Next Article in Journal
A Review on the Physical Parameters Affecting the Bond Behavior of FRP Bars Embedded in Concrete
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties of PALF/Kevlar-Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Hybrid Composite Laminates
Previous Article in Journal
Fracture Toughness of Moldable Low-Temperature Carbonized Elastomer-Based Composites Filled with Shungite and Short Carbon Fibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Peroxide Initiator on the Structure and Properties of Ultralow Loss Thermosetting Polyphenylene Oxide-Based Composite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/Macca Carbon Advanced Composite Film with Functional Properties for Packaging Materials

by
Jitladda Sakdapipanich
1,*,
Phawasoot Rodgerd
1 and
Natdanai Sakdapipanich
2
1
Department of Chemistry and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC), Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Salaya Campus, Salaya, Phutthamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
2
Mahidol Wittayanusorn School, Salaya, Phutthamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(9), 1794; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091794
Submission received: 3 April 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022

Abstract

:
Macca carbon (MC) powder, a biomass derived from macadamia nut cultivation that emits far-infrared (FIR) radiation, was incorporated into low-density polyethylene (LDPE) by melt-compounding and subsequent melt-extrusion operations. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermal gravitational analysis, mechanical properties, FIR emission power, barrier properties, transmission properties, antimicrobial activity assays, and storage tests were used to evaluate the manufactured LDPE/MC composite viability sheets for antimicrobial packaging applications. The physical properties and antibacterial activity of composite films were significantly correlated with the amount of MC powder used. The higher the MC powder content in the LDPE/MC composite film, the better the FIR emission ability. Only the MC powder at 0.5% by weight displayed adequate fundamental film characteristics, antibacterial activity, and storage performance, allowing lettuce and strawberries to remain fresh for more than 7 and 5 days, respectively, outside the refrigerator. This study demonstrates that FIR composites made from MC powder are a distinct and potential packaging material for future application in the food industry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

It becomes increasingly important to develop novel food packaging materials in recent years to protect food quality and safety and to extend the shelf life of food by reducing disease growth [1,2]. Polymer packaging that incorporates antimicrobial chemicals to prevent the growth of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria is an excellent packaging option [3,4]. Despite the fact that many products can act as antimicrobial agents, only a few commercialized products, such as silver-substituted zeolite, chlorine dioxide, ethanol, sulfur dioxide, and triclosan, are used in the food packaging industry due to strict safety and hygiene regulations, limited consumer acceptance of product effectiveness, and high costs [3]. Furthermore, consumers prefer goods that preserve food from natural sources in an effective manner. Several natural antibacterial compounds derived from plants and animals, including thyme, oregano oil, garlic oil, grapefruit seed extract, lactic acid, lysozyme, chitosan, and others, have been reported to be included in food packaging systems [5]. Although natural antimicrobial agents have low toxicity, their manufacturing costs are quite substantial [6]. Furthermore, many organic antibacterial compounds distort or evaporate when subjected to high processing pressure and temperature [2,7].
Consequently, inorganic synthetic materials have been established due to their capacity to survive severe processing conditions [3,8,9] and the unique functional features of food packaging. Through a photocatalytic process, TiO2 and ZnO may powerfully inactivate microbes [3,10]. The ceramic powder was utilized to develop commercial ceramic-filled polymer films with superior permeability [11]. The ceramic powder could emit far-infrared (FIR) radiation with wavelengths ranging from 6 to 14 µm, inducing biological systems to develop and flourish [12,13,14]. FIR radiation has the ability to permeate biological tissue and have a powerful rotational and vibrational energy effect at the molecular level without harming the skin’s surface [15,16]. The incorporation of ceramic powder into polyethylene and polypropylene films resulted in strong antibacterial activity and shelf-life extension of lettuces and strawberries [12,15]. It was claimed that the retained quality of strawberries wrapped in composite films was related to their FIR emission qualities, which impacted cell metabolism and aided exhausted cell recuperation [17,18]. The antibacterial capabilities of poly(vinyl alcohol) composite nanofibers combined with nanoscale Ge and SiO2 particles were discovered to be triggered by FIR radiation with wavelengths ranging from 5 to 20 µm [19]. Another organic product that can release FIR radiation is bamboo charcoal. It is also possible to produce far-infrared radiation from organic materials such as bamboo charcoal. These properties make activated charcoal an excellent absorbent and electromagnetic shielding and filter for a wide variety of applications. A previous study discovered that the addition of bamboo charcoal powder into chitosan films promoted water and oil absorption while decreasing mechanical characteristics at greater doses of bamboo charcoal [20]. Agricultural wastes such as oil palm shells, coconut shells, and nutshells, particularly macadamia nut shells, can also be used to make functional charcoal.
The macadamia nut-in-shell, which accounts for over 70% of macadamia nut processing waste, is extremely difficult to break down. In our earlier work, the macadamia nut-in-shell was transformed into a functional carbon by applying high-temperature carbonization at 1200 °C to generate a distinct material defined as Macca carbon (MC) [21]. MC has great porosity (about 350 m2/g), is rich in natural minerals, and has a large quantity of anions and the capacity to generate FIR radiation with wavelengths ranging from 6 to 20 µm and a deep-penetrating ability of around 4–5 cm. Based on its FIR-emitting capability, MC might be used as an antibacterial material in food packaging applications. As a reason, the purpose of this research would be to assess the efficiency and performance of the manufactured LDPE/MC composite film.

2. Materials and Experimental Method

2.1. Materials

Macca carbon (MC) powder was generously donated by Maccaya Co., Ltd. (Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand) as the FIR-generated material. The MC manufacturing method is described elsewhere [21]. The Plastic Institute of Thailand (Khlong Toei, Bangkok, Thailand) generously sponsored the virgin low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pellets (InnoPlus LD2426H Grade). Shaking was used to distribute the MC powder with the LDPE pellet at varied MC loadings of 0, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5% by weight. The LDPE/MC composites were manufactured by feeding a mixture of the LDPE and MC powder into a twin-screw extruder at a 5 Hz rotating speed, with temperature control in each zone as follows: hopper and feeding zones: 100–140 °C, compression zone: 150–170 °C, melting and die-head zones: 180 °C. They were then maintained at room temperature for 24 h before being dried in a hot oven at 70 °C for 1 h before being blown into a film with an average thickness of 55 ± 5 µm to accommodate physical property evaluation. The LDPE/MC-0, LDPE/MC-0.5, LDPE/MC-1, LDPE/MC-3, and LDPE/MC-5 composite film samples were designated after the MC powder loadings of 0, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5% by weight, respectively.

2.2. Characterization

2.2.1. Fundamental Characterization of MC Powder

The thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA/SDTA 851e, METTLER, Columbus, OH, USA) was used to perform the proximate analysis, expressed in moisture, volatile matter, and fixed carbon. Approximately 10 mg of MC powder was heated from room temperature to 110 °C in a nitrogen environment until dehydration was achieved, which was followed by decomposition at 850 °C for 10 min to quantify the quantity of volatile matter. The environment was then adjusted to become oxidizing. The specimen was cooled to 800 °C and kept for 3 h; then, it was placed in a desiccator until its weight remained unaltered. During this time, the weight loss was caused by the interaction of fixed carbon with oxygen. An adsorption assessment of MC, determined by nitrogen adsorption at −196 °C, led to evaluating their BET surface area, which was derived from the adsorption isotherms using the BET equation, following ASTM D4820. A scanning electron microscope (SEM S-2500, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to verify the morphology and particle size of MC. In this analysis, MC was coated with Pd-Pt.

2.2.2. Morphological Characterizations

The dispersion of MC in the LDPE/MC composite film was investigated using optical microscopy (OM; Nikon, model Eclipses E200, Tokyo, Japan) and a Quanta 250 W7 scanning electron microscope (SEM; FEI Co., Brno, Czech Republic). For SEM analysis, all samples were cut and mounted onto an aluminum stub and coated with a thin layer of gold for 60 s in a vacuum chamber before imaging.

2.2.3. Thermal Properties

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; Q10 TA instrument, New Castle, DE, USA) was used to determine the thermal characteristics of LDPE/MC composite films at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere. The thermal stability of an LDPE/MC composite was investigated using thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA; TG 209 F1 Libra®, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany). Samples weighing 10 mg were scanned at temperatures ranging from 30 to 700 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere at a rate of 20 °C/min. Values of onset degradation temperature and peak temperature were analyzed from TGA curves.

2.2.4. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of LDPE/MC composite films were determined according to ASTM D882 utilizing a universal testing machine (Instron, model 5566, Norwood, MA, USA). All measurements were made on ten samples at a temperature of 25 °C and a relative humidity of 75%. The extension rate was set to 100 mm/min, and the load cell employed was a 20 kgf load cell with an 8 mm gauge length. 1.5 cm × 15 cm was the dimension of the sheet utilized.

2.2.5. FIR Irradiation Characteristics

The FIR emission power generated by the MC in LDPE/MC composite films was evaluated in the wavelength range of 6–20 µm at 25 °C, using a Thorlabs S310C thermal power sensor machine connected with a PM100D energy meter as a detector, with data averaging 20,000 at a time interval of 4.0 s.

2.2.6. Barrier Properties

The LDPE/MC composite film thickness of 55 ± 5 µm was used. The oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of the composite films were analyzed using an OTR 8001 oxygen permeability tester and a WVTR 7001 water vapor permeation analyzer (both from Systech Instruments, Johnsburg, IL, USA). A barrier LDPE/MC composite film was sealed between a chamber holding oxygen and a chamber null and void of oxygen. According to ASTM D3985 Test Procedure, a coulometric device monitors the oxygen transported through the material at 23 °C and 0% relative humidity. Under phosphorous pentoxide, WVTR experiments were carried out with an LDPE/MC composite film sealed between a wet chamber and a dry chamber (P2O5). According to ASTM F1249, a pressure modulated sensor monitors moisture transferred through the material when it is conducted at 90% relative humidity and 37.5 °C. Both tests have been performed in triplicate, and the results were averaged.

2.2.7. Light Transmission and Opacity Properties

The light transmittance and opacity of the LDPE/MC composite films were measured in triplicate using a Hunter Laboratories (ColorQuest®XE) CIE colorimeter equipped with an Illuminant D65 light source. The LDPE/MC composite film thickness of 55 ± 5 µm were cut into rectangles and inserted into the instrumental interior. The instrument was conditioned in accordance with ASTM D-1003 at a temperature of 23 °C and relative humidity of 50%.

2.2.8. Antimicrobial Activities

Antibacterial behaviors of LDPE/MC composite films were assessed following JIS Z 2801 [22]. The microorganisms studied were strains of Escherichia coli (E. coli), a Gram-negative target organism, and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), a Gram-positive target organism. At 38 °C for 24 h, E. coli, and S. aureus were grown separately on a MacConkey agar plate and a trypticase soy agar plate. A single colony was adjusted to a 10 mL volumetric flask using either nutritious broth or trypticase soy broth. Both sides of the LDPE/MC composite films were sterilized using a UV-A light for 2 h and were injected with the cultured broth. Next, the microbial inoculum was coated with a thin sterile film, and the samples were incubated in a chamber at 38 ± 1 °C and 90% humidity for 24 h. After incubation, the samples were rinsed with 30 mL of neutralizer, and the colony-forming units (CFUs) were calculated. The percentage of microorganism reduction (% R) was determined using the following equation:
% R = (B − C)/B × 100
where B represents the number of viable microbial cells in the control LDPE/MC-0 sample and C corresponds to the number of viable microbial cells in the LDPE/MC composite film after 24 h. The average of the outcomes of three separate tests was determined.

2.2.9. Storage Tests

Plastic bags fabricated from LDPE/MC composite films were used to explore the freshness of lettuce and strawberries after seven days of storage at room temperature (28 °C) and 65% relative humidity. The lettuce and strawberry specimens were meticulously chosen for their consistent size and color and absence of mechanical damage, and aesthetic abnormalities. The rot progression behavior of the specimen was visually monitored during the test period.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fundamental Characteristics of MC Powder

The fundamental data of MC powder acquired from thermogravimetric analysis employed in this study, including moisture, volatile matter, and fixed carbon are 1.74, 2.58, and 87.97% by weight, respectively. These data supported that the purity of MC powder is quite high enough for further use. The adsorption characterization yielded an average BET surface area of 748.6 m2/g for MC. The surface area is high enough for absorption purposes. Figure 1 depicts SEM micrographs of MC powder taken at 1500 and 4000 expansion times. The average particle size of MC powder was found to be 5.7 µm with polygonal structures.

3.2. LDPE/MC Composite Film Fabrication

Melt-compounding twin-screw extrusion was used to prepare all of the LDPE/MC composite films, which were subsequently manufactured utilizing a blown film extrusion. Each specimen is a controlled specimen with a thickness of 55 ± 5 µm. To commence, a visibly magnified optical microscopic approach was used to evaluate the dispersion of MC powder in the LDPE/MC composite films, as seen in Figure 2. The black dots are MC powder spread throughout the LDPE/MC composite sheets. Although the MC powder was distributed adequately in all samples, adding more MC powder to the LDPE/MC composite films contributed to a denser dispersion. This finding shows that using excessively MC powder may not be required.
Figure 3 shows SEM micrographs of the LDPE/MC composite specimens. The surface of the pure LDPE specimen looked rather smooth. The surface of composites became rougher as the amount of MC powder added to the LDPE increased. The aggregation of MC powder and blooming to the surface of the composites were most visible at 3 and 5% MC. The poor interfacial adhesion between MC and LDPE yielded these results, which are consistent with the OM study. This evidence may cause a decline in mechanical characteristics as a consequence of rising MC powder content, which will be explored further below.

3.3. Thermal Properties

DSC analysis was used to study the effect of MC powder on the thermal properties of the LDPE/MC composite film. Table 1 shows the melting temperatures (Tm), melting enthalpies (ΔHm), and crystallinity percentages (Xc) of the LDPE/MC composite films. When the MC powder loading was increased, ΔHm ascended significantly, while Tm values remained relatively steady. The percentage ratio of ΔHm of sample and pure LDPE sample (293 J/g) can be used to calculate the Xc value. It is obvious that the crystallinity percentages of the LDPE/MC composite films increased from 37.8% to 51.3% when the MC content increased by up to 5%. This evidence suggests that the MC powder induces crystallinity directly, resulting in the increased film strength, as will be discussed later.
TGA analyses of the LDPE/MC composites were also carried out, as can be seen in Figure 4 and Table 1. It is noticeable that all of the composite films showed a similar one-step decomposition behavior at around 400–530 °C, demonstrating that the existence of MC powder had no considerable impact on the thermal characteristic of the LDPE/MC composite films. However, the losing weight temperature at 5% and 10% (T5% and T10%) was slightly elevated as MC content increased, implying that the contribution of MC powder may enhance the thermal stability of the LDPE film. Due to the obvious strong incorporation of MC powder in the LDPE matrix, the percentage of residues at 700 °C by TGA analysis was also fairly raised, and MC 3% and 5% exhibited relatively high values. These results imply that a higher amount of MC powder would lead to the residue after degradation, so the optimum amount should be as low as possible while still affecting the other properties of the composite film. (Note: T5% and T10% of MC powder were 315.8 and 618.9 °C, respectively.)

3.4. Mechanical Properties

Figure 5 illustrates the mechanical characteristics of the LDPE/MC composite films as determined using a universal testing equipment. It is obvious that varying the amount of MC powder used as the FIR generator in the virgin LDPE has a direct effect on the tensile strength and break elongation. Tensile strength of the LDPE/MC composite films with MC powder concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 3% by weight increased approximately 4.6, 7.3, and 22%, respectively. In contrast, the LDPE/MC composite films with a higher concentration of MC powder at 5% by weight contributed to a 2% reduction in tensile properties compared to the virgin LDPE. Increases in the MC powder content to 0.5, 1, 3, and 5% by weight resulted in about 17, 33, 73, and 83% decreases in elongation at break, respectively, compared to virgin LDPE film. This finding means that increasing the amount of MC powder increases strength up to a point while lowering elongation at break. On the basis of these data, it may be assumed that a concentration of 0.5% by weight should suffice to maintain the distinguishing features of the LDPE/MC film.

3.5. FIR Emission

The FIR emission power spectra of the LDPE/MC composite films at various MC powder concentrations in the wavelength range of 6–20 µm at 25 °C is shown in Figure 6. The virgin LDPE film exhibited essentially negligible irradiation at the frequencies of interest. However, increasing the MC content in LDPE/MC composite films increased the FIR emission power. This work demonstrated that MC is capable of being embedded in LDPE as a composite material. Since FIR is a kind of thermal energy, increasing the quantity of MC in the LDPE/MC composite results in an increased heat conduction. This result indicates that the LDPE/MC composite with 0.5% by weight MC was sufficiently functioning to provide FIR.

3.6. Barrier Properties

The oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) are typically used to describe the barrier characteristics of composite films. The principal goal of these specifications for materials used in food packaging is to keep the product’s flavor while shielding it from external contamination. The OTR and WVTR of the LDPE/MC composite films are depicted in Figure 7. In comparison to the control LDPE, the LDPE/MC composites had a greater OTR and WVTR, demonstrating that they had a reduced barrier property. In other words, the oxygen and vapor permeations are greater in the experimental condition than in the control condition. This finding suggests that the existence of MC may enhance the barrier characteristics well.

3.7. Light Transmission and Opacity Properties

Figure 8 illustrates the light transmission and opacity of the LDPE/MC composite films. Light transmission refers to the percentage of incident light that travels through a film. Opacity is the property of a thin and clear material that allows it to conceal the surface behind it; it is the inverse of transparency. Opacity is defined as the ratio of the material’s reflectance when backed by a black substrate to the relectance of material when backed by a white substrate. Thus, increasing the MC dose increased opacity and decreased light transmission and vice versa. According to the findings, the LDPE/MC composite with 0.5% by weight MC appears to satisfy the requirements for adequate packing characteristics at a level comparable to those of the virgin LDPE film.

3.8. Antimicrobial Activities

Table 2 shows the results of testing the antibacterial activity of LDPE/MC composite films using the JIS Z 2801 procedure. E. coli and S. aureus were chosen as the target Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively, in this investigation. As a control, LDPE/MC-0 or the virgin LDPE film was utilized to compare to other specimens treated with various MC powder dosages. According to Table 2, the reduction percentage of microorganisms (% R) was highly dependent on the MC powder dosage and microbial type. The greatest % R value was achieved as LDPE/MC-0.5 was used. In other words, the LDPE/MC composite films containing 0.5% by weight MC demonstrated a substantial antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus. In our findings, the antibacterial properties of the LDPE/MC composites deteriorated when the MC loading increased by over 0.5%. As seen in Figure 6, an increased MC loading causes an increased FIR emission, which is known to raise the target materials’ temperature or living beings [17,18,21]. If the temperature is raised to the appropriate level, bacteria will proliferate faster than they die. As a result, only the appropriate concentration of MC powder, approximately 0.5%, can directly serve as a bactericide in conjunction with FIR generated by MC powder [23,24,25].
As described in the previous section, MC powder may effectively generate the FIR in the wavelength range of 6–20 µm, promoting antibacterial and deodorization and perhaps increasing shelf-life [23]. However, the actual mechanism through which FIR materials exhibit such high antibacterial activity and their usefulness in preserving food quality have not been well investigated or understood.

3.9. Storage Tests

Plastic bags fabricated from LDPE/MC composite films were used to determine the shelf-life of food packaging in terms of freshness. In this study, lettuces and strawberries were chosen, and the decaying time was observed for one week. A plastic bag produced from LDPE/MC films with varying concentrations of MC powder was used to retain lettuce and strawberries at room temperature (28 °C, not in the refrigerator) for a week. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the representations of each experiment after they were stored for 3, 5, and 7 days, respectively. Each experiment included a visual examination of triplicate samples. It is evident that lettuces packed with LDPE/MC-0, LDPE/MC-1, LDPE/MC-3, and LDPE/MC-5 began to rot on the third day. The same results were observed in the case of strawberries.
Interestingly, only LDPE/MC-0.5 preserved the freshness of lettuces longer for 7 days, despite the fact that there was no difference in visual appearance from day 1 to day 7, and only LDPE/MC-0.5 retained the freshness of strawberries for 5 days at 28 °C, not in the refrigerator. This storage test, antimicrobial test, FIR test, and mechanical property tests revealed that a concentration of 0.5% by weight MC powder is perfectly adequate for food quality preservation and effectively extends food shelf-life without refrigeration. This point is because the FIR released by the MC powder may impact cell metabolism and enhance cell rejuvenation [17].

4. Conclusions

Various concentrations of MC powder were mixed with LDPE in this investigation, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5% by weight. The fundamental characteristics of the LDPE/MC composite film were determined. It was discovered that increasing the concentration of MC powder resulted in the improved film strength but decreased elongation qualities due to the proportionate incidence of high crystallinity. In terms of FIR emission power, all MC powder concentrations in the LDPE/MC composite films outperformed the virgin LDPE film. However, the most appropriate doses for constructing the LDPE/MC composites were 0.5% weight based on the barrier and light transmission characteristics. Finally, storage and antibacterial activity tests indicated that a 0.5% by weight MC powder in the LDPE/MC composite films resulted in the maximum percentage of microorganism decrease. As a consequence, it is feasible to conclude that MC powder at a concentration of 0.5% by weight is the best concentration to combine with LDPE to create the unique functional packaging film that efficiently protects food quality and extends its shelf-life. This study shows that LDPE/MC composite films are innovative and promising materials for implementation in food manufacturing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and N.S.; data curation, J.S., P.R. and N.S.; formal analysis, J.S. and P.R.; funding acquisition, J.S.; investigation, J.S. and P.R.; methodology, J.S., P.R. and N.S.; project administration, J.S.; Resources, J.S. and N.S.; Software, N.S.; supervision, J.S.; Validation, J.S. and N.S.; Visualization, J.S. and N.S.; Writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and N.S.; Writing—review and editing, J.S., and N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to convey their appreciation to the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC). We would like to convey our heartfelt appreciation to Maccaya Co., Ltd. (Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand) for providing unrestricted grant and Macca carbon powder. We would like to thank Bhusita Wannissorn of the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand) for assisting with antibacterial tests and to Anucha Khongrit of Thailand Plastics Institute (Khlong Toei, Bangkok, Thailand) for assisting with composite film preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Appendini, P.; Hotchkiss, J.H. Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2002, 3, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharma, R.; Jafari, S.M.; Sharma, S. Antimicrobial bio-nanocomposites and their potential applications in food packaging. Food Control 2020, 112, 107086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sung, S.-Y.; Sin, L.T.; Tee, T.-T.; Bee, S.-T.; Rahmat, A.R.; Rahman, W.A.W.A.; Tan, A.-C.; Vikhraman, M. Antimicrobial agents for food packaging applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Joerger, R.D. Antimicrobial films for food applications: A quantitative analysis of their effectiveness. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007, 20, 231–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malhotra, B.; Keshwani, A.; Kharkwal, H. Antimicrobial food packaging: Potential and pitfalls. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Huang, T.; Qian, Y.; Wei, J.; Zhou, C. Polymeric Antimicrobial Food Packaging and Its Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Vartiainen, J.; Skytta, E.; Ahvenainen-Rantala, R.; Enqvist, J. Antimicrobial and Barrier Properties of LDPE Films Containing Imazalil and EDTA. J. Plast. Film Sheeting 2003, 19, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Emamifar, A. Applications of antimicrobial polymer nanocomposite in food packaging. In Advances in Nanocomposite Technology; Hashim, A., Ed.; InTech: Vienna, Austria, 2011; pp. 299–318. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Povey, M.; York, D. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 2007, 9, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Talegaonkar, S.; Sharma, H.; Pandey, S.; Mishra, P.K.; Wimmer, R. Bionanocomposite: Smart biodegradable packaging material for food preservation. In Food Packaging; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 79–110. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yam, K.L. Design of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh produce. In Active Food Packaging; Rooney, M.L., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: Glasgow, Scotland, 1995; pp. 55–73. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiong, Y.; Huang, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, X.; Li, H. Properties and Applications of High Emissivity Composite Films Based on Far-Infrared Ceramic Powder. Materials 2017, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Teraoka, F.; Hamada, Y.; Takahashi, J. Bamboo charcoal inhibits growth of HeLa cells in vitro. Dent. Mater. J. 2004, 23, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ishibashi, J.; Yamashita, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Hosokawa, H.; Sumida, K.; Nagayama, M.; Kitamura, S. The effects inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells by far-infrared radiation (FIR) are controlled by the basal expression level of heat shock protein (HSP) 70A. Med. Oncol. 2008, 25, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ketsuk, P.; Lim, M.; Baek, S.H.; Jung, J.; Kim, D.; Malegowd, R.G.; Seo, J.; Khan, S.B. LDPE composite films incorporating ceramic powder emitting far-infrared radiation for advanced food-packaging applications. J. App. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vatansever, F.; Hamblin, M.R. Far infrared radiation (FIR): Its biological effects and medical applications: Ferne Infrarotstrahlung: Biologische Effekte und medizinische Anwendungen. Photonics Lasers Med. 2012, 1, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Inoué, S.; Kabaya, M. Biological activities caused by far-infrared radiation. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1989, 33, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, F.; Liang, J.; Tang, Q.; Li, L.; Han, L. Preparation and Far Infrared Emission Properties of Natural Sepiolite Nanofibers. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 2017–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chung, J.; Lee, S. Development of nanofibrous membranes with far-infrared radiation and their antimicrobial properties. Fibers Polym. 2014, 15, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nitayaphat, W.; Jiratumnukul, N.; Charuchinda, S.; Kittinaovarat, S. Mechanical properties of chitosan/bamboo charcoal composite films made with normal and surface oxidized charcoal. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tangvijitsakul, P. The Investigation on applications of Macca Charcoal. Master’s Thesis, Polymer Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. JIS Z 2801; Antimicrobial Products—Test for Antimicrobial Activity and Efficacy. Japanese Industrial Standard Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2000. Available online: https://airmidhealthgroup.com/jis-z-2801.html (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  23. Lee, K.T. Quality and safety aspects of meat products as affected by various physical manipulations of packaging materials. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, L.-C. The New Storage Technology: Effect of Far Infrared Ray (FIR) Ceramic Sheet Package on Storage Quality of Pork Loin. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 16, 1695–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leung, T.; Lin, Y.S.; Lee, C.M.; Chen, Y.C.; Shang, H.F.; Hsiao, S.Y.; Chang, H.T.; Chao, J.S. Direct and Indirect Effects of Ceramic Far Infrared Radiation on the Hydrogen Peroxide-scavenging Capacity and on Murine Macrophages under Oxidative Stress. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2011, 31, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of MC powder (a) ×1500 and (b) ×4000.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of MC powder (a) ×1500 and (b) ×4000.
Polymers 14 01794 g001
Figure 2. OM images of (a) LDPE/MC-0, (b) LDPE/MC-0.5, (c) LDPE/MC-1, (d) LDPE/MC-3, and (e) LDPE/MC-5.
Figure 2. OM images of (a) LDPE/MC-0, (b) LDPE/MC-0.5, (c) LDPE/MC-1, (d) LDPE/MC-3, and (e) LDPE/MC-5.
Polymers 14 01794 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) LDPE/MC-0, (b) LDPE/MC-0.5, (c) LDPE/MC-1, (d) LDPE/MC-3, and (e) LDPE/MC-5.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) LDPE/MC-0, (b) LDPE/MC-0.5, (c) LDPE/MC-1, (d) LDPE/MC-3, and (e) LDPE/MC-5.
Polymers 14 01794 g003
Figure 4. TGA thermograms of LDPE/MC composites films at various MC concentrations.
Figure 4. TGA thermograms of LDPE/MC composites films at various MC concentrations.
Polymers 14 01794 g004
Figure 5. Tensile strength and elongation at break of the LDPE/MC composite films at various MC powder concentrations.
Figure 5. Tensile strength and elongation at break of the LDPE/MC composite films at various MC powder concentrations.
Polymers 14 01794 g005
Figure 6. FIR emission spectra of the LDPE/MC composite films at various MC powder concentrations.
Figure 6. FIR emission spectra of the LDPE/MC composite films at various MC powder concentrations.
Polymers 14 01794 g006
Figure 7. The oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) as the barrier properties of various LDPE/MC composite films.
Figure 7. The oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) as the barrier properties of various LDPE/MC composite films.
Polymers 14 01794 g007
Figure 8. Light transmission and opacity of various LDPE/MC composite films.
Figure 8. Light transmission and opacity of various LDPE/MC composite films.
Polymers 14 01794 g008
Figure 9. Photographs of lettuces packed with various LDPE/MC composite films for 3/5/7 days at 28 °C.
Figure 9. Photographs of lettuces packed with various LDPE/MC composite films for 3/5/7 days at 28 °C.
Polymers 14 01794 g009
Figure 10. Photographs of strawberries packed with various LDPE/MC composite films for 3/5/7 days at 28 °C.
Figure 10. Photographs of strawberries packed with various LDPE/MC composite films for 3/5/7 days at 28 °C.
Polymers 14 01794 g010
Table 1. Thermal properties of LDPE/MC composite films by TGA and DSC analyses.
Table 1. Thermal properties of LDPE/MC composite films by TGA and DSC analyses.
Method DSCTGA
SampleTm
(°C)
ΔHm
(J/g)
Xc
(%)
T5%
(°C)
T10%
(°C)
Residues (%)
LDPE/MC-0109.03110.937.8435.4449.60.05
LDPE/MC-0.5109.25128.741.9436.2450.00.32
LDPE/MC-1109.51135.543.2432.4446.90.55
LDPE/MC-3109.79145.649.7436.9451.02.50
LDPE/MC-5109.90150.551.3440.4453.44.33
Table 2. Antimicrobial Activities of LDPE/MC Composite Films.
Table 2. Antimicrobial Activities of LDPE/MC Composite Films.
TypeE. coli% RS. aureus% R
Sample
LDPE/MC-0 Polymers 14 01794 i001- Polymers 14 01794 i002-
LDPE/MC-0.5 Polymers 14 01794 i00390.8 Polymers 14 01794 i00495.2
LDPE/MC-1 Polymers 14 01794 i00581.4 Polymers 14 01794 i00672
LDPE/MC-3 Polymers 14 01794 i0077.3 Polymers 14 01794 i00852.6
LDPE/MC-5 Polymers 14 01794 i0092.6 Polymers 14 01794 i01030.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakdapipanich, J.; Rodgerd, P.; Sakdapipanich, N. A Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/Macca Carbon Advanced Composite Film with Functional Properties for Packaging Materials. Polymers 2022, 14, 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091794

AMA Style

Sakdapipanich J, Rodgerd P, Sakdapipanich N. A Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/Macca Carbon Advanced Composite Film with Functional Properties for Packaging Materials. Polymers. 2022; 14(9):1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakdapipanich, Jitladda, Phawasoot Rodgerd, and Natdanai Sakdapipanich. 2022. "A Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/Macca Carbon Advanced Composite Film with Functional Properties for Packaging Materials" Polymers 14, no. 9: 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091794

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop