Vaccines and Vaccination: Historical Perspectives, Current Issues and Emerging/Evolving Themes

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "Epidemiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 16297

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Interests: development of vaccines; therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); stabilization and formulation of vaccines and mAbs; nanoparticles; protein folding and aggregation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Interests: biologic medicines; biosimilars; biobetters; drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; evidenced-based small-molecule drug therapy; phytotherapeutics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Vaccines, along with small-molecule antibiotics, are arguably the greatest medical accomplishments in human history and are indispensable therapeutic tools that are firmly embedded in modern healthcare systems and public health globally. Vaccines, in particular against bacterial or viral pathogens, are principally used as prophylactic measures and have saved hundreds of millions of lives since the start of vaccination campaigns worldwide, assisting humankind to contain many human and animal infectious diseases, and have even allowed the eradication of polio and rinderpest viruses completely.

The development of vaccines and implementation of widespread vaccination programs have historically had a long and arduous journey spanning many centuries, but recently, vaccine discovery has become a rapidly evolving field. Historically, there have been many roadblocks and mishaps with vaccine development and vaccination implementation programs that have affected public opinion regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccines and the necessity of vaccination programs, which have hindered their timely development and reduced the capacity for their full potential to be realised. Many external factors has also affected vaccine discovery and vaccination, including political decisions that did not follow science-based recommendations, various accidents that occurred during vaccine manufacturing, various (un)ethical practices during some of the first human vaccine trials, unwarranted and unproductive rivalry between scientists, hasty decisions made on the emergence of new viral strains, and many other decisions that have negatively influenced public opinion over many decades. For example, many early experiments or initial human trials as well as some actions of scientists who held strong opinions for or against new developments in the 19th and early 20th century were unethical or unacceptable in light of modern day norms or ethical standards. Nevertheless, these historical actions and experiences greatly shaped current thinking and policies on vaccines and vaccination globally. Such incidents are too numerous to list in detail here, but an example is the Cutter Laboratory incident in the US during the early days of Salk’s polio vaccine campaign, where some vaccine lots contained live polio virus. This somewhat influenced public perspectives on polio vaccines and the polio vaccination initiative. When looked at critically and objectively, however, the rich and thought-provoking history of vaccines and vaccination programs have paved the way for future vaccine developments and have greatly informed decision-making processes for future infectious disease events and the public health response to these. This is particularly important now, as we are still in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and are still navigating this public health crisis.

In this Special Issue (SI) of Vaccines, we invite our academic and research colleagues to join us in submitting research papers and reviews on historical perspectives on human and animal infectious diseases and vaccine discovery and vaccination programs, the current issues facing vaccines for bacterial and viral diseases, vaccine discovery platforms and policy and regulatory frameworks in the field of vaccines and vaccination as a key public health initiative nationally and internationally, especially during large-scale pandemics such as the current COVID-19 pandemic and seasonal influenza outbreaks. In addition, the rapidly emerging and evolving issues related to vaccine discovery and development, such as the rapidly shifting discovery platforms that are being (and will continue to be) introduced as well as the ability of national governments and international health agencies to embed vaccination policy and of regulatory platforms to align with rapidly evolving pandemics and viral mutations. Issues of vaccine affordability and the ethical considerations that underpin such universal access to citizens of all nations regardless of their socioeconomic status will also be included. The use of simulation and modelling strategies to track and predict the time-course of infections and viral mutations during a pandemic will also be considered. Greater adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in rational design of future vaccines during pandemics will also be included in this SI. Finally, development of future efficacy and safety surveillance programs to provide real-time measurements of such signals in the face of exponential changes to the structure of the virus will also be the subject of this SI of Vaccines.

We hope that the topics included in this SI will be of interest not only to those working directly in the field of medicine and therapeutics, vaccine, vaccination, and immunology, but also to those academics, researchers and scientists in public health, and social science and public policy and national and international bureaucrats and technocrats, who are in positions to influence government and institutional/organizational policy on vaccines and vaccination programs at national and international levels.

Dr. Veysel Kayser
Prof. Dr. Iqbal M. Ramzan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • artificial Intelligence and Vaccine Discovery
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • effect of infectious diseases in early colonialism in Latin America, Africa and Australia
  • emerging infectious diseases and pandemics
  • eradication of smallpox and rinderpest
  • history of animal vaccines and vaccination
  • history of human vaccines
  • history of infectious diseases
  • human and animal pathogens
  • infectious diseases and colonialism
  • infectious diseases—bacterial and viral
  • influenza
  • measles
  • national/international vaccine/vaccination policy and regulatory frameworks
  • novel discovery platforms
  • polio
  • seasonal influenza outbreaks and yearly vaccinations
  • simulation and modelling to track progress of pandemics
  • traditional vaccine discovery platforms
  • universal access to vaccines—monetary and economic policy
  • vaccination as a key public health measure
  • vaccine discovery platforms
  • vaccine efficacy and safety signal monitoring
  • vaccine hesitancy and initiatives to minimize reluctance to fully participate
  • vaccines
  • vaccinology

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 1497 KiB  
Article
The Use of Drones to Deliver Rift Valley Fever Vaccines in Rwanda: Perceptions and Recommendations
by Evan F. Griffith, Janna M. Schurer, Billy Mawindo, Rita Kwibuka, Thierry Turibyarive and Janetrix Hellen Amuguni
Vaccines 2023, 11(3), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030605 - 07 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3309
Abstract
Given the recent emergence of Rift Valley Fever (RVF) in Rwanda and its profound impact on livelihoods and health, improving RVF prevention and control strategies is crucial. Vaccinating livestock is one of the most sustainable strategies to mitigate the impact of RVF on [...] Read more.
Given the recent emergence of Rift Valley Fever (RVF) in Rwanda and its profound impact on livelihoods and health, improving RVF prevention and control strategies is crucial. Vaccinating livestock is one of the most sustainable strategies to mitigate the impact of RVF on health and livelihoods. However, vaccine supply chain constraints severely limit the effectiveness of vaccination programs. In the human health sector, unmanned aerial vehicles, i.e., drones, are increasingly used to improve supply chains and last-mile vaccine delivery. We investigated perceptions of whether delivering RVF vaccines by drone in Rwanda might help to overcome logistical constraints in the vaccine supply chain. We conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the animal health sector and Zipline employees in Nyagatare District in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. We used content analysis to identify key themes. We found that stakeholders in the animal health sector and Zipline employees believe that drones could improve RVF vaccination in Nyagatare. The primary benefits study participants identified included decreased transportation time, improved cold chain maintenance, and cost savings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4323 KiB  
Article
Using the Women Empowerment in Livestock Index (WELI) to Examine Linkages between Women Smallholder Livestock Farmers’ Empowerment and Access to Livestock Vaccines in Machakos County of Kenya: Insights and Critiques
by Catherine Kaluwa, Jemimah Oduma, Faduma Abdullahi Abdirahman, Byalungwa Kyotos Kitoga, Angela A. Opondoh, John Muchibi, Brigitte Bagnol, Marieke Rosenbaum, Sylvia Onchaga, Meghan Stanley and Janetrix Hellen Amuguni
Vaccines 2022, 10(11), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111868 - 04 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2017
Abstract
Livestock diseases are a major barrier to productivity for both male and female livestock keepers in Africa. In Kenya, two of the most devastating livestock diseases are Newcastle Disease (ND) in poultry and Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP) in goats. Female livestock keepers tend [...] Read more.
Livestock diseases are a major barrier to productivity for both male and female livestock keepers in Africa. In Kenya, two of the most devastating livestock diseases are Newcastle Disease (ND) in poultry and Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP) in goats. Female livestock keepers tend to own more small ruminants (goats, sheep, etc.) and poultry and their livelihoods are adversely affected if their herds are not vaccinated against these diseases. Livestock farming has gender specific challenges and opportunities, with implications for the empowerment of women smallholder farmers, their household well-being, food security, and livelihoods. There is a need to estimate the level to which women benefit personally, socially, and economically from keeping livestock, yet there are very few studies that can measure if livestock production does in fact empower women smallholder livestock farmers. This study was done to examine linkages between women’s empowerment and access and control over livestock products and vaccines. The Women Empowerment in Livestock Index (WELI) tool, which was customized to include questions on livestock vaccine access, was used to capture baseline data on empowerment scores for women in Machakos county, Kenya, prior to implementation of animal health and vaccine test models. In total, 400 participants were surveyed in two wards of Machakos County, Kola and Kalama, which were purposively selected. Women’s empowerment was mapped to three domains (3DE): intrinsic agency (power within), instrumental agency (power to), and collective agency (power with) measured against adequacy in 13 indicators. Our results indicate that the household structure (female headed or dual headed household), age of respondents and number of members in a household influence the adequacy score. Work balance was the most significant negative contributor to women’s disempowerment. Women contributed the most to livestock productive activities and attained adequacy in this area compared to men, directly impacting the WELI score. Women smallholder livestock farmers report low CCPP and ND vaccination rates, minimal knowledge on livestock diseases, a lack of access to cold chain storage and rarely visited veterinarians. The WELI score was 0.81 indicating a high level of empowerment for women in this community compared to men leading us to conclude that the overall WELI score was not an accurate indicator of women‘s empowerment in Machakos County. However, the decomposability of the index allows us to disaggregate the drivers of change and to examine how individual indicators contribute to disempowerment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 1437 KiB  
Review
Vaccine Hesitancy: Contemporary Issues and Historical Background
by Rina Fajri Nuwarda, Iqbal Ramzan, Lynn Weekes and Veysel Kayser
Vaccines 2022, 10(10), 1595; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101595 - 22 Sep 2022
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 9262
Abstract
Vaccination, despite being recognized as one of the most effective primary public health measures, is viewed as unsafe and unnecessary by an increasing number of individuals. Anxiety about vaccines and vaccination programs leading to vaccine hesitancy results from a complex mix of social [...] Read more.
Vaccination, despite being recognized as one of the most effective primary public health measures, is viewed as unsafe and unnecessary by an increasing number of individuals. Anxiety about vaccines and vaccination programs leading to vaccine hesitancy results from a complex mix of social and political influences, cultural and religious beliefs, the availability of and ability to interpret health and scientific information, and personal and population experiences of health systems and government policies. Vaccine hesitancy is becoming a serious threat to vaccination programs, and was identified as one of the World Health Organization’s top ten global health threats in 2019. The negative impact of anti-vaccination movements is frequently cited as one of the major reasons for rising vaccine hesitancy amongst the general public world-wide. This review discusses the various issues surrounding vaccine hesitancy and the anti-vaccine movement, starting with the definitions of vaccine hesitancy and the anti-vaccine movement in their early history and in the modern era, before discussing the key drivers of vaccine hesitancy, particularly across different regions of the world, with a focus on various countries with low-, middle-, or high-income economies with different socio-economic populations. The review concludes with the impact of vaccine hesitancy on herd immunity and social, psychological, and public health measures to counter vaccine hesitancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop