Next Article in Journal
Exploring Mycosporine-like Amino Acid UV-Absorbing Natural Products for a New Generation of Environmentally Friendly Sunscreens
Next Article in Special Issue
New Eremophilane-Type Sesquiterpenes from the Marine Sediment-Derived Fungus Emericellopsis maritima BC17 and Their Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Harvesting Aurantiochytrium sp. SW1 via Flocculation Using Chitosan: Effects of Flocculation Parameters on Flocculation Efficiency and Zeta Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rugulopteryx-Derived Spatane, Secospatane, Prenylcubebane and Prenylkelsoane Diterpenoids as Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Production

1
Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real (Cádiz), Spain
2
Unidad de Investigación, Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Avda. Ana de Viya 21, 11009 Cádiz, Spain
3
Departamento de Biomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, Pl. Falla, 9, 11003 Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(4), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040252
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 16 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Drugs Research in Spain 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory potential of the different classes of diterpenoids produced by algae of the genus Rugulopteryx. First, sixteen diterpenoids (116), including spatane, secospatane, prenylcubebane, and prenylkelsoane metabolites, were isolated from the extract of the alga Rugulopteryx okamurae collected at the southwestern Spanish coasts. Eight of the isolated diterpenoids are new compounds whose structures were determined by spectroscopic means: the spatanes okaspatols A-D (14); the secospatane rugukamural D (8); the prenylcubebanes okacubols A (13) and B (14); and okamurol A (16), which exhibits an unusual diterpenoid skeleton featuring a kelsoane-type tricyclic nucleus. Second, anti-inflammatory assays were performed on microglial cells Bv.2 and macrophage cells RAW 264.7. Compounds 1, 3, 6, 12, and 16 caused significant inhibition of the NO overproduction induced by LPS in Bv.2 cells, and compounds 3, 5, 12, 14, and 16 significantly decreased levels of NO in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. The most active compound was okaspatol C (3), which completely suppressed the effects of LPS stimulation, both in Bv.2 and in RAW 264.7 cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The genus Rugulopteryx of brown algae was described in 2006 by De Clerck et al. to accommodate the species Dictyota radicans, Dilophus suhrii, and Dilophus marginatus, which were removed from Dictyota and Dilophus genera and, consequently, renamed as Rugulopteryx radicans, R. shurii, and R. marginata [1]. Later, in 2009, the species known as Dilophus okamurae was also transferred to the genus Rugulopteryx [2]. Although these four species of macroalgae typically grow along several areas of the Pacific Ocean [3], in recent years, R. okamurae has become renowned for having severely invaded the coasts of the Strait of Gibraltar, which connect the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean [4].
Chemical studies of the genus Rugulopteryx, performed on R. marginata from Australian coasts [5] and on several collections of R. okamurae from Japanese [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] and southern Spanish coasts [14,15], have shown that these algae are prolific sources of diterpenoids which belong to various structural classes. A group is formed by diterpenoids exhibiting the carbon skeleton of spatane, which contains a fused 5/4/5 tricyclic ring system (Figure 1) [5,8,12,13,14]. A second, more numerous and distinctive group of Rugulopteryx diterpenoids is formed by the secospatanes, currently including more than twenty compounds [5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], which are formally derived from spatanes by cleavage of the bond at C-4,C-10. A third characteristic group comprises four compounds exhibiting a prenylcubebane framework, characterized by possessing a fused 5/3/6 tricyclic ring system [5,7,10,14]. It is noteworthy that secospatane diterpenoids have been exclusively described from algae of the genus Rugulopteryx. The only exception is a secospatane reported from an alga identified as Dictyota fenestrata [16], which on a chemotaxonomic basis, suggests that the classification of this species might need a revision. On the other hand, spatane diterpenoids have been isolated from other brown algae of the Family Dictyotaceae, such as D. fenestrata [16], Spatoglossum schmittii [17,18], S. howleii [18], and Stoechospermum marginatum [19,20,21,22,23]. More recently, four spatanes have also been described from soft corals [24,25,26]. Regarding the prenylcubebanes, besides Rugulopteryx algae, the gorgonians Anthogorgia sp. and Euplexaura sp. have yielded terpenoids displaying this skeleton, although the four compounds isolated from these gorgonians were named as serrulatane-type diterpenoids [27,28]. In addition, the species R. okamurae has been the source of a few unique compounds with unprecedented diterpenoid skeletons, such as the dictyterpenoids isolated from Japanese specimens [13] and rugukadiol A from Spanish specimens of the alga [15].
The noticeable structural diversity and unusual frameworks of the diterpenoids produced by algae of the genus Rugulopteryx offer great opportunities in the search for leads for the development of novel molecules for biomedical applications. In this regard, we have recently reported the first account on the anti-inflammatory activity of compounds of the secospatane class, in particular, of ruguloptone A and also of the uncommon diterpenoid rugukadiol A obtained from R. okamurae collected in the Spanish coasts [15]. These results prompted us to investigate the properties of diterpenoids of the spatane and prenylcubebane classes, whose potential remained unexplored, and to test additional secospatane metabolites. Herein we describe the isolation from R. okamurae of further sixteen diterpenoids. The isolated metabolites include seven spatanes (17), five secospatanes (812), and three prenylcubebanes (1315), among which okaspatols A–D (14), rugukamural D (8), okacubols A (13), and B (14) are new compounds. In addition, the new okamurol A (16), which possesses an unusual kelsoane-type tricyclic nucleus, was also isolated. The capability of diterpenoids of the four structural classes to modulate the production of inflammatory mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), was assayed. In particular, the anti-inflammatory effects were tested in a classic proinflammatory environment by LPS-stimulated microglial cells Bv.2 and macrophage cells RAW 264.7.

2. Results and Discussion

Fresh specimens of R. okamurae were treated with acetone/MeOH, and after evaporation of the solvent, the aqueous residue was extracted with diethyl ether. Column chromatography (CC) of the extract, followed by repeated CC and HPLC purification of selected fractions, led to the isolation of compounds 116 (Figure 2).

2.1. Spatane Diterpenoids 17

Okaspatol A (1) possesses the molecular formula C22H34O3, determined by HRESIMS. The IR spectrum showed absorption bands at 3387 and 1711 cm−1 due to hydroxy and carbonyl functions, respectively. In particular, the presence of an acetate group was defined from the 1H NMR signal at δ 2.03 (3H, s) and the 13C NMR signals at δ 172.6 (-COO-) and δ 21.2 (CH3-) (Table 1). Another five methyl groups in the 1H NMR spectrum (δH 1.76, 1.67, 1.63, 0.94, 0.82) and the remaining twenty signals of the 13C NMR spectrum suggested a diterpene framework for compound 1.
The NMR spectra showed the signals of two trisubstituted double bonds (δC 135.0 (C-13) and δC 127.3 (C-15)/δH 5.21 (H-15), δC 124.5 (C-17)/δH 5.07 (H-17) and δC 131.8 (C-18)) and one bis-allylic methylene (δH 2.70, H-16), which together with three methyl groups (δH 1.76, 1.67, and 1.63) were accommodated in a 1,5-dimethylhexa-1,4-dien-1-yl side chain (Figure 3a). The double bonds and the acetate group mentioned above accounted for three of the six unsaturations deduced from the molecular formula, and hence, compound 1 must be tricyclic. In particular, the presence of a tricarbocyclic core consisting of two five-membered rings fused to a four-membered one, such as that of the spatane diterpenoids, was proposed from the deshielded carbons at δC 52.2 (C, C-4), 49.6 (CH, C-9), and 44.0 (CH, C-8), which together with the oxygenated carbon at δC 82.4 (C-10), were attributable to the four bridgehead carbons. Moreover, the methyl groups at δH 0.82 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, Me-11) and 0.94 (s, Me-12) were assigned to the characteristic methyl groups linked to C-1 and C-4 of the spatane skeleton.
These proposals were supported, among others, by the HMBC correlations H-8/C-6, C-10, C-12, H-9/C-2, C-3, C-7, Me-11/C-9, and Me-12/C-10 (Figure 3a). The location of the acetoxy group at C-5 was defined from the HMBC correlations of the geminal proton (δH 5.49, H-5) with C-7, C-8, C-10, and the acetate carbonyl group together with that of the oxygenated methine carbon (δC 79.9, C-5) with Me-12. On the other hand, the HMBC correlations H-7/C-14 and H-15/C-7 confirmed the location of the side chain at C-7 of the tricyclic nucleus.
The relative configuration of the molecule was defined from the NOESY data (Figure 3b). The correlations H-8/H-2b, Me-12, and H-9/H-6a supported the cis-anti-cis arrangement of the 5/4/5 tricyclic ring system, exhibiting H-8 and Me-12 on one face of the molecule and H-9 and the hydroxy group on the opposite one. Following this, the NOESY correlations of H-8 with H-7 and Me-11 defined the orientation of the side chain and of Me-11. The α orientation of the acetate group at C-5 was assigned on the basis of the multiplicity of H-5, a doublet with J = 4.7 Hz, similar to that reported for spatol, whose stereochemistry was secured by X-ray diffraction analysis [17], for its acetate [18] and related compounds [18,19]. Moreover, when the acetoxy group at C-5 was β-oriented, H-5 has been described as a doublet of doublets with J = 10 and 8 Hz [19]. The NOESY correlations of H-5 with both methylene protons at C-6, while H-7 was only correlated with H-6b, were also consistent with the opposite orientation between H-5 and H-7. The Z configuration of the double bond at C-13,C-15 was defined by the NOESY correlation H-15/Me-14 and the 13C NMR chemical shift of Me-14 at δC 24.0 [29].
Okaspatol B (2) possesses the molecular formula C20H32O2, determined by HRESIMS. The NMR spectra (Table 1) were related to those of compound 1, although diagnostic differences were observed, including the absence of the signals due to the acetate group, the shielding of the oxymethine (δC 75.7/δH 4.17), and the presence of an olefinic methylene (δC 108.9/δH 4.82 and 4.76). The analysis of COSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra confirmed the spatane framework of compound 2 (Figure S29). The presence of a tertiary hydroxy group at C-10 was supported by the HMBC correlations of the oxygenated carbon at δC 82.4 (C-10) with H-8, H-9, and Me-12, while the location of a secondary hydroxy group at C-5 was supported by the HMBC correlations of the oxymethine proton (δH 4.17) with C-7, C-8, and C-10. Differing from 1, the side chain of 2 contained a double bond at C-13,C-14, as indicated by the HMBC correlation of H-7 with the olefinic methylene carbon. The NOESY correlations (Figure S30) and the multiplicity of H-5 (d, J = 4.5 Hz) indicated that compound 2 possessed the same relative configuration as 1 in all its chiral centers.
The molecular formula C20H32O2 was determined by HRESIMS analysis of okaspatol C (3). Upon comparison with compound 1, in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (Table 2) was evident the absence of the signals of the acetate, the oxymethine, and the Me-12 groups, showing, in turn, the signals of an AB system at δH 3.63 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, H-12a) and 3.43 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, H-12b) attributable to an isolated oxymethylene. These data suggested that compound 3 was a spatane diterpenoid bearing a primary hydroxy group at C-12. This proposal was confirmed by the HMBC correlations of the oxymethylene protons with C-5, C-8, and C-10 of the spatane tricyclic nucleus (Figure S29). The NOESY correlations (Figure S30) indicated that the relative configuration of compound 3 was identical to that of 1 and 2.
Okaspatol D (4) possessed the molecular formula C20H32O, determined by HRESIMS. The NMR spectra (Table 2) were related to those of the spatanes discussed above. However, the 1H NMR spectrum of 4 did not show any signal attributable to protons geminal to an oxygenated function. In fact, the 13C NMR spectrum of 4 only showed a carbon linked to oxygenated function at δC 82.2, which was identified as C-10 from its HMBC correlations with H-3, H-5, H-8, H-9, and Me-12 (Figure S29). On the other hand, compound 4 was concluded to possess a side chain that differed from that of 1 and 3 by the E configuration of the double bond at C-13,C-15, as indicated by the shielding of Me-14 (δH 1.59/δC 17.9) [29] and the NOESY correlation of Me-14 with the methylene protons H-16 (Figure S30).
In addition to the new okaspatols A-D (14) described above, the known spatanes 57 were also isolated. Compounds 5 and 6 have already been found in R. okamurae [14]. Compound 7 has been previously described from R. marginata, although only partial and not assigned NMR data were reported [5]. The fully assigned NMR data of compound 7 (Table S1), as well as the key COSY, HMBC, and NOESY correlations, are provided in Figures S29 and S30.

2.2. Secospatane Diterpenoids 812

Rugukamural D (8) possessed the molecular formula C22H32O5, determined by HRESIMS. The NMR spectra (Table 3) showed the signals of an acetate group (δH 1.96 (3H, s), δC 20.9 (CH3-), δC 172.1 (-COO-)), and the remaining twenty carbons of the 13C NMR spectrum were attributable to a diterpene. In particular, the presence in the spectra of a ketone (δC 220.4) and an aldehyde group (δC 201.7/δH 9.59) suggested that 8 was a secospatane diterpenoid related to dilkamural and rugukamurals A-C [15], which are characterized by containing a five-membered ketone directly linked to a cyclopentanecarbaldehyde moiety. Moreover, according to the NMR spectra, the molecule contained two trisubstituted double bonds, (δC 135.7 (C-13), δC 129.8 (C-15)/δH 5.26 (H-15) and δC 123.9 (C-17)/δH 5.09 (H-17), δC 132.6 (C-18)), a methine linked to the acetoxy group (δC 78.2 (C-5)/δH 5.63 (H-5)), and a methine linked to a hydroxy group (δC 73.5 (C-2)/δH 4.10 (H-2)).
On the basis of COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 4a), the two double bonds mentioned above, together with three methyl groups (δH 1.69 (Me-14, Me-19), δH 1.65 (Me-20)) and a bis-allylic methylene (δC 28.1 (C-16)/δH 2.84, 2.72 (H-16)), were accommodated in a 1,5-dimethylhexa-1,4-dien-1-yl side chain identical to that found in compounds 1, 3, and 47. The Z configuration of the double bond at C-13,C-15 was deduced from the NOESY correlation Me-14/H-15. The position of this chain on the cyclopentanecarbaldehyde ring was supported by the HMBC correlations H-6/C-13, H-7/C-14, H-8/C-13, and H-15/C-7. The HMBC correlation of the proton geminal to the acetoxy group (δH 5.63, H-5) with C-7 and C-8 determined the presence of the acetoxy group also on this ring, at C-5. On the other hand, the hydroxy group was deduced to be located on the ciclopentanone ring, at C-2, from the HMBC correlations of the proton geminal to the hydroxy group (δH 4.10, H-2) with C-9, the ketone carbonyl at C-10, and the methyl group at C-11.
The orientation of the aldehyde group, the acetoxy group, H-7, and H-8 on the same side of the ring was deduced from the NOESY correlations H-4/H-5, H-5/H-6a, H-6b/H-7, and H-7/H-8 (Figure 4b). For the other ring, the NOESY correlations H-1/H-9 and H-2/Me-11 indicated that the hydroxy group at C-2 and the Me-11 were on opposite sides of the cyclopentanone ring. These relative configurations were identical to those described for dilkamural [11] and rugukamurals A–C [15]. Based on biogenetic considerations, the stereochemistry of one ring with respect to the other in rugukamural D (8) is depicted as identical to that established for dilkamural [11].
Together with rugukamural D (8), the four known secospatanes 912 were also isolated. Compounds 911 are known diterpenoids of R. marginata [5] and herein are described for the first time as metabolites of R. okamurae. Compound 12 was first isolated from R. marginata [5] and later from R. okamurae [13]. Since partial and not assigned NMR data were reported for these four compounds [5], fully assigned 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 912, together with key COSY, HMBC, and NOESY correlations, are provided in Table S2 and Figures S29 and S30.

2.3. Prenylcubebane Diterpenoids 1315

The molecular formula C20H30O of okacubol A (13) was determined by HRESIMS. This formula, together with the presence of five methyl signals in the 1H NMR spectrum at δH 1.83 (3H), 1.80 (3H), 1.27 (6H), and 1.00 (3H) (Table 4), suggested that 13 was also a diterpenoid. The NMR spectra showed the signals of a tertiary oxygenated carbon (δC 71.4) and of three double bonds (δC 143.3,140.4,137.9,126.2,123.0,118.1), bearing in total four olefinic protons (δH 6.52, 5.83, 5.67, 5.25). Since the three double bonds accounted for three of the six degrees of unsaturation deduced from the molecular formula, compound 13 must be tricyclic.
Two of the double bonds mentioned above, the oxygenated carbon and three methyl groups, were deduced to be located in a 5-hydroxy-1,5-dimethylhexa-1,3-dien-1-yl side chain. Key data were the HMBC correlations of the oxygenated carbon (δC 71.4, C-18) with two methyl groups (δH 1.27, Me-19 and Me-20) and with two olefinic protons (δH 5.67 (H-17) and 6.52 (H-16)), together with the COSY coupling of these with another olefinic proton (δH 5.83 (H-15)), which showed allylic coupling with the methyl group at δH 1.80 (Me-14) (Figure 5a). On the other hand, the remaining methine and methylene groups of the molecule were connected following the sequence of COSY couplings spanning from the olefinic methine proton at δH 5.25 (H-5) to the methylene at δH 2.08 (H-3a)/1.74 (H-3b). Then, the HMBC correlations H-3/C-1,C-2,C-9, and C-10 were consistent with a five-membered ring, while the correlation H-3/C-8 defined the presence of the fused three-membered ring. The tricyclic framework was completed from the correlations H-3/C-4, H-5/C-10, and Me-12/C-10. Moreover, the HMBC correlation H-7/C-14 indicated that the side chain was connected to C-7. All these data led to conclude that compound 13 possessed a carbon skeleton of prenylcubebane. The NOESY correlations defined the cis orientation of H-1 and H-9 on one side of the molecule and the cis orientation of H-7, H-8, and Me-11 on the other side (Figure 5b). The 13Z,16E configuration of the double bonds of the side chain was deduced from the NOESY correlation Me-14/H-15 and the coupling constant J16,17 = 15.2 Hz, respectively.
The molecular formula C20H30O determined by HRESIMS of okacubol B (14) indicated that it was an isomer of compound 13. The analysis of the NMR spectra (Table 4) showed that 14 possessed the same tricyclic core as 13 but a different side chain. In particular, the hydroxy group was deduced to be located at C-13, and the conjugated double bonds at C-15,C-16, and C-17,C-18. Key data were the HMBC correlations of the methyl group at δH 1.42 (Me-14), both with the oxygenated carbon (δC 78.4, C-13) and with C-7 in the ring (Figure S29). The 15Z configuration was deduced from the coupling constant J15,16 = 12.1 Hz.
In addition to compounds 13 and 14, the known prenylcubebane 15 was also isolated. This compound was described from R. marginata [5], although only partial NMR data were reported. The full NMR data of compound 15, together with key COSY, HMBC, and NOESY correlations, are shown in Table S3 and Figures S29 and S30.

2.4. Prenylkelsoane Diterpenoid 16

The molecular formula C20H32O of okamurol A (16) was determined by HRESIMS, and the IR absorption band at 3384 cm−1 indicated the presence of a hydroxy group. The NMR spectra (Table 5) showed the signals of two double bonds, one 1,1-disubstituted (δC 150.0 (C-13) and δC 110.5 (C-14)/δH 4.94,4.85 (H-14)) and one trisubstituted (δC 125.6 (C-17)/δH 5.08 (H-17) and δC 132.2 (C-18)), which together with two allylic methylenes (δC 37.7(C-15)/δH 1.91,1.84 (H-15) and δC 27.4 (C-16)/δH 2.09,2.05 (H-16)) and two methyl groups (δH 1.65 (Me-19), δH 1.59 (Me-20)) were accommodated in a 6-methylhepta-1,5-dien-2-yl side chain similar to that found in 2. Eliminating these eight carbons and two unsaturations from the molecular formula showed that the remaining twelve carbons of the molecule must be arranged in a tricyclic moiety. In fact, similar to the spatane 4, the NMR data indicated that the tricyclic core of 16 contained four methylenes, four methines, and two fully substituted carbons, one of them linked to the hydroxy group. However, a careful analysis of the COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6a) indicated that 16 did not exhibit the fused 5/4/5 tricyclic ring system characteristic of the spatanes, but an alternative 5/5/4 arrangement of kelsoane type [30], featuring a cyclopentane ring and a cyclobutane ring fused to a central cyclopentane ring.
In particular, the presence of a methyl-substituted five-membered ring was supported by the HMBC correlations of the methine proton at δH 2.59 (H-9), with two methylene carbons (δC 32.2 (C-2) and 34.4 (C-3)) and with the oxygenated carbon (δC 94.6, C-10), together with the sequence of COSY couplings of protons δH 2.59 (H-9)/δH 2.50 (H-1)/δH 0.92 Me-11. Key data to define the central five-membered ring were the COSY sequence of couplings δH 2.59 (H-9)/δH 2.38 (H-8)/δH 2.29 (H-7) together with the HMBC correlation of H-7 with C-9 and of Me-12 with C-7 and C-10. Moreover, the location of the side chain linked to this central ring was deduced from the HMBC correlation of H-9 with the olefinic carbon at δC 150.0 (C-13). The presence of the four-membered ring was deduced from two COSY-coupled methylenes (δH 2.05, 1.40 (CH2-5) and δH 1.89, 1.52 (CH2-6)), which showed HMBC correlations with the oxygenated carbon C-10 and with the carbon C-8 bearing the side chain, respectively. All these data led to defining that compound 16 possessed a carbon skeleton of prenylkelsoane. The relative configuration of compound 16 was determined from the NOESY data. Thus, the correlation H-7/Me-12 indicated the cis fusion between the four- and five-membered rings (Figure 6b). The correlations of H-3a with H-8, Me-12, H-2b, and H-2b and H-8 with Me-11 indicated that H-8, Me-11, and Me-12 were on the same face of the molecule. On the other face were H-9 and the side chain, as supported by the NOESY correlation between H-9 and H-14. Although the absolute configuration has not been determined, compound 16 has been depicted on the basis of biogenetic considerations (see below), with the same configuration as the spatanes and other diterpenoids isolated from this alga.
The prenylkelsoane carbon skeleton exhibited by compound 16 is very unusual. A survey of the literature revealed only one previous account, which describes the isolation of a deoxyanalogue of 16 from the mixture resulting from the incubation of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) with a terpene synthase isolated from the marine bacterium Streptomyces xinghaiensis [31]. It is worth noting that in that study, the diterpene spata-13,17-diene was the major compound derived from GGPP, leading to the proposal of the formation of the tricyclic core of spatanes and prenylkelsoanes from a common biosynthetic intermediate, which was supported by isotope labeling experiments [31]. The biosynthesis of spatanes and the prenylkelsoane okamurol A (16) in the alga Rugulopteryx could take place in a similar way, as shown in Figure 7. After the cyclization of GGPP to yield the (E,E)-prenylgermacradienyl cation A, a second cyclization would produce cation B. This could experience two alternative openings of the cyclopropane ring to give C and D, which are precursors of the spatanes and of the prenylkelsoane 16, respectively.

2.5. Inhibitory Activity of NO Production

The anti-inflammatory activity of ten of the isolated compounds, including representatives of the four classes of diterpenoids, was assayed in specific immune cell lines, microglial cells Bv.2, and macrophage cells RAW 264.7. In particular, the capability of the spatane diterpenoids 1, 3, 5, and 6, the secospatanes 8, 10, 11, and 12, the prenylcubebane 14, and the prenylkelsoane 16 to inhibit the lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-stimulated production of nitric oxide (NO) in Bv.2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells was tested. Compounds 7, 9, and 13 were not tested because of solubility issues or low stability, while compounds 2 and 4 were expected to cause similar effects to compounds 5 and 6.
First, in order to select the highest dose of each compound that could be used in the assays without affecting cell viability, the cytotoxicity of each diterpenoid against Bv.2 and RAW 264.7 cells was evaluated (Figures S31 and S32). The spatane diterpenoids 1, 3, 5, 6, and the prenylkelsoane 16 were the less toxic compounds, and in most instances, they did not affect cell viability at concentrations up to 10 μM or even 25 μM for compound 3. On the other hand, the secospatanes 8, 10, 11, and 12 were much more toxic for both microglial and macrophage cells, and at 10 μM caused more than 70% of cell death for Bv.2 and more than 60% of cell death for RAW 264.7. The prenylcubebane 14 did not affect Bv.2 cells viability at concentrations up to 1 μM and RAW 264.7 up to 10 μM. On this basis, the highest doses of the compound used in the NO inhibitory assays with Bv.2 and RAW 264.7 cells were those shown in Table 6 in order to guarantee that decreases of NO levels in the cells were truly due to inhibition of its production and not to cell death.
For the anti-inflammatory assays, cells were pretreated for 3 h with the compounds at the highest non-cytotoxic doses previously evaluated (Table 6) and then stimulated with LPS (200 ng/mL) to trigger an inflammatory response, which includes the overproduction and release of NO. The production of this inflammatory mediator was determined by measuring the levels in the culture medium of nitrite secreted by the cells, which is one of the major metabolites derived from NO. The treatment of cells with the compounds in the absence of LPS did not cause any induction of inflammatory response. The changes observed in NO production in microglial cells Bv.2 and macrophage cells RAW 264.7 after pretreatment with the compounds and LPS stimulation are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.
Figure 8A shows the nitrite production measured in cultures of control Bv.2 cells (B bar), in cultures of cells stimulated with LPS (LPS bar), and in cultures of cells treated with the algal diterpenoids at the selected concentration or with dexamethaxone (DX bar) and subsequently stimulated with LPS. Upon stimulation of cells with LPS, the nitrites level increased threefold compared to control Bv.2 cells. However, treatment of cells with diterpenoids 1, 3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, and 16 significantly inhibited nitrite production, with decreases of 38.8%, 65.0%, 28.1%, 43.0%, 27.6%, 41.1%, 29.1%, and 54.4%, respectively, in relation to LPS-stimulated but non-treated cells. The inhibition caused by okaspatol C (3) and okamurol A (16) was outstanding, since effectively counteracted the effect of LPS stimulation. Upon treatment with these compounds, and in spite of adding the inflammatory stimulus, the level of nitrites remained identical or close to that of basal conditions and similar to the levels observed in cells treated with the classical anti-inflammatory steroid dexamethasone. Both compounds showed dose-dependent inhibitory activity (Figure 8B). The strongest inhibition was caused by compound 3 at 25 μM, although significant effects were also observed at a concentration of 10 μM, with compound 16 being more active than 3. The spatanes 1 and 6 and the secospatane 12 also caused noticeable inhibitory effects, suppressing the LPS-induced overproduction of nitrites to less than half.
As shown in Figure 9A, the treatment of macrophage cells RAW 264.7 with LPS induced the overproduction of nitrites. The pretreatment of cells with compounds 3, 5, 6, 12, 14, and 16 caused inhibition of the nitrite level by 64.0%, 30.8%, 28.9%, 35.0%, 39.0%, and 43.2%, respectively, in relation to LPS-stimulated but non-treated cells. Similar to that observed with Bv.2 cells, compound 3 completely suppressed the effects of LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells. The inhibition of nitrite production caused by compound 16 was also noticeable, although more moderated, suppressing the LPS-induced overproduction of nitrites to less than half. Both compounds, 3 and 16, showed dose-dependent inhibitory activity (Figure 9B). The strongest inhibition was observed for 3 at 25 μM, while at 10 μM, compound 16 was more active than 3. The spatane 5, the secospatane 12, and the prenylcubebane 14 were also capable of reducing the overproduction of NO to half.
Although diterpenoids of the spatane class have been known for a long time, data on their biomedical properties are scarce and mostly focused on the cytotoxicity shown by a few compounds in assays against cancer cell lines [17,18,25,32,33]. This study has shown the anti-inflammatory properties of various spatane diterpenoids, with okaspatol C (3) outstanding because of its capacity to completely inhibit the overproduction of NO induced upon inflammatory stimulation, both in microglial Bv.2 and in macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. On the other hand, most of the compounds of the secospatane series tested in this study showed weak or no significant inhibitory activity. This outcome strengths observations made in our previous study where another six secospatanes were assayed [15]. Altogether, the results suggest that the 1,5-dicarbonyl system present in secospatanes 8, 10, 11, 12, dilkamural [15], and rugukamural C [15] enhances cytotoxicity, constraining the use of these compounds to very low doses, which may not be effective in NO inhibition. On the other hand, secospatanes, such as ruguloptones A, B, and F, exhibiting a –CH2OR group at C-12 instead of the aldehyde function, are not toxic and effective NO inhibitors [15]. NO inhibitory activity was also detected for the prenylcubebane 14 and with more potency for the prenylkelsoane 16, although only a compound of each of these diterpenoid classes has been tested.
During the last three decades, growing evidence has shown that enhanced NO production, due to the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), plays a key role in the pathophysiology of inflammation [34,35]. Thus, inhibition of iNOS is an important strategy to control the inflammatory processes associated with many pathological conditions. In this regard, structurally diverse natural products, mostly isolated from plants, have been reported to act by inhibiting NO production [35]. In recent years, several metabolites of macroalgae, including phenolic compounds [36,37,38], fucosterol [36], fucoxanthin [39], C15 acetogenins [40], and terpenoids [40,41,42], have been described to decrease NO levels in LPS-stimulated macrophage RAW 264.7 cells and fucosterol also in microglial cells [43]. Together with our previous report [15], this study has demonstrated the NO inhibitory activity of algal diterpenoids of four structural classes in both immune cells Bv.2 and RAW 264.7 cells, showing the potential of macroalgal terpenoids in the search for lead compounds for new anti-inflammatory agents.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter (Jasco, Easton, MD, USA). IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin–Elmer FT-IR Spectrum Two spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent 500 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or on a Bruker 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), using CD3OD as solvent. Chemical shifts were referenced using the solvent signals at δH 3.30 and δC 49.0. COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments were performed using standard Agilent or Bruker pulse sequences. High-resolution mass spectra (HRESIMS) were obtained on a Waters XEVO G2-S Mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Column chromatography was carried out on Merck Silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). SPE separations were performed on Supelco DSC18 cartridges (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). HPLC separations were performed on a LaChrom-Hitachi apparatus (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a differential refractometer RI-71. Luna Si (2) (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and Luna Si (2) (250 × 10 mm, 5 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) columns were used for separations in normal phase. All solvents were of HPLC grade.

3.2. Algae Collection

Specimens of R. okamurae (E.Y. Dawson), I. K. Hwang, W. J. Lee, and H. S. Kim (Class Phaeophyceae, Order Dictyotales, Family Dictyotaceae) were collected at Punta Carnero (Cádiz, Spain, 36°04′ 38.6′′ N; 5°25′31.1′′ W) and transported to the laboratory in a thermal refrigerator. Algae were washed with fresh water to remove epiphytes and organic and inorganic debris and immediately extracted. A voucher specimen (RO-1019) is deposited at the Marine Natural Products Laboratory, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cadiz, Spain.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Fresh samples of R. okamurae (500 g) were extracted, and the extract was subjected to silica gel column chromatography, as described previously [15]. In brief, the algae were extracted with acetone/MeOH (1:1, v/v), and after evaporation of the solvent, the aqueous residue was extracted with Et2O. The Et2O extract (8.2 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using hexanes/Et2O mixtures, Et2O, CHCl3/MeOH (8:2, v/v), and finally, MeOH. The fraction eluted with hexanes/Et2O (9:1, v/v) was further separated by column chromatography (n-hexane/Et2O mixtures 99:1 to 9:1, v/v), and the subfractions showing in their NMR spectra signals attributable to terpenoids were subjected to HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc,99:1, v/v) yielding compounds 7, 14, and 15. Further separation of the fraction that eluted with hexanes/Et2O (8:2, v/v) by column chromatography (n-hexane/Et2O mixtures 99:1 to 8:2, v/v) and HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc, 95:5, v/v) of selected subfractions yielded compound 4 and further amounts of 14. The fraction that eluted with hexanes/Et2O (7:3, v/v) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane/Et2O 95:5 to 6:4, v/v) and selected subfractions separated by HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc, 95:5 to 8:2 v/v) to yield compounds 1, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 16. The fraction eluted with hexanes/Et2O (3:7, v/v) was separated on a silica gel column (n-hexane/Et2O mixtures, 8:2 to 1:1, v/v) and then purified by HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc 7:3 v/v) yielding compound 2. The fraction that was eluted with Et2O was purified on SPE-C18 cartridges (1 g/6 mL) preconditioned with MeOH/H2O (9:1, v/v, 2 mL) and eluted with 10 mL of the same solvent. After evaporation of the solvent, the resulting mixture was separated by silica gel column chromatography (n-hexane/Et2O mixtures, 75:25 to 1:1, v/v, and AcOEt), and selected subfractions were further purified by HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc 7:3 v/v) yielding compounds 5, 8, 9, and further amounts of 2. The fraction eluted with CHCl3/MeOH was separated on a silica gel column using n-hexane/Et2O mixtures (6:4 to 4:6, v/v) followed by HPLC (n-hexane/EtOAc, 1:1 v/v) of selected fractions to yield compound 3. The total amounts obtained of each compound were as follows: 1 (5.7 mg); 2 (4.6 mg); 3 (10.7mg); 4 (8.6 mg); 5 (52.2 mg); 6 (23.3 mg); 7 (10.0 mg); 8 (8.0 mg); 9 (15.6 mg); 10 (23.1 mg); 11 (18.1 mg); 12 (22.7 mg); 13 (7.7 mg); 14 (9.9 mg); 15 (35.3 mg); 16 (9.4 mg).

3.4. Characterization of Compounds

Okaspatol A (1): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +34.5 (c 0.05, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3387, 2943, 2866, 1711, 1452 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 369.2409 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C22H34O3Na 369.2406).
Okaspatol B (2): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +13.7 (c 0.12, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3391, 2931, 2864, 1448 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 327.2315 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C20H32O2Na 327.2300).
Okaspatol C (3): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +91.6 (c 0.09, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3357, 2953, 2865, 1450 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 287.2385 [M + H − H2O]+ (calcd. for C20H31O 287.2375).
Okaspatol D (4): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +21.6 (c 0.07, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3387, 2942, 2849, 1445 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 311.2357 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C20H32ONa 311.2351).
Rugukamural D (8): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +25.8 (c 0.13, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3356, 2931, 2865, 1731, 1240 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 3; HRESIMS m/z 399.2142 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C22H32O5Na 399.2147).
Okacubol A (13): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +22.9 (c 0.11, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3355, 2946, 2866, 1642, 1595, 1447 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 309.2211 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C20H30ONa 309.2194).
Okacubol B (14): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 +22.3 (c 0.09, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3460, 2948, 2864, 1648, 1595, 1448 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 309.2198 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C20H30ONa 309.2194).
Okamurol A (16): colorless oil; [ α ] D 25 −26.9 (c 0.11, MeOH); IR (film) υmax 3384, 2964, 1234 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) Table 5; 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz), Table 5; HRESIMS m/z 311.2349 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C20H32ONa 311.235126).

3.5. Cell Culture

Mouse microglia Bv.2 cell line was purchased from AcceGen Biotechnology (Fairfield, NJ, USA). Mouse macrophages RAW 264.7 cell line was supplied by Dr. A. M. Valverde (IIBm “Alberto Sols” UAM-CSIC, Madrid, Spain). Then, 1.5 × 105 cells/well were seeded in a 6-multiwell plate (Sarstedt, Germany). The culture conditions were 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in RPMI supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All experimental cell approaches were performed in a complete medium without FBS.

3.6. Analysis of the Cellular Viability by Crystal Violet Staining

Cells were cultured in 24-well plates and grown up to 70% confluence. The cells were treated with solutions of the diterpenes to reach final concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0 µM and incubated in a serum-free medium. After 24 h, the medium was discarded, and cells were fixed by adding 0.5 mL of glutaraldehyde 1% (v/v) for 30 min. Then, the plates were rinsed with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), and the remaining viable adherent cells were stained with crystal violet 0.1% (w/v) for 30 min. After rinsing plates with water and drying for 24 h, 0.5 mL of acetic acid 10% (v/v) was added. The absorbance of each plate was read spectrophotometrically at 590 nm in a microplate reader (Versamax Tunable Microplate reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

3.7. Analysis of Nitrites (NO2)

Cells were cultured in 6-well plates and grown up to 70% confluence. The cells were pre-treated for 3 h with the diterpenes at the corresponding concentration in serum-free medium and then stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 200 ng/mL) for another 24 h. Dexamethasone (Dx) was used as a positive reference compound at 2.5 µM. After cell treatments, levels of nitrites were measured by using the Griess reaction assay [44]. Briefly, the cell-cultured medium was treated with an acid solution containing 1% sulphanilamide and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine (NEDA) and read spectrophotometrically at 548 nm in a microplate reader.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared by using the Bonferroni ANOVA test. All statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with 2-sided tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

4. Conclusions

The brown alga Rugulopteryx okamurae, which expands along the coasts of the Strait of Gibraltar, is a rich source of diterpenoids exhibiting spatane, secospatane, and prenylcubebane carbon skeletons. The results herein obtained, together with data from the literature, suggest that the coexistence of these three diterpenoid classes is a characteristic of algae of the genus Rugulopteryx. In addition, R. okamurae contains okamurol A (16), which displays an uncommon diterpenoid skeleton with a 5/5/4 tricarbocyclic nucleus, likely derived from the same biosynthetic precursor of spatanes through an alternative ring closure reaction. From a biomedical point of view, several diterpenoids produced by Rugulopteryx are capable of inhibiting the production of the inflammatory mediator NO, with compounds such as the spatane okaspatol A (3) and the prenylkelsoane okamurol A (16) causing strong suppressive effects of NO overproduction in LPS-stimulated microglial cells Bv.2 and macrophage cells RAW264.7.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md21040252/s1, Tables S1–S3: NMR data of compounds 7, 912, and 15; Figures S1–S28: 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 14 and 716; Figure S29: Key COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 24, 7, 912, 14, and 15. Figure S30: Key NOESY correlations of compounds 24, 7, 912, 14, and 15. Figure S31: Results of cytotoxicity assays on Bv.2 cells; Figure S32: Results of cytotoxicity assays on RAW 264.7 cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.Z. and A.I.A.; investigation, B.C. and C.d.l.R.; validation, E.Z. and A.I.A.; formal analysis, E.Z., A.I.A. and B.C.; writing—original draft, E.Z. and B.C.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, E.Z., C.d.l.R. and B.C.; supervision: E.Z. and A.I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Junta de Andalucía, Spain (ITI-FEDER, research project ITI- 0012-2019).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Isabel Casal-Porras (University of Cadiz) for the collection and identification of the alga. We also thank Manuel Aguilar-Diosdado (UCA-INBICA) for his support in obtaining biomedical research facilities and funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Clerck, O.; Leliaert, F.; Verbruggen, H.; Lane, C.E.; De Paula, J.C.; Payo, D.A.; Coppejans, E. A revised classification of the Dictyoteae (Dictyotales, Paheophyceae) based on rbcL and 26S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. J. Phycol. 2006, 42, 1271–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hwang, I.K.; Lee, W.J.; Kim, H.S.; De Clerck, O. Taxonomic reappraisal of Dilophus okamurae (Dictyotales, phaeophyta) from the western Pacific ocean. Phycologia 2009, 48, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  4. García-Gómez, J.C.; Sempere-Valverde, J.; Gonzalez, A.R.; Martínez-Chacón, M.; Olaya-Ponzone, L.; Sánchez-Moyano, E.; Ostalé-Valriberas, E.; Megina, C. From exotic to invasive in record time: The extreme impact of Rugulopteryx okamurae (Dictyotales, Ochrophyta) in the Strait of Gibraltar. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ravi, B.N.; Wells, R.J. A series of new diterpenes from the brown alga Dilophus marginatus (Dictyotaceae). Aust. J. Chem. 1982, 35, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ochi, M.; Masui, N.; Kotsuki, H.; Miura, I.; Tokoroyama, T. The structures of fukurinolal and fukurinal, two new diterpenoids from the brown seaweed Dilophus okamurai Dawson. Chem. Lett. 1982, 11, 1927–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kurata, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Takato, T.; Taniguchi, K.; Suzuki, M. A new feeding-deterrent diterpenoid from the brown alga Dilophus okamurai Dawson. Chem. Lett. 1988, 17, 1629–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kurata, K.; Suzuki, M.; Shiraishi, K.; Taniguchi, K. Spatane-type diterpenes with biological activity from the brown alga Dilophus okamurai. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurata, K.; Taniguchi, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Suzuki, M. Structures of secospatane-type diterpenes with feeding-deterrent activity from the brown alga Dilophus okamurai. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 1567–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kurata, K.; Taniguchi, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Suzuki, M. Feeding-deterrent diterpenes from the brown alga Dilophus okamurai. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 3453–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ninomiya, M.; Hirohara, H.; Onishi, J.I.; Kusumi, T. Chemical study and absolute configuration of a new marine secospatane from the brown alga Dilophus okamurae. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5436–5440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yamase, H.; Umemoto, K.; Ooi, T.; Kusumi, T. Structures and absolute stereochemistry of five new secospatanes and a spatane isolated from the brown alga Dilophus okamurai Dawson. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 47, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suzuki, M.; Yamada, H.; Kurata, K. Dictyterpenoids A and B, two novel diterpenoids with feeding-deterrent activity from the brown alga Dilophus okamurae. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Casal-Porras, I.; Zubía, E.; Brun, F.G. Dilkamural: A novel chemical weapon involved in the invasive capacity of the alga Ruguloptexyx okamurae in the Strait of Gibraltar. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2021, 257, 107398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cuevas, B.; Arroba, A.I.; De los Reyes, C.; Gómez-Jaramillo, L.; González-Montelongo, M.C.; Zubía, E. Diterpenoids from the brown alga Rugulopteryx okamurae and their anti-inflammatory activity. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Altena, I.A.; McGivern, J. New spatane-derived diterpenoids from the Australian brown alga Dictyota fenestrata. Aust. J. Chem. 1992, 45, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gerwick, W.H.; Fenical, W.; Van Engen, D.; Clardy, J. Isolation and structure of spatol, a potent inhibitor of cell replication from the brown seaweed Spatoglossum schmittii. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7991–7993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gerwick, W.H.; Fenical, W. Spatane diterpenoids from the tropical marine algae Spatoglossum schmittii and Spatoglossum howleii (Dictyotaceae). J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3325–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gerwick, W.H.; Fenical, W.; Sultanbawa, M.U.S. Spatane diterpenoids from the tropical marine alga Stoechospermum marginatum (Dictyotaceae). J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2233–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rao, C.B.; Pullaiah, K.C.; Surapaneni, R.K.; Suryaprabha, R.; Raju, V.S.N. A new spatane diterpenoid from Stoechospermum marginatum. Ind. J. Chem. B 1987, 26B, 79–80. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wahidullah, S.; Kamat, S.Y.; Paknikar, S.K.; Bates, R.B. 5(R)-Acetoxyspata-13,17-diene, a novel diterpenoid from the brown alga Stoechospermum marginatum. Planta Med. 1988, 54, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Venkateswarlu, Y.; Biabani, M.A.F. A spatane diterpene from the brown alga Stoechospermum marginatum. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Rosa, S.; Iodice, C.; Khalaghdoust, M.; Oryan, S.; Rustaiyan, A. Spatane diterpenoids from the brown alga Stoechospermum marginatum (Dictyotaceae). Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, L.; Sheng, L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Huang, H.; Li, X.-B.; Li, J.; Mollo, E.; Gavagnin, M.; Guo, Y.-W. Diterpenes from the Hainan soft coral Lobophytum cristatum Tixier Durivault. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tsai, T.-C.; Wu, Y.-J.; Su, J.-H.; Lin, W.-T.; Lin, Y.-S. A new spatane diterpenoid from the cultured soft coral Sinularia leptoclados. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahelivao, M.P.; Gruner, M.; Lübken, T.; Islamov, D.; Kataeva, O.; Andriamanantoanina, H.; Bauer, I.; Knölker, H.-J. Chemical constituents of the soft corals Sinularia vanderlandi and Sinularia gravis from the coast of Madagascar. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 989–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, D.; Li, D.; Shen, S.; Cheng, W. Terpenoids from a Chinese gorgonian Anthogorgia sp. and their antifouling activities. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 1459–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, F.; Shao, C.-L.; Liu, Y.-F.; Zhu, H.-J.; Wang, C.Y. Cytotoxic serrulatane-type diterpenoids from the gorgonian Euplexaura sp. and their absolute configurations by vibrational circular dichroism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Crews, P.; Rodríguez, J.; Jaspars, M. Organic Structural Analysis, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  30. Le Bideau, F.; Kousara, M.; Chen, L.; Wei, L.; Dumas, F. Tricyclic sesquiterpenes from marine origin. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6110–6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rinkel, J.; Lauterbach, L.; Dickschat, J.S. Spata-13,17-diene synthase-an enzyme with sesqui-, di-, and seterterpene synthase activity from Streptomyces xinghaiensis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 16385–16389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chinnababu, B.; Reddy, S.P.; Rao, P.S.; Reddy, V.L.; Kumar, B.S.; Rao, J.V.; Prakasham, R.S.; Babu, K.S. Isolation, semi-synthesis and bio-evaluation of spatane derivatives from the brown algae Stoechospermum marginatum. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2479–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Velatooru, L.R.; Baggu, C.B.; Janapala, V.R. Spatane diterpinoid from the brown algae, Stoechospermum marginatum induces apoptosis via ROS induced mitochondrial mediated caspase dependent pathway in murine B16F10 melanoma cells. Mol. Carcinogen. 2016, 55, 2222–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pacher, P.; Beckman, J.S.; Liaudet, L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 315–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Minhas, R.; Bansal, Y.; Bansal, G. Inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitors: A comprehensive update. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 823–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jung, H.A.; Jin, S.E.; Ahn, B.R.; Lee, C.M.; Choi, J.S. Anti-inflammatory activity of edible brown alga Eisenia bicyclis and its constituens fucosterol and phlorotannins in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Choi, Y.K.; Ye, B.-R.; Kim, E.-A.; Kim, J.; Kim, M.-S.; Lee, W.W.; Ahn, G.-N.; Kang, N.; Jung, W.-K.; Heo, S.-J. Bis(3-bromo-4,5-dihydroxybenzyl)ether, a novel bromophenol from the marine red alga Polysiphonia morrowii that suppresses LPS-induced inflammatory response by inhibiting ROS-mediated ERK signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 103, 1170–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ko, E.-Y.; Heo, S.-J.; Cho, S.-H.; Lee, W.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yang, H.-W.; Ahn, G.; Cha, S.-H.; Kwon, S.-H.; Jeong, M.S.; et al. 3-Bromo-5-(ethoxymethyl)-1,2-benzenediol inhibits LPS-induced proinflammatory responses by preventing ROS production and downregulating NF-kB in vitro in a zebrafish model. Int. Immunopharm. 2019, 67, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heo, S.-J.; Yoon, W.-J.; Kim, K.-N.; Ahn, G.-N.; Kang, S.-M.; Kang, D.-H.; Affan, A.; Oh, C.; Jung, W.-K.; Jeon, Y.-J. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory effect of fucoxanthin isolated from brown algae in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2045–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tamman, M.A.; Daskalaki, M.G.; Tsoureas, N.; Kolliniati, O.; Mahdy, A.; Kampranis, S.C.; Tsatsanis, C.; Roussis, V.; Ioannou, E. Secondary metabolites with anti-inflammatory activity from Laurencia majuscula collected in the Red Sea. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wijesinghe, W.A.J.P.; Kang, M.-C.; Lee, W.-W.; Lee, H.-S.; Kamada, T.; Vairappan, C.S.; Jeon, Y.-J. 5β-hydroxypalisadin B isolated from the red alga Laurencia snackeyi attenuates inflammatory response in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Algae 2014, 29, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Daskalaki, M.G.; Vyrla, D.; Harizani, M.; Doxaki, C.; Eliopoulos, A.G.; Roussis, V.; Ioannou, E.; Tsatsanis, C.; Kampranis, S.C. Neorogioltriol and related diterpenes from the red alga Laurencia inhibit inflammatory bowel disease in mice by suppressing M1 and promoting M2-like macrophage responses. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wong, C.H.; Gan, S.Y.; Tan, S.C.; Gany, S.A.; Ying, T.; Gray, A.I.; Igoli, J.; Chan, E.W.L.; Pang, S.M. Fucosterol inhibits the cholinesterase activities and reduces the release of pro-inflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide and amyloid-induced microglial cells. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 3261–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Green, L.C.; Wagner, D.A.; Glogowski, J.; Skipper, P.L.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite and [15N] nitrate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 126, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Three characteristic carbon skeletons of diterpenoids of algae of the genus Rugulopteryx: (a) spatane; (b) secospatane; (c) prenylcubebane.
Figure 1. Three characteristic carbon skeletons of diterpenoids of algae of the genus Rugulopteryx: (a) spatane; (b) secospatane; (c) prenylcubebane.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the diterpenoids isolated from R. okamurae.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the diterpenoids isolated from R. okamurae.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g002
Figure 3. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 1. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 1.
Figure 3. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 1. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 1.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g003
Figure 4. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 8. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 8.
Figure 4. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 8. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 8.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g004
Figure 5. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 13. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 13.
Figure 5. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 13. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 13.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g005
Figure 6. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 16. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 16.
Figure 6. (a) Key COSY (bold bond) and HMBC correlations (arrow) observed for compound 16. (b) Key NOESY correlations observed for compound 16.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g006
Figure 7. Possible biosynthetic pathway to spatanes and prenylkelsoane 16 in Rugulopteryx.
Figure 7. Possible biosynthetic pathway to spatanes and prenylkelsoane 16 in Rugulopteryx.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g007
Figure 8. (A) Effects of diterpenoids 1 (10 μM), 3 (25 μM), 5 (10 μM), 6 (10 μM), 8 (0.1 μM), 10 (0.5 μM), 11 (0.5 μM), 12 (0.1 μM), 14 (1 μM), and 16 (10 μM) on NO release in microglial cells Bv.2. (B) Dose-response effects of diterpenoids 3 (0.1, 1, 10, and 25 μM ) and 16 (0.1, 1, 10 μM ) on NO release in microglial cells Bv2. Bv.2 cells were pretreated for 3 h with the compound at the corresponding concentration or with dexamethasone (DX, 2.5 μM), followed by stimulation with 200 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Nitrites accumulation in the culture media was measured using the Griess reagent. Results are expressed as fold change relative to the LPS condition and are mean ± SD (n ≥ 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni t-test. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. LPS. # p ≤ 0.05 vs. Basal.
Figure 8. (A) Effects of diterpenoids 1 (10 μM), 3 (25 μM), 5 (10 μM), 6 (10 μM), 8 (0.1 μM), 10 (0.5 μM), 11 (0.5 μM), 12 (0.1 μM), 14 (1 μM), and 16 (10 μM) on NO release in microglial cells Bv.2. (B) Dose-response effects of diterpenoids 3 (0.1, 1, 10, and 25 μM ) and 16 (0.1, 1, 10 μM ) on NO release in microglial cells Bv2. Bv.2 cells were pretreated for 3 h with the compound at the corresponding concentration or with dexamethasone (DX, 2.5 μM), followed by stimulation with 200 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Nitrites accumulation in the culture media was measured using the Griess reagent. Results are expressed as fold change relative to the LPS condition and are mean ± SD (n ≥ 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni t-test. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. LPS. # p ≤ 0.05 vs. Basal.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g008
Figure 9. (A) Effects of diterpenoids 1 (1 μM), 3 (25 μM), 5 (10 μM), 6 (10 μM), 8 (0.1 μM), 10 (0.5 μM), 11 (0.5 μM), and 12 (1 μM), 14 (10 μM), and 16 (10 μM) on NO release in macrophage cells RAW 264.7 (B) Dose-response effects of diterpenoids 3 (0.1, 1, 10, and 25 μM ) and 16 (0.1, 1, 10 μM) on NO release in RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated for 3 h with the compound at the corresponding concentration or with dexamethasone (DX, 2.5 μM), followed by stimulation with 200 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Nitrite accumulation in the culture media was measured using the Griess reagent. Results are expressed as fold change relative to the LPS condition and are mean ± SD (n ≥ 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni t-test. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. LPS. # p ≤ 0.05 vs. Basal.
Figure 9. (A) Effects of diterpenoids 1 (1 μM), 3 (25 μM), 5 (10 μM), 6 (10 μM), 8 (0.1 μM), 10 (0.5 μM), 11 (0.5 μM), and 12 (1 μM), 14 (10 μM), and 16 (10 μM) on NO release in macrophage cells RAW 264.7 (B) Dose-response effects of diterpenoids 3 (0.1, 1, 10, and 25 μM ) and 16 (0.1, 1, 10 μM) on NO release in RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated for 3 h with the compound at the corresponding concentration or with dexamethasone (DX, 2.5 μM), followed by stimulation with 200 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Nitrite accumulation in the culture media was measured using the Griess reagent. Results are expressed as fold change relative to the LPS condition and are mean ± SD (n ≥ 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni t-test. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. LPS. # p ≤ 0.05 vs. Basal.
Marinedrugs 21 00252 g009
Table 1. NMR data of the spatane diterpenoids 1 and 2 in CD3OD a,b.
Table 1. NMR data of the spatane diterpenoids 1 and 2 in CD3OD a,b.
Position12
δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)
136.6, CH2.12, m36.8, CH2.06, m
234.5, CH21.78, m
1.28, m
34.7, CH21.75, m
1.29, m
338.4, CH22.08, ddd (13.2,13.2,6.2)
1.51, ddd (13.2,13.2,6.9)
38.7, CH22.08, ddd (13.1,13.1,6.4)
1.48, ddd (13.1,13.1,6.8)
452.2, C 52.9, C
579.9, CH5.49, d (4.7)75.7, CH4.17, d (4.5)
637.0, CH22.46, ddd (13.6,13.6,4.7)
1.78, m
38.6, CH22.26, ddd (13.3,13.3,4.5)
1.64, m
742.7, CH3.19, ddd (13.6,5.9,5.9)46.4, CH2.97, ddd (13.3,5.5,5.5)
844.0, CH1.84, m41.4, CH 1.72, m
949.6, CH2.15, m48.2, CH1.87, br dd (6.4,4.5)
1082.4, C 82.4, C
1114.5, CH30.82, d (6.6)15.1, CH30.80, d (6.8)
1213.6, CH30.94, s14.0, CH31.02, s
13135.0, C 149.5, C
1424.0, CH31.76, d (1.1)108.9, CH24.82, s; 4.76, s
15127.3, CH5.21, br t (7.2)37.8, CH21.95, m
1627.8, CH22.70, m27.7, CH22.19, m
1.99, m
17 124.5, CH5.07, br t (7.2) 125.4, CH5.11, br t (7.0)
18131.8, C 132.3, C
1925.9, CH31.67, d (1.1) 25.9, CH31.66, d (1.0)
2017.8, CH31.63, br s17.7, CH31.60, br s
CH3COO-172.6, C
CH3COO-21.2, CH32.03, s
a 1H at 500 MHz. 13C at 125 MHz. b Assignments aided by COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments.
Table 2. NMR data of the spatane diterpenoids 3 and 4 in CD3OD a,b.
Table 2. NMR data of the spatane diterpenoids 3 and 4 in CD3OD a,b.
Position34
δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)
136.8, CH2.10, m37.0, CH2.06, m
234.7, CH21.77, m
1.28, m
34.5, CH21.75, m
1.30, m
338.1, CH22.08, m
1.56, m
38.0, CH22.03, m
1.46, m
454.1, C 48.2, C
530.7, CH22.20, dd (12.8, 6.9)
1.59, m
35.7, CH22.11, dd (12.7,6.7)
1.25, m
630.1, CH22.10, m
1.72, m
29.4, CH21.91, m
1.52, m
745.5, CH2.82, ddd (12.7,5.8,5.8)52.2, CH2.44, m
839.8, CH1.83, br dd (5.5, 5.2)41.6, CH 1.71, br dd (5.5,4.8)
949.9, CH2.08, m48.7, CH1.80, br dd (5.5, 5.1)
1081.8, C 82.2, C
1114.4, CH30.81, d (6.4)15.1, CH30.79, d (6.7)
1265.0, CH23.63, d (10.8)
3.43, d (10.8)
20.7, CH31.01, s
13135.9, C 134.6, C
1424.2, CH31.76, d (1.2)17.9, CH31.59, br s
15126.7, CH5.14, br t (7.0)123.6, CH5.17, br t (7.1)
1627.8, CH22.71, m
2.65, m
27.9, CH22.72, m
2.68, m
17124.7, CH5.07, br t (6.7)124.8, CH5.09, br t (7.2)
18131.7, C 131.8, C
1925.9, CH31.66, d (1.1)25.9, CH31.66, br s
2017.8, CH31.61, br s17.8, CH31.62, br s
a 1H at 500 MHz. 13C at 125 MHz. b Assignments aided by COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments.
Table 3. NMR data of secospatane 8 in CD3OD a,b.
Table 3. NMR data of secospatane 8 in CD3OD a,b.
PositionδC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)Position δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)
143.5, CH2.50, m1114.5, CH30.92, d (7.4)
273.5, CH4.10, br d (5.6)12201.7, CH9.59, d (2.3)
345.1, CH22.41, dd (19.1,5.6)
2.07, m
13135.7, C
459.4, CH3.49, ddd (9.7,7.2,2.3)1422.5, CH31.69, br s
578.2, CH5.63, ddd (7.2,6.6,4.3)m15129.8, CH5.26, br t (7.1)
638.1, CH22.12, m
1.89, ddd (14.2,8.1,4.3)
1628.1, CH22.84, ddd (15.5,7.1,7.1)
2.72, ddd (15.7,7.1,7.1)
741.7, CH3.57, m 17123.9, CH5.09, br t (7.1)
839.3, CH2.93, ddd (9.8,9.7,9.3)18132.6, C
951.4, CH2.64, dd (9.8,7.3)1925.8, CH31.69, br s
10220.4, C 2017.9, CH31.65, br s
CH3COO172.1, C
CH3COO20.9, CH31.96, s
a 1H at 500 MHz.13C at 125 MHz. b Assignments aided by COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments.
Table 4. NMR data of the prenylcubebane diterpenoids 13 and 14 in CD3OD a,b.
Table 4. NMR data of the prenylcubebane diterpenoids 13 and 14 in CD3OD a,b.
Position1314
δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)
135.8, CH2.30, m35.8, CH2.27, m
230.8, CH21.68, m
0.88,m
30.8, CH21.66,m
0.91, m
330.7, CH22.08, ddd (12.3.11.6,8.3)
1.74, dd (12.3,7.8)
30.7, CH22.07, ddd (12.3,11.5,8.3)
1.73, m
4137.9, C 137.4, C
5118.1, CH5.25, br d (7.0)118.2, CH5.20, br d (7.0)
627.5, CH21.84, m
1.64, m
24.2, CH22.02, m
1.51, m
734.1, CH3.02, m44.1, CH1.84, ddd (9.3,8.7,3.5)
824.7, CH0.98, m21.49, CH 1.24, m
934.9, CH1.64, m35.3, CH1.49, dd (4.6,4.6)
1032.1, C 32.1, C
1118.2, CH31.00, d (6.6)18.6, CH31.03, d (6.5)
1221.7, CH31.83, br s21.52, CH31.80, br s
13143.3, C 78.4, C
1420.5, CH31.80, br d (1.0)28.1, CH31.42, s
15126.2, CH5.83, br d (10.9)134.0, CH5.38, d (12.1)
16123.0, CH6.52, dd (15.2,10.9)126.2, CH6.18, dd (12.1,11.7)
17140.4, CH5.67, d (15.2) 123.4, CH6.72, br d (11.7)
1871.4, C 136.2, C
1930.09 c, CH31.27, s 26.6, CH31.78, br s
2030.07 c, CH31.27, s17.5, CH31.72, br s
a 1H at 500 MHz, 13C at 125 MHz. b Assignments aided by COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments. c Assignments marked with the same letter in the same column may be interchanged.
Table 5. NMR data of diterpenoid 16 in CD3OD a,b.
Table 5. NMR data of diterpenoid 16 in CD3OD a,b.
PositionδC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)Position δC, TypeδH, m (J in Hz)
135.7, CH2.50, m1117.8, CH30.92, d (7.0)
232.2, CH22.02, m
1.34, m
1221.2, CH31.19, s
334.4, CH21.75, m
1.44, m
13150.0, C
449.1, C 14110.5, CH24.94, br s
4.85, c
528.1, CH22.05, m
1.40, m
1537.7, CH21.89, m
1.84, m
616.0, CH21.89, m
1.52, m
1627.4, CH22.09, m
2.05, m
745.1, CH2.29, ddd (8.8,8.3,2.3)17125.6, CH5.08, br t (7.0)
845.5, CH2.38, dd (11.1,8.3) 18132.2, C
955.3, CH2.59, dd (11.1,6.4)1925.9, CH31.65, br s
1094.6, C 2018.1, CH31.59, br s
a 1H at 500 MHz. 13C at 125 MHz. b Assignments aided by COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments. c Obscured by the solvent signal.
Table 6. Highest concentration (μM) of diterpenoids 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 16 that does not affect cellular viability of Bv2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells.
Table 6. Highest concentration (μM) of diterpenoids 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 16 that does not affect cellular viability of Bv2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells.
Compound
135681011121416
Non-cytotoxic dose for Bv.2 (μM) 102510100.10.50.50.1110
Non-cytotoxic dose for RAW 264.7 (μM)12510100.10.50.511010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuevas, B.; Arroba, A.I.; de los Reyes, C.; Zubía, E. Rugulopteryx-Derived Spatane, Secospatane, Prenylcubebane and Prenylkelsoane Diterpenoids as Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Production. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040252

AMA Style

Cuevas B, Arroba AI, de los Reyes C, Zubía E. Rugulopteryx-Derived Spatane, Secospatane, Prenylcubebane and Prenylkelsoane Diterpenoids as Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Production. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(4):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cuevas, Belén, Ana I. Arroba, Carolina de los Reyes, and Eva Zubía. 2023. "Rugulopteryx-Derived Spatane, Secospatane, Prenylcubebane and Prenylkelsoane Diterpenoids as Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Production" Marine Drugs 21, no. 4: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040252

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop