Next Article in Journal
Stretchable Surface Electrode Arrays Using an Alginate/PEDOT:PSS-Based Conductive Hydrogel for Conformal Brain Interfacing
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction and Characterization of New Cellulosic Fiber from Catalpa bignonioides Fruits for Potential Use in Sustainable Products
Previous Article in Journal
Carboxymethyl-Cellulose-Containing Ag Nanoparticles as an Electrochemical Working Electrode for Fast Hydroxymethyl-Furfural Sensing in Date Molasses
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Alterations and Roles of Glycosaminoglycans in Human Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/polym15010083
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Starch Physicochemical Properties of Normal Maize under Different Fertilization Modes

by
Jue Wang
and
Dalei Lu
*
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010083
Submission received: 23 October 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Polysaccharide: Synthesis, Modification and Application)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Improving the quality with desired functions of natural starch through agronomic practice will meet the increasing need of people for natural, functional foods. A one-off application of slow-release fertilizer is a simple and efficient practice in maize production, though its influence on the starch quality is scarce. In the present study, the structural and functional properties of the starch of normal maize under two fertilization modes (one-off application of slow-release fertilizer at the sowing time (SF), and three applications of conventional fertilizer at the sowing time, and topdressing at the jointing and flowering stages (CF)) under the same fertilization level (N/P2O5/K2O = 405/135/135 kg/ha) were studied using Jiangyu877 (JY877) and Suyu30 (SY30) as materials. The observed results indicate that the size of starch granules was enlarged by fertilization and the size was the largest under CF in both hybrids. The amylose content was unaffected by CF and reduced by SF in both hybrids. In comparison to no fertilizer (0F), the peak 1/peak 2 ratio was decreased by CF in both hybrids, whereas the ratio under SF was unaffected in JY877 and decreased in SY30. The amylopectin average chain-length was reduced by fertilization and the reduction was higher under CF in JY877. The relative crystallinity was increased by CF in both hybrids and the value under SF was unaffected in SY30 and increased in JY877. The peak, trough, and final viscosities of starch were increased by fertilization in both hybrids. The starch thermal characteristics in response to fertilization modes were dependent on hybrids. The retrogradation enthalpy and percentage were increased by CF in both hybrids, whereas those two parameters under SF were increased in SY30 and decreased in JY877. In conclusion, starch with similar granule size, higher peak 1/peak 2 ratio, and lower relative crystallinity was obtained under SF than under CF for both hybrids. Longer amylopectin chain-length was observed in JY877, which induced lower pasting viscosities in SY30 and lower retrogradation characteristics in JY877.

1. Introduction

Among different starch resources, maize is the most important and dominates about 80% of the global market share [1]. In the traditional food industry, the starch quality is often modified by some enzymatic or chemical methods. With improving living standards, natural starch of a desired quality has received extensive attention. The natural starch quality affects its utilization and is dependent on genotypes, environmental factors, and agronomic practices. Among various agronomic practices, nitrogen (N) fertilization is an important measure and N type, application rate, time, and mode affect the starch quality. In maize production, N fertilization induces a larger effect for protein content as N rates increase, whereas the contents of starch and oil present less varied N rates [2]. Higher N rate in four to five split applications increases maize grain quality and yield [3], and a higher N rate increases oil, total unsaturated fatty acids, and starch and amylopectin under high irrigation level, though it does not affect grain quality under low irrigation level [4]. With an increase of the N rates, the contents of resistant starch, amylose, and phytic acid in maize also increase [1]. The waxy maize starch pasting and thermal properties are affected by N fertilization and starch with large starch granule size (SGS) exhibit high trough (TV), final (FV), and setback (SB) viscosities and gelatinization temperatures [5]. Studies on wheat [6,7], common buckwheat [8,9], Tartary buckwheat [10,11], and rice [12,13,14,15,16,17,18] have reported that starch pasting and thermal qualities of cereal grain are affected by N rates, split times, application stages, and the ratio of base fertilizer to topdressing application via changes in the grain composition contents and starch structures such as SGS, amylopectin chain-length (ACL), and relative crystallinity (RC).
With the development of the science and technology of agronomy, the use of fertilization transfers to simultaneously improve grain yield and quality, and the use of slow-release fertilizer (SF) as an efficient and environment friendly fertilizer have been widely adopted in maize and other cereal crops production. The N release of the SF agrees with the crop nutrient requirement, allowing for the coordination of vegetative and reproductive growth, a reduction in nutrient loss, an improvement in N utilization efficiency and a reduction in topdressing labor costs [19]. In the past decade, studies on rice [20,21,22,23,24] and wheat [25,26,27,28,29] have reported that the application of SF affects the grain quality by changing the concentrations of protein, starch, oil and mineral elements. However, studies have mainly focused on the grain quality while starch structural and functional properties have received less attention [30,31].
A one-time application of SF is a low labor-cost practice in modern agriculture, and grain quality has received more attention as living standards have improved. However, questions regarding the effects of split applications of traditional compound fertilizers and urea and one-off application of SF on the quality of normal maize starch remain unanswered. In this study, the physicochemical properties of starch under two fertilization modes (one-off application of slow-release fertilizer at the sowing time, and three applications of conventional fertilizer at the sowing time, topdressing urea at both the jointing and flowering stages) of two normal maize hybrids are compared.

2. Material and Method

2.1. Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted in Jiangxinsha farm (N 31°48′, E 121°05′), Nantong, Jiangsu, China, in 2018. The soil (0–20 cm) nutrient content before sowing was as follows: 11.83 g/kg organic matter, 1.11 g/kg total N, 81.36 mg/kg available N, 6.31 mg/kg available P, and 61.49 mg/kg available K. Pests, diseases, and weeds were controlled by managers. Cumulative temperature, rainfall, and sunlight during plant growth were 2925.8 °C, 290.2 mm, and 670.6 h, respectively.
Two normal maize hybrids widely planted in Jiangsu, namely Jiangyu877 (JY877) and Suyu30 (SY30), were used as the materials. Seeds were sown on 1 April with a density of 75,000 plants/ha, and both hybrids were harvested on 6 August. A field trial was performed with a randomized complete block design with three replications. All plots were 45.0 m long and 3.6 m wide with row spacing of 0.4 and 0.8 m.
The fertilization modes included no fertilizer (0F), one-off application of slow-release fertilizer at the sowing time (SF), and three applications of conventional fertilizer at the sowing time, jointing stage and flowering stage (CF). The fertilization rates of N, P2O5 and K2O were 405, 135 and 135 kg/ha, respectively, for both CF and SF [32]. SF (N/P2O5/K2O = 27%/9%/9%) (Lvjuneng, Zhongdong, Changzhou, China) was applied at the rate of 405 kg/ha N (P2O5 and K2O were 135 kg/ha) at the sowing time as basal fertilizer. CF was applied at the rate of 135 kg/ha N, with P2O5 and K2O forming a conventional compound fertilizer (N/P2O5/K2O = 15%/15%/15%) that was used as a basal fertilizer at the sowing time, an N rate of 225 and 45 kg/ha was used for conventional urea (N = 46%) at the jointing and flowering stages as topdressing fertilizer.

2.2. Starch Isolation

Grains (100 g) were steeped in 500 mL of distilled water containing 1 g/L NaHSO3 at room temperature for 48 h. Starch was isolated in accordance with a previously described method [33]. The grains were rinsed with distilled water, and then ground using a blender for 2.5 min. The suspensions were passed through a 100-mesh sieve. The materials left on the screen were homogenized for 1.5 min again, and then passed through the same sieve. The starch–protein slurry was collected in a 1000-mL wide-neck flask and allowed to stand for 4 h. The supernatant was removed through suction and the settled starch layer was collected in 50 mL centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min. The upper non-white layer was scooped. The white layer was resuspended in distilled water and stirred for 30 min before centrifugation. The isolation procedures were repeated three times. The starch was then collected and dried in an oven at 40 °C for 48 h. Protein, lipid and ash contents in the isolated starch were lower than 4, 2, and 2 mg/g, respectively, indicating that starch purity reached the Chinese National Standard of edible maize starch (GB/T 8885−2017).

2.3. Starch Granule Size Distribution

The distribution of SGS was analyzed using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern, Worcestershire, England). Instrument accuracy was verified with Malvern standard glass particles. The disperse phase was absolute ethyl alcohol. Size distribution was expressed in terms of the volume of equivalent spheres, and the granule size was defined as the volume weighted mean [34].

2.4. Amylopectin Chain Length Distribution

Starch (5 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL distilled deionized water in a boiling water bath for 60 min. Sodium azide solution (10 µL 2%w/v), acetate buffer (50 µL, 0.6 M, pH 4.4), and isoamylase (10 µL, 1400 U, EC 3.2.1.68, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA) were added to the starch dispersion, and the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37 °C for 24 h. The hydroxyl groups of the debranched glucans were reduced by treatment with 0.5% (w/v) of sodium borohydride under alkaline conditions for 20 h. The preparation of about 600 µL was dried in vacuo at room temperature and allowed to dissolve in 20 µL of 1 m NaOH for 60 min. Then, the solution was diluted with 580 µL of distilled water.
The chain length distribution of debranched amylopectin was determined using an ion chromatograph (ICS5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in accordance with a previously published protocol [34,35].

2.5. Molecular Weight Distribution

The starch was debranched with isoamylase (EC 3.2.1.68, Sigma) dissolved in 50 mM sodium acetate, and its molecular weight distribution was analyzed following a method described previously using a PL-GPC 220 high-temperature chromatograph (Agilent Technologies UK Limited, Shropshire, UK) with three columns (PL110-6100, 6300, and 6525) and a differential refractive index detector [36,37]. The eluent system was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing 0.5 mM NaNO3 at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The column oven temperature was controlled at 80 °C. Standard dextrans of known molecular weights (2800, 18,500, 111,900, 410,000, 1,050,000, 2,900,000, and 6,300,000) were used for column calibration.

2.6. X-ray Diffraction Pattern

The X-ray diffraction patterns of starch were obtained using an X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker-AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) operated at 200 mA and 40 kV. The scanning region of the diffraction angle (2θ) ranged from 3° to 40° at a step size of 0.04° with a count time of 0.6 s. Before measurements, the specimens were stored in a moist chamber where a saturated solution of NaCl maintained a constant humidity (relative humidity = 75%) for 1 week. RC (%) was calculated as the percentage ratio of the sum of the total crystalline peak areas to that of total diffractogram (sum of total crystalline and amorphous peak areas) using MDI Jade 6 software.

2.7. Pasting Properties

The pasting properties of starch (28 g total weight; 7%, w/w, dry weight) were evaluated using a rapid viscosity analyzer (RVA, Model 3D, Newport Scientific, Warriewood NSW, Australia) in accordance with a previously described method [34]. A sample suspension was equilibrated at 50 °C for 1 min, heated to 95 °C at 12 °C/min, maintained at 95 °C for 2.5 min, cooled to 50 °C at 12 °C/min, and maintained at 50°C for 1 min. The paddle speed was set at 960 rpm for the first 10 s and then decreased to 160 rpm for the rest of the analysis.

2.8. Thermal Properties

The thermal characteristics of the starch were determined using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, Model200F3 Maia, NETZSCH, Bavaria, Germany) in accordance with a previously described method [34]. Each sample (5 mg, dry weight) was loaded into an aluminum pan (25/40 mL, d = 5 mm), and 10 mL of distilled water was added to achieve a starch–water suspension containing 66.7% water. The samples were hermetically sealed and allowed to stand at 4 °C for 24 h before they were heated in the DSC analyzer. The DSC analyzer was calibrated using an empty aluminum pan as a reference. The pans were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min from 20 to 100 °C. The thermal transitions of starch were defined as onset temperature (To), peak gelatinization temperature (Tp), conclusion temperature (Tc), and gelatinization enthalpy (ΔHgel). After the thermal analysis was conducted, the samples were stored at 4 °C for 7 days for retrogradation investigations. Retrogradation enthalpy (ΔHret) was automatically evaluated, and retrogradation percentage (%R) was calculated as %R = 100 × ΔHret/ΔHgel.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Values shown in all tables and figures are means of three independent ears. Means were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the least significant difference test at the 0.05 probability level using Data Processing System 7.05 (DPS, version 7.05, Hangzhou, China).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Starch Granule Size

The size distribution of starch granules of all the samples presents dual peaks. In comparison to 0F, the SGS was enlarged by fertilization (CF and SF) in both hybrids (Figure 1). Meanwhile, the SGS of SF was similar to CF in both hybrids. Fertilization increased the SGS in Tartary buckwheat [11], whereas the proportion of large granules in common and Tartary buckwheat decreased by N fertilization [8,10]. Under the same fertilization level, the SGS gradually enlarged with the increase of the ratio of N fertilization at the panicle initiation stage [18], and postpone the N application time enlarged the SGS by increase the proportion of medium size granules [14]. The similar SGS between the SF and CF indicated that a one-off application of SF can achieve the same effect to the three applications of conventional fertilizer and can save the two-time fertilization labor cost. Studies on wheat [7] and rice [38] have also observed that the fertilization favored the formation of small starch granules. The discrepancy may be due to different starch granule development dynamics, the starch development in wheat first developed A-type starch granules followed by B-type starch granules [39], and the fertilization offered enough resources to develop B-type starch granules. In the maize endosperm, the starch develops with an increase in granule numbers in the first two weeks and enlarged granule sizes after that [40].

3.2. Molecular Weight Distribution

The isoamylase debranched starch presented trimodal peaks for all the samples (Figure 2), with peak 3 representing the amylose content, and peaks 1 and 2 representing the percentages of amylopectin short chains and long chains. The ratio of peak 1/peak 2 is commonly regarded as the branching degree of amylopectin [17]. Studies on common and Tartary buckwheat have reported that the amylose content was decreased by N fertilization [8,10]. A study on rice observed that the peak 3 ratio in response to N rates at the late stage was dependent on the genotypes [17]. In the present study, the amylose content (peak 3 ratio) was unaffected by CF and decreased by SF in both hybrids (Table 1). The peak 2 ratio was increased by fertilization and the value was similar between CF and SF in both hybrids. The peak 1 ratio was unaffected by CF and increased by SF in JY877 and the value was decreased by CF and unaffected by SF in SY30. The peak 1/peak 2 ratio was reduced by CF and unaffected by SF in JY877, whereas the value was decreased by fertilization and the decrease was severe under CF in SY30, indicating that CF with large SGS has a high ratio of amylopectin with long chains [41]. This observation is consistent with a previous report on rice with late-stage N application [17].

3.3. Amylopectin Chain Length Distribution

The average ACL of isoamylase-debranched amylopectin was decreased by the fertilization and the influence of this was more significant in JY877 (Figure 3). For JY877, the ratios of degree of polymerization (DP) with 6–9 and 22–76 were decreased and DP 10–21 was increased by fertilization, with the influence being higher for CF than for SF. For SY30, the ACL was similarly decreased in both SF and CF by fertilization, but the difference ratio was lower than 0.17% for DP 6–76, indicated that it was less affected by fertilization than JY877. In Tartary buckwheat, the ACL was increased by fertilization [11]. In rice, with the increase of N rate, the ACL first decreased and then increased, resulting in the highest content in short chain distribution under a moderate N rate [15,16,42]. Another study has reported that ACL is unaffected by N fertilization [43], and that the ACL gradually increased with the increase of N rate at the panicle stage [44]. In waxy maize, the ACL was unaffected by CF but its response to SF was different between the two years [30]. A study on rice has reported that the ACL’s response to N rates is dependent on cultivars, and that the change is consistent to the relative expression level of soluble starch synthase I and branching enzymes IIb [12].

3.4. XRD Pattern

The XRD pattern of both hybrids under all the treatments presents a typical “A”-type pattern (Figure 4). The RC in JY877 was increased by fertilization and the increase was higher for CF than for SF, whereas the value in SY30 was unaffected by SF and increased by CF. The high RC under CF may be due to how the starch has a large SGS and a low peak 1/peak 2 ratio [41]. A study on wheat [7], Tartary buckwheat [9], common buckwheat [8], and rice [18,38] also observed that the fertilization increases the RC, whereas a study on ‘super’ rice reported that the RC was dependent on N rates [15]. Meanwhile, a study has observed that RC in response to N fertilization was different among various cultivars [13]. Under the same fertilization level, the RC gradually increased with the increase of the ratio of N fertilization at the panicle initiation stage [18], and postponing the N application time increased the RC [14].

3.5. Pasting Property

Pasting temperature (Ptemp) and SB in SY30 were unaffected by fertilization, those two values in JY877 were unaffected by CF, and the Ptemp was decreased whereas the SB was increased by SF (Table 2). For JY877, the peak viscosity (PV) and TV were increased by fertilization similarly between SF and CF, the FV was increased by fertilization and the increase was higher for SF than for CF, and breakdown viscosity (BD) was unaffected by CF and decreased by SF. For SY30, PV, TV, BD, and FV were increased by fertilization and the increases were higher for CF than for SF. A study on rice has reported that the starch PV, TV, and BD were higher under SF [23]. The pasting viscosities were decreased by the N fertilization in Tartary buckwheat [11], common buckwheat [8,9], triticale [45], and rice [12,13,38]. In ‘super’ rice, the pasting viscosities were increased by low N rate and decreased by excessive N rate [15]. Under the same fertilization level, PV, TV, BD, and FV gradually increased with an increase of the ratio of N fertilization at the panicle initiation stage [12], but those parameters decreased with the postponement of the N application time [14]. Between the two hybrids, SY30 has higher PV, TV, and BD than that of JY877 with fertilization.

3.6. Thermal Property

The ΔHgel in JY877 was unaffected by CF and reduced by SF, whereas in SY30 it was decreased by fertilization in a similar way for both CF and SF. For JY877, To and Tp were increased by fertilization and the increases were similar between both CF and SF (Table 3). Tc was unaffected by SF and reduced by CF. For SY30, Tp and Tc were unaffected and decreased by fertilization, To was increased by CF and decreased by SF. In Tartary buckwheat starch, the gelatinization temperatures were decreased by low N rate but increased by moderate and high N rates, ΔHgel was increased by N application [9,10]; whereas ΔHgel and gelatinization temperatures of common buckwheat were increased by N fertilization [8]. In rice, the gelatinization temperatures were unaffected by N rates, but ΔHgel was discrepant between the cultivars [12]. Another study observed that ΔHgel and gelatinization temperatures of cultivars with normal and low amylose contents were unaffected by N fertilization [13]. Under the same fertilization level, the ΔHgel was increased and gelatinization temperatures were decreased under the higher ratio of N fertilization at the panicle initiation stage [18]. With a postponed application time of the N, the ΔHgel was increased and gelatinization temperatures were decreased [14]. In ‘super’ rice, the ΔHgel and gelatinization temperatures were decreased by a low N rate and increased by an excessive N rate [15].
In the present study, the ΔHret in SY30 was increased by fertilization, whereas in JY877 it was increased by CF and decreased by SF. The %R was increased by CF in both hybrids, whereas with SF it was decreased in JY877 and increased in SY30. The higher ΔHret and %R under CF may be due to how the starch has a larger SGS, higher RC, and lower peak 1/peak 2 ratio and ACL. A study on rice has observed that ΔHret and %R were lower in SF than in CF under the same fertilization level [23]. In ‘super’ rice, the ΔHret and %R were decreased by a low N rate and increased by an excessive N rate [15]. Another study has reported that the ΔHret and %R of rice starch was gradually decreased with increased N rates [38]. A study on rice also observed that the ΔHret and %R of cultivars with normal or low amylose contents were increased by N fertilization [13], but under the same fertilization level achieved a high ratio of N fertilization at the panicle initiation stage [18] while late N application time [14] induced lower ΔHret and %R.

4. Conclusions

The starch physicochemical properties of normal maize were affected by fertilization modes. In comparison to 0F, larger SGS, higher RC, lower peak 1/peak 2 ratio and ACL were obtained under CF, which results in higher PV, TV, BD, To, Tp, ΔHret and %R in both hybrids. Larger SGS, lower amylose content and ACL, and higher PV, TV, and FV were obtained under SF in both hybrids, whereas the responses of other parameters were different between the two hybrids. In comparison to CF, the similar SGS, lower amylose content and RC, and higher peak 1/peak 2 ratio were obtained under SF in both hybrids, but ACL, and pasting and thermal properties were dependent on the hybrids. Between the two hybrids, JY877 has higher ΔHgel, lower pasting viscosities and %R than those of SY30 with fertilization, which may be due to how JY877 has lower amylose content, SGS and ACL and higher RC. The results offer the option to choose the optimal maize hybrid and fertilization mode based on different food utilizations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L.; methodology, D.L.; software, J.W.; validation, J.W.; formal analysis, J.W.; investigation, J.W.; resources, D.L.; data curation, J.W. and D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and D.L.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and D.L.; visualization, J.W.; supervision, D.L.; project administration, D.L.; funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS[2022]497), Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation of Jiangsu (KYCX20_2983), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), and High-end Talent Support Program of Yangzhou University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data and code used in this study can be requested by email to the corresponding author Dalei Lu at dllu@yzu.edu.cn.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaplan, M.; Karaman, K.; Kardes, Y.M.; Kale, H. Phytic acid content and starch properties of maize (Zea mays L.): Effects of irrigation process and nitrogen fertilizer. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Correndo, A.A.; Fernandez, J.A.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Ciampitti, I.A. Do Water and Nitrogen Management Practices Impact Grain Quality in Maize? Agronomy 2021, 11, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shah, P. Timing and rate of nitrogen application influence grain quality and yield in maize planted at high and low densities. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jahangirlou, M.R.; Akbari, G.A.; Alahdadi, I.; Soufizadeh, S.; Parsons, D. Grain Quality of Maize Cultivars as a Function of Planting Dates, Irrigation and Nitrogen Stress: A Case Study from Semiarid Conditions of Iran. Agriculture 2021, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Wen, Z.R.; Fu, P.X.; Lu, W.P.; Lu, D.L. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Physicochemical Properties of Waxy Maize Starch. Starch-Stärke 2019, 71, 1900146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L.L.; Xu, Z.S.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, Y.R.; Zhang, Y.M.; Wu, Y.F.; Yu, X.R.; Chen, G.; Xiong, F. Agronomic Traits and Physicochemical Properties of Starch of Different Grain Positions in Wheat Spike Under Nitrogen Treatment. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ran, L.P.; Yu, X.R.; Li, Y.Q.; Zou, J.C.; Deng, J.W.; Pan, J.Y.; Xiong, F. Analysis of development, accumulation and structural characteristics of starch granule in wheat grain under nitrogen application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 3739–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, L.C.; Bai, W.M.; Xia, M.J.; Wan, C.X.; Wang, M.; Wang, P.K.; Gao, X.L.; Gao, J.F. Diverse effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the structural, pasting, and thermal properties of common buckwheat starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 179, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, L.C.; Wan, C.X.; Wang, J.L.; Wang, P.K.; Gao, X.L.; Eeckhout, M.; Gao, J.F. Relationship between nitrogen fertilizer and structural, pasting and rheological properties on common buckwheat starch. Food Chem. 2022, 389, 132664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, W.; Yang, Q.; Xia, M.; Bai, W.; Wang, P.; Gao, X.; Li, J.; Feng, B.; Gao, J. Effects of nitrogen level on the physicochemical properties of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, L.; Xia, M.; Wan, C.; Jia, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, P.; Yang, Q.; Yang, P.; Gao, X.; et al. Analysis of synthesis, accumulation and physicochemical properties of Tartary buckwheat starches affected by nitrogen fertilizer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, S.J.; Zhao, C.F.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, L.H.E.; Zheng, Q.H.; Wang, C.L. Characterization of eating quality and starch properties of two Wx alleles japonica rice cultivars under different nitrogen treatments. J. Integr. Agr. 2020, 19, 988–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, Y.J.; Cong, S.M.; Zhang, H.C. Comparison of the Grain Quality and Starch Physicochemical Properties between Japonica Rice Cultivars with Different Contents of Amylose, as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization. Agriculture 2021, 11, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, W.; Qiu, S.; Wei, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, G.; Xing, Z.; Hu, Y.; Guo, B.; et al. Effects of mid-stage nitrogen application timing on the morphological structure and physicochemical properties of japonica rice starch. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 2463–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, T.; Zhou, Q.; Li, E.; Yuan, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yang, J.; Gu, J. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on structure and physicochemical properties of ‘super’ rice starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, T.Y.; Li, Z.K.; Li, E.P.; Wang, W.L.; Yuan, L.M.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Gu, J.F.; Yang, J.C. Optimization of nitrogen fertilization improves rice quality by affecting the structure and physicochemical properties of starch at high yield levels. J. Integr. Agr. 2022, 21, 1576–1592. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cao, X.M.; Sun, H.Y.; Wang, C.G.; Ren, X.J.; Liu, H.F.; Zhang, Z.J. Effects of late-stage nitrogen fertilizer application on the starch structure and cooking quality of rice. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2018, 98, 2332–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, D.W.; Zhang, H.C.; Guo, B.W.; Xu, K.; Dai, Q.G.; Wei, C.X.; Wei, H.Y.; Gao, H.; Hu, Y.J.; Cui, P.Y.; et al. Effect of Nitrogen Management on the Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Rice Starch. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 8019–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, J.J.; Fan, J.L.; Xiang, Y.Z.; Zhang, F.C.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yan, S.C.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zhang, J.M.; Zheng, J.; Yan, F.L. Synchronizing nitrogen supply and uptake by rainfed maize using mixed urea and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2022, 122, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, H.Y.; Chen, Z.F.; Xing, Z.P.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Q.Y.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Y.J.; Zhu, J.Y.; Cui, P.Y.; et al. Effects of slow or controlled release fertilizer types and fertilization modes on yield and quality of rice. J. Integr. Agr. 2018, 17, 2222–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wahid, M.A.; Irshad, M.; Irshad, S.; Khan, S.; Hasnain, Z.; Ibrar, D.; Khan, A.R.; Saleem, M.F.; Bashir, S.; Alotaibi, S.S.; et al. Nitrogenous Fertilizer Coated With Zinc Improves the Productivity and Grain Quality of Rice Grown Under Anaerobic Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 914653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.Z.; Chen, T.T.; Zheng, J.L.; Sun, Y.D.; Chi, D.C. Soil nitrogen regulation using clinoptilolite for grain filling and grain quality improvements in rice. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 199, 104547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dong, X.; Ying, Z.; Zhu, H.B.; Qun, H.; Liu, G.D.; Wei, H.Y.; Zhang, H.C. Effects of a one-time application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on quality and yield of rice. Food Energy Secur. 2022, e413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bryant, R.J.; Anders, M.; McClung, A. Impact of production practices on physicochemical properties of rice grain quality. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2012, 92, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blandino, M.; Marinaccio, F.; Vaccino, P.; Reyneri, A. Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies Suitable to Achieve the Quality Requirements of Wheat for Biscuit Production. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. De Santis, M.A.; Giuliani, M.M.; Flagella, Z.; Reyneri, A.; Blandino, M. Impact of nitrogen fertilisation strategies on the protein content, gluten composition and rheological properties of wheat for biscuit production. Field Crops Res. 2020, 254, 107829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Y.C.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, D.D.; Liu, M.; Geng, Y.Q. Controlled Release Urea Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Yield, and Quality of Wheat. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rajala, A.; Peltonen-Sainio, P. Slow-release fertilizer to increase grain N content in spring wheat. Agr. Food Sci. 2013, 22, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ghafoor, I.; Rahman, M.H.U.; Hasnain, M.U.; Ikram, R.M.; Khan, M.A.; Iqbal, R.; Hussain, M.I.; Sabagh, A.E. Effect of slow-release nitrogenous fertilizers on dry matter accumulation, grain nutritional quality, water productivity and wheat yield under an arid environment. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, C.; Wang, S.Y.; Lu, D.L. Fertilization time of slow-release fertilizer affects the physicochemical properties of starch from spring-sown waxy maize. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2022, 102, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhuang, Y.H.; Ruan, S.H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, J.R.; Li, S.S.; Wen, W.J.; Liu, H.B. Effects and potential of optimized fertilization practices for rice production in China. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 42, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, G.H.; Fu, P.X.; Cheng, G.G.; Lu, W.P.; Lu, D.L. Delaying application time of slow-release fertilizer increases soil rhizosphere nitrogen content, root activity, and grain yield of spring maize. Crop J. 2022, 10, 1798–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, D.L.; Lu, W.P. Effects of protein removal on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize flours. Starch-Stärke 2012, 64, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, K.; Gu, X.T.; Lu, W.P.; Lu, D.L. Effects of weak-light stress during grain filling on the physicochemical properties of normal maize starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 202, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Q.; Gu, Z.; Donner, E.; Tetlow, I.; Emes, M. Investigation of digestibility in vitro and physicochemical properties of A- and B-type starch from soft and hard wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 2007, 84, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, L.S.; Guo, D.W.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhang, X.D.; Wang, J.; Zhang, F.M.; Wei, C.X. Comparative structure of starches from high-amylose maize inbred lines and their hybrids. Food Hydrocolloid 2016, 52, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cai, C.H.; Lin, L.S.; Man, J.M.; Zhao, L.X.; Wang, Z.F.; Wei, C.X. Different Structural Properties of High-Amylose Maize Starch Fractions Varying in Granule Size. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 11711–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, D.W.; Zhang, H.C.; Guo, B.W.; Xu, K.; Dai, Q.G.; Wei, C.X.; Zhou, G.S.; Huo, Z.Y. Effects of nitrogen level on structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch. Food Hydrocolloid 2017, 63, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Langeveld, S.M.; van Wijk, R.; Stuurman, N.; Kijne, J.W.; de Pater, S. B-type granule containing protrusions and interconnections between amyloplasts in developing wheat endosperm revealed by transmission electron microscopy and GFP expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 1357–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, L.; Blanco, M.; Jane, J. Physicochemical properties of endosperm and pericarp starches during maize development. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 67, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gu, X.T.; Zhang, X.Y.; Lu, W.P.; Lu, D.L. Starch structural and functional properties of waxy maize under different temperature regimes at grain formation stage. Food Chem. X 2022, 16, 100463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, X.Y.; Bi, J.G.; Gilbert, R.G.; Li, G.H.; Liu, Z.H.; Wang, S.H.; Ding, Y.F. Amylopectin chain length distribution in grains of japonica rice as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and genotype. J. Cereal. Sci. 2016, 71, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, S.; Zhang, H.X.; Liu, W.Z.; Dou, Z.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, S.H.; Ding, Y.F. Nitrogen fertilizer at heading stage effectively compensates for the deterioration of rice quality by affecting the starch-related properties under elevated temperatures. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, C.; Liu, G.M.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, L.T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.L.; Xu, K.; Li, G.H.; et al. The Starch Physicochemical Properties between Superior and Inferior Grains of Japonica Rice under Panicle Nitrogen Fertilizer Determine the Difference in Eating Quality. Foods 2022, 11, 2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nowotna, A.; Gambuś, H.; Kratsch, G.; Krawontka, J.; Gambuś, F.; Sabat, R.; Ziobro, R. ffect of Nitrogen Fertilization on the Physico-chemical Properties of Starch Isolated from German Triticale Varieties. Starch-Stärke 2007, 59, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 00083 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of the fertilization mode on the starch granule size distribution of normal maize. The data in brackets are the average granule size. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Figure 1. Effects of the fertilization mode on the starch granule size distribution of normal maize. The data in brackets are the average granule size. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Polymers 15 00083 g001
Polymers 15 00083 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of the fertilization mode on isoamylase-debranched starch GPC profiles of normal maize. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Figure 2. Effects of the fertilization mode on isoamylase-debranched starch GPC profiles of normal maize. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Polymers 15 00083 g002
Polymers 15 00083 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of the fertilization mode on isoamylase-debranched amylopectin chain length distribution of normal maize. The data in brackets are the average chain length. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Figure 3. Effects of the fertilization mode on isoamylase-debranched amylopectin chain length distribution of normal maize. The data in brackets are the average chain length. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Polymers 15 00083 g003
Polymers 15 00083 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch X-ray diffraction pattern of normal maize. The Data in brackets are the relative crystallinity. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Figure 4. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch X-ray diffraction pattern of normal maize. The Data in brackets are the relative crystallinity. Mean values within the same hybrid followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Polymers 15 00083 g004
Table
Table 1. Effects of the fertilization mode on percentage of three peaks of isoamylase-debranched starch of normal maize.
Table 1. Effects of the fertilization mode on percentage of three peaks of isoamylase-debranched starch of normal maize.
HybridFertilizationPeak 1 (%)Peak 2 (%)Peak 3 (%)Peak 1/Peak 2
JY8770F53.12 ± 0.22 b19.58 ± 0.43 b27.30 ± 0.21 c2.71 ± 0.07 b
CF52.91 ± 0.06 b20.22 ± 0.24 a26.87 ± 0.18 c2.62 ± 0.03 c
SF54.48 ± 0.00 a20.13 ± 0.21 a25.39 ± 0.21 d2.71 ± 0.03 b
SY300F50.48 ± 0.01 c18.26 ± 0.79 d31.25 ± 0.79 a2.77 ± 0.12 a
CF49.69 ± 0.10 d18.92 ± 0.09 c31.39 ± 0.19 a2.63 ± 0.01 c
SF50.81 ± 0.21 c18.79 ± 0.07 c30.40 ± 0.14 b2.70 ± 0.02 b
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization.
Table
Table 2. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch pasting properties of normal maize.
Table 2. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch pasting properties of normal maize.
HybridFertilizationPV
(mPa.s)		TV
(mPa.s)		BD
(mPa.s)		FV
(mPa.s)		SB
(mPa.s)		Ptemp
(°C)
JY8770F672 ± 31 d622 ± 28 e50 ± 3 b668 ± 27 e46 ± 4 c86.5 ± 1.3 a
CF735 ± 12 c687 ± 11 c47 ± 0 b735 ± 13 d48 ± 1 c87.0 ± 0.4 a
SF728 ± 14 c698 ± 16 c30 ± 2 c869 ± 17 a170 ± 11 a79.1 ± 0.4 b
SY300F689 ± 14 d655 ± 11 d34 ± 3 c786 ± 10 c130 ± 5 b78.0 ± 0.0 b
CF864 ± 5 a792 ± 10 a72 ± 8 a910 ± 14 a117 ± 24 b79.3 ± 1.0 b
SF769 ± 67 b716 ± 62 b54 ± 9 b818 ± 68 b103 ± 14 b79.1 ± 1.0 b
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization. PV, peak viscosity; TV, trough viscosity; BD, breakdown viscosity; FV, final viscosity; SB, setback viscosity; Ptemp, pasting temperature.
Table
Table 3. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch thermal properties of normal maize.
Table 3. Effects of the fertilization mode on starch thermal properties of normal maize.
HybridFertilizationΔHgel
(J/g)		To
(°C)		Tp
(°C)		Tc
(°C)		ΔHret
(J/g)		%R
(%)
JY8770F10.3 ± 0.3 b68.3 ± 0.2 c73.4 ± 0.1 b80.9 ± 0.2 a4.3 ± 0.2 b41.9 ± 1.3 c
CF10.3 ± 0.4 b69.4 ± 0.1 a74.0 ± 0.0 a79.0 ± 0.4 b5.4 ± 0.1 a52.4 ± 3.3 b
SF9.6 ± 0.5 c69.6 ± 0.2 a74.4 ± 0.0 a80.2 ± 0.4 a3.2 ± 0.2 d32.8 ± 1.1 e
SY300F11.4 ± 0.5 a69.1 ± 0.2 b73.9 ± 0.1 ab80.8 ± 0.5 a3.8 ± 0.2 c35.8 ± 0.3 d
CF8.7 ± 0.1 d69.5 ± 0.0 a74.2 ± 0.0 a78.8 ± 0.1 b5.4 ± 0.1 a61.2 ± 1.8 a
SF8.8 ± 0.8 d68.5 ± 0.6 c73.6 ± 0.3 b78.7 ± 0.2 b5.2 ± 0.3 a59.4 ± 2.5 a
Mean values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. JY877, Jiangyu877; SY30, Suyu30; 0F, zero fertilization; CF, common fertilization; SF, slow-release fertilization. ΔHgel, gelatinization enthalpy; To, onset temperature; Tp, peak gelatinization temperature; Tc, conclusion temperature; ΔHret, retrogradation enthalpy; %R, retrogradation percentage.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Lu, D. Starch Physicochemical Properties of Normal Maize under Different Fertilization Modes. Polymers 2023, 15, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010083

AMA Style

Wang J, Lu D. Starch Physicochemical Properties of Normal Maize under Different Fertilization Modes. Polymers. 2023; 15(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jue, and Dalei Lu. 2023. "Starch Physicochemical Properties of Normal Maize under Different Fertilization Modes" Polymers 15, no. 1: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010083

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop