sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Transparency, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance for Sustainable Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 18396

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Corporate Finance, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Interests: corporate governance; board gender diversity; corporate social responsibility reporting; environmental reporting; audit
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón, Spain
Interests: marketing; prediction-oriented modeling; sustainability; sustainable development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The international financial, sanitary, and cultural crisis, particularly severe in some European countries, in addition to the financial scandals, have led to questioning of the information disclosed by companies, which has become a key topic for researchers, investors, and body regulators, which are interested in knowing how corporate governance mechanisms are designed. Companies must have highly efficient governance systems in order to promote responsible and ethical business management, which is demanded by the stakeholders of the corporations, principally to prevent fraud (Pucheta‐Martínez and López‐Zamora, 2018). In this manner, the board of directors and its composition can become an important mechanism of restraint for all agents partaking in the decision-making process. In this sense, corporate boards become an important instrument in a firm’s decision to disclose CSR information since they are responsible for defending the interests of all stakeholders. Jamali et al. (2008) support the idea that board structure is a key element in organizational decision-making regarding CSR disclosure. In this regard, the internal corporate governance mechanism, such as board composition, independent directors, and ownsership structure, among others, are considered as a factors that influence CSR reporting. Moreover, external corporate governance mechanisms, such external auditors and governments, among others, are controlled by those outside the organization and tend to disclose more information in CSR reporting (Pucheta‐Martínez et al., 2019).

Past research has focused on the association between corporate governance and CSR disclosure. Furthermore, most of the attention of prior literature has been focused on board size and composition. However, empirical evidence is scarce when we focus on the effect of internal corporate governance mechanisms or external corporate governance mechanisms on CSR disclosure and their impact on transparency.

This Special Issue welcomes a wide variety of academic disciplines encompassing numerous methodological approaches that will allow for an expanded view of the importance of transparency, social responsibility, and corporate governance in companies. In this call for papers, we encourage researchers to submit papers on this topic based on studies conducted on developed countries or in a broader context involving several countries around the world. It is preferred that different tools such as STATA, Smart PLS, or Fuzzy Set are used in research articles presenting statistical models, with a clear focus on prediction or forecasting.

References

Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., and Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5): 443–459.

Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., Bel‐Oms, I., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2019). The engagement of auditors in the reporting of corporate social responsibility information. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 46-56.

Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & López‐Zamora, B. (2018). Engagement of directors representing institutional investors on environmental disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1108-1120.

Prof. Dr. Inmaculada Bel Oms
Prof. Dr. José Ramon Segarra-Moliner
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • board composition and CSR reporting
  • board composition and transparency in the companies
  • internal corporate governance mechanisms and CSR reporting
  • external corporate governance mechanisms and CSR reporting
  • corporate governance mechanisms and CSR reporting
  • corporate governance mechanisms and CSR practices
  • corporate governance mechanisms and environmental reporting
  • corporate governance mechanisms and sustainability reporting

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1409 KiB  
Article
Diversity and Governance: Is There Really Progress?
by Felipe Arenas-Torres, Miguel Bustamante-Ubilla, Valentín Santander-Ramírez and Pedro Severino-González
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5158; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095158 - 25 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1682
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine if the diversity of gender, nationality, and age has a positive and significant effect on adopting corporate governance practices. The study considered 1106 corporate social responsibility and corporate governance reports from 2015 to 2020. The [...] Read more.
The purpose of the study was to determine if the diversity of gender, nationality, and age has a positive and significant effect on adopting corporate governance practices. The study considered 1106 corporate social responsibility and corporate governance reports from 2015 to 2020. The research was of the descriptive–correlational type, with a longitudinal temporality, considering in the first instance an analysis of the disaggregated descriptive statistics to later determine if the diversity of gender, nationality, and age of the board affects the adoption of corporate governance practices. The results show a low degree of diversity and stagnation in the analyzed period. Regarding the adoption of corporate governance practices, these are in an incipient stage, and the most liquid companies in the Chilean stock market are the ones that have advanced the most during the period. It is concluded that gender diversity has a positive and significant impact on the degree of adoption of corporate governance practices, operation, and composition of the board of directors, and protection of shareholders, while the diversity of nationality has a positive and significant impact on the adoption of related practices to risk management. Finally, the study confirms the heterogeneity of results by linking board diversity variables versus non-financial variables. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 300 KiB  
Article
Does Corporate Governance Affect Labor Investment Efficiency?
by Hyunmin Oh and Sambock Park
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4599; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084599 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1827
Abstract
This study examined the effect of corporate governance on labor investment efficiency, using 5178 firm-year samples from companies listed on the Korean stock market over the period from 2011 to 2019. In addition, the relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency according [...] Read more.
This study examined the effect of corporate governance on labor investment efficiency, using 5178 firm-year samples from companies listed on the Korean stock market over the period from 2011 to 2019. In addition, the relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency according to whether the company belongs to a chaebol group was examined. Corporate governance was measured using KCGS’s corporate governance ratings. This study tried to verify whether labor investment inefficiency due to information asymmetry is improved by excellent corporate governance. The results show that in the case of the entire sample, the relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency was significant in the positive (+) direction. That is, it is an empirical result indicating that a company with a sound governance structure is making effective labor investment. The samples were divided into overinvestment samples and underinvestment samples, and the relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency was analyzed separately in the two samples. According to the results, the positive relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency was significant only in the case of underinvestment samples. In addition, the positive relationship between corporate governance and labor investment efficiency was more statistically significant in the case of companies belonging to a chaebol group. This study provided implications for authorities, shareholders, and investors, etc., in that it suggests the role of corporate governance as a mechanism to alleviate the agency problem between managers and investors. Full article
20 pages, 524 KiB  
Article
Allocation of Decision Rights and CSR Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Business Groups in China
by Rumeng Cui, Zhong Ma and Longfeng Wang
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 3840; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073840 - 24 Mar 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2104
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research has recently begun to focus on the CSR performance of business groups, with the scope shifting from group members to business groups in general. This paper focuses on whether business groups with centralized decision rights tend to disclose [...] Read more.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research has recently begun to focus on the CSR performance of business groups, with the scope shifting from group members to business groups in general. This paper focuses on whether business groups with centralized decision rights tend to disclose more CSR information and investigates the heterogeneous effect of the number of subsidiaries. Using a dataset for listed groups in China from 2010 to 2020, our empirical test discovered that centralized decision rights could promote group CSR disclosure. For groups with many subsidiaries, centralization makes a more significant contribution to promoting CSR disclosure. The mechanism test revealed that this positive relationship between centralization and disclosure relies on efficient internal capital market allocation, a reduction in rent-seeking behavior of subsidiaries, and reputational concerns. Furthermore, we observed that the centralized decision rights influence on disclosure varies across different aspects of CSR, with a negative impact on “Social Contribution” and a positive impact on “Shareholder Responsibility”, “Employee Responsibility”, “Supplier, Customer, and Consumer Responsibility” and “Environmental Responsibility”. Centralized decision rights promote more CSR disclosures with voluntary disclosures, while regulatory disclosures have no significant effect. We research the allocation of decision rights and group CSR disclosure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 530 KiB  
Article
Effect of the Absence of Unethical Controlling Shareholders on Firm Value and the Moderating Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from South Korea
by Ji-Hyun Lee and Su-Yol Lee
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3607; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063607 - 18 Mar 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1884
Abstract
Prior research on unethical controlling shareholder is limited. This study examines the effect of the evanishment of unethical controlling shareholders’ risk on firm value and how corporate governance moderates this effect from a principal–principal agency perspective. This research proposes a contingent model of [...] Read more.
Prior research on unethical controlling shareholder is limited. This study examines the effect of the evanishment of unethical controlling shareholders’ risk on firm value and how corporate governance moderates this effect from a principal–principal agency perspective. This research proposes a contingent model of corporate governance as a mechanism to provide professional managers with managerial autonomy. This study identifies 43 cases of controlling shareholders of Korean conglomerates being absent due to their imprisonment from 2006 to 2015. The regression analysis results indicate that the evanishment of controlling shareholders’ risks does not significantly influence the affiliated firms’ value. This study supports the positive effect of corporate governance on firm value. Although the statistical significance is low, it observes a tendency for corporate governance to amplify the relationship between the dissolution of unethical controlling shareholders’ risks and firm value. This study contributes to the literature by being one of the first to explore unethical controlling shareholders’ risks based on corporate governance theory. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 265 KiB  
Article
Another Form of Greenwashing: The Effects of Chaebol Firms’ Corporate Governance Performance on the Donations
by Manseek Choi and Soonwook Hong
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3373; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063373 - 13 Mar 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3541
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics are widely used to measure the firms’ social performance. In this regard, donation expenses are one of the outcomes for the firms’ effort to build, grow, and maintain the social value. However, firms may expense a trivial [...] Read more.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics are widely used to measure the firms’ social performance. In this regard, donation expenses are one of the outcomes for the firms’ effort to build, grow, and maintain the social value. However, firms may expense a trivial or minimum amount of donations, considering the corporate size, in order to disguise themselves as a “good company”. In this paper, exploiting 2010–2019 Korean Stock Exchange (KSE) market listed companies’ financials and ESG scores, we examine whether Chaebol firms with good governance “actually” spend more donation expenses. We predict and find that good governance does not actually lead to greater donation expenses among Chaebol firms, despite the positive relations between governance and donation expenses in general. Overall, our findings highlight that good Chaebol companies determined by ESG metrics may not be real charitable companies. Our findings provide counterevidence against the notion that firms with a higher ESG score are more likely to be charitable. Full article
20 pages, 341 KiB  
Article
Internal Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Companies
by Farman Ullah Khan, Vanina Adoriana Trifan, Mioara Florina Pantea, Junrui Zhang and Muhammad Nouman
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2261; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042261 - 16 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3019
Abstract
Stakeholder management researchers have recently put a lot of effort into figuring out why organizations facing extensive pressure respond differently to social responsibilities. In particular, ethics researchers believe that senior management must drive corporate social responsibility since their attitudes toward such issues are [...] Read more.
Stakeholder management researchers have recently put a lot of effort into figuring out why organizations facing extensive pressure respond differently to social responsibilities. In particular, ethics researchers believe that senior management must drive corporate social responsibility since their attitudes toward such issues are so important. In line with this sentiment, our study develops a framework of management power, composed of CEOs’ power and the organizations’ power, and explores how managerial power heterogeneity affects the corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of a firm. Using sample data from the largest emerging market—China—for the period 2010–2018, we submit that CEOs with structural power and shareholders with the highest concentration tend to show a lower commitment to CSR activities. On the other hand, we recognize that the ownership, expertise, and prestige power of CEOs’, the supervision, monitoring, and political power of the board can improve a firms’ CSR performance. These results are also validated by using a fixed effect model, two stage least square (2-SLS) regression, and the propensity score matching (PSM) technique. Our results imply that the implementation of social policies fundamentally results not only from powerful CEOs, but also from powerful boards and shareholders. Moreover, our study provides useful implications with regard to the social outcomes of power authorized by CEOs and the organizations. Full article
13 pages, 1351 KiB  
Article
How Do Remuneration Committees Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Empirical Evidence from an International Perspective
by Inmaculada Bel-Oms and José Ramón Segarra-Moliner
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 860; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020860 - 12 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2406
Abstract
The main goal of this study is to analyze whether the existence of remuneration committees tend to disclose more corporate social responsibility (CSR) information. In addition, we test the moderating role played by the proportion of independent directors on boards of directors with [...] Read more.
The main goal of this study is to analyze whether the existence of remuneration committees tend to disclose more corporate social responsibility (CSR) information. In addition, we test the moderating role played by the proportion of independent directors on boards of directors with the relationship between the constitution of remuneration committees and CSR disclosure. Previous research does not appear to have addressed these questions. The research questions proposed are tested using an international sample of 28,610 listed companies, and we took into consideration information on industrial companies from the Middle East, developed Asian and Pacific countries, both emerging and developed European countries, Africa, Latin America and North America. These findings provide evidence that the existence of remuneration committees is more likely to disclose CSR information, and the existence of independent board members positively moderates the association between the existence of remuneration committees and CSR disclosure. We expand on earlier empirical literature concerning corporate governance and CSR issues. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop