Lin, J.; Khanna, N.; Liu, X.; Teng, F.; Wang, X. China’s Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Future Trajectories and Mitigation Options and Potential. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Teng, F.; Su, X.; Wang, X. Can China Peak Its Non-CO2 GHG Emissions before 2030 by Implementing Its Nationally Determined Contribution? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 12168–12176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Song, R. Opportunities to Advance Mitigation Ambition in China: Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Working Paper; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA; Available online: https://www.wri.org/publication/opportunities-advance-mitigation-ambition (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  22. Wang, X.; Teng, F.; Zhang, J.; Khanna, N.; Lin, J. Challenges to addressing non-CO2 greenhouse gases in China’s long-term climate strategy. Clim. Policy 2017, 18, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Vuuren, D.P.; Eickhout, B.; Lucas, P.L.; Den Elzen, M.G.J. Long-term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing: Exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework. Energy J. 2006, 3, 201–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shindell, D.T.; Faluvegi, G.; Bell, N.; Schmidt, G.A. An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hayhoe, K.; Jain, A.; Pitcher, H.; MacCracken, C.; Gibbs, M.; Wuebbles, D.; Harvey, R.; Kruger, D. Costs of multi greenhouse gas reduction targets for the USA. Science 1999, 286, 905–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Swart, R.; Amann, M.; Raes, F.; Tuinstra, W. A Good Climate for Clean Air: Linkages between Climate Change and Air Pollution. An Editorial Essay. Clim. Change 2004, 66, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dennekamp, M.; Carey, M. Air quality and chronic disease: Why action on climate change is also good for health. New South Wales Public Health Bull. 2010, 21, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Anenberg, S.C.; Schwartz, J.; Shindell, D.; Amann, M.; Faluvegi, G.; Klimont, Z.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Pozzoli, L.; Van Dingenen, R.; Vignati, E.; et al. Global Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. IPCC. Climate Change 2014, Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  30. World Health Organization and Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Reducing Global Health Risks through Mitigation of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants. 2015. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/reducing-climate-pollutants/en/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  31. Ren, C.; Tong, S. Temperature modifies the health effects of particulate matter in Brisbane, Australia. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2006, 51, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Smith, K.R.; Jerrett, M.; Anderson, H.R.; Burnett, R.T.; Stone, V.; Derwent, R.; Atkinson, R.W.; Cohen, A.; Shonkoff, S.B.; Krewski, D.; et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants. Lancet 2009, 374, 2091–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sitch, S.; Cox, P.M.; Collins, W.J.; Huntingford, C. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 2007, 448, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Munnings, C.; Krupnick, A. Comparing Policies to Reduce Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Sector. 2017. Available online: http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-Rpt-Methane.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  35. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Natural Gas STAR Program. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/natural-gas-star-program/natural-gas-star-program (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  36. Global Methane Initiative. European Commission Global Methane Reduction Actions. Available online: https://www.globalmethane.org/documents/EC_GMI_reduction_actions.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  37. The CCAC Oil & Gas Methane Partnership. Available online: http://www.ccacoalition.org/en/activity/ccac-oil-gas-methane-partnership (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  38. White House. Fact Sheet: Administration Takes Steps Forward on Climate Action Plan by Announcing Actions to Cut Methane Emissions; Office of the Press Secretary: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  39. European Union. 2020 Climate & Energy Package. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020_en (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  40. OIL AND GAS, As House Moves to Kill Methane Regs, Colo. Asks Why. Available online: https://www.eenews.net/climatewire/2017/01/30/stories/1060049171 (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  41. Sheng, J.; Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Prinn, R.G.; Janssens-Maenhout, G. Bottom-Up estimates of coal mine methane emissions in China: A gridded inventory, emission factors, and trends. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, J.; Guan, C.; Zhang, B.; Li, K. Decreasing methane emissions from China’s coal mining with rebounded coal production. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 124037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. China’s Long-term Low-carbon Development Strategies and Pathways; Springer: Berlin, Germany; China Environment Publishing Group: Beijing, China, 2021; Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-16-2524-4#toc (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  44. National Development and Reform Commission. The First Biennial Update Report of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: http://qhs.ndrc.gov.cn/dtjj/201701/W020170123346264208002.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  45. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#energy/coalmining/allgas/subcategory/current (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  46. The People’s Republic of China First Biennial Update Report on Climate Change. 2016. Available online: https://www.ccchina.org.cn/archiver/ccchinacn/UpFile/Files/Default/20170124155928346053.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  47. China’s Achievements, New Goals and New Measures for Nationally Determined Contributions and China’s Mid-Century Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/cover%20letter.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
Figure 1. Whole research framework.
Figure 1. Whole research framework.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g001
Figure 2. Energy-related CH4 emissions by 2050.
Figure 2. Energy-related CH4 emissions by 2050.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g002
Figure 3. Comparison with other studies.
Figure 3. Comparison with other studies.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g003
Figure 4. CH4 emissions by the coal industry by 2050.
Figure 4. CH4 emissions by the coal industry by 2050.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g004
Figure 5. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry by 2050.
Figure 5. CH4 emissions by the oil and gas industry by 2050.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g005
Figure 6. CH4 emissions by the energy industry for the different scenarios.
Figure 6. CH4 emissions by the energy industry for the different scenarios.
Atmosphere 13 01989 g006
Table 1. Methods used to estimate CH4 emissions for energy industrial activities.
Table 1. Methods used to estimate CH4 emissions for energy industrial activities.
ActivityEquationActivity LevelEmission Factor
Coal industryUnderground miningAmount of coal mined × emission factor per unit of coal minedAmount of coal mined10.59 m3/t
Post-mining activitiesRaw coal output of underground coal mines × emission factorPost-mining activities should be arranged based on the raw coal outputs of outburst mines, high gas mines, and gas mines nationwide.
  • 3 m3/t for high gas mines and outburst mines
  • 0.94 m3/t for gas mines according to the current situation of the coal production industry in China
Oil and gas industryOil and gas exploitation-related steps: extraction, processing, and transmissionFacility/equipment × emission factor for the facility/equipment unitFor example, the numbers of well-head assemblies, compressor stations, transmission pipelines, and refineriesMean emission factor based on output or a factor for a specific emission source
Table 2. Scenario description.
Table 2. Scenario description.
ScenarioAssumptions
ActivityEmission Factor
BAUKeep the current development, coal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 2.9 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −1%, and double from 2030–2050.keep current methane recovery and utilization level of annual 20 billion cubic meters
Oil and gas consumption will peak by 2035, holding at 1.6 billion tce, oil consumption will peak earlier than gas consumption.Freeze, keep the current national inventory factors
NDC scenarioCoal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 1.5 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −3% and remain 4% from 2030–2050.encourage the recovery and utilization of low concentration methane after 2020, increase the utilized rate by more than 60%
Oil and gas consumption will peak about 2030, holding at 1.5 billion tce.lag five years compared with the same period in US
Extreme scenarioCoal production keeps increasing by 3.9 billion tons in 2020 and then decreases by 0.7 billion tons by 2050. The annual decrease rate for the period from 2020–2030 will be −8%, and −5% from 2030–2050.encourage the recovery and utilization of low concentration methane after 2020, increase the utilized rate by more than 65%
Oil and gas consumption will peak about 2025, holding at 1.4 billion tce.lag three years compared with the same period in US
Table 3. Main parameters.
Table 3. Main parameters.
Year2020202520302035204020452050
Activity
Coal production (Billion tons)
BAU3.903.903.903.733.303.102.90
NDC3.903.533.002.712.051.761.46
Extreme Scenario3.902.801.861.270.940.800.66
Oil production (Million tons)
BAU/NDC/Extreme Scenario195195200199197189180
Gas Production (Billion cubic meters)
BAU/NDC/Extreme Scenario192203247300328345350
Main Emission Factor
Coal mining emission factors (m3/ton)
BAU10.5910.5910.5910.5910.5910.5910.59
NDC10.5910.3610.139.679.218.988.75
Extreme Scenario10.5910.29.789.28.5058.167.81
Oil exploration emission factors (t CH4/million tons)
BAU586746781942795648600
NDC586746781942795648600
Extreme Scenario5865804833861492525
Oil production emission factor (t CH4/million tons)
BAU4063410640973900382137083593
NDC4063409741373821370835933095
Extreme Scenario4063382132952768257925502550
Oil transportation (t CH4/million tons)
BAU/NDC16.616.516.816.715.315.015.2
Extreme Scenario16.615.315.215.714.813.413.4
Gas production emission factors (t CH4/Billion cubic meters)
BAU7311752074207513734271776860
NDC7311742075137342717768606647
Extreme Scenario7311734268606156588059045904
Gas transportation and storage (t CH4/Billion cubic meters)
BAU1900190019001900190019001900
NDC1900190018011801180118011801
Extreme Scenario1900190018381848176317631763
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gu, A.; Zhou, S.; Xu, S.; Tong, Q. Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989

AMA Style

Gu A, Zhou S, Xu S, Tong Q. Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(12):1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gu, Alun, Sheng Zhou, Shuangqing Xu, and Qing Tong. 2022. "Energy Industry Methane Emissions Trajectory Analysis in China until 2050" Atmosphere 13, no. 12: 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop