Next Article in Journal
The Coding Mitogenome of the Freshwater Crayfish Pontastacus leptodactylus (Decapoda:Astacidea:Astacidae) from Lake Vegoritida, Greece and Its Taxonomic Classification
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Genome Mapping Reveals and Characterizes Recurrent Aberrations and New Fusion Genes in Adult ALL
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Identifies a Novel SALL1 Deletion, Supporting the Association of Haploinsufficiency with a Mild Phenotype of Townes–Brocks Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020491
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Repeat Accumulation in the Bimodal Karyotype of Agave L.

by
Lamonier Chaves Ramos
1,2,
Mariana Báez
2,3,
Joerg Fuchs
4,
Andreas Houben
4,
Reginaldo Carvalho
1 and
Andrea Pedrosa-Harand
2,*
1
Laboratory of Plant Cytogenetics, Graduate Program in Agronomy, Genetic Plant Breeding—PPGAMGP, Department of Agronomy, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-420, Brazil
3
Plant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, 53115 Bonn, Germany
4
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020491
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Commemorating the Launch of the Section "Cytogenomics")
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Agave presents a bimodal karyotype with x = 30 (5L, large, +25S, small chromosomes). Bimodality within this genus is generally attributed to allopolyploidy in the ancestral form of Agavoideae. However, alternative mechanisms, such as the preferential accumulation of repetitive elements at the macrochromosomes, could also be important. Aiming to understand the role of repetitive DNA within the bimodal karyotype of Agave, genomic DNA from the commercial hybrid 11648 (2n = 2x = 60, 6.31 Gbp) was sequenced at low coverage, and the repetitive fraction was characterized. In silico analysis showed that ~67.6% of the genome is mainly composed of different LTR retrotransposon lineages and one satellite DNA family (AgSAT171). The satellite DNA localized at the centromeric regions of all chromosomes; however, stronger signals were observed for 20 of the macro- and microchromosomes. All transposable elements showed a dispersed distribution, but not uniform across the length of the chromosomes. Different distribution patterns were observed for different TE lineages, with larger accumulation at the macrochromosomes. The data indicate the differential accumulation of LTR retrotransposon lineages at the macrochromosomes, probably contributing to the bimodality. Nevertheless, the differential accumulation of the satDNA in one group of macro- and microchromosomes possibly reflects the hybrid origin of this Agave accession.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A bimodal karyotype is composed of two sets of chromosomes of contrasting sizes, known as macro- (large) and microchromosomes (small). These karyotypes have, in general, an old origin, and their conservation may be related to some adaptive advantage [1] and/or mechanism of karyotypic orthoselection, as suggested for species of the genus Hippeastrum Herb. [2]. The origin of bimodal karyotypes could be attributed to three possible mechanisms. First, these karyotypes could be the consequence of chromosome rearrangements involving fusion–fission events, where macrochromosomes are the products of microchromosome fusions [3], or these are the results of macrochromosome fission, as observed in some bimodal karyotypes of the Lilieae tribe (Liliaceae) [4]. Second, allopolyploidy could result in a bimodal karyotype by the hybridization of parent species with different chromosome sizes, confirmed in Aloe L. (Asphodelaceae) [5] and Milium montianum Parl. (Poaceae) [6]. Third, the differential accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences has contributed to the increased size of a chromosome subset within the bimodal karyotypes of Muscari comosum (L.) Miller (Hyacinthaceae) [7], Eleutherine bulbosa (Miller) Urban (Iridaceae) [8] and Cuscuta L. bimodal species [9].
Repetitive sequences are involved in genome evolution, causing differences in DNA content between species because of insertions and deletions of repeats [10,11]. In plants, transposable elements (TEs) and satellite DNAs (satDNAs), as well as ribosomal DNAs, are the most abundant, contributing to karyotype evolution [12,13]. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has allowed detailed analyses of the composition of the genomes, especially the characterization of repetitive sequences and comparison of their evolutionary dynamics [9,14,15], including their dynamics in allopolyploid genomes [10,16].
The genus Agave L. (Asparagaceae Juss.) is characterized by having a highly conserved bimodal karyotype. Its monoploid set generally consists of 5 macrochromosomes and 25 microchromosomes, with some variation especially at higher ploidy levels [17,18]. Bimodality in this genus was attributed to allopolyploidy, although the possibility of chromosomal fusion and fission events could not be discounted [19]. The genus has different ploidy levels, with species ranging from diploid to octoploid [20]. Agave sensu lato, including Manfreda, Polianthes, and Prochnyanthes, is endemic to America, and comprises around 200 species. It is monocarpic, which means that the plant reproduces only once after many years and then dies [21]. Some Agave species are grown to produce natural fibres as a sustainable alternative for industrial products [22]. Because of their slow growth rate, long lifespan (8 to 20 years) and inefficient sexual reproduction, it is very difficult to genetically improve agaves, and consequently, little has been achieved. Most of the species of the genus are wild and constitute an important genetic resource for breeding purposes [17]. There is only one example of a breeding program implemented in today’s Tanzania in the early 20th century, which produced the only Agave hybrid (H11648) ever commercially exploited [23]. Agronomically, this hybrid stands out for its drought tolerance, significant leaf formation potential and superior fibre production per hectare, being the main one among the few genotypes widely cultivated for this purpose worldwide [24].
The H11648 cultivar has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 60, with a genome size of 1C = 7.61 pg [25,26], and is originally from Africa, obtained through a backcross between Agave angustifolia Haw. × Agave amaniensis Trel. and Nowell and A. amaniensis [23,27,28]. The hybrid is fertile, producing viable seeds, although it is usually clonally propagated. Both parental species possess 2n = 60 chromosomes with similar karyotypes [17,29,30], although A. amaniensis is not investigated in detail. Tetraploid and hexaploid varieties of A. angustifolia are also known [26], and intraspecific variation between diploid A. angustifolia cultivars was reported, with differences in the karyotype formulae (for instance, 42 m + 4 sm + 6 st + 8 t for “Cimarron” and 48 m + 2 sm + 2 st + 8 t for “Lineño”) and polymorphism of the secondary constriction, among other cytogenetic parameters [17,30]. One locus of 5S and 35S rDNA is present per basic, monoploid genome. The 5S rDNA locate proximally on a small submetacentric chromosome and the 35S rDNA is located in the secondary constriction of a large acrocentric chromosome, as observed for A. angustifolia and other Agave species [26,31]. Phylogenetically, A. angustifolia and A. amaniensis are closely related to each other and to A. americana, and the position of the hybrid H11648 in the same clade corroborates its known origin [32,33].
In order to characterize the repeats of Agave, the repetitive fraction of the Agave hybrid 11648 was in silico analysed, and the chromosomal distribution of the most abundant sequences was investigated. We selected H11648 because this accession is diploid and shows a typical Agave bimodal karyotype. In addition, this accession is cultivated worldwide due to its economic importance and is readily available. The characterization of its genome could assist further breeding. If bimodality is solely associated with allopolyploidy, we expected distinct repetitive elements from the ancestral species in either the macro- or microchromosomes. In the case of dysploidy by chromosome fusion, the distribution of repeats in multiple blocks along the macrochromosomes could be indicative of microchromosome fusions. However, the enrichment of repetitive sequences in macrochromosomes could only suggest that bimodality was correlated to the differential accumulation of repeats in macrochromosomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Young clones and seeds of the Agave hybrid H11648 were provided by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation Embrapa-Cotton, Paraíba, Brazil. Genomic DNA was extracted from seedlings, which was also used for estimating the genome size. Asexually reproduced individuals were kept in pots under external environmental conditions (approx. 30 °C and high humidity) in the experimental garden of the Laboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil, and used to collect roots for cytological preparations.

2.2. Slide Preparation and Double Staining with CMA/DAPI

Root tips were pre-treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 24 h at 10 °C, fixed in methanol: acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 2 h at room temperature and stored at −20 °C. After washing in distilled water, root tips were digested in a citrate phosphate buffer solution containing 2% cellulose (w/v, Onozuka), 20% pectinase (v/v, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C for 3 h. After enzymatic digestion, the root tips were disintegrated, with the aid of needles, in a cold fixative (methanol: acetic acid 3:1, v/v). With the use of an air pump, the meristem was spread over the surface of a slightly tilted slide. Then, slides were dipped in 45% acetic acid for 30 s and taken to a flat, preheated surface until completely dried at 37 °C, modified from [34].
Staining with chromomycin A3 (CMA) and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) fluorochromes was performed according to [35]. Slides were aged for three days at room temperature, stained with CMA at 0.1 mg/mL in McIlvaine buffer for 60 min and with 2 µg/mL DAPI for 30 min, and mounted in McIlvaine-glycerol buffer 1:1 (v/v). After image acquisition, the slides were destained with ethanol: acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 30 min, then dehydrated with ethanol for 60 min at room temperature, air-dried and used for sequential fluorescent in situ hybridization with ribosomal DNA probes.

2.3. Genome Size Estimation

Samples were prepared from 40 to 50 mg of young leaves in 1 mL of LB nuclear isolation buffer and filtered through a 30 µm nylon filter [36]. Hordeum vulgare L. (2C = 16.01 pg) served as standard. Nuclei were stained with propidium iodide (50 µg/mL), and RNase A (50 mg/mL) was added to prevent staining of RNA. The nuclear DNA content was determined with a Partec CyFlow SL (Partec) flow cytometer, and results were analysed with the Flomax program. For genome size estimations, three replicates were analysed, in two different days, and the nuclear DNA content of Agave H11648 was calculated according to [36].

2.4. Sequencing of Genomic DNA and Repeat Characterization

Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves using the DNAeasy Plant MiniKit kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and sequenced through the Illumina platform at IPK, Gatersleben, Germany, generating paired-end reads of 101 bp of length (GenBank Bioproject PRJNA934096). The obtained reads were used to identify and characterize the most abundant repetitive DNA families using the RepeatExplorer platform (http://repeatexplorer.umbr.cas.cz, accessed on 19 December 2016) [37,38]. This pipeline groups sequences by similarity, generating clusters for different repetitive DNA families. Standard parameters were used, and the clustering was performed with a minimum overlap of 55% and a similarity of 90% throughout the sequence. Protein domains were identified using the Find RT Domains tool within the platform. The clusters were identified and classified through searches in various databases, as well as by similarity searches (BLASTn and BLASTx) against GenBank and TIGR BLAST search. The layouts of the graphs of individual clusters were examined using the SeqGrapheR program [38]. Clusters containing satellite DNA were identified based on the presence of tandem sub repetitions within their sequences or assembled contigs using DOTTER [39]. All families of repetitive sequences were annotated manually, using the results of the different programs. Mobile elements were named according to [40].

2.5. Sequence Amplification and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

Primers for the six most abundant sequences of transposable elements (LTR retrotransposons Ty1/copia SIRE, Tork and TAR, and LTR retrotransposons Ty3/gypsy Ogre, Athila and Chromovirus) were designed based on the Integrase domain using the Geneious 7.0 software (Supplementary Table S1). For the satellite DNA family, primers were designed facing outwards, anchored at the most conserved region of the monomer, using the same software. The repetitive sequences were amplified by PCR under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 amplification cycles, each consisting of 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min, and 10 min final elongation at 72 °C. PCR reactions included 50 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.1 mM dNTP, 1× PCR buffer (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 mM MgCl2, 1× TBT (50 mM trehalose, 1 mg/mL BSA, 1% Tween 20 and 8.5 mM Tris hydrochloride) and 0.04 U of Taq Polymerase (Invitrogen). Products were checked on a 1% agarose gel, and sequences were confirmed and labelled with Cy3-dUTP (GE) by nick translation (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
To locate the ribosomal DNA sites, a clone containing a 500 bp fragment of the 5S rDNA of Lotus japonicus (Regel) K.Larsen (Fabaceae) [41] was labelled with Cy3-dUTP (GE), and a clone containing a 6.5 kb fragment corresponding to the 35S rDNA of Arabidopsis thaliana [42] was labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche). The 35S rDNA probe was detected with anti-digoxigenin produced in sheep, conjugated with FITC (Roche), and signals were amplified with anti-sheep IgG produced in rabbits also conjugated with FITC (Serotec).
FISH was performed according to [41], with minor modifications. The hybridization mix was composed of 50% formamide (v/v), 10% dextran sulphate (w/v), 2× SSC and 50 ng/μL of each probe. The slides were denatured at 75 °C for 3 min, and the final stringency of hybridization was 76%.

2.6. Image Acquisition and Processing

The images were captured with a Leica DM5500B microscope coupled with a Leica DFC345 FX camera and the LAS AF software. The images were uniformly optimized for brightness and contrast using Adobe Photoshop CS3.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and In Silico Characterization of Repetitive Sequences

Eight million 101 bp long sequence reads were obtained (800 Mbp) and, considering the genome size of the hybrid Agave H11648 2C = 12.91 pg (or 1C = 6.31 Gbp), this amount of reads corresponded to a genome coverage of approximately 0.13×. The automatic subsampling of 33.7% of the total input reads in the RepeatExplorer platform generated 43,944 clusters, containing 2 to 55,804 reads each. Of this total, 268 clusters containing at least 0.01% of the genome were annotated.
After annotation of the clusters and elimination of plastidial and mitochondrial DNA sequences, the analysis revealed that ~67.2% of the nuclear genome is composed of repetitive DNA. A total of 99% of repeats were classified, and 2% of the nuclear DNA is composed of a single satellite DNA family called AgSAT171, with a monomer length of ~171 bp. The most abundant elements were LTR retrotransposons, which constituted 62.5% of the nuclear DNA. Around 25% were classified as Ty1/copia elements, with the most abundant lineages being SIRE (4%), Tork (1.92%) and TAR (1.41%). Of the elements, 16.6% were annotated as Ty3/gypsy, with the most abundant lineages being Ogre, Athila and Chromovirus with 3.36%, 2.37% and 1.97%, respectively (Table 1).

3.2. Differential Distribution of Repeats along Micro- and Macrochromosomes

In order to understand the distribution of the main repetitive sequences in the bimodal karyotype of Agave, the six most abundant TEs (three Ty1/copia and three Ty3/gypsy elements) were amplified by PCR, labelled directly and used as probes for fluorescent in situ hybridization to mitotic chromosomes. All transposable elements showed a dispersed distribution, both in the micro- and macrochromosomes. However, some elements were differentially enriched in specific regions. The Ty1/copia Tork and TAR lineages were mainly distributed at proximal regions of the long arms of the macrochromosomes, while Ty1/copia SIRE and Ty3/gypsy Athila lineages were located more densely dispersed at interstitial and distal regions. On the other hand, Ty3/gypsy Chromovirus and Ogre lineages showed a dispersed distribution, with no particular intense region, along the macrochromosomes. All elements probed showed a dispersed labelling along microchromosomes, with variable intensities, but signals were generally weaker than along macrochromosomes (Figure 1).
The only satellite, AgSAT171, showed a single pair of dot-like signals per chromosome, associated with the primary constriction, when visible. However, strong signals were observed in only 20 chromosomes of the complement, 1 macro- and 19 microchromosomes, suggesting an enrichment of this repeat in a subset of macro- and microchromosomes (Figure 2). Double CMA/DAPI staining was used to visualize regions associated with heterochromatin and, together with the 35S and 5S rDNA sites, allowed the identification of three chromosome pairs. A pair of macrochromosomes had a CMA+/DAPI− interstitial band, colocalized with the 35S rDNA site. A pair of microchromosomes was also evidenced by a CMA+/DAPI− band, and a different microchromosome pair presented the 5S rDNA site (Figure 2). Single chromosome pairs bearing rDNA sites is a common feature among Agave species [26,31]. In the 35S rDNA carrying chromosome pair, the difference in intensity of the putative centromeric AgSAT171 signal between both chromosomes was very evident (arrows in Figure 2).
Thus, the chromosomal distribution of the main repetitive sequences of the Agave genome showed an accumulation of LTR retroelements, both Ty1/copia and Ty3/gypsy, in the macrochromosomes. On the other hand, tandem repeats were similarly distributed in both macro- and microchromosomes.

4. Discussion

We characterized the repetitive fraction of a representative of the Agave genus and revealed that most of its genome (~67.6%) is composed of different families of repeats, 62.5% being LTR retroelements, compatible with its relatively large genome (1C = 6.31 Gbp), although slightly smaller than previously reported (7.61 pg) [26]. This estimate of repeat content is much higher than that proposed for Hosta Tratt. from the same subfamily Agavoideae (Asparagaceae), with a repetitive DNA fraction of 4.49% and a genome size of 1C = 19.12 Gbp. At least part of this difference might be due to the different methodologies used [43]. In our analysis, Ty1/copia were the most abundant and diversified elements, as also observed for Agave tequilana Weber, for which a detailed molecular characterization of Ty1/copia elements is provided [44].
Despite the high abundance of repeats in general, only one family of satellite DNA with a genome abundance above 0.01% was found, which shared no similarity with a previously characterized satellite-like DNA from A. angustifolia Haworth, A. tequilana Webber and A. fourcroydes Lemaire [45]. The high proportion of retroelements and the low proportion of satellite DNA may explain the small amount of heterochromatin observed by CMA/DAPI staining, despite its large genome size. A small amount of satDNA was also observed in other plant species with larger genomes, such as Passiflora quadrangularis, with the largest genome known for its genus and only a few satellites, mostly related to the 35S rDNA [46]. Nevertheless, LTR-TEs may also form CMA+ bands in chromosomes, such as in some legumes from the Caesalpinia group where CMA+ bands are composed mainly of the Ty3/gypsy Tekay lineage [47] and several species from the Phaseolus genus with a complex composition involving different repetitive sequences [48]. Similarly, CMA/DAPI may not reveal large satDNA blocks if they are not particularly enriched in A/T or G/C, as seen in the Brazilian species of Alstroemeria genus with some satellites located on euchromatin [14].
Centromeric satellite DNA is commonly the most abundant satDNA of a species [49], and, indeed, the only abundant satellite DNA family of Agave is a putative centromeric repeat, based on its chromosomal distribution. The large Agave chromosomes are subtelocentric or telocentric [17,22], which is congruent with the position of AgSAT171. In addition to the 35S rDNA site, which colocalized with a CMA+/DAPI− band, a second heterochromatic band was observed in the genome, suggesting the existence of at least a second (not identified) tandem repeat of low abundance. Additional approaches [50] could be employed for identifying low-abundant satDNAs in Agave.
The centromeric satDNA varied in signal intensity between chromosome pairs, with a stronger signal in one-third of the chromosomes, suggesting that they contain significantly more copies of the AgSAT171 repeat. However, this distribution is not related to the bimodal condition of this karyotype, since both macro- and microchromosomes showed strong and weak hybridization signals. The difference in the abundance of centromeric satellite DNA among chromosomes may be related to the fact that the genotype originated from an interspecific backcross. In Saccharum spontaneum, an octoploid species, the distribution of centromeric satDNA also revealed high-intensity signals in only 8 of the 64 chromosomes of the complement; however, in this case, this observation was related to the ploidy level of species [51]. In the case of Agave, our hypothesis is that A. angustifolia presents a greater abundance of AgSAT171 than A. amaniensis. This latter species is the recurrent parent in the crossings that originated this Agave hybrid, suggesting that the two-thirds of chromosomes which have less AgSAT171 are coming from A. amaniensis. If confirmed, this repeat could be used as a marker to assist breeding programs for Agave hybrids.
Different lineages of retroelements displayed a differential distribution along the macrochromosomes. Ty1/copia Tork and TAR lineages were enriched at proximal regions of the long arms, while Ty1/copia SIRE and Ty3/gypsy Athila were enriched at interstitial and distal regions of the same chromosome arms. In most of the species with small genomes, the distribution of these elements is frequently related to the pericentromeric region, as seen in species from Phaseolus [48] and Passiflora [46]. On the other hand, species with larger genomes present a uniform distribution of most retroelements, commonly without any specific pattern along the chromosomes, as observed in the larger genomes within the Passiflora subgenus [46]. In different bimodal karyotypes, a combination of these patterns with the large chromosomes showing a dispersed uniform distribution and the small chromosomes an enrichment at pericentromeric regions was found, such as in E. bulbosa [8] and some species of Cuscuta [9]. Here, in addition to presenting differential dispersed distribution between chromosome sets, the largest chromosomes of the Agave bimodal karyotype display specific patterns for different lineages of repetitive sequences along the chromosomes.
Since the karyotype with 5 macro- and 25 microchromosomes pairs was first described [52], both fusion and fission and, more recently, allopolyploidy have been proposed as mechanisms to explain the bimodality [18,19]. Karyotype comparisons involving several species of Agave and closely related groups showed that the genus Agave has a smaller number of macrochromosomes and an increase in the number of microchromosomes, in addition to acro/telocentric chromosomes, suggesting fission events [18]. On the other hand, the analysis of transcriptome data indicated events of whole-genome duplication (WGD), with one WGD shared between species with bimodal karyotype, suggesting that the origin of the bimodal karyotype in the subfamily Agavoideae may be related to allopolyploidy [19]. The distribution of repetitive sequences on the chromosomes of Agave does not support any of these hypotheses for the origin of chromosomal bimodality in Agavoideae but provides support for the contribution of multiple LTR retrotransposons to the size of macrochromosomes within this group.
Different lineages of LTR retrotransposons accumulated in more significant proportion in the macrochromosomes of Agave, showing similarity to that observed in E. bulbosa. In this species, which has one pair of macrochromosomes and five pairs of microchromosomes, it was seen that both satellite DNA and several LTR retrotransposon probes showed more intense and uniform labelling in the larger chromosome pair after FISH [8]. In Agave, three of these same lineages (Tork, SIRE and Chromovirus) were more abundant in macrochromosomes. However, instead of a uniform distribution for all of them, some were preferentially enriched in the proximal regions and others in the more distal regions of the Agave macrochromosomes. In addition, even the microchromosomes showed a relatively uniform distribution for the same elements, instead of a pericentromeric distribution, as observed for the microchromosomes of Eleutherine and in small genome species. Therefore, Agave repeats have an unusual chromosomal distribution of repeats, perhaps related to its bimodal organization.

5. Conclusions

Altogether, considering the distribution of the observed repeats, the most likely scenario is that a differential accumulation of different repetitive sequences has contributed to the size increase of macrochromosomes in Agave. However, considering an ancestral allopolyploidy event, it is possible that the ancient origin of the group’s bimodal karyotype led to a homogenization of sequences between the two sets of chromosomes, without changing, in this case, the bimodal organization of these karyotypes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14020491/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Primers used for amplification and isolation of repetitive sequences.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H., R.C. and A.P.-H.; Formal analysis, L.C.R., M.B. and J.F.; Funding acquisition, A.H.; Investigation, L.C.R.; Methodology, M.B. and J.F.; Resources, A.P.-H.; Supervision, A.H., R.C. and A.P.-H.; Visualization, M.B.; Writing—review and editing, M.B., J.F., R.C. and A.P.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Finance Code 001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Genbank (Bioproject PRJNA93409).

Acknowledgments

We thank José Jaime Vasconcelos Cavalcanti, from the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation—Embrapa Cotton, Campina Grande-PB, for providing the plant accession used, its propagation for cytological analysis, as well as for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vosa, C.G. On chromosome uniformity, bimodality and evolution in the tribe Aloineae (Asphodelaceae). Caryologia 2005, 58, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Poggio, L.; Realini, M.F.; Fourastie, M.F.; Garcia, A.M.; Gonzalez, G.E. Genome downsizing and karyotype constancy in diploid and polyploid congeners: A model of genome size variation. AoB Plants 2014, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Schubert, I.; Lysak, M.A. Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet. 2011, 27, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yin, G.S.; Yang, Z.; Chiang, T.; Gong, X. Tracing the origin of the bimodal karyotype of the tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) based on comparative karyotypes analyses. Plant Div. Res. 2014, 36, 737–746. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandham, P.E. Evolution in a stable chromosome system. In Kew Chromosome Conference II; Brandham, P.E., Bennett, M.D., Eds.; Allen and Unwin: London, UK, 1983; pp. 251–260. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, S.T.; Kenton, A.Y.; Bennett, M.D. Genomic in situ hybridization reveals the allopolyploid nature of Milium montianum (Gramineae). Chromosoma 1992, 101, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De la Herrán, R.; Robles, F.; Cuñado, N.; Santos, J.L.; Rejón, R.M.; Garrido-Ramos, M.A.; Rejón, R.C. A heterochromatic satellite DNA is highly amplified in a single chromosome of Muscari (Hyacinthaceae). Chromosoma 2001, 110, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Báez, M.; Vaio, M.; Dreissig, S.; Schubert, V.; Houben, A.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Together But Different: The Subgenomes of the Bimodal Eleutherine Karyotypes Are Differentially Organized. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ibiapino, A.; Báez, M.; García, M.A.; Costea, M.; Stefanović, S.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Karyotype asymmetry in Cuscuta L. subgenus Pachystigma reflects its repeat DNA composition. Chromosome Res. 2022, 30, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Renny-Byfield, S.; Chester, M.; Kovarik, A.; Le Comber, S.C.; Grandbastien, M.A.; Deloger, M.; Nichols, R.A.; Macas, J.; Novák, P.; Chase, M.W.; et al. Next Generation Sequencing reveals genome downsizing in allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum, predominantly through the elimination of paternally derived repetitive DNAs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2843–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, S.-F.; Su, T.; Cheng, G.-Q.; Wang, B.-X.; Li, X.; Deng, C.-L.; Gao, W.-J. Chromosome Evolution in Connection with Repetitive Sequences and Epigenetics in Plants. Genes 2017, 8, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kovarik, A.; Dadejova, M.; Lim, Y.K.; Chase, M.W.; Clarkson, J.J.; Knapp, S.; Leitch, A.R. Evolution of rDNA in Nicotiana allopolyploids: A potential link between rDNA homogenization and epigenetics. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Klein, S.J.; O’Neill, R.J. Transposable elements: Genome innovation, chromosome diversity, and centromere conflict. Chromosome Res. 2018, 26, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ribeiro, T.; Vaio, M.; Félix, L.P.; Guerra, M. Satellite DNA probes of Alstroemeria longistaminea (Alstroemeriaceae) paint the heterochromatin and the B chromosome, reveal a G-like banding pattern, and point to a strong structural karyotype conservation. Protoplasma 2022, 259, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hofstatter, P.G.; Thangavel, G.; Lux, T.; Neumann, P.; Vondrak, T.; Novak, P.; Zhang, M.; Costa, C.; Castellani, M.; Scott, A.; et al. Repeat-based holocentromeres influence genome architecture and karyotype evolution. Cell 2022, 185, 3153–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tomaszewska, P.; Schwarzacher, T.; Heslop-Harrison, J.P. Oat chromosome and genome evolution defined by widespread terminal intergenomic translocations in polyploids. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1026364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Palomino, G.; Martínez, J.; Romero, P.; Barba-González, R.; Rodríguez-Garay, B. Nuclear genome size and karyotype analysis of Agave angustifolia Haw. “Cimarron” and “Lineño” (Asparagales, Asparagaceae). Caryologia 2017, 70, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Granick, E.B. A karyosystematic study of the genus Agave. Am. J. Bot. 1944, 31, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McKain, M.R.; Wickett, N.; Zhang, Y.; Ayyampalayam, S.; McCombie, W.R.; Chase, M.W.; Pires, J.C.; de Pamphilis, C.W.; Leebens-Mack, J. Phylogenomic analysis of transcriptome data elucidates co-occurrence of a paleopolyploid event and the origin of bimodal karyotypes in Agavoideae (Asparagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tamayo-Ordóñez, Y.J.; Narváez-Zapata, J.A.; Tamayo-Ordóñez, M.C.; Sánchez-Teyer, L.F. Retroelements and DNA methylation could contribute to diversity of 5S rDNA in Agave L. J. Mol. Evol. 2018, 86, 404–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Good-Avila, S.V.; Souza, V.; Gaut, B.S.; Eguiarte, L.E. Timing and rate of speciation in Agave (Agavaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9124–9129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hulle, A.; Kadole, P.; Katkar, P. Agave Americana leaf fibers. Fibers 2015, 3, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Monja-Mio, K.M.; Herrera-Alamillo, M.A.; Sánchez-Teyer, L.F.; Robert, M.L. Breeding strategies to improve production of Agave (Agave spp.). In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops; Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 6, pp. 319–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, X.; Xiao, M.; Xi, J.; He, C.; Zheng, J.; Chen, H.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Wu, W.; Liang, Y.; et al. De Novo transcriptome assembly of Agave H11648 by Illumina sequencing and identification of cellulose synthase genes in Agave species. Genes 2019, 102, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Queiroz, S.R.O.D.; Ortolani, F.A.; Mataqueiro, M.F.; Osuna, J.T.A.; Moro, J.R. Análise cromossômica em bulbilhos de sisal (Agave spp.) cultivados em diferentes municípios baianos, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2012, 26, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Robert, M.L.; Lim, K.Y.; Hanson, L.; Sanchez-Teyer, F.; Bennett, M.D.; Leitch, A.R.; Leitch, I.J. Wild and agronomically important Agave species (Asparagaceae) show proportional increases in chromosome number, genome size, and genetic markers with increasing ploidy. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 158, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Doughty, L.R. Chromosome behaviour in relation to genetics of Agave. J. Genet. 1936, 33, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Trejo-Torres, J.C.; Gann, G.D.; Christenhusz, M.J. The Yucatan Peninsula is the place of origin of sisal (Agave sisalana, Asparagaceae): Historical accounts, phytogeography and current populations. Bot. Sci. 2018, 96, 366–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Finch, R.A.; Osborne, J.F. Chromosome numbers and DNA amounts in Agave variants. East Afr. Agric. For. J. 1990, 55, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moreno-Salazar, S.F.; Esqueda, M.; Martínez, J.; Palomino, G. Tamaño del genoma y cariotipo en Agave angustifolia y A. rhodacantha de Sonora, México. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2007, 30, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomez-Rodriguez, V.M.; Rodriguez-Garay, B.; Palomino, G.; Martínez, J.; Barba-Gonzalez, R. Physical mapping of 5S and 18S ribosomal DNA in three species of Agave (Asparagales, Asparagaceae). Comp. Cytogen 2013, 7, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiménez-Barron, O.; García-Sandoval, R.; Magallón, S.; García-Mendoza, A.; Nieto-Sotelo, J.; Aguirre-Planter, E.; Eguiarte, L.E. Phylogeny, diversification rate, and divergence time of Agave sensu lato (Asparagaceae), a group of recent origin in the process of diversification. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 536135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, B.; Tan, S.; Qin, X.; Huang, X.; Xi, J.; Chen, H.; Qin, J.; Chen, T.; Yi, K. The complete chloroplast genome of Agave amaniensis (Asparagales: Asparagaceae: Agavoideae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2022, 7, 1519–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Carvalho, C.R.; Saraiva, L.S. An Air Drying Technique for Maize Chromosomes without Enzymatic Maceration. Biotech. Histochem. 1993, 68, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schweizer, D.; Ambros, P.E. Chromosome Banding. In Chromosome Analysis Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™; Gosden, J.R., Ed.; Humana Press. Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1994; Volume 29, pp. 97–112. ISBN 978-1-59259-516-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Doležel, J.; Greilhuber, J.; Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Novák, P.; Neumann, P.; Macas, J. Graph-based clustering and characterization of repetitive sequences in next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Novak, P.; Neumann, P.; Pech, J.; Steinhaisl, J.; Macas, J. RepeatExplorer: A Galaxy-based web server for genome-wide characterization of eukaryotic repetitive elements from next-generation sequence reads. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 792–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Durbin, R. A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene 1995, 167, GC1–GC10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Neumann, P.; Novák, P.; Hoštáková, N.; Macas, J. Systematic survey of plant LTR-retrotransposons elucidates phylogenetic relationships of their polyprotein domains and provides a reference for element classification. Mob DNA 2019, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pedrosa, A.; Sandal, N.; Stougaard, J.; Schweizer, D.; Bachmair, A. Chromosomal map of the model legume Lotus japonicus. Genetics 2002, 161, 1661–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wanzenbock, E.-M.; Schofer, C.; Schweizer, D.; Bachmair, A. Ribosomal transcription units integrated via T-DNA transformation associate with the nucleolus and do not require upstream repeat sequences for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1997, 11, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hertweck, K.L. Assembly and comparative analysis of transposable elements from low coverage genomic sequence data in Asparagales. Genome 2013, 56, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Khaliq, I.; Khan, M.A.; Pearce, S. Ty1-Copia retrotransposons are heterogeneous, extremely high copy number and are major players in the genome organization and evolution of Agave tequilana. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2011, 59, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Espinosa-Barrera, L.A.; Sánchez-Teyer, L.F.; Quiroz-Moreno, A.; Narváez-Zapata, J.A. Identification and characterization of a new satellite-like DNA family in three Agave species. Plant Gene 2018, 16, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sader, M.; Vaio, M.; Cauz-Santos, L.A.; Dornelas, M.C.; Vieira, M.L.C.; Melo, N.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Large vs small genomes in Passiflora: The influence of the mobilome and the satellitome. Planta 2021, 253, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Van-Lume, B.; Mata-Sucre, Y.; Báez, M.; Ribeiro, T.; Huettel, B.; Gagnon, E.; Leitch, I.J.; Pedrosa-Harand, A.; Lewis, G.P.; Souza, G. Evolutionary convergence or homology? Comparative cytogenomics of Caesalpinia group species (Leguminosae) reveals diversification in the pericentromeric heterochromatic composition. Planta 2019, 250, 2173–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ribeiro, T.; Vasconcelos, E.; Dos Santos, K.G.; Vaio, M.; Brasileiro-Vidal, A.C.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Diversity of repetitive sequences within compact genomes of Phaseolus L. beans and allied genera Cajanus L. and Vigna Savi. Chromosome Res. 2020, 28, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Melters, D.P.; Bradnam, K.R.; Young, H.A.; Telis, N.; May, M.R.; Ruby, J.G.; Sebra, R.; Peluso, P.; Eid, J.; Rank, D.; et al. Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruiz-Ruano, F.J.; López-León, M.D.; Cabrero, J.; Camacho, J.P.M. High-throughput analysis of the satellitome illuminates satellite DNA evolution. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, W.; Zuo, S.; Li, Z.; Meng, Z.; Han, J.; Song, J.; Pan, Y.-B.; Wang, K. Isolation and characterization of centromeric repetitive DNA sequences in Saccharum spontaneum. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Whitaker, T.W. Chromosome constitution in certain monocotyledons. J. Arnold Arbor. 1934, 15, 135–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 00491 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of the most abundant LTR retrotransposons (in red) in the mitotic chromosomes of hybrid Agave 11648 (DAPI in grey) after FISH, showing the differential chromosome patterns and accumulation at the macrochromosome pairs. (A–C), Ty3/gypsy Athila; (D–F), Ty3/gypsy Chromovirus; (G–I), Ty3/gypsy Ogre; (J–L), Ty1/copia SIRE; (M–O), Ty1/copia TAR; (P–R), Ty1/copia Tork. Insets show one macrochromosome of the same cell at higher magnification.
Figure 1. Distribution of the most abundant LTR retrotransposons (in red) in the mitotic chromosomes of hybrid Agave 11648 (DAPI in grey) after FISH, showing the differential chromosome patterns and accumulation at the macrochromosome pairs. (A–C), Ty3/gypsy Athila; (D–F), Ty3/gypsy Chromovirus; (G–I), Ty3/gypsy Ogre; (J–L), Ty1/copia SIRE; (M–O), Ty1/copia TAR; (P–R), Ty1/copia Tork. Insets show one macrochromosome of the same cell at higher magnification.
Genes 14 00491 g001
Genes 14 00491 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of tandem repeats and heterochromatin on chromosomes of Agave hybrid H11648. (A) DAPI (in grey); (B) AgSAT171 probe (in red) showing strong or weak signals in all chromosomes; (C) overlay of AgSAT171 (red) and 35S rDNA site (green, arrowheads) showing 20 chromosomes with stronger signals and heteromorphism for the chromosome pair bearing the rDNA site; (D) consensus sequence logo of AgSAT171 (black arrows signalized the primer positions); (E) CMA+/DAPI− heterochromatic bands (yellow); 5S (red) and 35S ribosomal DNA (in green, insets), with the 35S colocalizing with CMA+ bands (arrowheads). Arrows indicate the difference in AgSAT171 signal intensity between chromosomes of the large pair that harbours the 35S rDNA site (in C) or the second CMA+ block that does not colocalize with the rDNA (in E).
Figure 2. Distribution of tandem repeats and heterochromatin on chromosomes of Agave hybrid H11648. (A) DAPI (in grey); (B) AgSAT171 probe (in red) showing strong or weak signals in all chromosomes; (C) overlay of AgSAT171 (red) and 35S rDNA site (green, arrowheads) showing 20 chromosomes with stronger signals and heteromorphism for the chromosome pair bearing the rDNA site; (D) consensus sequence logo of AgSAT171 (black arrows signalized the primer positions); (E) CMA+/DAPI− heterochromatic bands (yellow); 5S (red) and 35S ribosomal DNA (in green, insets), with the 35S colocalizing with CMA+ bands (arrowheads). Arrows indicate the difference in AgSAT171 signal intensity between chromosomes of the large pair that harbours the 35S rDNA site (in C) or the second CMA+ block that does not colocalize with the rDNA (in E).
Genes 14 00491 g002
Table
Table 1. Genome proportion of major repetitive elements of the Agave hybrid 11648.
Table 1. Genome proportion of major repetitive elements of the Agave hybrid 11648.
Repetitive Elements Genome %
Retrotransposons 64.32
SINE0.46
LTRs 62.50
LTR non classified 20.99
Ty1/copia 24.90
SIRE 4.00
Tork1.92
TAR 1.41
Angela 0.90
Bianca 0.17
Ivana/Oryco0.16
Ale I 0.12
Ale II 0.12
Unclassified Ty1/copia16.12
Ty3/gypsy 16.61
Ogre 3.36
Athila2.37
Chromovirus1.97
Unclassified Ty3/gypsy8.92
rDNA 0.12
DNA Transposon 0.58
Satellite DNA 1.99
Unclassified 0.68
Total genome proportion 67.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramos, L.C.; Báez, M.; Fuchs, J.; Houben, A.; Carvalho, R.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Differential Repeat Accumulation in the Bimodal Karyotype of Agave L. Genes 2023, 14, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020491

AMA Style

Ramos LC, Báez M, Fuchs J, Houben A, Carvalho R, Pedrosa-Harand A. Differential Repeat Accumulation in the Bimodal Karyotype of Agave L. Genes. 2023; 14(2):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramos, Lamonier Chaves, Mariana Báez, Joerg Fuchs, Andreas Houben, Reginaldo Carvalho, and Andrea Pedrosa-Harand. 2023. "Differential Repeat Accumulation in the Bimodal Karyotype of Agave L." Genes 14, no. 2: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop