Next Article in Journal
A Fatigue Model to Predict Interlaminar Damage of FRP Composite Laminates Subjected to Mode I Load
Next Article in Special Issue
Negative Temperature Coefficient of Resistance in Aligned CNT Networks: Influence of the Underlying Phenomena
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan as an Outstanding Polysaccharide Improving Health-Commodities of Humans and Environmental Protection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of High-Photoelasticity Polyurethane to Tactile Sensor for Robot Hands
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/polym15030524
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tuning the Selectivity of Metal Oxide Gas Sensors with Vapor Phase Deposited Ultrathin Polymer Thin Films

by
Stefan Schröder
1,
Nicolai Ababii
2,
Mihai Brînză
2,
Nicolae Magariu
2,
Lukas Zimoch
3,
Mani Teja Bodduluri
4,
Thomas Strunskus
1,*,
Rainer Adelung
3,
Franz Faupel
1 and
Oleg Lupan
1,2,3,*
1
Multicomponent Materials, Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany
2
Center for Nanotechnology and Nanosensors, Department of Microelectronics and Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Moldova, 168 Stefan cel Mare Av., MD-2004 Chisinau, Moldova
3
Functional Nanomaterials, Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany
4
Fraunhofer Institute for Silicon Technology (ISIT), Fraunhoferstraße 1, D-25524 Itzehoe, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030524
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 15 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers’ Role in Sensors: Resistant Solid Supports or Multi-Purpose Sensing Units?)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal oxide gas sensors are of great interest for applications ranging from lambda sensors to early hazard detection in explosive media and leakage detection due to their superior properties with regard to sensitivity and lifetime, as well as their low cost and portability. However, the influence of ambient gases on the gas response, energy consumption and selectivity still needs to be improved and they are thus the subject of intensive research. In this work, a simple approach is presented to modify and increase the selectivity of gas sensing structures with an ultrathin polymer thin film. The different gas sensing surfaces, CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 are coated with a conformal < 30 nm Poly(1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-tetravinyl cyclotetrasiloxane) (PV4D4) thin film via solvent-free initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD). The obtained structures demonstrate a change in selectivity from ethanol vapor to 2-propanol vapor and an increase in selectivity compared to other vapors of volatile organic compounds. In the case of TiO2 structures coated with a PV4D4 thin film, the increase in selectivity to 2-propanol vapors is observed even at relatively low operating temperatures, starting from >200 °C. The present study demonstrates possibilities for improving the properties of metal oxide gas sensors, which is very important in applications in fields such as medicine, security and food safety.

1. Introduction

Metal oxide gas sensors are developing very rapidly and extensively, due to their use in different fields, ranging from natural sciences to nanobiomedicine, space innovations, the oil and food industries and the automotive industry [1,2]. The reasons are their superior properties such as response and selectivity to different gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [3,4,5,6], portability and selective sensitivity adjustment combined with ultra-low power consumption [7,8] and the nanoscale device dimensions [9,10]. However, energy consumption and gas selectivity of metal oxide gas sensors could be further improved and are thus of great interest in current research. Furthermore, the operation of this sensor type in ambient conditions, especially at high humidity levels is hindered by the moisture and environment, since overlap interference with various gas species is still a challenge for them [11,12]. Conductive polymers as emerging layers have gained increasing attention for sensor application due to their unique properties, low cost and processing procedure [13]. Beniwal et al. developed SnO2/polypyrrole (PPy) nanocomposite by electrospinning approach for 100 ppb NH3 sensing device structure obtaining a response of 57% [14]. PPy possesses a secondary amine group (-NH-) which interacts with NH3 vapor and thus increases the response. Furthermore, Zhang et al. synthesized PPy/Zn2SnO4 nanolayer for room temperature NH3 gas sensor [15]. In addition, polyaniline (PANI) was found as a polymer material with potential gas sensing applications. Sáaedi et al. developed ZnO/PANI nanocomposite as gas sensing films, which lower the operating temperature and increases the response of the device approximately four times compared to the original ZnO thin film device when exposed to methanol vapor [16]. Another recently investigated approach is based on the modification of conducting polymers by involving metal nanoparticles, nano-metal oxides, and carbon nanomaterials to improve the response/sensitivity, stability and reproducibility of the overall sensor characteristics [17]. Modern developments in synthesis approaches have facilitated the fabrication of various types of polymer sensors for a wide range of applications, starting from bioengineering/biomedical, smart clothes and energy harvesting up to modern robotics, etc [18]. We recently demonstrated the improved performance of CuO/Cu2O/ZnO:Fe gas sensing heterostructures covered with ultrathin 25 nm hydrophobic cyclotrisiloxane-based polymer thin films in high humidity environments [19]. The deposition of these tailored thin films was enabled by solvent-free initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD) using 1,3,5-trimethyl-trivinyl cyclotrisiloxane (V3D3) monomer combined with perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride (PFBSF) initiator. This polymer thin film provides a hydrophobic coating and is in addition stable at high operating temperatures required for the metal oxide gas sensing demonstrated for several measurement cycles and humidity-independent sensor structure. Another benefit associated with the additional ultrathin polymer V3D3 coating is a change in sensor selectivity towards hydrogen gas [19].
In this study, we investigate whether we can further tune/control the selectivity of gas sensors by replacing the V3D3 monomer with 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-tetravinyl cyclotetrasiloxane (V4D4) monomer in the iCVD process. PV4D4 was chosen because it has similar hydrophobic properties as PV3D3 but a larger ring structure, which could shift the specific selectivity to larger molecules such as 2-propanol. Three different gas sensing structures, copper oxide (CuO), aluminum oxide/copper oxide heterostructures (Al2O3/CuO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2), are each coated with a nanoscale PV4D4 thin film via iCVD. The responses to n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone are measured and compared to the respective responses of uncoated structures without PV4D4 thin films. The iCVD process is a solvent-free polymer thin film deposition process from the vapor phase [20,21]. The underlying reaction is a free radical polymerization at a substrate cooled to room temperature. Due to its CVD-typical growth characteristics, it can be easily scaled up and applied to coat complex geometries such as porous substrates or gas sensing structures as described in this study. For the deposition initiator and monomer vapors are introduced to a hot filament reactor. After the filaments are heated, the initiator is decomposed into free radicals, which start polymerization with the monomers adsorbed at the cooled substrate stage. The sizes of the cyclotetrasiloxane rings of the respective PV4D4 molecules are calculated by geometry optimization via density functional theory (DFT). It can help to explain and support the detection mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

We investigate three different gas sensing structures, CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 coated with a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film via iCVD by using a V4D4 monomer and PFBSF initiator, illustrated in Figure 1a. We test their response to various volatile organic compounds, namely n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone, and compare the respective sensor responses to uncoated structures without PV4D4 thin films. The structural formulas of these four vapors are shown in Figure 1b.

2.1. Sensor Fabrication

In order to obtain the sensor structures described in this study, several methods were used. The CuO structures were obtained by sputtering metallic copper under vacuum conditions onto glass substrates at 25 °C using a customized RF-magnetron system. Then, the structures were heat treated under normal atmospheric conditions according to a previous work [22]. For the Al2O3/CuO structures, a combination of two methods was used. The CuO films were obtained by the synthesis of chemical solutions (SCS approach) on a glass substrate [23,24] followed by a heat treatment in different regimes. Subsequently, an ultrathin film of Al2O3 was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at a deposition temperature of 75 °C. In the end, the samples were annealed according to the processes described in a previous work [25]. The TiO2 structures were, like the Al2O3 films, obtained by ALD on a glass or ceramic substrate. Additional details on the deposition parameters are described in a previous work [26].
After the fabrication of the three different gas sensing structures, a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film was deposited on each of the structures in a custom-made iCVD setup reported elsewhere [27,28,29]. A rotary vane pump (Pfeiffer Vacuum Duo 10) was used to evacuate the reactor. The monomer V4D4 (Abcr, 97%) and initiator PFBSF (Chempur, 95%) were delivered via low-flow metering valves at flow rates of 0.2 sccm and 0.1 sccm, respectively, to the reactor. The setup was handled in continuous flow mode and a process pressure of 40 Pa was maintained by a butterfly valve (VAT 615) coupled to a capacitive manometer (MKS Baratron). The reactor and all monomer and exhaust lines were heated to 110 °C to prevent monomer condensation. The substrate stage was cooled by a thermostat (Huber CC-K6) to 32 °C. A filament array consisting of NiCr wire (Goodfellow) is located 30 mm above the substrate stage and was resistively heated using 64.05 W during the deposition with a power supply.

2.2. Sample Characterization

The morphology of the CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 uncoated and PV4D4-coated gas sensor structures were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Carl Zeiss). The acceleration voltage was set to 3 kV and 7 kV for PV4D4-coated and uncoated structures, respectively. The gas sensing measurements for the coated and uncoated CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 structures were performed in a special custom-made chamber according to a protocol reported in a previous study [30]. All samples were inserted, electrically connected and heated to the desired working temperature for 45 min before applying the test gases. In order to obtain the gas response in % scale, the formula
S = G g a s − G a i r G a i r × 100 %
was used [31,32]. S is the response in %, Ggas is the electrical conductance of the specimen in gas and Gair represents the conductance of the same specimen in air. FTIR measurements were performed using an FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Invenio-R). 32 scans were performed from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 with a resolution width set to 4 cm−1. The measured spectra were baseline corrected using a scientific graphing program (Origin 2017). Geometry optimization of the V4D4 molecule was performed using density functional theory (DFT). For this purpose, the hybrid functional B3LYP [33,34,35] was applied together with the cc-pVDZ basis [36] set in the program NWChem [37].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Characterization

In this section, the surface morphology of the structures and heterostructures is presented. Due to the CVD-typical synthesis characteristics of iCVD complex geometries, such as the gas sensing structures in this study, can typically be homogeneously coated. Figure 2a–d shows the SEM images of the uncoated CuO surface structure compared to a CuO structure coated with a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film. Figure 2a,b reveals that the CuO film consists of penetrating nanogranules that completely cover the glass substrate. After the deposition of the nanometric PV4D4 thin film (Figure 2c,d), a smoothing of the nanogranules can be observed due to uniform polymer deposition. In Figure 2e–j, the SEM images of the second type of gas sensor, Al2O3/CuO, investigated in this study are shown. The SEM images show the structure of uncoated (Figure 2e–g) and PV4D4-coated structures (Figure 2h–j) at different magnifications. After deposition of the PV4D4 coating, a smoothening of the surface can again be observed, which indicates that the polymer was deposited conformally on the entire surface of the structure. Figure 2k–m shows SEM images of the third type of gas sensing structure, TiO2. The thickness of the TiO2 in the SEM-investigated samples is 30 nm. Different magnifications of the PV4D4-coated TiO2 are shown. The structure covers the glass substrate completely and continuously (Figure 2k). Figure 2k,l reveals that the homogeneous granular surface and the grains correspond to small aggregates of nano- and microcrystallites. For comparison, Figure A1 in the appendix shows the SEM image of the TiO2 structure without the PV4D4 thin film.

3.2. Chemical Characterization

For the chemical characterization of the deposited PV4D4 thin films FTIR measurements have been performed. The obtained spectra are shown in Figure 3a. The absence of vinyl groups in the spectrum indicates that the deposited PV4D4 thin film has been successfully polymerized. Vinyl groups are present in the V4D4 monomer and should give rise to a band >3000 cm−1 for the C-H stretch at a vinyl group [38]. Furthermore, the clearly visible band at 1057 cm−1 reveals, that the cyclotetrasiloxane ring was preserved during the polymerization [39]. The ring structure was not decomposed during the deposition and shows full functionality. In order to obtain information on the size of the cyclotetrasiloxane ring geometry optimizations of the respective molecule are performed using density functional theory (DFT) on the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ level. Two situations are investigated to estimate the maximum and minimum diameter of the ring. The first calculation is performed at an isolated D4 molecule, shown in Figure 3b, and the second at a V4D4 molecule, which is bonded at each site only to one other V4D4 molecule (Figure 3c). For the isolated octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) molecule, the smallest distance is found to be 0.369 nm across the two opposite oxygen atoms. The embedded molecule represents the smallest situation resulting from free radical polymerization, which is the underlying reaction in iCVD [40,41]. The smallest diameter in the embedded cyclotetrasiloxane ring is 0.333 nm measured between the two opposite oxygen atoms. As each molecule of the four investigated vapors is larger than the diameter of the cyclotetrasiloxane ring, it can be assumed that the transport of the vapor molecules through the PV4D4 film to the sensor surface might take place only via the remaining free volume of the polymer and not through the cyclotetrasiloxane rings. However, the more open structure of PV4D4 compared to PV3D3 should also give rise to more available free volume.

3.3. Gas Sensing Properties

In this section, the gas sensing properties of the three different structure types are described and the performance change attributed to the additional PV4D4 thin film is demonstrated. Additional electrical resistance measurements of all PV4D4/metal oxide gas sensing structures can be found in Figure A2 in Appendix A. Figure 4a shows the gas response of an uncoated CuO structure, grown by sputtering, for n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone with a concentration of 100 ppm versus working temperature. The measurement shows that at operating temperatures between 250 °C and 350 °C, the sensing structure responds to all vapors. The selectivity for ethanol vapors predominates, which is in accordance with the data from the literature [23,42]. The highest response to ethanol vapor has a value of ~100% at an operating temperature of 300 °C. The gas response of the CuO sensor coated with the PV4D4 thin film, presented in Figure 4b, shows a slightly different behavior. The coated structures were also exposed to n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone vapor with a concentration of 100 ppm and measured at different working temperatures. The measurement shows that the polymer deposited on top of the metal oxide sensor influences the gas response in a way that the selectivity changes to 2-propanol vapor with an optimum operating temperature of 300 °C. The responses to 2-propanol vapor are ~3.6%, ~46%, ~64% and ~57% at operating temperatures of 200 °C, 250 °C, 300 °C and 350 °C, respectively. Figure 4c shows the dynamic responses of the PV4D4-coated CuO structures to 100 ppm of 2-propanol. The measurement shows again an optimum operating temperature of 300 °C and all pulses return to their initial value after stopping the test gas, which indicates improved sensor performances of the developed structures.
The response/recovery times (defined as the necessary time to reach 90% of the full response value) were determined from the dynamic response measurement (Figure 4c). The values are presented in Table 1.
The gas response measurements for the second gas sensing structures, Al2O3/CuO, grown by ALD/SCS approaches, then coated with PV4D4 thin film on top are shown in Figure 4d,e. Figure 4d shows the response of the uncoated Al2O3/CuO structures to n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone vapor with a concentration of 100 ppm versus operating temperature. The structure responds to all vapors at working temperatures between 250 °C and 350 °C. The selectivity to 2-propanol vapor predominates. The 2-propanol response at the working temperatures of 250 °C, 300 °C and 350 °C have values of ~8%, ~8.9% and ~6.8%, respectively. Figure 4e results indicate that the additional PV4D4 coating shows here no significant influence on the responses to the vapors.
The third type of gas sensing structure investigated in this study are 15 nm and 25 nm TiO2 structures, grown by ALD, then coated with an additional PV4D4 thin film. Figure 4f shows the gas response of the TiO2 structures of 15 nm thickness coated with PV4D4 to n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone vapor with a concentration of 100 ppm versus working temperature. The measurement reveals that these structures are more selective to 2-propanol vapor at all working temperatures. At an operating temperature of 400 °C, the highest response with a value of 225% is obtained for such devices. TiO2 structures with a slightly larger thickness of 25 nm coated with PV4D4 show similar behavior, as shown in Figure 4g. Again, the response to n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone with a concentration of 100 ppm is investigated at different operating temperatures. The coated structures of the third type are selective for 2-propanol at all operating temperatures. It can also be observed that an increase in structure thickness results in the highest responses at working temperatures of 350 °C and 400 °C. The respective values are 245% and 250%. PV4D4 has a larger ring structure compared to PV3D3 used in our previous study [19]. PV4D4 seems to shift the specific selectivity to larger molecules such as 2-propanol. TiO2, coated with a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film via iCVD shows a clear performance for 2-propanol and indicates that the coverage with an additional polymer thin film can help to control the sensitivity and selectivity of metal oxide gas sensors.
To highlight the novelty of our work in comparison to previous works we provide a summary in Table 2. It shows a comparison of the sensors based on reported conducting polymer/metal oxide hybrids and the sensors based on the dielectric iCVD PV4D4/metal oxide hybrids developed and studied in this work.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we have reported on the surface modification of CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 gas sensing structures covered on top with a PV4D4 polymer nanoscale thin film deposited via solvent-free initiated chemical vapor deposition. FTIR measurements have been performed for the chemical characterization of the deposited PV4D4 thin films. The absence of vinyl groups in the spectrum indicated that these layers have been successfully polymerized and the ring structure was not decomposed during the deposition showing complete functionality. The size of the cyclotetrasiloxane ring geometry optimizations of the respective molecule was performed using DFT on the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ level. The embedded molecule showed the smallest distance when combined in the polymerization. The gas responses of the coated and uncoated gas sensors were tested for four volatile organic compounds, n-butanol, 2-propanol, ethanol and acetone. The presented approach enables to change the selectivity of CuO gas sensing structures from ethanol vapor to 2-propanol vapor. The highest response, ~64%, was observed at 300 °C working temperature. Al2O3/CuO gas sensing structures show no significant change in gas response when coated with the additional PV4D4 thin film. In the case of PV4D4-coated TiO2 structures with different thicknesses (15 nm and 25 nm), the selectivity for 2-propanol vapor also increases even at relatively low operating temperatures. At working temperatures of 400 °C, a gas response of 225% was obtained for PV4D4/TiO2 structures with a TiO2 structure thickness of 15 nm and responses of 245% and 250% were obtained at working temperatures of 350 °C and 400 °C for the respective PV4D4/TiO2 structure with 25 nm thickness. The main observation is that PV4D4/TiO2 coated structures are selective for 2-propanol at all operating temperatures. Geometry optimization reveals, that the transport might take place exclusively through the remaining free volume and not via the cyclotetrasiloxane rings in the polymer film. The obtained results are very promising in the field of metal oxide-based gas sensors since a simple approach can be used to change and increase the selectivity from one type of vapor to another and to protect its surface in various ambient conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S., R.A., F.F. and O.L.; methodology, S.S., T.S. and O.L.; software, S.S.; validation, S.S., T.S., N.A., R.A., F.F. and O.L.; formal analysis, S.S., N.A., M.B. and N.M.; investigation, S.S., N.A., M.B., M.T.B., N.M. and O.L.; resources, S.S., L.Z., M.T.B., R.A. and O.L.; data curation, S.S., N.A., M.B., N.M. and O.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S., M.B., N.A., N.M. and O.L.; writing—review and editing, S.S., M.B., R.A., F.F. and O.L.; visualization, S.S., M.B., N.M. and N.A.; supervision, T.S., R.A., F.F. and O.L.; project administration, T.S., R.A., F.F. and O.L.; funding acquisition, T.S., R.A., F.F. and O.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge funding within the project “SuSiBaBy”—SulfurSilicon Batteries by the EUSH and EFRE in SH (LPW-E/3.1.1/1801), German Research Foundation (DFG—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under the Project-ID 434434223-SFB 1461, Project-ID 286471992-SFB 1261 project A2, GRK 2154 project P4 and AD 183/16-1. This work was partially supported by the Technical University of Moldova and through the ANCD-NARD Grant No. 20.80009.5007.09 at TUM.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored in part by the ANCD-NARD Grant No. 20.80009.5007.09 at the Technical University of Moldova. We acknowledge funding within the project “SuSiBaBy”—SulfurSilicon Batteries by the EUSH and EFRE in SH (LPW-E/3.1.1/1801), German Research Foundation (DFG—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under the Project-ID 434434223-SFB 1461, Project-ID 286471992-SFB 1261 project A2, GRK 2154 project P4 and AD 183/16-1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Additional measurements for selected samples are shown here in the appendix.
Polymers 15 00524 g0a1 550
Figure A1. SEM image of the TiO2 structure with 25 nm thickness without PV4D4 polymer thin film.
Figure A1. SEM image of the TiO2 structure with 25 nm thickness without PV4D4 polymer thin film.
Polymers 15 00524 g0a1
Polymers 15 00524 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the: (a) uncoated CuO structures to ethanol vapor; and (b) CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film to 2-propanol vapor. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the: (c) uncoated Al2O3/CuO structures to 2-propanol vapor; and (d) Al2O3/CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film to different vapor. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the TiO2 structures with PV4D4 thin film to 2-propanol vapor. The investigated TiO2 structures are: (e) 15 nm and (f) 25 nm thick.
Figure A2. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the: (a) uncoated CuO structures to ethanol vapor; and (b) CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film to 2-propanol vapor. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the: (c) uncoated Al2O3/CuO structures to 2-propanol vapor; and (d) Al2O3/CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film to different vapor. Electrical resistance at different operating temperature for the TiO2 structures with PV4D4 thin film to 2-propanol vapor. The investigated TiO2 structures are: (e) 15 nm and (f) 25 nm thick.
Polymers 15 00524 g0a2

References

  1. Shafique, M.; Luo, X. Nanotechnology in Transportation Vehicles: An Overview of Its Applications, Environmental, Health and Safety Concerns. Materials 2019, 12, 2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Chen, X.; Leishman, M.; Bagnall, D.; Nasiri, N. Nanostructured Gas Sensors: From Air Quality and Environmental Monitoring to Healthcare and Medical Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Postica, V.; Reimer, T.; Lupan, O.; Lazari, E.; Ababii, N.; Shishiyanu, S.; Railean, S.; Kaidas, V.; Kaps, S.; Benecke, W.; et al. Sensing Properties of Ultra-Thin TiO2 Nanostructured Films Based Sensors. In 3rd International Conference on Nanotechnologies and Biomedical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ababii, N.; Hoppe, M.; Shree, S.; Vahl, A.; Ulfa, M.; Pauporté, T.; Viana, B.; Cretu, V.; Magariu, N.; Postica, V.; et al. Effect of Noble Metal Functionalization and Film Thickness on Sensing Properties of Sprayed TiO2 Ultra-Thin Films. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 293, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hoppe, M.; Ababii, N.; Postica, V.; Lupan, O.; Polonskyi, O.; Schütt, F.; Kaps, S.; Sukhodub, L.F.; Sontea, V.; Strunskus, T.; et al. (CuO-Cu2O)/ZnO:Al Heterojunctions for Volatile Organic Compound Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 1362–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vahl, A.; Dittmann, J.; Jetter, J.; Veziroglu, S.; Shree, S.; Ababii, N.; Lupan, O.; Aktas, O.C.; Strunskus, T.; Quandt, E.; et al. The impact of O2/Ar ratio on morphology and functional properties in reactive sputtering of metal oxide thin films. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 235603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lupan, O.; Ababii, N.; Santos-Carballal, D.; Terasa, M.-I.; Magariu, N.; Zappa, D.; Comini, E.; Pauporté, T.; Siebert, L.; Faupel, F.; et al. Tailoring the Selectivity of Ultralow-Power Heterojunction Gas Sensors by Noble Metal Nanoparticle Functionalization. Nano Energy 2021, 88, 106241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siebert, L.; Wolff, N.; Ababii, N.; Terasa, M.-I.; Lupan, O.; Vahl, A.; Duppel, V.; Qiu, H.; Tienken, M.; Mirabelli, M.; et al. Facile Fabrication of Semiconducting Oxide Nanostructures by Direct Ink Writing of Readily Available Metal Microparticles and Their Application as Low Power Acetone Gas Sensors. Nano Energy 2020, 70, 104420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Siebert, L.; Lupan, O.; Mirabelli, M.; Ababii, N.; Terasa, M.-I.; Kaps, S.; Cretu, V.; Vahl, A.; Faupel, F.; Adelung, R. 3D-Printed Chemiresistive Sensor Array on Nanowire CuO/Cu2O/Cu Heterojunction Nets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 25508–25515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lupan, O.; Postica, V.; Wolff, N.; Polonskyi, O.; Duppel, V.; Kaidas, V.; Lazari, E.; Ababii, N.; Faupel, F.; Kienle, L.; et al. Localized Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanowires and Fabrication of High Performance Nanosensors Based on a Single Fe2O3 Nanowire. Small 2017, 13, 1602868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ponzoni, A.; Baratto, C.; Cattabiani, N.; Falasconi, M.; Galstyan, V.; Nunez-Carmona, E.; Rigoni, F.; Sberveglieri, V.; Zambotti, G.; Zappa, D. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors, a Survey of Selectivity Issues Addressed at the SENSOR Lab, Brescia (Italy). Sensors 2017, 17, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prades, J.D.; Hernández-Ramírez, F.; Fischer, T.; Hoffmann, M.; Müller, R.; López, N.; Mathur, S.; Morante, J.R. Quantitative analysis of CO-humidity gas mixtures with self-heated nanowires operated in pulsed mode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 243105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, D.; Yang, Z.; Yu, S.; Mi, Q.; Pan, Q. Diversiform metal oxide-based hybrid nanostructures for gas sensing with versatile prospects. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 413, 213272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beniwal, A. Sunny, Electrospun SnO2/PPy nanocomposite for ultra-low ammonia concentration detection at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 296, 126660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, D.; Wu, Z.; Zong, X.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of polypyrrole/Zn2SnO4 nanofilm for ultra-highly sensitive ammonia sensing application. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 274, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sáaedi, A.; Shabani, P.; Yousefi, R. High performance of methanol gas sensing of ZnO/PAni nanocomposites synthesized under different magnetic field. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 802, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dakshayini, B.S.; Reddy, K.R.; Mishra, A.; Shetti, N.P.; Malode, S.J.; Basu, S.; Naveen, S.; Raghu, A.V. Role of conducting polymer and metal oxide-based hybrids for applications in ampereometric sensors and biosensors. Microchem. J. 2019, 147, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaynak, A.; Zolfagharian, A. Functional Polymers in Sensors and Actuators: Fabrication and Analysis. Polymers 2020, 12, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schröder, S.; Ababii, N.; Lupan, O.; Drewes, J.; Magariu, N.; Krüger, H.; Strunskus, T.; Adelung, R.; Hansen, S.; Faupel, F. Sensing performance of CuO/Cu2O/ZnO: Fe heterostructure coated with thermally stable ultrathin hydrophobic PV3D3 polymer layer for battery application. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Coclite, A.M.; Howden, R.M.; Borelli, D.C.; Petruczok, C.D.; Yang, R.; Yagüe, J.L.; Ugur, A.; Chen, N.; Lee, S.; Won, J.J.; et al. 25th Anniversary Article: CVD Polymers: A New Paradigm for Surface Modification and Device Fabrication. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5392–5423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gleason, K.K. Nanoscale Control by Chemically Vapour-Deposited Polymers. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020, 2, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lupan, O.; Santos-Carballal, D.; Ababii, N.; Magariu, N.; Hansen, S.; Vahl, A.; Zimoch, L.; Hoppe, M.; Pauporté, T.; Galstyan, V.; et al. TiO2/Cu2O/CuO Multi-Nanolayers as Sensors for H2 and Volatile Organic Compounds: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 32363–32380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lupan, O.; Cretu, V.; Postica, V.; Polonskyi, O.; Ababii, N.; Schütt, F.; Kaidas, V.; Faupel, F.; Adelung, R. Non-planar nanoscale p–p heterojunctions formation in ZnxCu1−xOy nanocrystals by mixed phases for enhanced sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 230, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lupan, O.; Postica, V.; Ababii, N.; Hoppe, M.; Cretu, V.; Tiginyanu, I.; Sontea, V.; Pauporté, T.; Viana, B.; Adelung, R. Influence of CuO nanostructures morphology on hydrogen gas sensing performances. Microelectron. Eng. 2016, 164, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lupan, O.; Ababii, N.; Mishra, A.K.; Bodduluri, M.T.; Magariu, N.; Vahl, A.; Krüger, H.; Wagner, B.; Faupel, F.; Adelung, R.; et al. Heterostructure-based devices with enhanced humidity stability for H2 gas sensing applications in breath tests and portable batteries. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 329, 112804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lupan, O.; Postica, V.; Ababii, N.; Reimer, T.; Shree, S.; Hoppe, M.; Polonskyi, O.; Sontea, V.; Chemnitz, S.; Faupel, F.; et al. Ultra-thin TiO2 films by atomic layer deposition and surface functionalization with Au nanodots for sensing applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 87, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schröder, S.; Strunskus, T.; Rehders, S.; Gleason, K.K.; Faupel, F. Tunable polytetrafluoroethylene electret films with extraordinary charge stability synthesized by initiated chemical vapor deposition for organic electronics applications. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Schröder, S.; Polonskyi, O.; Strunskus, T.; Faupel, F. Nanoscale gradient copolymer films via single-step deposition from the vapor phase. Mater. Today 2020, 37, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aktas, O.C.; Schröder, S.; Veziroglu, S.; Ghori, M.Z.; Haidar, A.; Polonskyi, O.; Strunskus, T.; Gleason, K.K.; Faupel, F. Superhydrophobiy 3D Porous PTFE/TiO2 Hybrid Structures. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1801967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lupan, O.; Ababii, N.; Mishra, A.K.; Gronenberg, O.; Vahl, A.; Schürmann, U.; Duppel, V.; Krüger, H.; Chow, L.; Kienle, L.; et al. Single CuO/Cu2O/Cu Microwire Covered by a Nanowire Network as a Gas Sensor for the Detection of Battery Hazards. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 42248–42263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lupan, O.; Santos-Carballal, D.; Magariu, N.; Mishra, A.K.; Ababii, N.; Krüger, H.; Wolff, N.; Vahl, A.; Bodduluri, M.T.; Kohlmann, N.; et al. Al2O3/ZnO Heterostructure-Based Sensors for Volatile Organic Compounds in Safety Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 29331–29344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kutukov, P.; Rumyantseva, M.; Krivetskiy, V.; Filatova, D.; Batuk, M.; Hadermann, J.; Khmelevsky, N.; Aksenenko, A.; Gaskov, A. Influence of Mono- and Bimetallic PtOx, PdOx, PtPdOx Clusters on CO Sensing by SnO2 Based Gas Sensors. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dunning, T.H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Valiev, M.; Bylaska, E.J.; Govind, N.; Kowalski, K.; Straatsma, T.P.; van Dam, H.J.J.; Wang, D.; Nieplocha, J.; Apra, E.; Windus, T.L.; et al. NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Socrates, G. Alkane Group Residues: C-H Group. In Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2004; pp. 50–67. [Google Scholar]
  39. Socrates, G. Organic Silicon Compounds. In Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2004; pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lau, K.K.S.; Gleason, K.K. Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition (iCVD) of Poly(alkyl acrylates):  An Experimental Study. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3688–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schröder, S.; Hinz, A.M.; Strunskus, T.; Faupel, F. Molecular Insight into Real-Time Reaction Kinetics of Free Radical Polymerization from the Vapor Phase by In-Situ Mass Spectrometry. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 1661–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lupan, O.; Cretu, V.; Postica, V.; Ababii, N.; Polonskyi, O.; Kaidas, V.; Schütt, F.; Mishra, Y.K.; Monaico, E.; Tiginyanu, I.; et al. Enhanced ethanol vapour sensing performances of copper oxide nanocrystals with mixed phases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, S.; Koh, H.; Ren, C.; Kwon, O.; Maleski, K.; Cho, S.; Anasori, B.; Kim, C.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J.; et al. Metallic Ti3C2TX MXene gas sensors with ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Malook, K.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.; Haque, I. Highly selective and sensitive response of polypyrrole-MnO2 based composites towards ammonia gas. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 1676–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhu, C.; Cakmak, U.; Sheikhnejad, O.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhao, H.; Huo, L.; Major, Z. One step synthesis of PANI/Fe2O3 nanocomposites and flexible film for enhanced NH3 sensing performance at room temperature. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 255502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bai, S.; Zhang, K.; Sun, J.; Zhang, D.; Luo, R.; Li, D.; Liu, C. Polythiophene-WO3 hybrid architectures for low-temperature H2S detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 197, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, J.; Yin, L. Platinum nanoparticle modified polyaniline-functionalized boron nitride nanotubes for amperometric glucose enzyme biosensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4354–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, J.; Huo, X.; Liu, X.; Ju, H. Gold nanoparticles deposited polyaniline–TiO2 nanotube for surface plasmon resonance enhanced photoelectrochemical biosensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 8, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Devi, R.; Thakur, M.; Pundir, C. Construction and application of an amperometric xanthine biosensor based on zinc oxide nanoparticles–polypyrrole composite film. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3420–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meng, F.; Shi, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wu, G.; Ruan, C.; Liu, X.; Ge, D. Nonenzymatic biosensor based on CuxO nanoparticles deposited on polypyrrole nanowires for improving detectionrange. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 42, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Bai, W. Potentiometric glucose biosensor based on core–shell Fe3O4–enzyme–polypyrrole nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 51, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, W.; Li, L.; Zeng, X. A glucose biosensor based on the synergistic action of nanometer-sized TiO2 and polyaniline. Talanta 2015, 131, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lu, L.; Zhang, O.; Xu, J.; Wen, Y.; Duan, X.; Yu, H.; Wu, L.; Nie, T. A facile one-step redox route for the synthesis of graphene/poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanocomposite and their applications in biosensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 181, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, W.; Xu, G.; Cui, X.T.; Sheng, G.; Luo, X. Enhanced catalytic and dopamine sensing properties of electrochemically reduced conducting polymer nanocomposite doped with pure graphene oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 58, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 15 00524 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the study: (a) CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 gas sensors are each coated with a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film grown from V4D4 monomer and PFBSF initiator using the iCVD process; (b) the coated and uncoated gas sensors are then exposed to different volatile organic vapors and compared based on their individual gas responses.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the study: (a) CuO, Al2O3/CuO and TiO2 gas sensors are each coated with a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film grown from V4D4 monomer and PFBSF initiator using the iCVD process; (b) the coated and uncoated gas sensors are then exposed to different volatile organic vapors and compared based on their individual gas responses.
Polymers 15 00524 g001
Polymers 15 00524 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of the morphologies of the three different gas sensor structures investigated in this study. Uncoated CuO structure grown by sputtering at: (a) low magnification and (b) high magnification. SEM images of the CuO structure grown by sputtering then covered with PV4D4 thin film at (c) low magnification and (d) high magnification. Uncoated Al2O3/CuO obtained by ALD/SCS approaches and measured at magnification (e) 1 µm; (f) and (g) 200 nm scale bar. SEM images of the Al2O3/CuO by ALD/SCS covered on top with PV4D4 thin film at (h) 1 µm; (i) and (j) 200 nm scale bar. TiO2 structures with a thickness of 30 nm and a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film on top measured at (k) low magnification; (l) medium magnification; and (m) high magnification by SEM.
Figure 2. SEM images of the morphologies of the three different gas sensor structures investigated in this study. Uncoated CuO structure grown by sputtering at: (a) low magnification and (b) high magnification. SEM images of the CuO structure grown by sputtering then covered with PV4D4 thin film at (c) low magnification and (d) high magnification. Uncoated Al2O3/CuO obtained by ALD/SCS approaches and measured at magnification (e) 1 µm; (f) and (g) 200 nm scale bar. SEM images of the Al2O3/CuO by ALD/SCS covered on top with PV4D4 thin film at (h) 1 µm; (i) and (j) 200 nm scale bar. TiO2 structures with a thickness of 30 nm and a 25 nm PV4D4 thin film on top measured at (k) low magnification; (l) medium magnification; and (m) high magnification by SEM.
Polymers 15 00524 g002
Polymers 15 00524 g003 550
Figure 3. Chemical characterization and theoretical estimation of PV4D4 ring structures. (a) The infrared bands measured for the deposited PV4D4 thin films via FTIR show preserved functionality of all functional groups as well as successful polymerization; (b) isolated D4 molecule geometry optimized using DFT on the B3LYP/6-31G* level; and (c) embedded V4D4 molecule connected at all sites only to one other V4D4 molecule geometry optimized via DFT.
Figure 3. Chemical characterization and theoretical estimation of PV4D4 ring structures. (a) The infrared bands measured for the deposited PV4D4 thin films via FTIR show preserved functionality of all functional groups as well as successful polymerization; (b) isolated D4 molecule geometry optimized using DFT on the B3LYP/6-31G* level; and (c) embedded V4D4 molecule connected at all sites only to one other V4D4 molecule geometry optimized via DFT.
Polymers 15 00524 g003
Polymers 15 00524 g004 550
Figure 4. Gas response versus operating temperature for the (a) uncoated CuO structures, grown by sputtering; and (b) CuO structures, grown by sputtering and then coated with PV4D4 thin film. (c) Dynamic responses to 100 ppm of 2-propanol for the CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film. Gas response versus operating temperature for the (d) uncoated Al2O3/CuO structures, grown by ALD/SCS; and (e) Al2O3/CuO structures, grown by ALD/SCS, then coated with PV4D4 thin film on top. Gas response versus operating temperature for the TiO2 structures, grown by ALD, then coated with PV4D4 thin film. The investigated TiO2 structures are (f) 15 nm and (g) 25 nm thick.
Figure 4. Gas response versus operating temperature for the (a) uncoated CuO structures, grown by sputtering; and (b) CuO structures, grown by sputtering and then coated with PV4D4 thin film. (c) Dynamic responses to 100 ppm of 2-propanol for the CuO structures with PV4D4 thin film. Gas response versus operating temperature for the (d) uncoated Al2O3/CuO structures, grown by ALD/SCS; and (e) Al2O3/CuO structures, grown by ALD/SCS, then coated with PV4D4 thin film on top. Gas response versus operating temperature for the TiO2 structures, grown by ALD, then coated with PV4D4 thin film. The investigated TiO2 structures are (f) 15 nm and (g) 25 nm thick.
Polymers 15 00524 g004
Table
Table 1. Response and recovery times of CuO structures with PV4D4 coating to 2-propanol vapor.
Table 1. Response and recovery times of CuO structures with PV4D4 coating to 2-propanol vapor.
Operating Temperature (°C)Response Time (s)Recovery Time (s)
2508.619.6
3009.535
35011.440
Table
Table 2. Comparison of sensors based on conducting polymer/metal oxide hybrids and gas sensors based on the dielectric iCVD PV4D4/metal oxide hybrids studied in this work.
Table 2. Comparison of sensors based on conducting polymer/metal oxide hybrids and gas sensors based on the dielectric iCVD PV4D4/metal oxide hybrids studied in this work.
Sensor MaterialPolymerAnalyteResponseWorking Temp (°C)
SnO2 [14](PPy) PolypyrroleNH357% (0.1 ppm)RT
ZnO [43]PT nanofibersNO22.8% (308 ppm)RT
MnO2 [44](PPy) PolypyrroleNH346.44 (5 ppm)RT
ZnO [16](PANi) PolyanilineMethanol19.2 (100 ppm)60
Fe2O3 [45](PANi) PolyanilineNH33.79 (100 ppm)RT
WO3 [46]PolythiopheneH2S13 (100 ppm)70
Boron nitride-Pt nanoparticles [47](PANi) PolyanilineGlucose19.2 mAM−1cm−260
TiO2 nanotube-Au nanoparticles [48](PANi) PolyanilineLactate0.0401 μAμM−1cm−2
ZnO [49](PPy) PolypyrroleXanthineN.A.35
CuxO [50](PPy) PolypyrroleGlucose232.22 μAmM−1cm−2RT
Fe3O4 [51](PPy) PolypyrroleGlucose-RT
TiO2-GOx [52](PANi) PolyanilineGlucose6.31 μAmM−1cm−2
Graphene [53](PEDOT) 3, 4-ethylenedioxythiopheneAscorbic acid-RT
Graphene [54](PEDOT) 3, 4-ethylenedioxythiopheneDopamine-RT
CuO (this work)PV4D42-propanol70%(100 ppm)300
Al2O3/CuO (this work)PV4D4n-butanol4.5%(100 ppm)350
TiO2 (this work)PV4D42-propanol225%(100 ppm)400
TiO2 (this work)PV4D42-propanol251%(100 ppm)350
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schröder, S.; Ababii, N.; Brînză, M.; Magariu, N.; Zimoch, L.; Bodduluri, M.T.; Strunskus, T.; Adelung, R.; Faupel, F.; Lupan, O. Tuning the Selectivity of Metal Oxide Gas Sensors with Vapor Phase Deposited Ultrathin Polymer Thin Films. Polymers 2023, 15, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030524

AMA Style

Schröder S, Ababii N, Brînză M, Magariu N, Zimoch L, Bodduluri MT, Strunskus T, Adelung R, Faupel F, Lupan O. Tuning the Selectivity of Metal Oxide Gas Sensors with Vapor Phase Deposited Ultrathin Polymer Thin Films. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schröder, Stefan, Nicolai Ababii, Mihai Brînză, Nicolae Magariu, Lukas Zimoch, Mani Teja Bodduluri, Thomas Strunskus, Rainer Adelung, Franz Faupel, and Oleg Lupan. 2023. "Tuning the Selectivity of Metal Oxide Gas Sensors with Vapor Phase Deposited Ultrathin Polymer Thin Films" Polymers 15, no. 3: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop