Vaccines and Health Economics

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "Human Vaccines and Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 January 2024) | Viewed by 2779

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Interests: rotavirus vaccine; health economics; public health

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Correctly defining the health economics of new vaccines at market launch by which a value price is determined is a challenging endeavour from the perspective of the payer and the producer: too much or not enough? The reason that these difficulties may appear is that a known evaluation scheme of cost-effectiveness is applied as a copy/paste exercise of what is executed for treatment drugs. The question often raised is whether this is the right approach for vaccines. Vaccines should be positioned as preventative, public health measures that essentially gain the maximum benefit at the population or societal level when the vaccination is sustained to control infection spread leading to disease. The consequences of good vaccination programmes, short to long term, are that, with the prevention they engender, QALY-loss reduction is achieved as a clinical outcome. However, major additional societal gains should be considered as well, such as a safe environment, decreased use of expensive healthcare, better work conditions, more familial rest, and increased taxation gains. Those different elements could be observed, but they are often not included in the value assessment because they are not measured. Should those gains be considered in the price setting of the vaccine as we do for treatment drugs? Potentially not, as those total value assessments could then become unpayable. However, they should be measured because they provide decision-makers with better arguments about the societal values needed to give support to vaccination. The health economics of vaccines should therefore enrich and position its evaluation with necessary societal gains of real-world data to overcome potential hesitancy without being the driver of price setting. 

Prof. Dr. Baudouin Standaert
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 2176 KiB  
Article
Estimating the Total Societal Cost of a Hexavalent Vaccine versus a Pentavalent Vaccine with Hepatitis B in South Korea
by Serim Min, Sun-Hong Kwon, Yeon-Woo Lee, Jung-Min Lee, Eun Jin Bae and Eui-Kyung Lee
Vaccines 2023, 11(5), 984; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050984 - 15 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2389
Abstract
In South Korea, the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B) is not listed despite its facility of no need to reconstitute. It, therefore, has the potential to augment the efficiency of prevention against the [...] Read more.
In South Korea, the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B) is not listed despite its facility of no need to reconstitute. It, therefore, has the potential to augment the efficiency of prevention against the six infectious diseases, and it may reduce vaccine-related errors of reconstitution when compared with the currently used vaccination scheme of the pentavalent vaccine with the additional shots against hepatitis B. Given the assumed clinical equivalence between the two vaccination schemes, a cost-minimization analysis has been performed from a societal perspective including all the medical and non-medical direct and indirect costs when vaccinating one birth cohort. The results indicate that the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine induces a cost reduction of KRW 47,155 (USD36.22) per infant or 12,026 million Korean Won ($9,236,417) in total for the whole birth cohort with 260,500 children. Using the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine causes a lower infection rate, has fewer vaccination sessions, and may save much time as compared with the current vaccination scheme in place. The ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine may, therefore, benefit the National Immunization Program by reducing the total societal costs of vaccination while improving convenience of infants, parents, and medical care professionals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Health Economics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop