sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Data Management to Bridge Bioeconomy and Circular Economy

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Bioeconomy of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 February 2024) | Viewed by 12797

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Interests: circular economy; sustainable manufacturing; industry 4.0

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
Interests: product–service systems; circular economy; design for X; product lifecycle management; Industry 4.0; sustainable development goals
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
Interests: industrial systems engineering; operations
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Interests: sustainable manufacturing; operations management; Industry 4.0

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The journal Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050, IF 3.889) is currently running a Special Issue entitled “Data Management to Bridge Bioeconomy and Circular Economy”, for which we are serving as Guest Editors. We think you could make an excellent contribution, based on your expertise.

Today more than ever, our society is struggling to cope with multiple and concurrent social and environmental macrotrends. Population surge and urbanization are increasing the demand for more resources to satisfy human needs. Natural finite resources are constantly and increasingly being exploited in an indiscriminate way, with sustained requests for higher amounts of energy flows. Wastes (of whatever type and composition) are overflowing into both biological and urban landscapes. Climate change, resulting from pollution produced by uncontrolled human activities, have reached high levels of human and financial costs. Efforts in studying how to boost environmental sustainability by balancing it with social and economic sustainability have been noticed in the extant literature. Among all the various aspects, circular economy (CE) has been considered a great driver in this direction. CE takes the name of circular manufacturing (CM) when a set of CM strategies is concurrently applied in circular companies’ business models, networks of firms, and supply chains [1]. In this context, studies in the extant literature demonstrate how to boost the adoption of CM in manufacturing companies by relying on the exploitation of digital technologies and data [2]. For discrete manufacturing companies in particular, data management has been investigated to study the type of data and information needed to be collected, analyzed, and shared in CM, the stakeholders involved for the data exchange, and the technological supports [3]. Nevertheless, although CM can facilitate the embracement of bioeconomy [4,5] based on the recirculation of urban and industrial waste and resources, few efforts to date have been dedicated to exploring how to properly use data in this context. To report an example, biomethane, generated from the collection of municipal solid waste, allows the substitution of nonrenewable with biological resources. This enables reducing the presence of biowaste in landfills and increasing biomass usage thanks to the circular treatment of waste. Indeed, energy recovery from residues and waste has been recognized as a model of a circular economy [6], and the biogas–biomethane chain has potential in terms of sustainability [7,8]. A gap still remains regarding how to model data to bridge CE and bioeconomy. The goal is to study how to enable the establishment of circular flows of resources functional for the creation of a circular bioeconomy. Digital platforms could be employed as a lever to bolster the creation of circular supply chains able to exploit data at an extended level and to sustain the foundation of sustainable communities able to address the bioeconomy purpose with a macro level of industrial symbiosis. The social and environmental benefits and impacts of a systematized production and management of bioenergy, driven by data, are huge.

In this regard, this Special Issue aims to boost research in the domain of data management for the bioeconomy by bridging the potentialities of the CE with those of bioeconomy based on data exploitation. We welcome papers on:

  • The exploration of the type of data needed to be collected, analyzed, and shared in a bioeconomy, the stakeholders involved in this context, and the supporting technologies enabling establishment of the flows of functional resources for the creation of a circular bioeconomy;
  • The use and adaptation of already existing digital platforms or the development of new ones for the establishment of an innovative ecosystem boosting the social sustainability of cities, regions, and nations based on data exchange for the creation of flows of bioresources;
  • The definition of models for the exploitation of bioresources enabling the independence of entities such as firms, cities, regions, and nations from external entities. Hence, based on data exploitation, renewable sources of energy can be easily created thanks to the biowaste treatments that can be established;
  • Exploration of the strategic role that the creation of proper data flows has in the establishment of communities exploiting renewable sources of energies generated thanks to the structured collection of urban solid waste;
  • The study of circular supply chains exploiting the integration of digital platforms and industry 4.0 for the management of biomass flows.
  • Methods, software, and tools facilitating users to realize the actual effects of CE and bioeconomy, evidence of which could be in the flows of materials and energy related to a specific setting of the plant and of the adopted wastes. These methods could support plant managers to rapidly evaluate the economic and environmental sustainability of their plant (and such an analysis could also be conducted prior to potentially investing in a specific technology).
  • The implementation of a digital twin of the plant allowing the capability to collect and analyze biomethane/biogas plants through real-time data gathered through sensors. This could initially support the internal measurement of circular flows going through the plant and, second, trigger more effective alignment of the plant resources with its external stakeholders, paving the way toward establishing a circular bioeconomy community.

References

  1. Acerbi, F.; Taisch, M. Information flows supporting Circular Economy adoption in the manufacturing sector. In Lalic B.; Majstorovic V.; Marjanovic U.; von Cieminski G., R.D. (Ed.), IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Springer, Cham, 2022, 703–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_81
  2. Acerbi, F.; Sassanelli, C.; Terzi, S.; Taisch, M. A Systematic Literature Review on Data and Information Required for Circular Manufacturing Strategies Adoption. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042047
  3. Acerbi, F.; Sassanelli, C.; Taisch, M. A conceptual data model promoting data-driven circular manufacturing. Oper Manag Res, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00271-x
  4. D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Morone, P.; Rosa, P.; Sassanelli, C.; Settembre-blundo, D.; Shen, Y. Bioeconomy of Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14010200
  5. D’adamo, I.; Sassanelli, C. Biomethane Community: A Research Agenda towards Sustainability. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14084735
  6. Tomić, T.; Schneider, D.R. The role of energy from waste in circular economy and closing the loop concept – Energy analysis approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev., 2018, 98, 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.029
  7. Baena-Moreno, F.M.; Malico, I.; Marques, I.P. Promoting sustainability: Wastewater treatment plants as a source of biomethane in regions far from a high-pressure grid. a real portuguese case study. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 8933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168933
  8. Lindfors, A.; Feiz, R.; Eklund, M.; Ammenberg, J. Assessing the potential, performance and feasibility of urban solutions: Methodological considerations and learnings from biogas solutions. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 3756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143756

Dr. Federica Acerbi
Dr. Claudio Sassanelli
Prof. Dr. Giorgio Mossa
Prof. Dr. Marco Taisch
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bioeconomy
  • circular economy
  • circular manufacturing
  • data management
  • Industry 4.0

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

24 pages, 1494 KiB  
Article
Fostering Green Finance for Sustainable Development: A Focus on Textile and Leather Small Medium Enterprises in Pakistan
by Love Kumar, Farah Nadeem, Maggie Sloan, Jonas Restle-Steinert, Matthew J. Deitch, Sohail Ali Naqvi, Avinash Kumar and Claudio Sassanelli
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 11908; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911908 - 21 Sep 2022
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 6307
Abstract
The green financing landscape in Pakistan is evolving, which signifies the need for a comprehensive gap analysis that examines the present status and constraints in supporting green finance in the country. Textile and leather industries are key sectors in Pakistan’s economy and rely [...] Read more.
The green financing landscape in Pakistan is evolving, which signifies the need for a comprehensive gap analysis that examines the present status and constraints in supporting green finance in the country. Textile and leather industries are key sectors in Pakistan’s economy and rely heavily on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Excessive resource use and inadequate environmental management methods pose a significant danger to the sectors’ long-term viability and account for an extreme relevance to the embracement of the circular economy paradigm. Green finance aims to ensure that economic process, safeguarding the environment, and maintaining environmental integrity all grow together. This research used a literature review and interview-based methodology (in which we interviewed more than 20 people representing SME operators, government officials, and banking staff) to examine SME finance, green banking, and demand and supply side constraints to cleaner/sustainable manufacturing in Pakistan’s leather and textile sectors. The research findings show that policy uncertainty and financial short-termism are economic impediments and obstacles that constitute a path-dependent, lock-in, non-linear mechanism. This study found a lack of tailored business advisory and financing for SMEs to learn about and invest in sustainable consumption and production (SCP). Furthermore, many banks in Pakistan also show a strong commitment to the expansion of the State Bank of Pakistan’s Green Banking Guidelines (GBGs). The results also highlight the high value of government assistance for businesses participating in green initiatives and incentives for banking institutions and private limited companies to support and invest in green practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Management to Bridge Bioeconomy and Circular Economy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 3032 KiB  
Review
Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability
by P. J. Stephenson and Anca Damerell
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10643; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710643 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5001
Abstract
Bioeconomy and circular economy approaches are being adopted by an increasing number of international organizations, governments and companies to enhance sustainability. Concerns have been raised about the implications for biodiversity. Here, we present a review of current research on the two approaches to [...] Read more.
Bioeconomy and circular economy approaches are being adopted by an increasing number of international organizations, governments and companies to enhance sustainability. Concerns have been raised about the implications for biodiversity. Here, we present a review of current research on the two approaches to determine their relationship to each other and to other economic models, their impact on sustainability and their relationship with biodiversity. Bioeconomy and circular economy are both poorly defined, inconsistently implemented and inadequately measured, and neither provides a clear pathway to sustainability. Many actors promote goals around economic growth above environmental issues. Biodiversity is often addressed indirectly or inadequately. Furthermore, many traditionally disadvantaged groups, including women and indigenous people, may be neglected and rarely engage or benefit. These challenges are compounded by capacity gaps and legal and governance complexities around implementation, influenced by traditional mindsets and approaches. Countries and companies need to plan their sustainability strategies more explicitly around the biodiversity they impact. Opportunities include the relevance and timeliness of sustainable economics for delivering Sustainable Development Goals in a post-COVID world, the existence of work to be built on, and the diversity of stakeholders already engaged. We propose five main steps to ensure the sustainability of economic approaches. Ultimately, we can ensure sustainability only by starting to shift mindsets and establishing a more focused agenda for bioeconomy and circular economy that puts species, ecosystems and the wellbeing of local people at the center. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Management to Bridge Bioeconomy and Circular Economy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop