sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The ABCs of Sustainable Organizations: Attitudes, Behaviors and Communication

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 1465

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, University of Roma Tre, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: sustainable work systems; human-centred design; sustainable behaviors; innovation acceptance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, University of Roma Tre, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: psychological responses to climate change; climate change education across lifespan; pro environmental and sustainable behaviors; sustainable Development Goals; environmental communication; psychosocial wellbeing; nature play
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Institute of Sciences and Technologies for Sustainable Energy and Mobility (STEMS), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 7-00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: eco-design; user-centered design; design thinking; sustainable communication; visual communication; green innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Life and Health Science, Link Campus University, 00165 Roma, RM, Italy
Interests: social psychology and law; qualitative research methods; mixed methods; community psychology; technology and communication
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the middle of the twentieth century there has been a dramatic increase in the consumption of resources, such as water, mineral fertilizers, fossil fuels, and paper, as well as increased levels of deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions, particularly CO2. All of these facts indirectly and directly influence the operation and role of organisations. In the last ten years, many companies have decided to take up the so-called eco-friendly strategy, including recycling programs, water/waste reduction programs, environmentally friendly purchasing, and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. However, to be recognised as green, organizations need to build a strong reputation, and communication with the public plays a key role here, as it is well known that satisfied stakeholders can significantly influence the availability of financial, human, and other resources of an organization. With regard to this, corporate communication can take the form of misleading practices (so-called ‘greenwashing’) or it can represent the sense-making process of the organisation among the stakeholders on an emotional, moral, and intellectual level. Both positive and negative information on corporate social and environmental responsibility influences the purchase, employment, and investment intentions of various stakeholders. Corporate green communication has a growing operational importance and raises challenging issues and multidisciplinary research opportunities to provide organizations with tools to correctly and effectively communicate their sustainability efforts. Based on these considerations, this Special Issue aims at gathering a better understanding of the determinants of corporate green communications and the role of psychosocial factors in shaping stakeholders’ perceptions and reactions. This Special Issue invites papers addressing these topics, especially those dealing with reasons leading organisations to communicate their green commitment, how different communications are perceived by stakeholders and the role of psychosocial factors in green communication, considering not only the individual but also the group, organizational, and system levels. Papers on mixed-method approaches in particular would be very welcome.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • corporate social responsibility (CSR);
  • psychosocial determinants;
  • green communication;
  • greenwashing;
  • green and ecological marketing;
  • sustainability communication;
  • communicating sustainable business models;
  • corporate environmentalism and green image;
  • stakeholders’ reaction to greenwashing;
  • stakeholders’ outcomes of CSR;
  • stakeholders’ perception;
  • life cycle marketing strategies;
  • environmental concern;
  • green orientation;
  • social capital.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Federica Caffaro
Dr. Lorenza Tiberio
Dr. Lucia Vigoroso
Dr. Eugenio De Gregorio
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • corporate social responsibility
  • corporate environmental communication
  • greenwashing
  • environmental management
  • social media
  • green purchasing behavior
  • mixed-methods research

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 487 KiB  
Article
Consumers’ Reaction to Greenwashing in the Saudi Arabian Skincare Market: A Moderated Mediation Approach
by Mohd Adil, Eden Samuel Parthiban, Haitham A. Mahmoud, Jei-Zheng Wu, Mohd Sadiq and Fatima Suhail
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041652 - 17 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1045
Abstract
Amidst the abundance of skincare options, the process of identifying the most fitting products is a daunting task. This challenge is further intensified when brands frequently lack transparency concerning their environment-friendly characteristics, fostering skepticism among consumers or potential adopters. As a result, to [...] Read more.
Amidst the abundance of skincare options, the process of identifying the most fitting products is a daunting task. This challenge is further intensified when brands frequently lack transparency concerning their environment-friendly characteristics, fostering skepticism among consumers or potential adopters. As a result, to resolve the problem of consumers’ mixed emotions towards skincare brands, it is necessary to understand how greenwashing, green skepticism with two moderators (information quality and brand reputation) shape consumers’ intentions. Drawing on a theoretical conceptual model rooted in the consumer behavior literature, the present investigation tested the hypotheses through cross-sectional survey research. Using convenience sampling, 441 participants were recruited through social media platforms and skincare-related forums. This study establishes the mediating role of green skepticism and the direct impact of greenwashing on consumers’ purchase intentions. Consequently, the statistical significance of the path coefficients provide empirical support for the influence of greenwashing and green skepticism on consumers’ intentions. Our research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable consumption, offering theoretical advancements and practical implications for the researchers, policymakers, and businesses involved in the Saudi Arabian skincare market. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop