Next Article in Journal
Nrf2 Deficiency Exacerbated CLP-Induced Pulmonary Injury and Inflammation through Autophagy- and NF-κB/PPARγ-Mediated Macrophage Polarization
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Targeted Absolute Proteomics for Better Characterization of an In Vitro Human Blood–Brain Barrier Model Derived from Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling the Endothelial Glycocalyx Layer in the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vascularization of Poly-ε-Caprolactone-Collagen I-Nanofibers with or without Sacrificial Fibers in the Neurotized Arteriovenous Loop Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/cells11233926
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxidative Stress and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Are Signature Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles Released upon Morphine Exposure on Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells

by
Tatjana Vujić
1,
Domitille Schvartz
1,
Izadora Liranço Furlani
2,3,4,
Isabel Meister
2,3,5,
Víctor González-Ruiz
2,3,5,
Serge Rudaz
2,3,5 and
Jean-Charles Sanchez
1,*
1
Department of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
2
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
3
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
4
Department of Chemistry, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-904, Brazil
5
Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, 4055 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(23), 3926; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233926
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Emerging Topics in Vascular Endothelial Cell Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Morphine, a commonly used antinociceptive drug in hospitals, is known to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by first passing through brain endothelial cells. Despite its pain-relieving effect, morphine also has detrimental effects, such as the potential induction of redox imbalance in the brain. However, there is still insufficient evidence of these effects on the brain, particularly on the brain endothelial cells and the extracellular vesicles that they naturally release. Indeed, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized bioparticles produced by almost all cell types and are currently thought to reflect the physiological state of their parent cells. These vesicles have emerged as a promising source of biomarkers by indicating the functional or dysfunctional state of their parent cells and, thus, allowing a better understanding of the biological processes involved in an adverse state. However, there is very little information on the morphine effect on human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs), and even less on their released EVs. Therefore, the current study aimed at unraveling the detrimental mechanisms of morphine exposure (at 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µM) for 24 h on human brain microvascular endothelial cells as well as on their associated EVs. Isolation of EVs was carried out using an affinity-based method. Several orthogonal techniques (NTA, western blotting and proteomics analysis) were used to validate the EVs enrichment, quality and concentration. Data-independent mass spectrometry (DIA-MS)-based proteomics was applied in order to analyze the proteome modulations induced by morphine on HBMECs and EVs. We were able to quantify almost 5500 proteins in HBMECs and 1500 proteins in EVs, of which 256 and 148, respectively, were found to be differentially expressed in at least one condition. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the “cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling” process and the “HIF1 pathway”, a pathway related to oxidative stress responses, were significantly modulated upon morphine exposure in HBMECs and EVs. Altogether, the combination of proteomics and bioinformatics findings highlighted shared pathways between HBMECs exposed to morphine and their released EVs. These results put forward molecular signatures of morphine-induced toxicity in HBMECs that were also carried by EVs. Therefore, EVs could potentially be regarded as a useful tool to investigate brain endothelial cells dysfunction, and to a different extent, the BBB dysfunction in patient circulation using these “signature pathways”.

1. Introduction

Morphine is the most commonly used antinociceptive drug in hospitals for relieving moderate-to-severe pain. This opioid acts in the brain and the spinal cord, mainly through µ-opioid receptors [1]. Morphine treatment may also present several side effects, such as headache, nervousness, nausea, vomiting, weakness, dizziness, and hallucinations, among others. At the cellular level, numerous studies suggest that morphine induces oxidative stress and may contribute to some of these adverse effects [2,3,4,5,6]. However, the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. In addition, morphine action in the brain requires its transport to the central nervous system (CNS) by crossing the blood brain barrier (BBB) within the neurovascular unit (NVU). The BBB is a multicellular complex including astrocytes, pericytes and endothelial cells, which are in tight interaction with the NVU cells such as neurons, oligodendrocytes and microglia. The BBB major function is to guarantee CNS molecular homeostasis. Although many studies focusing on neurons and astrocytes have indicated that their essential properties were altered upon opioid exposure such as morphine [7,8,9,10], the effects of morphine on brain endothelial cells remain largely unknown.
Therefore, in a previous study [11], we explored morphine effects on human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) using a proteomics approach. We showed that morphine exposure on HBMECs triggered changes in the biological processes associated with oxidative stress and highlighted a potential redox imbalance. To further explore the impact of morphine on these cells, we proposed investigating HBMECs-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), as they may mirror pathways in parent cells. Indeed, EVs form a heterogeneous mixture of membrane-bounded organelles released by almost all cell types, containing key material such as nucleic acids, proteins, lipids and metabolites. In recent years, it has been suggested that their cargos may reflect the status of their parent cells. This offers the possibility for a deeper understanding of the modulations of cellular processes. Moreover, it has been shown that EVs can cross the very restrictive BBB [12,13], and thus may constitute an important information carrier. Furthermore, with regards to their potential role in cell-cell communication, EV molecular cargo could be shuttled between cells and might modulate biological processes such as proliferation, neuronal survival, energy metabolism and response to a stimulus [14]. The investigation of EV molecular signatures is, therefore, crucial to obtain new insights into their biological functions upon primary morphine stimulation.
In this study, we simultaneously investigated HBMECs and associated EVs proteome modulations after morphine exposure using mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics. HBMECs were treated with morphine at five different concentrations (1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM) for 24 h. EVs were isolated with a chemical affinity-based method, which was confirmed using orthogonal techniques such as nanotracking particle analysis (NTA), western blots and a proteomics approach. A bioinformatics analysis of the proteomics data revealed modulations of biological pathways involved in oxidative stress responses, as well as modifications of the extracellular matrix organization in both cells and vesicles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells (ACBRI 367, Cell Systems, Kirkland, QC, Canada) were cultured onto a rat-tail collagen type I-coated flasks (T75, 15 µg/mL, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and maintained in complete endothelial cell growth medium-2 (EGM-2MV BulletKit, Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were washed three times at 80% confluence with phosphate-buffered saline solution containing calcium and magnesium (PBS, Gibco/Life technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands). They were incubated at 37 °C with 15 mL of complete endothelial cell growth medium-2 containing 5% of heat-inactivated exosome-depleted fetal bovine serum (Gibco/Life technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands) for 24 h. Fifteen T75 flasks were exposed to morphine at final concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µM (morphine sulfate pentahydrate, Lipomed AG, Arlesheim, Switzerland) for 24 h for different omics experiments. The medium of each T75 flask was collected and used for extracellular vesicles (EV) isolation. Cells were detached with Stempro Accutase (Gibco/Life technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands) and washed three times with ice-cold Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, Gibco/Life technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands), pelleted and dry-stored at −80 °C.

2.2. EV Isolation

In each T75 flask, about 6 million of human brain endothelial cells were cultured. Ten mL of cell media were recovered. Cells and apoptotic bodies were removed using centrifugation (2000× g, 20 min). EVs were isolated in 1 mL of cell supernatant using a chemical affinity-based method, the EVTRAP magnetic beads provided by Tymora Analytical as a suspension in water. These magnetic beads are modified with amphiphilic groups, enabling the specific binding to the lipid bilayer of the EV membranes.
The media loading buffer was added at 1:10 v/v ratio of the cell supernatant. Twenty-four μL of EVTRAP magnetic beads were added. The samples were incubated by end-over-end rotation for 30 min, according to updated manufacturer’s instructions. Following supernatant removal using a magnetic separator rack, the beads were washed with PBS and the EVs eluted by two 10 min incubations with fresh elution solution. Both eluted EVs were pooled and either resuspended in 80 μL of 0.2 μm-filtered water for nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) or dry-stored at −80 °C.

2.3. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

NTA was carried out using a Particle Metrix ZetaView® instrument (Particle Metrix GmbH, Inning, Germany). EVs were diluted at 1/400 with 0.2 μm-filtered PBS prior to analysis. To evaluate the total particle count and the overall size, the samples were measured in scatter mode and standard instrument settings (sensitivity: 80, shutter: 100, min. brightness: 30; min. area: 10; max area: 1000). The samples were measured with ZetaView® software version 8.05.12 SP1 (Particle Metrix GmbH, Inning, Germany).

2.4. Protein Extraction and Quantification

Cell and EV pellets were resuspended in 80 μL of 0.1% Rapigest (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) 100 mM TEAB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), incubated for 10 min at 80 °C and then sonicated (five cycles of 20 s with breaks on ice). Samples were then spun down (14,000× g, 10 min, 4 °C) and the supernatant was recovered. Protein content was measured using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.5. Western Blot Analysis

The equivalent of 20 μg of proteins for cell samples and EV samples were separated using electrophoresis on a 10%T/2.6%C polyacrylamide gel and were subsequently transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Membranes were stained with amido black to reveal the proteins and washed with water to remove the excess. Immunoblot assays were performed using an anti-mouse antibody against PDCD6IP at a dilution of 1:500 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-rabbit TSG101 at a dilution of 1:500 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-rabbit CD9 at a dilution of 1:500 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-rabbit calreticulin (negative marker) at a dilution of 1:250 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

2.6. Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Omics

For proteomics, 10 µg of proteins were reduced using TCEP for each sample of cells and EVs at morphine concentrations of 0, 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM (final concentration 5 mM, 30 min, 37 °C) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), alkylated using iodoacetamide (final concentration 15 mM, 60 min, RT, in dark conditions) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and digested by an overnight tryptic digestion (w/w ratio 1:50) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The RapiGest surfactant was cleaved by incubating samples with 0.5% trifluoacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 45 min at 37 °C. Samples were then desalted on a C18 reverse phase column (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA), peptides were dried under vacuum and subsequently resuspended in 5% ACN 0.1% FA (peptides final concentration of 0.5 µg/µL and spiked with iRT peptide (Biognosys, Schlieren, Switzerland) (1:20)).
For metabolomics, cell samples (morphine exposure: 0, 5 and 50 μM) were prepared based on Meister et al. [15] work, as described in Supplementary File S1.

2.7. MS Data Acquisition and Analysis

For proteomics, the equivalent of 2 µg of peptides for each sample (cells and EVs) were analyzed using Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray ionization-MS/MS (LC-ESI-MS/MS) on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an EASY nLC1200 liquid chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides were trapped on a 2 cm × 75 μm i.d. PepMap C18 precolumn packed with 3 μm particles and 100 Å pore size. Separation was performed using a 50 cm × 75 μm i.d. PepMap C18 column packed with 2 μm and 100 Å particles and heated at 50 °C. Peptides were separated using a 160 min segmented gradient of 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and 80% acetonitrile 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) at a flow rate of 250 nL/min. Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) was performed with a MS1 full scan at a resolution of 60,000 (FWHM) followed by 30 DIA MS2 scan with variable windows. MS1 was performed in the Orbitrap with an AGC target of 1 × 106, a maximum injection time of 50 ms and a scan range from 400 to 1250 m/z. DIA MS2 was performed in the Orbitrap using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) at 30%. Isolation windows (30) were variables with an AGC target of 2 × 106 and a maximum injection time of 54 ms. DirectDIA performance was used in Spectronaut™ (Biognosys AG, Zurich, Switzerland) to match DIA MS raw data.
For the analysis of cells and EVs, protein abundances were exported from Spectronaut™, and selected proteins were tested for significance using Student’s two-tailed t-test. Protein and peptide intensities were exported and analyzed using mapDIA. No further normalization was applied. The following parameters were used: min peptides = 2, max peptides = 10, min correl = −1 min DE = 0.01, max DE = 0.99 and experimental design = replicate design. Proteins were considered to have significantly changed in abundance with a LFDR < 0.05 and an absolute fold change (|FC|) > 1.2.
For metabolomics, the profiling was based on Pezzatti et al. [16] with slight modifications, as detailed in the Supplementary File S1.

2.8. Enrichment Pathway Analysis

The list of differentially expressed proteins was then analyzed with MetaCore™ (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) to highlight significantly represented biological pathways. The top 5 biological pathways were selected.

2.9. MST Proliferation and LDH Cytotoxicity Assay

HBMEC were seeded in a 96-well plate (10,000 cells per well) and treated for 24 h with morphine at different concentrations (1, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 µM). Cell proliferation was determined using the MTS assay (CellTiter 96®® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), whereas cytotoxicity was assessed by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released using a Pierce™ LDH cytotoxicity kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Both the MTS and LDH assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Significance is denoted as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. The data were analyzed using multiple t-test comparisons or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

3. Results

3.1. Morphine Doses Determination on Primary Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Morphine-induced toxicity was evaluated on HBMECs with proliferation assay (MTS) and a cytotoxicity assay (LDH release). Cells were exposed for 24 h with various morphine concentrations (1 µM, 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM, 100 µM, 200 µM and 400 µM). Results showed a significant difference between the untreated control and treated samples at 200 µM and 400 µM of morphine in both MTS proliferation assay and LDH cytotoxicity assay (Figure 1a,b). No significant differences were found at lower concentrations (1 µM, 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM and 100 µM) (Figure 1a,b). Concentrations from 1 to 100 µM were, thus, selected for the analysis of morphine-induced proteome modulations.

3.2. Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles from Morphine-Treated Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Culture media from morphine-treated primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells were recovered to isolate extracellular vesicles (EVs). Released EVs from HBMECs were isolated using EVTRAP magnetic beads, an isolation method based on a chemical affinity capture approach [17,18]. As this study is not intended to distinguish the EV populations and due to the current disagreement around the definition of EV subsets, the term EV will be used in this research article.
EV physical characterization was performed by NTA to determine EV sizes (nm) and concentrations (particles/mL). Results demonstrated that the median EV size for each morphine concentration was within the expected diameter range of small vesicles (<100 or <200 nm) according to the MISEV2018 (Figure 2a) [19]. EV concentrations were within 1.55 × 1010 ± 1.03 × 1010 particles/mL to 2.07 × 1010 ± 1.44 × 109, with no significant difference between the groups, as demonstrated in Figure 2b. These results also suggested that EV sizes and concentrations are not impacted by morphine exposure.
EV biochemical characterization was conducted using western blotting and proteomics-based mass spectrometry analysis to assess the presence of specific EV markers and EV proteins within the enriched EV samples. Three proteins were selected to confirm EV enrichment by western blots: two cytosolic proteins, PDCD6IP (Alix) and TSG101, as well as the membrane protein CD9. These three proteins were described as constitutively present in EVs. In addition, a protein localized in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum was also used as a negative control, the calreticulin (CALR) [20]. As shown in Figure 2c, the detection of PDCD6IP, TSG101 and CD9 markers was increased in EV samples, indicating an efficient EV isolation [21]. Regarding calreticulin, it was only present in the whole cell lysate, demonstrating that EVs were properly enriched [20]. A proteomic analysis using DIA mass spectrometry was conducted to deepen EV biochemical characterization. Total cell lysate was used as a control. Overall, 1565 proteins were quantified in EV samples (Table S1). The quantification of EV specific markers, such as PDCD6IP and CD9, was also significantly higher compared to the one in the parent cells (Figure 2d).
Finally, to further understand these results, a bioinformatics analysis was performed with the list of quantified EV proteins. The enrichment of cellular components from gene ontology (GO) ranked terms such as “extracellular exosome”, “extracellular vesicle”, “extracellular membrane-bounded organelle”, “extracellular organelle” and “extracellular space” (Figure 2e) with highly significant p-values, confirming the overall efficient EV enrichment (Table S2).
Since EV characterization yielded satisfactory results, the study was pursued by evaluating morphine-induced modulations on EV proteome through MS-based proteomics and pathway enrichment analysis.

3.3. Quantitative Proteomics Analysis to Study Morphine-Induced Protein Modulations in HMBECs and HBMECs-Derived EVs

After being exposed to morphine at 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µM for 24 h, DIA-based proteomics was performed to investigate morphine-induced alterations in HBMECs and associated EVs.
According to the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI), FDR thresholds for protein identification were set across all DIA-MS data to achieve a 1% FDR at the peptide and protein level. Overall, 5348 proteins were quantified in HBMECs and 1565 proteins in EVs in at least one condition (Tables S1 and S3). MapDIA tool [22] was used to compute protein ratios from precursors intensities and to perform the statistical analysis. Significantly modified proteins were defined with a local false discovery rate (LFDR) lower than 5% and an absolute fold change (|FC|) of 1.2, for each comparison versus the untreated control, based on the current trend in interpreting DIA data [23]. Interestingly, an increase in the number of differential proteins was noted in a dose-dependent manner in morphine-treated HBMECs and corresponding EVs, as presented in the volcano plots of Figure S1. In total, 265 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in HBMECs and 148 proteins in EVs in at least one condition (Tables S1 and S3). Venn diagrams displaying differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in HBMECs and EVs are presented in Figure S2.
DEPs (log2 ratio of treated vs untreated condition) in morphine-exposed HBMECs and EVs were displayed in the heatmap of Figure 3a,b, respectively. According to the horizontal clustering (representing the conditions), morphine concentrations at 1 μM, 10 μM and 25 μM were clustered together, while 50 μM and 100 µM of morphine shared another distinct cluster. This underlined similar protein modulation patterns at these specific concentrations. This pattern was also observed in both heatmaps, suggesting that morphine may act similarly in HBMECs and EVs. However, to investigate which biological pathways were impacted by these different morphine concentrations in HBMECs and EVs, pathway enrichment analysis was performed on DEPs.

3.4. Morphine Induces Specific Pathway Modulation in HBMECs and Associated EVs

To determine biological pathways that were affected by morphine exposure in HBMECs and their corresponding EVs for the different studied concentrations, pathway enrichment analysis was employed using the software MetaCore™. This manually curated database of protein-protein interactions and biological pathways determines which biological pathways are statistically enriched in a given dataset. As morphine treatment at 25 μM, 50 μM and 100 μM revealed a higher number of DEPs, the corresponding lists were loaded on MetaCore™ (|FC| > 1.2; p-value < 0.05) and pathway enrichment analysis was performed. The top five enriched pathways are represented in Figure 4. This analysis revealed that exposure of HBMECs with morphine strongly affected the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (first, second and fifth pathways) (Table S4) in both whole cells and EVs. In parallel, proteins related to hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) targets (the fourth pathway) were also shown to be highly modified by morphine (Table S4).
“HIF1 targets” is a pathway linked to oxidative stress, in which multiple protein levels were modulated by morphine exposure. In line with the major finding of our previous study [11], morphine exposure induces oxidative stress response in HBMECs, but more interestingly, also in EVs (transcription HIF1 targets pathway of Figure 4). DEPs shared in HBMECs and EVs (in bold in Figure 5 and Table S4) are linked to different physiological processes regulated by HIF1, including glucose metabolism (GAPDH, HXK1, HXK2), ECM remodeling (PLAUR, MMP2), vascular biology (TSP1, PAI1, VEGF) and iron/erythropoiesis (TFR), among others. These findings suggest that EVs have the potential to carry modulated pathway signatures originating from parent cells [14], mainly at 50 and 100 µM morphine exposures. For example, MMP2 and TSP1 were found to be downregulated, after morphine exposure at 25, 50 and 100 µM, in cells and in EVs, unlike PAI1 and TRF, which were upregulated. The regulation of these proteins has already been reported in other studies on oxidative stress [24,25,26,27], suggesting the possibility of considering morphine as an oxidative stress inducer.
The most highly affected biological pathway shared between HBMECs and EVs after morphine exposure was the “cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling” (Figure 4). Almost all the DEPs present in this pathway are associated with the extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling (Figure 6a), which is essential in normal physiological processes such as proliferation, cell motility and adhesion, angiogenesis and diseases progression, among others. DEPs directely linked to the ECM remodeling as nidogen (NID1), osteonectin (SPARC), laminin subunit alpha-4 (LAMA4) and fibronectin (FN1) (Figure 6a) are all downregulated upon morphine treatment (essentially at 50 and 100 µM) in HBMECs and EVs, suggesting a strong perturbation of the ECM. The only exception is the SPARC protein, which is upregulated in EV samples (Figure 6b).
In additon, two matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the MMP1 (collagenase) and MMP2 (gelatinase), are indirectly related to the ECM remodeling (Figure 6a), via the degradation of ECM components. MMP1 presented an increased protein level upon morphine exposure, while MMP2 was decreased (Figure 6b) at 50 and 100 µM of morphine. Such a discrepancy in matrix metalloproteinases levels was already described upon ECM homeostasis perturbation [29].
In addition, a serpin peptidase inhibitor (PAI1) at 50 and 100 µM of morphine, and plasminogen activator tissue (PLAT) only at the highest morphine condition, were upregulated in HBMECs and EVs (Figure 6b). These proteins play a pivotal role in the regulation of cell adhesion and migration during tissue remodeling, suggesting a strong morphine-induced alteration of cell adhesion and remodeling.

3.5. Confirmatory Experiments of Morphine-Induced Biological Pathways Related to HIF1 Target and ECM Remodeling by Metabolomics

Metabolomics was used to verify the biological pathways evidenced by enrichment analysis of altered proteins in HBMECs upon morphine exposure. HBMECs exposed for 24 h to morphine at 5 and 50 μM in triplicates were used. Treated samples were compared to their untreated samples. Metabolomic analysis revealed a significant change in metabolite levels related to glucose metabolism (glucose and UDP-glucose) and ECM remodeling (4-hydroxyproline and glutamic acid), both associated to the HIF-1 target pathway. Glucose showed a significant increase upon morphine exposure (5 and 50 µM), whereas UDP-glucose, 4-hydroxyproline and glutamic acid were only significantly increased upon 50 μM of morphine exposure (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Although morphine is an efficient and powerful analgesic, it also causes side effects such as dizziness, nausea, vomiting or hallucinations through different mechanisms. In our previous research on the morphine-induced effects on human brain microvascular endothelial cells [11], we proposed that the main affected biological pathway due to morphine exposure was related to oxidative stress. We assumed that morphine effect was mediated by the mu receptor in HBMECs, as demonstrated elsewhere [30,31,32]. Nervertheless, the expression of other opioid receptors in HBMECs and their activation was not excluded and would require further investigation.
Furthermore, our investigation revealed the induction of oxidative stress by morphine via the NRF2 pathway in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs). The NRF2 pathway was previously reported to increase morphine-induced analgesia while reducing its hyperanalgesic effects [33]. Even though EVs molecular mechanisms are increasingly studied, the current knowledge in brain endothelial cells is still poor. Therefore, the present study investigated the morphine effect on the proteome of HBMECs as well as the released EVs using the proteomics-based strategy to determine biological pathways that may be altered.
In our previous study [11], morphine induced mitochondrial dysfunctions by decreasing mitochondria respiration in HBMECs at 50 and 100 µM for 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, indicating that morphine already affects HBMECs at these doses. Vigilant interpretation is required as selected concentrations in this study (1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µM) are outside the therapeutic range of morphine, as suggested in other studies focused on BBB permeability that generally used morphine concentration at 10 µM [34,35,36]. However, chosen concentrations have been verified to withstand a physiological change without inducing a cytotoxic effect in the cell system used in this study (Figure 1). Furthermore, although these concentrations are higher than those reported in plasma, numerous studies have used them in in vitro models [37,38,39,40,41], suggesting that they remain relevant to be investigated from a biological point of view.
After EV affinity-based enrichment, EV sizes and concentrations were measured to verify the enrichment procedure. EVs enriched from HBMECs met MISEV2018 physical characteristics standards [19]. Common EV markers including Alix, TSG101 and CD9 were detected by western blot, without cellular contamination (no detection of calreticulin). To further check EV enrichment quality, mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis was used to verify the presence of several proteins known as EV markers. These markers displayed a higher protein abundance in EVs compared to total cell samples. GO term enrichment analysis revealed the increase of cellular component category terms linked to “extracellular exosome” and “extracellular vesicle”, among others, with highly significant p-values. Therefore, our results appear to comply with the expectations of the MSIEV2018 guidelines. Moreover, we used orthogonal techniques such as electron microscopy (EVs morphology) to strengthen our EV characterization. In addition, the current trend in the EV scientific community is to combine enrichment methods for EVs [34]. They provide evidence that characterization was significantly enhanced with this type of strategy [35,36,37,38], therefore it would be interesting to explore this combined isolation.
The HBMECs and EVs proteomes were also established to investigate morphine effects. Data provided evidence that morphine induced a dose-dependent alteration as shown in the volcano plots (Figure S1). The higher the dose, the higher the number of DEPs was in morphine-treated HBMECs and EVs. Some in vitro studies comparing different concentrations of a compound reported more differentially expressed proteins or genes after high exposure than low-dose exposure [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47], supporting our findings. Regarding DEPs induced by morphine in HBMECs and EVs, heatmaps established with mass spectrometry data present two distinct clusters according to low-medium morphine concentrations (1 µM, 10 µM and 25 µM) and the high morphine concentrations (50 µM and 100 µM), suggesting different modulations for these concentrations.

4.1. Oxidative Stress Related Pathway

The pathway enrichment analysis identified an oxidative stress-related pathway as being modulated by morphine exposure, in agreement with previous studies [11,48,49,50]. Oxidative stress is an abnormal physiological process and is defined as “an imbalance between antioxidants and oxidants, resulting in the disruption of redox signaling and the corresponding molecular damage” [51]. Under normal physiological conditions, ROS production and elimination are balanced, whereas this balance is disrupted during oxidative stress. Production of ROS is induced by multiple stimuli and, therefore, is responsible for the modulation of various biological processes such as apoptosis [52,53], inflammation [54,55,56], angiogenesis [57,58] or neurodegenerative diseases [59,60,61,62]. Moreover, ROS are known to promote a redox cascade by oxidizing and activating several transcription factors such as nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1) or hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1A). The present study mainly highlighted HIF1A-target proteins modulation by morphine exposure on cells and EVs. HIF1 regulates cellular and systemic O2 homeostasis in animals, and, thus, controls several physiological processes, including glucose metabolism, proliferation/survival, iron/erythropoiesis, extracellular matrix remodeling and vascular biology, among others [28].
HIF1-regulated genes include glycolytic enzymes [63,64]. In this study, hexokinase 1 and 2 (HXK1 and 2) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were modulated upon morphine treatment, and thereby may influence glucose metabolism. Indeed, a label-free proteomics analysis on rat hippocampus exposed to morphine reported similar GAPDH downregulation [65]. Since GAPDH has already been documented to undergo post-translational modifications [66,67,68], they speculated that these post-translational modifications of GAPDH may have a role in oxidative stress generation [65]. In addition, under oxidative stress, ATP levels are reduced and glycolysis is blocked, mainly due to the inactivation of GAPDH [69], which may be applicable to morphine-induced effects in our study. Moreover, although the underlying mechanisms of GAPDH are not yet fully understood, it has been proposed that GAPDH may be an intracellular sensor of oxidative stress, emphasizing its role in this process. In addition, two metabolites related to the glucose metabolism were found altered after exposure to morphine: glucose and UDP-glucose. Under normal cellular conditions, glucose is phosphorylated to glucose-6-phosphate by hexokinases and converted to UDP-glucose [70,71]. Therefore, glucose is a crucial metabolite mostly implicated in the production of ATP but is also the precursor of neuro-transmitters and neuro-modulators [71]. In turn, UDP-glucose is a metabolite involved in many cellular processes such as the synthesis of glycogen, glycolipids, glycoproteins or proteoglycans, among many others [70]. In the present study, morphine treatment induced significant changes in glucose level by a dose-dependent increase, while UDP-glucose level significantly increases at 50 μM only. Modification of metabolites related to glucose metabolism was already denoted in mammalian cells, especially under hypoxic condition [70].
Other HIF1-targets, such as the plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor (PLAUR) and metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), were modified by morphine according to our findings. PLAUR was only impacted upon one morphine exposed HBMECs condition, whereas MMP2 was modified by all the conditions in both HBMECs and EVs. MMP2, also known as gelatinase A, is a proteolytic enzyme, involved in the ECM organization [72]. Our results showed a decrease in the expression of this protein, proposing a probable disturbance at the cellular and extracellular level due to morphine exposure. Numerous results have proven that oxidative stress conditions alter the expression of MMPs, leading to cellular alterations [72,73,74,75,76]. In the brain, endothelial basal lamina may be disturbed leading to the BBB opening [77,78,79] and, finally, to the leukocytes transmigration [80,81]. In line with these findings, Gach et al. indicated that MMP decreases after morphine exposure was due to oxidative stress rather than classical opioid receptor mediation [24]. Moreover, metabolomics experiments confirmed proteomics analysis as metabolites related to the ECM remodeling (4-hydroxyproline and glutamic acid) were found to be affected by morphine treatment. Both metabolite levels were shown to be significantly increased after morphine exposure at 50 μM. 4-hydroxyproline is a collagen-related metabolite, playing a crucial role in collagen stability to protect tissues from damage. Under stress condition, it has been reported that 4-hydroxyproline urinary levels are increased due to accelerated collagen degradation [82]. Glutamic acid is an essential metabolite in cellular metabolism. This metabolite is indirectly linked to the ECM by being a precursor in the synthesis of the amino acid proline [83], another prominent amino acid in collagen. Therefore, collagen modification may be involved in the observed altered protective function in ECM [84].
Acting in tissue remodeling as a component of ECM, the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1) was upregulated in our study. PAI1 is a crucial element in fibrinolysis control. It has been evidenced that, upon generation of ROS, HIF1 is activated, which, in turn, induces the expression of PAI1 [85]. In the in vitro study of Görlach et al., they highlighted the decreased expression of PAI1 after ROS elevation [26], thereby suggesting a similar effect of morphine exposure on HBMECs and EVs by acting as a stress inducer [26].
In addition, we demonstrated in this study that altered proteins contained in EVs predominantly mirrored those of their parent cells. Thus, since the oxidative stress response is also a piece of information held by EVs, this could suggest their potential role in modulating distant physiological processes. Some studies hypothesized that EVs were mirroring parent cells status and were involved in biological processes, therefore, the redox status of the parent cells may determine the oxidative stress-related EV molecular cargo [14]. Indeed, EVs composition may be strongly influenced by an external stimulus or a pathological condition originating from their parent cells. As reported in the study of Biasutto et al., oxidatively stressed cells and EVs presented decreased protein expressions associated to pro-survival pathways and increased ones of pro-apoptotic pathways [86]. These results indicated that cells were transferring, through EVs, modulated molecules related to pathways regulating cell death. Conversely, under oxidative stress, cells can also release EVs with positive effects. Eldh et al. demonstrated that, under oxidative stress, EVs carried antioxidant molecules (mRNAs) contributing to the oxidative stress resistance of recipient cells [87]. In addition, the study of Liao et al. illustrated another EVs functionality, which is to activate distant brain cell types [88]. Indeed, they highlighted that EVs from morphine-treated astrocytes can be transported into microglia and induce microglia activation with subsequent morphological alterations.
According to our pathway enrichment analysis, EVs released by morphine-exposed HBMECs have the potential to exert negative effects, as their altered proteins (those of the cell of origin) are related to the transcription HIF1 target pathway. This biological pathway may be an EV signature pathway induced by morphine, reflecting the same changes in cells of origin. Some studies have already speculated on EVs functions in redox signaling and oxidative stress-related diseases such as neurologic, oncologic or cardiovascular pathologies [89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. However, more studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
As observed here, several major HIF1 targets have been significantly affected after morphine treatment in HBMECs and EVs, especially those from ECM, suggesting a strong ECM modulation by morphine. Indeed, pathway enrichment analysis highlighted that “cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling” was the major pathway altered in this study. Morphine-related oxidative stress might be at the origin of this change. Indeed, a variety of cellular and extracellular changes occurs upon oxidative stress, including extracellular matrix remodeling [96].

4.2. Cell Adhesion and ECM Remodeling Related Pathway

Extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling is a known and controlled mechanism permitting the readjustment of tissues in reaction to a stimulus. As mentioned above, MMPs are involved in the degradation of various components of the ECM and, therefore, have a pivotal role in these mechanisms. In our study, MMP1 expression was increased, while MMP2 was decreased. Such phenomena have already been observed in the study of Alge-Priglinger et al. [29]. Their study on cultured cells exposed to oxidative stress showed an increased MMP-1 but reduced MMP-2 [29], contributing to a perturbed ECM homeostasis, and, thus, a possible BBB alteration. However, it has been reported that excessive proteolytic ECM degradation due to MMPs may be balanced by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs) such as TIMP-1, -2 and -3, controlling the extent of ECM remodeling [97,98]. According to our results, TIMP2 is the only protein that was significantly decreased in the EVs at 100 µM of morphine, suggesting that TIMPs potentially struggled to act as MMP scavengers upon morphine exposure.
Furthermore, some proteins associated with the ECM degradation via MMPs, such as the tissue-type plasminogen activator (PLAT), urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor (PLAUR), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1), plasmin and plasminogen (PLG), could be cited. These proteins are all included in the plasminogen activator (PA) system, which has two classical roles: regulation of ECM degradation in several tissues and regulation of fibrinolysis in the bloodstream [99]. In the ECM, plasmin activates MMPs, allowing them to degrade ECM elements, which is an essential function to prevent fibrosis, cell migration and cell growth. In the blood, plasmin cleaves fibrin into fibrin degradation molecules. This is crucial for the prevention of fibrin clot formation, which may induce vascular occlusions. In addition, it is interesting to note that intravascular injection of recombinant PLAT is used in clinics to induce thrombolysis in ischemic stroke [100]. Moreover, PAI1 is the primary and irreversible inhibitor of PLAT and PLAU in the brain [101,102,103]. It is mainly synthetized in the vascular endothelial cells but also in astrocytes [104]. In our study, PAI1 was upregulated after morphine exposure in HBMECs as well as in EVs, while plasminogen was only upregulated in HBMECs. In the study of Wilhelm et al., they reported the same modulation of PAI1 after ethanol treatment on astrocytes [105], suggesting functional impairments in astrocytes. In addition, Wang et al., also working with HBMECs, demonstrated that PAI1 expression was upregulated under hypoxic condition [106]. These results suggest that PAI1 is strongly influenced by agents such as those used in the cited studies (including ours) [107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. The common feature of these agents is their ability to generate ROS and, thus, to alter ECM elements. Moreover, proteins that have been shown to be directly involved in the remodeling of ECM (LAMA4, ND1, FN1 and SPARC) were all decreased upon almost every morphine concentration, suggesting that these proteins were not able to ensure their structural and functional properties in the ECM [115,116,117]. Similar to MMPs protein group, their altered expressions lead to the degradation of ECM, and, ultimately, to an impaired cell integrity, whose consequences may be irreversible.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, physical and biochemical EV characterization supported an appropriate vesicle enrichment from HBMECs. We were, then, able to build upon our previous study on morphine by introducing two intermediate concentrations (25 µM and 50 µM) to cover a wider exposure range. Proteomics data demonstrated morphine-induced modulations in the HBMECs and EVs proteome. Moreover, enrichment pathway analysis indicated that the intermediate morphine concentrations (25 µM and particularly 50 µM) impacted HBMECs and EVs in a similar manner than the highest concentration (100 µM). We confirmed here that morphine negatively affects HBMECs since oxidative stress-related proteins were significantly modulated. We also demonstrated these changes in HBMECs-derived EVs, highlighting the ability of EVs to mirror the content of their parent cells after a stimulus. EVs enriched after morphine exposure give useful information on “signature pathways” that could potentially be delivered to neighboring cells. Furthermore, both results of morphine-exposed HBMECs and EVs provided striking evidence that proteins from ECM were strongly modified by morphine, indicating important cellular changes. Therefore, it appears that morphine compromised the two main functions of brain endothelial cells: the preservation of the integrity of the brain and its homeostasis. However, further studies are needed to better understand the impact of “stimulated EVs” on neighboring cells and their underlying biological mechanisms. Indeed, with the current trend of using conditioned media in the EV field, it would be of great interest to study the influence of media containing EVs from HBMECs treated with morphine on other cell types, especially those from the brain.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11233926/s1, Figure S1. Volcano plots and Figure S2. Venn diagrams, Table S1: EVs proteins quantified and DEPs output, Table S2: Top 5 GO enrichment for EVs, Table S3: HBMECs proteins quantified and DEPs output and Table S4: Top 5 enrichment pathways analysis of HBMECs and EVs treated by morphine. Supplementary File S1: Metabolomic methodology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.V. and J.-C.S.; methodology, T.V.; validation, T.V. and J.-C.S.; formal analysis, T.V.; investigation, T.V.; data curation, T.V.; writing—original draft preparation, T.V.; writing—review and editing, T.V., D.S. and J.-C.S.; visualization, T.V. and D.S.; supervision, J.-C.S.; project administration, J.-C.S.; funding acquisition, J.-C.S., I.M. and I.L.F. performed metabolomics studies, formal analysis of the data. I.M., V.G.-R. and S.R. were responsible for the supervision of the metabolomics work, and formal analysis of the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

T.V., D.S. and J.-C. S. are funded by the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology through grants from the Research Program 2017–2020. I.M, V.G.-R and S.R. are funded by the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology through grants from the Research Program 2021–2024. I.L.F received a PhD fellowship from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grants 2018/03035-3 and 2021/10410-8).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD038516, username: reviewer_pxd038516@ebi.ac.uk, password: k80FN4A6.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Alexandre Hainard and Carla Pasquarello from the proteomic core facility of the Geneva University for their kind help and advice for the proteomic analyses using mass spectrometry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rosenblum, A.; Marsch, L.A.; Joseph, H.; Portenoy, R.K. Opioids and the treatment of chronic pain: Controversies, current status, and future directions. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, Y.T.; Zheng, Q.S.; Pan, J.; Zheng, R.L. Oxidative damage of biomolecules in mouse liver induced by morphine and protected by antioxidants. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 95, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abdel-Zaher, A.O.; Abdel-Rahman, M.S.; FM, E.L. Blockade of nitric oxide overproduction and oxidative stress by Nigella sativa oil attenuates morphine-induced tolerance and dependence in mice. Neurochem. Res. 2010, 35, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sumathi, T.; Nathiya, V.C.; Sakthikumar, M. Protective Effect of Bacoside-A against Morphine-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rats. Ind. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 73, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Payabvash, S.; Beheshtian, A.; Salmasi, A.H.; Kiumehr, S.; Ghahremani, M.H.; Tavangar, S.M.; Sabzevari, O.; Dehpour, A.R. Chronic morphine treatment induces oxidant and apoptotic damage in the mice liver. Life Sci. 2006, 79, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guzmán, D.C.; Vázquez, I.E.; Brizuela, N.O.; Alvarez, R.G.; Mejía, G.B.; García, E.H.; Santamaría, D.; de Apreza, M.; Olguín, H.J. Assessment of oxidative damage induced by acute doses of morphine sulfate in postnatal and adult rat brain. Neurochem. Res. 2006, 31, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Murlanova, K.; Jouroukhin, Y.; Huseynov, S.; Pletnikova, O.; Morales, M.J.; Guan, Y.; Baraban, J.M.; Bergles, D.E.; Pletnikov, M.V. Deficient mitochondrial respiration in astrocytes impairs trace fear conditioning and increases naloxone-precipitated aversion in morphine-dependent mice. Glia 2022, 70, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Podhaizer, E.M.; Zou, S.; Fitting, S.; Samano, K.L.; El-Hage, N.; Knapp, P.E.; Hauser, K.F. Morphine and gp120 toxic interactions in striatal neurons are dependent on HIV-1 strain. J. Neuroimmune. Pharmacol. 2012, 7, 877–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jasmin, L.; Wang, H.; Tarczy-Hornoch, K.; Levine, J.D.; Basbaum, A.I. Differential effects of morphine on noxious stimulus-evoked fos-like immunoreactivity in subpopulations of spinoparabrachial neurons. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 7252–7260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Christie, M.J. Chapter 14—Mechanisms of opioid actions on neurons of the locus coeruleus. In Progress in Brain Research; Barnes, C.D., Pompeiano, O., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; Volume 88, pp. 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  11. Reymond, S.; Vujić, T.; Schvartz, D.; Sanchez, J.C. Morphine-induced modulation of Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway in primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banks, W.A.; Sharma, P.; Bullock, K.M.; Hansen, K.M.; Ludwig, N.; Whiteside, T.L. Transport of Extracellular Vesicles across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Brain Pharmacokinetics and Effects of Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Basso, M.; Bonetto, V. Extracellular Vesicles and a Novel Form of Communication in the Brain. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chiaradia, E.; Tancini, B.; Emiliani, C.; Delo, F.; Pellegrino, R.M.; Tognoloni, A.; Urbanelli, L.; Buratta, S. Extracellular Vesicles under Oxidative Stress Conditions: Biological Properties and Physiological Roles. Cells 2021, 10, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Meister, I.; Zhang, P.; Sinha, A.; Sköld, C.M.; Wheelock, Å.M.; Izumi, T.; Chaleckis, R.; Wheelock, C.E. High-Precision Automated Workflow for Urinary Untargeted Metabolomic Epidemiology. Anal Chem. 2021, 93, 5248–5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pezzatti, J.; González-Ruiz, V.; Codesido, S.; Gagnebin, Y.; Joshi, A.; Guillarme, D.; Schappler, J.; Picard, D.; Boccard, J.; Rudaz, S. A scoring approach for multi-platform acquisition in metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1592, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, X.; Li, L.; Iliuk, A.; Tao, W.A. Highly Efficient Phosphoproteome Capture and Analysis from Urinary Extracellular Vesicles. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 3308–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Iliuk, A.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Sun, J.; Hadisurya, M.; Boris, R.S.; Tao, W.A. Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Phosphoproteomics through Chemical Affinity Purification. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 2563–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Men, Y.; Yelick, J.; Jin, S.; Tian, Y.; Chiang, M.S.R.; Higashimori, H.; Brown, E.; Jarvis, R.; Yang, Y. Exosome reporter mice reveal the involvement of exosomes in mediating neuron to astroglia communication in the CNS. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yoshioka, Y.; Konishi, Y.; Kosaka, N.; Katsuda, T.; Kato, T.; Ochiya, T. Comparative marker analysis of extracellular vesicles in different human cancer types. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2013, 2, 20424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Teo, G.; Kim, S.; Tsou, C.-C.; Collins, B.; Gingras, A.-C.; Nesvizhskii, A.I.; Choi, H. mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry. J. Proteom. 2015, 129, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Walzer, M.; García-Seisdedos, D.; Prakash, A.; Brack, P.; Crowther, P.; Graham, R.L.; George, N.; Mohammed, S.; Moreno, P.; Papatheodorou, I.; et al. Implementing the reuse of public DIA proteomics datasets: From the PRIDE database to Expression Atlas. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gach, K.; Szemraj, J.; Wyrębska, A.; Janecka, A. The influence of opioids on matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 secretion and mRNA levels in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, J.-K.; Zhan, Y.-J.; Yang, C.-S.; Tzeng, S.-F. Oxidative stress-induced attenuation of thrombospondin-1 expression in primary rat astrocytes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 112, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Görlach, A.; Berchner-Pfannschmidt, U.; Wotzlaw, C.; Cool, R.H.; Fandrey, J.; Acker, H.; Jungermann, K.; Kietzmann, T. Reactive oxygen species modulate HIF-1 mediated PAI-1 expression: Involvement of the GTPase Rac1. Thromb. Haemost. 2003, 89, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Li, D.; Yan, Y.; Wang, H. Transferrin receptor-mediated reactive oxygen species promotes ferroptosis of KGN cells via regulating NADPH oxidase 1/PTEN induced kinase 1/acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 4 signaling. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 4983–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1, O2, and the 3 PHDs: How Animal Cells Signal Hypoxia to the Nucleus. Cell 2001, 107, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Alge-Priglinger, C.S.; Kreutzer, T.; Obholzer, K.; Wolf, A.; Mempel, M.; Kernt, M.; Kampik, A.; Priglinger, S.G. Oxidative Stress-Mediated Induction of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in Human RPE Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 5495–5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hansson, E.; Westerlund, A.; Björklund, U.; Olsson, T. μ-Opioid agonists inhibit the enhanced intracellular Ca2+ responses in inflammatory activated astrocytes co-cultured with brain endothelial cells. Neuroscience 2008, 155, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vidal, E.L.; Patel, N.A.; Wu, G.-d.; Fiala, M.; Chang, S.L. Interleukin-1 induces the expression of μ opioid receptors in endothelial cells. Immunopharmacology 1998, 38, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, S.L.; Felix, B.; Jiang, Y.; Fiala, M. Actions of endotoxin and morphine. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2001, 493, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Redondo, A.; Chamorro, P.A.F.; Riego, G.; Leánez, S.; Pol, O. Treatment with Sulforaphane Produces Antinociception and Improves Morphine Effects during Inflammatory Pain in Mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 2017, 363, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Marino, J.; Maubert, M.E.; Lawrence, J.M.; Wigdahl, B.; Nonnemacher, M.R. Chronic Low Dose Morphine Does Not Alter Two In Vitro BBB Models. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Strazza, M.; Pirrone, V.; Wigdahl, B.; Dampier, W.; Lin, W.; Feng, R.; Maubert, M.E.; Weksler, B.; Romero, I.A.; Couraud, P.-O.; et al. Prolonged Morphine Exposure Induces Increased Firm Adhesion in an in Vitro Model of the Blood–Brain Barrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mahajan, S.D.; Aalinkeel, R.; Sykes, D.E.; Reynolds, J.L.; Bindukumar, B.; Fernandez, S.F.; Chawda, R.; Shanahan, T.C.; Schwartz, S.A. Tight Junction Regulation by Morphine and HIV-1 Tat Modulates Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability. J. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 28, 528–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cai, Y.; Yang, L.; Hu, G.; Chen, X.; Niu, F.; Yuan, L.; Liu, H.; Xiong, H.; Arikkath, J.; Buch, S. Regulation of morphine-induced synaptic alterations: Role of oxidative stress, ER stress, and autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 215, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Almeida, M.B.; Costa-Malaquias, A.; Nascimento, J.L.; Oliveira, K.R.; Herculano, A.M.; Crespo-López, M.E. Therapeutic concentration of morphine reduces oxidative stress in glioma cell line. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2014, 47, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Dozio, V.; Daali, Y.; Desmeules, J.; Sanchez, J.C. Deep proteomics and phosphoproteomics reveal novel biological pathways perturbed by morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in human astrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 2020, 100, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, B.; Su, C.-J.; Liu, T.-T.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, Y.; Huang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.-H.; Chen, L.-H.; Luo, W.-F.; et al. The Neuroprotection of Low-Dose Morphine in Cellular and Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease Through Ameliorating Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress and Activating Autophagy. Front Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lam, C.-F.; Liu, Y.-C.; Tseng, F.-L.; Sung, Y.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Jiang, M.-J.; Tsai, Y.-C. High-dose Morphine Impairs Vascular Endothelial Function by Increased Production of Superoxide Anions. Anesthesiology 2007, 106, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stam, J.; Bartel, S.; Bischoff, R.; Wolters, J.C. Isolation of extracellular vesicles with combined enrichment methods. J. Chromatogr. B 2021, 1169, 122604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Onódi, Z.; Pelyhe, C.; Terézia Nagy, C.; Brenner, G.B.; Almási, L.; Kittel, Á.; Manček-Keber, M.; Ferdinandy, P.; Buzás, E.I.; Giricz, Z. Isolation of High-Purity Extracellular Vesicles by the Combination of Iodixanol Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation and Bind-Elute Chromatography From Blood Plasma. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Benedikter, B.J.; Bouwman, F.G.; Vajen, T.; Heinzmann, A.C.A.; Grauls, G.; Mariman, E.C.; Wouters, E.F.M.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Lopez-Iglesias, C.; Koenen, R.R.; et al. Ultrafiltration combined with size exclusion chromatography efficiently isolates extracellular vesicles from cell culture media for compositional and functional studies. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Corso, G.; Mäger, I.; Lee, Y.; Görgens, A.; Bultema, J.; Giebel, B.; Wood, M.J.A.; Nordin, J.Z.; Andaloussi, S.E.L. Reproducible and scalable purification of extracellular vesicles using combined bind-elute and size exclusion chromatography. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, K.; Bleackley, M.; Chisanga, D.; Gangoda, L.; Fonseka, P.; Liem, M.; Kalra, H.; Al Saffar, H.; Keerthikumar, S.; Ang, C.S.; et al. Extracellular vesicles secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae are involved in cell wall remodelling. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Brackmann, L.K.; Poplawski, A.; Grandt, C.L.; Schwarz, H.; Hankeln, T.; Rapp, S.; Zahnreich, S.; Galetzka, D.; Schmitt, I.; Grad, C.; et al. Comparison of time and dose dependent gene expression and affected pathways in primary human fibroblasts after exposure to ionizing radiation. Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Skrabalova, J.; Drastichova, Z.; Novotny, J. Morphine as a Potential Oxidative Stress-Causing Agent. Mini. Rev. Org. Chem. 2013, 10, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zeng, X.; Geng, W.-S.; Wang, Z.; Jia, J. Morphine Addiction and Oxidative Stress: The Potential Effects of Thioredoxin-1. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Calderón-Guzmán, D.; Osnaya-Brizuela, N.; García-Alvarez, R.; Hernández-García, E.; Juárez-Olguín, H. Oxidative stress induced by morphine in brain of rats fed with a protein deficient diet. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2009, 28, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sies, H. Oxidative Stress: Concept and Some Practical Aspects. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Skulachev, V.P. Cytochrome c in the apoptotic and antioxidant cascades. FEBS Lett. 1998, 423, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Hockenbery, D.M.; Oltvai, Z.N.; Yin, X.-M.; Milliman, C.L.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bcl-2 functions in an antioxidant pathway to prevent apoptosis. Cell 1993, 75, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hensley, K.; Robinson, K.A.; Gabbita, S.P.; Salsman, S.; Floyd, R.A. Reactive oxygen species, cell signaling, and cell injury. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 28, 1456–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Forrester, S.J.; Kikuchi, D.S.; Hernandes, M.S.; Xu, Q.; Griendling, K.K. Reactive Oxygen Species in Metabolic and Inflammatory Signaling. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 877–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chelombitko, M.A. Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation: A Minireview. Mosc. Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2018, 73, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Yang, J. The role of reactive oxygen species in angiogenesis and preventing tissue injury after brain ischemia. Microvasc. Res. 2019, 123, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ushio-Fukai, M. Redox signaling in angiogenesis: Role of NADPH oxidase. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 71, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lee, Y.M.; He, W.; Liou, Y.-C. The redox language in neurodegenerative diseases: Oxidative post-translational modifications by hydrogen peroxide. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Impact in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Literature Landscape Analysis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2021, 34, 402–420. [CrossRef]
  62. Gandhi, S.; Abramov, A.Y. Mechanism of Oxidative Stress in Neurodegeneration. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2012, 2012, 428010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Corcoran, S.E.; O’Neill, L.A. HIF1α and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation. J. Clin. Invest 2016, 126, 3699–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.M. HIF-1-regulated glucose metabolism: A key to apoptosis resistance? Cell Cycle 2007, 6, 790–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ujcikova, H.; Cechova, K.; Jagr, M.; Roubalova, L.; Vosahlikova, M.; Svoboda, P. Proteomic analysis of protein composition of rat hippocampus exposed to morphine for 10 days; comparison with animals after 20 days of morphine withdrawal. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kim, S.Y.; Chudapongse, N.; Lee, S.M.; Levin, M.C.; Oh, J.T.; Park, H.J.; Ho, I.K. Proteomic analysis of phosphotyrosyl proteins in morphine-dependent rat brains. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2005, 133, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huang, Q.; Lan, F.; Zheng, Z.; Xie, F.; Han, J.; Dong, L.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, F. Akt2 kinase suppresses glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via phosphorylating GAPDH at threonine 237 and decreasing its nuclear translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 42211–42220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Tristan, C.; Shahani, N.; Sedlak, T.W.; Sawa, A. The diverse functions of GAPDH: Views from different subcellular compartments. Cell Sign. 2011, 23, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hwang, N.R.; Yim, S.-H.; Kim, Y.M.; Jeong, J.; Song, E.J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, S.; Lee, K.-J. Oxidative modifications of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase play a key role in its multiple cellular functions. Biochemical. J. 2009, 423, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Flores-Díaz, M.; Alape-Girón, A.; Persson, B.; Pollesello, P.; Moos, M.; von Eichel-Streiber, C.; Thelestam, M.; Florin, I. Cellular UDP-Glucose Deficiency Caused by a Single Point Mutation in the UDP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 23784–23791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Dienel, G.A. Brain Glucose Metabolism: Integration of Energetics with Function. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 949–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ali, M.A.; Schulz, R. Activation of MMP-2 as a key event in oxidative stress injury to the heart. Front Biosci. 2009, 14, 699–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Valentin, F.; Bueb, J.L.; Kieffer, P.; Tschirhart, E.; Atkinson, J. Oxidative stress activates MMP-2 in cultured human coronary smooth muscle cells. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2005, 19, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kowluru, R.A.; Kanwar, M. Oxidative stress and the development of diabetic retinopathy: Contributory role of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 46, 1677–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Kandasamy, A.D.; Chow, A.K.; Ali, M.A.M.; Schulz, R. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and myocardial oxidative stress injury: Beyond the matrix. Cardiovasc. Res. 2009, 85, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Kameda, K.; Matsunaga, T.; Abe, N.; Hanada, H.; Ishizaka, H.; Ono, H.; Saitoh, M.; Fukui, K.; Fukuda, I.; Osanai, T.; et al. Correlation of oxidative stress with activity of matrix metalloproteinase in patients with coronary artery disease: Possible role for left ventricular remodelling. Eur. Heart J. 2003, 24, 2180–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rosenberg, G.A.; Navratil, M.; Barone, F.; Feuerstein, G. Proteolytic cascade enzymes increase in focal cerebral ischemia in rat. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Romanic, A.M.; White, R.F.; Arleth, A.J.; Ohlstein, E.H.; Barone, F.C. Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression Increases After Cerebral Focal Ischemia in Rats. Stroke 1998, 29, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Rosenberg, G.A.; Estrada, E.Y.; Dencoff, J.E. Matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs are associated with blood-brain barrier opening after reperfusion in rat brain. Stroke 1998, 29, 2189–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Gasche, Y.; Copin, J.C.; Sugawara, T.; Fujimura, M.; Chan, P.H. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition prevents oxidative stress-associated blood-brain barrier disruption after transient focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lou, J.; Gasche, Y.; Zheng, L.; Giroud, C.; Morel, P.; Clements, J.; Ythier, A.; Grau, G.E. Interferon-beta inhibits activated leukocyte migration through human brain microvascular endothelial cell monolayer. Lab. Invest. 1999, 79, 1015–1025. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lee, K.W.; Kim, S.J.; Park, J.B.; Lee, K.J. Relationship between depression anxiety stress scale (DASS) and urinary hydroxyproline and proline concentrations in hospital workers. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2011, 44, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Murphy, J.M.; Murch, S.J.; Ball, R.O. Proline is synthesized from glutamate during intragastric infusion but not during intravenous infusion in neonatal piglets. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Berretta, S. Extracellular matrix abnormalities in schizophrenia. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62, 1584–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Bonello, S.; Zähringer, C.; BelAiba, R.S.; Djordjevic, T.; Hess, J.; Michiels, C.; Kietzmann, T.; Görlach, A. Reactive oxygen species activate the HIF-1alpha promoter via a functional NFkappaB site. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Biasutto, L.; Chiechi, A.; Couch, R.; Liotta, L.A.; Espina, V. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) exosomes contain signaling phosphoproteins affected by oxidative stress. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 2113–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Eldh, M.; Ekström, K.; Valadi, H.; Sjöstrand, M.; Olsson, B.; Jernås, M.; Lötvall, J. Exosomes communicate protective messages during oxidative stress; possible role of exosomal shuttle RNA. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Liao, K.; Niu, F.; Hu, G.; Yang, L.; Dallon, B.; Villarreal, D.; Buch, S. Morphine-mediated release of miR-138 in astrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promotes microglial activation. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2020, 10, e12027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Burger, D.; Kwart, D.G.; Montezano, A.C.; Read, N.C.; Kennedy, C.R.; Thompson, C.S.; Touyz, R.M. Microparticles induce cell cycle arrest through redox-sensitive processes in endothelial cells: Implications in vascular senescence. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2012, 1, e001842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Loyer, X.; Vion, A.C.; Tedgui, A.; Boulanger, C.M. Microvesicles as cell-cell messengers in cardiovascular diseases. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Cai, Z.Y.; Xiao, M.; Quazi, S.H.; Ke, Z.Y. Exosomes: A novel therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease? Neural. Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 930–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tian, C.; Gao, L.; Zucker, I.H. Regulation of Nrf2 signaling pathway in heart failure: Role of extracellular vesicles and non-coding RNAs. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 167, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ho, J.; Chaiswing, L.; St Clair, D.K. Extracellular Vesicles and Cancer Therapy: Insights into the Role of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ma, J.; Shi, X.; Li, M.; Chen, S.; Gu, Q.; Zheng, J.; Li, D.; Wu, S.; Yang, H.; Li, X. MicroRNA-181a–2–3p shuttled by mesenchymal stem cell-secreted extracellular vesicles inhibits oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease by inhibiting EGR1 and NOX4. Cell Death Discov. 2022, 8, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Garnier, D.; Jabado, N.; Rak, J. Extracellular vesicles as prospective carriers of oncogenic protein signatures in adult and paediatric brain tumours. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1595–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Martins, S.G.; Zilhão, R.; Thorsteinsdóttir, S.; Carlos, A.R. Linking Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage to Changes in the Expression of Extracellular Matrix Components. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 673002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Verstappen, J.; Von den Hoff, J.W. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): Their biological functions and involvement in oral disease. J. Dent. Res. 2006, 85, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hannas, A.R.; Pereira, J.C.; Granjeiro, J.M.; Tjäderhane, L. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in the oral environment. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2007, 65, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mehra, A.; Ali, C.; Parcq, J.; Vivien, D.; Docagne, F. The plasminogen activation system in neuroinflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2016, 1862, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wardlaw, J.M.; Murray, V.; Berge, E.; del Zoppo, G.J. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD000213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lee, M.H.; Vosburgh, E.; Anderson, K.; McDonagh, J. Deficiency of plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 results in hyperfibrinolytic bleeding. Blood 1993, 81, 2357–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Fay, W.P.; Parker, A.C.; Condrey, L.R.; Shapiro, A.D. Human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) deficiency: Characterization of a large kindred with a null mutation in the PAI-1 gene. Blood 1997, 90, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Jankun, J.; Aleem, A.M.; Selman, S.H.; Skrzypczak-Jankun, E.; Lysiak-Szydlowska, W.; Grafos, N.; Fryer, H.J.; Greenfield, R.S. Highly stable plasminogen activator inhibitor type one (VLHL PAI-1) protects fibrin clots from tissue plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2007, 20, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Simpson, A.J.; Booth, N.A.; Moore, N.R.; Bennett, B. Distribution of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) in tissues. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Wilhelm, C.J.; Hashimoto, J.G.; Roberts, M.L.; Zhang, X.; Goeke, C.M.; Bloom, S.H.; Guizzetti, M. Plasminogen activator system homeostasis and its dysregulation by ethanol in astrocyte cultures and the developing brain. Neuropharmacology 2018, 138, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, W.; Jia, L. Regulatory Mechanism of MicroRNA-30b on Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE). J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2021, 30, 105553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. González, A.; Pariente, J.A.; Salido, G.M. Ethanol stimulates ROS generation by mitochondria through Ca2+ mobilization and increases GFAP content in rat hippocampal astrocytes. Brain Res. 2007, 1178, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alfonso-Loeches, S.; Ureña-Peralta, J.R.; Morillo-Bargues, M.J.; Oliver-De La Cruz, J.; Guerri, C. Role of mitochondria ROS generation in ethanol-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cell death in astroglial cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Bailey, S.M.; Pietsch, E.C.; Cunningham, C.C. Ethanol stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species at mitochondrial complexes I and III. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tafani, M.; Sansone, L.; Limana, F.; Arcangeli, T.; De Santis, E.; Polese, M.; Fini, M.; Russo, M.A. The Interplay of Reactive Oxygen Species, Hypoxia, Inflammation, and Sirtuins in Cancer Initiation and Progression. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 3907147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Chen, R.; Lai, U.H.; Zhu, L.; Singh, A.; Ahmed, M.; Forsyth, N.R. Reactive Oxygen Species Formation in the Brain at Different Oxygen Levels: The Role of Hypoxia Inducible Factors. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 6, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Chandel, N.S.; Maltepe, E.; Goldwasser, E.; Mathieu, C.E.; Simon, M.C.; Schumacker, P.T. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species trigger hypoxia-induced transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11715–11720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shi, Y.; Yuan, S.; Tang, S.J. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are Critical for Morphine Exacerbation of HIV-1 gp120-Induced Pain. J. Neuroimmune. Pharmacol. 2021, 16, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Guizzetti, M.; Zhang, X.; Goeke, C.; Gavin, D.P. Glia and Neurodevelopment: Focus on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Front. Pediatr. 2014, 2, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Da, J.; Jia, Z.; Wu, H.; Gu, K. Downregulation of SPARC Expression Decreases Cell Migration and Invasion Involving Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition through the p-FAK/p-ERK Pathway in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Cancer 2020, 11, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, J.; Yin, L.; Chen, Z. New insights into the altered fibronectin matrix and extrasynaptic transmission in the aging brain. J. Clin. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2011, 2, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Alkabie, S.; Basivireddy, J.; Zhou, L.; Roskams, J.; Rieckmann, P.; Quandt, J.A. SPARC expression by cerebral microvascular endothelial cells in vitro and its influence on blood-brain barrier properties. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 03926 g001 550
Figure 1. MTS proliferation assay and LDH cytotoxicity assay on morphine-exposed human brain microvascular endothelial cells. (a) MTS assay of 24 h of morphine treatment to determine viability of human brain endothelial cells. DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide. Mean ± SD, n = 3, **** p < 0.0001. (b) LDH assay of 24 h of morphine treatment to determine cytotoxicity of human brain endothelial cells. LB = lysis buffer, DMSO= dimethyl sulfoxide. Mean ± SD, n = 3, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. MTS proliferation assay and LDH cytotoxicity assay on morphine-exposed human brain microvascular endothelial cells. (a) MTS assay of 24 h of morphine treatment to determine viability of human brain endothelial cells. DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide. Mean ± SD, n = 3, **** p < 0.0001. (b) LDH assay of 24 h of morphine treatment to determine cytotoxicity of human brain endothelial cells. LB = lysis buffer, DMSO= dimethyl sulfoxide. Mean ± SD, n = 3, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Cells 11 03926 g001
Cells 11 03926 g002a 550Cells 11 03926 g002b 550
Figure 2. Characterization of extracellular vesicles isolated from human brain endothelial cells. (a) NTA measurement of EV sizes. Median ± SD, n = 3. (b) NTA measurement of EV concentration (particles/mL) of EVs. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (c) Western blots of EVs isolated by EVTRAP beads and brain endothelial cells lysate (cells). Alix, TSG101 and CD9 represent common EV markers. Calreticulin is an EV negative control, n = 3. (d) Mass spectrometry protein abundances of EV markers Alix and CD9. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (e) Gene Ontology term enrichment of EV quantified proteins provided by MetaCore™ software. X-axis corresponds to −log10(p-value), Y-axis corresponds to the gene ontology terms and the dot line represents the p-value cut-off of 0.05.
Figure 2. Characterization of extracellular vesicles isolated from human brain endothelial cells. (a) NTA measurement of EV sizes. Median ± SD, n = 3. (b) NTA measurement of EV concentration (particles/mL) of EVs. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (c) Western blots of EVs isolated by EVTRAP beads and brain endothelial cells lysate (cells). Alix, TSG101 and CD9 represent common EV markers. Calreticulin is an EV negative control, n = 3. (d) Mass spectrometry protein abundances of EV markers Alix and CD9. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (e) Gene Ontology term enrichment of EV quantified proteins provided by MetaCore™ software. X-axis corresponds to −log10(p-value), Y-axis corresponds to the gene ontology terms and the dot line represents the p-value cut-off of 0.05.
Cells 11 03926 g002aCells 11 03926 g002b
Cells 11 03926 g003 550
Figure 3. Heatmaps. (a) Heatmap of differentally expressed proteins (DEPs) for each morphine treatment (1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM) in human brain endothelial cells and (b) in extracellular vesicles. Rows are clustered using euclidean distance and the clustering method used is complete. K-means clustering is set at 2.
Figure 3. Heatmaps. (a) Heatmap of differentally expressed proteins (DEPs) for each morphine treatment (1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM) in human brain endothelial cells and (b) in extracellular vesicles. Rows are clustered using euclidean distance and the clustering method used is complete. K-means clustering is set at 2.
Cells 11 03926 g003
Cells 11 03926 g004 550
Figure 4. Pathway enrichment analysis of modulated proteins in morphine-treated human brain endothelial cells and associated extracellular vesicles. Top five enriched pathways in both total cells and EVs upon 25, 50 and 100 μM of morphine for 24 h (|FC|> 1.2, p-value ≤ 0.05, n = 3). X-axis corresponds to −log10(p-value), Y-axis corresponds to the biological pathways and the dot line represents the p-value cut-off of 0.05. HBMECs = human brain microvascular endothelial cells, EVs = extracellular vesicles.
Figure 4. Pathway enrichment analysis of modulated proteins in morphine-treated human brain endothelial cells and associated extracellular vesicles. Top five enriched pathways in both total cells and EVs upon 25, 50 and 100 μM of morphine for 24 h (|FC|> 1.2, p-value ≤ 0.05, n = 3). X-axis corresponds to −log10(p-value), Y-axis corresponds to the biological pathways and the dot line represents the p-value cut-off of 0.05. HBMECs = human brain microvascular endothelial cells, EVs = extracellular vesicles.
Cells 11 03926 g004
Cells 11 03926 g005 550
Figure 5. HIF-1 targets adapted from [28] and created with BioRender.com. Text in bold represents DEPs found in HBMECs and EVs upon various morphine concentrations.
Figure 5. HIF-1 targets adapted from [28] and created with BioRender.com. Text in bold represents DEPs found in HBMECs and EVs upon various morphine concentrations.
Cells 11 03926 g005
Cells 11 03926 g006a 550Cells 11 03926 g006b 550
Figure 6. Cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling pathway map with associated heatmap representation of morphine-treated human brain endothelial cells and extracellular vesicles. (a) Pathway map of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling. Modulated proteins upon morphine treatment of HBMECs and associated EVs are presented in grey circles. Red lines represent inhibition/negative interactions, green lines represent activation/positive interactions and grey lines represent unspecified interactions. (b) Heatmap displaying DEPs associated to cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling pathway. Color scale corresponds to log ratio of proteins. White color corresponds to unquantified proteins. Numbers in squares are log ratio of DEPs. HBMECs = human brain microvascular endothelial cells, EVs = extracellular vesicles.
Figure 6. Cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling pathway map with associated heatmap representation of morphine-treated human brain endothelial cells and extracellular vesicles. (a) Pathway map of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling. Modulated proteins upon morphine treatment of HBMECs and associated EVs are presented in grey circles. Red lines represent inhibition/negative interactions, green lines represent activation/positive interactions and grey lines represent unspecified interactions. (b) Heatmap displaying DEPs associated to cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling pathway. Color scale corresponds to log ratio of proteins. White color corresponds to unquantified proteins. Numbers in squares are log ratio of DEPs. HBMECs = human brain microvascular endothelial cells, EVs = extracellular vesicles.
Cells 11 03926 g006aCells 11 03926 g006b
Cells 11 03926 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative levels of metabolites involved in HIF1 target pathway (glucose and UDP-glucose) and ECM remodeling process (4-hydroxyproline and glutamic acid) after 24 h of exposure to morphine at 5 and 50 μM on HBMECs. Geometric shapes represents individual values. Statistical analysis for the morphine effects was evaluated with an unpaired t-test. Significant p-values: * p-value ≤ 0.05; ** p-value ≤ 0.01 and *** p-value ≤ 0.001.
Figure 7. Relative levels of metabolites involved in HIF1 target pathway (glucose and UDP-glucose) and ECM remodeling process (4-hydroxyproline and glutamic acid) after 24 h of exposure to morphine at 5 and 50 μM on HBMECs. Geometric shapes represents individual values. Statistical analysis for the morphine effects was evaluated with an unpaired t-test. Significant p-values: * p-value ≤ 0.05; ** p-value ≤ 0.01 and *** p-value ≤ 0.001.
Cells 11 03926 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vujić, T.; Schvartz, D.; Furlani, I.L.; Meister, I.; González-Ruiz, V.; Rudaz, S.; Sanchez, J.-C. Oxidative Stress and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Are Signature Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles Released upon Morphine Exposure on Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Cells 2022, 11, 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233926

AMA Style

Vujić T, Schvartz D, Furlani IL, Meister I, González-Ruiz V, Rudaz S, Sanchez J-C. Oxidative Stress and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Are Signature Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles Released upon Morphine Exposure on Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Cells. 2022; 11(23):3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233926

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vujić, Tatjana, Domitille Schvartz, Izadora Liranço Furlani, Isabel Meister, Víctor González-Ruiz, Serge Rudaz, and Jean-Charles Sanchez. 2022. "Oxidative Stress and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Are Signature Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles Released upon Morphine Exposure on Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells" Cells 11, no. 23: 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233926

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop