Next Article in Journal
Interplay of Ionic Species in Salts of Homoleptic Quaternary Phosphonium Cations Bearing Linear Biphenyl Moieties
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: Orun et al. Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA. Crystals 2022, 12, 49
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Investigation of the Undercooling Capacity and Single-Crystal Castability of Some Ni-Based Superalloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Molecular Docking, and Neuroprotective Effect of 2-Methylcinnamic Acid Amide in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)—An Induced Parkinson’s Disease Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

State-of-the Art Research in Biomolecular Crystals

Instituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Colonia UNAM, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico
Crystals 2023, 13(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13010058
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 23 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Research in Biomolecular Crystals)
This special issue, State-of-the Art Investigations on Biomolecular Crystals, is focused on strategies to procure suitable crystals for high-resolution X-ray crystallographic investigations [1,2] from experimental methods related to the use of different biomolecules for applications in biomedical sciences or bioinorganic chemistry [3]. The structure of these biomolecules, performed by X-ray diffraction, even using synchrotron radiation, combines different applications of peptides, proteins, and DNAs crystals in medicine, biology and in materials science. These techniques, employing the use of synchrotron facilities, will mold a new kind of future protein crystallographers trained in using novel software with big data recorded. Additionally, the tools for manipulating micro or nanocrystals are completely new and will also be included in this special issue.
X-rays, electron, and neutron diffraction techniques have been the most ubiquitously used strategies to obtain the structural elucidation of biomolecules and biomacromolecular complexes. Recently, with the development of synchrotron facilities, we necessitate smaller sizes of crystals progressing from microns to picometers. Exposing biological cryo-protected crystals to the X-ray intensity in a shorter time, combined with the use of highly efficient photon detectors, diminishes radiation damage. However, the use of small angle X-ray scattering techniques (SAXS) has developed into an extremely popular method for obtaining the structural envelope in solution for any biological macromolecule, where the structure is arduous to be solved due to the necessity of crystals [1,3]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was also extremely popular in the 90s (of the previous century) for obtaining protein structures in solution, although with a limitation in the molecular weight (MW). This limitation weight occurred because the larger the MW, the lower the possibility to procure the structure at very high resolution (the one-dimensional or two-dimensional NMR spectra are much more multifactorial with regards interpretation) [4]. X-ray crystallography is nowadays not only the principal method, but it also the most puissant method, for obtaining three-dimensional structures of macromolecules at a very high resolution, independently of their molecular weight. Particularly, in the classical crystallographic approach, X-ray diffraction necessitates high-quality single crystals for high resolution. We must take into consideration that possessing beautiful crystals does not necessarily signify that we will procure high-resolution structures in merely a few steps. Occasionally, ugly-shaped crystals, which are internally well structured, produce the appropriate X-ray patterns to solve the three-dimensional structure at excellent resolution. Currently, the existence of other methods to obtain the three-dimensional structure of any biological macromolecule from the investigations on nucleation up to the crystal growth have make it plausible to labor in the direct space, such as the case with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) or reciprocal space when using the classic X-ray crystallographic approaches [5]. The other possibility will be the use of linear synchrotrons of the fourth generation such as the XFEL, where the data collection does not strictly necessitate any type of high-quality or large crystals but, rather, highly pure proteins, nucleic acids or macromolecular complexes in solution are needed. We can employ even a few microliters of a viscous dispersion of micro and nanocrystals for injection bypassing through the pulses of high energy to obtain the three-dimensional structure of any biomolecule before it is destroyed [6,7]. Besides these techniques for obtaining the three-dimensional structure of a variety of proteins, nucleic acids or polysaccharides, as well as their complexes, there is a want of physicochemical mechanisms in crystal formation and protein–protein interactions (based on pH, temperature, or ionic strength). The significance of the crystal quality [8,9,10], the presence of impurities [11], the insights into the crystallization process from protein nucleation phenomena, crystallization, and crystal growth peculiarities are important topics for review [12]. The existence of polymorphs is another research topic that deserves to be investigated in detail for crystals of biological macromolecules [13]. The use of specific crystallization agents or organic polymers, such as poly-ethylene glycols (400–20,000 MW) and their interaction with proteins, will be discussed in one of the contributions associated with this special issue. The measurements of the crystal growth rate, either on Earth or in microgravity, have recently shown interesting information in terms of crystal quality and mechanisms of crystal growth [14].
The main intention of the the state-of-the art in biomolecular crystals was to present a collection of papers where diverse applications of crystals were investigated. The first group is dedicated to biomedical applications for Parkinson’s disease [15,16]; the second group is concerned with the application of crystals for basic research, combining organic (DNA) and inorganic crystals (silica carbonate biomorphs of Ba2+) [17]; theoretical models using PEGs for protein crystallization [18] and the importance of polymorphs are also considered [19]. The third group deals with crystal fracture breakage [20], cross-linked enzyme crystals [21], stabilization of DNA-Protein co-crystals [22], biotechnological approaches using the amidase process [23] and binding of covalent inhibitors, and reversible ligands and substrates [24].
We hope that this collection of papers for this special issue will inspire a plethora of publications regarding these trending topics soon.

Funding

The author is thankful to DGAPA-UNAM for the financial support (grant number IN207922), which, to some extent, has facilitated him towards being guest editor of this Special Issue.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the support from DGAPA-UNAM, project IN207922, for the support regarding the crystallization and structural investigations on human transferrins mentioned in this work and for using SAXS methods. Additionally, the author thanks MDPI editor for their help and professional support concerning the design and completion of this special issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Campos-Escamilla, C.; González-Ramírez, L.A.; Otálora, F.; Gavira, J.A.; Moreno, A. A short overview on practical techniques for protein crystallization and a new approach using low intensity electromagnetic fields. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2022, 68, 100559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gavira, J.A. Current trends in protein crystallization. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 602, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Campos-Escamilla, C.; Siliqi, D.; González-Ramírez, L.A.; López-Sánchez, C.; Gavira, J.A.; Moreno, A. X-ray Characterization of Conformational Changes of Human Apo- and Holo-Transferrin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cavalli, A.; Salvatella, X.; Dobson, C.M.; Vendruscolo, M. Protein Structure Determination from NMR Chemical Shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9615–9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Benjin, X.; Ling, L. Developments, applications, and prospects of cryo-electron microscopy. Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boutet, S.; Lomb, L.; Williams, G.J.; Barends, T.R.M.; Aquila, A.; Doak, R.B.; Weierstall, U.; DePonte, D.P.; Steinbrener, J.; Shoeman, R.L.; et al. High-resolution protein structure determination by serial femtosecond crystallography. Science 2012, 337, 362–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Fromme, R.; Ishchenko, A.; Metz, M.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Basu, S.; Boutet, S.; Fromme, P.; White, T.A.; Barty, A.; Spence, J.C.H.; et al. Serial femtosecond crystallography of soluble proteins in lipidic cubic phase. IUCrJ 2015, 2, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lee, K.M.; Bae, S.H.; Park, J.I.; Kwon, S.O. Synchrotron X-ray reciprocal-space mapping, topography and diffraction resolution studies of macromolecular crystal quality. Acta. Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2000, 56, 868–880. [Google Scholar]
  9. Otalora, F.F.; Garcia-Ruiz, J.M.; Gavira, J.A.; Capelle, B. Topography and high-resolution diffraction studies in tetragonal lysozyme. J. Cryst. Growth 1999, 196, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Robert, M.-C.; Capelle, B.; Lorber, B. Growth Sectors and Crystal Quality. Methods Enzymol. 2003, 368, 154–169. [Google Scholar]
  11. Robert, M.-C.; Capelle, B.; Lorber, B.; Giegé, R. Influence of impurities on protein crystal perfection. J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 232, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nanev, C.N. Recent Insights into Protein Crystal Nucleation. Crystals 2018, 8, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gillespie, C.M.; Asthagiri, D.; Lenhoff, A.M. Polymorphic Protein Crystal Growth: Influence of Hydration and Ions in Glucose Isomerase. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Tsukamoto, K.; Furukawa, E.; Dold, P.; Yamamoto, M.; Tachibana, M.; Kojina, K.; Yoshizaki, I.; Vlieg, E.; González-Ramírez, L.A.; Gracía-Ruiz, J.M. Higher Growth Rate of Protein Crystals in Space than on Earth. J. Cryst. Growth 2023, 603, 127016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chochkova, M.; Rusew, R.; Kalfin, R.; Tancheva, L.; Lazarova, M.; Sbirkova-Dimitrova, H.; Popatanasov, A.; Tasheva, K.; Shivachev, B.; Petek, N.; et al. Synthesis, Molecular Docking, and Neuroprotective Effect of 2-Methylcinnamic Acid Amide in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-An Induced Parkinson’ Model. Crystals 2022, 12, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Xue, M.; Meng, Z.; Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Lin, Q. Studies on the Crystal Forms of Istradefylline: Structure, Solubility and Dissolution Profile. Crystals 2022, 12, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pérez-Aguilar, C.D.; Islas, S.R.; Moreno, A.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M. The Effect of DNA from Escherichia Coli at High and Low CO2 Concentrations on the Shape and Form of Crystalline Silica-Carbonates of Barium (II). Crystals 2022, 12, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tanaka, H.; Utata, R.; Tsuganezawa, K.; Takahashi, S.; Tanaka, A. Through Diffusion Measurements of Molecules to a Numerical Model for Protein Crystallization in Viscous Polyethylene Glycol Solution. Crystals 2022, 12, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neron, V.; Gelin, P.; Hashemiesfahan, M.; De Malsche, M.; Lutsko, J.F.; Maes, D.; Galand, Q. The effect of Controlled Mixing on ROY Polymorphism. Crystals 2022, 12, 577. [Google Scholar]
  20. Radel, B.; Gleiβ, M.; Nirschl, H. Crystal Breakage Due to Combined Normal and Shear Loading. Crystals 2022, 12, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kubiak, M.; Kampen, I.; Schilde, C. Structure-Based Modeling of Mechanical Behaviour of Cross-Linked Enzyme Crystals. Crystals 2022, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ward, A.R.; Dmytriw, S.; Vajapayajula, A.; Snow, C.D. Stabilizing DNA-Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal chemical Ligation of the DNA. Crystals 2022, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez-Rodríguez, S.; Contreras-Montoya, R.; Torres, J.M.; Álvarez de Cienfuegos, L.; Gavira, J.A. A New L-Proline Amide Hydrolase with Potential Application within the Amidase Process. Crystals 2022, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Radic’, Z. Shifts in Backbone Conformation of Acetylcholinesterase upon Binding of Covalent Inhibitors, Reversible Ligands and Substrates. Crystals 2022, 11, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moreno, A. State-of-the Art Research in Biomolecular Crystals. Crystals 2023, 13, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13010058

AMA Style

Moreno A. State-of-the Art Research in Biomolecular Crystals. Crystals. 2023; 13(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moreno, Abel. 2023. "State-of-the Art Research in Biomolecular Crystals" Crystals 13, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop