Next Article in Journal
Baseline for Brassica carinata Components of Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Southern South America
Next Article in Special Issue
Cation Exchange Properties of Subsurface Soil in Mid-Subtropical China: Variations, Correlation with Soil-Forming Factors, and Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
Based on FCN and DenseNet Framework for the Research of Rice Pest Identification Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extraction of Information on the Flooding Extent of Agricultural Land in Henan Province Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images and Google Earth Engine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry and Its Response to Geographical and Climatic Factors in a Tropical Region: Evidence from Hainan Island

1
School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
Opening Project Fund of Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Rubber Tree/State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Cultivation and Physiology for Tropical Crops/Danzhou Investigation and Experiment Station of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Danzhou 571737, China
3
Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
4
Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
5
National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institutes of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai 200032, China
6
College of International Studies, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2023, 13(2), 411; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020411
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 30 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cultivated Land Sustainability in the Anthropocene)

Abstract

:
Leaf stoichiometry effectively indicates the response and adaptation of plants to environmental changes. Although numerous studies on leaf stoichiometry patterns have focused on the mid-latitudes and specific species of plants, these patterns and the effect of the climate change on them across a broad range of plants have remained poorly characterized in hot and humid regions at low latitudes. In the present study, leaf N, P, N:P, C:N, and C:P ratios, were determined from 345 plant leaf samples of 268 species at four forest sites in Hainan Island, China. For all plants, leaf N (3.80 ± 0.20 mg g−1) and P (1.82 ± 0.07 mg g−1) were negatively correlated with latitude and mean annual temperature (MAT) but were positively correlated with longitude. Leaf N was found to be positively correlated with altitude (ALT), and leaf P was positively correlated with mean annual precipitation (MAP). The leaf C:N ratio (278.77 ± 15.86) was significantly correlated with longitude and ALT, leaf C:P ratio (390.69 ± 15.15) was significantly correlated with all factors except ALT, and leaf N:P ratio (2.25 ± 0.10) was significantly correlated with ALT, MAT, and MAP. Comparable results were observed for woody plants. The results suggest that leaf stoichiometry on Hainan Island is affected by changes in geographical and climatic factors. In addition, the low N:P ratio indicates that plant growth may be limited by N availability. Moreover, the significant correlation between leaf N and P implies a possible synergistic relationship between N and P uptake efficiency in the plants of this region. This study helps to reveal the spatial patterns of leaf stoichiometry and their response to global climate change in a variety of plants in tropical regions with hot and humid environments, which may provide an insight in nutrient management in tropical rainforest.

1. Introduction

Leaf stoichiometry can indicate plant nutrient status, community composition, and ecosystem functions, and drives fundamental physiological and ecological processes in plants [1,2]. Essential nutrients for plants, such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, affect plant growth and adaptation to terrestrial habitats and are closely related to global biochemical cycles [3]. N and P are closely related to plant photosynthesis, genetic material composition, energy storage, and are the most important limiting nutrients in terrestrial ecosystems [4,5,6]. In particular, the stoichiometry of N and P is closely related to plant ecological strategies [7,8,9,10,11]. For example, as important indicators of leaf nutrient usage efficiency, higher leaf C:N and C:P ratios indicate a more efficient usage of N and P [4,6,12,13]. Research has shown that climate change considerably affects matter and energy cycles, both regionally and globally, thereby affecting vegetation activity and ecosystem function [11,14,15,16,17]. For instance, warming can affect the rate of alter litter decomposition and organic matter mineralization via changes in the soil’s physicochemical properties and microbial activity, ultimately leading to changes in plant nutrient availability and leaf stoichiometry [4,11,14]. Therefore, understanding the effects of geographical and climatic factors on the leaf N and P contents, as well as on the C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios, plays a vital role in discerning the plant response and adaptation to environmental changes.
Ecosystem functions and processes are regulated by both biotic and abiotic factors [18,19,20,21]. The former includes plant functional traits, whereas the latter includes edaphic, geographic, and climatic features. Thus, spatial variations in plant leaf chemometrics are influenced by various factors. Changes in climate and geomorphology, including air temperature, precipitation, and latitude, have significant impacts on plant physiology and soil biogeochemistry, which affects the nutrient cycling in ecosystems [22,23]. Reich and Oleksyn [4] described global patterns in leaf N and P stoichiometry of terrestrial plants across latitudinal and temperature gradients. They proposed that leaf N and P concentrations rise from the tropics to the mid-latitude regions and remain stable or decline at high-latitude regions. Additionally, they reported that the leaf N:P ratio increases with temperature [4]. Previous studies have shown that tropical climate and soil nutrient changes may lead to different spatial patterns of leaf C, N, and P stoichiometry and nutrient resorption [8,24]. Han et al. [25] analyzed leaf data from 753 terrestrial plants in China and found that the variations in leaf N and P concentrations showed an opposite trend to the mean annual temperature (MAT), but leaf N:P did not show significant changes. However, when additional species in China were considered, they found that plant functional type exhibited the greatest impact on most leaf nutrients. Additionally, the variation in leaf N and lack thereof in leaf P was better explained by changes in precipitation, rather than temperature [26]. Possibly due to the low availability of soil P in China, the previous two reports found that the leaf N:P ratio of Chinese flora was higher than the global average [25,26]. Other studies found that intense precipitation can exacerbate soil nutrient loss, resulting in reduced leaf P concentration [27].
The relationship between leaf stoichiometry and environmental factors has become a research hotspot in ecology and earth sciences [4]. The concentrations of leaf N and P can be used as indicators of how plants use nutrients and respond to environmental changes, as they are associated with many key aspects of plant growth, reproduction, and ecosystem functions [3,28]. Therefore, current studies on leaf stoichiometry mainly focus on N and P. This is especially true for studies exploring leaf stoichiometry models in the mid-latitude regions and under specific conditions [11,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. However, leaf stoichiometry patterns of various plants in areas with elevated temperatures and humidity at low latitudes, such as tropical regions, are poorly understood, limiting understanding of plant growth strategies in these areas under severe climate change conditions.
Tropical forests are the terrestrial ecosystems with the highest biodiversity and strongest ecological functions, causing them to be very significant to the global C budget. They account for 70% and approximately 55% of the gross global forest C sink and C pool, respectively [36,37]. Hainan Island is the largest and most diverse tropical-type forest in China. Owing to their high diversity, endemism, and complexity, tropical forests on Hainan Island are of great significance at both the national and global protection levels [38]. Here, we hypothesized the leaf N and P stoichiometry patterns would be affected by geographical and climatic factors in Hainan Island with high temperature and high humidity. To test our hypothesis, we selected the four areas of Danzhou, Tunchang, Changjiang, and Wuzhishan on Hainan Island as sampling points and analyzed the leaf nutrients of 345 leaf samples from 268 species. First, this study aimed to measure the leaf N and P content of all plants at four sampling sites on Hainan Island. Next, the relationship between leaf N, P concentration, C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios; and climatic and geographical factors were analyzed. This report provides better evidence of the patterns and drivers of leaf N and P stoichiometry and nutrient uptake on Hainan Island, which is important for discovering plant growth strategies in the tropical region under drastic environmental changes, and for guiding the nutrient management in tropical rainforests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

Our study was conducted at four forest sites (Wuzhishan, Danzhou, Changjiang and Tunchang) in the western central region of Hainan Island. These forest sites are geographically located from 109°2′ to 110°6′ E and 18°47′ to 19°22′ N (Figure 1). There were two plots (18°55′45.46″ N, 109°28′7.83″ E; 18°47′40.22″ N, 109°38′54.94″ E) in Wuzhshang, and only one plot in Danzhou (19°30′50.94″ N, 109°29′58.70″ E). Changjiang (19°07′21.87″ N, 109°04′45.63″ E) and Tunchang (19°27′48.29″ N, 110°05′52.77″ E). The study area is a humid tropical region, where the climate type is tropical monsoon and tropical alpine climate, with a MAT of 22 to 25 °C. The average annual temperature of Wuzhishan, Danzhou, Changjiang, and Tunchang is 22.80, 23.70, 24.33, and 23.13 °C, respectively. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) in the whole study region is 1400 to 2100 mm, with 70% to 90% of the precipitation concentrated in the rainy season from May to October. The total precipitation in the rainy season is >1500 mm. The MAP of Wuzhishan, Danzhou, Changjiang, and Tunchang is 2080.95 mm, 1934.99 mm, 1563.12 mm, and 2105.15 mm, respectively. The altitude (ALT) of the research area ranges from 135 to 660 m above sea level. The major soil types are laterite and yellow. The main soil types in Wuzhishan are yellow soil and latosol, while the main soil types in Danzhou, Changjiang and Tunchang are latosol. The dominant climate type in Wuzhishan is tropical alpine climate and in Danzhou, Changjiang, and Tunchang is tropical monsoon climate. Specific information regarding the study area is presented in Table 1.

2.2. Plant Sampling and Chemical Analysis

Leaf samples were collected from the study sites between August and September 2017. A healthy plant community was selected for each site in this study. More than three individuals from each species were selected and fully expanded healthy leaves were collected from shoots in different directions in areas of sun-exposed (total fresh mass > 100 g for each species). In total, we collected 345 leaf samples from 268 species. A total of 102 samples from different species were collected from Wuzhishan; 83 samples came from Danzhou; 83 samples were collected from Changjiang; and 77 samples were from Tunchang. Sample statistics were listed in Table 2, and the species of all samples were listed in Table A1.
All leaf samples were placed in sealed plastic bags and transported to the laboratory. The leaf samples were rinsed with distilled water before being oven-dried at 105 °C for 30 min to denature the enzymes. Next, the samples were dried at 75 °C for approximately 48 h to a consistent weight and were finely ground. Leaf N and P concentrations were determined after sample digestion in H2SO4-H2O2, using a flow analyzer (Proxima1022/1/1, Alliance, France).

2.3. Accessing Data

The MAT, MAP, and other meteorological data of Hainan Island from 1959 to 2019 were obtained from the National Meteorological Science Data Center (Beijing, China). For research areas lacking climate data, the Inverse Distance Weighted method was used to fit the spatial variation map of Hainan climate data according to data from the Hainan Island meteorological station, producing climate data of the research area. Additionally, leaf C concentration data were obtained in another part of this project, a report on “Effects of geographical and climatic factors on the intrinsic water use efficiency of tropical plants: evidence from leaf 13C” (unpublished results).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The inverse distance weight interpolation method of ArcGIS 10.6 was used to obtain the climatic data from each study site from 1959 to 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 was used to conduct single-factor analysis of variance and Spearman correlation analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Leaf Stoichiometry Characteristics in Hainan Island

In this study, the mean leaf N and P concentrations were 3.80 and 1.82 mg g−1 respectively, ranging from 0.16 to 16.39 mg g−1 and 0.24 to 7.18 mg g−1, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV) for leaf N and P concentrations ranged from 5.36 to 3.85, in which the leaf N concentration CV was the highest (Table 3). In this study, there was a significant positive correlation between leaf N and P concentrations in Hainan Island. (p < 0.01; Figure 2). The average leaf C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios and ranges can be found in Table 3.

3.2. Variations in Leaf Stoichiometry alongside Geographical and Climatic Variables

At the spatial scale, both leaf N and P concentrations decreased with latitude, and the C:N and C:P ratios increased with latitude (p < 0.01, Figure 3a,b), whereas the leaf N:P ratio did not change with latitude (Figure 3c). With increasing longitude, both leaf N (p < 0.05) and P (p < 0.01) concentrations increased, but the C:P ratio decreased (p < 0.01, Figure 3d,e). The C:N and N:P ratios did not change with longitude (Figure 3e,f). The leaf N concentration and N:P ratio (Figure 3g,i) significantly increased with altitude (p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively). Meanwhile, the leaf C:N ratio decreased with increasing ALT, and the leaf P concentration (p < 0.01, Figure 3g,h) and C:P ratio (Figure 3h) showed no marked changes along ALT.
The leaf P concentration increased, and the C:P and N:P ratios decreased with increasing MAP; however, the leaf N concentration and C:N and N:P ratios did not change with MAP (p < 0.01, Figure 4a–c). Both leaf N and P concentrations decreased with increasing MAT; however, the C:P and N:P ratios increased with increasing MAT, whereas the leaf C:N ratio was not affected by MAT (p < 0.01, Figure 4d–f).

3.3. Characteristics of Leaf Stoichiometry among Different Life Forms

There was no significant difference (p < 0.05) in the N concentration in the leaf of different life forms. The leaf N concentration of each life form was in the following order: herbs (4.34 mg g−1), woody plants (3.73 mg g−1), and vines (2.94 mg g−1). In contrast, the leaf P concentration of herbs (2.35 mg g−1) was significantly higher than that of woody plants and vines (1.68 and 1.54 mg g−1, respectively) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in leaf P content among the remaining life forms (Figure 5a, p < 0.05).
Among the different life forms, the C:N ratio was the highest in woody plants, followed by vines and herbs; however, there were no significant differences among the ratios of the different life forms. The C:P ratio in herb leaves was significantly lower than that in woody plants (p < 0.05). In descending order, the C:P ratio was the highest in woody plants, vines, and herbs (Figure 5c). The N:P ratio was significantly higher in the leaves of woody plants than in herbs (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the ratios of the leaves of the other life forms. In descending order, the N:P ratio was the highest in woody plants, vines, and herbs (Figure 5b).

3.4. Leaf Stoichiometry in Different Life Forms Response to Environmental Factors

3.4.1. Variations in Leaf Stoichiometry in Different Life Forms: Geographical Variables

The average leaf N and P concentrations in woody plant leaves are negative correlated with latitude, whereas the average leaf N and P concentrations of herbs and vines were not significantly correlated with latitude (p < 0.05). Both leaf N and P concentrations of woody plants showed a positive correlation with longitude. Meanwhile, the average leaf N and P concentrations of herbs and vines were not significantly correlated with longitude (p < 0.05). The average leaf N concentrations of woody plants showed a positive correlation with ALT, whereas the other plant life forms and their elemental concentrations had no significant correlation with this parameter (Figure 6, p < 0.05).
The average leaf C:N and C:P ratios of woody plants showed a positive correlation with latitude, whereas the ratios of herb and vine leaves were not significantly correlated with latitude (p < 0.05). The average leaf C:P ratio of woody plants and average leaf N:P ratio of vines showed a negative correlation with longitude, whereas the average leaf C:N ratio of herbs showed a positive correlation with longitude. No significant correlations were found between the stoichiometric ratios of the other life forms and longitude. The average leaf C:P ratio of woody plants and herbs showed a negative correlation with altitude, whereas the average leaf N:P ratio of woody plants and herbs showed a positive correlation with ALT. The stoichiometric ratios of other life forms were not significantly correlated with the change in ALT levels (Figure 6, p < 0.05).

3.4.2. Variations in Leaf Stoichiometry in Different Life Forms: Climatic Variables

The average leaf N concentration of woody plants showed a positive correlation with MAP, whereas the average leaf N and P concentrations of herbs and vines were not significantly correlated with MAP (p < 0.05). In terms of temperature variation, the average leaf N and P concentrations of woody plants were negatively correlated with MAT, whereas the average leaf N and P concentrations of herbs and vines were not significantly correlated with MAT (Figure 6, p < 0.05).
The average leaf C:P ratio of woody plants and average leaf N:P ratio of herbs and vines were negatively correlated with MAP, whereas the stoichiometric ratios of the other life forms were not significantly correlated with MAP (p < 0.05). The average leaf C:P ratio of woody plants, C:P and N:P ratios of herbs, and N:P ratio of vines were positively correlated with MAT. The stoichiometric ratios of the other life forms were not significantly correlated with MAT (Figure 6, p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Patterns of Leaf Stoichiometry in Hainan Island

Leaf stoichiometry is used as an important indicator to study plant nutrient limitation, nutrient cycling, and plant response to climate change [39,40]. The present study showed that the average leaf N concentration of 268 species on Hainan Island was 3.80 mg g−1 (Table 3), which was lower than that reported in global and other regional scale [4,25,41]. Compared with other regions, higher precipitation and temperature in Hainan Island may promote enzymatic activity and photosynthesis, thereby accelerating nutrient cycling and leading to relatively lower leaf N concentrations [42]. In addition, evergreen woody plants accounted for more than two-thirds of the total plant samples in this study (Table 2 and Table A1). Lower N concentrations in evergreen species is suggested to facilitate the adaptation to a wide range of conditions in different habitats [43]. Moreover, there is tight coupling between soil and plant nutrients [44]. Soil acidification is evident on Hainan Island [45], which inhibits microbial activity and the decomposition of organic matter, slowing the release of soil nutrients and thus affecting the uptake of soil N nutrients by plants. The mean leaf P concentration in Hainan Island was 1.82 mg g−1, which was slightly higher than that reported in previous studies [4,25,41]. Different from soil-available nitrogen, which comes from decomposition of organic matter, soil-available phosphorus is mainly derived from the weathering of rocks [46,47]. In the tropics and subtropics, geochemical and biological processes are expected to occur at faster rates, resulting in intense soil weathering [48,49,50]. Previous studies have shown that the soil P concentration tends to increase, and the N:P ratio tends to decrease on Hainan Island [51]. In addition, enhanced precipitation can increase the soil P uptake by plants [47,52]. Consequently, leaf P concentrations of plants in our study were higher than those in previous studies. The average leaf C:N and C:P ratios were 278.77 and 390.60, respectively (Table 3), which were higher than those in global scale [4,53]. The suitable moisture and temperature conditions in Hainan Island may accelerate the photosynthetic C assimilation in plants, resulting in higher N, P utilization, and thus higher C:N and C:P ratios [23,54]. The average leaf N:P ratio was 2.25, which was lower than global research [4]. The average leaf P concentration in this study was slightly higher than that in previous studies, whereas the leaf N concentration was lower, causing the lower N:P ratio in Hainan Island.
For plants of different life forms, the average leaf N and P concentrations of the herbs were the highest. According to the growth rate hypothesis [55,56], leaf N and P concentrations in short-lived and fast-growing species (e.g., annual herbaceous plants) are always higher than those in long-lived and slow-growing species (e.g., evergreen woody plants). Herbs have a shorter life span than woody plants [57,58]; therefore, they have higher leaf N and P concentrations. The homeostasis system of herbs is weaker than that of vines, resulting in a more quickly stoichiometric change under environmental shifts, and thus higher leaf N and P concentrations.
The stoichiometric ratio can objectively reflect the distribution and trade-offs of the restrictive elements of the plant during the growth process [59,60]. A previous study suggested that the C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios play a significant role in the determination of the plant nutrient limitation [61]. According to Verhoeven et al. [62], when N:P is less than 14, plant growth is mainly restricted by N; meanwhile, N:P greater than 16 results in the restriction of plant growth mainly by P. As mentioned above, the average leaf N:P ratio of the 268 plants in this study was 2.25, suggesting that plant growth on Hainan Island may be limited by N. This conclusion has also been proved by some previous studies [51,63]. N limitation is widespread among different habitats [64]. According to our results, N is also a key factor limiting plant growth in temperate and tropical forests. In addition, there was a close link between leaf N and P concentrations (Figure 2), which is consistent with several previous studies conducted at national and global scales [4,25]. This result suggests that there may be a synergistic relationship between the N and P absorption efficiency of plants on Hainan Island [65].

4.2. Influence of Geographical and Climatic Factors on Leaf Stoichiometry

The present study found that leaf N, P stoichiometry had significant correlation with latitude, longitude, altitude, MAT and MAP, which confirmed our hypothesis that leaf N and P stoichiometry patterns in Hainan Island would be affected by geographical and climatic factors. Changes in temperature and precipitation can affect plant growth and nutrient metabolism, consequently affecting the nutrient cycling of ecosystems [20,25,65,66]. The leaf N and P concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with MAT (Figure 4d), which were also observed in mainland China and on a global scale [4,25,41]. The temperature–plant physiology hypothesis [4] suggests that due to physiological acclimation (i.e., plants regulate N, P levels to counteract the effects of temperature) and the adaptation to temperature (i.e., temperature regulates N, P levels by affecting plant metabolism), N and P decline monotonically with increasing temperature. In general, temperature decreases with increasing latitude, resulting in a positive relationship between leaf N, P concentrations and latitude [4,25,41]. However, a negative correlation has been found between leaf N, P concentrations and latitude in Hainan Island (Figure 3a). This may be because the latitudinal range of our study area (18.79° to 19.51° N, Table 1) is smaller than those of the previous studies in global scale (43 to 70° N) [4], the Chinese mainland (18° to 48° N) [25], and the north–south transect of eastern China (18° to 52° N) [41]. At a smaller gradient, the leaf N and P concentrations showed weak geographical patterns and even decreased with latitude [3,67,68]. C:N and C:P ratios are important physiological indices of plants growth rate [56,69,70]. Our results showed that the leaf C:N and C:P ratios increased with latitude and MAT (Figure 3b and Figure 4b), implying that nutrient utilization and C assimilation rates increased in high-latitude regions [11,23,54,71]. Leaf N:P ratios reflect the relative availability of N [72]. Owing to the limited latitudinal range of the study area, no significant correlation between leaf N:P and latitude was observed (Figure 3f), this indicates that N availability does not vary with latitudinal gradient.
In this study, the leaf P concentration showed a significantly positive correlation with MAP (Figure 4a), which was consistent with the results of Sardans et al. [73]. High precipitation may enhance the nutrient uptake capacity of plants [74,75,76], resulting in a positive relationship between leaf P concentration and MAP. However, there was no significant correlation between leaf N concentration and MAP (Figure 4a), which differs from the results of a previous report [25]. This may be caused by the high nitrogen deposition in China over the last 30 years [6,77,78]. N deposition exacerbates the nutrient imbalance and disturb the C, N, and P cycles in tropical ecosystem [79]. A study in a tropical forest in China showed that large amounts of reactive atmospheric N deposition were absorbed and transported into plant tissues [80], which might have led to weak relationships between the leaf N concentration and MAP. In addition, Hui et al. [51] showed that the soil N availability on Hainan Island was lower, which might be due to the leaching of N modulated by the high annual precipitation. Therefore, the impact of soil N availability on the leaf N content on Hainan Island may be higher than the effect of MAP, resulting in the observed insignificance between leaf N concentration and MAP. The leaf N and P concentrations were positively correlated with longitude (Figure 3d), which is consistent with the findings of Han et al. [26]. The distribution of precipitation in China gradually decreases from the southeast coast to the northwest inland region. Therefore, the longitudinal zonality of leaf stoichiometry in China is mainly affected by precipitation. The ratio of leaf C:P and N:P in leaf are vital indicators of plant growth because the distribution and variation in P-rich RNA occur at different growth rates [55,81,82]. In our study, the leaf C:P and N:P ratios decreased with increasing MAP, which may have been influenced by the relationship between leaf N and P concentrations and climate (Figure 4a–c). These correlations indicate that along with longitude, high MAP promotes the utilization efficiency of P, improving the growth rate of plants [4,83].
The leaf N concentration and N:P ratio in Hainan Island were significantly positively associated with the altitude (Figure 3g,i), whereas the trend of the C:N ratio exhibited the opposite behavior (Figure 3h), and there was no significant correlation between P concentration and altitude, and between C:P and altitude (Figure 3g,i). Climatic and soil factors change along the altitudinal gradients, leading to the variation in plant functional traits and nutrient composition [84,85,86,87]; thereby, leaf stoichiometry changes with altitude [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Temperature decreases monotonically with increasing altitude, and leaf N concentration has a negative relationship with temperature. Therefore, leaf N, even N:P ratio increased, and C:N ratio decreased with increasing altitude in Hainan Island. No correlation between leaf P concentration and altitude, and between C:P ratio and altitude may be associated with the disturbance of soil phosphorus availability, which may also change along altitude.
In order to reduce interspecific competition [24], plants of different life forms have different resource utilization efficiencies and environmental adaptation strategies. Therefore, leaf element concentrations and their correlation with geographical and climatic factors change across life forms. The leaf stoichiometric characteristics of woody plants were consistent with those of the entire study area, whereas the leaf N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios of herbs and vine were almost not significantly related to geographical and climatic factors (Figure 6a,b). Limited by relatively shallow root depth more than woody plants, nutrient state in herbs is more sensitive to the change in soil nutrient availability. Thereby, leaf stoichiometry of herbs may be less affected by graphical and climatic factors. Vines have faster resource acquisition strategy than woody plants [95]; thus, their nutrient concentration may also be less sensitive to climatic change. However, the leaf N:P ratio was relatively stable and significant correlation with climatic and geographical variables across the different life forms (Figure 6c), which is inconsistent with the trends found in recent studies [4,25,96]. This inconsistency again suggested that study of biogeographic patterns of leaf nutrients at regional scales is increasingly important to accurately understand the relationship between vegetation and climate at the global scale.

5. Conclusions

The present study showed that average N, P concentration and N, P stoichiometric ratio of 345 plant samples from 268 species in Hainan Island were different from global scale and other regions, suggesting that plant stoichiometric pattern is unique in tropical regions. Leaf N concentration was negatively correlated with latitude and MAT, but was positively related to longitude and ALT; leaf P concentration was negatively associated with latitude and MAT, but was positively correlated with MAP; and leaf C:N, C:P, and N:P ratio was also related to some geographical and climatic factors. These results confirmed our hypothesis and suggest that geographical and climatic factors have great effect on plant stoichiometry in Hainan Island. In addition, the correlation between plant stoichiometry and geographical and climatic factors changed across life forms, indicating that plants of different life forms have different resource utilization efficiencies and environmental adaptation strategies. Our results contribute to the understanding of the spatial patterns of leaf stoichiometry in a wide variety of tropical plants and their response to global climate change, which may play a crucial role in guiding the nutrient management in tropical rainforest.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, J.W. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, G.W.; investigation, X.L., J.L. and H.W.; conceptualization, Z.C. and B.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42167011), the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (No. ZDYF2021GXJS038), and Opening Project Fund of Key Laboratory of Rubber Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture/State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Cultivation and Physiology for Tropical Crops/Danzhou Investigation and Experiment Station of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture (RRI-KLOF202204).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Plant species status.
Table A1. Plant species status.
Serial NumberPlant NameLife FormEvergreen/Deciduous Plant
1Alangium chinenseWoody plantDeciduous plant
2Artocarpus hypargyreusWoody plantEvergreen
3Abelmoschus esculentusHerbs/
4Acacia confusaWoody plantEvergreen
5Acalypha wikesianaWoody plantEvergreen
6Acanthopanax senticosusWoody plantEvergreen
7Acer buergerianumWoody plantDeciduous plant
8Achyranthes bidentataHerbs/
9Acmena acuminatissimaWoody plantEvergreen
10Acronychia pedunculataWoody plantEvergreen
11Actinidia chinensisVineDeciduous plant
12Adenanthera pavonlnaWoody plantDeciduous plant
13Aeschynomene indicaHerbs/
14Aidia cochinchinensisWoody plantEvergreen
15Alangium salviifoliumWoody plantDeciduous plant
16Albizia chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
17Albizzia corniculataVineEvergreen
18Albizzia proceraWoody plantDeciduous plant
19Alchornea davidiiWoody plantDeciduous plant
20Alchornea trewioidesWoody plantEvergreen
21Aleurites moluccanaWoody plantEvergreen
22Allamanda catharticaWoody plantEvergreen
23Alocasia macrorrhizaHerbs/
24Alpinia japonicaHerbs/
25Alpinia zerumbetHerbs/
26Alseodaphne rugosaWoody plantEvergreen
27Alstonia scholarisWoody plantEvergreen
28Annona glabraWoody plantEvergreen
29Annona montanaWoody plantEvergreen
30Aphanamixis polystachyaWoody plantEvergreen
31Aporosa dioicaWoody plantEvergreen
32Aquilaria sinensisWoody plantEvergreen
33Araucaria cunninghamiiWoody plantEvergreen
34Ardisia japonicaWoody plantEvergreen
35Areca catechuWoody plantEvergreen
36Areca triandraWoody plantEvergreen
37Arenga pinnataWoody plantEvergreen
38Bambusa textilisHerbs/
39Bidens pilosaHerbs/
40Blastus cochinchinensisWoody plantEvergreen
41Bombax malabaricumWoody plantDeciduous plant
42Bowringia callicarpaWoody plantEvergreen
43Brucea javanicaWoody plantEvergreen
44Buxus megistophyllaWoody plantEvergreen
45Byttneria aspereVineEvergreen
46Caesalpinia pulcherrimaWoody plantEvergreen
47Calliandra haematocephalaWoody plantDeciduous plant
48Callistemon rigidusWoody plantEvergreen
49Camptotheca acuminataWoody plantDeciduous plant
50Canarium pimelaWoody plantEvergreen
51Carica papayaHerbs/
52Carmona microphyllaWoody plantEvergreen
53Carvota mitisWoody plantEvergreen
54Caryota mitisWoody plantEvergreen
55Caryota ochlandraWoody plantEvergreen
56Cayratia japonicaVineEvergreen
57Cecropia peltataWoody plantEvergreen
58Ceiba pentandraWoody plantDeciduous plant
59Ceiba speciosaWoody plantDeciduous plant
60Celosia argenteaHerbs/
61Cerbera manghasWoody plantEvergreen
62Chamaedorea erumpensWoody plantEvergreen
63Choerospondias axillarisWoody plantDeciduous plant
64Chromolaene odorataHerbs/
65Chrysalidocarpus lutescensWoody plantEvergreen
66Chukrasia tabularisWoody plantEvergreen
67Cinnamomum bodinieriWoody plantEvergreen
68Cinnamomum pedunculatumWoody plantEvergreen
69Citrus maximaWoody plantEvergreen
70Clerodendrum trichotomumWoody plantEvergreen
71Cocos unciferaWoody plantEvergreen
72Codiaeum variegatumWoody plantEvergreen
73Cola acuminataWoody plantEvergreen
74Conyza canadensisHerbs/
75Cordyline fruticosaWoody plantEvergreen
76Costus speciosusHerbs/
77Crassocephalum crepidioidesHerbs/
78Cratoxylum cochin chinenseWoody plantDeciduous plant
79Croton laevigatusWoody plantEvergreen
80Cudrania cochin chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
81Curculigo orchioidesHerbs/
82Dalbergia hupeanaWoody plantEvergreen
83Delonix regiaWoody plantDeciduous plant
84Grona heterocarposWoody plantEvergreen
85Desmos chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
86Dianella ensifoliaHerbs/
87Digitaria sanguinalisHerbs/
88Dimocarpus longanWoody plantEvergreen
89Dioscorea oppositaVineEvergreen
90Diospyros ebenumWoody plantEvergreen
91Dolichandrone stipulataWoody plantEvergreen
92Dracaena angustifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
93Dracontomelon duperreanumWoody plantEvergreen
94Duranta repensWoody plantEvergreen
95Elaeagnus pungensWoody plantEvergreen
96Elaeis guineensisWoody plantEvergreen
97Elephantopus scaberHerbs/
98Elephantopus tomentosusHerbs/
99Eleusine indicaHerbs/
100Elsholtzia ciliataHerbs/
101Engelhardtia roxburghianaWoody plantEvergreen
102Erythrophleum fordiiWoody plantEvergreen
103Eugenia unifloraWoody plantEvergreen
104Euphorbia humifusaHerbs/
105Evodia glabrifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
106Evodia leptaWoody plantEvergreen
107Fagraea ceilanicaWoody plantEvergreen
108Ficus altissimaWoody plantEvergreen
109Ficus auriculataWoody plantEvergreen
110Ficus benjaminaWoody plantEvergreen
111Ficus fistulosaWoody plantEvergreen
112Ficus hirtaWoody plantEvergreen
113Ficus hispidaWoody plantEvergreen
114Ficus microcarpaWoody plantEvergreen
115Ficus subpisocarpaWoody plantEvergreen
116Ficus tinctoriaWoody plantEvergreen
117Fissistigma oldhamiiWoody plantEvergreen
118Garcia nutansWoody plantEvergreen
119Garcinia oblongifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
120Gardenia jasminoidesWoody plantEvergreen
121Gleditsia sinensisWoody plantDeciduous plant
122Gleditsia vestitaWoody plantEvergreen
123Gmelina arboreaWoody plantEvergreen
124Gnetum parvifoliumVineEvergreen
125Grevillea banksiiWoody plantEvergreen
126Gynura segetumHerbs/
127Hamelia patensWoody plantEvergreen
128Hedera nepalensisWoody plantEvergreen
129Hedyotis auriculariaHerbs/
130Hedyotis hedyotideaVineEvergreen
131Heritiera angustataWoody plantEvergreen
132Heritiera parvifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
133Hernandia sonoraWoody plantEvergreen
134Hevea brasiliensisWoody plantDeciduous plant
135Hibiscus mutabilisWoody plantDeciduous plant
136Hibiscus rosa-sinensisWoody plantEvergreen
137Hibiscus schizopetalusWoody plantEvergreen
138Holmskioldia sanguineaWoody plantEvergreen
139Holarrhena antidysentericaWoody plantEvergreen
140Homalium cochinchinenseWoody plantEvergreen
141Homalium hainanenseWoody plantEvergreen
142Hopea exalataWoody plantEvergreen
143Hoya carnosaVineEvergreen
144Hymenaea courbarilWoody plantEvergreen
145Ilex asprellaWoody plantDeciduous plant
146Ipomoea bifloraHerbs/
147Ixora chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
148Jasminum lanceolariumWoody plantEvergreen
149Juncellus serotinusHerbs/
150Kigelia pinnataWoody plantDeciduous plant
151Lantana camaraHerbs/
152Lasianthus chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
153Lasianthus japonicusWoody plantEvergreen
154Leptodermis parkeriWoody plantEvergreen
155Ligustrum vicaryiWoody plantDeciduous plant
156Litchi chinensisWoody plantEvergreen
157Lithocarpus corneusWoody plantEvergreen
158Litsea monopetalaHerbs/
159Litsea pungensWoody plantDeciduous plant
160LophatherumWoody plantEvergreen
161Lucuma nervosaWoody plantEvergreen
162Machilus salicinaWoody plantEvergreen
163Maesa japonicaWoody plantEvergreen
164Magnolia cocoWoody plantEvergreen
165Magnolia denudataWoody plantDeciduous plant
166Magnolia lilifloraWoody plantEvergreen
167Mallotus apeltaWoody plantEvergreen
168Mallotus hookerianusWoody plantEvergreen
169Malvastrum coromandelianumHerbs/
170Manihot esculentaWoody plantEvergreen
171Manilkara zapotaWoody plantEvergreen
172Melastoma candidumHerbs/
173Melastoma sanguineumHerbs/
174Mesua ferreaWoody plantEvergreen
175Michelia odoraWoody plantEvergreen
176Mimosa pudicaHerbs/
177Mimosa sepiariaHerbs/
178Mimusops elengiWoody plantEvergreen
179Miscanthus sinensisHerbs/
180Moghania macrophyllaWoody plantEvergreen
181Mucuna sempervirensVineEvergreen
182Muntingia calaburaWoody plantEvergreen
183Musa nanaHerbs/
184Nephelium lappceumWoody plantEvergreen
185Pacrydium pierreiWoody plantEvergreen
186Paederia scandensVineEvergreen
187Paeonia suffruticosaWoody plantDeciduous plant
188Pandanus tectoriusWoody plantEvergreen
189Parakmeria lotungensisWoody plantEvergreen
190Passiflora foetidaVineEvergreen
191Pharbitis nilHerbs/
192Photinia serrulataWoody plantEvergreen
193Phragmites australiasHerbs/
194Phyllanthus emblicaWoody plantEvergreen
195Phyllanthus urinariaHerbs/
196Pittosporum tobiraWoody plantEvergreen
197Platycladus orientalisWoody plantEvergreen
198Plumeria rubraWoody plantDeciduous plant
199Podocarpus imbricatusWoody plantEvergreen
200Pollia japonicaHerbs/
201Polyalthia longifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
202Polyalthia rumphiiWoody plantEvergreen
203Polygala japonicaHerbs/
204Polygonatum odoratumHerbs/
205Polygonatum sibiricumHerbs/
206Pongamia pinnataWoody plantEvergreen
207Portulaca grandifloraHerbs/
208Pothos chinensisVineEvergreen
209Pouzolzia zeylanicaHerbs/
210Psychotria rubraWoody plantEvergreen
211Pterocarpus marsupiumWoody plantEvergreen
212Pterolobium punctatumVineEvergreen
213Pterospermum heterophyllumWoody plantEvergreen
214Ptychosperma macarthuriiWoody plantEvergreen
215Pueraria lobataVineEvergreen
216Quercus variabilisWoody plantEvergreen
217Quisqualis indicaWoody plantEvergreen
218Rhaphidophora hongkongensisVineEvergreen
219Rhapis excelsaWoody plantEvergreen
220Rhodomyrtus tomentosaWoody plantEvergreen
221Rhopalostylis sapidaWoody plantEvergreen
222Richardia scabraHerbs/
223Rourea microphyllaWoody plantEvergreen
224Rubus corchorifoliusWoody plantEvergreen
225Russelia equisetiformisWoody plantEvergreen
226Schinus terebinthifoliusWoody plantEvergreen
227Sabal mauritiformisWoody plantEvergreen
228Sanchezia speciosaWoody plantEvergreen
229Sapium sebiferumWoody plantDeciduous plant
230Sarcandra glabraHerbs/
231Schefflera octophyllaWoody plantEvergreen
232Setaria viridisHerbs/
233Sida acutaHerbs/
234Sida rhombifoliaWoody plantEvergreen
235Sindora glabraWoody plantEvergreen
236Sinomenium acutumVineEvergreen
237Sloanea hemsleyanaWoody plantEvergreen
238Smilax chinaVineEvergreen
239Spathodea campanulataWoody plantDeciduous plant
240Spermacoce latifoliaHerbs/
241Spondias lakonensisWoody plantEvergreen
242Styrax suberifoliusWoody plantEvergreen
243Swietenia macrophyllaWoody plantEvergreen
244Symplocos caudataWoody plantEvergreen
245Symplocos congestaWoody plantEvergreen
246SynedrellanodifloraHerbs/
247Synsepalum dulcificumWoody plantEvergreen
248Syzygium buxifoliumWoody plantEvergreen
249Syzyglum hanceiWoody plantEvergreen
250Tectona grandisWoody plantEvergreen
251Terminalia arjunaWoody plantEvergreen
252Terminalia catappaWoody plantEvergreen
253Tetracera asiaticaVineEvergreen
254Thunbergia erectaWoody plantEvergreen
255Tithonia diversifoliaHerbs/
256Toddalia asiaticaWoody plantEvergreen
257Toona sinensisWoody plantDeciduous plant
258Trachelospermum jasminoidesVineEvergreen
259Triumfetta rhomboideaWoody plantEvergreen
260Urena lobataHerbs/
261Uvaria bonianaWoody plantEvergreen
262Veitchia merrilliiWoody plantEvergreen
263Viburnum odoratissimumWoody plantEvergreen
264Vitex quinataWoody plantEvergreen
265Wedelia chinensisHerbs/
266Zanthoxylum avicennaeWoody plantDeciduous plant
267Zanthoxylum bungeanumWoody plantDeciduous plant
268Zingiber zerumbetHerbs/

References

  1. Sardans, J.; Rivas-Ubach, A.; Peñuelas, J. The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 14, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, J.H.; Zhao, N.; Liu, C.C.; Yang, M.; Li, M.L.; Yu, G.R.; Wilcox, K.; Yu, Q.; He, N.P. C:N:P stoichiometry in Chin’s forests: From organs to ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chang, Y.N.; Zhong, Q.L.; Yang, H.; Xu, C.B.; Hua, W.P.; Li, B.Y. Patterns and driving factors of leaf C, N, and P stoichiometry in two forest types with different stand ages in a mid-subtropical zone. For. Ecosyst. 2022, 9, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reich, P.B.; Oleksyn, J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. PNAS 2004, 101, 11001–11006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Han, W.X.; Wu, Y.; Tang, Y.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Li, L.P.; He, J.S.; Fang, J.Y. Leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across plant species in Beijing and its periphery. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2009, 45, 855–860. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, J.X.; Fang, X.; Tang, X.L.; Wang, W.T.; Zhou, G.Y.; Xu, S.; Huang, W.J.; Wang, G.X.; Yan, J.H.; Ma, K.P.; et al. Patterns and controlling factors of plant nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across China’s forests. Biogeochemistry 2019, 143, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salazar, P.C.; Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M.; Cruz, G.; Villar, R. Intraspecific leaf functional trait variability of eight prosopis pallida tree populations along a climatic gradient of the dry forests of northern Peru. J. Arid Environ. 2018, 152, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamann, E.; Kesselring, H.; Stcklin, J. Plant responses to simulated warming and drought:a comparative study of functional plasticity between congeneric mid and high elevation species. J. Plant Ecol. 2018, 11, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tong, R.; Zhou, B.; Jiang, L.; Ge, X.; Cao, Y. Spatial patterns of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry and nutrient resorption in Chinese fir across subtropical China. Catena 2021, 201, 105221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, C.H.; Yu, H.L.; Xu, Y.X.; Zhu, W.W.; Wang, P.; Huang, J.Y. Close linkages between leaf functional traits and soil and leaf C:N:P stoichiometry under altered precipitation in a desert steppe in northwestern China. Plant Ecol. 2022, 223, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, Y.T.; Lai, Y.; Tang, S.B.; Qin, Z.F.; Liu, J.F.; Kang, F.F.; Kuang, Y.W. Climatic and edaphic variables determine leaf C, N, P stoichiometry of deciduous Quercus species. Plant Soil 2022, 474, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Minden, V.; Kleyer, M. Internal and external regulation of plant organ stoichiometry. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, Y.; Wu, J.; Clark, C.M.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, Q.B.; Han, X.G. Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49, 1204–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yuan, Z.Y.; Chen, H. Decoupling of nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial plants associated with global changes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zeng, Z.Z.; Piao, S.L.; Li, L.Z.X.; Zhou, L.M.; Ciais, P.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.P. Climate mitigation from vegetation biophysical feedbacks during the past three decades. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, M.; Piao, S.; Chen, A.; Yang, H.; Liu, Q.; Fu, Y.H.; Janssens, I.A. Divergent changes in the elevational gradient of vegetation activities over the last 30 years. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, in press.
  18. Hobbie, S.E.; Gough, L. Foliar and soil nutrients in tundra on glacial landscapes of contrasting ages in northern Alaska. Oecologia 2002, 131, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Mao, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, T. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in typical desert and desertified regions, North China. Environ. Sci. 2010, 31, 1716–1725. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.H.; Han, W.X.; Tang, L.Y.; Tang, Z.Y.; Fang, J.Y. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of woody plants differ in responses to climate, soil and plant growth form. Ecography 2013, 36, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, J.N.; Gao, P.; Li, C.; Wang, R.J.; Niu, X.; Wang, B. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of the leaf-litter-soil continuum of Quercus acutissima Carr. and Pinus densiflora Sieb. in Northern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Slik, J.W.F.; Cao, K. Leaf element concentrations of terrestrial plants across China are influenced by taxonomy and the environment. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.Q.; He, W.; Wu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhu, L.W.; Ouyang, L.; Ni, G.Y.; Dirk Hölscher, D. Leaf stoichiometry is synergistically-driven by climate, site, soil characteristics and phylogeny in karst areas, Southwest China. Biogeochemistry 2021, 155, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xing, S.P.; Cheng, X.Q.; Kang, F.F.; Wang, J.R.; Yan, J.X.; Han, H.R. The patterns of N/P/K stoichiometry in the Quercus Wutaishanica community among different life forms and organs and their responses to environmental factors in northern China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, W.X.; Fang, J.Y.; Guo, D.L.; Zhang, Y. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytol. 2005, 168, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, W.X.; Fang, J.Y.; Reich, P.B.; Woodward, F.I.; Wang, Z.H. Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Esmeijer-Liu, A.J.; Aerts, R.; Kürschner, W.M.; Bobbink, R.; Lotter, A.F.; Verhoeven, J. Nitrogen enrichment lowers Betula pendula green and yellow leaf stoichiometry irrespective of effects of elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 2009, 316, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Qin, J.; Shangguan, Z.P.; Xi, W.M. Seasonal variations of leaf traits and drought adaptation strategies of four common woody species in South Texas, USA. J. For. Res. 2019, 5, 1715–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, S.; Shangguan, Z. Spatial patterns of leaf nutrient traits of the plants in the Loess Plateau of China. Trees 2007, 21, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, J.T.; Gu, Z.J.; Shao, H.B.; Zhou, F.; Peng, S.Y. N-P stoichiometry in soil and leaves of pinus massoniana forest at different stand ages in the subtropical soil erosion area of China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Chen, Y. Coupling of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry in black locust, (Robinia pseudoacacia) plantations on the Loess Plateau, China. Trees 2017, 31, 1559–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, X.X.; Hong, J.T.; Wang, X.D. C:N:P stoichiometry of perennial herbs’ organs in the alpine steppe of the northern Tibetan Plateau. J. Mt. Sci. 2019, 16, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, J.; Liu, B.; You, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, M.; Shang, H.; He, J. Solar radiation regulates the leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across alpine meadows of the Tibetan Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 271, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wen, J.H.; Tao, H.M.; Du, B.M.; Hui, D.F.; Sun, N.X.; Umair, M.; Liu, C.J. Plantations modified leaf elemental stoichiometry compared to the native shrub community in karst areas, southwest of China. Trees 2021, 35, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Y.J.; Li, G.; Wang, M.X.; Ma, C.Y.; De Boeck, H.J.; Hou, F.J.; Li, Z.Q. Effects of water supply on plant stoichiometry of C, N, P in inner Mongolia grasslands. Plant Soil 2022, 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Fang, J.; Houghton, R.; Kauppi, P.E.; Kurz, W.A. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 2011, 333, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Langenhove, L.V.; Verryckt, L.T.; Bréchet, L.; Courtois, E.A.; Stahl, C.; Hofhansl, F.; Bauters, M.; Sardans, J.; Boeckx, P.; Fransen, E.; et al. Atmospheric deposition of elements and its relevance for nutrient budgets of tropical forests. Biogeochemistry 2020, 149, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, X.H.; Chen, Z.Z.; Wu, T.T.; Le, J.R.; Li, Y.N. C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of leaf and soil for two typical forest in Hainan Island. For. Environ. Sci. 2021, 37, 102–108. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baxter, I.; Dilkes, B.P. Elemental profiles reflect plant adaptations to the environment. Science 2012, 336, 1661–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Du, B.M.; Ji, H.W.; Peng, C.; Liu, X.J.; Liu, C.J. Altitudinal patterns of leaf stoichiometry and nutrient resorption in Quercus variabilis in the Baotianman Mountains, China. Plant Soil 2017, 413, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ren, S.J.; Yu, G.R.; Tao, B.; Wang, S.Q. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 654 terrestrial plant species in NSTEC. Environ. Sci. 2007, 28, 2665–2673. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Q.F.; Xie, J.S.; Lyu, M.K.; Xiong, D.C.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, M.K.; Yang, Y.S. Short-term effects of soil warming and nitrogen addition on the N:P stoichiometry of cunninghamia lanceolata in subtropical regions. Plant Soil 2017, 411, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Athokpam, F.D.; Garkoti, S.C. Dynamics of foliar nitrogen of evergreen and deciduous plant species in a wet tropical forest, south assam, India. Plant Ecol. 2015, 216, 1117–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, H.B.; Wu, J.P.; Liu, W.F.; Yuan, Y.H.; Hu, L.; Cai, Q.K. Linkages of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations. Plant Soil 2015, 392, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lin, Y.Q.; Wang, A.W.; Su, P.; Fu, H.S. Distribution characteristics of soil nutrients in western Hainan: A case study of Baisha Li Autonomous County. China Trop. Agric. 2017, 1, 32–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Hedin, L.O. Global organization of terrestrial plant-nutrient interactions. PNAS 2004, 101, 10849–10850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gong, H.D.; Li, Y.Y.; Yu, T.; Zhang, S.H.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.K.; Sun, D. Soil and climate effects on leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry along elevational gradients. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, H.; Chen, G.; Zhang, C.; Melillo, J.M.; Hall, C. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China’s soils: A synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry 2010, 98, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, D.; Niu, S.; Luo, Y. Global patterns of the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2012, 195, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, S.M.; Xia, Y.H.; Hu, Y.J.; Chen, X.B.; Rui, Y.C.; Gunina, A.; Kuzyakov, Y. Stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil: Effects of agricultural land use and climate at a continental scale. Soil Till. Res. 2021, 209, 104903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hui, D.F.; Yang, X.T.; Deng, Q.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Huai, Y.; Ren, H. Soil C:N:P stoichiometry in tropical forests on HaiNan Island of China: Spatial and vertical variations. Catena 2021, 201, 105228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Menge, D.N.L.; Field, C.B. Simulated global changes alter phosphorus demand in annual grassland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13, 2582–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Elser, J.J.; Fagan, W.F.; Denno, R.F.; Dobberfuhl, D.R.; Folarin, A.; Huberty, A.; Interlandi, S.; Kilham, S.S.; McCauley, E.; Schulz, K.L.; et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 2000, 408, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, D.; Wang, D.; Ren, Y. Using leaf nutrient stoichiometry as an indicator of flood tolerance and eutrophication in the riparian zone of the Lijang River. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 98, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elser, J.J.; Acharya, K.; Kyle, M.; Cotner, J.; Makino, W.; Markow, T.; Watts, T.; Hobbie, S.; Fagan, J.; Schade, J.; et al. Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ågren, G.I. The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs–-theory and observations. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Niklas, K.J.; Cobb, E.D. Biomass partitioning and leaf N, P-stoichiometry: Comparisons between tree and herbaceous current-year shoots. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 2030–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rowe, E.C.; Toberman, H.; Adams, J.L.; Lawlor, A.J.; Thacker, S.A.; Patel, M.; Tipping, E. Productivity in a dominant herbaceous species is largely unrelated to soil macronutrient stocks. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 1636–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ågren, G.I.; Wetterstedt, J.A.M.; Billberger, M.F.K. Nutrient limitation on terrestrial plant growth-modeling the interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ågren, G.I.; Weih, M. Multi-dimensional plant element stoichiometry-looking beyond carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Luo, Y.; Peng, Q.W.; Li, K.H.; Gong, Y.M.; Liu, Y.Y.; Han, W.X. Patterns of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry among leaf, stem and root of desert plants and responses to climate and soil factors in Xinjiang, China. Catena 2021, 199, 105100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Verhoeven, J.T.A.; Koerselman, W.; Meuleman, A.F.M. Nitrogen-or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: Relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. He, X.J.; Hou, E.Q.; Liu, Y.; Wen, D.Z. Altitudinal patterns and controls of plant and soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry in subtropical China. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lebauer, D.S.; Treseder, K.K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 2008, 89, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Yuan, Z.Y.; Chen, H. Global trends in senesced-leaf nitrogen and phosphorus. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2009, 18, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. He, J.S.; Wang, L.; Flynn, D.F.B.; Wang, X.P.; Ma, W.H.; Fang, J.Y. Leaf nitrogen: Phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes. Oecologia 2008, 155, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hu, Y.K.; Zhang, Y.L.; Liu, G.F.; Pan, X.; Yang, X.J.; Li, W.B.; Dai, W.H.; Tang, S.L.; Xiao, T.; Chen, L.Y.; et al. Intraspecific N and P stoichiometry of Phragmites australis: Geographic patterns and variation among climatic regions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sun, X.; Kang, H.Z.; Kattge, J.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.J. Biogeographic patterns of multi-element stoichiometry of Quercus variabilis leaves across China. Can. J. For. Res. 2015, 45, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Frost, P.C.; Evans-White, M.A.; Finkel, Z.V.; Jensen, T.C.; Matzek, V. Are you what you eat? Physiological constraints on organismal stoichiometry in an elementally imbalanced world. Oikos 2005, 109, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, N.; Fu, F.Z.; Wang, B.T.; Wang, R.J. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Pinus tabulaeformis forest ecosystems in warm temperate Shanxi Province, north China. J. For. Res. 2018, 29, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guo, R.Q.; Sun, S.C.; Liu, B. Difference in leaf water use efficiency/photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of Bt-cotton and its conventional peer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Güsewell, S. N: P ratios in terrestrial plants: Variation and functional significance. New Phytol. 2004, 164, 243–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sardans, J.; Rivas-Ubach, A.; Peñuelas, P. Factors affecting nutrient concentration and stoichiometry of forest trees in Catalonia (NE Spain). For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 2024–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, J.Y.; Yu, H.L.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Li, L.H. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and water supply on litter decomposition quality of senescing leaves of leymus Chinensis. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 35, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huang, G.; Su, Y.G.; Mu, X.H.; Li, Y. Foliar nutrient resorption responses of three life-form plants to water and nitrogen additions in a temperate desert. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, L.; Liu, H.L.; Zhang, L.W.; Chen, Y.F.; Baskin, C.C. Effects of increased precipitation on C, N and P stoichiometry at different growth stages of a cold desert annual. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2022, 37, e02158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jia, Y.L.; Yu, G.R.; He, N.P.; Zhan, X.Y.; Fang, H.J.; Sheng, W.P.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, D.Y.; Wang, Q.F. Spatial and decadal variations in inorganic nitrogen wet deposition in China induced by human activity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Han, W.X.; Tang, A.; Shen, J.L.; Cui, Z.L.; Zhang, F.S. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 2013, 494, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yu, Z.P.; Wang, M.H.; Huang, Z.Q.; Lin, T.C.; Vadeboncoeur, M.A.; Searle, E.B.; Chen, H. Temporal changes in soil C-N-P stoichiometry over the past 60 years across subtropical China. Global. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1308–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gurmesa, G.A.; Lu, X.K.; Gundersen, P.; Mao, Q.G.; Zhou, K.J.; Fang, Y.T.; Mo, J.M. High retention of 15N-labeled nitrogen deposition in a nitrogen-saturated old-growth tropical forest. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 22, 3608–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Makino, W.; Cotner, J.B.; Sterner, R.W.; Elser, J.J. Are bacteria more like plants or animals? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C:N: P stoichiometry. Funct. Ecol. 2003, 17, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lambers, H.; Poorter, H. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Ava. Ecol. Res. 2004, 34, 283–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kerkhoff, A.J.; Fagan, W.F.; Elser, J.J.; Enquist, B.J. Phylogenetic and growthform variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants. Am. Nat. 2006, 168, e103–e122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Körner, C.; Bannister, P.; Mark, A. Altitudinal variation in stomatal conductance, nitrogen content and leaf anatomy in different plant life forms in New Zealand. Oecologia 1986, 69, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Morecroft, M.D.; Woodward, F. Experiments on the causes of altitudinal differences in the leaf nutrient contents, size and δ13C of Alchemilla alpina. New Phytol. 1996, 134, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yu, F.; Wang, D.X.; Shi, X.X.; Yi, X.F.; Huang, Q.P.; Hu, Y.N. Effects of Environmental Factors on Tree Seedling Regeneration in a Pine-oak Mixed Forest in the Qinling Mountains, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sundqvist, M.K.; Sanders, N.J.; Wardle, D.A. Community and ecosystem responses to elevational gradients: Processes, mechanisms, and insights for global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Fisher, J.B.; Malhi, Y.; Torres, I.C.; Metcalfe, D.B.; Weg, M.J.; Meir, P.; Silva-Espejo, J.E.; Huasco, W.H. Nutrient limitation in rainforests and cloud forests along a 3000-m elevation gradient in the peruvian andes. Oecologia 2013, 172, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Soethe, N.; Lehmann, J.; Engels, C. Nutrient availability at different altitudes in a tropical montane forest in Ecuador. J. Trop. Ecol. 2008, 24, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhao, N.; He, N.P.; Wang, Q.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, R.L.; Xu, Z.W.; Yu, G.R. The altitudinal patterns of leaf C:N:P stoichiometry are regulated by plant growth form, climate and soil on changbai mountain, China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhao, H.; Xu, L.; Wang, Q.; Tian, J.; Tang, X.; Tang, Z.; Xie, Z.; He, N.; Yu, G. Spatial patterns and environmental factors influencing leaf carbon content in the forests and shrublands of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Frenne, P.D.; Graae, B.J.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, F.; Kolb, A.; Chabrerie, O.; Decocq, G.; Kort, H.D.; Schrijver, A.D.; Diekmann, M.; Eriksson, O.; et al. Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species’ responses to temperature. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schuur, E.A.G. The effect of water on decomposition dynamics in mesic to wet Hawaiian montane forests. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, M. Linkages of C: N: P stoichiometry between soil and leaf and their response to climatic factors along altitudinal gradients. J. Soils Sediment. 2019, 19, 1820–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, S.; Wang, W.; Gu, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L. Lianas have a faster resource acquisition strategy than trees: Below-ground evidence from root traits, phylogeny and the root economics space. J. Ecol. 2022, 111, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kerkhoff, A.J.; Enquist, B.J.; Elser, J.J.; Fagan, W.F. Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2005, 14, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area. Danzhou, Tunchang, Changjiang, and Wuzhishan on Hainan Island were selected as the sampling points. There were two sampling points in Wuzhishan, resulting in a total of five sampling points.
Figure 1. Location of the study area. Danzhou, Tunchang, Changjiang, and Wuzhishan on Hainan Island were selected as the sampling points. There were two sampling points in Wuzhishan, resulting in a total of five sampling points.
Agronomy 13 00411 g001
Figure 2. Correlation of N and P concentrations in leaves. Red solid line represents the significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Correlation of N and P concentrations in leaves. Red solid line represents the significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01).
Agronomy 13 00411 g002
Figure 3. Correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors. Both the red dotted and blue solid lines represent significant correlations between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). No line indicates the absence of a significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors. ALT: altitude.
Figure 3. Correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors. Both the red dotted and blue solid lines represent significant correlations between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). No line indicates the absence of a significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and geographical factors. ALT: altitude.
Agronomy 13 00411 g003
Figure 4. Correlation between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors. Both the red dotted and blue solid lines represent significant correlations between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). No line indicates the absence of a significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors. MAP and MAT represent the mean annual precipitation and temperature, respectively.
Figure 4. Correlation between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors. Both the red dotted and blue solid lines represent significant correlations between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). No line indicates the absence of a significant correlation between leaf stoichiometry and climatic factors. MAP and MAT represent the mean annual precipitation and temperature, respectively.
Agronomy 13 00411 g004
Figure 5. (a) Variance of N and P concentrations and (b,c) their stoichiometric ratios among different life forms (woody plants, herbs, and vines). Different lowercase letters above the bar indicate significant differences among the life forms for the same element, concentration, or ratio. (a) Description of N and P concentrations in the leaves of the different plant life forms. (b,c) description of stoichiometric ratios among the different life forms.
Figure 5. (a) Variance of N and P concentrations and (b,c) their stoichiometric ratios among different life forms (woody plants, herbs, and vines). Different lowercase letters above the bar indicate significant differences among the life forms for the same element, concentration, or ratio. (a) Description of N and P concentrations in the leaves of the different plant life forms. (b,c) description of stoichiometric ratios among the different life forms.
Agronomy 13 00411 g005
Figure 6. Heat map of Pearson’s matrix of correlation coefficients between leaf stoichiometry and geographical and climatic factors for different life forms. (ac) represent the correlations of woody plants, herbs, vines with geographical and climatic factors, respectively. * and ** represent significant correlations at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. ALT, MAP, and MAT represent altitude, mean annual precipitation, and mean annual temperature, respectively.
Figure 6. Heat map of Pearson’s matrix of correlation coefficients between leaf stoichiometry and geographical and climatic factors for different life forms. (ac) represent the correlations of woody plants, herbs, vines with geographical and climatic factors, respectively. * and ** represent significant correlations at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. ALT, MAP, and MAT represent altitude, mean annual precipitation, and mean annual temperature, respectively.
Agronomy 13 00411 g006
Table 1. Overview of the study area.
Table 1. Overview of the study area.
Study AreaWuzhishanDanzhouChangjiangTunchang
Latitude 18°55′45.46″ N18°47′40.22″ N19°30′50.94″ N19°07′21.87″ N19°27′48.29″ N
Longitude109°28′7.83″ E109°38′54.94″ E109°29′58.70″ E109°04′45.63″ E110°05′52.77″ E
Average Altitude (m)260505137660135
MAT (°C)22.8022.8023.7024.3323.13
MAP (mm)2080.952080.951934.991563.122105.15
Average Sunshine Time (h)2000190023002000
Soil TypesYellow soil, LatosolLatosol
Climate TypeTropical alpine climateTropical monsoon climate
MAP and MAT represent the mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature, respectively.
Table 2. Sample statistics.
Table 2. Sample statistics.
Study AreaWuzhishanDanzhouChangjiangTunchang
Life formWoody plants58836244
Herbs370828
Vines70135
Evergreen sample47777240
Deciduous plant sample18639
Sample size102838377
Sample size refers to the total number of woody plants, herbs, and vines samples.
Table 3. Statistics of N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios in leaves.
Table 3. Statistics of N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios in leaves.
ItemsMeanSDMinimumMaximumCV (%)
N (mg g−1)3.800.200.1616.395.26
P (mg g−1)1.820.070.247.183.85
C:N ratio (C:N)278.7715.8620.592865.255.69
C:P ratio (C:P)390.6915.1547.471756.333.88
N:P ratio (N:P)2.250.100.1414.704.44
SD represents standard deviation, CV indicates coefficient of variation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Liang, Y.; Wang, G.; Lin, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Wu, B. Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry and Its Response to Geographical and Climatic Factors in a Tropical Region: Evidence from Hainan Island. Agronomy 2023, 13, 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020411

AMA Style

Wang J, Liang Y, Wang G, Lin X, Liu J, Wang H, Chen Z, Wu B. Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry and Its Response to Geographical and Climatic Factors in a Tropical Region: Evidence from Hainan Island. Agronomy. 2023; 13(2):411. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jingjing, Yongyi Liang, Guoan Wang, Xiaoyan Lin, Jiexi Liu, Hao Wang, Zixun Chen, and Bingsun Wu. 2023. "Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry and Its Response to Geographical and Climatic Factors in a Tropical Region: Evidence from Hainan Island" Agronomy 13, no. 2: 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop