sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability of Post-disaster Recovery

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Hazards and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 May 2024 | Viewed by 3742

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
Interests: disaster-induced relocations and resettlements; use of ICT for improved disaster resilience; disaster-resilient urban infrastructure

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
Interests: disaster response and rescue; risk assessments; policy modelling; multi-agency collaboration; mass-scale community engagement; early warning systems

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
Interests: risk-sensitive urban planning; inclusive development; community engagement; empowerment and transformation; equitable resilience

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Disasters, whether natural or man-made, can have a devastating impact on human lives and the environment. The frequency and severity of disasters have been increasing in recent years, highlighting the need to strengthen the resilience of communities and enhance the sustainability of post-disaster recovery efforts. The field of disaster management has undergone a significant transformation over the past few decades, with a growing focus on disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Despite these efforts, post-disaster recovery remains a complex and challenging process that requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach.

Some current knowledge gaps in post-disaster recovery that need further research include the following:

  • Long-term sustainability: Most post-disaster recovery efforts focus on the immediate response and short-term recovery of affected communities. There is a need for more research to understand the long-term sustainability of these efforts and the factors that influence their success.
  • Integration of sustainable development principles: Despite increasing recognition of the importance of sustainable development in post-disaster recovery, there is still a gap in understanding how to effectively integrate sustainable development principles into recovery efforts.
  • Community participation and engagement: While there is a growing emphasis on the importance of community participation and engagement in post-disaster recovery efforts, there is still a need for more research on how to equitably involve communities in the recovery process.
  • Social and cultural dimensions: Post-disaster recovery efforts are often focused on physical infrastructure and economic recovery, but there is a need for more research on the social and cultural dimensions of recovery. This includes understanding the impact of disasters on social structures and cultural practices, and how to integrate these dimensions into recovery efforts effectively.
  • Climate change and disaster risk reduction: With the increasing frequency and severity of disasters, there is a need to understand the linkages between climate change and disaster risk reduction, and how to integrate these considerations into post-disaster recovery efforts.

This Special Issue aims to advance the knowledge and understanding of the sustainability of post-disaster recovery efforts. The scope of this Special Issue is two-fold: one is to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with post-disaster recovery, with a particular focus on sustainability, community resilience, and environmental management; and the other one is to provide insights into innovative solutions that can enhance the sustainability of post-disaster recovery efforts.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • post-disaster reconstruction;
  • innovative approaches to post-disaster recovery;
  • inclusive and risk-sensitive development;
  • disaster risk reduction strategies;
  • community resilience;
  • environmental management;
  • policy and governance;
  • social and economic impacts of disasters.

We welcome contributions from local, regional, or global perspectives that address these themes and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in this important field.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Kaushal Keraminiyage
Prof. Dr. Terrence Fernando
Dr. Devindi Geekiyanage
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • post-disaster recovery
  • post-disaster reconstruction
  • post-disaster resettlements
  • rehabilitation
  • disaster resilience
  • climate change adaptation
  • community resilience
  • risk-responsive development
  • inclusive development
  • build back better

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 1830 KiB  
Article
Community Resilience after Disasters: Exploring Teacher, Caregiver and Student Conceptualisations in Indonesia
by Elinor Parrott, Andrea Bernardino, Martha Lomeli-Rodriguez, Rochelle Burgess, Alfi Rahman, Yulia Direzkia and Helene Joffe
Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010073 - 20 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1173
Abstract
Despite the potentially catastrophic nature of disasters, survivors can be highly resilient. Resilience, the capacity to successfully adapt to adversity, is both individual and collective. Policymakers and academics have recently emphasised the importance of community resilience, but with little consideration of local survivors’ [...] Read more.
Despite the potentially catastrophic nature of disasters, survivors can be highly resilient. Resilience, the capacity to successfully adapt to adversity, is both individual and collective. Policymakers and academics have recently emphasised the importance of community resilience, but with little consideration of local survivors’ perspectives, particularly young survivors within low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, this exploratory study aims to give voice to disaster-affected caregivers, teachers and female adolescent students by examining their conceptualisations of community coping and priorities for resilient recovery following the 2018 Central Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami. A total of 127 survivors of the devastating disaster, including 47 adolescents, answered open-ended survey questions related to post-disaster resilience. A content analysis identified key constituents of community resilience. The results indicate that survivors highly value community cohesion and participation, drawing on the community’s intra-personal strengths to overcome post-disaster stressors. Student conceptualisations of and recommendations for a resilient recovery often differ from the views of important adults in their lives, for example, regarding the role played by the built environment, “trauma healing” and religiosity in the recovery process. These findings have implications for the design of disaster resilience interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Post-disaster Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1964 KiB  
Article
Measuring Disaster Recovery: Lessons Learned from Early Recovery in Post-Tsunami Area of Aceh, Indonesia
by Ni Wayan Suriastini, Ika Yulia Wijayanti, Bondan Sikoki and Cecep Sukria Sumantri
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16870; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416870 - 15 Dec 2023
Viewed by 825
Abstract
The assessment of post-disaster recovery is often hindered by limited metric and longitudinal data, in addition to the dynamic and long-term processes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the early stages after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia, using the Disaster [...] Read more.
The assessment of post-disaster recovery is often hindered by limited metric and longitudinal data, in addition to the dynamic and long-term processes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the early stages after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia, using the Disaster Recovery Index (DRI). The two initial waves of Study of Tsunami and Aftermath Recovery (STAR) data were used to track the recovery process from 5 to 19 months after the tsunami. The results showed various recovery patterns in three affected areas and five sectors. Furthermore, recovery rates in the medium and heavily damaged areas increased by 2.05 and 7.45 percentage points, respectively, with a 0.33 percentage point decrease in the lightly damaged areas. The social and livelihood sectors showed rapid progress, supported by the establishment of temporary health and education facilities, including Cash-for-Work programs. Meanwhile, other sectors experienced slower recovery due to their complexity. The application of the DRI successfully showed the relative positions across affected areas and sectors over time in a simple way. This confirmed the variety of recoveries in subgroups in the community and suggested the importance of regularly measuring progress using standard metrics to observe long-term conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Post-disaster Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2721 KiB  
Article
Modelling Interrelationships of the Factors Impeding Community Engagement in Risk-Sensitive Urban Planning: Evidence from Sri Lanka
by Devindi Geekiyanage, Terrence Fernando and Kaushal Keraminiyage
Sustainability 2023, 15(20), 14662; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014662 - 10 Oct 2023
Viewed by 970
Abstract
During the last two decades, global disasters have impacted over 5.2 billion people, with economic losses exceeding USD 2.97 trillion. This underscores the critical need for inclusive risk-sensitive urban planning (RSUP) that integrates community insights. Community-based disaster risk reduction (CBDRR) has demonstrated a [...] Read more.
During the last two decades, global disasters have impacted over 5.2 billion people, with economic losses exceeding USD 2.97 trillion. This underscores the critical need for inclusive risk-sensitive urban planning (RSUP) that integrates community insights. Community-based disaster risk reduction (CBDRR) has demonstrated a potential reduction of up to 40% in mortality rates during disasters and cost savings in disaster response and recovery. However, research has shown that only 20% felt they are involved in decisions related to neighborhood planning, despite communities’ lived experience in surviving local hazards. This highlights a gap where practitioners dominate the development of mitigation and development plans, sidelining local perspectives. Using Sri Lanka as a case study, this study investigated the barriers to effective community participation in the decision-making of RSUP and thereby developed an interpretive logic model to establish an understanding of why they occur and how each barrier is interlinked. The data gathered from a sample of 44 experts and community representatives revealed 19 factors that impede community inclusion in the decision-making of RSUP in Sri Lanka. The Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM) analysis adopted identified that the absence of legal provisions for inclusive development, political dynamics, and corruption are the most significant barriers. The Matrix Impact of Cross Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) further revealed that fewer financial provisions and the absence of an institutional framework for community engagement are the linking barriers to the other 17 barriers. This study not only extends the theoretical debate on barriers to community engagement for risk-responsive and equitable development but also helps urban planners, disaster management practitioners, and strategy policymakers focus on critical areas that need major reforms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Post-disaster Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop