The Visual International Relations Project

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "International Relations".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 May 2023) | Viewed by 11325

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
International Relations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0044, USA
Interests: international relations; methods; Canadian politics
International Law and Relations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Interests: diplomacy; judicial decision-making; criminal law; political decision-making

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Each article would be built around graphic depiction of two publications in a given subject area. A technique developed in a number of publications on International Studies, systemism, would be used to create these visualizations. These publications involve Patrick James, Director of the Visual International Relations Project (VIRP) and Sarah Gansen, Associate Director.  Please see the VIRP archive to acquire a basic sense of the method and technique and to access examples of the graphics (www.visualinternationalrelationsproject.com). Contributions to the special issue will correspond approximately to sections of the International Studies Association. For example, one confirmed article will focus on political demography and geography.

Contributors can send representations of their work to Sarah Gansen (gansen@usc.edu), who is an expert on the creation of diagrams through application of a software package.

Prof. Dr. Patrick James
Sarah Gansen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • graphic
  • systemism
  • Visual International Relations Project

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

6 pages, 213 KiB  
Editorial
Conclusion: Special Issue on the Visual International Relations Project
by Sarah Gansen and Patrick James
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(10), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100537 - 25 Sep 2023
Viewed by 661
Abstract
This Special Issue of Social Sciences has introduced and applied the systemist graphical method of conveying ideas [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

9 pages, 789 KiB  
Article
Religious Discrimination against Minorities: Theories and Findings
by Yasemin Akbaba
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(9), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090522 - 19 Sep 2023
Viewed by 2709
Abstract
One of the established trends in religion and international relations (IR) scholarship is the awareness of a rising level of religious discrimination against minorities. Although there is variation in rates, religious restrictions are widely observed across the globe, including in Western democracies. Scholarship [...] Read more.
One of the established trends in religion and international relations (IR) scholarship is the awareness of a rising level of religious discrimination against minorities. Although there is variation in rates, religious restrictions are widely observed across the globe, including in Western democracies. Scholarship on the restrictions on religious practices has advanced through seeking answers to the following questions: Who discriminates? Who is discriminated against more? What are the causes of restrictions on religious freedom? What are the forms of discrimination? The purpose of this article is to connect the theories and findings of two religious discrimination studies of IR via the graphic method of systemism. Featured works engage with religious discrimination in a sub-group of states—Western democracies and those with a Christian majority. While one study focused on government-based restrictions, the other one engaged with societal ones. Collectively, these works revealed the fragility of freedom and the importance of understanding the mechanisms that protect it. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1340 KiB  
Article
People and Places: The Contextual Side of Politics in Demography and Geography
by Tadeusz Kugler and J. Patrick Rhamey
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(8), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080456 - 15 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1568
Abstract
The disciplines of political demography and geography examine the interplay between social behaviors, spatial dimensions, politics, and policy. Investigations into demographic shifts, driven by evolving social norms or domestic and international political events, can influence numerous critical dependent variables in international relations, such [...] Read more.
The disciplines of political demography and geography examine the interplay between social behaviors, spatial dimensions, politics, and policy. Investigations into demographic shifts, driven by evolving social norms or domestic and international political events, can influence numerous critical dependent variables in international relations, such as trade, development, and inter- and intra-state conflict. Similarly, geography and the interconnection of space with independent variables, such as power, wealth, and culture, yield similar insights. In this article, we employ a systemist approach from the Visual International Relations Project (VIRP) to provide a brief overview of the theoretical intersection between geography, demography, and international relations focusing on using VIRP to teach these subjects. To accomplish this, we have selected two representative pieces of literature from each field. For demography, we examine Hendrik Urdal’s A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence, and for geography, we review Alex Braithwaite’s The Geographic Spread of Militarized Disputes. These seminal articles in their respective fields demonstrate the clear applicability of demography and geography to international politics scholarship. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2153 KiB  
Article
Polarization and Moral Threat: Insights from Systemist Analysis
by Ilona Goldner and Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(8), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080453 - 14 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1165
Abstract
This article presents a theoretical framework for understanding the social consequences of polarization-driven behaviors by conceptualizing them as a moral threat to the self. Our argument employs systemist graphics, illustrating key connections and patterns from two distinct scientific works. First, an analysis of [...] Read more.
This article presents a theoretical framework for understanding the social consequences of polarization-driven behaviors by conceptualizing them as a moral threat to the self. Our argument employs systemist graphics, illustrating key connections and patterns from two distinct scientific works. First, an analysis of polarization-driven behavior, which reveals Americans’ willingness to trade democratic values for partisan goals. Second, research on moral disengagement strategies, revealing the role of resentment as a coping mechanism in armed conflicts. We offer a synthesis analysis between these two studies and uncover a twofold role of morality in polarization: as a factor in forming partisan animosity and a catalyst in its perpetuation and intensification. We further highlight the role of outgroup hate, rather than ingroup love, in driving negative actions resulting from polarization, and the challenge of reconciling morally-driven conflicts. Our framework sheds new light on the complex interplay between morality and conflicts, with implications for social cohesion, erosion of moral values, and democratic backsliding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1434 KiB  
Article
Key Concepts in the Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Comparative Examination Using Systemist Theory
by Steven B. Redd
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(8), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080446 - 08 Aug 2023
Viewed by 2036
Abstract
The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making incorporates the conditions surrounding foreign policy decisions, as well as the cognitive processes decision makers undergo en route to a choice. It argues that high-level decision makers, who routinely face stressful decision environments, engage in [...] Read more.
The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making incorporates the conditions surrounding foreign policy decisions, as well as the cognitive processes decision makers undergo en route to a choice. It argues that high-level decision makers, who routinely face stressful decision environments, engage in a two-stage decision process wherein they first employ cognitive-based, heuristic shortcuts in an attempt to simplify the decision task. In the second stage, once the decision task is more manageable, decision makers employ more analytic strategies in order to minimize risks and maximize rewards. Poliheuristic theory also posits that politics is the essence of decision and that decision makers will avoid choosing alternatives that hurt them politically. Using systemist theory, I compare two journal articles that use poliheuristic theory to explain foreign policy behavior and choices. More specifically, I compare Özdamar and Erciyas’s 2020 Foreign Policy Analysis article, which uses case study methods to analyze Turkish decisions during the crises of 1964, 1967, and 1974, with Redd’s 2002 Journal of Conflict Resolution article that uses experimental methods to analyze decision making in an advisory group setting. Systemism uses diagrams in a visual approach to explicate the relationships among various factors in any given theory. As such, systemism enables us to precisely examine how poliheuristic theory has evolved over nearly twenty years as well as compare what the different methodologies of case studies and experimental methods have to offer in explaining the foreign policy behavior of leaders and their advisers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 1254 KiB  
Article
Cross-National Active Learning in Global Development Studies: De-Colonizing the Curriculum
by Mary Jane Parmentier
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(7), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070414 - 19 Jul 2023
Viewed by 746
Abstract
De-colonizing the curriculum and active learning approaches that engage students experientially are both current themes in the teaching of International Studies and related disciplines. For the discipline of global development, both are critically needed approaches to training students who are able to work [...] Read more.
De-colonizing the curriculum and active learning approaches that engage students experientially are both current themes in the teaching of International Studies and related disciplines. For the discipline of global development, both are critically needed approaches to training students who are able to work across national contexts and effectively interact with communities of different political histories and cultures. Yet neither is necessarily straightforward. This article explores two pedagogical projects that, while very different from each other, reveal commonalities through a technique of systemist notation and visualization, strengthening their contribution to cross-cultural and cross-national active learning. While online international collaborations and study abroad programs are different pedagogical contexts, they both involve significant levels of intercultural communication and knowledge exchange, neither of which is a given and requires careful course design and implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 676 KiB  
Article
When States Regionally Integrate: How Relative Economic Size and Institutional Homogeneity Matter
by Gaspare M. Genna
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(7), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070397 - 07 Jul 2023
Viewed by 938
Abstract
This study compares two articles that seek to explain why states participate in regional integration organizations and why they want to deepen their economic and political partnerships. The method of comparison is the systemist diagrammatic approach, which requires a deconstruction and mapping of [...] Read more.
This study compares two articles that seek to explain why states participate in regional integration organizations and why they want to deepen their economic and political partnerships. The method of comparison is the systemist diagrammatic approach, which requires a deconstruction and mapping of ideas found in social science. The articles demonstrate common variables in their explanations, namely that power asymmetry and satisfaction with the status quo among regional partners are critical in determining why states integrate. The articles diverge in their explanations, with one emphasizing the similarities of institutionalized policies and the other the role a rising power, China, has in developing regional integration in the Western Hemisphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

13 pages, 5398 KiB  
Perspective
Introduction: Special Issue on the Visual International Relations Project
by Sarah Gansen and Patrick James
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(9), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090498 - 04 Sep 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 929
Abstract
The application of systemism, an innovative and user-friendly technique for generating lucid, graphic summaries of analytical arguments, can enhance the social sciences. Content, as research and pedagogy move forward, becomes increasingly vast and diverse in theory and methods. Systemism offers both a means [...] Read more.
The application of systemism, an innovative and user-friendly technique for generating lucid, graphic summaries of analytical arguments, can enhance the social sciences. Content, as research and pedagogy move forward, becomes increasingly vast and diverse in theory and methods. Systemism offers both a means and a method for enhanced communication in the face of challenges posed by the rapid expansion of the social sciences in the fast-paced world of the new millennium. This is the motivation for a Special Issue of Social Sciences that will show systemism in action. The Visual International Relations Project (VIRP) archive continues to accumulate materials. The contents of this Special Issue will demonstrate the value of that resource across a wide range of subject areas. This introductory article proceeds in five sections. The first section provides a general overview of systemism and the VIRP. The second section introduces systemism in greater detail as a graphic approach to the communication of ideas. The third section applies systemism to convey the framework for analysis utilizing a classic work of social science—The Logic of Collective Action. The fourth section outlines the articles that follow in making up the Special Issue. The fifth and final section sums up what has been accomplished in this introductory article. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Visual International Relations Project)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop