Next Article in Journal
The Community Structure of eDNA in the Los Angeles River Reveals an Altered Nitrogen Cycle at Impervious Sites
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Anisakid Nematode Larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in the Black Cusk eel Genypterus maculatus from the Southeastern Pacific Ocean off Peru
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biomonitoring for Watershed Protection from a Multiscale Land-Use Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microplastics Occurrence in Fish from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia

by
Lindys Miranda-Peña
1,
Milena Urquijo
1,
Victoria A. Arana
1,
Roberto García-Alzate
1,
Carlos A. García-Alzate
2,3,4 and
Jorge Trilleras
5,*
1
Grupo de Investigación Ciencias, Educación y Tecnología–CETIC, Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 No. 8–49, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia
2
Grupo de Estudios en Sistemática y Conservación–GESC, Programa de Maestría en Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 No. 8–49, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia
3
Grupo de Estudios en Sistemática y Conservación-GESC, Programa de Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria, Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria, Corporación Universitaria Autónoma del Cauca, Calle 5 No. 3-85, Popayán 190003, Colombia
4
Grupo de Investigación Biodiversidad del Caribe Colombiano, Programa de Maestría en Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 No. 8–49, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia
5
Grupo de Investigación en Compuestos Heterocíclicos, Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Químicas, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 No. 8–49, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(7), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070821
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Revised: 23 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 29 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomonitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
Following global trends, research to determine the presence and abundance of microplastics (MPs) in environmental matrices in Colombia has focused on the coastal and marine environments. However, little scientific information is available on the impact of this pollutant on wetlands and fish. In this study, we provided scientific data on the occurrence and abundance of MPs in water and fish from Tocagua Lake, an important wetland in the Colombian Caribbean, and the unique habitat of wild cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Water (72) and fish (228 individuals of six species) samples were collected during four sampling events and two climatic seasons (wet and dry). A total of 1174 microplastic particles were collected in water with an average abundance of microplastics at the six stations sampled during four sampling events of 0.96 ± 0.40 MPs/L, and 648 MPs were identified in the gastrointestinal tract of 191 individuals, corresponding to a frequency of occurrence of 83.7%. Black- and blue-colored fiber MPs were particles that predominated in both matrices (water and fish), and seven types of polymers were identified through attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis. The abundance, type, and color of MPs in water and fish were not significantly different between seasons.

1. Introduction

Among the different materials, plastic is present in many aspects of our daily lives, increasing industrial production considerably as well as its waste, or plastic garbage, which has become one of the challenges of this century as an environmental crisis [1,2,3]. Plastics are generated in the post-consumer cycle because of inadequate management of these wastes, making them ubiquitous pollutants in the environment [4,5]. According to reports in the literature, despite the increase in plastic waste management techniques and innovative strategies to incorporate plastic waste as a raw material in different sectors, it is necessary to increase capacity, collection, expansion, and recycling rates [6,7,8]. Colombia produces approximately 1.4 million tons of plastic material annually and 3804 tons of plastic waste. Only 7% of single-use plastics are recycled, which generates pollution problems in various environmental matrices [9,10,11]. Plastic waste is a mixture of different types of polymers (i.e., polyamide, polyethylene, polyester, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polymethyl methacrylate) that, under environmental conditions, are exposed to mechanical, physical, and chemical factors that break down into tiny plastic particles called microplastics (MPs, 1 μm–5 mm in size) that, through distinct transport phenomena, have been detected in various environmental compartments [12,13,14,15,16]. This is one of the main sources of microplastics (secondary MPs). MPs also reach bodies of water as manufactured microplastics, another source of microplastics (MPs primary), such as pellets or micropellets contained in a variety of products (e.g., beauty, care, personal hygiene products, paint, and coatings) [17].
The effects, impacts, and risks associated with the accumulation of MPs in environmental compartments have been extensively studied [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The composition of MPs (polymer type and chemical additives), color, size, and shape (fibers, fragments, films, pellets, and foams) make them emergent contaminants that are difficult to remove and constantly accumulate in environmental compartments. Scientific experiments have revealed the associated impacts of MPs on potential human health problems, including the accumulation of fibers in the gastrointestinal tract through the food chain and interaction with the intestinal epithelium. Controlled studies have shown the potential risk of additives that MPs have on organ toxicity and neurotoxic effects [21,22,23,24,25]. Microbial pathogens, hydrophilic and persistent organic compounds, and heavy metals can adhere to the surfaces of different forms of MPs, converting them into vectors that cause unwanted effects in living organisms. These particles are persistent and accumulate in various environmental matrices for long periods of time, which is why studies on the dynamics of contamination in freshwater and the organisms that inhabit it have increased [27,28,29].
MPs in inland water are distributed depending on factors such as water body size, wind, currents, and particle density and can stay afloat, be suspended in the water column, or become part of the sediment. During the different seasons of the year, there are physical and chemical variations in the water bodies; these modifications that occur during the wet and dry seasons can modify the concentrations of MPs [30,31]. The occurrence and abundance of MPs in aquatic organisms are indicators of the impact and inadequate disposal of plastic debris generated by anthropogenic activities in these lentic environments. Many of these organisms modify their diets during different seasons, which may be related to the concentration of this pollutant [32,33]. The diversity in the shape and color of MPs can influence how fish ingest them. Studies have shown that fish species with different feeding behaviors and dietary preferences may accidentally ingest microplastics by mistaking them for prey or food because of their size, shape, and physical characteristics [26,33,34,35,36,37,38]. These observations highlight the importance of understanding how different fish species interact with MPs and how the physical characteristics of MPs influence their ingestion. In addition, it allows the identification of the risks associated with the occurrence and abundance of MPs in aquatic life and the trophic webs of freshwater ecosystems. The information available in the literature on the ecotoxicological effects of MPs in fish is the result of controlled laboratory experiments. These results show that the ingestion of MPs and their accumulation in the digestive tract cause blockages in the digestive system and reduce feeding owing to false satiety, which causes structural and functional deterioration in the gastrointestinal tract, in addition to the effects and associated risks of transmitting hazardous chemicals and pathogenic microorganisms to fish [34,35,36,37,38].
In Colombia, there are few investigations on microplastics, and the existing reports in the literature follow the global trend: (i) mostly in coastal and marine environments [39,40,41,42,43,44,45]; (ii) the consequences of excessive consumption of plastic and environmental impacts, including MPs pollution emerging in inland waters, are not known in detail [1,2,3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to encourage and increase research to determine the effects of MP pollution on aquatic environments in Colombia. This study contributes to expanding the information on MPs pollution to generate scientific data on its abundance, distribution, and ecological impact on continental aquatic ecosystems in the lower basin of the Magdalena River. Tocagua Lake is an important ecosystem located within the regional district integrated management of Palmar del Tití, Luruaco-Atlántico, which is a protected area for the conservation of dry forests and wild primates [46,47].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Tocagua Lake (10°42′9″ N 75°14′54″ W) is located in the Canal del Dique Basin with an area of 300 ha in the municipality of Luruaco–Atlántico and is part of the Atlántico Department complex of wetlands (Figure 1). Water resources depend on precipitation and networks of streams that flow from hills (Platanal, Guayacán, and Iraca streams) with an ichthyofauna, including six species (Andinoacara latifrons, Astyanax magdalenae, Caquetaia kraussii, Mugil liza, Oreochromis niloticus, and Poecilia gillii) with different feeding behaviors. Tocagua Lake is a wetland within the regional district of integrated management Palmar del Tití (2622.15 ha), a protected area for the settlement of migratory birds that enter Colombia, a nesting site for many species of herons and waterfowl, and a unique habitat for wild cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) [47]. The population settlement, corregimiento de San Juan de Tocagua, with approximately 200 inhabitants, developed livestock, fishing, and handicrafts that came from the Mokaná–Caribbean, African, and Indigenous heritages [48].

2.2. Water Sampling

Six sampling points were located to cover the lake area, and four sampling events were scheduled. Samples of surface water and fish were collected on the same day in different temporal variations associated with the wet season (September–November 2021) and the dry season (March–May 2022). At each sampling point, lake water was monitored in situ, and conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature were recorded using a multiparameter analyzer (YSI ProPlus, YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Water samples were collected following a previously reported methodology [49], preserved, and stored for hardness and alkalinity measurements using commercial physicochemical kits (Hanna Instruments; Vöhringen, Germany). A total of 72 samples were collected, with 20 L of surface water/station and three replicates of equal quantity for each sampling event. The abundance of MP particles in the surface water samples was determined as a function of the density of the bulk samples and is reported as MP particles/L. The total MP concentrations are reported as the mean number of microplastics per liter (MPs/L) with a standard deviation (± SD).

2.3. Sampling and Processing of Fish

In each sampling event, fish samples from six species were collected using a trawl (8 m long, 1.5 m high, with 0.5 cm mesh eye size) for small individuals (Poecilia gillii and Astyanax magdalenae) and a cast net (2 m diameter, 0.5 cm mesh eye). The trawling methodology (trawl net) was performed three times, and the cast net was cast five times at each sampling point to capture individual fish. The captured fish were preserved in an icebox during their transport to the laboratory. All fish specimens (228 in total) were identified, measured (standard length, mm), and weighed (g) (Table 1) [50,51].
Each specimen was washed with filtered distilled water and dissected using scissors, a scalpel, and forceps on a metal tray. Dissection was performed by making a horizontal incision along the ventral side of the fish from the anal pore to below the pectoral fin. The gastrointestinal tract of each fish from the esophagus to the anal pore was removed, measured (mm), weighed (g), and transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) to start the digestion process according to a previously reported method with slight modifications [33,52,53]. The amount of 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution was determined from the weight of the gastrointestinal tract (1p:3v ratio), covered with aluminum foil, and placed in an orbital shaker for 48 h at 60 °C and 250 rpm (Heidolph Incubator 1000 and Heidolph Unimax 1010, Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). To each Erlenmeyer flask, 100 mL of saturated and filtered sodium chloride solution (1.2 g/mL density) was added. The mixture was stirred for 10 min and allowed to rest for 24 h at room temperature. The supernatant was filtered under vacuum (2019 B, Welch, Limenau, Germany) using a metal funnel with a glass microfiber filter (grade GF/C, 1.2 μm, Whatman, Maidstone, UK). Each filter paper was dried at room temperature in a petri dish. The abundance of microplastics in fish was presented as the number of microplastics per individual (MPs/individual).

2.4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)

To avoid potential contamination by airborne microfibers, laboratory quality assurance and control were performed as previously described [49]. In addition, “procedural controls” (150 mm diameter glass beakers filled with distilled water) were placed in the working environment for each step (n = 3 for each set of samples). Microplastics that were detected in laboratory control experiments with the same typology and color were excluded from each set of samples following the quality criteria reported in the literature for these studies [54,55].

2.5. Physical and Chemical MPs Characterization

The classification of plastic particles based on their morphological characteristics provides reference information and comparable elements for similar investigations [34,35,36,37,38]. Through visual inspection, the morphometric data of the MPs was recorded to determine the relationship between the environmental matrices [26,38]. MPs isolated and collected on the filters were analyzed using a stereomicroscope (SteREO Discovery V20, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) to determine the number of particles and record their physical characteristics, such as color, size, and shape (fibers, films, pellets, fragments, and foam), and minimum standardized information in these studies [56,57,58,59]. Representative microplastic samples were analyzed using micro-attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (μ–ATR-FTIR) (ATR–FTIR microscope, LUMOS II, Bruker Optics GmbH & Co. KG, Mannheim, Germany) with a thermoelectrically cooled mercury cadmium telluride (TE–MCT) detector and an automated ATR probe (Ge crystal). The spectral range was set between 4000 and 670 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 with 64 scans. The obtained spectra were compared with those of the reference (ATR-Polymer library complete (vol. 1–4), KIMW ATR–IR Polymer libraries), and the polymer content was confirmed to be >75% [60,61].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The association between the number of MPs per individual according to species and diet, including season, was determined by fitting negative binomial regression models [62]. The amount of microplastic particles for each species is represented as the frequency of plastic ingestion (%FO, Equation (1)).
% F O = N i n × 100
where Ni is the number of individuals that presented MPs and n is the total number of individuals analyzed. The condition index (K) was calculated using the relationship between the length (L) and weight (W) of each individual (Equation (2)) [50,51].
K = 100 W L 3
The data were analyzed using a generalized linear model (GLM)-Poisson regression to examine the relationship between the abundance of MPs in fish and their morphometric variables (weight, length, and K index). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance using Bray–Curtis distance matrices (ADONIS) was used to determine the relationship between the color of MPs, species, and diet for the six species, including the interaction with season in each setting. A generalized linear mixed model was used to compare the differences between the abundance of MPs in fish (the response variable) and sampling seasons (the fixed effect variable). The abundance of MPs in the water samples was used as a random variable to estimate the effect of MP contamination on the abundance of MPs in the fish.
The bioconcentration factor (BCF) indicates the relationship between the concentration of the contaminant and the biota (Equation (3)). In this study, we evaluated the accumulation capacity of MPs in wild fish species in the environment [63,64,65].
B C F = C b C w
where Cb is the mean concentration of MPs in fish (items/g-individual) and Cw is the concentration of MPs in water (MPs/m3) [63,64,65]. The data analyzed using a multivariate model of community composition and similarities of MP colors (ANOSIM) allowed us to relate the types of MPs found in both matrices (water and fish). The dissimilarity matrix calculated using the Bray–Curtis method, includes simple, complete, and average clustering points. Then, through non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS), the similarity or dissimilarity of the MP communities in water and fish for their colors was determined [66,67]. Statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio software (version 4.2.2, R Core Team, 2022), including the MASS, vegan, stats, lme4, glmmADMB, broom.mixed, and ggplot2 packages [68].

3. Results

3.1. Habitat Physicochemical Characterization

According to the physicochemical characterization of the habitat, the surface water temperature in the lake presented an average value of 31.4 °C during the wet season (September–November 2021) and an average temperature of 31.5 °C in the dry season (March–May 2022). The conductivity registered average values of 698 and 730 μs/cm during the wet and dry periods, respectively. The alkalinity recorded average values of 155 mg/L CaCO3 and 240 mg/L CaCO3 in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. Regarding the average value of dissolved oxygen, it was low at 5.4 ± 3.7 mg/L; the lake presented moderately hard water with hardness values ranging between 45.0 and 165.0 mg/L, with an average of 95.1 ± 59 mg/L. The pH of the water tended to be acidic during the four sampling events, with a mean of 4.55 ± 3.35. These data indicate that Tocagua Lake was under environmental stress during sample collection.

3.2. Abundance and Characteristics of Microplastics in Water

MPs were detected at six stations sampled from Tocagua Lake during the two seasons. A total of 1174 microplastic particles were collected from Tocagua Lake water, with an average abundance of microplastics at the six stations sampled during four sampling events of 0.96 ± 0.40 MPs/L. According to the results, there was a small variation in the average abundance of MPs between seasons during sampling. During the wet season, the average abundance was 1.04 ± 0.22; in the dry season, the average abundance was 0.88 ± 0.53 MPs/L. Station four (S4) presented a higher abundance of MPs with a value of 1.38 MPs/L and 1.47 MPs/L in the wet and dry seasons, respectively (Table 2) [49].
The microplastic particles were shaped as fibers, fragments, and foams (Figure 2). Fibers (89.5%) were more abundant than fragments (9.9%) and foams (0.6%). Low fluctuations were recorded in the total fibers (wet = 58.0%, dry = 42.0%) and fragments (wet = 51.7%, dry = 48.3%) during the evaluated seasons. The proportion of fragments increased during the dry season (11.2%). In the case of the foam, 86.0% of the particles were in the wet season. The distributions of shapes in the seasons did not present variations in the proportions, and the dominance of the typologies (fibers > fragments > foam) remained the same (Supplementary Materials Figure S1).
The MPs presented 13 colors: yellow, blue, white, gold, grey, brown, purple, orange, black, red, pink, transparent, and green. For the analysis, MPs with less presence were grouped into the other categories (yellow, gold, brown, purple, orange, pink, and transparent). The most abundant MPs were blue (43.4%), red (18.4%), and black (15.8%), representing 77.6% of all shapes and sizes (Figure 3A). In the wet and dry seasons, the colors presented variations in proportions, with a lower value of dominance in the colors identified in the dry season: blue (wet = 53.5%, dry = 29.7%), red (wet = 12.0%, dry = 27.0%), and black (wet = 17.0%, dry = 14.5%) were the most frequent colors in both seasons (Supplementary Materials Figures S2A and S3A). The dominant colors in the fibers were blue (48.1%), red (20.4%), and black (17.6%). In the fragments and foam, the dominant colors were white (58.6% and 100%, respectively) (Figure 3B). In the wet and dry seasons, the dominant colors of the fibers were blue (wet = 58.5%, dry = 33.7%), black (wet =18.7%, dry = 16.1%), and red (wet = 12.6%, dry = 30.9%). In the wet season, the fragments showed greater variation in the identified colors. The dry season was characterized by the dominance of white (76.8%) and transparent (10.7%) fragments (Supplementary Materials Figures S2B and S3B). The MPs have a range of 0.1 to 4.7 mm, with a mean value of 2.75 ± 0.93 mm, and 53% present sizes smaller than 2 mm (Figure 3C).
A representative group of fibers and fragments was selected for μ-ATR-FTIR analysis of the MPs. Five polymers were obtained: polyester (50.1%), polypropylene (19.2%), polymethyl methacrylate (15.4%), polyamide (11.5%), and polyurethane (3.8%). The percentages of polyacrylate and polyvinyl chloride fragments were 55.0% and 45.0%, respectively.

3.3. Abundance and Characteristics of Microplastics in Fish Samples

A total of 228 individuals from six fish species were collected during the four sampling events. Of the 191 individuals, 648 MPs were identified, corresponding to a frequency of occurrence (%FO) of 83.7%. The number of plastic particles for the fish species analyzed varied from 0 to 20 MPs/individual, with an average of 2.8 ± 2.7 MPs/individual in the wet season and 2.3 ± 3.6 MPs/individual in the dry season. The fish caught during the wet season (n = 158) had a higher abundance of MPs (544 items). Andinoacara latifrons (181 items) and Caquetaia krausii (49 items) presented the highest numbers of MPs in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. Caquetaia krausii presented the maximum number of MPs detected in the gastrointestinal tract during the dry season (20 MPs/individual). Andinoacara latifrons, Caquetaia krausii, and Poecilia gilli had similar %FO values for MP intake in both seasons (Table 3).
The fibers were MPs that predominated (604 items, 93%), followed by irregular fragments of various colors, such as black, blue, red, and transparent. Blue (n = 317) and black (n = 140) fibers and transparent fragments were predominant (Figure 4). The size of MPs did not exceed 2 mm in length, and 75% of the MP particles were smaller than 1 mm [49].
The proportion of blue MP in the fish species was similar in both seasons. Black MP presented a greater variation in proportion between seasons, decreasing in the dry season. The dry season has a higher prevalence of white and transparent fibers and fragments. C. krausii and A. latifrons were the only species that presented fragments, whereas C. krausii did not present fragments during the wet season, similar to A. magdalenae. The omnivorous-carnivorous group presented a similar abundance of MPs in both seasons (wet = 42 items, dry = 49 items), but with variation in the proportion of colors; blue MPs predominated in the wet season and white MPs in the dry season. Only the omnivorous group presented fragments (Figure 5).
A representative group of fibers and fragments was selected for μ-ATR-FTIR analysis of the MPs. Four polymers were obtained from the fibers: polyamide (53.8%), polyester (34.7%), polymethyl methacrylate (7.7%), and polytetrafluoroethylene (3.8%). Polymethyl methacrylate and polyester were predominant in the fragments.

3.4. Seasonal Variation of MPs in Fish

The results of the negative binomial regression models of the number of MPs per individual for fish species did not show a relationship with species or diet between wet and dry seasons. The correlation analysis values were not significant (p > 0.05; Supplementary Materials, Table S1). In the analysis of the relationship between the abundance of MPs per fish and their morphometric variables, only the weight variable with a negative estimation (p = −0.0226) was significant, indicating that the concentration of MPs in the fish decreased logarithmically with increasing body weight. There was no linear relationship between the abundance of MPs and the total length (p = 0.1613) or the K factor of the fish (p = 0.3757). The PERMANOVA test between both seasons indicated that MP abundance (color characteristics) varied significantly among fish species (p = 0.038) and diet (p = 0.019), whereas shape characteristics did not significantly differ in the abundance of MP with fish species (p = 0.178) and diet (p = 0.133).

3.5. Transfer of MPs between Water and Dietary Trends of Fish

The abundance of MPs in water had a significant positive effect (p = 0.00275) on the abundance of MPs in fish in both seasons. Similarly, seasonal differences had a strong effect on the increase in the accumulation of MPs in fish. The wet season had the highest estimated coefficient for the second sampling period. This indicates that there is a greater availability of MPs in the environment, which in turn increases the number of MPs in fish.
The communities represented by the colors of MPs in water and fish showed low dissimilarity (R = −0.052, p = 0.6255) in the ANOSIM analysis. NMDS analysis showed that the colors of MPs clustered slightly distantly in both matrices (water and fish) at each sampling event, with a higher proportion of MPs colored in water. The analysis of multilevel patterns did not show any association between the colors of MPs and the matrices (water and fish). Therefore, the availability and abundance of colored MP particles detected in water and fish during different seasons were not variables that could independently explain the distribution of colored particles detected in fish.
The BCF index did not identify a trophic transfer pattern in the consumption of MPs or diet types. The highest value of the BCF index was observed in the herbivorous fish group (BCF = 0.00708), indicating a strong relationship between the consumption of fibers and fragments in water. In contrast, detritivoreous fish with a tendency to consume microalgae showed a lower BCF index value, which is a group with a lower tendency to consume MP particles in water. During the wet season, the omnivorous–insectivorous group presented a higher amount of fiber-type MPs than the other food groups (BCF = 0.00406). Following the previously observed trend, the MPs-type fragments had lower concentrations in both environmental matrices and showed the lowest BCF index values in the dry season (Table 4).

4. Discussion

This is the first descriptive study of microplastic contamination in water from Tocagua Lake and a pioneering study on microplastic contamination in fish from freshwater ecosystems in rural areas of Colombia. It is noteworthy that studies on rural lakes worldwide have low representativeness [69]. In Colombia, contributions to the knowledge of microplastic pollution have focused on marine coastal ecosystems, such as beaches [40,41,42,43,44,45] and coastal lagoons [39,70,71,72], and a few have focused on continental wetlands [49]. In this study, the temporal variation did not show differential values for the mean abundance of microplastics in water. Concentrations of 1.04 ± 0.22 MPs/L and 0.88 ± 0.53 MPs/L were found in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. These results differ from the recent study carried out in Luruaco Lake, a wetland with similar characteristics, which showed variation in the concentration of MPs between seasons, 1.9 MPs/L and 0.25 MPs/L in the wet and dry seasons, respectively [49]. The difference in the concentration of microplastics in the nearby bodies of water was due to the different retention times and streams in each lake. In the case of Luruaco Lake, all streams have a semi-permanent flow of water, mainly during the dry season, and the drainage of the streams is of the subparallel type with a fast flow speed [72]. In Tocagua Lake, the mainstream is Platanal, which contributes seasonally; therefore, the residence time in this water body may be longer, generating little seasonal variability. According to the results, microplastic contamination in water was higher in both seasons for stations S1 and S4, with mean concentrations of 1.31 MPs/L and 1.42 MPs/L, respectively (Figure 1, Table 2). S1 is close to the urban center (with a distance of less than 300 m) and is the mouth of the streams to the lake. Some of these streams are roads during the dry season, and once the wet season begins, waste is dragged into the wetland (verified in the field). S4 is on an island, an area of water retention and accumulation of microplastics, and is near the mouth of the Platanal stream, crossing areas of livestock and agriculture, which drag waste into wetlands in the wet season.
In fish, the abundance of microplastics in both seasons did not show significant differences between species or types of diet. An average of 2.8 ± 2.7 MPs/individual in the wet season and 2.3 ± 3.6 MPs/individual in the dry season were found. The sampling events coincided with the fishing season, which began during the wet season in the lake (August–September). Tourism and the incidence of plastic waste in this area have also increased. Most streams in the department of Atlántico cross urban settlements, accumulating large amounts of garbage that is washed away by high rainfall and increasing the concentration and availability of MPs in wetlands [42]. In general, the %FO of MPs detected in the gastrointestinal tract of fish from Tocagua Lake was high at 83.7% (191 individuals). The wet season registered a higher %FO value (86.3%), different from the value in the dry season (73.3%). The biotic, ecological, hydrodynamic, and morphological factors that characterize wetlands make comparisons difficult. However, by analyzing the sampling methodology, laboratory work, and data processing to determine the abundance of MPs in the environmental matrices of small rural lakes, it is possible to provide an overview based on these studies with scientific rigor (Supplementary Materials, Table S2) [73,74,75,76,77,78]. %FO of MPs are reported in fish from three lakes of economic and cultural importance in China, with values between 91% and 100%, results influenced by the high human population, wastewater, and runoff [75,76,77]. Scientific studies on small Swiss lakes have reported a low %FO of MPs (12–7.5%), indicating less pollution, possibly because of a less human-influenced and industrialized watershed with better waste disposal [78]. Under this scenario, Tocagua Lake had MP concentrations similar to those found in larger water bodies, indicating high contamination in this wetland.
Analysis of the abundance and color of MPs detected in fish showed significant differences between the seasons. The MPs found in the gastrointestinal tract of fish caught in both seasons were black and blue fibers, although in the wet season, the number of fragments increased to 31%, which was not significant. Our results are consistent with those reported for the rural lakes in China and Switzerland. Black- and blue-colored fiber MPs are particles that predominate in the gastrointestinal tract of fish from the Chinese [75,76,77] and Swiss lakes [78] (Supplementary Materials, Table S2). This type of MP originates from the fragmentation of blue plastics, with which nets, rope fishing, and textiles are manufactured. Black MP are related to tire wear, abrasives, and plastic bags [79,80].
Analysis of the length, weight, and condition factors K data did not show a significant relationship between the morphometric variables of fish and the MPs detected, which was also reported in a recent study [66,67,81], suggesting that other factors influence the ingestion of MPs. In the stomachs of fish with greater weights, such as M. Liza (w > 80 g), a low abundance of plastic particles was detected, contrary to the species C. krausii, in which one individual (w = 40 g) presented 20 MPs, and generalized behavior in fish with lower gastrointestinal tract weight and higher retention of MPs. Among the factors that influence the retention of food in the gastrointestinal tract are the size of the fish, organ morphology, water temperature, and diet. Studies that evaluate the retention time of MPs do not explain the variations presented by individuals of the same species or expose the possible influence of gastrointestinal tract morphology on the retention of MPs without reporting specific data on the relationship between organ morphology per individual and the number of MPs detected. Similar to our results, these reports detailed the amount, type, and color of MP particles found in ichthyofauna [66,67,75,76,77,81]. According to our results, the low variation in the concentration and type of MPs between seasons maintained the availability of these contaminants in the water, thereby increasing the probability of their consumption by fish. Regardless of the season, evaluation of the diet and species of fish caught showed significant differences in the consumption of MPs. Omnivores fed a non-selective diet had a higher number of MP particles (fibers and fragments) per individual. Herbivores are the second group with the highest consumption of MPs fibers in both seasons, represented by the species P. gilli, whose diet specializes in the consumption of filamentous algae and microalgae [82], which are confused with black and blue MPs fibers. The omnivorous group, with a tendency toward a carnivorous diet, presented a low amount of MP particles, probably because they had more developed sensory systems.
Monitoring MP contamination in fish from rural and urban lakes is becoming more frequent because they represent the highest trophic level and are the most consumed organisms in the biota. The effects of MPs ingestion in fish include neurotoxicity, intestinal obstruction, reduced appetite, inflammatory responses, and translocation to organs and tissues [83]. These effects can be transferred to the population through consumption [84], generating health risks because these fish constitute the principal food source [33,34,35,39,71,75,76,77].
BCF values greater than 1 indicate the accumulation of contaminants in the biota. In the present study, the calculated values were less than 1; however, there was an increase in trophic groups, with herbivores and omnivorous fish having higher BCF indices, indicating that P. gilli and A. latifrons had the highest probabilities of ecological risk. The BCF of MPs values can be explained by the retention time in fish. A study on the selectivity and retention time of MPs in two species of fish determined that these contaminants were excreted with an efficiency greater than 90% between 24 and 48 h after consumption, a situation that can be associated with our results [66,67,81].
The concentration, abundance, type, and color of MPs in water and fish were not significantly different between the seasons. The availability of MP particles in water provides this contaminant to fish. Even in both environmental matrices, MPs of the same color, shape, and type predominated, indicating some connection between MP pollution found in surface waters and in fish. In this study, color did not seem to influence the consumption of MPs by the fish. Neither the predominant colors of the MPs in either environmental matrix provide information about the origin of the fibers and fragments, indicating, as in similar studies, that the relationship with potential sources is intuitive [56,57,58,59,60,75,76,77,78]. However, through quantitative analysis methods such as thermogravimetric analysis-differential scanning calorimetry (TGA-DSC), pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), and thermal extraction desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TED-GC–MS), the color can be associated with different types of additives for degradation studies and provide information on historical changes in microplastic sources [12,14,56,57,58,59]. Future studies on the degradation of MP particles will lead to a better understanding of the dynamics of this pollutant in Tocagua Lake.
Six types of polymers were identified with respect to the composition of the plastic particles (fibers and fragments). Polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and polyurethane are the predominant polymers used to make bottles, utensils, packaging, meshes, and nets in the fishing and food industries. Polyvinyl chloride and polymethyl methacrylate, which are dense polymers used to manufacture construction materials, electrical appliances, and electronic devices, have also been identified.
The physicochemical characterization of this water body indicated that it is subjected to environmental stress [85]. High and fluctuating temperatures, together with high conductivity, suggest a significant load of chemical substances from the deposition of domestic wastewater and runoff from agriculture and livestock. The low alkalinity registered indicates a potential process of acidification of the lake, and the reduced value of the dissolved oxygen potential affects the respiration of aquatic biota [86]. By collecting data on the presence and concentration of MPs in different areas of the lake over time, patterns and trends can be identified, and a more complete understanding of the environmental impacts caused by MPs can be obtained. This can help establish clear connections between microplastic pollution and potential negative effects on aquatic ecosystems.

5. Conclusions

This study is the first to document the identification of MPs in Tocagua Lake, a reflection of contamination with plastic waste from the environment and inadequate disposal. MPs were found in both investigated matrices (water and fish), and seven types of polymers were identified. Thirteen colors and two predominant shapes were identified, confirming their ubiquity and distribution. Although no significant differences were detected in the number of MPs in the gastrointestinal tract of the fish during the different climatic seasons, variations were found in the types of MPs throughout the year. In particular, the black and blue fibers, with lengths less than 2 mm, are easily confused with prey by herbivorous and omnivorous species, which suggests a selection by the fish regarding the availability of different types of MP in abiotic environments. The gastrointestinal tract of fish is a key organ for detecting the presence of MPs in water bodies and provides relevant information for future studies evaluating MP contamination in aquatic ecosystems. Our results are similar to those reported for lakes with low variation in MPs concentrations between seasons, maintaining the availability of these particles for different types of organisms and different functional feeding guilds. It is necessary to investigate other biotic, ecological, hydrodynamic, and morphological factors that characterize this freshwater ecosystem and alter the dynamics of microplastics to establish remediation strategies based on the evaluation of biological risks.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15070821/s1, Figure S1. Proportion of the distribution of the shapes of microplastics identified in the water from Tocagua Lake during the wet and dry seasons; Figure S2. Typological characteristics of MPs found in the water of Tocagua Lake during the wet season. (A) Color and (B) shape; Figure S3. Typological characteristics of MPs found in the water of Tocagua Lake during the dry season. (A) Color and (B) shape; Table S1: Results of the negative binomial regression models to determine the association between the abundance of microplastics per individual according to species and diet per season. No significant differences were observed; see Table S2. General description of studies on microplastic ingestion by fish from freshwater lake ecosystems. %FO: is the percentage of fish with at least one microplastic particle in the gastrointestinal tract. References [33,73,74,75,76,77,78] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.G.-A. and V.A.A.; methodology, V.A.A.; software, C.A.G.-A.; formal analysis, L.M.-P. and M.U.; investigation, C.A.G.-A., V.A.A., J.T. and R.G.-A.; resources, J.T.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.-P. and M.U.; writing—review and editing, J.T.; project administration, J.T.; funding acquisition, J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by the MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN (MINCIENCIAS), Colombia, grant number 1116–852–72530 (agreement 80740–485–2020), and the Universidad del Atlántico.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work is a contribution from research groups “Ciencias, Educación y Tecnología–CETIC”, “Biodiversidad del Caribe Colombiano”, “Estudios en Sistemática y Conservación”, “Compuestos Heterocíclicos”, and Universidad del Atlántico.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williams, A.T.; Rangel-Buitrago, N. The past, present, and future of plastic pollution. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 176, 113429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rangel-Buitrago, N.; Velez Mendoza, A.; Mantilla-Barbosa, E.; Arroyo-Olarte, H.; Arana, V.A.; Trilleras, I.; Gracia, A.; Neal, W.J.; Williams, A.T. Plastic pollution on the Colombian central Caribbean beaches. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 162, 111837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garcés-Ordóñez, O.; Espinosa, L.F.; Pereira Cardoso, R.; Barroso Issa Cardozo, B.; Meigikos dos Anjos, R. Plastic litter pollution along sandy beaches in the Caribbean and Pacific coast of Colombia. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chawla, S.; Varghese, B.S.; Chithra, A.; Hussain, C.G.; Keçili, R.; Hussain, C.M. Environmental impacts of post-consumer plastic wastes: Treatment technologies towards eco-sustainability and circular economy. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 135867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, W.Q.; Ciacci, L.; Sun, N.N.; Yoshioka, T. Sustainable cycles and management of plastics: A brief review of RCR publications in 2019 and early 2020. Res. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 159, 104822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Ivanovich Vatin, N.; Mohamed, A.M.; Deifalla, A.F.; Mehmood, I. Plastic Waste Management Strategies and Their Environmental Aspects: A Scientometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lorang, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Lü, F.; He, P. Achievements and policy trends of extended producer responsibility for plastic packaging waste in Europe. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2022, 4, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Babaremu, K.O.; Okoya, S.A.; Hughes, E.; Tijani, B.; Teidi, D.; Akpan, A.; Igwe, J.; Karera, S.; Oyinlola, M.; Akinlabi, E.T. Sustainable plastic waste management in a circular economy. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Plásticos en Colombia 2022–2023—Acoplásticos. Available online: https://bit.ly/acoPeC22 (accessed on 28 January 2023).
  10. Jiang, J.; Shi, K.; Zhang, X.; Yu, K.; Zhang, H.; He, J.; Ju, Y.; Liu, J. From plastic waste to wealth using chemical recycling: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Plastics Europe, EPRO. Plastics—The Facts 2022: An Analysis of the Latest Data Related to Plastics Production, Demand, Conversion and Waste Management in Europe. 2022. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ (accessed on 16 April 2023).
  12. Manzoor, S.; Naqash, N.; Rashid, G.; Singh, R. Plastic Material Degradation and Formation of Microplastic in the Environment: A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 3254–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huber, M.; Archodoulaki, V.-M.; Pomakhina, E.; Pukánszky, B.; Zinöcker, E.; Gahleitner, M. Environmental degradation and formation of secondary microplastics from packaging material: A polypropylene film case study. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022, 195, 109794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, K.; Hamidian, A.H.; Tubić, A.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.K.; Wu, C.; Lam, P.K. Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 274, 116554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Cui, Q.; Cui, Y.; Song, D.; Fang, L. Review on migration, transformation and ecological impacts of microplastics in soil. App. Soil Ecol. 2022, 176, 104486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koutnik, V.S.; Leonard, J.; Alkidim, S.; DePrima, F.J.; Ravi, S.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Mohanty, S.K. Distribution of microplastics in soil and freshwater environments: Global analysis and framework for transport modeling. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 274, 116552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. An, L.; Liu, Q.; Deng, Y.; Wu, W.; Gao, Y.; Ling, W. Sources of microplastic in the environment. In Microplastics in Terrestrial Environments. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; He, D., Luo, Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 95, pp. 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Klavins, M.; Klavins, L.; Stabnikova, O.; Stabnikov, V.; Marynin, A.; Ansone-Bertina, L.; Mezulis, M.; Vaseashta, A. Interaction between Microplastics and Pharmaceuticals Depending on the Composition of Aquatic Environment. Microplastics 2022, 1, 520–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stabnikova, O.; Stabnikov, V.; Marinin, A.; Klavins, M.; Vaseashta, A. The role of microplastics biofilm in accumulation of trace metals in aquatic environments. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Waldschläger, K.; Lechthaler, S.; Stauch, G.; Schüttrumpf, H. The way of microplastic through the environment–Application of the source-pathway-receptor model. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qu, H.; Wang, F.; Barrett, H.; Wang, B.; Han, J.; Wu, J.; Huang, X.; Hu, Y.; Yu, G. Synthetical effect of microplastics and chiral drug amphetamine on a primary food source algae Chlorella pyrenoids. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 69, 113415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, H.-S.; Amarakoon, D.; Wei, C.; Choi, K.Y.; Smolensky, D.; Lee, S.-H. Adverse effect of polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) on tube formation and viability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 154, 112356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Shi, X.; Xu, S. Microplastics and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate synergistically induce apoptosis in mouse pancreas through the GRP78/CHOP/Bcl-2 pathway activated by oxidative stress. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 167, 113315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, W.; Zhu, R.; Ye, X.; Sun, Y.; Tang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yan, F.; Yu, T.; Zheng, X.; Tu, P. Food-derived cyanidin-3-O-glucoside reverses microplastic toxicity via promoting discharge and modulating the gut microbiota in mice. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 1447–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, A.; Han, Q.; Wei, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xie, J.; Chen, M. Polystyrene microplastics affect learning and memory in mice by inducing oxidative stress and decreasing the level of acetylcholine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 162, 112904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bertoli, M.; Pastorino, P.; Lesa, D.; Renzi, M.; Anselmi, S.; Prearo, M.; Pizzul, E. Microplastics accumulation in functional feeding guilds and functional habit groups of freshwater macrobenthic invertebrates: Novel insights in a riverine ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 804, 150207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Iqbal, R.; Khan, M.T.; Bilal, H.; Aslam, M.M.; Khan, I.A.; Arslan, M.; Nguyen, P.M. Microplastics as vectors of environmental contaminants: Interactions in the natural ecosystems. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2022, 28, 1022–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, Z.; Zhi, D.; Yang, J.; Lam, S.S. Microplastics and environmental pollutants: Key interaction and toxicology in aquatic and soil environments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 422, 126843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of microplastics on wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and their removal: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Xing, B. Environmental source, fate, and toxicity of microplastics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 407, 124357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. O’Hara, P.D.; Avery-Gomm, S.; Wood, J.; Bowes, V.; Wilson, L.; Morgan, K.H.; Boyd, W.S.; Hipfner, J.M.; Desforges, J.-P.; Bertram, D.F.; et al. Seasonal variability in vulnerability for Cassin’s auklets (Ptychoramphus aleuticus) exposed to microplastic pollution in the Canadian Pacific region. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Talbot, R.; Chang, H. Microplastics in freshwater: A global review of factors affecting spatial and temporal variations. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Merga, L.B.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E.; Van den Brink, P.J.; Koelmans, A.A. Distribution of microplastic and small macroplastic particles across four fish species and sediment in an African lake. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, C.; Xiong, X.; Hamidian, A.H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X. A review on source, occurrence, and impacts of microplastics in freshwater aquaculture systems in China. Water Biol. Secur. 2022, 1, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Koraltan, I.; Mavruk, S.; Güven, O. Effect of biological and environmental factors on microplastic ingestion of commercial fish species. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wootton, N.; Reis-Santos, P.; Gillanders, B.M. Microplastic in fish—A global synthesis. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 2021, 31, 753–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. D’Avignon, G.; Gregory-Eaves, I.; Ricciardi, A. Microplastics in lakes and rivers: An issue of emerging significance to limnology. Environ. Rev. 2022, 30, 228–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, W.; Ge, J.; Yu, X. Bioavailability and toxicity of microplastics to fish species: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Garcés–Ordóñez, O.; Saldarriaga–Vélez, J.F.; Espinosa–Díaz, L.F.; Patiño, A.D.; Cusba, J.; Canals, M.; Mejía–Esquivia, K.; Fragozo–Velásquez, L.; Sáenz–Arias, S.; Córdoba–Meza, T.; et al. Microplastic pollution in water, sediments and commercial fish species from Laguna Grande de Santa Marta lagoon complex, Colombian Caribbean. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 829, 154643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jimenez-Cárdenas, V.; Luna-Acosta, A.; Gómez-Méndez, L.D. Differential Presence of Microplastics and Mesoplastics in Coral Reef and Mangrove Fishes in Isla Grande, Colombia. Microplastics 2022, 1, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rusinque-Quintero, L.L.; Montoya-Rojas, G.A.; Moyano-Molano, A.L. Environmental risks due to the presence of microplastics in coastal and marine environments of the Colombian Caribbean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 185, 114357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rangel-Buitrago, N.; Arroyo-Olarte, H.; Trilleras, J.; Arana, V.A.; Mantilla-Barbosa, E.; Gracia, A.; Velez Mendoza, A.; Neal, W.J.; Williams, A.T.; Micalle, A. Microplastics pollution on Colombian Central Caribbean beaches. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 170, 112685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garcés-Ordóñez, O.; Espinosa, L.F.; Costa Muniz, M.; Salles Pereira, L.B.; Meigikos Dos Anjos, R. Abundance, distribution, and characteristics of microplastics in coastal surface waters of the Colombian Caribbean and Pacific. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 43431–43442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vásquez-Molano, D.; Molina, A.; Duque, G. Spatial distribution and increase of microplastics over time in sediments of Buenaventura Bay, Colombian Pacific. Bol. Investig. Mar. Cost. 2021, 50, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Acosta-Coley, I.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Microplastic resin pellets on an urban tropical beach in Colombia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Corporación Autónoma Regional del Atlántico CRA (2021). Acuerdo Número 000008, por Medio del Cual se Adopta el Plan de Manejo Ambiental del Distrito Regional del Manejo Integrado (DRMI), Palmar del Tití Como Área Protegida y se Establecen Otras Disposiciones. Available online: https://www.crautonoma.gov.co/la-c-r-a/consejo-directivo/acuerdos-consejo (accessed on 27 May 2023).
  47. Arias-González, C.; González-Maya, J.F.; González Zamorano, P.; Ortega Rubiuo, A. Climate refugia for two Colombian endemic tamarin primates are critically under-protected. Mamm. Biol. 2021, 101, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martínez, L.; Dámato, G. Identity and environmental law protection of the Mokaná indigenous people in Malambo, Atlántico. Jurídicas CUC 2022, 18, 303–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rojas–Luna, R.A.; Oquendo–Ruiz, L.; García–Alzate, C.A.; Arana, V.A.; García–Alzate, R.; Trilleras, J. Identification, Abundance, and Distribution of Microplastics in Surface Water Collected from Luruaco Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia. Water 2023, 15, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Parker, B.; Britton, J.R.; Green, I.D.; Amat-Trigo, F.; Andreou, D. Parasite infection but not chronic microplastic exposure reduces the feeding rate in a freshwater fish. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 320, 121120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pereira, R.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Silva, D.; Freitas, V.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Ramos, S. Microplastic contamination in large migratory fishes collected in the open Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Foekema, E.M.; De Gruijter, C.; Mergia, M.T.; Van Franeker, J.A.; Murk, A.J.; Koelmans, A.A. Plastic in North Sea fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 8818–8824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dehaut, A.; Cassone, A.L.; Frère, L.; Hermabessiere, L.; Himber, C.; Rinnert, E.; Rivière, G.; Lambert, C.; Soudant, P.; Huvet, A.; et al. Microplastics in seafood: Benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Enders, K.; Lenz, R.; do Sul, J.A.I.; Tagg, A.S.; Labrenz, M. When every particle matters: A QuEChERS approach to extract microplastics from environmental samples. MethodsX 2020, 7, 100784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koelmans, A.A.; Nor, N.H.M.; Hermsen, E.; Kooi, M.; Mintenig, S.M.; De France, J. Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality. Water Res. 2019, 155, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Z.; Wu, X.; Liu, H.; Huang, X.; Chen, Q.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J. A systematic review of microplastics in the environment: Sampling, separation, characterization and coexistence mechanisms with pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859, 160151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Cabanilles, P.; Acle, S.; Arias, A.; Masiá, P.; Ardura, A.; Garcia-Vazquez, E. Microplastics Risk into a Three-Link Food Chain Inside European Hake. Diversity 2022, 14, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pastorino, P.; Prearo, M.; Di Blasio, A.; Barcelò, D.; Anselmi, S.; Colussi, S.; Alberti, S.; Tedde, G.; Dondo, A.; Ottino, M.; et al. Microplastics Occurrence in the European Common Frog (Rana temporaria) from Cottian Alps (Northwest Italy). Diversity 2022, 14, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Occurrence and ecological impact of microplastics in aquaculture ecosystems. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andrade, J.M.; Ferreiro, B.; López–Mahía, P.; Muniategui–Lorenzo, S. Standardization of the minimum information for publication of infrared-related data when microplastics are characterized. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 154, 111035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Primpke, S.; Wirth, M.; Lorenz, C.; Gerdts, G. Reference database design for the automated analysis of microplastic samples based on Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Analyt. Bioanalyt. Chem. 2018, 410, 5131–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Venables, W.N.; Ripley, B.D. Random and Mixed Effects. In Modern Applied Statistics with S. Statistics and Computing; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gao, S.; Yan, K.; Liang, B.; Shu, R.; Wang, N.; Zhang, S. The different ways mmicroplastics from the water column and sediment accumulate in fish in Haizhou Bay. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, T.; Hu, M.; Xu, G.; Shi, H.; Leung, J.Y.S.; Wang, Y. Microplastic accumulation via trophic transfer: Can a predatory crab counter the adverse effects of microplastics by body defence? Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, J.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liang, Y.; Lu, W.; Song, J. Microplastic contamination assessment in water and economic fishes in different trophic guilds from an urban water supply reservoir after flooding. J. Environ. Manage. 2021, 299, 113667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Li, G.; Wang, K.; Cai, X.; Xiong, X.; Wu, C. Factors affecting microplastic accumulation by wild fish: A case study in the Nandu River, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 847, 157486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yuan, W.; Christie-Oleza, J.A.; Xu, E.G.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Lin, L.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y. Environmental fate of microplastics in the world’s third-largest river: Basin-wide investigation and microplastic community analysis. Water Res. 2022, 210, 118002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2022. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 27 March 2023).
  69. Dusaucy, J.; Gateuille, D.; Perrette, Y.; Naffrechoux, E. Microplastic pollution of worldwide lakes. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 117075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Garcés-Ordóñez, O.; Castillo-Olaya, V.A.; Granados-Briceño, A.F.; García, L.M.B.; Díaz, L.F.E. Marine litter and microplastic pollution on mangrove soils of the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 145, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Garcés-Ordóñez, O.; Mejía-Esquivia, K.A.; Sierra-Labastidas, T.; Patiño, A.; Blandón, L.M.; Díaz, L.F.E. Prevalence of microplastic contamination in the digestive tract of fishes from mangrove ecosystem in Cispata, Colombian Caribbean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 154, 111085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Elagami, H.; Frei, S.; Boos, J.P.; Trommer, G.; Gilfedder, B.S. Quantifying microplastic residence times in lakes using mesocosm experiments and transport modelling. Water Res. 2023, 229, 119463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Biginagwa, F.J.; Mayoma, B.S.; Shashoua, Y.; Syberg, K.; Khan, F.R. First evidence of microplastics in the African Great Lakes: Recovery from Lake Victoria Nile perch and Nile tilapia. J. Great Lakes Res. 2016, 42, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Roch, S.; Walter, T.; Ittner, L.D.; Friedrich, C.; Brinker, A. A systematic study of the microplastic burden in freshwater fishes of south-western Germany—Are we searching at the right scale? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, J.; Yin, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Xie, C.; Liang, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, Z. Seasonal variation and ecological risk assessment of microplastics ingested by economic fishes in Lake Chao, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yin, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Xie, C.; Liang, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, Z. Accumulation of microplastics in fish guts and gills from a large natural lake: Selective or non-selective? Environ. Pollut. 2022, 309, 119785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yuan, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, W.; Di, M.; Wang, J. Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition in water, sediments, and wild fish from Poyang Lake, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Faure, F.; Demars, C.; Wieser, O.; Kunz, M.; de Alencastro, L.F. Plastic pollution in Swiss surface waters: Nature and concentrations, interaction with pollutants. Environ. Chem. 2015, 12, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Weinstein, J.E.; Ertel, B.M.; Gray, A.D. Accumulation and depuration of microplastic fibers, fragments, and tire particles in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica: A toxicokinetic approach. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 308, 119681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Turner, S.; Horton, A.A.; Rose, N.L.; Hall, C. A temporal sediment record of microplastics in an urban lake, London, UK. J. Paleolimnol. 2019, 61, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Okamoto, K.; Nomura, M.; Horie, Y.; Okamura, H. Color preferences and gastrointestinal-tract retention times of microplastics by freshwater and marine fishes. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 304, 119253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Morales, J.; García-Alzate, C.A. Trophic structure of river fish from Corral de San Luis, Magdalena river basin, Colombia Caribbean. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2016, 64, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Rios-Fuster, B.; Arechavala-Lopez, P.; García-Marcos, K.; Alomar, C.; Compa, M.; Álvarez, E.; Julià, M.M.; Solomando Martíd, A.; Sureda, A.; Deudero, S. Experimental evidence of physiological and behavioral effects of microplastic ingestion in Sparus aurata. Aquat. Toxicol. 2021, 231, 105737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vethaak, A.D.; Legler, J. Microplastics and human health. Science 2021, 371, 672–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: First Addendum to the Fourth Edition. 2017. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254636 (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  86. Das, R.; Krishnakumar, A.; Kumar, M.R.; Thulseedharan, D. Water quality assessment of three tropical freshwater lakes of Kerala, SW India, with special reference to drinking water potential. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical location of Tocagua Lake, Atlántico–Colombia, and sampling points.
Figure 1. Geographical location of Tocagua Lake, Atlántico–Colombia, and sampling points.
Diversity 15 00821 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of some fibers (AC), fragments (DG) found in water from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia.
Figure 2. Photographs of some fibers (AC), fragments (DG) found in water from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia.
Diversity 15 00821 g002
Figure 3. Typological characteristics of the MPs found in water from Tocagua Lake. (A) Color all MP particles, (B) Shape and (C) Size.
Figure 3. Typological characteristics of the MPs found in water from Tocagua Lake. (A) Color all MP particles, (B) Shape and (C) Size.
Diversity 15 00821 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of some fragments (AE) and fibers (FJ) detected in the gastrointestinal tract of individual fish of six fish species from Tocagua lake.
Figure 4. Photographs of some fragments (AE) and fibers (FJ) detected in the gastrointestinal tract of individual fish of six fish species from Tocagua lake.
Diversity 15 00821 g004
Figure 5. Proportion of MPs (color and shape characteristics) by (A) species and (B) diet type in fish samples between wet and dry seasons.
Figure 5. Proportion of MPs (color and shape characteristics) by (A) species and (B) diet type in fish samples between wet and dry seasons.
Diversity 15 00821 g005
Table 1. Morphological description of the fish.
Table 1. Morphological description of the fish.
SpeciesFeeding GroupsNTotal Length (mm) *Weight (g) ***K Index
WetDryWetDryWetDryWetDry
Andinoacara latifronsOV5412118.4 (50.2)59.8 (4.7)42.0 (44.5)3.5 (1.2)0.6 (0.8)1.4 (0.5)
Astyanax magdalenaeOI140112.0 (46.6)NA **40.2 (66)NA0.4 (0.3)NA
Caquetaia kraussiiOC2316106.3 (41.2)57.8 (5.1)34.9 (30)3.1 (1.3)0.6 (0.9)1.3 (0.5)
Mugil lizaDM137119.7 (49.5)61.8 (8.8)39.0 (35.1)4.2 (1.7)0.3 (0.3)1.7 (0.7)
Oreochromis niloticusOV23492.7 (55.1)51.7 (11.9)26.4 (33.2)2.5 (1.8)0.6 (0.6)1.0 (0.7)
Poecilia gilliiHB566115.6 (44)60.6 (6.3)39.9 (38.2)4.0 (1.3)0.3 (0.3)1.6 (0.5)
18345
OV: omnivorous; OI: omnivorous–insectivorous; OC: omnivorous–carnivorous; DM: detritivores–microalgae; HB: herbivorous. N: total number of individuals analyzed. * Average size of fish species (±SD). ** NA: no specimens were caught. *** Average weight of fish species (±SD). K: value (±SD).
Table 2. Average of abundance of MPs (MPs/L) according to the shape in water from Tocagua Lake.
Table 2. Average of abundance of MPs (MPs/L) according to the shape in water from Tocagua Lake.
SeasonStationTotalFiberFragmentFoam
WetS11.110.970.120.03
S20.740.630.090.03
S30.970.920.050.00
S41.381.000.350.03
S50.880.810.070.01
S61.171.000.140.03
DryS11.521.240.300.18
S20.640.590.050.00
S30.750.500.250.00
S41.471.190.250.03
S50.830.530.280.00
S60.100.100.000.00
Table 3. Abundance MPs in six fish species from Tocagua Lake.
Table 3. Abundance MPs in six fish species from Tocagua Lake.
SpeciesNiNMPs%FOAverage (±SD)
WetDryWetDryMax.WetDryWetDry
Andinoacara latifrons5010181387–1292.683.33.4 (2.9)3.2 (3.9)
Astyanax magdalenae1305005–092.90.03.6 (1.8)0.0 (0.0)
Caquetaia krausii191342494–2082.681.21.8 (1.5)3.1 (4.9)
Mugil liza1043967–276.957.13.0 (3.1)0.9 (0.9)
Oreochromis niloticus1718129–173.925.03.5 (3.5)0.5 (1.0)
Poecilia gilli49515196–387.583.32.7 (2.0)1.5 (1.2)
Total15833544104
Ni: number of individuals that presented MPs; NMPs: number of microplastics detected; Max: maximum number of particles detected from one individual per season, wet–dry; %FO: Frequency of occurrence; Average: Average number of MPs in the GT.
Table 4. BCF indices for MPs and its characteristics (fiber and fragment) in fish (types of diets) in wet and dry seasons.
Table 4. BCF indices for MPs and its characteristics (fiber and fragment) in fish (types of diets) in wet and dry seasons.
Type of Diets WetDry
TotalFibersFragmentsFibersFragments
Detritivorous–microalgae0.000640.000150.000070.000420
Herbivorous0.007080.001370.00350.002210
Omnivorous0.001160.000260.000420.000070.00041
Omnivorous–carnivorous0.000520.0001300.000110.00028
Omnivorous–insectivorous0.004060.00406000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miranda-Peña, L.; Urquijo, M.; Arana, V.A.; García-Alzate, R.; García-Alzate, C.A.; Trilleras, J. Microplastics Occurrence in Fish from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia. Diversity 2023, 15, 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070821

AMA Style

Miranda-Peña L, Urquijo M, Arana VA, García-Alzate R, García-Alzate CA, Trilleras J. Microplastics Occurrence in Fish from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia. Diversity. 2023; 15(7):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070821

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miranda-Peña, Lindys, Milena Urquijo, Victoria A. Arana, Roberto García-Alzate, Carlos A. García-Alzate, and Jorge Trilleras. 2023. "Microplastics Occurrence in Fish from Tocagua Lake, Low Basin Magdalena River, Colombia" Diversity 15, no. 7: 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070821

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop