Next Article in Journal
DNA Barcodes of Mansonia (Mansonia) Blanchard, 1901 (Diptera, Culicidae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Integrative Transcriptional Profiling Identifies Age-Associated Signatures in Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
A Pervasive History of Gene Flow in Madagascar’s True Lemurs (Genus Eulemur)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Genome of a Pigeonpea Compatible Rhizobial Strain ‘10ap3’ Appears to Lack Common Nodulation Genes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Resistance Genes in Genus Vigna Reveals Highly Variable NLRome in Parallel Domesticated Member Species

1
Evolutionary Biology Lab, Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
2
Metabolomics Innovative Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
3
Sheikh Zayad Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
4
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
5
Agricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Constituent College of Pakistan, Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
6
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(6), 1129; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061129
Submission received: 11 April 2023 / Revised: 14 May 2023 / Accepted: 15 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome-Wide Identifications: Recent Trends in Genomic Studies)

Abstract

:
Vigna is a unique genus that consist of multiple crop species that are domesticated in parallel fashion between 7–10 thousand years ago. Here we studied the evolution of nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat receptor (NLR) genes across five crop species of genus Vigna. In total identified 286, 350, 234, 250, 108 and 161 NLR genes were from Phaseolous vulgaris, Vigna. unguiculata, Vigna mungo, Vigna radiata, Vigna angularis and Vigna umbellata respectively. Comprehensive phylogenetic and clusterization analysis reveals the presence of seven subgroups of Coiled coil like NLRs (CC-NLR) genes and four distinct lineages of Toll interleukin receptor like NLRs (TIR-NLR). Subgroup CCG10-NLR shows large scale diversification among Vigna species suggesting genus specific distinct duplication pattern in Vigna species. Mainly birth of new NLR gene families and higher rate of terminal duplication is the major determinants for expansion of NLRome in genus Vigna. Recent expansion of NLRome in V. anguiculata and V. radiata was also observed which might suggest that domestication have supported their duplication of lineage specific NLR genes. In short, large scale difference in the architecture of NLRome were observed in diploid plant species. Our findings allowed us to hypothesized that independent parallel domestication is the major drivers of highly divergent evolution of NLRome in genus Vigna.

1. Introduction

Genus Vigna is an important member of the family Fabaceae and consist of multiple crop species which are under cultivation in diverse geographical regions of Africa, Middle East Asia, South Asia, East and South east Asia [1]. It’s a pantropical genus containing 104 species widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions [1,2]. Five major crop species including Vigna unguiculata, Vigna angularis, Vigna mungo, Vigna radiata and Vigna umbellata. Interestingly all five species have undergone parallel yet independent domestication events. In case of V. unguiculata, also known as Cowpea, was domesticated in Africa and latter spread across Asia, South, central and North America and Europe [3]. V. unguiculata is known for Its resilience for abiotic and biotic stresses. V. angularis also known as adzuki bean, was domesticated in China ~12,000 years ago and its also known for broad adaptability and high tolerance to poor soil fertility [4]. V. mungo (black gram) and V. radiata are domesticated in India around 7000 years ago and cultivated mostly in South, East, southeast Asia [5,6]. V. umbellate is also known as rice bean, it’s a lesser-known pulse and also domesticated in India [7]. Vigna crops are ideal candidates to study the effect of parallel domestication. It`s been reported that these cultivated species does harbor major and minor domestication-related QTLs [8,9]. However, domestication often leads to narrowing of genetic diversity resulting in compromised adaptability towards abiotic and biotic stresses.
Plant response to various biotic stresses using disease resistance gene as a part of their effector triggered immune (ETI) response [10]. Among them Nucleotide binding site leucine rich repeat receptors (NLRs) are responsible for recognizing a pathogen’s effector through direct or indirect interactions, which triggers a number of defensive mechanisms, including hypersensitive response or localized programmed cell death [11]. There are four major subclasses are divided on the basis of distinct N-terminal domain fusion (1) TIR-NLR subclass containing Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR domain) (2) CC-NLR is the most diversified class containing coiled coil in the N-terminal (3) CCR-NLR are considered as helper NLRs (4) CCG10-NLR containing distinct type of CC and forming a monophyletic group. The wide range of pathogenic effectors are recognized because of large scale of sequence variability of NLR genes. Several mechanism are involved in the evolution of NLR genes including diversification of binding specificities in LRR domain, which is responsible for direct protein-protein interaction with the pathogens effectors [12,13]. Recent studies suggest that NB-ARC domain regions are evolving under negative selection, however LRRs are evolving under positive selections. Gene conversion, tandem duplication followed by local rearrangements are the major mechanism that contribute to the recognition of distinct pathogenic effectors [12,13]. As the NLR gene family continuously evolves, the regulation of their expression must also evolve to adapt to the changing environment and new virulent strains of pathogens.
The NLR gene family is highly variable in plant genomes and evolved through duplication, crossing-over, recombination, and gene conversion events [14,15]. Positive diversifying selection, which favors mutations, is often seen in NLRs, contributing to the gene family’s high variability [14]. Variation in NLR genes family occurs at distinct levels, such as allelic variation, presence/absence variation and copy number variations (CNVs). NLR copy numbers can vary significantly among species, and these genes tend to be overrepresented in regions with presence/absence variations [12]. This evolutionary response can be related to the severity and frequency of pathogen infection and the variability of NLR presence with the occurrence of effectors in pathogen populations [16]. Variations have also been associated with a lower accumulation of polymorphism, especially for NLRs involved in indirect recognition where subtle changes to the NLR can trigger autoimmunity. To this date, no study is reported to understand the evolution of NLR genes in Vigna species [17,18].
Here in this study, we have utilized the NLRtracker for the mining and annotation of NLR genes. Subsequently, we have utilized comprehensive evolutionary approaches to under the distinct evolution of NLR genes in genus Vigna. Since members of genus lack polyploidy except one species, all other species are diploid in nature [1,2]. Here we attempted to address the important question (1) Effect of parallel domestication on the evolution of NLRome. What are the main species that have shown expansion and contraction in the NLRome? What are the major mechanisms responsible for the expansion and contraction of NLR genes in Vigna species? whether domestication of Vigna species have narrowed the NLRome?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mining of NLR Genes in Arachis Species

The genome sequence of multiple species of genus Vigna were available at different genome database portals. We selected NCBI genome portal to acquire the genome and annotation files for five Vigna spp. in order to retain the homogeneity in the sequence headers. We downloaded genome of V. mungo, V. radiata, V. umbellata, V. angularis and V. unguiculata (Table S1). All genomes files were already annotated into respective transcriptome, proteome and gene transfer file format. The reference proteomes of all five Vigna genomes were subjected to NLRtracker pipeline [17,19]. The NLRtracker output files provides domain configuration, complete sequence all NLR gene along with conserved NB-ARC domain sequences from each identified sequence. Since several entries of NLR genes remained indeterminate using NLRtracker pipeline therefore manual curation using clusterization and phylogeny.

2.2. Phylogeny and Classification of NLR Genes

All known characterized NLR genes were acquired from PRG database libraries of NB-ARC domains [20]. These NB-ARC domain were clustered at 50% of sequence identity using UCLUST tool [21,22]. The nomenclature provided by Eunyoung Seo et al. [10] were adapted for NLR genes identified in family Fabaceae using clusterization and phylogentic approaches using seed probes. NB-ARC domains from Vigna species were aligned with seed probes from reference NLR genes using using MUSCLE (version 1.26) to build comprehensive phylogeny. Conducting the maximum likelihood analysis through IQtree v 2.0 [23], the most appropriate model of evolution (−m JTT + F + R10) was chosen, with 1000 bootstrap replicates being incorporated in the process.

2.3. Gene Density of NLR Genes across Vigna Chromosomes

Gene density maps were built using three file GFF3, NLR output file from NLR tracker and assemble genome file. Where assembled genome file was used to build fasta index. We then utilized to intersect NLR genes on GFF3 file using BEDtools [24] with bin size of 5 Kb. Resulting count files were then manually edited by providing bin number to each coordinate and built of karyotype file for R package RIdeogram [25].

2.4. Evolutionary Analysis in Vigna NLRs

Custom build pipeline using bash script was developed to perform multiple steps of evolutionary analysis including utilization of Clustalw to align protein sequence from each subgroups (Li, 2003). Subsequently, pal2nal software (version 1.0) was linked in the pipeline to perform protein guided nucleotide alignment [26]. At the end gaps were removed and substitution rate ks were estimated using MA method of tool ka/ks calculator and selection value on each paralog pair was tested using Fisher test and significant parolog pairs were kept and duplication events with p-values lower than 0.01 were not included [27]. In order to study orthologous relationship of NLR genes in Vigna species Ortho-venn2 was utilized [28]. Default settings were utilized except E-value of 10 × 10−2. For understanding NLR gene birth and death, Orthofinder was utilized using all identified NLR genes from Vigna species [29]. Ortholog sequences between the V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. umbellate, V. radiata genomes were also obtained from Orthofinder [29]. Output species tree was converted into ultrametric tree using R package APE and the orthogroups were manually labelled [30]. Both the orthogroups and ultrametric tree files were used as input for CAFE5 [31], and gene gain and loss at each node was performed by parsing the resulting files.

2.5. Expression Analysis of NLR Genes Using RNA-Seq

We further determined the basal expression of identified NLR genes in available transcriptome datasets of V. radiata and V. unguiculata. Whole transcriptome based assay are sparingly available due to paucity of scientific attention provided for legume species. Here we screened two transcriptome dataset with significant alignment score. For V. radiata dataset was acquired under bioproject number PRJNA779876 that includes 12 samples that compared the expression between two tissues shoot apex and young pod. Secondly, we further screened basal expression levels of NLR genes in V. unguiculata, where in total 28 sample were used to compared the expression between different tissues. We utilized the HISAT, Stringtie and Ballgown based alignment and quantification pipeline as already mentioned in previous article [22,32].

3. Results

3.1. Gene Mining of NLR Genes in Vigna Species

We have utilized two approaches for the identification of resistance genes in the five species of this genus Vigna. Primarily we utilized the NLRtracker pipeline for NLR genes mining and successive annotations. Closest relative Phaseolous vulgaris was considered as the closest outgroup and selected for comparison of NLRome diversity. In total we identified 286, 350, 234, 250, 108 and 161 NLR genes were identified from P. vulgaris, V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellata respectively (Figure 1). Secondly, we further utilized manual clusterization of identified NLR genes to verify the number of NLR gene reported from each species. Substantial NLR genes and sub-class variations were observed among these five species of Vigna. Previous, investigations of NLR genes in genus Cicer, Trifolium and members of Dalbergioids [22] did not reported such variation within the diploid species as observed in case of genus Vigna. Large scale expansion of NLRome were observed for V. unguiculata and V. radiata where class TIR-NLR subclass have highest increase. Conversely, V. angularis have shown the significant contraction in the NLRome. Interestingly, number of CCR-NLR remained unchanged irrespective to expansion and contraction and their genome size. It reiterates the fact that helper NLR (CCR-NLR) are conserved among Fabaceae family. The repertoire of NLR genes identified here are appended in the Supplementary File (Supplementary File S2).

3.2. Gene Density among of NLR Genes in Vigna Species

Genus Vigna have shown substantial diversity in the repertoire of resistance genes in each species. We further studied the architecture of these genes in the assembled genome from each member species. Gene density maps of identified NLR genes were built using the bin size of 5 kb (Figure 2). These maps have shown that V. umbellata and V. mungo possess equal distribution of NLR genes across the genome, whereas the V. radiata and V. unguiculata possess large scale clusters of NLR genes. These clusters are believed to be develop as a result of tandem duplication of NLR genes due unequal crossing over, retro-transposition, gene conversion, asymmetric recombination [33,34]. In short, tandem duplication have played important role in expansion of NLRome in V. radiata and V. unguiculata. Due to lack of highly resolved chromosomally anchored genomes our estimated loci maps might show slight deviation to the actual loci map.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Classification of NLR Genes

Initially, reference NLR genes and identified NLRome from each species were clustered at 75 percent identity using CD-HIT and utilized for the manual classification of NLR genes. Representative members of NLR genes from each cluster from V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellata were utilized for the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationship (Figure 3). All five species have shown highly polyphyletic TIR-NLR and CNL-NLR subclasses. Especially five major distinct radiation of TIR-NLR were observed, where majority of putatively novel nodes belonged to V. angularis and V. radiata. In case of CNL-NLR six major sub-groups were observed G4, G7, G11, CNL-UN, CCG10-NLR and CCR-NLR. It is consistent with the previous observation that subgroups G1, G2, G3, G5, G6, G8 are not present in Fabaceae family However, significant divergence and expansion in G4 and G7 were observed in genus Vigna. That might suggest another hypothesis that other CC-CNL subgroups might be removed due to extinction of pathogens of Fabaceae member. As already indicated, helper NLRs (CCR-NLR) were found stable across all genomes and interestingly two major radiation were observed which are common to all five species. However, third radiation were discovered that was only present in V. radiata and absent in other members of this genus. Class CCG10-NLR have shown the highest phylogenomic diversity among all members of this species especially V. radiata and V. angularis. Three major lineages of this subclass were frequently observed for all five species of this genus. In short, NLRome of genus Vigna have shown highly unbalanced gene duplication occurrence that suggest that majority of duplication have occurred after speciation from common ancestor.
We also compared the selection pressure within in the pairs of paralogs from four major subgroups (G4, G7, CCG10-NLR and TIR-NLR). Highest selection pressure were observed for CCG10-NLR where selection pressure of 0.5 (median) and above were observed in all species especially V. unguiculata and V. radiata. However, the G4 and G7 have shown variable range of selection pressure between 0.4 to 0.5 (median). It suggest that tendency of divergence of CCG10-NLR is higher as compared to other subgroup diversification incase genus Vigna (Figure S1).

3.4. NLR Gene Birth and Death Ratio

Gene gain and loss is a prevalent phenomenon for NLR gene evolution, due to consistent arms race between host and pathogen. NLR gene identified from NLRtracker were further subjected to orthology based analysis (Figure 4). In total 46 core orthologs clusters were found as an ancestral NLRome of genus Vigna. Surprisingly, 20 unqiue ortholog clusters were observed in V. unguiculata. We further tested this unique finding by understanding gene gain and loss analysis using Orthofinder and CAFÉ analysis (Figure 4 birth and death of gene families (green/red) and number of genes duplicated colored in blue). In case of V. unguiculata, total 36 gene families were gained and recorded highest rate of terminal duplication, where 238 gene were gain as a result of gene duplication after speciation and reported a loss of 16 gene families. Similarly, V. radiata also have shown the gain of 41 distinct gene families and significant duplication of already present gene families. On the otherside, V. angularis and V. umbellata have shown extensive loss of distinct NLR families and slower rate of terminal duplication. Overall, since the divergence from the common ancestor (approx. 9–10 Mya), contraction of NLRome was observed and latter after complete speciation several species have shown expansion. In short, large scale expansion of V. unguiculata and V. radiata were due to large scale gain in gene families and higher terminal duplication.

3.5. NLR Gene Duplication Assay

Previous analysis suggest that terminal gene duplication is one of the major reason for the expansion of NLRome in Vigna species. Here we explored the duplication history of genus Vigna by comparing the Ks values between paralogs of each subgroups (Figure 5). Genus Vigna shows one of the highest rate mutation (6.5 × 10−9) among Fabaceae family [35]. The divergence from common ancestor of V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellata occurred 9–10 Mya ([36] time tree reference). Collective Ks values obtained from all five species have shown one major curve of duplication between 6–10 Mya (Ks: 0.08–0.12), suggesting common expansion of NLRome in Vigna genus occurred after speciation. In addition one peak was observed for V. unguiculata and V. radiata between 1–3 Mya (Ks: 0.02–0.05) that suggest that their large scale expansion occurred quite recently. Subgroup G4–G7, G10 CNL and TIR-NLR have been amplified quite rapidly during recent 1–3 Mya leading toward birth of novel genes after speciation.

4. Expression Analysis

We compared the basal expression of NLR genes in V. radiata (PRJNA779876), where the 6 whole transcriptome samples, each from shoot apex and young pods were sequenced. Comparative transcriptome expression analysis have only shown the expression of four NLR genes that belongs to subgroup G4-CNL and CCR-NLR (Figure S2). Overall the expression level was same in shoot apex and young pod tissues. However two genes (Vradi10g02490.1 and Vradi0405s0010.1) have shown higher expression in both tissues. Secondly, we compared the expression levels of NLRs in six different tissues (seeds, roots, stem, leaf, flower and pod) in V. unguiculata. In total 15 genes have shown a significant quantitative expression in all these tissue, which suggest that these five genes are constitutively expressed in all six different tissues type of V. unguiculata. It should be noted that sharp increase in expression levels were observed suggesting that these genes are actively expressed. Genes that have shown active expression in both species belonged to subgroups G4-CNL and CCR-NLR (Figure 6).

5. Discussion

Disease resistance genes especially NLR genes are directly or indirectly interacting with pathogen effector molecules for coordinated defense response [33]. Host-pathogens are under continuous arms race to suppress primary and secondary responses. For this several novel NLR genes tend to evolve as result of duplication, recombination, unequal crossing over and mutation. Extinction of pathogen often lead to death of several NLR genes to maintain host fitness [33]. Among Fabaceae family, several members have been investigated including Dalbergioids, genus Cicer and genus Trifolium [22,32,37]. One common observation, was the importance of crop wild relatives (CWRs) that contain broader and expanded NLRome and conversely domesticated crop species suffers from narrowing of genetic diversity [22,32,37]. Secondly, presence of polyploidy have considerably broaden and expanded the NLRome of allotetraploid species of Arachis and Trifolium [22,32]. However, genus Vigna only contain one polyploid species among 104 member species, yet its members contain highly diversified repertoire of NLR genes.
Findings of this study, suggest that Vigna genus have shown dramatic variation in their NLRome. Especially V. radiata and V. unguiculata have shown rapid expansion of NLRome whereas V. umbellata and V. mungo have shown slower rate of diversification. We employed comprehensive phylogeny, duplication assay, gene gain and loss analysis which suggest that diversification on NLR occurred after the speciation from common ancestor of Vigna between 9–10 Mya [2,36]. And birth of novel genes and terminal duplication are the major reason of the expansion on NLRome V. radiata and V. unguiculata. Duplication analysis further confirms that these two species have undergone a sharp expansion of NLRome during last three million years. In short all five species have shown species specific divergent evolution of NLR genes.
Since, Vigna species have undergone independent domestication in three major geographical regions. V. radiata and V. unguiculata have been domesticated in South Asia and Africa respectively, which could be the reason for their divergent NLR evolution. In addition, recent duplications of NLR genes in these two species allowed us to hypothesized that domestication have favored the expansion of NLRome. However, additional evidence will be required to test this hypothesis. Genome sequence of related wild relatives of V. radiata and V. unguiculata will be required to confirm whether the domestication has broaden the repertoire of NLR genes.

6. Conclusions

Investigation of NLR genes in genus Vigna reveals highly divergent evolution of this superfamily in the cultivated crop members. Common wave of NLRome expansion was observed after speciation from common ancestor. In addition, preferential duplication of CCG10-NLR have been observed in all five members of this genus suggesting a genus specific diversification. Birth of diverse gene families and terminal duplication are putatively main reason for the expansion of NLRome in Vigna species. In our opinion, lack of concerted evolution and specialized evolution of NLR genes occurred among the member of this genus. Recent expansion of NLRome in V. anguiculata and V. radiata might suggest that domestication have support their duplication.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14061129/s1, Figure S1: Comparative selection pressure in each subgroup of five member species of Vigna genus. Figure S2: Expression analysis of NLR genes in V. radiata in two tissue types shoot apex and young pod. Table S1: List of genomic resources of member species of Vigna.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; methodology, J.A. and F.Q.; software, M.Z., H.N., E.N., S.F., A.B., S.T., U.M.; validation, F.S., S.N. and M.S.; formal analysis, J.A., F.Q., H.N., E.N., S.F., S.T., U.M., M.Z. and A.B.; investigation, J.A., S.S. and S.A.; resources, S.S.; data curation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A. and F.Q.; writing—review and editing J.A., S.S., F.Q., H.N., E.N., S.F. and A.B.; visualization, H.N., E.N., S.F. and A.B., supervision, S.A. and S.S., provided support in script development and contributed to the writing and preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R26), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the accession numbers utilized in this study are provided. NLR genes identified in this study are included in the supplementary dataset.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R26), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tomooka, N.; Naito, K.; Kaga, A.; Sakai, H.; Isemura, T.; Ogiso-Tanaka, E.; Iseki, K.; Takahashi, Y. Evolution, Domestication and Neo-Domestication of the Genus Vigna. Plant Genet. Resour. Characterisation Util. 2014, 12, 2011–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Naito, K.; Wakatake, T.; Shibata, T.F.; Iseki, K.; Shigenobu, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Ogiso-Tanaka, E.; Muto, C.; Teruya, K.; Shiroma, A.; et al. Genome Sequence of 12 Vigna Species as a Knowledge Base of Stress Tolerance and Resistance. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lonardi, S.; Muñoz-Amatriaín, M.; Liang, Q.; Shu, S.; Wanamaker, S.I.; Lo, S.; Tanskanen, J.; Schulman, A.H.; Zhu, T.; Luo, M.C.; et al. The Genome of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). Plant J. 2019, 98, 767–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kang, Y.J.; Satyawan, D.; Shim, S.; Lee, T.; Lee, J.; Hwang, W.J.; Kim, S.K.; Lestari, P.; Laosatit, K.; Kim, K.H.; et al. Draft Genome Sequence of Adzuki Bean, Vigna Angularis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, A.K.; Velmurugan, A.; Gupta, D.S.; Kumar, J.; Kesari, R.; Konda, A.; Singh, N.P.; Roy, S.D.; Biswas, U.; Kumar, R.R.; et al. Draft Genome Sequence of a Less-Known Wild Vigna: Beach Pea (V. Marina Cv. ANBp-14-03). Crop J. 2019, 7, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pootakham, W.; Nawae, W.; Naktang, C.; Sonthirod, C.; Yoocha, T.; Kongkachana, W.; Sangsrakru, D.; Jomchai, N.; U-thoomporn, S.; Somta, P.; et al. A Chromosome-Scale Assembly of the Black Gram (Vigna mungo) Genome. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2021, 21, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaul, T.; Easwaran, M.; Thangaraj, A.; Meyyazhagan, A.; Nehra, M.; Raman, N.M.; Verma, R.; Sony, S.K.; Abdel, K.F.; Bharti, J.; et al. De Novo Genome Assembly of Rice Bean (Vigna Umbellata)—A Nominated Nutritionally Rich Future Crop Reveals Novel Insights into Flowering Potential, Habit, and Palatability Centric—Traits for Efficient Domestication. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chaitieng, B.; Kaga, A.; Tomooka, N.; Isemura, T.; Kuroda, Y.; Vaughan, D.A. Development of a Black Gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] Linkage Map and Its Comparison with an Azuki Bean [Vigna Angularis (Willd.) Ohwi and Ohashi] Linkage Map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kongjaimun, A.; Somta, P.; Tomooka, N.; Kaga, A.; Vaughan, D.A.; Srinives, P. QTL Mapping of Pod Tenderness and Total Soluble Solid in Yardlong Bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Subsp. Unguiculata Cv.-Gr. Sesquipedalis]. Euphytica 2013, 189, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seo, E.; Kim, S.; Yeom, S.I.; Choi, D. Genome-Wide Comparative Analyses Reveal the Dynamic Evolution of Nucleotide-Binding Leucine-Rich Repeat Gene Family among Solanaceae Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kahraman, A.; Pandey, A.; Khan, M.K.; Lindsay, D.; Moenga, S.; Vance, L.; Bergmann, E.; Carrasquilla-Garcia, N.; Shin, M.G.; Chang, P.L.; et al. Distinct Subgroups of Cicer Echinospermum Are Associated with Hybrid Sterility and Breakdown in Interspecific Crosses with Cultivated Chickpea. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 3101–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Borrelli, G.M.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Marone, D.; Crosatti, C.; Michelotti, V.; Valè, G.; Mastrangelo, A.M. Regulation and Evolution of NLR Genes: A Close Interconnection for Plant Immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Van Wersch, S.; Li, X. Stronger When Together: Clustering of Plant NLR Disease Resistance Genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Q.; Han, Z.; Jiang, H.; Tian, D.; Yang, S. Strong Positive Selection Drives Rapid Diversification of R-Genes in Arabidopsis Relatives. J. Mol. Evol. 2010, 70, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guo, Y.L.; Fitz, J.; Schneeberger, K.; Ossowski, S.; Cao, J.; Weigel, D. Genome-Wide Comparison of Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine-Rich Repeat-Encoding Genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 757–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Der Hoorn, R.A.L.; De Wit, P.J.G.M.; Joosten, M.H.A.J. Balancing Selection Favors Guarding Resistance Proteins. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kourelis, J.; Sakai, T.; Adachi, H.; Kamoun, S. RefPlantNLR Is a Comprehensive Collection of Experimentally Validated Plant Disease Resistance Proteins from the NLR Family. PLoS Biol. 2021, 19, e3001124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, S.; Park, J.; Yeom, S.I.; Kim, Y.M.; Seo, E.; Kim, K.T.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, J.M.; Cheong, K.; Shin, H.S.; et al. New Reference Genome Sequences of Hot Pepper Reveal the Massive Evolution of Plant Disease-Resistance Genes by Retroduplication. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-Scale Protein Function Classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calle García, J.; Guadagno, A.; Paytuvi-Gallart, A.; Saera-Vila, A.; Amoroso, C.G.; D’esposito, D.; Andolfo, G.; Aiese Cigliano, R.; Sanseverino, W.; Ercolano, M.R.; et al. PRGdb 4.0: An Updated Database Dedicated to Genes Involved in Plant Disease Resistance Process. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D1483–D1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Edgar, R.C. Search and Clustering Orders of Magnitude Faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rani, S.; Zahra, R.; Bakar, A.; Rizwan, M.; Sultan, A.-B.; Zain, M.; Mehmood, A.; Danial, M.; Shakoor, S.; Saleem, F.; et al. Dynamic Evolution of NLR Genes in Dalbergioids. Genes 2023, 14, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quinlan, A.R.; Hall, I.M. BEDTools: A Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 841–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hao, Z.; Lv, D.; Ge, Y.; Shi, J.; Weijers, D.; Yu, G.; Chen, J. RIdeogram: Drawing SVG Graphics to Visualize and Map Genome-Wide Data on the Idiograms. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2020, 6, e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suyama, M.; Torrents, D.; Bork, P. PAL2NAL: Robust Conversion of Protein Sequence Alignments into the Corresponding Codon Alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Suppl. S2), W609–W612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z. KaKs_calculator 3.0: Calculating Selective Pressure on Coding and Non-Coding Sequences. Genomics. Proteom. Bioinform. 2022, 20, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, L.; Dong, Z.; Fang, L.; Luo, Y.; Wei, Z.; Guo, H.; Zhang, G.; Gu, Y.Q.; Coleman-Derr, D.; Xia, Q.; et al. OrthoVenn2: A Web Server for Whole-Genome Comparison and Annotation of Orthologous Clusters across Multiple Species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W52–W58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic Orthology Inference for Comparative Genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paradis, E.; Bolker, B.; Claude, J.; Cuong, H.S.; Desper, R.; Durand, B.; Dutheil, J.; Gascuel, O.; Heibl, C.; Lawson, D.; et al. Ape: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution. Bioinformatics 2014, 20, 289–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mendes, F.K.; Vanderpool, D.; Fulton, B.; Hahn, M.W. CAFE 5 Models Variation in Evolutionary Rates among Gene Families. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 5516–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Areej, A.; Nawaz, H.; Aslam, I.; Danial, M.; Qayyum, Z.; Rasool, U.A.; Asif, J.; Khalid, A.; Serfraz, S.; Saleem, F.; et al. Investigation of NLR Genes Reveals Divergent Evolution on NLRome in Diploid and Polyploid Species in Genus Trifolium. Genes 2023, 14, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Michelmore, R.W.; Meyers, B.C. Clusters of Resistance Genes in Plants Evolve by Divergent Selection and a Birth-and-Death Process. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 1113–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, J.Y.; Xue, J.Y.; Van de Peer, Y. Evolution of NLR Resistance Genes in Magnoliids: Dramatic Expansions of CNLs and Multiple Losses of TNLs. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Peng, J.; Fan, B.; Xu, D.; Wu, J.; Cao, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; et al. High-Quality Genome Assembly and Pan-Genome Studies Facilitate Genetic Discovery in Mung Bean and Its Improvement. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Hedges, S.B. TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tariq, T.; Haider, Z.; Rani, S.; Serfraz, S. Evolution of NLR Genes in Cicer Species Revealed a Dynamic Expansion of the NLRome in C. Echinospermum. 2022; Unpublished article. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Distribution of NLR genes and its subclasses in P. vulgaris, V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellata.
Figure 1. Distribution of NLR genes and its subclasses in P. vulgaris, V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellata.
Genes 14 01129 g001
Figure 2. The NLR genes located on chromosomes are denoted in vertical blue and orange lines, inferring the gene density map between genomes assemblies of three Vigna species.
Figure 2. The NLR genes located on chromosomes are denoted in vertical blue and orange lines, inferring the gene density map between genomes assemblies of three Vigna species.
Genes 14 01129 g002
Figure 3. Reconstruction of phylogenetic relationship between NLR genes superfamily of genus Vigna, using V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellate.
Figure 3. Reconstruction of phylogenetic relationship between NLR genes superfamily of genus Vigna, using V. unguiculata, V. mungo, V. radiata, V. angularis and V. umbellate.
Genes 14 01129 g003
Figure 4. Orthology and birth/death analysis of NLR genes. (A) Venn diagram expressing common ortholog gene cluster found in five species of genus Vigna. (B) Phylogenetic tree expressing number of gained (green) and lost (red) gene families in member species. Number of duplicated genes are added in blue color.
Figure 4. Orthology and birth/death analysis of NLR genes. (A) Venn diagram expressing common ortholog gene cluster found in five species of genus Vigna. (B) Phylogenetic tree expressing number of gained (green) and lost (red) gene families in member species. Number of duplicated genes are added in blue color.
Genes 14 01129 g004
Figure 5. Estimation of NLRome duplication event in the genus Vigna. All five species belonging to the genus Vigna with Ks values of their paralogs are denoted. (A) The vertical axis indicate Ks value and horizontal axis shows frequencies. (B) The generalized observed duplication manner in all species.
Figure 5. Estimation of NLRome duplication event in the genus Vigna. All five species belonging to the genus Vigna with Ks values of their paralogs are denoted. (A) The vertical axis indicate Ks value and horizontal axis shows frequencies. (B) The generalized observed duplication manner in all species.
Genes 14 01129 g005
Figure 6. Comparative expression of NLR genes in 6 different tissues types of V. unguiculata. Here 13 identified NLRs have shown constitutive expression across all tissue types.
Figure 6. Comparative expression of NLR genes in 6 different tissues types of V. unguiculata. Here 13 identified NLRs have shown constitutive expression across all tissue types.
Genes 14 01129 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Asif, J.; Qureshi, F.; Zain, M.; Nawaz, H.; Naz, E.; Fareed, S.; Bibi, A.; Nawaz, S.; Saleem, F.; Shafique, M.; et al. Investigation of Resistance Genes in Genus Vigna Reveals Highly Variable NLRome in Parallel Domesticated Member Species. Genes 2023, 14, 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061129

AMA Style

Asif J, Qureshi F, Zain M, Nawaz H, Naz E, Fareed S, Bibi A, Nawaz S, Saleem F, Shafique M, et al. Investigation of Resistance Genes in Genus Vigna Reveals Highly Variable NLRome in Parallel Domesticated Member Species. Genes. 2023; 14(6):1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Asif, Jehanzaib, Fatima Qureshi, Muhammad Zain, Hamza Nawaz, Effat Naz, Shahid Fareed, Aqsa Bibi, Sehar Nawaz, Fozia Saleem, Muhammad Shafique, and et al. 2023. "Investigation of Resistance Genes in Genus Vigna Reveals Highly Variable NLRome in Parallel Domesticated Member Species" Genes 14, no. 6: 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop