Next Article in Journal
An RDL Modeling and Thermo-Mechanical Simulation Method of 2.5D/3D Advanced Package Considering the Layout Impact Based on Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
High Gain Slot Array Antenna at 110 GHz Based on Computer Numerical Control
Previous Article in Journal
Biopolymers Used for Receptor Immobilization for Nickel-Detection Biosensors in Food
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High-Power 170 GHz in-Phase Power-Combing Frequency Doubler Based on Schottky Diodes

1
The CAS Key Laboratory of Microwave Remote Sensing, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(8), 1530; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081530
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Revised: 26 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 30 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutting-Edge Terahertz Technology)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a high-power 170 GHz frequency doubler based on a Schottky diode is proposed using an in-phase power-combining structure. Unlike a conventional power-combining frequency doubler, the proposed frequency doubler utilizes the combination of a T-junction power divider and two bend waveguides to eliminate the phase difference between the two output ports of the T-junction power divider, so as to achieve in-phase power combining with a concise structure. The frequency doubler was fabricated on a 50 μm thick AlN high-thermal-conductivity substrate to reduce the impact of the thermal effect on the performance. The measured results show that the doubler exhibits a conversion efficiency of 11–31.3% in the 165–180 GHz band under 350–400 mW of input power, and a 118 mW peak output power with a 31.3% efficiency was measured at 174 GHz `when the input power was 376 mW. A good agreement was achieved between the simulation results and the measured performance of the doubler, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed in-phase power-combining structure.

1. Introduction

Terahertz (THz) technology has been used in high-speed communication, the remote sensing of the Earth’s atmosphere, safety imaging, and so on due to its special characteristics, such as a high resolution, atmospheric attenuation characteristics, and low quantum energy [1,2,3,4]. However, how to obtain a stable and reliable high-power broadband terahertz source is the primary problem in terahertz technology research [5]. Currently, there are two main approaches to generating a THz signal: photonics and electronics [6,7]. Methods based on photonics have the problems of a low energy conversion efficiency and low output power [8]. Electronic methods mainly include vacuum electronics and solid-state electronics. Based on vacuum electronics, a THz signal can be generated with a pulse power up to the kilowatt level, but their large size and high production and maintenance costs limit their application [9,10]. Solid-state electronics have become mainstream in the generation of terahertz signals due to their small vacuum, low cost, and operation at room temperature [11].
A frequency multiplier, which is a core component of a THz source, will directly affect the performance of the terahertz source. Multipliers can utilize non-liner devices such as high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMT), heterojunction barrier varactors (HBV), and Schottky barrier diodes (SBD) to generate a harmonic signal. Considering that a HBV is a symmetrical device, it only can be used in odd harmonic frequency multipliers [12]. A HEMT is a three-port device with many parasitic parameters, which is not suitable for the higher terahertz frequency band (>1 THz) [13]. As a result, frequency multipliers based on Schottky diodes are preferred in the THz band, benefiting from the advantages of low parasitic parameters, a high cut-off frequency, and a high stability [14,15].
For the further development of a terahertz source, a high-power local oscillator frequency multiplier is essential. Generally, two main approaches are used, a frequency multiplier based on high-bandgap material (such as GaN) Schottky diodes [16,17] or applying power-combining techniques [18,19]. Meanwhile, the multiplier generates heat dissipation during the operation, which will degrade the performance of the multiplier or even disable the diode. Thus, by using high-thermal-conductivity materials as substrates, the effect of the heat dissipation on the performance of the frequency multiplier can be reduced, resulting in an improvement in the output power of the frequency multiplier [20].
The conversion efficiency of a frequency multiplier based on GaN Schottky is limited by its large series resistance. To enhance this efficiency, in this paper, a high-power 170 GHz in-phase power-combining frequency doubler based on GaAs Schottky technology is proposed. An improved T-junction structure is designed to eliminate the phase difference between the output ports of the T-junction. This elimination is realized by adding a bend waveguide after the output ports of the T-junction. Compared to the 3 dB coupling bridge, this structure has the merits of a simplified structure, low processing difficulty, and high-amplitude phase consistency within broadband. The measured results show that the frequency doubler exhibits a conversion efficiency of 11–31.3% in the 165–180 GHz band under 350–400 mW of input power, proving that the doubler with an in-phase power-combining structure is effective.

2. Architecture and Design

A reduction in the power-combining loss is the main design issue for a power-combining frequency multiplier. Formula (1) shows the output power of the n-channel power-combining frequency multiplier [21]. Pav is the input power of a single branch. For a symmetrical n-branch power synthesis circuit, when the input signals of each branch are consistent in terms of amplitude and phase, the synthesis efficiency is highest, expressed as ηmax. The amplitudes and phases of different branches will be inconsistent due to processing errors, resulting in a decrease in the synthesis efficiency, as shown in Formula (2). Mb is the effect factor of the amplitude on the efficiency, with a value of 10ΔG/10, where ΔG is the maximum difference in the driving power between the signals. δmax is the effect factor of the phase on the efficiency and the values are in the range of [0,π/2]. Based on the above analysis, in order to obtain the high-power frequency multiplier, it is necessary to select the concise circuit structure to decrease the processing error. Therefore, the modified T-junction structure is adopted in this paper, which not only reduces the processing difficulty in the THz band, but also ensures the consistency of the output port phase of the power divider.
P o u t = η c k = 1 n P a v , k
η c 4 M b   cos 2   δ max ( 1 + M b ) 2 η max
Figure 1 shows the basic topology of the 170 GHz in-phase power-combining frequency doubler based on a Schottky diode. The direction of the electric field is twisted by the two bend waveguides, eliminating the 180 degree phase difference caused by the two output ports of the T-junction. Thus, the phase consistency of the input signals of the two-branch frequency doubler is realized. The single-branch frequency doubler is designed as a typical Erickson-style structure [22] to form a balanced structure. In this structure, the input signal of the diodes is in the TE10 mode and then transformed into the quasi-TEM mode, and the structure of the frequency doubler is simplified using mode isolation. The single-branch frequency doubler is composed of an input/output-matching circuit and diode model. In the doubler, the input/output-matching circuit, together with the diode model, achieve a high conversion efficiency. Finally, the two-branch doubler output signals are combined by the in-phase power-combining structure to obtain the high output power.

2.1. Diode Model and Thermal Characterization

The frequency multiplier uses the non-linear effect of the diodes to generate the required harmonics. Therefore, it is essential to select the suitable diode for the corresponding band. In this paper, the varactor diode produced by ACST with three anodes was chosen. The main parameters of the diode are shown in Table 1.
An essential concern for high-power THz multipliers is heat dissipation, especially at the anode areas of Schottky diodes. Excessive heat dissipation around the Schottky junction due to the high driving power and limited conversion rate can degrade the diode performance or even disable the diode. The effect of temperature on the electrical performance of the diode is shown in Formulas (3)–(5), where k is the Boltzmann constant and χ is the temperature coefficient, which is generally set at 0.3–0.4. VT is the thermal voltage [23]. Formulas (3)–(5) show that temperature causes an increase in the intrinsic parameter Rs and the reverse current Is, leading to a deterioration in the performance of the frequency doubler.
V T ( T ) = k T q T
I s ( T ) T 2 × exp ( ϕ b V T )
R s ( T ) = R e p i ( T ) + R s p r e a d i n g ( T ) + R c o n t e n t + R f i n g e r χ R s ( T ) + ( 1 χ ) R s χ R s ( T = 300 K ) × ( T 300 K ) 0.89 + ( 1 χ ) R s
In the terahertz frequency band, the frequency multipliers based on hybrid integration technology usually use a low-relative-permittivity quartz substrate. However, when the input power increases and the thermal effect dominates, the low-thermal-conductivity quartz substrate becomes unsuitable for high-power applications. Therefore, an AlN substrate was chosen for the 170 GHz high-power frequency doubler in this paper, which has a thermal conductivity more than tenfold higher than the quartz substrate. A 3D electromagnetic model of a diode based on the AlN substrate is shown in Figure 2. To more intuitively demonstrate the superior heat dissipation of the AlN substrate compared to the quartz substrate, a thermal simulation was performed using the COMSOL software (COMSOL Multiphysics 5.5’) on the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode shown in Figure 2. The material characteristics in the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode are shown in Table 2. From the thermal simulation results of the 3D electromagnetic model based on the AlN substrate and quartz substrate in Figure 3, it can be seen that, when the dissipation power of a single anode junction of the diode is greater than 15 mW, the junction temperature of the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode based on the AlN substrate is significantly lower than that based on the quartz substrate. When the dissipated power of a single anode is 35 mW, the AlN substrate can reduce the maximum junction temperature by 32 K compared to the quartz substrate. Formula (6) shows the relationship between the dissipated power and the anode junction temperature.
T a n o d e T 0 = R t h ( T a n o d e ) × P d i s

2.2. Impedance Extraction and Matching Circuit

The efficiency of the frequency multiplier is optimal when the matching circuit and 3D electromagnetic mode of the diode reach a conjugate matching state. The values of the input-matching circuit and the output-matching circuit that need to be conjugated to the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode are called Zin and Zout, as shown in Figure 4. To extract the conjugate value of the embedded impedances of the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode, the in-band (160–180 GHz) embedded impedance optimization method is used, where the embedded impedances Zin is 75 + j∗170 Ω, Zout is 138 − j∗44 Ω.
The input-matching circuit is shown in Figure 5a. For the input-matching circuit, the impedance transformers with narrow side sizes, W2 and W3, are inserted between W1 and W4 to form shunt capacitors in the input-matching circuit [24], where W1 is the narrow side of the waveguide WR-10 and W4 has the same size as the input port of the 3D EM of the diode. By adjusting the lengths of W2 and W3, the input impedance value Zin of the input-matching circuit is shifted in the Smith chart. Finally, the value of Zin that has a subtle error of 75 + j∗170 Ω is obtained. As shown in Figure 5b, the output-matching circuit consists of an output probe and a DC bias filter circuit. The DC bias filter effectively prevents the reflection of the RF signal to the DC port and has little effect on the output impedance value. Thus, the output impedance value of the output-matching circuit can reach the desired value, mainly by adjusting the size of the output probe, and a better output-matching circuit can be obtained. It can be seen from the simulation results of the input- and output-matching circuits in Figure 5c that the impedance values of the input- and output-matching circuits are basically consistent with the required optimum embedding impedance, which proves that the input- and output-matching circuits can achieve conjugate matching with the 3D EM of the diode.

2.3. Power Divider/Combiner Circuit

The demand of the power divider in this paper is to divide the input signal into two signals of equal amplitude and phase. In the traditional T-junction structure, there is a 180 degree phase difference between the two output ports of the power divider. Two WR-10 bend waveguides are connected to a T-junction to eliminate the phase difference at the output ports by twisting the direction of the electric field in this paper. In the improved power divider, a reflector-matching structure is adopted, as shown in Figure 6, and the metal-matching block is placed on the inside of the two output branches, playing a role in the circuit impedance matching and effectively extending the bandwidth of the power divider [25]. The simulation results of the return loss of the power divider under different metal block widths, W1, are shown in Figure 7a. At W1 = 0.65 mm, the return loss of the power divider is better than 20 dB in the frequency range of 75–95 GHz, which meets the design requirements. Figure 7b shows the phase simulation results of output ports 2 and 3, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving phase consistency by bending the waveguide to twist the electric field. Considering the effect of machining errors on the performance of the power divider, a tolerance analysis on the size of the metal-matching blocks was performed with a step size of 5 μm. As can be seen from the simulation results in Figure 8, compared to L1, the return loss is more sensitive to W1. With a negative tolerance of W1, the return loss is slightly reduced for bands better than 20 dB.
The power combiner also uses a reflector-matching structure, as shown in Figure 9. In order to expand the bandwidth of the power combiner, a multi-stage waveguide impedance converter structure is adopted. As shown in Figure 9, the combiner has a stepped pattern, which can reduce the effect of discontinuity caused by connecting different sizes of waveguide and achieve bandwidth expansion. The symmetrical structure of the in-phase power-combining frequency doubler determines that the distance L of the power combiner should be the same as that of the power divider, L = 6.17 mm. The phase of input ports 1 and 2 is consistent, as shown in Figure 10a. Figure 10b shows a comparison of the simulation results of the return loss of the power combiner for different-order impedance converters. In the 145–185 GHz frequency range, the return loss of the power combiner based on a two-stage waveguide impedance converter is better than 25 dB, and the bandwidth increases threefold compared to the single-stage one when the return loss is better than 25 dB. Figure 11 shows the results of the tolerance analysis of the metal-matching blocks in the power combiner. According to the results of the tolerance analysis, the performance of the power combiner at a high frequency (>180 GHz) will deteriorate slightly, if the metal-matching block has machining errors.

3. Fabrication and Measurements

Figure 12 shows a photograph of the frequency doubler. It can be seem from Figure 12b that the Schottky diodes were flip soldered onto the high-thermal-conductivity AlN substrate. Finally, the frequency doubler was packaged in a 30 mm × 26 mm × 20 mm split metal block, as shown in Figure 12a. To verify the proposed in-phase power-combining doubler, the 170 GHz frequency doubler was measured. The measured platform of the doubler is shown in Figure 13. A ×6 multiplier chain, an adjustable attenuator, and VDI’s PM4 power meter were included in the measured platform. The ×6 multiplier chain could amplify the signal generated by the signal generator up to 28 dBm; thus, a W-band adjustable attenuator with an attenuation factor of 0–30 dB was necessary to adjust the input power to a suitable power level.
A comparison between the measured and simulated conversion loss under 350–400 mW of input power is shown in Figure 14. The measured results show that the conversion loss is less than 10.2 dB (efficiency > 11%) at 165–180 GHz and the best result is 5.28 dB (efficiency = 31.3%) at 174 GHz. Considering the loss of the standard waveguide (estimated at 0.4 dB) and the tapering waveguide, WR5.1-to-WR10 (estimated at 0.4 dB) are not corrected in the measured results. For comparison, the corrected conversion loss is also shown in Figure 14. From Figure 15, it can be seen that the peak output power of the doubler at 174 GHz is 118 mW under 376 mW of input power. To provide an intuitive understanding of the operating state of the frequency doubler, a single-point measurement was performed on the frequency doubler at a different driving power. The single-point measured results are shown in Figure 16. When the input power is higher than 300 mW, the output power of the frequency doubler increases relatively slowly. The reason for this is that the performance of the frequency doubler deteriorates due to the heat dissipation.
Table 3 summarizes the published doubler performance in the similar frequency range. The frequency multiplier based on a GaN Schottky diode can withstand a high driving power. As reported in [16], the frequency doubler can withstand a maximum driving power of 1100 mW. However, due to the high series resistance of the GaN Schottky diode, the conversion efficiency of the frequency doubler is low. The in-phase power-combining frequency doubler proposed in this paper can not only withstand a higher driving power, but also ensure a high conversion efficiency. From the above comparison, it can be concluded that the proposed frequency doubler has a relatively excellent performance.

4. Conclusions

A high-power 170 GHz in-phase power-combining frequency doubler based on a Schottky diode was successfully fabricated and studied in this work. The doubler using the proposed divider has the advantage of a simplified structure and reduces the difficulty of the processing in the THz band, so that the influence of the synthesis efficiency caused by error factors can be reduced and enhance the performance of the doubler. The measured results show that the frequency doubler exhibited a peak output power of 118 mW at 174 GHz under 376 mW of input power, which proves the validity of this in-phase power-combining frequency doubler design.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, conceptualization, and editing, L.W.; software and visualization, J.M. and H.Z.; supervision and review, D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (E1213A041S). Corresponding author: Meng Jin.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dayong Wu for providing advice on fabrication processes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, P.H. Terahertz technology. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2002, 50, 910–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hubers, H.-W. Terahertz Heterodyne Receivers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2008, 14, 378–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Waters, J.W.; Froidevaux, L.; Harwood, R.S.; Jarnot, R.F.; Pickett, H.M.; Read, W.G.; Siegel, P.H.; Cofield, R.E.; Filipiak, M.J.; Flower, D.A.; et al. The Earth observing system microwave limb sounder (EOS MLS) on the aura Satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 1075–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hirata, A.; Yaita, M. Ultrafast Terahertz Wireless Communications Technologies. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 1128–1132. [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowe, T.W.; Bishop, W.L.; Porterfield, D.W.; Hesler, J.L.; Weikle, R.M. Opening the terahertz window with integrated diode circuits. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2005, 40, 2104–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Michael, S. Terahertz technology: Devices and applications. In Proceedings of the 31st European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Grenoble, France, 13–21 September 2005. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pawar, A.Y.; Sonawane, D.D.; Erande, K.B. Terahertz technology and its applications. Drug Invent. Today 2013, 5, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tonouchi, M. Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hruszowiec, M.; Nowak, K.; Szlachetko, B.; Grzelczak, M.P.; Czarczynski, W.; Plinski, E.F.; Wieckowski, T.W. The Microwave Sources for EPR Spectroscopy. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 2017, 2, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Booske, J.H.; Dobbs, R.J.; Joye, C.D. Vacuum electronic high power terahertz sources. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 54–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eisele, H. State of the art and future of electronic sources at terahertz frequencies. Electron. Lett. 2010, 46, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stake, J.; Malko, A.; Bryllert, T.; Vukusic, J. Status and Prospects of High-Power Heterostructure Barrier Varactor Frequency Multipliers. Proc. IEEE 2017, 105, 1008–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kevin, M.K.H.; Mei, X.B.; Wayne, H.; Zamora, A.; Padilla, J.G.; Gorospe, B.S.; Nguyen, K.; Deal, W.R. 850 GHz Receiver and Transmitter Front-Ends Using InP HEMT. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 466–475. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, J.; Maestrini, A.; Gatilova, L.; Cavanna, A.; Shi, S.; Wu, W. High Efficiency and Wideband 300 GHz Frequency Doubler Based on Six Schottky Diodes. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 2017, 38, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, G.; Zhu, W.; Xian, W.; Yang, Y. A 135–150 GHz high-power frequency tripler with filtering matching network. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2022, 32, 1327–1330. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, B.; Ji, D.; Fang, D.; Liang, S.; Fan, Y.; Chen, X. A Novel 220-GHz GaN Diode On-Chip Tripler with High Driven Power. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, S.; Song, X.; Zhang, L.; Lv, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wei, B.; Guo, Y.; Gu, G.; Wang, B.; Cai, S.; et al. A 177-183 GHz High-Power GaN-Based Frequency Doubler with Over 200 mW Output Power. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maestrini, A.; Ward, J.S.; Tripon-Canseliet, C.; Gill, J.J.; Lee, C. In-phase power-combined frequency triplers at 300 GHz. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2008, 18, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Siles, J.V.; Lee, C.; Lin, R. A High-Power 105–120 GHz Broadband On-Chip Power-Combined Frequency Tripler. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2015, 25, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.; Niu, Z.Q. Development of High Power 220 GHz Frequency Triplers Based on Schottky Diodes. IEEE Access 2022, 8, 74401–74412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, M.S. Degradation of power combining efficiency due to variability among signal sources. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1992, 40, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erickson, N. High efficiency submillimeter frequency multipliers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Digest on Microwave Symposium, Dallas, TX, USA, 8–10 May 1990; pp. 1301–1304. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tang, A.Y.; Schlecth, E.; Lin, R. Electro-Thermal Model for Multi-Anode Schottky Diode Multipliers. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shang, X.; Ke, M.; Wang, Y.; Lancaster, M.J. Micromachined W-band waveguide and flter with two embedded H-plane bends. Iet Microw. Antennas Propag. 2011, 5, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, K.L.; Wang, H.Y. A Rigorous Modal Analysis of H-Plane Waveguide T-Junction Loaded with a Partial-Height Post for Wide-Band Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2001, 49, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. An, N.; Li, L.; Wang, W.; Xu, X.; Zeng, J. High-Efficiency D-Band Monolithically Integrated GaN SBD-Based Frequency Doubler With High Power Handling Capability. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 4843–4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, H.; Liang, Z.; Meng, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yan, C.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, X.; et al. 120 GHz Frequency-Doubler Module Based on GaN Schottky Barrier Diode. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Meng, J.; Zhang, D.H.; Jiang, C.H.; Yao, C.F. Design of a 166 GHz high power source based on power-combined technology. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 2018, 37, 608–612. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tian, Y.; He, Y.; Huang, K.; Jiang, J. High power 170 GHz frequency doubler based on GaAs Schottky diodes. Chin. J. Electron. 2022, 31, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The basic topology of the 170 GHz in-phase power-combining frequency doubler.
Figure 1. The basic topology of the 170 GHz in-phase power-combining frequency doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g001
Figure 2. The 3D electromagnetic model of the diode.
Figure 2. The 3D electromagnetic model of the diode.
Micromachines 14 01530 g002
Figure 3. Anode temperature of the 3D electromagnetic model of diode mounted on different substrate.
Figure 3. Anode temperature of the 3D electromagnetic model of diode mounted on different substrate.
Micromachines 14 01530 g003
Figure 4. The frequency doubler structure.
Figure 4. The frequency doubler structure.
Micromachines 14 01530 g004
Figure 5. The 3D EM of circuit and simulated results. (a) Input-matching circuit (W1 = 1.27 mm, W2 = 0.4 mm, W3 = 1.3 mm, and W4 = 0.36 mm for finial input matching). (b) Output-matching circuit. (c) the simulated results of circuits.
Figure 5. The 3D EM of circuit and simulated results. (a) Input-matching circuit (W1 = 1.27 mm, W2 = 0.4 mm, W3 = 1.3 mm, and W4 = 0.36 mm for finial input matching). (b) Output-matching circuit. (c) the simulated results of circuits.
Micromachines 14 01530 g005
Figure 6. The 3D structure of the power divider (W1 = 0.65 mm, L1 = 0.835 mm).
Figure 6. The 3D structure of the power divider (W1 = 0.65 mm, L1 = 0.835 mm).
Micromachines 14 01530 g006
Figure 7. The simulation results of the power divider. (a) The return loss simulation results. (b) The phase simulation results of the output ports.
Figure 7. The simulation results of the power divider. (a) The return loss simulation results. (b) The phase simulation results of the output ports.
Micromachines 14 01530 g007
Figure 8. The tolerance analysis the power divider. (a) The tolerance analysis of W1 of the metal-matching block. (b) The tolerance analysis of L1 of the metal-matching block.
Figure 8. The tolerance analysis the power divider. (a) The tolerance analysis of W1 of the metal-matching block. (b) The tolerance analysis of L1 of the metal-matching block.
Micromachines 14 01530 g008
Figure 9. The 3D structure of the power combiner (W1 = 0.18 mm, L1 = 0.404 mm).
Figure 9. The 3D structure of the power combiner (W1 = 0.18 mm, L1 = 0.404 mm).
Micromachines 14 01530 g009
Figure 10. The simulation results of the power combiner. (a) The phase simulation results of the input ports. (b) The return loss simulation results.
Figure 10. The simulation results of the power combiner. (a) The phase simulation results of the input ports. (b) The return loss simulation results.
Micromachines 14 01530 g010
Figure 11. The tolerance analysis the power combiner. (a) The tolerance analysis of W1 of the metal-matching block. (b) The tolerance analysis of L1 of the metal-matching block.
Figure 11. The tolerance analysis the power combiner. (a) The tolerance analysis of W1 of the metal-matching block. (b) The tolerance analysis of L1 of the metal-matching block.
Micromachines 14 01530 g011
Figure 12. The photograph of the frequency doubler. (a) The structure of the frequency doubler. (b) The internal structure of the assembled frequency doubler.
Figure 12. The photograph of the frequency doubler. (a) The structure of the frequency doubler. (b) The internal structure of the assembled frequency doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g012
Figure 13. The measured platform of the doubler.
Figure 13. The measured platform of the doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of simulated and measured conversion loss of the doubler.
Figure 14. Comparison of simulated and measured conversion loss of the doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g014
Figure 15. Measured results of the input power (black square line) and output power (red square line) of the doubler.
Figure 15. Measured results of the input power (black square line) and output power (red square line) of the doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g015
Figure 16. Measured results of the single point of the doubler.
Figure 16. Measured results of the single point of the doubler.
Micromachines 14 01530 g016
Table 1. The main parameters of the diode.
Table 1. The main parameters of the diode.
I s Reverse saturation current 5.0 fA
R s Series resistance 4   Ω
N Emission coefficient 1.2
C j 0 Zero bias junction capacitance 40 fF
V j Barrier voltage 0.85   V
B v Reverse breakdown voltage 13   V
E g Band gap width 1.43   eV
Table 2. The material characteristics in the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode.
Table 2. The material characteristics in the 3D electromagnetic model of the diode.
MaterialThermal Conductivity
(W/(m·K))
Bulk
Conductivity (S/m)
Relative
Permittivity
Metal (Gold)3104.1 × 1071
Insulation layer (SiO2)1.404.2
Epitaxial layer (GaAs)51 × (300/T)1.2883012.9
Buffer layer (GaAs)51 × (300/T)1.284.1 × 10712.9
Substrate (AlN)16008.8
Table 3. Summary of published doubler performance in the similar frequency range.
Table 3. Summary of published doubler performance in the similar frequency range.
Diode MaterialAnodesFrequency
(GHz)
Input Power
(mW)
POP *
(mW)
PE *
(%)
[26]GaN8111–12528648.517
[27]GaN6117–12550015.13
[16]GaN8200–220110017.51.6
[28]GaAs6 × 2164–172300–6005922
[29]GaAs6 × 2166–179520–910204.530.2
This workGaAs6 × 2165–180350–40011831.3
* POP: peak output power, PE: peak efficiency.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Zhang, D.; Meng, J.; Zhu, H. A High-Power 170 GHz in-Phase Power-Combing Frequency Doubler Based on Schottky Diodes. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081530

AMA Style

Wang L, Zhang D, Meng J, Zhu H. A High-Power 170 GHz in-Phase Power-Combing Frequency Doubler Based on Schottky Diodes. Micromachines. 2023; 14(8):1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Li, Dehai Zhang, Jin Meng, and Haotian Zhu. 2023. "A High-Power 170 GHz in-Phase Power-Combing Frequency Doubler Based on Schottky Diodes" Micromachines 14, no. 8: 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop