sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 29222

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Quellenstrasse 51-55, 1100 Vienna, Austria
Interests: human-wildlife conflicts; protected area management; management effectiveness evaluation; human-nature interactions; amphibian monitoring
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Capital Regional District of Victoria Regional Parks, Victoria, V8S3M3 BC, Canada
Interests: human-wildlife interactions; coexistence; protected area governance; community engagement; conservation social science

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Human–wildlife interactions (HWI) are increasing in many parts of the world and are often viewed as an intractable problem when those interactions are manifested as human wildlife conflicts (HWC) either between humans and wildlife, or between humans and humans over wildlife and its management. In many cases, HWC contribute to biodiversity loss and are complex because they can involve charismatic species, multiple stakeholders, clashing values, varied institutional and governance arrangements, and are routinely embedded within other societal issues. Moreover, these interactions are frequently manifested within or adjacent to protected areas, which often have dual—and sometimes conflicting—mandates to both protect biodiversity and enhance wellbeing for their neighbors. Although we now have a good understanding of human-wildlife interactions in a range of contexts, there is still a paucity of empirical data and studies on how to address conflicts and enhance acceptance, tolerance, and coexistence. In this Special Issue we seek submissions reporting on such studies, particularly focused on the following:

  • what factor(s) determine 'success' or 'failure' of interventions to mitigate negative and/or enhance positive human-wildlife interactions?
  • what factor(s) are critical to maintain/enhance lasting coexistence between people, wildlife, and management structures?
  • what recommendations can be applied to other HWI in similar contexts that can enhance successful conflict resolution?
  • what innovative and ‘out of the box’ solutions can be pursued or ‘borrowed’ from other disciplines to shift from conflict to coexistence between humans and wildlife?

This Special Issue invites papers that outline cases of HWC and document determinant factors and recommendations as outlined above. We welcome papers from across a wide spectrum of geographical (terrestrial, aquatic, and/or marine) and taxonomic contexts, methodological approaches, and institutional settings, particularly those involving protected areas.

Prof. Brandon P. Anthony
Dr. Beatrice Frank
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biodiversity loss
  • coexistence
  • conflict resolution
  • conservation
  • human–wildlife conflict
  • protected areas
  • stakeholders

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

5 pages, 207 KiB  
Editorial
Towards More Resilient Conservation Practices: Bridging the Past and Present of Human–Wildlife Interactions
by Beatrice Frank and Brandon P. Anthony
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 12131; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112131 - 03 Nov 2021
Viewed by 1459
Abstract
Human–wildlife interactions (HWI), whether they be conflict to coexistence situations, are widely researched and described in the literature, as shown by the flourishing of HWI publications over the past 20 years [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

18 pages, 748 KiB  
Article
Oso, Osito ¿A Qué Venís? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation, and Campesinos in the Colombian Páramos
by Ana María Garrido Corredor, Hanne Cottyn, Santiago Martínez-Medina, Christopher J. Wheatley, Adriana Sanchez, Joshua Kirshner, Helen Cowie, Julia Touza-Montero and Piran C. L. White
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10489; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910489 - 22 Sep 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3442
Abstract
This article proposes a historical, multispecies, and ontological approach to human–wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian páramos. Focusing on the páramos surrounding the capital city of Bogotá, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus [...] Read more.
This article proposes a historical, multispecies, and ontological approach to human–wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian páramos. Focusing on the páramos surrounding the capital city of Bogotá, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus. Using ethnographic and historical research methods, we conceptualise this relationship as embedded in localised landscapes and multispecies assemblages, in which scientists, conservation practitioners, water infrastructures, public environmental agencies, and cows participate as well. This article demonstrates that insufficient attention to the practices and relationships of historically marginalised humans and non-humans in the management of HWCs contributes to new dynamics of exclusion and friction, and can reduce the effectiveness of conservation programmes. We conclude that opening up conservation to the interests and knowledges of local communities is imperative in moving towards more historically informed, pluralistic and effective conservation strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 289 KiB  
Article
Community-Based Conservation for the Sustainable Management of Conservation Conflicts: Learning from Practitioners
by Juliette Claire Young, Justine Shanti Alexander, Ajay Bijoor, Deepshikha Sharma, Abhijit Dutta, Bayarjargal Agvaantseren, Tserennadmid Nadia Mijiddorj, Kubanych Jumabay, Venera Amankul, Benazir Kabaeva, Ali Nawaz, Shafiqullah Khan, Hussain Ali, Jennifer Snell Rullman, Koustubh Sharma, Ranjini Murali and Charudutt Mishra
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7557; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147557 - 06 Jul 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4963
Abstract
We explore the role of community-based conservation (CBC) in the sustainable management of conservation conflicts by examining the experiences of conservation practitioners trying to address conflicts between snow leopard conservation and pastoralism in Asian mountains. Practitioner experiences are examined through the lens of [...] Read more.
We explore the role of community-based conservation (CBC) in the sustainable management of conservation conflicts by examining the experiences of conservation practitioners trying to address conflicts between snow leopard conservation and pastoralism in Asian mountains. Practitioner experiences are examined through the lens of the PARTNERS principles for CBC (Presence, Aptness, Respect, Transparency, Negotiation, Empathy, Responsiveness, and Strategic Support) that represent an inclusive conservation framework for effective and ethical engagement with local communities. Case studies from India, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, and Pakistan show that resilient relationships arising from respectful engagement and negotiation with local communities can provide a strong platform for robust conflict management. We highlight the heuristic value of documenting practitioner experiences in on-the-ground conflict management and community-based conservation efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts)
20 pages, 1615 KiB  
Article
Paying for the Past: The Importance of Fulfilling Promises as a Key Component to Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflict
by Brandon P. Anthony
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7407; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137407 - 01 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2427
Abstract
Damage-causing animals (DCAs) originating from protected areas which inflict damage on persons and property are particularly contentious when promises to satisfactorily address such conflicts, either by protected areas or other management institutions, are left unfulfilled. Human–wildlife conflicts (HWCs) of this nature can erode [...] Read more.
Damage-causing animals (DCAs) originating from protected areas which inflict damage on persons and property are particularly contentious when promises to satisfactorily address such conflicts, either by protected areas or other management institutions, are left unfulfilled. Human–wildlife conflicts (HWCs) of this nature can erode trust and if not adequately resolved, assure the maintenance of tense relationships between parks and neighboring communities. This paper, based on archival research, interviews and community focus groups, examines management responses to the long history of DCAs exiting the Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa. First, I document historical promises of compensation and the subsequent responses by conservation agencies to local communities to address these past injustices. Recent strategies to the DCA problem at KNP have been multi-faceted and include a wildlife damage compensation scheme initiated in 2014 which entails financial retribution given to affected farmers who have lost, and continue to lose, livestock to DCAs originating from the park from 2008 to date. I then present livestock farmers’ recent perceptions of DCAs, the compensation scheme itself, and proposed avenues for going forward. Despite continuing challenges in the process, I demonstrate that fulfilling promises is a key step to building relational trust and legitimacy and must be considered in similar contexts where protected areas and other conservation agencies are key actors in managing HWC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

14 pages, 1087 KiB  
Review
Human–Elephant Conflict in Sri Lanka: A Critical Review of Causal Explanations
by Sören Köpke, Sisira S. Withanachchi, Ruwan Pathiranage, Chandana R. Withanachchi, Deepika U. Gamage, Thushantha S. Nissanka, Chinthana C. Warapitiya, Banu M. Nissanka, Nirangani N. Ranasinghe, Chathurika D. Senarathna, Christian Schleyer and Andreas Thiel
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8625; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158625 - 02 Aug 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 15261
Abstract
Human–elephant conflict (HEC) is a severe and much-debated issue in Sri Lanka. An average of two hundred animals are intentionally killed, and seventy to eighty human casualties are counted each year. The Sri Lankan elephant (Elephas maximus maximus) is an endangered [...] Read more.
Human–elephant conflict (HEC) is a severe and much-debated issue in Sri Lanka. An average of two hundred animals are intentionally killed, and seventy to eighty human casualties are counted each year. The Sri Lankan elephant (Elephas maximus maximus) is an endangered subspecies. The reported elephant mortality rates are high. On the other hand, human–elephant conflict also leads to hardship and trauma among rural populations. This research paper reviews causal explanations for HEC in Sri Lanka, tracing underlying narratives and connecting broader conservation theory and practical approaches. The paper discusses potential causes and contexts of HEC in Sri Lanka, including historical factors (i.e., colonial hunting and land-use changes), poaching, habitat loss due to population growth, crop-raiding behaviour, problem animals, and changes in agricultural production systems. The review concludes that socio-economic and cultural factors in HEC in Sri Lanka are poorly explained, and more research should focus on the underlying conditions of rural populations’ vulnerability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finding Long Term Resolutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop