Next Article in Journal
The Neuropharmacological Evaluation of Seaweed: A Potential Therapeutic Source
Next Article in Special Issue
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Retinitis Pigmentosa: Novel RPGR Variant and Possible Modifier Gene
Previous Article in Journal
Sustained Nrf2 Overexpression-Induced Metabolic Deregulation Can Be Attenuated by Modulating Insulin/Insulin-like Growth Factor Signaling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ciliary Ultrastructure Assessed by Transmission Electron Microscopy in Adults with Bronchiectasis and Suspected Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia but Inconclusive Genotype

1
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
2
Biomedical Research in End-Stage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 30625 Hannover, Germany
3
European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Lung Diseases (ERN-LUNG), 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
4
Research Core Unit Electron Microscopy, Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
5
Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
6
Leibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs (LEBAO), Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
7
REBIRTH—Research Center for Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
8
Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(22), 2651; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222651
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Revised: 15 November 2023 / Accepted: 16 November 2023 / Published: 18 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Cilia in Health and Diseases)

Abstract

:
Whole-exome sequencing has expedited the diagnostic work-up of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), when used in addition to clinical phenotype and nasal nitric oxide. However, it reveals variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in established PCD genes or (likely) pathogenic variants in genes of uncertain significance in approximately 30% of tested individuals. We aimed to assess genotype–phenotype correlations in adults with bronchiectasis, clinical suspicion of PCD, and inconclusive whole-exome sequencing results using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and ciliary image averaging by the PCD Detect software. We recruited 16 patients with VUS in CCDC39, CCDC40, CCDC103, DNAH5, DNAH5/CCDC40, DNAH8/HYDIN, DNAH11, and DNAI1 as well as variants in the PCD candidate genes DNAH1, DNAH7, NEK10, and NME5. We found normal ciliary ultrastructure in eight patients with VUS in CCDC39, DNAH1, DNAH7, DNAH8/HYDIN, DNAH11, and DNAI1. In six patients with VUS in CCDC40, CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1, we identified a corresponding ultrastructural hallmark defect. In one patient with homozygous variant in NME5, we detected a central complex defect supporting clinical relevance. Using TEM as a targeted approach, we established important genotype–phenotype correlations and definite PCD in a considerable proportion of patients. Overall, the PCD Detect software proved feasible in support of TEM.

1. Introduction

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare and heterogeneous genetic multisystem disorder caused by the dysfunction of motile cilia [1]. Its pulmonary manifestation is characterized by persistent retention of hyperconcentrated mucus in the airways, with subsequent chronic inflammation, recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract infections, and progressive lung damage resulting in bronchiectasis [2]. Approximately half of the patients show laterality defects like situs inversus totalis, referred to as Kartagener syndrome. In addition, PCD is associated with extrapulmonary manifestations like male and female subfertility and, rarely, hydrocephalus [1]. The global prevalence of PCD is approximately 1:7500 population [3], although PCD is probably underdiagnosed, in particular among people with bronchiectasis [4].
Unfortunately, there is no stand-alone diagnostic test for PCD and guidelines from the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommend a combination of tests including measurement of nasal nitric oxide (nNO), high-speed video microscopy (HSVM), immunofluorescence microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and genetic analysis [5,6]. However, only TEM and genetics are able to confirm definite PCD by detecting ultrastructural hallmark defects or unambiguous pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in motile ciliopathy genes with established significance [7,8]. To date, >50 genes have been described with well-known association to characteristic clinical symptoms and ultrastructural defects in TEM, also referred to as genotype–phenotype correlation [1,9]. Genetic analysis by next generation sequencing (NGS) is an expeditious diagnostic that is increasingly used in many research settings [4], but also in the routine work-up of orphan diseases in Germany in the past few years [10]. However, it reveals inconclusive results in approximately 30% of patients with a clinical phenotype compatible with PCD, due to either variants of uncertain significance (VUS; class 3 according to American College of Medical Genetics [ACMG]) in established PCD genes or variants in candidate genes of uncertain significance with assumed but unconfirmed association to motile ciliopathies [1,8].
In the present study, we aimed to assess genotype–phenotype correlations in adult patients with bronchiectasis and clinically suspected PCD, but inconclusive genetics in whole-exome sequencing (WES). In addition to conventional TEM, we assessed the feasibility of the PCD Detect software for evaluating ciliary ultrastructure with regard to the confirmation of outer and inner dynein arm defects by ciliary image averaging.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

Between December 2020 and January 2022, we consecutively recruited adult patients with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis from our dedicated clinic at Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. At our center, we routinely use NGS, in terms of WES, for the confirmation of clinically suspected PCD since 2018, while HSVM, immunofluorescence, and TEM have not been readily available in the past due to technical complexity and limited staff resources. Thus, all included patients had clinically suspected PCD with unconfirmed diagnosis and were offered genetic testing by WES within the routine work-up for the etiology of bronchiectasis. We obtained informed and written consent before WES according to national legislation. After WES, all patients included in this study had inconclusive genetic results and did not meet the criteria of definite PCD according to ERS or ATS guidelines [5,6]. They were included regardless of the expected TEM outcome, i.e., even if the gene, in which the respective variants were detected, was presumably associated with normal ultrastructure. Patients had either compound heterozygous or homozygous VUS in established PCD genes, e.g., DNAH5, or likely pathogenic compound heterozygous or homozygous variants in PCD candidate genes, e.g., NME5 [8]. Candidate genes were genes of uncertain significance that at the time of patient recruitment were suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of motile ciliopathies based on supporting data like genomic location or function, but which were still unconfirmed in human patients [8] or merely had few reported cases [11,12,13]. We included one subject with confirmed PCD due to known pathogenic variants in DNAH5 and one healthy subject as positive and negative controls, respectively. All patients and control subjects provided informed and written consent for study participation before we conducted nasal brush biopsy for TEM. Finally, we grouped the etiology of bronchiectasis into the following categories: definite PCD; probable PCD; possible PCD; or other diagnoses, e.g., asthma. For the purpose of our study, definite PCD required the detection of an ultrastructural hallmark defect by TEM [7], while we diagnosed probable and possible PCD in patients with a suggestive clinical phenotype and at least one supporting abnormal test (or positive familial segregation analysis) or no clearly abnormal test, respectively [14]. Cystic fibrosis (CF) and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency were ruled out in all patients as part of their clinical routine. We extracted clinical data, including medical history, signs and symptoms, and findings from routine diagnostics like nNO from our electronic clinical database (FileMaker Pro, Claris International, Cupertino, CA, USA). We evaluated all patients for laterality defects (situs inversus totalis, situs inversus thoracalis, situs inversus abdominalis, left/right isomerism) and excluded patients with current sinonasal or pulmonary exacerbation, epistaxis, hemorrhagic diathesis, and therapeutic anticoagulation.

2.2. Whole-Exome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA blood samples with the NucleoMag Blood kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). We used the IDT Exome library kit (xGen, IDT, Leuven, Belgium) for DNA enrichment and library preparation. WES was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). We aligned the exome sequence to the reference genome (GRCh37/hg19) with megSAP, version 0.1-710-g52d2b0c (https://github.com/imgag/megSAP (accessed on 15 October 2023)). Genetic variants were visualized and filtered with GSvar, version 2018_04 (https://github.com/imgag/ngs-bits (accessed on 15 October 2023)), IGV [12], version 2.4.14 and with Alamut® visual, version 2.11.0 (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France). For prediction of splicing effects, we used SSF, MaxEntScan and NNSPLICE (integrated part of Alamut v2.11.0, Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France). The genetic variants were classified according to the ACMG standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (class 1—benign; class 2—likely benign; class 3—variant of unknown significance; class 4—likely pathogenic; and class 5—pathogenic) [8]. First, all patients were screened for variants in well-established PCD genes as well as the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene (Supplementary Table S1). Additionally, we used a comprehensive virtual gene panel, which contained PCD candidate genes as published by Paff et al. [15].

2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy and PCD Detect Software

Ciliated epithelial cells were obtained by nasal brush biopsy of the inferior nasal meatus with a cytological brush (Gynobrush, Herenz, Hamburg, Germany) at stable state, i.e., in the absence of acute airway infection or sinonasal and pulmonary exacerbation, respectively. Samples were fixed overnight in 150 mM Hepes solution buffer (pH 7.35) containing 1.5% glutaraldehyde and 1.5% formaldehyde. We processed samples to 60 nm ultra-thin sections for TEM as described in Mariani et al. [16]. Ultra-thin sections were observed with a Morgagni 268 Transmission Electron Microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) and images of transverse orientated cilia (cross-sections) were taken using a side-mounted Veleta CCD camera (Olympus SIS, Muenster, Germany). We analyzed >50 ciliary cross-sections from different cells per sample, only assessing cilia with clear structural features and intact membrane. We analyzed and classified the ciliary ultrastructure according to the international consensus guideline BEAT PCD TEM Criteria, with disease-defining class 1 (hallmark) defects, class 2 defects that indicate the diagnosis of PCD in combination with other supporting evidence, or normal ultrastructure [7]. In addition, we used the software PCD Detect, 2020 (downloaded from: https://doi.org/10.5522/04/12327839, last accessed on 28 September 2023), to analyze outer and inner dynein arms on TEM images [17]. PCD Detect is a cilia-averaging tool that generates an averaged image from multiple, manually chosen and layered cutouts, thus reducing background. Nine cutouts, each including a microtubular doublet with outer and inner dynein arms, were manually taken from each ciliary cross-section. At least 5 ciliary cross-sections from different cells, resulting in minimum 45 cutouts, were analyzed in each sample. We performed a reference free averaging using the same search settings as the developers of the software (angle search range: 360°; angle increment size: 1°; search X and Y: 10 pixels; and translational increment size: 1 pixel) [17]. In the present study, we used the color contour map of best-matching features, with yellow and blue indicating low and high electron density, respectively. In a small subset of subjects we assessed the test–retest reliability of TEM analysis on separate samples from nasal brush biopsies of the same individual taken at different occasions.

2.4. Statistical Analysis and Ethical Approval

We assessed the patient cohort by descriptive statistics, using medians, interquartile ranges (IQR), and absolute ranges (SPSS, version 27.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). This study was conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of Hannover Medical School approved our research (No. 9831_BO_S_2021). All patients and control subjects provided informed and written consent prior to study inclusion.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

We included 16 patients with inconclusive results in WES due to VUS in established PCD genes (n = 11) or variants in the candidate genes DNAH1 (n = 2), DNAH7, NEK10 and NME5 (n = 1, each; Table 1). Among those, seven patients (44%) were female and nine (56%) were male, with a median age of 41 years (IQR 23–53, range 18–63 years). The majority of patients descended from Germany (n = 7), followed by Turkey (n = 5), Russia, Tunisia, Syria, and Kenya (n = 1, each). At inclusion in our study, all patients had bronchiectasis without a definite diagnosis of PCD. Clinically, we graded patients as probable PCD (n = 10), possible PCD (n = 3), idiopathic bronchiectasis (n = 2), and asthma (n = 1). Nasal NO measurements were available from medical records for all but one subject with Mycobacterium abscessus infection. Eight patients showed levels below the diagnostic threshold of 77 nL/min. Overall, median nNO production rate was 46 nL/min (IQR 17–238, range 4–290 nL/min). Median FEV1 was 54% of predicted (IQR 36–70, range 30–109; Table 1), indicating moderate to severe airflow limitation for the majority of patients.

3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

Overall, we detected ultrastructural hallmark (class 1) defects in six patients with probable PCD and inconclusive WES results due to VUS in the established PCD genes CCDC40 (n = 3; Figure 1), CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1 (n = 1, each; Figure 2). In addition, we observed a characteristic central complex (CC; class 2) defect in one subject with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the candidate gene NME5 (n = 1; Figure 3). In detail, TEM revealed disease-defining microtubular disorganization with inner dynein arm (MTD + IDA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC40 (Figure 1). Notably, the homozygous VUS in CCDC40 in Patient 13 were only discovered following the detection of the MTD + IDA defect with subsequent reevaluation of WES data, as this ultrastructural defect did not match the initially reported variants in DNAH5. Moreover, we found disease-defining outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1 (n = 1, each; Figure 2). Overall, the findings from averaged images of the PCD Detect software showed perfect agreement with those of conventional TEM imaging (Figure 1 and Figure 2). In the NME5 patient, TEM images showed ciliary cross-sections with normal 9 + 2 structure (in 42 of 119 evaluated cilia, 35%), but also deviant arrangements with the absence of the central pair (9 + 0 structure, 49/119, 41%; and 8 + 0 structure, 13/119, 11%), an additional central pair (9 + 4 structure, 3/119, 3%), and translocated microtubules (8 + 1 structure, 12/119, 10%; Figure 3). Nasal NO measurements showed nNO levels well below the diagnostic threshold of 77 nL/min in all patients with routine data available (Table 1). All patient had a history of early onset of chronic wet cough and chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps. Four patients, in whom we detected characteristic ultrastructural defects, recalled neonatal Respiratory Distress (NRD). One patient with VUS in CCDC40 and DNAI1 had Kartagener syndrome, respectively, and one patient with VUS in CCDC40 had a history of congenital heart but no laterality defect. One female with VUS in CCDC40 reported a history of infertility (Table 1). There was no history of hydrocephalus reported in these seven patients.
TEM showed normal ciliary ultrastructure in five patients with VUS in the established PCD genes DNAH11 (n = 2), CCDC39, DNAH8/HYDIN, and DNAI1 (n = 1, each). In addition, we observed normal ciliary ultrastructure in patients with variants in the PCD candidate genes DNAH1 (n = 2) and DNAH7 (n = 1; Figure 4). Again, the findings from averaged images of the PCD Detect software were well in line with those from conventional TEM imaging (Figure 4). Among patients with normal ultrastructure, two patients had probable PCD, three had possible PCD, and three had other diagnoses, including idiopathic bronchiectasis (n = 2) and asthma (n = 1), based on clinical signs and symptoms as well as diagnostic testing results (Table 1). Both patients with probable PCD had chronic upper airway disease, chronic wet cough, and low nNO levels, while one patient had NRD and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, respectively. Among the three patients with possible PCD, all had chronic upper airway disease and chronic wet cough, but normal nNO levels. One of those patients had a positive family history and a history of parental consanguinity, each, while another patient recalled NRD and two had chronic P. aeruginosa infection. All of the three patients with other diagnoses had chronic wet cough and normal nNO levels, while two of them had chronic P. aeruginosa infection (Table 1).
We were unable to obtain a robust sample for analysis by TEM and PCD Detect in one patient with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NEK10 (Patient 16), even after repeat nasal brush biopsies on different occasions. Overall, we performed 24 TEM evaluations on separate samples from 16 patients, including repeats due to insufficient initial samples, evaluation of test–retest reliability (n = 3, each), and one positive and one negative control, respectively. Due to initially insufficient sample quality, we had to repeat nasal brush biopsies in three patients. In two of those, repeat sampling yielded robust findings (Patients 1 and 4), while we were unable to obtain sufficient samples in the patient with variants in NEK10. Furthermore, we assessed the test–retest reliability of TEM evaluation in a subset of three patients. Of those, two patients with normal TEM had consistently normal results at repeat sampling and TEM evaluation. However, in one patient with homozygous VUS in DNAI1 (Patient 8), in who we revealed an ODA defect on initial evaluation, the quality of the retest sample was insufficient and precluded repeat evaluation. In order to assure the validity of our TEM evaluation, we included a healthy person as negative control and a person with PCD and known biallelic pathogenic variants in DNAH5 as positive control, respectively. In both control subjects, TEM showed the expected findings (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

4. Discussion

We analyzed 16 patients with inconclusive results from WES using conventional TEM and averaging of images by the PCD Detect software and, overall, revealed ultrastructural defects in 7 patients (44%). Considering the nine patients with probable PCD and available TEM, this rate was even higher (78%). In six patients the observed ultrastructural hallmark defects confirmed definite PCD. Moreover, we detected a CC (class 2) defect in another patient and, thus, provide supporting evidence for the relevance of genetic variants in NME5 as the cause of PCD. In summary, our findings highlight the use of TEM to validate the diagnosis of PCD in patients with inconclusive WES results and, in addition, demonstrate the feasibility of the PCD Detect software in support of TEM.
PCD is a heterogeneous genetic disorder, with reported prevalence rates relating to geographical variability, ethnicity as well as the expertise and availability of dedicated centers providing appropriate diagnostics [18,19]. However, clinical presentation, disease manifestations, comorbidities, and the clinical course of disease may vary according to additional factors, including age (at diagnosis), the gene in which particular genetic variants occur (genotype), and others [20,21]. All 16 patients included in our study had bronchiectasis, clinical features suggestive of PCD, and inconclusive WES results. Based on characteristic signs and symptoms as well as basic diagnostic testing like nNO, we grouped the etiology of bronchiectasis in probable PCD, possible PCD, and other diagnoses. Although the detection of low nNO levels is a sensitive and specific diagnostic test for PCD, other diseases like CF may also show low nNO values [1,22]. However, seven out of nine patients (78%) with probable PCD and low nNO values had ultrastructural (class 1 and 2) defects in the present study. Notably, the two patients with probable PCD and normal ciliary ultrastructure in TEM had VUS in the PCD genes DNAH11 and DNAH8/HYDIN, which are known to have normal ciliary ultrastructure, although even subtle ultrastructural defects may be visualized by image averaging or electron tomography [17,23]. DNAH8 had first been linked to male infertility, but was also described in a patient with PCD [24,25]. Therefore, we did not expect to find ultrastructural defects in these patients. In contrast, in six out of eight patients with normal ciliary ultrastructure in TEM the diagnosis of PCD was a priori considered to be less likely. Of those, three patients had possible PCD and three patients had other diagnoses. All had normal nNO levels. This finding supports the measuring of nNO as a screening test along with characteristic history and clinical symptoms, as recommended by current diagnostic guidelines [5,6]. However, it should be noted that normal nNO levels have been described in people with PCD associated with genetic variants in several specific genes [1], e.g., NEK10, as observed in our study (see below).
Beyond the clinical likelihood of PCD, TEM findings depended on the respective genetic variants in affected genes and their genotype–phenotype correlations. All seven patients with ciliary class 1 and 2 ultrastructural defects in TEM had genetic variants in established PCD genes or PCD candidate genes with known genotype–phenotype correlations, including specific ultrastructural defects. In agreement with previous reports, we reproduced ODA defects in three patients with VUS in the PCD genes CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1, respectively [26,27,28]. Moreover, in three patients with VUS in the PCD gene CCDC40 and another patient with a homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NME5, we were able to demonstrate MTD + IDA defects [29] and a CC defect [12], respectively. In addition, we observed characteristic genotype–phenotype correlations concerning clinical features of PCD. While respiratory symptoms virtually occur in all people with PCD, laterality defects, infertility, and congenital heart defects are associated to specific PCD genes [1]. In this regard, we observed situs inversus totalis (Kartagener syndrome) in two patients with VUS in CCDC40 and DNAI1 and female infertility in another patient with VUS in CCDC40, as previously reported by others [26,29,30].
We revealed a CC defect of ciliary ultrastructure in a patient with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NME5. To date, there is merely one patient reported from South Korea with homozygous nonsense variants in NME5, in whom the central pair was reported to be absent in TEM (9 + 0 structure) [12]. In contrast, we also found ciliary cross-sections with normal ultrastructure (9 + 2 structure), but also cross-sections with an additional central pair (9 + 4 structure) or a translocated microtubule (8 + 1 structure). In line with the patient reported by Cho and coworkers, our patient had chronic upper and lower respiratory symptoms and situs solitus [12]. NME5 encodes for the RSPH23 protein from radial spokes [1,12]. Other PCD genes encoding for radial spoke components like RSPH9 are also associated to CC defects [31]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report of laterality defects in patients with (likely) pathogenic variants in PCD genes encoding for radial spoke components, which implies that these do not influence the nodal cilia [32]. Noteworthy, CC defects may also occur as secondary changes following infection. Accordingly, BEAT PCD TEM Criteria define them as class 2 defects [7], which only indicate PCD diagnosis and always require additional diagnostics to confirm disease. Taken together, the characteristic clinical features, the reduced nNO levels, abnormal HSVM, positive familial segregation analysis, and the CC defect observed in our patient, support the hypothesis that genetic variants in NME5 may cause PCD in humans.
Our findings have several important implications for the diagnostic work-up of PCD. On the one hand, TEM confirmed definite PCD in a considerable proportion of patients with inconclusive WES results in PCD genes with established genotype–phenotype associations. Remarkably, all subjects with definite PCD and available nNO had levels below the diagnostic threshold. Thus, PCD may be reasonably excluded in patients with bronchiectasis and repeatedly normal nNO levels and VUS in PCD genes with known associated ciliary ultrastructural defects as well as reduced nNO, if TEM unequivocally demonstrates normal findings. On the other hand, TEM cannot rule out or confirm PCD in patients with normal ciliary ultrastructure and VUS in PCD genes that are associated with such, e.g., DNAH11 or HYDIN. Following our diagnostic approach with early application of NGS in patients with suspected PCD, this may suggest to perform TEM as a targeted approach in patients with VUS in PCD genes, which are expected to show ultrastructural defects according to already known genotype–phenotype correlations. However, alternative diagnostics are needed in those patients with VUS in PCD genes expected to show normal ciliary ultrastructure, e.g., HSVM in addition to clinical features and nNO for DNAH11 and immunofluorescence microscopy for HYDIN [1]. However, we observed a mutual interaction between genetic testing and TEM in one patient with Kartagener syndrome and VUS in DNAH5, in whom the observed ultrastructural defect (MTD + IDA) did not match the expected outcome and triggered genetic reanalysis and, subsequently, detection of homozygous VUS in CCDC40 that would otherwise have been missed.
Without doubt, we had to deal with the quality of nasal brush biopsies for use in TEM. This highlights the complexity of the procedure and may limit its use for broad application in routine care. Ultimately, this precluded TEM evaluation in the patient with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NEK10. Notably, pathogenic variants in NEK10 have very recently been reported to be associated with situs solitus as well as normal nNO levels, while affecting ciliary growth, mucociliary transport, and thereby causing motile ciliopathy [33]. In our patient, we performed additional familial segregation analysis of the homozygous variant in NEK10, including parents as well as affected and unaffected siblings, thus suggesting disease causation. Likewise, in the meantime, we produced additional evidence for the relevance of the detected likely pathogenic homozygous variant in NME5 [34], which is beyond the scope of the present work. Lastly, our findings confirm that the PCD Detect software is an easy-to-apply and useful tool, in particular when analyzing faintly contrasted ciliary components like the IDA [17].
Our study has limitations. We assumed that two heterozygous variants were compound heterozygous (in trans), while definite confirmation from the analysis of parents was available in merely two patients. In addition, the investigator who performed the visual evaluation of ciliary ultrastructure by TEM and PCD Detect (B.O.S.) was not blinded to the findings from WES. Moreover, the assessment of fertility in clinical routine did not follow a standardized approach. Therefore, we may have missed cases of subfertility. Finally, it should be noted that ultrastructural hallmark defects alone are insufficient to reclassify VUS as pathogenic variants, according to ACMG guidelines that require “well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product” [8]. In this respect, ultrastructural defects are considered to be unspecific for disease-causing variants in a unique PCD gene, as they may theoretically also be associated with other PCD genes, e.g., MTD + IDA defects are associated with CCDC40, but also occur in people with variants in CCDC39 [1].

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we established the definite diagnosis of PCD in a considerable proportion of patients with inconclusive results from WES by TEM, thus providing important information on genotype–phenotype correlations regarding VUS in CCDC40, CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1 as well as a likely pathogenic variant in the PCD candidate gene NME5. This may suggest a targeted approach within the diagnostic work-up for PCD, requiring confirmation among a larger patient population from a multicenter study. However, the finding that we detected an ultrastructural hallmark defect in one patient, which reversely informed the interpretation of genetic analysis and resulted in the definite diagnosis of PCD associated with VUS in CCDC40, supports its broader application. Further, the PCD Detect software proved to be a feasible tool in addition to the visual analysis of conventional TEM.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12222651/s1, Table S1: Genes in PCD screening panel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.O.S., M.W. and F.C.R.; data curation, B.O.S., J.H., B.A., S.v.H. and F.C.R.; formal analysis, B.O.S., J.H., B.A., S.v.H., R.O. and F.C.R.; funding acquisition, F.C.R.; investigation, B.O.S., J.H., B.A., R.E., S.v.H., I.P. and J.R.; methodology, B.O.S., J.H., B.A., S.v.H. and F.C.R.; project administration, F.C.R.; resources, J.H., B.A., S.v.H. and F.C.R.; software, B.O.S.; supervision, J.H. and F.C.R.; validation, J.H., B.A. and S.v.H.; visualization, B.O.S. and J.H.; writing—original draft, B.O.S.; writing—review and editing, B.O.S., J.H., B.A., R.E., S.v.H., R.O., I.P., J.R., M.W. and F.C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the German Center for Lung research (DZL; 82DZL002A1) and an unrestricted research grant from Novartis AG.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School (No. 9831_BO_S_2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to inclusion in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

A preliminary analysis of our study was presented at the annual congress of the German Respiratory Society on 26 May 2022 in Leipzig, Germany. B.O.S. conducted this work as part of his thesis. He is grateful to J. Hegermann for serving as co-supervisor of his thesis.

Conflicts of Interest

B.O.S., J.H., B.A., R.E., S.v.H., R.O., I.P., J.R. and M.W. declare no conflicts of interest. F.C.R. reports grants from the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), IMI (EU/EFPIA) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) and EFPIA companies under the European Commission funded project, iABC (grant 115721), Novartis, and Insmed Germany paid to his institution; personal fees for consulting or advisory board participation and honoraria for lectures from Parion, Grifols, Zambon, Insmed, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, i!DE Werbeagentur GmbH, Interkongress GmbH, streamedup! GmbH, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Shionogi and Grifols; travel support from the German Kartagener Syndrome and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia patient advocacy group, which he serves as the unpaid co-speaker of its medical advisory board. He is honorary chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS, member of the steering committee of the European Bronchiectasis Registry EMBARC, and member of the Protocol Review Committee of the PCD-Clinical Trials Network.

References

  1. Wallmeier, J.; Nielsen, K.G.; Kuehni, C.E.; Lucas, J.S.; Leigh, M.W.; Zariwala, M.A.; Omran, H. Motile ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ringshausen, F.C.; Shapiro, A.J.; Nielsen, K.G.; Mazurek, H.; Pifferi, M.; Donn, K.H.; van der Eerden, M.M.; Loebinger, M.R.; Zariwala, M.A.; Leigh, M.W.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the epithelial sodium channel blocker idrevloride in people with primary ciliary dyskinesia (CLEAN-PCD): A multinational, phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hannah, W.B.; Seifert, B.A.; Truty, R.; Zariwala, M.A.; Ameel, K.; Zhao, Y.; Nykamp, K.; Gaston, B. The global prevalence and ethnic heterogeneity of primary ciliary dyskinesia gene variants: A genetic database analysis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2022, 10, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shoemark, A.; Griffin, H.; Wheway, G.; Hogg, C.; Lucas, J.S.; Genomics England Research Consortium; Camps, C.; Taylor, J.; Carroll, M.; Loebinger, M.R.; et al. Genome sequencing reveals underdiagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in bronchiectasis. Eur. Respir. J. 2022, 60, 2200176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lucas, J.S.; Barbato, A.; Collins, S.A.; Goutaki, M.; Behan, L.; Caudri, D.; Dell, S.; Eber, E.; Escudier, E.; Hirst, R.A.; et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 49, 1601090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shapiro, A.J.; Davis, S.D.; Polineni, D.; Manion, M.; Rosenfeld, M.; Dell, S.D.; Chilvers, M.A.; Ferkol, T.W.; Zariwala, M.A.; Sagel, S.D.; et al. Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, e24–e39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shoemark, A.; Boon, M.; Brochhausen, C.; Bukowy-Bieryllo, Z.; De Santi, M.M.; Goggin, P.; Griffin, P.; Hegele, R.G.; Hirst, R.A.; Leigh, M.W.; et al. International consensus guideline for reporting transmission electron microscopy results in the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia (BEAT PCD TEM Criteria). Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1900725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shoemark, A.; Rubbo, B.; Legendre, M.; Fassad, M.R.; Haarman, E.G.; Best, S.; Bon, I.C.M.; Brandsma, J.; Burgel, P.R.; Carlsson, G.; et al. Topological data analysis reveals genotype-phenotype relationships in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, 2002359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. von Hardenberg, S.; Wallaschek, H.; Du, C.; Schmidt, G.; Auber, B. A holistic approach to maximise diagnostic output in trio exome sequencing. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1183891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, R.; Barbosa, T.; Gales, L.; Oliveira, E.; Santos, R.; Oliveira, J.; Sousa, M. Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Children with Kartagener Syndrome. Cells 2019, 8, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cho, E.H.; Huh, H.J.; Jeong, I.; Lee, N.Y.; Koh, W.J.; Park, H.C.; Ki, C.S. A nonsense variant in NME5 causes human primary ciliary dyskinesia with radial spoke defects. Clin. Genet. 2020, 98, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Al Mutairi, F.; Alkhalaf, R.; Alkhorayyef, A.; Alroqi, F.; Yusra, A.; Umair, M.; Nouf, F.; Khan, A.; Meshael, A.; Hamad, A.; et al. Homozygous truncating NEK10 mutation, associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia: A case report. BMC Pulm. Med. 2020, 20, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Werner, C.; Lablans, M.; Ataian, M.; Raidt, J.; Wallmeier, J.; Grosse-Onnebrink, J.; Kuehni, C.E.; Haarman, E.G.; Leigh, M.W.; Quittner, A.L.; et al. An international registry for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 47, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paff, T.; Kooi, I.E.; Moutaouakil, Y.; Riesebos, E.; Sistermans, E.A.; Daniels, H.; Weiss, J.M.M.; Niessen, H.; Haarman, E.G.; Pals, G.; et al. Diagnostic yield of a targeted gene panel in primary ciliary dyskinesia patients. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 653–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mariani, S.; Li, T.; Hegermann, J.; Bounader, K.; Hanke, J.; Meyer, T.; Jannsen-Peters, H.; Haverich, A.; Schmitto, J.D.; Dogan, G. Biocompatibility of an apical ring plug for left ventricular assist device explantation: Results of a feasibility pre-clinical study. Artif. Organs 2022, 46, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shoemark, A.; Pinto, A.L.; Patel, M.P.; Daudvohra, F.; Hogg, C.; Mitchison, H.M.; Burgoyne, T. PCD Detect: Enhancing ciliary features through image averaging and classification. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2020, 319, L1048–L1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuehni, C.E.; Frischer, T.; Strippoli, M.P.; Maurer, E.; Bush, A.; Nielsen, K.G.; Escribano, A.; Lucas, J.S.; Yiallouros, P.; Omran, H.; et al. Factors influencing age at diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in european children. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 1248–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Contarini, M.; Shoemark, A.; Rademacher, J.; Finch, S.; Gramegna, A.; Gaffuri, M.; Roncoroni, L.; Seia, M.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Welte, T.; et al. Why, when and how to investigate primary ciliary dyskinesia in adult patients with bronchiectasis. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 2018, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goutaki, M.; Meier, A.B.; Halbeisen, F.S.; Lucas, J.S.; Dell, S.D.; Maurer, E.; Casaulta, C.; Jurca, M.; Spycher, B.D.; Kuehni, C.E. Clinical manifestations in primary ciliary dyskinesia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 48, 1081–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davis, S.D.; Rosenfeld, M.; Lee, H.S.; Ferkol, T.W.; Sagel, S.D.; Dell, S.D.; Milla, C.; Pittman, J.E.; Shapiro, A.J.; Sullivan, K.M.; et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: Longitudinal study of lung disease by ultrastructure defect and genotype. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shapiro, A.J.; Josephson, M.; Rosenfeld, M.; Yilmaz, O.; Davis, S.D.; Polineni, D.; Guadagno, E.; Leigh, M.W.; Lavergne, V. Accuracy of Nasal Nitric Oxide Measurement as a Diagnostic Test for Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017, 14, 1184–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shoemark, A.; Burgoyne, T.; Kwan, R.; Dixon, M.; Patel, M.P.; Rogers, A.V.; Onoufriadis, A.; Scully, J.; Daudvohra, F.; Cullup, T.; et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal ultrastructure: Three-dimensional tomography detects absence of DNAH11. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1701809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Watson, C.M.; Crinnion, L.A.; Morgan, J.E.; Harrison, S.M.; Diggle, C.P.; Adlard, J.; Lindsay, H.A.; Camm, N.; Charlton, R.; Sheridan, E.; et al. Robust diagnostic genetic testing using solution capture enrichment and a novel variant-filtering interface. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, C.; Miyata, H.; Gao, Y.; Sha, Y.; Tang, S.; Xu, Z.; Whitfield, M.; Patrat, C.; Wu, H.; Dulioust, E.; et al. Bi-allelic DNAH8 Variants Lead to Multiple Morphological Abnormalities of the Sperm Flagella and Primary Male Infertility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 107, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guichard, C.; Harricane, M.C.; Lafitte, J.J.; Godard, P.; Zaegel, M.; Tack, V.; Lalau, G.; Bouvagnet, P. Axonemal dynein intermediate-chain gene (DNAI1) mutations result in situs inversus and primary ciliary dyskinesia (Kartagener syndrome). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 68, 1030–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hornef, N.; Olbrich, H.; Horvath, J.; Zariwala, M.A.; Fliegauf, M.; Loges, N.T.; Wildhaber, J.; Noone, P.G.; Kennedy, M.; Antonarakis, S.E.; et al. DNAH5 mutations are a common cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with outer dynein arm defects. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Panizzi, J.R.; Becker-Heck, A.; Castleman, V.H.; Al-Mutairi, D.A.; Liu, Y.; Loges, N.T.; Pathak, N.; Austin-Tse, C.; Sheridan, E.; Schmidts, M.; et al. CCDC103 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia by disrupting assembly of ciliary dynein arms. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Becker-Heck, A.; Zohn, I.E.; Okabe, N.; Pollock, A.; Lenhart, K.B.; Sullivan-Brown, J.; McSheene, J.; Loges, N.T.; Olbrich, H.; Haeffner, K.; et al. The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC40 is essential for motile cilia function and left-right axis formation. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vanaken, G.J.; Bassinet, L.; Boon, M.; Mani, R.; Honore, I.; Papon, J.F.; Cuppens, H.; Jaspers, M.; Lorent, N.; Coste, A.; et al. Infertility in an adult cohort with primary ciliary dyskinesia: Phenotype-gene association. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 50, 1700314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castleman, V.H.; Romio, L.; Chodhari, R.; Hirst, R.A.; de Castro, S.C.; Parker, K.A.; Ybot-Gonzalez, P.; Emes, R.D.; Wilson, S.W.; Wallis, C.; et al. Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pennekamp, P.; Menchen, T.; Dworniczak, B.; Hamada, H. Situs inversus and ciliary abnormalities: 20 years later, what is the connection? Cilia 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chivukula, R.R.; Montoro, D.T.; Leung, H.M.; Yang, J.; Shamseldin, H.E.; Taylor, M.S.; Dougherty, G.W.; Zariwala, M.A.; Carson, J.; Daniels, M.L.A.; et al. A human ciliopathy reveals essential functions for NEK10 in airway mucociliary clearance. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. von Schledorn, L.; Puertollano Martin, D.; Cleve, N.; Zollner, J.; Roth, D.; Staar, B.O.; Hegermann, J.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Nawroth, J.; Martin, U.; et al. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro. Cells 2023, 12, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Microtubular disorganization and inner dynein arm (MTD + IDA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC40. Top: TEM images (greyscale); below: averaged cutout images from the PCD Detect software (colored), representing one microtubule doublet corresponding to the pair oriented downward in TEM. Negative control shows normal ciliary ultrastructure with 9 + 2 arrangement and both dynein arms present (arrowheads). In contrast, arrangement of nine microtubule doublets and a central pair is disorganized and IDAs are absent in the depicted patient samples (arrows). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: IDA = inner dynein arm; MTD = microtubular disorganization; TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Figure 1. Microtubular disorganization and inner dynein arm (MTD + IDA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC40. Top: TEM images (greyscale); below: averaged cutout images from the PCD Detect software (colored), representing one microtubule doublet corresponding to the pair oriented downward in TEM. Negative control shows normal ciliary ultrastructure with 9 + 2 arrangement and both dynein arms present (arrowheads). In contrast, arrangement of nine microtubule doublets and a central pair is disorganized and IDAs are absent in the depicted patient samples (arrows). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: IDA = inner dynein arm; MTD = microtubular disorganization; TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Cells 12 02651 g001
Figure 2. Outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1. Ciliary cross-sections in TEM images (greyscale images in upper row) and cutout images of microtubular doublets and ODA (if present) averaged with PCD Detect (colored images in lower row). ODA (white filled arrows) are absent in TEM images of three patients with VUS in CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1, as well as the positive control (DNAH5). PCD Detect images of the positive control and Patient 8 show a partial loss of ODA with a remaining shortened ODA projection (black filled arrows), whereas Patients 1 and 4 show a complete loss of ODA (white filled arrows). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: ODA = outer dynein arm; TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Figure 2. Outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in three patients with VUS in CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1. Ciliary cross-sections in TEM images (greyscale images in upper row) and cutout images of microtubular doublets and ODA (if present) averaged with PCD Detect (colored images in lower row). ODA (white filled arrows) are absent in TEM images of three patients with VUS in CCDC103, DNAH5, and DNAI1, as well as the positive control (DNAH5). PCD Detect images of the positive control and Patient 8 show a partial loss of ODA with a remaining shortened ODA projection (black filled arrows), whereas Patients 1 and 4 show a complete loss of ODA (white filled arrows). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: ODA = outer dynein arm; TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Cells 12 02651 g002
Figure 3. Central Complex (CC) defect in a patient with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NME5. TEM images show examples of ciliary sections with 9 + 0 structure (A), normal 9 + 2 structure (B), 8 + 0 structure (C), 8 + 1 structure (D), and 9 + 4 structure (E). Scale bar: 100 nm. Abbreviation: TEM = transmission electron microscopy.
Figure 3. Central Complex (CC) defect in a patient with a likely pathogenic homozygous variant in the PCD candidate gene NME5. TEM images show examples of ciliary sections with 9 + 0 structure (A), normal 9 + 2 structure (B), 8 + 0 structure (C), 8 + 1 structure (D), and 9 + 4 structure (E). Scale bar: 100 nm. Abbreviation: TEM = transmission electron microscopy.
Cells 12 02651 g003
Figure 4. Normal ciliary ultrastructure in four patients with VUS in CCDC39, DNAH11, DNAI1, and DNAH7. TEM images of four patients with VUS show normal 9 + 2 structure and both dynein arms present (arrowheads) in conventional TEM imaging (greyscale images in upper row) and PCD Detect imaging (colored images in lower row). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Figure 4. Normal ciliary ultrastructure in four patients with VUS in CCDC39, DNAH11, DNAI1, and DNAH7. TEM images of four patients with VUS show normal 9 + 2 structure and both dynein arms present (arrowheads) in conventional TEM imaging (greyscale images in upper row) and PCD Detect imaging (colored images in lower row). Color scale: Black (TEM) and blue (PCD Detect) as well as white (TEM) and yellow (PCD Detect) indicate high and low electron-density, respectively. Scale bars: 100 nm in TEM images and 10 nm in PCD Detect images. Abbreviations: TEM = transmission electron microscopy; VUS = variant of unknown significance.
Cells 12 02651 g004
Table 1. Individual patient disposition.
Table 1. Individual patient disposition.
SubjectAgeSexOriginInitial EtiologyEtiology after TEMNasal NO (nL/min)ppFEV1Patient History (Signs, Symptoms, and Findings) aGene bcDNA ChangeProtein ChangeACMG ClassTEM
Results
129FTurkeyProbable PCDDefinite PCD1169NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, chronic otitis media, and history of grommet insertionsCCDC103c.548T>C
c.548T>C
p.(Leu183Pro)
p.(Leu183Pro)
3
3
ODA
261FRussiaIdiopathic bronchiectasisIdiopathic bronchiectasis25137School-age onset of chronic wet cough, and P. aeruginosa infectionDNAH1c.5639C>T
c.6925C>A
p.(Thr1880Met)
p.(Pro2309Thr)
3
3
Normal
363MGermanyPossible PCDPossible PCD17033Pre-school onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, positive family history, history of infertility, and P. aeruginosa infectionDNAH1c.2995C>T
c.7633A>G
p.(Arg999Cys)
p.(Ile2545Val)
3
3
Normal
438FGermanyProbable PCDDefinite PCD27109NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough, CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, chronic otitis media, history of grommet insertions, P. aeruginosa infection, and abnormal HSVM (immotile cilia)DNAH5c.10815delT
c.11212-4A>G (intronic)
p.(Pro3606Hisfs*23)
-
5
3
ODA
558FKenyaProbable PCD Probable PCD4677Young-adult onset of chronic wet cough, CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, and P. aeruginosa infectionDNAH8
HYDIN
c.3215G>A
c.1169T>C
c.12401T>C
c.2943T>C
c.1043+5G>C
p.(Arg1072Gln)
p.(Leu3723Leu)
p.(Leu4134Pro)
p.(Asp981=)
p.?
3
3
3
3
3
Normal
618MGermanyAsthmaAsthma24059Adolescent onset of chronic wet cough, and P. aeruginosa infectionDNAH11c.5924+12G>A
c.6226G>A
p.?
p.(Val2076Met)
3
3
Normal
747MGermanyProbable PCDProbable PCD3769NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, history of infertility, and abnormal HSVM (static stroke)DNAH11c.7456A>G
c.9815>G
p.(Thr2486AIa)
p.(Asn3272Ser)
3
3
Normal
846FTurkeyProbable KSDefinite KS-30Situs inversus, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, history of lower lobe resection, middle lobe atelectasis, and M. abscessus infectionDNAI1c.1168G>A
c.1168G>A
p.(Asp390Asn)
p.(Asp390Asn)
3
3
ODA
923MTunisiaPossible PCDPossible PCD29036NRD, early onset chronic wet cough and CRSwNPCCDC39c.1363-3delC
c.1781C>T
p.?
p.(Thr594Ile)
3
3
Normal
1053MGermanyProbable PCDDefinite PCD856NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, chronic otitis media, hearing loss and aid, history of middle lobe resection, and atrial septal defectCCDC40c.3129delC
c.3354C>A
p.(Phe1004Serfs*35)
p.(Tyr1118*)
5
3
MTD + IDA
1119MGermanyIdiopathic bronchiectasisIdiopathic bronchiectasis23682Adolescent onset of chronic wet coughDNAI1c.1055A>G
c.1207C>T
p.(Tyr352Cys)
p.(His403Tyr)
3
3
Normal
1244FGermanyProbable PCDDefinite PCD2140Early onset chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, history of infertility, and P. aeruginosa infectionCCDC40c.1345C>T
c.2597A>G
p.(Arg449*)
p.(Asn866Ser)
5
3
MTD + IDA
1324MTurkeyProbable KSDefinite KS1751Situs inversus, NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, chronic otitis media, P. aeruginosa infection, and abnormal HSVM (reduced amplitude, rigid stroke)DNAH5
CCDC40
c.358G>A
c.3656G>A
c.615G>C
c.615G>C
p.(Asp120Asn)
p.(Arg1219His)
p.=
p.=
3
3
3
MTD + IDA
1451MTurkeyPossible PCDPossible PCD11232Early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, parental consanguinity, and P. aeruginosa infectionDNAH7c.12056_12060delTATGT
c.12056_12060delTATGT
p.(Leu4019Serfs*3)
p.(Leu4019Serfs*3)
3
3
Normal
1523FTurkeyProbable PCDProbable PCD470Early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, repeat sinus surgery, history of middle and lower lobe resection, parental consanguinity, positive familial segregation analysis, P. aeruginosa infection, and abnormal HSVM (uncoordinated and circular beating)NME5c.415delA
c.415delA
p.(Ile139Tyrfs*8)
p.(Ile139Tyrfs*8)
4
4
CC
1627MSyriaProbable PCDProbable PCD23842NRD, early onset of chronic wet cough and CRSwNP, chronic otitis media, lower lobe atelectasis, affected sibling / positive familial segregation analysis, parental consanguinity, and P. aeruginosa infectionNEK10c.1389C>A
c.1389C>A
p.(Tyr463*)
p.(Tyr463*)
4
4
N/A
a All patients had computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis. All patients had situs solitus, unless otherwise mentioned. Only clinical features that were present are mentioned above. b Gene transcripts to which variants refer: CCDC39 (NM_181426.2), CCDC40 (NM_017950.4), CCDC103 (NM_213607.3), DNAH1 (NM_015512.5), DNAH5 (NM_001369.3), DNAH7 (NM_018897.3), DNAH8 (NM_001206927.2), DNAH11 (NM_001277115.2), DNAI1 (NM_012144.4), HYDIN (NM_001270974.2), NEK10 (ENST00000295720.6); NME5 (NM_003551.3). Abbreviations: ACMG = American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; CC = central complex defect; cDNA = complementary DNA; CRSwNP = chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; IDA = inner dynein arm defect; KS = Kartagener syndrome; MTD = microtubular disorganization; NO = nitric oxide; N/A = not assessable (due to insufficient samples; after repeat sampling); NRD = neonatal respiratory distress; ODA = outer dynein arm defect; PCD = primary ciliary dyskineasia; ppFEV1 = percent predicted of forced expiratory volume in one second; TEM = transmission electron microscopy. Explanations of symbols used with protein change: According to the Sequence Variant Nomenclature of the Human Genome Variation Society (version 20.05; https://varnomen.hgvs.org; accessed on 15 October 2023), “p.=” means that the entire protein coding region was analyzed and no variant was found that changes (or is predicted to change) the protein sequence; “*” means that the amino acid is changed to a stop codon; and “?” means that the consequence, at the protein level, of a variant affecting the translation initiation codon cannot be predicted, i.e. is unknown.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staar, B.O.; Hegermann, J.; Auber, B.; Ewen, R.; von Hardenberg, S.; Olmer, R.; Pink, I.; Rademacher, J.; Wetzke, M.; Ringshausen, F.C. Ciliary Ultrastructure Assessed by Transmission Electron Microscopy in Adults with Bronchiectasis and Suspected Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia but Inconclusive Genotype. Cells 2023, 12, 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222651

AMA Style

Staar BO, Hegermann J, Auber B, Ewen R, von Hardenberg S, Olmer R, Pink I, Rademacher J, Wetzke M, Ringshausen FC. Ciliary Ultrastructure Assessed by Transmission Electron Microscopy in Adults with Bronchiectasis and Suspected Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia but Inconclusive Genotype. Cells. 2023; 12(22):2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222651

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staar, Ben O., Jan Hegermann, Bernd Auber, Raphael Ewen, Sandra von Hardenberg, Ruth Olmer, Isabell Pink, Jessica Rademacher, Martin Wetzke, and Felix C. Ringshausen. 2023. "Ciliary Ultrastructure Assessed by Transmission Electron Microscopy in Adults with Bronchiectasis and Suspected Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia but Inconclusive Genotype" Cells 12, no. 22: 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop