sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Construction: Opportunities and Challenges for Green Building and Energy Efficient Building

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Green Building".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 5642

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Patrimony Architecture Urbanism (PAU), Medi-terranea University, Viale dell’Università 25, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
Interests: sustainability strategy; appraisal, valuation, economics of Sustainability and of projects/plans; green building real estate market price premium assessment; benefit cost analysis; multi criteria decision system; gis; data base management system
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Patrimony Architecture Urbanism (PAU), Mediterranea University, Viale dell’Università 25, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
Interests: appraisal, valuation, economics of Sustainability and of projects plans; green building real estate market price premium assessment; benefit cost analysis; multi criteria decision system;
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Patrimony Architecture Urbanism (PAU), Mediterranea University, Viale dell’Università 25, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
Interests: appraisal, valuation, economics of Sustainability and of projects plans; green building real estate market price premium assessment; benefit cost analysis; multi criteria decision system; gis; data base management system
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
Interests: econometric models; mass appraisal; real estate market; risk management; urban and real estate economics; real estate investments; building management; economic valuation of real estate investment projects; environmental economics; transport economics; sustainability; knowledge management; corporate valuation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Humankind (and the entire planet) are in increasingly greater danger due to climate change, its consequent global warming and its fatal destructive side effects. It must be strongly emphasised that among the important causes of climate change is the huge, worldwide, annual overconsumption of energy largely derived from the burning of fossil fuels (including coal, gas and oil), wood and biomass.

It is crucial to acknowledge that the integrated construction/building/civil sectors, through the construction process and the consequent thermal management of residential units and non residential buildings, consume the vast majority of the total amount of fossil energy annually used worldwide.

Thus, the integrated construction sector is the main user of fossil fuels and is the most inefficient and, consequently, the greatest polluter and the biggest cause of climate change and of its fatal consequences on the planet.

Reducing the absolute energy consumption in this sector is one of the most effective strategies in reducing the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. This reduction can be achieved by the implementation of a nature-based ecological transition that incorporates the bio ecological enhancement of building energy efficiency, which has already proved to be an excellent investment in the short to medium term, as shown by the initial available experiences and reports.

To ensure the planet’s survival, it is imperative that the use of fossil fuel energy in buildings must be dramatically reduced. The strategy used to achieve this shall be two-fold: the construction of exclusively –nature-based new green buildings and the ecological retrofitting of the existing world building stock/portfolio.

This strategy uses the world’s cheapest and most effective energy: the one we do not consume, i.e., building bio efficiency and its consequent structural and permanent energy-saving qualities. This cheapest energy is one key driver that can help find a definitive solution for worldwide climate change.

This proposed Special Issue aims to contribute to the understanding of the theories and the models involved, the tools and software used and the supporting case studies carried out regarding this topic, thereby promoting the completely nature-based transition of the entire construction sector to a more sustainable form of construction. This really is the decisive step needed to find a definitive solution to the effects of climate change, and it is a step that can be adopted for use in the smallest to the largest building on a local or global level.

This Special Issue aims to stimulate discussion and debate in some of (but not only) the following areas.

Areas

  • Planet ecological transition.
  • European Union ecological transition in the European framework: the Green Deal; the next-generation EU; the recovery and resilience facility; etc.
  • Air pollution from the world construction sector: premature casualties.
  • EPSPs, Energy Performance Simulation Program Software.
  • ECM, Energy Conservation Measure.
  • A nature-based ecological transition of the entire construction sector, with the main approaches of analysis, strategy, and valuation.
  • Possible comparative scenarios in the life cycle framework: new green buildings versus new brown buildings.
  • Real-life comparative scenarios in the life cycle framework: nature-based ecological retrofitting versus maintenance business as usual (BAS) of existing buildings.
  • The simultaneous positive benefits stemming from nature-based ecological retrofitting and from new green buildings: from buildings to cities and the planet.
  • The taxonomy of the contemporary positive benefits (co-benefits) stemming from nature-based ecological retrofitting and new green buildings.
  • The approaches, methods, tools, and software used to appraise and valuate the ecological transition of the entire construction sector.
  • Comparative tests of the overall profitability of the brand-new green building.
  • Comparative tests of the overall profitability of the ecological retrofitting of already existing buildings.
  • Post-carbon city strategies.
  • Green building, energy district/quarter, post-carbon cities, ecological region and green country.
  • New proposed research fields.

Prof. Dr. Domenico Enrico Massimo
Dr. Mariangela Musolino
Dr. Alessandro Malerba
Prof. Dr. Pierfrancesco De Paola
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pollution
  • climate change
  • global warming
  • sustainability
  • ecological transition
  • urban metabolism and post-carbon city strategy
  • pollution from construction sector
  • nature-based ecological transition of construction world whole sector
  • nature-based transition implementation
  • sustainable construction
  • green building
  • brand new green buildings versus new brown buildings
  • Green Building Rating Tool, GBRT. GBRT post-occupancy valuation
  • ecological retrofitting of existing portfolio versus BAS Maintenance of stocks
  • energy bio eco (nature-based) efficiency
  • energy conservation
  • energy conservation measure, nature-based
  • co-benefits from energy conservation measure
  • co-benefit valuation
  • MCA, Multi Criteria Analysis
  • MCDV, Multi Criteria Decision Valuation
  • Energy Performance Simulation Program Software, EPSPs
  • thermal comfort
  • Life Cycle Assessment LCA
  • LCA of green building versus brown building
  • benefit cost valuation. CFA, cash flow analysis of investments
  • Data Base Management System DBMS, Gis, BIM, 3D studio, in green building strategy and implementation
  • cost analysis
  • cost archives
  • cost estimation
  • cost forecast
  • detailed cost estimate of nature-based green building new construction and ret-rofitting
  • cost, income, market-value of buildings
  • market price less construction total cost of a building: value added and profitabil-ity creation
  • market-price premium for green building extra expenses
  • spatial and factor analysis of materials, works and chantier—yard sites in green construction
  • material and factor analysis of green works versus brown works

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 4624 KiB  
Article
Historic Building Renovation with Solar System towards Zero-Energy Consumption: Feasibility Analysis and Case Optimization Practice in China
by Wenyang Han, Meng Han, Menglong Zhang, Ying Zhao, Kai Xie and Yin Zhang
Sustainability 2024, 16(3), 1298; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031298 - 03 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 816
Abstract
This paper aims to study the required solar panel tilt angle, area, and investment payback period for achieving zero-energy heating in historically significant courtyard-style residential buildings. The retrofitting approach involves positioning solar panels on the main building of the structure using four supports, [...] Read more.
This paper aims to study the required solar panel tilt angle, area, and investment payback period for achieving zero-energy heating in historically significant courtyard-style residential buildings. The retrofitting approach involves positioning solar panels on the main building of the structure using four supports, each located at the corners, elevated from the ground and not in direct contact with the building. This approach does not alter the external envelope structure of the building, thereby preserving the authenticity of the cultural heritage. Using BESI software, we simulated the heating energy demand of the sample building. We integrated a solar heating system within the building and analyzed the optimal solar panel layout area, installation angle, and payback period for achieving zero-energy heating. This allowed the building to meet the zero-energy heating requirements. Taking the Hu Family Courtyard heritage conservation building as an example, we proposed the optimal layout plan for solar energy retrofitting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1470 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Cement Production Methods Using a Life Cycle Assessment and a Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach
by Busola Dorcas Akintayo, Olubayo Moses Babatunde and Oludolapo Akanni Olanrewaju
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020484 - 05 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1155
Abstract
Manufacturing cement has a major impact on climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Selecting sustainable cement alternatives is vital but entails difficult trade-offs between numerous variables. The objective of this study is to determine the most environmentally beneficial method of cement manufacturing by [...] Read more.
Manufacturing cement has a major impact on climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. Selecting sustainable cement alternatives is vital but entails difficult trade-offs between numerous variables. The objective of this study is to determine the most environmentally beneficial method of cement manufacturing by employing an integrated life cycle assessment multi-criteria decision-making technique. The LCA is employed to quantitatively evaluate the environmental effects of ten different methods of cement production across eighteen distinct categories. Meanwhile, the CRITIC weighted TOPSIS and EDAS MCDM approaches are utilized to rank the various alternatives by determining their proximity to the optimal solution. The LCA results showed that CEM III/A slag cement had lower environmental impacts than Portland cement. With a ranking score of 0.9094 and 1.7228 for EDAS and TOPSIS techniques, respectively, both MCDM identified CM10: ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as the most recommended. In addition, midpoint characterization revealed that clinker production was responsible for 55% of the global warming impact. Based on these findings, slag cements are more environmentally friendly than Portland cement. Furthermore, an integrated LCA-MCDM approach offers a thorough sustainability evaluation that incorporates many aspects. Overall, this research shows that blast furnace slag cements, notably CM10, are ideal alternatives for reducing the environmental consequences of cement production in a variety of areas. This integrated methodology provides a systematic framework for making informed decisions in the production of sustainable cement. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2549 KiB  
Article
Study on the Critical Factors Influencing High-Quality Development of Green Buildings for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals of China
by Wenxi Zhu, Jing Zhang, Da Wang, Chongsen Ma, Jinfan Zhang and Pei Chen
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5035; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065035 - 12 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1596
Abstract
Green buildings are an important initiative to address energy and environmental issues in the construction field. The high-quality development of green buildings is affected by many factors, and it is necessary to identify the critical factors affecting the high-quality development of green buildings [...] Read more.
Green buildings are an important initiative to address energy and environmental issues in the construction field. The high-quality development of green buildings is affected by many factors, and it is necessary to identify the critical factors affecting the high-quality development of green buildings and analyze them systematically. The adopted literature analysis method and expert consultation method, the DIM (DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC) model was established to explore critical factors influencing green buildings’ high-quality development and their internal hierarchical structure, interrelationships, and mechanisms. Then, targeted suggestions were put forward to promote green buildings’ high-quality development. The results showed that: (1) The critical factors influencing green buildings’ high-quality development could be divided into five levels, three groups, and four areas. The economic development level, living standard of residents, education level, incentive policies, and compulsory laws and regulations were in the deep factor group, fundamentally affecting green buildings’ high-quality development. (2) In terms of drive and centrality, the economic development level, living standard of residents, education level, and incentive policies were at the forefront, playing a vital role in the high-quality development of green buildings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

26 pages, 4743 KiB  
Review
Sustainability Transitions in the Construction Sector: A Bibliometric Review
by Luis Felipe Cândido, Jose Carlos Lazaro, Adriano Olivier de Freitas e Silva and José de Paula Barros Neto
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12814; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712814 - 24 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1212
Abstract
Sustainability transition constitutes an important topic in innovation studies that have been providing insights into contemporary sustainability issues. These insights can help us to rethink how the construction industry can become more sustainable. Thus, this study review comprehensively analyzes the scientific production of [...] Read more.
Sustainability transition constitutes an important topic in innovation studies that have been providing insights into contemporary sustainability issues. These insights can help us to rethink how the construction industry can become more sustainable. Thus, this study review comprehensively analyzes the scientific production of ST in the CI through bibliometric analysis, using a sample of 121 documents from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The review identified the evolution of scientific production and the top journals, institutions, nations, and authors contributing to this field and highlights a significant increase in publications since 2017. The VOSviewer was used to perform the science mapping and revealed the ongoing fragmentation within the publication network in the field. The bibliographic coupling and author keyword co-occurrence networks shed light on the research trends and directions. In sum, the scientific production on the transition to sustainability in the construction sector is diverse but relatively recent, indicating that the field is still in its early stages and requires more research for a comprehensive understanding of the subject. Overall, this study contributes by providing insightful information about the current state of TS in the CI, enabling dialogue between academic communities and stimulating interest in TS among those who have not yet addressed these issues. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop