sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Ecosystem Services in Water Resources and Their Management: Investing in Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Resources and Sustainable Utilization".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 March 2023) | Viewed by 5441

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering Polytechnic School, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece
Interests: ecology; water quality; freshwater management; restoration; water governance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, Greece
Interests: lake ecology; river and lake ecohydrology; hydromorphology; monitoring; freshwater management; WFD
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Interests: freshwater ecology; monitoring, conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems; freshwater pollution; invasive species ecology; invertebrate ecology; ecological quality

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The symbiotic relationships among water, natural environment, and sustainable economic growth are now part of conventional water wisdom. Water is embedded in all aspects of natural resource management for inclusive and sustainable growth, i.e., energy, agriculture, transport, and other productive activities, which demand sustaining the ecosystems on which everything else depends. Water-related ecosystems provide multiple benefits and services to societies, making them essential for reaching several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the ability of these ecosystems to provide services is not unlimited but is dependent on the type of ecosystem and its full functioning. It is acknowledged that both can easily be hampered by human-induced pressures. These pressures may affect ecosystem structures and catchment features, thus modifying the conditions under which each ecosystem operates, and their capacity to provide services becomes affected, along with the values associated with the latter. The ecosystem services (ES) concept can offer a valuable approach for linking human activities and nature, and a solid reason for the conservation and restoration of natural ecosystems. The ES concept is widely recognized as an integrative approach that can capture different policy objectives in a single assessment, and therefore, its application for a sustainable management of ecosystems is increasingly appreciated and utilized by policy makers. Thus, the need to study the links among water quality, ecological and conservation status, water security, and the delivery of ecosystem services in a changing world has tremendously increased.

Despite the increasing interest in the topic, it is still a relatively new concept, especially among water policy makers and managers. Since the objective of the EU water Policy along with the main strategic directives, i.e., Water Framework Directive, Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Flood Directive, Bathing Directive, and Nitrate Directive, is the sustainability of aquatic ecosystems, the goal is to identify how the ES approach can support and supplement the EU Policy or even become embedded in it.

This Special Issue welcomes contributions that advance our knowledge on how to integrate the ES concept into various sectoral and governance levels, how these numerous ES are related to basic aquatic ecological functions, and how these are linked to biodiversity and water security and, further, to the water–energy–food nexus. The restoration of water-related ecosystems and the associated ES (regulating, cultural, provisioning) will be particularly appreciated. Relationships between sustainability indicators and ES are also of crucial importance to highlight the way ES can contribute to achieve SDGs. We are also looking forward to exploring the capacity of the ecohydrological, hydromorphological, and biological indices to assess the ES in all types of aquatic ecosystems.

Nevertheless, any knowledge acquired needs to be implemented in practice, and the ES concept is an “open issue”, so the stakeholders’ vision is one of our strategic topics. Transdisciplinary papers with the co-affiliation of academic and non-academic experts and water managers, consultants, policy- makers are particularly welcome.

Prof. Dr. Ifigenia Kagalou
Dr. Dionissis Latinopoulos
Dr. Chrysoula Ntislidou
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • water resources
  • catchment management
  • policy
  • quantification
  • evaluation
  • management schemes
  • ES values
  • hydroecosystems
  • water–energy–food nexus
  • land use/land cover

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 3279 KiB  
Article
Determination of Spatially-Distributed Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS) in the Red River Delta Using a Calibrated SWAT Model
by Lan Thanh Ha and Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 6247; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076247 - 05 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1860
Abstract
The principles of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), conservation of natural capital, and water accounting requires Hydrological Eco-System Services (HESS) to be determined. This paper presents a modeling approach for quantifying the HESS framework using the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). SWAT was [...] Read more.
The principles of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), conservation of natural capital, and water accounting requires Hydrological Eco-System Services (HESS) to be determined. This paper presents a modeling approach for quantifying the HESS framework using the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). SWAT was used–after calibration against remote sensing data–to quantify and spatially identify total runoff, natural livestock feed production, fuelwood from natural forests, dry season flow, groundwater recharge, root zone storage for carrying over water from wet to dry season, sustaining rainfall, peak flow attenuation, carbon sequestration, microclimate cooling, and meeting environmental flow requirements. The environmental value of the current land use and vegetation was made explicit by carrying out parallel simulations for bare soil and vegetation conditions and reporting the incremental ecosystem services. Geographical areas with more and fewer HESS are identified. The spatial and temporal variability of annual HESS services is demonstrated for the Day Basin—which is part of the Red River delta (Vietnam)—for the period 2003 to 2013. The result shows that even though the basin is abundant with HESS, e.g., 7482 m3/ha of runoff, 3820 m3/ha of groundwater recharge, the trend for many HESS values, e.g., micro-climate cooling, meeting environmental flow requirements, and rootzone storage, are declining. It is found and proven that quantified HESS indicators highlighted the provisioning and regulating characters of ecosystem services, as well as geographical hotspots across the basin. The SWAT model shows the capability of simulating terrestrial eco-hydrological processes such as climate, soil, and current land use. The methodology illustrates how eco-hydrologists can benchmark ecosystem values and include HESS in exploring river basin management scenarios, climate change studies, and land use planning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3831 KiB  
Article
A New Framework of 17 Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HESS17) for Supporting River Basin Planning and Environmental Monitoring
by Lan Thanh Ha, Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen, Gijs W. H. Simons and Ate Poortinga
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 6182; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076182 - 04 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2350
Abstract
Hydrological ecosystem services (HESS) describe the benefits of water for multiple purposes with an emphasis on environmental values. The value of HESS is often not realized because primary benefits (e.g., food production, water withdrawals) get the most attention. Secondary benefits such as water [...] Read more.
Hydrological ecosystem services (HESS) describe the benefits of water for multiple purposes with an emphasis on environmental values. The value of HESS is often not realized because primary benefits (e.g., food production, water withdrawals) get the most attention. Secondary benefits such as water storage, purification or midday temperature cooling are often overlooked. This results in an incorrect evaluation of beneficial water usage in urban and rural resettlements and misunderstandings when land use changes are introduced. The objective of this paper is to propose a standard list of 17 HESS indicators that are in line with the policy and philosophy of the Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and that are measurable with earth observation technologies in conjunction with GIS and hydrological models. The HESS17 framework considered indicators that can be directly related to water flows, water fluxes and water stocks; they have a natural characteristic with minimal anthropogenic influence and must be quantifiable by means of earth observation models in combination with GIS and hydrological models. The introduction of a HESS framework is less meaningful without proper quantification procedures in place. Because of the widely diverging management options, the role of water should be categorized as (i) consumptive use (i.e., evapotranspiration and dry matter production) and (ii) non-consumptive use (stream flow, recharge, water storage). Governments and responsible agencies for integrated water management should recognize the need to include HESS17 in water allocation policies, water foot-printing, water accounting, transboundary water management, food security purposes and spatial land-use planning processes. The proposed HESS17 framework and associated methods can be used to evaluate land, soil and water conservation programs. This paper presents a framework that is non-exhaustive but can be realistically computed and applicable across spatial scales. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop