Next Article in Journal
Choice of Differentiation Media Significantly Impacts Cell Lineage and Response to CFTR Modulators in Fully Differentiated Primary Cultures of Cystic Fibrosis Human Airway Epithelial Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of R/S-Roscovitine and CDKs Related Inhibition under Both Focal and Global Cerebral Ischemia: A Focus on Neurovascular Unit and Immune Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Cytokine Profiling in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Overview on Phenotype Correlation, Outcome Prediction, and Role of Genetic Variants
Previous Article in Special Issue
HPLC-MS/MS Shows That the Cellular Uptake of All-Trans-Retinoic Acid under Hypoxia Is Downregulated by the Novel Active Agent 5-Methoxyleoligin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Rationale of Neprilysin Inhibition in Prevention of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

1
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università FEDERICO II, 80131 Napoli, Italy
2
Unità Operativa Complessa Cardiologia con UTIC ed Emodinamica—Dipartimento Emergenza Accettazione, Azienda Ospedaliera “Antonio Cardarelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
3
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Montevergine Clinic, 83013 Mercogliano (AV), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(9), 2134; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092134
Submission received: 25 August 2020 / Revised: 17 September 2020 / Accepted: 18 September 2020 / Published: 21 September 2020

Abstract

:
During the last three decades, timely myocardial reperfusion using either thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) has allowed amazing improvements in outcomes with a more than halving in 1-year ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) mortality. However, mortality and left ventricle (LV) remodeling remain substantial in these patients. As such, novel therapeutic interventions are required to reduce myocardial infarction size, preserve LV systolic function, and improve survival in reperfused-STEMI patients. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) prevention represents the main goal to reach in order to reduce STEMI mortality. There is currently no effective therapy for MIRI prevention in STEMI patients. A significant reason for the weak and inconsistent results obtained in this field may be the presence of multiple, partially redundant, mechanisms of cell death during ischemia-reperfusion, whose relative importance may depend on the conditions. Therefore, it is always more recognized that it is important to consider a “multi-targeted cardioprotective therapy”, defined as an additive or synergistic cardioprotective agents or interventions directed to distinct targets with different timing of application (before, during, or after pPCI). Given that some neprilysin (NEP) substrates (natriuretic peptides, angiotensin II, bradykinin, apelins, substance P, and adrenomedullin) exert a cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury, it is conceivable that antagonism of proteolytic activity by this enzyme may be considered in a multi-targeted strategy for MIRI prevention. In this review, by starting from main pathophysiological mechanisms promoting MIRI, we discuss cardioprotective effects of NEP substrates and the potential benefit of NEP pharmacological inhibition in MIRI prevention.

1. Introduction

The improvement of strategies for the protection of myocardium following acute ischemic insult represents, nowadays, the real challenge of the clinical research in cardiology. In fact, despite the widespread use of the best available therapies (i.e., timely revascularization, antiplatelet and anti-remodeling drugs, vascular devices), up to 30% of patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) still develop left ventricular remodeling (LVR) [1,2,3,4,5] and heart failure (HF) [6,7].
The reduction of the infarction area and the preservation of myocardial metabolism represent the pathophysiological basis of cardioprotection. The extension of the resulting infarction depends on (1) the size of the ischemic area at risk, (2) the duration and intermittency of coronary occlusion, (3) the magnitude of residual collateral blood flow, and (4) the extent of coronary microvascular dysfunction. In humans, 30–50% of the area at risk is still viable, and therefore, salvageable by reperfusion, after 4–6 h from the onset of anginal symptoms, as estimated from magnetic resonance imaging and biomarker analysis of myocardial salvage [8]. Even after 12 h of coronary occlusion, there is viable myocardium, and interventional reperfusion can limit infarct size (IS) [9].
Whereas reperfusion is mandatory to salvage ischemic myocardium from impending infarction, it also inflicts a metabolic injury that is not only reversible, such as stunning [10,11,12], but also irreversible and manifest, such as increased IS and microvascular dysfunction. This phenomenon is called myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI). Thus, efficient cardioprotection is the result of early myocardial reperfusion (mechanical by the primary percutaneous coronary intervention [pPCI] or pharmacological by fibrinolysis) and MIRI prevention. This latter may be induced by different endogenous compounds, such as natriuretic peptides (NPs), angiotensin (Ang), opioids, adenosine (ADE), bradykinin (Bk), apelin, substance P (SP), and adrenomedullin (ADM). Interestingly, most of these molecules (NPs, Ang, Bk, apelin, SP, and ADM) are substrates of aminopeptidase neprilysin (NEP). Furthermore, reduced expression of NEP has been found in heart regions at 24 h since exposure to brief repeated periods of ischemia-reperfusion (late ischemic preconditioning; late PC), raising the concern that functional down-regulation of this enzyme plays a pivotal role in MIRI prevention by late PC [13].
Therefore, by starting from MIRI pathophysiology, this review focuses on cardioprotective pathways activated by NEP substrates and the clinical role of NEP inhibition in the prevention of MIRI.

2. Pathophysiology of Myocardial and Coronary Microvascular Reperfusion Injury

The etiology of MIRI is multifactorial, and several molecular mechanisms have been shown to be involved, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, defects in calcium handling, mitochondrial damage, and inflammation [14]. Indeed, excessive oxygen-free radical production leads to structural damage and functional or metabolic disorder. Inadequate re-synthesis of ATP, loss of membrane phospholipids, and intracellular calcium overload also contribute to MIRI [15,16]. Here, we discuss the main pathophysiological mechanisms promoting MIRI.

2.1. Apoptosis

Oxidative stress and calcium overload can both induce the abrupt opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTPs) during MIRI [17,18]. The abrupt opening of MPTPs causes mitochondrial swelling and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, thereby inducing apoptosis and cell necrosis [14,19,20]. Apoptosis is an energy-dependent process. It gets activated during ischemia, but it is not affected until reperfusion (when oxygen supply is reinitiated). Caspase activation is a major event in apoptosis. It has been demonstrated that pan-caspase inhibition during early reperfusion protects the myocardium against MIRI in a murine model [21]. Consistently, specific inhibition of individual caspases (such as caspase-3) also mitigates MIRI in a porcine model [22].

2.2. Autophagy and Mitophagy

Activation of cellular autophagy and degradation of damaged mitochondria by lysosomes (a phenomenon called “mitophagy”) is generally beneficial because they reduce MIRI [23]. As an example, the autophagy activator chloramphenicol reduces IS in a pig model [24]. Furthermore, mitophagy activation via Ulk1/Rab9/Rip1/Drp1 protects the heart against MIRI [25]. However, the role of autophagy still needs deeper dissection. It is well-known that ischemia stimulates autophagy through an adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent mechanism, whereas ischemia-reperfusion stimulates autophagic myocardial cell death and left ventricular dysfunction through a Beclin 1–dependent but AMPK-independent mechanism [26]. This last event is associated with an increase of autophagosomes containing damaged mitochondria [27]. Likewise, the down-regulation of autophagy decreases the number of apoptotic cardiomyocytes in MIRI [28]. Thus, autophagy may be protective during ischemia, whereas it may be detrimental during reperfusion [26]. Therefore, autophagy exerts a key role in the pathogenesis of MIRI [29] and represents a potential target for molecular therapeutic strategy.

2.3. Defects in Calcium Handling

The common clinical characteristics of MIRI are reperfusion arrhythmias [30], myocardial stunning [31], IS enlargement [32], microvascular obstruction (MVO) [12], and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) [33]. In particular, perturbations of calcium homeostasis play an important role in reperfusion arrhythmias, including idioventricular rhythm, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation after MIRI [34]. The inhibition of intracellular Ca2+ overload improves the recovery of heart function and prevents the heart from contracture during reperfusion [35]. Consistently, damage to the cell membrane, which causes dysregulation of Na+/Ca2+ exchange and Na+/H+ exchange, is one of the reasons for cell edema leading to myocardial stunning [36].

2.4. Inflammation

Inflammation exerts a key role in cardiovascular diseases, as extensively reported in the literature [37,38]. Inflammatory responses exert a different effect in the acute and chronic phase. The acute activation of inflammatory responses, including inflammatory cells infiltration in the myocardium and cytokines release, contributes to the healing process, whereas prolonged activation triggers pro-apoptotic pathways [39]. In particular, emerging evidence suggests a potential role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in linking prolonged sterile inflammation and resistant thrombosis. NETs are a weblike structure composed of decondensed chromatin (DNA backbone) released from neutrophils in response to activated platelets [40], activated endothelial cells [41], and proinflammatory cytokines [42]. Externalized nucleosomes, in conjunction with neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G, can induce intravascular thrombus formation, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of MIRI. Interestingly, an experimental study showed the long-term benefit of a novel deoxyribonuclease I (the enzyme implied in DNA degradation)-based reperfusion strategy in a murine model of MIRI [43].
In addition, there is a growing body of evidence raising the hypothesis that the genetically-driven interaction between inflammation and thrombosis plays a pivotal role not only in the etiology of myocardial infarction (MI) [44,45], but also in the coronary microvascular ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI).

2.5. Cross-Talk between MIRI and Coronary Microvascular IRI

The coronary circulation with atherosclerotic plaque rupture and superimposed thrombosis is not only the culprit of myocardial ischemia but, after the restoration of coronary blood flow, it is also the target of IRI [11,46]. IRI in the coronary circulation manifests as microvascular dysfunction, primarily by increased capillary permeability and edema [47,48], coronary microembolization of atherosclerotic particular debris [49], impaired vasomotion secondary to endothelial and vascular smooth muscle damage [50,51,52], and release of vasoconstrictor substances from the atherosclerotic lesion [53,54,55], stasis due to platelet, leukocyte and erythrocyte aggregates in the microcirculation [56,57,58], and finally, capillary destruction and hemorrhage [59,60]. Impaired myocardial blood flow despite restoration of epicardial coronary patency was first reported by Krug et al. [33], and Kloner et al. subsequently characterized the no-reflow phenomenon (NR) as the most severe form of coronary microvascular IRI [61]. NR is observed in ~35% of patients after STEMI [62]. The incidence of NR increases with the delay to reperfusion [63], and both, NR and IMH, are powerful and clinically important adverse prognostic factors [64,65,66,67]. The causal relationship between myocardial and coronary microvascular IRI is largely unclear, although they are closely associated [68,69]. Possibly, there is a common pathophysiologic mechanism, such as the formation of ROS [70], that underlies myocardial and coronary microvascular IRI, but with a distinct impact on both compartments.

2.6. Cardioprotective Molecular Mechanisms: RISK and SAFE Pathways

Two main cardioprotective molecular pathways have been described [14,20,71]. The reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) pathway has been postulated to be a combination of two parallel cascades, phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (Akt) and MEK1-ERK1/2. The authors of this term suggest that it refers to a group of pro-survival protein kinases, which confer cardioprotection when activated specifically at the time of reperfusion [72]. It has been suggested that some exogenous cardioprotective agonists activate PI3K, Akt, and ERK at the early reperfusion stage of IRI. It has been reported that the RISK pathway is involved in PC [73]. After PC cycles, PI3K/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK 3β) cascade is activated together with ERK with consequent transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. GSK 3β is suggested to be the downstream point of convergence of the RISK pathway. GSK 3β, when phosphorylated, inhibits MPTPs opening, which is cardioprotective. Thus, there is an idea that RISK activation at early reperfusion is a unifying pattern of cardioprotective signaling [74,75]. However, there are some reports that would contradict such a concept. It has been reported that GSK 3β is not required for cardioprotection induced by PC and post-conditioning (Post-C) [76] and that an intact RISK pathway is not necessarily required for Post-C in all species [77].
Survivor Activating Factor Enhancement (SAFE) has been indicated as a further cardioprotective signaling pathway. Key components of SAFE have been suggested to be cytokines of the immune system and transcription factors [78]. The crucial part of the pathway is STAT 3, a transcription factor. It has been shown that the trigger phase of PC is STAT 3-dependent [79] and that Post-C also requires activation of STAT 3 [80]. It is yet unclear whether cytosolic or mitochondrial STAT 3 are involved in mediating cardioprotection. STAT 3 seems to regulate mitochondrial respiration short term and expression of cardioprotective proteins long-term [81]. It has been postulated that STAT 3 is located in the matrix of mitochondria, where it regulates complex I respiration and inhibits MPTPs opening and ROS formation [82]. However, so far, it has been only established that STAT 3-mediated cardioprotection involves the up-regulation of proteins, while the full function in regulating mitochondrial respiration is yet to be elucidated [83,84]. The involvement of STAT 5 was suggested in remote PC [85].
Interestingly, drugs activating both pathways (such as the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonist fingolimod) ameliorate MIRI and reduce MI size in a porcine model [22].

3. Neprilysin

NEP, an endothelial cell surface zinc metallopeptidase, is widely expressed in endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, cardiac myocytes, renal epithelial cells, and fibroblasts. It is found in the lung, gut, adrenal glands, brain, and heart. NEP catalyzes the degradation of cardioprotective peptides, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), Ang II, Bk, SP, and ADM at different degrees [86]. The catalytic site of NEP, like other proteases, has a specific size, shape, and unique distribution of charges that all aid in the binding of the substrate to the catalytic site within the enzyme. The binding site within NEP does not vary, but NEP displays a different binding affinity for its substrates: high affinity for ANP, CNP, and Ang I and II, and low affinity for BNP, ET-1, and Bk [86]. More recently, it has been reported that NEP cleaves apelin peptides [87].
Few data explored the effects of NEP inhibition using endogenous substrates at various concentrations, thereby limiting our knowledge about NEP activity in specific stress conditions. However, it could be hypothesized that NEP enzymatic affinity may change based on specific substrate concentrations. Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that elevated plasma BNP is an endogenous NEP inhibitor, and it works as an important self-regulation mechanism of NPs concentration [88]. Furthermore, it has been reported that NEP may play a more dominant role in Bk degradation when levels of this peptide are high [89].
An early event in STEMI is the acute and marked increase of ventricular expression and release of ANP and BNP [90]. The time course of the plasma BNP and ANP levels could be divided into two patterns: a monophasic pattern with one peak at about 16 h after admission and a biphasic pattern with two peaks at about 16 h and 5 days after admission. There were significantly more patients with anterior infarction, congestive HF, a higher level of maximal creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction in the biphasic group than in the monophasic group [90]. However, both peaks were significantly below the cut-off value for endogenous NEP inhibition [88]. Consistently, it has been demonstrated that Bk concentration decuples within 48 h since STEMI onset [91]. Therefore, it is conceivable that NEP could exert a primary catalytic role in the early phase of STEMI, when NPs plasmatic levels are not so high to inhibit its activity, and Bk significantly increases.

4. NEP Substrates and Their Cardioprotective Effects

Neprilysin catalyzes the degradation of several substrates, which are promoters of peripheral vasodilation (NPs, BK, apelin, SP, and ADM) or vasoconstrictors (Ang II, Endothelin I) [86]. Here, we discuss their mechanisms of action and cardioprotective effects (Figure 1).

4.1. Natriuretic Peptides (NPs)

The NPs include ANP, BNP, and CNP. ANP is derived from pre-proANP, a 151 amino acid precursor, and is primarily expressed and stored in the atria, although lower concentrations can be found in the ventricles and in the kidneys. Atrial wall stress stimulates ANP secretion. Human BNP is similarly synthesized as a pre-hormone, pre-proBNP, a 134 amino acid peptide, and cleaved into proBNP, which is 108 amino acids in length. ProBNP is subsequently cleaved into the biologically active 32 amino acid BNP, plus the 76 amino acid NT-proBNP. Although low levels of BNP are found in the atria, a greater concentration of BNP is stored in the ventricles, and it is released in response to cardiac stress, such as volume overload. CNP is the most expressed NP in the brain, but it is also produced in chondrocytes and endothelial cells. After a vascular insult or endothelial injury, CNP neo-intimal expression increases [92].
NPs possess several physiological effects within the body [93,94,95,96,97]. Nevertheless, the main hormonal effects are cardiovascular ones. Indeed, ANP and BNP in the circulation cause vasodilation, increase diuresis and natriuresis, and act as counter-regulatory to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) [95,98,99]. Speculation has been whether the cardioprotective actions of NPs are due to direct actions on the heart or indirect actions through peripheral vasodilation, and thereby a theoretically desirable decrease in pre- and after-load or both. However, clear evidence exists on direct beneficial infarct-limiting effects of NPs in the cardiomyocytes.
In vitro studies showed that synthetic ANP, via cGMP-forming trans-membrane guanylyl cyclase (GC)-receptor A (GC-A or NPR-A), reduces TNF-α-induced endothelial hyperpermeability [100] and limits neutrophil adhesion to hypoxic endothelium [101]. In vivo, in the systemic microcirculation, ANP attenuates acute, immediate inflammatory effects of mast cells or histamine [102]. These observations suggest that ANP and BNP, released in the very early phase of acute MI, might improve the endothelial barrier and attenuate the inflammatory infiltration of the myocardium, thereby limiting the area of necrosis. Furthermore, CNP from cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts coordinates and preserves the cardiac structure, function, and coronary vasoreactivity via activation of NP receptor C (NPR-C) [103].
It has been reported that cardioprotective action of NPs is mediated through mitochondrial, but not sarcolemmal, K+-ATP-channel opening [104,105]. Urodilatin, which is a kidney-specific form of ANP, limited acute reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart by attenuating cGMP depletion [106]. ANP infusion in the isolated rabbit heart, given just before and during early reperfusion, limits infarct size possibly through the RISK pathway involving activation of PI3/Akt and Erk1/2 kinases [107]. Consistently, ANP and urodilatin protected cardiomyocytes subjected to anoxia/reoxygenation against reoxygenation hypercontracture [108]. It has been also demonstrated that the cardioprotective actions of urodilatin were due to inhibition of Ca2+-induced hypercontracture caused by an increase in sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) ATPase (SERCA) activity [109].
A reduced release of myocardial creatinine kinase isoform MB by ~15%, an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction by ~5%, and a decrease in reperfusion injuries (defined as malignant arrhythmias, re-elevation of ST-segment, or worsening of chest pain) have been reported in a clinical placebo-controlled trial on ANP infusion during MI [110]. Finally, plasma BNP level before pPCI may be a predictor of IRI and the resultant extent of myocardial damage. In particular, high plasma BNP levels might have a clinically important protective effect on ischemic myocardium in patients with STEMI who receive pPCI [111].

4.2. Angiotensin (Ang)

Cardiac RAS (cRAS) plays an important role in MIRI. Ang I converts into vasoconstrictor Ang II peptide, formed of eight amino acids, via the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), whereas Ang I and Ang II are converted into vasodilator peptide Ang 1–7 by ACE2 and NEP [112].
Ang II has been shown to reduce IS by affecting mitochondrial respiration and cardiac functions [113,114]. In fact, recent studies suggest that intracellular Ang II exerts protective effects in cells during high extracellular levels of the hormone or chronic stimulation of the local tissue RAS. Notably, the intracellular RAS (iRAS) described in neurons, fibroblasts, renal cells, and cardiomyocytes provided new insights into regulatory mechanisms mediated by intracellular Ang II type 1 (AT1Rs) and 2 (AT2Rs) receptors, particularly in mitochondria and nucleus. For instance, Ang II, through nuclear AT1Rs, promotes protective mechanisms through the stimulation of AT2R signaling cascade, which involves mitochondrial AT2Rs and Mas receptors [115]. The stimulation of nuclear Ang II receptors enhances mitochondrial biogenesis by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α and increases sirtuins activity, thereby protecting the cell against oxidative stress [115]. Thus, despite abundant data on the deleterious effects of Ang II, a growing body of studies also supports a protective role for cRAS and iRAS that could be of relevance to support the hypothesis of NEP inhibition in MIRI prevention.
Ang 1–7 regulates cardiac functions, blood pressure, cardiac hypertrophy, HF, and the growth of cells. In particular, Ang 1–7 has anti-proliferative action on the vascular smooth muscles, cardiac muscle cells, and improves endothelial functions by releasing Bk and nitric oxide (NO) [116,117]. The ACE2 activator (diminazene aceturate) exerts a cardioprotective effect in cardiomyocytes hypertrophy [118]. Furthermore, diminazene aceturate attenuates LVR post-MI. Indeed, ACE2 activates the circulating endothelial progenitor cells in the blood that decreases the inflammatory cells and increases the cardiac progenitor cells in the region of peri-infarct cardiac muscles [119]. It also enhances the function of the heart and increases the level of angiotensin 1–7 in both humans and rats [120,121].

4.3. Bradykinin (Bk)

The kallikrein-kinin system has well-established cardioprotective actions. Although both plasma and tissue kallikrein (KLK1) produce kinin peptides, KLK1 plays a major role in cardioprotection. Studies of KLK1 gene knockout mice reveal an essential role for KLK1 in the maintenance of Bk levels in the heart [122]. Whereas, some of the benefits of KLK1 appear to be due to increased Bk formation [123], KLK1 may also directly activate the Bk receptor type 2 (BKR2) by a mechanism that is independent of increased Bk formation [124].
Bk is a peptide made up of nine amino acids that increase vascular permeability and acts as a potent vasodilator through the stimulation of specific endothelial BKR2. BKR2 couples to Gi proteins and activates the downstream endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)/protein kinase G (PKG) and RISK pathways, including the two parallel cascades, PI3K-Akt, and MEK1-ERK1/2, against MIRI [125]. Furthermore, Bk activates cyclo-oxygenase, and prostacyclin synthesis to attenuate IS [126,127,128].
However, Bk does not only protect the heart against MIRI, but also prevents apoptotic death induced by prolonged hypoxia in arterial endothelial cells. In particular, PC induces Bk synthesis by increasing KLK1 activity in endothelial cells [129]. Released Bk, through an autocrine mechanism, promotes cytoprotection against prolonged hypoxia [129]. This phenomenon is mainly mediated by the internalization of BKR2, which, in turn, promotes the cross-talk between protein kinase A (PKA) and Akt [129], independently by NO synthesis (Figure 2) [130]. Because these results showed that locally synthesized Bk is implied in arterial endothelium survival, they account for a systemic protective role of Bk against IRI.
Bk has a very short half-life because many different enzymes cleave it and may participate in its metabolism, and peptidase activity (ACE, NEP, NEP2, aminopeptidase, carboxypeptidase, endothelin converting enzyme) plays a major role in the tissue-specific regulation of Bk levels [131]. Therefore, it is difficult to modulate Bk concentration by blocking a single degradation pathway. However, an enzyme’s contribution to Bk degradation and the effect of inhibition of that enzyme on Bk degradation depends not only on the concentration of the enzyme, but also on the Bk concentration and the Km (Michaelis constant) of each peptidase [131]. Thus, depending on an enzyme’s abundance and kcat (turnover number), an enzyme with a low Km, such as ACE, may have a predominant role in Bk metabolism when Bk levels are low, whereas an enzyme with a higher Km (e.g., carboxypeptidase and NEP) may play a more dominant role when Bk levels are high [89], such as in STEMI [91,132].
Furthermore, the effect of an enzyme inhibition on Bk levels depends not only on the specific enzyme’s contribution to Bk metabolism relative to other enzymes, but also on the baseline degradation rate for Bk in each district [131]. It has been demonstrated that NEP contribution to Bk degradation is higher than ACE in the heart [133,134]. Therefore, it is conceivable that the selective NEP antagonism may increase tissue cardiac Bk levels more than ACE-inhibitors, thereby empowering the local cardioprotective effect of this peptide against MIRI.

4.4. Apelin

The pre-pro-apelin consists of 77 amino acid residues and is cleaved into shorter biologically active C-terminal fragments, including apelin-12, -13, -17, and -36 [135]. A large body of evidence suggests that the apelin/APJ system protects the heart against MIRI. In particular, apelin-12, -13, and -36 ameliorate MIRI [136] (Figure 3). Apelin-13 reduces the decline in mitochondrial membrane potential and inhibits the opening of MPTPs by PI3K/Akt/GSK 3β [137]. The administration of apelin-13 and 36 at reperfusion delays MPTPs opening ratios and results in direct cardioprotective actions through PI3K-Akt and p44/42 in MIRI [138]. Besides, activation of PI3K/Akt inhibits the abrupt opening of MPTPs and ameliorates MIRI [139]. Thus, the apelin/APJ system might decrease mitophagy by inhibiting MPTPs opening through PI3K/Akt in MIRI.
Moreover, the apelin/APJ system inhibits the generation of mitochondrial ROS, which leads to the abrupt opening of MPTPs and cell death in response to MIRI [140]. Apelin-12 and apelin-13 selectively inhibit mitochondrial ROS generation and improve heart functional and metabolic recovery after MIRI [141]. Apelin-13 decreases ROS overproduction and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways under PC [142]. Similarly, apelin-12 and its structural analogue lessen oxidative stress by increasing antioxidant enzyme activation and reducing ROS formation in MIRI [143].
Apelin/APJ system increases NO formation and improves MIRI-induced cardiac dysfunction [144]. The apelin/APJ system promotes NOS activation mainly through enhancing the phosphorylation of Akt. In particular, apelin-12 activates eNOS and induces cardioprotection by PI3K/Akt after reperfusion [145], thereby reducing cardiomyocyte membrane damage, and limiting IS in MIRI through NO formation [146]. Furthermore, NO formation is involved in the process of recovery of energy metabolism induced by the apelin/APJ system. Restoration of energy metabolism increases functional recovery of the heart and decreases cell membrane damage in MIRI [147,148].
The apelin/APJ system plays an important role in angiogenesis [149]. Apelin-13 induces vascular smooth cell proliferation through ERK-dependent [150] and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways [151]. Apelin-13 also promotes capillary density through overexpression of the proangiogenic factor, VEGF, in MIRI [152]. Furthermore, the treatment with apelin-13 significantly increases myocardial capillary density and arteriole formation and improves cardiac repair [153].
Apelin/APJ system may also attenuate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response-induced cell death by promoting NO formation in MIRI [154,155]. The ER is responsible for protein synthesis, folding, maturation, and transport. ER stress not only gives rise to the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER [156], but also induces cell apoptosis through caspase-12 and JNK [157]. Suppression of ER stress can protect the myocardium from MIRI [158].
Apelin-12 and -13, as well as structural apelin-12 analogues, decrease cell membrane damage through better control of cell membrane integrity and ion homeostasis. Indeed, exogenous apelin-12 significantly decreases LDH leakage and reduces myocardial cell membrane damage by phospholipase-C (PLC), protein kinase C (PKC), PI3K, and MEK1/2 signaling [159]. Inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange can reverse the effects of apelin-12 on LDH leakage and promote membrane damage in MIRI [159]. Therefore, apelin-12 maintains the integrity of cell membranes through Na+/H+ exchange.
Finally, the apelin/APJ system significantly affects calcium handling. In isolated rat hearts, apelin-13 improves the redox states of SR Ca2+-modulators and maintains Ca2+ transient in MIRI [160]. Maintaining of Ca2+ transient can inhibit Ca2+ transient overload and induce cardioprotection in MIRI. Furthermore, apelin-13 and apelin-36 inhibit reperfusion-induced hypercontracture of heart by delaying the abrupt opening of MPTPs [138].
Despite their fundamental potency, apelin peptides are prone to fast proteolytic degradation [161,162]. So far, ACE-2 [163,164], NEP [87], and human plasma kallikrein (KLKB1) [165] have been identified as metalloproteases that cleave apelins.

4.5. Substance P (SP)

SP is an undecapeptide member of the tachykinin neuropeptide family, that acts as a neurotransmitter and as a neuromodulator [166]. SP is released from sensory nerve terminals in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Although its levels are low in the myocardium, it can affect the heart, due to its role in nociception, inflammation, plasma extravasation, platelet, and leukocyte aggregation in post-capillary venules, and leucocyte chemotactic migration through vessel walls [167]. In the heart, SP-containing nerve fibers are located in the intrinsic ganglia of the myocardium and around coronary vessels. A small number of coronary endothelial cells also contain SP. Of note, localization of SP-containing nerve fibers around the coronary arteries, as well as in coronary artery endothelial cells, may suggest that this neuropeptide is ideally placed to be released in response to changes in coronary arterial pressure or situations of hemodynamic stress. SP can be considered as a potent vasodilator through NO release [168].
SP has two distinct effects in response to myocardial insult or overload. Short-term, SP vasodilatory effects appear to be protective by increasing myocardial perfusion, as demonstrated by ischemia-reperfusion studies. Indeed, SP induces bone marrow stem cell mobilization that has been experimentally and clinically investigated to regenerate damaged hearts and suppresses inflammation in ischemic injuries [169,170,171]. In a murine model of MIRI and acute MI, systemic injection of SP decreased early inflammatory responses and promoted stem cell mobilization, leading to a compact vasculature and improved cardiac function [172]. In particular, it has been reported that SP reduces MIRI-induced cell death by directly acting on cardiac cells to initiate cell survival pathways via the neurokinin receptor 1 (NK-1) and Akt [173].
On the other hand, long-term up-regulation of SP appears to be associated with inflammation, apoptosis, matrix metalloproteinase activation, and alterations of the extracellular matrix, which may collectively lead to adverse remodeling and worsening HF [174].

4.6. Adrenomedullin (ADM)

Human ADM is a 52 amino acid peptide, that is produced from its precursor molecule pre-pro-ADM. Since the discovery that the ADM gene is expressed to a greater extent in endothelial cells than in the adrenal medulla, it has been recognized that this peptide should be considered as a secretory product of the vascular endothelium, together with NO and endothelin [175].
The beneficial effects of ADM on MIRI are well-known [176]. It has been demonstrated that ADM gene delivery [177], as well as a short-term infusion of ADM [178], significantly attenuated MIRI in rats. These cardioprotective effects are attributed mainly to the antiapoptotic effects of ADM via a PI3K/Akt-dependent pathway [178]. Moreover, clinical studies showed that ADM reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, increases cardiac index, and increases urinary volume and sodium excretion in patients with HF [179].
Consistently, intermedin (IMD or ADM-2), an ADM similar peptide, plays an important role in MIRI prevention. Administration of IMD attenuates acute IRI in the isolated perfused rodent heart [180,181] and following coronary artery ligation in vivo [182]; this protection is only partly due to IMD-mediated augmentation of coronary blood flow. Direct protective effects of IMD against hypoxia-reoxygenation injury have also been demonstrated in neonatal cardiomyocytes [183].
IMD has been detected in patients without evident cardiac disease post-mortem in left ventricular cardiomyocytes, pericardial adipocytes, pericardial vein endothelial cells, and coronary artery vascular smooth muscle [184]. IMD is expressed more abundantly than ADM in human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (HCMEC) and cardiac fibroblasts from the human ventricle (v-HCF) [185]. IMD circulates in human plasma at lower levels than ADM, indicative of more limited distribution, but is elevated upon acute MI [186,187]. It has been reported that IMD protects HCMEC and v-HCF in culture against the deleterious effects of simulated acute IRI, predominantly via AM1 receptor involvement [185]. Furthermore, although IMD is present in human cardiomyocytes (HCM), IMD derived from HCMEC and acting in a paracrine manner, predominantly via AM1 receptors, makes a marked contribution to HCM protection by the endogenous peptide against acute IRI [188].
ADM levels in the plasma and tissues are regulated by the proteolysis of NEP, the enzyme mainly involved in ADM degradation [86]. Therefore, NEP inhibition during reperfusion could represent an attractive treatment option in the early management of acute coronary syndrome to salvage myocardial tissue.

5. Clinical Perspectives for NEP Inhibition in MIRI Prevention

During the last three decades, timely myocardial reperfusion using either thrombolytic therapy or pPCI has allowed amazing improvements in outcomes with a more than halving in 1-year STEMI mortality [189,190,191]. However, mortality and LVR remain substantial in these patients. Interestingly, LV remodelers are more likely to be admitted to hospital for HF than non-remodelers [6,7]. As such, novel therapeutic interventions are required to reduce IS, preserve LV systolic function, and improve survival in reperfused-STEMI patients.
Actually, MIRI prevention represents the main goal to reach in order to reduce STEMI mortality [192,193]. Nevertheless, the translation of effective cardioprotective strategies tested in animal studies to human treatments has not yet been successful [194]. As an example, while cyclosporine reduced IS in animal models and in preliminary human trials [195], it did not reduce IS in a properly performed randomized clinical trial with a large sample size [196]. Consistently, while metoprolol reduced IS in pigs [197] and in a post hoc analysis of the METOCARD-CNIC (effect of METOprolol of CARDioproteCtioN during an acute myocardial InfarCtion) trial on a little cohort of patients with anterior STEMI [198], it failed to offer any benefit in large clinical trials [199]. Moreover, although Post-C demonstrated marked effects in experimental studies [200], it failed to reduce all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF in a large trial [201]. Conversely, non-invasive remote ischemic conditioning (RIC; performed during acute ischemia) gave good results in experimental studies [202] and clinical trials with a reduction of cardiovascular events [203,204]. The LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial evaluated the combination of RIC plus Post-C in addition to pPCI [205]. This study showed a significantly increased myocardial salvage assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and a reduction of new HF incidence compared with conventional pPCI [206]. However, it remains unclear whether cardioprotection was mainly attributable to RIC or to synergistic effects of combining RIC and Post-C, because of the lack of a RIC control group.
An important reason for the weak and inconsistent results obtained in this field may be the presence of multiple, partially redundant, mechanisms of cell death during ischemia-reperfusion, whose relative importance may depend on the conditions. Therefore, it is always more recognized that it is important to consider a “multi-targeted cardioprotective therapy”, defined as an additive or synergistic cardioprotective agents or interventions directed to distinct targets with different timing of application (before, during, or after pPCI) [207].
Given that NEP substrates exert a cardioprotective effect against IRI, it is conceivable that antagonism of proteolytic activity by this enzyme may be considered in a multi-targeted strategy for MIRI prevention. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696; SAC/VAL) is a first-in-class approved angiotensin receptor NEP inhibitor (ARNI), that simultaneously provides NEP inhibition and blockade of the Ang II type I receptors (AT1Rs). This concomitant blocking is required because the single NEP inhibition increases Bk levels leading to clinically relevant episodes of angioedema [208]. SAC/VAL has been successfully used in the treatment of chronic [209] and acute decompensated HF [210]. There are many reasons because SAC/VAL could be an attractive candidate for cardioprotection against MIRI, even if there are essentially no data to support this proposal, so far.
Firstly, concomitant NEP and AT1Rs antagonism increase levels of molecular compounds leading to activation of different pro-survival pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, PKC, PKG, AMPK, and ERK (Figure 1). In particular, augmented Bk levels mediate protection against MIRI at myocardial [125,126,127] end endothelial level [129], whereas AT1Rs blocking inhibits pro-apoptotic pathways mediated by acute Ang II increase. Consistently, the reflex increased Ang II levels may activate cRAS and iRAS that enhance cell protection against oxidative stress [115]. Furthermore, SAC/VAL may prevent the long-term harmful accumulation of SP, because this peptide is broken down by the uninhibited ACE, thereby exploiting acute SP positive effects on MIRI prevention [169,170,171]. NEP is also the main enzyme involved in the degradation of apelins, that are prone to fast proteolysis [161,162]. Therefore, SAC/VAL may significantly increase levels of these potent MIRI antagonists, thereby reducing cardiomyocytes’ necrosis.
As proof of its molecular effects, NEP/AT1Rs inhibition gave good results in different animal experimental models of MI [211,212,213]. In fact, it has been demonstrated that SAC/VAL prevents cardiac rupture in a murine model of MI [214] and plays a pro-survival effect in reperfused rabbit hearts after prolonged ischemia [215].
The timing of SAC/VAL therapy is also important. Following oral administration, SAC/VAL dissociates into individual components with plasma concentrations of SAC, its active metabolite sacubitrilat (LBQ657), and VAL achieving peaks in 0.5 h, 2 h, and 1.5 h, respectively. In clinical study PIONEER-HF, the time-averaged reduction of the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration was significantly greater in the SAC/VAL group than in the enalapril group. Interestingly, the greater reduction in the NT-proBNP concentration with SAC/VAL than with enalapril was evident as early as week 1 (ratio of change, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85) [210]. Furthermore, considering urinary cyclic guanosine 3′-5′ monophosphate (ucGMP) as a measure of the biological effect of SAC/VAL on NP-mediated activation of NP receptors, serial measurement of ucGMP revealed a very significant increased concentration in patients treated with SAC/VAL compared with a decline in ucGMP concentration in the enalapril group (p < 0.001 for SAC/VAL versus enalapril at 1 week through 8 weeks) [216]. Thus, SAC/VAL shows a very fast action on the increase of NPs levels that could allow an earlier cardioprotective effect against MIRI.
Given these findings, in a “multi-targeted” strategy aimed at MIRI prevention, we hypothesize that optimal timing for SAC/VAL may be immediately at the end of pPCI, after RIC protocol administration and instead of Post-C. In fact, RIC has been shown to reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, in particular of HF, whereas the role of Post-C has been not well defined [206]. In this context, SAC/VAL might prolong the window of cardioprotection induced by RIC, thereby more efficiently antagonizing MIRI.
Interestingly, SAC/VAL is not in contrast with other drugs commonly used in STEMI treatment. Dedicated drug interaction studies demonstrated that co-administration of furosemide, carvedilol, amlodipine, omeprazole, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, and atorvastatin, did not alter the systemic exposure to SAC, sacubitrilat, or VAL [217]. Nevertheless, we have to keep in mind that there are also some limitations to SAC/VAL use in patients affected by acute MI. As an example, hypotension is a very frequent potential collateral effect of this therapy, and SAC/VAL has not to be used if blood systolic pressure is below 100 mmHg [217]. SAC/VAL can be titrated from the lowest to the highest dosage according to blood pressure values in order to reduce the risk of hypotension [218]. Furthermore, concomitant administration of potassium-sparing diuretics (e.g., the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone, also used as an anti-ventricular remodeling agent) [219], potassium supplements, or salt substitutes containing potassium may lead to an increase in serum potassium concentrations. In patients who are elderly, volume-depleted (including those on diuretic therapy), or with compromised renal function, SAC/VAL may result in worsening of renal function, including possible acute renal failure [217].
It is hoped that most doubts about SAC/VAL utilization in the setting of acute MI may be clarified by the results of the ongoing PARADISE MI study (NCT02924727). Nevertheless, it is noteworthy to mention that the benefits of SAC/VAL on post-MI LV remodeling may be mitigated on the background of optimal medical therapy (beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, previous treatment with RAAS inhibitors). Consistently, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to ameliorate post-MI LV remodeling in a porcine model of MI [220]. Thus, it is entirely possible that a future more extensive administration of these drugs in patients affected by STEMI may attenuate the benefits of SAC/VAL.

6. Conclusions

In STEMI, coronary reperfusion itself induces myocardial injury that can be prevented by endogenous compounds targeting different pro-survival pathways. These molecules are the substrate of various peptidases that regulate their plasmatic levels. NEP plays a pivotal role in enzymatic degradation of most of them (NPs, Ang, Bk, apelin, SP, and ADM), especially in the setting of acute MI. Thus, it is conceivable that NEP inhibition could represent an interesting target to prevent MIRI. SAC/VAL is a well-known ARNI yet successfully used in the treatment of chronic and acute decompensated HF. Because of its concomitant selective inhibitory action on NEP and RAS, SAC/VAL has a wide protective effect on myocardium in experimental models of MI. This is currently under investigation for cardiovascular protection against MIRI in humans (PARADISE MI study).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Methodology, A.B. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Validation, A.B. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Investigation, A.B., D.S. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Data Curation, A.B. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.B., D.S. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Writing—Review and Editing, A.B., D.S. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Visualization, A.B., C.M., E.B., G.D.G., D.S., B.T. and C.M. (Carmine Morisco); Supervision, C.M. (Ciro Mauro), E.B., G.D.G., B.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

G.D.G. was supported by the CardioPaTh PhD programme.

Acknowledgments

The Authors are grateful to Federica De Luise for her technical assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Buono, F.; Spinelli, L.; Giallauria, F.; di Panzillo, E.A.; di Marino, S.; Ferrara, F.; Vigorito, C.; Trimarco, B.; Morisco, C. Usefulness of satisfactory control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to predict left ventricular remodeling after a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction successfully reperfused. Am. J. Cardiol. 2011, 107, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Giallauria, F.; Cirillo, P.; Lucci, R.; Pacileo, M.; de Lorenzo, A.; D’Agostino, M.; Moschella, S.; Psaroudaki, M.; del Forno, D.; Orio, F.; et al. Left ventricular remodelling in patients with moderate systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction: Favourable effects of exercise training and predictive role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2008, 15, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Savoye, C.; Equine, O.; Tricot, O.; Nugue, O.; Segrestin, B.; Sautiere, K.; Elkohen, M.; Pretorian, E.M.; Taghipour, K.; Philias, A.; et al. Left ventricular remodeling after anterior wall acute myocardial infarction in modern clinical practice (from the REmodelage VEntriculaire [REVE] study group). Am. J. Cardiol. 2006, 98, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heusch, G. Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Heusch, G.; Gersh, B.J. The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: A continual challenge. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Van der Bijl, P.; Abou, R.; Goedemans, L.; Gersh, B.J.; Holmes, D.R., Jr.; Marsan, N.A.; Delgado, V.; Bax, J.J. Left Ventricular Post-Infarct Remodeling: Implications for Systolic Function Improvement and Outcomes in the Modern Era. JACC Heart Fail. 2020, 8, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heusch, G.; Libby, P.; Gersh, B.; Yellon, D.; Böhm, M.; Lopaschuk, G.; Opie, L. Cardiovascular remodelling in coronary artery disease and heart failure. Lancet 2014, 383, 1933–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ibanez, B.; Heusch, G.; Ovize, M.; van de Werf, F. Evolving therapies for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 65, 1454–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schomig, A.; Mehilli, J.; Antoniucci, D.; Ndrepepa, G.; Markwardt, C.; di Pede, F.; Nekolla, S.G.; Schlotterbeck, K.; Schuhlen, H.; Pache, J.; et al. Mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005, 293, 2865–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bolli, R. Myocardial ‘stunning’ in man. Circulation 1992, 86, 1671–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Heusch, G. The Coronary Circulation as a Target of Cardioprotection. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1643–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Heusch, G. Coronary microvascular obstruction: The new frontier in cardioprotection. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2019, 114, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pavo, N.; Lukovic, D.; Zlabinger, K.; Zimba, A.; Lorant, D.; Goliasch, G.; Winkler, J.; Pils, D.; Auer, K.; jan Ankersmit, H.; et al. Sequential activation of different pathway networks in ischemia-affected and non-affected myocardium, inducing intrinsic remote conditioning to prevent left ventricular remodeling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hausenloy, D.J.; Yellon, D.M. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: A neglected therapeutic target. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kutala, V.K.; Khan, M.; Angelos, M.G.; Kuppusamy, P. Role of oxygen in postischemic myocardial injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 1193–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ladilov, Y.; Efe, O.; Schafer, C.; Rother, B.; Kasseckert, S.; Abdallah, Y.; Meuter, K.; Schluter, K.D.; Piper, H.M. Reoxygenation-induced rigor-type contracture. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2003, 35, 1481–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruiz-Meana, M.; Abellan, A.; Miro-Casas, E.; Garcia-Dorado, D. Opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces hypercontracture in Ca2+ overloaded cardiac myocytes. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2007, 102, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heusch, G.; Boengler, K.; Schulz, R. Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening: The Holy Grail of cardioprotection. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Shanmuganathan, S.; Hausenloy, D.J.; Duchen, M.R.; Yellon, D.M. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore as a target for cardioprotection in the human heart. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H237–H242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heusch, G. Molecular basis of cardioprotection: Signal transduction in ischemic pre-, post-, and remote conditioning. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 674–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mocanu, M.M.; Baxter, G.F.; Yellon, D.M. Caspase inhibition and limitation of myocardial infarct size: Protection against lethal reperfusion injury. Br. J. Pharm. 2000, 130, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Santos-Gallego, C.G.; Vahl, T.P.; Goliasch, G.; Picatoste, B.; Arias, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Njerve, I.U.; Sanz, J.; Narula, J.; Sengupta, P.P.; et al. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Agonist Fingolimod Increases Myocardial Salvage and Decreases Adverse Postinfarction Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion. Circulation 2016, 133, 954–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Przyklenk, K.; Dong, Y.; Undyala, V.V.; Whittaker, P. Autophagy as a therapeutic target for ischaemia /reperfusion injury? Concepts, controversies, and challenges. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 94, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sala-Mercado, J.A.; Wider, J.; Undyala, V.V.; Jahania, S.; Yoo, W.; Mentzer, R.M., Jr.; Gottlieb, R.A.; Przyklenk, K. Profound cardioprotection with chloramphenicol succinate in the swine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 2010, 122, S179–S184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Saito, T.; Nah, J.; Oka, S.I.; Mukai, R.; Monden, Y.; Maejima, Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Sciarretta, S.; Liu, T.; Li, H.; et al. An alternative mitophagy pathway mediated by Rab9 protects the heart against ischemia. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 802–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Matsui, Y.; Takagi, H.; Qu, X.; Abdellatif, M.; Sakoda, H.; Asano, T.; Levine, B.; Sadoshima, J. Distinct roles of autophagy in the heart during ischemia and reperfusion: Roles of AMP-activated protein kinase and Beclin 1 in mediating autophagy. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, P.; Zhang, J.; Yu, S.; Luo, Z.; Hua, F.; Yuan, L.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Q.; Du, X.; Chen, S.; et al. Protective Effect of Sevoflurane Postconditioning against Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via Ameliorating Mitochondrial Impairment, Oxidative Stress and Rescuing Autophagic Clearance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ke, J.; Yao, B.; Li, T.; Cui, S.; Ding, H. A2 Adenosine Receptor-mediated Cardioprotection Against Reperfusion Injury in Rat Hearts Is Associated With Autophagy Downregulation. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2015, 66, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cao, F. The role of the autophagy in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1852, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Manning, A.S.; Hearse, D.J. Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias: Mechanisms and prevention. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1984, 16, 497–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bolli, R.; Marban, E. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial stunning. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 609–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Entman, M.L.; Michael, L.; Rossen, R.D.; Dreyer, W.J.; Anderson, D.C.; Taylor, A.A.; Smith, C.W. Inflammation in the course of early myocardial ischemia. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1991, 5, 2529–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Krug, A.; De Rochemont, W.D.M.; Korb, G. Blood supply of the myocardium after temporary coronary occlusion. Circ. Res. 1966, 19, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kukreja, R.C.; Janin, Y. Reperfusion Injury: Basic Concepts and Protection Strategies. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 1997, 4, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, C.C.; Morishige, N.; Masuda, M.; Lin, W.; Wieland, W.; Thone, F.; Mubagwa, K.; Borgers, M.; Flameng, W. R56865, a Na(+)- and Ca(2+)-overload inhibitor, reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in blood-perfused rabbit hearts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1993, 25, 1445–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Askenasy, N. Is cytotoxic cellular edema real? The effect of calcium ion on water homeostasis in the rat heart. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2001, 1, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fiordelisi, A.; Iaccarino, G.; Morisco, C.; Coscioni, E.; Sorriento, D. NFkappaB is a Key Player in the Crosstalk between Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sorriento, D.; Iaccarino, G. Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases: The Most Recent Findings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Inflammation and Inflammatory Cells in Myocardial Infarction and Reperfusion Injury: A Double-Edged Sword. Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology 2016, 10, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Clark, S.R.; Ma, A.C.; Tavener, S.A.; McDonald, B.; Goodarzi, Z.; Kelly, M.M.; Patel, K.D.; Chakrabarti, S.; McAvoy, E.; Sinclair, G.D.; et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gupta, A.K.; Joshi, M.B.; Philippova, M.; Erne, P.; Hasler, P.; Hahn, S.; Resink, T.J. Activated endothelial cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death. Febs Lett. 2010, 584, 3193–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Oehmcke, S.; Mörgelin, M.; Herwald, H. Activation of the human contact system on neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Innate Immun. 2009, 1, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ge, L.; Zhou, X.; Ji, W.-J.; Lu, R.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.-D.; Ma, Y.-Q.; Zhao, J.-H.; Li, Y.-M. Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemia-reperfusion injury-induced myocardial no-reflow: Therapeutic potential of DNase-based reperfusion strategy. Am. J. Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2015, 308, H500–H509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gigante, B.; Bellis, A.; Visconti, R.; Marino, M.; Morisco, C.; Trimarco, V.; Galasso, G.; Piscione, F.; de Luca, N.; Prince, J.A.; et al. Retrospective analysis of coagulation factor II receptor (F2R) sequence variation and coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gigante, B.; Vikstrom, M.; Meuzelaar, L.S.; Chernogubova, E.; Silveira, A.; Hooft, F.V.; Hamsten, A.; de Faire, U. Variants in the coagulation factor 2 receptor (F2R) gene influence the risk of myocardial infarction in men through an interaction with interleukin 6 serum levels. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 101, 943–953. [Google Scholar]
  46. Heusch, G.; Kleinbongard, P.; Skyschally, A.; Levkau, B.; Schulz, R.; Erbel, R. The coronary circulation in cardioprotection: More than just one confounder. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 94, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dauber, I.M.; VanBenthuysen, K.M.; McMurtry, I.F.; Wheeler, G.S.; Lesnefsky, E.J.; Horwitz, L.D.; Weil, J.V. Functional coronary microvascular injury evident as increased permeability due to brief ischemia and reperfusion. Circ. Res. 1990, 66, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Garcia-Dorado, D.; Andres-Villarreal, M.; Ruiz-Meana, M.; Inserte, J.; Barba, I. Myocardial edema: A translational view. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 52, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Heusch, G.; Kleinbongard, P.; Bose, D.; Levkau, B.; Haude, M.; Schulz, R.; Erbel, R. Coronary microembolization: From bedside to bench and back to bedside. Circulation 2009, 120, 1822–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bolli, R.; Triana, J.F.; Jeroudi, M.O. Prolonged impairment of coronary vasodilation after reversible ischemia. Evidence for microvascular “stunning”. Circ. Res. 1990, 67, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ehring, T.; Krajcar, M.; Baumgart, D.; Kompa, S.; Hummelgen, M.; Heusch, G. Cholinergic and alpha-adrenergic coronary vasomotion [corrected] with increasing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. 1995, 268, H886–H894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gross, G.J.; O’Rourke, S.T.; Pelc, L.R.; Warltier, D.C. Myocardial and endothelial dysfunction after multiple, brief coronary occlusions: Role of oxygen radicals. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 263, H1703–H1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kleinbongard, P.; Baars, T.; Mohlenkamp, S.; Kahlert, P.; Erbel, R.; Heusch, G. Aspirate from human stented native coronary arteries vs. saphenous vein grafts: More endothelin but less particulate debris. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2013, 305, H1222–H1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kleinbongard, P.; Bose, D.; Baars, T.; Mohlenkamp, S.; Konorza, T.; Schoner, S.; Elter-Schulz, M.; Eggebrecht, H.; Degen, H.; Haude, M.; et al. Vasoconstrictor potential of coronary aspirate from patients undergoing stenting of saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts and its pharmacological attenuation. Circ. Res. 2011, 108, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Leineweber, K.; Bose, D.; Vogelsang, M.; Haude, M.; Erbel, R.; Heusch, G. Intense vasoconstriction in response to aspirate from stented saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 981–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Barrabes, J.A.; Garcia-Dorado, D.; Mirabet, M.; Inserte, J.; Agullo, L.; Soriano, B.; Massaguer, A.; Padilla, F.; Lidon, R.M.; Soler-Soler, J. Antagonism of selectin function attenuates microvascular platelet deposition and platelet-mediated myocardial injury after transient ischemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 45, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Driesen, R.B.; Zalewski, J.; Driessche, N.V.; Vermeulen, K.; Bogaert, J.; Sipido, K.R.; van de Werf, F.; Claus, P. Histological correlate of a cardiac magnetic resonance imaged microvascular obstruction in a porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2012, 21, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sheridan, F.M.; Dauber, I.M.; McMurtry, I.F.; Lesnefsky, E.J.; Horwitz, L.D. Role of leukocytes in coronary vascular endothelial injury due to ischemia and reperfusion. Circ. Res. 1991, 69, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Higginson, L.A.; White, F.; Heggtveit, H.A.; Sanders, T.M.; Bloor, C.M.; Covell, W.J. Determinants of myocardial hemorrhage after coronary reperfusion in the anesthetized dog. Circulation 1982, 65, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Robbers, L.F.; Eerenberg, E.S.; Teunissen, P.F.; Jansen, M.F.; Hollander, M.R.; Horrevoets, A.J.; Knaapen, P.; Nijveldt, R.; Heymans, M.W.; Levi, M.; et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-defined areas of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction represent microvascular destruction and haemorrhage. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2346–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kloner, R.A.; Ganote, C.E.; Jennings, R.B. The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J. Clin. Investig. 1974, 54, 1496–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Niccoli, G.; Burzotta, F.; Galiuto, L.; Crea, F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Prasad, A.; Gersh, B.J.; Mehran, R.; Brodie, B.R.; Brener, S.J.; Dizon, J.M.; Lansky, A.J.; Witzenbichler, B.; Kornowski, R.; Guagliumi, G.; et al. Effect of Ischemia Duration and Door-to-Balloon Time on Myocardial Perfusion in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis From HORIZONS-AMI Trial (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015, 8, 1966–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Betgem, R.P.; de Waard, G.A.; Nijveldt, R.; Beek, A.M.; Escaned, J.; van Royen, N. Intramyocardial haemorrhage after acute myocardial infarction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015, 12, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hamirani, Y.S.; Wong, A.; Kramer, C.M.; Salerno, M. Effect of microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage by CMR on LV remodeling and outcomes after myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 7, 940–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Ndrepepa, G.; Tiroch, K.; Fusaro, M.; Keta, D.; Seyfarth, M.; Byrne, R.A.; Pache, J.; Alger, P.; Mehilli, J.; Schomig, A.; et al. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2383–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Niccoli, G.; Montone, R.A.; Ibanez, B.; Thiele, H.; Crea, F.; Heusch, G.; Bulluck, H.; Hausenloy, D.J.; Berry, C.; Stiermaier, T.; et al. Optimized Treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res. 2019, 125, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Heusch, G.; Kleinbongard, P.; Skyschally, A. Myocardial infarction and coronary microvascular obstruction: An intimate, but complicated relationship. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2013, 108, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Reffelmann, T.; Hale, S.L.; Li, G.; Kloner, R.A. Relationship between no reflow and infarct size as influenced by the duration of ischemia and reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2002, 282, H766–H772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hori, M.; Gotoh, K.; Kitakaze, M.; Iwai, K.; Iwakura, K.; Sato, H.; Koretsune, Y.; Inoue, M.; Kitabatake, A.; Kamada, T. Role of oxygen-derived free radicals in myocardial edema and ischemia in coronary microvascular embolization. Circulation 1991, 84, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Heusch, G.; Musiolik, J.; Gedik, N.; Skyschally, A. Mitochondrial STAT3 activation and cardioprotection by ischemic postconditioning in pigs with regional myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Rossello, X.; Yellon, D.M. The RISK pathway and beyond. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2018, 113, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Mocanu, M.M.; Bell, R.M.; Yellon, D.M. PI3 kinase and not p42/p44 appears to be implicated in the protection conferred by ischemic preconditioning. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2002, 34, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Efentakis, P.; Andreadou, I.; Bibli, S.I.; Vasileiou, S.; Dagres, N.; Zoga, A.; Lougiakis, N.; Kremastinos, D.T.; Iliodromitis, E.K. Ranolazine triggers pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning in anesthetized rabbits through activation of RISK pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 789, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Xu, Z.; Kim, S.; Huh, J. Zinc plays a critical role in the cardioprotective effect of postconditioning by enhancing the activation of the RISK pathway in rat hearts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2014, 66, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Nishino, Y.; Webb, I.G.; Davidson, S.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; Clark, J.E.; Jacquet, S.; Shah, A.M.; Miura, T.; Yellon, D.M.; Avkiran, M.; et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inactivation is not required for ischemic preconditioning or postconditioning in the mouse. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Skyschally, A.; Gent, S.; Amanakis, G.; Schulte, C.; Kleinbongard, P.; Heusch, G. Across-Species Transfer of Protection by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning With Species-Specific Myocardial Signal Transduction by Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinase and Survival Activating Factor Enhancement Pathways. Circ. Res. 2015, 117, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Hadebe, N.; Cour, M.; Lecour, S. The SAFE pathway for cardioprotection: Is this a promising target? Arch. Kreislaufforsch. 2018, 113, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Suleman, N.; Somers, S.; Smith, R.; Opie, L.H.; Lecour, S.C. Dual activation of STAT-3 and Akt is required during the trigger phase of ischaemic preconditioning. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2008, 79, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Lacerda, L.; Somers, S.; Opie, L.H.; Lecour, S. Ischaemic postconditioning protects against reperfusion injury via the SAFE pathway. Cardiovasc. Res. 2009, 84, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Qi, Q.R.; Yang, Z.M. Regulation and function of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. World J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 5, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Huang, C.H.; Tsai, M.S.; Chiang, C.Y.; Su, Y.J.; Wang, T.D.; Chang, W.T.; Chen, H.W.; Chen, W. Activation of mitochondrial STAT-3 and reduced mitochondria damage during hypothermia treatment for post-cardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2015, 110, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wincewicz, A.; Sulkowski, S. Stat proteins as intracellular regulators of resistance to myocardial injury in the context of cardiac remodeling and targeting for therapy. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Yang, Y.; Hu, W.; Di, S.; Ma, Z.; Fan, C.; Wang, D.; Jiang, S.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Li, T.; et al. Tackling myocardial ischemic injury: The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) at a good site. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2017, 21, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kottenberg, E.; Musiolik, J.; Thielmann, M.; Jakob, H.; Peters, J.; Heusch, G. Interference of propofol with signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014, 147, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. D’Elia, E.; Iacovoni, A.; Vaduganathan, M.; Lorini, F.L.; Perlini, S.; Senni, M. Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure: Mechanisms and substrates beyond modulating natriuretic peptides. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017, 19, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. McKinnie, S.M.; Fischer, C.; Tran, K.M.; Wang, W.; Mosquera, F.; Oudit, G.Y.; Vederas, J.C. The Metalloprotease Neprilysin Degrades and Inactivates Apelin Peptides. Chembiochem A Eur. J. Chem. Biol. 2016, 17, 1495–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vodovar, N.; Seronde, M.F.; Laribi, S.; Gayat, E.; Lassus, J.; Januzzi, J.L.; Boukef, R., Jr.; Nouira, S.; Manivet, P.; Samuel, J.L.; et al. Elevated Plasma B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Concentrations Directly Inhibit Circulating Neprilysin Activity in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2015, 3, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kuoppala, A.; Lindstedt, K.A.; Saarinen, J.; Kovanen, P.T.; Kokkonen, J.O. Inactivation of bradykinin by angiotensin-converting enzyme and by carboxypeptidase N in human plasma. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000, 278, H1069–H1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Morita, E.; Yasue, H.; Yoshimura, M.; Ogawa, H.; Jougasaki, M.; Matsumura, T.; Mukoyama, M.; Nakao, K. Increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993, 88, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Hashimoto, K.; Hamamoto, H.; Honda, Y.; Hirose, M.; Furukawa, S.; Kimura, E. Changes in components of kinin system and hemodynamics in acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 1978, 95, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lumsden, N.G.; Khambata, R.S.; Hobbs, A.J. C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP): Cardiovascular roles and potential as a therapeutic target. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 4080–4088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Addisu, A.; Gower, W.R., Jr.; Landon, C.S.; Dietz, J.R. B-type natriuretic peptide decreases gastric emptying and absorption. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Birkenfeld, A.L.; Boschmann, M.; Moro, C.; Adams, F.; Heusser, K.; Franke, G.; Berlan, M.; Luft, F.C.; Lafontan, M.; Jordan, J. Lipid mobilization with physiological atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 3622–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Burnett, J.C., Jr.; Granger, J.P.; Opgenorth, T.J. Effects of synthetic atrial natriuretic factor on renal function and renin release. Am. J. Physiol. 1984, 247, F863–F866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Casserly, B.P.; Sears, E.H.; Gartman, E.J. The role of natriuretic peptides in inflammation and immunity. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2010, 4, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shah, S.J.; Michaels, A.D. Acute effects of intravenous nesiritide on cardiac contractility in heart failure. J. Card. Fail. 2010, 16, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Holmes, S.J.; Espiner, E.A.; Richards, A.M.; Yandle, T.G.; Frampton, C. Renal, endocrine, and hemodynamic effects of human brain natriuretic peptide in normal man. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1993, 76, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Richards, A.M.; McDonald, D.; Fitzpatrick, M.A.; Nicholls, M.G.; Espiner, E.A.; Ikram, H.; Jans, S.; Grant, S.; Yandle, T. Atrial natriuretic hormone has biological effects in man at physiological plasma concentrations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1988, 67, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kiemer, A.K.; Weber, N.C.; Furst, R.; Bildner, N.; Kulhanek-Heinze, S.; Vollmar, A.M. Inhibition of p38 MAPK activation via induction of MKP-1: Atrial natriuretic peptide reduces TNF-alpha-induced actin polymerization and endothelial permeability. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. El, M.M.; Houard, X.; Rais, S.; Pasquier, C.; Oudghiri, M.; Jacob, M.P.; Meilhac, O.; Michel, J.B. Pharmacological potentiation of natriuretic peptide limits polymorphonuclear neutrophil-vascular cell interactions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2002, 22, 1824–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Chen, W.; Oberwinkler, H.; Werner, F.; Gassner, B.; Nakagawa, H.; Feil, R.; Hofmann, F.; Schlossmann, J.; Dietrich, A.; Gudermann, T.; et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide-mediated inhibition of microcirculatory endothelial Ca2+ and permeability response to histamine involves cGMP-dependent protein kinase I and TRPC6 channels. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2121–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Moyes, A.J.; Chu, S.M.; Aubdool, A.A.; Dukinfield, M.S.; Margulies, K.B.; Bedi, K.C.; Hodivala-Dilke, K.; Baliga, R.S.; Hobbs, A.J. C-type natriuretic peptide co-ordinates cardiac structure and function. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 1006–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Burley, D.S.; Baxter, G.F. B-type natriuretic peptide at early reperfusion limits infarct size in the rat isolated heart. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2007, 102, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. D’Souza, S.P.; Yellon, D.M.; Martin, C.; Schulz, R.; Heusch, G.; Onody, A.; Ferdinandy, P.; Baxter, G.F. B-type natriuretic peptide limits infarct size in rat isolated hearts via KATP channel opening. Am. J. Physiol.. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 284, H1592–H1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Inserte, J.; Garcia-Dorado, D.; Agullo, L.; Paniagua, A.; Soler-Soler, J. Urodilatin limits acute reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2000, 45, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yang, X.M.; Philipp, S.; Downey, J.M.; Cohen, M.V. Atrial natriuretic peptide administered just prior to reperfusion limits infarction in rabbit hearts. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2006, 101, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hempel, A.; Friedrich, M.; Schluter, K.D.; Forssmann, W.G.; Kuhn, M.; Piper, H.M. ANP protects against reoxygenation-induced hypercontracture in adult cardiomyocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, H244–H249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Abdallah, Y.; Gkatzoflia, A.; Pieper, H.; Zoga, E.; Walther, S.; Kasseckert, S.; Schafer, M.; Schluter, K.D.; Piper, H.M.; Schafer, C. Mechanism of cGMP-mediated protection in a cellular model of myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 66, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Kitakaze, M.; Asakura, M.; Kim, J.; Shintani, Y.; Asanuma, H.; Hamasaki, T.; Seguchi, O.; Myoishi, M.; Minamino, T.; Ohara, T.; et al. Human atrial natriuretic peptide and nicorandil as adjuncts to reperfusion treatment for acute myocardial infarction (J-WIND): Two randomised trials. Lancet 2007, 370, 1483–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Arakawa, K.; Himeno, H.; Kirigaya, J.; Otomo, F.; Matsushita, K.; Nakahashi, H.; Shimizu, S.; Nitta, M.; Takamizawa, T.; Yano, H.; et al. B-type natriuretic peptide as a predictor of ischemia/reperfusion injury immediately after myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2016, 5, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ajmani, P.; Yadav, H.N.; Singh, M.; Sharma, P.L. Possible involvement of caveolin in attenuation of cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning in diabetic rat heart. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2011, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Nunez, R.E.; Castro, M.; Javadov, S.; Escobales, N. Angiotensin II and ischemic preconditioning synergize to improve mitochondrial function while showing additive effects on ventricular postischemic recovery. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2014, 64, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sharma, A.; Singh, M. Role of angiotensin in cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1999, 33, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Escobales, N.; Nunez, R.E.; Javadov, S. Mitochondrial angiotensin receptors and cardioprotective pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019, 316, H1426–H1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Loot, A.E.; Roks, A.J.; Henning, R.H.; Tio, R.A.; Suurmeijer, J.A.; Boomsma, F.; van Gilst, W.H. Angiotensin-(1-7) attenuates the development of heart failure after myocardial infarction in rats. Circulation 2002, 105, 1548–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Trask, A.J.; Ferrario, C.M. Angiotensin-(1-7): Pharmacology and new perspectives in cardiovascular treatments. Cardiovasc. Drug Rev. 2007, 25, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Macedo, L.M.; Souza, A.P.; de Maria, M.L.; Borges, C.L.; Soares, C.M.; Pedrino, G.R.; Colugnati, D.B.; Santos, R.A.; Mendes, E.P.; Ferreira, A.J.; et al. Cardioprotective effects of diminazene aceturate in pressure-overloaded rat hearts. Life Sci. 2016, 155, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Qi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cole-Jeffrey, C.T.; Shenoy, V.; Espejo, A.; Hanna, M.; Song, C.; Pepine, C.J.; Katovich, M.J.; Raizada, M.K. Diminazene aceturate enhances angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity and attenuates ischemia-induced cardiac pathophysiology. Hypertension 2013, 62, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bessa, A.S.M.; Jesus, E.F.; Nunes, A.D.C.; Pontes, C.N.R.; Lacerda, I.S.; Costa, J.M.; Souza, E.J.; Lino-Junior, R.S.; Biancardi, M.F.; Santos, F.C.A.D.; et al. Stimulation of the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas axis in hypertensive pregnant rats attenuates cardiovascular dysfunction in adult male offspring. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 1883–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Singh, N.; Joshi, S.; Guo, L.; Baker, M.B.; Li, Y.; Castellano, R.K.; Raizada, M.K.; Jarajapu, Y.P. ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas axis stimulates vascular repair-relevant functions of CD34+ cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015, 309, H1697–H1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Meneton, P.; Bloch-Faure, M.; Hagege, A.A.; Ruetten, H.; Huang, W.; Bergaya, S.; Ceiler, D.; Gehring, D.; Martins, I.; Salmon, G.; et al. Cardiovascular abnormalities with normal blood pressure in tissue kallikrein-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2634–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Yoshida, H.; Zhang, J.J.; Chao, L.; Chao, J. Kallikrein gene delivery attenuates myocardial infarction and apoptosis after myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Hypertension 2000, 35, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Chao, J.; Yin, H.; Gao, L.; Hagiwara, M.; Shen, B.; Yang, Z.R.; Chao, L. Tissue kallikrein elicits cardioprotection by direct kinin b2 receptor activation independent of kinin formation. Hypertension 2008, 52, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Heusch, G.; Boengler, K.; Schulz, R. Cardioprotection: Nitric oxide, protein kinases, and mitochondria. Circulation 2008, 118, 1915–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Jalowy, A.; Schulz, R.; Dorge, H.; Behrends, M.; Heusch, G. Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998, 32, 1787–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Penna, C.; Mancardi, D.; Tullio, F.; Pagliaro, P. Postconditioning and intermittent bradykinin induced cardioprotection require cyclooxygenase activation and prostacyclin release during reperfusion. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2008, 103, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ehring, T.; Baumgart, D.; Krajcar, M.; Hümmelgen, M.; Kompa, S.; Heusch, G. Attenuation of myocardial stunning by the ACE inhibitor ramiprilat through a signal cascade of bradykinin and prostaglandins but not nitric oxide. Circulation 1994, 90, 1368–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Bellis, A.; Sorriento, D.; Fiordelisi, A.; Izzo, R.; Sadoshima, J.; Mauro, C.; Cerasuolo, F.; Mancusi, C.; Barbato, E.; Pilato, E.; et al. Autocrine Bradykinin Release Promotes Ischemic Preconditioning-Induced Cytoprotection in Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bellis, A.; Castaldo, D.; Trimarco, V.; Monti, M.G.; Chivasso, P.; Sadoshima, J.; Trimarco, B.; Morisco, C. Cross-talk between PKA and Akt protects endothelial cells from apoptosis in the late ischemic preconditioning. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Campbell, D.J. Neprilysin Inhibitors and Bradykinin. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Pan, H.L.; Chen, S.R.; Scicli, G.M.; Carretero, O.A. Cardiac interstitial bradykinin release during ischemia is enhanced by ischemic preconditioning. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000, 279, H116–H121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Campbell, D.J.; Anastasopoulos, F.; Duncan, A.M.; James, G.M.; Kladis, A.; Briscoe, T.A. Effects of neutral endopeptidase inhibition and combined angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase inhibition on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 287, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Kokkonen, J.O.; Kuoppala, A.; Saarinen, J.; Lindstedt, K.A.; Kovanen, P.T. Kallidin- and bradykinin-degrading pathways in human heart: Degradation of kallidin by aminopeptidase M-like activity and bradykinin by neutral endopeptidase. Circulation 1999, 99, 1984–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Kawamata, Y.; Habata, Y.; Fukusumi, S.; Hosoya, M.; Fujii, R.; Hinuma, S.; Nishizawa, N.; Kitada, C.; Onda, H.; Nishimura, O.; et al. Molecular properties of apelin: Tissue distribution and receptor binding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1538, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Chen, Z.; Wu, D.; Li, L.; Chen, L. Apelin/APJ System: A Novel Therapeutic Target for Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Dna Cell Biol. 2016, 35, 766–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yang, S.; Li, H.; Tang, L.; Ge, G.; Ma, J.; Qiao, Z.; Liu, H.; Fang, W. Apelin-13 protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through the RISK-GSK-3beta-mPTP pathway. Arch. Med. Sci. 2015, 11, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Simpkin, J.C.; Yellon, D.M.; Davidson, S.M.; Lim, S.Y.; Wynne, A.M.; Smith, C.C. Apelin-13 and apelin-36 exhibit direct cardioprotective activity against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2007, 102, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Rahman, S.; Li, J.; Bopassa, J.C.; Umar, S.; Iorga, A.; Partownavid, P.; Eghbali, M. Phosphorylation of GSK-3beta mediates intralipid-induced cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injury. Anesthesiology 2011, 115, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Schriewer, J.M.; Peek, C.B.; Bass, J.; Schumacker, P.T. ROS-mediated PARP activity undermines mitochondrial function after permeability transition pore opening during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Pisarenko, O.I.; Pelogeykina, Y.A.; Zh, D.B.; Serebryakova, L.I.; Sidorova, M.V.; Az’muko, A.A.; Khatri, D.N.; Studneva, I.M.; Pal’keeva, M.E.; Tskitishvili, O.V.; et al. Limitation of myocardial infarction by a structural analog of the peptide apelin-12. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2012, 443, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mottaghi, S.; Larijani, B.; Sharifi, A.M. Apelin 13: A novel approach to enhance efficacy of hypoxic preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells for cell therapy of diabetes. Med. Hypotheses 2012, 79, 717–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Pisarenko, O.I.; Lankin, V.Z.; Konovalova, G.G.; Serebryakova, L.I.; Shulzhenko, V.S.; Timoshin, A.A.; Tskitishvili, O.V.; Pelogeykina, Y.A.; Studneva, I.M. Apelin-12 and its structural analog enhance antioxidant defense in experimental myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 391, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Zeng, X.J.; Zhang, L.K.; Wang, H.X.; Lu, L.Q.; Ma, L.Q.; Tang, C.S. Apelin protects heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat. Peptides 2009, 30, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Pisarenko, O.I.; Serebryakova, L.I.; Studneva, I.M.; Pelogeykina, Y.A.; Tskitishvili, O.V.; Bespalova, Z.D.; Sidorova, M.V.; Az’muko, A.A.; Khatri, D.N.; Pal’keeva, M.E.; et al. Effects of structural analogues of apelin-12 in acute myocardial infarction in rats. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2013, 4, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Pisarenko, O.I.; Serebriakova, L.I.; Iu, A.P.; Studneva, I.M.; Kkhatri, D.N.; Tskitishvili, O.V.; Zh, D.B.; Az’muko, A.A.; Sidorova, M.V.; Pal’keeva, M.E.; et al. Involvement of NO-dependent mechanisms of apelin action in myocardial protection against ischemia/reperfusion damage. Kardiologiia 2012, 52, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  147. Pisarenko, O.I.; Iu, A.P.; Shul’zhenko, V.S.; Studneva, I.M.; Zh, D.B.; Az’muko, A.A.; Sidorova, M.V.; Pal’keeva, M.E. The influence of inhibiting no formation on metabolic recovery of ischemic rat heart by apelin-12. Biomeditsinskaia Khimiia 2012, 58, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Pisarenko, O.I.; Shulzhenko, V.S.; Iu, A.P.; Studneva, I.M.; Kkhatri, D.N.; Zh, D.B.; Az’muko, A.A.; Sidorova, M.V.; Pal’keeva, M.E. Effects of exogenous apelin-12 on functional and metabolic recovery of isolated rat heart after ischemia. Kardiologiia 2010, 50, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  149. Kunduzova, O.; Alet, N.; Delesque-Touchard, N.; Millet, L.; Castan-Laurell, I.; Muller, C.; Dray, C.; Schaeffer, P.; Herault, J.P.; Savi, P.; et al. Apelin/APJ signaling system: A potential link between adipose tissue and endothelial angiogenic processes. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 4146–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Li, L.; Li, L.; Xie, F.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Tang, G.; Lv, D.; Lu, Q.; Chen, L.; Li, J. Jagged-1/Notch3 signaling transduction pathway is involved in apelin-13-induced vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2013, 45, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Liu, C.; Su, T.; Li, F.; Li, L.; Qin, X.; Pan, W.; Feng, F.; Chen, F.; Liao, D.; Chen, L. PI3K/Akt signaling transduction pathway is involved in rat vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation induced by apelin-13. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2010, 42, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Azizi, Y.; Faghihi, M.; Imani, A.; Roghani, M.; Zekri, A.; Mobasheri, M.B.; Rastgar, T.; Moghimian, M. Post-infarct treatment with [Pyr(1)]apelin-13 improves myocardial function by increasing neovascularization and overexpression of angiogenic growth factors in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 761, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Li, L.; Zeng, H.; Chen, J.X. Apelin-13 increases myocardial progenitor cells and improves repair postmyocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 303, H605–H618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Kitiphongspattana, K.; Khan, T.A.; Ishii-Schrade, K.; Roe, M.W.; Philipson, L.H.; Gaskins, H.R. Protective role for nitric oxide during the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in pancreatic beta-cells. American journal of physiology. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 292, E1543–E1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Tao, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, Y.; Xin, P.; Li, J.; Liu, M.; Li, J.; Andrew, N.R.; Wei, M. Apelin-13 protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through inhibition of ER-dependent apoptotic pathways in a time-dependent fashion. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, H1471–H1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kaufman, R.J. Stress signaling from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum: Coordination of gene transcriptional and translational controls. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1211–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Boyce, M.; Yuan, J. Cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress: A matter of life or death. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Liu, X.H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Sun, S.; Wu, X.D. Ischemic postconditioning protects myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion injury through attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress. Shock 2008, 30, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pisarenko, O.I.; Shulzhenko, V.S.; Studneva, I.M.; Serebryakova, L.I.; Pelogeykina, Y.A.; Veselova, O.M. Signaling pathways of a structural analogue of apelin-12 involved in myocardial protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury. Peptides 2015, 73, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wang, C.; Liu, N.; Luan, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Zou, W.; Xing, Y.; Tao, L.; Cao, F.; Wang, H. Apelin protects sarcoplasmic reticulum function and cardiac performance in ischaemia-reperfusion by attenuating oxidation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase and ryanodine receptor. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013, 100, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Japp, A.G.; Cruden, N.L.; Barnes, G.; van Gemeren, N.; Mathews, J.; Adamson, J.; Johnston, N.R.; Denvir, M.A.; Megson, I.L.; Flapan, A.D.; et al. Acute cardiovascular effects of apelin in humans: Potential role in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2010, 121, 1818–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Xi, Y.; Yu, D.; Yang, R.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Qian, K.; Shi, Z.; Wang, W.; Brown, R.; et al. Recombinant Fc-Elabela fusion protein has extended plasma half-life andmitigates post-infarct heart dysfunction in rats. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 292, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Vickers, C.; Hales, P.; Kaushik, V.; Dick, L.; Gavin, J.; Tang, J.; Godbout, K.; Parsons, T.; Baronas, E.; Hsieh, F.; et al. Hydrolysis of biological peptides by human angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 14838–14843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Wang, W.; McKinnie, S.M.; Farhan, M.; Paul, M.; McDonald, T.; McLean, B.; Llorens-Cortes, C.; Hazra, S.; Murray, A.G.; Vederas, J.C.; et al. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Metabolizes and Partially Inactivates Pyr-Apelin-13 and Apelin-17: Physiological Effects in the Cardiovascular System. Hypertension 2016, 68, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Fischer, C.; Lamer, T.; Wang, W.; McKinnie, S.M.K.; Iturrioz, X.; Llorens-Cortes, C.; Oudit, G.Y.; Vederas, J.C. Plasma kallikrein cleaves and inactivates apelin-17: Palmitoyl- and PEG-extended apelin-17 analogs as metabolically stable blood pressure-lowering agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 166, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zubrzycka, M.; Janecka, A. Substance P: Transmitter of nociception (Minireview). Endocr. Regul. 2000, 34, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
  167. Datar, P.; Srivastava, S.; Coutinho, E.; Govil, G. Substance P: Structure, function, and therapeutics. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 75–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Bossaller, C.; Reither, K.; Hehlert-Friedrich, C.; Auch-Schwelk, W.; Graf, K.; Grafe, M.; Fleck, E. In vivo measurement of endothelium-dependent vasodilation with substance P in man. Herz 1992, 17, 284–290. [Google Scholar]
  169. Beltrami, A.P.; Barlucchi, L.; Torella, D.; Baker, M.; Limana, F.; Chimenti, S.; Kasahara, H.; Rota, M.; Musso, E.; Urbanek, K.; et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell 2003, 114, 763–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Chavakis, E.; Koyanagi, M.; Dimmeler, S. Enhancing the outcome of cell therapy for cardiac repair: Progress from bench to bedside and back. Circulation 2010, 121, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Dimmeler, S.; Burchfield, J.; Zeiher, A.M. Cell-based therapy of myocardial infarction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Hong, H.S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Woo, J.S.; Lee, K.H.; Cheng, X.W.; Son, Y.; Kim, W. Substance-P Prevents Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Modulating Stem Cell Mobilization and Causing Early Suppression of Injury-Mediated Inflammation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Int. J. Exp. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 52, 40–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Jubair, S.; Li, J.; Dehlin, H.M.; Manteufel, E.J.; Goldspink, P.H.; Levick, S.P.; Janicki, J.S. Substance P induces cardioprotection in ischemia-reperfusion via activation of AKT. American journal of physiology. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015, 309, H676–H684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Dehlin, H.M.; Levick, S.P. Substance P in heart failure: The good and the bad. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 170, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Hinson, J.P.; Kapas, S.; Smith, D.M. Adrenomedullin, a multifunctional regulatory peptide. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 138–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hamid, S.A.; Totzeck, M.; Drexhage, C.; Thompson, I.; Fowkes, R.C.; Rassaf, T.; Baxter, G.F. Nitric oxide/cGMP signalling mediates the cardioprotective action of adrenomedullin in reperfused myocardium. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kato, K.; Yin, H.; Agata, J.; Yoshida, H.; Chao, L.; Chao, J. Adrenomedullin gene delivery attenuates myocardial infarction and apoptosis after ischemia and reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, H1506–H1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Okumura, H.; Nagaya, N.; Itoh, T.; Okano, I.; Hino, J.; Mori, K.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Ishibashi-Ueda, H.; Miwa, S.; Tambara, K.; et al. Adrenomedullin infusion attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway. Circulation 2004, 109, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Nagaya, N.; Satoh, T.; Nishikimi, T.; Uematsu, M.; Furuichi, S.; Sakamaki, F.; Oya, H.; Kyotani, S.; Nakanishi, N.; Goto, Y.; et al. Hemodynamic, renal, and hormonal effects of adrenomedullin infusion in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 2000, 101, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Yang, J.H.; Jia, Y.X.; Pan, C.S.; Zhao, J.; Ouyang, M.; Yang, J.; Chang, J.K.; Tang, C.S.; Qi, Y.F. Effects of intermedin(1-53) on cardiac function and ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 327, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yang, J.H.; Qi, Y.F.; Jia, Y.X.; Pan, C.S.; Zhao, J.; Yang, J.; Chang, J.K.; Tang, C.S. Protective effects of intermedin/adrenomedullin2 on ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. Peptides 2005, 26, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Heng, Y.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, J.Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.L.; Chen, H.B.; Xin, D.J. Huang. Intermedin is upregulated and has protective roles in a mouse ischemia/reperfusion model. Hypertens. Res. 2009, 32, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Song, J.Q.; Teng, X.; Cai, Y.; Tang, C.S.; Qi, Y.F. Activation of Akt/GSK-3beta signaling pathway is involved in intermedin(1-53) protection against myocardial apoptosis induced by ischemia/reperfusion. Apoptosis 2009, 14, 1299–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Morimoto, R.; Satoh, F.; Murakami, O.; Totsune, K.; Suzuki, T.; Sasano, H.; Ito, S.; Takahashi, K. Expression of adrenomedullin2/intermedin in human brain, heart, and kidney. Peptides 2007, 28, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bell, D.; Campbell, M.; Ferguson, M.; Sayers, L.; Donaghy, L.; O’Regan, A.; Jewhurst, V.; Harbinson, M. AM(1)-receptor-dependent protection by intermedin of human vascular and cardiac non-vascular cells from ischaemia-reperfusion injury. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 1181–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Holmes, D.; Campbell, M.; Harbinson, M.; Bell, D. Protective effects of intermedin on cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal diseases: Comparison with adrenomedullin and CGRP. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2013, 14, 294–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Lv, Z.; Wu, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Hong, B. Plasma intermedin levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Peptides 2013, 43, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Bell, D.; Campbell, M.; McAleer, S.F.; Ferguson, M.; Donaghy, L.; Harbinson, M.T. Endothelium-derived intermedin/adrenomedullin-2 protects human ventricular cardiomyocytes from ischaemia-reoxygenation injury predominantly via the AM(1) receptor. Peptides 2016, 76, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Puymirat, E.; Simon, T.; Cayla, G.; Cottin, Y.; Elbaz, M.; Coste, P.; Lemesle, G.; Motreff, P.; Popovic, B.; Khalife, K.; et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction: Changes in Patient Characteristics, Management, and 6-Month Outcomes Over a Period of 20 Years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015. Circulation 2017, 136, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Szummer, K.; Wallentin, L.; Lindhagen, L.; Alfredsson, J.; Erlinge, D.; Held, C.; James, S.; Kellerth, T.; Lindahl, B.; Ravn-Fischer, A.; et al. Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: Experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 3056–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Szummer, K.; Wallentin, L.; Lindhagen, L.; Alfredsson, J.; Erlinge, D.; Held, C.; James, S.; Kellerth, T.; Lindahl, B.; Ravn-Fischer, A.; et al. Relations between implementation of new treatments and improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years: Experiences from SWEDEHEART registry 1995 to 2014. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3766–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Yellon, D.M.; Hausenloy, D.J. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1121–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Frohlich, G.M.; Meier, P.; White, S.K.; Yellon, D.M.; Hausenloy, D.J. Myocardial reperfusion injury: Looking beyond primary PCI. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Hausenloy, D.J.; Botker, H.E.; Engstrom, T.; Erlinge, D.; Heusch, G.; Ibanez, B.; Kloner, R.A.; Ovize, M.; Yellon, D.M.; Garcia-Dorado, D. Targeting reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trials and tribulations. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Piot, C.; Croisille, P.; Staat, P.; Thibault, H.; Rioufol, G.; Mewton, N.; Elbelghiti, R.; Cung, T.T.; Bonnefoy, E.; Angoulvant, D.; et al. Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Cung, T.T.; Morel, O.; Cayla, G.; Rioufol, G.; Garcia-Dorado, D.; Angoulvant, D.; Bonnefoy-Cudraz, E.; Guérin, P.; Elbaz, M.; Delarche, N.; et al. Cyclosporine before PCI in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Ibanez, B.; Prat-González, S.; Speidl, W.S.; Vilahur, G.; Pinero, A.; Cimmino, G.; García, M.J.; Fuster, V.; Sanz, J.; Badimon, J.J. Early metoprolol administration before coronary reperfusion results in increased myocardial salvage: Analysis of ischemic myocardium at risk using cardiac magnetic resonance. Circulation 2007, 115, 2909–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. García-Ruiz, J.M.; Fernández-Jiménez, R.; García-Alvarez, A.; Pizarro, G.; Galán-Arriola, C.; Fernández-Friera, L.; Mateos, A.; Nuno-Ayala, M.; Aguero, J.; Sánchez-González, J.; et al. Impact of the Timing of Metoprolol Administration During STEMI on Infarct Size and Ventricular Function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 2093–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Roolvink, V.; Ibáñez, B.; Ottervanger, J.P.; Pizarro, G.; van Royen, N.; Mateos, A.; Dambrink, J.E.; Escalera, N.; Lipsic, E.; Albarran, A.; et al. Early Intravenous Beta-Blockers in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Before Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 2705–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sun, H.; Guo, T.; Liu, L.; Yu, Z.; Xu, W.; Chen, W.; Shen, L.; Wang, J.; Dou, X. Ischemic postconditioning inhibits apoptosis after acute myocardial infarction in pigs. Heart Surg. Forum 2010, 13, E305–E310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Engstrøm, T.; Kelbæk, H.; Helqvist, S.; Høfsten, D.E.; Kløvgaard, L.; Clemmensen, P.; Holmvang, L.; Jørgensen, E.; Pedersen, F.; Saunamaki, K.; et al. Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Heusch, G.; Botker, H.E.; Przyklenk, K.; Redington, A.; Yellon, D. Remote ischemic conditioning. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 65, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Gaspar, A.; Lourenço, A.P. Randomized controlled trial of remote ischaemic conditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as adjuvant to primary angioplasty (RIC-STEMI). Basic Res. Cardiol. 2018, 113, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. McLeod, S.L.; Iansavichene, A.; Cheskes, S. Remote Ischemic Perconditioning to Reduce Reperfusion Injury during Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Eitel, I.; Stiermaier, T.; Rommel, K.P.; Fuernau, G.; Sandri, M.; Mangner, N.; Linke, A.; Erbs, S.; Lurz, P.; Boudriot, E.; et al. Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital remote ischaemic perconditioning and postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The randomized LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 3049–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Stiermaier, T.; Jensen, J.O.; Rommel, K.P.; de Waha-Thiele, S.; Fuernau, G.; Desch, S.; Thiele, H.; Eitel, I. Combined Intrahospital Remote Ischemic Perconditioning and Postconditioning Improves Clinical Outcome in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1482–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Davidson, S.M.; Ferdinandy, P.; Andreadou, I.; Botker, H.E.; Heusch, G.; Ibanez, B.; Ovize, M.; Schulz, R.; Yellon, D.M.; Hausenloy, D.J.; et al. Multitarget Strategies to Reduce Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Packer, M.; McMurray, J.J. Importance of endogenous compensatory vasoactive peptides in broadening the effects of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system for the treatment of heart failure. Lancet 2017, 389, 1831–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. McMurray, J.J.; Packer, M.; Desai, A.S.; Gong, J.; Lefkowitz, M.P.; Rizkala, A.R.; Rouleau, J.L.; Shi, V.C.; Solomon, S.D.; Swedberg, K.; et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Velazquez, E.J.; Morrow, D.A.; DeVore, A.D.; Duffy, C.I.; Ambrosy, A.P.; McCague, K.; Rocha, R.; Braunwald, E.; Investigators, P.-H. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Imran, M.; Hassan, M.Q.; Akhtar, M.S.; Rahman, O.; Akhtar, M.; Najmi, A.K. Sacubitril and valsartan protect from experimental myocardial infarction by ameliorating oxidative damage in Wistar rats. Clin Exp. Hypertens. 2019, 41, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Nakano, A.; Miura, T.; Miki, T.; Nozawa, Y.; Ichikawa, Y.; Ura, N.; Shimamoto, K. Effects of neutral endopeptidase 24.11 inhibition on myocardial infarct size and ischemic preconditioning in rabbits. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2002, 366, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Yang, X.P.; Liu, Y.H.; Peterson, E.; Carretero, O.A. Effect of neutral endopeptidase 24.11 inhibition on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: The role of kinins. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1997, 29, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Ishii, M.; Kaikita, K.; Sato, K.; Sueta, D.; Fujisue, K.; Arima, Y.; Oimatsu, Y.; Mitsuse, T.; Onoue, Y.; Araki, S.; et al. Cardioprotective Effects of LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan) After Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res. 2017, 2, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Torrado, J.; Cain, C.; Mauro, A.G.; Romeo, F.; Ockaili, R.; Chau, V.Q.; Nestler, J.A.; Devarakonda, T.; Ghosh, S.; Das, A.; et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan Averts Adverse Post-Infarction Ventricular Remodeling and Preserves Systolic Function in Rabbits. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2342–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Morrow, D.A.; Velazquez, E.J.; DeVore, A.D.; Prescott, M.F.; Duffy, C.I.; Gurmu, Y.; McCague, K.; Rocha, R.; Braunwald, E. Cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with acute decompensated heart failure randomized to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril in the PIONEER-HF trial. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 3345–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Anker, S.D.; Bueno, H.; Cleland, J.G.F.; Coats, A.J.S.; Falk, V.; González-Juanatey, J.R.; Harjola, V.P.; Jankowska, E.A.; et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2129–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Senni, M.; McMurray, J.J.; Wachter, R.; McIntyre, H.F.; Reyes, A.; Majercak, I.; Andreka, P.; Shehova-Yankova, N.; Anand, I.; Yilmaz, M.B.; et al. Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: Results of TITRATION, a double-blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016, 18, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Ibanez, B.; James, S.; Agewall, S.; Antunes, M.J.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C.; Bueno, H.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Crea, F.; Goudevenos, J.A.; Halvorsen, S.; et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 119–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Santos-Gallego, C.G.; Requena-Ibanez, J.A.; Antonio, R.S.; Ishikawa, K.; Watanabe, S.; Picatoste, B.; Flores, E.; Garcia-Ropero, A.; Sanz, J.; Hajjar, R.J.; et al. Empagliflozin Ameliorates Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling in Nondiabetic Heart Failure by Enhancing Myocardial Energetics. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 1931–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms of cardiomyocytes protection against MIRI and the potential effect of concomitant NEP inhibition/AT1R antagonism. NEP inhibition by sacubitril leads to increased levels of plasmatic Ang II, Bk, SP, NPs, ADM, and apelin. Increased Ang II levels, through a PKCε dependent mechanism, lead to the AT1R and AT2R translocation from plasmatic to mitochondrial membrane where they exert their protective role. In particular, plasmatic AT1Rs stimulate NOS activity leading to superoxide generation, mitochondrial K+-ATP channel activity, membrane depolarization, and MPTPs opening. This process enhances the efflux of superoxide into the cytoplasm and promotes the activation of pro-survival kinases. By contrast, plasmatic AT2R stimulation leads to NOS-NO-PKG stimulation that further stimulates PKCε. In the mitochondria, the up-regulation of AT2R/AT1R protein levels controls the MRC activity through a stimulatory mechanism composed of ROS and an inhibitory pathway involving NOS-NO. This latter exerts a master control on respiratory function as it modulates AT1Rs, while tonically suppressing electron transport chain activity. Concomitant inhibition of AT1R by valsartan blocks pro-apoptotic mechanisms mediated by this receptor, thereby, empowering pro-survival pathways induced by AT2R. Increased levels of Bk, SP, NPs, ADM, and apelin lead to PI3K-Akt and GSK-3β protective pathways activation and suppression of pro-apoptotic mechanisms induced by ER stress. These cardioprotective actions are mediated by NO synthesis and by direct inhibition of caspase-3 cleavage. MIRI, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury; NEP, neprilysin; AT1R and AT2R, angiotensin receptor type 1 and 2; Ang II, angiotensin II; Bk, bradykinin; SP, substance P; NPs, natriuretic peptides; ADM, adrenomedullin; PKCε, protein kinase Cε; NOX, NAD(P)H oxidase; MPTPs, mitochondrial permeability transition pores; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; PKG, protein kinase G; PI3K, phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MRC, mitochondrial respiratory chain; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms of cardiomyocytes protection against MIRI and the potential effect of concomitant NEP inhibition/AT1R antagonism. NEP inhibition by sacubitril leads to increased levels of plasmatic Ang II, Bk, SP, NPs, ADM, and apelin. Increased Ang II levels, through a PKCε dependent mechanism, lead to the AT1R and AT2R translocation from plasmatic to mitochondrial membrane where they exert their protective role. In particular, plasmatic AT1Rs stimulate NOS activity leading to superoxide generation, mitochondrial K+-ATP channel activity, membrane depolarization, and MPTPs opening. This process enhances the efflux of superoxide into the cytoplasm and promotes the activation of pro-survival kinases. By contrast, plasmatic AT2R stimulation leads to NOS-NO-PKG stimulation that further stimulates PKCε. In the mitochondria, the up-regulation of AT2R/AT1R protein levels controls the MRC activity through a stimulatory mechanism composed of ROS and an inhibitory pathway involving NOS-NO. This latter exerts a master control on respiratory function as it modulates AT1Rs, while tonically suppressing electron transport chain activity. Concomitant inhibition of AT1R by valsartan blocks pro-apoptotic mechanisms mediated by this receptor, thereby, empowering pro-survival pathways induced by AT2R. Increased levels of Bk, SP, NPs, ADM, and apelin lead to PI3K-Akt and GSK-3β protective pathways activation and suppression of pro-apoptotic mechanisms induced by ER stress. These cardioprotective actions are mediated by NO synthesis and by direct inhibition of caspase-3 cleavage. MIRI, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury; NEP, neprilysin; AT1R and AT2R, angiotensin receptor type 1 and 2; Ang II, angiotensin II; Bk, bradykinin; SP, substance P; NPs, natriuretic peptides; ADM, adrenomedullin; PKCε, protein kinase Cε; NOX, NAD(P)H oxidase; MPTPs, mitochondrial permeability transition pores; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; PKG, protein kinase G; PI3K, phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MRC, mitochondrial respiratory chain; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Cells 09 02134 g001
Figure 2. Repeated episodes of hypoxia-reoxygenation enhance the synthesis and the release in the extracellular space of bradykinin (Bk), through an increase of tissue kallikrein 1 (KLK1) activity. The released Bk by an autocrine mechanism binds its receptors. These consist of 2 types of seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors: type 2 (BKR2), which is constitutively expressed; and type 1 (BKR1), which is not constitutively expressed, but it is up-regulated by late PC. The binding of Bk to BKR2 induces the endocytosis of the receptor; this phenomenon activates protein kinase A (PKA), which, in turn, phosphorylates/activates Akt. This mechanism accounts for the cytoprotective effect of the early and late preconditioning (PC). The binding of Bk to BKR1 through the activation of PKA-Akt accounts for cytoprotection in the late window of PC.
Figure 2. Repeated episodes of hypoxia-reoxygenation enhance the synthesis and the release in the extracellular space of bradykinin (Bk), through an increase of tissue kallikrein 1 (KLK1) activity. The released Bk by an autocrine mechanism binds its receptors. These consist of 2 types of seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors: type 2 (BKR2), which is constitutively expressed; and type 1 (BKR1), which is not constitutively expressed, but it is up-regulated by late PC. The binding of Bk to BKR2 induces the endocytosis of the receptor; this phenomenon activates protein kinase A (PKA), which, in turn, phosphorylates/activates Akt. This mechanism accounts for the cytoprotective effect of the early and late preconditioning (PC). The binding of Bk to BKR1 through the activation of PKA-Akt accounts for cytoprotection in the late window of PC.
Cells 09 02134 g002
Figure 3. Protective effects of apelins against MIRI. A large body of evidence suggests that apelin-12, -13, and -36 ameliorate MIRI. These apelin isoforms trigger inhibition and activation pathways during MIRI. In particular, they inhibit MPTPs opening, ROS formation, and ER stress. Consistently, they activate ionic channel function for ion homeostasis, NO synthesis, and angiogenesis. All these effects protect the heart against MIRI. MIRI, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury; MPTPs, mitochondrial permeability transition pores; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NO, nitric oxide.
Figure 3. Protective effects of apelins against MIRI. A large body of evidence suggests that apelin-12, -13, and -36 ameliorate MIRI. These apelin isoforms trigger inhibition and activation pathways during MIRI. In particular, they inhibit MPTPs opening, ROS formation, and ER stress. Consistently, they activate ionic channel function for ion homeostasis, NO synthesis, and angiogenesis. All these effects protect the heart against MIRI. MIRI, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury; MPTPs, mitochondrial permeability transition pores; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NO, nitric oxide.
Cells 09 02134 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bellis, A.; Mauro, C.; Barbato, E.; Di Gioia, G.; Sorriento, D.; Trimarco, B.; Morisco, C. The Rationale of Neprilysin Inhibition in Prevention of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Cells 2020, 9, 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092134

AMA Style

Bellis A, Mauro C, Barbato E, Di Gioia G, Sorriento D, Trimarco B, Morisco C. The Rationale of Neprilysin Inhibition in Prevention of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Cells. 2020; 9(9):2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bellis, Alessandro, Ciro Mauro, Emanuele Barbato, Giuseppe Di Gioia, Daniela Sorriento, Bruno Trimarco, and Carmine Morisco. 2020. "The Rationale of Neprilysin Inhibition in Prevention of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction" Cells 9, no. 9: 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop