Next Article in Journal
Snowpack as Indicators of Atmospheric Pollution: The Valday Upland
Next Article in Special Issue
Air Quality Modeling Study on the Controlling Factors of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in Hanoi: A Case Study in December 2010
Previous Article in Journal
Retrieval of Cloud Liquid Water Using Microwave Signals from LEO Satellites: A Feasibility Study through Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
NOx Emission Reduction and Recovery during COVID-19 in East China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantifying the Influences of PM2.5 and Relative Humidity on Change of Atmospheric Visibility over Recent Winters in an Urban Area of East China

1
Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2
Jiangsu Provincial Meteorological Observatory, Nanjing 210008, China
3
Institute of Atmospheric Composition/Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4
Jiangsu Climate Center, Nanjing 210009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2020, 11(5), 461; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050461
Submission received: 3 April 2020 / Revised: 27 April 2020 / Accepted: 30 April 2020 / Published: 2 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asian/Pacific Air Pollution and Environment)

Abstract

:
Fine particulate matters (PM2.5) and relative humidity (RH) in the ambient atmosphere are the leading anthropogenic and natural factors changing atmospheric horizontal visibility. Based on the analysis of environmental and meteorological data observed over 2013–2019 in Nanjing, an urban area in East China, this study investigated the influences of PM2.5 and RH on atmospheric visibility changes over recent years. The visibility had significantly negative correlations with the PM2.5 concentrations and RH changes. The nonlinear relationships existed between PM2.5 concentrations and visibility, as well as between RH and visibility, with the inflection points in the atmospheric visibility changes. The PM2.5 inflection concentrations were 81.0 μg m−3, 76.0 μg m−3, 49.0 μg m−3, and 33.0 μg m−3, respectively, for the RH ranges of RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤ RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90%, indicating that the improvement of visibility with reducing PM2.5 concentrations could be more difficult under the humid meteorological condition. The visibility changes were most sensitive to PM2.5 concentrations in the RH range of 60–80% in this urban area of East China. The relative contributions of natural factor RH and anthropogenic factor PM2.5 to variations of wintertime atmospheric visibility were quantified with 54.3% and 45.7%, respectively, revealing an important role of natural factor RH in the change of atmospheric visibility in the urban area of East Asian monsoon region.

1. Introduction

Atmospheric horizontal visibility (hereinafter, visibility) is meteorologically defined as the distance at which a normal observer can perceive a black object viewed against the horizon [1]. For the air environment, visibility can express the ambient atmospheric opacity reflecting the levels of air pollution, especially haze pollution resulting from high aerosol concentrations, which could deteriorate atmospheric visual range [1,2]. With the adverse influence of low visibility on traffic, human health, climate change, and other significant aspects, the spatial and temporal changes of visibility have attracted considerable attention worldwide as part of scientific studies of atmospheric environment [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The changes in atmospheric visibility in long-term data of observation is of major interest in air pollution studies with climatology of atmospheric environment [9,10,11,12].
Visibility is determined by the light extinctions of aerosol particles [13,14] and gaseous pollutants (NOx, SO2 and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)) [5,15,16] in the ambient atmosphere. Compared to aerosol particles, the gaseous species have much weaker light extinction for less influence on visibility [17]. The size distribution, chemical composition, and mass concentrations of aerosol particles can heavily influence the extinction of aerosols changing atmospheric visibility [18,19,20]. The extinction efficiency of aerosol particles depends not only on the particle size, but also on the chemical compositions [21]. The chemical composition of PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamical diameter equal to or less than 2.5 μm) is quite complicated, including primary particulate matter, secondary inorganic and organic particles, carbonaceous species (organic carbon and elemental carbon), crustal elements, and water [22]. Visibility is mainly deteriorated to a large extent by enhancing concentrations of secondary aerosols [23,24]. Most secondary aerosol species (e.g., (NH4)2SO4, NH4NO3) can strengthen the light scattering [25], while other primary aerosol species, such as elemental carbon and soil dust, can cause a strong light absorption but reflect less visible light [21,26,27].
Relative humidity (RH) in the ambient atmosphere is another important factor that impacts atmospheric visibility by affecting the hygroscopic property of particles, and the humidification increases the particle scattering in the atmosphere [28,29]. The aerosol chemical compounds contain a large amount of hydrophilic aerosol particles (e.g., (NH4)2SO4, NH4NO3), which have a strong hygroscopic property [21,30]. Hygroscopic aerosol particles take up water as RH increases [31], and aerosol water can affect both the size and refractive indices of atmospheric aerosols, thereby influencing the mass concentrations, size distribution, and optical properties, increasing the scattering and absorption capacities to the visible light, resulting in impairment of visibility [32,33,34,35,36,37]. When the RH values reach 70–80%, water content of aerosols, such as sulfate and nitrate, can generally contribute 50% or more of PM2.5 to visibility changes, becoming a controlling factor in enlarging light scattering of aerosol optical properties [17,38,39].
In China, there was a notable decrease in visibility of about 2.1 km per decade from 1990 to 2005 [10], and air pollution of high PM2.5 concentrations is becoming a serious environmental problem [40,41,42,43,44]. Extreme low visibility events resulted from high PM2.5 levels are commonly accompanied by high RH weather [45,46,47]. In some cases, the variations on visibility are mainly determined by PM2.5 concentrations, so visibility can very well represent the level of air quality. In contrast, in the cases where RH dominates the variations in visibility, the visibility may not be a good proxy of air quality [48]. Visibility can be generally influenced by anthropogenic and natural factors. PM2.5 and RH, as the leading anthropogenic and natural factors with their relative contributions to changing visibility, have been poorly understood in the change of atmospheric environment.
Nanjing, a major urban area in East China, has confronted the environmental problem in atmosphere associated with high concentrations of PM2.5 and low visual range over recent years [49,50]. In this study, we selected Nanjing as an urban area with seven-year (2013–2019) data of meteorological and environmental observations to understand the anthropogenic and natural influences on the change of atmospheric visibility over recent winters. The main objectives of this study were to recognize the influences of anthropogenic factor PM2.5 and natural factor RH on atmospheric visibility change and to quantify the relative contributions of PM2.5 and RH to visibility change over recent years in an urban area of East China.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Data

The seven-year (2013–2019) data of hourly PM2.5 concentrations were used in this study, including nine observational sites in Nanjing with eight urban sites in residential and industrial zones, as well as one suburban site over the national air quality monitoring network in China (Figure 1). The PM2.5 concentrations were averaged over nine observational sites in Nanjing to characterize the variations of fine aerosol particles over this urban area. The meteorological data of surface observation in Nanjing were obtained from the Meteorological Data Sharing Network of China Meteorological Administration [51]. The meteorological data of surface observation included visibility and RH with temporal resolutions of 3 h in order to analyze the meteorological variations and the influence of RH on visibility for this study. Daily mean visibility, RH, and PM2.5 concentrations were computed from the hourly observation data of meteorology and environment.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Categorizations of Atmospheric Visibility and RH

In this study, we categorized daily visibility into the good, low, and poor visibility levels, respectively, with the lower limit of 10 km and upper limits of 10 km and 5 km [35,52]. To more quantitatively analyze the variation of visibility, the visibility values were divided into three levels: > 10.0 km, 5.0–10.0 km, and < 5.0 km. Aerosol light scattering enhancement factor grows smoothly with RH < 60% and exhibits a rapid enhancement at high RH > 60% [45]. The aerosol hygroscopic effect becomes significant when RH exceeds 90% [45]. Thus, we divided RH into four ranges: RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤ RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90%.

2.2.2. A Measure of Relative Importance in Multiple Regression

Multiple regression analysis has two distinct applications: Prediction and explanation [53]. When multiple regression is used for explanatory purpose, we are interested in the extent of each variable contributing to the response variable [54]. Standardized regression coefficients are the most common measure of relative importance when multiple regression is used [55,56].
We constructed a stepwise multiple linear regression model to quantify the effect of RH and PM2.5 on visibility variability. The model fitted the daily visibility with daily RH and PM2.5. The daily values of visibility, PM2.5 and RH satisfied approximately normal distribution. The fit has the form:
Y ( t ) = k = 1 n β k X k ( t )
where Y ( t ) is the standardized time series of daily visibility for all winters over 2013-2018 in Nanjing, and X k ( t ) is the corresponding time series for the standardized affecting factors (PM2.5 and RH) k [ 1 , n ] . β k is the standardized regression coefficient. The contribution ( C x k ) of a given predictor ( x k ) to response variable (Y) is:
C x k = | β k | k = 1 n | β k |

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Variations in Atmospheric Visibility

Figure 2 showed the monthly variations of visibility in Nanjing averaged over 2013–2019, with the error bars indicating the standard deviations for the mean visibility based on the daily values. Similar to most urban areas in China, visibility in Nanjing varied seasonally from the high values in summer (July and August) to the low values in winter (December, January, and February) during the past seven years, which could be in association with a combination of air pollutant emissions and seasonal variance in meteorology [57]. Hence, we focused this study on the wintertime visibility variations and their relationship with wintertime PM2.5 and RH.
The occurrence frequencies of good, low, and poor visibility levels were calculated as a percentage of the number of daily visibility values in each level during winter. The interannual variations of wintertime mean visibility, RH, PM2.5 concentrations, and occurrence frequencies of good, low, and poor visibility levels in winter over 2013–2018 are shown in Figure 3. The interannual variations of PM2.5 concentrations presented a significantly decreasing trend over 2013–2018, and the values of visibility enhanced after 2013 (Figure 3a), which could present the effect of China’s emission control strategies introduced in 2013 [58,59]. Differently, the interannual variations of wintertime RH presented a weak humid trend in the urban environment from 2014 to 2018, reflecting the change of natural factor RH in the East Asian monsoon region [60,61]. The slight increase in RH during these winter periods could intensify the hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles, thus increasing light extinctions and reducing visibility. Although the number of days with the level of “good visibility” had an obvious enhancement over the past winters, especially since 2016, the level of “poor visibility” dominated the wintertime ambient air with 42–63% days, with a weak interannual change over 2013–2018 in Nanjing (Figure 3b). All of the mean visibility values averaged over each winter ranged between 5–10 km in the level of “low visibility” (Figure 3a).
The correlation coefficients of daily visibility with PM2.5 and RH during wintertime of 2013–2018 were given in Table 1. The visibility had significantly negative correlations with the PM2.5 concentrations and RH. The light extinction efficiency of the coarse particles was substantially lower than that of fine particles, and aerosols with diameters of 0.5–2 μm were most efficient for scattering visible light [49,62]. In terms of particles, we could expect that the visibility degradation was mainly caused by the increment of the PM2.5 concentrations during winter in Nanjing. However, the better correlation between visibility and RH was found than that between visibility and PM2.5 concentrations for all winters (Table 1), which could indicate that the natural factor RH might play the more important role in visibility change compared with the anthropogenic factor PM2.5 concentrations in this urban region. The impact of RH on the size and chemical composition of aerosol particles could alter aerosol optical property for changing visibility in the ambient atmosphere [32,35].

3.2. Connection of Visibility with PM2.5 and RH

Figure 4 exhibited the changes in atmospheric visibility with respect to PM2.5 concentrations and RH in ambient air. The nonlinear relationships of visibility with PM2.5 concentrations and RH could be fitted as power functions with the goodness of fitting respectively at 0.30 and 0.37, passing the confidence level of 95%. Reduction of PM2.5 over the high levels could improve atmospheric visibility insignificantly, and as PM2.5 concentrations were reduced to the low levels reaching the inflection point in changing visibility, further decreasing PM2.5 concentrations could enhance the visibility sharply (Figure 4a). Similarly, an inflection point existed in the nonlinear relationship between atmospheric visibility and RH changes (Figure 4b). In humid air environment with high RH, the visibility dropped slowly with increasing RH, while RH changed visibility significantly in dry air with low RH.
Based on the observation analysis, it was found that the nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 concentrations and visibility depended on different RH values in the ambient atmosphere. With the same PM2.5 concentrations, the higher the RH was, the lower the visibility was (Figure 5). The increases of RH can promote the moisture absorption of the particles and strengthen the scattering and absorption capacities to the visible light, leading to the impairment of atmospheric visibility [32,35]. Power functions were used to fit the nonlinear relationships between visibility and PM2.5 concentrations in different RH ranges (Table 2). The visibility changes in this urban area of East China were most sensitive to PM2.5 concentrations in the RH range of 60–80% with a power exponent of −0.77, and the visibility changes showed the least sensitivity to PM2.5 concentrations when RH ≥ 90% with a power exponent of −0.55 (Table 2). Under the high humid condition (RH ≥ 90%), the visibility values were mostly lower than 5 km for the “poor visibility,” even with low PM2.5 concentrations (Figure 5), which could have resulted from the formation of fog droplets in ambient air with water vapor saturation. Under the dry air condition (RH < 60%), a large part of the observed visibility was longer than 5 km in the good and low visibility levels with the enhancement of PM2.5 concentrations (Figure 5), which might have been caused by the low aerosol water contents and weak water vapor uptake by fine aerosol matters [49].
Figure 5 also showed the inflection points on the fitting curves of visibility and PM2.5 changes. The inflection point of PM2.5 concentrations was a turning point in the change of visibility induced by PM2.5 concentrations. Atmospheric visibility showed low and high sensitivity with PM2.5 concentration changes, respectively, above and below the inflection points (Figure 5). Under four RH ranges of RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤ RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90%, the inflection points of PM2.5 concentrations in changing visibility reduced to 81.0 μg m−3, 76.0 μg m−3, 49.0 μg m−3, and 33.0 μg m−3 (Figure 5, Table 3), which indicated that improving atmospheric visibility with reducing PM2.5 concentrations could be more difficult in more humid air environment. An important task of atmospheric environment control is reducing the PM2.5 concentrations below the inflection points in order to achieve a significant improvement in visibility [36].
According to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards of China released by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, light air pollution level of PM2.5 is categorized by the daily average PM2.5 concentration exceeding 75 μg m−3 in ambient air. There is a widely used haze definition with visibility of less than 10 km and RH of less than 90% [63,64]. Based on the fitting curves of nonlinear relationships between visibility and PM2.5 concentrations in four RH ranges of RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90%, Table 3 presented the critical values of PM2.5 concentrations on the fitting curves at visibility of 10km in low visibility level. For the visibility at 10 km, the critical PM2.5 concentrations varied significantly between 43.0 μg m−3, 30.7 μg m−3, 11.4 μg m−3, and 3.8 μg m−3 in dry and humid air with four RH ranges of RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤ RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90% (Table 3), and all the critical PM2.5 concentrations with much lower than the light PM2.5 pollution level at 75 μg m−3 implied that the standard of clean air environment with PM2.5 < 75 μg m−3 had apparent inconformity with the threshold of visibility at 10 km for haze pollution, reflecting the different influences of anthropogenic and natural factors on atmospheric environment changes.
Table 3 also gave the critical values of visibility on the fitting curves at PM2.5 concentrations of 75 μg m−3 in light air pollution level. The critical visibility values at PM2.5 of 75 μg m−3 were 7.2 km, 5.0 km, 3.0 km, and 1.9 km, respectively, with different RH ranges (Table 3). The increases of RH could significantly deteriorate atmospheric visibility, providing a larger contribution to the visibility change. The critical values of visibility were below the visibility threshold of 10 km for haze pollution under all RH conditions, indicating a discrepancy of haze pollution defined by visual ranges and PM2.5 concentrations. PM2.5 concentrations and RH, as the leading anthropogenic and natural factors changing atmospheric visibility, exerted an integrate influence on wintertime visibility impairment in this urban area of East China.

3.3. Relative Contribution of RH and PM2.5 to Wintertime Visibility Variations

The impairment of wintertime visibility is generally linked with rapid increases in anthropogenic pollutant emissions in conjunction with unfavorable meteorological conditions for air pollutant dispersion [65,66]. This has led to a hot debate concerning whether the notable changes in visibility were mainly attributed to the meteorological conditions and anthropogenic emission control. Based on the discussion above, the anthropogenic factor PM2.5 led to the visibility impairment by light extinction, and natural factor RH promoted aerosols’ hygroscopic growth to a certain extent. We quantified their relative contribution of the leading anthropogenic and natural factors, PM2.5 and RH, to the change of wintertime visibility in Nanjing over 2013–2018 with the multiple linear regression analysis of visibility, RH, and PM2.5 concentrations. The regression equation was:
[ VIS ] = 0.57 [ RH ] 0.48 [ PM 2.5 ] , R 2 = 0.58 ,   p   <   0.01 ,
The goodness of fitting was 0.58, passing the confidence level of 99%, which could mean the inclusion of PM2.5 and RH accounted for the major contribution to wintertime visibility variations from 2013 to 2018 in Nanjing.
We estimated the relative importance of RH and PM2.5 by the method of comparing the standardized regression coefficients mentioned in Section 2.2.2. The daily variations of wintertime visibility represented by natural factor RH was 54.3%, indicating a higher contribution as compared with the anthropogenic factor PM2.5 contribution of 45.7%. That is, in spite of the effective PM2.5 reduction in this urban area, natural factor RH was a dominant driver for the changes of wintertime visibility over recent years. The change of natural factor RH was closely connected with climate change in this East Asian monsoon region, implicating an importance of the regional climate change for variation of atmospheric visibility and environment.

4. Conclusions

Anthropogenic and natural factors affecting visibility change were investigated based on data of environmental and meteorological observations over 2013–2019 in Nanjing, an urban area of East China. We recognized PM2.5 and RH changing atmospheric visibility and quantified the relative contribution of leading anthropogenic and natural factors to the variations of atmospheric visibility over recent winters in this urban area of East China. The application of these results will improve the representativeness and reliability of the use of visibility in the field of air pollution attribution and the determination of its climatic effects.
In spite of the effective PM2.5 reductions after 2013, the level of “poor visibility” dominated the ambient atmosphere over winter in this urban area of East China. Although the visibility had significantly negative correlations with the PM2.5 concentrations and RH, the inflection points existed in the nonlinear relationships between visibility and PM2.5 concentrations, as well as between visibility and RH. Under the RH ranges of RH < 60%, 60% ≤ RH < 80%, 80% ≤ RH < 90%, and RH ≥ 90%, the inflection points of PM2.5 concentrations were 81.0 μg m−3, 76.0 μg m−3, 49.0 μg m−3, and 33.0 μg m−3, respectively, reflecting that reducing the PM2.5 concentrations to the inflection points for improving the visibility would be more difficult in more humid air environment in context of climate change. The visibility changes were most and least sensitive to PM2.5 concentrations, respectively, in the RH range of 60–80% and RH≥90% in this urban area of East China. The relative contributions of natural factor RH and anthropogenic factor PM2.5 to the changes of visibility were quantified with 54.3% and 45.7%, respectively, in this urban area, indicating an important role of natural factor RH in the changes of atmospheric visibility in the urban area of East Asian monsoon region.
This study revealed the influences of PM2.5 and RH on changing wintertime visibility with the seven-year data of environmental and meteorological observations over an urban area in East China. It should be emphasized that the particle size distribution, optical properties, and the chemical composition of aerosols exert the impacts on atmospheric visibility. The influences of atmospheric particles and meteorological conditions to atmospheric visibility are more complicated, which could be further investigated based on the long-term observations on physical and chemical properties of particle and fine meteorology. The influences of long-range transport of PM2.5, weather patterns, and human activities on visibility change could be a further study with a more comprehensive numerical model of air quality and fine observations of meteorology and environment.

Author Contributions

X.S. and T.Z. conceived and designed the experiments as well as wrote the article; S.G. and J.X. conceived and designed the experiments. D.L. and X.M. helped in the statistical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Key R & D Program Pilot Projects of China (2016YFC0203304) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4180522 and 91744209).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.Y.; Jo, W.K.; Chun, H.H. Characteristics of Atmospheric Visibility and Its Relationship with Air Pollution in Korea. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, Q.; Quan, J.N.; Tie, X.X.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, D.L. Effects of meteorology and secondary particle formation on visibility during heavy haze events in Beijing, China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2015, 502, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Trijonis, J. Existing and natural background levels of visibility and fine particles in the rural East. Atmos. Environ. 1982, 16, 2431–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Husar, R.B.; Wilson, W.E. Haze and sulfur emission trends in the eastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 27, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, Y.L.; Sequeira, R. Visibility degradation across Hong Kong: Its components and their relative contributions. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5861–5872. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, H.P.; Wang, H.J. Haze days in North China and the associated atmospheric circulations based on daily visibility data from 1960 to 2012. J. Geophys. Res. 2015, 120, 5895–5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, M.; Chan, I.N.; Chan, C.Y.; Engling, G.; Bloss, W. Implications of regional surface ozone increases on visibility degradation in southeast China. Tellus. B. 2012, 64, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, T.L.; Liu, D.; Zheng, X.B.; Yang, L.X.; Gu, X.P.; Hu, J.; Shu, Z.Z.; Chang, J.C.; Wu, X.S. Revealed variations of air quality in industrial development over a remote plateau of Southwest China: An application of atmospheric visibility data. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 2016, 129, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Trijonis, J. Visibility in the southwest—An exploration of the historical data base. Atmos. Environ. 1979, 13, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Che, H.Z.; Zhang, X.Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z.J.; Qu, J.J. Horizontal visibility trends in China 1981–2005. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, L24706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Naegele, P.S.; Sellers, W.D. A Study of Visibility in Eighteen Cities in the Western and Southwestern United States. Mon. Weather Rev. 2009, 109, 1438–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xu, X.D.; Zhao, T.L.; Liu, F.; Gong, S.L.; Kristovich, D.; Lu, C.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Ding, G. Climate modulation of the Tibetan Plateau on haze in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 15, 28915–28937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sloane, C.S.; White, W.H. Visibility: An evolving issue. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, X.J.; Tie, X.X.; Wu, D.; Zhou, X.J.; Bi, X.Y.; Tan, H.B.; Li, F.; Jiang, C.L. Long-term trend of visibility and its characterizations in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hodkinson, J.R. Calculation of colour and visibility in urban atmospheres polluted by gaseous NO2. Air Water Pollut. 1966, 10, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, H.N.; Chen, J.; Wen, J.J.; Tian, H.Z.; Liu, X.G. Composition and sources of PM2.5around the heating periods of 2013 and 2014 in Beijing: Implications for efficient mitigation measures. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 124, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chan, Y.C.; Simpson, R.W.; Mctainsh, G.H.; Vowles, P.D.; Cohen, D.D.; Bailey, G.M. Source apportionment of visibility degradation problems in Brisbane (Australia) using the multiple linear regression techniques. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3237–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malm, W.C.; Molenar, J.V.; Eldred, R.A.; Sisler, J.F. Examining the relationship among atmospheric aerosols and light scattering and extinction in the Grand Canyon area. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1996, 101, 19251–19265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chung, Y.S.; Kim, H.S.; Yoon, M.B. Observations of visibility and chemical compositions related to fog, mist and haze in south Korea. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1999, 111, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, H.S.; Huh, J.B.; Hopke, P.K.; Holsen, T.M.; Yi, S.M. Characteristics of the major chemical constituents of PM2.5and smog events in Seoul, Korea in 2003 and 2004. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 6762–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deng, X.J.; Wu, D.; Yu, J.Z.; Lau, A.K.H.; Li, F.; Tan, H.B.; Yuan, Z.B.; Ng, W.M.; Deng, T.; Wu, C.; et al. Characterization of secondary aerosol and its extinction effects on visibility over the Pearl River Delta Region, China. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2013, 63, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Steinfeld; Jeffrey, I. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 1998, 40, 26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, D.; Cui, H.F.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, L.N.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.G. A two-year study of carbonaceous aerosols in ambient PM2.5at a regional background site for western Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos. Res. 2017, 183, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, J.J.; Zhang, Y.R.; Hong, Y.W.; Xu, L.L.; Chen, Y.T.; Du, W.J.; Chen, J.S. Optical properties of PM2.5 and the impacts of chemical compositions in the coastal city Xiamen in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, R.J.; Zhang, Y.L.; Bozzetti, C.; Ho, K.F.; Cao, J.J.; Han, Y.M.M.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Slowik, J.G.; Platt, S.M.; Canonaco, F.; et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 2014, 514, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bond, T.C.; Doherty, S.J.; Fahey, D.W.; Forster, P.; Berntsen, T.; DeAngelo, B.J.; Flanner, M.G.; Ghan, S.J.; Kärcher, B.; Koch, D.; et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 2013, 118, 5380–5552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xin, J.Y.; Gong, C.S.; Wang, S.G.; Wang, Y.S. Aerosol direct radiative forcing in desert and semi-desert regions of northwestern China. Atmos. Res. 2016, 171, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, X.N.; Ma, J.; An, J.L.; Yuan, L.; Zhu, B.; Liu, D.Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Cui, H.X. Impacts of meteorological condition and aerosol chemical compositions on visibility impairment in Nanjing, China. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Covert, D.S.; Charlson, R.J.; Ahlquist, N.C. A Study of the Relationship of Chemical Composition and Humidity to Light Scattering by Aerosols. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1972, 11, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. An, J.L.; Duan, Q.; Wang, H.L.; Miao, Q.; Shao, P.; Wang, J.; Zou, J.N. Fine particulate pollution in the Nanjing northern suburb during summer: Composition and sources. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Engelhart, G.J.; Hildebrandt, L.; Kostenidou, E.; Mihalopoulos, N.; Donahue, N.M.; Pandis, S.N. Water content of aged aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Malm, W.C.; Day, D.E. Estimates of aerosol species scattering characteristics as a function of relative humidity. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 2845–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Randles, C.A. Hygroscopic and optical properties of organic sea salt aerosol and consequences for climate forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, 31, L16108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, Y.F.; Wiedensohler, A.; Eichler, H.; Heintzenbergb, J.; Tescheb, M.; Ansmannb, A.; Wendischb, M.; Sua, H.; Althausenb, D.; Herrmannb, H.; et al. Relative humidity dependence of aerosol optical properties and direct radiative forcing in the surface boundary layer at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China: An observation based numerical study. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 6373–6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, G.Q.; Xu, W.Y.; Yang, R.F.; Li, J.B.; Zhao, C.S. The distribution and trends of fog and haze in the North China Plain over the past 30 years. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 11949–11958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kong, L.B.; Xin, J.Y.; Liu, Z.R.; Zhang, K.Q.; Tang, G.Q.; Zhang, W.Y.; Wang, Y.S. The PM2.5 threshold for aerosol extinction in the Beijing megacity. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 167, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, S.; Gao, M.; Xu, W.; Sun, Y.; Worsnop, D.R.; Jayne, J.T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, M.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Possible heterogeneous chemistry of hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) in northern China winter haze. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 1357–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bohren, C.F.; Huffman, D.R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  39. McMurry, P.H. Chapter 17 A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2002, 1, 443–517. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, H.Y.; Tan, S.C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Shi, G.Y.; Zhang, M.X.; Che, H.Z. A multisource observation study of the severe prolonged regional haze episode over eastern China in January 2013. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 89, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, H.; Xu, J.Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.Q.; Shen, X.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Chen, D.; Guo, J.P. A study of the meteorological causes of a prolonged and severe haze episode in January 2013 over central-eastern China. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, M.; Qiao, L.P.; Zhu, S.H.; Li, L.; Lou, S.R.; Wang, H.L.; Wang, Q.; Tao, S.K.; Huang, C.; Chen, C.H. Chemical characteristics of fine particles and their impact on visibility impairment in Shanghai based on a 1-year period observation. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 48, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhai, S.X.; Jacob, D.; Wang, X.; Shen, L.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Gui, K.; Zhao, T.L.; Liao, H. Fine particulate matter (PM2:5) trends in China, 2013–2018: Separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 11031–11041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Leung, D.M.; Tai, A.P.K.; Mickley, L.J.; Moch, J.M.; van Donkelaar, A.; Shen, L.; Martin, R.V. Synoptic meteorological modes of variability for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air quality in major metropolitan regions of China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 6733–6748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Deng, H.; Tan, H.B.; Li, F.; Cai, M.F.; Chan, P.W.; Xu, H.B.; Huang, X.Y.; Wu, D. Impact of relative humidity on visibility degradation during a haze event: A case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 1149–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moch, J.M.; Dovrou, E.; Mickley, L.J.; Keutsch, F.N.; Cheng, Y.; Jacob, D.J.; Jiang, J.; Li, M.; Munger, J.W.; Qiao, X. Contribution of hydroxymethane sulfonate to ambient particulate matter: A potential explanation for high particulate sulfur during severe winter haze in Beijing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 11969–11979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pendergrass, D.C.; Shen, L.; Jacob, D.J.; Mickley, L.J. Predicting the impact of climate change on severe wintertime particulate pollution events in Beijing using extreme value theory. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, X.Y.; Zhang, R.H.; & Yu, W. The effects of PM2.5 concentrations and relative humidity on atmospheric visibility in Beijing. J. Geophys. Res. 2019, 124, 2235–2259. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, J.; Qiu, S.S.; Shang, J.; Wilfrid, O.M.F.; Liu, X.G.; Tian, H.Z.; Boman, J. Impact of Relative Humidity and Water Soluble Constituents of PM2.5 on Visibility Impairment in Beijing, China. Aerosol. Air. Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Shen, G.F.; Yuan, S.Y.; Xie, Y.N.; Xia, S.J.; Li, L.; Yao, Y.K.; Qiao, Y.Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Ding, A.J.; et al. Ambient levels and temporal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 at a residential site in the mega-city, Nanjing, in the western Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ. Sci. Heal. 2014, 49, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meteorological Data Sharing Network of China Meteorological Administration. Available online: http://data.cma.cn/ (accessed on 1 May 2020).
  52. Fu, C.B.; Wu, J.; Gao, Y.C.; Zhao, D.M.; Han, Z.W. Consecutive extreme visibility events in China during 1960-2009. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Courville, T.; Thompson, B. Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not Enough. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2001, 61, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Johnson, J.W.; Lebreton, J.M. History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research. Organ. Res. Methods. 2004, 7, 238–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Darlington, R.B. Regression and Linear Models; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  56. Newman, T.B.; Browner, W.S. In Defense of Standardized Regression Coefficients. Epidemiology. 1991, 2, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chang, D.; Song, Y.; Liu, B. Visibility trends in six megacities in China 1973–2007. Atmos. Res. 2009, 94, 0–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gao, M.; Liu, Z.R.; Zheng, B.; Ji, D.S.; Sherman, P.; Song, S.J.; Xin, J.Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.S.; Zhang, Q.; et al. China’s emission control strategies have suppressed unfavorable influences of climate on wintertime PM2:5 concentrations in Beijing since 2002. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zheng, B.; Tong, D.; Li, M.; Liu, F.; Hong, C.; Geng, G.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Peng, L.; Qi, J.; et al. Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 14095–14111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Niu, F.; Li, Z.Q.; Li, C.; Lee, K.H.; Wang, M.Y. Increase of wintertime fog in China: Potential impacts of weakening of the Eastern Asian monsoon circulation and increasing aerosol loading. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, D00K20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yin, Z.C.; Wang, H.J.; Guo, W.L. Climatic change features of fog and haze in winter over North China and Huang-Huai Area. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2015, 58, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Horvath, H. Atmospheric light absorption—A review. Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27, 293–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schichtel, B.A.; Husar, R.B.; Falke, S.R.; Wilson, W.E. Haze trends over the United States, 1980-1995. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 5205–5210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Doyle, M.; Dorling, S. Visibility trends in the UK 1950–1997. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3161–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Deng, J.J.; Wang, T.J.; Jiang, Z.Q.; Xie, M.; Zhang, R.J.; Huang, X.X.; Zhu, J.L. Characterization of visibility and its affecting factors over Nanjing, China. Atmos. Res. 2011, 101, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Ding, A.J.; Mao, H.T.; Nie, W.; Zhou, D.R.; Liu, L.X.; Huang, X.; Fu, C.B. Impact of synoptic weather patterns and inter-decadal climate variability on air quality in the North China Plain during 1980–2013. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 124, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Topographical height (m, a. s. l.) in China with the locations of Nanjing (left panel) and nine sites of air quality measurement in Nanjing, an urban area in East China (right panel).
Figure 1. Topographical height (m, a. s. l.) in China with the locations of Nanjing (left panel) and nine sites of air quality measurement in Nanjing, an urban area in East China (right panel).
Atmosphere 11 00461 g001
Figure 2. Monthly variations of atmospheric visibility in Nanjing averaged over 2013–2019. Error bars denote the standard deviations of daily visibility.
Figure 2. Monthly variations of atmospheric visibility in Nanjing averaged over 2013–2019. Error bars denote the standard deviations of daily visibility.
Atmosphere 11 00461 g002
Figure 3. Interannual variations of wintertime (a) Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations, visibility, relative humidity (RH) and (b) the percentages (%) of days with good (VIS > 10 km), low (5 km <VIS ≤ 10 km), and poor (VIS ≤ 5 km) visibility in winter observed in Nanjing from 2013 to 2018.
Figure 3. Interannual variations of wintertime (a) Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations, visibility, relative humidity (RH) and (b) the percentages (%) of days with good (VIS > 10 km), low (5 km <VIS ≤ 10 km), and poor (VIS ≤ 5 km) visibility in winter observed in Nanjing from 2013 to 2018.
Atmosphere 11 00461 g003
Figure 4. Scatterplots of (a) visibility and PM2.5 as well as (b) visibility and RH in Nanjing during winter over 2013–2018 with the curves of the power function fitting equations.
Figure 4. Scatterplots of (a) visibility and PM2.5 as well as (b) visibility and RH in Nanjing during winter over 2013–2018 with the curves of the power function fitting equations.
Atmosphere 11 00461 g004
Figure 5. Scatterplot of wintertime visibility and PM2.5 concentrations in different RH ranges in Nanjing over 2013–2018 with circles colored in different RH. The curves and black dots present the fitting curves and their inflection points; black lines of 5 km and 10 km visibility indicate the poor, low, and good visibility levels; and the dashed line represents the light PM2.5 pollution level of 75 μg m−3.
Figure 5. Scatterplot of wintertime visibility and PM2.5 concentrations in different RH ranges in Nanjing over 2013–2018 with circles colored in different RH. The curves and black dots present the fitting curves and their inflection points; black lines of 5 km and 10 km visibility indicate the poor, low, and good visibility levels; and the dashed line represents the light PM2.5 pollution level of 75 μg m−3.
Atmosphere 11 00461 g005
Table 1. Correlation coefficients of daily visibility with PM2.5 concentrations and RH in Nanjing during wintertime of 2013–2018 (passing the confidence level of 99%).
Table 1. Correlation coefficients of daily visibility with PM2.5 concentrations and RH in Nanjing during wintertime of 2013–2018 (passing the confidence level of 99%).
WinterVisibility vs. PM2.5Visibility vs. RH
2013−0.52−0.63
2014−0.56−0.73
2015−0.70−0.79
2016−0.56−0.62
2017−0.60−0.72
2018−0.54−0.59
Table 2. Nonlinear fitting equations of visibility and PM2.5 in different RH ranges and adjusted coefficients of determination (Adj R2) passing the confidence level of 99%.
Table 2. Nonlinear fitting equations of visibility and PM2.5 in different RH ranges and adjusted coefficients of determination (Adj R2) passing the confidence level of 99%.
Nonlinear Fitting CurvesAdj R2
RH < 60% VIS = 93.08 × [ PM 2.5 ] 0.59 0.58
60% ≤ RH < 80% VIS = 139.40 × [ PM 2.5 ] 0.77 0.70
80% ≤ RH < 90% VIS = 46.44 × [ PM 2.5 ] 0.63 0.49
RH ≥ 90% VIS = 20.94 × [ PM 2.5 ] 0.55 0.39
Table 3. The critical PM2.5 concentrations on the fitting curves at visibility of 10 km, and the inflection point PM2.5 concentrations and the critical visibility values on the fitting curves at PM2.5 concentrations of 75 μg m−3 in different RH ranges.
Table 3. The critical PM2.5 concentrations on the fitting curves at visibility of 10 km, and the inflection point PM2.5 concentrations and the critical visibility values on the fitting curves at PM2.5 concentrations of 75 μg m−3 in different RH ranges.
Critical PM2.5 Concentrations (μg m−3) at Visibility of 10 kmInflection Point PM2.5 Concentrations (μg m−3)Critical Visibility (km) at PM2.5 Concentrations of 75 μg m−3
RH < 60%43.081.07.2
60% ≤ RH < 80%30.776.05.0
80% ≤ RH < 90%11.449.03.0
RH ≥ 90%3.833.01.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, X.; Zhao, T.; Liu, D.; Gong, S.; Xu, J.; Ma, X. Quantifying the Influences of PM2.5 and Relative Humidity on Change of Atmospheric Visibility over Recent Winters in an Urban Area of East China. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050461

AMA Style

Sun X, Zhao T, Liu D, Gong S, Xu J, Ma X. Quantifying the Influences of PM2.5 and Relative Humidity on Change of Atmospheric Visibility over Recent Winters in an Urban Area of East China. Atmosphere. 2020; 11(5):461. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050461

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Xiaoyun, Tianliang Zhao, Duanyang Liu, Sunling Gong, Jiaping Xu, and Xiaodan Ma. 2020. "Quantifying the Influences of PM2.5 and Relative Humidity on Change of Atmospheric Visibility over Recent Winters in an Urban Area of East China" Atmosphere 11, no. 5: 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050461

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop