Energy Communities in the Changing Energy Landscape

Dear Colleagues,

Energy communities are facing changing regulatory and technological landscapes, which represent both opportunities for and barriers to their development. On the one hand, the new European clean energy regulation envisages important roles for energy communities in energy systems and provides enabling conditions for their deployment (EU, 2019). Furthermore, new types of interactions among active consumers, prosumers and prosumagers are emerging, often facilitated by decentralized storage, smart grid technologies, distributed energy resources, and other small-scale technologies, as well as local exchanges enabled by innovative blockchain-based peer-to-peer trading platforms and local energy markets (Giotitsas et al., 2015; Hahnel et al., 2019; Koirala et al., 2019, 2018b; Parra et al., 2017, 2016). All these evolutions create new opportunities for energy communities to play an active role in transitioning towards more sustainable energy systems (Devine-Wright, 2019; van der Schoor and Scholtens, 2019; Rommel et al., 2018; Karunathilake et al., 2018; Koirala et al., 2016; Bauwens, 2016; Schoor et al., 2016; Dóci et al., 2015). In turn, the integration of electricity, heating, and transport sectors together with community engagement is expected to contribute to more flexible, cost-effective and efficient local energy systems (Koirala et al., 2016; Thellufsen and Lund, 2016). In this regard, energy communities are a modern development to re-organize the energy system to simultaneously integrate distributed energy resources and engage local communities (Bauwens and Devine-Wright, 2018).

On the other hand, policies that have boosted the development of local renewable projects are being withdrawn across several European countries, including pioneers like Denmark and Germany, where shifts from feed-in tariffs to more market-based instruments have progressively taken place (Bauwens et al., 2016; Leiren and Reimer, 2018; Lundberg, 2019). This has led energy communities to become increasingly professional and commercial and to search for new business models, notably through a diversification of their revenue streams, by proposing other offerings in addition to renewable energy generation, such as electric mobility services, energy efficiency models, and demand-side management (Funkhouser et al., 2015; Gui and MacGill, 2018; Herbes et al., 2017; Mirzania et al., 2019). Another notable evolution is the emergence of networks, intermediaries, coalitions, and collaborative dynamics among initiatives, which help existing and aspiring communities with various aspects of project development and advocacy work  (Bauwens et al., 2019; Hargreaves et al., 2013; Huybrechts and Haugh, 2018).

These changes in policies and business models will likely have consequences ion the forms of and motivations behind participation in energy communities. Until recently, energy communities were driven by environmentally or socially motivated collectives of citizens willing to collaborate, share benefits, and challenge incumbent energy systems (Bauwens, 2016; Koirala et al., 2018a; Rogers et al., 2008; Wirth, 2014). It remains to be seen how these policy changes and evolutions in business models will affect the dynamics of community engagement. Similarly whether these new networks and intermediary organizations will be able to ensure the inclusion of a broader diversity of communities is an open question.

This Special Issue will focus on the process aspects of the ongoing energy transition by contributing to knowledge acquisition on how these changing policy and technological landscapes affect energy communities in terms of conditions for emergence and development, motivations and social dynamics of collective action and participation, business models, energy system integration options, local energy market design, policy and regulatory issues, socio-technical configurations, and community engagement. In this context, this Special Issue invites interdisciplinary contributions on technological, socio-economic, and institutional aspects of energy communities as well as their roles in the ongoing energy transition.

We invite manuscripts on topics including but not limited to the following:

• Local, virtual, and hybrid energy communities;
• Positive energy districts and neighborhoods;
• Energy communities as commons;
• Opportunities and challenges for energy communities;
• Enabling technologies and digitalization;
• Techno-economic and socio-institutional assessments of energy communities;
• (Self-)Governance, ownership, business models, cost–benefit allocations;
• Polycentricity, meta-governance, and policy-mix approach for energy communities;
• Design of local energy markets;
• Demand response and flexibility in energy communities;
• Intrinsic motivations and drivers for energy communities;
• Energy system integration and the role of multi-energy carriers (electricity, hydrogen, heat);
• Socio-technical innovations and alignments;
• Citizens and community engagement;
• Regulation and legal frameworks for energy communities;
• Changing roles and responsibilities;
• Multi-actor perspectives on energy communities;
• Energy communities and local/regional energy transition;
• Energy Citizenship;
• Digital twins of energy communities.

References:

1. Bauwens, T. Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy. Energy Policy 2016, 93, 278–290.
2. Bauwens, T.; Devine-Wright, P. Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy. Energy Policy 2018, 118, 612–625.
3. Bauwens, T.; Gotchev, B.; Holstenkamp, L. What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 13, 136–147.
4. Bauwens, T.; Huybrechts, B.; Dufays, F. Understanding the Diverse Scaling Strategies of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Renewable Energy Cooperatives. Organ. Environ. 2019, 1086026619837126.
5. Devine-Wright, P. Community versus local energy in a context of climate emergency. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 894–896.
6. Dóci, G.; Vasileiadou, E.; Petersen, A.C. Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities. Futur. 2015, 66, 85–95.
7. EU. Clean energy for all Europeans - Energy - European Commission Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy/clean-energy-all-europeans (accessed on 24 July 2019).
8. Funkhouser, E.; Blackburn, G.; Magee, C.; Rai, V. Business model innovations for deploying distributed generation: The emerging landscape of community solar in the U.S. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2015, 10, 90–101.
9. Giotitsas, C.; Pazaitis, A.; Kostakis, V. A peer-to-peer approach to energy production. Technol. Soc. 2015, 42, 28–38.
10. Gui, E.M.; MacGill, I. Typology of future clean energy communities: An exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 35, 94–107.
11. Hahnel, U.J.; Herberz, M.; Pena-Bello, A.; Parra, D.; Brosch, T. Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities. Energy Policy 2020, 137, 111098.
12. Hargreaves, T.; Hielscher, S.; Seyfang, G.; Smith, A. Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 868–880.
13. Herbes, C.; Brummer, V.; Rognli, J.; Blazejewski, S.; Gericke, N. Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – Barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy 2017, 109, 82–95.
14. Huybrechts, B.; Haugh, H. The Roles of Networks in Institutionalizing New Hybrid Organizational Forms: Insights from the European Renewable Energy Cooperative Network. Organ. Stud. 2017, 39, 1085–1108.
15. Karunathilake, H.; Perera, P.; Ruparathna, R.; Hewage, K.; Sadiq, R. Renewable energy integration into community energy systems: A case study of new urban residential development. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 173, 292–307.
16. Koirala, B.P.; Araghi, Y.; Kroesen, M.; Ghorbani, A.; Hakvoort, R.A.; Herder, P. Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 38, 33–40.
17. Koirala, B.P.; Hakvoort, R.A.; Van Oost, E.C.; Van Der Windt, H.J. Community Energy Storage: Governance and Business Models; Elsevier BV, 2019; pp. 209–234;.
18. Koirala, B.P.; Koliou, E.; Friege, J.; Hakvoort, R.; Herder, P. Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 722–744.
19. Koirala, B.P.; Van Oost, E.; Van Der Windt, H. Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system? Appl. Energy 2018, 231, 570–585.
20. Leiren, M.D.; Reimer, I. Historical institutionalist perspective on the shift from feed-in tariffs towards auctioning in German renewable energy policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 43, 33–40.
21. Lundberg, L. Auctions for all? Reviewing the German wind power auctions in 2017. Energy Policy 2019, 128, 449–458.
22. Mirzania, P.; Ford, A.; Andrews, D.; Ofori, G.; Maidment, G. The impact of policy changes: The opportunities of Community Renewable Energy projects in the UK and the barriers they face. Energy Policy 2019, 129, 1282–1296.
23. Parra, D.; Norman, S.A.; Walker, G.S.; Gillott, M. Optimum community energy storage system for demand load shifting. Appl. Energy 2016, 174, 130–143.
24. Parra, D.; Swierczynski, M.J.; Stroe, D.L.; Norman, S.; Abdon, A.; Worlitschek, J.; O’Doherty, T.; Rodrigues, L.; Gillott, M.; Zhang, X.; et al. An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 730–749.
25. Rogers, J.; Simmons, E.; Convery, I.; Weatherall, A. Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4217–4226.
26. Rommel, J.; Radtke, J.; Von Jorck, G.; Mey, F.; Yildiz, Özgür Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1746–1753.
27. Van Der Schoor, T.; Van Lente, H.; Scholtens, B.; Peine, A. Challenging obduracy: How local communities transform the energy system. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 13, 94–105.
28. Thellufsen, J.Z.; Lund, H. Roles of local and national energy systems in the integration of renewable energy. Appl. Energy 2016, 183, 419–429.
29. van der Schoor, T., Scholtens, B. Scientific approaches of community energy: a literature review. Centre for Energy Economics Research (CEER). University of St Andrews Research: St Andrews, UK, 2019
30. Wirth, S., 2014. Communites matter: Institutional preconditions for community renewable energy. Energy Policy 2014, 70, 236–346.

Dr. Binod Koirala
Dr. David Parra
Dr. Thomas Bauwens
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

• community energy
• community engagement
• renewable energy
• energy transition
• peer–peer energy exchange
• business models
• institutional design
• energy citizenship
• (self-)governance
• socio-technical innovation