Next Article in Journal
Head Size in Phelan–McDermid Syndrome: A Literature Review and Pooled Analysis of 198 Patients Identifies Candidate Genes on 22q13
Next Article in Special Issue
Cellular Transcriptomics of Carboplatin Resistance in a Metastatic Canine Osteosarcoma Cell Line
Previous Article in Journal
PeCLH2 Gene Positively Regulate Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Populus alba × Populus glandulosa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Loss of Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity despite Population Growth: The Legacy of Past Wolf Population Declines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/genes14030539
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

History of Polish Canidae (Carnivora, Mammalia) and Their Biochronological Implications on the Eurasian Background

by
Adrian Marciszak
1,*,
Aleksandra Kropczyk
1,
Wiktoria Gornig
1,
Małgorzata Kot
2,
Adam Nadachowski
3 and
Grzegorz Lipecki
3
1
Department of Paleozoology, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland
2
Faculty of Archaeology, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland
3
Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(3), 539; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030539
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Canine Genetics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The remains of 12 canid species that date back ca. 4.9 myr have been found at 116 paleontological localities. Among these localities, eight are dated to the Pliocene age, 12 are dated to the Early Pleistocene age, 12 are from the Middle Pleistocene age, while the most numerous group includes 84 sites from the Late Pleistocene–Holocene age. Some, especially older forms such as Eucyon odessanus and Nyctereutes donnezani, have only been found at single sites, while the remains of species from the genus Lycaon, Canis and Vulpes have been recorded at numerous sites from the last 2 myr. Ancient canids such as Eucyon and Nyctereutes had already vanished from Poland in the Earliest Pleistocene, between 2.5 and 2.2 myr ago. Poland’s extant canid fauna is characterised by the presence of two new species, which spread into the territory due to a human introduction (Nyctereutes procyonoides) or natural expansion (Canis aureus). Research indicates a strong competition between dogs, especially between Lycaon, Canis and Cuon, with a strong lycaon-limiting effect on the wolf between 2.5 and 0.4 myr ago. After the extinction of Lycaon lycaonoides, Canis lupus evolved rapidly, increasing in number and size, and taking over the niche occupied by Lycaon. In order to reduce competition, the body size of Cuon alpinus gradually reduced, and it became an animal adapted to the forest, highland and mountain environments. Generally, the history of canids in Poland is similar to that known of Eurasia with some noteworthy events, such as the early occurrence of Canis cf. etruscus from Węże 2 (2.9–2.6 myr ago), Lycaon falconeri from Rębielice Królewskie 1A or one of the latest occurrences of L. lycaonoides from Draby 3 (430–370 kyr). Predominantly lowland or upland in the southern part and devoid of significant ecological barriers, Poland is also an important migration corridor in the East–West system. This 500–600 km wide corridor was the Asian gateway to Europe, from where species of an eastern origin penetrated the continent’s interior. In colder periods, it was in turn a region through which boreal species or those associated with the mammoth steppe retreated.

1. Introduction

A biostratigraphical and paleoecological analysis of Europe’s faunal changes would not be complete without including representatives of the Canidae family. Abundant and well-represented in the Plio–Pleistocene, they played an important ecological role among carnivoran guilds and were high-level competitors. Their appearance and dispersal were considered among the main bioevents and thus are important biochronological markers that can be correlated with main European faunal turnovers [1]. Among them, the most well-known is the “wolf-event”, used for the expansion of the wolves or at least wolf-like dogs into Europe ca. 2 myr [2,3,4,5]. Recently, it has been discovered that members of the genus Canis appeared in Europe much earlier, with the oldest occurrence from the French site Vialette, dated at 3.2–3.1 myr old [6,7,8,9]. This event is followed by high taxonomic diversity during the Early to Middle Pleistocene and, later, by a specific lineage with high size variation during the Middle and Late Pleistocene [1].
Similar to other widely distributed mammals, canids demonstrate a high morphological and size (clinal) variability. This is, however, often underestimated and leads to the creation of multiple taxa from a biogeographical basis. The body size of canids can be inferred from the size of anatomical elements such as teeth and bones. Canids’ geographical distributions are particularly wide across the earth. They cover Africa, both Americas, Eurasia and, as introduced, also Australia [1]. Such wide distributions cover several distinct climates and vegetation environments. This often implies a morphological, biometrical and genetic variability for the species, expressed as subspecies or geographical variants in taxonomy. The morphology and body size are among the two main analytical parameters of canids.
However, despite their remains being commonly found across Poland, contrary to other carnivores such as ursids and cats, canids as a group have never been an object of intensive, comprehensive study. The Polish territory has not usually been considered an area that yielded fossils of Canidae. The presence of different canids, mostly C. lupus remains, in a Polish territory had already been mentioned as of the 19th century [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, apart from a few articles [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], Polish canids have only rarely been the subject of detailed scientific interest. These previously mentioned publications are purely descriptive and deal with faunal assemblages or isolated finds. Wolsan [28,29,30] was the first to publish comprehensive papers on all canids. These studies included a list of sites and plentiful descriptions of fossil remains. In these papers, however, there is no reference to any biochronological scheme and the lists of taxa are often incomplete. This study is the first comprehensive account of all known records of canids from Poland and the data presented are a result of an extensive revision. The work includes both quantitative and qualitative updates; however, it is neither exhaustive nor complete. It is very likely that there are still many finds that have not been reported to scientific institutions or museums, or else remain in private collections. They were often found by local reserchers and may have been sold on account of their great value and rarity. The material from some localities, e.g., caves of Połom or Węże 1, is scattered over many museums and private collections and it still contains hundreds of bones of different species to be further studied. This broad query and revision caused multiple new findings and descriptions of new taxa in Polish fossil theriofauna, e.g., C. alpinus [31].
This paper considers the importance of the morphology and the body size of canids from Poland on the European background. As a country, Poland is characterised by high regional peculiarities and regarded as an important, ecological corridor, especially in the east–west, geographical orientation. In the following paper, the canid remains from Poland were placed in a biochronological, European framework. The contribution of canids as biochronological taxa is also discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

The geologic timescale and subdivisions were based on the International Chronostratigraphic Chart (v2018/08) “http://www.stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale (accessed on 6 Janurary 2023)” [32,33,34,35]. The biochronological division of Canidae is based on three main parameters: (1) the evolutionary stage, (2) the composition of the mammal assemblages in terms of genera and species and (3) the first appearance (FAD—First Appearance Datum) and last appearance (LAD—Last Appearance Datum) of the particular taxa. A δ18O curve is based on a benthic curve proposed by Lisiecki and Raymo [36]. A detailed list of Polish localities, with a list of species recorded at the site, age and full citation was given in File S1.
The nomenclatural codification follows the 4th edition of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999). Capital and lowercase letters, C/c (canines), I/i (incisors), P/p (premolars) and M/m (molars), refer to upper and lower teeth, respectively. The biochronology of the Mammal Ages was based on the macromammal assemblages [32,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].

3. Results

3.1. General Remarks

Canid remains were found in 116 Polish paleontological localities, dated ca. 4.9 myr (Figure 1; Table 1). Among them, 8 were dated to the Pliocene, 12 were dated to the Early Pleistocene, 12 were of the Middle Pleistocene age, while the most numerous group had 84 localities from the Late Pleistocene–Holocene. The presence of members of at least 12 species and 16 chronoforms was documented in Polish territories (Figure 1; Table 1). The obtained AMS dates directly confirmed the occurrence of C. lupus, C. a. europaeus, V. vulpes and V. lagopus in the chronological framework (Table 2).
The intense industrialisation of Western Poland in the second half of the 19th century and thus a significant intensification of earthworks resulted in an increase in the number of findings. These works included, among others, the railway and road infrastructure, the development of towns and villages, as well as a broad-based action of the drainage and regulation of water courses. Additionally, the growing interest in the archaeological research of caves and the exploitation of their sediments for producing fertilisers provided a significant amount of the material. Due to their accidental character, the exact location and stratigraphical context of those findings are usually scarce, if present at all. The accumulation of remains may be an outcome of natural or catastrophic death, slope or fluvial processes, activity of carnivores and some additional factors. The materials from the Polish open-air sites were most likely accumulated through natural processes. In addition, with the exception of Kraków-Spadzista, there is no evidence of human activity. A vast majority of the canid remains were found in localities concentrated in Southern Poland (Figure 1).

3.2. Neogene

The Polish records of Neogene canids are relatively rare and consist of a few specimens in isolated occurrences. The oldest known canids from Poland are the undetermined remains of a Canidae indet. of Podlesice and layers 4-5 of Mała Cave, dated on MN 14 (4.9–4.2 myr old) (Figure 1). In a few other sites such as Ewy Cave, Raciszyn 1 and Mokra 1, all dated at MN 15b (3.8–3.4 myr old), the remains probably belonging to Nyctereutes sp. have been found. Similarly dated, the only Polish occurrences of Eucyon cf. odessanus and N. donnezani were documented at Węże 1 (3.8–3.4 myr old) [20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,52]. The previously reported presence of Canis at Węże 1 [26] was not confirmed [27]. The fauna located nearby at Węże 2 differs significantly from that of Węże 1 and includes species characteristics for the MN 16b, e.g., [53]. Taking into consideration the whole faunal assemblage, the latest Pliocene age (~2.9–2.6 myr ago) was proposed for this locality [28,54,55]. At Węże 2, the oldest and first occurrences of Canis cf. etruscus and Vulpes cf. alopecoides were found [56].

3.3. Quaternary

Since the earliest Pleistocene, the number of Polish records of canids has considerably risen. Ancient lineages from the genera Eucyon and Nyctereutes disappeared, while new large, social canids appeared. The oldest Polish record of the genus Lycaon is represented by sole M1 of considerable size of the L. falconeri from Rębielice Królewskie 1A (2.4–2.2 myr old). The known remains of C. etruscus and V. alopecoides have been found at only a few other, similarly dated (2.4–2.0 myr old) localities such as Zamkowa Dolna Cave (fauna A), Kielniki 3B, Kadzielnia and Mokra 2.
Approximately 2 Myr into the Polish fossil record, V. praeglacialis appeared with the oldest occurrence from Kadzielnia (2.2–1.8 myr old) and Kamyk (1.9–1.8 myr old) [28,29,30]. In localities dated between 1.9 and 1.7 myr ago, such as Kadzielnia, Kamyk, Kielniki 3B and Przymiłowice 3A, very little material (mostly isolated teeth) of C. etrusus, classified previously as Canis sp., has been discovered and mentioned [28,29,30]. The abundant material of canids has been found in Żabia Cave (1.7–1.5 myr old), represented by L. falconeri, C. etrusus, V. praeglacialis, and Vulpes praecorsac Kormos, 1932. The remains of both foxes, although in smaller numbers, have also been found in younger sites, dated at 1.5–1.2 myr old, such as Kielniki 1, Przymiłowice and Zalesiaki A. A few of them were also found dated on the late Early Pleistocene fauna C from Zamkowa Dolna Cave [28,29,30]. Between 1.7 and 1.5 myr ago, C. etrusus was replaced in the fossil record by C. mosbachensis, which makes it the oldest record of this species from Poland. Similarly, L. lycaonoides replaced L. falconeri, and the remains of both large canids have been found in Przymiłowice from Zalesiaki A and in fauna C from Zamkowa Dolna Cave.
The early Middle Pleistocene is less represented than the Early Pleistocene in Polish biochronology and only three sites have been documented for this period. From the most known, Kozi Grzbiet (800–700 Kyr), the remains of L. lycaonoides, C. mosbachensis and V. praeglacialis have been found [28,29,30,57]. The same canid composition was found in Południowa Cave, which is currently the only Sudeten locality of the Middle Pleistocene age [58]. It is also the site with the oldest record of V. v. angustidens. This chronosubspecies from ca. 700 kyr began being a constant member of Polish and European paleoguilds [57]. C. mosbachensis is also present in slightly younger (600–500 Kyr) localities such as Sitkówka and Rębielice Królewskie 2, which is also the last occurrence of V. praeglacialis in Poland.
From the biochronological viewpoint, what are especially valuable are two Polish sites documented from the late Middle Pleistocene. Canid remains, dated at ~550–450 Kyr from Tunel Wielki Cave, consist of L. lycaonoides, C. mosbachensis, C. a. priscus and V. vulpes ssp. and show not only the first appearance of dhole in Poland [59], but also the environment before and slightly during the massive glaciation of MIS 12. The second site, Draby 3 (MIS 11), is similarly intriguing. For L. lycaonoides and C. mosbachensis it is the latest and relict record not only in Poland, but also in the whole of Eurasia, especially for the Lycaon. After MIS 11, no sites with remains of L. lycaonoides are known elsewhere [60].
Dated at MIS 9, the oldest appearance of C. l. lunellensis in a slender and relatively small form was documented in the lowermost layers of Biśnik Cave. This first, true wolf was, however, larger and more robust than C. mosbachensis from Tunel Wielki Cave or Draby 3. In those layers, C. a. priscus, V. vulpes and V. lagopus also occurred [61]. The last is also the first Polish appearance and specimens from these layers are characterised by the presence of numerous, intermediate features that were still far away from those known in the Late Pleistocene individuals. From similarly dated (MIS 9) layers 1-V of Deszczowa Cave came a similar canid composition with some differences. Isolated M1 from layers V of Deszczowa Cave was classified as C. a. fossilis [31]. Small, gracile C. l. lunellensis and V. vulpes are morphologically very similar to those from contemporary layers of Biśnik Cave. The remains of a smaller fox strongly resembled V. praeglacialis [31,62,63,64], which may suggest an even older age.
From dated MIS 8 sediments of the Sudeten sites, Naciekowa and Wschodnia Cave, came the first record of large C. lupus, metrically and morphologically comparable with the extant, Polish grey wolf [65,66]. Both records are regarded as among the oldest of large-bodied wolves in Europe and probably documented an eastern immigration to Central Europe. On average, the Polish wolves from the period of MIS 7-5e, similar to those from the lowermost part of Wierzchowska Górna Cave, layers 18-15 of Nietoperzowa Cave, layers 18-14 of Biśnik Cave, layers 4-3 of Dziadowa Skała Cave or lowermost horizon of Komarowa Cave, are slightly smaller than the extant, Polish C. lupus [66].
The period of MIS 7-5e is also the time when the canid fauna finally formed the composition known today, including C. lupus, V. vulpes and V. lagopus [24,28,58,67,68], and rarely C. a. europaeus, whose presence was confirmed from a few Late Pleistocene sites [31]. These canids are common and permanent members of the Late Pleistocene, Polish palaeofaunas, and their presence is documented by numerous cave and open-air sites across the country [24,28,58,67,68]. Additionally, from a few sites such as Rogóżka Cave or layers 7-5 of Biśnik Cave, the presence of Vulpes corsac was confirmed for the first time in Poland. This adds a fifth canid species and this small fox was an eastern immigrant. Its presence in the fossil record is an indicator of open areas such as the steppe tundra.
Although the species composition is essentially unchanged in the Late Pleistocene, during the last 100 Kyr, there are marked fluctuations in body size, especially in the case of C. lupus [58,66,67,68]. Canids’ body size appears to have been profoundly influenced by the harsh environmental conditions that were present, with a larger size potentially being a Bergman response to the severely cold climate. This, in combination with the strong competition with other larger carnivores, was very likely responsible for the substantial increase in size of C. lupus. Alongside the normal-sized individuals, dimensionally comparable with the extant Polish C. lupus, such as those from Cave no 4 on Mount Birów, Raj Cave, Kraków-Spadzista or Borsuka Cave [24,58,67,68,69], particularly large and robust individuals commonly appeared. In some, especially Sudeten (Radochowska, Obok Wschodniej Cave, Niedźwiedzia Cave) and those from Kraków-Częstochowa Upland such as the layers 7-5 from Biśnik Cave localities, whole populations were significantly larger than the extant C. lupus [58,66,67]. Maybe they were not so common, but these huge wolves have been found in some open-air sites, located in Polish lowlands [67,70,71,72]. The presence of these great wolves, referred to as C. l. spelaeus, is traditionally linked with the cooler phases of the Late Pleistocene. Their occurrence from multiple Polish sites is documented until the end of MIS 2.
Since MIS 3, the occurrence of C. lupus, C. a. europaeus, V. vulpes and V. lagopus is additionally directly confirmed by a series of AMS dates (Table 2). Among them, the dated 44.3-43 call Kyr record of C. a. europaeus from Radochowska Cave [31] or the occurrence of the huge C. l. spelaeus in Niedźwiedzia Cave during the cold period 31.2–30.2 call Kyr are especially noteworthy (Table 2). They also indicate that the cold-adapted V. lagopus survived until the late part of MIS 2 (Table 2) and the last known specimens dated ~13.8–13.7 call Kyr [63,73,74]. It probably retreated to the east and north from the Polish territory during the Early Holocene. From MIS 1, the remains of C. l. spelaeus and V. corsac are also already unknown. In general, like numerous other carnivores, C. lupus and V. vulpes cannot be grouped in a typical ‘Pleistocene’ or ‘Holocene’ faunal community. The extreme, ecological adaptability of both canids means that, in their case, we cannot talk about the recolonisation of the Polish territory after the retreat of the ice sheet. They just continued their presence in Poland, maybe only increasing in density due to the warming of the climate and expansion of various, preferable habitats.
For almost the whole Holocene, C. lupus and V. vulpes were at the core of canid fauna in Poland [24,28]. C. l. familiaris joined these species (Linnaeus, 1758). Their remains from Poland are not older than the Mesolithic, and shortly after, domestic dogs started to be the most commonly recorded canid from the archaeozoological sites [75,76]. Holocene records of C. lupus and V. vulpes are also common and widespread, and their presence has been confirmed from numerous cave and open-air sites [24,58,67,68,69] as well as from archaeozoological localities [75]. Finally, in the last 70 years, two new species of canids have appeared in Poland. The extant N. procyonoides (Gray, 1834) came to Poland in 1955 from areas of Belarus, Lithuania and Ukraine. In Finland, they were recorded for the first time in 1935, in Sweden in 1945–46, Romania in 1952, Slovakia in 1959, Germany and Hungary in 1961–62 and Norway in 1983. The first specimens were observed in and around the Białowieża Primeval Forest (NE Poland) and Hrubieszów in the Zamość region (SE Poland) [77,78,79,80,81,82]. N. procyonoides spread into the Polish territory in the NE to SW direction. Until the 1980s, their geographical range covered almost the entire area to the east of the Wisła river. By the early 1990s, the species had been recorded in almost the whole of Poland. The expansion was the result of finding a free ecological niche with favourable biotope conditions [82,83]. In 2015, in Poland for the first time appeared the golden jackal C. aureus Linnaeus, 1758 [84]. The records suggest a natural expansion into Poland, probably from different source populations [84].
Table
Table 2. AMS radiocarbon dating results of canids from Polish sites. All new dates were calibrated using the programme IntCal 20 according to [85]. Within the text, only calibrated data were used.
Table 2. AMS radiocarbon dating results of canids from Polish sites. All new dates were calibrated using the programme IntCal 20 according to [85]. Within the text, only calibrated data were used.
SpeciesSiteBoneLab. Code%C%N14C AgeCal. BP 95.4%Source
C. a. europaeusRadochowska CavemaxillaMAMS-48222 *45.7 40.480 ± 38044.310–42.960[31]
V. vulpesObłazowa 2mandibleOxA-3696 33.430 ± 123038.885–37,675[86]
V. vulpesCave 4 on Mt BirówmandiblePoz-272799.93.527.980 ± 22032.048–31.681[69]
C. l. spelaeusNiedźwiedzia CavecostaePoz-14382110.01.826.640 ± 29031.078–30.858new
V. lagopusDeszczowa Cave, l. VIIaradiusPoz-261268.82.924.620 ± 20029.038–28.736[63]
V. vulpesDeszczowa Cave, l. VIIahumerusPoz-234377.31.524.470 ± 26028.824–28.628[87]
V. lagopusKraków-SpadzistamaxillaPoz-287348.02.824.640 ± 16029.061–28.753[88]
V. lagopusObłazowa Cave, l. 7femurPoz-2268613.13.023.500 ± 23027.827–27.627[87]
V. lagopusKraków-SpadzistamandiblePoz-287336.61.923.150 ± 19027.590–27.274[88]
V. lagopusDeszczowa Cave, l. VIIIahumerusPoz-2507510.23.322.530 ± 16027.091–26.868[63]
V. vulpesDeszczowa Cave, l. VIIIatibiaPoz-226667.01.220.280 ± 13024.535–24,188[87]
V. lagopusKraków-SpadzistamandiblePoz-51377 *** 178.70 ± 11021.906–21,456[89]
V. lagopusJasna Strzegowska CavemandiblePoz-2420516.75.114.400 ± 8017.784–17,375new
V. lagopusNad Potoczkiem CavemandiblePoz-2364616.64.213.560 ± 7016.487–16,267new
V. lagopusWilczyceTooth **OxA-16728 13.180 ± 6015.928–15,710[74]
V. lagopusKrucza Skała Shelter, l. 2-4mandiblePoz-272457.12.112.970 ± 6015.634–15,364[63]
V. lagopusKrucza Skała Shelter, l. 1mandiblePoz-272467.72.212.920 ± 6015.577–15,316[73]
V. lagopusCave 4 on Mt BirówmandiblePoz-2724410.33.712.590 ± 6015.114–14,926[69]
V. lagopusPuchacza Skała SheltermandiblePoz-272609.52.4123.00 ± 7014.328–14,132new
V. lagopusWilczyceboneUa-15723 11.890 ± 10513.797–13,747[74]
* in Marciszak [31] under the working number REVA-3413. ** perforated arctic fox tooth, pendant. *** The possibility of some contamination affecting the results cannot be excluded.

4. Discussion

4.1. Large Canids: Genus Eucyon, Lycaon, Canis and Cuon

The earliest advanced member of the tribe Canini Fischer, 1817 is the genus Eucyon. Its origin is identified in North America [90], where it appeared in the fossil record ca. 12 myr [90,91]. During a westward dispersal in the Miocene, the Eucyon species appeared in Central Asia [92], Europe [93,94,95] and Africa [96,97]. This was not a single event and during the late Miocene, a number of taxa migrated between North America and Africa and Eurasia [93,94,95,98,99,100].
Eucyon cipio (Crusafont Pairó, 1950) was the first canine from Eurasia, known from the dated MN 12 (~7.9–6.9 myr ago) Iberian sites, Concud and Los Mansuetos [93,94,95,101,102,103,104,105]. The dental morphology is primitive and suggestive of a taxon at an early stage of evolution before the differentiation of the genus Canis. Eucyon gave rise to the first representative of Canis ~6.5–6.0 myr ago in North America and did not survive into the late Miocene [91,95,106]. Contrary to that, in the Pliocene in Eurasia, the genus reached a relatively high diversity. In Europe its latest occurrence was documented from ~3.8–3.4 myr sites, Saint-Estève (France), La Calera 1 (Spain) and Red Crag (England) [93,94,95,102,105,107,108]. The material from these sites represents the jackal-sized Eucyon adoxus (Martin, 1973). The Eastern European, more or less, contemporary records from Moldova, Ukraine, Greece and Turkey were assigned to E. odessanus (Odintzov, 1967) [94,95,109]. To this group, a new Polish record from Węże 1 has recently been added, which is among the latest Eucyon occurrences. It still survived until the latest Pliocene (~2.8–2.7 myr ago) in Central Asia, Morocco and Turkey [92,95,110].
The extinction of the Eucyons in the latest Pliocene is correlated in time with the appearance of the first representatives of the genus Canis and Lycaon in Eurasia. Firstly, they appeared in Central Asia 3.4–3.3 myr ago (Figure 2) [60,94], while the earliest European record from the French site Vialette is dated at 3.2–3.1 myr old [6,7,8,9]. This implies that these wolf-sized forms appeared in Eurasia practically simultaneously in Asia and Europe. The Hungarian locality Osztramos 8 is slightly younger (2.8–2.6 myr old) [106]. It is known that Eucyon gave rise to Canis 6.5–6.0 myr ago in North America [95,101,106]. This scenario in Europe, like the evolution in situ, also cannot be entirely ruled out. The westward invasion of Canis dogs put an end to domination, especially as they emerged in a larger, social and much more advanced form. Here, it can be also added that any of the so-called “jackal” lineages such as Canis arnensis Del Campana, 1913 (and all related forms) never reached Polish territory. They were widespread across Southern Europe during the late Villafranchian and were replaced by C. mosbachensis 1.6–1.5 myr ago [111].
Shortly after the early wolves in Europe appeared, canids from the genus Lycaon, dominated ecosystems for the next 2 myr. Canids from the genus Lycaon appeared in Europe ~2.6 myr ago in a robust build and great-sized form, which did not particularly change for the next 2 myr [112]. Admittedly, their ancestor, Sinicuon dubius (Teilhard de Chardin, 1940), from the Tibetan region Zanda Basin dated at 3.8–3.4 myr ago, was the size of a large dhole C. alpinus (L m1 = 22.5 mm) [112,113,114,115,116,117,118]; their descendants were much larger and were similar in size to or exceeded the largest extant wolves [31]. The individuals from the oldest European record of Perrier-Roccaneyra (France; 2.6–2.5 myr old) already had the morphology and size characteristics of the Early Pleistocene Lycaones [112]. As shown in the analysis of the size variation over time, the dimensions of the Lycaon underwent only slight changes. It was a member of a quite stable paleoguild of ancient carnivores, including C. etruscus, Ursus etruscus Cuvier, 1823, Homotherium latidens (Owen, 1846), Panthera gombaszoegensis (Kretzoi, 1938), Acinonyx pardinensis (Croizet & Joubert, 1828), Puma pardoides (Owen, 1846), Pachycrocuta brevirostris (Gervais, 1850), Chasmaporthetes lunensis lunensis (Del Campana, 1914) and Pliocrocuta perrieri (Croizet and Jobert, 1828) [119,120,121,122]. Among them, L. falconeri held a very high position and, when grouped, was regarded among the dominant carnivore species [119,120,121,122].
Known from the late Pliocene, the relatively long-lived and seemingly fairly stable European carnivore guild during the Early Pleistocene was changing. P. brevirostris replaced P. perrieri and larger canids replaced Ch. lunensis [122,123,124,125]. In the habitats previously dominated by large hyenas, the social, highly intelligent, easily adaptable and aggressive canids from the genuses Canis and Lycaon emerged. They dominated these ecological niches for the next 2 myr. L. falconeri and the latter L. lycaonoides were as large or larger than the extant largest C. lupus [31,60]. Their great size and social behaviour were advantageous in the competition with Canis and Ch. lunensis. As an active social hunter, Ch. lunensis suffered mainly from the retrieval of prey, just as in extant times L. pictus often lost its prey to Cr. crocuta. Although Ch. lunensis had no counterpart among hyenas in extant faunas and is closest to L. pictus, many analogies can be found. In sufficiently numerous packs, L. pictus coped well in competition with Cr. crocuta and Parahyaena brunnea (Thunberg, 1820). Even the extant, relatively small packs of L. pictus were able to successfully compete in the habitats dominated by Cr. crocuta. However, as noted by Eaton [126], these data originate from recent populations in which the pack size of Lycaones appears to have been much smaller than in the early part of this century and before. Thus, historically, wild dogs were probably dominant to spotted hyenas.
Ch. lunensis was comparable in size to the modern Cr. crocuta but was much more lightly built, probably weighing at least 30% less. As research shows, a massive body structure is one of the factors that guarantees an advantage in aggressive encounters with other carnivorans of a similar size [127,128]. Examples include the Panthera spelaea fossilis (von Reichenau, 1906) and H. latidens [31,129], P. gombaszoegensis and A. pardinensis in the Pleistocene or the extant C. lupus and Hyaena hyaena (Linnaeus, 1758). We suggest that Ch. lunensis was not powerful enough to successfully compete with the pair of effective cursorial hunters such as L. falconeri and C. etruscus. As a result, this hyena disappeared as one of the first large carnivores ca. 1.8–1.6 myr ago. Contrary to Ch. lunensis, immense and extremely robust P. brevirostris was powerful enough to successfully compete not only with those canids, but also with H. latidens and P. gombaszoegensis [130,131,132].
A more marked increase in body size is noticeable from the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 0.8 myr ago) as a possible response to the increasing competition from the side of two great newcomers of African origin. Their appearance led to a complete reconstruction of the fauna of carnivores. The first to appear was Crocuta crocuta ssp., which quickly led to the extinction of P. brevirostris [31,121,123,130,131,132]. Shortly afterwards, the huge P. s. fossilis (von Reichenau, 1906) appeared, which led to a drastic decline in numbers and almost the complete disappearance of H. latidens and P. gombaszoegensis [64,133,134].
The Polish records from the genus Canis and Lycaon are slightly younger than the oldest European occurrences but still showed an early appearance of these canids (Figure 2). The oldest Canis is known from Węże 2 (2.9–2.6 myr ago), while the oldest Lycaon was found in Rębielice Królewskie 1A (2.6–2.2 myr ago). For the next 2 myr, the presence of the pair of two large canids in the fossil records, the larger Lycaon and smaller wolf, has been well documented across Eurasia by a number of localities [31,60,112,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170]. Of these two, the long-legged Lycaon was much larger than the wolf and dominated the open grasslands. It had short, broad jaws and massive dentition, ideal for crushing and slicing [159]. In its lifestyle and hunting behaviour, L. lycaonoides was similar to the extant Lycaon. Long, slender legs allowed it long and persistent chases, due to which the tired prey was killed by evisceration [60,153,156,159,166]. The larger size of L. lycaonoides and its more robust build allowed it to hunt much larger prey. They also positively influenced the competition with other carnivores [153]. This canid occupied a particular area of the morphospace that is unlike any extant species [112]. It was capable of bringing down very large prey. The carcass would have been eaten whole, thanks to the sturdy dentognathic features.
The mighty L. lycaonoides was accompanied by the small C. mosbachensis. The slender build and small size of this canid were almost identical to the extant Arabian or Indian wolf [60,146,147,153,156,169,171]. It was probably more flexible ecologically and better adapted to changing conditions than the Eurasian Lycaon. By about 1.5 myr ago, members of the genus Canis lived in the shadow of the dominant L. lycaonoides (Figure 2). Relationships between these two canids were probably similar to the extant relationship between C. lupus and Canis latrans Say, 1823 in North America [172].
During the latest Early Pleistocene, robust C. a. priscus joined L. lycaonoides and C. mosbachensis (Thenius, 1954). Being of an intermediate size between L. lycaonoides and C. mosbachensis, the massive and short-legged dhole was adapted to life in the mountains, forest and upland areas. Being smaller than most of the larger carnivores, its in-group cooperation compensated for its lack of size. Extant dholes lived in packs of up to several dozen individuals [173]. C. a. priscus found favourable habitats, as evidenced by the increasing number of sites at which its remains have been found over time [174]. L. lycaonoides dominated the open lands, while C. a. priscus tended to prefer forests, mountains and highlands. C. mosbachensis coexisted in all these environments, trying to minimise competition with other canids by avoiding them or living in habitats less suited to them [171]. Today, the dhole and the small Indian wolf coexist quite well in Southeast Asia. The cases of aggression between them are rare [175]. C. a. priscus and C. mosbachensis, which had similar body sizes, probably had similar relationships. Relationships between the Eurasian Lycaon and the primitive dhole are more difficult to reconstruct, even if it has been suggested that L. lycaonoides was outcompeted by a primitive dhole in some isolated areas such as Java [176,177]. L. lycaonoides probably had a negative impact on the wolf population. The much more numerous but smaller C. mosbachensis could be actively killed and driven away from carcasses by a larger Lycaon, as larger canids usually dominated smaller species [178].
The earliest appearance of C. a. priscus is dated to the mid-Middle Pleistocene ca. 600–550 kyr ago [146,148,179,180]. Recent revisions show that material morphologically similar to large, robust dholes is also present in a few older European sites dated between 0.9 and 0.7 myr ago. Cuon has an Asian origin [118,146,181,182,183,184,185,186,187]. Since the genus has a common ancestor with Lycaon, the similarity between the Middle Pleistocene Cuon and Lycaon is sometimes so close that their bones have often been confused in the past. The largest individuals of C. a. priscus, such as those from Mosbach 2 or Petralona Cave, metrically matched with the smallest specimens of L. lycaonoides from Vallparadis [169].
Up to MIS 12, L. lycaonoides was widespread across Eurasia, but in a younger period (MIS 11), its occurrence was noted only rarely [60]. The only undisputed occurrences of L. lycaonoides from that time are the Polish site Draby 3 and (probably) the Hungarian site Vertesszöllös 2 [188]. Most likely during MIS 12, the combination of the influences of the harsh climate, changes in the ungulate fauna and increasing competition with Cr. spelaea and P. s. fossilis resulted in a drastic reduction in the number and range of L. lycaonoides. It was probably a similar process to what was noted in the 19th and 20th centuries for L. pictus in sub-Saharan Africa [189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198]. The balance between carnivores was disturbed, and a certain critical point in the L. lycaonoides–C. mosbachensis relationship was exceeded. Between 450 and 400 kyr ago, the Eurasian Lycaon was already too rare to be a real competitor and a limiting factor for the wolf. As soon as L. lycaonoides disappeared in Eurasia, a distinct increase in the number of sites and size of the wolf was observed (Figure 3; 1, 60, 153, 198). The obtained results of the estimated wolf body weight for a wolf from 2.0–0.5 myr ago show a significant similarity, regardless of age or geographic distances. The resulting estimates between different populations from that period are remarkably similar to one another. Taking into consideration their difference in age as well as regional distances, the apparent temporal and regional stability in size during the Early and Middle Pleistocene is notable [199,200].
In this matter, the two Polish records from Tunel Wielki Cave and Draby 3 are especially noteworthy. The first, from Tunel Wielki Cave, dated at MIS 13-12, documented the time where all three large canids, L. lycaonoides, C. a. priscus and C. mosbachensis, still occurred together spatially and temporally [59]. It is also the last time when Lycaones was still widespread across Europe and before the massive glacial age of MIS 12, which was critical and crucial for the disappearance of this species in Eurasia [31]. In turn, Draby 3 showed the world already after this massive glaciation a strongly rebuilt fauna. This record represents the latest, relict occurrence of L. lycaonoides. The rich faunal assemblage of Tunel Wielki Cave is characteristic of mixed open grassland, closed woodland and aquatic environments based on the presence of numerous grazer animals. The presence of numerous thermophilus taxa indicate warmer-than-present interglacial conditions [59,201]. The assemblages from the younger Draby are also characterised by temperate conditions. The assemblage suggests the presence of a temperate climatic episode within a single complex interglacial period (Figure 3).
The climatic complexity of the Middle Pleistocene of Poland was characterised by multiple temperate episodes. Even though the assemblages investigated here represent the overall temperate interglacial conditions, the time interval was characterised by notable climatic upheavals. Following the Mid-Pleistocene Revolution (~1.2 myr ago), Northern Europe began to experience the first major land-based glaciations, with 100 kyr eccentricity-dominated glacial-interglacial cycles fully established ca. 800 kyr ago [201]. A notably cold period of MIS 22 was the first major cold event that led to substantial continental ice volumes equivalent to the later Pleistocene glaciations (e.g., MIS 16, 12, 6 and 4-2) [201,202]. However, periodical climatic fluctuations seem to have had a minimal effect on the C. mosbachensis body size over time. A slight size variation between different populations may have arisen from regional differences in the climate and environment. Temporal stability in the C. mosbachensis body mass occurred in concert with palaeodietary stability in the same Pleistocene populations [199,200,203].
The period between 400 and 300 kyr ago was a time when the dhole and the wolf were still close in body size, but the situation changed. The wolf slowly increased in size, reaching the sizes known today, and the number of individuals in packs grew to several dozen [1,144,198,204]. The wolf became the dominant canid in Eurasian ecosystems and took over a niche occupied so far by the Lycaon [31,171]. It was also the time when the first true wolves C. l. lunellensis appeared [1,144,186,198]. This process occurred both as the evolution in situ from C. mosbachensis and also as a replacement by these new wolves [205]. The process has most probably an irregular character. From contemporary, European localities, the remains of wolves were determined once as C. mosbachensis and once as C. lupus [154,165,181,182,186,188,206,207,208]. Some authors favoured the hypothesis that it was the replacement rather than the evolution in situ, especially when considering the large turnover recorded during and after the MIS 12 [205]. According to them, glacial conditions of MIS 12 may have played a role in triggering the spread of C. lupus into Europe. In this scenario, C. lupus may have dispersed into Europe, encountering or even interbreeding with C. mosbachensis which previously inhabited the region [209,210,211,212]. The timespan of MIS 11-10 as the time of interchange from C. mosbachensis into C. lupus is also documented in Polish territory. The individuals of C. mosbachensis from Tunel Wielki Cave (MIS 13-12) and especially those from Draby 3 (MIS 11) are large and robust, and their size places them among the largest known specimens. Metrically and morphologically similar populations are known from Vertesszöllös 2 (Hungary, MIS 11) [154,188] or layers 8-5 of the Kudaro 1 Cave (Georgia, MIS 11) [186].
Stratigraphically younger layers 19ad-19 of Biśnik Cave (MIS 10-9) documented the oldest presence of C. l. lunellensis in Poland, together with large C. a. priscus and a lack of L. lycaonoides (Figure 3). This was already the time when the Eurasian Lycaones no longer existed in Eurasia. From this period an increasing size process started. This is well documented by the wolf material from the Sudeten sites Naciekowa and Wschodnia Caves (MIS 8) [66]. The remains of C. lupus from MIS 7-5e, commonly found across Europe, are still slightly smaller than the average extant specimens. A recent analysis of cranio-dental measurements showed that C. lupus from the period MIS 7-5e was less adapted for fast flesh slicing and more adapted for the crushing of non-flesh foods, combined with comparatively weaker jaws than its later (MIS 5d-2) counterparts [199,200,203]. Contrary to that, the great Late Pleistocene C. l. spelaeus showed a changed skeletal development due to a preference for larger prey. It resulted in larger and more robust wolves with a shortened rostrum, the pronounced development of the temporalis muscles, proportionally enlarged and wider premolars and carnassials. These features were specialised adaptations for the processing of fast-freezing carcasses, especially during cooler phases, and associated with the hunting and scavenging of larger prey. Additionally, the body dimensions of C. lupus appear to have been profoundly influenced by harsh climatic and environmental conditions [199,200]. The association of a cold, low and relatively stable diversity of mammalian fauna during the coolest interstadials of the Late Pleistocene and great C. l. spelaeus was documented from multiple Polish sites. The robust build, large dimensions and cranio-dental adaptations at this time would have enabled these wolves to hunt larger prey than their MIS 7-5e or MIS 1 counterparts, making even adult Bison priscus Bojanus, 1827 a more attainable target [199,200].
Compared with the extant C. lupus, some Late Pleistocene populations of C. l. spelaeus showed an increase in tooth breakage. When the frequency and location of teeth fractures found in these wolves were compared with the extant C. crocuta (Erxleben, 1777), it was stated clearly that they were habitual bone crackers [203]. A genetic analysis confirmed that these ancient populations of C. l. spelaeus carried mitochondrial lineages which could not be found among the extant C. lupus, which implies their extinction [213,214]. This also indicates that C. l. familiaris dogs are descendents from those extinct lineages of C. lupus [215,216,217]. In Central Europe, the earliest C. l. familiaris remains, dated at 14.4–14.2 call kyr ago, were discovered in Bonn-Oberkassel [218,219,220]. Multiple pieces of evidence, such as an archaeological context, isotopic and genetic analysis, and morphological values, clearly indicate a domestic dog. Contrary to C. l. familiaris from Bonn-Oberkassel, the remains of so called “first dogs” from Moravian sites such as Dolní Věstonice, Pavlov and Předmostí, e.g., [221,222], were in fact more than highly variable populations of C. l. spelaeus. In this term, we agree with other authors such as Wilczyński [221], especially because our studies also supported this opinion. However, because the remains of C. l. familiaris from Poland are not older than the Mesolithic period [76], we did not reopen the discussion about the early history of the domestication.

4.2. Small Canids: Genus Nyctereutes and Vulpes

The origin of the genus Nyctereutes is highly debatable and rather dubious [223]. The oldest Eurasian occurrence is dated at ca. 4.9–4.2 myr ago and is represented by Nyctereutes tingi Tedford and Qiu 1991 from the Yushe Basin [223]. The first appearance in Europe is slightly younger (4.2–4.0 myr ago), with mainly documented presences of N. donnezani (Depéret, 1890) in sites such as French Perpignan or Spanish La Gloria 4 [105,224,225]. A bit later (4.0–3.9 myr ago), Nyctereutes megamastoides appeared (Pomel, 1842) with the first record from the Spanish locality Layna [223,226,227]. Canids from the genus Nyctereutes are characteristic members of the Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene Eurasian palaeofaunas (4.9–2.0 myr), and survived until the late Villafranchian. Eurasian sites younger than 2 myr ago documented the fast declining process of their diversity and range, most likely due to the competition with species from the genus Vulpes, until their final extinction between 1.8 and 1.6 myr ago [223,226,227,228].
Previously, it was agreed that N. megamastoides evolved to be larger and with stronger dentition from the primitive N. donnezani [52]. The wide geographical range, complicated evolutionary history and previous lack of clear, diagnostic features caused material in the past from the same site to be differently determined [52,229,230,231,232,233,234,235]. The same was true for the material of Nyctereutes from Węże 1 (3.8–3.4 myr), which is so far the only Polish record of this genus. First, it was described as Nyctereutes sp. [20,22], then classified once as Nyctereutes sinensis (Schlosser, 1903) [25], once as N. donnezani [52] and as N. megamastoides [25]. Finally, however, it was agreed to determine Nyctereutes from Węże 1 as N. aff. donnezani [28]. Additionally, our preliminary observations, made during the revision and study of the new material from this locality, confirmed this assignation. The only other Polish record of Nyctereutes came from the nearby and slightly younger (2.9–2.6 myr ago) site Węże 2, where a partially preserved hemimandible with p4-m1 had been found. After a consistent hiatus in the Polish history of Nyctereutes during the Pleistocene [226], N. procyonoides appeared in 1955 and spread into the territory from the NE to SW direction [77,78,79,80,81]. By the early 1990s, the species was already recorded in almost the whole of Poland [83].
Traditionally, three species of the genus Vulpes were recognised from the European Plio-Pleistocene: V. alopecoides (Del Campana, 1913), V. praeglacialis (Kormos, 1932) and V. praecorsac Kormos, 1932 [236,237]. The late Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene fox remains have been ascribed to V. alopecoides. The Early to Middle Pleistocene fossils have been determined mostly as V. praeglacialis and, but in much rarer cases, as smaller V. praecorsac on the basis of size. In the broad, most recent revision, all Early Pleistocene individuals were allocated to V. alopecoides and synonymising with the latter multiple species distinguished by previous authors [144,235,236,238,239,240]. The earliest European fox records are those from the Bulgarian site Musselievo [241,242,243] and Odessa [244], both dating back 4.0–3.6 myr. From the slightly younger (3.3–3.2 myr) Georgian site Kvabebi, Vulpes cf. alopecoides was described [245].
The evolutionary history of V. vulpes and V. lagopus started in the early Middle Pleistocene. The first appearances of the species are not older than 0.8 myr [235]. They are known from Stránská Skála (0.8–0.7 myr old) [145], L’Escale (0.7–0.6 myr old) [144], Bed 5 of Westbury-Sub-Mendip (0.6–0.5 myr old) [153], Arago Cave (0.6–0.5 myr old) [237,239], Vallparadís Estació (0.6–0.5 myr old) [237] and Hundsheim (0.6–0.5 myr old) [179]. Two chronosubspecies were recognised: Vulpes vulpes jansoni Bonifay 1971 from L’Escale (Bonifay 1971) and originally described as an independent species, V. v. angustidens (Thenius, 1954) from Hundsheim [179,240]. V. v. jansoni is characterised, when compared with the extant V. vulpes, by a more prominent protocone of the P4, M1 with a sharp paracone and metacone, strong lingual cingulum, distinct metaconule and hypocone, and M2 with a larger hypocone [144,237]. It was also concluded, however, that the main feature distinguishing V. v. jansoni from the extant V. vulpes is the development of the P4 protocone. Nevertheless, as shown in the broad revision of early Vulpes species, the shape and size of this cusp is highly variable in the extant V. vulpes [237]. Morphologically, it is indistinguishable from many extant specimens of the extant V. vulpes and falls within its range of variability. This resulted in this chronosubspecies no longer being valid [246].
V. v. angustidens was described as being slightly smaller than the extant V. vulpes, with an M1 with weaker protoconid, strong mesoconid and ridge-connected hypo- and entoconid, and narrow M2 with strong mesial cingulum, strong entoconid and metaconid higher than the protoconid [179]. In the revision of the European Middle Pleistocene, it was noted that similarly dated (0.6–0.5 myr old) V. vulpes [235] individuals, from the Vallparadís Section to that from Hundsheim, resemble them in the small size of the entoconid and the well-developed entoconulid on the M1 talonid. The material from Hundsheim was also personally studied by A.M. and we also found strong similarities with other Middle Pleistocene specimens [222]. From Poland, the earliest occurrences of V. v. angustidens from Południowa Cave and Rębielice Królewskie 2 are similarly dated like other European localities from 0.7–0.6 myr ago. Younger records are those from Tunel Wielki Cave (MIS 14-12) and Draby 3 (MIS 11). We found some small morphometrical differences between them and the extant V. vulpes, and on this background assigned them to V. v. angustidens [247]. However, as was noted by Szuma [248,249,250,251,252], the enormous geographic range of the extant V. vulpes and a number of factors associated therewith, such as the geographic, climatic and biological factors, latitude, habitat productivity, differential food availability, competition (on various levels, i.e., intraguild, intrafamily or intraspecific), character displacement, genetic diversity and population density, resulted in a high metrical and morphological variability [247]. On this term, a further revision of the Middle Pleistocene V. vulpes from Europe, based on a higher number of specimens, is required. Until then, we maintain a taxonomic determination of V. v. angustidens as a valid chronosubspecies.
The evolutionary history of V. lagopus is much less clear and is very fragmentary and patchy. Firstly, it was recorded in the Olyorian Fauna (Siberia) ca. 700 kyr ago [253,254] but later disappeared from the fossil record for a long time. There is a consistent hiatus in the European fossil history of V. lagopus during the Middle Pleistocene, since the oldest European records of this species are not older than MIS 6 [186,255]. During the Late Pleistocene (MIS 5d-2), it was a member of the widespread Mammuthus-Coelodonta faunal complex that ranged from Eastern Siberia to Spain [247,254,255].
In this context, Polish records of this species, especially those dated at MIS 9-7, are especially noteworthy. Specimens from the lowermost layers of the Biśnik Cave (19ad-19) and Deszczowa Cave (layers I-V), dated at MIS 9-8, showed morphology with an admixture of intermediate features between V. lagopus and V. praeglacialis [61,63]. The material from older sites, dated at MIS 15-13 such as Rębielice Królewskie 2 or Południowa Cave, is still classified as V. praeglacialis. The material dated as MIS 9 and younger was already determined as V. lagopus, but morphologically is still far away from the Late Pleistocene (MIS 5d-2) specimens. They are small and gracile like younger individuals but, simultaneously, still possesses a less curved lower margin of the mandibular body, proportionally longer diastemas between C1/c1 and P1/p1, and less reduced entoconid on the M1, and still present ridge-connected hypo- and entoconid on the M1 talonid. Later dated (MIS 7 or younger) specimens morphologically resembled the Late Pleistocene and the extant V. lagopus, and the distinguishing differences are minor [247]. Contrary to V. vulpes, for V. lagopus, the geographic and climatic factors were less important. Its morphology was influenced more by its interspecific competition with V. vulpes and food source variability and accessibility [248,249,250,251,252]. Different species are susceptible to different combinations of these proxies with different variability and, eventually, features [240,252,253,254]. It was also showed that these proxies more severely affected the morphology in the case of sympatry between different species of Vulpes, such as that between V. vulpes and V. lagopus, which accentuated the variability. Additionally, Szuma [248] found an important relationship between morphotypes and climatic parameters such as the air moisture and mean annual temperature. This may have a great relevance for paleontological studies; however, it is still poorly studied [247].

5. Conclusions

The analysis of Polish canids implies a strong geographical variation. The body size of canids demonstrates a clinal gradient correlated with climatic and environmental factors. This was well-documented and noted for the extant canids and the same can be expected for the extinct species. Body size cannot be strictly taken as a good indicator in taxonomy. However, it certainly constitutes important ecological characters in this process.
We summarised over 170 years of research on canids in Poland against the backdrop of Europe. Despite such a long period of research, relatively few publications on this subject were published during this time. In the case of many species, Poland is still a blank spot in biostratigraphic and palaeoecological analyses. However, as research has shown, this is usually not due to the fact that they do not exist in this area, but rather is because their remains have not been found as of yet. It often has to do with the lack of proper recognition of the already accumulated material. The extensive revision of canine material carried out consistently for many years in conjunction with new finds allowed for a significant expansion of the knowledge about their spatial and temporal occurrence in Poland. In biostratigraphic and palaeoecological analyses, the area of Poland that is particularly important to consider is its geographical location. Predominantly lowland or upland in the southern part, devoid of significant ecological barriers with the exception of three major rivers (Bug, Wisła, Odra), it has been and is an important migration corridor in the East–West system. This 500–600 km wide corridor, bounded in the north by the Baltic Sea and in the south by the arch of the Carpathians and Sudetes, was the Asian gateway to Europe, from where species of eastern origin penetrated into the interior of the continent. In colder periods, it was, in turn, a region through which boreal species or those associated with the mammoth steppe retreated.
Compared to Poland, areas such as Western Europe are a peripheral zone of Eurasia and migrations or evolutionary processes occurred in limited forms. Such peripheral zones are characterised rather by a greater variability that more reflects the biogeographical conditions. This is also an area better suited to possible survivals of more archaic subspecies or species in some isolated corners of Southern and Southwestern Europe, compared to the open, flat, vast lowlands of Central and Eastern Europe. This study confirms the importance of canids as biomarkers within most of the taxa considered likely in relation with climatic environmental changes.
The revision of the Polish canid fauna based on 111 sites, mainly cave and karstic localities, but also open-air sites, showed the presence of 12 canid species. These records covered a time span of the last 4.9 myr. Canid material, although found at numerous sites, is often represented by just a few or fragmentary finds. In many cases, these remains have a low taxonomic value due to a small number of poorly expressed diagnostic features. For this reason, the earliest history of the evolution of this family is relatively poorly documented in Poland and requires further research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14030539/s1, File S1: List of Polish sites with canid remains in chronological order.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed to this submission. The individual contributions of each co-author are as follows: A.M.: introduction, morphological and metrical studies, description of bones and partially of sites, results and partially in discussion, Figure 1 and Figure 3; A.K.: results and partially in discussion, Table 1 and Table 2; W.G.: results and partially in discussion, Figure 2; M.K.: description of sites, geological framework; A.N.: Table 2; G.L.: description of sites, geological framework, Figure 2 and Figure 3. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was financed by subsidies for the activities of the University of Wrocław, subsidy 2022—research activity (501), MPK 2599280000 ZP, discipline 73—biological sciences. It was also supported by an internal grant from the Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Wrocław entitled “The Middle Pleistocene Revolution—How the Modern Theriofauna of Eurasia was developed”, as part of the program “Inicjatywa Doskonałości—Uczelnia Badawcza (IDUB)”, grant no. BPIDUB.4610.6.2021.KP.A. The funding organization had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brugal, J.P.; Boudadi-Maligne, M. Quaternary small to large canids in Europe: Taxonomic status and biochronological contribution. Quat. Int. 2011, 243, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Azzaroli, A. Quaternary mammals and the ‘End Villafranchian’ dispersal event—A turning point in the history of Eurasia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1983, 44, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rook, L.; Torre, D. The “wolf-event” in Western Europe and the beginning of the Late Villafranchian. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Monatsh. 1996, 8, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sardella, R.; Palombo, M.P. The Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary: Which significance for the so called "wolf event"? Evidences from Western Europe. Quaternaire 2007, 18, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Meloro, C.; Sansalone, G. Palaeoecological significance of the “wolf event” as revealed by skull ecometrics of the canid guilds. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2022, 281, 107419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Monguillon, A. Canis sp. Les grands mammifères fossiles du Velay. Les collections paléontologiques du Plio-Pléistocene du Musée Crozatier, Le Puy-en-Velay. Ann. Amis Mus. Crozatier 2005, 13–14, 42–43. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lacombat, F. New data on the Early Villafranchian fauna from Vialette (Haute-Loire, France). Collection of the Musee Crozatier (Le Puy-en-Velay, Haute-Loire). Stratigraphy, paleontology and paleoenvironment of Pliocene-Pleistocene of Transbaikalia and interregional correlations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium, Ulan-Ude, Russia, 28 August–3 September 2006; Volume 56. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lacombat, F.; Abbazzi, L.; Ferretti, M.P.; Martínez-Navarro, B.; Martínez, P.E.; Palombo, M.R.; Rook, L.; Turner, A.; Valli, A.M.F. New data on the Early Villafranchian fauna from Vialette (Haute-Loire, France) based on the collection of the Crozatier Museum (Le Puy-en-Velay, Haute-Loire, France). Quat. Int. 2008, 179, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sotnikova, M.V.; Rook, L. Dispersal of the Canini (Mammalia, Canidae: Caninae) across Eurasia during the Late Miocene to Early Pleistocene. Quat. Int. 2010, 212, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ossowski, G. Sprawozdanie z badań geologiczno-antropologicznych dokonanych w 1879 w jaskiniach okolic Krakowa. Zbiór Wiad. Antrop. Kraj. 1880, 4, 35–57. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ossowski, G. Drugie sprawozdanie z badań geologiczno-antropologicznych w jaskiniach okolic Krakowa w r. 1880. Zbiór Wiad. Antrop. Kraj. 1881, 5, 18–46. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ossowski, G. O szczątkach fauny dyluwialnej znalezionych w namule jaskiń wąwozu mnikowskiego. Spraw. Kom. Fizjogr. 1883, 17, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ossowski, G. Czwarte sprawozdanie z badań antropologiczno-archeologicznych w jaskiniach okolic Krakowa w 1882. Zbiór Wiad. Antrop. Kraj. 1883, 7, 66–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ossowski, G. Jaskinie okolic Ojcowa pod względem paleo-etnologicznym. Pam. PAU Wyd. Mat. Przyr. 1885, 11, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ossowski, G. Sprawozdanie z badań paleo-etnologicznych w jaskiniach okolic Ojcowa w r. 1886. Zbiór Wiad. Antrop. Kraj. 1887, 11, 12–32. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ossowski, G. Fouillos de la Caverne de Wierzchowska-Gorna en Pologne. Antiqua 1887, 2, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  17. Römer, F. Die Knochenhöhlen von Ojców in Polen. Palaeontographica 1883, 29, 193–235. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiernik, E. Materiały do paleozoologii dyluwialnych ssaków ziem polskich. Cz. 5. Szczątki wilka z dyluwium warstw ziem polskich. Roz. Wydz. Mat. Przyrod. PAU III 1913, 13, 491–541. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kiernik, E. Materiały do paleozoologii dyluwialnych ssaków ziem polskich. Cz. 5. Familia: Canidae; Sectio: Lupinae. Spraw. Czynn. Pos. PAU Kraków 1913, 18, 15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stach, J. Nyctereutes (Canidae) w pliocenie Polski. Acta Geol. Pol. 1954, 4, 191–206. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kowalski, K. Polskie badania nad systematyką, zoogeografią i faunistyką kręgowców w latach 1953-1956. Przegl. Zool. 1957, 1, 228–236. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kowalski, K. Katalog Ssaków Plejstocenu Polski; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kowalski, K. Les Mammiferes Fossiles des Remplissages Karstiques de Pologne—Prohlemes Paleobiologiques et Stratigraphiques. In Livre du Centenaire Emile G. Racovitza, 1868–1968; Orghidan, T., Racovitza, G., Eds.; Académie de la République Socialiste de Roumanie: Bucharest, Romania, 1970; pp. 491–498. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bigaj, J. Szczątki Canidae z plejstocenu Polski. Folia Quat. 1963, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Czyżewska, T. Nyctereutes sinensis Schlosser (Canidae, Mammalia) from the Pliocene breccia in Węże (Poland). Acta Zool. Crac. 1969, 14, 441–450. [Google Scholar]
  26. Czyżewska, T. Natural endocranial casts of the Canidae from Węże I near Działoszyn (Poland). Acta Zool. Crac. 1981, 25, 251–260. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ivanoff, D.V.; Wolsan, M.; Marciszak, A. Brainy stuff of long-gone dogs: A reappraisal of the supposed Canis endocranial cast from the Pliocene of Poland. Sci. Nat. 2014, 101, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wolsan, M. Drapieżne—Carnivora. Fol. Quat. 1989, 59–60, 177–197. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wolsan, M. Lower Pleistocene carnivores of Poland. Quarterpäläntologie 1990, 8, 277–280. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wolsan, M. Evolution des carnivores quaternaires en Europe centrale dans leur contexte stratigraphique et paleoclimatique. L’Anthropologie 1993, 97, 203–222. [Google Scholar]
  31. Marciszak, A.; Kropczyk, A.; Lipecki, G. The first record of Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811) from Poland and the possible impact of other large canids on the evolution of the species. J. Quat. Sci. 2021, 36, 1101–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Steininger, F.F.; Bernor, R.L.; Fahlbusch, V. European Neogene marine/continental chronologic correlations. In European Neogene Mammal Chronology; Lindsay, E.H., Fahlbusch, V., Mein, P., Eds.; NATO ASI Series: Brussels, Belgium, 1990; Volume 180, pp. 15–46. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gibbard, P.L.; Head, M.J. IUGS ratification of the Quaternary system/period and the Pleistocene series/epoch with a base at 2.58 ma. Quaternaire 2009, 20, 411–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gibbard, P.L.; Head, M.J.; Walker, M.J. Formal ratification of the Quaternary system/period and the Pleistocene series/epoch with a base at 2.58 ma. J. Quat. Sci. 2010, 25, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cohen, K.M.; Harper, D.A.T.; Gibbard, P.L.; Fan, J.H. International Chronostratigraphic Chart (V2018/08). International Commission on Stratigraphy. 2018. Available online: http://www.stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-charttimescale (accessed on 6 January 2023).
  36. Lisiecki, L.E.; Raymo, M.E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 2005, 20, PA1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mein, P. Updating of MN Zones. In European Neogene Mammal Chronology, European Neogene Mammal Chronology; Lindsay, E.H., Fahlbusch, V., Mein, P., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 73–90. [Google Scholar]
  38. Guérin, C. Première biozonation du Plistocène europen, principal resultat biostratigraphique de l’tude des Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène terminal au Plistocène suprieur d′Europe occidentale. Geobios 1982, 15, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guérin, C. Biozones of Mammal Units? Methods and Limits in Biochronology. In European Neogene Mammal Chronology, European Neogene Mammal Chronology; Lindsay, E.H., Fahlbusch, V., Mein, P., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 119–130. [Google Scholar]
  40. Azzaroli, A.; De Giuli, C.; Ficcarelli, G.; Torre, D. Late Pliocene to early Mid-Pleistocene in Eurasia: Faunal succesion and dispersal events. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1988, 66, 77–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caloi, L.; Palombo, R. Biochronology of large mammals in the Early and Middle Pleistocene of the Italian peninsula. Hystrix 1997, 9, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gliozzi, E.; Abbazzi, L.; Argenti, A.; Azzaroli, A.; Caloi, L.; Capasso Barbato, L.; Di Stefano, G.; Esu, D.; Ficcarelli, G.; Girotti, O.; et al. Biochronology of selected mammals, molluscs and ostracodes from the Middle Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene in Italy. The state of the art. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 1997, 103, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sardella, R.; Caloi, L.; Di Stefano, G.; Palombo, M.R.; Petroni, C.; Abbazzi, L.; Azzaroli, A.; Ficcarelli, G.; Mazza, P.; Mezzabotta, C.; et al. Mammal faunal turnover in Italy from the middle Pliocene to Holocene. Medd. Ned. Inst. Toegep. Geoweten. TNO 1998, 60, 499–512. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rook, L.; Martinez-Navarro, B. Villafranchian: The long story of a Plio-Pleistocene European large mammal biochronologic unit. Quat. Int. 2010, 219, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kahlke, R.-D. Untermassfeld—a late Early Pleistocene (Epivillafranchian) fossil site near Meiningen (Thuringia, Germany) and its position in the development of the European mammal fauna. BAR Int. Ser. 2006, 1578, 1–141. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kahlke, R.D. Late Early Pleistocene European large mammals and the concept on an Epivillafranhian biochron. Cour. Forschungsinst. Senckenberg 2007, 259, 265–278. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kahlke, R.D. Les communautés de grands mammifères du Pléistocène inférieur terminal et le concept d’un biochrone Épivillafranchien. Quaternaire 2009, 20, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kahlke, R.D. The origin of Eurasian Mammoth faunas (Mammuthus-Coelodonta Faunal Complex). Quat. Sci. Rev. 2014, 96, 32–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kahlke, R.-D.; Garcia, N.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Lacombat, F.; Lister, A.M.; Mazza, P.P.A.; Spassov, N.; Titov, V.V. Western Palearctic paleoenvironment conditions during communities, and implications for hominin dispersal in Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 1368–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Petronio, C.; Bellucci, L.; Martiinetto, E.; Pandolfi, L.; Salari, L. Biochronology and palaeoenvironmental changes from the Middle Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene in Central Italy. Geodiversitas 2011, 33, 485–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bellucci, L.; Sardella, R.; Rook, L. Large mammal biochronology framework in Europe at Jaramillo: The Epivillafranchian as a formal biochron. Quat. Int. 2015, 389, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soria, D.; Aguirre, E. 1976. El canido de Layna: Revision de los Nyctereutes fosiles. Trab. Neogeno-Cuatern. 1976, 5, 83–115. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stefaniak, K.; Ratajczak, U.; Kotowski, A.; Kozłowska, M.; Mackiewicz, P. Polish Pliocene and Quaternary deer and their biochronological implications. Quat. Int. 2020, 546, 64–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kowalski, K. Historia i ewolucja lądowej fauny Polski (red.). Fol. Quat. 1989, 59–60, 1–276. [Google Scholar]
  55. Stefaniak, K. Neogene and Quaternary Cervidae from Poland. ISEA PAS: Kraków, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  56. Marciszak, A. Carnivores of the latest Pliocene from Węże 2, Poland. Acta Paleontol. Polonica, 2023; in review. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiszniowska, T. Middle Pleistocene Carnivora (Mammalia) from Kozi Grzbiet in the Świętokrzyskie Mts., Poland. Acta Zool. Crac. 1989, 32, 589–630. [Google Scholar]
  58. Marciszak, A.; Sobczyk, A.; Kasprzak, M.; Gornig, W.; Ratajczak, U.; Wiśniewski, A.; Stefaniak, K. Taphonomic and paleoecological aspects of large mammals from Sudety Mts (Silesia, SW Poland), with particular interest to the carnivores. Quat. Int. 2020, 546, 42–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kot, M.; Berto, C.; Krajcarz, M.T.; Moskal-del Hoyo, M.; Gryczewska, N.; Szymanek, M.; Marciszak, A.; Stefaniak, K.; Zarzecka-Szubińska, K.; Lipecki, G.; et al. Frontiers of the Lower Palaeolithic expansion in Europe: Tunel Wielki Cave (Poland). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sotnikova, M.V. 2001. Remains of Canidae from the Lower Pleistocene site of Untermassfeld. Monogr. Des. RGZM 2001, 40, 607–632. [Google Scholar]
  61. Marciszak, A.; Socha, P.; Nadachowski, A.; Stefaniak, K. Carnivores from Biśnik Cave. Quat. Hors-Ser. 2011, 4, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wojtal, P. Zooarchaeological Studies of the Late Pleistocene Sites in Poland; ISEA PAS: Cracow, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  63. Nadachowski, A.; Żarski, M.; Urbanowski, M.; Wojtal, P.; Miękina, B.; Lipecki, G.; Ochman, K.; Krawczyk, M.; Jakubowski, G.; Tomek, T. Late Pleistocene Environment of the Częstochowa Upland (Poland) Reconstructed on the Basis of Faunistic Evidence from Archaeological Cave Sites; ISEA PAS: Kraków, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  64. Marciszak, A.; Schouwenburg, C.; Gornig, W.; Lipecki, G.; Mackiewicz, P. 2019. Morphometric comparison of Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) from Poland with the lion remains from Eurasia over the last 700 ka. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2019, 223, 105950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Marciszak, A. Carnivores from Naciekowa Cave (Połom Hill, Kaczawskie Mts., south-west Poland). In Proceedings of the 17th International Cave Bear Symposium, Einhornhöhle (Unicorn Cave); Harz, Germany, 15–18 September 2011, Döppes, D., Joger, U., Nielbock, R., Rosendahl, W., Eds.; Reiss-Engelhorn Museen: Osterode am Harz, Germany, 2011; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  66. Made, V.D.J.; Stefaniak, K.; Marciszak, A. The Polish fossil record of the wolf Canis and the deer Alces, Capreolus, Megaloceros, Dama and Cervus in an evolutionary perspective. Quat. Int. 2014, 326–327, 406–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Marciszak, A.; Kotowski, A.; Przybylski, B.; Badura, J.; Wiśniewski, A.; Stefaniak, K. Large mammals from historical collections of open-air sites of Silesia (southern Poland) with special reference to carnivores and rhinoceros. Hist. Biol. 2019, 31, 696–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lipecki, G.; Wojtal, P. Carnivores from the Open-Air Gravettian Site Kraków Spadzista. In A Gravettian Site in Southern Poland: Kraków Spadzista; Wilczyński, J., Wojtal, P., Haynes, G., Eds.; ISEA PAS: Kraków, Poland, 2015; pp. 117–157. [Google Scholar]
  69. Muzolf, B.; Stefaniak, K.; Tomek, T.; Wertz, K.; Socha, P.; Cyrek, K.; Mirosław-Grabowska, J.; Madeyska, T.; Nadachowski, A. Multiculturate sites on Mt. Birów in Podzamcze. Stud. Fac. Earth Scien. Univ. Sil. 2009, 56, 283–294. [Google Scholar]
  70. Herr, O. Diluviale und altalluviale Säugetierreste aus der Oberlausitz. Abh. Naturforsch. Ges. Görlitz 1924, 29, 92–101. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wiśniewski, A.; Stefaniak, K.; Wojtal, P.; Zych, J.; Nadachowski, A.; Musil, R.; Badura, J.; Przybylski, B. Archaeofauna or palaeontological record? Remarks on Pleistocene fauna from Silesia. Spraw. Archeol. 2009, 61, 1–62. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kropczyk, A.; Marciszak, A. Ssaki Stepu Mamuciego ze Śląskiego Stanowiska Skarszyn Koło Wrocławia. Monografia Pokonferencyjna XV; Kopernikańskie Seminarium Doktoranckie, UMK: Toruń, Poland, 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  73. Nadachowski, A.; Krajcarz, M.; Lemanik, A.; Lipecki, G.; Marciszak, A.; Miękina, B.; Stefaniak, K.; Tomek, T. Vertebrate Remains from Krucza Skała Rockshelter. In Late Magdalenian Campsite at Krucza Skała Rockshelter; Cyrek, K., Sudoł-Procyk, M., Czyżewski, Ł, Eds.; Wyd. Nauk. UMK: Toruń, Poland, 2022; pp. 138–160. [Google Scholar]
  74. Schild, R. Taphonomy and Chronology of the Settlement. In Wilczyce. A Late Magdalenian Winter Hunting Camp in Southern Poland; IAE PAS: Warszawa, Poland, 2014; pp. 87–104. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wyrost, P. Dawna fauna Polski w świetle badań kostnych materiałów archeologicznych (in Polish). Rocz. Ak. Rol. Poz. 1994, 259, 155–176. [Google Scholar]
  76. Piątkowska-Małecka, J.; Gubernat, J. Pies w neolicie na ziemiach polskich. Światowit B 2003, 5, 207–242. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dehnel, A. Nowy ssak dla fauny polskiej Nyctereutes procyonoides (Gray). Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 1956, 12, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  78. Dudziński, W.; Haber, A.; Matuszewski, G. Junat (Nyctereutes procyonoides) w Polsce. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 1965, 20, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  79. Jabłońska, J. 1965. Uwagi o junacie, Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray. Przeg. Zool. 1965, 9, 299–300. [Google Scholar]
  80. Pucek, Z.; Raczyński, J. Atlas Rozmieszczenia Ssaków w Polsce; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  81. Krzywiński, A.; Włodek, K. Jenot. Low. Pol. 1984, 4, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sumiński, P.; Goszczyński, J.; Romanowski, J. Ssaki Drapieżne Europy; PWRiL: Warszawa, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kauhala, K.; Kowalczyk, R. Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna. Curr. Zool. 2011, 57, 584–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Kowalczyk, R.; Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M.; Ruczyńska, I.; Wójcik, J.M. Range expansion of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) into Poland: First records. Mamm. Res. 2015, 60, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Reimer, P.J.; Austin, W.E.N.; Bard, E.; Bayliss, A.; Blackwell, P.G.; Bronk Ramsey, C.; Butzin, M.; Cheng, H.; Edwards, R.L.; Friedrich, M.; et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 2020, 62, 725–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nadachowski, A.; Harrison, D.L.; Szyndlar, Z.; Tomek, T.; Wolsan, M. Late Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from Obłazowa 2 (Carpathians, Poland): Palaeological reconstruction. Acta Zool. Crac. 1993, 36, 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  87. Lorenc, M. Radiocarbon ages of bones from Vistulian (Weichselian) cave deposits in Poland and their stratigraphy. Acta Geol. Pol. 2013, 63, 399–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wilczyński, J.; Wojtal, P.; Sobczyk, K. Spatial organization of the Gravettian mammoth hunters site—Kraków Spadzista (southern Poland). J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012, 39, 3627–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wojtal, P.; Wilczyński, J. Zooarchaeological studies of large mammal remains from Kraków Spadzista site—trench C2 and trench E1 (2011-2012 excavations). In A Gravettian Site in Southern Poland: Kraków Spadzista; Wilczyński, J., Wojtal, P., Haynes, G., Eds.; ISEA PAS: Kraków, Poland, 2015; pp. 93–111. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tedford, R.H.; Qiu, Z. A new canid genus from the Pliocene of Yushe, Shanxi Province. Vert. PalAs. 1996, 34, 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang, X.; Tedford, R.H. Dogs, Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  92. Figueirido, B.; Martín-Serra, A.; Tseng, Z.J.; Janis, C.M. Habitat changes and changing predatory habits in North American fossil canids. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Rook, L. “Canis” monticinensis sp. nov., a new Canidae (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the late Messinian of Italy. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 1992, 31, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rook, L. I cani dell’Eurasia dal Miocene Superiore al Pleistocene Medio. Ph.D. Dissertation, Firenze and Roma “La Sapienza” Universities, Bologna Italy, Modena, Italy, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rook, L. The wide ranging genus Eucyon Tedford & Qiu, 1996 (Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae, Canini) in the Mio-Pliocene of the Old World. Geodiversitas 2009, 31, 723–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pickford, M.; Soria, D.; Morales, J. Carnivores from the late Miocene and basal Pliocene of the Tugen Hills, Kenya. Rev. Soc. Geol. Esp. 2005, 18, 39–61. [Google Scholar]
  97. Howell, F.C.; Garcia, N. Carnivora (Mammalia) from Lemudong’o (late Miocene: Narok District, Kenya). Kirtlandia 2007, 46, 121–139. [Google Scholar]
  98. Lawrence, J.; Flynn, L.J.; Tedford, R.H.; Qiu, Z. Enrichment and stability in the Pliocene mammal faunas of North China. Paleobiology 1991, 17, 246–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Richard, H.; Tedford, R.H.; Flynn, L.J.; Qiu, Z.; Opdyke, N.D.; Downs, W.R. Yushe basin, China: Paleomagnetically calibrated mammalian biostratigraphic standard for the late Neogene of Eastern Asia. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1991, 11, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Qiu, Z. Dispersals of Neogene carnivorans between Asia and North America. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2003, 279, 18–31. [Google Scholar]
  101. Crusafont Pairó, M. El primer representante del género Canis en el Pontiense Eurasiatico (Canis cipio nova sp). Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. Secc. Biol. 1950, 48, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  102. Pons Moyá, J.; Crusafont Pairó, M. El Canis cipio Crusafont (1950), comparacion con los canidos del Plioceno y Pleistoceno europeo. Acta Geol. Hisp. 1978, 13, 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  103. Rook, L.; Ficcarelli, G.; Torre, D. Messinian carnivores from Italy. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 1991, 30, 7–22. [Google Scholar]
  104. Torre, D.; Ficcarelli, G.; Masini, F.; Rook, L.; Sala, B. Mammal dispersal events in the Early Pleistocene of Western Europe. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 1992, 53, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  105. Alcalá Martínez, L. Macromamíferos Neógenos de la Fosa de Alfambra-Teruel; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales: Madrid, Spain, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang, X.; Tedford, R.H. Evolutionary History of Canids. In The Behavioural Biology of Dogs; Jensen, P., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  107. Lydekker, R.B. Catalogue of the fossil Mammalia in the British Museum. Part I: Primates, Chiroptera, Insectivora, Carnivora; British Museum of the Natural History: London, UK, 1885. [Google Scholar]
  108. Martin, R. Trois nouvelles espèces de caninae (Canidae, Carnivora) des gisements Plio-Villafranchiens d’Europe. Doc. Lab. Géol. Fac. Sci. Lyon 1973, 57, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  109. Odintzov, I.A. New species of Pliocene Carnivora, Vulpes odessana sp. nov. from the Karst Cave of Odessa. Paleontol. Sbornik 1967, 4, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  110. Spassov, N.; Rook, L. Eucyon marinae sp. nov. (Mammalia, Carnivora), a new canid species from the Pliocene of Mongolia, with a review of forms referable to the genus. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratig. 2006, 112, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bartolini Lucenti, S.; Rook, R. A review on the Late Villafranchian medium-sized canid Canis arnensis based on the evidence from Poggio Rosso (Tuscany, Italy). Quat. Sci. Rev. 2016, 151, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bartolini-Lucenti, S.; Spassov, N. Cave canem! The earliest Canis (Xenocyon) (Canidae, Mammalia) of Europe: Taxonomic affinities and paleoecology of the fossil wild dogs. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2022, 276, 107315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, S.; Zhao, S. Additional note on the Cuon from Linyi, Shanxi Province, China. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Vertebrate Paleontology; Dong, W., Ed.; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Xie, G.; Wang, B.; Qiu, Z.; Tseng, Z.; Takeuchi, G.T.; Deng, T. Neogene Mammalian Biostratigraphy and Geochronology of the Tibetan Plateau. In Fossil Mammals of Asia: Neogene Biostratigraphy and Chronology; Wang, X., Flynn, L.J., Fortelius, M., Eds.; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 274–292. [Google Scholar]
  115. Wang, X.; Flynn, L.J.; Fortelius, M. Fossil Mammals of Asia: Neogene Biostratigraphy and Chronology; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  116. Tao Deng, T.; Wu, F.; Wang, S.D.; Su, T.; Zhou, Z. Major turnover of biotas across the Oligocene/Miocene boundary on the Tibetan Plateau. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2021, 567, 110241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, X.; Tseng, Z.; Li, Q.; Takeuchi, G.T.; Xie, G. From ‘third pole’ to north pole: A Himalayan origin for the arctic fox. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20140893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Xie, G. Earliest record of Sinicuon in Zanda Basin, southern Tibet and implications for hypercarnivores in cold environments. Quat. Int. 2015, 355, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hemmer, H. Die Feliden aus dem Epivillafranchium von Untermaßfeld bei Meiningen (Thüringen), Teil 3. Monogr. RGZM 2001, 40, 699–782. [Google Scholar]
  120. Hemmer, H.; Kahlke, R.-D. New results on felids from the Early Pleistocene site of Untermassfeld. Monogr. RGZM 2022, 40, 1465–1566. [Google Scholar]
  121. Turner, A. Remains of Pachycrocuta brevirostris (Carnivora, Hyaenidae) from the Lower Pleistocene site of Untermassfeld. Monogr. RGZM 2001, 2, 673–690. [Google Scholar]
  122. Turner, A. The evolution of the guild of large Carnivora of the British Isles during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. J. Quat. Sci. 2009, 24, 991–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Turner, A.; Antón, M. The giant hyaena Pachycrocuta brevirostris (Mammalia, Carnivora, Hyaenidae). Geobios 1996, 29, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Turner, A.; Antón, M.; Werdelin, L. Taxonomy and evolutionary patterns in the fossil Hyaenidae of Europe. Geobios 2008, 41, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Marciszak, A.; Gornig, W.; Kropczyk, A.; Rössner, G.E. The Latest European Record of Chasmaporthetes lunensis lunensis (Del Campana, 1914) from Schernfeld (Bavaria, Germany) in Terms of the Changes in the European Carnivore Paleoguilds. In Stratigraphy and Timescales; Montenari, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 7, pp. 52–66. [Google Scholar]
  126. Eaton, R.L. Interference competition among carnivores: A model for the evolution of social behaviour. Carnivore 1979, 2, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Meachen, J.A.; Samuels, J.X. Evolution in coyotes (Canis latrans) in response to the megafaunal extinctions. PNAS 2012, 109, 4191–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Silvestro, D.; Antonelli, A.; Salamin, N.; Quental, T.B. The role of clade competition in the diversification of North American canids. PNAS 2015, 112, 8684–8689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Antón, M.; Galobart, A.; Turner, A. Co-existence of scimitar-toothed cats, lions and hominins in the European Pleistocene. Implications of the post-cranial anatomy of Homotherium latidens (Owen) for comparative palaeoecology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2005, 24, 1287–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Palmqvist, P.; Martínez-Navarro, B.; Pérez-Claros, J.A.; Torregrosa, V.; Figueirido, B.; Jiménez-Arenas, J.M.; Patrocinio Espigares, M.; Ros-Montoya, S.; De Renzi, M. The giant hyena Pachycrocuta brevirostris: Modelling the bone-cracking behavior of an extinct carnivore. Quat. Int. 2011, 243, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Iannucci, A.; Mecozzi, B.; Sardella, R.; Iurino, D.A. The extinction of the giant hyena Pachycrocuta brevirostris and a reappraisal of the Epivillafranchian and Galerian Hyaenidae in Europe: Faunal turnover during the Early-Middle Pleistocene Transition. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2021, 272, 107240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wagner, J.; Jiangzuo, Q.; Song, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Jin, C. The giant short-faced hyena Pachycrocuta brevirostris (Mammalia, Carnivora, Hyaenidae) from Northeast Asia: A reinterpretation of subspecies differentiation and intercontinental dispersal. Quat. Int. 2021, 577, 29–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hemmer, H. Notes on the Ecological Role of European Cats (Mammalia: Felidae) of the Last Two Million Years. Misc. Homen. Emiliano Aquirre Paleontol. 2004, 2, 214–232. [Google Scholar]
  134. Marciszak, A.; Schouwenburg, C.; Darga, R. Decreasing size process in the cave (Pleistocene) lion Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) evolution—A review. Quat. Int. 2014, 339–340, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Forsyth Major, C.I. Considerazioni sulla fauna dei mammiferi pliocenici e post pliocenici della Toscana e I. La Fauna dei Mammiferi del Val d’Arno superiore. Atti. Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. 1875, 1, 7–40. [Google Scholar]
  136. Forsyth Major, C.I. Considerazioni sulla fauna dei mammiferi pliocenici e post pliocenici della Toscana e II. La Fauna dei Mammiferi del Pliocene inferiore (Orizzonte di Casino). Atti. Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. 1875, 1, 223–245. [Google Scholar]
  137. Forsyth Major, C.I. Considerazioni sulla fauna dei mammiferi pliocenici e post pliocenici della Toscana e III. Cani fossili del Val d’Arno superiore e della Valle d’Era. Atti. Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. 1877, 3, 207–227. [Google Scholar]
  138. Del Campana, D. I cani Pliocenici di Toscana. Palaeontogr. Ital. 1913, 19, 189–254. [Google Scholar]
  139. Stehlík, A. Fosilní savci ze Stránské skály u Brna. Práce Moravské Přírodov. Společn. 1934, 9, 1–94. [Google Scholar]
  140. Kretzoi, M. Die Raubtiere von Gombaszög nebst einer übersicht der Gesamtfauna. Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 1938, 31, 88–157. [Google Scholar]
  141. Kretzoi, M. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fauna von Gombaszög. Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 1941, 34, 105–139. [Google Scholar]
  142. Kretzoi, M. Präokkupierte und durch ältere zu ersetzende Säugetiernamen. Földt. Közl. 1942, 71, 308–335. [Google Scholar]
  143. Torre, D. I cani villafranchiani della Toscana. Palaeontogr. Ital. 1967, 63, 113–138. [Google Scholar]
  144. Bonifay, M.-F. Carnivores quaternaires du sud-est de la France. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Sér. C Sci. Terre C 1971, 21, 1–377. [Google Scholar]
  145. Musil, R. Die Caniden der Stránská Skála. In: Musil, R. (Ed.), Stránská Skála 1, 1910-1945. Anthropos 1972, 20, 77–106. [Google Scholar]
  146. Schütt, G. Revision der Cuon- und Xenocyon-Funde (Canidae, Mammalia) aus dem alpleistozänen Mosbacher sanden (Wiesbaden, Hessen). Mainz. Naturwissensch. Arch. 1973, 12, 49–77. [Google Scholar]
  147. Schütt, G. Die Carnivoren von Würzburg–Schalksberg: Mit einem Beitrag zur biostratigraphischen und zoogeographischen Stellung der altpleistozänen Wirbeltierfaunen von Mittelmain (Unterfranken). Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Abh. 1974, 147, 61–90. [Google Scholar]
  148. Kurtén, B.; Poulianos, A.N. New stratigraphic and faunal material from Petralona Cave, with special reference to the Carnivora. Anthropos 1977, 4, 47–130. [Google Scholar]
  149. Kurtén, B.; Poulianos, A.N. Fossil Carnivora of Petralona Cave: Status of 1980. Anthropos 1981, 8, 9–56. [Google Scholar]
  150. Cordy, J.-M. Le paléokarst de la Belle-Roche (Sprimont, Liège), premier gisement paléontologique et archéologique du Pléistocène moyen ancien en Belgique. C. R. Acad. Sci. 1980, 291, 749–751. [Google Scholar]
  151. Cordy, J.-M. Biozonation du Quaternaire post-villafranchien continental d’Europe occidentale à partir des grands mammifères. Bull. Soc. Géol. Belgiq. 1982, 105, 303–314. [Google Scholar]
  152. Bishop, M.J. A preliminary report on the Middle Pleistocene mammal bearing deposits of Westbury-sub-Mendip, Somerset. Proc. Univ. Bristol Speleol. Soc. 1974, 13, 301–318. [Google Scholar]
  153. Bishop, M.J. The mammal fauna of the early Middle Pleistocene cavern infill site of Westbury-sub-Mendip, Somerset. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 1982, 28, 1–108. [Google Scholar]
  154. Jánossy, D. Pleistocene Vertebrae Faunas of Hungary; Akademiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  155. De Giuli, C.; Masini, F. Late Villafranchian faunas in Italy: The Casa Frata local fauna (Upper Valdarno, Tuscany). Palaeontogr. Ital. 1986, 74, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  156. Sotnikova, M. Associacia melkij volk-ksenocion v pozdnem eoplejstocene-rannem plejstocene Zentral’noj Azii. Bull. Comm. Study Quat. Per. 1988, 57, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
  157. Rook, L. The Plio-Pleistocene Old World Canis (Xenocyon) ex gr. falconeri. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 1994, 33, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  158. Palmqvist, P.; Martínez-Navarro, B.; Arribas, A. Prey selection by terrestrial carnivores in a lower Pleistocene paleocommunity. Paleobiology 1996, 22, 514–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Palmqvist, P.; Arribas, A.; Martínez-Navarro, B. Ecomorphological study of large canids from the lower Pleistocene of southeastern Spain. Lethaia 1999, 32, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Palmqvist, P.; Mendoza, M.; Arribas, A.; Gröcke, D.R. Estimating the body mass of Pleistocene canids: Discussion of some methodological problems and a new ‘taxon free’ approach. Lethaia 2002, 35, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Palmqvist, P.; Gröcke, D.R.; Arribas, A.; Fariňa, R. Paleoecological reconstruction of a lower Pleistocene large mammals community using biogeochemical (d13C, d15N, d18O, Sr:Zn) and ecomorphological approaches. Paleobiology 2003, 29, 205–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Palmqvist, P.; Pérez-Claros, J.A.; Janis, C.M.; Gröcke, D.R. Tracing the ecophysiology of ungulates and predator-prey relationships in an early Pleistocene large mammal community. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2008, 266, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Palmqvist, P.; Pérez-Claros, J.A.; Gröcke, D.R.; Janis, C.M. Biogeochemical and ecomorphological inferences on prey selection and resource partitioning among mammalian carnivores in an early Pleistocene community. Palaios 2008, 23, 724–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Martinez-Navarro, B.; Rook, L. Gradual evolution in the hunting dog lineage. C. R. Palevol. 2003, 2, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bertè, D.F. L’evoluzione del Genere Canis (Carnivora, Canidae, Caninae) in Italia Dal Wolf-Event a Oggi: Implicazioni Biocronologiche, Paleoecologiche e Paleoambientali. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università di Roma, Sapienza, Italy, 2014; p. 390. [Google Scholar]
  166. Petrucci, M.; Cipullo, A.; Martínez-Navarro, B.; Rook, L.; Sardella, R. The Late Villafranchian (Early Pleistocene) carnivores (Carnivora, Mammalia) from Pirro Nord (Italy). Palaeontogr. Abt. A 2013, 298, 113–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Alba, D.M.; Moyà-Solà, S. Carnivora from the late Early Pleistocene of Cal Guardiola (Terrassa, Vallès-Pendès Basin, Catalonia, Spain). J. Paleontol. 2009, 83, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Minwer-Barakat, R.; Alba, D.M.; Garcés, M.; Gómez, M.; Aurell-Garrido, J.; Ros-Montoya, S.; Moyà-Solà, S.; Berástegui, X. The Vallparadís section (Terrassa, Iberian Peninsula) and the latest Villafranchian faunas of Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010, 29, 2972–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Rook, L.; Martínez-Navarro, B.M.; Alba, D.M.; Aurell-Garrido, J.; Moyà-Solà, S. The latest European painted dog. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2013, 33, 1244–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Ros-Montoya, S.; Espigares, M.P.; Alba, D.M.; Aurell-Garrido, J. Villafrachian large mammals from the Iberian Peninsula: Paleobiogeography, paleoecology and dispersal events. J. Iber. Geol. 2014, 40, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. García, N.; Virgós, E. Evolution of community composition in several carnivore palaeoguilds from the European Pleistocene: The role of interspecific competition. Lethaia 2007, 40, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Merkle, J.A.; Stahler, D.R.; Smith, D.W. Interference competition between gray wolves and coyotes in Yellowstone National Park. Can. J. Zool. 2009, 87, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Venkataraman, A.B.; Arumugan, R.; Sukumar, R. The foraging ecology of dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Mudumalai Sanctuary, southern India. J. Zool. 1995, 237, 543–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ghezzo, E.; Rook, L. Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811) (Mammalia, Carnivora) from Equi (Late Pleistocene, Massa-Carrara, Italy): Anatomical analysis and palaeoethological contextualisation. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 2014, 25, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hayward, M.W.; Lyngdoh, S.; Habib, B. Diet and prey preferences of dholes (Cuon alpinus): Dietary competition within Asia’s apex predator guild. J. Zool. 2014, 294, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Volmer, R.; Hertler, C.; van der Geer, A. Niche overlap and competition potential among tigers (Panthera tigris), saber-toothed cats (Homotherium ultimum, Hemimachairodus zwierzyckii) and Merriam’s dog (Megacyon merriami) in the Pleistocene of Java. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016, 441, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Volmer, R.; van der Geer, A.A.E.; Cabera, P.A.; Prasetyo, W.U.; Kurniawan, I. When did Cuon reach Java?—Reinvestigation of canid fossils from Homo erectus faunas. Geobios 2019, 55, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kamler, J.F.; Davies-Mostert, H.T.; Hunter, L.; Macdonald, D.W. Predation on black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) by African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Afr. J. Ecol. 2007, 45, 667–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Thenius, E. Die Caniden (Mammalia) aus dem Altquartär von Hundsheim (Niederösterreich) nebst Bemerkungen zur stammesgeschichte der Gattung Cuon. Neues Jahrb. Fur Geol. Palaontol. Abh. 1954, 99, 230–286. [Google Scholar]
  180. Tobien, H. Cuon Hodg. und Gulo Frisch (Carnivora, Mammalia) aus den altpleistozän Sanden von Mosbach bei Wiesbaden. Acta Zool. Cracov. 1957, 18, 433–451. [Google Scholar]
  181. Adam, K.D. Mittelpleistozäne Caniden aus den Heppenloch bei Gutenberg (Würtemberg). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. A 1959, 27, 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  182. Adam, K.D. Die Bedeutung der pleistozänen Säugetier-Faunen Mitteleuropas für die Geschichte des Eiszeitalters. Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. A 1961, 78, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  183. Moullé, P.-É.; Echassoux, A. Étude du Xenocyon lycaonoides de la grotte du Vallonnet (Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, Alpes-Maritimes). Bull. Mus. Anthropol. Préhist. Monaco 2005, 45, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  184. Moullé, P.-É.; Echassoux, A.; Lacombat, F. Taxonomie du grand canidé de la grotte du Vallonnet (Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, Alpes-Maritimes, France). L’Anthropologie 2006, 110, 832–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Tedford, R.H.; Wang, X.; Taylor, B.E. Phylogenetic systematics of the North American fossil Caninae (Carnivora, Canidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2009, 325, 1–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Baryshnikov, G.F. Pleistocene Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora) from the Palaeolithic Kudaro caves in the Caucasus. Russ. J. Theriol. 2012, 11, 77–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Sinding, M.-H.S.; Ramos-Madrigal, J.; Niemann, J.; Samaniego Castruita, J.A.; Vieira, F.G.; Carøe, C.; Montero, M.d.M.; Kuderna, L.; Serres, A.; et al. Interspecific gene flow shaped the evolution of the genus Canis. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 3441–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Jánossy, D. Vertebrate Fauna of Site II. In Vertesszölös. Site, Man and Culture; Kretzoi, M., Dobosi, V.T., Eds.; Akademiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary, 1990; pp. 187–219. [Google Scholar]
  189. Pienaar, U.d.V. Predator-prey relationships amongst the larger mammals of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 1969, 12, 108–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Kruuk, H. The spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior; University of California Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  191. Schaller, G.B. The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  192. Creel, S.; Creel, N.M. Limitation of African wild dogs by competition with larger carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Creel, S.; Creel, N.M. Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Anim. Conserv. 1998, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Creel, S.; Creel, N.M. The African Wild Dog: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  195. McNutt, J.; Boggs, L.P. Running wild: Dispelling the Myths of the African Wild Dog; D.C. Smithsonian Books: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  196. Mecozzi, B.; Iurino, D.A.; Profico, A.; Rosa, C.; Sardella, R. The wolf from the Middle Pleistocene site of Ostiense (Rome): The last occurrence of Canis mosbachensis (Canidae, Mammalia) in Italy. Hist Biol. 2021, 33, 2031–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Woodroffe, R.; Ginsberg, J.R. Past and Future Causes of Wild Dogs Population Decline. In Status Survey and Conservation Plan: The African Wild Dog; Woodroffe, R., Ginsberg, J., MacDonald, D., Eds.; IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group: Gland, CA, USA, 1997; pp. 58–73. [Google Scholar]
  198. Woodroffe, R.; Ginsberg, J.R. Conserving the African wild dog Lycaon pictus. I. Diagnosing and treating causes of decline. Oryx 1999, 33, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Boudadi-Maligne, M. Les Canis Pléistocénes du Sud de la France: Approche Biosystématique, Évolutive et Biochronologique. Ph.D Thesis, Université Bordeaux-Talence, Bordeaux, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  200. Flower, L.O.H. Canid Evolution and Palaeoecology in the Pleistocene of Western Europe, with Particular Reference to the Wolf Canis lupus L. 1758; University of London: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  201. Flower, L.O.H. New body mass estimates of British Pleistocene wolves: Palaeoenvironmental implications and competitive interactions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2016, 149, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Berto, C.; Nadachowski, A.; Pereswiet–Soltan, A.; Lemanik, A.; Kot, M. The Middle Pleistocene small mammals from the lower layers of Tunel Wielki Cave (Kraków-Częstochowa Upland): An Early Toringian assemblage in Poland. Quat. Int. 2021, 577, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ehlers, J.; Gibbard, L. The extent and chronology of Cenozoic global glaciation. Quat. Int. 2007, 164–165, 6–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Flower, L.O.H.; Schreve, D.C. An investigation of palaeodietary variability in European Pleistocene canids. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2014, 96, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Parfitt, S.A. Mammalia. In Boxgrove. A Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex; Roberts, M.B., Ed.; University College London: London, UK, 1999; pp. 197–290. [Google Scholar]
  206. Iurino, D.A.; Mecozzi, B.; Iannucci, A.; Moscarella, A.; Strani, F.; Bona, M.; Gaeta, M.; Sardella, R. A Middle Pleistocene wolf from central Italy provides insights on the first occurrence of Canis lupus in Europe. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Portis, A. Di una formazione stagnale presso la Basalica di Ostiense di Roma e degli avanzi di fossili vertebrati in essa rinvenuti. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1900, 19, 179–240. [Google Scholar]
  208. Portis, A. Avanzi di canidi fossili dai terreni sedimento-tufacei di Roma. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1909, 28, 203–247. [Google Scholar]
  209. Adam, K.D. Vom Heppenloch zur Sibyllenhöhle. Ein Bericht über alte Funde eiszeitlicher Säugetiere auf der Kirchheimer Alb. Jahresh. Karst-Höhlenk. 1963, 4, 271–285. [Google Scholar]
  210. Adam, K.D. Die mittelpleistozäne Säugetier–Fauna aus dem Heppenloch bei Gutenberg (Württemberg). Stutt. Beitr. Naturkd. B 1975, 3, 1–247. [Google Scholar]
  211. Musil, R. Eine karstspalte mit mittelpleistozänen Funden im Kalksteinbruch Žernavá. Čas. Morav. Mus. Vědy Přírodní 1969, 54, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  212. Abbazzi, L.; Fanfani, F.; Ferretti, M.P.; Rook, L.; Cattani, L.; Masini, F.; Mallegni, F.; Negrino, F.; Tozzi, C. New human remains of archaic Homo sapiens and lower palaeolithic industries from Visogliano (Duino Aurisina, Trieste, Italy). J. Archaeol. Sci. 2000, 27, 1173–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Pilot, M.; Moura, A.E.; Okhlopkov, I.M.; Mamaev, N.V.; Alagaili, A.N.; Mohammed, O.B.; Yavruyan, E.G.; Manaseryan, N.H.; Hayrapetyan, V.; Kopaliani, N.; et al. Global phylogeographic and admixture patterns in grey wolves and genetic legacy of an ancient Siberian lineage. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Morrell, V. Ch2.1-From wolf to dog. Our furry friends: The science of pets. Sci. Am. 2015, 313, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Freedman, A.H.; Schweizer, R.M.; Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D.; Han, E.; Davis, B.W.; Gronau, I.; Silva, P.M.; Galaverni, M.; Fan, Z.; Marx, P.; et al. Demographically-based evaluation of genomic regions under selection in domestic dogs. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Janssens, L.; Giemsch, L.; Schmitz, R.; Street, M.; Van Dongen, S.; Crombé, P. A new look at an old dog: Bonn-Oberkassel reconsidered. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2018, 92, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Bergström, A.; Stanton, D.W.G.; Taron, U.H.; Frantz, L.; Sinding, M.-H.S.; Ersmark, E.; Pfrengle, S.; Cassatt-Johnstone, M.; Lebrasseur, O.; Girdland-Flink, L.; et al. Grey wolf genomic history reveals a dual ancestry of dogs. Nature 2022, 607, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Bryce, C.M.; Davis, M.S.; Gompper, M.E.; Hurt, A.; Koster, J.M.; Larson, G.; Ostrander, E.A.; Udell, M.A.R.; Urfer, S.; Wirsing, A.J.; et al. Biology’s best friend: Bridging disciplinary gaps to advance canine science. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2021, 61, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Perri, A.R.; Feuerborn, T.R.; Frantz, L.A.F.; Larson, G.; Malhi, R.S.; Meltzer, D.J.; Witt, K.E. Dog domestication and the dual dispersal of people and dogs into the Americas. PNAS 2021, 118, e2010083118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Germonpré, M.; Lázničková-Galetová, M.; Sablin, M.V.; Bocherens, H. Self-Domestication or Human Control? The Upper Palaeolithic Domestication of the Wolf. In Hybrid Communities. Biosocial Approaches to Domestication and Other Transspecies Relationships; Stepanoff, C., Vigne, J.-D., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 39–64. [Google Scholar]
  221. Wilczyński, J.; Haynes, G.; Sobczyk, Ł.; Svoboda, J.; Roblíčková, M.; Wojtal, P. Friend or foe? Large canid remains from Pavlovian sites and their archaeozoological context. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2020, 59, 101197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Marciszak, A.; Kasprzak, M.; Matyaszczyk, L. Canids and ursids from Południowa Cave (Sudety Mts, Silesia, SW Poland): Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology. Palaeontol. Electron. 2023; in review. [Google Scholar]
  223. Bartolini Lucenti, S.; Rook, L.; Morales, J. Nyctereutes (Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae) from Layna and the Eurasian raccoon-dogs: An updated revision. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat. 2018, 124, 597–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Domingo, L.; Koch, P.L.; Fernández, M.H.; Fox, D.L.; Domingo, M.S.; Alberdi, M.T. Late Neogene and early Quaternary paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic conditions in southwestern Europe: Isotopic analyses on mammalian taxa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Clauzon, G.; Le Strat, P.; Duvail, C.; Do Couto, D.; Suc, J.P.; Molliex, S.; Bache, F.; Besson, D.; Lindsay, E.H.; Opdyke, N.D.; et al. The Roussillon basin (S. France): A case-study to distinguish local and regional events between 6 and 3 Ma. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 18–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Bartolini Lucenti, S. Nyctereutes megamastoides (Canidae, Mammalia) from the early and middle Villafranchian (late Pliocene and early Pleistocene) of the Lower Valdarno (Firenze and Pisa, Tuscany, Italy). Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat. 2017, 123, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Bartolini Lucenti, S. Nyctereutes Temminck, 1838 (Mammalia, Canidae): A revision of the genus across the Old World during Plio-Pleistocene times. Fossilia 2018, 2018, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Tamvakis, A.; Savvidou, A.; Spassov, N.; Youlatos, D.; Merceron, G.; Kostopoulos, D.S. New insights on Early Pleistocene Nyctereutes from the Balkans based on material from Dafnero-3 (Greece) and Varshets (Bulgaria). Palaeoworld 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Teilhard de Chardin, P.; Pivetau, J. Les mammiferes fossils de Nihewan (Chine). Ann. Paleontol. 1930, 19, 1–134. [Google Scholar]
  230. Viret, J. Le loess à bancs durcis de Saint-Vallier (Drôme) et sa faune de mammifères villafranchiens. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon 1954, 4, 3–67. [Google Scholar]
  231. Kurtén, B.; Crusafont Pairó, M. Villafranchian carnivores (Mammalia) from La Puebla de Valverde (Teruel, Spain). Commentat. Biol. 1977, 85, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  232. Geraads, D. Carnivores du Pliocene terminal de Ahl al Oughlam (Casablanca, Maroc). Géobios 1997, 30, 127–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Koufos, G.D. The canids Eucyon and Nyctereutes from the Ruscinian of Macedonia, Greece. Paleont. Evol. 1997, 30–31, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  234. Ginsburg, L. Le gisement de vertébrés pliocènes de Çalta, Ankara, Turquie. 5. Carnivores. Geodiversitas 1998, 20, 379–396. [Google Scholar]
  235. Bartolini Lucenti, S.; Madurell-Malapeira, J. Unravelling the fossil record of foxes: An updated review on the Plio-Pleistocene Vulpes ssp. from Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 236, 106296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Kormos, T. Die Füchse des ungarischen Oberpliozän. Fol. Zool. Hydrobiol. 1932, 4, 167–188. [Google Scholar]
  237. Crégut, E. La faune de mammifères du Pléistocène moyen de la Caune de l’Arago à Tautavel (Pyrénées-Orientales). Trav. Laborat. Paléontol. Hum. Préh. Marseille 1979, 3, 1–381. [Google Scholar]
  238. García, N.; Arsuaga, J.L.; Torres, T.D. The carnivore remains from the Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). J. Hum. Evol. 1997, 33, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Moigne, A.-M.; Palombo, M.R.; Belda, V.; Heriech-Briki, D.; Kacimi, S.; Lacombat, F.; de Lumley, M.-A.; Moutoussamy, J.; Rivals, F.; Quilèsa, J.; et al. Les faunes de grands mammifères de la Caune de l’Arago (Tautavel) dans le cadre biochronologique des faunes du Pléistocène moyen italien. L’Anthropologie 2006, 110, 788–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Rabeder, G. Die Carnivore (Mammalia) aus dem Altpleistozän von Deutsch-Altenburg 2. Mit Beiträgen zur Systematik einiger Musteliden und Caniden. Beit. Paläontol. 1976, 1, 5–119. [Google Scholar]
  241. Spassov, N. Villafranchian succession of mammalian megafaunas from Bulgaria and the biozonation of southeast Europe. Geol. Balc. 1997, 27, 83–94. [Google Scholar]
  242. Spassov, N. Biochronology and zoogeographical affinities of the Villafranchian faunas of Bulgaria and south Europe. Hist. Nat. Bulg. 2000, 12, 89–128. [Google Scholar]
  243. Spassov, N. The Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate fauna in South-Eastern Europe and the megafaunal migratory waves from the east to Europe. Rev. Paléobiol. 2003, 22, 197–229. [Google Scholar]
  244. Odintzov, I.A. Vulpes praecorsac Kormos from Pliocene deposits of Odessa. Paleont. Zb. 1965, 2, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  245. Rook, L.; Bartolini Lucenti, S.; Bukhsianidze, M.; Lordkipanidze, D. The Kvabebi Canidae record revisited (late Pliocene, Sighnaghi, eastern Georgia). J. Paleontol. 2017, 91, 1258–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Bartolini Lucenti, S.; Alba, D.M. Middle Pleistocene fox from the Vallparadís Section (Vallès-Penedès Basin, NE Iberian Peninsula) and the earliest records of the extant red fox. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat. 2021, 127, 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  247. Geraads, D.; Drapeau, M.S.; Bobe, R.; Fleagle, J.G. Vulpes mathisoni, sp. nov., a new fox from the Pliocene Mursi Formation of southern Ethiopia and its contribution to the origin of African foxes. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2015, 35, e943765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Szuma, E. Geography of dental polymorphism in the red fox Vulpes vulpes and its evolutionary implications. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 90, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Szuma, E. Geography of sexual dimorphism in the tooth size of the red fox Vulpes vulpes (Mammalia, Carnivora). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2008, 46, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Szuma, E. Evolutionary and climatic factors affecting tooth size in the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the Holarctic. Mamm. Res. 2008, 53, 289–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Szuma, E. Geographic variation of tooth and skull sizes in the arctic fox Vulpes (Alopex) lagopus. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2008, 45, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Szuma, E. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of dental polymorphism in the arctic fox Vulpes (Alopex) lagopus. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2011, 48, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Sher, A.V. Olyorian land mammal age of northeastern Siberia. Palaeontogr. Ital. 1986, 74, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  254. Lister, A.M. The impact of Quaternary Ice Ages on mammalian evolution. Phil Trans. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359, 221–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  255. Krakhmalnaya, T.V. Carnivore remains from Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits in the Ukraine. Archäol. Eurasien 1999, 6, 223–235. [Google Scholar]
Genes 14 00539 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of paleontological sites with canid remains in Poland: 1—Podlesice, Podlesice Shelter, Żabia Cave and Babie Nogi Shelter, Zamkowa Dolna Cave, Kadzielnia, Kielniki, Przymiłowice, Towarna Cave, Olsztyńska i Wszystkich Świętych Cave and Ostrężnicka Cave; 2—Mała Cave, Węże 1, Ewy Cave, Raciszyn 1, Zalesiaki, Węże 2 and Draby; 3—Mokra (1 and 2), Rębielice Królewskie and Kamyk; 4—Kozi Grzbiet, Sitkówka, Raj Cave and Zygmuntówka Quarry; 5—Południowa Cave, Wschodnia Cave, Naciekowa Cave, Obok Wschodniej Cave, Północna Duża Cave, Cisowe Shelter (1 and 2), Małgorzaty Shelter, Kuny Shelter, Wilcze Shelter, Panna Shelter, Trwoga Paleontologa Shelter, Aven w Połomie Cave and Kryształowa Cave; 6—Tunel Wielki Cave, Sąspowska Zachodnia Cave, Bramka Shelter and Zalas Shelter; 7—Biśnik Cave, Zegar Cave, Mroczna w Pośrednicy Cave, Jasna Strzegowska Cave, Shelter in Pośrednica 2, Pośrednie Shelter and Jasna Smoleńska Cave; 8—Deszczowa Cave, Niedźwiedzia Górna Cave and Krucza Skała Shelter; 9—Wierzchowska Górna Cave, Nietoperzowa Cave, Mamutowa Cave, Koziarnia Cave, Łokietka Cave, Gorenicka Cave, Żytnia Skała Shelter, na Miłaszówce Cave, Murek Cave and Shelter above Niedostępna Cave; 10—Dziadowa Skała Cave, Stajnia Cave, Górne Shelter above Stajnia Cave, Cave no 4 on Mount Birów, Ruska Skała Shelter, Komarowa Cave and Wilcze 1 Shelter; 11—Niedźwiedzia Cave, Na Ścianie Cave, Biały Kamień Cave, Kontaktowa Cave, Rogóżka Cave and Small Przy Torach Cave; 12—Ciemna Cave, Zbójecka Cave, Zawalona Cave, Puchacza Skała Shelter and Duża Cave at Mączna Skała; 13—Radochowska Cave; 14—Solna Jama Cave; 15—Obłazowa Cave and Obłazowa 2; 16—Wrocław-Hallera; 17—Skarszyn; 18—Kraków-Spadzista, Borsuka Cave, na Gołąbcu Cave, Maszycka Cave, nad Galoską Cave and na Gaiku 2 Shelter; 19—Borsucza Cave and nad Mosurem Starym Duża Cave; 20—Jaksice 2; 21—Pietraszyn; 22—Pyskowice; 23—Magurska Cave; 24—Wilczyce; 25—Okiennik Cave; 26—Przegińska Cave; 27—in Sobczański Wąwóz Cave; 28—Poszukiwaczy Skarbów Cave, Ciasna Cave; 29—Krobia; 30—Tczew; 31—Elbląg; 32—Trzebowisko; 33—Rzeszów (Wisłoka river); 34—Wielopolka.
Figure 1. Location of paleontological sites with canid remains in Poland: 1—Podlesice, Podlesice Shelter, Żabia Cave and Babie Nogi Shelter, Zamkowa Dolna Cave, Kadzielnia, Kielniki, Przymiłowice, Towarna Cave, Olsztyńska i Wszystkich Świętych Cave and Ostrężnicka Cave; 2—Mała Cave, Węże 1, Ewy Cave, Raciszyn 1, Zalesiaki, Węże 2 and Draby; 3—Mokra (1 and 2), Rębielice Królewskie and Kamyk; 4—Kozi Grzbiet, Sitkówka, Raj Cave and Zygmuntówka Quarry; 5—Południowa Cave, Wschodnia Cave, Naciekowa Cave, Obok Wschodniej Cave, Północna Duża Cave, Cisowe Shelter (1 and 2), Małgorzaty Shelter, Kuny Shelter, Wilcze Shelter, Panna Shelter, Trwoga Paleontologa Shelter, Aven w Połomie Cave and Kryształowa Cave; 6—Tunel Wielki Cave, Sąspowska Zachodnia Cave, Bramka Shelter and Zalas Shelter; 7—Biśnik Cave, Zegar Cave, Mroczna w Pośrednicy Cave, Jasna Strzegowska Cave, Shelter in Pośrednica 2, Pośrednie Shelter and Jasna Smoleńska Cave; 8—Deszczowa Cave, Niedźwiedzia Górna Cave and Krucza Skała Shelter; 9—Wierzchowska Górna Cave, Nietoperzowa Cave, Mamutowa Cave, Koziarnia Cave, Łokietka Cave, Gorenicka Cave, Żytnia Skała Shelter, na Miłaszówce Cave, Murek Cave and Shelter above Niedostępna Cave; 10—Dziadowa Skała Cave, Stajnia Cave, Górne Shelter above Stajnia Cave, Cave no 4 on Mount Birów, Ruska Skała Shelter, Komarowa Cave and Wilcze 1 Shelter; 11—Niedźwiedzia Cave, Na Ścianie Cave, Biały Kamień Cave, Kontaktowa Cave, Rogóżka Cave and Small Przy Torach Cave; 12—Ciemna Cave, Zbójecka Cave, Zawalona Cave, Puchacza Skała Shelter and Duża Cave at Mączna Skała; 13—Radochowska Cave; 14—Solna Jama Cave; 15—Obłazowa Cave and Obłazowa 2; 16—Wrocław-Hallera; 17—Skarszyn; 18—Kraków-Spadzista, Borsuka Cave, na Gołąbcu Cave, Maszycka Cave, nad Galoską Cave and na Gaiku 2 Shelter; 19—Borsucza Cave and nad Mosurem Starym Duża Cave; 20—Jaksice 2; 21—Pietraszyn; 22—Pyskowice; 23—Magurska Cave; 24—Wilczyce; 25—Okiennik Cave; 26—Przegińska Cave; 27—in Sobczański Wąwóz Cave; 28—Poszukiwaczy Skarbów Cave, Ciasna Cave; 29—Krobia; 30—Tczew; 31—Elbląg; 32—Trzebowisko; 33—Rzeszów (Wisłoka river); 34—Wielopolka.
Genes 14 00539 g001
Genes 14 00539 g002 550
Figure 2. Biochronology of Polish canids (late Pliocene to Holocene): 1—E. odessanus, 2—N. donnezani, 3—C. etruscus, 4—L. falconeri, 5—V. alopecoides, 6—C. mosbachensis, 7—L. lycaonoides, 8—V. praeglacialis, 9—C. l. lunellensis, 10—C. a. priscus, 11—V. lagopus, 12—V. vulpes, 13—C. a. europaeus, 14—C. l. spelaeus. Extant, Polish canids are separated and showed in the rectangle: 15—C. l. familiaris (a big specimen of the common dog race German shepherd, with a withers height of 70 cm, for comparison to wild canids), 16—C. l. lupus, 17—C. aureus, 18—V. vulpes, 19—N. procyonoides. Artwork by W. Gornig.
Figure 2. Biochronology of Polish canids (late Pliocene to Holocene): 1—E. odessanus, 2—N. donnezani, 3—C. etruscus, 4—L. falconeri, 5—V. alopecoides, 6—C. mosbachensis, 7—L. lycaonoides, 8—V. praeglacialis, 9—C. l. lunellensis, 10—C. a. priscus, 11—V. lagopus, 12—V. vulpes, 13—C. a. europaeus, 14—C. l. spelaeus. Extant, Polish canids are separated and showed in the rectangle: 15—C. l. familiaris (a big specimen of the common dog race German shepherd, with a withers height of 70 cm, for comparison to wild canids), 16—C. l. lupus, 17—C. aureus, 18—V. vulpes, 19—N. procyonoides. Artwork by W. Gornig.
Genes 14 00539 g002
Genes 14 00539 g003 550
Figure 3. Lower carnassials (m1) of the Pleistocene canids from Poland: 1—L. lycaonoides from Żabia Cave (1.7–1.5 myr ago), 2—L. lycaonoides from Draby (MIS 11), 3—C. a. fossilis from Wschodnia Cave (MIS 8), 4—C. a. europaeus from Rogóżka Cave (MIS 3), 5—Vulpes vulpes angustidens from Rębielice Królewskie 2 (MIS 15-13), 6—C. l. spelaeus from Radochowska Cave (MIS 3), 7—C. lupus ssp. from of Dziadowa Skała Cave, layer 3 (MIS 5e), 8—C. mosbachensis from Żabia Cave (1.7–1.5 myr ago), 9—C. mosbachensis from Południowa Cave (MIS 19-17), 10—C. l. lunellensis from Biśnik Cave, layer 19ad (MIS 9), 11—C. etruscus from Węże 2 (2.9–2.6 myr ago), 12—C. mosbachensis from Sitkówka (MIS 15-13). All teeth showed in the same scale, in the occlusal view. Scale bar 10 mm.
Figure 3. Lower carnassials (m1) of the Pleistocene canids from Poland: 1—L. lycaonoides from Żabia Cave (1.7–1.5 myr ago), 2—L. lycaonoides from Draby (MIS 11), 3—C. a. fossilis from Wschodnia Cave (MIS 8), 4—C. a. europaeus from Rogóżka Cave (MIS 3), 5—Vulpes vulpes angustidens from Rębielice Królewskie 2 (MIS 15-13), 6—C. l. spelaeus from Radochowska Cave (MIS 3), 7—C. lupus ssp. from of Dziadowa Skała Cave, layer 3 (MIS 5e), 8—C. mosbachensis from Żabia Cave (1.7–1.5 myr ago), 9—C. mosbachensis from Południowa Cave (MIS 19-17), 10—C. l. lunellensis from Biśnik Cave, layer 19ad (MIS 9), 11—C. etruscus from Węże 2 (2.9–2.6 myr ago), 12—C. mosbachensis from Sitkówka (MIS 15-13). All teeth showed in the same scale, in the occlusal view. Scale bar 10 mm.
Genes 14 00539 g003
Table
Table 1. List of the main Polish sites with canid remains in chronological order.
Table 1. List of the main Polish sites with canid remains in chronological order.
SiteAgeE. odessanusN. donnezaniL. falconeriL. lycaonoidesCuon alpinus priscusCuon alpinus fossilisCuon alpinus europaeusCanis etruscusCanis mosbachensisCanis lupus lunellensisCanis lupus spelaeusCanis lupus lupus/ssp.Vulpes alopecoidesVulpes praeglacialisVulpes vulpesVulpes lagopus
Węże 13.8–3.4 myr
Węże 22.8–2.6 myr
Rębielice Królewskie 1A2.4–2.2 myr
Zamkowa Dolna Cave A2.4–2.2 myr
Kielniki 3B2.2–1.8 myr
Kadzielnia2.2–1.8 myr
Kamyk1.9–1.8 myr
Żabia Cave1.7–1.5 myr
Kielniki 3A1.5–1.3 myr
Zalesiaki 1A1.1–0.9 myr
Kielniki 11.1–0.8 myr
Zamkowa Dolna Cave C1.0–0.8 myr
PrzymiłowiceMIS 22-17
Kozi GrzbietMIS 19-17
SitkówkaMIS 19-17
Południowa CaveMIS 17-15
Rębielice Królewskie 2MIS 15-13
Tunel Wielki CaveMIS 14-12
Draby 3MIS 11
Biśnik Cave, l. 19ad-19MIS 9
Deszczowa Cave, l. 1-5MIS 9-8
Wschodnia CaveMIS 8-7
Biśnik Cave, l. 18-13MIS 7-5e
Wierzchowska Górna CaveMIS 7-1
Nietoperzowa CaveMIS 6-1
Komarowa CaveMIS 6-1
Stajnia CaveMIS 6-1
Dziadowa Skała CaveMIS 5e-1
Mamutowa CaveMIS 5-1
Koziarnia CaveMIS 5-1
Niedźwiedzia CaveMIS 5d-1
Raj CaveMIS 5-1
Biśnik Cave, l. 12-1MIS 5d-1
Radochowska CaveMIS 5d-1
SkarszynMIS 3
Kraków-SpadzistaMIS 3
Late Pleistocene 1MIS 5d-1
Holocene 2MIS 1
1 Various Late Pleistocene Polish sites are characterised by the same canid composition: C. lupus, V. vulpes and V. lagopus. Those localities are: Towarna Cave, Ciemna Cave, Tczew, Elbląg, Malschwitz, Naciekowa Cave, Obok Wschodniej Cave, Północna Duża Cave, Wschodnia Cave, Rogóżka Cave, Obłazowa Cave, Bramka Shelter, Żytnia Skała Shelter, Ruska Skała Shelter, Cisowe 1 Shelter, Biały Kamień Cave, Miniaturka Cave, Na Ścianie Cave, Aven w Połomie Cave, Zbójecka Cave, Gorenicka Cave, Okiennik Cave, na Miłaszówce Cave, na Gołąbcu Cave, nad Galoską Cave, na Gaiku 2 Shelter, Obłazowa Skała 2, Murek Cave, Trzebowisko, Przegińska Cave, Poszukiwaczy Skarbów Cave, Solna Jama Cave, Magurska Cave, Rzeszów, Wisłoka river, Wielopolka, Krucza Skała Shelter, Wrocław-Hallera, Maszycka Cave, Zalas Shelter. In some, such as in Naciekowa Cave, Obok Wschodniej Cave, Północna Duża Cave, Wschodnia Cave, Rogóżka Cave and Skarszyn, a presence of very large, robust cave wolf C. l. spelaeus, a characteristic element of glacial faunas, has been detected. 2 From numerous Holocene Polish localities (Sąspowska Zachodnia Cave, in Sobczański Wąwóz Cave, Puchacza Skała Shelter, Cisowe 2 Shelter, Małgorzaty Shelter, Kuny Shelter, Panna Shelter, Trwoga Paleontologa Shelter, Niedostępną Cave, Ciasna Cave, Puchacza Skała Cave, Nad Mosurem Starym Duża Cave, Kontaktowa Cave, Small Przy Torach Cave, Duża Cave at Mączna Skała, Zbójecka Cave, Gorenicka Cave, Okiennik Cave, na Miłaszówce Cave, na Gołąbcu Cave, nad Galoską Cave, na Gaiku 2 Shelter, Murek Cave), the occurrence of two canids was documented: C. lupus, V. vulpes. Additionally, in most of these paleontological sites as well as from a few thousands of archaeological localities, Canis lupus familiaris Linnaeus, 1758 was documented. The oldest remains of a domestic dog from Poland are not older than 11–10 kyr BP and are much younger than other European finds. The result is that they change absolutely nothing in the research on canine biochronology and therefore they are not the subject of this study. The presence of this species is only signalled and listing all the sites is beyond the scope of this work.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marciszak, A.; Kropczyk, A.; Gornig, W.; Kot, M.; Nadachowski, A.; Lipecki, G. History of Polish Canidae (Carnivora, Mammalia) and Their Biochronological Implications on the Eurasian Background. Genes 2023, 14, 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030539

AMA Style

Marciszak A, Kropczyk A, Gornig W, Kot M, Nadachowski A, Lipecki G. History of Polish Canidae (Carnivora, Mammalia) and Their Biochronological Implications on the Eurasian Background. Genes. 2023; 14(3):539. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marciszak, Adrian, Aleksandra Kropczyk, Wiktoria Gornig, Małgorzata Kot, Adam Nadachowski, and Grzegorz Lipecki. 2023. "History of Polish Canidae (Carnivora, Mammalia) and Their Biochronological Implications on the Eurasian Background" Genes 14, no. 3: 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop