Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Control of Patients with Phenylketonuria in a Portuguese Metabolic Centre Comparing Three Different Recommendations
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolic Effects of Vitamin B1 Therapy under Overnutrition and Undernutrition Conditions in Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation with Transgenic Camelina sativa Oil Containing 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 or Fish Oil Induces Differential Changes in the Transcriptome of CD3+ T Lymphocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences in the Concentration of Vitamin D Metabolites in Plasma Due to the Low-Carbohydrate-High-Fat Diet and the Eastern European Diet—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Vitamin D Status in Population of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease—A Preliminary Study

by
Mohamed Abouzid
1,
Marlena Kruszyna
2,
Paweł Burchardt
2,3,
Łukasz Kruszyna
4,
Franciszek K. Główka
1 and
Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada
1,*
1
Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 6 Święcickiego Street, 60-781 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Hypertension, Angiology, and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Długa ½, 60-848 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Cardiology, J. Struś Hospital, Szwajcarska 3, 61-285 Poznan, Poland
4
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Długa ½, 60-848 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(9), 3117; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093117
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 31 August 2021 / Accepted: 3 September 2021 / Published: 6 September 2021

Abstract

:
The association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism and the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess a relationship between the VDR genotypes, plasma concentrations of vitamin D metabolites, and the occurrence of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. Fifty-eight patients treated for various cardiological afflictions were included. Identification of VDR polymorphisms: ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI were carried out using the PCR-RFLP method. Plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3, and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 were assessed by the UPLC-MS/MS method. Lower incidence of BsmI AA genotype in the studied patients was observed compared with healthy controls, but the difference was insignificant. Among patients with the TT genotype, frequency of hypertension was higher than among carriers of other ApaI genotypes (p < 0.01). In addition, carriers of the TT ApaI, TC TaqI, and GA BsmI genotypes had an increased risk of obesity, while the presence of the FokI TT genotype was associated with a higher incidence of heart failure and hypertension. In conclusion, the BsmI AA genotype can be protective against CVD, but this observation needs study on a larger group of patients. Particular VDR genotypes were associated with 25-hydroxyvitamin-D levels, and the mechanism of this association should be further investigated.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death in the world and include heart and vessel disease related to a process of atherosclerosis [1]. CVDs refer to the following entities: coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease (PAD), and aortic atherosclerosis [2]. The etiology of CVD is multifactorial and involves a complex interaction of political, social, behavioral, physical, biological, and genetic factors [3]. Over 100 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with CVD have been identified [4]. However, the precise mechanism of how SNPs influence CVD remains poorly recognized [5].
The endocrine vitamin D (vitD) system involves a wide range of biological processes, including cell proliferation, control and differentiation, bone synthesis, and immune response modulation [6]. The mechanism of vitD involves binding the active metabolite calcitriol to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which belongs to the steroid hormone family of nuclear receptors accountable for the transcriptional regulation of several hormone-responsive genes [7]. Modern studies show that there are four well-characterized VDR polymorphisms; FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI (Figure 1), in addition to Cdx2, poly (A), A-1012G, and Tru 91, which are still rarely analyzed [8]. VDR gene polymorphisms may potentially affect CVD due to the presence of VDRs in all main cardiovascular cell types such as vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) [9], endothelial cells (ECs) [10], cardiomyocytes [11], platelets [12], and most immune cells [13]. Moreover, the VDR is a major element in regulating the expression of varied proteins involved in regulating the cardiovascular system, such as renin [14], endothelial nitric oxide synthase [15], and NADPH oxidase (NOX) [16].
Investigating the association of genetic variation in the VDR with CVD may therefore provide further insights regarding the influence of the endocrine vitD system on the incidence rate or severity of the disease. To date, only a few studies have assessed the association between vitD related ApaI, BsmI, FokI, and TaqI SNPs and the occurrence of CVD, but their results are inconsistent. Ortlepp et al. [17] declared no association between BsmI polymorphism and CAD in the European population, while van Schooten et al. [18] obtained contradictory results. In addition, VDR FokI polymorphisms appear to be associated with CAD in Han Chinese adults [19]. There is only one study on BsmI and FokI polymorphisms and CVD in the Polish population [20]. No studies were conducted to evaluate all aforementioned polymorphisms and 25-hydroxy metabolites of vitD in Polish patients with CVD.
Evidence indicates that measuring the vitD status in the body may be beneficial to predict patients’ susceptibility to CAD [21,22]. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) and vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) are the main functionally inactive precursors for vitD [23]. Upon hydroxylation in the liver, they yield 25-hydroxyvitamin-D2 (25(OH)D2) and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3 (25(OH)D3), which are used to determine vitD status [24]. Additional epimerization by 3-epimerase produces 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (3-epi-25(OH)D2, 3-epi-25(OH)D3) [25]. The biological activity of C3 epimeric metabolites has been discussed widely in in vitro models; however, there are few research articles about the in vivo model [26]. According to a recent study, it is believed that there are differences between genetic determinants of non-C3-epimers and C3-epimers [27]. The physiological role of 3-epi-25(OH)D is undefined, but its concentration may influence the clinical interpretation of vitamin D status. According to Strathmann [28], 3% of adults would be misclassified as sufficient if 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was included in the quantification of 25(OH)D3. Moreover, recent research shows that the presence of the C-3 epimers may constitute up to 50% of the 25(OH)D content in adults [29]. Because the clinical impact of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 remains ambiguous, many studies are trying to measure it in various situations such as in pregnancy [30], chronic liver disease [31], and thyroid disorders [32]. Despite Stokes et al. [31] not finding a significant relationship in 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels in some diseases, Bennett et al. reported [30] that 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels are key markers for glycemic control in women with type 1 diabetes.
Although the relationship between VDR polymorphism and 25(OH)D levels was confirmed, the mechanism of this linkage is unknown [33]. Divanoglou et al. [34] suggested that epigenetic modifications of VDR regulate the conversion of vitD into its metabolites through CYP450 and thus affect 25(OH)D concentrations.
Therefore, this study was undertaken to investigate the association between four SNPs of BsmI (rs1544410), ApaI (rs7975232), TaqI (rs731236), and FokI (rs2228570), plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxy metabolites of vitD, including 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in Polish patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

The participants of this study were 58 patients (49 males and 9 females) with CVD admitted to the hospital for planned angioplasty/angiography due to CAD (52 patients) or PAD (6 patients). The average age of the patients was 62.9 ± 8.2 years and body mass index (BMI) 28.6 ± 3.8 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included: supplementation with vitD, acute myocardial infarction, malignancies, impaired renal function determined by serum creatinine concentration >2 mg/dL, and current liver dysfunction. A total of 90 samples were collected from the patients in different seasons, autumn–winter and spring–summer (Table 1). The study design and conduction are within agreement with the outlined ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocols (no. 273/15, and 58/20) were accepted and approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PUMS). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. In addition, 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentrations were assessed using the validated UPLC-MS/MS method [29]. Briefly, 200 μL of patients’ plasma was mixed with 20 μL of methanol and 20 μL of the internal standard, D6-25-hydroxyvitamin D3. The analytes were extracted with two portions of 1000 μL of hexane. After evaporation, the residue was dissolved in 200 μL of methanol-water (80:20, v/v) solution, and 10 μL was injected directly into the UPLC Nexera coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer LCMS-8030 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The separation of 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was performed in the Kinetex 2.6μm F5 analytical column (50 mm×2.1 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) with a mobile phase composed of methanol–water (80:20, v/v) containing formic acid (0.1%, v/v). Mass spectrometry detection of the analytes was performed in a positive electrospray ionization mode. The UPLC-MS/MS method was linear in the concentration range of 1–100 ng/mL. Recovery of the analytes from plasma samples were 85–107%. The inter- and inter-day precision was in the range of 4–18%, while accuracy of the method was 86–115% [29]. The applied UPLC-MS/MS method enabled for separating 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 from 3-epi-25(OH)D3, which allowed for avoiding overestimation of the 25(OH)D3 concentration in the studied group of patients with CVD.

2.2. Genetic Analyses

The isolation of the genomic DNA from 200 μL of blood was performed using a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (GenMATRIX Quick Blood Purification Kit, EURx, Poland). To identify ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI polymorphisms, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with restriction fragment length analysis (RFLP) was performed. Primers were used as reported by Pani et al. [35]. Their sequences were checked by the Primer3Plus software [36]. The primers’ sequences, their annealing temperatures, the length of the products obtained, and the results of restriction were presented in the supplementary material (Table S1).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using TIBCO Statistica™ 13.4.0 with Medical Bundle (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the continuous variables for age, weight, height and BMI, lipid profiles, and 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentrations. Descriptive statistics are presented for the normal variables as mean and standard deviation (SD), and for non-normal variables as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Deviation from the normality of the distribution of vitD concentrations was verified with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Chi-squared test (χ2) goodness-of-fit was used to test Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for detecting the allele frequency. The Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA by Ranks, followed by Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc, was applied to compare the differences between multiple groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. In the next step, we used multivariate logistic regression analysis to find parameters most strongly and independently related to the occurrence of patients’ medical conditions such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and heart failure.

3. Results

The distribution of BsmI, TaqI, and FokI genotypes in the studied group was consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 < 3.84, α = 0.05). Slight deviations were observed for ApaI genotypes (χ2 = 4.08, α = 0.05). Allele frequencies of the polymorphisms in the studied population and healthy Polish subjects are presented in Table 2. The comparison shows that these frequencies are similar. The biggest difference concerns the BsmI polymorphism, where the prevalence of the AA genotype is almost two times lower than in healthy subjects.
The contribution of the ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI genetic variants to the variability in demographic, biochemical, and medical conditions were assessed. We also analyzed the concentrations of the 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels in relation to the studied polymorphisms and different seasons.

3.1. ApaI

When analyzing ApaI polymorphism, significant differences in frequency (p = 0.01) were found in the occurrence of hypertension in the studied group. Among people with the GG genotype, 71% had hypertension, 48% had the disease in GT genotype, whereas there were 93% patients with the TT genotype. Additionally, a higher incidence of obesity was observed in carriers of at least one T allele, and the result has hovered around significance (p = 0.06). Patients with GG genotype had significantly (p < 0.01) higher plasma levels of 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 compared with the GT carriers (Table 3).

3.2. TaqI

In patients with different TaqI genotypes, significant differences between the values were found in BMI, and the incidence of obesity and hypercholesterolemia. Obesity (p < 0.01) was noticed in 22% of patients with the CC genotype, 50% of patients with the TC genotype, and 12% patients with the TT genotype. Hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.05) was found in 67% carriers of genotype CC, 45% with the TC genotype, 69% with the TT genotype. 25(OH)D2 levels were lower in TT genotype than CC and TC genotypes and results were a reliable trend (p = 0.06). In addition, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels were significantly lower in TC genotype compared with CC genotype (p = 0.03) (Table 4).

3.3. BsmI

Significant differences (p = 0.04) in frequency were found in the prevalence of obesity in people with different BsmI genotypes. Among people with the GG genotype, 10% were obese, 41% of people with the GA genotype had the disease, and with the AA genotype, there were 25% patients. The levels of 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 were significantly (p = 0.01) higher in GG genotype compared with GA (Table 5).

3.4. FokI

Significant differences (p = 0.03) in frequency were found in the occurrence of heart failure in people with different FokI genotypes. Among people from heart failure was diagnosed in 40% of patients with the TT genotype and 13% of patients with the CC genotype with no heart failure occurrences in TC genotype. Additionally, a higher incidence of hypertension was observed in people with at least one T allele, with all patients with the TT genotype having the disease. However, the differences in the incidence of hypertension in people with different FokI genotypes were at the borderline of statistical significance (p = 0.05). Levels of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 were significantly higher in TC genotype compared with CC genotype (p = 0.03) (Table 6).

3.5. Multifactorial Model

Backward stepwise regression shows that hypertension can be predicted by BMI, HbA1C [%], and ApaI GT (Table 7). HbA1C [%] was a 32-fold risk factor of hypertension (OR = 32.39, 95%CI = 0.17–6.79, p = 0.04), while BMI (OR = 2.11, 95%CI = 0.08–1.41, p = 0.03), and ApaI GT (OR = 0.05, 95%CI = −5.92-(−0.02), p = 0.03). ApaI GT genotype was protective.

3.6. Seasonal Analysis

Inter-seasonal changes have been analyzed for 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and VDR polymorphisms. Only 25(OH)D3 levels were found to vary significantly according to the season in some VDR polymorphisms (Table 8). 25(OH)D3 concentrations were significantly higher in the spring–summer period than autumn–winter in several genotypes: ApaI GT (p = 0.02), FokI TC (p = 0.04), FokI CC (p = 0.02), and BsmI GA (p < 0.01). Although TaqI TT genotype was sensitive to 25(OH)D3 seasonal variation, the differences were insignificant. Intra-seasonal 25(OH)D3 levels were significantly the highest in ApaI GG compared with ApaI GT and TT (p = 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). In addition, 25(OH)D3 was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in BsmI GG compared with BsmI GA. Seasonal variation data associated with 25(OH)D2 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 are not shown.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to examine the four major VDR polymorphisms: ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI, plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxy metabolites, and occurrence of such conditions as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hypercholesterolemia in Polish patients with CVD. Allele frequencies observed in the studied Polish population were similar to those reported by Harbuzova et al. [38] and Ortlepp et al. [17] in Ukrainian and German patients. In addition, frequencies of VDR polymorphisms were compared with healthy volunteers in Poland [37] and similar results were observed. Only the BsmI AA genotype was almost twice lower in CVD patients than healthy volunteers; however, the difference was not statistically significant (Table 2). A meta-analysis conducted by Zhu et al. [39] revealed a lower BsmI AA genotype frequency in hypertension patients than healthy controls. The authors suggested that the population carrying the VDR BsmI AA genotype has a lower hypertension risk than those carrying the GA or GG genotype [39]. Therefore, AA genotype can be protective against CVD, but a study on a larger population is needed.

4.1. ApaI

Patients with GT genotype had a lower frequency of hypertension than GG and TT genotypes. Despite the noted higher incidence of obesity with at least one T allele, the result has hovered around significance. There were no observed significant relationships between the presence of ApaI genotypes and diabetes, being overweight, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, or heart failure. According to Alizadeh et al. [40], ApaI polymorphism was not associated with CAD. However, Lu et al. [41] mentioned that a decreased risk of CAD was associated with the ApaI heterozygote genotype and an increased risk with the recessive genotype but only in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In addition, according to Ferrarezi et al. [42], AAC haplotype (BsmI/ApaI/TaqI) was significantly associated with CAD in T2D patients.
In our study, the multivariate analysis revealed that BMI, HbA1C [%], and ApaI GT genotype were significantly linked to hypertension (Table 7). Shen et al. [43] observed that people with the ApaI GT genotype had higher cholesterol and LDL levels and the presence of the T allele was associated with triceps skinfold thickness and body fat percentage in the Chinese population. In our study, the concentration of total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, HbA1C, and creatinine did not differ significantly according to genotype (Table 3). However, patients with ApaI GG genotype had significantly higher plasma levels of 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-(OH)D3 compared with the ApaI GT carriers. Maaty et al. [44] confirmed that ApaI GG genotype was associated with greater levels of 25(OH)D in patients with CAD in Egypt. Another study on Indian patients with angiography by Shanker et al. [45] revealed that VDR genotypes did not show any association with either vitD levels or CAD.

4.2. TaqI

Obesity was the most prevalent among patients with TC genotype, and they also had the highest BMI. In addition, patients with TT genotype had a significantly higher frequency of hypercholesterolemia. In our CVD patients, being overweight was a 6-fold risk factor for hypercholesterolemia regardless of the polymorphism type (OR = 6.4, 95%CI = 1.0–40.3, p = 0.05). The association of obesity with the TaqI genotype was also confirmed in other studies [46,47]. Al-Hazmi et al. [46] concluded that CC genotype was significantly associated with a higher obesity risk in Saudi men. Similarly, Al-Daghri et al. [47] mentioned that GTA [(rs731236 (G), rs1544410 (T), and rs7975232 (A)] haplotype was significantly associated with the presence of obesity and higher BMI. Moreover, Lu et al. [41] observed that the presence of the TaqI restriction site might be associated with an increased risk of developing CVD, especially ischemic heart disease. Therefore, modifying therapeutic management is necessary, especially with patients with increased BMI and cholesterol levels. Analysis of 25(OH)D metabolites revealed that 25(OH)D2 levels were lower in TaqI TT genotype compared with TaqI CC and TaqI TC genotypes, and the result was a reliable trend. In addition, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels were significantly lower in the TaqI TC genotype compared with TaqI CC genotype. In contrast, Maaty et al. [44] reported that TaqI polymorphism was not found to predict 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels.

4.3. BsmI

A significant relationship between genotype and obesity incidence was also observed in the case of BsmI polymorphism. The greatest number of cases of obesity was found in patients with GA genotype, followed by AA, while the lowest obesity cases were found in patients with GG genotype (Table 5). However, a contradicted result has been reported by Hazmi et al. [46] since, in Saudi men, GG genotype was associated with higher obesity risk. In contrast, Laczmanski et al. [20] mentioned that BsmI common allele A is associated with biochemical risk factors (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, glucose, insulin, homeostatic model) of CVD in older Polish Caucasian men and women population. We did not record a significant association between hypertension and BsmI polymorphism. In addition, Ortlepp et al. [17] reported that BsmI polymorphism is insignificant with the incidence and severity of CAD. However, according to Zhu et al. [39], patients with the AA genotype had a lower incidence of hypertension compared with other genotypes. In addition, Lee et al. [48] observed that arterial hypertension occurs more often in people with at least one G allele (OR = 2.1; 95%CI = 1.0–4.4; p = 0.05). Moreover, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher (by 2.7–3.7 mm Hg and 1.9–2.5 mm Hg, respectively) than in the AA genotype carriers [48]. Finally, Rahmadhani et al. [49] found that AA genotype in adolescents was associated significantly with higher insulin resistance but not with obesity. The analysis of 25(OH)D levels revealed that 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3 were significantly higher in BsmI GG genotype compared with BsmI GA (Table 5). However, according to Cobayashi et al. [50], mutant allele T was negatively associated with serum 25(OH)D.

4.4. FokI

Significant differences were found in the occurrence of heart failure in people with different FokI genotypes. Heart failure was diagnosed in 40% of patients with the TT genotype and 13% of patients with the CC genotype with no heart failure occurrences in TC genotype (Table 6). Hao et al. [51] stated that the T allele was more common in Chinese patients with heart failure than in healthy volunteers (OR = 2.45, p < 0.01). In addition, Lu et al. [41] mentioned that TC may play a protective role in CAD. Contradicted results were reported by Pan et al. [52] who mentioned that Chinese patients with CAD show no significant difference between BsmI and FokI polymorphism allele frequencies and CAD. Despite this fact, we noticed a higher incidence of hypertension in people with at least one T allele, and all patients with the TT genotype had the disease. The results were at the borderline of statistical significance (Table 6). According to Swapna et al. [53], CC genotype and allele T were at a significantly greater risk for developing hypertension in Indian patients. A study by Schuch et al. [54] confirmed the association between TC polymorphism with the development of higher insulin resistance, cholesterol and triglycerides, and lower HDL levels. A significant association was observed between levels of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and the presence of FokI TC genotype compared with FokI CC genotype (Table 6). Biswas et al. [55] reported a significant relation between FokI TT genotype polymorphism and increased level of serum 1, 25(OH)D3 in autism spectrum disorder patients.

4.5. Seasonal Analysis

Various studies have mentioned seasonal variation in vitD [56,57,58,59,60]. Some studies have shown lower levels of serum 25(OH)D in winter, whereas, in others, the prevalence of vitD deficiency did not differ by seasonal changes and remained stable even in a sunny climate [57,58,59,60,61,62]. In our sample, we have noticed significant changes in 25(OH)D metabolites between seasons according to VDR polymorphisms. Concerning inter-seasonal changes in the whole group of patients, 25(OH)D3 levels were higher in spring–summer compared with autumn–winter (p < 0.01). In-depth analysis shows that the four genotypes—ApaI GT, FokI TC, BsmI GA, and FokI CC—were significantly sensitive to seasonal changes (Table 8).

5. Conclusions

Lower frequency of BsmI AA genotype in the studied patients compared with healthy controls suggests that the population carrying VDR BsmI AA genotype has a lower risk of CVD. However, this observation needs further investigation on a larger group of patients. Since particular ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI genotypes seem to predict 25(OH)D levels, the mechanism of this association should be studied. A triangular relationship between the VDR polymorphisms, disease incidence, and 25(OH)D metabolites may be helpful in the prediction of the CVD risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu13093117/s1, Table S1: Primers’ sequences, annealing temperature, lengths of products obtained, and results of restriction in PCR reaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.-Ł.; methodology, M.K.-Ł.; validation, M.K.-Ł. and M.A.; formal analysis, M.K.-Ł., P.B., Ł.K.; investigation, M.A., M.K., M.K.-Ł.; resources, P.B., Ł.K.; data curation, M.A., M.K.-Ł.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A., M.K., M.K.-Ł.; writing—review and editing, M.A., M.K., P.B., Ł.K., F.K.G., M.K.-Ł.; visualization, M.A., M.K., M.K.-Ł.; supervision, M.K.-Ł.; project administration, M.A., M.K.-Ł.; funding acquisition, M.K.-Ł. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank Poznan University of Medical Sciences for the financial support of the paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of Poznan University of Medical Sciences (protocol no. 273/15, date of approval: 5 March 2015 and protocol no. 58/20, date of approval 16 January 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

Mohamed Abouzid is a participant of the STER Internationalization of Doctoral Schools Program from NAWA Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange No. PPI/STE/2020/1/00014/DEC/02.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Virani, S.S.; Alonso, A.; Benjamin, E.J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Chang, A.R.; Cheng, S.; Delling, F.N.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020, 141, e139–e596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Olvera Lopez, E.; Ballard, B.D.; Jan, A. Cardiovascular Disease. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta, R.; Wood, D.A. Primary Prevention of Ischaemic Heart Disease: Populations, Individuals, and Health Professionals. Lancet 2019, 394, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Humphries, S.E. Common Variants for Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Utility Confirmed. Circulation 2017, 135, 2102–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abouzid, M.; Karazniewicz-Lada, M.; Glowka, F. Genetic Determinants of Vitamin D-Related Disorders; Focus on Vitamin D Receptor. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Uitterlinden, A.G.; Fang, Y.; Van Meurs, J.B.J.; Pols, H.A.P.; Van Leeuwen, J.P.T.M. Genetics and Biology of Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms. Gene 2004, 338, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Christakos, S.; Dhawan, P.; Verstuyf, A.; Verlinden, L.; Carmeliet, G. Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Köstner, K.; Denzer, N.; Müller, C.S.L.; Klein, R.; Tilgen, W.; Reichrath, J. The Relevance of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphisms for Cancer: A Review of the Literature. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 3511–3536. [Google Scholar]
  9. Somjen, D.; Weisman, Y.; Kohen, F.; Gayer, B.; Limor, R.; Sharon, O.; Jaccard, N.; Knoll, E.; Stern, N. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-Hydroxylase Is Expressed in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Is Upregulated by Parathyroid Hormone and Estrogenic Compounds. Circulation 2005, 111, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Merke, J.; Milde, P.; Lewicka, S.; Hugel, U.; Klaus, G.; Mangelsdorf, D.J.; Haussler, M.R.; Rauterberg, E.W.; Ritz, E. Identification and Regulation of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Receptor Activity and Biosynthesis of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3. Studies in Cultured Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cells and Human Dermal Capillaries. J. Clin. Investig. 1989, 83, 1903–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tishkoff, D.X.; Nibbelink, K.A.; Holmberg, K.H.; Dandu, L.; Simpson, R.U. Functional Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) in the T-Tubules of Cardiac Myocytes: VDR Knockout Cardiomyocyte Contractility. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Silvagno, F.; De Vivo, E.; Attanasio, A.; Gallo, V.; Mazzucco, G.; Pescarmona, G. Mitochondrial Localization of Vitamin D Receptor in Human Platelets and Differentiated Megakaryocytes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Guillot, X.; Semerano, L.; Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.; Falgarone, G.; Boissier, M.C. Vitamin D and Inflammation. Jt. Bone Spine 2010, 77, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kong, J.; Qiao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, S.Q.; Li, Y.C. Targeted Vitamin D Receptor Expression in Juxtaglomerular Cells Suppresses Renin Expression Independent of Parathyroid Hormone and Calcium. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 1577–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Talmor-Barkan, Y.; Bernheim, J.; Green, J.; Benchetrit, S.; Rashid, G. Calcitriol Counteracts Endothelial Cell Pro-Inflammatory Processes in a Chronic Kidney Disease-like Environment. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 124, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hirata, M.; Serizawa, K.-I.; Aizawa, K.; Yogo, K.; Tashiro, Y.; Takeda, S.; Moriguchi, Y.; Endo, K.; Fukagawa, M. 22-Oxacalcitriol Prevents Progression of Endothelial Dysfunction through Antioxidative Effects in Rats with Type 2 Diabetes and Early-Stage Nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2013, 28, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ortlepp, J.R.; Von Korff, A.; Hanrath, P.; Zerres, K.; Hoffmann, R. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism BsmI Is Not Associated with the Prevalence and Severity of CAD in a Large-Scale Angiographic Cohort of 3441 Patients. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 33, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Van Schooten, F.J.; Hirvonen, A.; Maas, L.M.; De Mol, B.A.; Kleinjans, J.C.S.; Bell, D.A.; Durrer, J.D. Putative Susceptibility Markers of Coronary Artery Disease: Association between VDR Genotype, Smoking, and Aromatic DNA Adduct Levels in Human Fight Atrial Tissue. FASEB J. 1998, 12, 1409–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, L.; Wang, M. Association of Vitamin d Receptor-a Gene Polymorphisms with Coronary Heart Disease in Han Chinese. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 6224–6229. [Google Scholar]
  20. Laczmanski, L.; Milewicz, A.; Lwow, F.; Puzianowska-Kuznicka, M.; Pawlak, M.; Kolackov, K.; Jedrzejuk, D.; Krzyzanowska-Swiniarska, B.; Bar-Andziak, E.; Chudek, J.; et al. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Cardiovascular Risk Variables in Elderly Polish Subjects. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013, 29, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Syal, S.K.; Kapoor, A.; Bhatia, E.; Sinha, A.; Kumar, S.; Tewari, S.; Garg, N.; Goel, P.K. Vitamin D Deficiency, Coronary Artery Disease, and Endothelial Dysfunction: Observations from a Coronary Angiographic Study in Indian Patients. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2012, 24, 385–389. [Google Scholar]
  22. Anagnostis, P.; Athyros, V.G.; Adamidou, F.; Florentin, M.; Karagiannis, A. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: A Novel Agent for Reducing Cardiovascular Risk? CVP 2010, 8, 720–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D Metabolism, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Applications. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Singh, R.J.; Taylor, R.L.; Reddy, G.S.; Grebe, S.K.G. C-3 Epimers Can Account for a Significant Proportion of Total Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Infants, Complicating Accurate Measurement and Interpretation of Vitamin D Status. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 91, 3055–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Granado Lorencio, F.; Blanco-Navarro, I.; Pérez-Sacristán, B.; Donoso-Navarro, E.; Silvestre-Mardomingo, R. Serum Levels of 3-Epi-25-OH-D3during Hypervitaminosis D in Clinical Practice. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E2266–E2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Zohily, B.; Al-Menhali, A.; Gariballa, S.; Haq, A.; Shah, I. Epimers of Vitamin d: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Torugsa, S.; Nimitphong, H.; Warodomwichit, D.; Chailurkit, L.; Srijaruskul, K.; Chanprasertyothin, S.; Ongphiphadhanakul, B. The Genetic Determinants of Circulating C3-Epimers of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D. J. Clin. Transl. Endocrinol. 2018, 12, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Strathmann, F.G.; Sadilkova, K.; Laha, T.J.; LeSourd, S.E.; Bornhorst, J.A.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Jack, R. 3-Epi-25 Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Are Not Correlated with Age in a Cohort of Infants and Adults. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Abouzid, M.; Karaźniewicz-Łada, M.; Pawlak, K.; Burchardt, P.; Kruszyna, Ł.; Główka, F. Measurement of Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D2, 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and 3-Epi-25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in Population of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease by UPLC-MS/MS Method. J. Chromatogr. B 2020, 1159, 122350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bennett, S.E.; Casey, C.; McPeake, J.; McCance, D.R.; Manderson, J.G.; McGinty, A. 3-Epi-25 Hydroxyvitamin D in Pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. Int. J. Womens Cardiovasc. Health 2014, 4, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stokes, C.S.; Volmer, D.A. Assessment of 3-Epi-25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels during Cholecalciferol Supplementation in Adults with Chronic Liver Diseases. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 41, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kmieć, P.; Minkiewicz, I.; Rola, R.; Sworczak, K.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Kowalski, K. Vitamin D Status Including 3-Epi-25(OH)D 3 among Adult Patients with Thyroid Disorders during Summer Months. Endokrynol. Pol. 2018, 69, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Santos, B.R.; Mascarenhas, L.P.G.; Satler, F.; Boguszewski, M.C.S.; Spritzer, P.M. Vitamin D Deficiency in Girls from South Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study on Prevalence and Association with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variants. BMC Pediatr. 2012, 12, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Divanoglou, N.; Komninou, D.; Stea, E.A.; Argiriou, A.; Papatzikas, G.; Tsakalof, A.; Pazaitou-Panayiotou, K.; Georgakis, M.K.; Petridou, E. Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Serum Vitamin D Levels in a Greek Rural Population (Velestino Study). Lifestyle Genom. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pani, M.A.; Knapp, M.; Donner, H.; Braun, J.; Baur, M.P.; Usadel, K.H.; Badenhoop, K. Vitamin D Receptor Allele Combinations Influence Genetic Susceptibility to 1 Diabetes in Germans. Diabetes 2000, 49, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3-New Capabilities and Interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lesiak, A.; Wódz-Naskiewicz, K.; Pawliczak, R.; Rogowski-Tylman, M.; Sysa-Jędrzejowska, A.; Sobjanek, M.; Włodarkiewicz, A.; Narbutt, J. The Influence of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism on Basal Cel Carcinoma Development in the Polish Population. Adv. Dermatol. Alergol. 2011, 28, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  38. Harbuzova, V.Y.; Stroy, D.A.; Dosenko, V.E.; Dubovyk, Y.I.; Borodenko, A.O.; Shimko, K.A.; Obukhova, O.A.; Ataman, O.V. Association of Allelic Gene Polymorphisms of Matrix Gla-Protein System with Ischemic Atherothrombotic Stroke. IJPP 2016, 7, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, Y.-B.; Li, Z.-Q.; Ding, N.; Yi, H.-L. The Association between Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 9066–9074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alizadeh, S.; Djafarian, K.; Alizadeh, H.; Mohseni, R.; Shab-Bidar, S. Common Variants of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Nutr. Nutr. 2017, 10, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, S.; Guo, S.; Hu, F.; Guo, Y.; Yan, L.; Ma, W.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z. The Associations Between the Polymorphisms of Vitamin D Receptor and Coronary Artery Disease. Medicine 2016, 95, e3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferrarezi, D.A.F.; Bellili-Muñoz, N.; Dubois-Laforgue, D.; Cheurfa, N.; Lamri, A.; Reis, A.F.; Le Feuvre, C.; Roussel, R.; Fumeron, F.; Timsit, J.; et al. Allelic Variations of the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Are Associated with Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetics: The DIABHYCAR Prospective Study. Diabetes Metab. 2013, 39, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shen, F.; Wang, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, D.; Yu, F.; Yu, S.; Han, H.; Wang, J.; Ba, Y.; Wang, C.; et al. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Triceps Skin Fold Thickness and Body Fat Percentage but Not with Body Mass Index or Waist Circumference in Han Chinese. Lipids Health Dis. 2019, 18, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Abu el Maaty, M.A.; Hassanein, S.I.; Sleem, H.M.; Gad, M.Z. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms (TaqI and ApaI) in Relation to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Coronary Artery Disease Incidence. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. 2015, 35, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shanker, J.; Maitra, A.; Arvind, P.; Nair, J.; Dash, D.; Manchiganti, R.; Rao, V.S.; Radhika, K.N.; Hebbagodi, S.; Kakkar, V.V. Role of Vitamin D Levels and Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms in Relation to Coronary Artery Disease: The Indian Atherosclerosis Research Study. Coron. Artery Dis. 2011, 22, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Al-Hazmi, A.S.; Al-Mehmadi, M.M.; Al-Bogami, S.M.; Shami, A.A.; Al-Askary, A.A.; Alomery, A.M.; Al-Shehri, S.S.; Dahlawi, H.; Abdulrazag, K.; Ali, T.; et al. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Obesity in Saudi Men. Electron Physician 2017, 9, 5427–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Al-Daghri, N.M.; Guerini, F.R.; Al-Attas, O.S.; Alokail, M.S.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Draz, H.M.; Agliardi, C.; Costa, A.S.; Saulle, I.; Mohammed, A.K.; et al. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Obesity and Inflammosome Activity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, B.K.; Lee, G.S.; Stewart, W.F.; Ahn, K.D.; Simon, D.; Kelsey, K.T.; Todd, A.C.; Schwartz, B.S. Associations of Blood Pressure and Hypertension with Lead Dose Measures and Polymorphisms in the Vitamin D Receptor and Delta-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase Genes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rahmadhani, R.; Zaharan, N.L.; Mohamed, Z.; Moy, F.M.; Jalaludin, M.Y. The Associations between VDR BsmI Polymorphisms and Risk of Vitamin D Deficiency, Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Adolescents Residing in a Tropical Country. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cobayashi, F.; Hatzlhoffer Lourenço, B.; Augusto Cardoso, M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels, BsmI Polymorphism and Insulin Resistance in Brazilian Amazonian Children. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12531–12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hao, Y.; Chen, Y. Vitamin D Levels and Vitamin D Receptor Variants Are Associated with Chronic Heart Failure in Chinese Patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2019, 33, e22847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Pan, X.-M.; Li, D.-R.; Yang, L.; Wang, E.-Y.; Chen, T.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Liu, M.; Liao, Z.-G. No Association between Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms and Coronary Artery Disease in a Chinese Population. DNA Cell Biol. 2009, 28, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Swapna, N.; Vamsi, U.M.; Usha, G.; Padma, T. Risk Conferred by FokI Polymorphism of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene for Essential Hypertension. Indian J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 17, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Schuch, N.J.; Garcia, V.C.; Vívolo, S.R.G.F.; Martini, L.A. Relationship between Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and the Components of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Biswas, S.; Kanwal, B.; Jeet, C.; Seminara, R.S. Fok-I, Bsm-I, and Taq-I Variants of Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphism in the Development of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Literature Review. Cureus 2018, 10, e3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Shoben, A.B.; Kestenbaum, B.; Levin, G.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Psaty, B.M.; Siscovick, D.S.; de Boer, I.H. Seasonal Variation in 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 174, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Rockell, J.E.P.; Skeaff, C.M.; Venn, B.J.; Williams, S.M.; Green, T.J. Vitamin D Insufficiency in New Zealanders during the Winter Is Associated with Higher Parathyroid Hormone Concentrations: Implications for Bone Health? N. Z. Med. J. 2008, 121, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Kashi, Z.; sima Saeedian, F.; Akha, O.; ali Hydari Gorgi, M.; fatemeh Emadi, S.; Zakeri, H. Vitamin D Deficiency Prevalence in Summer Compared to Winter in a City with High Humidity and a Sultry Climate. Endokrynol. Pol. 2011, 62, 249–251. [Google Scholar]
  59. González-Parra, E.; Avila, P.J.; Mahillo-Fernández, I.; Lentisco, C.; Gracia, C.; Egido, J.; Ortiz, A. High Prevalence of Winter 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Deficiency despite Supplementation According to Guidelines for Hemodialysis Patients. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2012, 16, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Costanzo, P.R.; Constanzo, P.R.; Elías, N.O.; Kleiman Rubinsztein, J.; García Basavilbaso, N.X.; Piacentini, R.; Salerni, H.H. Ultraviolet radiation impact on seasonal variations of serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D in healthy young adults in Buenos Aires. Medicina 2011, 71, 336–342. [Google Scholar]
  61. Heidari, B.; Shirvani, J.S.; Firouzjahi, A.; Heidari, P.; Hajian-Tilaki, K.O. Association between Nonspecific Skeletal Pain and Vitamin D Deficiency. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 13, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rajakumar, K.; Holick, M.F.; Jeong, K.; Moore, C.G.; Chen, T.C.; Olabopo, F.; Haralam, M.A.; Nucci, A.; Thomas, S.B.; Greenspan, S.L. Impact of Season and Diet on Vitamin D Status of African American and Caucasian Children. Clin. Pediatr. 2011, 50, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Common polymorphisms in VDR genes and its PCR-RFLP based genotyping.
Figure 1. Common polymorphisms in VDR genes and its PCR-RFLP based genotyping.
Nutrients 13 03117 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of patients. Values are given as the number of patients N (%) or mean ± SD.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients. Values are given as the number of patients N (%) or mean ± SD.
CharacteristicN (%)
Sex & demographic data:
Male49 (84)
Female9 (16)
Age [years]62.91 ± 8.21
Weight [kg]83.82 ± 14.80
Height [m]1.71 ± 0.85
BMI [kg/m2]28.66 ± 3.83
Diagnosis & medical history:
Overweight44 (76)
Obesity16 (28)
Diabetes21 (36)
Hypercholesterolemia34 (59)
Hypertension41 (71)
Heart failure6 (10)
Stroke3 (5)
Table 2. Distribution of genotypes (N, (%)).
Table 2. Distribution of genotypes (N, (%)).
Patients with Cardiovascular Disease (N = 58)Healthy Subjects (N = 142, [37])p
ApaI
GG22 (37.9)57 (40.1)0.77
GT21 (36.2)49 (34.5)0.82
TT15 (25.9)36 (25.4)0.94
FokI
TT6 (10.3)17 (12.0)0.74
TC21 (36.2)42 (29.6)0.36
CC31 (53.4)83 (58.5)0.52
TaqI *
TT26 (45.6)69 (48.6)0.95
TC22 (38.6)49 (34.5)0.65
CC9 (15.8)24 (16.9)0.63
BsmI
GG21 (36.2)49 (34.5)0.82
GA29 (50)59 (41.5)0.19
AA8 (13.8)34 (23.9)0.11
* missing results for one patient.
Table 3. Patient characteristics according to the ApaI polymorphism.
Table 3. Patient characteristics according to the ApaI polymorphism.
VariableGG (N = 22)GT (N = 21)TT (N = 15)p
Weight [kg] 81.45 ± 9.8882.35 ± 14.4890.69 ± 20.080.38
BMI [kg/m2] 27.34 ± 2.6828.45 ± 3.5430.95 ± 4.800.08
Cholesterol [mmol/l] 4.23 ± 1.094.31 ± 1.364.27 ± 1.080.89
HDL [mmol/l] 1.31 ± 0.341.11 ± 0.371.29 ± 0.280.12
LDL [mmol/l] 2.37 ± 0.952.60 ± 1.322.38 ± 0.920.93
Triglycerides [mmol/l] 1.31 ± 0.661.35 ± 0.451.32 ± 0.840.68
HbA1C [%] 5.84 ± 1.065.78 ± 0.726.49 ± 1.560.32
Creatinine [μmol/l] 89.79 ± 33.8879.11 ± 19.4284.62 ± 14.630.33
25(OH)D2 [ng/mL] §1.74 (1.10–2.93)1.55 (1.07–2.34)1.34 (0.18–2.62)0.48
25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §21.12 (13.44–24.62)8.33 (3.46–16.66)12.25 (4.75–14.95)<0.01 α$
3-epi-25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §3.00 (2.33–3.78)1.80 (1.04–2.79)1.85 (1.16–3.21)0.03 α$
Diabetes β7 (32%)7 (33%)7 (47%)0.69
Overweight β18 (82%)14 (66%)12 (80%)0.67
Obesity β3 (14%)6 (29%)7 (47%)0.06
Hypertension β17 (77%)10 (48%)14 (93%)<0.01 α¥
Hypercholesterolemia β17 (77%)9 (43%)8 (53%)0.07
Heart failure β2 (9%)4 (19%)0 (0%)0.16
—Data are presented as mean ± SD; §—Data are presented as median (IQR), β—Data are presented as N (%); α—Significant at p < 0.05; $—Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA; ¥—Pearson’s & M-L Chi-square. Abbreviations: HDL—high density lipoprotein; LDL—low density lipoprotein; HbA1C — hemoglobin A1c.
Table 4. Patient characteristics according to the TaqI polymorphism.
Table 4. Patient characteristics according to the TaqI polymorphism.
VariableCC (N = 9)TC (N = 22)TT (N = 26)p
Weight [kg] 79.22 ± 15.4991.17 ± 17.9080.73 ± 9.860.05
BMI [kg/m2] 28.14 ± 3.2530.54 ± 4.7630.16 (28.34–33.93) §0.04 α$
Cholesterol [mmol/l] 4.27 ± 1.024.40 ± 1.284.07 ± 1.100.42
HDL [mmol/l] 1.29 ± 0.311.16 ± 0.341.29 ± 0.370.39
LDL [mmol/l] 2.46 ± 0.842.59 ± 1.232.25 ± 0.960.57
Triglycerides [mmol/l] 1.18 ± 0.521.48 ± 0.661.25 ± 0.680.28
HbA1C [%] 6.31 ± 1.545.95 ± 1.015.87 ± 1.040.64
Creatinine [μmol/l] 86.44 ± 15.2680.90 ± 19.1388.40 ± 33.200.49
25(OH)D2 [ng/mL] §1.81 (1.15–2.98)1.74 (1.34–3.68)0.56 (0.18–1.35)0.06
25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §17.99 (4.28–24.07)8.81 (3.46–14.89)12.78 (6.22–25.03)0.04 α$
3-epi-25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §3.03 (1.79–3.61)1.69 (0.96–2.86)2.41 (1.54–3.17)0.03 α$
Diabetes β4 (40)8 (36)8 (31)0.84
Overweight β8 (80)15 (68)20 (77)0.76
Obesity β2 (20)11 (50)3 (12)<0.01 α¥
Hypertension β8 (80)13 (59)20 (77)0.09
Hypercholesterolemia β6 (67)10 (45)18 (69)0.05 α¥
Heart failure β0 (0)4 (18)2 (8)0.28
—Data are presented as mean ± SD; §—Data are presented as median (IQR); β—Data are presented as N (%); α—Significant at p < 0.05; $—Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA; ¥—Pearson’s & M-L Chi-square.
Table 5. Patient characteristics according to the BsmI polymorphism.
Table 5. Patient characteristics according to the BsmI polymorphism.
VariableGG (N = 21)GA (N = 29)AA (N = 8)p
Weight [kg] 80.56 ± 10.1687.60 ± 16.6581.14 ± 17.330.35
BMI [kg/m2] 27.23 ± 2.6729.65 ± 4.4028.80 ± 3.400.19
Cholesterol [mmol/l] 4.34 ± 1.104.23 ± 1.314.22 ± 0.860.93
HDL [mmol/l] 1.31 ± 0.371.14 ± 0.311.40 ± 0.310.07
LDL [mmol/l] 2.52 ± 0.902.46 ± 1.242.30 ± 0.930.75
Triglycerides [mmol/l] 1.25 ± 0.711.43 ± 0.631.14 ± 0.500.29
HbA1C [%] 5.93 ± 1.065.87 ± 0.946.52 ± 1.770.57
Creatinine [μmol/l] 90.56 ± 37.1581.07 ± 16.7984.57 ± 17.100.70
25(OH)D2 [ng/mL] §1.7 (1.09–2.98)1.71 (0.98–2.78)1.32 (0.18–1.72)0.59
25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §21.39 (12.15–24.21)10.98 (3.46–16.59)11.10 (4.75–25.03)0.01 α$
3-epi-25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §2.89 (2.33–3.98)1.81 (1.04–2.94)1.91 (1.31–3.21)0.01 α$
Diabetes β6 (29)11 (38)4 (50)0.66
Overweight β15 (71)22 (76)7 (88)0.52
Obesity β2 (10)12 (41)2 (25)0.04 α¥
Hypertension β14 (67)19 (66)8 (100)0.15
Hypercholesterolemia β13 (61)17 (59)4 (50)0.55
Heart failure β3 (14)3 (10)0 (0)0.47
—Data are presented as mean ± SD; §—Data are presented as median (IQR); β—Data are presented as N (%); α—Significant at p < 0.05; $—Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA; ¥—Pearson’s & M-L Chi-square.
Table 6. Patient characteristics according to the FokI polymorphism.
Table 6. Patient characteristics according to the FokI polymorphism.
VariableTT (N = 6)TC (N = 21)CC (N = 31)p
Weight [kg] 82.00 ± 17.8784.20 ± 13.9483.92 ± 15.550.84
BMI [kg/m2] 28.87 ± 2.9228.93 ± 4.5328.24 ± 3.460.91
Cholesterol [mmol/l] 3.88 ± 0.784.27 ± 1.144.37 ± 1.260.62
HDL [mmol/l] 1.22 ± 0.441.23 ± 0.291.24 ± 0.380.97
LDL [mmol/l] 2.26 ± 0.862.42 ± 0.942.55 ± 1.210.10
Triglycerides [mmol/l] 0.92 ± 0.421.48 ± 0.801.30 ± 0.540.22
HbA1C [%] 5.45 ± 0.195.79 ± 0.546.27 ± 1.500.41
Creatinine [μmol/l] 78.20 ± 14.5379.77 ± 16.6890.00 ± 31.180.43
25(OH)D2 [ng/mL] §1.68 (0.25–1.71)1.62 (1.01–2.93)1.55 (0.56–2.63)0.99
25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §9.12 (4.52–19.42)13.67 (6.52–22.67)14.89 (3.46–21.77)0.45
3-epi-25(OH)D3 [ng/mL] §2.44 (1.82–3.09)3.05 (1.80–3.84)1.61 (1.04–2.81)0.03 α$
Diabetes β0 (0)9 (43)11 (35)0.17
Overweight β5 (83)17 (81)21 (68)0.66
Obesity β1 (17)7 (33)7 (23)0.79
Hypertension β5 (83)17 (81)18 (58)0.05 α¥
Hypercholesterolemia β4 (67)13 (62)16 (52)0.78
Heart failure β2 (33)0 (0)4 (13)0.03 α¥
—Data are presented as mean ± SD; §—Data are presented as median (IQR); β—Data are presented as N (%); α—Significant at p < 0.05; $—Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA; ¥—Pearson’s & M-L Chi-square.
Table 7. Determinants of hypertension in the studied group of patients with cardiovascular disease.
Table 7. Determinants of hypertension in the studied group of patients with cardiovascular disease.
EstimateStandard ErrorWald Stat.CL 95%pOdds RatioConfidence OR
LowerUpper−95%95%
BMI0.750.344.870.081.410.032.111.094.11
HbA1C [%]3.481.694.250.176.790.0432.391.19884.43
ApaI GT−3.081.454.49−5.92−0.230.030.05<0.010.79
Table 8. Inter-seasonal changes of 25(OH)D3 in patients’ plasma according to the VDR polymorphism.
Table 8. Inter-seasonal changes of 25(OH)D3 in patients’ plasma according to the VDR polymorphism.
NAutumn–WinterSpring–SummerZp
ApaI
GG 1421.56 (15.52–24.01) 17.30 (11.61–27.49)1.650.10
GT124.35 (2.92–8.81)13.62 (8.39–18.41)2.290.02 α
TT 96.22 (3.45–12.15) 14.95 (12.43–25.03)1.590.11
TaqI
TT89.43 (5.16–12.77)24.65 (13.69–32.53)1.820.07
CT125.07 (2.96–10.25)12.84 (8.39–16.62)2.100.04 α
CC1421.48 (2.85–23.18)15.19 (11.61–25.74)1.570.12
BsmI
GG921.67 (15.53–24.07) 17.30 (11.61–27.49)1.120.26
GA205.97 (2.94–12.91)13.33 (8.93–20.16)2.87<0.01 α
AA65.69 (3.35–11.10) 24.65 (14.95–28.50)1.570.12
FokI
TT59.12 (3.62–12.78)10.86 (4.75–37.76)1.480.14
TC1516.67 (3.48–22.67)14.16 (11.99–23.57)1.310.19
CC156.22 (3.15–21.15)16.94 (9.95–26.41)2.440.02 α
Total359.12 (3.22–21.48)14.96 (10.97–25.74)3.21<0.01 α
Data are presented as median (IQR); α—Significant at p < 0.05; and —Significant at p < 0.05 during intra-seasonal analysis by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abouzid, M.; Kruszyna, M.; Burchardt, P.; Kruszyna, Ł.; Główka, F.K.; Karaźniewicz-Łada, M. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Vitamin D Status in Population of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease—A Preliminary Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093117

AMA Style

Abouzid M, Kruszyna M, Burchardt P, Kruszyna Ł, Główka FK, Karaźniewicz-Łada M. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Vitamin D Status in Population of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease—A Preliminary Study. Nutrients. 2021; 13(9):3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abouzid, Mohamed, Marlena Kruszyna, Paweł Burchardt, Łukasz Kruszyna, Franciszek K. Główka, and Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada. 2021. "Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Vitamin D Status in Population of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease—A Preliminary Study" Nutrients 13, no. 9: 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop