Next Article in Journal
Comparative Spectrographic Analysis of the Newborns’ Cry in the Presence of Tight Intrapartum Nuchal Cord vs. Normal Using the Neonat App. Preliminary Results
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Different Repair Acrylic Resin and Thermocycling on the Flexural Strength of Denture Base Resin
Previous Article in Journal
Ethyl Rosmarinate Prevents the Impairment of Vascular Function and Morphological Changes in L-NAME-Induced Hypertensive Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Hydrothermal Aging and Beverages on Color Stability of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Based Ceramics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Conscious Sedation in Dentistry

Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, 98100 Me, Italy
Medicina 2019, 55(12), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120778
Submission received: 3 December 2019 / Revised: 3 December 2019 / Accepted: 6 December 2019 / Published: 7 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Health: Economic and Psychological–Behavioral Implications)

Abstract

:
Invasive dental procedures can be performed only with local anesthesia; in some cases, it may be useful to combine the administration of drugs to obtain anxiolysis with local anesthesia. Sedation required level should be individually adjusted to achieve a proper balance between the needs of the patient, the operator, and the safety of the procedure. Surgical time is an important factor for post-operative phases, and this could be greatly increased by whether the patient interrupts the surgeon or if it is not collaborative. In this manuscript some dentistry-used methods to practice conscious sedation have been evaluated. This manuscript could be a useful reading on the current state of conscious sedation in dentistry and an important starting point for future perspectives. Surely the search for safer drugs for our patients could have beneficial effects for them and for the clinicians.

Difficult situations and patients often present themselves to the dentist specialist, whose treatment requires special methods. Frequently, the emotional and anxious component makes the treatment of some subjects particularly difficult [1]. The use of conscious sedation proved to be effective in winning and controlling these phenomena of aversion for the dentist. This practice—now widely used and well defined in specific protocols—allows, together with other appropriate measures, results in excellent satisfaction in many clinical cases. This method, as well as being effective, has the great advantage of being safe and of routine use in an ambulatory environment [2,3,4].
The methods of administration and the sedative drugs could be different. Moreover, it is necessary to at least mention that some schools of thought practice non-pharmacological techniques such as hypnosis [5,6].
During sedation, the reduction or abolition of physiological and psychological responses of the patient to surgery are obtained, without, however, a loss of consciousness, collaboration, and protective reflexes; it is used to treat moderately anxious patients and allows for a calm and relaxed patient during therapy, with anterograde amnesia. Sedation can be performed by different methods orally or parenterally with benzodiazepines or inhaled with nitrous oxide. Sedation with benzodiazepines is not recommended under the age of 16 and in children in whom nitrous oxide (conscious sedation) is preferable. Some benzodiazepines administered orally produce sedation similar to intravenous techniques; temazepam has a short half-life (8 h) and is preferable to diazepam (half-life of 20–30 h). Intravenous sedation has immediate action; requires skill and experience in intravenous and drug administration; for this reason, it is contraindicated for inexperienced operators. Intramuscular absorption is slower and inconstant [4]. Midazolam is two times powerful than diazepam, has a shorter half-life of 2 h, rapid onset and recovery with anterograde amnesia. It should however be reiterated that the sedation technique requires special precautions:
  • Guarantee a recovery time and postoperative medical surveillance in the dental office of at least 1 h.
  • Discharge the accompanied patient.
  • It requires to have a specific benzodiazepine antagonist (flumazenil) in the dental office for overdose emergencies management.
  • Warn the patient to avoid driving or taking on responsibilities for the next 12–24 h [4,5].
Nitrous oxide is a colorless gas with a sweetish taste. It is an effective analgesic/anxiolytic agent that causes depression and euphoria in the central nervous system (CNS) with negligible effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular system. The analgesic effect of nitrous oxide is manifested by the release of endogenous opioid peptides with the consequent activation of opioid receptors and descending receptors of Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA-A) and the noradrenergic metabolic sequence which modifies the spinal nociceptive process. The anxiolytic effect involves the activation of GABA receptors through the benzodiazepine binding sites. Nitrous oxide, in the blood, is 34 times soluble than nitrogen. It is quickly eliminated and 98% through the lungs. When it is eliminated from the body, for physical reasons, it could cause a desaturation of O2. To avoid the inconvenience, it is important to give patients 100% oxygen for a period of 3–5 min. Nitrous oxide causes a minor depression in the heart flow while peripheral resistance slightly increases; because of this the blood pressure remains unchanged. This gas causes a minimum weakening of the protective reflexes, such as coughing and swallowing, in the patient despite having liquids in his mouth. There is no danger because the patient could take advantage of these fundamental reflexes. It is obvious that if the patient loses consciousness these reflexes could be compromised. It is necessary the patient always remains conscious during sedation. For some patients, especially those suffering from severe anxiety, the feeling of loss of control could be a problem and claustrophobic patient could find the imprisoning nasal mask and have the feeling of not breathing well. Inhalation sedation with N2O/O2 is based on the use of an inhalation mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen administered in different percentages. Today, as an alternative to deep sedation and narcosis, it could be used on an outpatient basis for children who should undergo modest procedures, with rectal diazepam. This consists of rectal administration of a short-lived benzodiazepine [4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
Diazepam is supplied in the form of 5 mg/2.5 mL micro-cells or 10 mg/2.5 mL to be used based on the age and weight of the pediatric patient. The achievement of different sedation conditions should be carefully evaluated also based on the requests made by the oral surgeon, and the general health situations of our patient [11,12,13]. Surely the time of sedation is one of the most important factors to evaluate, depending on the presence of a first-level surgery or an elective surgery such as the implant surgery [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
The use of these systems is strongly recommended to subjects, adults and children, intolerant to dental care by supporting them in equipped and adequately organized healthcare facilities to safely apply these techniques [22,23,24,25].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Stefano, R. Psychological Factors in Dental Patient Care: Odontophobia. Medicina 2019, 55, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gomes, H.S.; Gomes, H.S.; Sado-Filho, J.; Costa, L.R.; Costa, P.S. Does sevoflurane add to outpatient procedural sedation in children? A randomised clinical trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017, 17, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gomes, H.S.; Correa-Faria, P.; Silva, T.A.; Paiva, S.M.; Costa, P.S.; Batista, A.C.; Costa, L.R. Oral midazolam reduces cortisol levels during local anaesthesia in children: A randomised controlled trial. Braz. Oral Res. 2015, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dantas, L.P.; de Oliveira-Ribeiro, A.; de Almeida-Souza, L.M.; Groppo, F.C. Effects of passiflora incarnata and midazolam for control of anxiety in patients undergoing dental extraction. Med. Oral Patol. 2017, 22, e95–e101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kaiser, P.; Kohen, D.P.; Brown, M.L.; Kajander, R.L.; Barnes, A.J. Integrating Pediatric Hypnosis with Complementary Modalities: Clinical Perspectives on Personalized Treatment. Children 2018, 5, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Armfield, J.M.; Heaton, L.J. Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: A review. Aust. Dent. J. 2013, 58, 390–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogawski, M.A.; Heller, A.H. Diazepam buccal film for the treatment of acute seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Moretti, R.; Julliand, S.; Rinaldi, V.E.; Titomanlio, L. Buccal Midazolam Compared with Rectal Diazepam Reduces Seizure Duration in Children in the Outpatient Setting. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2019, 35, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Q.H.; Alston, T.A. The Perfect and Famous Anesthetic Known as Methyl in Boston in 1895. J. Anesth. Hist. 2018, 4, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shah, S. Paediatric dentistry—Novel evolvement. Ann. Med. Surg. 2018, 25, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Isola, G.; Cicciù, M.; Fiorillo, L.; Matarese, G. Association between odontoma and impacted teeth. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2017, 28, 755–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cervino, G.; Romeo, U.; Lauritano, F.; Bramanti, E.; Fiorillo, L.; D’Amico, C.; Milone, D.; Laino, L.; Campolongo, F.; Rapisarda, S.; et al. Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM(r) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads. Open Dent. J. 2018, 12, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bramanti, E.; Matacena, G.; Cecchetti, F.; Arcuri, C.; Cicciù, M. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients before and after implant therapy: A 2-year longitudinal study. ORAL Implantol. 2013, 6, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lo Giudice, G.; Cutroneo, G.; Centofanti, A.; Artemisia, A.; Bramanti, E.; Militi, A.; Rizzo, G.; Favaloro, A.; Irrera, A.; Lo Giudice, R.; et al. Dentin morphology of root canal surface: A quantitative evaluation based on a scanning electronic microscopy study. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 164065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Germano, F.; Bramanti, E.; Arcuri, C.; Cecchetti, F.; Cicciù, M. Atomic force microscopy of bacteria from periodontal subgingival biofilm: Preliminary study results. Eur. J. Dent. 2013, 7, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Maiorana, C.; Beretta, M.; Grossi, G.B.; Santoro, F.; Herford, A.S.; Nagursky, H.; Cicciù, M. Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: Preliminary results. Open Dent. J. 2011, 5, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Smiljic, S. The clinical significance of endocardial endothelial dysfunction. Medicina 2017, 53, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soldani, F.; Manton, S.; Stirrups, D.R.; Cumming, C.; Foley, J. A comparison of inhalation sedation agents in the management of children receiving dental treatment: A randomized, controlled, cross-over pilot trial. Int. J. Pediatr. Dent. 2010, 20, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. American Dental Association (ADA). Guidelines for Theaching Pain Control and Sedation to Dentists and Dental Students; ADA: Niagara Falls, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Herford, A.S.; Lu, M.; Akin, L.; Cicciù, M. Evaluation of a porcine matrix with and without platelet-derived growth factor for bone graft coverage in pigs. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2012, 27, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar]
  21. Valeri, V.; Theodoridis, D.; Gatto, R.; Fidanza, F. Approccio psicologico e sedazione cosciente nel piccolo paziente pedodontico. Dent. Mod. 2008, 96, 107. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zoccali, R.; Muscatello, M.R.; Bruno, A.; Barilla, G.; Campolo, D.; Meduri, M.; Familiari, L.; Bonica, M.; Consolo, P.; Scaffidi, M. Anger and ego-defence mechanisms in non-psychiatric patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig. Liver Dis. 2006, 38, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muscatello, M.R.; Bruno, A.; Pandolfo, G.; Mico, U.; Stilo, S.; Scaffidi, M.; Consolo, P.; Tortora, A.; Pallio, S.; Giacobbe, G.; et al. Depression, anxiety and anger in subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome patients. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 2010, 17, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L.; Monte, I.P.; De Stefano, R.; Laino, L.; Crimi, S.; Bianchi, A.; Herford, A.S.; Biondi, A.; Cicciù, M. Advances in Antiplatelet Therapy for Dentofacial Surgery Patients: Focus on Past and Present Strategies. Materials 2019, 12, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. De Stefano, R.; Bruno, A.; Muscatello, M.; Cedro, C.; Cervino, G.; Fiorillo, L. Fear and anxiety managing methods during dental treatments: Systematic review of recent data. Minerva Stomatol. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiorillo, L. Conscious Sedation in Dentistry. Medicina 2019, 55, 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120778

AMA Style

Fiorillo L. Conscious Sedation in Dentistry. Medicina. 2019; 55(12):778. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiorillo, Luca. 2019. "Conscious Sedation in Dentistry" Medicina 55, no. 12: 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120778

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop